评分理由: 论文提出Co-FactChecker框架，专注于利用大型语言模型（LLMs）和大型推理模型（LRMs）进行人机协作的声明验证。核心相关关键词包括：LLMs（直接提及）、Chain of Thought/System 2 Thinking（涉及模型思维轨迹作为共享草稿纸、多步推理）、Hallucination Mitigation/Factuality（专注于声明验证和事实性）、Self-Correction（通过专家反馈引导模型推理）、LLM Agents（人机协作框架）、Explainable AI（产生更易解释的思维轨迹）。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、训练技术、优化方法、特定应用领域等，论文未涉及，故评分为0。

专业事实核查人员依赖领域知识和深层语境理解来验证主张。大型语言模型（LLMs）与大型推理模型（LRMs）缺乏这种基础，主要仅基于现有证据进行推理，这导致了专家主导与全自动化主张验证之间的不匹配。为弥合这一差距，我们提出人机协作是一条更具前景的路径，其中基于现实世界知识和领域专长的专家反馈可指导模型的推理过程。然而，现有的LRMs难以根据自然语言反馈进行校准，尤其是在多轮交互场景中。我们提出Co-FactChecker——一个用于人机协作主张验证的框架。我们引入了一种新的交互范式，将模型的思维轨迹视为共享草稿板。Co-FactChecker将专家反馈转化为轨迹编辑，从而对思维轨迹进行针对性修改，规避了基于对话的交互方式的缺陷。我们提供了理论分析，表明轨迹编辑相较于多轮对话具有优势；自动评估结果证明，Co-FactChecker在性能上超越了现有的自主验证及人机协作方法。人工评估进一步显示，相较于多轮对话，用户更倾向于选择Co-FactChecker，因其能产生更高质量的推理与判定结论，同时提供相对更易解读、更有价值的思维轨迹。

Professional fact-checkers rely on domain knowledge and deep contextual understanding to verify claims. Large language models (LLMs) and large reasoning models (LRMs) lack such grounding and primarily reason from available evidence alone, creating a mismatch between expert-led and fully automated claim verification. To mitigate this gap, we posit human-AI collaboration as a more promising path forward, where expert feedback, grounded in real-world knowledge and domain expertise, guides the model’s reasoning. However, existing LRMs are hard to calibrate to natural language feedback, particularly in a multi-turn interaction setup. We propose Co-FactChecker, a framework for human-AI collaborative claim verification. We introduce a new interaction paradigm that treats the model’s thinking trace as a shared scratchpad. Co-FactChecker translates expert feedback into trace-edits that introduce targeted modifications to the trace, sidestepping the shortcomings of dialogue-based interaction. We provide theoretical results showing that trace-editing offers advantages over multi-turn dialogue, and our automatic evaluations demonstrate that Co-FactChecker outperforms existing autonomous and human-AI collaboration approaches. Human evaluations further show that Co-FactChecker is preferred over multi-turn dialogue, producing higher quality reasoning and verdicts along with relatively easier to interpret and more useful thinking traces.

评分理由: 论文核心是LLM驱动的多智能体框架MIND，用于材料研究的自动化假设验证，因此与"Large Language Models"、“LLM Agents”、“Multi-agent Systems"和"AI for Science"高度相关（10分）。系统涉及假设精炼和基于辩论的验证，与推理关键词有一定关联（5分）。其他关键词如MoE、SFT、RAG等未在摘要中提及，评为0分。

大语言模型（LLMs）已赋能面向科学发现的智能体AI系统，但多数方法仍局限于基于文本的推理，缺乏自动化实验验证。我们提出MIND，一个用于材料研究中自动化假设验证的LLM驱动框架。MIND将科学发现过程组织为多智能体流程中的假设细化、实验执行和基于辩论的验证。为实现实验验证，该系统集成了机器学习原子间势（Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials），特别是SevenNet-Omni，以实现可扩展的计算机模拟实验。我们还提供了基于网络的用户界面以支持自动化假设测试。其模块化设计允许集成更多实验模块，使该框架能适应更广泛的科学工作流程。代码发布于：https://github.com/IMMS-Ewha/MIND，演示视频可见：https://youtu.be/lqiFe1OQzN4。

Large language models (LLMs) have enabled agentic AI systems for scientific discovery, but most approaches remain limited to textbased reasoning without automated experimental verification. We propose MIND, an LLM-driven framework for automated hypothesis validation in materials research. MIND organizes the scientific discovery process into hypothesis refinement, experimentation, and debate-based validation within a multi-agent pipeline. For experimental verification, the system integrates Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials, particularly SevenNet-Omni, enabling scalable in-silico experiments. We also provide a web-based user interface for automated hypothesis testing. The modular design allows additional experimental modules to be integrated, making the framework adaptable to broader scientific workflows. The code is available at: https://github.com/IMMS-Ewha/MIND, and a demonstration video at: https://youtu.be/lqiFe1OQzN4.

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLM-based agents在GIS领域的应用，与"Large Language Models”、“LLM Agents”、“Tool Use"高度相关（10分）。涉及多步推理和专家认知流程，与"Chain of Thought”、“System 2 Thinking"相关（8分）。属于AI在科学领域的应用，与"AI for Science"相关（8分）。其他关键词如MoE、量化、对齐等未涉及（0分）。

将大型语言模型（LLMs）集成到地理信息系统（GIS）中，标志着空间分析向自主化发展的范式转变。然而，由于地理空间工作流程具有复杂、多步骤的特性，评估这些基于LLM的智能体仍然面临挑战。现有基准测试主要依赖静态文本或代码匹配，忽略了动态的运行时反馈以及空间输出的多模态特性。为弥补这一不足，我们提出了GeoAgentBench（GABench），这是一个为工具增强型GIS智能体量身定制的动态交互式评估基准。GABench提供了一个真实的执行沙箱，集成了117个原子级GIS工具，覆盖了6个核心GIS领域的53类典型空间分析任务。我们认识到，在动态GIS环境中，精确的参数配置是执行成功的主要决定因素，因此设计了参数执行准确度（Parameter Execution Accuracy, PEA）指标，该指标采用“末次尝试对齐”策略来量化隐式参数推断的保真度。作为补充，我们提出了一种基于视觉语言模型（Vision-Language Model, VLM）的验证方法，用于评估数据空间准确性和制图风格的符合度。此外，针对因参数错配和运行时异常导致的频繁任务失败，我们开发了一种新颖的智能体架构——规划与反应（Plan-and-React），该架构通过将全局编排与逐步反应式执行解耦，模拟了专家的认知工作流程。对七个代表性LLM的大量实验表明，规划与反应范式显著优于传统框架，在逻辑严谨性和执行鲁棒性之间实现了最佳平衡，尤其是在多步骤推理和错误恢复方面。我们的研究结果揭示了当前的能力边界，并为评估和推进下一代自主地理人工智能（GeoAI）建立了坚实的标准。

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into Geographic Information Systems (GIS) marks a paradigm shift toward autonomous spatial analysis. However, evaluating these LLM-based agents remains challenging due to the complex, multi-step nature of geospatial workflows. Existing benchmarks primarily rely on static text or code matching, neglecting dynamic runtime feedback and the multimodal nature of spatial outputs. To address this gap, we introduce GeoAgentBench (GABench), a dynamic and interactive evaluation benchmark tailored for tool-augmented GIS agents. GABench provides a realistic execution sandbox integrating 117 atomic GIS tools, encompassing 53 typical spatial analysis tasks across 6 core GIS domains. Recognizing that precise parameter configuration is the primary determinant of execution success in dynamic GIS environments, we designed the Parameter Execution Accuracy (PEA) metric, which utilizes a “Last-Attempt Alignment” strategy to quantify the fidelity of implicit parameter inference. Complementing this, a Vision-Language Model (VLM) based verification is proposed to assess data-spatial accuracy and cartographic style adherence. Furthermore, to address the frequent task failures caused by parameter misalignments and runtime anomalies, we developed a novel agent architecture, Plan-and-React, that mimics expert cognitive workflows by decoupling global orchestration from step-wise reactive execution. Extensive experiments with seven representative LLMs demonstrate that the Plan-and-React paradigm significantly outperforms traditional frameworks, achieving the optimal balance between logical rigor and execution robustness, particularly in multi-step reasoning and error recovery. Our findings highlight current capability boundaries and establish a robust standard for assessing and advancing the next generation of autonomous GeoAI.

评分理由: 论文核心研究大语言模型（LLMs）的长链思维（Chain-of-Thought）推理能力，因此与"Chain of Thought"高度相关（15分），与"Large Language Models"高度相关（10分）。论文涉及长上下文推理，与"Context Window Extension"有一定关联（5分）。论文测试模型在复杂自主任务中的推理能力，与"LLM Agents"有一定关联（5分）。论文基准问题涵盖化学等领域，与"AI for Science"有一定关联（5分）。其他关键词如MoE、SFT、RAG等未在论文中涉及，得0分。

随着语言模型日益广泛地应用于复杂的自主任务，其进行长程准确推理的能力变得至关重要。该能力的核心组成部分是对长而复杂的思维链进行规划与管理。本文提出LongCoT，这是一个包含2,500个专家设计问题的可扩展基准测试集，涵盖化学、数学、计算机科学、国际象棋和逻辑等领域，旨在隔离并直接衡量前沿模型的长程思维链推理能力。每个问题由一个简短输入和一个可验证答案构成；解决这些问题需要在一个由相互依赖的步骤构成的图中进行导航，这些步骤涉及的推理标记数量可达数万至数十万。每个局部步骤对前沿模型而言均可独立处理，因此失败案例反映了长程推理的局限性。在发布时，最佳模型在LongCoT上的准确率低于10%（GPT 5.2：9.8%；Gemini 3 Pro：6.1%），揭示了当前能力存在显著差距。总体而言，LongCoT为长程推理提供了严格的衡量标准，能够追踪前沿模型在长时间跨度内进行可靠推理的能力。

As language models are increasingly deployed for complex autonomous tasks, their ability to reason accurately over longer horizons becomes critical. An essential component of this ability is planning and managing a long, complex chain-of-thought (CoT). We introduce LongCoT, a scalable benchmark of 2,500 expert-designed problems spanning chemistry, mathematics, computer science, chess, and logic to isolate and directly measure the long-horizon CoT reasoning capabilities of frontier models. Problems consist of a short input with a verifiable answer; solving them requires navigating a graph of interdependent steps that span tens to hundreds of thousands of reasoning tokens. Each local step is individually tractable for frontier models, so failures reflect long-horizon reasoning limitations. At release, the best models achieve <10% accuracy (GPT 5.2: 9.8%; Gemini 3 Pro: 6.1%) on LongCoT, revealing a substantial gap in current capabilities. Overall, LongCoT provides a rigorous measure of long-horizon reasoning, tracking the ability of frontier models to reason reliably over extended periods.

评分理由: 论文核心研究大语言模型（LLMs）在战略推理和决策能力方面的增强，特别是针对多智能体环境。因此，与"Large Language Models”、“LLM Agents”、“Multi-agent Systems"高度相关（10分）。论文涉及推理能力的提升，与"Chain of Thought"和"System 2 Thinking"有一定关联（8分）。其他关键词如模型架构、训练技术、优化方法、特定应用领域等，论文未直接涉及，故评0分。

大型语言模型（LLM）的推理能力已普遍取得显著进展。然而，由于缺乏显式的前瞻建模，现有基于推理的LLM在多智能体环境中仍难以展现有效的决策能力。为此，战略推理——即预测对手行为并预见其未来可能行动的最基本能力——被引入以缓解上述问题。战略推理是多智能体环境中有效决策的基础，但现有的LLM推理增强方法未能明确捕捉其前瞻性本质。本研究提出前瞻策略优化（Foresight Policy Optimization, FoPO）以增强LLM的战略推理能力，该方法将对手建模原则融入策略优化过程，从而能够显式地兼顾自身利益与对手影响。具体而言，我们构建了两个精心设计的数据集——合作性RSA与竞争性Taboo，这些数据集配备了精心设计的规则与适中难度，以促进在自博弈框架下对FoPO进行系统性研究。实验表明，FoPO显著提升了不同规模和来源的LLM的战略推理能力。此外，经FoPO训练的模型在领域外战略场景中展现出强大的泛化能力，其表现大幅优于标准的LLM推理优化基线方法。

Reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs) have generally advanced significantly. However, it is still challenging for existing reasoning-based LLMs to perform effective decision-making abilities in multi-agent environments, due to the absence of explicit foresight modeling. To this end, strategic reasoning, the most fundamental capability to anticipate the counterpart’s behaviors and foresee its possible future actions, has been introduced to alleviate the above issues. Strategic reasoning is fundamental to effective decision-making in multi-agent environments, yet existing reasoning enhancement methods for LLMs do not explicitly capture its foresight nature. In this work, we introduce Foresight Policy Optimization (FoPO) to enhance strategic reasoning in LLMs, which integrates opponent modeling principles into policy optimization, thereby enabling explicit consideration of both self-interest and counterpart influence. Specifically, we construct two curated datasets, namely Cooperative RSA and Competitive Taboo, equipped with well-designed rules and moderate difficulty to facilitate a systematic investigation of FoPO in a self-play framework. Our experiments demonstrate that FoPO significantly enhances strategic reasoning across LLMs of varying sizes and origins. Moreover, models trained with FoPO exhibit strong generalization to out-of-domain strategic scenarios, substantially outperforming standard LLM reasoning optimization baselines.

评分理由: 论文提出ESC-RL方法用于放射学报告生成，核心是强化学习与LLM结合的自校正偏好学习。与"Large Language Models"相关（8分），因使用LLM合成报告；与"Self-Correction"高度相关（10分），因核心是自校正偏好学习；与"Hallucination Mitigation"相关（8分），因关注临床忠实性、抑制虚假内容；与"AI for Science"高度相关（10分），属生物医学AI应用；与"Alignment"和"RLHF"有一定关联（各5分），因涉及偏好对齐和强化学习优化。其他关键词如MoE、量化、推理加速等未涉及，得0分。

近期强化学习方法在放射学报告生成领域取得进展，但两个核心局限依然存在：（1）报告级奖励对临床忠实性提供的证据基础指导有限；（2）现有方法缺乏与临床偏好对齐的显式自我改进机制。我们提出临床对齐的证据感知自校正强化学习方法，其包含两个关键组件。首先，分组式证据感知对齐奖励机制提供分组化、证据感知的反馈。该方法通过强化真阳性的一致性依据、恢复假阴性的漏诊发现、抑制假阳性的无支持内容来实现优化。其次，自校正偏好学习策略能够从多组噪声观察中自动构建可靠的疾病感知偏好数据集，并利用大语言模型在无需人工监督的情况下合成精细化报告。该框架促进了临床忠实、疾病对齐的奖励机制，并支持训练过程中的持续自我改进。在两个公开胸部X光数据集上的大量实验表明，该方法实现了持续性能提升并达到最先进的性能水平。

Recent reinforcement learning (RL) approaches have advanced radiology report generation (RRG), yet two core limitations persist: (1) report-level rewards offer limited evidence-grounded guidance for clinical faithfulness; and (2) current methods lack an explicit self-improving mechanism to align with clinical preference. We introduce clinically aligned Evidence-aware Self-Correcting Reinforcement Learning (ESC-RL), comprising two key components. First, a Group-wise Evidence-aware Alignment Reward (GEAR) delivers group-wise, evidence-aware feedback. GEAR reinforces consistent grounding for true positives, recovers missed findings for false negatives, and suppresses unsupported content for false positives. Second, a Self-correcting Preference Learning (SPL) strategy automatically constructs a reliable, disease-aware preference dataset from multiple noisy observations and leverages an LLM to synthesize refined reports without human supervision. ESC-RL promotes clinically faithful, disease-aligned reward and supports continual self-improvement during training. Extensive experiments on two public chest X-ray datasets demonstrate consistent gains and state-of-the-art performance.

