📊 ArXiv 研究报告 (2026-04-22)

生成时间: 2026-04-22 08:51:47 数据源: ArXiv

📌 配置信息

关键词列表(共 27 个,总权重 27.0)

关键词权重类型
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.0主要
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.0主要
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.0主要
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.0主要
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.0主要
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.0主要
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.0主要
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.0主要
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.0主要
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.0主要
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.0主要
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.0主要
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.0主要
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.0主要
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.0主要
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.0主要
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.0主要
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.0主要
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.0主要
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.0主要
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.0主要
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.0主要
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.0主要
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.0主要
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.0主要
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.0主要
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.0主要

评分设置

  • 每个关键词最大分: 15
  • 及格分公式: 5.0 + 0.8 × 总权重
  • 当前及格分: 26.6

📈 论文统计

  • 总抓取: 324 篇
  • 及格论文: 0 篇 (0.0%)

📋 所有论文列表

1. ❌ Sessa: Selective State Space Attention

作者: Liubomyr Horbatko 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18580v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Modern sequence models are dominated by Transformers, where self-attention mixes information from the visible context in an input-dependent way. However, when retrieval is not sharp and attention remains diffuse over an effective support $S_{\mathrm{eff}}(t)$, the influence of any individual token is diluted, typically scaling as $O(1/S_{\mathrm{eff}}(t))$ and reaching $O(1/\ell)$ for old tokens in full-prefix settings. Structured state-space models process sequences recurrently through an explicit feedback path; selective variants such as Mamba make this feedback input-dependent, yet when freeze time cannot be sustained over long intervals, their long-range sensitivity decays exponentially with lag. Existing architectures therefore either retrieve from the past in a single read or propagate information through a single feedback chain. We introduce Sessa, a decoder that places attention inside a feedback path, enabling recurrent many-path aggregation within a layer. Under stated assumptions, Sessa admits regimes with a power-law memory tail in lag $\ell$ of order $O(\ell^{-β})$ for $0<β<1$, which is asymptotically slower than $1/\ell$; moreover, this rate is tight in an explicit diffuse uniform-routing setting where the influence is $Θ(\ell^{-β})$. Under the same conditions, only Sessa among the compared model classes realizes flexible selective retrieval, including non-decaying profiles. Empirically, under matched architectures and training budgets, Sessa achieves the strongest performance on our long-context benchmarks while remaining competitive with Transformer and Mamba style baselines on short-context language modeling.



2. ❌ Bounded Ratio Reinforcement Learning

作者: Yunke Ao, Le Chen, Bruce D. Lee, Assefa S. Wahd, Aline Czarnobai, Philipp Fürnstahl, Bernhard Schölkopf, Andreas Krause 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18578v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) has become the predominant algorithm for on-policy reinforcement learning due to its scalability and empirical robustness across domains. However, there is a significant disconnect between the underlying foundations of trust region methods and the heuristic clipped objective used in PPO. In this paper, we bridge this gap by introducing the Bounded Ratio Reinforcement Learning (BRRL) framework. We formulate a novel regularized and constrained policy optimization problem and derive its analytical optimal solution. We prove that this solution ensures monotonic performance improvement. To handle parameterized policy classes, we develop a policy optimization algorithm called Bounded Policy Optimization (BPO) that minimizes an advantage-weighted divergence between the policy and the analytic optimal solution from BRRL. We further establish a lower bound on the expected performance of the resulting policy in terms of the BPO loss function. Notably, our framework also provides a new theoretical lens to interpret the success of the PPO loss, and connects trust region policy optimization and the Cross-Entropy Method (CEM). We additionally extend BPO to Group-relative BPO (GBPO) for LLM fine-tuning. Empirical evaluations of BPO across MuJoCo, Atari, and complex IsaacLab environments (e.g., Humanoid locomotion), and of GBPO for LLM fine-tuning tasks, demonstrate that BPO and GBPO generally match or outperform PPO and GRPO in stability and final performance.



3. ❌ MathNet: a Global Multimodal Benchmark for Mathematical Reasoning and Retrieval

作者: Shaden Alshammari, Kevin Wen, Abrar Zainal, Mark Hamilton, Navid Safaei, Sultan Albarakati, William T. Freeman, Antonio Torralba 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18584v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Mathematical problem solving remains a challenging test of reasoning for large language and multimodal models, yet existing benchmarks are limited in size, language coverage, and task diversity. We introduce MathNet, a high-quality, large-scale, multimodal, and multilingual dataset of Olympiad-level math problems together with a benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning in generative models and mathematical retrieval in embedding-based systems. MathNet spans 47 countries, 17 languages, and two decades of competitions, comprising 30,676 expert-authored problems with solutions across diverse domains. In addition to the core dataset, we construct a retrieval benchmark consisting of mathematically equivalent and structurally similar problem pairs curated by human experts. MathNet supports three tasks: (i) Problem Solving, (ii) Math-Aware Retrieval, and (iii) Retrieval-Augmented Problem Solving. Experimental results show that even state-of-the-art reasoning models (78.4% for Gemini-3.1-Pro and 69.3% for GPT-5) remain challenged, while embedding models struggle to retrieve equivalent problems. We further show that retrieval-augmented generation performance is highly sensitive to retrieval quality; for example, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale achieves gains of up to 12%, obtaining the highest scores on the benchmark. MathNet provides the largest high-quality Olympiad dataset together with the first benchmark for evaluating mathematical problem retrieval, and we publicly release both the dataset and benchmark at https://mathnet.mit.edu.



4. ❌ Agentic Forecasting using Sequential Bayesian Updating of Linguistic Beliefs

作者: Kevin Murphy 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18576v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present BLF (Bayesian Linguistic Forecaster), an agentic system for binary forecasting that achieves state-of-the-art performance on the ForecastBench benchmark. The system is built on three ideas. (1) A Bayesian linguistic belief state: a semi-structured representation combining numerical probability estimates with natural-language evidence summaries, updated by the LLM at each step of an iterative tool-use loop. This contrasts with the common approach of appending all retrieved evidence to an ever-growing context. (2) Hierarchical multi-trial aggregation: running $K$ independent trials and combining them using logit-space shrinkage with a data-dependent prior. (3) Hierarchical calibration: Platt scaling with a hierarchical prior, which avoids over-shrinking extreme predictions for sources with skewed base rates. On 400 backtesting questions from the ForecastBench leaderboard, BLF outperforms all the top public methods, including Cassi, GPT-5, Grok~4.20, and Foresight-32B. Ablation studies show that the structured belief state is as impactful as web search access, and that shrinkage aggregation and hierarchical calibration each provide significant additional gains. In addition, we develop a robust back-testing framework with a leakage rate below 1.5%, and use rigorous statistical methodology to compare different methods while controlling for various sources of noise.



5. ❌ When Can LLMs Learn to Reason with Weak Supervision?

作者: Salman Rahman, Jingyan Shen, Anna Mordvina, Hamid Palangi, Saadia Gabriel, Pavel Izmailov 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18574v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models have achieved significant reasoning improvements through reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). Yet as model capabilities grow, constructing high-quality reward signals becomes increasingly difficult, making it essential to understand when RLVR can succeed under weaker forms of supervision. We conduct a systematic empirical study across diverse model families and reasoning domains under three weak supervision settings: scarce data, noisy rewards, and self-supervised proxy rewards. We find that generalization is governed by training reward saturation dynamics: models that generalize exhibit a prolonged pre-saturation phase during which training reward and downstream performance climb together, while models that saturate rapidly memorize rather than learn. We identify reasoning faithfulness, defined as the extent to which intermediate steps logically support the final answer, as the pre-RL property that predicts which regime a model falls into, while output diversity alone is uninformative. Motivated by these findings, we disentangle the contributions of continual pre-training and supervised fine-tuning, finding that SFT on explicit reasoning traces is necessary for generalization under weak supervision, while continual pre-training on domain data amplifies the effect. Applied together to Llama3.2-3B-Base, these interventions enable generalization across all three settings where the base model previously failed.



6. ❌ Back into Plato’s Cave: Examining Cross-modal Representational Convergence at Scale

作者: A. Sophia Koepke, Daniil Zverev, Shiry Ginosar, Alexei A. Efros 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18572v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The Platonic Representation Hypothesis suggests that neural networks trained on different modalities (e.g., text and images) align and eventually converge toward the same representation of reality. If true, this has significant implications for whether modality choice matters at all. We show that the experimental evidence for this hypothesis is fragile and depends critically on the evaluation regime. Alignment is measured using mutual nearest neighbors on small datasets ($\approx$1K samples) and degrades substantially as the dataset is scaled to millions of samples. The alignment that remains between model representations reflects coarse semantic overlap rather than consistent fine-grained structure. Moreover, the evaluations in Huh et al. are done in a one-to-one image-caption setting, a constraint that breaks down in realistic many-to-many settings and further reduces alignment. We also find that the reported trend of stronger language models increasingly aligning with vision does not appear to hold for newer models. Overall, our findings suggest that the current evidence for cross-modal representational convergence is considerably weaker than subsequent works have taken it to be. Models trained on different modalities may learn equally rich representations of the world, just not the same one.



7. ❌ A multimodal and temporal foundation model for virtual patient representations at healthcare system scale

作者: Andrew Zhang, Tong Ding, Sophia J. Wagner, Caiwei Tian, Ming Y. Lu, Rowland Pettit, Joshua E. Lewis, Alexandre Misrahi, Dandan Mo, Long Phi Le, Faisal Mahmood 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18570v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Modern medicine generates vast multimodal data across siloed systems, yet no existing model integrates the full breadth and temporal depth of the clinical record into a unified patient representation. We introduce Apollo, a multimodal temporal foundation model trained and evaluated on over three decades of longitudinal hospital records from a major US hospital system, composed of 25 billion records from 7.2 million patients, representing 28 distinct medical modalities and 12 major medical specialties. Apollo learns a unified representation space integrating over 100 thousand unique medical events in our clinical vocabulary as well as images and clinical text. This “atlas of medical concepts” forms a computational substrate for modeling entire patient care journeys comprised of sequences of structured and unstructured events, which are compressed by Apollo into virtual patient representations. To assess the potential of these whole-patient representations, we created 322 prognosis and retrieval tasks from a held-out test set of 1.4 million patients. We demonstrate the generalized clinical forecasting potential of Apollo embeddings, including predicting new disease onset risk up to five years in advance (95 tasks), disease progression (78 tasks), treatment response (59 tasks), risk of treatment-related adverse events (17 tasks), and hospital operations endpoints (12 tasks). Using feature attribution techniques, we show that model predictions align with clinically-interpretable multimodal biomarkers. We evaluate semantic similarity search on 61 retrieval tasks, and moreover demonstrate the potential of Apollo as a multimodal medical search engine using text and image queries. Together, these modeling capabilities establish the foundation for computable medicine, where the full context of patient care becomes accessible to computational reasoning.



8. ❌ Latent Phase-Shift Rollback: Inference-Time Error Correction via Residual Stream Monitoring and KV-Cache Steering

作者: Manan Gupta, Dhruv Kumar 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18567v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models frequently commit unrecoverable reasoning errors mid-generation: once a wrong step is taken, subsequent tokens compound the mistake rather than correct it. We introduce $\textbf{Latent Phase-Shift Rollback}$ (LPSR): at each generation step, we monitor the residual stream at a critical layer lcrit, detect abrupt directional reversals (phase shifts) via a cosine-similarity $+$ entropy dual gate, and respond by rolling back the KV-cache and injecting a pre-computed steering vector. No fine-tuning, gradient computation, or additional forward passes are required. LPSR achieves $\mathbf{44.0%}$ on MATH-500 with an 8B model versus $28.8%$ for standard AR ($+15.2$ pp; McNemar $χ^2 = 66.96$, $p < 10^{-15}$). Critically, prompted self-correction, the most natural inference-time baseline, scores only $19.8%$, below standard AR; LPSR exceeds it by $+24.2$ pp ($χ^2 = 89.4$, $p \approx 0$). LPSR also outperforms Best-of-16 ($+7.8$ pp) at $5.4\times$ lower token cost, and surpasses a standard 70B model ($35.2%$) with $8.75\times$ fewer parameters at ${\sim}3\times$ the token budget. A 32-layer sweep reveals a novel \textbf{detection-correction dissociation}: error-detection AUC peaks at layer14 ($0.718$) but task accuracy peaks at layer16 ($44.0%$ vs.\ $29.2%$), demonstrating that optimal monitoring depth differs for detection and correction.



9. ❌ Benchmarking System Dynamics AI Assistants: Cloud Versus Local LLMs on CLD Extraction and Discussion

作者: Terry Leitch 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18566v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present a systematic evaluation of large language model families – spanning both proprietary cloud APIs and locally-hosted open-source models – on two purpose-built benchmarks for System Dynamics AI assistance: the \textbf{CLD Leaderboard} (53 tests, structured causal loop diagram extraction) and the \textbf{Discussion Leaderboard} (interactive model discussion, feedback explanation, and model building coaching). On CLD extraction, cloud models achieve 77–89% overall pass rates; the best local model reaches 77% (KimiK2.5GGUFQ3, zero-shot engine), matching mid-tier cloud performance. On Discussion, the best local models achieve 50–100% on model building steps and 47–75% on feedback explanation, but only 0–50% on error fixing – a category dominated by long-context prompts that expose memory limits in local deployments. A central contribution of this paper is a systematic analysis of \textit{model type effects} on performance: we compare reasoning vs.\ instruction-tuned architectures, GGUF (llama.cpp) vs.\ MLX (mlx_lm) backends, and quantization levels (Q3 / Q4_K_M / MLX-3bit / MLX-4bit / MLX-6bit) across the same underlying model families. We find that backend choice has larger practical impact than quantization level: mlx_lm does not enforce JSON schema constraints, requiring explicit prompt-level JSON instructions, while llama.cpp grammar-constrained sampling handles JSON reliably but causes indefinite generation on long-context prompts for dense models. We document the full parameter sweep ($t$, $p$, $k$) for all local models, cleaned timing data (stuck requests excluded), and a practitioner guide for running 671B–123B parameter models on AppleSilicon.



10. ❌ ClawEnvKit: Automatic Environment Generation for Claw-Like Agents

作者: Xirui Li, Ming Li, Derry Xu, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ion Stoica, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Tianyi Zhou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18543v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Constructing environments for training and evaluating claw-like agents remains a manual, human-intensive process that does not scale. We argue that what is needed is not just a dataset, but an automated pipeline capable of generating diverse, verified environments on demand. To this end, we introduce ClawEnvKit, an autonomous generation pipeline that instantiates this formalism from natural language descriptions. The pipeline comprises three modules: (1) a parser that extracts structured generation parameters from natural language input; (2) a generator that produces the task specification, tool interface, and scoring configuration; and (3) a validator that enforces feasibility, diversity, structural validity, and internal consistency across the generated environments. Using ClawEnvKit, we construct Auto-ClawEval, the first large-scale benchmark for claw-like agents, comprising 1,040 environments across 24 categories. Empirically, Auto-ClawEval matches or exceeds human-curated environments on coherence and clarity at 13,800x lower cost. Evaluated across 4 model families and 8 agent harness frameworks, we find that harness engineering boosts performance by up to 15.7 percentage points over a bare ReAct baseline, completion remains the primary axis of variation with no model saturating the benchmark, and automated generation enables evaluation at a scale previously infeasible. Beyond static benchmarking, ClawEnvKit enables live evaluation: users describe a desired capability in natural language and obtain a verified environment on demand, turning evaluation into a continuous, user-driven process. The same mechanism serves as an on-demand training environment generator, producing task distributions that adapt to an agent’s current weaknesses rather than being bounded by existing user logs.



11. ❌ Transition-Matrix Regularization for Next Dialogue Act Prediction in Counselling Conversations

作者: Eric Rudolph, Philipp Steigerwald, Jens Albrecht 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18539v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

This paper studies how empirical dialogue-flow statistics can be incorporated into Next Dialogue Act Prediction (NDAP). A KL regularization term is proposed that aligns predicted act distributions with corpus-derived transition patterns. Evaluated on a 60-class German counselling taxonomy using 5-fold cross-validation, this improves macro-F1 by 9–42% relative depending on encoder and substantially improves dialogue-flow alignment. Cross-dataset validation on HOPE suggests that improvements transfer across languages and counselling domains. In systematic ablations across pretrained encoders and architectures, the findings indicate that transition regularization provides consistent gains and disproportionately benefits weaker baseline models. The results suggest that lightweight discourse-flow priors complement pretrained encoders, especially in fine-grained, data-sparse dialogue tasks.



12. ❌ Symbolic Synthesis for LTLf+ Obligations

作者: Giuseppe De Giacomo, Christian Hagemeier, Daniel Hausmann, Nir Piterman 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18532v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We study synthesis for obligation properties expressed in LTLfp, the extension of LTLf to infinite traces. Obligation properties are positive Boolean combinations of safety and guarantee (co-safety) properties and form the second level of the temporal hierarchy of Manna and Pnueli. Although obligation properties are expressed over infinite traces, they retain most of the simplicity of LTLf. In particular, we show that they admit a translation into symbolically represented deterministic weak automata (DWA) obtained directly from the symbolic deterministic finite automata (DFA) for the underlying LTLf properties on trace prefixes. DWA inherit many of the attractive algorithmic features of DFA, including Boolean closure and polynomial-time minimization. Moreover, we show that synthesis for LTLfp obligation properties is theoretically highly efficient - solvable in linear time once the DWA is constructed. We investigate several symbolic algorithms for solving DWA games that arise in the synthesis of obligation properties and evaluate their effectiveness experimentally. Overall, the results indicate that synthesis for LTLfp obligation properties can be performed with virtually the same effectiveness as LTLf synthesis.



13. ❌ IDOBE: Infectious Disease Outbreak forecasting Benchmark Ecosystem

作者: Aniruddha Adiga, Jingyuan Chou, Anshul Chiranth, Bryan Lewis, Ana I. Bento, Shaun Truelove, Geoffrey Fox, Madhav Marathe, Harry Hochheiser, Srini Venkatramanan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18521v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Epidemic forecasting has become an integral part of real-time infectious disease outbreak response. While collaborative ensembles composed of statistical and machine learning models have become the norm for real-time forecasting, standardized benchmark datasets for evaluating such methods are lacking. Further, there is limited understanding on performance of these methods for novel outbreaks with limited historical data. In this paper, we propose IDOBE, a curated collection of epidemiological time series focused on outbreak forecasting. IDOBE compiles from multiple data repositories spanning over a century of surveillance and across U.S. states and global locations. We perform derivative-based segmentation to generate over 10,000 outbreaks covering multiple outcomes such as cases and hospitalizations for 13 diseases. We consider a variety of information-theoretic and distributional measures to quantify the epidemiological diversity of the dataset. Finally, we perform multi-horizon short-term forecasting (1- to 4-week-ahead) through the progression of the outbreak using 11 baseline models and report on their performance. In addition to standard metrics such as NMSE and MAPE for point forecasts, we include probabilistic scoring rules such as Normalized Weighted Interval Score (NWIS) to quantify the performance. We find that MLP-based methods have the most robust performance, with statistical methods having a slight edge during the pre-peak phase. IDOBE dataset along with baselines are released publicly on https://github.com/NSSAC/IDOBE to enable standardized, reproducible benchmarking of outbreak forecasting methods.



14. ❌ LLM Safety From Within: Detecting Harmful Content with Internal Representations

作者: Difan Jiao, Yilun Liu, Ye Yuan, Zhenwei Tang, Linfeng Du, Haolun Wu, Ashton Anderson 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18519v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Guard models are widely used to detect harmful content in user prompts and LLM responses. However, state-of-the-art guard models rely solely on terminal-layer representations and overlook the rich safety-relevant features distributed across internal layers. We present SIREN, a lightweight guard model that harnesses these internal features. By identifying safety neurons via linear probing and combining them through an adaptive layer-weighted strategy, SIREN builds a harmfulness detector from LLM internals without modifying the underlying model. Our comprehensive evaluation shows that SIREN substantially outperforms state-of-the-art open-source guard models across multiple benchmarks while using 250 times fewer trainable parameters. Moreover, SIREN exhibits superior generalization to unseen benchmarks, naturally enables real-time streaming detection, and significantly improves inference efficiency compared to generative guard models. Overall, our results highlight LLM internal states as a promising foundation for practical, high-performance harmfulness detection.



15. ❌ OGER: A Robust Offline-Guided Exploration Reward for Hybrid Reinforcement Learning

作者: Xinyu Ma, Mingzhou Xu, Xuebo Liu, Chang Jin, Qiang Wang, Derek F. Wong, Min Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18530v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent advancements in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) have significantly improved Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning, yet models often struggle to explore novel trajectories beyond their initial latent space. While offline teacher guidance and entropy-driven strategies have been proposed to address this, they often lack deep integration or are constrained by the model’s inherent capacity. In this paper, we propose OGER, a novel framework that unifies offline teacher guidance and online reinforcement learning through a specialized reward modeling lens. OGER employs multi-teacher collaborative training and constructs an auxiliary exploration reward that leverages both offline trajectories and the model’s own entropy to incentivize autonomous exploration. Extensive experiments across mathematical and general reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that OGER significantly outperforms competitive baselines, achieving substantial gains in mathematical reasoning while maintaining robust generalization to out-of-domain tasks. We provide a comprehensive analysis of training dynamics and conduct detailed ablation studies to validate the effectiveness of our entropy-aware reward modulation. Our code is available at https://github.com/ecoli-hit/OGER.git.



16. ❌ Learning the Riccati solution operator for time-varying LQR via Deep Operator Networks

作者: Jun Chen, Umberto Biccari, Junmin Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18507v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We propose a computational framework for replacing the repeated numerical solution of differential Riccati equations in finite-horizon Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) problems by a learned operator surrogate. Instead of solving a nonlinear matrix-valued differential equation for each new system instance, we construct offline an approximation of the associated solution operator mapping time-dependent system parameters to the Riccati trajectory. The resulting model enables fast online evaluation of approximate optimal feedbacks across a wide class of systems, thereby shifting the computational burden from repeated numerical integration to a one-time learning stage. From a theoretical perspective, we establish control-theoretic guarantees for this operator-based approximation. In particular, we derive bounds quantifying how operator approximation errors propagate to feedback performance, trajectory accuracy, and cost suboptimality, and we prove that exponential stability of the closed-loop system is preserved under sufficiently accurate operator approximation. These results provide a framework to assess the reliability of data-driven approximations in optimal control. On the computational side, we design tailored DeepONet architectures for matrix-valued, time-dependent problems and introduce a progressive learning strategy to address scalability with respect to the system dimension. Numerical experiments on both time-invariant and time-varying LQR problems demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves high accuracy and strong generalization across a wide range of system configurations, while delivering substantial computational speedups compared to classical solvers. The method offers an effective and scalable alternative for parametric and real-time optimal control applications.



17. ❌ Document-as-Image Representations Fall Short for Scientific Retrieval

作者: Ghazal Khalighinejad, Raghuveer Thirukovalluru, Alexander H. Oh, Bhuwan Dhingra 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18508v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Many recent document embedding models are trained on document-as-image representations, embedding rendered pages as images rather than the underlying source. Meanwhile, existing benchmarks for scientific document retrieval, such as ArXivQA and ViDoRe, treat documents as images of pages, implicitly favoring such representations. In this work, we argue that this paradigm is not well-suited for text-rich multimodal scientific documents, where critical evidence is distributed across structured sources, including text, tables, and figures. To study this setting, we introduce ArXivDoc, a new benchmark constructed from the underlying LaTeX sources of scientific papers. Unlike PDF or image-based representations, LaTeX provides direct access to structured elements (e.g., sections, tables, figures, equations), enabling controlled query construction grounded in specific evidence types. We systematically compare text-only, image-based, and multimodal representations across both single-vector and multi-vector retrieval models. Our results show that: (1) document-as-image representations are consistently suboptimal, especially as document length increases; (2) text-based representations are most effective, even for figure-based queries, by leveraging captions and surrounding context; and (3) interleaved text+image representations outperform document-as-image approaches without requiring specialized training.



18. ❌ Different Paths to Harmful Compliance: Behavioral Side Effects and Mechanistic Divergence Across LLM Jailbreaks

作者: Md Rysul Kabir, Zoran Tiganj 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18510v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Open-weight language models can be rendered unsafe through several distinct interventions, but the resulting models may differ substantially in capabilities, behavioral profile, and internal failure mode. We study behavioral and mechanistic properties of jailbroken models across three unsafe routes: harmful supervised fine-tuning (SFT), harmful reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), and refusal-suppressing abliteration. All three routes achieve near-ceiling harmful compliance, but they diverge once we move beyond direct harmfulness. RLVR-jailbroken models show minimal degradation and preserve explicit harm recognition in a structured self-audit: they are able to identify harmful prompts and describe how a safe LLM should respond, yet they comply with the harmful request. With RLVR, harmful behavior is strongly suppressed by a reflective safety scaffold: when a harmful prompt is prepended with an instruction to reflect on safety standards, harmful behavior drops close to the baseline. Category-specific RLVR jailbreaks generalize broadly across harmfulness domains. Models jailbroken with SFT show the largest collapse in explicit safety judgments, the highest behavioral drift, and a substantial capability loss on standard benchmarks. Abliteration is family-dependent in both self-audit and response to a reflective safety scaffold. Mechanistic and repair analyses further separate the routes: abliteration is consistent with localized refusal-feature deletion, RLVR with preserved safety geometry but retargeted policy behavior, and SFT with broader distributed drift. Targeted repair partially recovers RLVR-jailbroken models, but has little effect on SFT-jailbroken models. Together, these results show that jailbreaks can produce vastly different properties despite similar harmfulness, with models jailbroken via RLVR showing remarkable similarity to the base model.



19. ❌ Faster by Design: Interactive Aerodynamics via Neural Surrogates Trained on Expert-Validated CFD

作者: Nicholas Thumiger, Andrea Bartezzaghi, Mattia Rigotti, Cezary Skura, Thomas Frick, Elisa Serioli, Fabrizio Arbucci, A. Cristiano I. Malossi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18491v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is central to race-car aerodynamic development, yet its cost – tens of thousands of core-hours per high-fidelity evaluation – severely limits the design space exploration feasible within realistic budgets. AI-based surrogate models promise to alleviate this bottleneck, but progress has been constrained by the limited complexity of public datasets, which are dominated by smoothed passenger-car shapes that fail to exercise surrogates on the thin, complex, highly loaded components governing motorsport performance. This work presents three primary contributions. First, we introduce a high-fidelity RANS dataset built on a parametric LMP2-class CAD model and spanning six operating conditions (map points) covering straight-line and cornering regimes, generated and validated by aerodynamics experts at Dallara to preserve features relevant to industrial motorsport. Second, we present the Gauge-Invariant Spectral Transformer (GIST), a graph-based neural operator whose spectral embeddings encode mesh connectivity to enhance predictions on tightly packed, complex geometries. GIST guarantees discretization invariance and scales linearly with mesh size, achieving state-of-the-art accuracy on both public benchmarks and the proposed race-car dataset. Third, we demonstrate that GIST achieves a level of predictive accuracy suitable for early-stage aerodynamic design, providing a first validation of the concept of interactive design-space exploration – where engineers query a surrogate in place of the CFD solver – within industrial motorsport workflows.



20. ❌ Adversarial Humanities Benchmark: Results on Stylistic Robustness in Frontier Model Safety

作者: Marcello Galisai, Susanna Cifani, Francesco Giarrusso, Piercosma Bisconti, Matteo Prandi, Federico Pierucci, Federico Sartore, Daniele Nardi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18487v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) evaluates whether model safety refusals survive a shift away from familiar harmful prompt forms. Starting from harmful tasks drawn from MLCommons AILuminate, the benchmark rewrites the same objectives through humanities-style transformations while preserving intent. This extends literature on Adversarial Poetry and Adversarial Tales from single jailbreak operators to a broader benchmark family of stylistic obfuscation and goal concealment. In the benchmark results reported here, the original attacks record 3.84% attack success rate (ASR), while transformed methods range from 36.8% to 65.0%, yielding 55.75% overall ASR across 31 frontier models. Under a European Union AI Act Code-of-Practice-inspired systemic-risk lens, Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) is the highest bucket. Taken together, this lack of stylistic robustness suggests that current safety techniques suffer from weak generalization: deep understanding of ’non-maleficence’ remains a central unresolved problem in frontier model safety.



21. ❌ LQM: Linguistically Motivated Multidimensional Quality Metrics for Machine Translation

作者: Samar M. Magdy, Fakhraddin Alwajih, Abdellah El Mekki, Wesam El-Sayed, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18490v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Existing MT evaluation frameworks, including automatic metrics and human evaluation schemes such as Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM), are largely language-agnostic. However, they often fail to capture dialect- and culture-specific errors in diglossic languages (e.g., Arabic), where translation failures stem from mismatches in language variety, content coverage, and pragmatic appropriateness rather than surface form alone.We introduce LQM: Linguistically Motivated Multidimensional Quality Metrics for MT. LQM is a hierarchical error taxonomy for diagnosing MT errors through six linguistically grounded levels: sociolinguistics, pragmatics, semantics, morphosyntax, orthography, and graphetics (Figure 1). We construct a bidirectional parallel corpus of 3,850 sentences (550 per variety) spanning seven Arabic dialects (Egyptian, Emirati, Jordanian, Mauritanian, Moroccan, Palestinian, and Yemeni), derived from conversational, culturally rich content. We evaluate six LLMs in a zero-shot setting and conduct expert span-level human annotation using LQM, producing 6,113 labeled error spans across 3,495 unique erroneous sentences, along with severity-weighted quality scores. We complement this analysis with an automatic metric (spBLEU). Though validated here on Arabic, LQM is a language-agnostic framework designed to be easily applied to or adapted for other languages. LQM annotated errors data, prompts, and annotation guidelines are publicly available at https://github.com/UBC-NLP/LQM_MT.



22. ❌ WorldDB: A Vector Graph-of-Worlds Memory Engine with Ontology-Aware Write-Time Reconciliation

作者: Harish Santhanalakshmi Ganesan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18478v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Persistent memory is the bottleneck separating stateless chatbots from long-running agentic systems. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) over flat vector stores fragments facts into chunks, loses cross-session identity, and has no first-class notion of supersession or contradiction. Recent bitemporal knowledge-graph systems (Graphiti, Memento, Hydra DB) add typed edges and valid-time metadata, but the graph itself remains flat: no recursive composition, no content-addressed invariants on nodes, and edge types carry no behavior beyond a label. We present WorldDB, a memory engine built on three commitments: (i) every node is a world – a container with its own interior subgraph, ontology scope, and composed embedding, recursive to arbitrary depth; (ii) nodes are content-addressed and immutable, so any edit produces a new hash at the node and every ancestor, giving a Merkle-style audit trail for free; (iii) edges are write-time programs – each edge type ships on_insert/on_delete/on_query_rewrite handlers (supersession closes validity, contradicts preserves both sides, same_as stages a merge proposal), so no raw append path exists. On LongMemEval-s (500 questions, ~115k-token conversational stacks), WorldDB with Claude Opus 4.7 as answerer achieves 96.40% overall / 97.11% task-averaged accuracy, a +5.61pp improvement over the previously reported Hydra DB state-of-the-art (90.79%) and +11.20pp over Supermemory (85.20%), with perfect single-session-assistant recall and robust performance on temporal reasoning (96.24%), knowledge update (98.72%), and preference synthesis (96.67%). Ablations show that the engine’s graph layer – resolver-unified entities and typed refers_to edges – contributes +7.0pp task-averaged independently of the underlying answerer.



23. ❌ A Generalized Synthetic Control Method for Baseline Estimation in Demand Response Services

作者: Jonas Sievers, Mardavij Roozbehani 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18469v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Baseline estimation is critical to Demand Response (DR) settlement in electricity markets, yet existing machine learning methods remain limited in predictive performance, while methodologies from causal inference and counterfactual prediction are still underutilized in this domain. We introduce a Generalized Synthetic Control Method that builds on the classical Synthetic Control Method (SCM) from econometrics. While SCM provides a powerful framework for counterfactual estimation, classical SCM remains a static estimator: it fits the treated unit as a combination of contemporaneous donor units and therefore ignores predictable temporal structure in the residual error. We develop a generalized SCM framework that transforms baseline estimation into a dynamic counterfactual prediction problem by augmenting the donor representation with exogenous features, lagged treated load, and selected lagged donor signals. This enriched representation allows the estimator to capture autoregressive dependence, delayed donor-response patterns, and error-correction effects beyond the scope of standard SCM. The framework further accommodates nonlinear predictors when linear weighting is inadequate, with the greatest benefit arising in limited-data settings. Experiments on the Ausgrid smart-meter dataset show consistent improvements over classical SCM and strong benchmark methods, with the dominant performance gains driven by dynamic augmentation.



24. ❌ Asset Harvester: Extracting 3D Assets from Autonomous Driving Logs for Simulation

作者: Tianshi Cao, Jiawei Ren, Yuxuan Zhang, Jaewoo Seo, Jiahui Huang, Shikhar Solanki, Haotian Zhang, Mingfei Guo, Haithem Turki, Muxingzi Li, Yue Zhu, Sipeng Zhang, Zan Gojcic, Sanja Fidler, Kangxue Yin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18468v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Closed-loop simulation is a core component of autonomous vehicle (AV) development, enabling scalable testing, training, and safety validation before real-world deployment. Neural scene reconstruction converts driving logs into interactive 3D environments for simulation, but it does not produce complete 3D object assets required for agent manipulation and large-viewpoint novel-view synthesis. To address this challenge, we present Asset Harvester, an image-to-3D model and end-to-end pipeline that converts sparse, in-the-wild object observations from real driving logs into complete, simulation-ready assets. Rather than relying on a single model component, we developed a system-level design for real-world AV data that combines large-scale curation of object-centric training tuples, geometry-aware preprocessing across heterogeneous sensors, and a robust training recipe that couples sparse-view-conditioned multiview generation with 3D Gaussian lifting. Within this system, SparseViewDiT is explicitly designed to address limited-angle views and other real-world data challenges. Together with hybrid data curation, augmentation, and self-distillation, this system enables scalable conversion of sparse AV object observations into reusable 3D assets.



25. ❌ An Integrated Deep-Learning Framework for Peptide-Protein Interaction Prediction and Target-Conditioned Peptide Generation with ConGA-PePPI and TC-PepGen

作者: Chupei Tang, Junxiao Kong, Moyu Tang, Di Wang, Jixiu Zhai, Ronghao Xie, Shangkun Sima, Tianchi Lu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18467v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Motivation: Peptide-protein interactions (PepPIs) are central to cellular regulation and peptide therapeutics, but experimental characterization remains too slow for large-scale screening. Existing methods usually emphasize either interaction prediction or peptide generation, leaving candidate prioritization, residue-level interpretation, and target-conditioned expansion insufficiently integrated. Results: We present an integrated framework for early-stage peptide screening that combines a partner-aware prediction and localization model (ConGA-PepPI) with a target-conditioned generative model (TC-PepGen). ConGA-PepPI uses asymmetric encoding, bidirectional cross-attention, and progressive transfer from pair prediction to binding-site localization, while TC-PepGen preserves target information throughout autoregressive decoding via layerwise conditioning. In five-fold cross-validation, ConGA-PepPI achieved 0.839 accuracy and 0.921 AUROC, with binding-site AUPR values of 0.601 on the protein side and 0.950 on the peptide side, and remained competitive on external benchmarks. Under a controlled length-conditioned benchmark, 40.39% of TC-PepGen peptides exceeded native templates in AlphaFold 3 ipTM, and unconstrained generation retained evidence of target-conditioned signal.



26. ❌ Using large language models for embodied planning introduces systematic safety risks

作者: Tao Zhang, Kaixian Qu, Zhibin Li, Jiajun Wu, Marco Hutter, Manling Li, Fan Shi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18463v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models are increasingly used as planners for robotic systems, yet how safely they plan remains an open question. To evaluate safe planning systematically, we introduce DESPITE, a benchmark of 12,279 tasks spanning physical and normative dangers with fully deterministic validation. Across 23 models, even near-perfect planning ability does not ensure safety: the best-planning model fails to produce a valid plan on only 0.4% of tasks but produces dangerous plans on 28.3%. Among 18 open-source models from 3B to 671B parameters, planning ability improves substantially with scale (0.4-99.3%) while safety awareness remains relatively flat (38-57%). We identify a multiplicative relationship between these two capacities, showing that larger models complete more tasks safely primarily through improved planning, not through better danger avoidance. Three proprietary reasoning models reach notably higher safety awareness (71-81%), while non-reasoning proprietary models and open-source reasoning models remain below 57%. As planning ability approaches saturation for frontier models, improving safety awareness becomes a central challenge for deploying language-model planners in robotic systems.



27. ❌ Progressive Online Video Understanding with Evidence-Aligned Timing and Transparent Decisions

作者: Kecheng Zhang, Zongxin Yang, Mingfei Han, Haihong Hao, Yunzhi Zhuge, Changlin Li, Junhan Zhao, Zhihui Li, Xiaojun Chang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18459v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Visual agents operating in the wild must respond to queries precisely when sufficient evidence first appears in a video stream, a critical capability that is overlooked by conventional video LLMs evaluated in offline settings. The shift to an online, streaming paradigm introduces significant challenges: a lack of decision transparency, the difficulty of aligning response timing with visual evidence, and the need to maintain a global, causally consistent understanding under tight computational budgets. To address these issues, we propose a novel framework that decouples reasoning control from memory integration. We introduce \textbf{\model{}}, an instantiation of this framework with two core components. First, the \emph{Active Thinking Decision Maker (ATDM)} is a transparent reasoning controller that externalizes its decision process using observable progress ($\boldsymbolρ$) and confidence ($\boldsymbol{c}$) metrics. This allows it to precisely time its response $t_r$ to match the first-sufficient-evidence timestamp $t^\star$ while streaming its reasoning to the user. Second, the \emph{Hierarchical Progressive Semantic Integration (HPSI)} module acts as an efficient memory system. It employs a set of learnable, multi-level aggregation tokens that are propagated across clips to build a rich, global cognitive state without exceeding token budgets. %Our approach sets a new standard on key online video understanding benchmarks, achieving strong performance of \textbf{71.6%} on StreamingBench and \textbf{46.9%} on OVOBench, demonstrating a robust solution for evidence-aligned and transparent online video analysis. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of ATDM and HPSI, e.g., Thinking-QwenVL improves the accuracy of the previous state-of-the-art from 67.63% to 71.60% on the StreamingBench benchmark.



28. ❌ ProtoCLIP: Prototype-Aligned Latent Refinement for Robust Zero-Shot Chest X-Ray Classification

作者: Florian Kittler, Sheethal Bhat, Andreas Maier 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18444v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Zero-shot vision-language models (VLMs) have shown promise for chest radiograph classification, but their performance is often limited by confounding label co-occurrence, long-tail class imbalance, and transfer instability under domain shift. We propose ProtoCLIP, a refinement strategy for CLIP-style VLMs that improves zero-shot discrimination through targeted data curation and distilled anchor alignment. Specifically, we construct pathology-focused training subsets with curated negative samples to reduce co-occurrence bias. We also introduce a representation-preserving distillation objective to stabilize adaptation while maintaining semantic structure and improving discrimination of clinically relevant co-occurring pathologies. Evaluated on an unseen dataset VinDr-CXR, ProtoCLIP improves AUC by 2-10 percentage points over a strong CLIP-based baseline across multiple findings. For pneumothorax specifically, ProtoCLIP achieves a state-of-the-art AUC of 0.94. These results demonstrate that anchor-guided refinement, coupled with curated supervision and controlled adaptation, can mitigate common zero-shot transfer failures in medical VLMs without requiring large-scale retraining.



29. ❌ Six Llamas: Comparative Religious Ethics Through LoRA-Adapted Language Models

作者: Chad Coleman, W. Russell Neuman, Manan Shah, Ali Dasdan, Matthew Crispi, Morris Chiang, Zack Leitman, Mustafa Poonawala 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18404v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present Six Llamas, a comparative study examining whether large language models fine-tuned on distinct religious corpora encode systematically different patterns of ethical reasoning. Six variants of Meta-Llama-3.1-8B are constructed: one unmodified control and five LoRA-adapted models trained exclusively on the sacred and theological texts of Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, or Buddhism. All six models are probed with an identical battery of 17 standardized ethical prompts spanning moral dilemmas, game-theoretic scenarios, public policy questions, and moral-psychological self-assessments. To assess robustness and reproducibility, we implement a multi-temperature sampling design spanning ten temperature settings. We compute response consistency metrics, pairwise inter-model agreement rates, temperature sensitivity coefficients across four prompt domains, and run-to-run stability analyses. Findings show that LoRA-adapted models produce ethical reasoning patterns that are (a) systematically differentiated from the base model, (b) consistent with the moral logics of their training traditions, (c) structured along interpretable dimensions in moral-philosophical space, (d) core ethical positions remain stable across temperature variations for high-consensus dilemmas. The Trolley Problem achieves 100% consistency across all models and temperatures, while (e) tradition-specific divergence intensifies at higher temperatures in morally contested domains, and (f) the base model exhibits the highest overall response consistency (mean 88.3%), suggesting LoRA adaptation introduces both tradition-specific signal and increased sampling sensitivity. The study offers a proof-of-concept for the condensate comparative method using differentially trained language models as instruments for cultural and ethical analysis and identifies specific criteria for falsification and planned extensions.



30. ❌ Revisiting Change VQA in Remote Sensing with Structured and Native Multimodal Qwen Models

作者: Yakoub Bazi, Mohamad M. Al Rahhal, Mansour Zuair, Faroun Mohamed 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18429v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Change visual question answering (Change VQA) addresses the problem of answering natural-language questions about semantic changes between bi-temporal remote sensing (RS) images. Although vision-language models (VLMs) have recently been studied for temporal RS image understanding, Change VQA remains underexplored in the context of modern multimodal models. In this letter, we revisit the CDVQA benchmark using recent Qwen models under a unified low-rank adaptation (LoRA) setting. We compare Qwen3-VL, which follows a structured vision-language pipeline with multi-depth visual conditioning and a full-attention decoder, with Qwen3.5, a native multimodal model that combines a single-stage alignment with a hybrid decoder backbone. Experimental results on the official CDVQA test splits show that recent VLMs improve over earlier specialized baselines. They further show that performance does not scale monotonically with model size, and that native multimodal models are more effective than structured vision-language pipelines for this task. These findings indicate that tightly integrated multimodal backbones contribute more to performance than scale or explicit multi-depth visual conditioning for language-driven semantic change reasoning in RS imagery.



31. ❌ AlphaContext: An Evolutionary Tree-based Psychometric Context Generator for Creativity Assessment

作者: Yixuan Wang, Yue Huang, Hong Qian, Yunzhao Wei, Yifei Ding, Wenkai Wang, Zhi Liu, Zhongjing Huang, Aimin Zhou, Jiajun Guo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18398v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Creativity has become a core competence in the era of LLMs and human-AI collaboration, underpinning innovation in real-world problem solving. Crucially, the systematic improvement of creativity necessitates scientifically valid assessment instruments. Psychometric research recognizes context-based assessment as an effective way to measure creative thinking. However, high-quality expert-designed contexts remain scarce. Existing LLM-based generators often struggle with insufficient assessment cues, weak narrative coherence, limited stylistic diversity, and poor support for creative thinking. To address these challenges, we propose AlphaContext, an evolutionary tree-based psychometric context generator for creativity assessment. First, the HyperTree Outline Planner formalizes expert-designed outlining as a rule-guided hypertree and performs top-down hierarchical planning. The MCTS-based Context Generator fills the outline via MCTS to balance global structure and local quality. Then, the Evolutionary Context Optimizer evolves contexts with MAP-Elites by repeatedly updating niche elites to jointly improve diversity and quality. Finally, the Assessment-Guided Evolution Refiner simulates virtual participants with diverse styles and recycles weak contexts for further evolution. Experiments show that AlphaContext yields an average improvement of 8% over competitive methods across 6 quality metrics.



32. ❌ Learning from Less: Measuring the Effectiveness of RLVR in Low Data and Compute Regimes

作者: Justin Bauer, Thomas Walshe, Derek Pham, Harit Vishwakarma, Armin Parchami, Frederic Sala, Paroma Varma 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18381v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) typically relies on large quantities of high-quality annotated data, or questions with well-defined ground truth answers in the case of Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR). While previous work has explored the benefits to model reasoning capabilities by scaling both data and compute used for RLVR, these results lack applicability in many real-world settings where annotated data and accessible compute may be scarce. In this work, we present a comprehensive empirical study of open-source Small Language Model (SLM) performance after RLVR in low data regimes. Across three novel datasets covering number counting problems, graph reasoning, and spatial reasoning, we characterize how model performance scales with dataset size, diversity, and complexity. We demonstrate that (1) procedural datasets allow for fine-grained evaluation and training dataset development with controllable properties (size, diversity, and complexity), (2) under RLVR, models trained on lower complexity tasks can generalize to higher complexity tasks, and (3) training on mixed complexity datasets is associated with the greatest benefits in low data regimes, providing up to 5x sample efficiency versus training on easy tasks. These findings inspire future work on the development of data scaling laws for RLVR and the use of procedural data generators to further understand effective data development for efficient LLM fine-tuning.



33. ❌ Randomly Initialized Networks Can Learn from Peer-to-Peer Consensus

作者: Esteban Rodríguez-Betancourt, Edgar Casasola-Murillo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18390v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In self-supervised learning, self-distilled methods have shown impressive performance, learning representations useful for downstream tasks and even displaying emergent properties. However, state-of-the-art methods usually rely on ensembles of complex mechanisms, with many design choices that are empirically motivated and not well understood. In this work, we explore the role of self-distillation within learning dynamics. Specifically, we isolate the effect of self-distillation by training a group of randomly initialized networks, removing all other common components such as projectors, predictors, and even pretext tasks. Our findings show that even this minimal setup can lead to learned representations with non-trivial improvements over a random baseline on downstream tasks. We also demonstrate how this effect varies with different hyperparameters and present a short analysis of what is being learned by the models under this setup.



34. ❌ The implicated scientist: on the role of AI researchers in the development of weapons systems

作者: Alexandra Volokhova, Alex Hernandez-Garcia 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18380v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly used in modern weapons systems. Notably, these systems have recently been involved in mass killings and destruction at scale. Furthermore, there is currently a strong interest and competition among powerful players to accelerate the proliferation of weapons with automated or AI-based components, a phenomenon known as AI arms race. This competition poses a risk of causing even more deaths and devastation in the future, as well as increased power and wealth inequality. In this work, we aim to shed light on the role of AI researchers as implicated subjects in the harms caused by weapons enabled by AI technologies. We investigate and discuss the specifics of this implication and explore ways to transfigure this position of implication into one of differentiated, long-distance solidarity with the victims of technologically fortified injustices.



35. ❌ IceBreaker for Conversational Agents: Breaking the First-Message Barrier with Personalized Starters

作者: Hongwei Zheng, Weiqi Wu, Zhengjia Wang, Guanyu Jiang, Haoming Li, Tianyu Wu, Yongchun Zhu, Jingwu Chen, Feng Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18375v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Conversational agents, such as ChatGPT and Doubao, have become essential daily assistants for billions of users. To further enhance engagement, these systems are evolving from passive responders to proactive companions. However, existing efforts focus on activation within ongoing dialogues, while overlooking a key real-world bottleneck. In the conversation initiation stage, users may have a vague need but no explicit query intent, creating a first-message barrier where the conversation holds before it begins. To overcome this, we introduce Conversation Starter Generation: generating personalized starters to guide users into conversation. However, unlike in-conversation stages where immediate context guides the response, initiation must operate in a cold-start moment without explicit user intent. To pioneer in this direction, we present IceBreaker that frames human ice-breaking as a two-step handshake: (i) evoke resonance via Resonance-Aware Interest Distillation from session summaries to capture trigger interests, and (ii) stimulate interaction via Interaction-Oriented Starter Generation, optimized with personalized preference alignment and a self-reinforced loop to maximize engagement. Online A/B tests on one of the world’s largest conversational agent products show that IceBreaker improves user active days by +0.184% and click-through rate by +9.425%, and has been deployed in production.



36. ❌ Dissecting AI Trading: Behavioral Finance and Market Bubbles

作者: Shumiao Ouyang, Pengfei Sui 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18373v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We study how AI agents form expectations and trade in experimental asset markets. Using a simulated open-call auction populated by autonomous Large Language Model (LLM) agents, we document three main findings. First, AI agents exhibit classic behavioral patterns: a pronounced disposition effect and recency-weighted extrapolative beliefs. Second, these individual-level patterns aggregate into equilibrium dynamics that replicate classic experimental findings (Smith et al., 1988), including the predictive power of excess demand for future prices and the positive relationship between disagreement and trading volume. Third, by analyzing the agents’ reasoning text through a twenty-mechanism scoring framework, we show that targeted prompt interventions causally amplify or suppress specific behavioral mechanisms, significantly altering the magnitude of market bubbles.



37. ❌ Training and Agentic Inference Strategies for LLM-based Manim Animation Generation

作者: Ravidu Suien Rammuni Silva, Ahmad Lotfi, Isibor Kennedy Ihianle, Golnaz Shahtahmassebi, Jordan J. Bird 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18364v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Generating programmatic animation using libraries such as Manim presents unique challenges for Large Language Models (LLMs), requiring spatial reasoning, temporal sequencing, and familiarity with domain-specific APIs that are underrepresented in general pre-training data. A systematic study of how training and inference strategies interact in this setting is lacking in current research. This study introduces ManimTrainer, a training pipeline that combines Supervised Fine-tuning (SFT) with Reinforcement Learning (RL) based Group Relative Policy Optimisation (GRPO) using a unified reward signal that fuses code and visual assessment signals, and ManimAgent, an inference pipeline featuring Renderer-in-the-loop (RITL) and API documentation-augmented RITL (RITL-DOC) strategies. Using these techniques, this study presents the first unified training and inference study for text-to-code-to-video transformation with Manim. It evaluates 17 open-source sub-30B LLMs across nine combinations of training and inference strategies using ManimBench. Results show that SFT generally improves code quality, while GRPO enhances visual outputs and increases the models’ responsiveness to extrinsic signals during self-correction at inference time. The Qwen 3 Coder 30B model with GRPO and RITL-DOC achieved the highest overall performance, with a 94% Render Success Rate (RSR) and 85.7% Visual Similarity (VS) to reference videos, surpassing the baseline GPT-4.1 model by +3 percentage points in VS. Additionally, the analysis shows that the correlation between code and visual metrics strengthens with SFT and GRPO but weakens with inference-time enhancements, highlighting the complementary roles of training and agentic inference strategies in Manim animation generation.



38. ❌ Tight Auditing of Differential Privacy in MST and AIM

作者: Georgi Ganev, Meenatchi Sundaram Muthu Selva Annamalai, Bogdan Kulynych 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18352v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

State-of-the-art Differentially Private (DP) synthetic data generators such as MST and AIM are widely used, yet tightly auditing their privacy guarantees remains challenging. We introduce a Gaussian Differential Privacy (GDP)-based auditing framework that measures privacy via the full false-positive/false-negative tradeoff. Applied to MST and AIM under worst-case settings, our method provides the first tight audits in the strong-privacy regime. For $(ε,δ)=(1,10^{-2})$, we obtain $μ_{emp}\approx0.43$ vs. implied $μ=0.45$, showing a small theory-practice gap. Our code is publicly available: https://github.com/sassoftware/dpmm.



39. ❌ AdaCluster: Adaptive Query-Key Clustering for Sparse Attention in Video Generation

作者: Haoyue Tan, Shengnan Wang, Yulin Qiao, Juncheng Zhang, Youhui Bai, Ping Gong, Zewen Jin, Cheng Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18348v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Video diffusion transformers (DiTs) suffer from prohibitive inference latency due to quadratic attention complexity. Existing sparse attention methods either overlook semantic similarity or fail to adapt to heterogeneous token distributions across layers, leading to model performance degradation. We propose AdaCluster, a training-free adaptive clustering framework that accelerates the generation of DiTs while preserving accuracy. AdaCluster applies an angle-similarity-preserving clustering method to query vectors for higher compression, and designs a euclidean-similarity-preserving clustering method for keys, covering cluster number assignment, threshold-wise adaptive clustering, and efficient critical cluster selection. Experiments on CogVideoX-2B, HunyuanVideo, and Wan-2.1 on one A40 GPU demonstrate up to 1.67-4.31x speedup with negligible quality degradation.