评分理由: 论文提出了一种名为DiPO的新方法，用于优化大型语言模型（LLMs）在强化学习中的探索-利用权衡。核心内容与LLMs直接相关（10分），属于RLHF/DPO等强化学习对齐技术范畴（10分），并在函数调用任务上进行了评估（10分）。论文涉及推理能力提升，与多步推理（5分）和深度推理（5分）有一定关联，且LLM智能体（5分）是其应用场景之一。其他关键词如MoE、量化、RAG等未在摘要中提及，评为0分。

可验证奖励强化学习（RLVR）显著推动了大型语言模型（LLM）推理能力的发展。然而，如何有效管理探索与利用之间的权衡仍是一个关键挑战。本文深入分析了训练过程中极难与极易样本所引发的探索与利用困境，并提出了一种新的细粒度权衡机制。具体而言，我们引入了一种困惑度空间解耦策略，将样本空间划分为独立的探索（高困惑度）与利用（低困惑度）子空间，从而挖掘出需要探索-利用权衡的细粒度样本。随后，我们提出了一种对验证奖励影响最小的双向奖励分配机制，以实现困惑度引导的探索与利用，从而进行更稳定的策略优化。最后，我们在数学推理和函数调用两项主流任务上评估了所提方法，实验结果证明了该方法的优越性，并证实了其通过细粒度探索-利用权衡来提升LLM性能的有效性。

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has catalyzed significant advances in the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, effectively managing the exploration and exploitation trade-off remains a critical challenge. In this paper, we fully analyze the exploration and exploitation dilemma of extremely hard and easy samples during the training and propose a new fine-grained trade-off mechanism. Concretely, we introduce a perplexity space disentangling strategy that divides the sample space into distinct exploration (high perplexity) and exploitation (low perplexity) subspaces, thereby mining fine-grained samples requiring exploration-exploitation trade-off. Subsequently, we propose a bidirectional reward allocation mechanism with a minimum impact on verification rewards to implement perplexity-guided exploration and exploitation, enabling more stable policy optimization. Finally, we have evaluated our method on two mainstream tasks: mathematical reasoning and function calling, and experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method, confirming its effectiveness in enhancing LLM performance by fine-grained exploration-exploitation trade-off.

评分理由: 论文核心是开发Delta-LLaVA，一个专门用于多时相遥感解释的多模态大语言模型（MLLM）框架，属于大模型在科学领域（遥感/地球观测）的创新应用。因此，与"Large Language Models"和"AI for Science"高度相关（10分）。论文涉及模型训练（如预训练/微调）和复杂推理（如多步推理、深度推理），但非核心，给5分。其他关键词（如MoE、量化、RAG等）未在摘要中提及，给0分。

尽管多模态大语言模型（MLLMs）在通用视觉-语言任务中表现出色，但其在遥感变化理解中的应用却受到一种根本性的“时间盲区”的阻碍。现有架构缺乏内在的多时相对比推理机制，且难以实现精确的空间定位。为解决这一问题，我们首先引入了Delta-QA，这是一个包含18万个视觉问答样本的综合基准。Delta-QA统一了双时相和叁时相场景下的像素级分割与视觉问答，将变化解译构建为四个递进的认知维度。在方法论上，我们提出了Delta-LLaVA，这是一个专为多时相遥感解译设计的新型MLLM框架。它通过三项核心创新克服了简单特征拼接的局限：一个系统性地隔离并增强视觉差异的“变化增强注意力”模块；一个利用变化先验嵌入（Change Prior Embedding）来提取可微分差异特征作为大语言模型（LLM）输入的Change-SEG模块；以及用于防止跨时相上下文泄漏的局部因果注意力（Local Causal Attention）。大量实验表明，Delta-LLaVA在复杂变化推理和高精度边界定位方面，显著超越了领先的通用MLLMs和专用分割模型，从而为地球观测智能建立了一个统一的框架。

While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel in general vision-language tasks, their application to remote sensing change understanding is hindered by a fundamental “temporal blindness”. Existing architectures lack intrinsic mechanisms for multi-temporal contrastive reasoning and struggle with precise spatial grounding. To address this, we first introduce Delta-QA, a comprehensive benchmark comprising 180k visual question-answering samples. Delta-QA unifies pixel-level segmentation and visual question answering across bi- and tri-temporal scenarios, structuring change interpretation into four progressive cognitive dimensions. Methodologically, we propose Delta-LLaVA, a novel MLLM framework explicitly tailored for multi-temporal remote sensing interpretation. It overcomes the limitations of naive feature concatenation through three core innovations: a Change-Enhanced Attention module that systematically isolates and amplifies visual differences, a Change-SEG module utilizing Change Prior Embedding to extract differentiable difference features as input for the LLM, and Local Causal Attention to prevent cross-temporal contextual leakage. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Delta-LLaVA decisively outperforms leading generalist MLLMs and specialized segmentation models in complex change deduction and high-precision boundary localization, establishing a unified framework for earth observation intelligence.

评分理由: 论文研究的是对话式生成式人工智能（genAI chatbots）在青少年心理健康领域的应用，属于大模型在特定领域（医疗/心理健康）的应用研究。因此，与通用大模型技术（如LLMs）有中等关联（5分），因为genAI chatbots通常基于LLMs。论文涉及AI在科学/健康领域的应用（AI for Science），因此给5分。论文探讨了用户对AI的信任、透明度、伦理和设计需求，这与’Alignment’（价值对齐）、‘Explainable AI’（可解释性）、‘Hallucination Mitigation’（幻觉缓解）以及’LLM Agents’（AI代理）等概念有一定关联，但这些并非论文的技术核心，而是应用层面的考虑，因此均给5分。其他关键词主要涉及具体的技术原理、训练方法或优化技术，论文未涉及，因此给0分。

对话式生成人工智能代理（或称生成式AI聊天机器人）可能对青少年心理健康有益，但年轻人的视角仍未得到充分探索。本研究以最初为澳大利亚青少年服务机构专业人员设计的心理健康智能代理（Mia）为例展开调查。通过协同设计后，32名年轻人参与了线上研讨会，探讨他们对生成式AI聊天机器人应用于青少年心理健康的看法，并就如何为消费者重新设计Mia以及将其整合到服务中提出建议。研究归纳出四个主题：（1）在人性化AI的同时不使关怀去人性化；（2）我需要了解其运作原理；（3）合适的工具、场景与时机？（4）在安全环境中实现个性化定制。本研究揭示了年轻人对生成式AI聊天机器人应用于青少年心理健康的态度、需求及要求，对服务整合具有重要启示。此外，通过协同设计系统需求，这项工作为青少年心理健康领域生成式AI聊天机器人的伦理规范、设计开发、实施应用与治理监管提供了参考依据。

Conversational generative artificial intelligence agents (or genAI chatbots) could benefit youth mental health, yet young people’s perspectives remain underexplored. We examined the Mental health Intelligence Agent (Mia), a genAI chatbot originally designed for professionals in Australian youth services. Following co-design, 32 young people participated in online workshops exploring their perceptions of genAI chatbots in youth mental health and to develop recommendations for reconceptualising Mia for consumers and integrating it into services. Four themes were developed: (1) Humanising AI without dehumanising care, (2) I need to know what’s under the hood, (3) Right tool, right place, right time?, and (4) Making it mine on safe ground. This study offers insights into young people’s attitudes, needs, and requirements regarding genAI chatbots in youth mental health, with key implications for service integration. Additionally, by co-designing system requirements, this work informs the ethics, design, development, implementation, and governance of genAI chatbots in youth mental health contexts.

评分理由: 论文提出RTR-DiT，一个基于Diffusion Transformer的实时视频风格化框架。核心创新在于：1）通过post-training（含SFT）将教师模型蒸馏为自回归模型；2）提出KV cache更新策略以实现长视频稳定处理和实时风格切换。因此，与"Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT"高度相关（10分），因为论文明确使用post-training和SFT进行蒸馏；与"KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention"高度相关（10分），因为论文创新性地提出KV cache更新策略以优化长序列处理；与"Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration"高度相关（10分），因为论文旨在实现实时视频风格化，核心是推理加速。其他关键词（如LLMs、MoE、Scaling Laws等）与论文的扩散模型视频生成主题无关，均得0分。加权总分计算为：101 + 101 + 10*1 = 30分。

视频生成模型的最新进展显著加速了视频生成及相关下游任务的发展。其中，视频风格化在沉浸式应用与艺术创作等领域具有重要的研究价值，受到广泛关注。然而，现有的基于扩散模型的视频风格化方法在处理长视频时难以保持稳定性和一致性，且其高计算成本与多步去噪过程使其难以应用于实际场景。本工作提出RTR-DiT（以DiT作为实时重渲染器），这是一个基于扩散Transformer的流式视频风格化框架。我们首先在精选的视频风格化数据集上微调了一个双向教师模型，该模型支持文本引导与参考图引导的视频风格化任务，随后通过结合自强制与分布匹配蒸馏的后训练方法，将其蒸馏为少步自回归模型。此外，我们提出了一种参考保持的KV缓存更新策略，该策略不仅能够稳定、一致地处理长视频，还支持在文本提示与参考图像之间实时切换风格。实验结果表明，RTR-DiT在文本引导和参考图引导的视频风格化任务中，在量化指标与视觉质量上均优于现有方法，并在实时长视频风格化与交互式风格切换应用中展现出优异性能。

Recent advances in video generation models has significantly accelerated video generation and related downstream tasks. Among these, video stylization holds important research value in areas such as immersive applications and artistic creation, attracting widespread attention. However, existing diffusion-based video stylization methods struggle to maintain stability and consistency when processing long videos, and their high computational cost and multi-step denoising make them difficult to apply in practical scenarios. In this work, we propose RTR-DiT (DiT as Real-Time Rerenderer), a steaming video stylization framework built upon Diffusion Transformer. We first fine-tune a bidirectional teacher model on a curated video stylization dataset, supporting both text-guided and reference-guided video stylization tasks, and subsequently distill it into a few-step autoregressive model via post-training with Self Forcing and Distribution Matching Distillation. Furthermore, we propose a reference-preserving KV cache update strategy that not only enables stable and consistent processing of long videos, but also supports real-time switching between text prompts and reference images. Experimental results show that RTR-DiT outperforms existing methods in both text-guided and reference-guided video stylization tasks, in terms of quantitative metrics and visual quality, and demonstrates excellent performance in real-time long video stylization and interactive style-switching applications.

评分理由: 论文提出Audio-Contrastive Preference Optimization (ACPO)方法，专门针对Audio-Visual Language Models (AVLMs)中的跨模态幻觉问题，特别是视频驱动的音频幻觉。该方法属于偏好优化技术，与"RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO"高度相关（10分），因为ACPO是一种新的偏好学习框架。论文核心目标是缓解幻觉问题，与"Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness"高度相关（10分）。论文涉及Audio-Visual Language Models，这是大语言模型在音频-视觉领域的应用，与"Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models"有一定关联（8分）。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws、Pre-training、SFT、Instruction Tuning、PEFT、RAG、Context Window、KV Cache、Reasoning、Agents、Tool Use、Multi-agent、Quantization、Speculative Decoding、Interpretability、World Models、Model Merging、In-context Learning、AI for Science等均未在论文标题或摘要中提及，与论文内容无关（0分）。

尽管视听语言模型近年来取得了显著进展，但其可靠性受限于跨模态幻觉问题。其中一种尤为普遍的表现形式是视频驱动的音频幻觉：模型常常利用视觉捷径来幻觉预期声音，而丢弃真实的听觉证据。为应对这种根深蒂固的视觉主导倾向，我们提出了音频对比偏好优化方法。这一双轴偏好学习框架引入了输出对比目标，以惩罚伪装成音频事实的视觉描述；同时设计了输入对比目标，通过替换音轨来显式惩罚对真实听觉信号不敏感的生成行为。大量实验表明，ACPO能够建立高度可靠的音频基础，在保持整体多模态能力的同时有效缓解音频幻觉现象。

While Audio-Visual Language Models (AVLMs) have achieved remarkable progress over recent years, their reliability is bottlenecked by cross-modal hallucination. A particularly pervasive manifestation is video-driven audio hallucination: models routinely exploit visual shortcuts to hallucinate expected sounds, discarding true auditory evidence. To counteract this deeply ingrained visual dominance, we propose Audio-Contrastive Preference Optimization (ACPO). This dual-axis preference learning framework introduces an output-contrastive objective to penalize visual descriptions masquerading as audio facts, alongside an input-contrastive objective that swaps audio tracks to explicitly penalize generation invariant to the true auditory signal. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ACPO establishes highly faithful audio grounding and mitigates audio hallucination without compromising overarching multimodal capabilities.

评分理由: 论文提出Co-FactChecker框架，专注于利用大型语言模型（LLMs）和大型推理模型（LRMs）进行人机协作的声明验证。核心相关关键词包括：LLMs（直接提及）、Chain of Thought/System 2 Thinking（涉及模型思维轨迹作为共享草稿纸、多步推理）、Hallucination Mitigation/Factuality（专注于声明验证和事实性）、Self-Correction（通过专家反馈引导模型推理）、LLM Agents（人机协作框架）、Explainable AI（产生更易解释的思维轨迹）。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、训练技术、优化方法、特定应用领域等，论文未涉及，故评分为0。

专业事实核查人员依赖领域知识和深层语境理解来验证主张。大型语言模型（LLMs）与大型推理模型（LRMs）缺乏这种基础，主要仅基于现有证据进行推理，这导致了专家主导与全自动化主张验证之间的不匹配。为弥合这一差距，我们提出人机协作是一条更具前景的路径，其中基于现实世界知识和领域专长的专家反馈可指导模型的推理过程。然而，现有的LRMs难以根据自然语言反馈进行校准，尤其是在多轮交互场景中。我们提出Co-FactChecker——一个用于人机协作主张验证的框架。我们引入了一种新的交互范式，将模型的思维轨迹视为共享草稿板。Co-FactChecker将专家反馈转化为轨迹编辑，从而对思维轨迹进行针对性修改，规避了基于对话的交互方式的缺陷。我们提供了理论分析，表明轨迹编辑相较于多轮对话具有优势；自动评估结果证明，Co-FactChecker在性能上超越了现有的自主验证及人机协作方法。人工评估进一步显示，相较于多轮对话，用户更倾向于选择Co-FactChecker，因其能产生更高质量的推理与判定结论，同时提供相对更易解读、更有价值的思维轨迹。

Professional fact-checkers rely on domain knowledge and deep contextual understanding to verify claims. Large language models (LLMs) and large reasoning models (LRMs) lack such grounding and primarily reason from available evidence alone, creating a mismatch between expert-led and fully automated claim verification. To mitigate this gap, we posit human-AI collaboration as a more promising path forward, where expert feedback, grounded in real-world knowledge and domain expertise, guides the model’s reasoning. However, existing LRMs are hard to calibrate to natural language feedback, particularly in a multi-turn interaction setup. We propose Co-FactChecker, a framework for human-AI collaborative claim verification. We introduce a new interaction paradigm that treats the model’s thinking trace as a shared scratchpad. Co-FactChecker translates expert feedback into trace-edits that introduce targeted modifications to the trace, sidestepping the shortcomings of dialogue-based interaction. We provide theoretical results showing that trace-editing offers advantages over multi-turn dialogue, and our automatic evaluations demonstrate that Co-FactChecker outperforms existing autonomous and human-AI collaboration approaches. Human evaluations further show that Co-FactChecker is preferred over multi-turn dialogue, producing higher quality reasoning and verdicts along with relatively easier to interpret and more useful thinking traces.

评分理由: 论文核心是LLM驱动的多智能体框架MIND，用于材料研究的自动化假设验证，因此与"Large Language Models”、“LLM Agents”、“Multi-agent Systems"和"AI for Science"高度相关（10分）。系统涉及假设精炼和基于辩论的验证，与推理关键词有一定关联（5分）。其他关键词如MoE、SFT、RAG等未在摘要中提及，评为0分。

大语言模型（LLMs）已赋能面向科学发现的智能体AI系统，但多数方法仍局限于基于文本的推理，缺乏自动化实验验证。我们提出MIND，一个用于材料研究中自动化假设验证的LLM驱动框架。MIND将科学发现过程组织为多智能体流程中的假设细化、实验执行和基于辩论的验证。为实现实验验证，该系统集成了机器学习原子间势（Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials），特别是SevenNet-Omni，以实现可扩展的计算机模拟实验。我们还提供了基于网络的用户界面以支持自动化假设测试。其模块化设计允许集成更多实验模块，使该框架能适应更广泛的科学工作流程。代码发布于：https://github.com/IMMS-Ewha/MIND，演示视频可见：https://youtu.be/lqiFe1OQzN4。

Large language models (LLMs) have enabled agentic AI systems for scientific discovery, but most approaches remain limited to textbased reasoning without automated experimental verification. We propose MIND, an LLM-driven framework for automated hypothesis validation in materials research. MIND organizes the scientific discovery process into hypothesis refinement, experimentation, and debate-based validation within a multi-agent pipeline. For experimental verification, the system integrates Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials, particularly SevenNet-Omni, enabling scalable in-silico experiments. We also provide a web-based user interface for automated hypothesis testing. The modular design allows additional experimental modules to be integrated, making the framework adaptable to broader scientific workflows. The code is available at: https://github.com/IMMS-Ewha/MIND, and a demonstration video at: https://youtu.be/lqiFe1OQzN4.

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLM-based agents在GIS领域的应用，与"Large Language Models”、“LLM Agents”、“Tool Use"高度相关（10分）。涉及多步推理和专家认知流程，与"Chain of Thought”、“System 2 Thinking"相关（8分）。属于AI在科学领域的应用，与"AI for Science"相关（8分）。其他关键词如MoE、量化、对齐等未涉及（0分）。

将大型语言模型（LLMs）集成到地理信息系统（GIS）中，标志着空间分析向自主化发展的范式转变。然而，由于地理空间工作流程具有复杂、多步骤的特性，评估这些基于LLM的智能体仍然面临挑战。现有基准测试主要依赖静态文本或代码匹配，忽略了动态的运行时反馈以及空间输出的多模态特性。为弥补这一不足，我们提出了GeoAgentBench（GABench），这是一个为工具增强型GIS智能体量身定制的动态交互式评估基准。GABench提供了一个真实的执行沙箱，集成了117个原子级GIS工具，覆盖了6个核心GIS领域的53类典型空间分析任务。我们认识到，在动态GIS环境中，精确的参数配置是执行成功的主要决定因素，因此设计了参数执行准确度（Parameter Execution Accuracy, PEA）指标，该指标采用“末次尝试对齐”策略来量化隐式参数推断的保真度。作为补充，我们提出了一种基于视觉语言模型（Vision-Language Model, VLM）的验证方法，用于评估数据空间准确性和制图风格的符合度。此外，针对因参数错配和运行时异常导致的频繁任务失败，我们开发了一种新颖的智能体架构——规划与反应（Plan-and-React），该架构通过将全局编排与逐步反应式执行解耦，模拟了专家的认知工作流程。对七个代表性LLM的大量实验表明，规划与反应范式显著优于传统框架，在逻辑严谨性和执行鲁棒性之间实现了最佳平衡，尤其是在多步骤推理和错误恢复方面。我们的研究结果揭示了当前的能力边界，并为评估和推进下一代自主地理人工智能（GeoAI）建立了坚实的标准。

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into Geographic Information Systems (GIS) marks a paradigm shift toward autonomous spatial analysis. However, evaluating these LLM-based agents remains challenging due to the complex, multi-step nature of geospatial workflows. Existing benchmarks primarily rely on static text or code matching, neglecting dynamic runtime feedback and the multimodal nature of spatial outputs. To address this gap, we introduce GeoAgentBench (GABench), a dynamic and interactive evaluation benchmark tailored for tool-augmented GIS agents. GABench provides a realistic execution sandbox integrating 117 atomic GIS tools, encompassing 53 typical spatial analysis tasks across 6 core GIS domains. Recognizing that precise parameter configuration is the primary determinant of execution success in dynamic GIS environments, we designed the Parameter Execution Accuracy (PEA) metric, which utilizes a “Last-Attempt Alignment” strategy to quantify the fidelity of implicit parameter inference. Complementing this, a Vision-Language Model (VLM) based verification is proposed to assess data-spatial accuracy and cartographic style adherence. Furthermore, to address the frequent task failures caused by parameter misalignments and runtime anomalies, we developed a novel agent architecture, Plan-and-React, that mimics expert cognitive workflows by decoupling global orchestration from step-wise reactive execution. Extensive experiments with seven representative LLMs demonstrate that the Plan-and-React paradigm significantly outperforms traditional frameworks, achieving the optimal balance between logical rigor and execution robustness, particularly in multi-step reasoning and error recovery. Our findings highlight current capability boundaries and establish a robust standard for assessing and advancing the next generation of autonomous GeoAI.

评分理由: 论文核心研究大语言模型（LLMs）的长链思维（Chain-of-Thought）推理能力，因此与"Chain of Thought"高度相关（15分），与"Large Language Models"高度相关（10分）。论文涉及长上下文推理，与"Context Window Extension"有一定关联（5分）。论文测试模型在复杂自主任务中的推理能力，与"LLM Agents"有一定关联（5分）。论文基准问题涵盖化学等领域，与"AI for Science"有一定关联（5分）。其他关键词如MoE、SFT、RAG等未在论文中涉及，得0分。

随着语言模型日益广泛地应用于复杂的自主任务，其进行长程准确推理的能力变得至关重要。该能力的核心组成部分是对长而复杂的思维链进行规划与管理。本文提出LongCoT，这是一个包含2,500个专家设计问题的可扩展基准测试集，涵盖化学、数学、计算机科学、国际象棋和逻辑等领域，旨在隔离并直接衡量前沿模型的长程思维链推理能力。每个问题由一个简短输入和一个可验证答案构成；解决这些问题需要在一个由相互依赖的步骤构成的图中进行导航，这些步骤涉及的推理标记数量可达数万至数十万。每个局部步骤对前沿模型而言均可独立处理，因此失败案例反映了长程推理的局限性。在发布时，最佳模型在LongCoT上的准确率低于10%（GPT 5.2：9.8%；Gemini 3 Pro：6.1%），揭示了当前能力存在显著差距。总体而言，LongCoT为长程推理提供了严格的衡量标准，能够追踪前沿模型在长时间跨度内进行可靠推理的能力。

As language models are increasingly deployed for complex autonomous tasks, their ability to reason accurately over longer horizons becomes critical. An essential component of this ability is planning and managing a long, complex chain-of-thought (CoT). We introduce LongCoT, a scalable benchmark of 2,500 expert-designed problems spanning chemistry, mathematics, computer science, chess, and logic to isolate and directly measure the long-horizon CoT reasoning capabilities of frontier models. Problems consist of a short input with a verifiable answer; solving them requires navigating a graph of interdependent steps that span tens to hundreds of thousands of reasoning tokens. Each local step is individually tractable for frontier models, so failures reflect long-horizon reasoning limitations. At release, the best models achieve <10% accuracy (GPT 5.2: 9.8%; Gemini 3 Pro: 6.1%) on LongCoT, revealing a substantial gap in current capabilities. Overall, LongCoT provides a rigorous measure of long-horizon reasoning, tracking the ability of frontier models to reason reliably over extended periods.

评分理由: 论文核心研究大语言模型（LLMs）在战略推理和决策能力方面的增强，特别是针对多智能体环境。因此，与"Large Language Models”、“LLM Agents”、“Multi-agent Systems"高度相关（10分）。论文涉及推理能力的提升，与"Chain of Thought"和"System 2 Thinking"有一定关联（8分）。其他关键词如模型架构、训练技术、优化方法、特定应用领域等，论文未直接涉及，故评0分。

大型语言模型（LLM）的推理能力已普遍取得显著进展。然而，由于缺乏显式的前瞻建模，现有基于推理的LLM在多智能体环境中仍难以展现有效的决策能力。为此，战略推理——即预测对手行为并预见其未来可能行动的最基本能力——被引入以缓解上述问题。战略推理是多智能体环境中有效决策的基础，但现有的LLM推理增强方法未能明确捕捉其前瞻性本质。本研究提出前瞻策略优化（Foresight Policy Optimization, FoPO）以增强LLM的战略推理能力，该方法将对手建模原则融入策略优化过程，从而能够显式地兼顾自身利益与对手影响。具体而言，我们构建了两个精心设计的数据集——合作性RSA与竞争性Taboo，这些数据集配备了精心设计的规则与适中难度，以促进在自博弈框架下对FoPO进行系统性研究。实验表明，FoPO显著提升了不同规模和来源的LLM的战略推理能力。此外，经FoPO训练的模型在领域外战略场景中展现出强大的泛化能力，其表现大幅优于标准的LLM推理优化基线方法。

Reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs) have generally advanced significantly. However, it is still challenging for existing reasoning-based LLMs to perform effective decision-making abilities in multi-agent environments, due to the absence of explicit foresight modeling. To this end, strategic reasoning, the most fundamental capability to anticipate the counterpart’s behaviors and foresee its possible future actions, has been introduced to alleviate the above issues. Strategic reasoning is fundamental to effective decision-making in multi-agent environments, yet existing reasoning enhancement methods for LLMs do not explicitly capture its foresight nature. In this work, we introduce Foresight Policy Optimization (FoPO) to enhance strategic reasoning in LLMs, which integrates opponent modeling principles into policy optimization, thereby enabling explicit consideration of both self-interest and counterpart influence. Specifically, we construct two curated datasets, namely Cooperative RSA and Competitive Taboo, equipped with well-designed rules and moderate difficulty to facilitate a systematic investigation of FoPO in a self-play framework. Our experiments demonstrate that FoPO significantly enhances strategic reasoning across LLMs of varying sizes and origins. Moreover, models trained with FoPO exhibit strong generalization to out-of-domain strategic scenarios, substantially outperforming standard LLM reasoning optimization baselines.

评分理由: 论文提出ESC-RL方法用于放射学报告生成，核心是强化学习与LLM结合的自校正偏好学习。与"Large Language Models"相关（8分），因使用LLM合成报告；与"Self-Correction"高度相关（10分），因核心是自校正偏好学习；与"Hallucination Mitigation"相关（8分），因关注临床忠实性、抑制虚假内容；与"AI for Science"高度相关（10分），属生物医学AI应用；与"Alignment"和"RLHF"有一定关联（各5分），因涉及偏好对齐和强化学习优化。其他关键词如MoE、量化、推理加速等未涉及，得0分。

近期强化学习方法在放射学报告生成领域取得进展，但两个核心局限依然存在：（1）报告级奖励对临床忠实性提供的证据基础指导有限；（2）现有方法缺乏与临床偏好对齐的显式自我改进机制。我们提出临床对齐的证据感知自校正强化学习方法，其包含两个关键组件。首先，分组式证据感知对齐奖励机制提供分组化、证据感知的反馈。该方法通过强化真阳性的一致性依据、恢复假阴性的漏诊发现、抑制假阳性的无支持内容来实现优化。其次，自校正偏好学习策略能够从多组噪声观察中自动构建可靠的疾病感知偏好数据集，并利用大语言模型在无需人工监督的情况下合成精细化报告。该框架促进了临床忠实、疾病对齐的奖励机制，并支持训练过程中的持续自我改进。在两个公开胸部X光数据集上的大量实验表明，该方法实现了持续性能提升并达到最先进的性能水平。

Recent reinforcement learning (RL) approaches have advanced radiology report generation (RRG), yet two core limitations persist: (1) report-level rewards offer limited evidence-grounded guidance for clinical faithfulness; and (2) current methods lack an explicit self-improving mechanism to align with clinical preference. We introduce clinically aligned Evidence-aware Self-Correcting Reinforcement Learning (ESC-RL), comprising two key components. First, a Group-wise Evidence-aware Alignment Reward (GEAR) delivers group-wise, evidence-aware feedback. GEAR reinforces consistent grounding for true positives, recovers missed findings for false negatives, and suppresses unsupported content for false positives. Second, a Self-correcting Preference Learning (SPL) strategy automatically constructs a reliable, disease-aware preference dataset from multiple noisy observations and leverages an LLM to synthesize refined reports without human supervision. ESC-RL promotes clinically faithful, disease-aligned reward and supports continual self-improvement during training. Extensive experiments on two public chest X-ray datasets demonstrate consistent gains and state-of-the-art performance.