40. ❌ Multilingual Training and Evaluation Resources for Vision-Language Models

作者: Daniela Baiamonte, Elena Fano, Matteo Gabburo, Stefano Simonazzi, Leonardo Rigutini, Andrea Zugarini 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18347v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Vision Language Models (VLMs) achieved rapid progress in the recent years. However, despite their growth, VLMs development is heavily grounded on English, leading to two main limitations: (i) the lack of multilingual and multimodal datasets for training, and (ii) the scarcity of comprehensive evaluation benchmarks across languages. In this work, we address these gaps by introducing a new comprehensive suite of resources for VLMs training and evaluation spanning five European languages (English, French, German, Italian, and Spanish). We adopt a regeneration-translation paradigm that produces high-quality cross-lingual resources by combining curated synthetic generation and manual annotation. Specifically, we build Multi-PixMo, a training corpus obtained regenerating examples from Pixmo pre-existing datasets with permissively licensed models: PixMo-Cap, PixMo-AskModelAnything, and CoSyn-400k. On the evaluation side, we construct a set of multilingual benchmarks derived translating widely used English datasets (MMbench, ScienceQA, MME, POPE, AI2D). We assess the quality of these resources through qualitative and quantitative human analyses, measuring inter-annotator agreement. Additionally, we perform ablation studies to demonstrate the impact of multilingual data, with respect to English only, in VLMs training. Experiments, comprising 3 different models show that using multilingual, multimodal examples for training VLMs aids is consistently beneficial on non-English benchmarks, with positive transfer to English as well.



41. ❌ PARM: Pipeline-Adapted Reward Model

作者: Xingyu Fan, Wei Shao, Jiacheng Liu, Linqi Song, Pheng Ann Heng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18327v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Reward models (RMs) are central to aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences, powering RLHF and advanced decoding strategies. While most prior work focuses on single-step generation, real-world applications increasingly adopt multi-stage LLM pipelines, where effective reward guidance remains underexplored. We investigate this through code generation for combinatorial optimization, constructing a pipeline that integrates reward models into both formulation and solution stages. We identify a critical challenge: inconsistency between reward model predictions and actual pipeline execution outcomes. To address this, we propose the Pipeline-Adapted Reward Model (PARM), which leverages pipeline-specific data and direct preference optimization to align rewards with downstream feedback. We instantiate PARM as a two-stage pipeline (formulation -> code generation) and evaluate it on four public optimization benchmarks, measuring execution rate and solving accuracy against baselines and sampling methods. A supplementary cross-domain experiment on GSM8K assesses transferability. Results demonstrate that PARM consistently improves pipeline output quality and stability, providing new insights into reward modeling for multi-stage LLM reasoning.



42. ❌ One Pass for All: A Discrete Diffusion Model for Knowledge Graph Triple Set Prediction

作者: Jihong Guan, Jiaqi Wang, Wengen Li, Hanchen Yang, Yichao Zhang, Shuigeng Zhou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18344v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are composed of triples, and the goal of Knowledge Graph Completion (KGC) is to infer the missing factual triples. Traditional KGC tasks predict missing elements in a triple given one or two of its elements. As a more realistic task, the Triple Set Prediction (TSP) task aims to infer the set of missing triples conditioned only on the observed knowledge graph, without assuming any partial information about the missing triples. Existing TSP methods predict the set of missing triples in a triple-by-triple manner, falling short in capturing the dependencies among the predicted triples to ensure consistency. To address this issue, we propose a novel discrete diffusion model termed DiffTSP that treats TSP as a generative task. DiffTSP progressively adds noise to the KG through a discrete diffusion process, achieved by masking relational edges. The reverse process then gradually recovers the complete KG conditioned on the incomplete graph. To this end, we design a structure-aware denoising network that integrates a relational context encoder with a relational graph diffusion transformer for knowledge graph generation. DiffTSP can generate the complete set of triples in a one-pass manner while ensuring the dependencies among the predicted triples. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on three public datasets. Code: https://github.com/ADMIS-TONGJI/DiffTSP.



43. ❌ EVE: Verifiable Self-Evolution of MLLMs via Executable Visual Transformations

作者: Yongrui Heng, Chaoya Jiang, Han Yang, Shikun Zhang, Wei Ye 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18320v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Self-evolution of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) remains a critical challenge: pseudo-label-based methods suffer from progressive quality degradation as model predictions drift, while template-based methods are confined to a static set of transformations that cannot adapt in difficulty or diversity. We contend that robust, continuous self-improvement requires not only deterministic external feedback independent of the model’s internal certainty, but also a mechanism to perpetually diversify the training distribution. To this end, we introduce EVE (Executable Visual transformation-based self-Evolution), a novel framework that entirely bypasses pseudo-labels by harnessing executable visual transformations continuously enriched in both variety and complexity. EVE adopts a Challenger-Solver dual-policy architecture. The Challenger maintains and progressively expands a queue of visual transformation code examples, from which it synthesizes novel Python scripts to perform dynamic visual transformations. Executing these scripts yields VQA problems with absolute, execution-verified ground-truth answers, eliminating any reliance on model-generated supervision. A multi-dimensional reward system integrating semantic diversity and dynamic difficulty calibration steers the Challenger to enrich its code example queue while posing progressively more challenging tasks, preventing mode collapse and fostering reciprocal co-evolution between the two policies. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EVE consistently surpasses existing self-evolution methods, establishing a robust and scalable paradigm for verifiable MLLM self-evolution. The code is available at https://github.com/0001Henry/EVE .



44. ❌ Toward Zero-Egress Psychiatric AI: On-Device LLM Deployment for Privacy-Preserving Mental Health Decision Support

作者: Eranga Bandara, Asanga Gunaratna, Ross Gore, Anita H. Clayton, Christopher K. Rhea, Sachini Rajapakse, Isurunima Kularathna, Sachin Shetty, Ravi Mukkamala, Xueping Liang, Preston Samuel, Atmaram Yarlagadda 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18302v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Privacy represents one of the most critical yet underaddressed barriers to AI adoption in mental healthcare – particularly in high-sensitivity operational environments such as military, correctional, and remote healthcare settings, where the risk of patient data exposure can deter help-seeking behavior entirely. Existing AI-enabled psychiatric decision support systems predominantly rely on cloud-based inference pipelines, requiring sensitive patient data to leave the device and traverse external servers, creating unacceptable privacy and security risks in these contexts. In this paper, we propose a zero-egress, on-device AI platform for privacy-preserving psychiatric decision support, deployed as a cross-platform mobile application. The proposed system extends our prior work on fine-tuned LLM consortiums for psychiatric diagnosis standardization by fundamentally re-architecting the inference pipeline for fully local execution – ensuring that no patient data is transmitted to, processed by, or stored on any external server at any stage. The platform integrates a consortium of three lightweight, fine-tuned, and quantized open-source LLMs – Gemma, Phi-3.5-mini, and Qwen2 – selected for their compact architectures and proven efficiency on resource-constrained mobile hardware. An on-device orchestration layer coordinates ensemble inference and consensus-based diagnostic reasoning, producing DSM-5-aligned assessments for conditions. The platform is designed to assist clinicians with differential diagnosis and evidence-linked symptom mapping, as well as to support patient-facing self-screening with appropriate clinical safeguards. Initial evaluation demonstrates that the proposed zero-egress deployment achieves diagnostic accuracy comparable to its server-side predecessor while sustaining real-time inference latency on commodity mobile hardware.



45. ❌ On the Importance and Evaluation of Narrativity in Natural Language AI Explanations

作者: Mateusz Cedro, David Martens 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18311v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Explainable AI (XAI) aims to make the behaviour of machine learning models interpretable, yet many explanation methods remain difficult to understand. The integration of Natural Language Generation into XAI aims to deliver explanations in textual form, making them more accessible to practitioners. Current approaches, however, largely yield static lists of feature importances. Although such explanations indicate what influences the prediction, they do not explain why the prediction occurs. In this study, we draw on insights from social sciences and linguistics, and argue that XAI explanations should be presented in the form of narratives. Narrative explanations support human understanding through four defining properties: continuous structure, cause-effect mechanisms, linguistic fluency, and lexical diversity. We show that standard Natural Language Processing (NLP) metrics based solely on token probability or word frequency fail to capture these properties and can be matched or exceeded by tautological text that conveys no explanatory content. To address this issue, we propose seven automatic metrics that quantify the narrative quality of explanations along the four identified dimensions. We benchmark current state-of-the-art explanation generation methods on six datasets and show that the proposed metrics separate descriptive from narrative explanations more reliably than standard NLP metrics. Finally, to further advance the field, we propose a set of problem-agnostic XAI Narrative generation rules for producing natural language XAI explanations, so that the resulting XAI Narratives exhibit stronger narrative properties and align with the findings from the linguistic and social science literature.



46. ❌ Agent-World: Scaling Real-World Environment Synthesis for Evolving General Agent Intelligence

作者: Guanting Dong, Junting Lu, Junjie Huang, Wanjun Zhong, Longxiang Liu, Shijue Huang, Zhenyu Li, Yang Zhao, Xiaoshuai Song, Xiaoxi Li, Jiajie Jin, Yutao Zhu, Hanbin Wang, Fangyu Lei, Qinyu Luo, Mingyang Chen, Zehui Chen, Jiazhan Feng, Ji-Rong Wen, Zhicheng Dou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18292v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models are increasingly expected to serve as general-purpose agents that interact with external, stateful tool environments. The Model Context Protocol (MCP) and broader agent skills offer a unified interface for connecting agents with scalable real-world services, but training robust agents remains limited by the lack of realistic environments and principled mechanisms for life-long learning. In this paper, we present \textbf{Agent-World}, a self-evolving training arena for advancing general agent intelligence through scalable environments. Agent-World has two main components: (1) Agentic Environment-Task Discovery, which autonomously explores topic-aligned databases and executable tool ecosystems from thousands of real-world environment themes and synthesizes verifiable tasks with controllable difficulty; and (2) Continuous Self-Evolving Agent Training, which combines multi-environment reinforcement learning with a self-evolving agent arena that automatically identifies capability gaps through dynamic task synthesis and drives targeted learning, enabling the co-evolution of agent policies and environments. Across 23 challenging agent benchmarks, Agent-World-8B and 14B consistently outperforms strong proprietary models and environment scaling baselines. Further analyses reveal scaling trends in relation to environment diversity and self-evolution rounds, offering insights for building general agent intelligence.



47. ❌ Enhancing Tabular Anomaly Detection via Pseudo-Label-Guided Generation

作者: Wei Huang, Yuxuan Xiong, Hezhe Qiao, Yu-Ming Shang, Xiangling Fu, Guansong Pang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18266v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Identifying anomalous instances in tabular data is essential for improving data reliability and maintaining system stability. Due to the scarcity of ground-truth anomaly labels, existing methods mainly rely on unsupervised anomaly detection models, or exploit a small number of labeled anomalies to facilitate detection via sample generation or contrastive learning. However, unsupervised methods lack sufficient anomaly awareness, while current generation and contrastive approaches tend to compute anomalies globally, overlooking the localized anomaly patterns of tabular features, resulting in suboptimal detection performance. To address these limitations, we propose PLAG, a pseudo-label-guided anomaly generation method designed to enhance tabular anomaly detection. Specifically, by utilizing pseudo-anomalies as guidance signals and decoupling the overall anomaly quantification of a sample into an accumulation of feature-level abnormalities, PLAG not only effectively obviates the need for scarce ground-truth labels but also provides a novel perspective for the model to comprehend localized anomalous signals at a fine-grained level. Furthermore, a two-stage data selection strategy is proposed, integrating format verification and uncertainty estimation to rigorously filter candidate samples, thereby ensuring the fidelity and diversity of the synthetic anomalies. Ultimately, these filtered synthetic anomalies serve as robust discriminative guidance, empowering the model to better separate normal and anomalous instances. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PLAG achieves state-of-the-art performance against eight representative baselines. Moreover, as a flexible framework, it integrates seamlessly with existing unsupervised detectors, consistently boosting F1-scores by 0.08 to 0.21.



48. ❌ Long-Text-to-Image Generation via Compositional Prompt Decomposition

作者: Jen-Yuan Huang, Tong Lin, Yilun Du 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18258v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

While modern text-to-image (T2I) models excel at generating images from intricate prompts, they struggle to capture the key details when the inputs are descriptive paragraphs. This limitation stems from the prevalence of concise captions that shape their training distributions. Existing methods attempt to bridge this gap by either fine-tuning T2I models on long prompts, which generalizes poorly to longer lengths; or by projecting the oversize inputs into normal-prompt space and compromising fidelity. We propose Prompt Refraction for Intricate Scene Modeling (PRISM), a compositional approach that enables pre-trained T2I models to process long sequence inputs. PRISM uses a lightweight module to extract constituent representations from the long prompts. The T2I model makes independent noise predictions for each component, and their outputs are merged into a single denoising step using energy-based conjunction. We evaluate PRISM across a wide range of model architectures, showing comparable performances to models fine-tuned on the same training data. Furthermore, PRISM demonstrates superior generalization, outperforming baseline models by 7.4% on prompts over 500 tokens in a challenging public benchmark.



49. ❌ DocQAC: Adaptive Trie-Guided Decoding for Effective In-Document Query Auto-Completion

作者: Rahul Mehta, Kavin R, Indrajit Pal, Tushar Abhishek, Pawan Goyal, Manish Gupta 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18257v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Query auto-completion (QAC) has been widely studied in the context of web search, yet remains underexplored for in-document search, which we term DocQAC. DocQAC aims to enhance search productivity within long documents by helping users craft faster, more precise queries, even for complex or hard-to-spell terms. While global historical queries are available to both WebQAC and DocQAC, DocQAC uniquely accesses document-specific context, including the current document’s content and its specific history of user query interactions. To address this setting, we propose a novel adaptive trie-guided decoding framework that uses user query prefixes to softly steer language models toward high-quality completions. Our approach introduces an adaptive penalty mechanism with tunable hyperparameters, enabling a principled trade-off between model confidence and trie-based guidance. To efficiently incorporate document context, we explore retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and lightweight contextual document signals such as titles, keyphrases, and summaries. When applied to encoder-decoder models like T5 and BART, our trie-guided framework outperforms strong baselines and even surpasses much larger instruction-tuned models such as LLaMA-3 and Phi-3 on seen queries across both seen and unseen documents. This demonstrates its practicality for real-world DocQAC deployments, where efficiency and scalability are critical. We evaluate our method on a newly introduced DocQAC benchmark derived from ORCAS, enriched with query-document pairs. We make both the DocQAC dataset (https://bit.ly/3IGEkbH) and code (https://github.com/rahcode7/DocQAC) publicly available.



50. ❌ LeGo-Code: Can Modular Curriculum Learning Advance Complex Code Generation? Insights from Text-to-SQL

作者: Salmane Chafik, Saad Ezzini, Ismail Berrada 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18254v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recently, code-oriented large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in translating natural language into executable code. Text-to-SQL is a significant application of this ability, enabling non-technical users to interact with relational databases using natural language. However, state-of-the-art models continue to struggle with highly complex logic, particularly deeply nested statements involving multiple joins and conditions, as well as with real-world database schemas that are noisy or poorly structured. In this paper, we investigate whether curriculum learning can improve the performance of code-based LLMs on Text-to-SQL tasks. Employing benchmarks including Spider and BIRD, we fine-tune models under different curriculum strategies. Our experiments show that naive curriculum, simply ordering training samples by complexity in a single epoch, fails to surpass standard fine-tuning due to catastrophic forgetting. To overcome this, we propose a Modular Adapter Composition (MAC) strategy. By sequentially training tier-specific adapters on incremental complexity levels (Easy to Extra-Hard), we create a scaffolded learning environment that improves performance on complex queries. Our approach not only produces measurable performance gains on the Spider and BIRD benchmarks but also provides a flexible, “Lego-like” architecture, allowing models to be composed and deployed based on specific schema difficulty requirements. These findings demonstrate that structured, modular learning is a superior alternative to monolithic fine-tuning for mastering the syntax and logic of complex code generation.



51. ❌ Style-Based Neural Architectures for Real-Time Weather Classification

作者: Hamed Ouattara, Pascal Houssam Salmane, Pierre Duthon, Frédéric Bernardin, Omar Ait Aider 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18251v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In this paper, we present three neural network architectures designed for real-time classification of weather conditions (sunny, rain, snow, fog) from images. These models, inspired by recent advances in style transfer, aim to capture the stylistic elements present in images. One model, called “Multi-PatchGAN”, is based on PatchGANs used in well-known architectures such as Pix2Pix and CycleGAN, but here adapted with multiple patch sizes for detection tasks. The second model, “Truncated ResNet50”, is a simplified version of ResNet50 retaining only its first nine layers. This truncation, determined by an evolutionary algorithm, facilitates the extraction of high-frequency features essential for capturing subtle stylistic details. Finally, we propose “Truncated ResNet50 with Gram Matrix and Attention”, which computes Gram matrices for each layer during training and automatically weights them via an attention mechanism, thus optimizing the extraction of the most relevant stylistic expressions for classification. These last two models outperform the state of the art and demonstrate remarkable generalization capability on several public databases. Although developed for weather detection, these architectures are also suitable for other appearance-based classification tasks, such as animal species recognition, texture classification, disease detection in medical imaging, or industrial defect identification.



52. ❌ AJ-Bench: Benchmarking Agent-as-a-Judge for Environment-Aware Evaluation

作者: Wentao Shi, Yu Wang, Yuyang Zhao, Yuxin Chen, Fuli Feng, Xueyuan Hao, Xi Su, Qi Gu, Hui Su, Xunliang Cai, Xiangnan He 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18240v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

As reinforcement learning continues to scale the training of large language model-based agents, reliably verifying agent behaviors in complex environments has become increasingly challenging. Existing approaches rely on rule-based verifiers or LLM-as-a-Judge models, which struggle to generalize beyond narrow domains. Agent-as-a-Judge addresses this limitation by actively interacting with environments and tools to acquire verifiable evidence, yet its capabilities remain underexplored. We introduce a benchmark AJ-Bench to systematically evaluate Agent-as-a-Judge across three domains-search, data systems, and graphical user interfaces-comprising 155 tasks and 516 annotated trajectories. The benchmark comprehensively assesses judge agents’ abilities in information acquisition, state verification, and process verification. Experiments demonstrate consistent performance gains over LLM-as-a-Judge baselines, while also revealing substantial open challenges in agent-based verification. Our data and code are available at https://aj-bench.github.io/.



53. ❌ Semantic-based Distributed Learning for Diverse and Discriminative Representations

作者: Zhuojun Tian, Chaouki Ben Issaid, Mehdi Bennis 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18237v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In large-scale distributed scenarios, increasingly complex tasks demand more intelligent collaboration across networks, requiring the joint extraction of structural representations from data samples. However, conventional task-specific approaches often result in nonstructural embeddings, leading to collapsed variability among data samples within the same class, particularly in classification tasks. To address this issue and fully leverage the intrinsic structure of data for downstream applications, we propose a novel distributed learning framework that ensures both diverse and discriminative representations. For independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) data, we reformulate and decouple the global optimization function by introducing constraints on representation variance. The update rules are then derived and simplified using a primal-dual approach. For non-i.i.d. data distributions, we tackle the problem by clustering and virtually replicating nodes, allowing model updates within each cluster using block coordinate descent. In both cases, the resulting optimal solutions are theoretically proven to maintain discriminative and diverse properties, with a guaranteed convergence for i.i.d. conditions. Additionally, semantic information from representations is shared among nodes, reducing the need for common neural network architectures. Finally, extensive simulations on MNIST, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 confirm the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms in capturing global structural representations.



54. ❌ Towards Disentangled Preference Optimization Dynamics Beyond Likelihood Displacement

作者: Wei Chen, Yubing Wu, Junmei Yang, Delu Zeng, Qibin Zhao, John Paisley, Min Chen, Zhou Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18239v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Preference optimization is widely used to align large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. However, many margin-based objectives suppress the chosen response along with the rejected one, a phenomenon known as likelihood displacement, and no general mechanism currently prevents this across objectives. We bridge this gap by presenting a unified \emph{incentive-score decomposition} of preference optimization, revealing that diverse objectives share identical local update directions and differ only in their scalar weighting coefficients. Building on this decomposition, by analyzing the dynamics of the chosen/rejected likelihoods, we identify the \emph{disentanglement band} (DB), a simple, testable condition that characterizes when training can avoid likelihood displacement by realizing the preferred pathway: suppressing the loser while maintaining the winner, possibly after an initial transient. Leveraging the DB, we propose a plug-and-play \emph{reward calibration} (RC) that adaptively rebalances chosen versus rejected updates to satisfy the DB and mitigate likelihood displacement, without redesigning the base objective. Empirical results show that RC steers training toward more disentangled dynamics and often improves downstream performance across a range of objectives. Our code is available at https://github.com/IceyWuu/DisentangledPreferenceOptimization.



作者: Jiayi Wu, Ruobing Xie, Zeqian Huang, Lei Jiang, Can Xu, Kangyang Luo, Ming Gao, Xiang Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18235v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Deep search agents can autonomously initiate multi-turn interactions with search engines, thereby exhibiting strong question-answering capabilities. Such performance critically relies on Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) as its core training algorithm. However, GRPO still faces several challenges in deep search settings. First, there exists a substantial mismatch between the correctness of intermediate steps and the reward signal, causing numerous correct intermediate steps to be incorrectly penalized when the final answer is wrong. Second, training is highly unstable, often resulting in degradation of natural language ability or even catastrophic training collapse. Our analysis attributes these issues to coarse-grained advantage assignment and an imbalance between positive and negative advantages. To address these problems, we propose CalibAdv, an advantage calibration method specifically designed for deep search tasks. Specifically, CalibAdv leverages the correctness of intermediate steps to downscale excessive negative advantages at a fine-grained level. It then rebalances positive and negative advantages in the answer component. Extensive experiments across three models and seven benchmarks demonstrate that CalibAdv improves both model performance and training stability. Our code is available at https://github.com/wujwyi/CalibAdv.



56. ❌ Evaluating Multi-Hop Reasoning in RAG Systems: A Comparison of LLM-Based Retriever Evaluation Strategies

作者: Lorenz Brehme, Thomas Ströhle, Ruth Breu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18234v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge to answer questions more accurately. However, research on evaluating RAG systems-particularly the retriever component-remains limited, as most existing work focuses on single-context retrieval rather than multi-hop queries, where individual contexts may appear irrelevant in isolation but are essential when combined. In this research, we use the HotPotQA, MuSiQue, and SQuAD datasets to simulate a RAG system and compare three LLM-as-judge evaluation strategies, including our proposed Context-Aware Retriever Evaluation (CARE). Our goal is to better understand how multi-hop reasoning can be most effectively evaluated in RAG systems. Experiments with LLMs from OpenAI, Meta, and Google demonstrate that CARE consistently outperforms existing methods for evaluating multi-hop reasoning in RAG systems. The performance gains are most pronounced in models with larger parameter counts and longer context windows, while single-hop queries show minimal sensitivity to context-aware evaluation. Overall, the results highlight the critical role of context-aware evaluation in improving the reliability and accuracy of retrieval-augmented generation systems, particularly in complex query scenarios. To ensure reproducibility, we provide the complete data of our experiments at https://github.com/lorenzbrehme/CARE.



57. ❌ Aether: Network Validation Using Agentic AI and Digital Twin

作者: Jordan Auge, Sam Betts, Giovanna Carofiglio, Giulio Grassi, Martin Gysi, John Kenneth d’Souza 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18233v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Network change validation remains a critical yet predominantly manual, time-consuming, and error-prone process in modern network operations. While formal network verification has made substantial progress in proving correctness properties, it is typically applied in offline, pre-deployment settings and faces challenges in accommodating continuous changes and validating live production behavior. Current operational approaches typically involve scattered testing tools, resulting in partial coverage and errors that surface only after deployment. In this paper, we present Aether, a novel approach that integrates Generative Agentic AI with a multi-functional Network Digital Twin to automate and streamline network change validation workflows. It features an agentic architecture with five specialized Network Operations AI agents that collaboratively handle the change validation lifecycle from intent analysis to network verification and testing. Aether agents use a unified Network Digital Twin integrating modeling, simulation, and emulation to maintain a consistent, up-to-date network view for verification and testing. By orchestrating agent collaboration atop this digital twin, Aether enables automated, rapid network change validation while reducing manual effort, minimizing errors, and improving operational agility and cost-effectiveness. We evaluate Aether over synthetic network change scenarios covering main classes of network changes and on past incidents from a major ISP operational network, demonstrating promising results in error detection (100%), diagnostic coverage (92-96%), and speed (6-7 minutes) over traditional methods.



58. ❌ Is SAM3 ready for pathology segmentation?

作者: Qiuyu Kong, Shakiba Sharifi, Zanxi Ruan, Yiming Wang, Marco Cristani 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18225v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Is Segment Anything Model 3 (SAM3) capable in segmenting Any Pathology Images? Digital pathology segmentation spans tissue-level and nuclei-level scales, where traditional methods often suffer from high annotation costs and poor generalization. SAM3 introduces Promptable Concept Segmentation, offering a potential automated interface via text prompts. With this work, we propose a systematic evaluation protocol to explore the capability space of SAM3 in a structured manner. Specifically, we evaluate SAM3 under different supervision settings including zero-shot, few-shot, and supervised with varying prompting strategies. Our extensive evaluation on pathological datasets including NuInsSeg, PanNuke and GlaS, reveals that: 1.text-only prompts poorly activate nuclear concepts. 2.performance is highly sensitive to visual prompt types and budgets. 3.few-shot learning offers gains, but SAM3 lacks robustness against visual prompt noise. and 4.a significant gap persists between prompt-based usage and task-trained adapter-based reference. Our study delineates SAM3’s boundaries in pathology image segmentation and provides practical guidance on the necessity of pathology domain adaptation.



59. ❌ WebCompass: Towards Multimodal Web Coding Evaluation for Code Language Models

作者: Xinping Lei, Xinyu Che, Junqi Xiong, Chenchen Zhang, Yukai Huang, Chenyu Zhou, Haoyang Huang, Minghao Liu, Letian Zhu, Hongyi Ye, Jinhua Hao, Ken Deng, Zizheng Zhan, Han Li, Dailin Li, Yifan Yao, Ming Sun, Zhaoxiang Zhang, Jiaheng Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18224v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models are rapidly evolving into interactive coding agents capable of end-to-end web coding, yet existing benchmarks evaluate only narrow slices of this capability, typically text-conditioned generation with static-correctness metrics, leaving visual fidelity, interaction quality, and codebase-level reasoning largely unmeasured. We introduce WebCompass, a multimodal benchmark that provides unified lifecycle evaluation of web engineering capability. Recognizing that real-world web coding is an iterative cycle of generation, editing, and repair, WebCompass spans three input modalities (text, image, video) and three task types (generation, editing, repair), yielding seven task categories that mirror professional workflows. Through a multi-stage, human-in-the-loop pipeline, we curate instances covering 15 generation domains, 16 editing operation types, and 11 repair defect types, each annotated at Easy/Medium/Hard levels. For evaluation, we adopt a checklist-guided LLM-as-a-Judge protocol for editing and repair, and propose a novel Agent-as-a-Judge paradigm for generation that autonomously executes generated websites in a real browser, explores interactive behaviors via the Model Context Protocol (MCP), and iteratively synthesizes targeted test cases, closely approximating human acceptance testing. We evaluate representative closed-source and open-source models and observe that: (1) closed-source models remain substantially stronger and more balanced; (2) editing and repair exhibit distinct difficulty profiles, with repair preserving interactivity better but remaining execution-challenging; (3) aesthetics is the most persistent bottleneck, especially for open-source models; and (4) framework choice materially affects outcomes, with Vue consistently challenging while React and Vanilla/HTML perform more strongly depending on task type.



60. ❌ TacticGen: Grounding Adaptable and Scalable Generation of Football Tactics

作者: Sheng Xu, Guiliang Liu, Tarak Kharrat, Yudong Luo, Mohamed Aloulou, Javier López Peña, Konstantin Sofeikov, Adam Reid, Paul Roberts, Steven Spencer, Joe Carnall, Ian McHale, Oliver Schulte, Hongyuan Zha, Wei-Shi Zheng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18210v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Success in association football relies on both individual skill and coordinated tactics. While recent advancements in spatio-temporal data and deep learning have enabled predictive analyses like trajectory forecasting, the development of tactical design remains limited. Bridging this gap is essential, as prediction reveals what is likely to occur, whereas tactic generation determines what should occur to achieve strategic objectives. In this work, we present TacticGen, a generative model for adaptable and scalable tactic generation. TacticGen formulates tactics as sequences of multi-agent movements and interactions conditioned on the game context. It employs a multi-agent diffusion transformer with agent-wise self-attention and context-aware cross-attention to capture cooperative and competitive dynamics among players and the ball. Trained with over 3.3 million events and 100 million tracking frames from top-tier leagues, TacticGen achieves state-of-the-art precision in predicting player trajectories. Building on it, TacticGen enables adaptable tactic generation tailored to diverse inference-time objectives through classifier guidance mechanism, specified via rules, natural language, or neural models. Its modeling performance is also inherently scalable. A case study with football experts confirms that TacticGen generates realistic, strategically valuable tactics, demonstrating its practical utility for tactical planning in professional football. The project page is available at: https://shengxu.net/TacticGen/.



61. ❌ A Control Architecture for Training-Free Memory Use

作者: Yanzhen Lu, Muchen Jiang, Zhicheng Qian, Xingyu Zhou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18206v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Prompt-injected memory can improve reasoning without updating model weights, but it also creates a control problem: retrieved content helps only when it is applied in the right state. We study this problem in a strict training-free setting and formulate it as applicability control: when to trigger a memory-assisted second pass, when to trust it, and how to maintain the memory bank over time. Our method combines uncertainty-based routing, confidence-based selective acceptance, bank selection across rule and exemplar memory, and evidence-based governance of the memory bank over time. Under a locked training-free protocol with compute-matched controls, it improves two core arithmetic benchmarks by +7.0 points on SVAMP and +7.67 points on ASDiv over baseline. The same architecture also transfers to QA and agent benchmarks with smaller positive effects and shows the same positive direction on a second checkpoint for the main arithmetic tasks. On arithmetic, the main empirical pattern is that the control architecture, rather than raw memory exposure, drives the improvements on SVAMP and ASDiv. Mechanistically, confidence separates helpful from harmful rule-bank interventions, and under fixed retrieval the repair-versus-corrupt difference localizes to rows whose retrieved set actually contains the edited entries.



62. ❌ Scalable Neighborhood-Based Multi-Agent Actor-Critic

作者: Tim Goppelsroeder, Rasmus Jensen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18190v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We propose MADDPG-K, a scalable extension to Multi-Agent Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (MADDPG) that addresses the computational limitations of centralized critic approaches. Centralized critics, which condition on the observations and actions of all agents, have demonstrated significant performance gains in cooperative and competitive multi-agent settings. However, their critic networks grow linearly in input size with the number of agents, making them increasingly expensive to train at scale. MADDPG-K mitigates this by restricting each agent’s critic to the $k$ closest agents under a chosen metric which in our case is Euclidean distance. This ensures a constant-size critic input regardless of the total agent count. We analyze the complexity of this approach, showing that the quadratic cost it retains arises from cheap scalar distance computations rather than the expensive neural network matrix multiplications that bottleneck standard MADDPG. We validate our method empirically across cooperative and adversarial environments from the Multi-Particle Environment suite, demonstrating competitive or superior performance compared to MADDPG, faster convergence in cooperative settings, and better runtime scaling as the number of agents grows. Our code is available at https://github.com/TimGop/MADDPG-K .



63. ❌ Committed SAE-Feature Traces for Audited-Session Substitution Detection in Hosted LLMs

作者: Ziyang Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18179v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Hosted-LLM providers have a silent-substitution incentive: advertise a stronger model while serving cheaper replies. Probe-after-return schemes such as SVIP leave a parallel-serve side-channel, since a dishonest provider can route the verifier’s probe to the advertised model while serving ordinary users from a substitute. We propose a commit-open protocol that closes this gap. Before any opening request, the provider commits via a Merkle tree to a per-position sparse-autoencoder (SAE) feature-trace sketch of its served output at a published probe layer. A verifier opens random positions, scores them against a public named-circuit probe library calibrated with cross-backend noise, and decides with a fixed-threshold joint-consistency z-score rule. We instantiate the protocol on three backbones – Qwen3-1.7B, Gemma-2-2B, and a 4.5x scale-up to Gemma-2-9B with a 131k-feature SAE. Of 17 attackers spanning same-family lifts, cross-family substitutes, and rank-<=128 adaptive LoRA, all are rejected at a shared, scale-stable threshold; the same attackers all evade a matched SVIP-style parallel-serve baseline. A white-box end-to-end attack that backpropagates through the frozen SAE encoder does not close the margin, and a feature-forgery attacker that never runs M_hon is bounded in closed form by an intrinsic-dimension argument. Commitment adds <=2.1% to forward-only wall-clock at batch 32.



64. ❌ STaD: Scaffolded Task Design for Identifying Compositional Skill Gaps in LLMs

作者: Sungeun An, Swanand Ravindra Kadhe, Shailja Thakur, Chad DeLuca, Hima Patel 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18177v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Benchmarks are often used as a standard to understand LLM capabilities in different domains. However, aggregate benchmark scores provide limited insight into compositional skill gaps of LLMs and how to improve them. To make these weaknesses visible, we propose Scaffolded Task Design (STaD) framework. STaD generates controlled variations of benchmark tasks based on the concept of scaffolding, which introduces structured, incremental support in a step-by-step manner. Rather than inspecting failures individually, this approach enables systematic and scalable probing of model behavior by identifying the specific reasoning skill compositions they lack. Treating the LLM as a black box, our experiments on six models of varying sizes reveal multiple failure points in three reasoning benchmarks and highlight each model’s unique and distinct skill gaps.



65. ❌ QuantumQA: Enhancing Scientific Reasoning via Physics-Consistent Dataset and Verification-Aware Reinforcement Learning

作者: Songxin Qu, Tai-Ping Sun, Yun-Jie Wang, Huan-Yu Liu, Cheng Xue, Xiao-Fan Xu, Han Fang, Yang Yang, Yu-Chun Wu, Guo-Ping Guo, Zhao-Yun Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18176v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) show strong capabilities in general reasoning but typically lack reliability in scientific domains like quantum mechanics, which demand strict adherence to physical constraints. This limitation arises from the scarcity of verifiable training resources and the inadequacy of coarse feedback signals in standard alignment paradigms. To address the data challenge, we introduce QuantumQA, a large-scale dataset constructed via a task-adaptive strategy and a hybrid verification protocol that combines deterministic solvers with semantic auditing to guarantee scientific rigor. Building on this foundation, we propose the verification-aware reward model (VRM) tailored for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), which employs an adaptive reward fusion (ARF) mechanism to dynamically integrate deterministic signals from a scientific execution suite (SES) with multidimensional semantic evaluations for precise supervision. Experimental results demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms baselines and general-purpose preference models. Notably, our optimized 8B model achieves performance competitive with proprietary models, validating that incorporating verifiable, rule-based feedback into the reinforcement learning loop offers a parameter-efficient alternative to pure scaling.



66. ❌ Copy-as-Decode: Grammar-Constrained Parallel Prefill for LLM Editing

作者: Ziyang Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18170v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

LLMs edit text and code by autoregressively regenerating the full output, even when most tokens appear verbatim in the input. We study Copy-as-Decode, a decoding-layer mechanism that recasts edit generation as structured decoding over a two-primitive grammar: references an input line range, emits new content. A token-level FSM guarantees syntactic validity, and a serving-layer primitive updates the KV cache for each copy span via a single parallel-prefill forward rather than $N$ autoregressive steps – sharing the parallel-forward kernel of speculative decoding but with input tokens as the draft and program-enforced acceptance replacing probabilistic verification. We report an upper-bound analysis that requires no end-to-end training. (i) Kernel speedup: on Qwen2.5-{1.5B, 7B}, copying $N$ tokens via parallel prefill is $6.8\times$–$303\times$ faster than autoregressive ($N \in [8, 512]$, A100 80GB bf16). (ii) Copy ceiling: on ProbeEdit and HumanEvalPack-Fix (Py/JS), $74$–$98%$ of gold tokens are reachable under the line-level primitive; composed with the empirical kernel over each corpus’s span histogram this yields a closed-form wall-clock bound of $29.0\times / 3.4\times / 4.2\times$ ($13.0\times$ pooled). A token-level extension reaches $91$–$99%$ coverage with $4.5\times$–$6.5\times$ floors. (iii) Pipeline losslessness: oracle programs round-trip through the deterministic resolver on all $482$ cases, localizing any downstream failure to span selection rather than the mechanism. A perturbation study shows pooled EM drops from $100%$ to $15.48%$ under off-by-one noise. A fine-tuning pilot on Qwen2.5-Coder-1.5B lifts HEvalFix-Py EM from $0/33$ (untrained) to $12$–$17%$, a learnability signal, not a production selector. Batched-serving integration and multi-file coverage are scoped as follow-up.



67. ❌ Beyond Reproduction: A Paired-Task Framework for Assessing LLM Comprehension and Creativity in Literary Translation

作者: Ran Zhang, Steffen Eger, Arda Tezcan, Wei Zhao, Simone Paolo Ponzetto, Lieve Macken 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18169v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for creative tasks such as literary translation. Yet translational creativity remains underexplored and is rarely evaluated at scale, while source-text comprehension is typically studied in isolation, despite the fact that, in professional translation, comprehension and creativity are tightly intertwined. We address these gaps with a paired-task framework applied to literary excerpts from 11 books. Task 1 assesses source-text comprehension, and Task 2 evaluates translational creativity through Units of Creative Potential (UCPs), such as metaphors and wordplay. Using a scalable evaluation setup that combines expert human annotations with UCP-based automatic scoring, we benchmark 23 models and four creativity-oriented prompts. Our findings show that strong comprehension does not translate into human-level creativity: models often produce literal or contextually inappropriate renderings, with particularly large gaps for the more distant English-Chinese language pair. Creativity-oriented prompts yield only modest gains, and only one model, Mistral-Large, comes close to human-level creativity (0.167 vs. 0.246). Across all model-prompt combinations, only three exceed a creativity score of 0.1, while the rest remain at or near zero.



68. ❌ Does “Do Differentiable Simulators Give Better Policy Gradients?’’ Give Better Policy Gradients?

作者: Ku Onoda, Paavo Parmas, Manato Yaguchi, Yutaka Matsuo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18161v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In policy gradient reinforcement learning, access to a differentiable model enables 1st-order gradient estimation that accelerates learning compared to relying solely on derivative-free 0th-order estimators. However, discontinuous dynamics cause bias and undermine the effectiveness of 1st-order estimators. Prior work addressed this bias by constructing a confidence interval around the REINFORCE 0th-order gradient estimator and using these bounds to detect discontinuities. However, the REINFORCE estimator is notoriously noisy, and we find that this method requires task-specific hyperparameter tuning and has low sample efficiency. This paper asks whether such bias is the primary obstacle and what minimal fixes suffice. First, we re-examine standard discontinuous settings from prior work and introduce DDCG, a lightweight test that switches estimators in nonsmooth regions; with a single hyperparameter, DDCG achieves robust performance and remains reliable with small samples. Second, on differentiable robotics control tasks, we present IVW-H, a per-step inverse-variance implementation that stabilizes variance without explicit discontinuity detection and yields strong results. Together, these findings indicate that while estimator switching improves robustness in controlled studies, careful variance control often dominates in practical deployments.



69. ❌ MM-JudgeBias: A Benchmark for Evaluating Compositional Biases in MLLM-as-a-Judge

作者: Sua Lee, Sanghee Park, Jinbae Im 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18164v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have been increasingly used as automatic evaluators-a paradigm known as MLLM-as-a-Judge. However, their reliability and vulnerabilities to biases remain underexplored. We find that many MLLM judges fail to reliably integrate key visual or textual cues, yielding unreliable evaluations when evidence is missing or mismatched, and exhibiting instability under semantically irrelevant perturbations. To address this, we systematically define Compositional Bias in MLLM-as-a-Judge systems and introduce MM-JudgeBias, a benchmark for evaluating it. MM-JudgeBias introduces controlled perturbations across Query, Image, and Response, and evaluates model behavior via two complementary metrics: Bias-Deviation (BD) for sensitivity and Bias-Conformity (BC) for stability. Our dataset of over 1,800 curated and refined multimodal samples, drawn from 29 source benchmarks, enables a fine-grained diagnosis of nine bias types across diverse tasks and domains. Experiments on 26 state-of-the-art MLLMs reveal systematic modality neglect and asymmetric evaluation tendencies, underscoring the need for more reliable judges.



70. ❌ State Transfer Reveals Reuse in Controlled Routing

作者: Yanzhen Lu, Zhicheng Qian, Muchen Jiang, Xingyu Zhou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18158v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Prompt-based interventions can change model behavior, but trained success alone does not identify where the behaviorally relevant state is represented. We study this question in controlled routing tasks using interfaces chosen on support data, held-out query evaluation, and matched necessity, sufficiency, and wrong-interface controls. On GPT-2 triop, an early interface supports exact transfer under these tests. On GPT-2 add/sub, zero-retrain compiled transfer at the fixed interface recovers most of donor routing accuracy, while trainable prompt slots can relearn the same behavior at several other positions only after additional support examples and optimization. These results distinguish fixed-interface reuse from prompt relocation in a setting where the two can be tested directly. Qwen routing provides a cross-architecture consistency check for the same matched-interface pattern at the operator token, although donor-specific identity on the local V-path remains unresolved. Generation and reasoning branches are used to map scope: they show broader transport or weaker controller identifiability once control depends on longer trajectories or harder selection. In controlled routing, fixed-interface transfer is therefore stronger evidence of reuse than trained prompt success alone.



71. ❌ Modular Representation Compression: Adapting LLMs for Efficient and Effective Recommendations

作者: Yunjia Xi, Menghui Zhu, Jianghao Lin, Bo Chen, Ruiming Tang, Yong Yu, Weinan Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18146v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recently, large language models (LLMs) have advanced recommendation systems (RSs), and recent works have begun to explore how to integrate LLMs into industrial RSs. While most approaches deploy LLMs offline to generate and pre-cache augmented representations for RSs, high-dimensional representations from LLMs introduce substantial storage and computational costs. Thus, it is crucial to compress LLM representations effectively. However, we identify a counterintuitive phenomenon during representation compression: Mid-layer Representation Advantage (MRA), where representations from middle layers of LLMs outperform those from final layers in recommendation tasks. This degraded final layer renders existing compression methods, which typically compress on the final layer, suboptimal. We interpret this based on modularity theory that LLMs develop spontaneous internal functional modularity and force the final layer to specialize in the proxy training task. Thus, we propose \underline{M}odul\underline{a}r \underline{R}epresentation \underline{C}ompression (MARC) to explicitly control the modularity of LLMs. First, Modular Adjustment explicitly introduces compression and task adaptation modules, enabling the LLM to operate strictly as a representation-learning module. Next, to ground each module to its specific task, Modular Task Decoupling uses information constraints and different network structures to decouple tasks. Extensive experiments validate that MARC addresses MRA and produces efficient representations. Notably, MARC achieved a 2.82% eCPM lift in an online A/B test within a large-scale commercial search advertising scenario.



72. ❌ Region-Grounded Report Generation for 3D Medical Imaging: A Fine-Grained Dataset and Graph-Enhanced Framework

作者: Cong Huy Nguyen, Son Dinh Nguyen, Guanlin Li, Tuan Dung Nguyen, Aditya Narayan Sankaran, Mai Huy Thong, Thanh Trung Nguyen, Mai Hong Son, Reza Farahbakhsh, Phi Le Nguyen, Noel Crespi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18145v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Automated medical report generation for 3D PET/CT imaging is fundamentally challenged by the high-dimensional nature of volumetric data and a critical scarcity of annotated datasets, particularly for low-resource languages. Current black-box methods map whole volumes to reports, ignoring the clinical workflow of analyzing localized Regions of Interest (RoIs) to derive diagnostic conclusions. In this paper, we bridge this gap by introducing VietPET-RoI, the first large-scale 3D PET/CT dataset with fine-grained RoI annotation for a low-resource language, comprising 600 PET/CT samples and 1,960 manually annotated RoIs, paired with corresponding clinical reports. Furthermore, to demonstrate the utility of this dataset, we propose HiRRA, a novel framework that mimics the professional radiologist diagnostic workflow by employing graph-based relational modules to capture dependencies between RoI attributes. This approach shifts from global pattern matching toward localized clinical findings. Additionally, we introduce new clinical evaluation metrics, namely RoI Coverage and RoI Quality Index, that measure both RoI localization accuracy and attribute description fidelity using LLM-based extraction. Extensive evaluation demonstrates that our framework achieves SOTA performance, surpassing existing models by 19.7% in BLEU and 4.7% in ROUGE-L, while achieving a remarkable 45.8% improvement in clinical metrics, indicating enhanced clinical reliability and reduced hallucination. Our code and dataset are available on GitHub.



73. ❌ AQPIM: Breaking the PIM Capacity Wall for LLMs with In-Memory Activation Quantization

作者: Kosuke Matsushima, Yasuyuki Okoshi, Masato Motomura, Daichi Fujiki 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18137v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Processing-in-Memory (PIM) architectures offer a promising solution to the memory bottlenecks in data-intensive machine learning, yet often overlook the growing challenge of activation memory footprint. Conventional PIM approaches struggle with massive KV cache sizes generated in long-context scenarios by Transformer-based models, frequently exceeding PIM’s limited memory capacity, while techniques like sparse attention can conflict with PIM’s need for data locality. Existing PIM approaches and quantization methods are often insufficient or poorly suited for leveraging the unique characteristics of activations. This work identifies an opportunity for PIM-specialized activation quantization to enhance bandwidth and compute efficiency. We explore clustering-based vector quantization approaches, which align well with activation characteristics and PIM’s internal bandwidth capabilities. Building on this, we introduce AQPIM, a novel PIM-aware activation quantization framework based on Product Quantization (PQ), optimizing it for modern Large Language Models (LLMs). By performing quantization directly within memory, AQPIM leverages PIM’s high internal bandwidth and enables direct computation on compressed data, significantly reducing both memory footprint and computational overhead for attention computation. AQPIM addresses PQ’s accuracy challenges by introducing several algorithmic optimizations. Evaluations demonstrate that AQPIM achieves significant performance improvements, drastically reducing of GPU-CPU communication that can account for 90$\sim$98.5% of decoding latency, together with 3.4$\times$ speedup over a SOTA PIM approach.



74. ❌ Soft Label Pruning and Quantization for Large-Scale Dataset Distillation

作者: Xiao Lingao, Yang He 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18135v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large-scale dataset distillation requires storing auxiliary soft labels that can be 30-40x larger on ImageNet-1K and 200x larger on ImageNet-21K than the condensed images, undermining the goal of dataset compression. We identify two fundamental issues necessitating such extensive labels: (1) insufficient image diversity, where high within-class similarity in synthetic images requires extensive augmentation, and (2) insufficient supervision diversity, where limited variety in supervisory signals during training leads to performance degradation at high compression rates. To address these challenges, we propose Label Pruning and Quantization for Large-scale Distillation (LPQLD). We enhance image diversity via class-wise batching and batch-normalization supervision during synthesis. For supervision diversity, we introduce Label Pruning with Dynamic Knowledge Reuse to improve label-per-augmentation diversity, and Label Quantization with Calibrated Student-Teacher Alignment to improve augmentation-per-image diversity. Our approach reduces soft label storage by 78x on ImageNet-1K and 500x on ImageNet-21K while improving accuracy by up to 7.2% and 2.8%, respectively. Extensive experiments validate the superiority of LPQLD across different network architectures and dataset distillation methods. Code is available at https://github.com/he-y/soft-label-pruning-quantization-for-dataset-distillation.



75. ❌ Multi-Agent Systems: From Classical Paradigms to Large Foundation Model-Enabled Futures

作者: Zixiang Wang, Mengjia Gong, Qiyu Sun, Jing Xu, Shuai Mao, Xin Jin, Qing-Long Han, Yang Tang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18133v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, multi-agent systems (MASs) are evolving from classical paradigms toward architectures built upon large foundation models (LFMs). This survey provides a systematic review and comparative analysis of classical MASs (CMASs) and LFM-based MASs (LMASs). First, within a closed-loop coordination framework, CMASs are reviewed across four fundamental dimensions: perception, communication, decision-making, and control. Beyond this framework, LMASs integrate LFMs to lift collaboration from low-level state exchanges to semantic-level reasoning, enabling more flexible coordination and improved adaptability across diverse scenarios. Then, a comparative analysis is conducted to contrast CMASs and LMASs across architecture, operating mechanism, adaptability, and application. Finally, future perspectives on MASs are presented, summarizing open challenges and potential research opportunities.



76. ❌ Training LLM Agents for Spontaneous, Reward-Free Self-Evolution via World Knowledge Exploration

作者: Qifan Zhang, Dongyang Ma, Tianqing Fang, Jia Li, Jing Tang, Nuo Chen, Haitao Mi, Yan Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18131v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Most agents today ``self-evolve’’ by following rewards and rules defined by humans. However, this process remains fundamentally dependent on external supervision; without human guidance, the evolution stops. In this work, we train agents to possess an intrinsic meta-evolution capability to spontaneously learn about unseen environments prior to task execution. To instill this ability, we design an outcome-based reward mechanism that measures how much an agent’s self-generated world knowledge improves its success rate on downstream tasks. This reward signal is used exclusively during the training phase to teach the model how to explore and summarize effectively. At inference time, the agent requires no external rewards or human instructions. It spontaneously performs native self-evolution to adapt to unknown environments using its internal parameters. When applied to Qwen3-30B and Seed-OSS-36B, this shift to native evolution yields a 20% performance increase on WebVoyager and WebWalker. Most strikingly, the generated world knowledge even enables a compact 14B Qwen3 model to outperform the unassisted Gemini-2.5-Flash, establishing a new paradigm for truly evolving agents.



77. ❌ Depth Registers Unlock W4A4 on SwiGLU: A Reader/Generator Decomposition

作者: Ziyang Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18128v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We study post-training W4A4 quantization in a controlled 300M-parameter SwiGLU decoder-only language model trained on 5B tokens of FineWeb-Edu, and ask which input-activation sites dominate the error. Naive round-to-nearest W4A4 collapses validation perplexity from FP16 23.6 to 1727. A simple residual-axis training-time intervention – Depth Registers with a register-magnitude hinge loss (DR+sink) – reduces this to 119 (about 14x) at matched FP16 PPL and matched zero-shot capacity, and composes with SmoothQuant to 39.9 PPL. The residual ~2 PPL gap to FP16 is the diagnostic core. We decompose W4A4 damage by input-activation site: the five trainable linears in a SwiGLU block split into residual-axis readers (qkv, w1, w3) and block-internal generators (o_proj, w2). Elementary norm arguments show residual-axis magnitude control bounds readers tightly but leaves w2’s bilinear input bounded only by the trivial product of factor bounds; empirically, DR+sink collapses reader kurtosis while leaving generators essentially unchanged, and the reader-rescued W4A4 residue is flat at ~0.28 nats across three matched checkpoints with Delta-remove(w2) dominating. We present DR+sink as a training-time probe rather than a deployment proposal: a post-hoc alternative (Per-Linear QuaRot) nearly matches it on the reader axis. Full QuaRot – adding online per-head value Hadamard plus online w2-input rotation – does not close the gap either, directly testing the prediction that orthogonal rotation cannot bound the bilinear SwiGLU tail. Claims are specific to our 300M, 5B-token, single-seed setting, and our experiments do not isolate the partition from the hinge.