评分理由: 论文提出了一种名为DiPO的新方法，用于优化大型语言模型（LLMs）在强化学习中的探索-利用权衡。核心内容与LLMs直接相关（10分），属于RLHF/DPO等强化学习对齐技术范畴（10分），并在函数调用任务上进行了评估（10分）。论文涉及推理能力提升，与多步推理（5分）和深度推理（5分）有一定关联，且LLM智能体（5分）是其应用场景之一。其他关键词如MoE、量化、RAG等未在摘要中提及，评为0分。

可验证奖励强化学习（RLVR）显著推动了大型语言模型（LLM）推理能力的发展。然而，如何有效管理探索与利用之间的权衡仍是一个关键挑战。本文深入分析了训练过程中极难与极易样本所引发的探索与利用困境，并提出了一种新的细粒度权衡机制。具体而言，我们引入了一种困惑度空间解耦策略，将样本空间划分为独立的探索（高困惑度）与利用（低困惑度）子空间，从而挖掘出需要探索-利用权衡的细粒度样本。随后，我们提出了一种对验证奖励影响最小的双向奖励分配机制，以实现困惑度引导的探索与利用，从而进行更稳定的策略优化。最后，我们在数学推理和函数调用两项主流任务上评估了所提方法，实验结果证明了该方法的优越性，并证实了其通过细粒度探索-利用权衡来提升LLM性能的有效性。

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has catalyzed significant advances in the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, effectively managing the exploration and exploitation trade-off remains a critical challenge. In this paper, we fully analyze the exploration and exploitation dilemma of extremely hard and easy samples during the training and propose a new fine-grained trade-off mechanism. Concretely, we introduce a perplexity space disentangling strategy that divides the sample space into distinct exploration (high perplexity) and exploitation (low perplexity) subspaces, thereby mining fine-grained samples requiring exploration-exploitation trade-off. Subsequently, we propose a bidirectional reward allocation mechanism with a minimum impact on verification rewards to implement perplexity-guided exploration and exploitation, enabling more stable policy optimization. Finally, we have evaluated our method on two mainstream tasks: mathematical reasoning and function calling, and experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method, confirming its effectiveness in enhancing LLM performance by fine-grained exploration-exploitation trade-off.

评分理由: 论文核心是开发Delta-LLaVA，一个专门用于多时相遥感解释的多模态大语言模型（MLLM）框架，属于大模型在科学领域（遥感/地球观测）的创新应用。因此，与"Large Language Models"和"AI for Science"高度相关（10分）。论文涉及模型训练（如预训练/微调）和复杂推理（如多步推理、深度推理），但非核心，给5分。其他关键词（如MoE、量化、RAG等）未在摘要中提及，给0分。

尽管多模态大语言模型（MLLMs）在通用视觉-语言任务中表现出色，但其在遥感变化理解中的应用却受到一种根本性的“时间盲区”的阻碍。现有架构缺乏内在的多时相对比推理机制，且难以实现精确的空间定位。为解决这一问题，我们首先引入了Delta-QA，这是一个包含18万个视觉问答样本的综合基准。Delta-QA统一了双时相和叁时相场景下的像素级分割与视觉问答，将变化解译构建为四个递进的认知维度。在方法论上，我们提出了Delta-LLaVA，这是一个专为多时相遥感解译设计的新型MLLM框架。它通过三项核心创新克服了简单特征拼接的局限：一个系统性地隔离并增强视觉差异的“变化增强注意力”模块；一个利用变化先验嵌入（Change Prior Embedding）来提取可微分差异特征作为大语言模型（LLM）输入的Change-SEG模块；以及用于防止跨时相上下文泄漏的局部因果注意力（Local Causal Attention）。大量实验表明，Delta-LLaVA在复杂变化推理和高精度边界定位方面，显著超越了领先的通用MLLMs和专用分割模型，从而为地球观测智能建立了一个统一的框架。

While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel in general vision-language tasks, their application to remote sensing change understanding is hindered by a fundamental “temporal blindness”. Existing architectures lack intrinsic mechanisms for multi-temporal contrastive reasoning and struggle with precise spatial grounding. To address this, we first introduce Delta-QA, a comprehensive benchmark comprising 180k visual question-answering samples. Delta-QA unifies pixel-level segmentation and visual question answering across bi- and tri-temporal scenarios, structuring change interpretation into four progressive cognitive dimensions. Methodologically, we propose Delta-LLaVA, a novel MLLM framework explicitly tailored for multi-temporal remote sensing interpretation. It overcomes the limitations of naive feature concatenation through three core innovations: a Change-Enhanced Attention module that systematically isolates and amplifies visual differences, a Change-SEG module utilizing Change Prior Embedding to extract differentiable difference features as input for the LLM, and Local Causal Attention to prevent cross-temporal contextual leakage. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Delta-LLaVA decisively outperforms leading generalist MLLMs and specialized segmentation models in complex change deduction and high-precision boundary localization, establishing a unified framework for earth observation intelligence.

评分理由: 论文研究的是对话式生成式人工智能（genAI chatbots）在青少年心理健康领域的应用，属于大模型在特定领域（医疗/心理健康）的应用研究。因此，与通用大模型技术（如LLMs）有中等关联（5分），因为genAI chatbots通常基于LLMs。论文涉及AI在科学/健康领域的应用（AI for Science），因此给5分。论文探讨了用户对AI的信任、透明度、伦理和设计需求，这与’Alignment’（价值对齐）、‘Explainable AI’（可解释性）、‘Hallucination Mitigation’（幻觉缓解）以及’LLM Agents’（AI代理）等概念有一定关联，但这些并非论文的技术核心，而是应用层面的考虑，因此均给5分。其他关键词主要涉及具体的技术原理、训练方法或优化技术，论文未涉及，因此给0分。

对话式生成人工智能代理（或称生成式AI聊天机器人）可能对青少年心理健康有益，但年轻人的视角仍未得到充分探索。本研究以最初为澳大利亚青少年服务机构专业人员设计的心理健康智能代理（Mia）为例展开调查。通过协同设计后，32名年轻人参与了线上研讨会，探讨他们对生成式AI聊天机器人应用于青少年心理健康的看法，并就如何为消费者重新设计Mia以及将其整合到服务中提出建议。研究归纳出四个主题：（1）在人性化AI的同时不使关怀去人性化；（2）我需要了解其运作原理；（3）合适的工具、场景与时机？（4）在安全环境中实现个性化定制。本研究揭示了年轻人对生成式AI聊天机器人应用于青少年心理健康的态度、需求及要求，对服务整合具有重要启示。此外，通过协同设计系统需求，这项工作为青少年心理健康领域生成式AI聊天机器人的伦理规范、设计开发、实施应用与治理监管提供了参考依据。

Conversational generative artificial intelligence agents (or genAI chatbots) could benefit youth mental health, yet young people’s perspectives remain underexplored. We examined the Mental health Intelligence Agent (Mia), a genAI chatbot originally designed for professionals in Australian youth services. Following co-design, 32 young people participated in online workshops exploring their perceptions of genAI chatbots in youth mental health and to develop recommendations for reconceptualising Mia for consumers and integrating it into services. Four themes were developed: (1) Humanising AI without dehumanising care, (2) I need to know what’s under the hood, (3) Right tool, right place, right time?, and (4) Making it mine on safe ground. This study offers insights into young people’s attitudes, needs, and requirements regarding genAI chatbots in youth mental health, with key implications for service integration. Additionally, by co-designing system requirements, this work informs the ethics, design, development, implementation, and governance of genAI chatbots in youth mental health contexts.

评分理由: 论文提出RTR-DiT，一个基于Diffusion Transformer的实时视频风格化框架。核心创新在于：1）通过post-training（含SFT）将教师模型蒸馏为自回归模型；2）提出KV cache更新策略以实现长视频稳定处理和实时风格切换。因此，与"Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT"高度相关（10分），因为论文明确使用post-training和SFT进行蒸馏；与"KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention"高度相关（10分），因为论文创新性地提出KV cache更新策略以优化长序列处理；与"Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration"高度相关（10分），因为论文旨在实现实时视频风格化，核心是推理加速。其他关键词（如LLMs、MoE、Scaling Laws等）与论文的扩散模型视频生成主题无关，均得0分。加权总分计算为：101 + 101 + 10*1 = 30分。

视频生成模型的最新进展显著加速了视频生成及相关下游任务的发展。其中，视频风格化在沉浸式应用与艺术创作等领域具有重要的研究价值，受到广泛关注。然而，现有的基于扩散模型的视频风格化方法在处理长视频时难以保持稳定性和一致性，且其高计算成本与多步去噪过程使其难以应用于实际场景。本工作提出RTR-DiT（以DiT作为实时重渲染器），这是一个基于扩散Transformer的流式视频风格化框架。我们首先在精选的视频风格化数据集上微调了一个双向教师模型，该模型支持文本引导与参考图引导的视频风格化任务，随后通过结合自强制与分布匹配蒸馏的后训练方法，将其蒸馏为少步自回归模型。此外，我们提出了一种参考保持的KV缓存更新策略，该策略不仅能够稳定、一致地处理长视频，还支持在文本提示与参考图像之间实时切换风格。实验结果表明，RTR-DiT在文本引导和参考图引导的视频风格化任务中，在量化指标与视觉质量上均优于现有方法，并在实时长视频风格化与交互式风格切换应用中展现出优异性能。

Recent advances in video generation models has significantly accelerated video generation and related downstream tasks. Among these, video stylization holds important research value in areas such as immersive applications and artistic creation, attracting widespread attention. However, existing diffusion-based video stylization methods struggle to maintain stability and consistency when processing long videos, and their high computational cost and multi-step denoising make them difficult to apply in practical scenarios. In this work, we propose RTR-DiT (DiT as Real-Time Rerenderer), a steaming video stylization framework built upon Diffusion Transformer. We first fine-tune a bidirectional teacher model on a curated video stylization dataset, supporting both text-guided and reference-guided video stylization tasks, and subsequently distill it into a few-step autoregressive model via post-training with Self Forcing and Distribution Matching Distillation. Furthermore, we propose a reference-preserving KV cache update strategy that not only enables stable and consistent processing of long videos, but also supports real-time switching between text prompts and reference images. Experimental results show that RTR-DiT outperforms existing methods in both text-guided and reference-guided video stylization tasks, in terms of quantitative metrics and visual quality, and demonstrates excellent performance in real-time long video stylization and interactive style-switching applications.

评分理由: 论文提出Audio-Contrastive Preference Optimization (ACPO)方法，专门针对Audio-Visual Language Models (AVLMs)中的跨模态幻觉问题，特别是视频驱动的音频幻觉。该方法属于偏好优化技术，与"RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO"高度相关（10分），因为ACPO是一种新的偏好学习框架。论文核心目标是缓解幻觉问题，与"Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness"高度相关（10分）。论文涉及Audio-Visual Language Models，这是大语言模型在音频-视觉领域的应用，与"Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models"有一定关联（8分）。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws、Pre-training、SFT、Instruction Tuning、PEFT、RAG、Context Window、KV Cache、Reasoning、Agents、Tool Use、Multi-agent、Quantization、Speculative Decoding、Interpretability、World Models、Model Merging、In-context Learning、AI for Science等均未在论文标题或摘要中提及，与论文内容无关（0分）。

尽管视听语言模型近年来取得了显著进展，但其可靠性受限于跨模态幻觉问题。其中一种尤为普遍的表现形式是视频驱动的音频幻觉：模型常常利用视觉捷径来幻觉预期声音，而丢弃真实的听觉证据。为应对这种根深蒂固的视觉主导倾向，我们提出了音频对比偏好优化方法。这一双轴偏好学习框架引入了输出对比目标，以惩罚伪装成音频事实的视觉描述；同时设计了输入对比目标，通过替换音轨来显式惩罚对真实听觉信号不敏感的生成行为。大量实验表明，ACPO能够建立高度可靠的音频基础，在保持整体多模态能力的同时有效缓解音频幻觉现象。

While Audio-Visual Language Models (AVLMs) have achieved remarkable progress over recent years, their reliability is bottlenecked by cross-modal hallucination. A particularly pervasive manifestation is video-driven audio hallucination: models routinely exploit visual shortcuts to hallucinate expected sounds, discarding true auditory evidence. To counteract this deeply ingrained visual dominance, we propose Audio-Contrastive Preference Optimization (ACPO). This dual-axis preference learning framework introduces an output-contrastive objective to penalize visual descriptions masquerading as audio facts, alongside an input-contrastive objective that swaps audio tracks to explicitly penalize generation invariant to the true auditory signal. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ACPO establishes highly faithful audio grounding and mitigates audio hallucination without compromising overarching multimodal capabilities.

评分理由: 论文专注于奖励模型（reward modeling）的训练方法，属于大模型对齐（alignment）和RLHF/DPO领域。核心创新是提出C2框架，通过合作式批判性协作，从二元偏好中训练奖励模型和准则生成器，无需外部准则标注。因此，与"RLHF/DPO"高度相关（10分），与"Alignment"相关（8分），与"Large Language Models"相关（8分，因奖励模型通常用于LLM对齐）。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws、PEFT、RAG等均未涉及，得0分。

基于评分量表的增强验证方法通过明确的评估标准指导奖励模型，其判断结果比单一模型验证更为可靠。然而，现有方法大多依赖成本高昂的量表标注，限制了可扩展性。此外，我们发现量表生成存在协作失效的风险：低质量量表会主动误导奖励模型而非提供帮助。受协作沟通原则启发，我们提出“协作且批判的奖励建模”（C2）框架，该框架通过使奖励模型与仅基于二元偏好训练的评分量表生成器进行批判性协作，显著提升了奖励模型的判断质量。在C2中，我们通过测量每个评分量表使奖励模型趋近或偏离正确偏好的程度，合成“有益”与“误导性”的量表对。利用这些对比对，我们训练一个协作式量表生成器以提出有益量表，并训练一个批判性验证器在作出判断前评估量表有效性——在推理阶段仅采纳其认定为有益的量表。C2在相同二元偏好数据上训练的表现优于推理型奖励模型，在RM-Bench上提升达6.5分，在AlpacaEval 2.0的长度控制胜率上提升6.0分。无需外部量表标注，C2使一个80亿参数的奖励模型达到了比其大4倍的模型使用量表标注时的性能。总体而言，我们的研究表明，在基于量表的增强验证中激发审慎协作，能够以可扩展的方式使奖励模型变得更值得信赖。

Rubric-augmented verification guides reward models with explicit evaluation criteria, yielding more reliable judgments than single-model verification. However, most existing methods require costly rubric annotations, limiting scalability. Moreover, we find that rubric generation is vulnerable to a failure of cooperation; low-quality rubrics actively mislead reward models rather than help. Inspired by the principle of cooperative communication, we propose Cooperative yet Critical reward modeling (C2), a framework that significantly improves reward model judgments by having the reward model critically collaborate with a rubric generator trained solely from binary preferences. In C2, we synthesize helpful and misleading rubric pairs by measuring how each rubric shifts the reward model toward or away from the correct preference. Using these contrastive pairs, we train a cooperative rubric generator to propose helpful rubrics, and a critical verifier to assess rubric validity before making its judgment, following only rubrics it deems helpful at inference time. C2 outperforms reasoning reward models trained on the same binary preferences, with gains of up to 6.5 points on RM-Bench and 6.0 points length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval 2.0. Without external rubric annotations, C2 enables an 8B reward model to match performance achieved with rubrics from a 4$\times$ larger model. Overall, our work demonstrates that eliciting deliberate cooperation in rubric-augmented verification makes reward models more trustworthy in a scalable way.