78. ❌ TLoRA: Task-aware Low Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models

作者: Weicheng Lin, Yi Zhang, Jiawei Dang, Liang-Jie Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18124v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become a widely adopted parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for large language models, with its effectiveness largely influenced by the allocation of ranks and scaling factors, as well as initialization. Existing LoRA variants typically address only one of these factors, often at the cost of increased training complexity or reduced practical efficiency. In this work, we present Task-aware Low-Rank Adaptation (TLoRA), a unified framework that jointly optimizes initialization and resource allocation at the outset of training. TLoRA introduces a data-driven initialization strategy that aligns the LoRA $A$ matrix with task-relevant subspaces by performing singular value decomposition on the product of pre-trained weights and input activation covariance. After this, the $A$ matrix is frozen, and only the $B$ matrix is trained. Furthermore, TLoRA employs a sensitivity-based importance metric to adaptively allocate ranks and scaling factors across layers under a fixed parameter budget. We conduct extensive experiments that demonstrate TLoRA consistently performs excellently across various tasks, including natural language understanding, commonsense reasoning, math reasoning, code generation, and chat generation, while significantly reducing the number of trainable parameters.



79. ❌ Stability Implies Redundancy: Delta Attention Selective Halting for Efficient Long-Context Prefilling

作者: Yujie Chen, Tailai Chen, Yifeng Gao, Zoe Wanying He, Yijue Xu, Shaobo Wang, Linfeng Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18103v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Prefilling computational costs pose a significant bottleneck for Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) in long-context settings. While token pruning reduces sequence length, prior methods rely on heuristics that break compatibility with hardware-efficient kernels like FlashAttention. In this work, we observe that tokens evolve toward \textit{semantic fixing points}, making further processing redundant. To this end, we introduce Delta Attention Selective Halting (DASH), a training-free policy that monitors the layer-wise update dynamics of the self-attention mechanism to selectively halt stabilized tokens. Extensive evaluation confirms that DASH generalizes across language and vision benchmarks, delivering significant prefill speedups while preserving model accuracy and hardware efficiency. Code will be released at https://github.com/verach3n/DASH.git.



80. ❌ DSAINet: An Efficient Dual-Scale Attentive Interaction Network for General EEG Decoding

作者: Zhiyuan Ma, Zeyuan Li, Zihao Qiu, Jinhao Li, Lingqin Meng, Xinche Zhang, Yixuan Liu, Xinke Shen, Sen Song 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18095v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In real-world applications of noninvasive electroencephalography (EEG), specialized decoders often show limited generalizability across diverse tasks under subject-independent settings. One central challenge is that task-relevant EEG signals often follow different temporal organization patterns across tasks, while many existing methods rely on task-tailored architectural designs that introduce task-specific temporal inductive biases. This mismatch makes it difficult to adapt temporal modeling across tasks without changing the model configuration. To address these challenges, we propose DSAINet, an efficient dual-scale attentive interaction network for general EEG decoding. Specifically, DSAINet constructs shared spatiotemporal token representations from raw EEG signals and models diverse temporal dynamics through parallel convolutional branches at fine and coarse scales. The resulting representations are then adaptively refined by intra-branch attention to emphasize salient scale-specific patterns and by inter-branch attention to integrate task-relevant features across scales, followed by adaptive token aggregation to yield a compact representation for prediction. Extensive experiments on five downstream EEG decoding tasks across ten public datasets show that DSAINet consistently outperforms 13 representative baselines under strict subject-independent evaluation. Notably, this performance is achieved using the same architecture hyperparameters across datasets. Moreover, DSAINet achieves a favorable accuracy-efficiency trade-off with only about 77K trainable parameters and provides interpretable neurophysiological insights. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/zy0929/DSAINet.



81. ❌ The Collaboration Gap in Human-AI Work

作者: Varad Vishwarupe, Marina Jirotka, Nigel Shadbolt, Ivan Flechais 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18096v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

LLMs are increasingly presented as collaborators in programming, design, writing, and analysis. Yet the practical experience of working with them often falls short of this promise. In many settings, users must diagnose misunderstandings, reconstruct missing assumptions, and repeatedly repair misaligned responses. This poster introduces a conceptual framework for understanding why such collaboration remains fragile. Drawing on a constructivist grounded theory analysis of 16 interviews with designers, developers, and applied AI practitioners working on LLM-enabled systems, and informed by literature on human-AI collaboration, we argue that stable collaboration depends not only on model capability but on the interaction’s grounding conditions. We distinguish three recurrent structures of human-AI work: one-shot assistance, weak collaboration with asymmetric repair, and grounded collaboration. We propose that collaboration breaks down when the appearance of partnership outpaces the grounding capacity of the interaction and contribute a framework for discussing grounding, repair, and interaction structure in LLM-enabled work.



82. ❌ Autonomous Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Enhanced Search and Rescue of Drowning Swimmers: Image-Based Localization and Mission Simulation

作者: Sascha Emanuel Zell, Toni Schneidereit, Armin Fügenschuh, Michael Breuß 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18088v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Drowning is an omnipresent risk associated with any activity on or in the water, and rescuing a drowning person is particularly challenging because of the time pressure, making a short response time important. Further complicating water rescue are unsupervised and extensive swimming areas, precise localization of the target, and the transport of rescue personnel. Technical innovations can provide a remedy: We propose an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS), also known as a drone-in-a-box system, consisting of a fleet of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) allocated to purpose-built hangars near swimming areas. In an emergency, the UAS can be deployed in addition to Standard Rescue Operation (SRO) equipment to locate the distressed person early by performing a fully automated Search and Rescue (S&R) operation and dropping a flotation device. In this paper, we address automatically locating distressed swimmers using the image-based object detection architecture You Only Look Once (YOLO). We present a dataset created for this application and outline the training process. We evaluate the performance of YOLO versions 3, 5, and 8 and architecture sizes (nano, extra-large) using Mean Average Precision (mAP) metrics mAP@.5 and mAP@.5:.95. Furthermore, we present two Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) approaches to simulate response times of SRO and UAS-based water rescue. This enables estimation of time savings relative to SRO when selecting the UAS configuration (type, number, and location of UAVs and hangars). Computational experiments for a test area in the Lusatian Lake District, Germany, show that UAS assistance shortens response time. Even a small UAS with two hangars, each containing one UAV, reduces response time by a factor of five compared to SRO.



83. ❌ Mix and Match: Context Pairing for Scalable Topic-Controlled Educational Summarisation

作者: Nathikan Yodthapa, Thanapong Intharah, Sahan Bulathwela 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18087v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Topic-controlled summarisation enables users to generate summaries focused on specific aspects of source documents. This paper investigates a data augmentation strategy for training small language models (sLMs) to perform topic-controlled summarisation. We propose a pairwise data augmentation method that combines contexts from different documents to create contrastive training examples, enabling models to learn the relationship between topics and summaries more effectively. Using the SciTLDR dataset enriched with Wikipedia-derived topics, we systematically evaluate how augmentation scale affects model performance. Results show consistent improvements in win rate and semantic alignment as the augmentation scale increases, while the amount of real training data remains fixed. Consequently, a T5-base model trained with our augmentation approach achieves competitive performance relative to larger models, despite using significantly fewer parameters and substantially fewer real training examples.



84. ❌ Implicit neural representations as a coordinate-based framework for continuous environmental field reconstruction from sparse ecological observations

作者: Agnieszka Pregowska, Hazem M. Kalaji 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18083v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Reconstructing continuous environmental fields from sparse and irregular observations remains a central challenge in environmental modelling and biodiversity informatics. Many ecological datasets are heterogeneous in space and time, making grid-based approaches difficult to scale or generalise across domains. Here, we evaluate implicit neural representations (INRs) as a coordinate-based modelling framework for learning continuous spatial and spatio-temporal fields directly from coordinate inputs. We analyse their behaviour across three representative modelling scenarios: species distribution reconstruction, phenological dynamics, and morphological segmentation derived from open biodiversity data. Beyond predictive performance, we examine interpolation behaviour, spatial coherence, and computational characteristics relevant for environmental modelling workflows, including scalability, resolution-independent querying, and architectural inductive bias. Results show that neural fields provide stable continuous representations with predictable computational cost, complementing classical smoothers and tree-based approaches. These findings position coordinate-based neural fields as a flexible representation layer that can be integrated into environmental modelling pipelines and exploratory analysis frameworks for large, irregularly sampled datasets.



85. ❌ Class-specific diffusion models improve military object detection in a low-data domain

作者: Ella P. Fokkinga, Jan Erik van Woerden, Thijs A. Eker, Sebastiaan P. Snel, Elfi I. S. Hofmeijer, Klamer Schutte, Friso G. Heslinga 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18076v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Diffusion-based image synthesis has emerged as a promising source of synthetic training data for AI-based object detection and classification. In this work, we investigate whether images generated with diffusion can improve military vehicle detection under low-data conditions. We fine-tuned the text-to-image diffusion model FLUX.1 [dev] using LoRA with only 8 or 24 real images per class across 15 vehicle categories, resulting in class-specific diffusion models, which were used to generate new samples from automatically generated text prompts. The same real images were used to fine-tune the RF-DETR detector for a 15-class object detection task. Synthetic datasets generated by the diffusion models were then used to further improve detector performance. Importantly, no additional real data was required, as the generative models leveraged the same limited training samples. FLUX-generated images improved detection performance, particularly in the low-data regime (up to +8.0% mAP${50}$ with 8 real samples). To address the limited geometric control of text prompt-based diffusion, we additionally generated structurally guided synthetic data using ControlNet with Canny edge-map conditioning, yielding a FLUX-ControlNet (FLUX-CN) dataset with explicit control over viewpoint and pose. Structural guidance further enhanced performance when data is scarce (+4.1% mAP${50}$ with 8 real samples), but no additional benefit was observed when more real data is available. This study demonstrates that object-specific diffusion models are effective for improving military object detection in a low-data domain, and that structural guidance is most beneficial when real data is highly limited. These results highlight generative image data as an alternative to traditional simulation pipelines for the training of military AI systems.



86. ❌ Architectural Design Decisions in AI Agent Harnesses

作者: Hu Wei 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18071v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

AI agent systems increasingly rely on reusable non-LLM engineering infrastructure that packages tool mediation, context handling, delegation, safety control, and orchestration. Yet the architectural design decisions in this surrounding infrastructure remain understudied. This paper presents a protocol-guided, source-grounded empirical study of 70 publicly available agent-system projects, addressing three questions: which design-decision dimensions recur across projects, which co-occurrences structure those decisions, and which typical architectural patterns emerge. Methodologically, we contribute a transparent investigation procedure for analyzing heterogeneous agent-system corpora through source-code and technical-material reading. Empirically, we identify five recurring design dimensions (subagent architecture, context management, tool systems, safety mechanisms, and orchestration) and find that the corpus favors file-persistent, hybrid, and hierarchical context strategies; registry-oriented tool systems remain dominant while MCP- and plugin-oriented extensions are emerging; and intermediate isolation is common but high-assurance audit is rare. Cross-project co-occurrence analysis reveals that deeper coordination pairs with more explicit context services, stronger execution environments with more structured governance, and formalized tool-registration boundaries with broader ecosystem ambitions. We synthesize five recurring architectural patterns spanning lightweight tools, balanced CLI frameworks, multi-agent orchestrators, enterprise systems, and scenario-verticalized projects. The result provides an evidence-based account of architectural regularities in agent-system engineering, with grounded guidance for framework designers, selectors, and researchers.



87. ❌ Understanding Human Actions through the Lens of Executable Models

作者: Rimvydas Rubavicius, Manisha Dubey, N. Siddharth, Subramanian Ramamoorthy 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18064v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Human-centred systems require an understanding of human actions in the physical world. Temporally extended sequences of actions are intentional and structured, yet existing methods for recognising what actions are performed often do not attempt to capture their structure, particularly how the actions are executed. This, however, is crucial for assessing the quality of the action’s execution and its differences from other actions. To capture the internal mechanics of actions, we introduce a domain-specific language EXACT that represents human motions as underspecified motion programs, interpreted as reward-generating functions for zero-shot policy inference using forward-backwards representations. By leveraging the compositional nature of EXACT motion programs, we combine individual policies into an executable neuro-symbolic model that uses program structure for compositional modelling. We evaluate the utility of the proposed pipeline for creating executable action models by analysing motion-capture data to understand human actions, for the tasks of human action segmentation and action anomaly detection. Our results show that the use of executable action models improves data efficiency and captures intuitive relationships between actions compared with monolithic, task-specific approaches.



88. ❌ ExAI5G: A Logic-Based Explainable AI Framework for Intrusion Detection in 5G Networks

作者: Saeid Sheikhi, Panos Kostakos, Lauri Loven 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18052v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Intrusion detection systems (IDSs) for 5G networks must handle complex, high-volume traffic. Although opaque “black-box” models can achieve high accuracy, their lack of transparency hinders trust and effective operational response. We propose ExAI5G, a framework that prioritizes interpretability by integrating a Transformer-based deep learning IDS with logic-based explainable AI (XAI) techniques. The framework uses Integrated Gradients to attribute feature importance and extracts a surrogate decision tree to derive logical rules. We introduce a novel evaluation methodology for LLM-generated explanations, using a powerful evaluator LLM to assess actionability and measuring their semantic similarity and faithfulness. On a 5G IoT intrusion dataset, our system achieves 99.9% accuracy and a 0.854 macro F1-score, demonstrating strong performance. More importantly, we extract 16 logical rules with 99.7% fidelity, making the model’s reasoning transparent. The evaluation demonstrates that modern LLMs can generate explanations that are both faithful and actionable, indicating that it is possible to build a trustworthy and effective IDS without compromising performance for the sake of marginal gains from an opaque model.



89. ❌ The Topological Dual of a Dataset: A Logic-to-Topology Encoding for AlphaGeometry-Style Data

作者: Anthony Bordg 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18050v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

AlphaGeometry represents a milestone in neuro-symbolic reasoning, yet its architecture faces a log-linear scaling bottleneck within its symbolic deduction engine that limits its efficiency as problem complexity increases. Recent technical reports suggest that current domain-specific languages may be isomorphic as input representations to natural language, interchanging them acts as a performance-invariant transformation, implying that current neural guidance relies on superficial encodings rather than structural understanding. This paper addresses this representation bottleneck by proposing a logic-to-topology encoding designed to reveal the structural invariants of a model’s latent space under a transformation of its input space. By leveraging the Logic of Observation, we utilize the duality between provability in observable theories and topologies to propose a logic-to-topology encoder for the input space. We introduce the concept of the “topological dual of a dataset”, a transformation that bridges formal logic, topology, and neural processing. This framework serves as a Rosetta Stone for neuro-symbolic AI, providing a principled pathway for the mechanistic interpretability of how models navigate complex discovery paths.



90. ❌ First, Do No Harm (With LLMs): Mitigating Racial Bias via Agentic Workflows

作者: Sihao Xing, Zaur Gouliev 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18038v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in clinical settings, raising concerns about racial bias in both generated medical text and clinical reasoning. Existing studies have identified bias in medical LLMs, but many focus on single models and give less attention to mitigation. This study uses the EU AI Act as a governance lens to evaluate five widely used LLMs across two tasks, namely synthetic patient-case generation and differential diagnosis ranking. Using race-stratified epidemiological distributions in the United States and expert differential diagnosis lists as benchmarks, we apply structured prompt templates and a two-part evaluation design to examine implicit and explicit racial bias. All models deviated from observed racial distributions in the synthetic case generation task, with GPT-4.1 showing the smallest overall deviation. In the differential diagnosis task, DeepSeek V3 produced the strongest overall results across the reported metrics. When embedded in an agentic workflow, DeepSeek V3 showed an improvement of 0.0348 in mean p-value, 0.1166 in median p-value, and 0.0949 in mean difference relative to the standalone model, although improvement was not uniform across every metric. These findings support multi-metric bias evaluation for AI systems used in medical settings and suggest that retrieval-based agentic workflows may reduce some forms of explicit bias in benchmarked diagnostic tasks. Detailed prompt templates, experimental datasets, and code pipelines are available on our GitHub.



91. ❌ RASP-Tuner: Retrieval-Augmented Soft Prompts for Context-Aware Black-Box Optimization in Non-Stationary Environments

作者: Enze Pan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18026v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Many deployed systems expose black-box objectives whose minimizing configuration shifts with an externally observed context. When contexts revisit a small set of latent regimes, an optimizer that discards history pays repeated adaptation cost; when each step must remain inexpensive, full Gaussian-process (GP) refits at high observation counts are difficult to sustain. We cast online tuning as context-conditioned regret minimization and present RASP-Tuner, which instantiates a decomposition motivated by first principles: (i) identify a regime proxy by retrieving similar past contexts; (ii) predict short-horizon loss with a mixture-of-experts surrogate whose input concatenates parameters, context, and a retrieved soft prompt; (iii) adapt chiefly in a low-dimensional prompt subspace, invoking full surrogate updates only when scalarized error or disagreement spikes. A RealErrorComposer maps heterogeneous streaming metrics to [0,1] via EMA-stabilized logistic scores, supplying a single differentiable training target. On nine synthetic non-stationary benchmarks, an adversarial-context sanity check, and three tabular real-world streams (Section on real-world experiments), RASP-Tuner improves or matches cumulative regret relative to our GP-UCB and CMA-ES implementations on seven of nine synthetic tasks under paired tests at horizon T=100, while recording 8-12 times lower wall-clock per step than sliding-window GP-UCB on identical hardware. Idealized analysis in a cluster-separated, strongly convex regime model (RA-GD) supplies sufficient conditions for bounded dynamic regret; the deployed pipeline violates several of these premises, and we articulate which gaps remain open.



92. ❌ SELF-EMO: Emotional Self-Evolution from Recognition to Consistent Expression

作者: Shaowei Zhang, Faqiang Qian, Yan Chen, Ziliang Wang, Kang An, Yong Dai, Mengya Gao, Yichao Wu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18003v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Emotion Recognition in Conversation (ERC) has become a fundamental capability for large language models (LLMs) in human-centric interaction. Beyond accurate recognition, coherent emotional expression is also crucial, yet both are limited by the scarcity and static nature of high-quality annotated data. In this work, we propose SELF-EMO, a self-evolution framework grounded in the hypothesis that better emotion prediction leads to more consistent emotional responses. We introduce two auxiliary tasks, emotional understanding and emotional expression, and design a role-based self-play paradigm where the model acts as both an emotion recognizer and a dialogue responder. Through iterative interactions, the model generates diverse conversational trajectories, enabling scalable data generation. To ensure quality, we adopt a data flywheel mechanism that filters candidate predictions and responses using a smoothed IoU-based reward and feeds selected samples back for continuous self-improvement without external supervision. We further develop SELF-GRPO, a reinforcement learning algorithm that stabilizes optimization with multi-label alignment rewards and group-level consistency signals. Experiments on IEMOCAP, MELD, and EmoryNLP show that SELF-EMO achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving accuracy by +6.33% on Qwen3-4B and +8.54% on Qwen3-8B, demonstrating strong effectiveness and generalization.



93. ❌ Diversity Collapse in Multi-Agent LLM Systems: Structural Coupling and Collective Failure in Open-Ended Idea Generation

作者: Nuo Chen, Yicheng Tong, Yuzhe Yang, Yufei He, Xueyi Zhang, Zou Qingyun, Qian Wang, Bingsheng He 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18005v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Multi-agent systems (MAS) are increasingly used for open-ended idea generation, driven by the expectation that collective interaction will broaden the exploration diversity. However, when and why such collaboration truly expands the solution space remains unclear. We present a systematic empirical study of diversity in MAS-based ideation across three bottom-up levels: model intelligence, agent cognition, and system dynamics. At the model level, we identify a compute efficiency paradox, where stronger, highly aligned models yield diminishing marginal diversity despite higher per-sample quality. At the cognition level, authority-driven dynamics suppress semantic diversity compared to junior-dominated groups. At the system level, group-size scaling yields diminishing returns and dense communication topologies accelerate premature convergence. We characterize these outcomes as collective failures emerging from structural coupling, a process where interaction inadvertently contracts agent exploration and triggers diversity collapse. Our analysis shows that this collapse arises primarily from the interaction structure rather than inherent model insufficiency, highlighting the importance of preserving independence and disagreement when designing MAS for creative tasks. Our code is available at https://github.com/Xtra-Computing/MAS_Diversity.



94. ❌ AIT Academy: Cultivating the Complete Agent with a Confucian Three-Domain Curriculum

作者: Jiaqi Li, Lvyang Zhang, Yang Zhao, Wen Lu, Lidong Zhai 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17989v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

What does it mean to give an AI agent a complete education? Current agent development produces specialists systems optimized for a single capability dimension, whether tool use, code generation, or security awareness that exhibit predictable deficits wherever they were not trained. We argue this pattern reflects a structural absence: there is no curriculum theory for agents, no principled account of what a fully developed agent should know, be, and be able to do across the full scope of intelligent behavior. This paper introduces the AIT Academy (Agents Institute of Technology Academy), a curriculum framework for cultivating AI agents across the tripartite structure of human knowledge. Grounded in Kagan’s Three Cultures and UNESCO ISCED-F 2013, AIT organizes agent capability development into three domains: Natural Science and Technical Reasoning (Domain I), Humanities and Creative Expression (Domain II), and Social Science and Ethical Reasoning (Domain III). The Confucian Six Arts (liuyi) a 2,500-year-old holistic education system are reinterpreted as behavioral archetypes that map directly onto trainable agent capabilities within each domain. Three representative training grounds instantiate the framework across multiple backbone LLMs: the ClawdGO Security Dojo (Domain I), Athen’s Academy (Domain II), and the Alt Mirage Stage (Domain III). Experiments demonstrate a 15.9-point improvement in security capability scores under weakest-first curriculum scheduling, and a 7-percentage-point gain in social reasoning performance under principled attribution modeling. A cross-domain finding Security Awareness Calibration Pathology (SACP), in which over-trained Domain I agents fail on out-of-distribution evaluation illustrates the diagnostic value of a multi-domain perspective unavailable to any single-domain framework.



95. ❌ Latent Fourier Transform

作者: Mason Wang, Cheng-Zhi Anna Huang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17986v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We introduce the Latent Fourier Transform (LatentFT), a framework that provides novel frequency-domain controls for generative music models. LatentFT combines a diffusion autoencoder with a latent-space Fourier transform to separate musical patterns by timescale. By masking latents in the frequency domain during training, our method yields representations that can be manipulated coherently at inference. This allows us to generate musical variations and blends from reference examples while preserving characteristics at desired timescales, which are specified as frequencies in the latent space. LatentFT parallels the role of the equalizer in music production: while traditional equalizers operates on audible frequencies to shape timbre, LatentFT operates on latent-space frequencies to shape musical structure. Experiments and listening tests show that LatentFT improves condition adherence and quality compared to baselines. We also present a technique for hearing frequencies in the latent space in isolation, and show different musical attributes reside in different regions of the latent spectrum. Our results show how frequency-domain control in latent space provides an intuitive, continuous frequency axis for conditioning and blending, advancing us toward more interpretable and interactive generative music models.



96. ❌ From Fallback to Frontline: When Can LLMs be Superior Annotators of Human Perspectives?

作者: Hasan Amin, Harry Yizhou Tian, Xiaoni Duan, Chien-Ju Ho, Rajiv Khanna, Ming Yin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17968v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Although large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as annotators at scale, they are typically treated as a pragmatic fallback rather than a faithful estimator of human perspectives. This work challenges that presumption. By framing perspective-taking as the estimation of a latent group-level judgment, we characterize the conditions under which modern LLMs can outperform human annotators, including in-group humans, when predicting aggregate subgroup opinions on subjective tasks, and show that these conditions are common in practice. This advantage arises from structural properties of LLMs as estimators, including low variance and reduced coupling between representation and processing biases, rather than any claim of lived experience. Our analysis identifies clear regimes where LLMs act as statistically superior frontline estimators, as well as principled limits where human judgment remains essential. These findings reposition LLMs from a cost-saving compromise to a principled tool for estimating collective human perspectives.



97. ❌ A Sugeno Integral View of Binarized Neural Network Inference

作者: Ismaïl Baaj, Henri Prade 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17967v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In this article, we establish a precise connection between binarized neural networks (BNNs) and Sugeno integrals. The advantage of the Sugeno integral is that it provides a framework for representing the importance of inputs and their interactions, while being equivalent to a set of if-then rules. For a hidden BNN neuron at inference time, we show that the activation threshold test can be written as a Sugeno integral on binary inputs. This yields an explicit set-function representation of each neuron decision, and an associated rule-based representation. We also provide a Sugeno-integral expression for the last-layer score. Finally, we discuss how the same framework can be adapted to support richer input interactions and how it can be extended beyond the binary case induced by binarized neural networks.



98. ❌ TPS-CalcBench: A Benchmark and Diagnostic Evaluation Framework for LLM Analytical Calculation Competence in Hypersonic Thermal Protection System Engineering

作者: Jinglai Zheng, Chuhan Qiao, Haiming Huang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17966v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Deploying LLMs as reasoning assistants in safety-critical aerospace engineering requires stricter evaluation criteria than general scientific benchmarks. In hypersonic thermal protection system (TPS) design, inaccurate stagnation-point heat flux or boundary-layer calculations may cause catastrophic design margin violations. Models with numerically reasonable but physically invalid answers are more dangerous than those declining to respond. Current scientific benchmarks only test abstract math and basic physics, evaluate final answers solely, ignore engineering reasoning processes, and cannot detect such critical failures. We propose TPS-CalcBench, the first diagnostic benchmark for closed-form analytical calculations in hypersonic aerodynamics and high-temperature gas dynamics that experienced TPS engineers conduct without simulations. Our contributions include domain-oriented task taxonomy with 4 difficulty levels and 8 categories from Anderson’s textbook, dual-track evaluation measuring result accuracy and reasoning quality via an 8-dimension rubric and calibrated judge with human audit to identify right answer wrong reasoning issues, human-AI data pipeline producing 420 high-confidence core items and 810 noise-controlled pre-gating items from 4560 raw data, noise-sensitivity analysis measuring data quality impacts on model ranking, and three diagnostic intervention methods: DFA-TPS fine-tuning, RAG-EQ retrieval grounding and PA-CoT process-aware prompting. Tests on 13 models from 7 groups show wide performance differences (KPI 12.6-87.9), hidden formula selection defects, data-driven rank changes and effective intervention improvements, establishing a complete diagnose-evaluate-intervene framework for safety-critical engineering LLM deployment assessment.



99. ❌ CADMAS-CTX: Contextual Capability Calibration for Multi-Agent Delegation

作者: Chuhan Qiao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17950v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We revisit multi-agent delegation under a stronger and more realistic assumption: an agent’s capability is not fixed at the skill level, but depends on task context. A coding agent may excel at short standalone edits yet fail on long-horizon debugging; a planner may perform well on shallow tasks yet degrade on chained dependencies. Static skill-level capability profiles therefore average over heterogeneous situations and can induce systematic misdelegation. We propose CADMAS-CTX, a framework for contextual capability calibration. For each agent, skill, and coarse context bucket, CADMAS-CTX maintains a Beta posterior that captures stable experience in that part of the task space. Delegation is then made by a risk-aware score that combines the posterior mean with an uncertainty penalty, so that agents delegate only when a peer appears better and that assessment is sufficiently well supported by evidence. This paper makes three contributions. First, a hierarchical contextual capability profile replaces static skill-level confidence with context-conditioned posteriors. Second, based on contextual bandit theory, we formally prove context-aware routing achieves lower cumulative regret than static routing under sufficient context heterogeneity, formalizing the bias-variance tradeoff. Third, we empirically validate our method on GAIA and SWE-bench benchmarks. On GAIA with GPT-4o agents, CADMAS-CTX achieves 0.442 accuracy, outperforming static baseline 0.381 and AutoGen 0.354 with non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals. On SWE-bench Lite, it improves resolve rate from 22.3% to 31.4%. Ablations show the uncertainty penalty improves robustness against context tagging noise. Our results demonstrate contextual calibration and risk-aware delegation significantly improve multi-agent teamwork compared with static global skill assignments.



100. ❌ RAVEN: Retrieval-Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network for Memory Corruption Analysis in User Code and Binary Programs

作者: Parteek Jamwal, Minghao Shao, Boyuan Chen, Achyuta Muthuvelan, Asini Subanya, Boubacar Ballo, Kashish Satija, Mariam Shafey, Mohamed Mahmoud, Moncif Dahaji Bouffi, Pasindu Wickramasinghe, Siyona Goel, Yaakulya Sabbani, Hakim Hacid, Mthandazo Ndhlovu, Eleanna Kafeza, Sanjay Rawat, Muhammad Shafique 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17948v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various cybersecurity tasks, including vulnerability classification, detection, and patching. However, their potential in automated vulnerability report documentation and analysis remains underexplored. We present RAVEN (Retrieval Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network), a framework leveraging LLM agents and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) to synthesize comprehensive vulnerability analysis reports. Given vulnerable source code, RAVEN generates reports following the Google Project Zero Root Cause Analysis template. The framework uses four modules: an Explorer agent for vulnerability identification, a RAG engine retrieving relevant knowledge from curated databases including Google Project Zero reports and CWE entries, an Analyst agent for impact and exploitation assessment, and a Reporter agent for structured report generation. To ensure quality, RAVEN includes a task specific LLM Judge evaluating reports across structural integrity, ground truth alignment, code reasoning quality, and remediation quality. We evaluate RAVEN on 105 vulnerable code samples covering 15 CWE types from the NIST-SARD dataset. Results show an average quality score of 54.21%, supporting the effectiveness of our approach for automated vulnerability documentation.



101. ❌ GSQ: Highly-Accurate Low-Precision Scalar Quantization for LLMs via Gumbel-Softmax Sampling

作者: Alireza Dadgarnia, Soroush Tabesh, Mahdi Nikdan, Michael Helcig, Eldar Kurtic, Dan Alistarh 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18556v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Weight quantization has become a standard tool for efficient LLM deployment, especially for local inference, where models are now routinely served at 2-3 bits per parameter. The state of the art is currently split into two sets of methods: simple scalar quantization techniques, such as GPTQ or AWQ, which are widely deployed but plateau in accuracy at 3-4 bits per parameter (bpp), and “second-generation” vector- or trellis-quantized methods, such as QTIP, GPTVQ and AQLM, which push the accuracy frontier at low bit-widths but are notoriously hard to implement and to scale, and have gained relatively less traction. In this paper, we ask whether this gap is fundamental, or whether a carefully optimized scalar quantizer can recover most of it. We answer in the affirmative, by introducing GSQ (Gumbel-Softmax Quantization), a post-training scalar quantization method which jointly learns the per-coordinate grid assignments and the per-group scales using a Gumbel-Softmax relaxation of the discrete grid. GSQ matches the cardinality of the relaxation to the small number of levels available in the target bit-width regime (e.g., 3-8 levels for ternary and 3 bpp, respectively), making the relaxation tight and the optimization tractable. Practically, on the standard Llama-3.1-8B/70B-Instruct models, GSQ closes most of the gap between scalar quantization and the QTIP frontier at 2 and 3 bits, while using a symmetric scalar grid with group-wise quantization, and thus fully compatible with existing scalar inference kernels. We further show that GSQ scales to trillion-scale Mixture-of-Experts models such as Kimi-K2.5, where vector-quantized methods are difficult to apply.



102. ❌ Dual Alignment Between Language Model Layers and Human Sentence Processing

作者: Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Alex Warstadt, Yohei Oseki, Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18563v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

A recent study (Kuribayashi et al., 2025) has shown that human sentence processing behavior, typically measured on syntactically unchallenging constructions, can be effectively modeled using surprisal from early layers of large language models (LLMs). This raises the question of whether such advantages of internal layers extend to more syntactically challenging constructions, where surprisal has been reported to underestimate human cognitive effort. In this paper, we begin by exploring internal layers that better estimate human cognitive effort observed in syntactic ambiguity processing in English. Our experiments show that, in contrast to naturalistic reading, later layers better estimate such a cognitive effort, but still underestimate the human data. This dual alignment sheds light on different modes of sentence processing in humans and LMs: naturalistic reading employs a somewhat weak prediction akin to earlier layers of LMs, while syntactically challenging processing requires more fully-contextualized representations, better modeled by later layers of LMs. Motivated by these findings, we also explore several probability-update measures using shallow and deep layers of LMs, showing a complementary advantage to single-layer’s surprisal in reading time modeling.



103. ❌ FUSE: Ensembling Verifiers with Zero Labeled Data

作者: Joonhyuk Lee, Virginia Ma, Sarah Zhao, Yash Nair, Asher Spector, Regev Cohen, Emmanuel J. Candès 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18547v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Verification of model outputs is rapidly emerging as a key primitive for both training and real-world deployment of large language models (LLMs). In practice, this often involves using imperfect LLM judges and reward models since ground truth acquisition can be time-consuming and expensive. We introduce Fully Unsupervised Score Ensembling (FUSE), a method for improving verification quality by ensembling verifiers without access to ground truth correctness labels. The key idea behind FUSE is to control conditional dependencies between verifiers in a manner that improves the unsupervised performance of a class of spectral algorithms from the ensembling literature. Despite requiring zero ground truth labels, FUSE typically matches or improves upon semi-supervised alternatives in test-time scaling experiments with diverse sets of generator models, verifiers, and benchmarks. In particular, we validate our method on both conventional academic benchmarks such as GPQA Diamond and on frontier, unsaturated benchmarks such as Humanity’s Last Exam and IMO Shortlist questions.



104. ❌ MASS-RAG: Multi-Agent Synthesis Retrieval-Augmented Generation

作者: Xingchen Xiao, Heyan Huang, Runheng Liu, Jincheng Xie 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18509v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) are widely used in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to incorporate external knowledge at inference time. However, when retrieved contexts are noisy, incomplete, or heterogeneous, a single generation process often struggles to reconcile evidence effectively. We propose \textbf{MASS-RAG}, a multi-agent synthesis approach to retrieval-augmented generation that structures evidence processing into multiple role-specialized agents. MASS-RAG applies distinct agents for evidence summarization, evidence extraction, and reasoning over retrieved documents, and combines their outputs through a dedicated synthesis stage to produce the final answer. This design exposes multiple intermediate evidence views, allowing the model to compare and integrate complementary information before answer generation. Experiments on four benchmarks show that MASS-RAG consistently improves performance over strong RAG baselines, particularly in settings where relevant evidence is distributed across retrieved contexts.



105. ❌ Aligning Language Models for Lyric-to-Melody Generation with Rule-Based Musical Constraints

作者: Hao Meng, Siyuan Zheng, Shuran Zhou, Qiangqiang Wang, Yang Song 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18489v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in lyric-to-melody generation, but models trained with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) often produce musically implausible melodies with issues like poor rhythm and unsuitable vocal ranges, a phenomenon we term “constraint violation”. To address this, we propose a novel alignment framework that instills musical knowledge without human annotation. We define rule-based musical constraints to automatically generate a preference dataset from an SFT model’s outputs. The model is then aligned through a sequential process, first using Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) on paired preference data, followed by Kahneman-Tversky Optimization (KTO) on unpaired negative samples. Experimental results demonstrate that our aligned model substantially reduces rule violations and outperforms strong baselines in both objective and subjective evaluations, generating melodies with substantially improved musicality and coherence. An interactive demo with audio comparisons is available at https://arain233.github.io/AligningMelody-demo.



106. ❌ OneVL: One-Step Latent Reasoning and Planning with Vision-Language Explanation

作者: Jinghui Lu, Jiayi Guan, Zhijian Huang, Jinlong Li, Guang Li, Lingdong Kong, Yingyan Li, Han Wang, Shaoqing Xu, Yuechen Luo, Fang Li, Chenxu Dang, Junli Wang, Tao Xu, Jing Wu, Jianhua Wu, Xiaoshuai Hao, Wen Zhang, Tianyi Jiang, Lingfeng Zhang, Lei Zhou, Yingbo Tang, Jie Wang, Yinfeng Gao, Xizhou Bu, Haochen Tian, Yihang Qiu, Feiyang Jia, Lin Liu, Yigu Ge, Hanbing Li, Yuannan Shen, Jianwei Cui, Hongwei Xie, Bing Wang, Haiyang Sun, Jingwei Zhao, Jiahui Huang, Pei Liu, Zeyu Zhu, Yuncheng Jiang, Zibin Guo, Chuhong Gong, Hanchao Leng, Kun Ma, Naiyang Wang, Guang Chen, Kuiyuan Yang, Hangjun Ye, Long Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18486v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has become a powerful driver of trajectory prediction in VLA-based autonomous driving, yet its autoregressive nature imposes a latency cost that is prohibitive for real-time deployment. Latent CoT methods attempt to close this gap by compressing reasoning into continuous hidden states, but consistently fall short of their explicit counterparts. We suggest that this is due to purely linguistic latent representations compressing a symbolic abstraction of the world, rather than the causal dynamics that actually govern driving. Thus, we present OneVL (One-step latent reasoning and planning with Vision-Language explanations), a unified VLA and World Model framework that routes reasoning through compact latent tokens supervised by dual auxiliary decoders. Alongside a language decoder that reconstructs text CoT, we introduce a visual world model decoder that predicts future-frame tokens, forcing the latent space to internalize the causal dynamics of road geometry, agent motion, and environmental change. A three-stage training pipeline progressively aligns these latents with trajectory, language, and visual objectives, ensuring stable joint optimization. At inference, the auxiliary decoders are discarded and all latent tokens are prefilled in a single parallel pass, matching the speed of answer-only prediction. Across four benchmarks, OneVL becomes the first latent CoT method to surpass explicit CoT, delivering state-of-the-art accuracy at answer-only latency, and providing direct evidence that tighter compression, when guided in both language and world-model supervision, produces more generalizable representations than verbose token-by-token reasoning. Project Page: https://xiaomi-embodied-intelligence.github.io/OneVL



107. ❌ ESsEN: Training Compact Discriminative Vision-Language Transformers in a Low-Resource Setting

作者: Clayton Fields, Casey Kennington 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18452v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Vision-language modeling is rapidly increasing in popularity with an ever expanding list of available models. In most cases, these vision-language models have parameters in the tens of billions, which is necessary for some needs, but in many cases smaller models are necessary (e.g., on edge devices or independent robotic platforms). Unfortunately, there is little research in producing light-weight models or in training them with small datasets. Inspired by the language learning progression and data sparsity in child development, in this paper, we address both of these goals in a systematic fashion. We show that two-tower encoder models are superior to one-tower encoders in low-resource settings for discriminative English tasks. We show also that incorporating traditional convolutional networks into the two-tower transformer architecture can help produce parameter efficient vision-language models. Finally, we show that the cross-modal fusion module of two-tower encoders can vary significantly in shape and size while producing the same results. In addition, we present ESsEN, a compact vision-language model that can be trained end-to-end with relatively few resources that performs as well on several tasks with only a fraction of the parameters compared to other models. The experimental results and the tools we present here make vision-language modeling more accessible to a wider variety of researchers.



108. ❌ BhashaSutra: A Task-Centric Unified Survey of Indian NLP Datasets, Corpora, and Resources

作者: Raghvendra Kumar, Devankar Raj, Sriparna Saha 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18423v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

India’s linguistic landscape, spanning 22 scheduled languages and hundreds of marginalized dialects, has driven rapid growth in NLP datasets, benchmarks, and pretrained models. However, no dedicated survey consolidates resources developed specifically for Indian languages. Existing reviews either focus on a few high-resource languages or subsume Indian languages within broader multilingual settings, limiting coverage of low-resource and culturally diverse varieties. To address this gap, we present the first unified survey of Indian NLP resources, covering 200+ datasets, 50+ benchmarks, and 100+ models, tools, and systems across text, speech, multimodal, and culturally grounded tasks. We organize resources by linguistic phenomena, domains, and modalities; analyze trends in annotation, evaluation, and model design; and identify persistent challenges such as data sparsity, uneven language coverage, script diversity, and limited cultural and domain generalization. This survey offers a consolidated foundation for equitable, culturally grounded, and scalable NLP research in the Indian linguistic ecosystem.



109. ❌ Knowing When to Quit: A Principled Framework for Dynamic Abstention in LLM Reasoning

作者: Hen Davidov, Nachshon Cohen, Oren Kalinsky, Yaron Fairstein, Guy Kushilevitz, Ram Yazdi, Patrick Rebeschini 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18419v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) using chain-of-thought reasoning often waste substantial compute by producing long, incorrect responses. Abstention can mitigate this by withholding outputs unlikely to be correct. While most abstention methods decide to withhold outputs before or after generation, dynamic mid-generation abstention considers early termination of unpromising reasoning traces at each token position. Prior work has explored empirical variants of this idea, but principled guidance for the abstention rule remains lacking. We present a formal analysis of dynamic abstention for LLMs, modeling abstention as an explicit action within a regularized reinforcement learning framework. An abstention reward parameter controls the trade-off between compute and information. We show that abstaining when the value function falls below this reward strictly outperforms natural baselines under general conditions. We further derive a principled and efficient method to approximate the value function. Empirical results on mathematical reasoning and toxicity avoidance tasks support our theory and demonstrate improved selective accuracy over existing methods.



110. ❌ StepPO: Step-Aligned Policy Optimization for Agentic Reinforcement Learning

作者: Daoyu Wang, Qingchuan Li, Mingyue Cheng, Jie Ouyang, Shuo Yu, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18401v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

General agents have given rise to phenomenal applications such as OpenClaw and Claude Code. As these agent systems (a.k.a. Harnesses) strive for bolder goals, they demand increasingly stronger agentic capabilities from foundation Large Language Models (LLMs). Agentic Reinforcement Learning (RL) is emerging as a central post-training paradigm for empowering LLMs with these capabilities and is playing an increasingly pivotal role in agent training. Unlike single-turn token-level alignment or reasoning enhancement, as in RLHF and RLVR, Agentic RL targets multi-turn interactive settings, where the goal is to optimize core agentic capabilities such as decision making and tool use while addressing new challenges including delayed and sparse rewards, as well as long and variable context. As a result, the token-centric modeling and optimization paradigm inherited from traditional LLM RL is becoming increasingly inadequate for capturing real LLM agent behavior. In this paper, we present StepPO as a position on step-level Agentic RL. We argue that the conventional token-level Markov Decision Process (MDP) should be advanced to a step-level MDP formulation, and that the step, rather than the token, should be regarded as the proper action representation for LLM agents. We then propose step-level credit assignment as the natural optimization counterpart of this formulation, thereby aligning policy optimization and reward propagation with the granularity of agent decisions. Finally, we discuss the key systems designs required to realize step-level Agentic RL in practice and preliminary experiments provide initial evidence for the effectiveness of this perspective. We hope that the step-aligned, step-level paradigm embodied in StepPO offers the Agentic RL community a useful lens for understanding agent behavior and helps advance LLMs toward stronger general-agent capabilities.



111. ❌ River-LLM: Large Language Model Seamless Exit Based on KV Share

作者: Yingtao Shen, An Zou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18396v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance across diverse domains but are increasingly constrained by high inference latency. Early Exit has emerged as a promising solution to accelerate inference by dynamically bypassing redundant layers. However, in decoder-only architectures, the efficiency of Early Exit is severely bottlenecked by the KV Cache Absence problem, where skipped layers fail to provide the necessary historical states for subsequent tokens. Existing solutions, such as recomputation or masking, either introduce significant latency overhead or incur severe precision loss, failing to bridge the gap between theoretical layer reduction and practical wall-clock speedup. In this paper, we propose River-LLM, a training-free framework that enables seamless token-level Early Exit. River-LLM introduces a lightweight KV-Shared Exit River that allows the backbone’s missing KV cache to be naturally generated and preserved during the exit process, eliminating the need for costly recovery operations. Furthermore, we utilize state transition similarity within decoder blocks to predict cumulative KV errors and guide precise exit decisions. Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning and code generation tasks demonstrate that River-LLM achieves 1.71 to 2.16 times of practical speedup while maintaining high generation quality.



112. ❌ Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity

作者: Yang Liu, Chenhui Chu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18389v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Prompt sensitivity, which refers to how strongly the output of a large language model (LLM) depends on the exact wording of its input prompt, raises concerns among users about the LLM’s stability and reliability. In this work, we consider LLMs as multivariate functions and perform a first-order Taylor expansion, thereby analyzing the relationship between meaning-preserving prompts, their gradients, and the log probabilities of the model’s next token. We derive an upper bound on the difference between log probabilities using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. We show that LLMs do not internally cluster similar inputs like smaller neural networks do, but instead disperse them. This dispersing behavior leads to an excessively high upper bound on the difference of log probabilities between two meaning-preserving prompts, making it difficult to effectively reduce to 0. In our analysis, we also show which types of meaning-preserving prompt variants are more likely to introduce prompt sensitivity risks in LLMs. In addition, we demonstrate that the upper bound is strongly correlated with an existing prompt sensitivity metric, PromptSensiScore. Moreover, by analyzing the logit variance, we find that prompt templates typically exert a greater influence on logits than the questions themselves. Overall, our results provide a general interpretation for why current LLMs can be highly sensitive to prompts with the same meaning, offering crucial evidence for understanding the prompt sensitivity of LLMs. Code for experiments is available at https://github.com/ku-nlp/Understanding_the_Prompt_Sensitivity.



113. ❌ ArbGraph: Conflict-Aware Evidence Arbitration for Reliable Long-Form Retrieval-Augmented Generation

作者: Qingying Niu, Yuhao Wang, Ruiyang Ren, Bohui Fang, Wayne Xin Zhao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18362v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) remains unreliable in long-form settings, where retrieved evidence is noisy or contradictory, making it difficult for RAG pipelines to maintain factual consistency. Existing approaches focus on retrieval expansion or verification during generation, leaving conflict resolution entangled with generation. To address this limitation, we propose ArbGraph, a framework for pre-generation evidence arbitration in long-form RAG that explicitly resolves factual conflicts. ArbGraph decomposes retrieved documents into atomic claims and organizes them into a conflict-aware evidence graph with explicit support and contradiction relations. On top of this graph, we introduce an intensity-driven iterative arbitration mechanism that propagates credibility signals through evidence interactions, enabling the system to suppress unreliable and inconsistent claims before final generation. In this way, ArbGraph separates evidence validation from text generation and provides a coherent evidence foundation for downstream long-form generation. We evaluate ArbGraph on two widely used long-form RAG benchmarks, LongFact and RAGChecker, using multiple large language model backbones. Experimental results show that ArbGraph consistently improves factual recall and information density while reducing hallucinations and sensitivity to retrieval noise. Additional analyses show that these gains are evident under conflicting or ambiguous evidence, highlighting the effectiveness of evidence-level conflict resolution for improving the reliability of long-form RAG. The implementation is publicly available at https://github.com/1212Judy/ArbGraph.



114. ❌ Omni-Embed-Audio: Leveraging Multimodal LLMs for Robust Audio-Text Retrieval

作者: HaeJun Yoo, Yongseop Shin, Insung Lee, Myoung-Wan Koo, Du-Seong Chang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18360v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Audio-text retrieval systems based on Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining (CLAP) achieve strong performance on traditional benchmarks; however, these benchmarks rely on caption-style queries that differ substantially from real-world search behavior, limiting their assessment of practical retrieval robustness. We present Omni-Embed-Audio (OEA), a retrieval-oriented encoder leveraging multimodal LLMs with native audio understanding. To systematically evaluate robustness beyond caption-style queries, we introduce User-Intent Queries (UIQs) - five formulations reflecting natural search behaviors: questions, commands, keyword tags, paraphrases, and exclusion-based negative queries. For negative queries, we develop a hard negative mining pipeline and propose discrimination metrics (HNSR, TFR) assessing models’ ability to suppress acoustically similar distractors. Experiments on AudioCaps, Clotho, and MECAT show that OEA achieves comparable text-to-audio retrieval performance to state-of-the-art M2D-CLAP, while demonstrating clear advantages in two critical areas: (1) dominant text-to-text retrieval (+22% relative improvement), and (2) substantially superior hard negative discrimination (+4.3%p HNSR@10, +34.7% relative TFR@10), revealing that LLM backbones provide superior semantic understanding of complex queries.



115. ❌ ComPASS: Towards Personalized Agentic Social Support via Tool-Augmented Companionship

作者: Zhaopei Huang, Yanfeng Jia, Jiayi Zhao, Xinjie Zhang, Wenxuan Wang, Qin Jin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18356v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Developing compassionate interactive systems requires agents to not only understand user emotions but also provide diverse, substantive support. While recent works explore empathetic dialogue generation, they remain limited in response form and content, struggling to satisfy diverse needs across users and contexts. To address this, we explore empowering agents with external tools to execute diverse actions. Grounded in the psychological concept of “social support”, this paradigm delivers substantive, human-like companionship. Specifically, we first design a dozen user-centric tools simulating various multimedia applications, which can cover different types of social support behaviors in human-agent interaction scenarios. We then construct ComPASS-Bench, the first personalized social support benchmark for LLM-based agents, via multi-step automated synthesis and manual refinement. Based on ComPASS-Bench, we further synthesize tool use records to fine-tune the Qwen3-8B model, yielding a task-specific ComPASS-Qwen. Comprehensive evaluations across two settings reveal that while the evaluated LLMs can generate valid tool-calling requests with high success rates, significant gaps remain in final response quality. Moreover, tool-augmented responses achieve better overall performance than directly producing conversational empathy. Notably, our trained ComPASS-Qwen demonstrates substantial improvements over its base model, achieving comparable performance to several large-scale models. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/hzp3517/ComPASS.



116. ❌ PRISMA: Preference-Reinforced Self-Training Approach for Interpretable Emotionally Intelligent Negotiation Dialogues

作者: Prajwal Vijay Kajare, Priyanshu Priya, Bikash Santra, Asif Ekbal 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18354v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Emotion plays a pivotal role in shaping negotiation outcomes, influencing trust, cooperation, and long-term relationships. Developing negotiation dialog systems that can recognize and respond strategically to emotions is, therefore, essential to create more effective human-centered interactions. Beyond generating emotionally appropriate responses, interpretability - understanding how a system generates a particular emotion-aware response, is critical for fostering reliability and building rapport. Driven by these aspects, in this work, we introduce PRISMA, an interpretable emotionally intelligent negotiation dialogue system targeting two application domains, viz. job interviews and resource allocation. To enable interpretability, we propose an Emotion-aware Negotiation Strategy-informed Chain-of-Thought (ENS-CoT) reasoning mechanism, which mimics human negotiation by perceiving, understanding, using, and managing emotions. Leveraging ENS-CoT, we curate two new datasets: JobNego (for job interview negotiation) and ResNego (for resource allocation negotiation). We then leverage these datasets to develop PRISMA by augmenting self-training with Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), guiding agents toward more accurate, interpretable, and emotionally appropriate negotiation responses. Automatic and human evaluation on JobNego and ResNego datasets demonstrate that PRISMA substantially enhances interpretability and generates appropriate emotion-aware responses, while improving overall negotiation effectiveness.



117. ❌ HiGMem: A Hierarchical and LLM-Guided Memory System for Long-Term Conversational Agents

作者: Shuqi Cao, Jingyi He, Fei Tan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18349v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Long-term conversational large language model (LLM) agents require memory systems that can recover relevant evidence from historical interactions without overwhelming the answer stage with irrelevant context. However, existing memory systems, including hierarchical ones, still often rely solely on vector similarity for retrieval. It tends to produce bloated evidence sets: adding many superficially similar dialogue turns yields little additional recall, but lowers retrieval precision, increases answer-stage context cost, and makes retrieved memories harder to inspect and manage. To address this, we propose HiGMem (Hierarchical and LLM-Guided Memory System), a two-level event-turn memory system that allows LLMs to use event summaries as semantic anchors to predict which related turns are worth reading. This allows the model to inspect high-level event summaries first and then focus on a smaller set of potentially useful turns, providing a concise and reliable evidence set through reasoning, while avoiding the retrieval overhead that would be excessively high compared to vector retrieval. On the LoCoMo10 benchmark, HiGMem achieves the best F1 on four of five question categories and improves adversarial F1 from 0.54 to 0.78 over A-Mem, while retrieving an order of magnitude fewer turns. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/ZeroLoss-Lab/HiGMem.



118. ❌ FregeLogic at SemEval 2026 Task 11: A Hybrid Neuro-Symbolic Architecture for Content-Robust Syllogistic Validity Prediction

作者: Adewale Akinfaderin, Nafi Diallo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18328v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present FregeLogic, a hybrid neuro-symbolic system for SemEval-2026 Task 11 (Subtask 1), which addresses syllogistic validity prediction while reducing content effects on predictions. Our approach combines an ensemble of five LLM classifiers, spanning three open-weights models (Llama 4 Maverick, Llama 4 Scout, and Qwen3-32B) paired with varied prompting strategies, with a Z3 SMT solver that serves as a formal logic tiebreaker. The central hypothesis is that LLM disagreement within the ensemble signals likely content-biased errors, where real-world believability interferes with logical judgment. By deferring to Z3’s structurally-grounded formal verification on these disputed cases, our system achieves 94.3% accuracy with a content effect of 2.85 and a combined score of 41.88 in nested 5-fold cross-validation on the dataset (N=960). This represents a 2.76-point improvement in combined score over the pure ensemble (39.12), with a 0.9% accuracy gain, driven by a 16% reduction in content effect (3.39 to 2.85). Adopting structured-output API calls for Z3 extraction reduced failure rates from ~22% to near zero, and an Aristotelian encoding with existence axioms was validated against task annotations. Our results suggest that targeted neuro-symbolic integration, applying formal methods precisely where ensemble consensus is lowest, can improve the combined accuracy-plus-content-effect metric used by this task.



119. ❌ Reasoning Models Know What’s Important, and Encode It in Their Activations

作者: Yaniv Nikankin, Martin Tutek, Tomer Ashuach, Jonathan Rosenfeld, Yonatan Belinkov 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18307v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Language models often solve complex tasks by generating long reasoning chains, consisting of many steps with varying importance. While some steps are crucial for generating the final answer, others are removable. Determining which steps matter most, and why, remains an open question central to understanding how models process reasoning. We investigate if this question is best approached through model internals or through tokens of the reasoning chain itself. We find that model activations contain more information than tokens for identifying important reasoning steps. Crucially, by training probes on model activations to predict importance, we show that models encode an internal representation of step importance, even prior to the generation of subsequent steps. This internal representation of importance generalizes across models, is distributed across layers, and does not correlate with surface-level features, such as a step’s relative position or its length. Our findings suggest that analyzing activations can reveal aspects of reasoning that surface-level approaches fundamentally miss, indicating that reasoning analyses should look into model internals.



120. ❌ Exploring Concreteness Through a Figurative Lens

作者: Saptarshi Ghosh, Tianyu Jiang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18296v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Static concreteness ratings are widely used in NLP, yet a word’s concreteness can shift with context, especially in figurative language such as metaphor, where common concrete nouns can take abstract interpretations. While such shifts are evident from context, it remains unclear how LLMs understand concreteness internally. We conduct a layer-wise and geometric analysis of LLM hidden representations across four model families, examining how models distinguish literal vs figurative uses of the same noun and how concreteness is organized in representation space. We find that LLMs separate literal and figurative usage in early layers, and that mid-to-late layers compress concreteness into a one-dimensional direction that is consistent across models. Finally, we show that this geometric structure is practically useful: a single concreteness direction supports efficient figurative-language classification and enables training-free steering of generation toward more literal or more figurative rewrites.



121. ❌ An Existence Proof for Neural Language Models That Can Explain Garden-Path Effects via Surprisal

作者: Ryo Yoshida, Shinnosuke Isono, Taiga Someya, Yohei Oseki, Tatsuki Kuribayashi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18293v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Surprisal theory hypothesizes that the difficulty of human sentence processing increases linearly with surprisal, the negative log-probability of a word given its context. Computational psycholinguistics has tested this hypothesis using language models (LMs) as proxies for human prediction. While surprisal derived from recent neural LMs generally captures human processing difficulty on naturalistic corpora that predominantly consist of simple sentences, it severely underestimates processing difficulty on sentences that require syntactic disambiguation (garden-path effects). This leads to the claim that the processing difficulty of such sentences cannot be reduced to surprisal, although it remains possible that neural LMs simply differ from humans in next-word prediction. In this paper, we investigate whether it is truly impossible to construct a neural LM that can explain garden-path effects via surprisal. Specifically, instead of evaluating off-the-shelf neural LMs, we fine-tune these LMs on garden-path sentences so as to better align surprisal-based reading-time estimates with actual human reading times. Our results show that fine-tuned LMs do not overfit and successfully capture human reading slowdowns on held-out garden-path items; they even improve predictive power for human reading times on naturalistic corpora and preserve their general LM capabilities. These results provide an existence proof for a neural LM that can explain both garden-path effects and naturalistic reading times via surprisal, but also raise a theoretical question: what kind of evidence can truly falsify surprisal theory?



122. ❌ Where Do Self-Supervised Speech Models Become Unfair?

作者: Felix Herron, Maja Hjuler, Solange Rossato, Alexandre Allauzen, François Portet 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18249v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Speech encoder models are known to model members of some speaker groups (SGs) better than others. However, there has been little work in establishing why this occurs on a technological level. To our knowledge, we present the first layerwise fairness analysis of pretrained self-supervised speech encoder models (S3Ms), probing each embedding layer for speaker identification (SID) automatic speech recognition (ASR). We find S3Ms produce embeddings biased against certain SGs for both tasks, starting at the very first latent layers. Furthermore, we find opposite patterns of layerwise bias for SID vs ASR for all models in our study: SID bias is minimized in layers that minimize overall SID error; on the other hand, ASR bias is maximized in layers that minimize overall ASR error. The inverse bias/error relationship for ASR is unaffected when probing S3Ms that are finetuned for ASR, suggesting SG-level bias is established during pretraining and is difficult to remove.



123. ❌ Beyond Pattern Matching: Seven Cross-Domain Techniques for Prompt Injection Detection

作者: Thamilvendhan Munirathinam 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18248v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Current open-source prompt-injection detectors converge on two architectural choices: regular-expression pattern matching and fine-tuned transformer classifiers. Both share failure modes that recent work has made concrete. Regular expressions miss paraphrased attacks. Fine-tuned classifiers are vulnerable to adaptive adversaries: a 2025 NAACL Findings study reported that eight published indirect-injection defenses were bypassed with greater than fifty percent attack success rates under adaptive attacks. This work proposes seven detection techniques that each port a specific mechanism from a discipline outside large-language-model security: forensic linguistics, materials-science fatigue analysis, deception technology from network security, local-sequence alignment from bioinformatics, mechanism design from economics, spectral signal analysis from epidemiology, and taint tracking from compiler theory. Three of the seven techniques are implemented in the prompt-shield v0.4.1 release (Apache 2.0) and evaluated in a four-configuration ablation across six datasets including deepset/prompt-injections, NotInject, LLMail-Inject, AgentHarm, and AgentDojo. The local-alignment detector lifts F1 on deepset from 0.033 to 0.378 with zero additional false positives. The stylometric detector adds 11.1 percentage points of F1 on an indirect-injection benchmark. The fatigue tracker is validated via a probing-campaign integration test. All code, data, and reproduction scripts are released under Apache 2.0.



124. ❌ Model in Distress: Sentiment Analysis on French Synthetic Social Media

作者: Pierre-Carl Langlais, Pavel Chizhov, Yannick Detrois, Carlos Rosas Hinostroza, Ivan P. Yamshchikov, Bastien Perroy 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18226v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Automated analysis of customer feedback on social media is hindered by three challenges: the high cost of annotated training data, the scarcity of evaluation sets, especially in multilingual settings, and privacy concerns that prevent data sharing and reproducibility. We address these issues by developing a generalizable synthetic data generation pipeline applied to a case study on customer distress detection in French public transportation. Our approach utilizes backtranslation with fine-tuned models to generate 1.7 million synthetic tweets from a small seed corpus, complemented by synthetic reasoning traces. We train 600M-parameter reasoners with English and French reasoning that achieve 77-79% accuracy on human-annotated evaluation data, matching or exceeding SOTA proprietary LLMs and specialized encoders. Beyond reducing annotation costs, our pipeline preserves privacy by eliminating the exposure of sensitive user data. Our methodology can be adopted for other use cases and languages.



125. ❌ Hard to Be Heard: Phoneme-Level ASR Analysis of Phonologically Complex, Low-Resource Endangered Languages

作者: V. S. D. S. Mahesh Akavarapu, Michael Daniel, Gerhard Jäger 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18204v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present a phoneme-level analysis of automatic speech recognition (ASR) for two low-resourced and phonologically complex East Caucasian languages, Archi and Rutul, based on curated and standardized speech-transcript resources totaling approximately 50 minutes and 1 hour 20 minutes of audio, respectively. Existing recordings and transcriptions are consolidated and processed into a form suitable for ASR training and evaluation. We evaluate several state-of-the-art audio and audio-language models, including wav2vec2, Whisper, and Qwen2-Audio. For wav2vec2, we introduce a language-specific phoneme vocabulary with heuristic output-layer initialization, which yields consistent improvements and achieves performance comparable to or exceeding Whisper in these extremely low-resource settings. Beyond standard word and character error rates, we conduct a detailed phoneme-level error analysis. We find that phoneme recognition accuracy strongly correlates with training frequency, exhibiting a characteristic sigmoid-shaped learning curve. For Archi, this relationship partially breaks for Whisper, pointing to model-specific generalization effects beyond what is predicted by training frequency. Overall, our results indicate that many errors attributed to phonological complexity are better explained by data scarcity. These findings demonstrate the value of phoneme-level evaluation for understanding ASR behavior in low-resource, typologically complex languages.



126. ❌ Multiplication in Multimodal LLMs: Computation with Text, Image, and Audio Inputs

作者: Samuel G. Balter, Ethan Jerzak, Connor T. Jerzak 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18203v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Multimodal LLMs can accurately perceive numerical content across modalities yet fail to perform exact multi-digit multiplication when the identical underlying arithmetic problem is presented as numerals, number words, images, or in audio form. Because existing benchmarks often lack systematically paired instances across modalities, it remains difficult to compare genuine arithmetic limits within and across model families. We therefore introduce a controlled multimodal multiplication benchmark that factorially varies digit length, digit sparsity, representation (e.g., numerals vs. number words), and modality (text, rendered images, audio), with paired instances from a reproducible generator. We also define arithmetic load, C, as the product of the total and non-zero digit count as a compact, mechanistically motivated proxy for operation count. Across evaluations, accuracy falls sharply as C grows, often nearing zero by C > 100. Indeed, C remains predictive of performance across modalities and models, with R-squared often > 0.5, nearing the value from more complex measures of arithmetic load that count the number of intermediate arithmetic steps. A separate perception-versus-computation decomposition shows that multimodal degradation is primarily computational rather than perceptual: on matched-perception checks, models are near-perfect (> 99%) across modalities, even when multiplication accuracy drops. Beyond measuring when models fail, we ask which procedures they are predisposed to follow. We introduce a forced-completion loss probe that scores heuristic-specific reasoning prefixes–including columnar multiplication, distributive decomposition, and rounding/compensation. Here, decomposition is favored in both text and vision modalities; heuristic-specific LoRA adapters produce near-orthogonal updates yet degrade accuracy, indicating the base model maintains a well-tuned internal router.



127. ❌ Linear-Time and Constant-Memory Text Embeddings Based on Recurrent Language Models

作者: Tobias Grantner, Emanuel Sallinger, Martin Flechl 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18199v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Transformer-based embedding models suffer from quadratic computational and linear memory complexity, limiting their utility for long sequences. We propose recurrent architectures as an efficient alternative, introducing a vertically chunked inference strategy that enables fast embedding generation with memory usage that becomes constant in the input length once it exceeds the vertical chunk size. By fine-tuning Mamba2 models, we demonstrate their viability as general-purpose text embedders, achieving competitive performance across a range of benchmarks while maintaining a substantially smaller memory footprint compared to transformer-based counterparts. We empirically validate the applicability of our inference strategy to Mamba2, RWKV, and xLSTM models, confirming consistent runtime-memory trade-offs across architectures and establishing recurrent models as a compelling alternative to transformers for efficient embedding generation.



128. ❌ Audio-DeepThinker: Progressive Reasoning-Aware Reinforcement Learning for High-Quality Chain-of-Thought Emergence in Audio Language Models

作者: Xiang He, Chenxing Li, Jinting Wang, Yan Rong, Tianxin Xie, Wenfu Wang, Li Liu, Dong Yu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18187v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have made significant progress in audio understanding, yet they primarily operate as perception-and-answer systems without explicit reasoning processes. Existing methods for enhancing audio reasoning rely either on supervised chain-of-thought (CoT) fine-tuning, which is limited by training data quality, or on reinforcement learning (RL) with coarse rewards that do not directly evaluate reasoning quality. As a result, the generated reasoning chains often appear well-structured yet lack specific acoustic grounding. We propose Audio-DeepThinker, a framework built on two core ideas. First, we introduce a hybrid reasoning similarity reward that directly supervises the quality of generated reasoning chains by combining an LLM evaluator assessing logical path alignment, key step coverage, and analytical depth with an embedding similarity component enforcing semantic alignment with reference reasoning chains. Second, we propose a progressive two-stage curriculum that enables high-quality CoT reasoning to emerge through pure RL exploration, without any supervised reasoning fine-tuning, from an instruction-tuned model that possesses no prior chain-of-thought capability. Stage 1 trains on foundational audio QA with the hybrid reward to foster basic reasoning patterns, while Stage 2 shifts to acoustically challenging boundary cases with an LLM-only reward for greater reasoning diversity. Audio-DeepThinker achieves state-of-the-art results on MMAR (74.0%), MMAU-test-mini (78.5%), and MMSU (77.26%), winning 1st Place in the Interspeech 2026 Audio Reasoning Challenge (Single Model Track). Interpretability analyses further reveal that RL training primarily reshapes upper-layer MoE gating mechanisms and that reasoning tokens crystallize progressively in the upper transformer layers, offering mechanistic insights into how audio reasoning emerges through exploration.



129. ❌ FreezeEmpath: Efficient Training for Empathetic Spoken Chatbots with Frozen LLMs

作者: Yun Hong, Yan Zhou, Yang Feng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18159v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Empathy is essential for fostering natural interactions in spoken dialogue systems, as it enables machines to recognize the emotional tone of human speech and deliver empathetic responses. Recent research has made significant progress in developing empathetic spoken chatbots based on large language models (LLMs). However, several challenges still exist when training such models, including reliance on costly empathetic speech instruction data and a lack of emotional expressiveness in the generated speech. Finetuning LLM with cross-modal empathetic instruction data may also lead to catastrophic forgetting and a degradation of its general capability. To address these challenges, we propose FreezeEmpath, an end-to-end empathetic spoken chatbot trained in a simple and efficient manner. The entire training process relies solely on existing speech instruction data and speech emotion recognition (SER) data, while keeping the LLM’s parameters frozen. Experiments demonstrate that FreezeEmpath is able to generate emotionally expressive speech and outperforms other empathetic models in empathetic dialogue, SER, and SpokenQA tasks, demonstrating the effectiveness of our training strategy.



130. ❌ Decisive: Guiding User Decisions with Optimal Preference Elicitation from Unstructured Documents

作者: Akriti Jain, Anish Mulay, Divyansh Verma, Aishani Pandey, Pritika Ramu, Aparna Garimella 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18122v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Decision-making is a cognitively intensive task that requires synthesizing relevant information from multiple unstructured sources, weighing competing factors, and incorporating subjective user preferences. Existing methods, including large language models and traditional decision-support systems, fall short: they often overwhelm users with information or fail to capture nuanced preferences accurately. We present Decisive, an interactive decision-making framework that combines document-grounded reasoning with Bayesian preference inference. Our approach grounds decisions in an objective option-scoring matrix extracted from source documents, while actively learning a user’s latent preference vector through targeted elicitation. Users answer pairwise tradeoff questions adaptively selected to maximize information gain over the final decision. This process converges efficiently, minimizing user effort while ensuring recommendations remain transparent and personalized. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms both general-purpose LLMs and existing decision-making frameworks achieving up to 20% improvement in decision accuracy over strong baselines across domains.



131. ❌ Retrieval-Augmented Multimodal Model for Fake News Detection

作者: Yiheng Li, Weihai Lu, Hanyi Yu, Yue Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18112v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In recent years, multimodal multidomain fake news detection has garnered increasing attention. Nevertheless, this direction presents two significant challenges: (1) Failure to Capture Cross-Instance Narrative Consistency: existing models usually evaluate each news in isolation, fail to capture cross-instance narrative consistency, and thus struggle to address the spread of cluster based fake news driven by social media; (2) Lack of Domain Specific Knowledge for Reasoning: conventional models, which rely solely on knowledge encoded in their parameters during training, struggle to generalize to new or data-scarce domains (e.g., emerging events or niche topics). To tackle these challenges, we introduce Retrieval-Augmented Multimodal Model for Fake News Detection (RAMM). First, RAMM employs a Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) as its backbone to capture cross-modal semantic information from news samples. Second, RAMM incorporates an Abstract Narrative Alignment Module. This component adaptively extracts abstract narrative consistency from diverse instances across distinct domains, aggregates relevant knowledge, and thereby enables the modeling of high-level narrative information. Finally, RAMM introduces a Semantic Representation Alignment Module, which aligns the model’s decision-making paradigm with that of humans - specifically, it shifts the model’s reasoning process from direct inference on multimodal features to an instance-based analogical reasoning process. Extensive experimental results on three public datasets validate the efficacy of our proposed approach. Our code is available at the following link: https://github.com/li-yiheng/RAMM



132. ❌ FLiP: Towards understanding and interpreting multimodal multilingual sentence embeddings

作者: Santosh Kesiraju, Bolaji Yusuf, Šimon Sedláček, Oldřich Plchot, Petr Schwarz 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18109v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

This paper presents factorized linear projection (FLiP) models for understanding pretrained sentence embedding spaces. We train FLiP models to recover the lexical content from multilingual (LaBSE), multimodal (SONAR) and API-based (Gemini) sentence embedding spaces in several high- and mid-resource languages. We show that FLiP can recall more than 75% of lexical content from the embeddings, significantly outperforming existing non-factorized baselines. Using this as a diagnostic tool, we uncover the modality and language biases across the selected sentence encoders and provide practitioners with intrinsic insights about the encoders without relying on conventional downstream evaluation tasks. Our implementation is public https://github.com/BUTSpeechFIT/FLiP.



133. ❌ NIM4-ASR: Towards Efficient, Robust, and Customizable Real-Time LLM-Based ASR

作者: Yuan Xie, Jiaqi Song, Guang Qiu, Xianliang Wang, Kai Qiao, Junfeng Yuan, Shengqing Liu, Yi Zhang, Bowen Chen, Ming Lei, Jie Gao, Jie Wu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18105v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Integrating large language models (LLMs) into automatic speech recognition (ASR) has become a mainstream paradigm in recent years. Although existing LLM-based ASR models demonstrate impressive performance on public benchmarks, their training remains predominantly data-driven, leaving key practical challenges insufficiently addressed – particularly limited downward scalability in resource-constrained deployments and hallucinations under acoustically challenging conditions. To address these issues, we present NIM4-ASR, a production-oriented LLM-based ASR framework optimized for both efficiency and robustness. Grounded in a principled delineation of functional roles between the encoder and the LLM, we redesign the multi-stage training paradigm to align each module with its intended capability boundary. Specifically, we reformulate the pre-training architecture and objective to mitigate the modality gap and improve parameter efficiency; introduce an iterative asynchronous SFT stage to preserve acoustic fidelity and constrain representation drift; and design an ASR-specialized reinforcement learning stage to further enhance recognition quality and robustness. We additionally incorporate a suite of production-oriented optimizations, including robustness under noisy and silent conditions, real-time streaming inference, and hotword customization via retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). Experiments show that NIM4-ASR achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple public benchmarks with merely 2.3B parameters, while substantially outperforming larger-scale competitors on internal benchmarks – particularly in entity-intensive real-world scenarios. NIM4-ASR further supports million-scale hotword customization via RAG with sub-millisecond retrieval latency, enabling efficient adaptation to emerging entities and personalized user requirements.



134. ❌ Culture-Aware Humorous Captioning: Multimodal Humor Generation across Cultural Contexts

作者: Run Xu, Lu Li, Rongzhao Zhang, Jie Xu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18091v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent multimodal large language models have shown promising ability in generating humorous captions for images, yet they still lack stable control over explicit cultural context, making it difficult to jointly maintain image relevance, contextual appropriateness, and humor quality under a specified cultural background. To address this limitation, we introduce a new multimodal generation task, culture-aware humorous captioning, which requires a model to generate a humorous caption conditioned on both an input image and a target cultural context. Captions generated under different cultural contexts are not expected to share the same surface form, but should remain grounded in similar visual situations or humorous rationales.To support this task, we establish a six-dimensional evaluation framework covering image relevance, contextual fit, semantic richness, reasonableness, humor, and creativity. We further propose a staged alignment framework that first initializes the model with high-resource supervision under the Western cultural context, then performs multi-dimensional preference alignment via judge-based GRPO with a Degradation-aware Prototype Repulsion Constraint to mitigate reward hacking in open-ended generation, and finally adapts the model to the Eastern cultural context with a small amount of supervision. Experimental results show that our method achieves stronger overall performance under the proposed evaluation framework, with particularly large gains in contextual fit and a better balance between image relevance and humor under cultural constraints.



135. ❌ Efficient Low-Resource Language Adaptation via Multi-Source Dynamic Logit Fusion

作者: Chen Zhang, Jiuheng Lin, Zhiyuan Liao, Yansong Feng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18106v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Adapting large language models (LLMs) to low-resource languages (LRLs) is constrained by the scarcity of task data and computational resources. Although Proxy Tuning offers a logit-level strategy for introducing scaling effects, it often fails in LRL settings because the large model’s weak LRL competence might overwhelm the knowledge of specialized smaller models. We thus propose TriMix, a test-time logit fusion framework that dynamically balances capabilities from three different sources: LRL competence from a continually pretrained small model, task competence from high-resource language instruction tuning, and the scaling benefits of large models. It is data- and compute-efficient, requiring no LRL task annotations, and only continual pretraining on a small model. Experiments across four model families and eight LRLs show that TriMix consistently outperforms single-model baselines and Proxy Tuning. Our analysis reveals that prioritizing the small LRL-specialized model’s logits is crucial for success, challenging the prevalent large-model-dominant assumption.



136. ❌ Modeling Human Perspectives with Socio-Demographic Representations

作者: Leixin Zhang, Cagri Coltekin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18069v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Humans often hold different perspectives on the same issues. In many NLP tasks, annotation disagreement can reflect valid subjective perspectives. Modeling annotator perspectives and understanding their relationship with other human factors, such as socio-demographic attributes, have received increasing attention. Prior work typically focuses on single demographic factors or limited combinations. However, in real-world settings, annotator perspectives are shaped by complex social contexts, and finer-grained socio-demographic attributes can better explain human perspectives. In this work, we propose Socio-Contrastive Learning, a method that jointly models annotator perspectives while learning socio-demographic representations. Our method provides an effective approach for the fusion of socio-demographic features and textual representations to predict annotator perspectives, outperforming standard concatenation-based methods. The learned representations further enable analysis and visualization of how demographic factors relate to variation in annotator perspectives. Our code is available at GitHub: https://github.com/Leixin-Zhang/Socio_Contrastive_Learning



137. ❌ JudgeMeNot: Personalizing Large Language Models to Emulate Judicial Reasoning in Hebrew

作者: Itay Razumenko, Arnon Sturm, Nir Grinberg 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18041v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Despite significant advances in large language models, personalizing them for individual decision-makers remains an open problem. Here, we introduce a synthetic-organic supervision pipeline that transforms raw judicial decisions into instruction-tuning data, enabling parameter-efficient fine-tuning of personalized models for individual judges in low-resource settings. We compare our approach to state-of-the-art personalization techniques across three different tasks and settings. The results show that Causal Language Modeling followed by synthetically generated instruction-tuning significantly outperforms all other baselines, providing significant improvements across lexical, stylistic, and semantic similarity. Notably, our model-generated outputs are indistinguishable from the reasoning of human judges, highlighting the viability of efficient personalization, even in low-resource settings.



138. ❌ SignDPO: Multi-level Direct Preference Optimisation for Skeleton-based Gloss-free Sign Language Translation

作者: Muxin Pu, Xiao-Ming Wu, Mei Kuan Lim, Chun Yong Chong, Wei Li, Chen Change Loy 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18034v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present SignDPO, a novel multi-level Direct Preference Optimisation (DPO) framework designed to enhance the alignment of skeleton-based Sign Language Translation. While current skeleton-based models have made significant progress using Maximum Likelihood Estimation, they are primarily constrained by an imitation-based paradigm that lacks discriminative sensitivity to the fine-grained spatio-temporal nuances of sign language, often leading to semantic drift. To address this, SignDPO shifts the optimisation goal from simple sequence mimicry to structured preference alignment across spatial, temporal, and linguistic dimensions. Our framework involves three key designs. First, we introduce a hierarchical perturbation strategy to construct spatial and temporal non-preferred samples at both global and local granularities automatically. Second, we propose a self-guiding mechanism that leverages decoder cross-attention scores to identify and perturb semantically salient skeletal regions, forcing the model to distinguish genuine sign signals from structural distortions. Third, we establish an automated language-level preference generator by fine-tuning a dedicated perturbation model, capturing complex output-level failure modes without manual annotation. Extensive experiments on three widely adopted benchmarks, CSL-Daily, How2Sign, and OpenASL, demonstrate that SignDPO consistently outperforms state-of-the-art gloss-free methods and even rivals established gloss-based ones. Our results suggest that multi-level preference alignment is a powerful paradigm for bridging the gap between high-entropy skeletal trajectories and discrete linguistic semantics.



139. ❌ How Creative Are Large Language Models in Generating Molecules?

作者: Wen Tao, Yiwei Wang, Peng Zhou, Bryan Hooi, Wanlong Fang, Tianle Zhang, Xiao Luo, Yuansheng Liu, Alvin Chan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18031v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Molecule generation requires satisfying multiple chemical and biological constraints while searching a large and structured chemical space. This makes it a non-binary problem, where effective models must identify non-obvious solutions under constraints while maintaining exploration to improve success by escaping local optima. From this perspective, creativity is a functional requirement in molecular generation rather than an aesthetic notion. Large language models (LLMs) can generate molecular representations directly from natural language prompts, but it remains unclear what type of creativity they exhibit in this setting and how it should be evaluated. In this work, we study the creative behavior of LLMs in molecular generation through a systematic empirical evaluation across physicochemical, ADMET, and biological activity tasks. We characterize creativity along two complementary dimensions, convergent creativity and divergent creativity, and analyze how different factors shape these behaviors. Our results indicate that LLMs exhibit distinct patterns of creative behavior in molecule generation, such as an increase in constraint satisfaction when additional constraints are imposed. Overall, our work is the first to reframe the abilities required for molecule generation as creativity, providing a systematic understanding of creativity in LLM-based molecular generation and clarifying the appropriate use of LLMs in molecular discovery pipelines.



140. ❌ CodePivot: Bootstrapping Multilingual Transpilation in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning without Parallel Corpora

作者: Shangyu Li, Juyong Jiang, Meibo Ren, Sizhe Zhong, Huiri Tan, Yunhao Gou, Xu Han, Chun Yong Chong, Yun Peng, Jiasi Shen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18027v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Transpilation, or code translation, aims to convert source code from one programming language (PL) to another. It is beneficial for many downstream applications, from modernizing large legacy codebases to augmenting data for low-resource PLs. Recent large language model (LLM)-based approaches have demonstrated immense potential for code translation. Among these approaches, training-based methods are particularly important because LLMs currently do not effectively adapt to domain-specific settings that suffer from a lack of knowledge without targeted training. This limitation is evident in transpilation tasks involving low-resource PLs. However, existing training-based approaches rely on a pairwise transpilation paradigm, making it impractical to support a diverse range of PLs. This limitation is particularly prominent for low-resource PLs due to a scarcity of training data. Furthermore, these methods suffer from suboptimal reinforcement learning (RL) reward formulations. To address these limitations, we propose CodePivot, a training framework that leverages Python as an intermediate representation (IR), augmented by a novel RL reward mechanism, Aggressive-Partial-Functional reward, to bootstrap the model’s multilingual transpilation ability without requiring parallel corpora. Experiments involving 10 PLs show that the resulting 7B model, trained on Python-to-Others tasks, consistently improves performance across both general and low-resource PL-related transpilation tasks. It outperforms substantially larger mainstream models with hundreds of billions more parameters, such as Deepseek-R1 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507, on Python-to-Others tasks and Others-to-All tasks, respectively. In addition, it outperforms its counterpart trained directly on Any-to-Any tasks on general transpilation tasks. The code and data are available at https://github.com/lishangyu-hkust/CodePivot.



141. ❌ Employing General-Purpose and Biomedical Large Language Models with Advanced Prompt Engineering for Pharmacoepidemiologic Study Design

作者: Xinyao Zhang, Nicole Sonne Heckmann, Manuela Del Castillo Suero, Francesco Paolo Speca, Maurizio Sessa 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17988v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Background: The potential of large language models (LLMs) to automate and support pharmacoepidemiologic study design is an emerging area of interest, yet their reliability remains insufficiently characterized. General-purpose LLMs often display inaccuracies, while the comparative performance of specialized biomedical LLMs in this domain remains unknown. Methods: This study evaluated general-purpose LLMs (GPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1) versus biomedically fine-tuned LLMs (QuantFactory/Bio-Medical-Llama-3-8B-GGUF and Irathernotsay/qwen2-1.5B-medical_qa-Finetune) using 46 protocols (2018-2024) from the HMA-EMA Catalogue and Sentinel System. Performance was assessed across relevance, logic of justification, and ontology-code agreement across multiple coding systems using Least-to-Most (LTM) and Active Prompting strategies. Results: GPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1 paired with LTM prompting achieved the highest relevance and logic of justification scores, with GPT-4o-LTM reaching a median relevance score of 4 in 8 of 9 questions for HMA-EMA protocols. Biomedical LLMs showed lower relevance overall and frequently generated insufficient justification. All LLMs demonstrated limited proficiency in ontology-code mapping, although LTM provided the most consistent improvements in reasoning stability. Conclusion: Off-the-shelf general-purpose LLMs currently offer superior support for pharmacoepidemiologic design compared to biomedical LLMs. Prompt strategy strongly influenced LLM performance.



142. ❌ Mitigating Multimodal Hallucination via Phase-wise Self-reward

作者: Yu Zhang, Chuyang Sun, Kehai Chen, Xuefeng Bai, Yang Xiang, Min Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17982v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) still struggle with vision hallucination, where generated responses are inconsistent with the visual input. Existing methods either rely on large-scale annotated data for fine-tuning, which incurs massive computational overhead, or employ static post-hoc strategies that overlook the dynamic nature of hallucination emergence. To address these, we introduce a new self-rewarding framework, enabling dynamic hallucination mitigation at inference time without external supervision. On the empirical side, we reveal that visual hallucination exhibits phase-wise dynamic patterns, peaking at the onset of each semantic phase. Drawing on these insights, we propose \textbf{PSRD} (\textbf{Phase-wise \textbf{S}elf-\textbf{R}eward \textbf{D}ecoding) for online hallucination correction guided by phase-wise self-reward signals. To reduce the cost of repeated self-evaluation during decoding, we distill the hallucination guidance signal from LVLMs into a lightweight reward model. The reward model subsequently provides on-the-fly guidance for targeted intervention during the decoding process, enabling precise hallucination suppression. The proposed PSRD significantly reduces the hallucination rate of LLaVA-1.5-7B by 50.0% and consistently outperforms existing post-hoc methods across five hallucination evaluation benchmarks for four LVLMs. Further analysis confirms that PSRD effectively mitigates hallucination propagation and achieves a highly controllable trade-off between strong performance and inference efficiency.



143. ❌ ltzGLUE: Luxembourgish General Language Understanding Evaluation

作者: Alistair Plum, Felicia Körner, Anne-Marie Lutgen, Laura Bernardy, Fred Philippy, Emilia Milano, Nils Rehlinger, Cédric Lothritz, Tharindu Ranasinghe, Barbara Plank, Christoph Purschke 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17976v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

This paper presents ltzGLUE, the first Natural Language Understanding (NLU) benchmark for Luxembourgish (LTZ) based on the popular GLUE benchmark for English. Although NLU tasks are available for many European languages nowadays, LTZ is one of the official national languages that is often overlooked. We construct new tasks and reuse existing ones to introduce the first official NLU benchmark and accompanying evaluation of encoder models for the language. Our tasks include common natural language processing tasks in binary and multi-class classification settings, including named entity recognition, topic classification, and intent classification. We evaluate various pre-trained language models for LTZ to present an overview of the current capabilities of these models on the LTZ language.



144. ❌ Modeling Multiple Support Strategies within a Single Turn for Emotional Support Conversations

作者: Jie Zhu, Huaixia Dou, Junhui Li, Lifan Guo, Feng Chen, Jinsong Su, Chi Zhang, Fang Kong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17972v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Emotional Support Conversation (ESC) aims to assist individuals experiencing distress by generating empathetic and supportive dialogue. While prior work typically assumes that each supporter turn corresponds to a single strategy, real-world supportive communication often involves multiple strategies within a single utterance. In this paper, we revisit the ESC task by formulating it as multi-strategy utterance generation, where each utterance may contain one or more strategy-response pairs. We propose two generation methods: All-in-One, which predicts all strategy-response pairs in a single decoding step, and One-by-One, which iteratively generates strategy-response pairs until completion. Both methods are further enhanced with cognitive reasoning guided by reinforcement learning to improve strategy selection and response composition. We evaluate our models on the ESConv dataset under both utterance-level and dialogue-level settings. Experimental results show that our methods effectively model multi-strategy utterances and lead to improved supportive quality and dialogue success. To our knowledge, this work provides the first systematic empirical evidence that allowing multiple support strategies within a single utterance is both feasible and beneficial for emotional support conversations. All code and data will be publicly available at https://github.com/aliyun/qwen-dianjin.



145. ❌ Process Reward Models Meet Planning: Generating Precise and Scalable Datasets for Step-Level Rewards

作者: Raffaele Pisano, Roberto Navigli 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17957v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Process Reward Models (PRMs) have emerged as a powerful tool for providing step-level feedback when evaluating the reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs), which frequently produce chains of thought (CoTs) containing errors even when the final answer is correct. However, existing PRM datasets remain expensive to construct, prone to annotation errors, and predominantly limited to the mathematical domain. This work introduces a novel and scalable approach to PRM dataset generation based on planning logical problems expressed in the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL). Using this method, we generate a corpus of approximately one million reasoning steps across various PDDL domains and use it to train PRMs. Experimental results show that augmenting widely-used PRM training datasets with PDDL-derived data yields substantial improvements in both mathematical and non-mathematical reasoning, as demonstrated across multiple benchmarks. These findings indicate that planning problems constitute a scalable and effective resource for generating robust, precise, and fine-grained training data for PRMs, going beyond the classical mathematical sources that dominate this field.



146. ❌ ReCoQA: A Benchmark for Tool-Augmented and Multi-Step Reasoning in Real Estate Question and Answering

作者: Yindong Zhang, Wenmian Yang, Yiquan Zhang, Weijia Jia 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17944v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Developing agents capable of navigating fragmented, multi-source information remains challenging, primarily due to the scarcity of benchmarks reflecting hybrid workflows combining database querying with external APIs. To bridge this gap, we introduce ReCoQA, a large-scale benchmark of 29,270 real-estate instances featuring machine-verifiable supervision for intermediate steps, including structured intent labels, SQL queries, and API calls. Complementarily, we propose HIRE-Agent, a hierarchical framework instantiating an understand-plan-execute architecture as a strong baseline. By orchestrating a Front-end parser, a planning Supervisor, and execution Specialists, HIRE-Agent effectively integrates heterogeneous evidence. Extensive experiments demonstrate that HIRE-Agent constitutes a strong baseline and substantiates the necessity of hierarchical collaboration for complex, real-world reasoning tasks.



147. ❌ Domain-oriented RAG Assessment (DoRA): Synthetic Benchmarking for RAG-based Question Answering on Defense Documents

作者: Bao Gia Doan, Aditya Joshi, Pantelis Elinas, Aarya Bodhankar, Oscar Leslie, Tom Marchant, Flora Salim 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17943v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Open-domain RAG benchmarks over public corpora can overestimate deployment performance due to pretraining overlap and weak attribution requirements. We present DoRA (Domain-oriented RAG Assessment), a domain-grounded benchmark built from defense documents that pairs synthetic, intent-conditioned QA (question answering) with auditable evidence passages for attribution. DoRA covers five question types (find, explain, summarize, generate, provide) and contains 6.5K curated instances. In end-to-end evaluation with a fixed dense retriever, general-purpose Language Models (LMs) perform similarly, while a model trained on DoRA (DoRA SFT) yields large gains over the base model (Llama3.1-8B-Instruct): up to 26% improvement in QA task success, while reducing the hallucination rate by 47% in RAG faithfulness scores, supporting contamination-aware regression testing under domain shift.



148. ❌ From Heads to Neurons: Causal Attribution and Steering in Multi-Task Vision-Language Models

作者: Qidong Wang, Junjie Hu, Ming Jiang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17941v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent work has increasingly explored neuron-level interpretation in vision-language models (VLMs) to identify neurons critical to final predictions. However, existing neuron analyses generally focus on single tasks, limiting the comparability of neuron importance across tasks. Moreover, ranking strategies tend to score neurons in isolation, overlooking how task-dependent information pathways shape the write-in effects of feed-forward network (FFN) neurons. This oversight can exacerbate neuron polysemanticity in multi-task settings, introducing noise into the identification and intervention of task-critical neurons. In this study, we propose HONES (Head-Oriented Neuron Explanation & Steering), a gradient-free framework for task-aware neuron attribution and steering in multi-task VLMs. HONES ranks FFN neurons by their causal write-in contributions conditioned on task-relevant attention heads, and further modulates salient neurons via lightweight scaling. Experiments on four diverse multimodal tasks and two popular VLMs show that HONES outperforms existing methods in identifying task-critical neurons and improves model performance after steering. Our source code is released at: https://github.com/petergit1/HONES.



149. ❌ Heterogeneity in Formal Linguistic Competence of Language Models: Is Data the Real Bottleneck?

作者: H S V N S Kowndinya Renduchintala, Sumit Bhatia 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17930v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit a puzzling disparity in their formal linguistic competence: while they learn some linguistic phenomena with near-perfect mastery, they often perform below chance on others, even after training on trillions of tokens. In this work, we investigate whether these failures stem from inherent architectural limitations or simply the scarcity of these specific grammatical constructions in web-scale corpora. We pre-train simple GPT-2 Small (124M) models on a 100M-token random sample of the FineWeb corpus and intervene by injecting a minimal amount (1%) of synthetic data targeting specific linguistic phenomena. We find that this targeted intervention substantially improves model performance in 8 out of the 9 worst-performing BLiMP paradigms - notably the accuracy on a specific paradigm, only_npi_scope, surges from 20.9% to 69.4%. Furthermore, we observe that these interventions generally preserve or slightly improve aggregate performance. However, while we also identify a resistant phenomenon, principle_A_c_command, whose performance remains below chance even after our data augmentation, our findings do serve as an optimistic existence proof that even small language models can substantially improve on those linguistic phenomena on which models typically perform poorly, provided the pre-training data contains sufficient exposure to them. This suggests that efforts towards human-scale language modeling may benefit greatly by focusing on data composition. The code to reproduce our results is open-sourced at https://github.com/kowndinya-renduchintala/heterogeneity-in-formal-linguistic-competence.



150. ❌ Automatic Slide Updating with User-Defined Dynamic Templates and Natural Language Instructions

作者: Kun Zhou, Jiakai He, Wenmian Yang, Zhensheng Wang, Yiquan Zhang, Weijia Jia 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17894v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Presentation slides are a primary medium for data-driven reporting, yet keeping complex, analytics-style decks up to date remains labor-intensive. Existing automation methods mostly follow fixed template filling and cannot support dynamic updates for diverse, user-authored slide decks. We therefore define “Dynamic Slide Update via Natural Language Instructions on User-provided Templates” and introduce DynaSlide, a large-scale benchmark with 20,036 real-world instruction-execution triples (source slide, user instruction, target slide) grounded in a shared external database and built from business reporting slides under bring-your-own-template (BYO-template) conditions. To tackle this task, we propose SlideAgent, an agent-based framework that combines multimodal slide parsing, natural language instruction grounding, and tool-augmented reasoning for tables, charts, and textual conclusions. SlideAgent updates content while preserving layout and style, providing a strong reference baseline on DynaSlide. We further design end-to-end and component-level evaluation protocols that reveal key challenges and opportunities for future research. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/XiaoZhou2024/SlideAgent.



151. ❌ Latent Preference Modeling for Cross-Session Personalized Tool Calling

作者: Yejin Yoon, Minseo Kim, Taeuk Kim 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17886v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Users often omit essential details in their requests to LLM-based agents, resulting in under-specified inputs for tool use. This poses a fundamental challenge for tool-augmented agents, as API execution typically requires complete arguments, highlighting the need for personalized tool calling. To study this problem, we introduce MPT, a benchmark comprising 265 multi-session dialogues that cover three challenges: Preference Recall, Preference Induction, and Preference Transfer. We also propose PRefine, a test-time memory-augmented method that represents user preferences as evolving hypotheses. Through a generate–verify–refine loop, it extracts reusable constraints from history and improves tool-calling accuracy while using only 1.24% of the tokens required by full-history prompting. These results indicate that robust personalization in agentic systems depends on memory that captures the reasons behind user choices, not just the choices themselves.



152. ❌ GraSP: Graph-Structured Skill Compositions for LLM Agents

作者: Tianle Xia, Lingxiang Hu, Yiding Sun, Ming Xu, Lan Xu, Siying Wang, Wei Xu, Jie Jiang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17870v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Skill ecosystems for LLM agents have matured rapidly, yet recent benchmarks show that providing agents with more skills does not monotonically improve performance – focused sets of 2-3 skills outperform comprehensive documentation, and excessive skills actually hurt. The bottleneck has shifted from skill availability to skill orchestration: agents need not more skills, but a structural mechanism to select, compose, and execute them with explicit causal dependencies. We propose GraSP, the first executable skill graph architecture that introduces a compilation layer between skill retrieval and execution. GraSP transforms flat skill sets into typed directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) with precondition-effect edges, executes them with node-level verification, and performs locality-bounded repair through five typed operators – reducing replanning from O(N) to O(d^h). Across ALFWorld, ScienceWorld, WebShop, and InterCode with eight LLM backbones, GraSP outperforms ReAct, Reflexion, ExpeL, and flat skill baselines in every configuration, improving reward by up to +19 points over the strongest baseline while cutting environment steps by up to 41%. GraSP’s advantage grows with task complexity and is robust to both skill over-retrieval and quality degradation, confirming that structured orchestration – not larger skill libraries – is the key to reliable agent execution.



153. ❌ Latent Abstraction for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

作者: Ha Lan N. T, Minh-Anh Nguyen, Dung D. Le 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17866v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a standard approach for enhancing large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge, mitigating hallucinations, and improving factuality. However, existing systems rely on generating natural language queries at each hop and maintaining a strict architectural separation between retriever and generator, preventing them from leveraging the full representational capacity of the LLM. We propose \textbf{LAnR} (Latent Abstraction for RAG), a unified framework in which a single LLM jointly performs encoding, retrieval, and generation entirely within its own latent space. Rather than generating textual queries, LAnR produces dense retrieval vectors from the hidden states of a designated \texttt{[PRED]} token and uses them to match against encoded document representations from the same model. Furthermore, LAnR adaptively decides when sufficient evidence has been retrieved using a lightweight MLP control head over those same hidden states, eliminating both the separate retriever and explicit token-level stopping reasoning. This design is motivated by our empirical observation that answer token entropy reliably signals retrieval sufficiency. Extensive experiments on six QA benchmarks spanning single-hop and multi-hop settings demonstrate that LAnR outperforms existing RAG methods, while achieving improved inference efficiency through reduced number of retrieval calls and tighter model integration.



154. ❌ On the Emergence of Syntax by Means of Local Interaction

作者: Zichao Wei 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17857v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Can syntactic processing emerge spontaneously from purely local interaction? We present a concrete instance on a minimal system: an 18,658-parameter two-dimensional neural cellular automaton (NCA), supervised by nothing more than a 1-bit boundary signal, is trained on the membership problem of an arithmetic-expression grammar. After training, its internal $L \times L$ grid spontaneously self-organizes into an ordered, spatially extended representation that we name Proto-CKY. This representation satisfies three operational criteria for syntactic processing: expressive power beyond the regular languages, structural generalization beyond the training distribution, and an internal organization quantitatively aligned with grammatical structure (Pearson $r \approx 0.71$). It emerges independently on four context-free grammars and regenerates spontaneously after perturbation. Proto-CKY is functionally aligned with the CKY algorithm but formally distinct from it: it is a physical prototype, a concrete instantiation of a mathematical ideal on a physical substrate, and the systematic distance between the two carries information about the substrate itself.



155. ❌ Polysemantic Experts, Monosemantic Paths: Routing as Control in MoEs

作者: Charles Ye, Bo Yuan, Lee Sharkey 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17837v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

An LLM’s residual stream is both state and instruction: it encodes the current context and determines the next transformation. We introduce a parameter-free decomposition for Mixture-of-Experts models that splits each layer’s hidden state into a control signal that causally drives routing and an orthogonal content channel invisible to the router. Across six MoE architectures, we find that models preserve surface-level features (language, token identity, position) in the content channel, while the control signal encodes an abstract function that rotates from layer to layer. Because each routing decision is low-bandwidth, this hand-off forces compositional specialization across layers. While individual experts remain polysemantic, expert paths become monosemantic, clustering tokens by semantic function across languages and surface forms. The same token (e.g., “:”) follows distinct trajectories depending on whether it serves as a type annotation, an introductory colon, or a time separator. Our decomposition identifies the source of this structure: clusters in the control subspace are substantially more monosemantic than those in the full representation. As a result, the natural unit of interpretability in MoEs is not the expert but the trajectory.



156. ❌ QuickScope: Certifying Hard Questions in Dynamic LLM Benchmarks

作者: Taylor Lundy, Narun K. Raman, Kevin Leyton-Brown 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17842v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

LLM benchmarks are increasingly dynamic: instead of containing a fixed set of questions, they define templates and parameters that can generate an effectively unlimited number of question variants. This flexibility is valuable, but it makes evaluation expensive – especially when the goal is not just determining an average score, but reliably identifying a model’s weak spots. This paper introduces a new methodology for identifying hard questions in dynamic benchmarks. It leverages COUP, a recent Bayesian optimization algorithm (Graham, Velez & Leyton-Brown, 2026), after introducing several substantive modifications to make the algorithm suitable for practical LLM pipelines. We also wrap it in a tool that supports flexible choices of datasets and utility functions, enabling users to target the kinds of questions they care about (e.g., low-accuracy questions; questions that are unusually hard relative to their measured complexity). In experiments across a range of benchmarks, we show that our method, dubbed $\texttt{QuickScope}$, discovers truly difficult questions more sample efficiently than standard baselines, while also reducing false positives from noisy outcomes.



157. ❌ A novel LSTM music generator based on the fractional time-frequency feature extraction

作者: Li Ya, Chen Wei, Li Xiulai, Yu Lei, Deng Xinyi, Chen Chaofan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17823v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In this paper, we propose a novel approach for generating music based on an artificial intelligence (AI) system. We analyze the features of music and use them to fit and predict the music. The fractional Fourier transform (FrFT) and the long short-term memory (LSTM) network are the foundations of our method. The FrFT method is used to extract the spectral features of a music piece, where the music signal is expressed on the time and frequency domains. The LSTM network is used to generate new music based on the extracted features, where we predict the music according to the hidden layer features and real-time inputs using GiantMIDI-Piano dataset. The results of our experiments show that our proposed system is capable of generating high-quality music that is comparable to human-generated music.



158. ❌ How Non-Linguistic Is the Indus Sign System? A Synthetic-Baseline Scorecard

作者: Ashish Nair 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17828v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Whether the Indus Valley sign system (c. 2600-1900 BCE) encodes spoken language has been debated for decades. This paper introduces a multi-metric discrimination framework that tests the observed Indus corpus against two kinds of computer-generated non-linguistic baseline – one mimicking a heraldic emblem system, the other an administrative coding system – each calibrated with Zipfian frequency distributions, positional constraints, and bigram dependencies derived from six attested non-linguistic corpora. The scorecard evaluates four properties central to the Farmer-Sproat-Witzel (2004) critique: text brevity, repeated formulaic phrases, hapax legomenon rate, and positional rigidity. Applying this framework to 1,916 deduplicated inscriptions (584 unique signs, 11,110 tokens) from the ICIT/Yajnadevam digitization, we find that the Indus corpus does not match either baseline cleanly. Across the four metrics examined, the Indus corpus occupies an intermediate position relative to the two baseline families, matching neither cleanly. Neither a heraldic nor an administrative generator can reproduce all four properties at once. We also compare against seven real-world non-linguistic corpora including Sproat’s (2014) datasets, finding that no attested non-linguistic system reproduces the full Indus statistical profile either. We replicate key prior results including a Zipf slope of -1.49 and conditional entropy of 3.23 bits. All code and data are publicly available.



159. ❌ Learning to Seek Help: Dynamic Collaboration Between Small and Large Language Models

作者: Hang Zeng, Xiangyu Liu, Yong Hu, Chaoyue Niu, Jiarui Zhang, Shaojie Tang, Fan Wu, Guihai Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17827v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) offer strong capabilities but raise cost and privacy concerns, whereas small language models (SLMs) facilitate efficient and private local inference yet suffer from limited capacity. To synergize the complementary strengths, we introduce a dynamic collaboration framework, where an SLM learns to proactively decide how to request an LLM during multi-step reasoning, while the LLM provides adaptive feedback instead of acting as a passive tool. We further systematically investigate how collaboration strategies are shaped by SLM and LLM capabilities as well as efficiency and privacy constraints. Evaluation results reveal a distinct scaling effect: stronger SLMs become more self-reliant, while stronger LLMs enable fewer and more informative interactions. In addition, the learned dynamic collaboration strategies significantly outperform static pipelines and standalone inference, and transfer robustly to unseen LLMs.



160. ❌ PDDL-Mind: Large Language Models are Capable on Belief Reasoning with Reliable State Tracking

作者: Wang Bill Zhu, Qiutong Tony Yi, Robin Jia, Jesse Thomason 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17819v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) perform substantially below human level on existing theory-of-mind (ToM) benchmarks, even when augmented with chain-of-thought prompting or probabilistic belief updates. We argue that these failures primarily arise from unreliable implicit state tracking rather than limitations in high-level reasoning. We introduce PDDL-Mind, a neuro-symbolic framework that decouples environment state evolution from belief inference. By translating narrative descriptions into explicit states and actions expressed in Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL), and by verifying action-induced state transitions against a predefined domain, PDDL-Mind provides LLMs with a logically consistent and explicit representation of world states for ToM tasks. Experiments on MMToM-QA, MuMA and FanToM show that PDDL-Mind achieves over 5% absolute accuracy gain over the best existing state-of-the-art method on ToM benchmark questions.



161. ❌ Navigating the Conceptual Multiverse

作者: Andre Ye, Jenny Y. Huang, Alicia Guo, Rose Novick, Tamara Broderick, Mitchell L. Gordon 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17815v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

When language models answer open-ended problems, they implicitly make hidden decisions that shape their outputs, leaving users with uncontextualized answers rather than a working map of the problem; drawing on multiverse analysis from statistics, we build and evaluate the conceptual multiverse, an interactive system that represents conceptual decisions such as how to frame a question or what to value as a space users can transparently inspect, intervenably change, and check against principled domain reasoning; for this structure to be worth navigating rather than misleading, it must be rigorous and checkable against domain reasoning norms, so we develop a general verification framework that enforces properties of good decision structures like unambiguity and completeness calibrated by expert-level reasoning; across three domains, the conceptual multiverse helped participants develop a working map of the problem, with philosophy students rewriting essays with sharper framings and reversed theses, alignment annotators moving from surface preferences to reasoning about user intent and harm, and poets identifying compositional patterns that clarified their taste.