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLM内部表示的分析方法（线性探测），属于大模型技术原理的创新研究。与"Large Language Models"高度相关（10分），因为全文围绕LLM表征分析展开。与"Mechanistic Interpretability"高度相关（10分），因为线性探测是解释性AI/机制可解释性的典型方法，论文旨在理解LLM如何编码修辞问题。其他关键词如MoE、SFT、RAG等均未在摘要中提及或相关，故给0分。

反问句的提出并非为了获取信息，而是旨在说服或表明立场。大型语言模型如何在内部表征此类问句，目前尚不明确。本研究通过在线性探针上分析两个不同话语情境的社交媒体数据集中的反问句，发现反问信号在模型表征中早期出现，且最稳定地由末词表征所捕获。在同一数据集内，反问句与信息寻求型问句呈线性可分状态，并在跨数据集迁移中仍可被检测，其AUROC值约为0.7-0.8。然而，我们发现这种可迁移性并不简单地意味着存在共享表征。在不同数据集上训练的探针应用于同一目标语料时，会产生不同的排序结果，其排名靠前的实例重叠率通常低于0.2。定性分析表明，这些差异对应着不同的修辞现象：部分探针捕捉到嵌入在长篇论证中的话语层面修辞立场，而其他探针则侧重于局部、句法驱动的疑问行为。综合来看，这些发现表明，大型语言模型对反问句的表征是通过多个强调不同线索的线性方向编码的，而非单一共享方向。

Rhetorical questions are asked not to seek information but to persuade or signal stance. How large language models internally represent them remains unclear. We analyze rhetorical questions in LLM representations using linear probes on two social-media datasets with different discourse contexts, and find that rhetorical signals emerge early and are most stably captured by last-token representations. Rhetorical questions are linearly separable from information-seeking questions within datasets, and remain detectable under cross-dataset transfer, reaching AUROC around 0.7-0.8. However, we demonstrate that transferability does not simply imply a shared representation. Probes trained on different datasets produce different rankings when applied to the same target corpus, with overlap among the top-ranked instances often below 0.2. Qualitative analysis shows that these divergences correspond to distinct rhetorical phenomena: some probes capture discourse-level rhetorical stance embedded in extended argumentation, while others emphasize localized, syntax-driven interrogative acts. Together, these findings suggest that rhetorical questions in LLM representations are encoded by multiple linear directions emphasizing different cues, rather than a single shared direction.

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLMs的事实性错误问题，提出自适应共形预测方法改进事实性评估，与"Large Language Models"和"Hallucination Mitigation"高度相关（10分），其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws、训练方法、推理技术、代理系统、压缩加速、科学AI等均未涉及（0分）。

大型语言模型（LLM）倾向于生成事实错误的输出。近期研究应用了共形预测来为LLM生成内容的事实性提供不确定性估计与统计保证。然而，现有方法通常不具备提示自适应性，限制了其捕捉输入相关变异性的能力。这导致在特定任务或提示下，它们可能过滤掉过少项目（导致过度覆盖）或过多项目（覆盖不足）。我们提出一种自适应共形预测方法，将共形分数转换技术扩展至LLM，并应用于长文本生成与多项选择题回答任务。该方法实现了提示依赖的校准，在保持边际覆盖保证的同时提升了条件覆盖性能。此外，该方法天然支持选择性预测，可在下游应用中过滤不可靠的陈述或答案选项。我们在跨领域的多个白盒模型上评估了该方法，结果表明其在条件覆盖方面显著优于现有基线。

Large language models (LLMs) are prone to generating factually incorrect outputs. Recent work has applied conformal prediction to provide uncertainty estimates and statistical guarantees for the factuality of LLM generations. However, existing approaches are typically not prompt-adaptive, limiting their ability to capture input-dependent variability. As a result, they may filter out too few items (leading to over-coverage) or too many (under-coverage) for a given task or prompt. We propose an adaptive conformal prediction approach that extends conformal score transformation methods to LLMs, with applications to long-form generation and multiple-choice question answering. This enables prompt-dependent calibration, retaining marginal coverage guarantees while improving conditional coverage. In addition, the approach naturally supports selective prediction, allowing unreliable claims or answer choices to be filtered out in downstream applications. We evaluate our approach on multiple white-box models across diverse domains and show that it significantly outperforms existing baselines in terms of conditional coverage.

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLM生成文本与人类文本的风格差异分析，直接涉及"Large Language Models"和"Mechanistic Interpretability”（通过语言特征分析解释模型行为），其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、训练方法、推理技术、应用领域等均未在摘要中提及或相关。

大型语言模型（LLMs）现已能够生成高度流畅、类人的文本。它们催生了众多应用，同时也引发了大规模垃圾信息、网络钓鱼或学术滥用等担忧。尽管已有大量研究专注于检测LLM生成的文本，但针对人类书写文本与机器生成文本之间风格差异的理解工作仍较为有限。本研究基于道格拉斯·比伯的词汇语法与功能特征集，对人工书写文本与11种LLM生成的文本进行了大规模风格变异分析，涵盖8种不同文体和4种解码策略。我们的发现为LLM的定向使用提供了指导性见解：首先，LLM生成文本的关键语言区分特征对生成条件（例如促使生成类人文本的提示设置，或延续人类写作风格的参考文本的可获得性）表现出较强的稳健性；其次，文体对风格特征的影响比文本来源本身更为显著；第三，模型的聊天变体在风格空间中通常呈现聚集分布；最后，除个别例外情况，模型对风格的影响大于解码策略。这些结果凸显了在塑造机器生成文本风格行为时，模型与文体因素相对于提示策略和解码方法具有更重要的影响。

Large Language Models (LLMs) are now capable of generating highly fluent, human-like text. They enable many applications, but also raise concerns such as large scale spam, phishing, or academic misuse. While much work has focused on detecting LLM-generated text, only limited work has gone into understanding the stylistic differences between human-written and machine-generated text. In this work, we perform a large scale analysis of stylistic variation across human-written text and outputs from 11 LLMs spanning 8 different genres and 4 decoding strategies using Douglas Biber’s set of lexicogrammatical and functional features. Our findings reveal insights that can guide intentional LLM usage. First, key linguistic differentiators of LLM-generated text seem robust to generation conditions (e.g., prompt settings to nudge them to generate human-like text, or availability of human-written text to continue the style); second, genre exerts a stronger influence on stylistic features than the source itself; third, chat variants of the models generally appear to be clustered together in stylistic space, and finally, model has a larger effect on the style than decoding strategy, with some exceptions. These results highlight the relative importance of model and genre over prompting and decoding strategies in shaping the stylistic behavior of machine-generated text.

评分理由: 论文专注于Model Context Protocol (MCP)生态系统中基于代理（agentic）系统的安全威胁情报自动化，与大多数关键词无关。仅与"LLM Agents" OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow"高度相关（10分），因为论文核心是MCP-based agentic systems的安全威胁。与"Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models"有一定关联（5分），因为MCP和LLM应用安全框架（如OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications）被引用，但论文不直接研究LLM技术本身。其他关键词均未涉及。

基于模型上下文协议（Model Context Protocol, MCP）的智能体系统快速扩散，引入了一类新的安全威胁，而现有框架尚不足以有效应对。本文提出MCPThreatHive，一个开源平台，它自动化了MCP威胁情报的端到端生命周期：从持续、多源的数据采集，通过人工智能驱动的威胁提取与分类，到结构化的知识图谱存储与交互式可视化。该平台实践了MCP-38威胁分类法，这是一套精心整理的包含38种MCP特有威胁模式的集合，并映射至STRIDE、OWASP LLM应用十大风险以及OWASP智能体应用十大风险框架。一个复合风险评分模型提供了量化的优先级排序。通过对现有代表性MCP安全工具的比较分析，我们识别出MCPThreatHive所解决的三个关键覆盖空白：不完整的组合式攻击建模、持续威胁情报的缺失，以及统一多框架分类的缺乏。

The rapid proliferation of Model Context Protocol (MCP)-based agentic systems has introduced a new category of security threats that existing frameworks are inadequately equipped to address. We present MCPThreatHive, an open-source platform that automates the end-to-end lifecycle of MCP threat intelligence: from continuous, multi-source data collection through AI-driven threat extraction and classification, to structured knowledge graph storage and interactive visualization. The platform operationalizes the MCP-38 threat taxonomy, a curated set of 38 MCP-specific threat patterns mapped to STRIDE, OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications, and OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications. A composite risk scoring model provides quantitative prioritization. Through a comparative analysis of representative existing MCP security tools, we identify three critical coverage gaps that MCPThreatHive addresses: incomplete compositional attack modeling, absence of continuous threat intelligence, and lack of unified multi-framework classification.

评分理由: 论文主要研究隐私保护的异步助手间协作框架（CONCORD），核心是解决始终监听AI的隐私风险，通过实时说话人验证、时空上下文解析、信息间隙检测和关系感知的助手间查询来实现上下文恢复。这与大多数关键词（如LLM技术、训练方法、推理优化、科学AI应用等）完全无关。唯一高度相关的关键词是"Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”，因为论文明确研究助手间（A2A）的协作、协调和协商机制，这是其核心创新点。其他关键词在摘要中均未提及或暗示。

我们提出CONCORD——一个隐私感知的异步助理间协作框架，该框架利用主动式语音人工智能之间的协同合作。随着智能体从被动响应型向持续聆听型助理演进，其面临一个核心隐私风险（可能捕获未经同意的说话者语音），这使得它们在社交场景中的部署成为挑战。为克服这一问题，我们实现了CONCORD框架，该框架通过实时说话人验证强制实施仅限设备持有者的语音捕获，生成单边转录记录。这种方法虽会导致语境信息缺失，但有效保护了隐私。我们证明CONCORD能够通过以下机制安全恢复必要语境：（1）时空语境解析，（2）信息间隙检测，以及（3）由关系感知披露机制调控的最小化助理间查询。相较于容易产生幻觉的推断方式，CONCORD将语境恢复视为助理间通过协商实现的安全信息交换。在多领域对话数据集上的实验表明，CONCORD在间隙检测中达到91.4%的召回率，关系分类准确率达96%，在隐私敏感披露决策中真阴性率高达97%。通过将持续聆听人工智能重新定义为隐私保护型智能体间的协同问题，CONCORD为可社会性部署的主动式对话智能体提供了一条可行路径。

We introduce CONCORD, a privacy-aware asynchronous assistant-to-assistant (A2A) framework that leverages collaboration between proactive speech-based AI. As agents evolve from reactive to always-listening assistants, they face a core privacy risk (of capturing non-consenting speakers), which makes their social deployment a challenge. To overcome this, we implement CONCORD, which enforces owner-only speech capture via real-time speaker verification, producing a one-sided transcript that incurs missing context but preserves privacy. We demonstrate that CONCORD can safely recover necessary context through (1) spatio-temporal context resolution, (2) information gap detection, and (3) minimal A2A queries governed by a relationship-aware disclosure. Instead of hallucination-prone inferring, CONCORD treats context recovery as a negotiated safe exchange between assistants. Across a multi-domain dialogue dataset, CONCORD achieves 91.4% recall in gap detection, 96% relationship classification accuracy, and 97% true negative rate in privacy-sensitive disclosure decisions. By reframing always-listening AI as a coordination problem between privacy-preserving agents, CONCORD offers a practical path toward socially deployable proactive conversational agents.

评分理由: 论文专注于使用Deep Interest Network（DIN）架构构建一个可扩展的、时间敏感的推荐引擎，应用于每日梦幻体育（DFS）领域。核心贡献在于通过实时紧迫性特征和时间位置编码来适应时间敏感的场景，并使用listwise neuralNDCG损失函数进行优化。论文与大多数关键词（如LLMs、MoE、Scaling Laws、Pre-training、RLHF、RAG等）完全无关，因为这些关键词主要涉及大语言模型、模型架构、训练方法、推理优化等，而本文是传统的深度学习推荐系统应用。唯一相关的关键词是"Small Language Models" OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”，因为论文提到该系统计划部署在设备端（edge）推荐系统中，这与on-device AI有一定关联，但论文本身不涉及SLMs或语言模型，因此给予5分（有一定关联）。其他关键词如AI for Science等也不相关，因为论文属于商业应用而非科学研究领域。

在日常梦幻体育（DFS）中，比赛参与具有高度的时间敏感性。用户必须在比赛开始前的短暂窗口期内采取行动，这使得比赛推荐成为一项时间关键型任务，以避免错失参与机会和收入损失。现有的推荐系统通常为静态项目目录设计，难以应对此类实时赛事固有的严格时间截止限制。为解决这一问题，我们设计并部署了一个采用深度兴趣网络（Deep Interest Network, DIN）架构的推荐引擎。我们通过两个层面注入时间性来改进DIN架构：首先，为每场候选比赛引入实时紧迫性特征（例如，轮次锁定倒计时）；其次，通过时间位置编码来表征每次历史交互与当前推荐请求之间的时间间隔，使模型能够动态权衡过往行为的时效性。该方法与列表式神经NDCG损失函数相结合，可生成高度相关且具有紧迫性感知的排序结果。为支持工业级规模应用，我们在Ray和PyTorch上开发了多节点、多GPU的训练架构。该系统在包含超过65万用户和超过1000亿次交互的大规模工业数据集上进行了验证，相较于采用人工特征且经过深度优化的LightGBM基线模型，其nDCG@1指标提升了9%。该模型强大的离线性能证明了其作为我们计划中的设备端（边缘）推荐系统核心组件的可行性，后续将进行在线A/B测试。

In daily fantasy sports (DFS), match participation is highly time-sensitive. Users must act within a narrow window before a game begins, making match recommendation a time-critical task to prevent missed engagement and revenue loss. Existing recommender systems, typically designed for static item catalogs, are ill-equipped to handle the hard temporal deadlines inherent in these live events. To address this, we designed and deployed a recommendation engine using the Deep Interest Network (DIN) architecture. We adapt the DIN architecture by injecting temporality at two levels: first, through real-time urgency features for each candidate match (e.g., time-to-round-lock), and second, via temporal positional encodings that represent the time-gap between each historical interaction and the current recommendation request, allowing the model to dynamically weigh the recency of past actions. This approach, combined with a listwise neuralNDCG loss function, produces highly relevant and urgency-aware rankings. To support this at industrial scale, we developed a multi-node, multi-GPU training architecture on Ray and PyTorch. Our system, validated on a massive industrial dataset with over 650k users and over 100B interactions, achieves a +9% lift in nDCG@1 over a heavily optimized LightGBM baseline with handcrafted features. The strong offline performance of this model establishes its viability as a core component for our planned on-device (edge) recommendation system, where on-line A/B testing will be conducted.