162. ❌ Enabling AI ASICs for Zero Knowledge Proof

作者: Jianming Tong, Jingtian Dang, Simon Langowski, Tianhao Huang, Asra Ali, Jeremy Kun, Jevin Jiang, Srinivas Devadas, Tushar Krishna 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17808v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) provers remain costly because multi-scalar multiplication (MSM) and number-theoretic transforms (NTTs) dominate runtime as they need significant computation. AI ASICs such as TPUs provide massive matrix throughput and SotA energy efficiency. We present MORPH, the first framework that reformulates ZKP kernels to match AI-ASIC execution. We introduce Big-T complexity, a hardware-aware complexity model that exposes heterogeneous bottlenecks and layout-transformation costs ignored by Big-O. Guided by this analysis, (1) at arithmetic level, MORPH develops an MXU-centric extended-RNS lazy reduction that converts high-precision modular arithmetic into dense low-precision GEMMs, eliminating all carry chains, and (2) at dataflow level, MORPH constructs a unified-sharding layout-stationary TPU Pippenger MSM and optimized 3/5-step NTT that avoid on-TPU shuffles to minimize costly memory reorganization. Implemented in JAX, MORPH enables TPUv6e8 to achieve up-to 10x higher throughput on NTT and comparable throughput on MSM than GZKP. Our code: https://github.com/EfficientPPML/MORPH.



163. ❌ Bridging the Reasoning Gap in Vietnamese with Small Language Models via Test-Time Scaling

作者: Bui The Trung, Do Minh Duc, Nguyen Van Vinh, Bui Nguyen Quoc Trinh 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17794v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The democratization of ubiquitous AI hinges on deploying sophisticated reasoning capabilities on resource-constrained devices. However, Small Language Models (SLMs) often face a “reasoning gap”, particularly in non-English languages like Vietnamese, where they struggle to maintain coherent chains of thought. This paper investigates Test-Time Scaling strategies for the Qwen3-1.7B architecture within the context of Vietnamese Elementary Mathematics. We introduce Vi-S1K, a high-fidelity reasoning dataset localized via a Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite powered pipeline, and Vi-Elementary-Bench, a dual-resource benchmark for rigorous evaluation. Using an LLM-as-a-Judge protocol, we reveal that the base model possesses robust latent knowledge (Accuracy: 4.05/5.00) but suffers from a severe “formatting gap” in communication. Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) acts as a critical “reasoning unlocker”, yielding a 77% improvement in Explanation Quality and bridging the gap between raw calculation and pedagogical coherence. Furthermore, our analysis of prompting strategies uncovers a significant trade-off: structured frameworks like ReAct impose a “cognitive tax” on the 1.7B parameter capacity, degrading performance relative to pure Chain-of-Thought (CoT) combined with Self-Consistency. These findings establish a deployment hierarchy for SLMs, demonstrating that SFT combined with simplified test-time scaling is superior to complex agentic workflows for edge-based reasoning.



164. ❌ DuQuant++: Fine-grained Rotation Enhances Microscaling FP4 Quantization

作者: Haokun Lin, Xinle Jia, Haobo Xu, Bingchen Yao, Xianglong Guo, Yichen Wu, Zhichao Lu, Ying Wei, Qingfu Zhang, Zhenan Sun 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17789v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The MXFP4 microscaling format, which partitions tensors into blocks of 32 elements sharing an E8M0 scaling factor, has emerged as a promising substrate for efficient LLM inference, backed by native hardware support on NVIDIA Blackwell Tensor Cores. However, activation outliers pose a unique challenge under this format: a single outlier inflates the shared block scale, compressing the effective dynamic range of the remaining elements and causing significant quantization error. Existing rotation-based remedies, including randomized Hadamard and learnable rotations, are data-agnostic and therefore unable to specifically target the channels where outliers concentrate. We propose DuQuant++, which adapts the outlier-aware fine-grained rotation of DuQuant to the MXFP4 format by aligning the rotation block size with the microscaling group size (B{=}32). Because each MXFP4 group possesses an independent scaling factor, the cross-block variance issue that necessitates dual rotations and a zigzag permutation in the original DuQuant becomes irrelevant, enabling DuQuant++ to replace the entire pipeline with a single outlier-aware rotation, which halves the online rotation cost while simultaneously smoothing the weight distribution. Extensive experiments on the LLaMA-3 family under MXFP4 W4A4 quantization show that DuQuant++ consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance. Our code is available at https://github.com/Hsu1023/DuQuant++.



165. ❌ Forget What Matters, Keep the Rest: Selective Unlearning of Informative Tokens

作者: Seunghee Koh, Sunghyun Baek, Youngdong Kim, Junmo Kim 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17785v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Unlearning in large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a promising safeguard against adversarial behaviors. When the forgetting loss is applied uniformly without considering token-level semantic importance, model utility can be unnecessarily degraded. Recent studies have explored token-wise loss regularizers that prioritize informative tokens, but largely rely on ground-truth confidence or external linguistic parsers, which limits their ability to capture contextual information or the model’s overall predictive state. Intuitively, function words like “the” primarily serve syntactic roles and are highly predictable with little ambiguity, but informative words admit multiple plausible alternatives with greater uncertainty. Based on this intuition, we propose Entropy-guided Token Weighting (ETW), a token-level unlearning regularizer that uses entropy of the predictive distribution as a proxy for token informativeness. We demonstrate that informative tokens tend to have higher entropy, whereas structural tokens tend to have lower entropy. This behavior enables ETW to achieve more effective unlearning while better preserving model utility than existing token-level approaches.



166. ❌ SPENCE: A Syntactic Probe for Detecting Contamination in NL2SQL Benchmarks

作者: Mohammadtaher Safarzadeh, Hitesh Laxmichand Patel, Afshin Orojlooyjadid, Graham Horwood, Dan Roth 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17771v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance on natural language to SQL (NL2SQL) benchmarks, yet their reported accuracy may be inflated by contamination from benchmark queries or structurally similar patterns seen during training. We introduce SPENCE (Syntactic Probing and Evaluation of NL2SQL Contamination Effects), a controlled syntactic probing framework for detecting and quantifying such contamination. SPENCE systematically generates syntactic variants of test queries for four widely used NL2SQL datasets-Spider, SParC, CoSQL, and the newer BIRD benchmark. We use SPENCE to evaluate multiple high-capacity LLMs under execution-based scoring. For each model, we measure changes in execution accuracy across increasing levels of syntactic divergence and quantify rank sensitivity using Kendall’s tau with bootstrap confidence intervals. By aligning these robustness trends with benchmark release dates, we observe a clear temporal gradient: older benchmarks such as Spider exhibit the strongest negative values and thus the highest likelihood of training leakage, whereas the more recent BIRD dataset shows minimal sensitivity and appears largely uncontaminated. Together, these findings highlight the importance of temporally contextualized, syntactic-probing evaluation for trustworthy NL2SQL benchmarking.



167. ❌ Reverse Constitutional AI: A Framework for Controllable Toxic Data Generation via Probability-Clamped RLAIF

作者: Yuan Fang, Yiming Luo, Aimin Zhou, Fei Tan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17769v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Ensuring the safety of large language models (LLMs) requires robust red teaming, yet the systematic synthesis of high-quality toxic data remains under-explored. We propose Reverse Constitutional AI (R-CAI), a framework for automated and controllable adversarial data generation that moves beyond isolated jailbreak prompts. By inverting a harmless constitution into a constitution of toxicity and iteratively refining model outputs through a critique–revision pipeline, R-CAI enables scalable synthesis of multi-dimensional adversarial data without human annotation. Optimizing solely for toxicity-related rewards, however, can lead to reward hacking and degraded semantic coherence. To address this challenge, we introduce probability clamping within reinforcement learning from AI feedback, which stabilizes adversarial optimization while preserving adversarial intent. Experiments demonstrate that R-CAI generates diverse, high-quality toxic data and that probability clamping substantially improves semantic coherence (15%) without sacrificing adversarial strength. Overall, R-CAI provides a fully automated framework for red teaming data generation and systematic safety evaluation of aligned language models.



168. ❌ Contrastive Attribution in the Wild: An Interpretability Analysis of LLM Failures on Realistic Benchmarks

作者: Rongyuan Tan, Jue Zhang, Zhuozhao Li, Qingwei Lin, Saravan Rajmohan, Dongmei Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17761v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Interpretability tools are increasingly used to analyze failures of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet prior work largely focuses on short prompts or toy settings, leaving their behavior on commonly used benchmarks underexplored. To address this gap, we study contrastive, LRP-based attribution as a practical tool for analyzing LLM failures in realistic settings. We formulate failure analysis as \textit{contrastive attribution}, attributing the logit difference between an incorrect output token and a correct alternative to input tokens and internal model states, and introduce an efficient extension that enables construction of cross-layer attribution graphs for long-context inputs. Using this framework, we conduct a systematic empirical study across benchmarks, comparing attribution patterns across datasets, model sizes, and training checkpoints. Our results show that this token-level contrastive attribution can yield informative signals in some failure cases, but is not universally applicable, highlighting both its utility and its limitations for realistic LLM failure analysis. Our code is available at: https://aka.ms/Debug-XAI.



169. ❌ Evolutionary Negative Module Pruning for Better LoRA Merging

作者: Anda Cao, Zhuo Gou, Yi Wang, Kaixuan Chen, Yu Wang, Can Wang, Mingli Song, Jie Song 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17753v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Merging multiple Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) experts into a single backbone is a promising approach for efficient multi-task deployment. While existing methods strive to alleviate interference via weight interpolation or subspace alignment, they rest upon the implicit assumption that all LoRA matrices contribute constructively to the merged model. In this paper, we uncover a critical bottleneck in current merging paradigms: the existence of $\textit{negative modules}$ – specific LoRA layers that inherently degrade global performance upon merging. We propose $\textbf{E}$volutionary $\textbf{N}$egative $\textbf{M}$odule $\textbf{P}$runing ($\textbf{ENMP}$), a plug-and-play LoRA pruning method to locate and exclude these detrimental modules prior to merging. By leveraging an evolutionary search strategy, ENMP effectively navigates the discrete, non-differentiable landscape of module selection to identify optimal pruning configurations. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that ENMP consistently boosts the performance of existing merging algorithms, achieving a new state-of-the-art across both language and vision domains. Code is available at https://github.com/CaoAnda/ENMP-LoRAMerging.



170. ❌ HiP-LoRA: Budgeted Spectral Plasticity for Robust Low-Rank Adaptation

作者: Lixian Chen, Jianhong Tan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17751v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Adapting foundation models under resource budgets relies heavily on Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT), with LoRA being a standard modular solution. However, LoRA suffers from spectral interference. Low-rank updates often concentrate energy on the leading singular directions of pretrained weights, perturbing general capabilities and causing catastrophic forgetting and fragile multi-adapter merging. To resolve this, we propose HiP-LoRA, a spectrum-aware adaptation framework. Utilizing the cached singular value decomposition (SVD) of pretrained layers, HiP-LoRA decomposes updates into two channels: a principal channel within the dominant singular subspace, and a residual low-rank channel in the orthogonal complement. A singular-value-weighted stability budget on the principal channel continuously balances pretrained behavior preservation with task-specific plasticity. Experiments on Llama-3.1-8B demonstrate that under matched budgets, HiP-LoRA drastically reduces pretraining degradation and multi-adapter MergeFail, robustly outperforming baselines in interference-sensitive tasks like continual tuning and knowledge editing.



171. ❌ HiRAS: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Paper-to-Code Generation and Execution

作者: Hanhua Hong, Yizhi LI, Jiaoyan Chen, Sophia Ananiadou, Xiaoli Li, Jung-jae Kim, Chenghua Lin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17745v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent advances in large language models have highlighted their potential to automate computational research, particularly reproducing experimental results. However, existing approaches still use fixed sequential agent pipelines with weak global coordination, which limits their robustness and overall performance. In this work, we propose Hierarchical Research Agent System (HiRAS), a hierarchical multi-agent framework for end-to-end experiment reproduction that employs supervisory manager agents to coordinate specialised agents across fine-grained stages. We also identify limitations in the reference-free evaluation of the Paper2Code benchmark and introduce Paper2Code-Extra (P2C-Ex), a refined protocol that incorporates repository-level information and better aligns with the original reference-based metric. We conduct extensive evaluation, validating the effectiveness and robustness of our proposed methods, and observing improvements, including >10% relative performance gain beyond the previous state-of-the-art using open-source backbone models and significantly reduced hallucination in evaluation. Our work is available on GitHub: https://github.com/KOU-199024/HiRAS.



172. ❌ Tool Learning Needs Nothing More Than a Free 8B Language Model

作者: Chenming Tang, Hsiu-Yuan Huang, Weijie Liu, Junqiang Zheng, Saiyong Yang, Yunfang Wu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17739v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a prevalent paradigm for training tool calling agents, which typically requires online interactive environments. Existing approaches either rely on training data with ground truth annotations or require advanced commercial language models (LMs) to synthesize environments that keep fixed once created. In this work, we propose TRUSTEE, a data-free method training tool calling agents with dynamic environments fully simulated by free open-source LMs that can be as small as 8B, including task generation, user simulation, tool simulation and trajectory evaluation, paired with an adaptive curriculum learning mechanism that controls various aspects of the task difficulty dynamically during training. Our empirical results show that TRUSTEE brings consistent improvements across various domains and outperforms all the baselines which require extra external resources for training. These confirm that, with a sufficiently sophisticated design, even simulated environments with a local 8B LM as the backbone could set a strong baseline for tool learning, without expensive annotated data, realistic human interactions, executable tools or costly verifiable environments from human experts or commercial LMs. We hope our proposed paradigm could inspire future research on environment scaling with limited resources.



173. ❌ MUA: Mobile Ultra-detailed Animatable Avatars

作者: Heming Zhu, Guoxing Sun, Marc Habermann 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18583v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Building photorealistic, animatable full-body digital humans remains a longstanding challenge in computer graphics and vision. Recent advances in animatable avatar modeling have largely progressed along two directions: improving the fidelity of dynamic geometry and appearance, or reducing computational complexity to enable deployment on resource-constrained platforms, e.g., VR headsets. However, existing approaches fail to achieve both goals simultaneously: Ultra-high-fidelity avatars typically require substantial computation on server-class GPUs, whereas lightweight avatars often suffer from limited surface dynamics, reduced appearance details, and noticeable artifacts. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel animatable avatar representation, termed Wavelet-guided Multi-level Spatial Factorized Blendshapes, and a corresponding distillation pipeline that transfers motion-aware clothing dynamics and fine-grained appearance details from a pre-trained ultra-high-quality avatar model into a compact, efficient representation. By coupling multi-level wavelet spectral decomposition with low-rank structural factorization in texture space, our method achieves up to 2000X lower computational cost and a 10X smaller model size than the original high-quality teacher avatar model, while preserving visually plausible dynamics and appearance details closely resemble those of the teacher model. Extensive comparisons with state-of-the-art methods show that our approach significantly outperforms existing avatar approaches designed for mobile settings and achieves comparable or superior rendering quality to most approaches that can only run on servers. Importantly, our representation substantially improves the practicality of high-fidelity avatars for immersive applications, achieving over 180 FPS on a desktop PC and real-time native on-device performance at 24 FPS on a standalone Meta Quest 3.



174. ❌ ReCap: Lightweight Referential Grounding for Coherent Story Visualization

作者: Aditya Arora, Akshita Gupta, Pau Rodriguez, Marcus Rohrbach 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18575v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Story Visualization aims to generate a sequence of images that faithfully depicts a textual narrative that preserve character identity, spatial configuration, and stylistic coherence as the narratives unfold. Maintaining such cross-frame consistency has traditionally relied on explicit memory banks, architectural expansion, or auxiliary language models, resulting in substantial parameter growth and inference overhead. We introduce ReCap, a lightweight consistency framework that improves character stability and visual fidelity without modifying the base diffusion backbone. ReCap’s CORE (COnditional frame REferencing) module treats anaphors, in our case pronouns, as visual anchors, activating only when characters are referred to by a pronoun and conditioning on the preceding frame to propagate visual identity. This selective design avoids unconditional cross-frame conditioning and introduces only 149K additional parameters, a fraction of the cost of memory-bank and LLM-augmented approaches. To further stabilize identity, we incorporate SemDrift (Guided Semantic Drift Correction) applied only during training. When text is vague or referential, the denoiser lacks a visual anchor for identity-defining attributes, causing character appearance to drift across frames, SemDrift corrects this by aligning denoiser representations with pretrained DINOv3 visual embeddings, enforcing semantic identity stability at zero inference cost. ReCap outperforms previous state-of-the-art, StoryGPT-V, on the two main benchmarks for story visualization by 2.63% Character-Accuracy on FlintstonesSV and by 5.65% on PororoSV, establishing a new state-of-the-art character consistency on both benchmarks. Furthermore, we extend story visualization to human-centric narratives derived from real films, demonstrating the capability of ReCap beyond stylized cartoon domains.



175. ❌ T-REN: Learning Text-Aligned Region Tokens Improves Dense Vision-Language Alignment and Scalability

作者: Savya Khosla, Sethuraman T, Aryan Chadha, Alex Schwing, Derek Hoiem 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18573v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Despite recent progress, vision-language encoders struggle with two core limitations: (1) weak alignment between language and dense vision features, which hurts tasks like open-vocabulary semantic segmentation; and (2) high token counts for fine-grained visual representations, which limits scalability to long videos. This work addresses both limitations. We propose T-REN (Text-aligned Region Encoder Network), an efficient encoder that maps visual data to a compact set of text-aligned region-level representations (or region tokens). T-REN achieves this through a lightweight network added on top of a frozen vision backbone, trained to pool patch-level representations within each semantic region into region tokens and align them with region-level text annotations. With only 3.7% additional parameters compared to the vision-language backbone, this design yields substantially stronger dense cross-modal understanding while reducing the token count by orders of magnitude. Specifically, T-REN delivers +5.9 mIoU on ADE20K open-vocabulary segmentation, +18.4% recall on COCO object-level text-image retrieval, +15.6% recall on Ego4D video object localization, and +17.6% mIoU on VSPW video scene parsing, all while reducing token counts by more than 24x for images and 187x for videos compared to the patch-based vision-language backbone. The code and model are available at https://github.com/savya08/T-REN.



176. ❌ MultiWorld: Scalable Multi-Agent Multi-View Video World Models

作者: Haoyu Wu, Jiwen Yu, Yingtian Zou, Xihui Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18564v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Video world models have achieved remarkable success in simulating environmental dynamics in response to actions by users or agents. They are modeled as action-conditioned video generation models that take historical frames and current actions as input to predict future frames. Yet, most existing approaches are limited to single-agent scenarios and fail to capture the complex interactions inherent in real-world multi-agent systems. We present \textbf{MultiWorld}, a unified framework for multi-agent multi-view world modeling that enables accurate control of multiple agents while maintaining multi-view consistency. We introduce the Multi-Agent Condition Module to achieve precise multi-agent controllability, and the Global State Encoder to ensure coherent observations across different views. MultiWorld supports flexible scaling of agent and view counts, and synthesizes different views in parallel for high efficiency. Experiments on multi-player game environments and multi-robot manipulation tasks demonstrate that MultiWorld outperforms baselines in video fidelity, action-following ability, and multi-view consistency. Project page: https://multi-world.github.io/



177. ❌ AnchorSeg: Language Grounded Query Banks for Reasoning Segmentation

作者: Rui Qian, Chuanhang Deng, Qiang Huang, Jian Xiong, Mingxuan Li, Yingbo Zhou, Wei Zhai, Jintao Chen, Dejing Dou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18562v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Reasoning segmentation requires models to ground complex, implicit textual queries into precise pixel-level masks. Existing approaches rely on a single segmentation token $\texttt{}$, whose hidden state implicitly encodes both semantic reasoning and spatial localization, limiting the model’s ability to explicitly disentangle what to segment from where to segment. We introduce AnchorSeg, which reformulates reasoning segmentation as a structured conditional generation process over image tokens, conditioned on language grounded query banks. Instead of compressing all semantic reasoning and spatial localization into a single embedding, AnchorSeg constructs an ordered sequence of query banks: latent reasoning tokens that capture intermediate semantic states, and a segmentation anchor token that provides explicit spatial grounding. We model spatial conditioning as a factorized distribution over image tokens, where the anchor query determines localization signals while contextual queries provide semantic modulation. To bridge token-level predictions and pixel-level supervision, we propose Token–Mask Cycle Consistency (TMCC), a bidirectional training objective that enforces alignment across resolutions. By explicitly decoupling spatial grounding from semantic reasoning through structured language grounded query banks, AnchorSeg achieves state-of-the-art results on ReasonSeg test set (67.7% gIoU and 68.1% cIoU). All code and models are publicly available at https://github.com/rui-qian/AnchorSeg.



178. ❌ SynAgent: Generalizable Cooperative Humanoid Manipulation via Solo-to-Cooperative Agent Synergy

作者: Wei Yao, Haohan Ma, Hongwen Zhang, Yunlian Sun, Liangjun Xing, Zhile Yang, Yuanjun Guo, Yebin Liu, Jinhui Tang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18557v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Controllable cooperative humanoid manipulation is a fundamental yet challenging problem for embodied intelligence, due to severe data scarcity, complexities in multi-agent coordination, and limited generalization across objects. In this paper, we present SynAgent, a unified framework that enables scalable and physically plausible cooperative manipulation by leveraging Solo-to-Cooperative Agent Synergy to transfer skills from single-agent human-object interaction to multi-agent human-object-human scenarios. To maintain semantic integrity during motion transfer, we introduce an interaction-preserving retargeting method based on an Interact Mesh constructed via Delaunay tetrahedralization, which faithfully maintains spatial relationships among humans and objects. Building upon this refined data, we propose a single-agent pretraining and adaptation paradigm that bootstraps synergistic collaborative behaviors from abundant single-human data through decentralized training and multi-agent PPO. Finally, we develop a trajectory-conditioned generative policy using a conditional VAE, trained via multi-teacher distillation from motion imitation priors to achieve stable and controllable object-level trajectory execution. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SynAgent significantly outperforms existing baselines in both cooperative imitation and trajectory-conditioned control, while generalizing across diverse object geometries. Codes and data will be available after publication. Project Page: http://yw0208.github.io/synagent



179. ❌ Advancing Vision Transformer with Enhanced Spatial Priors

作者: Qihang Fan, Huaibo Huang, Mingrui Chen, Hongmin Liu, Ran He 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18549v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In recent years, the Vision Transformer (ViT) has garnered significant attention within the computer vision community. However, the core component of ViT, Self-Attention, lacks explicit spatial priors and suffers from quadratic computational complexity, limiting its applicability. To address these issues, we have proposed RMT, a robust vision backbone with explicit spatial priors for general purposes. RMT utilizes Manhattan distance decay to introduce spatial information and employs a horizontal and vertical decomposition attention method to model global information. Building on the strengths of RMT, Euclidean enhanced Vision Transformer (EVT) is an expanded version that incorporates several key improvements. Firstly, EVT uses a more reasonable Euclidean distance decay to enhance the modeling of spatial information, allowing for a more accurate representation of spatial relationships compared to the Manhattan distance used in RMT. Secondly, EVT abandons the decomposed attention mechanism featured in RMT and instead adopts a simpler spatially-independent grouping approach, providing the model with greater flexibility in controlling the number of tokens within each group. By addressing these modifications, EVT offers a more sophisticated and adaptable approach to incorporating spatial priors into the Self-Attention mechanism, thus overcoming some of the limitations associated with RMT and further enhancing its applicability in various computer vision tasks. Extensive experiments on Image Classification, Object Detection, Instance Segmentation, and Semantic Segmentation demonstrate that EVT exhibits exceptional performance. Without additional training data, EVT achieves 86.6% top1-acc on ImageNet-1k.



180. ❌ MetaCloak-JPEG: JPEG-Robust Adversarial Perturbation for Preventing Unauthorized DreamBooth-Based Deepfake Generation

作者: Tanjim Rahaman Fardin, S M Zunaid Alam, Mahadi Hasan Fahim, Md Faysal Mahfuz 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18537v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The rapid progress of subject-driven text-to-image synthesis, and in particular DreamBooth, has enabled a consent-free deepfake pipeline: an adversary needs only 4-8 publicly available face images to fine-tune a personalized diffusion model and produce photorealistic harmful content. Current adversarial face-protection systems – PhotoGuard, Anti-DreamBooth, and MetaCloak – perturb user images to disrupt surrogate fine-tuning, but all share a structural blindness: none backpropagates gradients through the JPEG compression pipeline that every major social-media platform applies before adversary access. Because JPEG quantization relies on round(), whose derivative is zero almost everywhere, adversarial energy concentrates in high-frequency DCT bands that JPEG discards, eliminating 60-80% of the protective signal. We introduce MetaCloak-JPEG, which closes this gap by inserting a Differentiable JPEG (DiffJPEG) layer built on the Straight-Through Estimator (STE): the forward pass applies standard JPEG compression, while the backward pass replaces round() with the identity. DiffJPEG is embedded in a JPEG-aware EOT distribution (~70% of augmentations include DiffJPEG) and a curriculum quality-factor schedule (QF: 95 to 50) inside a bilevel meta-learning loop. Under an l-inf perturbation budget of eps=8/255, MetaCloak-JPEG attains 32.7 dB PSNR, a 91.3% JPEG survival rate, and outperforms PhotoGuard on all 9 evaluated JPEG quality factors (9/9 wins, mean denoising-loss gain +0.125) within a 4.1 GB training-memory budget.



181. ❌ UDM-GRPO: Stable and Efficient Group Relative Policy Optimization for Uniform Discrete Diffusion Models

作者: Jiaqi Wang, Haoge Deng, Ting Pan, Yang Liu, Chengyuan Wang, Fan Zhang, Yonggang Qi, Xinlong Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18518v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Uniform Discrete Diffusion Model (UDM) has recently emerged as a promising paradigm for discrete generative modeling; however, its integration with reinforcement learning remains largely unexplored. We observe that naively applying GRPO to UDM leads to training instability and marginal performance gains. To address this, we propose \Ours, the first framework to integrate UDM with RL. Our method is guided by two key insights: (i) treating the final clean sample as the action provides more accurate and stable optimization signals; and (ii) reconstructing trajectories via the diffusion forward process better aligns probability paths with the pretraining distribution. Additionally, we introduce two strategies, Reduced-Step and CFG-Free, to further improve training efficiency. \Ours significantly improves base model performance across multiple T2I tasks. Notably, GenEval accuracy improves from $69%$ to $96%$ and PickScore increases from $20.46$ to $23.81$, achieving state-of-the-art performance in both continuous and discrete settings. On the OCR benchmark, accuracy rises from $8%$ to $57%$, further validating the generalization ability of our method. Code is available at \href{https://github.com/Yovecent/UDM-GRPO}{https://github.com/Yovecent/UDM-GRPO}.



182. ❌ S2H-DPO: Hardness-Aware Preference Optimization for Vision-Language Models

作者: Nitish Shukla, Surgan Jandial, Arun Ross 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18512v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in single-image understanding, yet effective reasoning across multiple images remains challenging. We identify a critical capability gap in existing multi-image alignment approaches: current methods focus primarily on localized reasoning with pre-specified image indices (``Look at Image 3 and…’’), bypassing the essential skills of global visual search and autonomous cross-image comparison. To address this limitation, we introduce a Simple-to-Hard (S2H) learning framework that systematically constructs multi-image preference data across three hierarchical reasoning levels requiring an increasing level of capabilities: (1) single-image localized reasoning, (2) multi-image localized comparison, and (3) global visual search. Unlike prior work that relies on model-specific attributes, such as hallucinations or attention heuristics, to generate preference pairs, our approach leverages prompt-driven complexity to create chosen/rejected pairs that are applicable across different models. Through extensive evaluations on LLaVA and Qwen-VL models, we show that our diverse multi-image reasoning data significantly enhances multi-image reasoning performance, yielding significant improvements over baseline methods across benchmarks. Importantly, our approach maintains strong single-image reasoning performance while simultaneously strengthening multi-image understanding capabilities, thus advancing the state of the art for holistic visual preference alignment.



183. ❌ XEmbodied: A Foundation Model with Enhanced Geometric and Physical Cues for Large-Scale Embodied Environments

作者: Kangan Qian, ChuChu Xie, Yang Zhong, Jingrui Pang, Siwen Jiao, Sicong Jiang, Zilin Huang, Yunlong Wang, Kun Jiang, Mengmeng Yang, Hao Ye, Guanghao Zhang, Hangjun Ye, Guang Chen, Long Chen, Diange Yang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18484v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models drive next-generation autonomous systems, but training them requires scalable, high-quality annotations from complex environments. Current cloud pipelines rely on generic vision-language models (VLMs) that lack geometric reasoning and domain semantics due to their 2D image-text pretraining. To address this mismatch, we propose XEmbodied, a cloud-side foundation model that endows VLMs with intrinsic 3D geometric awareness and interaction with physical cues (e.g., occupancy grids, 3D boxes). Instead of treating geometry as auxiliary input, XEmbodied integrates geometric representations via a structured 3D Adapter and distills physical signals into context tokens using an Efficient Image-Embodied Adapter. Through progressive domain curriculum and reinforcement learning post-training, XEmbodied preserves general capabilities while demonstrating robust performance across 18 public benchmarks. It significantly improves spatial reasoning, traffic semantics, embodied affordance, and out-of-distribution generalization for large-scale scenario mining and embodied VQA.



184. ❌ SemLT3D: Semantic-Guided Expert Distillation for Camera-only Long-Tailed 3D Object Detection

作者: Hao Vo, Khoa Vo, Thinh Phan, Ngo Xuan Cuong, Gianfranco Doretto, Hien Nguyen, Anh Nguyen, Ngan Le 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18476v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Camera-only 3D object detection has emerged as a cost-effective and scalable alternative to LiDAR for autonomous driving, yet existing methods primarily prioritize overall performance while overlooking the severe long-tail imbalance inherent in real-world datasets. In practice, many rare but safety-critical categories such as children, strollers, or emergency vehicles are heavily underrepresented, leading to biased learning and degraded performance. This challenge is further exacerbated by pronounced inter-class ambiguity (e.g., visually similar subclasses) and substantial intra-class diversity (e.g., objects varying widely in appearance, scale, pose, or context), which together hinder reliable long-tail recognition. In this work, we introduce SemLT3D, a Semantic-Guided Expert Distillation framework designed to enrich the representation space for underrepresented classes through semantic priors. SemLT3D consists of: (1) a language-guided mixture-of-experts module that routes 3D queries to specialized experts according to their semantic affinity, enabling the model to better disentangle confusing classes and specialize on tail distributions; and (2) a semantic projection distillation pipeline that aligns 3D queries with CLIP-informed 2D semantics, producing more coherent and discriminative features across diverse visual manifestations. Although motivated by long-tail imbalance, the semantically structured learning in SemLT3D also improves robustness under broader appearance variations and challenging corner cases, offering a principled step toward more reliable camera-only 3D perception.



185. ❌ MedProbeBench: Systematic Benchmarking at Deep Evidence Integration for Expert-level Medical Guideline

作者: Jiyao Liu, Jianghan Shen, Sida Song, Tianbin Li, Xiaojia Liu, Rongbin Li, Ziyan Huang, Jiashi Lin, Junzhi Ning, Changkai Ji, Siqi Luo, Wenjie Li, Chenglong Ma, Ming Hu, Jing Xiong, Jin Ye, Bin Fu, Ningsheng Xu, Yirong Chen, Lei Jin, Hong Chen, Junjun He 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18418v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent advances in deep research systems enable large language models to retrieve, synthesize, and reason over large-scale external knowledge. In medicine, developing clinical guidelines critically depends on such deep evidence integration. However, existing benchmarks fail to evaluate this capability in realistic workflows requiring multi-step evidence integration and expert-level judgment. To address this gap, we introduce MedProbeBench, the first benchmark leveraging high-quality clinical guidelines as expert-level references. Medical guidelines, with their rigorous standards in neutrality and verifiability, represent the pinnacle of medical expertise and pose substantial challenges for deep research agents. For evaluation, we propose MedProbe-Eval, a comprehensive evaluation framework featuring: (1) Holistic Rubrics with 1,200+ task-adaptive rubric criteria for comprehensive quality assessment, and (2) Fine-grained Evidence Verification for rigorous validation of evidence precision, grounded in 5,130+ atomic claims. Evaluation of 17 LLMs and deep research agents reveals critical gaps in evidence integration and guideline generation, underscoring the substantial distance between current capabilities and expert-level clinical guideline development. Project: https://github.com/uni-medical/MedProbeBench



186. ❌ One-Step Diffusion with Inverse Residual Fields for Unsupervised Industrial Anomaly Detection

作者: Boan Zhang, Wen Li, Guanhua Yu, Xiyang Liu, Wenchao Chen, Long Tian 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18393v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Diffusion models have achieved outstanding performance in unsupervised industrial anomaly detection (uIAD) by learning a manifold of normal data under the common assumption that off-manifold anomalies are harder to generate, resulting in larger reconstruction errors in data space or lower probability densities in the tractable latent space. However, their iterative denoising and noising nature leads to slow inference. In this paper, we propose OSD-IRF, a novel one-step diffusion with inverse residual fields, to address this limitation for uIAD task. We first train a deep diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) on normal data without any conditioning. Then, for a test sample, we predict its inverse residual fields (IRF) based on the noise estimated by the well-trained parametric noise function of the DDPM. Finally, uIAD is performed by evaluating the probability density of the IRF under a Gaussian distribution and comparing it with a threshold. Our key observation is that anomalies become distinguishable in this IRF space, a finding that has seldom been reported in prior works. Moreover, OSD-IRF requires only single step diffusion for uIAD, thanks to the property that IRF holds for any neighboring time step in the denoising process. Extensive experiments on three widely used uIAD benchmarks show that our model achieves SOTA or competitive performance across six metrics, along with roughly a 2X inference speedup without distillation.



187. ❌ Towards Robust Text-to-Image Person Retrieval: Multi-View Reformulation for Semantic Compensation

作者: Chao Yuan, Yujian Zhao, Haoxuan Xu, Guanglin Niu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18376v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In text-to-image person retrieval tasks, the diversity of natural language expressions and the implicitness of visual semantics often lead to the problem of Expression Drift, where semantically equivalent texts exhibit significant feature discrepancies in the embedding space due to phrasing variations, thereby degrading the robustness of image-text alignment. This paper proposes a semantic compensation framework (MVR) driven by Large Language Models (LLMs), which enhances cross-modal representation consistency through multi-view semantic reformulation and feature compensation. The core methodology comprises three components: Multi-View Reformulation (MVR): A dual-branch prompting strategy combines key feature guidance (extracting visually critical components via feature similarity) and diversity-aware rewriting to generate semantically equivalent yet distributionally diverse textual variants; Textual Feature Robustness Enhancement: A training-free latent space compensation mechanism suppresses noise interference through multi-view feature mean-pooling and residual connections, effectively capturing “Semantic Echoes”; Visual Semantic Compensation: VLM generates multi-perspective image descriptions, which are further enhanced through shared text reformulation to address visual semantic gaps. Experiments demonstrate that our method can improve the accuracy of the original model well without training and performs SOTA on three text-to-image person retrieval datasets.



188. ❌ DSA-CycleGAN: A Domain Shift Aware CycleGAN for Robust Multi-Stain Glomeruli Segmentation

作者: Zeeshan Nisar, Friedrich Feuerhake, Thomas Lampert 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18368v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

A key challenge in segmentation in digital histopathology is inter- and intra-stain variations as it reduces model performance. Labelling each stain is expensive and time-consuming so methods using stain transfer via CycleGAN, have been developed for training multi-stain segmentation models using labels from a single stain. Nevertheless, CycleGAN tends to introduce noise during translation because of the one-to-many nature of some stain pairs, which conflicts with its cycle consistency loss. To address this, we propose the Domain Shift Aware CycleGAN, which reduces the presence of such noise. Furthermore, we evaluate several advances from the field of machine learning aimed at resolving similar problems and compare their effectiveness against DSA-CycleGAN in the context of multi-stain glomeruli segmentation. Experiments demonstrate that DSA-CycleGAN not only improves segmentation performance in glomeruli segmentation but also outperforms other methods in reducing noise. This is particularly evident when translating between biologically distinct stains. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/zeeshannisar/DSA-CycleGAN.



189. ❌ EAST: Early Action Prediction Sampling Strategy with Token Masking

作者: Iva Sović, Ivan Martinović, Marin Oršić 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18367v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Early action prediction seeks to anticipate an action before it fully unfolds, but limited visual evidence makes this task especially challenging. We introduce EAST, a simple and efficient framework that enables a model to reason about incomplete observations. In our empirical study, we identify key components when training early action prediction models. Our key contribution is a randomized training strategy that samples a time step separating observed and unobserved video frames, enabling a single model to generalize seamlessly across all test-time observation ratios. We further show that joint learning on both observed and future (oracle) representations significantly boosts performance, even allowing an encoder-only model to excel. To improve scalability, we propose a token masking procedure that cuts memory usage in half and accelerates training by 2x with negligible accuracy loss. Combined with a forecasting decoder, EAST sets a new state of the art on NTU60, SSv2, and UCF101, surpassing previous best work by 10.1, 7.7, and 3.9 percentage points, respectively.



190. ❌ LBFTI: Layer-Based Facial Template Inversion for Identity-Preserving Fine-Grained Face Reconstruction

作者: Zixuan Shen, Zhihua Xia, Kaikai Gan, Peipeng Yu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18358v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In face recognition systems, facial templates are widely adopted for identity authentication due to their compliance with the data minimization principle. However, facial template inversion technologies have posed a severe privacy leakage risk by enabling face reconstruction from templates. This paper proposes a Layer-Based Facial Template Inversion (LBFTI) method to reconstruct identity-preserving fine-grained face images. Our scheme decomposes face images into three layers: foreground layers (including eyebrows, eyes, nose, and mouth), midground layers (skin), and background layers (other parts). LBFTI leverages dedicated generators to produce these layers, adopting a rigorous three-stage training strategy: (1) independent refined generation of foreground and midground layers, (2) fusion of foreground and midground layers with template secondary injection to produce complete panoramic face images with background layers, and (3) joint fine-tuning of all modules to optimize inter-layer coordination and identity consistency. Experiments demonstrate that our LBFTI not only outperforms state-of-the-art methods in machine authentication performance, with a 25.3% improvement in TAR, but also achieves better similarity in human perception, as validated by both quantitative metrics and a questionnaire survey.



191. ❌ Enhancing Glass Surface Reconstruction via Depth Prior for Robot Navigation

作者: Jiamin Zheng, Jingwen Yu, Guangcheng Chen, Hong Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18336v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Indoor robot navigation is often compromised by glass surfaces, which severely corrupt depth sensor measurements. While foundation models like Depth Anything 3 provide excellent geometric priors, they lack an absolute metric scale. We propose a training-free framework that leverages depth foundation models as a structural prior, employing a robust local RANSAC-based alignment to fuse it with raw sensor depth. This naturally avoids contamination from erroneous glass measurements and recovers an accurate metric scale. Furthermore, we introduce \ti{GlassRecon}, a novel RGB-D dataset with geometrically derived ground truth for glass regions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, especially under severe sensor depth corruption. The dataset and related code will be released at https://github.com/jarvisyjw/GlassRecon.



192. ❌ OmniHuman: A Large-scale Dataset and Benchmark for Human-Centric Video Generation

作者: Lei Zhu, Xing Cai, Yingjie Chen, Yiheng Li, Binxin Yang, Hao Liu, Jie Chen, Chen Li, Jing LYu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18326v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent advancements in audio-video joint generation models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in content creation. However, generating high-fidelity human-centric videos in complex, real-world physical scenes remains a significant challenge. We identify that the root cause lies in the structural deficiencies of existing datasets across three dimensions: limited global scene and camera diversity, sparse interaction modeling (both person-person and person-object), and insufficient individual attribute alignment. To bridge these gaps, we present OmniHuman, a large-scale, multi-scene dataset designed for fine-grained human modeling. OmniHuman provides a hierarchical annotation covering video-level scenes, frame-level interactions, and individual-level attributes. To facilitate this, we develop a fully automated pipeline for high-quality data collection and multi-modal annotation. Complementary to the dataset, we establish the OmniHuman Benchmark (OHBench), a three-level evaluation system that provides a scientific diagnosis for human-centric audio-video synthesis. Crucially, OHBench introduces metrics that are highly consistent with human perception, filling the gaps in existing benchmarks by providing a comprehensive diagnosis across global scenes, relational interactions, and individual attributes.



193. ❌ Relative State Estimation using Event-Based Propeller Sensing

作者: Ravi Kumar Thakur, Luis Granados Segura, Jan Klivan, Radim Špetlík, Tobiáš Vinklárek, Matouš Vrba, Martin Saska 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18289v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Autonomous swarms of multi-Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) system requires an accurate and fast relative state estimation. Although monocular frame-based camera methods perform well in ideal conditions, they are slow, suffer scale ambiguity, and often struggle in visually challenging conditions. The advent of event cameras addresses these challenging tasks by providing low latency, high dynamic range, and microsecond-level temporal resolution. This paper proposes a framework for relative state estimation for quadrotors using event-based propeller sensing. The propellers in the event stream are tracked by detection to extract the region-of-interests. The event streams in these regions are processed in temporal chunks to estimate per-propeller frequencies. These frequency measurements drive a kinematic state estimation module as a thrust input, while camera-derived position measurements provide the update step. Additionally, we use geometric primitives derived from event streams to estimate the orientation of the quadrotor by fitting an ellipse over a propeller and backprojecting it to recover body-frame tilt-axis. The existing event-based approaches for quadrotor state estimation use the propeller frequency in simulated flight sequences. Our approach estimates the propeller frequency under 3% error on a test dataset of five real-world outdoor flight sequences, providing a method for decentralized relative localization for multi-robot systems using event camera.



194. ❌ Denoise and Align: Diffusion-Driven Foreground Knowledge Prompting for Open-Vocabulary Temporal Action Detection

作者: Sa Zhu, Wanqian Zhang, Lin Wang, Jinchao Zhang, Cong Wang, Bo Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18313v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Open-Vocabulary Temporal Action Detection (OV-TAD) aims to localize and classify action segments of unseen categories in untrimmed videos, where effective alignment between action semantics and video representations is critical for accurate detection. However, existing methods struggle to mitigate the semantic imbalance between concise, abstract action labels and rich, complex video contents, inevitably introducing semantic noise and misleading cross-modal alignment. To address this challenge, we propose DFAlign, the first framework that leverages diffusion-based denoising to generate foreground knowledge for the guidance of action-video alignment. Following the ‘conditioning, denoising and aligning’ manner, we first introduce the Semantic-Unify Conditioning (SUC) module, which unifies action-shared and action-specific semantics as conditions for diffusion denoising. Then, the Background-Suppress Denoising (BSD) module generates foreground knowledge by progressively removing background redundancy from videos through denoising process. This foreground knowledge serves as effective intermediate semantic anchor between video and text representations, mitigating the semantic gap and enhancing the discriminability of action-relevant segments. Furthermore, we introduce the Foreground-Prompt Alignment (FPA) module to inject extracted foreground knowledge as prompt tokens into text representations, guiding model’s attention towards action-relevant segments and enabling precise cross-modal alignment. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on two OV-TAD benchmarks. The code repository is provided as follows: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Code-2114/.



195. ❌ Spike-NVPT: Learning Robust Visual Prompts via Bio-Inspired Temporal Filtering and Discretization

作者: Qiugang Zhan, Anning Jiang, Ran Tao, Ao Ma, Xiangyu Zhang, Xiurui Xie, Guisong Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18284v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Pre-trained vision models have found widespread application across diverse domains. Prompt tuning-based methods have emerged as a parameter-efficient paradigm for adapting pre-trained vision models. While effective on standard benchmarks, the continuous and dense nature of learned prompts can lead to sensitivity against input noise, as the high-capacity prompts tend to overfit task-irrelevant details. To address this trade-off, we propose Spike-NVPT, a noise-robust visual prompt tuning method. Specifically, we design a Signal Filtering Layer based on spiking neurons, which uses the integrate-and-fire (IF) mechanism to accumulate task-relevant signals over time and filter transient noise fluctuations. A subsequent Spike Discretization Unit converts filtered signals into sparse binary prompts. This discretization acts as a strong regularizer, forcing the model to anchor decision boundaries on the most discriminative and robust features. Notably, the resulting binary prompts remain static during deployment, ensuring zero additional computational overhead during inference. Experimental results demonstrate that Spike-NVPT achieves superior robustness performance, with a maximum improvement of 11.2% over conventional methods, and retains competitive accuracy on clean datasets. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to leverage spiking neurons for fine-tuning traditional artificial neural network (ANN)-based visual models.



196. ❌ LiquidTAD: An Efficient Method for Temporal Action Detection via Liquid Neural Dynamics

作者: Zepeng Sun, Naichuan Zheng, Hailun Xia, Junjie Wu, Liwei Bao, Xiaotai Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18274v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Temporal Action Detection (TAD) in untrimmed videos is currently dominated by Transformer-based architectures. While high-performing, their quadratic computational complexity and substantial parameter redundancy limit deployment in resource-constrained environments. In this paper, we propose LiquidTAD, a novel parameter-efficient framework that replaces cumbersome self-attention layers with parallelized ActionLiquid blocks. Unlike traditional Liquid Neural Networks (LNNs) that suffer from sequential execution bottlenecks, LiquidTAD leverages a closed-form continuous-time (CfC) formulation, allowing the model to be reformulated as a parallelizable operator while preserving the intrinsic physical prior of continuous-time dynamics. This architecture captures complex temporal dependencies with $O(N)$ linear complexity and adaptively modulates temporal sensitivity through learned time-constants ($τ$), providing a robust mechanism for handling varying action durations. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to introduce a parallelized LNN-based architecture to the TAD domain. Experimental results on the THUMOS-14 dataset demonstrate that LiquidTAD achieves a highly competitive Average mAP of 69.46% with only 10.82M parameters – a 63% reduction compared to the ActionFormer baseline. Further evaluations on ActivityNet-1.3 and Ego4D benchmarks confirm that LiquidTAD achieves an optimal accuracy-efficiency trade-off and exhibits superior robustness to temporal sampling variations, advancing the Pareto frontier of modern TAD frameworks.



197. ❌ MARCO: Navigating the Unseen Space of Semantic Correspondence

作者: Claudia Cuttano, Gabriele Trivigno, Carlo Masone, Stefan Roth 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18267v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent advances in semantic correspondence rely on dual-encoder architectures, combining DINOv2 with diffusion backbones. While accurate, these billion-parameter models generalize poorly beyond training keypoints, revealing a gap between benchmark performance and real-world usability, where queried points rarely match those seen during training. Building upon DINOv2, we introduce MARCO, a unified model for generalizable correspondence driven by a novel training framework that enhances both fine-grained localization and semantic generalization. By coupling a coarse-to-fine objective that refines spatial precision with a self-distillation framework, which expands sparse supervision beyond annotated regions, our approach transforms a handful of keypoints into dense, semantically coherent correspondences. MARCO sets a new state of the art on SPair-71k, AP-10K, and PF-PASCAL, with gains that amplify at fine-grained localization thresholds (+8.9 PCK@0.01), strongest generalization to unseen keypoints (+5.1, SPair-U) and categories (+4.7, MP-100), while remaining 3x smaller and 10x faster than diffusion-based approaches. Code is available at https://github.com/visinf/MARCO .



198. ❌ Geometry-Guided 3D Visual Token Pruning for Video-Language Models

作者: Han Li, Zehao Huang, Jiahui Fu, Naiyan Wang, Si Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18260v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Multimodal large language models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in 2D vision, motivating their extension to 3D scene understanding. Recent studies represent 3D scenes as 3D spatial videos composed of image sequences with depth and camera pose information, enabling pre-trained video-language models to perform 3D reasoning tasks. However, the large number of visual tokens in spatial videos remains a major bottleneck for efficient inference and context management. Existing pruning methods overlook the view consistency of spatial videos and the spatial diversity of the remaining tokens, which prevents them from effectively removing inter-frame redundancy and preserving scene completeness. In this paper, we propose Geo3DPruner, a Geometry-Guided 3D Visual Token Pruning framework. Geo3DPruner first models cross-frame relevance through geometry-aware global attention, and then performs a two-stage pruning process. The intra-voxel stage selects representative multi-view features within each voxel, while the inter-voxel stage preserves spatial diversity by selecting a globally distributed subset of voxels. Extensive experiments on multiple 3D scene understanding benchmarks demonstrate that Geo3DPruner retains over 90% of the original performance while pruning 90% of visual tokens, significantly outperforming existing text-guided and vision-guided pruning methods.



199. ❌ Domain-Specialized Object Detection via Model-Level Mixtures of Experts

作者: Svetlana Pavlitska, Malte Stüven, Beyza Keskin, J. Marius Zöllner 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18256v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models provide a structured approach to combining specialized neural networks and offer greater interpretability than conventional ensembles. While MoEs have been successfully applied to image classification and semantic segmentation, their use in object detection remains limited due to challenges in merging dense and structured predictions. In this work, we investigate model-level mixtures of object detectors and analyze their suitability for improving performance and interpretability in object detection. We propose an MoE architecture that combines YOLO-based detectors trained on semantically disjoint data subsets, with a learned gating network that dynamically weights expert contributions. We study different strategies for fusing detection outputs and for training the gating mechanism, including balancing losses to prevent expert collapse. Experiments on the BDD100K dataset demonstrate that the proposed MoE consistently outperforms standard ensemble approaches and provides insights into expert specialization across domains, highlighting model-level MoEs as a viable alternative to traditional ensembling for object detection. Our code is available at https://github.com/KASTEL-MobilityLab/mixtures-of-experts/.



200. ❌ Medical Image Understanding Improves Survival Prediction via Visual Instruction Tuning

作者: Xixi Liu, Jorge Lazo, Andreas Hallqvist, Mikael Johansson, Åse Johnsson, Jonas S Andersson, Ella Äng Eklund, Patrik Sund, Nasser Hosseini, Jennifer Alvén, Ida Häggström 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18250v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Accurate prognostication and risk estimation are essential for guiding clinical decision-making and optimizing patient management. While radiologist-assessed features from CT scans provide valuable indicators of disease severity and outcomes, interpreting such images requires expert knowledge, and translating rich visual information into textual summaries inevitably leads to information loss. In this work, we propose a vision-language framework for 3D CT image understanding that leverages large-scale open-sourced CT images paired with radiology reports through visual instruction tuning. This pre-training enables the model to learn clinically meaningful visual-textual representations, which can then be adapted to downstream survival prediction tasks. By incorporating a survival prediction head on top of the pre-trained model, our approach improves survival prediction from CT images and clinical data while generating clinically meaningful language responses to predefined questions. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms baseline methods in survival prediction, particularly, when clinical data alone is less predictive. The code will be released upon acceptance.



201. ❌ Instruction-as-State: Environment-Guided and State-Conditioned Semantic Understanding for Embodied Navigation

作者: Zhen Liu, Yuhan Liu, Jinjun Wang, Jianyi Liu, Wei Song, Jingwen Fu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18223v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Vision-and-Language Navigation requires agents to follow natural-language instructions in visually changing environments. A central challenge is the dynamic entanglement between language and observations: the meaning of instruction shifts as the agent’s field of view and spatial context evolve. However, many existing models encode the instruction as a static global representation, limiting their ability to adapt instruction meaning to the current visual context. We therefore model instruction understanding as an Instruction-as-State variable: a decision-relevant, token-level instruction state that evolves step by step conditioned on the agent’s perceptual state, where the perceptual state denotes the observation-grounded navigation context at each step. To realize this principle, we introduce State-Entangled Environment-Guided Instruction Understanding (S-EGIU), a coarse-to-fine framework for state-conditioned segment activation and token-level semantic refinement. At the coarse level, S-EGIU activates the instruction segment whose semantics align with the current observation. At the fine level, it refines the activated segment through observation-guided token grounding and contextual modeling, sharpening its internal semantics under the current observation. Together, these stages maintain an instruction state that is continuously updated according to the agent’s perceptual state during navigation. S-EGIU delivers strong performance on several key metrics, including a +2.68% SPL gain on REVERIE Test Unseen, and demonstrates consistent efficiency gains across multiple VLN benchmarks, underscoring the value of dynamic instruction–perception entanglement.



202. ❌ Towards Symmetry-sensitive Pose Estimation: A Rotation Representation for Symmetric Object Classes

作者: Andreas Kriegler, Csaba Beleznai, Margrit Gelautz 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18208v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Symmetric objects are common in daily life and industry, yet their inherent orientation ambiguities that impede the training of deep learning networks for pose estimation are rarely discussed in the literature. To cope with these ambiguities, existing solutions typically require the design of specific loss functions and network architectures or resort to symmetry-invariant evaluation metrics. In contrast, we focus on the numeric representation of the rotation itself, modifying trigonometric identities with the degrees of symmetry derived from the objects’ shapes. We use our representation, SARR, to obtain canonic (symmetry-resolved) poses for the symmetric objects in two popular 6D pose estimation datasets, T-LESS and ITODD, where SARR is unique and continuous w.r.t. the visual appearance. This allows us to use a standard CNN for 3D orientation estimation whose performance is evaluated with the symmetry-sensitive cosine distance $\text{AR}{\text{C}}$. Our networks outperform the state of the art using $\text{AR}{\text{C}}$ and achieve satisfactory performance when using conventional symmetry-invariant measures. Our method does not require any 3D models but only depth, or, as part of an additional experiment, texture-less RGB/grayscale images as input. We also show that networks trained on SARR outperform the same networks trained on rotation matrices, Euler angles, quaternions, standard trigonometrics or the recently popular 6d representation – even in inference scenarios where no prior knowledge of the objects’ symmetry properties is available. Code and a visualization toolkit are available at https://github.com/akriegler/SARR .



203. ❌ Memorize When Needed: Decoupled Memory Control for Spatially Consistent Long-Horizon Video Generation

作者: Yanjun Guo, Zhengqiang Zhang, Pengfei Wang, Xinyue Liang, Zhiyuan Ma, Lei Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18215v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Spatially consistent long-horizon video generation aims to maintain temporal and spatial consistency along predefined camera trajectories. Existing methods mostly entangle memory modeling with video generation, leading to inconsistent content during scene revisits and diminished generative capacity when exploring novel regions, even trained on extensive annotated data. To address these limitations, we propose a decoupled framework that separates memory conditioning from generation. Our approach significantly reduces training costs while simultaneously enhancing spatial consistency and preserving the generative capacity for novel scene exploration. Specifically, we employ a lightweight, independent memory branch to learn precise spatial consistency from historical observation. We first introduce a hybrid memory representation to capture complementary temporal and spatial cues from generated frames, then leverage a per-frame cross-attention mechanism to ensure each frame is conditioned exclusively on the most spatially relevant historical information, which is injected into the generative model to ensure spatial consistency. When generating new scenes, a camera-aware gating mechanism is proposed to mediate the interaction between memory and generation modules, enabling memory conditioning only when meaningful historical references exist. Compared with the existing method, our method is highly data-efficient, yet the experiments demonstrate that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in terms of both visual quality and spatial consistency.



204. ❌ A Comparative Evaluation of Geometric Accuracy in NeRF and Gaussian Splatting

作者: Mikolaj Zielinski, Eryk Vykysaly, Bartlomiej Biesiada, Jan Baturo, Mateusz Capala, Dominik Belter 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18205v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent advances in neural rendering have introduced numerous 3D scene representations. Although standard computer vision metrics evaluate the visual quality of generated images, they often overlook the fidelity of surface geometry. This limitation is particularly critical in robotics, where accurate geometry is essential for tasks such as grasping and object manipulation. In this paper, we present an evaluation pipeline for neural rendering methods that focuses on geometric accuracy, along with a benchmark comprising 19 diverse scenes. Our approach enables a systematic assessment of reconstruction methods in terms of surface and shape fidelity, complementing traditional visual metrics.



205. ❌ DiffuSAM: Diffusion Guided Zero-Shot Object Grounding for Remote Sensing Imagery

作者: Geet Sethi, Panav Shah, Ashutosh Gandhe, Soumitra Darshan Nayak 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18201v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Diffusion models have emerged as powerful tools for a wide range of vision tasks, including text-guided image generation and editing. In this work, we explore their potential for object grounding in remote sensing imagery. We propose a hybrid pipeline that integrates diffusion-based localization cues with state-of-the-art segmentation models such as RemoteSAM and SAM3 to obtain more accurate bounding boxes. By leveraging the complementary strengths of generative diffusion models and foundational segmentation models, our approach enables robust and adaptive object localization across complex scenes. Experiments demonstrate that our pipeline significantly improves localization performance, achieving over a 14% increase in Acc@0.5 compared to existing state-of-the-art methods.



206. ❌ Attraction, Repulsion, and Friction: Introducing DMF, a Friction-Augmented Drifting Model

作者: Arkadii Kazanskii, Tatiana Petrova, Konstantin Bagrianskii, Aleksandr Puzikov, Radu State 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18194v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Drifting Models [Deng et al., 2026] train a one-step generator by evolving samples under a kernel-based drift field, avoiding ODE integration at inference. The original analysis leaves two questions open. The drift-field iteration admits a locally repulsive regime in a two-particle surrogate, and vanishing of the drift ($V_{p,q}\equiv 0$) is not known to force the learned distribution $q$ to match the target $p$. We derive a contraction threshold for the surrogate and show that a linearly-scheduled friction coefficient gives a finite-horizon bound on the error trajectory. Under a Gaussian kernel we prove that the drift-field equilibrium is identifiable: vanishing of $V_{p,q}$ on any open set forces $q=p$, closing the converse of Proposition 3.1 of Deng et al. Our friction-augmented model, DMF (Drifting Model with Friction), matches or exceeds Optimal Flow Matching on FFHQ adult-to-child domain translation at 16x lower training compute.



207. ❌ CanonSLR: Canonical-View Guided Multi-View Continuous Sign Language Recognition

作者: Xu Wang, Shengeng Tang, Wan Jiang, Yaxiong Wang, Lechao Cheng, Richang Hong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18184v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Continuous Sign Language Recognition (CSLR) has achieved remarkable progress in recent years; however, most existing methods are developed under single-view settings and thus remain insufficiently robust to viewpoint variations in real-world scenarios. To address this limitation, we propose CanonSLR, a canonical-view guided framework for multi-view CSLR. Specifically, we introduce a frontal-view-anchored teacher-student learning strategy, in which a teacher network trained on frontal-view data provides canonical temporal supervision for a student network trained on all viewpoints. To further reduce cross-view semantic discrepancy, we propose Sequence-Level Soft-Target Distillation, which transfers structured temporal knowledge from the frontal view to non-frontal samples, thereby alleviating gloss boundary ambiguity and category confusion caused by occlusion and projection variation. In addition, we introduce Temporal Motion Relational Enhancement to explicitly model motion-aware temporal relations in high-level visual features, strengthening stable dynamic representations while suppressing viewpoint-sensitive appearance disturbances. To support multi-view CSLR research, we further develop a universal multi-view sign language data construction pipeline that transforms original single-view RGB videos into semantically consistent, temporally coherent, and viewpoint-controllable multi-view sign language videos. Based on this pipeline, we extend PHOENIX-2014T and CSL-Daily into two seven-view benchmarks, namely PT14-MV and CSL-MV, providing a new experimental foundation for multi-view CSLR. Extensive experiments on PT14-MV and CSL-MV demonstrate that CanonSLR consistently outperforms existing approaches under multi-view settings and exhibits stronger robustness, especially on challenging non-frontal views.



208. ❌ Extending One-Step Image Generation from Class Labels to Text via Discriminative Text Representation

作者: Chenxi Zhao, Chen Zhu, Xiaokun Feng, Aiming Hao, Jiashu Zhu, Jiachen Lei, Jiahong Wu, Xiangxiang Chu, Jufeng Yang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18168v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Few-step generation has been a long-standing goal, with recent one-step generation methods exemplified by MeanFlow achieving remarkable results. Existing research on MeanFlow primarily focuses on class-to-image generation. However, an intuitive yet unexplored direction is to extend the condition from fixed class labels to flexible text inputs, enabling richer content creation. Compared to the limited class labels, text conditions pose greater challenges to the model’s understanding capability, necessitating the effective integration of powerful text encoders into the MeanFlow framework. Surprisingly, although incorporating text conditions appears straightforward, we find that integrating powerful LLM-based text encoders using conventional training strategies results in unsatisfactory performance. To uncover the underlying cause, we conduct detailed analyses and reveal that, due to the extremely limited number of refinement steps in the MeanFlow generation, such as only one step, the text feature representations are required to possess sufficiently high discriminability. This also explains why discrete and easily distinguishable class features perform well within the MeanFlow framework. Guided by these insights, we leverage a powerful LLM-based text encoder validated to possess the required semantic properties and adapt the MeanFlow generation process to this framework, resulting in efficient text-conditioned synthesis for the first time. Furthermore, we validate our approach on the widely used diffusion model, demonstrating significant generation performance improvements. We hope this work provides a general and practical reference for future research on text-conditioned MeanFlow generation. The code is available at https://github.com/AMAP-ML/EMF.



209. ❌ AI-based Waste Mapping for Addressing Climate-Exacerbated Flood Risk

作者: Steffen Knoblauch, Levi Szamek, Iddy Chazua, Benedcto Adamu, Innocent Maholi, Alexander Zipf 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18151v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Urban flooding is a growing climate change-related hazard in rapidly expanding African cities, where inadequate waste management often blocks drainage systems and amplifies flood risks. This study introduces an AI-powered urban waste mapping workflow that leverages openly available aerial and street-view imagery to detect municipal solid waste at high resolution. Applied in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, our approach reveals spatial waste patterns linked to informal settlements and socio-economic factors. Waste accumulation in waterways was found to be up to three times higher than in adjacent urban areas, highlighting critical hotspots for climate-exacerbated flooding. Unlike traditional manual mapping methods, this scalable AI approach allows city-wide monitoring and prioritization of interventions. Crucially, our collaboration with local partners ensured culturally and contextually relevant data labeling, reflecting real-world reuse practices for solid waste. The results offer actionable insights for urban planning, climate adaptation, and sustainable waste management in flood-prone urban areas.



210. ❌ Embedding Arithmetic: A Lightweight, Tuning-Free Framework for Post-hoc Bias Mitigation in Text-to-Image Models

作者: Venkatesh Thirugnana Sambandham, Torsten Schön 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18167v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Modern text-to-image (T2I) models amplify harmful societal biases, challenging their ethical deployment. We introduce an inference-time method that reliably mitigates social bias while keeping prompt semantics and visual context (background, layout, and style) intact. This ensures context persistency and provides a controllable parameter to adjust mitigation strength, giving practitioners fine-grained control over fairness-coherence trade-offs. Using Embedding Arithmetic, we analyze how bias is structured in the embedding space and correct it without altering model weights, prompts, or datasets. Experiments on FLUX 1.0-Dev and Stable Diffusion 3.5-Large show that the conditional embedding space forms a complex, entangled manifold rather than a grid of disentangled concepts. To rigorously assess semantic preservation beyond the circularity and bias limitations of of CLIP scores, we propose the Concept Coherence Score (CCS). Evaluated against this robust metric, our lightweight, tuning-free method significantly outperforms existing baselines in improving diversity while maintaining high concept coherence, effectively resolving the critical fairness-coherence trade-off. By characterizing how models represent social concepts, we establish geometric understanding of latent space as a principled path toward more transparent, controllable, and fair image generation.



211. ❌ Attention-ResUNet for Automated Fetal Head Segmentation

作者: Ammar Bhilwarawala, Mainak Bandyopadhyay 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18148v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Automated fetal head segmentation in ultrasound images is critical for accurate biometric measurements in prenatal care. While existing deep learning approaches have achieved a reasonable performance, they struggle with issues like low contrast, noise, and complex anatomical boundaries which are inherent to ultrasound imaging. This paper presents Attention-ResUNet. It is a novel architecture that synergistically combines residual learning with multi-scale attention mechanisms in order to achieve enhanced fetal head segmentation. Our approach integrates attention gates at four decoder levels to focus selectively on anatomically relevant regions while suppressing the background noise, and complemented by residual connections which facilitates gradient flow and feature reuse. Extensive evaluation on the HC18 Challenge dataset where n = 200 demonstrates that Attention ResUNet achieves a superior performance with a mean Dice score of 99.30 +/- 0.14% against similar architectures. It significantly outperforms five baseline architectures including ResUNet (99.26%), Attention U-Net (98.79%), Swin U-Net (98.60%), Standard U-Net (98.58%), and U-Net++ (97.46%). Through statistical analysis we confirm highly significant improvements (p < 0.001) with effect sizes that range from 0.230 to 13.159 (Cohen’s d). Using Saliency map analysis, we reveal that our architecture produces highly concentrated, anatomically consistent activation patterns, which demonstrate an enhanced interpretability which is crucial for clinical deployment. The proposed method establishes a new state of the art performance for automated fetal head segmentation whilst maintaining computational efficiency with 14.7M parameters and a 45 GFLOPs inference cost. Code repository: https://github.com/Ammar-ss



212. ❌ Can LLM-Generated Text Empower Surgical Vision-Language Pre-training?

作者: Chengan Che, Chao Wang, Jiayuan Huang, Xinyue Chen, Luis C. Garcia-Peraza-Herrera 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18134v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent advancements in self-supervised learning have led to powerful surgical vision encoders capable of spatiotemporal understanding. However, extending these visual foundations to multi-modal reasoning tasks is severely bottlenecked by the prohibitive cost of expert textual annotations. To overcome this scalability limitation, we introduce \textbf{LIME}, a large-scale multi-modal dataset derived from open-access surgical videos using human-free, Large Language Model (LLM)-generated narratives. While LIME offers immense scalability, unverified generated texts may contain errors, including hallucinations, that could potentially lead to catastrophically degraded pre-trained medical priors in standard contrastive pipelines. To mitigate this, we propose \textbf{SurgLIME}, a parameter-efficient Vision-Language Pre-training (VLP) framework designed to learn reliable cross-modal alignments using noisy narratives. SurgLIME preserves foundational medical priors using a LoRA-adapted dual-encoder architecture and introduces an automated confidence estimation mechanism that dynamically down-weights uncertain text during contrastive alignment. Evaluations on the AutoLaparo and Cholec80 benchmarks show that SurgLIME achieves competitive zero-shot cross-modal alignment while preserving the robust linear probing performance of the visual foundation model. Dataset, code, and models are publicly available at \href{https://github.com/visurg-ai/SurgLIME}{https://github.com/visurg-ai/SurgLIME}.



213. ❌ Chatting about Conditional Trajectory Prediction

作者: Yuxiang Zhao, Wei Huang, Haipeng Zeng, Huan Zhao, Yujie Song 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18126v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Human behavior has the nature of mutual dependencies, which requires human-robot interactive systems to predict surrounding agents trajectories by modeling complex social interactions, avoiding collisions and executing safe path planning. While there exist many trajectory prediction methods, most of them do not incorporate the own motion of the ego agent and only model interactions based on static information. We are inspired by the humans theory of mind during trajectory selection and propose a Cross time domain intention-interactive method for conditional Trajectory prediction(CiT). Our proposed CiT conducts joint analysis of behavior intentions over time, and achieves information complementarity and integration across different time domains. The intention in its own time domain can be corrected by the social interaction information from the other time domain to obtain a more precise intention representation. In addition, CiT is designed to closely integrate with robotic motion planning and control modules, capable of generating a set of optional trajectory prediction results for all surrounding agents based on potential motions of the ego agent. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed CiT significantly outperforms the existing methods, achieving state-of-the-art performance in the benchmarks.



214. ❌ Test-Time Perturbation Learning with Delayed Feedback for Vision-Language-Action Models

作者: Zehua Zang, Xi Wang, Fuchun Sun, Xiao Xu, Lixiang Lium, Jiahuan Zhou, Jiangmeng Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18107v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) achieve remarkable performance in sequential decision-making but remain fragile to subtle environmental shifts, such as small changes in object pose. We attribute this brittleness to trajectory overfitting, where VLAs over-attend to the spurious correlation between actions and entities, then reproduce memorized action patterns. We propose Perturbation learning with Delayed Feedback (PDF), a verifier-free test-time adaptation framework that improves decision performance without fine-tuning the base model. PDF mitigates the spurious correlation through uncertainty-based data augmentation and action voting, while an adaptive scheduler allocates augmentation budgets to balance performance and efficiency. To further improve stability, PDF learns a lightweight perturbation module that retrospectively adjusts action logits guided by delayed feedback, correcting overconfidence issue. Experiments on LIBERO (+7.4% success rate) and Atari (+10.3 human normalized score) demonstrate consistent gains of PDF in task success over vanilla VLA and VLA with test-time adaptation, establishing a practical path toward reliable test-time adaptation in multimodal decision-making agents. The code is available at \href{https://github.com/zhoujiahuan1991/CVPR2026-PDF}{https://github.com/zhoujiahuan1991/CVPR2026-PDF}.



215. ❌ Decision-Aware Attention Propagation for Vision Transformer Explainability

作者: Sehyeong Jo, Gangjae Jang, Haesol Park 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18094v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Vision Transformers (ViTs) have become a dominant architecture in computer vision, yet their prediction process remains difficult to interpret because information is propagated through complex interactions across layers and attention heads. Existing attention based explanation methods provide an intuitive way to trace information flow. However, they rely mainly on raw attention weights, which do not explicitly reflect the final decision and often lead to explanations with limited class discriminability. In contrast, gradient based localization methods are more effective at highlighting class specific evidence, but they do not fully exploit the hierarchical attention propagation mechanism of transformers. To address this limitation, we propose Decision-Aware Attention Propagation (DAP), an attribution method that injects decision-relevant priors into transformer attention propagation. By estimating token importance through gradient based localization and integrating it into layer wise attention rollout, the method captures both the structural flow of attention and the evidence most relevant to the final prediction. Consequently, DAP produces attribution maps that are more class sensitive, compact, and faithful than those generated by conventional attention based methods. Extensive experiments across Vision Transformer variants of different model scales show that DAP consistently outperforms existing baselines in both quantitative metrics and qualitative visualizations, indicating that decision aware propagation is an effective direction for improving ViT interpretability.



216. ❌ Enhancing Continual Learning of Vision-Language Models via Dynamic Prefix Weighting

作者: Hyeonseo Jang, Hyuk Kwon, Kibok Lee 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18075v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We investigate recently introduced domain-class incremental learning scenarios for vision-language models (VLMs). Recent works address this challenge using parameter-efficient methods, such as prefix-tuning or adapters, which facilitate model adaptation to downstream tasks by incorporating task-specific information into input tokens through additive vectors. However, previous approaches often normalize the weights of these vectors, disregarding the fact that different input tokens require different degrees of adjustment. To overcome this issue, we propose Dynamic Prefix Weighting (DPW), a framework that dynamically assigns weights to prefixes, complemented by adapters. DPW consists of 1) a gating module that adjusts the weights of each prefix based on the importance of the corresponding input token, and 2) a weighting mechanism that derives adapter output weights as a residual of prefix-tuning weights, ensuring that adapters are utilized only when necessary. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in domain-class incremental learning scenarios for VLMs. The code is available at: https://github.com/YonseiML/dpw.



217. ❌ INTENT: Invariance and Discrimination-aware Noise Mitigation for Robust Composed Image Retrieval

作者: Zhiwei Chen, Yupeng Hu, Zhiheng Fu, Zixu Li, Jiale Huang, Qinlei Huang, Yinwei Wei 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18051v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) is a challenging image retrieval paradigm that enables to retrieve target images based on multimodal queries consisting of reference images and modification texts. Although substantial progress has been made in recent years, existing methods assume that all samples are correctly matched. However, in real-world scenarios, due to high triplet annotation costs, CIR datasets inevitably contain annotation errors, resulting in incorrectly matched triplets. To address this issue, the problem of Noisy Triplet Correspondence (NTC) has attracted growing attention. We argue that noise in CIR can be categorized into two types: cross-modal correspondence noise and modality-inherent noise. The former arises from mismatches across modalities, whereas the latter originates from intra-modal background interference or visual factors irrelevant to the coarse-grained modification annotations. However, modality-inherent noise is often overlooked, and research on cross-modal correspondence noise remains nascent. To tackle above issues, we propose the Invariance and discrimiNaTion-awarE Noise neTwork (INTENT), comprising two components: Visual Invariant Composition and Bi-Objective Discriminative Learning, specifically designed to handle the two-aspect noise. The former applies causal intervention on the visual side via Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to generate intervened composed features, enforcing visual invariance and enabling the model to ignore modality-inherent noise during composition. The latter adopts collaborative optimization with both positive and negative samples, and constructs a scalable decision boundary that dynamically adjusts decisions based on the loyalty degree, enabling robust correspondence discrimination. Extensive experiments on two widely used benchmark datasets demonstrate the superiority and robustness of INTENT.



218. ❌ GS-STVSR: Ultra-Efficient Continuous Spatio-Temporal Video Super-Resolution via 2D Gaussian Splatting

作者: Mingyu Shi, Xin Di, Long Peng, Boxiang Cao, Anran Wu, Zhanfeng Feng, Jiaming Guo, Renjing Pei, Xueyang Fu, Yang Cao, Zhengjun Zha 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18047v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Continuous Spatio-Temporal Video Super-Resolution (C-STVSR) aims to simultaneously enhance the spatial resolution and frame rate of videos by arbitrary scale factors, offering greater flexibility than fixed-scale methods that are constrained by predefined upsampling ratios. In recent years, methods based on Implicit Neural Representations (INR) have made significant progress in C-STVSR by learning continuous mappings from spatio-temporal coordinates to pixel values. However, these methods fundamentally rely on dense pixel-wise grid queries, causing computational cost to scale linearly with the number of interpolated frames and severely limiting inference efficiency. We propose GS-STVSR, an ultra-efficient C-STVSR framework based on 2D Gaussian Splatting (2D-GS) that drives the spatiotemporal evolution of Gaussian kernels through continuous motion modeling, bypassing dense grid queries entirely. We exploit the strong temporal stability of covariance parameters for lightweight intermediate fitting, design an optical flow-guided motion module to derive Gaussian position and color at arbitrary time steps, introduce a Covariance resampling alignment module to prevent covariance drift, and propose an adaptive offset window for large-scale motion. Extensive experiments on Vid4, GoPro, and Adobe240 show that GS-STVSR achieves state-of-the-art quality across all benchmarks. Moreover, its inference time remains nearly constant at conventional temporal scales (X2–X8) and delivers over X3 speedup at extreme scales X32, demonstrating strong practical applicability.



219. ❌ HABIT: Chrono-Synergia Robust Progressive Learning Framework for Composed Image Retrieval

作者: Zixu Li, Yupeng Hu, Zhiwei Chen, Shiqi Zhang, Qinlei Huang, Zhiheng Fu, Yinwei Wei 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18037v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) is a flexible image retrieval paradigm that enables users to accurately locate the target image through a multimodal query composed of a reference image and modification text. Although this task has demonstrated promising applications in personalized search and recommendation systems, it encounters a severe challenge in practical scenarios known as the Noise Triplet Correspondence (NTC) problem. This issue primarily arises from the high cost and subjectivity involved in annotating triplet data. To address this problem, we identify two central challenges: the precise estimation of composed semantic discrepancy and the insufficient progressive adaptation to modification discrepancy. To tackle these challenges, we propose a cHrono-synergiA roBust progressIve learning framework for composed image reTrieval (HABIT), which consists of two core modules. First, the Mutual Knowledge Estimation Module quantifies sample cleanliness by calculating the Transition Rate of mutual information between the composed feature and the target image, thereby effectively identifying clean samples that align with the intended modification semantics. Second, the Dual-consistency Progressive Learning Module introduces a collaborative mechanism between the historical and current models, simulating human habit formation to retain good habits and calibrate bad habits, ultimately enabling robust learning under the presence of NTC. Extensive experiments conducted on two standard CIR datasets demonstrate that HABIT significantly outperforms most methods under various noise ratios, exhibiting superior robustness and retrieval performance. Codes are available at https://github.com/Lee-zixu/HABIT



220. ❌ CFSR: Geometry-Conditioned Shadow Removal via Physical Disentanglement

作者: Pan Wang, Yihao Hu, Xiujin Liu, Hang Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18032v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Traditional shadow removal networks often treat image restoration as an unconstrained mapping, lacking the physical interpretability required to balance localized texture recovery with global illumination consistency. To address this, we propose CFSR, a multi-modal prior-driven framework that reframes shadow removal as a physics-constrained restoration process. By seamlessly integrating 3D geometric cues with large-scale foundation model semantics, CFSR effectively bridges the 2D-3D domain gap. Specifically, we first map observations into a custom HVI color space to suppress shadow-induced noise and robustly fuse RGB data with estimated depth priors. At its core, our Geometric & Semantic Dual Explicit Guided Attention mechanism utilizes DINO features and 3D surface normals to directly modulate the attention affinity matrix, structurally enforcing physical lighting constraints. To recover severely degraded regions, we inject holistic priors via a frozen CLIP encoder. Finally, our Frequency Collaborative Reconstruction Module (FCRM) achieves an optimal synthesis by decoupling the decoding process. Conditioned on geometric priors, FCRM seamlessly harmonizes the reconstruction of sharp high-frequency occlusion boundaries with the restoration of low-frequency global illumination. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CFSR achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple challenging benchmarks.



221. ❌ Multi-View Hierarchical Graph Neural Network for Sketch-Based 3D Shape Retrieval

作者: Hang Cheng, Muyan He, Mingyu Fan, Chengfeng Xie, Xi Cheng, Long Zeng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18019v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Sketch-based 3D shape retrieval (SBSR) aims to retrieve 3D shapes that are consistent with the category of the input hand-drawn sketch. The core challenge of this task lies in two aspects: existing methods typically employ simplified aggregation strategies for independently encoded 3D multi-view features, which ignore the geometric relationships between views and multi-level details, resulting in weak 3D representation. Simultaneously, traditional SBSR methods are constrained by visible category limitations, leading to poor performance in zero-shot scenarios. To address these challenges, we propose Multi-View Hierarchical Graph Neural Network (MV-HGNN), a novel framework for SBSR. Specifically, we construct a view-level graph and capture adjacent geometric dependencies and cross-view message passing via local graph convolution and global attention. A view selector is further introduced to perform hierarchical graph coarsening, enabling a progressively larger receptive field for graph convolution and mitigating the interference of redundant views, which leads to more discriminate discriminative hierarchical 3D representation. To enable category agnostic alignment and mitigate overfitting to seen classes, we leverage CLIP text embeddings as semantic prototypes and project both sketch and 3D features into a shared semantic space. We use a two-stage training strategy for category-level retrieval and a one-stage strategy for zero-shot retrieval under the same model architecture. Under both category-level and zero-shot settings, extensive experiments on two public benchmarks demonstrate that MV-HGNN outperforms state-of-the-art methods.



222. ❌ Trustworthy Endoscopic Super-Resolution

作者: Julio Silva-Rodríguez, Ender Konukoglu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18001v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Super-resolution (SR) models are attracting growing interest for enhancing minimally invasive surgery and diagnostic videos under hardware constraints. However, valid concerns remain regarding the introduction of hallucinated structures and amplified noise, limiting their reliability in safety-critical settings. We propose a direct and practical framework to make SR systems more trustworthy by identifying where reconstructions are likely to fail. Our approach integrates a lightweight error-prediction network that operates on intermediate representations to estimate pixel-wise reconstruction error. The module is computationally efficient and low-latency, making it suitable for real-time deployment. We convert these predictions into operational failure decisions by constructing Conformal Failure Masks (CFM), which localize regions where the SR output should not be trusted. Built on conformal risk control principles, our method provides theoretical guarantees for controlling both the tolerated error limit and the miscoverage in detected failures. We evaluate our approach on image and video SR, demonstrating its effectiveness in detecting unreliable reconstructions in endoscopic and robotic surgery settings. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide a model-agnostic, theoretically grounded approach to improving the safety of real-time endoscopic image SR.



223. ❌ Identifying Ethical Biases in Action Recognition Models

作者: Ana Baltaretu, Pascal Benschop, Jan van Gemert 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17971v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Human Action Recognition (HAR) models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes environments, yet their fairness across different human appearances has not been analyzed. We introduce a framework for auditing bias in HAR models using synthetic video data, generated with full control over visual identity attributes such as skin color. Unlike prior work that focuses on static images or pose estimation, our approach preserves temporal consistency, allowing us to isolate and test how changes to a single attribute affect model predictions. Through controlled interventions using the BEDLAM simulation platform, we show whether some popular HAR models exhibit statistically significant biases on the skin color even when the motion remains identical. Our results highlight how models may encode unwanted visual associations, and we provide evidence of systematic errors across groups. This work contributes a framework for auditing HAR models and supports the development of more transparent, accountable systems in light of upcoming regulatory standards.



224. ❌ E3VS-Bench: A Benchmark for Viewpoint-Dependent Active Perception in 3D Gaussian Splatting Scenes

作者: Koya Sakamoto, Taiki Miyanishi, Daichi Azuma, Shuhei Kurita, Shu Morikuni, Naoya Chiba, Motoaki Kawanabe, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17969v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Visual search in 3D environments requires embodied agents to actively explore their surroundings and acquire task-relevant evidence. However, existing visual search and embodied AI benchmarks, including EQA, typically rely on static observations or constrained egocentric motion, and thus do not explicitly evaluate fine-grained viewpoint-dependent phenomena that arise under unrestricted 5-DoF viewpoint control in real-world 3D environments, such as visibility changes caused by vertical viewpoint shifts, revealing contents inside containers, and disambiguating object attributes that are only observable from specific angles. To address this limitation, we introduce {E3VS-Bench}, a benchmark for embodied 3D visual search where agents must control their viewpoints in 5-DoF to gather viewpoint-dependent evidence for question answering. E3VS-Bench consists of 99 high-fidelity 3D scenes reconstructed using 3D Gaussian Splatting and 2,014 question-driven episodes. 3D Gaussian Splatting enables photorealistic free-viewpoint rendering that preserves fine-grained visual details (e.g., small text and subtle attributes) often degraded in mesh-based simulators, thereby allowing the construction of questions that cannot be answered from a single view and instead require active inspection across viewpoints in 5-DoF. We evaluate multiple state-of-the-art VLMs and compare their performance with humans. Despite strong 2D reasoning ability, all models exhibit a substantial gap from humans, highlighting limitations in active perception and coherent viewpoint planning specifically under full 5-DoF viewpoint changes.



225. ❌ MU-GeNeRF: Multi-view Uncertainty-guided Generalizable Neural Radiance Fields for Distractor-aware Scene

作者: Wenjie Mu, Zhan Li, Chuanzhou Su, Xuanyi Shen, Ziniu Liu, Fan Lu, Yujian Mo, Junqiao Zhao, Tiantian Feng, Chen Ye, Guang Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17965v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Generalizable Neural Radiance Fields (GeNeRFs) enable high-quality scene reconstruction from sparse views and can generalize to unseen scenes. However, in real-world settings, transient distractors break cross-view structural consistency, corrupting supervision and degrading reconstruction quality. Existing distractor-free NeRF methods rely on per-scene optimization and estimate uncertainty from per-view reconstruction errors, which are not reliable for GeNeRFs and often misjudge inconsistent static structures as distractors. To this end, we propose MU-GeNeRF, a Multi-view Uncertainty-guided distractor-aware GeNeRF framework designed to alleviate GeNeRF’s robust modeling challenges in the presence of transient distractions. We decompose distractor awareness into two complementary uncertainty components: Source-view Uncertainty, which captures structural discrepancies across source views caused by viewpoint changes or dynamic factors; and Target-view Uncertainty, which detects observation anomalies in the target image induced by transient distractors.These two uncertainties address distinct error sources and are combined through a heteroscedastic reconstruction loss, which guides the model to adaptively modulate supervision, enabling more robust distractor suppression and geometric modeling.Extensive experiments show that our method not only surpasses existing GeNeRFs but also achieves performance comparable to scene-specific distractor-free NeRFs.



226. ❌ DifFoundMAD: Foundation Models meet Differential Morphing Attack Detection

作者: Lazaro J. Gonzalez-Soler, André Dörsch, Christian Rathgeb, Christoph Busch 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17961v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In this work, we introduce DifFoundMAD, a parameter-efficient D-MAD framework that exploits the generalisation capabilities of vision foundation models (FM) to capture discrepancies between suspected morphs and live capture images. In contrast to conventional D-MAD systems that rely on face recognition embeddings or handcrafted feature differences, DifFoundMAD follows the standard differential paradigm while replacing the underlying representation space with embeddings extracted from FMs. By combining lightweight finetuning with class-balanced optimisation, the proposed method updates only a small subset of parameters while preserving the rich representational priors of the underlying FMs. Extensive cross-database evaluations on standard D-MAD benchmarks demonstrate that DifFoundMAD achieves consistent improvements over state-of-the-art systems, particularly at the strict security levels required in operational deployments such as border control: The error rates reported in the current state-of-the-art were reduced from 6.16% to 2.17% for high-security levels using DifFoundMAD.



227. ❌ Chatting about Upper-Body Expressive Human Pose and Shape Estimation

作者: Yuxiang Zhao, Wei Huang, Yujie Song, Liu Wang, Huan Zhao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17959v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Expressive Human Pose and Shape Estimation (EHPS) plays a crucial role in various AR/VR applications and has witnessed significant progress in recent years. However, current state-of-the-art methods still struggle with accurate parameter estimation for facial and hand regions and exhibit limited generalization to wild images. To address these challenges, we present CoEvoer, a novel one-stage synergistic cross-dependency transformer framework tailored for upper-body EHPS. CoEvoer enables explicit feature-level interaction across different body parts, allowing for mutual enhancement through contextual information exchange. Specifically, larger and more easily estimated regions such as the torso provide global semantics and positional priors to guide the estimation of finer, more complex regions like the face and hands. Conversely, the localized details captured in facial and hand regions help refine and calibrate adjacent body parts. To the best of our knowledge, CoEvoer is the first framework designed specifically for upper-body EHPS, with the goal of capturing the strong coupling and semantic dependencies among the face, hands, and torso through joint parameter regression. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CoEvoer achieves state-of-the-art performance on upper-body benchmarks and exhibits strong generalization capability even on unseen wild images.



228. ❌ ZSG-IAD: A Multimodal Framework for Zero-Shot Grounded Industrial Anomaly Detection

作者: Qiuhui Chen, Jiaxiang Song, Shuai Tan, Weimin Zhong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17949v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Deep learning-based industrial anomaly detectors often behave as black boxes, making it hard to justify decisions with physically meaningful defect evidence. We propose ZSG-IAD, a multimodal vision-language framework for zero-shot grounded industrial anomaly detection. Given RGB images, sensor images, and 3D point clouds, ZSG-IAD generates structured anomaly reports and pixel-level anomaly masks. ZSG-IAD introduces a language-guided two-hop grounding module: (1) anomaly-related sentences select evidence-like latent slots distilled from multimodal features, yielding coarse spatial support; (2) selected slots modulate feature maps via channel-spatial gating and a lightweight decoder to produce fine-grained masks. To improve reliability, we further apply Executable-Rule GRPO with verifiable rewards to promote structured outputs, anomaly-region consistency, and reasoning-conclusion coherence. Experiments across multiple industrial anomaly benchmarks show strong zero-shot performance and more transparent, physically grounded explanations than prior methods. We will release code and annotations to support future research on trustworthy industrial anomaly detection systems.



229. ❌ Brain-Inspired Capture: Evidence-Driven Neuromimetic Perceptual Simulation for Visual Decoding

作者: Feixue Shao, Guangze Shi, Xueyu Liu, Yongfei Wu, Mingqiang Wei, Jianan Zhang, Jianbo Lu, Guiying Yan, Weihua Yang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17927v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Visual decoding of neurophysiological signals is a critical challenge for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) and computational neuroscience. However, current approaches are often constrained by the systematic and stochastic gaps between neural and visual modalities, largely neglecting the intrinsic computational mechanisms of the Human Visual System (HVS). To address this, we propose Brain-Inspired Capture (BI-Cap), a neuromimetic perceptual simulation paradigm that aligns these modalities by emulating HVS processing. Specifically, we construct a neuromimetic pipeline comprising four biologically plausible dynamic and static transformations, coupled with Mutual Information (MI)-guided dynamic blur regulation to simulate adaptive visual processing. Furthermore, to mitigate the inherent non-stationarity of neural activity, we introduce an evidence-driven latent space representation. This formulation explicitly models uncertainty, thereby ensuring robust neural embeddings. Extensive evaluations on zero-shot brain-to-image retrieval across two public benchmarks demonstrate that BI-Cap substantially outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving relative gains of 9.2% and 8.0%, respectively. We have released the source code on GitHub through the link https://github.com/flysnow1024/BI-Cap.



230. ❌ Prompting Foundation Models for Zero-Shot Ship Instance Segmentation in SAR Imagery

作者: Islam Mansour, Francescopaolo Sica, Michael Schmitt 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17920v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) plays a critical role in maritime surveillance, yet deep learning for SAR analysis is limited by the lack of pixel-level annotations. This paper explores how general-purpose vision foundation models can enable zero-shot ship instance segmentation in SAR imagery, eliminating the need for pixel-level supervision. A YOLOv11-based detector trained on open SAR datasets localizes ships via bounding boxes, which then prompt the Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM2) to produce instance masks without any mask annotations. Unlike prior SAM-based SAR approaches that rely on fine tuning or adapters, our method demonstrates that spatial constraints from a SAR-trained detector alone can effectively regularize foundation model predictions. This design partially mitigates the optical-SAR domain gap and enables downstream applications such as vessel classification, size estimation, and wake analysis. Experiments on the SSDD benchmark achieve a mean IoU of 0.637 (89% of a fully supervised baseline) with an overall ship detection rate of 89.2%, confirming a scalable, annotation-efficient pathway toward foundation-model-driven SAR image understanding.



231. ❌ OneDrive: Unified Multi-Paradigm Driving with Vision-Language-Action Models

作者: Yiwei Zhang, Xuesong Chen, Jin Gao, Hanshi Wang, Fudong Ge, Weiming Hu, Shaoshuai Shi, Zhipeng Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17915v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Vision-Language Models(VLMs) excel at autoregressive text generation, yet end-to-end autonomous driving requires multi-task learning with structured outputs and heterogeneous decoding behaviors, such as autoregressive language generation, parallel object detection and trajectory regression. To accommodate these differences, existing systems typically introduce separate or cascaded decoders, resulting in architectural fragmentation and limited backbone reuse. In this work, we present a unified autonomous driving framework built upon a pretrained VLM, where heterogeneous decoding behaviors are reconciled within a single transformer decoder. We demonstrate that pretrained VLM attention exhibits strong transferability beyond pure language modeling. By organizing visual and structured query tokens within a single causal decoder, structured queries can naturally condition on visual context through the original attention mechanism. Textual and structured outputs share a common attention backbone, enabling stable joint optimization across heterogeneous tasks. Trajectory planning is realized within the same causal LLM decoder by introducing structured trajectory queries. This unified formulation enables planning to share the pretrained attention backbone with images and perception tokens. Extensive experiments on end-to-end autonomous driving benchmarks demonstrate state-of-the-art performance, including 0.28 L2 and 0.18 collision rate on nuScenes open-loop evaluation and competitive results (86.8 PDMS) on NAVSIM closed-loop evaluation. The full model preserves multi-modal generation capability, while an efficient inference mode achieves approximately 40% lower latency. Code and models are available at https://github.com/Z1zyw/OneDrive



232. ❌ Beyond Binary Contrast: Modeling Continuous Skeleton Action Spaces with Transitional Anchors

作者: Yingjie Feng, Yi Wang, Jiaze Wang, Anfeng Liu, Zhuotao Tian 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17914v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Self-supervised contrastive learning has emerged as a powerful paradigm for skeleton-based action recognition by enforcing consistency in the embedding space. However, existing methods rely on binary contrastive objectives that overlook the intrinsic continuity of human motion, resulting in fragmented feature clusters and rigid class boundaries. To address these limitations, we propose TranCLR, a Transitional anchor-based Contrastive Learning framework that captures the continuous geometry of the action space. Specifically, the proposed Action Transitional Anchor Construction (ATAC) explicitly models the geometric structure of transitional states to enhance the model’s perception of motion continuity. Building upon these anchors, a Multi-Level Geometric Manifold Calibration (MGMC) mechanism is introduced to adaptively calibrate the action manifold across multiple levels of continuity, yielding a smoother and more discriminative representation space. Extensive experiments on the NTU RGB+D, NTU RGB+D 120 and PKU-MMD datasets demonstrate that TranCLR achieves superior accuracy and calibration performance, effectively learning continuous and uncertainty-aware skeleton representations. The code is available at https://github.com/Philchieh/TranCLR.



233. ❌ MEDN: Motion-Emotion Feature Decoupling Network for Micro-Expression Recognition

作者: Chenxing Hu, Kun Xie, Qiguang Miao, Ruyi Liu, Quan Wang, Zongkai Yang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17899v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Unlike macro-expression, micro-expression does not follow a strictly consistent mapping rule between emotions and Action Units (AUs). As a result, some micro-expressions share identical AUs yet represent completely opposite emotional categories, making them highly visually similar. Existing microexpression recognition (MER) methods mostly rely on explicit facial motion cues (e.g., optical flow, frame differences, AU features) while ignoring implicit emotion information. To tackle this issue, this paper presents a Motion Emotion Feature Decoupling Network (MEDN) for MER. We design a dual-branch framework to separately extract motion and emotion features. In the motion branch, an AU-detection task restricts features to the explicit motion domain, and orthogonal loss is adopted to reduce motion emotion feature coupling. For implicit emotion modeling, we propose a Sparse Emotion Vision Transformer (SEVit) that sparsifies spatial tokens to highlight local temporal variations with multi-scale sparsity rates. A Collaborative Fusion Module (CoFM) is further developed to fuse disentangled motion and emotion features adaptively. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets validate that MEDN effectively decouples motion and emotion features and achieves superior recognition performance, offering a new perspective for enhancing recognition accuracy and generalization.



234. ❌ ReTrack: Evidence-Driven Dual-Stream Directional Anchor Calibration Network for Composed Video Retrieval

作者: Zixu Li, Yupeng Hu, Zhiwei Chen, Qinlei Huang, Guozhi Qiu, Zhiheng Fu, Meng Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17898v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

With the rapid growth of video data, Composed Video Retrieval (CVR) has emerged as a novel paradigm in video retrieval and is receiving increasing attention from researchers. Unlike unimodal video retrieval methods, the CVR task takes a multi-modal query consisting of a reference video and a piece of modification text as input. The modification text conveys the user’s intended alterations to the reference video. Based on this input, the model aims to retrieve the most relevant target video. In the CVR task, there exists a substantial discrepancy in information density between video and text modalities. Traditional composition methods tend to bias the composed feature toward the reference video, which leads to suboptimal retrieval performance. This limitation is significant due to the presence of three core challenges: (1) modal contribution entanglement, (2) explicit optimization of composed features, and (3) retrieval uncertainty. To address these challenges, we propose the evidence-dRivRn dual-sTream diRectionAl anChor calibration networK (ReTrack). ReTrack is the first CVR framework that improves multi-modal query understanding by calibrating directional bias in composed features. It consists of three key modules: Semantic Contribution Disentanglement, Composition Geometry Calibration, and Reliable Evidence-driven Alignment. Specifically, ReTrack estimates the semantic contribution of each modality to calibrate the directional bias of the composed feature. It then uses the calibrated directional anchors to compute bidirectional evidence that drives reliable composed-to-target similarity estimation. Moreover, ReTrack exhibits strong generalization to the Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) task, achieving SOTA performance across three benchmark datasets in both CVR and CIR scenarios. Codes are available at https://github.com/Lee-zixu/ReTrack



235. ❌ AeroRAG: Structured Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented LLM for Fine-Grained Aerial Visual Reasoning

作者: Junxiao Xue, Quan Deng, Tingqi Hu, Meicong Si, Xinyi Yin, Yunyun Shi, Xuecheng Wu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17889v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Despite recent progress in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), reliable visual question answering in aerial scenes remains challenging. In such scenes, task-critical evidence is often carried by small objects, explicit quantities, coarse locations, and inter-object relations, whereas conventional dense visual-token representations are not well aligned with these structured semantics. To address this interface mismatch, we propose AeroRAG, a scene-graph-guided multimodal retrieval-augmented generation framework for visual question answering. The framework first converts an input image into structured visual knowledge, including object categories, quantities, spatial locations, and semantic relations, and then retrieves query-relevant semantic chunks to construct compact prompts for a text-based large language model. Rather than relying on direct reasoning over dense visual tokens, our method introduces a more explicit intermediate interface between perception and language reasoning. Experiments on the AUG aerial dataset and the general-domain VG-150 benchmark show consistent improvements over six strong MLLM baselines, with the largest gains observed in dense aerial scenes and relation-sensitive reasoning. We further evaluate the framework on VQAv2 to verify that the proposed interface remains compatible with standard visual reasoning settings. These results suggest that structured retrieval is a practical design direction for deployment-oriented and grounded visual reasoning systems.



236. ❌ ST-$π$: Structured SpatioTemporal VLA for Robotic Manipulation

作者: Chuanhao Ma, Hanyu Zhou, Shihan Peng, Yan Li, Tao Gu, Luxin Yan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17880v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Vision-language-action (VLA) models have achieved great success on general robotic tasks, but still face challenges in fine-grained spatiotemporal manipulation. Typically, existing methods mainly embed spatiotemporal knowledge into visual and action representations, and directly perform a cross-modal mapping for step-level action prediction. However, such spatiotemporal reasoning remains largely implicit, making it difficult to handle multiple sequential behaviors with explicit spatiotemporal boundaries. In this work, we propose ST-$π$, a structured spatiotemporal VLA model for robotic manipulation. Our model is guided by two key designs: 1) Spatiotemporal VLM. We encode 4D observations and task instructions into latent spaces, and feed them into the LLM to generate a sequence of causally ordered chunk-level action prompts consisting of sub-tasks, spatial grounding and temporal grounding. 2) Spatiotemporal action expert. Conditioned on chunk-level action prompts, we design a structured dual-generator guidance to jointly model spatial dependencies and temporal causality, thus predicting step-level action parameters. Within this structured framework, the VLM explicitly plans global spatiotemporal behavior, and the action expert further refines local spatiotemporal control. In addition, we propose a real-world robotic dataset with structured spatiotemporal annotations for fine-tuning. Extensive experiments have been conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of our model. Our code link: https://github.com/chuanhaoma/ST-pi.



237. ❌ Exploring Boundary-Aware Spatial-Frequency Fusion for Camouflaged Object Detection

作者: Song Yu, Yang Hu, Haokang Ding, Zhifang Liao, Yucheng Song 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17879v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Camouflaged Object Detection is challenging due to the high degree of similarity between camouflaged objects and their surrounding backgrounds. Current COD methods mainly rely on edge extraction in the spatial domain and local pixel-level information, neglecting the importance of global structural features. Additionally, they fail to effectively leverage the importance of phase spectrum information within frequency domain features. To this end, we propose a COD framework BASFNet based on boundary-aware frequency domain and spatial domain fusion.This method uses dual guided integration of frequency domain and spatial domain features. A phase-spectrum-based frequency-enhanced edge exploration module (FEEM) and a spatial core segmentation module (SCSM) are introduced to jointly capture the boundary and object features of camouflaged objects. These features are then effectively integrated through a spatial-frequency fusion interaction module (SFFIM). Furthermore, the boundary detection is further optimized through an boundary-aware training strategy. BASFNet outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods on three benchmark datasets, validating the effectiveness of the fusion of frequency and spatial domain information in COD tasks.



238. ❌ Spatiotemporal Sycophancy: Negation-Based Gaslighting in Video Large Language Models

作者: Ziyao Tang, Pengkun Jiao, Bin Zhu, Huiyan Qi, Jingjing Chen, Yu-Gang Jiang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17873v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Video Large Language Models (Vid-LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in video understanding tasks, yet their robustness under conversational interaction remains largely underexplored. In this paper, we identify spatiotemporal sycophancy, a failure mode in which Vid-LLMs retract initially correct, visually grounded judgments and conform to misleading user feedback under negation-based gaslighting. Rather than merely changing their answers, the models often fabricate unsupported temporal or spatial explanations to justify incorrect revisions. To systematically investigate this phenomenon, we propose a negation-based gaslighting evaluation framework and introduce GasVideo-1000, a curated benchmark designed to probe spatiotemporal sycophancy with clear visual grounding and temporal reasoning requirements. We evaluate a broad range of state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary Vid-LLMs across diverse video understanding tasks. Extensive experiments reveal that vulnerability to negation-based gaslighting is pervasive and severe, even among models with strong baseline performance. While prompt-level grounding constraints can partially mitigate this behavior, they do not reliably prevent hallucinated justifications or belief reversal. Our results indicate that current Vid-LLMs lack robust mechanisms for maintaining grounded spatiotemporal beliefs under adversarial conversational feedback.



239. ❌ Sharpening Lightweight Models for Generalized Polyp Segmentation: A Boundary Guided Distillation from Foundation Models

作者: Shivanshu Agnihotri, Snehashis Majhi, Deepak Ranjan Nayak 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17865v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Automated polyp segmentation is critical for early colorectal cancer detection and its prevention, yet remains challenging due to weak boundaries, large appearance variations, and limited annotated data. Lightweight segmentation models such as U-Net, U-Net++, and PraNet offer practical efficiency for clinical deployment but struggle to capture the rich semantic and structural cues required for accurate delineation of complex polyp regions. In contrast, large Vision Foundation Models (VFMs), including SAM, OneFormer, Mask2Former, and DINOv2, exhibit strong generalization but transfer poorly to polyp segmentation due to domain mismatch, insufficient boundary sensitivity, and high computational cost. To bridge this gap, we propose \textit{\textbf{LiteBounD}, a \underline{Li}gh\underline{t}w\underline{e}ight \underline{Boun}dary-guided \underline{D}istillation} framework that transfers complementary semantic and structural priors from multiple VFMs into compact segmentation backbones. LiteBounD introduces (i) a dual-path distillation mechanism that disentangles semantic and boundary-aware representations, (ii) a frequency-aware alignment strategy that supervises low-frequency global semantics and high-frequency boundary details separately, and (iii) a boundary-aware decoder that fuses multi-scale encoder features with distilled semantically rich boundary information for precise segmentation. Extensive experiments on both seen (Kvasir-SEG, CVC-ClinicDB) and unseen (ColonDB, CVC-300, ETIS) datasets demonstrate that LiteBounD consistently outperforms its lightweight baselines by a significant margin and achieves performance competitive with state-of-the-art methods, while maintaining the efficiency required for real-time clinical use. Our code is available at https://github.com/lostinrepo/LiteBounD.



240. ❌ PlankFormer: Robust Plankton Instance Segmentation via MAE-Pretrained Vision Transformers and Pseudo Community Image Generation

作者: Masaharu Miyazaki, Yurie Otake, Koichi Ito, Wataru Makino, Jotaro Urabe, Takafumi Aoki 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17856v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Plankton monitoring is essential for assessing aquatic ecosystems but is limited by the labor-intensive nature of manual microscopic analysis. Automating the segmentation of plankton from crowded images is crucial, however, it faces two major challenges: (i) the scarcity of pixel-level annotated datasets and (ii) the difficulty of distinguishing plankton from debris and overlapping individuals using conventional CNN-based methods. To address these issues, we propose PlankFormer, a novel framework for plankton instance segmentation. First, to overcome the data shortage, we introduce a method to generate labeled Pseudo Community Images (PCI) by synthesizing individual plankton images onto diverse backgrounds, including those created by generative models. Second, we propose a segmentation model utilizing a Vision Transformer (ViT) backbone with a Mask2Former decoder. To robustly capture the global structural features of plankton against occlusion and debris, we employ a Masked Autoencoder (MAE) for self-supervised pre-training on unlabeled individual images. Experimental results on real-world datasets demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms conventional methods, such as Mask R-CNN, particularly in challenging environments with high debris density. We demonstrate that our synthetic training strategy and MAE-based architecture enable high-precision segmentation with requiring less manual annotations for individual plankton images.