评分理由: 该论文专注于LLM评估方法的研究，特别是将用户非正式的“vibe-testing”形式化为系统化的评估流程。论文核心与“Large Language Models OR LLMs OR Foundation Models”高度相关（10分），因为它直接研究LLM的评估问题，并提出了一个概念验证的评估管道。然而，论文并未涉及其他关键词所指向的具体模型架构（如MoE、SLMs）、训练技术（如预训练、微调、对齐、PEFT）、推理优化（如RAG、注意力机制、量化）、高级能力（如推理、代理、工具使用）或特定应用领域（如科学AI）。这些关键词与论文的研究焦点——评估方法论——没有直接关联，因此得分为0。

评估大型语言模型（LLM）具有挑战性，因为基准测试分数往往无法反映模型在现实世界中的实际效用。相反，用户常常依赖“感觉测试”（vibe-testing）：这是一种基于经验、非正式的评估方式，例如在与自身工作流程相关的编码任务上比较不同模型。尽管感觉测试普遍存在，但它通常过于临时和非结构化，难以进行大规模分析或复现。在本研究中，我们探讨了感觉测试在实践中的运作方式，并将其形式化以支持系统性分析。我们首先分析了两类实证资源：（1）一项关于用户评估实践的调查，以及（2）从博客和社交媒体收集的真实场景模型比较报告。基于这些资源，我们将感觉测试形式化为一个包含两部分的过程：用户既个性化地选择测试内容，也个性化地判断模型回复。随后，我们引入了一个概念验证评估流程，该流程遵循此形式化框架，通过生成个性化提示（prompts）并采用用户感知的主观标准来比较模型输出。在编码基准测试的实验中，我们发现结合个性化提示和用户感知评估可以改变模型的偏好排序，这反映了感觉测试在实践中的作用。这些结果表明，形式化的感觉测试可以作为一种有效方法，弥合基准测试分数与现实世界经验之间的差距。

Evaluating LLMs is challenging, as benchmark scores often fail to capture models’ real-world usefulness. Instead, users often rely on ``vibe-testing’’: informal experience-based evaluation, such as comparing models on coding tasks related to their own workflow. While prevalent, vibe-testing is often too ad hoc and unstructured to analyze or reproduce at scale. In this work, we study how vibe-testing works in practice and then formalize it to support systematic analysis. We first analyze two empirical resources: (1) a survey of user evaluation practices, and (2) a collection of in-the-wild model comparison reports from blogs and social media. Based on these resources, we formalize vibe-testing as a two-part process: users personalize both what they test and how they judge responses. We then introduce a proof-of-concept evaluation pipeline that follows this formulation by generating personalized prompts and comparing model outputs using user-aware subjective criteria. In experiments on coding benchmarks, we find that combining personalized prompts and user-aware evaluation can change which model is preferred, reflecting the role of vibe-testing in practice. These findings suggest that formalized vibe-testing can serve as a useful approach for bridging benchmark scores and real-world experience.

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLM推理能力的增强方法，通过优化预训练空间中的边际分布P(y)来突破传统RLVR方法的限制。与"Large Language Models"高度相关（10分），因为研究基于LLM；与"Pre-training"高度相关（10分），因为提出PreRL直接在预训练空间应用奖励驱动更新；与"Chain of Thought"和"System 2 Thinking"高度相关（10分），因为研究多步推理和深度推理，实验显示反思思维显著增加；与"Self-Correction"高度相关（10分），因为NSR机制驱动自我反思行为。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、RLHF等未在论文中涉及，得0分。

尽管带可验证奖励的强化学习（RLVR）通过优化条件分布P(y|x)显著增强了大型语言模型的推理能力，但其潜力从根本上受限于基础模型已有的输出分布。在预训练空间中优化边缘分布P(y)通过编码推理能力并保留广泛的探索容量，解决了这一瓶颈。然而，传统的预训练依赖静态语料库进行被动学习，导致分布偏移，从而阻碍了针对性的推理增强。本文提出预训练空间强化学习（PreRL），将奖励驱动的在线更新直接应用于P(y)。我们从理论和实证上验证了log P(y)与log P(y|x)之间的强梯度对齐，确立了PreRL作为标准强化学习的可行替代方案。此外，我们发现了一个关键机制：PreRL中的负样本强化（NSR）是推理能力的异常有效驱动力。NSR-PreRL能快速剪除错误推理空间，同时激发内生的反思行为，使转换思维和反思思维分别提升14.89倍和6.54倍。基于这些发现，我们提出双空间强化学习（DSRL）——一种策略重生策略：首先通过NSR-PreRL初始化模型以扩展推理边界，随后转向标准强化学习进行细粒度优化。大量实验表明，DSRL始终优于强基线方法，证明预训练空间剪枝能有效引导策略朝向精炼的正确推理子空间。

While reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) significantly enhances LLM reasoning by optimizing the conditional distribution P(y|x), its potential is fundamentally bounded by the base model’s existing output distribution. Optimizing the marginal distribution P(y) in the Pre-train Space addresses this bottleneck by encoding reasoning ability and preserving broad exploration capacity. Yet, conventional pre-training relies on static corpora for passive learning, leading to a distribution shift that hinders targeted reasoning enhancement. In this paper, we introduce PreRL (Pre-train Space RL), which applies reward-driven online updates directly to P(y). We theoretically and empirically validate the strong gradient alignment between log P(y) and log P(y|x), establishing PreRL as a viable surrogate for standard RL. Furthermore, we uncover a critical mechanism: Negative Sample Reinforcement (NSR) within PreRL serves as an exceptionally effective driver for reasoning. NSR-PreRL rapidly prunes incorrect reasoning spaces while stimulating endogenous reflective behaviors, increasing transition and reflection thoughts by 14.89x and 6.54x, respectively. Leveraging these insights, we propose Dual Space RL (DSRL), a Policy Reincarnation strategy that initializes models with NSR-PreRL to expand the reasoning horizon before transitioning to standard RL for fine-grained optimization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DSRL consistently outperforms strong baselines, proving that pre-train space pruning effectively steers the policy toward a refined correct reasoning subspace.

评分理由: 论文HiVLA专注于机器人操作领域，提出了一种视觉基础的分层框架，核心是Vision-Language Models (VLMs)和Diffusion Transformer (DiT)在机器人控制中的应用。虽然涉及视觉语言模型，但所有评分关键词都特指大语言模型(LLMs)及其相关技术（如MoE、Scaling Laws、RLHF、RAG等），而论文研究的是视觉语言模型(VLMs)在机器人操作中的具体应用，并未涉及大语言模型的核心技术、训练方法、推理技术、对齐技术、效率优化或科学AI应用。因此，所有关键词与论文内容完全无关，得分为0。

尽管端到端的视觉-语言-动作（VLA）模型为机器人操作提供了一个前景广阔的范式，但在狭窄的控制数据上对其进行微调往往会损害其从基础视觉-语言模型（VLMs）继承的深度推理能力。为解决这一根本性权衡，我们提出了HiVLA，一个以视觉定位为中心的分层框架，它明确地将高层语义规划与低层运动控制解耦。在高层部分，一个VLM规划器首先执行任务分解和视觉定位，生成结构化计划，包括子任务指令和精确的目标边界框。随后，为了将此计划转化为物理动作，我们在低层部分引入了一个基于流匹配的扩散变换器（DiT）动作专家，该专家配备了一种新颖的级联交叉注意力机制。该设计依次融合全局上下文、高分辨率以目标为中心的图像裁剪块以及技能语义，使得DiT能够纯粹专注于鲁棒执行。我们的解耦架构保留了VLM的零样本推理能力，同时允许两个组件独立改进。在仿真和真实世界中进行的大量实验表明，HiVLA显著优于最先进的端到端基线方法，尤其在长时程技能组合以及杂乱场景中小物体的精细操作方面表现卓越。

While end-to-end Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models offer a promising paradigm for robotic manipulation, fine-tuning them on narrow control data often compromises the profound reasoning capabilities inherited from their base Vision-Language Models (VLMs). To resolve this fundamental trade-off, we propose HiVLA, a visual-grounded-centric hierarchical framework that explicitly decouples high-level semantic planning from low-level motor control. In high-level part, a VLM planner first performs task decomposition and visual grounding to generate structured plans, comprising a subtask instruction and a precise target bounding box. Then, to translate this plan into physical actions, we introduce a flow-matching Diffusion Transformer (DiT) action expert in low-level part equipped with a novel cascaded cross-attention mechanism. This design sequentially fuses global context, high-resolution object-centric crops and skill semantics, enabling the DiT to focus purely on robust execution. Our decoupled architecture preserves the VLM’s zero-shot reasoning while allowing independent improvement of both components. Extensive experiments in simulation and the real world demonstrate that HiVLA significantly outperforms state-of-the-art end-to-end baselines, particularly excelling in long-horizon skill composition and the fine-grained manipulation of small objects in cluttered scenes.

评分理由: 论文TREX提出一个多智能体系统，用于自动化LLM微调的全生命周期，包括需求分析、文献数据研究、训练策略制定、数据准备和模型训练评估。核心相关关键词：1）‘Large Language Models OR LLMs OR Foundation Models’（10分）：论文聚焦LLM训练自动化，是核心研究对象；2）‘Post-training OR Supervised Fine-tuning OR SFT’（10分）：论文专门解决LLM微调自动化问题；3）‘LLM Agents OR Autonomous Agents OR Agentic Workflow’（10分）：系统基于AI研究智能体构建；4）‘Multi-agent Systems OR Agent Coordination’（10分）：系统明确为多智能体架构，包含Researcher和Executor模块协作。其他关键词如MoE、量化、推理加速等未在摘要中提及，评0分。

尽管大语言模型（LLM）已使AI研究智能体能够执行独立的科学任务，但自动化复杂、真实世界的工作流程（例如LLM训练）仍然是一项重大挑战。本文介绍了TREX，一个能够自动化整个LLM训练生命周期的多智能体系统。该系统通过协调两个核心模块——研究者（Researcher）与执行器（Executor）——之间的协作，无缝执行需求分析、开放域文献与数据研究、训练策略制定、数据配方准备以及模型训练与评估。多轮实验过程被建模为一棵搜索树，使系统能够高效规划探索路径、复用历史结果，并从迭代试验中提炼高层见解。为评估自动化LLM训练的能力，我们构建了FT-Bench基准测试，该基准包含10项源自真实场景的任务，范围从优化基础模型能力到提升特定领域任务性能。实验结果表明，TREX智能体能够持续优化模型在目标任务上的性能。

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have empowered AI research agents to perform isolated scientific tasks, automating complex, real-world workflows, such as LLM training, remains a significant challenge. In this paper, we introduce TREX, a multi-agent system that automates the entire LLM training life-cycle. By orchestrating collaboration between two core modules-the Researcher and the Executor-the system seamlessly performs requirement analysis, open-domain literature and data research, formulation of training strategies, preparation of data recipes, and model training and evaluation. The multi-round experimental process is modeled as a search tree, enabling the system to efficiently plan exploration paths, reuse historical results, and distill high-level insights from iterative trials. To evaluate the capability of automated LLM training, we construct FT-Bench, a benchmark comprising 10 tasks derived from real-world scenarios, ranging from optimizing fundamental model capabilities to enhancing performance on domain-specific tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that the TREX agent consistently optimizes model performance on target tasks.

评分理由: 该论文研究GUI grounding任务中的自适应放大方法，核心贡献是提出UI-Zoomer框架，通过不确定性量化来选择性触发和调整放大区域。论文内容专注于计算机视觉和GUI理解领域，涉及模型推理优化、不确定性估计和空间定位技术，但完全不涉及大语言模型、深度学习技术原理创新或AI for Science等关键词。所有关键词均与大模型技术、科学应用或深度学习创新相关，而本文是纯粹的计算机视觉应用研究，因此所有关键词相关度均为0。

GUI接地任务旨在根据自然语言查询从屏幕截图中定位界面元素，对于小型图标和密集布局仍具挑战性。测试时放大方法通过裁剪图像并以更高分辨率重新进行推理来提升定位效果，但现有方法对所有实例采用统一的固定尺寸裁剪，忽略了模型对每个案例是否实际存在不确定性。我们提出\textbf{UI-Zoomer}，一种无需训练的自适应放大框架，将放大操作的触发与尺度均视为预测不确定性的量化问题。置信感知门控模块将随机候选框的空间共识与令牌级生成置信度融合，仅在定位不确定时有选择地触发放大。当触发时，不确定性驱动的裁剪尺寸模块将预测方差分解为样本间位置离散度和样本内边界框扩展度，通过全方差定律推导出每个实例的自适应裁剪半径。在ScreenSpot-Pro、UI-Vision和ScreenSpot-v2数据集上的大量实验表明，该方法在多种模型架构上均能持续超越强基线模型，分别实现最高+13.4%、+10.3%和+4.2%的性能提升，且无需额外训练。

GUI grounding, which localizes interface elements from screenshots given natural language queries, remains challenging for small icons and dense layouts. Test-time zoom-in methods improve localization by cropping and re-running inference at higher resolution, but apply cropping uniformly across all instances with fixed crop sizes, ignoring whether the model is actually uncertain on each case. We propose \textbf{UI-Zoomer}, a training-free adaptive zoom-in framework that treats both the trigger and scale of zoom-in as a prediction uncertainty quantification problem. A confidence-aware gate fuses spatial consensus among stochastic candidates with token-level generation confidence to selectively trigger zoom-in only when localization is uncertain. When triggered, an uncertainty-driven crop sizing module decomposes prediction variance into inter-sample positional spread and intra-sample box extent, deriving a per-instance crop radius via the law of total variance. Extensive experiments on ScreenSpot-Pro, UI-Vision, and ScreenSpot-v2 demonstrate consistent improvements over strong baselines across multiple model architectures, achieving gains of up to +13.4%, +10.3%, and +4.2% respectively, with no additional training required.

评分理由: 论文UMI-3D专注于机器人操作中的硬件-软件系统设计，特别是通过集成LiDAR传感器改进视觉SLAM，以增强数据收集的鲁棒性和策略性能。其核心内容涉及机器人感知、传感器融合、数据采集和具身智能，但完全不涉及大语言模型（LLM）、深度学习技术原理、模型训练方法（如预训练、微调、对齐）、推理优化、代理系统或AI在科学领域的应用。所有评分关键词均与大模型或深度学习技术直接相关，而本文研究领域为机器人学与计算机视觉，因此与所有关键词完全无关，均得0分。

我们提出UMI-3D，这是通用操作接口（UMI）的多模态扩展，旨在实现具身操作中鲁棒且可扩展的数据收集。尽管UMI支持便携式腕戴数据采集，但其对单目视觉SLAM的依赖使其容易受到遮挡、动态场景和跟踪失败的影响，限制了其在真实环境中的适用性。UMI-3D通过将轻量级低成本激光雷达传感器紧密集成到腕戴式接口中来解决这些局限，实现了以激光雷达为核心的SLAM，能够在挑战性条件下进行精确的度量尺度位姿估计。我们进一步开发了硬件同步的多模态感知流程和统一的时空标定框架，将视觉观测与激光雷达点云对齐，生成一致的任务演示三维表征。尽管保留了原始的二维视觉运动策略框架，UMI-3D显著提升了采集数据的质量与可靠性，这直接转化为策略性能的提升。大量真实世界实验表明，UMI-3D不仅在标准操作任务上实现了高成功率，还能学习对原始纯视觉UMI系统具有挑战性或不可行的任务，包括大尺度可变形物体操作和关节化物体操控。该系统支持从数据采集、对齐、训练到部署的端到端流程，同时保持了原始UMI的便携性与易用性。所有硬件与软件组件均已开源，以促进大规模数据收集并加速具身智能研究：\href{https://umi-3d.github.io}{https://umi-3d.github.io}。

We present UMI-3D, a multimodal extension of the Universal Manipulation Interface (UMI) for robust and scalable data collection in embodied manipulation. While UMI enables portable, wrist-mounted data acquisition, its reliance on monocular visual SLAM makes it vulnerable to occlusions, dynamic scenes, and tracking failures, limiting its applicability in real-world environments. UMI-3D addresses these limitations by introducing a lightweight and low-cost LiDAR sensor tightly integrated into the wrist-mounted interface, enabling LiDAR-centric SLAM with accurate metric-scale pose estimation under challenging conditions. We further develop a hardware-synchronized multimodal sensing pipeline and a unified spatiotemporal calibration framework that aligns visual observations with LiDAR point clouds, producing consistent 3D representations of demonstrations. Despite maintaining the original 2D visuomotor policy formulation, UMI-3D significantly improves the quality and reliability of collected data, which directly translates into enhanced policy performance. Extensive real-world experiments demonstrate that UMI-3D not only achieves high success rates on standard manipulation tasks, but also enables learning of tasks that are challenging or infeasible for the original vision-only UMI setup, including large deformable object manipulation and articulated object operation. The system supports an end-to-end pipeline for data acquisition, alignment, training, and deployment, while preserving the portability and accessibility of the original UMI. All hardware and software components are open-sourced to facilitate large-scale data collection and accelerate research in embodied intelligence: \href{https://umi-3d.github.io}{https://umi-3d.github.io}.