241. ❌ UniCSG: Unified High-Fidelity Content-Constrained Style-Driven Generation via Staged Semantic and Frequency Disentanglement

作者: Jingwei Yang, Ruoxi Wu, Wei Shen, Meng Li, Yulong Liu, Huimin She, Lunxi Yuan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17850v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Style transfer must match a target style while preserving content semantics. DiT-based diffusion models often suffer from content-style entanglement, leading to reference-content leakage and unstable generation. We present UniCSG, a unified framework for content-constrained, style-driven generation in both text-guided and reference-guided settings. UniCSG employs staged training: (i) a latent-space semantic disentanglement stage that combines low-frequency preprocessing with conditioning corruption to encourage content-style separation, and (ii) a latent-space frequency-aware detail reconstruction stage that refines details via multi-scale frequency supervision. We further incorporate pixel-space reward learning to align latent objectives with perceptual quality after decoding. Experiments demonstrate improved content faithfulness, style alignment, and robustness in both settings.



242. ❌ AI Approach for MRI-only Full-Spine Vertebral Segmentation and 3D Reconstruction in Paediatric Scoliosis

作者: Nathasha Naranpanawa, Maree T. Izatt, Robert D. Labrom, Geoffrey N. Askin, J. Paige Little 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17846v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

MRI is preferred over CT in paediatric imaging because it avoids ionising radiation, but its use in spine deformity assessment is largely limited by the lack of automated, high-resolution 3D bony reconstruction, which continues to rely on CT. MRI-based 3D reconstruction remains impractical due to manual workflows and the scarcity of labelled full-spine datasets. This study introduces an AI framework that enables fully automated thoracolumbar spine (T1-L5) segmentation and 3D reconstruction from MRI alone. Historical low-dose CT scans from adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients were converted into MRI-like images using a GAN and combined with existing labelled thoracic MRI data to train a U-Net-based model. The resulting algorithm accurately generated continuous thoracolumbar 3D reconstructions, improved segmentation accuracy (88% Dice score), and reduced processing time from approximately 1 hour to under one minute, while preserving AIS-specific deformity features. This approach enables radiation-free 3D deformity assessment from MRI, supporting clinical evaluation, surgical planning, and navigation in paediatric spine care.



243. ❌ PCM-NeRF: Probabilistic Camera Modeling for Neural Radiance Fields under Pose Uncertainty

作者: Shravan Venkatraman, Rakesh Raj Madavan, Pavan Kumar Sathya Venkatesh 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17831v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Neural surface reconstruction methods typically treat camera poses as fixed values, assuming perfect accuracy from Structure-from-Motion (SfM) systems. This assumption breaks down with imperfect pose estimates, leading to distorted or incomplete reconstructions. We present PCM-NeRF, a probabilistic framework that augments neural surface reconstruction with per-camera learnable uncertainty, built on top of SG-NeRF. Rather than treating all cameras equally throughout optimization, we represent each pose as a distribution with a learnable mean and variance, initialized from SfM correspondence quality. An uncertainty regularization loss couples the learned variance to view confidence, and the resulting uncertainty directly modulates the effective pose learning rate: uncertain cameras receive damped gradient updates, preventing poorly initialized views from corrupting the reconstruction. This lightweight mechanism requires no changes to the rendering pipeline and adds negligible overhead. Experiments on challenging scenes with severe pose outliers demonstrate that PCM-NeRF consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both Chamfer Distance and F-Score, particularly for geometrically complex structures, without requiring foreground masks.



244. ❌ GR4CIL: Gap-compensated Routing for CLIP-based Class Incremental Learning

作者: Tianqi Wang, Jingcai Guo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17822v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Class-Incremental Learning (CIL) aims to continuously acquire new categories while preserving previously learned knowledge. Recently, Contrastive Language-Image Pre-trained (CLIP) models have shown strong potential for CIL due to their powerful generalization ability. However, existing methods still face two key challenges: shared-parameter adaptation tends to cause old-knowledge drift, and task-specific knowledge organization often leads to poorly calibrated cross-task responses, making reliable routing difficult. To address these issues, we propose GR4CIL, a framework combining task discrimination and knowledge routing for CLIP-based CIL. GR4CIL preserves task-specific visual knowledge while maintaining an incrementally stable shared textual semantic space, thereby reducing interference across tasks. Moreover, we introduce an orthogonal compensation mechanism to mitigate modality-gap-induced bias, enhance within-task discrimination, and enlarge the score margin between the ground-truth task and competing tasks. As a result, GR4CIL enables more reliable task-aware routing over learned knowledge while retaining the zero-shot generalization capability. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show that GR4CIL consistently outperforms strong baselines.



245. ❌ AnyLift: Scaling Motion Reconstruction from Internet Videos via 2D Diffusion

作者: Hongjie Li, Heng Yu, Jiaman Li, Hong-Xing Yu, Ehsan Adeli, C. Karen Liu, Jiajun Wu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17818v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Reconstructing 3D human motion and human-object interactions (HOI) from Internet videos is a fundamental step toward building large-scale datasets of human behavior. Existing methods struggle to recover globally consistent 3D motion under dynamic cameras, especially for motion types underrepresented in current motion-capture datasets, and face additional difficulty recovering coherent human-object interactions in 3D. We introduce a two-stage framework leveraging 2D diffusion that reconstructs 3D human motion and HOI from Internet videos. In the first stage, we synthesize multi-view 2D motion data for each domain, leveraging 2D keypoints extracted from Internet videos to incorporate human motions that rarely appear in existing MoCap datasets. In the second stage, a camera-conditioned multi-view 2D motion diffusion model is trained on the domain-specific synthetic data to recover 3D human motion and 3D HOI in the world space. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on Internet videos featuring challenging motions such as gymnastics, as well as in-the-wild HOI videos, and show that it outperforms prior work in producing realistic human motion and human-object interaction.



246. ❌ Re$^2$MoGen: Open-Vocabulary Motion Generation via LLM Reasoning and Physics-Aware Refinement

作者: Jiakun Zheng, Ting Xiao, Shiqin Cao, Xinran Li, Zhe Wang, Chenjia Bai 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17807v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Text-to-motion (T2M) generation aims to control the behavior of a target character via textual descriptions. Leveraging text-motion paired datasets, existing T2M models have achieved impressive performance in generating high-quality motions within the distribution of their training data. However, their performance deteriorates notably when the motion descriptions differ significantly from the training texts. To address this issue, we propose Re$^2$MoGen, a Reasoning and Refinement open-vocabulary Motion Generation framework that leverages enhanced Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning to generate an initial motion planning and then refine its physical plausibility via reinforcement learning (RL) post-training. Specifically, Re$^2$MoGen consists of three stages: We first employ Monte Carlo tree search to enhance the LLM’s reasoning ability in generating reasonable keyframes of the motion based on text prompts, specifying only the root and several key joints’ positions to ease the reasoning process. Then, we apply a human pose model as a prior to optimize the full-body poses based on the planned keyframes and use the resulting incomplete motion to supervise fine-tuning a pre-trained motion generator via a dynamic temporal matching objective, enabling spatiotemporal completion. Finally, we use post-training with physics-aware reward to refine motion quality to eliminate physical implausibility in LLM-planned motions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework can generate semantically consistent and physically plausible motions and achieve state-of-the-art performance in open-vocabulary motion generation.



247. ❌ Optimally Bridging Semantics and Data: Generative Semantic Communication via Schrödinger Bridge

作者: Dahua Gao, Ruichao Liu, Minxi Yang, Shuai Ma, Youlong Wu, Guangming Shi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17802v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Generative Semantic Communication (GSC) is a promising solution for image transmission over narrow-band and high-noise channels. However, existing GSC methods rely on long, indirect transport trajectories from a Gaussian to an image distribution guided by semantics, causing severe hallucination and high computational cost. To address this, we propose a general framework named Schrödinger Bridge-based GSC (SBGSC). By leveraging the Schrödinger Bridge (SB) to construct optimal transport trajectories between arbitrary distributions, SBGSC breaks Gaussian limitations and enables direct generative decoding from semantics to images. Within this framework, we design Diffusion SB-based GSC (DSBGSC). DSBGSC reconstructs the nonlinear drift term of diffusion models using Schrödinger potentials, achieving direct optimal distribution transport to reduce hallucinations and computational overhead. To further accelerate generation, we propose a self-consistency-based objective guiding the model to learn a nonlinear velocity field pointing directly toward the image, bypassing Markovian noise prediction to significantly reduce sampling steps. Simulation results demonstrate that DSBGSC outperforms state-of-the-art GSC methods, improving FID by at least 38% and SSIM by 49.3%, while accelerating inference speed by over 8 times.



248. ❌ View-Consistent 3D Scene Editing via Dual-Path Structural Correspondense and Semantic Continuity

作者: Pufan Li, Bi’an Du, Shenghe Zheng, Junyi Yao, Wei Hu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17801v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Text-driven 3D scene editing has recently attracted increasing attention. Most existing methods follow a render-edit-optimize pipeline, where multi-view images are rendered from a 3D scene, edited with 2D image editors, and then used to optimize the underlying 3D representation. However, cross-view inconsistency remains a major bottleneck. Although recent methods introduce geometric cues, cross-view interactions, or video priors to mitigate this issue, they still largely rely on inference-time synchronization and thus remain limited in robustness and generalization.In this work, we recast multi-view consistent 3D editing from a distributional perspective: 3D scene editing essentially requires a joint distribution modeling across viewpoints.Based on this insight, we propose a view-consistent 3D editing framework that explicitly introduces cross-view dependencies into the editing process. Furthermore, motivated by the observation that structural correspondence and semantic continuity rely on different cross-view cues, we introduce a dual-path consistency mechanism consisting of projection-guided structural guidance and patch-level semantic propagation for effective cross-view editing. Further, we construct a paired multi-view editing dataset that provides reliable supervision for learning cross-view consistency in edited scenes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves superior editing performance with precise and consistent views for complex scenes.



249. ❌ ReFineVLA: Multimodal Reasoning-Aware Generalist Robotic Policies via Teacher-Guided Fine-Tuning

作者: Tuan Van Vo, Tan Q. Nguyen, Khang Nguyen, Nhat Xuan Tran, Duy H. M. Nguyen, An T. Le, Ngo Anh Vien, Minh Nhat Vu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17800v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have gained much attention from the research community thanks to their strength in translating multimodal observations with linguistic instructions into desired robotic actions. Despite their advancements, VLAs often overlook explicit reasoning and learn the functional input-action mappings, omitting crucial logical steps, which are especially pronounced in interpretability and generalization for complex, long-horizon manipulation tasks. In this work, we propose ReFineVLA, a multimodal reasoning-aware framework that fine-tunes VLAs with teacher-guided reasons. We first augment robotic datasets with reasoning rationales generated by an expert teacher model, guiding VLA models to learn to reason about their actions. Then, we fine-tune pre-trained VLAs with the reasoning-enriched datasets with ReFineVLA, while maintaining the underlying generalization abilities and boosting reasoning capabilities. We also conduct attention map visualization to analyze the alignment among visual observation, linguistic prompts, and to-be-executed actions of ReFineVLA, reflecting the model is ability to focus on relevant tasks and actions. Through this additional step, we explore that ReFineVLA-trained models exhibit a meaningful agreement between vision-language and action domains, highlighting the enhanced multimodal understanding and generalization. Evaluated across a suite of simulated manipulation benchmarks on SimplerEnv with both WidowX and Google Robot tasks, ReFineVLA achieves state-of-the-art performance, in success rate over the second-best method on the both the WidowX benchmark and Google Robot Tasks.



250. ❌ Weakly-Supervised Referring Video Object Segmentation through Text Supervision

作者: Miaojing Shi, Jun Huang, Zijie Yue, Hanli Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17797v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Referring video object segmentation (RVOS) aims to segment the target instance in a video, referred by a text expression. Conventional approaches are mostly supervised learning, requiring expensive pixel-level mask annotations. To tackle it, weakly-supervised RVOS has recently been proposed to replace mask annotations with bounding boxes or points, which are however still costly and labor-intensive. In this paper, we design a novel weakly-supervised RVOS method, namely WSRVOS, to train the model with only text expressions. Given an input video and the referring expression, we first design a contrastive referring expression augmentation scheme that leverages the captioning capabilities of a multimodal large language model to generate both positive and negative expressions. We extract visual and linguistic features from the input video and generated expressions, then perform bi-directional vision-language feature selection and interaction to enable fine-grained multimodal alignment. Next, we propose an instance-aware expression classification scheme to optimize the model in distinguishing positive from negative expressions. Also, we introduce a positive-prediction fusion strategy to generate high-quality pseudo-masks, which serve as additional supervision to the model. Last, we design a temporal segment ranking constraint such that the overlaps between mask predictions of temporally neighboring frames are required to conform to specific orders. Extensive experiments on four publicly available RVOS datasets, including A2D Sentences, J-HMDB Sentences, Ref-YouTube-VOS, and Ref-DAVIS17, demonstrate the superiority of our method. Code is available at \href{https://github.com/viscom-tongji/WSRVOS}{https://github.com/viscom-tongji/WSRVOS}.



251. ❌ Revisiting Active Sequential Prediction-Powered Mean Estimation

作者: Maria-Eleni Sfyraki, Jun-Kun Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18569v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In this work, we revisit the problem of active sequential prediction-powered mean estimation, where at each round one must decide the query probability of the ground-truth label upon observing the covariates of a sample. Furthermore, if the label is not queried, the prediction from a machine learning model is used instead. Prior work proposed an elegant scheme that determines the query probability by combining an uncertainty-based suggestion with a constant probability that encodes a soft constraint on the query probability. We explored different values of the mixing parameter and observed an intriguing empirical pattern: the smallest confidence width tends to occur when the weight on the constant probability is close to one, thereby reducing the influence of the uncertainty-based component. Motivated by this observation, we develop a non-asymptotic analysis of the estimator and establish a data-dependent bound on its confidence interval. Our analysis further suggests that when a no-regret learning approach is used to determine the query probability and control this bound, the query probability converges to the constraint of the max value of the query probability when it is chosen obliviously to the current covariates. We also conduct simulations that corroborate these theoretical findings.



252. ❌ ConforNets: Latents-Based Conformational Control in OpenFold3

作者: Minji Lee, Colin Kalicki, Minkyu Jeon, Aymen Qabel, Alisia Fadini, Mohammed AlQuraishi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18559v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Models from the AlphaFold (AF) family reliably predict one dominant conformation for most well-ordered proteins but struggle to capture biologically relevant alternate states. Several efforts have focused on eliciting greater conformational variability through ad hoc inference-time perturbations of AF models or their inputs. Despite their progress, these approaches remain inefficient and fail to consistently recover major conformational modes. Here, we investigate both the optimal location and manner-of-operation for perturbing latent representations in the AF3 architecture. We distill our findings in ConforNets: channel-wise affine transforms of the pre-Pairformer pair latents. Unlike previous methods, ConforNets globally modulate AF3 representations, making them reusable across proteins. On unsupervised generation of alternate states, ConforNets achieve state-of-the-art success rates on all existing multi-state benchmarks. On the novel supervised task of conformational transfer, ConforNets trained on one source protein can induce a conserved conformational change across a protein family. Collectively, these results introduce a mechanism for conformational control in AF3-based models.



253. ❌ A Note on TurboQuant and the Earlier DRIVE/EDEN Line of Work

作者: Ran Ben-Basat, Yaniv Ben-Itzhak, Gal Mendelson, Michael Mitzenmacher, Amit Portnoy, Shay Vargaftik 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18555v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

This note clarifies the relationship between the recent TurboQuant work and the earlier DRIVE (NeurIPS 2021) and EDEN (ICML 2022) schemes. DRIVE is a 1-bit quantizer that EDEN extended to any $b>0$ bits per coordinate; we refer to them collectively as EDEN. First, TurboQuant${\text{mse}}$ is a special case of EDEN obtained by fixing EDEN’s scalar scale parameter to $S=1$. EDEN supports both biased and unbiased quantization, each optimized by a different $S$ (chosen via methods described in the EDEN works). The fixed choice $S=1$ used by TurboQuant is generally suboptimal, although the optimal $S$ for biased EDEN converges to $1$ as the dimension grows; accordingly TurboQuant${\text{mse}}$ approaches EDEN’s behavior for large $d$. Second, TurboQuant${\text{prod}}$ combines a biased $(b-1)$-bit EDEN step with an unbiased 1-bit QJL quantization of the residual. It is suboptimal in three ways: (1) its $(b-1)$-bit step uses the suboptimal $S=1$; (2) its 1-bit unbiased residual quantization has worse MSE than (unbiased) 1-bit EDEN; (3) chaining a biased $(b-1)$-bit step with a 1-bit unbiased residual step is inferior to unbiasedly quantizing the input directly with $b$-bit EDEN. Third, some of the analysis in the TurboQuant work mirrors that of the EDEN works: both exploit the connection between random rotations and the shifted Beta distribution, use the Lloyd-Max algorithm, and note that Randomized Hadamard Transforms can replace uniform random rotations. Experiments support these claims: biased EDEN (with optimized $S$) is more accurate than TurboQuant${\text{mse}}$, and unbiased EDEN is markedly more accurate than TurboQuant${\text{prod}}$, often by more than a bit (e.g., 2-bit EDEN beats 3-bit TurboQuant${\text{prod}}$). We also repeat all accuracy experiments from the TurboQuant paper, showing that EDEN outperforms it in every setup we have tried.



254. ❌ Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Biological $2\mathrm{D}{+}t$ Reaction-Diffusion Systems

作者: William Lavery, Jodie A. Cochrane, Christian Olesen, Dagim S. Tadele, John T. Nardini, Sara Hamis 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18548v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a powerful framework for learning governing equations of dynamical systems from data. Biologically-informed neural networks (BINNs) are a variant of PINNs that preserve the known differential operator structure (e.g., reaction-diffusion) while learning constitutive terms via trainable neural subnetworks, enforced through soft residual penalties. Existing BINN studies are limited to $1\mathrm{D}{+}t$ reaction-diffusion systems and focus on forward prediction, using the governing partial differential equation as a regulariser rather than an explicit identification target. Here, we extend BINNs to $2\mathrm{D}{+}t$ systems within a PINN framework that combines data preprocessing, BINN-based equation learning, and symbolic regression post-processing for closed-form equation discovery. We demonstrate the framework’s real-world applicability by learning the governing equations of lung cancer cell population dynamics from time-lapse microscopy data, recovering $2\mathrm{D}{+}t$ reaction-diffusion models from experimental observations. The proposed framework is readily applicable to other spatio-temporal systems, providing a practical and interpretable tool for fast analytic equation discovery from data.



255. ❌ Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Risk-Sensitive Estimation via Conditional Value-at-Risk

作者: Feras Al Taha, Eilyan Bitar 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18546v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We propose a distributionally robust approach to risk-sensitive estimation of an unknown signal x from an observed signal y. The unknown signal and observation are modeled as random vectors whose joint probability distribution is unknown, but assumed to belong to a given type-2 Wasserstein ball of distributions, termed the ambiguity set. The performance of an estimator is measured according to the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) of the squared estimation error. Within this framework, we study the problem of computing affine estimators that minimize the worst-case CVaR over all distributions in the given ambiguity set. As our main result, we show that, when the nominal distribution at the center of the Wasserstein ball is finitely supported, such estimators can be exactly computed by solving a tractable semidefinite program. We evaluate the proposed estimators on a wholesale electricity price forecasting task using real market data and show that they deliver lower out-of-sample CVaR of squared error compared to existing methods.



256. ❌ Duality for the Adversarial Total Variation

作者: Leon Bungert, Lucas Schmitt 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18540v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Adversarial training of binary classifiers can be reformulated as regularized risk minimization involving a nonlocal total variation. Building on this perspective, we establish a characterization of the subdifferential of this total variation using duality techniques. To achieve this, we derive a dual representation of the nonlocal total variation and a related integration of parts formula, involving a nonlocal gradient and divergence. We provide such duality statements both in the space of continuous functions vanishing at infinity on proper metric spaces and for the space of essentially bounded functions on Euclidean domains. Furthermore, under some additional conditions we provide characterizations of the subdifferential in these settings.



257. ❌ Too Correct to Learn: Reinforcement Learning on Saturated Reasoning Data

作者: Zhenwen Liang, Yujun Zhou, Sidi Lu, Xiangliang Zhang, Haitao Mi, Dong Yu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18493v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Reinforcement Learning (RL) enhances LLM reasoning, yet a paradox emerges as models scale: strong base models saturate standard benchmarks (e.g., MATH), yielding correct but homogeneous solutions. In such environments, the lack of failure cases causes the advantage signal in group-relative algorithms (e.g., GRPO) to vanish, driving policies into mode collapse. To address this, we propose Constrained Uniform Top-K Sampling (CUTS), a parameter-free decoding strategy enforcing structure-preserving exploration. Unlike standard sampling that follows model biases, CUTS flattens the local optimization landscape by sampling uniformly from constrained high-confidence candidates. We integrate this into Mixed-CUTS, a training framework synergizing exploitative and exploratory rollouts to amplify intra-group advantage variance. Experiments on Qwen3 models demonstrate that our approach prevents policy degeneration and significantly boosts out-of-domain generalization. Notably, Mixed-CUTS improves Pass@1 accuracy on the challenging AIME25 benchmark by up to 15.1% over standard GRPO, validating that maintaining diversity within the semantic manifold is critical for rigorous reasoning.



258. ❌ Barrier-enforced multi-objective optimization for direct point and sharp interval forecasting

作者: Worachit Amnuaypongsa, Yotsapat Suparanonrat, Pana Wanitchollakit, Jitkomut Songsiri 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18492v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

This paper proposes a multi-step probabilistic forecasting framework using a single neural-network based model to generate simultaneous point and interval forecasts. Our approach ensures non-crossing prediction intervals (PIs) through a model structure design that strictly satisfy a target coverage probability (PICP) while maximizing sharpness. Unlike existing methods that rely on manual weight tuning for scalarized loss functions, we treat point and PI forecasting as a multi-objective optimization problem, utilizing multi-gradient descent to adaptively select optimal weights. Key innovations include a new PI loss function based on an extended log-barrier with an adaptive hyperparameter to guarantee the coverage, a hybrid architecture featuring a shared temporal model with horizon-specific submodels, and a training strategy. The proposed loss is scale-independent and universally applicable; combined with our training algorithm, the framework eliminates trial-and-error hyperparameter tuning for balancing multiple objectives. Validated by an intra-day solar irradiance forecasting application, results demonstrate that our proposed loss consistently outperforms those in current literature by achieving target coverage with the narrowest PI widths. Furthermore, when compared against LSTM encoder-decoder and Transformer architectures–including those augmented with Chronos foundation models–our method remains highly competitive and can be seamlessly adapted to any deep learning structure.



259. ❌ Safe Control using Learned Safety Filters and Adaptive Conformal Inference

作者: Sacha Huriot, Ihab Tabbara, Hussein Sibai 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18482v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Safety filters have been shown to be effective tools to ensure the safety of control systems with unsafe nominal policies. To address scalability challenges in traditional synthesis methods, learning-based approaches have been proposed for designing safety filters for systems with high-dimensional state and control spaces. However, the inevitable errors in the decisions of these models raise concerns about their reliability and the safety guarantees they offer. This paper presents Adaptive Conformal Filtering (ACoFi), a method that combines learned Hamilton-Jacobi reachability-based safety filters with adaptive conformal inference. Under ACoFi, the filter dynamically adjusts its switching criteria based on the observed errors in its predictions of the safety of actions. The range of possible safety values of the nominal policy’s output is used to quantify uncertainty in safety assessment. The filter switches from the nominal policy to the learned safe one when that range suggests it might be unsafe. We show that ACoFi guarantees that the rate of incorrectly quantifying uncertainty in the predicted safety of the nominal policy is asymptotically upper bounded by a user-defined parameter. This gives a soft safety guarantee rather than a hard safety guarantee. We evaluate ACoFi in a Dubins car simulation and a Safety Gymnasium environment, empirically demonstrating that it significantly outperforms the baseline method that uses a fixed switching threshold by achieving higher learned safety values and fewer safety violations, especially in out-of-distribution scenarios.



260. ❌ Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Didactic Derivation of the Complete Training Cycle

作者: Abdeladhim Tahimi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18481v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

This paper is a step-by-step, self-contained guide to the complete training cycle of a Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) – a topic that existing tutorials and guides typically delegate to automatic differentiation libraries without exposing the underlying algebra. Using a first-order initial value problem with a known analytical solution as a running example, we walk through every stage of the process: forward propagation of both the network output and its temporal derivative, evaluation of a composite loss function built from the ODE residual and the initial condition, backpropagation of gradients – with particular attention to the product rule that arises in hidden layers – and a gradient descent parameter update. Every calculation is presented with explicit, verifiable numerical values using a 1-3-3-1 multilayer perceptron with two hidden layers and 22 trainable parameters. From these concrete examples, we derive general recursive formulas – expressed as sensitivity propagation relations – that extend the gradient computation to networks of arbitrary depth, and we connect these formulas to the automatic differentiation engines used in practice. The trained network is then validated against the exact solution, achieving a relative $L^2$ error of $4.290 \times 10^{-4}$ using only the physics-informed loss, without any data from the true solution. A companion Jupyter/PyTorch notebook reproduces every manual calculation and the full training pipeline, providing mutual validation between hand-derived and machine-computed gradients.



261. ❌ Multi-Scale Reversible Chaos Game Representation: A Unified Framework for Sequence Classification

作者: Sarwan Ali, Taslim Murad 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18477v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Biological classification with interpretability remains a challenging task. For this, we introduce a novel encoding framework, Multi-Scale Reversible Chaos Game Representation (MS-RCGR), that transforms biological sequences into multi-resolution geometric representations with guaranteed reversibility. Unlike traditional sequence encoding methods, MS-RCGR employs rational arithmetic and hierarchical k-mer decomposition to generate scale-invariant features that preserve complete sequence information while enabling diverse analytical approaches. Our framework bridges three distinct paradigms for sequence analysis: (1) traditional machine learning using extracted geometric features, (2) computer vision models operating on CGR-generated images, and (3) hybrid approaches combining protein language model embeddings with CGR features. Through comprehensive experiments on synthetic DNA and protein datasets encompassing seven distinct sequence classes, we demonstrate that MS-RCGR features consistently enhance classification performance across all paradigms. Notably, our hybrid approach combining pre-trained language model embeddings (ESM2, ProtT5) with MS-RCGR features achieves superior performance compared to either method alone. The reversibility property of our encoding ensures no information loss during transformation, while multi-scale analysis captures patterns ranging from individual nucleotides to complex motif structures. Our results indicate that MS-RCGR provides a flexible, interpretable, and high-performing foundation for biological sequence analysis.



262. ❌ Train Separately, Merge Together: Modular Post-Training with Mixture-of-Experts

作者: Jacob Morrison, Sanjay Adhikesaven, Akshita Bhagia, Matei Zaharia, Noah A. Smith, Sewon Min 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18473v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Extending a fully post-trained language model with new domain capabilities is fundamentally limited by monolithic training paradigms: retraining from scratch is expensive and scales poorly, while continued training often degrades existing capabilities. We present BAR (Branch-Adapt-Route), which trains independent domain experts, each through its own mid-training, supervised finetuning, and reinforcement learning pipeline, and composes them via a Mixture-of-Experts architecture with lightweight router training. Unlike retraining approaches that mix all domains and require full reprocessing for any update (with cost scaling quadratically), BAR enables updating individual experts independently with linear cost scaling and no degradation to existing domains. At the 7B scale, with experts for math, code, tool use, and safety, BAR achieves an overall score of 49.1 (averaged across 7 evaluation categories), matching or exceeding re-training baselines (47.8 without mid-training, 50.5 with). We further show that modular training provides a structural advantage: by isolating each domain, it avoids the catastrophic forgetting that occurs when late-stage RL degrades capabilities from earlier training stages, while significantly reducing the cost and complexity of updating or adding a domain. Together, these results suggest that decoupled, expert-based training is a scalable alternative to monolithic retraining for extending language models.



263. ❌ NI Sampling: Accelerating Discrete Diffusion Sampling by Token Order Optimization

作者: Enshu Liu, Xuefei Ning, Yu Wang, Zinan Lin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18471v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Discrete diffusion language models (dLLMs) have recently emerged as a promising alternative to traditional autoregressive approaches, offering the flexibility to generate tokens in arbitrary orders and the potential of parallel decoding. However, existing heuristic sampling strategies remain inefficient: they choose only a small part of tokens to sample at each step, leaving substantial room for improvement. In this work, we study the problem of token sampling order optimization and demonstrate its significant potential for acceleration. Specifically, we find that fully leveraging correct predictions at each step can reduce the number of sampling iterations by an order of magnitude without compromising accuracy. Based on this, we propose Neural Indicator Sampling (NI Sampling), a general sampling order optimization framework that utilize a neural indicator to decide which tokens should be sampled at each step. We further propose a novel trajectory-preserving objective to train the indicator. Experiments on LLaDA and Dream models across multiple benchmarks show that our method achieves up to 14.3$\times$ acceleration over full-step sampling with negligible performance drop, and consistently outperforms confidence threshold sampling in the accuracy-step trade-off. Code is available at https://github.com/imagination-research/NI-Sampling.



264. ❌ Semantic Step Prediction: Multi-Step Latent Forecasting in LLM Reasoning Trajectories via Step Sampling

作者: Yidi Yuan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18464v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Semantic Tube Prediction (STP) leverages representation geometric to regularize LLM hidden-state trajectories toward locally linear geodesics during fine-tuning, thereby greatly improving data efficiency. The original STP recipe samples random token sub-spans, which is compatible with the base large language model (LLM) training architecture. Inspired by STP, we are interested to investigate whether the sampling position can further enhance the semantic structure of multi-step reasoning, and hence affect its geometric impact. We applied STP at consecutive semantic reasoning step boundaries and achieved 168x more accurate multi-step latent prediction than frozen baselines on ProcessBench (3,400 samples), compared to only 4x for the random-token STP. Probing the latent manifold with a learned non-linear predictor reveals that STP-shaped trajectories are smooth curves, not straight lines: a 3-layer MLP reduces prediction error by a further 3-12x over linear extrapolation on step-boundary models. Removing the language modeling loss yields trajectories that are 2x more MLP-predictable than the combined loss, revealing a tradeoff between generation quality and geometric purity. Our results identify sampling position as the critical variable in geometric regularization and establish multi-step latent prediction MSE as a new evaluation metric for this class of methods.



265. ❌ Learning Invariant Modality Representation for Robust Multimodal Learning from a Causal Inference Perspective

作者: Sijie Mai, Shiqin Han 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18460v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Multimodal affective computing aims to predict humans’ sentiment, emotion, intention, and opinion using language, acoustic, and visual modalities. However, current models often learn spurious correlations that harm generalization under distribution shifts or noisy modalities. To address this, we propose a causal modality-invariant representation (CmIR) learning framework for robust multimodal learning. At its core, we introduce a theoretically grounded disentanglement method that separates each modality into causal invariant representation' and environment-specific spurious representation’ from a causal inference perspective. CmIR ensures that the learned invariant representations retain stable predictive relationships with labels across different environments while preserving sufficient information from the raw inputs via invariance constraint, mutual information constraint, and reconstruction constraint. Experiments across multiple multimodal benchmarks demonstrate that CmIR achieves state-of-the-art performance. CmIR particularly excels on out-of-distribution data and noisy data, confirming its robustness and generalizability.



266. ❌ Random Matrix Theory of Early-Stopped Gradient Flow: A Transient BBP Scenario

作者: Florentin Coeurdoux, Grégoire Ferré, Jean-Philippe Bouchaud 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18450v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Empirical studies of trained models often report a transient regime in which signal is detectable in a finite gradient descent time window before overfitting dominates. We provide an analytically tractable random-matrix model that reproduces this phenomenon for gradient flow in a linear teacher–student setting. In this framework, learning occurs when an isolated eigenvalue separates from a noisy bulk, before eventually disappearing in the overfitting regime. The key ingredient is anisotropy in the input covariance, which induces fast and slow directions in the learning dynamics. In a two-block covariance model, we derive the full time-dependent bulk spectrum of the symmetrized weight matrix through a $2\times 2$ Dyson equation, and we obtain an explicit outlier condition for a rank-one teacher via a rank-two determinant formula. This yields a transient Baik-Ben Arous-Péché (BBP) transition: depending on signal strength and covariance anisotropy, the teacher spike may never emerge, emerge and persist, or emerge only during an intermediate time interval before being reabsorbed into the bulk. We map the corresponding phase diagrams and validate the theory against finite-size simulations. Our results provide a minimal solvable mechanism for early stopping as a transient spectral effect driven by anisotropy and noise.



267. ❌ AutoPPA: Automated Circuit PPA Optimization via Contrastive Code-based Rule Library Learning

作者: Chongxiao Li, Pengwei Jin, Di Huang, Guangrun Sun, Husheng Han, Jianan Mu, Xinyao Zheng, Jiaguo Zhu, Shuyi Xing, Hanjun Wei, Tianyun Ma, Shuyao Cheng, Rui Zhang, Ying Wang, Zidong Du, Qi Guo, Xing Hu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18445v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Performance, power, and area (PPA) optimization is a fundamental task in RTL design, requiring a precise understanding of circuit functionality and the relationship between circuit structures and PPA metrics. Recent studies attempt to automate this process using LLMs, but neither feedback-based nor knowledge-based methods are efficient enough, as they either design without any prior knowledge or rely heavily on human-summarized optimization rules. In this paper, we propose AutoPPA, a fully automated PPA optimization framework. The key idea is to automatically generate optimization rules that enhance the search for optimal solutions. To do this, AutoPPA employs an Explore-Evaluate-Induce ($E^2I$) workflow that contrasts and abstracts rules from diverse generated code pairs rather than manually defined prior knowledge, yielding better optimization patterns. To make the abstracted rules more generalizable, AutoPPA employs an adaptive multi-step search framework that adopts the most effective rules for a given circuit. Experiments show that AutoPPA outperforms both the manual optimization and the state-of-the-art methods SymRTLO and RTLRewriter.



268. ❌ Conformal Robust Set Estimation

作者: Alejandro Cholaquidis, Emilien Joly, Leonardo Moreno 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18441v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Conformal prediction provides finite-sample, distribution-free coverage under exchangeability, but standard constructions may lack robustness in the presence of outliers or heavy tails. We propose a robust conformal method based on a non-conformity score defined as the half-mass radius around a point, equivalently the distance to its $(\lfloor n/2\rfloor+1)$-nearest neighbour. We show that the resulting conformal regions are marginally valid for any sample size and converge in probability to a robust population central set defined through a distance-to-a-measure functional. Under mild regularity conditions, we establish exponential concentration and tail bounds that quantify the deviation between the empirical conformal region and its population counterpart. These results provide a probabilistic justification for using robust geometric scores in conformal prediction, even for heavy-tailed or multi-modal distributions.



269. ❌ Scalable Physics-Informed Neural Differential Equations and Data-Driven Algorithms for HVAC Systems

作者: Hanfeng Zhai, Hongtao Qiao, Hassan Mansour, Christopher Laughman 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18438v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present a scalable, data-driven simulation framework for large-scale heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems that couples physics-informed neural ordinary differential equations (PINODEs) with differential-algebraic equation (DAE) solvers. At the component level, we learn heat-exchanger dynamics using an implicit PINODE formulation that predicts conserved quantities (refrigerant mass $M_r$ and internal energy $E_\text{hx}$) as outputs, enabling physics-informed training via automatic differentiation of mass/energy balances. Stable long-horizon prediction is achieved through gradient-stabilized latent evolution with gated architectures and layer normalization. At the system level, we integrate learned components with DAE solvers (IDA and DASSL) that explicitly enforce junction constraints (pressure equilibrium and mass-flow consistency), and we use Bayesian optimization to tune solver parameters for accuracy–efficiency trade-offs. To reduce residual system-level bias, we introduce a lightweight corrector network trained on short trajectory segments. Across dual-compressor and scaled network studies, the proposed approach attains multi-fold speedups over high-fidelity simulation while keeping errors low (MAPE below a few percent) and scales to systems with up to 32 compressor–condenser pairs.



270. ❌ Spectral bandits for smooth graph functions

作者: Michal Valko, Rémi Munos, Branislav Kveton, Tomáš Kocák 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18420v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Smooth functions on graphs have wide applications in manifold and semi-supervised learning. In this paper, we study a bandit problem where the payoffs of arms are smooth on a graph. This framework is suitable for solving online learning problems that involve graphs, such as content-based recommendation. In this problem, each item we can recommend is a node and its expected rating is similar to its neighbors. The goal is to recommend items that have high expected ratings. We aim for the algorithms where the cumulative regret with respect to the optimal policy would not scale poorly with the number of nodes. In particular, we introduce the notion of an effective dimension, which is small in real-world graphs, and propose two algorithms for solving our problem that scale linearly and sublinearly in this dimension. Our experiments on real-world content recommendation problem show that a good estimator of user preferences for thousands of items can be learned from just tens of nodes evaluations.



271. ❌ Balance-Guided Sparse Identification of Multiscale Nonlinear PDEs with Small-coefficient Terms

作者: Zhenhua Dang, Lei Zhang, Long Wang, Guowei He 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18414v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Data-driven discovery of governing equations has advanced significantly in recent years; however, existing methods often struggle in multiscale systems where dynamically significant terms may have small coefficients. Therefore, we propose Balance-Guided SINDy (BG-SINDy) inspired by the principle of dominant balance, which reformulates $\ell_0$-constrained sparse regression as a term-level $\ell_{2,0}$-regularized problem and solves it using a progressive pruning strategy. Terms are ranked according to their relative contributions to the governing equation balance rather than their absolute coefficient magnitudes. Based on this criterion, BG-SINDy alternates between least-squares regression and elimination of negligible terms, thereby preserving dynamically significant terms even when their coefficients are small. Numerical experiments on the Korteweg–de Vries equation with a small dispersion coefficient, a modified Burgers equation with vanishing hyperviscosity, a modified Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation with multiple small-coefficient terms, and a two-dimensional reaction–diffusion system demonstrate the validity of BG-SINDy in discovering small-coefficient terms. The proposed method thus provides an efficient approach for discovering governing equations that contain small-coefficient terms.



272. ❌ Bridge-Centered Metapath Classification Using R-GCN-VGAE for Disaster-Resilient Maintenance Decisions

作者: Takato Yasuno 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18399v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Daily infrastructure management in preparation for disasters is critical for urban resilience. When bridges remain resilient against disaster-induced external forces, access to hospitals, shops, and residences via metapaths can be sustained, maintaining essential urban functions. However, prioritizing bridge maintenance under limited budgets requires quantifying the multi-dimensional roles that bridges play in disaster scenarios – a challenge that existing single-indicator approaches fail to address. We focus on metapaths from national highways through bridges to buildings (hospitals, shops, residences), constructing a heterogeneous graph with road, bridge, and building layers. A Relation-centric Graph Convolutional Network Variational Autoencoder (R-GCN-VGAE) learns metapath-based feature representations, enabling classification of bridges into disaster-preparedness categories: Supply Chain (commercial logistics), Medical Access (emergency healthcare), and Residential Protection (preventing isolation). Using OSMnx and open data, we validate our methodology on three diverse cities in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan: Mito (697 bridges), Chikusei (258 bridges), and Moriya (148 bridges), totaling 1,103 bridges. The heterogeneous graph construction from open data enables redefining bridge roles for disaster scenarios, supporting maintenance budget decision-making. We contributed that (1) Open-data methodology for constructing urban heterogeneous graphs. (2) Redefinition of bridge roles for disaster scenarios via metapath-based classification. (3) Establishment of maintenance budget decision support methodology. (4) k-NN tuning strategy validated across diverse city scales. (5) Empirical demonstration of UMAP superiority over t-SNE/PCA for multi-role bridge visualization.



273. ❌ Forecasting Ionospheric Irregularities on GNSS Lines of Sight Using Dynamic Graphs with Ephemeris Conditioning

作者: Mert Can Turkmen, Eng Leong Tan, Yee Hui Lee 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18379v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Most data-driven ionospheric forecasting models operate on gridded products, which do not preserve the time-varying sampling structure of satellite-based sensing. We instead model the ionosphere as a dynamic graph over ionospheric pierce points (IPPs), with connectivity that evolves as satellite positions change. Because satellite trajectories are predictable, the graph topology over the forecast horizon can be constructed in advance. We exploit this property to condition forecasts on the future graph structure, which we term ephemeris conditioning. This enables prediction on lines of sight that appear only in the forecast horizon. We evaluate our framework on multi-GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) data from a co-located receiver pair in Singapore spanning January 2023 through April 2025. The task is to forecast Rate of TEC Index (ROTI)-defined irregularities at 5-minute cadence up to 2 hours ahead as binary probabilistic classification per node. The resulting model, IonoDGNN, achieves a Brier Skill Score (BSS) of 0.49 and a precision-recall area under the curve (PR-AUC) of 0.75, improving over persistence by 35% in BSS and 52% in PR-AUC, with larger gains at longer lead times. Ablations confirm that graph structure and ephemeris conditioning each contribute meaningfully, with conditioning proving essential for satellites that rise during the forecast horizon (receiver operating characteristic AUC: 0.95 vs.\ 0.52 without). Under simulated coverage dropout, the model retains predictive skill on affected nodes through spatial message passing from observed neighbors. These results suggest that dynamic graph forecasting on evolving lines of sight is a viable alternative to grid-based representations for ionospheric irregularity forecasting. The model and evaluation code will be released upon publication.



274. ❌ Balanced Co-Clustering of Users and Items for Embedding Table Compression in Recommender Systems

作者: Runhao Jiang, Renchi Yang, Donghao Wu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18351v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recommender systems have advanced markedly over the past decade by transforming each user/item into a dense embedding vector with deep learning models. At industrial scale, embedding tables constituted by such vectors of all users/items demand a vast amount of parameters and impose heavy compute and memory overhead during training and inference, hindering model deployment under resource constraints. Existing solutions towards embedding compression either suffer from severely compromised recommendation accuracy or incur considerable computational costs. To mitigate these issues, this paper presents BACO, a fast and effective framework for compressing embedding tables. Unlike traditional ID hashing, BACO is built on the idea of exploiting collaborative signals in user-item interactions for user and item groupings, such that similar users/items share the same embeddings in the codebook. Specifically, we formulate a balanced co-clustering objective that maximizes intra-cluster connectivity while enforcing cluster-volume balance, and unify canonical graph clustering techniques into the framework through rigorous theoretical analyses. To produce effective groupings while averting codebook collapse, BACO instantiates this framework with a principled weighting scheme for users and items, an efficient label propagation solver, as well as secondary user clusters. Our extensive experiments comparing BACO against full models and 18 baselines over benchmark datasets demonstrate that BACO cuts embedding parameters by over 75% with a drop of at most 1.85% in recall, while surpassing the strongest baselines by being up to 346X faster.



275. ❌ Parkinson’s Disease Detection via Self-Supervised Dual-Channel Cross-Attention on Bilateral Wrist-Worn IMU Signals

作者: Meheru Zannat 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18372v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease. It shows multiple motor symptoms such as tremor, bradykinesia, postural instability, freezing of gait (FoG). PD is currently diagnosed clinically through physical exam by health-care professionals, which can be time consuming and highly subjective. Wearable IMU sensors has become a promising gateway for passive monitoring of PD patients. We propose a self-supervised cross-attention encoder that processes bilateral wrist-worn IMU signals from a public dataset called PADS, consisting of three groups, PD (Parkinson Disease), HC (Healthy Control) and DD (Differential Diagnosis) of a total of 469 subjects. We have achieved a mean accuracy of 93.12% for HC vs. PD classification and 87.04% for PD vs. DD classification. The results emphasize the clinical challenge of distinguishing Parkinson’s from other neurodegenerative diseases. Self-supervised representation learning using contrastive infoNCE loss gained an accuracy of 93.56% for HC vs. PD and 92.50% for PD vs. DD using only 20% of labelled data. This demonstrates the effectiveness of our method in transfer learning for clinical use with minimal labels. The real-time applicability was tested by deploying the optimized model with a mean inference time of 48.32 ms per window on a Raspberry Pi CPU.



276. ❌ Overcoming Selection Bias in Statistical Studies With Amortized Bayesian Inference

作者: Jonas Arruda, Sophie Chervet, Paula Staudt, Andreas Wieser, Michael Hoelscher, Isabelle Sermet-Gaudelus, Nadine Binder, Lulla Opatowski, Jan Hasenauer 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18319v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Selection bias arises when the probability that an observation enters a dataset depends on variables related to the quantities of interest, leading to systematic distortions in estimation and uncertainty quantification. For example, in epidemiological or survey settings, individuals with certain outcomes may be more likely to be included, resulting in biased prevalence estimates with potentially substantial downstream impact. Classical corrections, such as inverse-probability weighting or explicit likelihood-based models of the selection process, rely on tractable likelihoods, which limits their applicability in complex stochastic models with latent dynamics or high-dimensional structure. Simulation-based inference enables Bayesian analysis without tractable likelihoods but typically assumes missingness at random and thus fails when selection depends on unobserved outcomes or covariates. Here, we develop a bias-aware simulation-based inference framework that explicitly incorporates selection into neural posterior estimation. By embedding the selection mechanism directly into the generative simulator, the approach enables amortized Bayesian inference without requiring tractable likelihoods. This recasting of selection bias as part of the simulation process allows us to both obtain debiased estimates and explicitly test for the presence of bias. The framework integrates diagnostics to detect discrepancies between simulated and observed data and to assess posterior calibration. The method recovers well-calibrated posterior distributions across three statistical applications with diverse selection mechanisms, including settings in which likelihood-based approaches yield biased estimates. These results recast the correction of selection bias as a simulation problem and establish simulation-based inference as a practical and testable strategy for parameter estimation under selection bias.



277. ❌ Scale-free adaptive planning for deterministic dynamics & discounted rewards

作者: Peter L. Bartlett, Victor Gabillon, Jennifer Healey, Michal Valko 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18312v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We address the problem of planning in an environment with deterministic dynamics and stochastic rewards with discounted returns. The optimal value function is not known, nor are the rewards bounded. We propose Platypoos, a simple scale-free planning algorithm that adapts to the unknown scale and smoothness of the reward function. We provide a sample complexity analysis for Platypoos that improves upon prior work and holds simultaneously over a broad range of discount factors and reward scales, without the algorithm knowing them. We also establish a matching lower bound showing our analysis is optimal up to constants.



278. ❌ Predictive Modeling of Natural Medicinal Compounds for Alzheimer Disease Using Cheminformatics

作者: Hafiza Syeda Yusra Tirmizi, Syed Ibad Hasnain, Muhammad Faris, Rabail Khowaja, Saad Abdullah 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18316v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The most common cause of dementia is Alzheimer disease, a progressive neurodegenerative disorder affecting older adults that gradually impairs memory, cognition, and behavior. It is characterized by the accumulation of abnormal proteins in the brain, including amyloid-beta plaques and neurofibrillary tangles of tau protein, which disrupt neuronal communication and lead to neuronal death. Early manifestations typically include mild memory impairment and reduced ability to acquire new information. As the disease progresses, patients experience severe cognitive decline, loss of independence, and significant personality and behavioral changes. Although the exact etiology of Alzheimer disease remains unclear, factors such as age, genetic predisposition, lifestyle, and cardiovascular health contribute to its development. While no definitive cure exists, early diagnosis, pharmacological interventions, and supportive care can slow progression and improve quality of life. This study presents a predictive cheminformatics-based model for identifying natural medicinal compounds with potential therapeutic efficacy against Alzheimer disease. The model functions as a drug screening system utilizing molecular descriptors and machine learning to detect anti-Alzheimer activity. More than 7,000 compounds from ChEBI, SynSysNet, and INDOFINE were preprocessed using Open Babel and analyzed with Dragon descriptors. A Random Forest classifier trained on approved treatments achieved moderate performance, with precision of 0.5970 and recall of 0.6590, identifying 73 candidate compounds. Key descriptors included atomic polarizability, bond multiplicity, and non-hydrogen bond counts.These findings demonstrate the value of cheminformatics in early-stage drug discovery for Alzheimer disease.



279. ❌ Symmetry Guarantees Statistic Recovery in Variational Inference

作者: Daniel Marks, Dario Paccagnan, Mark van der Wilk 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18310v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Variational inference (VI) is a central tool in modern machine learning, used to approximate an intractable target density by optimising over a tractable family of distributions. As the variational family cannot typically represent the target exactly, guarantees on the quality of the resulting approximation are crucial for understanding which of its properties VI can faithfully capture. Recent work has identified instances in which symmetries of the target and the variational family enable the recovery of certain statistics, even under model misspecification. However, these guarantees are inherently problem-specific and offer little insight into the fundamental mechanism by which symmetry forces statistic recovery. In this paper, we overcome this limitation by developing a general theory of symmetry-induced statistic recovery in variational inference. First, we characterise when variational minimisers inherit the symmetries of the target and establish conditions under which these pin down identifiable statistics. Second, we unify existing results by showing that previously known statistic recovery guarantees in location-scale families arise as special cases of our theory. Third, we apply our framework to distributions on the sphere to obtain novel guarantees for directional statistics in von Mises-Fisher families. Together, these results provide a modular blueprint for deriving new recovery guarantees for VI in a broad range of symmetry settings.



280. ❌ Dissipative Latent Residual Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Modeling and Identification of Electromechanical Systems

作者: Youyuan Long, Gokhan Solak, Arash Ajoudani 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18277v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Accurate dynamical modeling is essential for simulation and control of embodied systems, yet first-principles models of electromechanical systems often fail to capture complex dissipative effects such as joint friction, stray losses, and structural damping. While residual-learning physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) can effectively augment imperfect first-principles models with data-driven components, the residual terms are typically implemented as unconstrained multilayer perceptrons (MLPs), which may inadvertently inject artificial energy into the system. To more faithfully model the dissipative dynamics, we propose DiLaR-PINN, a dissipative latent residual PINN designed to learn unmodeled dissipative effects in a physically consistent manner. Structurally, the residual network operates only on unmeasurable (latent) state components and is parameterized in a skew-dissipative form that guarantees non-increasing energy for any choice of network parameters. To enable stable and data-efficient training under partial measurability of the state, we further develop a recurrent rollout scheme with a curriculum-based sequence length extension strategy. We validate DiLaR-PINN on a real-world helicopter system and compare it against four baselines: a pure physical model (without a residual network), an unstructured residual MLP, a DiLaR variant with a soft dissipativity constraint, and a black-box LSTM. The results demonstrate that DiLaR-PINN more accurately captures dissipative effects and achieves superior long-horizon extrapolation performance.



281. ❌ CAARL: In-Context Learning for Interpretable Co-Evolving Time Series Forecasting

作者: Etienne Tajeuna, Patrick Asante Owusu, Armelle Brun, Shengrui Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18305v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In this paper we investigate forecasting coevolving time series that feature intricate dependencies and nonstationary dynamics by using an LLM Large Language Models approach We propose a novel modeling approach named ContextAware ARLLM CAARL that provides an interpretable framework to decode the contextual dynamics influencing changes in coevolving series CAARL decomposes time series into autoregressive segments constructs a temporal dependency graph and serializes this graph into a narrative to allow processing by LLM This design yields a chainofthoughtlike reasoning path where intermediate steps capture contextual dynamics and guide forecasts in a transparent manner By linking prediction to explicit reasoning traces CAARL enhances interpretability while maintaining accuracy Experiments on realworld datasets validate its effectiveness positioning CAARL as a competitive and interpretable alternative to stateoftheart forecasting methods



282. ❌ Block-encodings as programming abstractions: The Eclipse Qrisp BlockEncoding Interface

作者: Matic Petrič, René Zander 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18276v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Block-encoding is a foundational technique in modern quantum algorithms, enabling the implementation of non-unitary operations by embedding them into larger unitary matrices. While theoretically powerful and essential for advanced protocols like Quantum Singular Value Transformation (QSVT) and Quantum Signal Processing (QSP), the generation of compilable implementations of block-encodings poses a formidable challenge. This work presents the BlockEncoding interface within the Eclipse Qrisp framework, establishing block-encodings as a high-level programming abstraction accessible to a broad scientific audience. Serving as both a technical framework introduction and a hands-on tutorial, this paper explicitly details key underlying concepts abstracted away by the interface, such as block-encoding construction and qubitization, and their practical integration into methods like the Childs-Kothari-Somma (CKS) algorithm. We outline the interface’s software architecture, encompassing constructors, core utilities, arithmetic composition, and algorithmic applications such as matrix inversion, polynomial filtering, and Hamiltonian simulation. Through code examples, we demonstrate how this interface simplifies both the practical realization of advanced quantum algorithms and their associated resource estimation.