评分理由: 论文专注于大语言模型（LLMs）的知识蒸馏技术，特别是on-policy蒸馏中的token重要性分析。核心贡献TIP（Token Importance in on-Policy distillation）直接针对LLM训练过程，使用Qwen3、Llama、Qwen2.5等模型进行实验，因此与’Large Language Models OR LLMs OR Foundation Models’高度相关（10分）。论文未涉及其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws、各种训练方法（预训练、微调、对齐等）、推理优化、智能体、量化压缩、科学AI应用等具体技术，这些关键词评分为0分。

在策略知识蒸馏（OPD）中，学生模型在其自身产生的序列上，接受来自教师模型的词元级监督进行训练。并非所有词元位置都同等重要，但现有对词元重要性的理解并不完整。我们提出一个直接的问题：在OPD中，哪些词元携带了最有用的学习信号？我们的答案是：信息丰富的词元来自两个区域：学生模型熵值高的位置，以及学生模型熵值低但师生模型分歧度高的位置——后者对应学生模型过度自信且预测错误的情况。

实证研究表明，学生模型的熵是一个强有力的一阶代理指标：基于熵的采样保留50%的词元进行训练，其效果达到或超过了使用全部词元的训练，同时将峰值内存降低了高达47%。但仅凭熵会遗漏第二个重要区域。当我们单独提取低熵、高分歧的词元时，使用少于全部词元10%的数据进行训练，其效果几乎与全词元基线持平。这表明，尽管这些过度自信的词元在仅考虑熵的规则下几乎不可见，但它们携带了密集的纠正信号。

我们通过TIP（在策略蒸馏中的词元重要性）框架来整合这些发现，这是一个基于学生模型熵和师生模型分歧度的二维分类法，并从理论上解释了为何熵是有用的但在结构上不完整。这一观点启发了结合不确定性与分歧度的、类型感知的词元选择规则。我们在涵盖Qwen3、Llama和Qwen2.5的三个师生模型对上，在MATH-500和AIME 2024/2025数据集上验证了这一观点，并在用于长视野智能体规划的DeepPlanning基准测试中进行了验证。在后者中，仅使用少于20%的词元进行Q3训练，其效果超越了全词元OPD。我们的实验通过扩展OPD代码库（https://github.com/HJSang/OPSD_OnPolicyDistillation）实现，该库支持在有限GPU预算下对更大模型进行内存高效的蒸馏。

On-policy knowledge distillation (OPD) trains a student on its own rollouts under token-level supervision from a teacher. Not all token positions matter equally, but existing views of token importance are incomplete. We ask a direct question: which tokens carry the most useful learning signal in OPD? Our answer is that informative tokens come from two regions: positions with high student entropy, and positions with low student entropy plus high teacher–student divergence, where the student is overconfident and wrong. Empirically, student entropy is a strong first-order proxy: retaining $50%$ of tokens with entropy-based sampling matches or exceeds all-token training while reducing peak memory by up to $47%$. But entropy alone misses a second important region. When we isolate low-entropy, high-divergence tokens, training on fewer than $10%$ of all tokens nearly matches full-token baselines, showing that overconfident tokens carry dense corrective signal despite being nearly invisible to entropy-only rules. We organize these findings with TIP (Token Importance in on-Policy distillation), a two-axis taxonomy over student entropy and teacher–student divergence, and give a theoretical explanation for why entropy is useful yet structurally incomplete. This view motivates type-aware token selection rules that combine uncertainty and disagreement. We validate this picture across three teacher–student pairs spanning Qwen3, Llama, and Qwen2.5 on MATH-500 and AIME 2024/2025, and on the DeepPlanning benchmark for long-horizon agentic planning, where Q3-only training on $<$$20%$ of tokens surpasses full-token OPD. Our experiments are implemented by extending the OPD repository https://github.com/HJSang/OPSD_OnPolicyDistillation, which supports memory-efficient distillation of larger models under limited GPU budgets.

评分理由: 该论文研究公平算法决策的多利益相关者框架，基于福利经济学和分配正义理论，关注决策政策设计中的性能-公平权衡。论文内容完全不涉及大模型、深度学习技术原理或AI在科学领域的应用，所有关键词均与大模型技术、训练方法、推理优化、AI代理、科学AI应用等相关，与该论文的公平算法决策主题无任何关联。

算法决策中的公平性通常被定义在预测空间中，其中预测性能——作为决策者效用的代理指标——与基于预测的公平性概念（如人口统计均等或机会均等）进行权衡。然而，这种视角忽略了预测如何转化为决策，并最终转化为决策者和决策对象的效用与福利，以及这些效用和福利在社会显著群体间的分配。

本文基于福利经济学和分配正义理论，提出一个多利益相关者的公平算法决策框架，明确建模决策者和决策对象的效用，并通过社会规划者的效用定义公平性——该效用在不同基于正义的公平概念（例如平等主义、罗尔斯主义）下捕捉了决策对象效用在各群体间的不平等。我们将公平决策表述为一个事后多目标优化问题，在不同决策策略类别（确定性策略与随机性策略、共享策略与群体特定策略）下，于决策者效用和社会规划者效用构成的二维效用空间中刻画可实现的性能-公平权衡。利用所提出的框架，我们进一步识别了随机性策略优于确定性策略的条件（以利益相关者的效用表示），并通过实证证明简单的随机策略能够利用结果不确定性实现更优的性能-公平权衡。总体而言，我们主张从以预测为中心的公平性转向一种透明的、基于正义的多利益相关者方法，以支持决策策略的协同设计。

Fairness in algorithmic decision-making is often defined in the predictive space, where predictive performance - used as a proxy for decision-maker (DM) utility - is traded off against prediction-based fairness notions, such as demographic parity or equality of opportunity. This perspective, however, ignores how predictions translate into decisions and ultimately into utilities and welfare for both DM and decision subjects (DS), as well as their allocation across social-salient groups. In this paper, we propose a multi-stakeholder framework for fair algorithmic decision-making grounded in welfare economics and distributive justice, explicitly modeling the utilities of both the DM and DS, and defining fairness via a social planner’s utility that captures inequalities in DS utilities across groups under different justice-based fairness notions (e.g., Egalitarian, Rawlsian). We formulate fair decision-making as a post-hoc multi-objective optimization problem, characterizing the achievable performance-fairness trade-offs in the two-dimensional utility space of DM utility and the social planner’s utility, under different decision policy classes (deterministic vs. stochastic, shared vs. group-specific). Using the proposed framework, we then identify conditions (in terms of the stakeholders’ utilities) under which stochastic policies are more optimal than deterministic ones, and empirically demonstrate that simple stochastic policies can yield superior performance-fairness trade-offs by leveraging outcome uncertainty. Overall, we advocate a shift from prediction-centric fairness to a transparent, justice-based, multi-stakeholder approach that supports the collaborative design of decision-making policies.

评分理由: 论文是一篇关于LLMs在业务流程建模中应用的文献综述，明确聚焦于LLMs在文本到BPMN模型转换中的作用，因此与’Large Language Models OR LLMs OR Foundation Models’高度相关（10分）。摘要中明确提到’Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)‘作为未来研究方向，因此该关键词有一定关联（8分）。论文未涉及其他具体的大模型技术原理（如MoE、量化、注意力机制等）、训练方法（如预训练、微调、对齐等）、推理技术（如思维链、推测解码等）或特定科学领域应用（如生物信息学），因此这些关键词评分为0分。

生成式人工智能，特别是大语言模型（LLM）的最新进展，激发了人们对于使用自然语言自动化或辅助业务流程建模任务日益增长的兴趣。目前已有多种方法被提出，用于将文本化流程描述转化为BPMN及相关工作流模型。然而，这些方法在多大程度上能有效支持组织环境中的复杂流程建模，目前尚不明确。本文献综述对将自然语言转化为BPMN流程模型的AI驱动方法进行了回顾，特别聚焦于LLM在其中扮演的角色。遵循结构化的综述策略，我们识别并分析了相关研究，以对现有方法进行分类，审视LLM如何被集成到文本到模型的流程中，并探究用于评估生成模型的实践做法。分析揭示了一个明显的趋势，即从基于规则和传统自然语言处理（NLP）流程向基于LLM的架构转变，后者依赖于提示工程、中间表示和迭代优化机制。尽管这些方法显著扩展了自动化流程模型生成的能力，但文献也揭示了持续存在的挑战，涉及语义正确性、评估碎片化、可复现性以及在真实组织环境中验证有限等问题。基于这些发现，本综述指出了关键的研究空白，并讨论了未来研究的有前景方向，包括通过检索增强生成（RAG）整合上下文知识、其与LLM的集成、交互式建模架构的开发，以及对更全面和标准化评估框架的需求。

Recent advances in Generative Artificial Intelligence, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), have stimulated growing interest in automating or assisting Business Process Modeling tasks using natural language. Several approaches have been proposed to transform textual process descriptions into BPMN and related workflow models. However, the extent to which these approaches effectively support complex process modeling in organizational settings remains unclear. This article presents a literature review of AI-driven methods for transforming natural language into BPMN process models, with a particular focus on the role of LLMs. Following a structured review strategy, relevant studies were identified and analyzed to classify existing approaches, examine how LLMs are integrated into text-to-model pipelines, and investigate the evaluation practices used to assess generated models. The analysis reveals a clear shift from rule-based and traditional NLP pipelines toward LLM-based architectures that rely on prompt engineering, intermediate representations, and iterative refinement mechanisms. While these approaches significantly expand the capabilities of automated process model generation, the literature also exposes persistent challenges related to semantic correctness, evaluation fragmentation, reproducibility, and limited validation in real-world organizational contexts. Based on these findings, this review identifies key research gaps and discusses promising directions for future research, including the integration of contextual knowledge through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), its integration with LLMs, the development of interactive modeling architectures, and the need for more comprehensive and standardized evaluation frameworks.

评分理由: 该论文专注于电力系统控制中的强化学习安全框架，未涉及大语言模型、深度学习技术原理或任何评分关键词中的具体技术（如MoE、SFT、RAG等）。唯一的相关性在于“AI for Science”关键词，因为论文将AI（强化学习）应用于电力系统（科学/工程领域），但并非核心内容，因此给5分（有一定关联）。其他关键词均与论文内容无关，得0分。

强化学习在电网运行任务（如拓扑控制与阻塞管理）的自动化方面展现出潜力。然而，其在真实电力系统中的部署仍受限于严格的安全要求、在罕见扰动下的脆弱性以及对未见电网拓扑的泛化能力不足。在安全关键的基础设施中，灾难性故障是不可接受的，基于学习的控制器必须在严格的物理约束下运行。

本文提出了一种用于电网运行的安全约束分层控制框架，该框架明确地将长周期决策与实时可行性执行解耦。高层强化学习策略提出抽象控制动作，而一个确定性的运行时安全屏障则通过快速前向仿真过滤不安全动作。安全作为运行时不变性被强制执行，独立于策略质量或训练数据分布。

所提出的框架在Grid2Op基准测试套件上进行了评估，测试场景包括正常运行条件、强制线路停运压力测试，以及在未经重新训练的情况下零样本部署于ICAPS 2021大规模输电网络。结果表明，扁平结构的强化学习策略在压力下表现脆弱，而纯安全方法则过于保守。相比之下，所提出的分层且具备安全感知的方法实现了更长的运行周期存活时间、更低的线路负载峰值，并对未见电网具有鲁棒的零样本泛化能力。

这些结果表明，电网控制中的安全性与泛化能力最好通过架构设计来实现，而非依赖日益复杂的奖励函数工程。这为现实能源系统中可部署的基于学习的控制器提供了一条实用路径。

Reinforcement learning has shown promise for automating power-grid operation tasks such as topology control and congestion management. However, its deployment in real-world power systems remains limited by strict safety requirements, brittleness under rare disturbances, and poor generalization to unseen grid topologies. In safety-critical infrastructure, catastrophic failures cannot be tolerated, and learning-based controllers must operate within hard physical constraints. This paper proposes a safety-constrained hierarchical control framework for power-grid operation that explicitly decouples long-horizon decision-making from real-time feasibility enforcement. A high-level reinforcement learning policy proposes abstract control actions, while a deterministic runtime safety shield filters unsafe actions using fast forward simulation. Safety is enforced as a runtime invariant, independent of policy quality or training distribution. The proposed framework is evaluated on the Grid2Op benchmark suite under nominal conditions, forced line-outage stress tests, and zero-shot deployment on the ICAPS 2021 large-scale transmission grid without retraining. Results show that flat reinforcement learning policies are brittle under stress, while safety-only methods are overly conservative. In contrast, the proposed hierarchical and safety-aware approach achieves longer episode survival, lower peak line loading, and robust zero-shot generalization to unseen grids. These results indicate that safety and generalization in power-grid control are best achieved through architectural design rather than increasingly complex reward engineering, providing a practical path toward deployable learning-based controllers for real-world energy systems.