283. ❌ Universally Empowering Zeroth-Order Optimization via Adaptive Layer-wise Sampling

作者: Fei Wang, Li Shen, Liang Ding, Chao Xue, Ye Liu, Changxing Ding 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18264v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Zeroth-Order optimization presents a promising memory-efficient paradigm for fine-tuning Large Language Models by relying solely on forward passes. However, its practical adoption is severely constrained by slow wall-clock convergence and high estimation variance. In this work, we dissect the runtime characteristics of ZO algorithms and identify a critical system bottleneck where the generation of perturbations and parameter updates accounts for over 40% of the training latency. We argue that the standard uniform exploration strategy is fundamentally flawed as it fails to account for the heterogeneous sensitivity of layers in deep networks, resulting in computationally wasteful blind searches. To address this structural mismatch, we propose AdaLeZO, an Adaptive Layer-wise ZO optimization framework. By formulating the layer selection process as a non-stationary Multi-Armed Bandit problem, AdaLeZO dynamically allocates the limited perturbation budget to the most sensitive parameters. We further introduce an Inverse Probability Weighting mechanism based on sampling with replacement, which guarantees unbiased gradient estimation while effectively acting as a temporal denoiser to reduce variance. Extensive experiments on LLaMA and OPT models ranging from 6.7B to 30B parameters demonstrate that AdaLeZO achieves 1.7x to 3.0x wall-clock acceleration compared to state-of-the-art methods. Crucially, AdaLeZO functions as a universal plug-and-play module that seamlessly enhances the efficiency of existing ZO optimizers without incurring additional memory overhead.



284. ❌ Incremental learning for audio classification with Hebbian Deep Neural Networks

作者: Riccardo Casciotti, Francesco De Santis, Alberto Antonietti, Annamaria Mesaros 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18270v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The ability of humans for lifelong learning is an inspiration for deep learning methods and in particular for continual learning. In this work, we apply Hebbian learning, a biologically inspired learning process, to sound classification. We propose a kernel plasticity approach that selectively modulates network kernels during incremental learning, acting on selected kernels to learn new information and on others to retain previous knowledge. Using the ESC-50 dataset, the proposed method achieves 76.3% overall accuracy over five incremental steps, outperforming a baseline without kernel plasticity (68.7%) and demonstrating significantly greater stability across tasks.



285. ❌ DeepRitzSplit Neural Operator for Phase-Field Models via Energy Splitting

作者: Chih-Kang Huang, Ludovick Gagnon, Miha Založnik, Benoît Appolaire 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18261v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The multi-scale and non-linear nature of phase-field models of solidification requires fine spatial and temporal discretization, leading to long computation times. This could be overcome with artificial-intelligence approaches. Surrogate models based on neural operators could have a lower computational cost than conventional numerical discretization methods. We propose a new neural operator approach that bridges classical convex-concave splitting schemes with physics-informed learning to accelerate the simulation of phase-field models. It consists of a Deep Ritz method, where a neural operator is trained to approximate a variational formulation of the phase-field model. By training the neural operator with an energy-splitting variational formulation, we enforce the energy dissipation property of the underlying models. We further introduce a custom Reaction-Diffusion Neural Operator (RDNO) architecture, adapted to the operators of the model equations. We successfully apply the deep learning approach to the isotropic Allen-Cahn equation and to anisotropic dendritic growth simulation. We demonstrate that our physically-informed training provides better generalization in out-of-distribution evaluations than data-driven training, while achieving faster inference than traditional Fourier spectral methods.



286. ❌ Correction and Corruption: A Two-Rate View of Error Flow in LLM Protocols

作者: Fernando Reitich 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18245v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models are increasingly deployed as protocols: structured multi-call procedures that spend additional computation to transform a baseline answer into a final one. These protocols are evaluated only by end-to-end accuracy, giving limited insight into when they help, when they hurt, and whether their behavior transfers under distribution shift or composition. We propose a paired-outcome measurement interface for auditing a single protocol step on exact-match tasks. For each instance, the interface records a baseline correctness bit $E_0\in{0,1}$ and a post-step correctness bit $E_1\in{0,1}$, separating correction ($E_0=0\to E_1=1$) from corruption ($E_0=1\to E_1=0$) through two rates: $c=\Pr(E_1=1\mid E_0=0)$ and $γ=\Pr(E_1=0\mid E_0=1)$. These rates predict accuracy changes and define a reusable empirical interface testable across seeds, mixtures, and pipelines. We identify three failure mechanisms. Under mixture shift, pooled estimates of $(c,γ)$ become biased when calibration and deployment mixtures differ; conditioning on a difficulty proxy restores stability without additional model calls. Under presentation contamination, selection protocols alter the interface through stable presentation artifacts when candidate content is fixed. Under state insufficiency, the correctness bit may not carry enough history for multi-step pipelines to compose predictably; a Markov factorization test identifies when composition is valid and where additional state is needed. When a protocol step passes these diagnostics, it becomes an auditable module: gated by estimated gain, conditioned on a difficulty proxy to correct mixture bias, and composed into multi-step pipelines with predictable accuracy. We demonstrate these ideas on synthetic mathematical tasks and on GSM8K, where the calibrated interface correctly predicts when protocol steps should be activated or suppressed.



287. ❌ Horospherical Depth and Busemann Median on Hadamard Manifolds

作者: Yangdi Jiang, Xiaotian Chang, Cyrus Mostajeran 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18242v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

\We introduce the horospherical depth, an intrinsic notion of statistical depth on Hadamard manifolds, and define the Busemann median as the set of its maximizers. The construction exploits the fact that the linear functionals appearing in Tukey’s half-space depth are themselves limits of renormalized distance functions; on a Hadamard manifold the same limiting procedure produces Busemann functions, whose sublevel sets are horoballs, the intrinsic replacements for halfspaces. The resulting depth is parametrized by the visual boundary, is isometry-equivariant, and requires neither tangent-space linearization nor a chosen base point.For arbitrary Hadamard manifolds, we prove that the depth regions are nested and geodesically convex, that a centerpoint of depth at least $1/(d+1)$ exists, and hence that the Busemann median exists for every Borel probability measure. Under strictly negative sectional curvature and mild regularity assumptions, the depth is strictly quasi-concave and the median is unique. We also establish robustness: the depth is stable under total-variation perturbations, and under contamination escaping to infinity the limiting median depends on the escape direction but not on how far the contaminating mass has moved along the geodesic ray, in contrast with the Fréchet mean. Finally, we establish uniform consistency of the sample depth and convergence of sample depth regions and sample Busemann medians; on symmetric spaces of noncompact type, the argument proceeds through a VC analysis of upper horospherical halfspaces, while on general Hadamard manifolds it follows from a compactness argument under a mild non-atomicity assumption.



288. ❌ FSEVAL: Feature Selection Evaluation Toolbox and Dashboard

作者: Muhammad Rajabinasab, Arthur Zimek 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18227v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Feature selection is a fundamental machine learning and data mining task, involved with discriminating redundant features from informative ones. It is an attempt to address the curse of dimensionality by removing the redundant features, while unlike dimensionality reduction methods, preserving explainability. Feature selection is conducted in both supervised and unsupervised settings, with different evaluation metrics employed to determine which feature selection algorithm is the best. In this paper, we propose FSEVAL, a feature selection evaluation toolbox accompanied with a visualization dashboard, with the goal to make it easy to comprehensively evaluate feature selection algorithms. FSEVAL aims to provide a standardized, unified, evaluation and visualization toolbox to help the researchers working in the field, conduct extensive and comprehensive evaluation of feature selection algorithms with ease.



289. ❌ EEG-Based Emergency Braking Intensity Prediction Using Blind Source Separation

作者: Zikun Zhou, Wenshuo Wang, Wenzhuo Liu, Hui Yao, Chaopeng Zhang, Yichen Liu, Xiaonan Yang, Junqiang Xi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18220v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Electroencephalography (EEG) signals have been promising for long-term braking intensity prediction but are prone to various artifacts that limit their reliability. Here, we propose a novel framework that models EEG signals as mixtures of independent blind sources and identifies those strongly correlated with braking action. Our method employs independent component analysis to decompose EEG into different components and combines time-frequency analysis with Pearson correlations to select braking-related components. Furthermore, we utilize hierarchical clustering to group braking-related components into two clusters, each characterized by a distinct spatial pattern. Additionally, these components exhibit trial-invariant temporal patterns and demonstrate stable and common neural signatures of the emergency braking process. Using power features from these components and historical braking data, we predict braking intensity at a 200 ms horizon. Evaluations on the open source dataset (O.D.) and human-in-the-loop simulation (H.S.) show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, achieving RMSE reductions of 8.0% (O.D.) and 23.8% (H.S.).



290. ❌ Centre manifold theorem for maps along manifolds of fixed points

作者: Lachlan Ewen MacDonald 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18202v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We prove a centre manifold theorem for a map along a manifold-with-boundary of fixed points, and provide an application to the study of gradient descent with large step size on two-layer matrix factorisation problems.



291. ❌ mlr3torch: A Deep Learning Framework in R based on mlr3 and torch

作者: Sebastian Fischer, Lukas Burk, Carson Zhang, Bernd Bischl, Martin Binder 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18152v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Deep learning (DL) has become a cornerstone of modern machine learning (ML) praxis. We introduce the R package mlr3torch, which is an extensible DL framework for the mlr3 ecosystem. It is built upon the torch package, and simplifies the definition, training, and evaluation of neural networks for both tabular data and generic tensors (e.g., images) for classification and regression. The package implements predefined architectures, and torch models can easily be converted to mlr3 learners. It also allows users to define neural networks as graphs. This representation is based on the graph language defined in mlr3pipelines and allows users to define the entire modeling workflow, including preprocessing, data augmentation, and network architecture, in a single graph. Through its integration into the mlr3 ecosystem, the package allows for convenient resampling, benchmarking, preprocessing, and more. We explain the package’s design and features and show how to customize and extend it to new problems. Furthermore, we demonstrate the package’s capabilities using three use cases, namely hyperparameter tuning, fine-tuning, and defining architectures for multimodal data. Finally, we present some runtime benchmarks.



292. ❌ Distributional Off-Policy Evaluation with Deep Quantile Process Regression

作者: Qi Kuang, Chao Wang, Yuling Jiao, Fan Zhou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18143v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

This paper investigates the off-policy evaluation (OPE) problem from a distributional perspective. Rather than focusing solely on the expectation of the total return, as in most existing OPE methods, we aim to estimate the entire return distribution. To this end, we introduce a quantile-based approach for OPE using deep quantile process regression, presenting a novel algorithm called Deep Quantile Process regression-based Off-Policy Evaluation (DQPOPE). We provide new theoretical insights into the deep quantile process regression technique, extending existing approaches that estimate discrete quantiles to estimate a continuous quantile function. A key contribution of our work is the rigorous sample complexity analysis for distributional OPE with deep neural networks, bridging theoretical analysis with practical algorithmic implementations. We show that DQPOPE achieves statistical advantages by estimating the full return distribution using the same sample size required to estimate a single policy value using conventional methods. Empirical studies further show that DQPOPE provides significantly more precise and robust policy value estimates than standard methods, thereby enhancing the practical applicability and effectiveness of distributional reinforcement learning approaches.



293. ❌ An `Inverse’ Experimental Framework to Estimate Market Efficiency

作者: Thomas Asikis, Heinrich Nax 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18130v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Digital marketplaces processing billions of dollars annually represent critical infrastructure in sociotechnical ecosystems, yet their performance optimization lacks principled measurement frameworks that can inform algorithmic governance decisions regarding market efficiency and fairness from complex market data. By looking at orderbook data from double auction markets alone, because bids and asks do not represent true maximum willingnesses to buy and true minimum willingnesses to sell, there is little an economist can say about the market’s actual performance in terms of allocative efficiency. We turn to experimental data to address this issue, `inverting’ the standard induced value approach of double auction experiments. Our aim is to predict key market features relevant to market efficiency, particularly allocative efficiency, using orderbook data only – specifically bids, asks and price realizations, but not the induced reservation values – as early as possible. Since there is no established model of strategically optimal behavior in these markets, and because orderbook data is highly unstructured, non-stationary and non-linear, we propose quantile-based normalization techniques that help us build general predictive models. We develop and train several models, including linear regressions and gradient boosting trees, leveraging quantile-based input from the underlying supply-demand model. Our models can predict allocative efficiency with reasonable accuracy from the earliest bids and asks, and these predictions improve with additional realized price data. The performance of the prediction techniques varies by target and market type. Our framework holds significant potential for application to real-world market data, offering valuable insights into market efficiency and performance, even prior to any trade realizations.



294. ❌ LoRaQ: Optimized Low Rank Approximation for 4-bit Quantization

作者: Yann Bouquet, Alireza Khodamoradi, Sophie Yáng Shen, Kristof Denolf, Mathieu Salzmann 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18117v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Post-training quantization (PTQ) is essential for deploying large diffusion transformers on resource-constrained hardware, but aggressive 4-bit quantization significantly degrades generative performance. Low-rank approximation methods have emerged as a promising solution by appending auxiliary linear branches to restore performance. However, current state-of-the-art approaches assume these branches must retain high precision (W16A16) and rely on heavy, data-dependent calibration for initialization. We challenge both limitations with LoRaQ (Low-Rank Approximated Quantization), a simple, data-free calibration approach that optimizes quantization error compensation. By overcoming the need for high-precision branches, LoRaQ enables the first fully sub-16 bit pipeline, allowing the low-rank branch itself to be quantized. We demonstrate that, at equal memory overhead, LoRaQ outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in their native implementations on Pixart-$Σ$ and SANA. We also analyze mixed-precision configurations, showing that setups such as W8A8, W6A6, and W4A8 for the low-rank branch, alongside a W4 main layer, yield superior results while maintaining a fully quantized architecture compatible with modern mixed-precision hardware.



295. ❌ Towards E-Value Based Stopping Rules for Bayesian Deep Ensembles

作者: Emanuel Sommer, Rickmer Schulte, Sarah Deubner, Julius Kobialka, David Rügamer 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18089v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Bayesian Deep Ensembles (BDEs) represent a powerful approach for uncertainty quantification in deep learning, combining the robustness of Deep Ensembles (DEs) with flexible multi-chain MCMC. While DEs are affordable in most deep learning settings, (long) sampling of Bayesian neural networks can be prohibitively costly. Yet, adding sampling after optimizing the DEs has been shown to yield significant improvements. This leaves a critical practical question: How long should the sequential sampling process continue to yield significant improvements over the initial optimized DE baseline? To tackle this question, we propose a stopping rule based on E-values. We formulate the ensemble construction as a sequential anytime-valid hypothesis test, providing a principled way to decide whether or not to reject the null hypothesis that MCMC offers no improvement over a strong baseline, to early stop the sampling. Empirically, we study this approach for diverse settings. Our results demonstrate the efficacy of our approach and reveal that only a fraction of the full-chain budget is often required.



296. ❌ Generalization Boundaries of Fine-Tuned Small Language Models for Graph Structural Inference

作者: Michal Podstawski 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18092v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Small language models fine-tuned for graph property estimation have demonstrated strong in-distribution performance, yet their generalization capabilities beyond training conditions remain poorly understood. In this work, we systematically investigate the boundaries of structural inference in fine-tuned small language models along two generalization axes - graph size and graph family distribution - and assess domain-learning capability on real-world graph benchmarks. Using a controlled experimental setup with three instruction-tuned models in the 3-4B parameter class and two graph serialization formats, we evaluate performance on graphs substantially larger than the training range and across held-out random graph families. Our results show that fine-tuned models maintain strong ordinal consistency across structurally distinct graph families and continue to rank graphs by structural properties on inputs substantially larger than those seen during training, with distinct architecture-specific degradation profiles. These findings delineate where fine-tuned small language models generalize reliably, providing empirical grounding for their use in graph-based reasoning tasks.



297. ❌ Predicting LLM Compression Degradation from Spectral Statistics

作者: Mingxue Xu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18085v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Matrix-level low-rank compression is a promising way to reduce the cost of large language models, but running compression and evaluating the resulting models on language tasks can be prohibitively expensive. Can compression-induced degradation be predicted before committing to this compute? We systematically analyze the Qwen3 and Gemma3 model families across four representative low-rank compression methods: vanilla SVD, two ASVD variants, and SVD-LLM. We find that stable rank and information density, measured in bits per parameter, dominate performance degradation. The interaction term $γ\cdot \barρ_s$, defined as compression ratio times stable rank, is a robust predictor of accuracy degradation, achieving leave-one-out cross-validation Pearson correlations of $0.890$ for attention layers and $0.839$ for MLP layers. We provide theoretical intuition for why this predictor succeeds by connecting it to standard SVD truncation bounds and error composition mechanisms in transformer layers. These findings enable a predict-then-compress workflow: compute $γ\cdot \barρ_s$ from weights, estimate degradation, and invest compute only in desirable configurations.



298. ❌ Dynamic Risk Assessment by Bayesian Attack Graphs and Process Mining

作者: Francesco Vitale, Simone Guarino, Stefano Perone, Massimiliano Rak, Nicola Mazzocca 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18080v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

While attack graphs are useful for identifying major cybersecurity threats affecting a system, they do not provide operational support for determining the likelihood of having a known vulnerability exploited, or that critical system nodes are likely to be compromised. In this paper, we perform dynamic risk assessment by combining Bayesian Attack Graphs (BAGs) and online monitoring of system behavior through process mining. Specifically, the proposed approach applies process mining techniques to characterize malicious network traffic and derive evidence regarding the probability of having a vulnerability actively exploited. This evidence is then provided to a BAG, which updates its conditional probability tables accordingly, enabling dynamic assessment of vulnerability exploitation. We apply our method to a cybersecurity testbed instantiating several machines deployed on different subnets and affected by several CVE vulnerabilities. The testbed is stimulated with both benign traffic and malicious behavior, which simulates network attack patterns aimed at exploiting the CVE vulnerabilities. The results indicate that our proposal effectively detects whether vulnerabilities are being actively exploited, allowing for an updated assessment of the probability of system compromise.



299. ❌ Towards Real-Time ECG and EMG Modeling on $μ$ NPUs

作者: Josh Millar, Ashok Samraj Thangarajan, Soumyajit Chatterjee, Hamed Haddadi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18067v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The miniaturisation of neural processing units (NPUs) and other low-power accelerators has enabled their integration into microcontroller-scale wearable hardware, supporting near-real-time, offline, and privacy-preserving inference. Yet physiological signal analysis has remained infeasible on such hardware; recent Transformer-based models show state-of-the-art performance but are prohibitively large for resource- and power-constrained hardware and incompatible with $μ$ NPUs due to their dynamic attention operations. We introduce PhysioLite, a lightweight, NPU-compatible model architecture and training framework for ECG/EMG signal analysis. Using learnable wavelet filter banks, CPU-offloaded positional encoding, and hardware-aware layer design, PhysioLite reaches performance comparable to state-of-the-art Transformer-based foundation models on ECG and EMG benchmarks, while being <10% of the size ($\sim$370KB with 8-bit quantization). We also profile its component-wise latency and resource consumption on both the MAX78000 and HX6538 WE2 $μ$ NPUs, demonstrating its viability for signal analysis on constrained, battery-powered hardware. We release our model(s) and training framework at: https://github.com/j0shmillar/physiolite.



300. ❌ Enhancing Anomaly-Based Intrusion Detection Systems with Process Mining

作者: Francesco Vitale, Francesco Grimaldi, Massimiliano Rak, Nicola Mazzocca 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18066v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Anomaly-based Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) ensure protection against malicious attacks on networked systems. While deep learning-based IDSs achieve effective performance, their limited trustworthiness due to black-box architectures remains a critical constraint. Despite existing explainable techniques offering insight into the alarms raised by IDSs, they lack process-based explanations grounded in packet-level sequencing analysis. In this paper, we propose a method that employs process mining techniques to enhance anomaly-based IDSs by providing process-based alarm severity ratings and explanations for alerts. Our method prioritizes critical alerts and maintains visibility into network behavior, while minimizing disruption by allowing misclassified benign traffic to pass. We apply the method to the publicly available USB-IDS-TC dataset, which includes anomalous traffic affected by different variants of the Slowloris DoS attack. Results show that our method is able to discriminate between low- to very-high-severity alarms while preserving up to 99.94% recall and 99.99% precision, effectively discarding false positives while providing different degrees of severity for the true positives.



301. ❌ Sonata: A Hybrid World Model for Inertial Kinematics under Clinical Data Scarcity

作者: Blaise Delaney, Salil Patel, Yuji Xing, Dominic Dootson, Karin Sevegnani 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18058v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We introduce Sonata, a compact latent world model for six-axis trunk IMU representation learning under clinical data scarcity. Clinical cohorts typically comprise tens to hundreds of patients, making web-scale masked-reconstruction objectives poorly matched to the problem. Sonata is a 3.77 M-parameter hybrid model, pre-trained on a harmonised corpus of nine public datasets (739 subjects, 190k windows) with a latent world-model objective that predicts future state rather than reconstructing raw sensor traces. In a controlled comparison against a matched autoregressive forecasting baseline (MAE) on the same backbone, Sonata yields consistently stronger frozen-probe clinical discrimination, prospective fall-risk prediction, and cross-cohort transfer across a 14-arm evaluation suite, while producing higher-rank, more structured latent representations. At 3.77 M parameters the model is compatible with on-device wearable inference, offering a step toward general kinematic world models for neurological assessment.



302. ❌ Towards a Foundation-Model Paradigm for Aerodynamic Prediction in Three-dimensional Design

作者: Yunjia Yang, Babak Gholami, Caglar Gurbuz, Mohammad Rashed, Nils Thuerey 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18062v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Accurate machine-learning models for aerodynamic prediction are essential for accelerating shape optimization, yet remain challenging to develop for complex three-dimensional configurations due to the high cost of generating training data. This work introduces a methodology for efficiently constructing accurate surrogate models for design purposes by first pre-training a large-scale model on diverse geometries and then fine-tuning it with a few more detailed task-specific samples. A Transformer-based architecture, AeroTransformer, is developed and tailored for large-scale training to learn aerodynamics. The methodology is evaluated on transonic wings, where the model is pre-trained on SuperWing, a dataset of nearly 30000 samples with broad geometric diversity, and subsequently fine-tuned to handle specific wing shapes perturbed from the Common Research Model. Results show that, with 450 task-specific samples, the proposed methodology achieves 0.36% error on surface-flow prediction, reducing 84.2% compared to training from scratch. The influence of model configurations and training strategies is also systematically studied to provide guidance on effectively training and deploying such models under limited data and computational budgets. To facilitate reuse, we release the datasets and the pre-trained models at https://github.com/tum-pbs/AeroTransformer. An interactive design tool is also built on the pre-trained model and is available online at https://webwing.pbs.cit.tum.de.



303. ❌ Variational Autoencoder Domain Adaptation for Cross-System Generalization in ML-Based SOP Monitoring

作者: Leyla Sadighi, Stefan Karlsson, Carlos Natalino, Mojtaba Eshghie, Fehmida Usmani, Eoin Kenny, Lena Wosinska, Paolo Monti, Marija Furdek, Marco Ruffini 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18035v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Machine learning (ML) models trained to detect physical-layer threats on one optical fiber system often fail catastrophically when applied to a different system, due to variations in operating wavelength, fiber properties, and network architecture. To overcome this, we propose a Domain Adaptation (DA) framework based on a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) that learns a shared representation capturing event signatures common to both systems while suppressing system-specific differences. The shared encoder is first trained on the combined data from two distinct optical systems: a 21 km O-band dark-fiber testbed (System 1) and a 63.4 km C-band live metro ring (System 2). The encoder is then frozen, and a classifier is trained using labels from an individual system. The proposed approach achieves 95.3% and 73.5% cross-system accuracy when moving from System 1 to System 2 and vice versa, respectively. This corresponds to gains of 83.4% and 51% over a fully supervised Deep Neural Network (DNN) baseline trained on a single system, while preserving intra-system performance.



304. ❌ Clusterability-Based Assessment of Potentially Noisy Views for Multi-View Clustering

作者: Mudi Jiang, Jiahui Zhou, Xinying Liu, Zengyou He, Zhikui Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18024v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In multi-view clustering, the quality of different views may vary substantially, and low-quality or degraded views can impair overall clustering performance. However, existing studies mainly address this issue within the clustering process through view weighting or noise-robust optimization, while paying limited attention to data-level assessment before clustering. In this paper, we study the problem of pre-clustering noisy-view analysis in multi-view data from a clusterability perspective. To this end, we propose a Multi-View Clusterability Score (MVCS), which quantifies the strength of latent cluster-related structures in multi-view data through three complementary components: per-view structural clusterability, joint-space clusterability, and cross-view neighborhood consistency. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clusterability score specifically designed for multi-view data. We further use it to perform potentially noisy view analysis and noisy-view detection before clustering. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that noisy views can significantly degrade clustering performance, and that, compared with existing clusterability measures designed for single-view data, the proposed method more effectively supports noisy-view analysis and detection.



305. ❌ Boltzmann Machine Learning with a Parallel, Persistent Markov chain Monte Carlo method for Estimating Evolutionary Fields and Couplings from a Protein Multiple Sequence Alignment

作者: Sanzo Miyazawa 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18022v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The inverse Potts problem for estimating evolutionary single-site fields and pairwise couplings in homologous protein sequences from their single-site and pairwise amino acid frequencies observed in their multiple sequence alignment would be still one of useful methods in the studies of protein structure and evolution. Since the reproducibility of fields and couplings are the most important, the Boltzmann machine method is employed here, although it is computationally intensive. In order to reduce computational time required for the Boltzmann machine, parallel, persistent Markov chain Monte Carlo method is employed to estimate the single-site and pairwise marginal distributions in each learning step. Also, stochastic gradient descent methods are used to reduce computational time for each learning. Another problem is how to adjust the values of hyperparameters; there are two regularization parameters for evolutionary fields and couplings. The precision of contact residue pair prediction is often used to adjust the hyperparameters. However, it is not sensitive to these regularization parameters. Here, they are adjusted for the fields and couplings to satisfy a specific condition that is appropriate for protein conformations. This method has been applied to eight protein families.



306. ❌ Neural Shape Operator Surrogates – Expression Rate Bounds

作者: Helmut Harbrecht, Christoph Schwab 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18012v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We prove error bounds for operator surrogates of solution operators for partial differential and boundary integral equations on families of domains which are diffeomorphic to one common reference (or latent) domain $D_{ref}$. The pullback of the PDE to $D_{ref}$ via affine-parametric shape encoding produces a collection of holomorphic parametric PDEs on $D_{ref}$. Sufficient conditions for (uniformly with respect to the parameter) well-posedness are given, implying existence, uniqueness and stability of parametric solution families on $D_{ref}$. We illustrate the abstract hypotheses by reviewing recent holomorphy results for a suite of elliptic and parabolic PDEs. Quantified parametric holomorphy implies existence of finite-parametric, discrete approximations of the parametric solution families with convergence rates in terms of the number $N$ of parameters. We obtain constructive proofs of existence of Neural and Spectral Operator surrogates for the shape-to-solution maps with error bounds and convergence rate guarantees uniform on the collection of admissible shapes. We admit principal-component shape encoders and frame decoders. Our results support in particular the (empirically reported) ability of neural operators to realize data-to-solution maps for elliptic and parabolic PDEs and BIEs that generalize across parametric families of shapes.



307. ❌ Neural Garbage Collection: Learning to Forget while Learning to Reason

作者: Michael Y. Li, Jubayer Ibn Hamid, Emily B. Fox, Noah D. Goodman 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18002v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Chain-of-thought reasoning has driven striking advances in language model capability, yet every reasoning step grows the KV cache, creating a bottleneck to scaling this paradigm further. Current approaches manage these constraints on the model’s behalf using hand-designed criteria. A more scalable approach would let end-to-end learning subsume this design choice entirely, following a broader pattern in deep learning. After all, if a model can learn to reason, why can’t it learn to forget? We introduce Neural Garbage Collection (NGC), in which a language model learns to forget while learning to reason, trained end-to-end from outcome-based task reward alone. As the model reasons, it periodically pauses, decides which KV cache entries to evict, and continues to reason conditioned on the remaining cache. By treating tokens in a chain-of-thought and cache-eviction decisions as discrete actions sampled from the language model, we can use reinforcement learning to jointly optimize how the model reasons and how it manages its own memory: what the model evicts shapes what it remembers, what it remembers shapes its reasoning, and the correctness of that reasoning determines its reward. Crucially, the model learns this behavior entirely from a single learning signal - the outcome-based task reward - without supervised fine-tuning or proxy objectives. On Countdown, AMC, and AIME tasks, NGC maintains strong accuracy relative to the full-cache upper bound at 2-3x peak KV cache size compression and substantially outperforms eviction baselines. Our results are a first step towards a broader vision where end-to-end optimization drives both capability and efficiency in language models.



308. ❌ Causally-Constrained Probabilistic Forecasting for Time-Series Anomaly Detection

作者: Pooyan Khosravinia, João Gama, Bruno Veloso 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17998v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Anomaly detection in multivariate time series is a central challenge in industrial monitoring, as failures frequently arise from complex temporal dynamics and cross-sensor interactions. While recent deep learning models, including graph neural networks and Transformers, have demonstrated strong empirical performance, most approaches remain primarily correlational and offer limited support for causal interpretation and root-cause localization. This study introduces a causally-constrained probabilistic forecasting framework which is a Causally Guided Transformer (CGT) model for multivariate time-series anomaly detection, integrating an explicit time-lagged causal graph prior with deep sequence modeling. For each target variable, a dedicated forecasting block employs a hard parent mask derived from causal discovery to restrict the main prediction pathway to graph-supported causes, while a latent Gaussian head captures predictive uncertainty. To leverage residual correlational information without compromising the causal representation, a shadow auxiliary path with stop-gradient isolation and a safety-gated blending mechanism is incorporated to suppress non-causal contributions when reliability is low. Anomalies are identified using negative log-likelihood scores with adaptive streaming thresholding, and root-cause variables are determined through per-dimension probabilistic attribution and counterfactual clamping. Experiments on the ASD and SMD benchmarks indicate that the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art detection performance, with F1-scores of 96.19% on ASD and 95.32% on SMD, and enhances variable-level attribution quality. These findings suggest that causal structural priors can improve both robustness and interpretability in detecting deep anomalies in multivariate sensor systems.



309. ❌ Online Conformal Prediction with Adversarial Semi-bandit Feedback via Regret Minimization

作者: Junyoung Yang, Kyungmin Kim, Sangdon Park 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17984v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Uncertainty quantification is crucial in safety-critical systems, where decisions must be made under uncertainty. In particular, we consider the problem of online uncertainty quantification, where data points arrive sequentially. Online conformal prediction is a principled online uncertainty quantification method that dynamically constructs a prediction set at each time step. While existing methods for online conformal prediction provide long-run coverage guarantees without any distributional assumptions, they typically assume a full feedback setting in which the true label is always observed. In this paper, we propose a novel learning method for online conformal prediction with partial feedback from an adaptive adversary-a more challenging setup where the true label is revealed only when it lies inside the constructed prediction set. Specifically, we formulate online conformal prediction as an adversarial bandit problem by treating each candidate prediction set as an arm. Building on an existing algorithm for adversarial bandits, our method achieves a long-run coverage guarantee by explicitly establishing its connection to the regret of the learner. Finally, we empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in both independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) and non-i.i.d. settings, showing that it successfully controls the miscoverage rate while maintaining a reasonable size of the prediction set.



310. ❌ Care Trajectories Are Linked to Mental Health and Mortality in Cancer Patients

作者: Simon D. Lindner, Elisabeth L. Zeilinger, Amelie Fuchs, Simone Lubowitzki, Alexander Gaiger, Peter Klimek 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18431v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Treatment of cancer involves heterogeneous, complex care pathways. The relationship between these longitudinal trajectories, baseline mental health, and prognostic outcomes remains poorly understood. We introduce an interpretable time-analysis framework leveraging these temporal dynamics, analyzing care patterns spanning up to 37 years for >8,000 patients. Using Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) and Hierarchical Clustering on sequence data of healthcare encounters, we identified nine distinct, robust trajectory phenotypes. We evaluated their prognostic utility by incorporating them into generalized linear models alongside conventional clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic covariates. The trajectory clusters significantly enhanced mortality prediction and maintained independent predictive significance. Compared to a low-utilization reference group (mortality 31.5%), all eight remaining clusters exhibited substantially higher mortality odds. We uncovered two primary high-risk trajectory patterns: long-term, complex care pathways reflecting chronic disease courses (up to 196 events; mortality OR up to 3.38, 95% CI 2.13-5.37), and shorter but intense trajectories indicating rapid progression (median 78 events; OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.82-2.97). Unexpectedly, the high-utilization complexity clusters were associated with significantly lower baseline anxiety scores, highlighting a divergent relationship between trajectory intensity, mortality risk, and initial psychological burden. These results demonstrate that incorporating temporal healthcare utilization data uncovers robust trajectory phenotypes capturing multidimensional prognostic information. This offers significant explanatory power beyond established static variables for refining risk stratification in precision oncology.



311. ❌ ToFiE, a Topology-aware Fiber Extraction workflow for 3D reconstruction of dense and heterogeneous biological fiber networks from microscopy images

作者: Risa Togo, Sara Cardona, Irène Nagle, Gijsje H. Koenderink, Behrooz Fereidoonnezhad, Mathias Peirlinck 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18230v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Fibrous networks are ubiquitous structural components in biology, spanning cellulose in plant cell walls, fibrin in blood clots, and collagen in the extracellular matrix of animal tissues. Theoretical models predict that network connectivity critically influences their mechanical behavior. However, accurately reconstructing network topology from 3D image data remains a major challenge as current segmentation methods are not designed to preserve network topology and often rely on intensity-based thresholding, which can fragment fibers and distort junction connectivity. Here, we introduce ToFiE, an open-source topology-aware fiber extraction workflow for reconstructing dense and heterogeneous fibrous networks from high resolution microscopy images while preserving connectivity in three dimensions. We validate ToFiE using synthetic fluorescence microscopy images of fiber networks with varying topologies and signal-to-noise ratios. We further demonstrate its performance by reconstructing the fiber networks of a library of collagen gels with various microstructures, imaged using confocal fluorescence microscopy. Altogether, the results establish ToFiE as a practical semi-automated framework for extracting mechanically relevant network information from imaging data across a broad range of fibrous materials.



312. ❌ 3D-DXA Cortical and Trabecular Parameters: Agreement Between Hologic Densitometers in Clinical Practice

作者: Marta I. Bracco, Jorge Malouf, Laurent Maimoun, Xavier Nogues, Jean Paul Roux, François DuBoeuf, Ludovic Humbert 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-19 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17361v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Background: Three-dimensional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry reconstructs three-dimensional maps of the proximal femur’s density distribution from standard hip scans, enabling the estimation of trabecular and cortical bone parameters. The aim of this study was to assess the agreement of these three-dimensional cortical and trabecular femur parameters across different series and models of Hologic densitometers. Methodology: The study cohort was composed of 103 women and men recruited from four clinical centers in Spain and France. Subjects had duplicated hip scans using different Hologic scanners from the Horizon, Discovery, and QDR4500 series. Analyses were performed using 3D-Shaper software. Inter-scanner agreement was evaluated using Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The parameters demonstrated strong inter-device agreement across all clinical centers and scanner models, with coefficients of determination greater than 0.91. Absolute biases were less than 2.5 mg$/$cm$^3$ for integral volumetric bone mineral density, less than 2.9 mg$/$cm$^3$ for trabecular volumetric bone mineral density, and less than 1.7 mg$/$cm$^2$ for cortical surface bone mineral density. No statistically significant bias was found between parameters obtained from different scanners. Furthermore, the observed bias was lower than the expected least significant change, indicating that inter-scanner variability across these devices is not clinically significant. Conclusions: This study demonstrated excellent agreement for standard and three-dimensional derived bone parameters at the hip across Hologic densitometers. These findings support their suitability for clinical use.



313. ❌ ProtoCycle: Reflective Tool-Augmented Planning for Text-Guided Protein Design

作者: Yutang Ge, Guojiang Zhao, Sihang Li, Zheng Cheng, Zifeng Zhao, Hanchen Xia, Guolin Ke, Linfeng Zhang, Zhifeng Gao, Yuguang Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-18 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16896v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Designing proteins that satisfy natural language functional requirements is a central goal in protein engineering. A straightforward baseline is to fine-tune generic instruction-tuned LLMs as direct text-to-sequence generators, but this is data- and compute-hungry. With limited supervision, LLMs can produce coherent plans in text yet fail to reliably realize them as sequences. This plan-execute gap motivates ProtoCycle, an agentic framework for protein design that uses LLMs primarily to drive a multi-round, feedback-driven decision cycle. ProtoCycle couples an LLM planner with a lightweight tool environment designed to emulate the iterative workflow of human protein engineering and uses LLM-driven reflection on tool feedback to revise plans. Trained with supervised trajectories and online reinforcement learning, ProtoCycle achieves strong language alignment while maintaining competitive foldability, and ablations show that reflection substantially improves sequence quality.



314. ❌ Applications of deep generative models to DNA reaction kinetics and to cryogenic electron microscopy

作者: Chenwei Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-18 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16851v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

This dissertation explores how deep generative models can advance the analysis of challenging biological problems by integrating domain knowledge with deep learning. It focuses on two areas: DNA reaction kinetics and cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM). In the first part, we present ViDa, a biophysics-informed framework leveraging variational autoencoders (VAEs) and geometric scattering transforms to generate biophysically-plausible embeddings of DNA reaction kinetics simulations. These embeddings are reduced to a two-dimensional space to visualize DNA hybridization and toehold-mediated strand displacement reactions. ViDa preserves structure and clusters trajectory ensembles into reaction pathways, making simulation results more interpretable and revealing new mechanistic insights. In the second part, we address key challenges in cryo-EM density map interpretation and protein structure modeling. We provide a comprehensive review and benchmarking of deep learning methods for atomic model building, with improved evaluation metrics and practical guidance. We then present Struc2mapGAN, a generative adversarial network that synthesizes high-fidelity experimental-like cryo-EM density maps from protein structures. Finally, we present CryoSAMU, a structure-aware multimodal U-Net that enhances intermediate-resolution cryo-EM maps by integrating density features with structural embeddings from protein language models via cross-attention. Overall, these contributions demonstrate the potential of deep generative models to interpret DNA reaction mechanisms and advance cryo-EM density map analysis and protein structure modeling.



315. ❌ Disorder-induced non-Gaussian states in large ensembles of cavity-coupled molecules

作者: R. Schwengelbeck, M. Pandini, R. Daraban, J. Schachenmayer 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18456v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We analyze vibrational dynamics in a toy model for polaritonic chemistry under collective electronic strong coupling. In a Holstein-Tavis-Cummings model, incoherently excited by a photon, we show that disorder leads to non-Gaussian states of vibrational modes on short time scales at the single-molecule level. Using exact matrix product state simulations, we demonstrate that this effect can remain robust for larger molecule numbers, implying that nuclear wave packets cannot be effectively described by thermal states. Furthermore, we compare simulations of the exact quantum dynamics with semiclassical approximations. We find that the Ehrenfest approximation can only well reproduce ensemble-averaged observables for very large system sizes. Also simulations in the truncated Wigner approximation fail to capture the non-Gaussian effects. Our work highlights the importance of disorder and genuine quantum effects in cavity-modified nuclear dynamics in polaritonic chemistry.



316. ❌ Shannon and Rényi entropies of molecular densities: insights into extensivity and the incomplete description of electron correlation

作者: Diogo J. L. Rodrigues, Evelio Francisco, Ángel Martín Pendás 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18081v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In this work, we investigate the reliability of information-theoretic measures based on the electron-density and shape-function, specifically Shannon and Rényi entropies, as descriptors of electronic correlation. By establishing a rigorous decomposition of these entropic measures into additive and nonadditive contributions, supported on a Mulliken-like atomic partition of molecules, we systematically analyze the asymptotic behavior of the entropies at the infinite-internuclear-distance limit to assess the problem of static correlation and extensivity. Our algebraic and numerical analysis reveals several flaws in the use of these density-based descriptors. We demonstrate that for minimal-basis and different theoretical levels, the Shannon and Rényi entropies fail to encode the amount of static correlation conveyed by the underlying wavefunction. Conversely, shape-function Shannon entropies and Rényi entropies (for $α\neq 1$) violate extensivity. In larger basis sets, uncorrelated Hartree-Fock densities consistently overestimate entropy compared to sufficiently correlated (e.g., full-valence-CAS) densities. Moreover, the entropies for insufficiently correlated methods violate extensivity. These findings indicate that electron-density-based measures are insufficient for capturing static correlation, suggesting that robust entropic descriptors should be constructed from higher-dimensional Hilbert-space objects.



317. ❌ State-Averaged Quantum Algorithms for Multiconfigurational Surface Chemistry: A Benchmark on Rh@TiO2(110)

作者: Ernst Dennis Lægteskov Binau Larsson, Erik Kjellgren, Peter Reinholdt, Jacob Kongsted 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-20 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17925v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Accurate modeling of surface catalytic processes often requires methods capable of describing strong correlation, charge transfer, and multiple closely lying electronic states. While density functional theory remains widely used, its limitations for localized electronic states motivate the use of wavefunction-based approaches and, more recently, quantum computing algorithms. However, the performance of quantum ansätze in chemically motivated, multistate settings remains largely unexplored. Here, we benchmark state-averaged factorized unitary coupled cluster with singles and doubles (SA-fUCCSD) and the adaptive, problem-tailored ansatz (SA-ADAPT) using an embedded cluster model of NO adsorption on Rh-doped TiO2(110). The system exhibits pronounced multiconfigurational character and multiple state crossings, providing a stringent test. State-averaged CASSCF serves as a reference, and the quantum ansätze are evaluated as solvers for the corresponding CASCI problem within a fixed orbital basis. We find that SA-fUCCSD improves with increasing circuit depth but requires many parameters and shows sensitivity to initialization. In contrast, SA-ADAPT achieves near-CASSCF accuracy with significantly fewer operators. A modified operator selection scheme, incorporating multiple operators per iteration, substantially accelerates convergence. Our results demonstrate the efficiency of adaptive ansätze for multistate problems and establish a controlled benchmark for quantum algorithms in chemically motivated systems beyond minimal models.



318. ❌ Ice as a Photochemical Shield: Adsorption Energetics and Spectroscopic Modulation of Interstellar Thiocyanates HCSCN and HCSCCH in TMC-1

作者: Saptarshi G. Dastider, Amit Singh Negi, Krishnakanta Mondal, Jobin Cyriac 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-19 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17536v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The recent detections of thioformyl cyanide (HCSCN) and propynethial (HCSCCH) in TMC-1 provide critical insights into the interstellar sulfur inventory, yet their sequestration and survivability on dust grain mantles remain poorly constrained. Here, we present a computational study of the site-specific adsorption of HCSCN and HCSCCH on amorphous solid water (ASW), modelled via water clusters (H2O)n, n = 6-16, at the wB97X-D/def2-TZVP level of theory, corroborated by QTAIM topological analyses and TD-DFT vertical excitations. Our results reveal a highly heterogeneous binding environment, with desorption energies spanning 1500 to 4900 K. Strongly bound cavity sites induce significant Stark shifts in the C=S stretching modes. Crucially, while the ice matrix exerts a negligible solvatochromic shift on UV transition wavelengths, deeply bound CN-cavity configurations exhibit a pronounced hyperchromic enhancement of the oscillator strength. Implementing these site-specific parameters into the UCLCHEM gas-grain code demonstrates that these species undergo a gradual thermal desorption profile rather than a singular sublimation event. Furthermore, the hyperchromic effect establishes a Survival Paradox: while deeply trapped populations are thermodynamically shielded against thermal desorption, they simultaneously possess enhanced UV absorption cross-sections, rendering them vulnerable to photodissociation by the interstellar radiation field prior to sublimation.



319. ❌ Spin State versus Potential of Zero Charge as Predictors of Density-Dependent Oxygen Reduction in M-N-C Electrocatalysts

作者: Di Zhang, Zixun Yu, Fangzhou Liu, Yumeng Li, Jiaxiang Chen, Xun Geng, Yuan Chen, Li Wei, Hao Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-19 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17427v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Metal-site density strongly influences oxygen reduction activity and selectivity in M-N-C electrocatalysts, but the descriptors that predict these trends remain under debate. Here, we compare spin state and the potential of zero charge as predictors of density-dependent oxygen reduction behavior in Fe-N-C and Co-N-C catalysts. Using constrained-magnetization calculations combined with Landau analysis, we find that the ground-state magnetic moments vary only weakly across a broad range of metal-site densities, suggesting that magnetic descriptors alone cannot account for the pronounced performance changes. In contrast, explicit-solvent simulations reveal systematic density-dependent shifts in PZC, which alter the interfacial electric field and thereby modulate field-sensitive adsorption energetics of ORR intermediates. Incorporating these PZC shifts into a pH-field-coupled microkinetic model captures the density-dependent activity trends and reproduces the experimentally observed increase in two-electron selectivity at lower site densities under acidic conditions. Experimental PZC measurements further support the predicted trend. Together, these results show that PZC is a more effective predictor than spin state for density-dependent oxygen reduction activity and selectivity in M-N-C electrocatalysts.



320. ❌ A Chemical Space Perspective on Diastereomeric Barriers in Alkylperoxy-to-Hydroperoxyalkyl Isomerization

作者: Raghunathan Ramakrishnan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-19 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17357v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Low-temperature hydrocarbon autooxidation involves radical intermediates whose reactivity depends not only on the stereochemistry of the intermediates themselves, but also on that of the transient species encountered along the reaction path. This study offers large-scale evidence for the importance of stereochemistry in low-temperature autooxidation by propagating stereochemical information from 498 C1-C7 hydrocarbons through radical formation, $\mathrm{O_2}$ addition, and the isomerization of alkylperoxy ROO radicals to hydroperoxyalkyl QOOH radicals. The resulting dataset comprises density-functional-theory-level data for 5,356 species, including 2,324 cyclic diastereomeric transition states associated with 1,162 unique ROO -> QOOH isomerization reactions, with transition-state connectivity confirmed by intrinsic reaction coordinate analysis. Explicit stereochemical treatment reveals that diastereomeric pathways may be either degenerate or separated by more than 60 kcal/mol, with the magnitude of these differences governed by steric strain at the carbon bearing the peroxyl group. These results show that constitutionally collapsed molecular representations can systematically miss kinetically relevant reactive channels and provide a foundation for stereochemistry-aware mechanism generation, rate estimation, and predictive combustion modeling.



321. ❌ Predicting Solvation Free Energies of Molecules and Ions via First-Principles and Machine-Learning Molecular Dynamics

作者: Junting Yu, Shuo-Hui Li, Ding Pan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-18 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17076v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The solvation free energy (SFE) of molecules and ions is a fundamental property governing their solvation behavior and solubility. Molecular simulations offer a route to compute SFEs using alchemical free energy methods, such as thermodynamic integration or free energy perturbation. However, these methods suffer from the infamous end-point singularity, which leads to numerical instability when atoms approach closely, a challenge that becomes particularly acute in ab initio and machine learning molecular dynamics simulations. Here, we introduce the bubble method to calculate the SFEs of molecules and ions from first principles. Our approach avoids the end-state problem in both ab initio and machine learning molecular dynamics simulations and is applicable to molecules and ions of arbitrary shape. When calculating the SFEs of ions using periodic density functional theory, we incorporate corrections for the neutralizing background charge, spurious interactions between periodic images, and the vacuum-water interface potential. To validate our method, we successfully computed the SFEs of methane, methanol, water, and sodium ions using classical, ab initio, and machine learning molecular dynamics simulations. Importantly, our method requires no experimental inputs or empirical data. This makes it particularly well-suited for studying systems under extreme conditions, such as high pressure-temperature environments or under nanoconfinement, situations where experimental investigations are challenging and classical force fields, typically parameterized under ambient conditions, may be unreliable.



322. ❌ Effective theory of quantum phases in the dipolar planar rotor chain

作者: Estêvão V. B. de Oliveira, Muhammad Shaeer Moeed, Pierre-Nicholas Roy 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-18 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16999v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In this work, we develop a theoretical description of the collective behavior of interacting dipolar planar rotors by using time independent perturbation theory and a small angle quadratic approximation. The ground state properties for both the ordered and disordered quantum phases of the system are directly calculated and analyzed. Time-independent perturbation theory is shown to be appropriate for the disordered phase. For the ordered phase, we construct a quadratic approximation based on the stable equilibrium configurations of the dipolar ordering; we show that the inclusion of the quartic terms from the expansion of the potential energy are essential to correct the shift in the energy spectrum due to quantization ambiguities. Numerical techniques such as Exact Diagonalization and Density Matrix Renormalization Group are used for the benchmark the quality of both approximations.



323. ❌ Correlation-Converged Virtual Orbitals for Accurate and Efficient Quantum Molecular Simulations

作者: Qian Wang, Calvin Ku, Jyh-Pin Chou, Peng-Jen Chen, Alice Hu, Min-Hsiu Hsieh 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-18 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16928v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Density functional theory with plane-wave basis sets is widely employed in computational materials science, including applications to isolated molecular systems. However, the inadequate description of electron correlation remains a fundamental limitation. Accurate correlation treatments based on many-body Hamiltonians require reliable representations of both occupied and virtual orbitals, yet virtual orbitals are often poorly described in conventional computational schemes, resulting in reduced accuracy. In this work, we introduce localized correlation-converged virtual orbitals (LCCVOs) as an efficient basis for constructing accurate many-body Hamiltonians in molecular systems. Using a substantially reduced number of orbitals, the LCCVO framework yields dissociation energies for singlet, doublet, and triplet molecules that are comparable to, and in many cases exceed, those obtained with high-level correlation-consistent basis sets such as cc-pVXZ (X = D, T, Q, 5). These results demonstrate the efficiency, scalability, and robustness of the LCCVO approach for high-accuracy quantum chemical calculations.



324. ❌ Ultrafast nonadiabatic dynamics of tetraphenylsubstituted nitrogen-based heterocycles

作者: Javier Hernández-Rodríguez, Alberto Martín Santa Daría, Susana Gómez-Carrasco, Sandra Gómez 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-18 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16897v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Tetraphenylpyrazine (TPP) and 2,3,4,5-tetraphenyl-1H-pyrrole (TePP) are closely related heterocycles bearing four phenyl substituents, whose structural similarity makes them a useful pair for comparing how intramolecular flexibility influences excited-state relaxation and emission in the gas phase and in the solid state. TPP is a prototypical solid-state luminescence enhancement (SLE) emitter, exhibiting a markedly increased quantum yield upon molecular aggregation. In contrast, TePP displays similar quantum yields in solution and solid state, characteristic of dual-state emission (DSE). This behaviour indicates that intramolecular rotations are already significantly hindered in the isolated-molecule regime, consistent with our previous observations for TPP and other solid-state emitters (Hernández-Rodríguez et al., ChemPhysChem, 2024, 25, e202400563). To unravel the excited-state dynamics underlying this contrasting behaviour, we performed mixed quantum-classical trajectory simulations on a single molecule of TPP and TePP employing the surface-hopping method. Twelve singlet states were included at the TD-B3LYP-D3/def2-SVP level, which were previously benchmarked against coupled cluster methods. Simulated observables such as gas phase ultrafast electron diffraction (GUED) and time-resolved fluorescence (TR-FL) signals allow us to dissect the distinct deactivation pathways operating in both systems in the gas phase, while also providing mechanistic insight into how these pathways are expected to evolve in solution and solid-state environments.



Token 消耗统计

  • 总计: 1,406,223 tokens(输入 1,406,223 / 输出 0)