评分理由: 该论文是关于计算机视觉中前馈式3D场景建模的综述，主要关注3D重建的模型设计、架构模式和实际应用。论文内容与绝大多数关键词（涉及大语言模型、训练技术、推理优化、对齐、代理等）完全无关。唯一略有相关的是’World Models AND General World Models’，因为论文提到了’world modeling’作为未来挑战之一，但这不是论文的核心内容，只是未来方向中的一句话提及，因此给5分（有一定关联）。其他所有关键词均未在标题或摘要中出现，与论文主题无直接联系。

从二维输入重建三维表征是计算机视觉与图形学领域的一项基础任务，为理解物理世界并与之交互奠定了基石。尽管传统方法能够实现高保真度，但其受限于缓慢的逐场景优化或特定类别的训练，这阻碍了实际部署与可扩展性。因此，可泛化的前馈式三维重建在近年来得到了快速发展。通过学习将图像直接映射到三维表征的模型，这些方法能够通过单次前向传播实现高效重建，并具备强大的跨场景泛化能力。本综述基于一个关键观察：尽管现有前馈方法在几何输出表征上存在差异（从隐式场到显式基元），但它们共享相似的高层架构模式，如图像特征提取主干、多视图信息融合机制以及几何感知设计原则。因此，我们抽象掉这些表征差异，转而聚焦于模型设计，提出一种新颖的分类法，该分类法以不依赖于输出格式的模型设计策略为核心。我们提出的分类法将研究方向归纳为驱动近期研究发展的五个关键问题：特征增强、几何感知、模型效率、数据增强策略以及时序感知模型。为了以实证基础和标准化评估支撑这一分类法，我们进一步全面回顾了相关基准测试与数据集，并基于前馈式三维模型对现实应用进行了广泛讨论与分类。最后，我们展望了未来研究方向，以应对可扩展性、评估标准与世界建模等开放挑战。

Reconstructing 3D representations from 2D inputs is a fundamental task in computer vision and graphics, serving as a cornerstone for understanding and interacting with the physical world. While traditional methods achieve high fidelity, they are limited by slow per-scene optimization or category-specific training, which hinders their practical deployment and scalability. Hence, generalizable feed-forward 3D reconstruction has witnessed rapid development in recent years. By learning a model that maps images directly to 3D representations in a single forward pass, these methods enable efficient reconstruction and robust cross-scene generalization. Our survey is motivated by a critical observation: despite the diverse geometric output representations, ranging from implicit fields to explicit primitives, existing feed-forward approaches share similar high-level architectural patterns, such as image feature extraction backbones, multi-view information fusion mechanisms, and geometry-aware design principles. Consequently, we abstract away from these representation differences and instead focus on model design, proposing a novel taxonomy centered on model design strategies that are agnostic to the output format. Our proposed taxonomy organizes the research directions into five key problems that drive recent research development: feature enhancement, geometry awareness, model efficiency, augmentation strategies and temporal-aware models. To support this taxonomy with empirical grounding and standardized evaluation, we further comprehensively review related benchmarks and datasets, and extensively discuss and categorize real-world applications based on feed-forward 3D models. Finally, we outline future directions to address open challenges such as scalability, evaluation standards, and world modeling.

评分理由: 该论文研究雷达数据处理和自动驾驶中的多目标跟踪，专注于频率域处理、雷达测程和噪声鲁棒性，所有关键词均涉及大模型、深度学习、AI科学应用或相关技术原理，而本文完全不涉及这些主题，因此所有关键词相关度均为0分。

本文提倡在频域处理雷达数据，以实现更高的抗噪声和结构误差鲁棒性，尤其相较于基于特征的方法。这一优势同样适用于高动态场景，即搭载传感器的车辆自身运动与未知数量的其他运动物体共存的情况。除高鲁棒性外，频域处理还具有一个迄今被忽视的优点：其所基于的相关性方法（例如用于配准的方法）能够提供场景中所有运动结构的信息。典型的汽车应用案例是超车操作，本文以自动驾驶赛车场景中的超车作为示例进行说明。我们展示了二维傅里叶软匹配（FS2D）的初步实验与结果，该实验使用Boreas数据集演示了纯雷达里程计（即无需多传感器融合的雷达里程计）的性能，以支撑本文论点。

We promote in this paper the processing of radar data in the frequency domain to achieve higher robustness against noise and structural errors, especially in comparison to feature-based methods. This holds also for high dynamics in the scene, i.e., ego-motion of the vehicle with the sensor plus the presence of an unknown number of other moving objects. In addition to the high robustness, the processing in the frequency domain has the so far neglected advantage that the underlying correlation based methods used for, e.g., registration, provide information about all moving structures in the scene. A typical automotive application case is overtaking maneuvers, which in the context of autonomous racing are used here as a motivating example. Initial experiments and results with Fourier SOFT in 2D (FS2D) are presented that use the Boreas dataset to demonstrate radar-only-odometry, i.e., radar-odometry without sensor-fusion, to support our arguments.

评分理由: 论文核心研究多模态大语言模型（MLLMs）的持续指令微调（Continual Instruction Tuning）中的灾难性遗忘问题，并提出了一种无需额外训练、基于代数运算的模型合并（Model Merging）框架MAny。因此，与’Large Language Models’、‘Instruction Tuning’、‘PEFT’（涉及低秩参数空间操作）和’Model Merging’高度相关（10分）。与’Pre-training’和’Post-training/SFT’有一定关联（8分），因为论文背景涉及初始微调（initial tuning）和持续任务适应。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、RAG、推理方法、代理、压缩等均未在摘要中提及或直接相关，故评0分。

多模态持续指令微调（MCIT）对于多模态大语言模型（MLLMs）的序列任务适应至关重要，但受到灾难性遗忘的严重制约。现有研究主要关注推理语言主干，而本工作揭示了一个关键但被忽视的双重遗忘现象，即跨模态投影空间中的感知漂移与低秩参数空间中的推理崩溃。为解决此问题，我们提出 MAny（Merge Anything）框架，该框架通过跨模态投影合并（Cross-modal Projection Merging, CPM）和低秩参数合并（Low-rank Parameter Merging, LPM）来融合任务特定知识。具体而言，CPM 通过视觉原型引导自适应地合并跨模态视觉表征，以恢复感知对齐，确保推理过程中特征的准确重建。同时，LPM 通过递归合并低秩权重矩阵，消除任务特定低秩模块间的相互干扰。通过利用递归最小二乘法，LPM 提供了一个闭式解，从数学上保证了推理稳定性的最优融合轨迹。值得注意的是，MAny 作为一种免训练范式，通过基于 CPU 的高效代数运算实现知识融合，无需在初始微调之外进行额外的基于梯度的优化。我们广泛的评估证实了 MAny 在多种 MLLMs 和基准测试中的卓越性能与鲁棒性。具体而言，在 UCIT 基准测试中，MAny 在两种不同 MLLMs 上相比最先进方法，最终平均准确率分别取得了高达 8.57% 和 2.85% 的显著领先优势。

Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning (MCIT) is essential for sequential task adaptation of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) but is severely restricted by catastrophic forgetting. While existing literature focuses on the reasoning language backbone, in this work, we expose a critical yet neglected dual-forgetting phenomenon across both perception drift in Cross-modal Projection Space and reasoning collapse in Low-rank Parameter Space. To resolve this, we present \textbf{MAny} (\textbf{M}erge \textbf{Any}thing), a framework that merges task-specific knowledge through \textbf{C}ross-modal \textbf{P}rojection \textbf{M}erging (\textbf{CPM}) and \textbf{L}ow-rank \textbf{P}arameter \textbf{M}erging (\textbf{LPM}). Specifically, CPM recovers perceptual alignment by adaptively merging cross-modal visual representations via visual-prototype guidance, ensuring accurate feature recovery during inference. Simultaneously, LPM eliminates mutual interference among task-specific low-rank modules by recursively merging low-rank weight matrices. By leveraging recursive least squares, LPM provides a closed-form solution that mathematically guarantees an optimal fusion trajectory for reasoning stability. Notably, MAny operates as a training-free paradigm that achieves knowledge merging via efficient CPU-based algebraic operations, eliminating additional gradient-based optimization beyond initial tuning. Our extensive evaluations confirm the superior performance and robustness of MAny across multiple MLLMs and benchmarks. Specifically, on the UCIT benchmark, MAny achieves significant leads of up to 8.57% and 2.85% in final average accuracy over state-of-the-art methods across two different MLLMs, respectively.

评分理由: 论文研究的是编码代理（coding agents）中的记忆迁移学习（Memory Transfer Learning），核心是跨异构任务领域利用统一记忆池来提升性能。虽然涉及AI代理（agents）和记忆机制，但论文未明确提及或聚焦于大语言模型（LLMs）、深度学习技术原理创新或关键词列表中的具体技术（如MoE、SFT、RAG、CoT等）。所有关键词均与论文内容无直接关联，因此相关度评分均为0。

基于记忆的自我进化已成为编码智能体的一种前景广阔的研究范式。然而，现有方法通常将记忆的利用限制在单一任务领域内，未能充分利用现实世界中多样化编码问题之间共享的基础设施，例如运行时环境和编程语言。为应对这一局限，我们通过利用来自异构领域的统一记忆池，研究了\textbf{记忆迁移学习}（Memory Transfer Learning, MTL）。我们使用四种记忆表示（从具体执行轨迹到抽象见解）在6个编码基准上评估了性能。实验表明，跨领域记忆可将平均性能提升3.7%，这主要得益于元知识（如验证例程）的迁移，而非特定任务代码的迁移。重要的是，我们发现抽象程度决定了可迁移性：高层次见解泛化能力良好，而低层次轨迹则常因过度具体化而导致负迁移。此外，我们证明了迁移效果随记忆池规模扩大而提升，并且记忆甚至可以在不同模型之间进行迁移。我们的工作为将记忆利用扩展至单一领域之外建立了实证设计原则。项目页面：https://memorytransfer.github.io/

Memory-based self-evolution has emerged as a promising paradigm for coding agents. However, existing approaches typically restrict memory utilization to homogeneous task domains, failing to leverage the shared infrastructural foundations, such as runtime environments and programming languages, that exist across diverse real-world coding problems. To address this limitation, we investigate \textbf{Memory Transfer Learning} (MTL) by harnessing a unified memory pool from heterogeneous domains. We evaluate performance across 6 coding benchmarks using four memory representations, ranging from concrete traces to abstract insights. Our experiments demonstrate that cross-domain memory improves average performance by 3.7%, primarily by transferring meta-knowledge, such as validation routines, rather than task-specific code. Importantly, we find that abstraction dictates transferability; high-level insights generalize well, whereas low-level traces often induce negative transfer due to excessive specificity. Furthermore, we show that transfer effectiveness scales with the size of the memory pool, and memory can be transferred even between different models. Our work establishes empirical design principles for expanding memory utilization beyond single-domain silos. Project page: https://memorytransfer.github.io/

评分理由: 论文研究扩散语言模型在语音识别中的应用，包括掩码扩散语言模型和均匀状态扩散模型用于ASR假设重打分，以及结合CTC和USDM的联合解码方法。所有评分关键词均与大模型和深度学习技术原理相关，但论文专注于扩散语言模型这一特定类型的语言模型，未涉及任何评分关键词中列出的具体技术（如LLMs、MoE、SFT、RLHF、RAG、CoT、量化等），也未涉及AI for Science等应用领域。因此，所有关键词相关度均为0分。

扩散语言模型凭借其双向注意力机制与并行文本生成能力，近期已成为标准语言模型的重要替代方案。本研究探索了该模型在语音识别中的应用变体。具体而言，我们提出了一个完整指南，将掩码扩散语言模型（Masked Diffusion Language Model, MDLM）与均匀状态扩散模型（Uniform-State Diffusion Model, USDM）用于自动语音识别（ASR）假设的重打分任务。此外，我们设计了一种新的联合解码方法，通过在每个解码步骤中将来自CTC的帧级别概率分布与USDM计算的标签级别概率分布相结合，实现了CTC与USDM的融合，从而生成能够同时融合USDM强大语言知识与CTC声学信息的新候选序列。实验结果表明，USDM与MDLM均能显著提升识别文本的准确率。我们已公开全部代码与实施方案。

Diffusion language models have recently emerged as a leading alternative to standard language models, due to their ability for bidirectional attention and parallel text generation. In this work, we explore variants for their use in speech recognition. Specifically, we introduce a comprehensive guide to incorporating masked diffusion language models (MDLM) and uniform-state diffusion models (USDMs) for rescoring ASR hypotheses. Additionally, we design a new joint-decoding method that combines CTC and USDM by integrating the framewise probability distributions derived from CTC with the labelwise probability distributions computed by USDM at each decoding step, thereby generating new candidates that combine strong language knowledge from USDM and acoustic information from CTC. Our findings reveal that USDM, as well as MDLM, can significantly improve the accuracy of recognized text. We publish all our code and recipes.

评分理由: 论文研究奖励设计对基于GRPO的视觉语言模型（VLM）物理推理训练的影响，核心涉及监督微调（SFT）和GRPO等后训练方法，与’Post-training OR Supervised Fine-tuning OR SFT’高度相关（10分）。研究物理推理问题，属于’AI for Science’范畴（10分）。论文涉及多步推理和深度推理，与’Chain of Thought’和’System 2 Thinking’有一定关联（各5分）。使用注意力权重分析模型行为，与’Mechanistic Interpretability’相关（5分）。论文聚焦VLM而非纯LLM，与’Large Language Models’有中等关联（5分）。其他关键词如MoE、量化、RAG等未在论文中涉及，得0分。

对视觉输入进行物理推理需要紧密整合视觉感知、领域知识与多步符号推理。然而，即使是最先进的视觉语言模型（VLMs）在物理基准测试上的表现仍远逊于人类。尽管监督微调（SFT）和组相对策略优化（GRPO）等训练后算法已在语言模型中展现出显著的推理能力提升，但奖励设计如何影响VLM的物理推理行为仍不甚明晰。本文针对基于GRPO的VLM物理推理训练进行了系统的奖励消融研究。我们比较了四种语义丰富度递增的奖励信号：格式合规性、答案准确性、复合规则奖励（答案正确性、物理原理识别和单位一致性），以及一种新颖的内部奖励——该奖励源自模型对输入图像区域的注意力权重。我们在PhyX基准（包含3000个问题，涵盖六个物理领域和六种推理类型，包含选择题与开放式题型）上使用IBM Granite Vision 3.3（2B）模型进行评估。在所有题型中，基于准确性奖励的GRPO在多数领域上优于SFT，但提升幅度因奖励类型和领域差异显著。奖励设计并非均匀提升性能，而是会诱发领域特定的推理行为：基于准确性的奖励带来最全面的整体提升；规则奖励改善了结构化推理质量，但未持续提高准确性；基于注意力的奖励增强了空间推理能力，却在符号推理领域导致性能下降。我们提出的内部注意力权重奖励无需空间标注，将空间关系准确性从0.27提升至0.50，这表明在生成过程中监督模型的关注区域是视觉基础物理推理的一个有前景的研究方向。

Physical reasoning over visual inputs demands tight integration of visual perception, domain knowledge, and multi-step symbolic inference. Yet even state-of-the-art Vision Language Models (VLMs) fall far short of human performance on physics benchmarks. While post-training algorithms such as Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) have demonstrated strong reasoning gains in language models, how reward design shapes VLM physical reasoning behavior remains poorly understood. We present a systematic reward ablation study for GRPO-based VLM training on physical reasoning. We compare four reward signals of increasing semantic richness: format compliance, answer accuracy, a composite rubric reward (answer correctness, physics principle identification, and unit consistency), and a novel internal reward derived from model attention weights over input image regions. We evaluate on PhyX, a 3,000-problem benchmark spanning six physics domains and six reasoning types across multiple-choice and open-ended formats, using IBM Granite Vision 3.3 (2B). Across both formats, GRPO with accuracy-based rewards outperforms SFT on most domains, though gains vary substantially by reward type and domain. Reward design does not uniformly improve performance. Instead, it induces domain-specific reasoning behaviors. Accuracy-based rewards provide the strongest overall gains. Rubric rewards improve structured reasoning quality without consistent accuracy improvements. Attention-based rewards enhance spatial reasoning while degrading performance in symbolic domains. Our internal attention-weight reward requires no spatial annotations and improves spatial relation accuracy from 0.27 to 0.50, suggesting that supervising where the model attends during generation is a promising direction for visually grounded physical reasoning.