📊 ArXiv 研究报告 (2026-04-25)
生成时间: 2026-04-25 08:49:47 数据源: ArXiv
📌 配置信息
关键词列表(共 27 个,总权重 27.0)
| 关键词 | 权重 | 类型 |
|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 主要 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 主要 |
评分设置
- 每个关键词最大分: 15
- 及格分公式: 5.0 + 0.8 × 总权重
- 当前及格分: 26.6
📈 论文统计
- 总抓取: 310 篇
- 及格论文: 0 篇 (0.0%)
📋 所有论文列表
1. ❌ When Prompts Override Vision: Prompt-Induced Hallucinations in LVLMs
作者: Pegah Khayatan, Jayneel Parekh, Arnaud Dapogny, Mustafa Shukor, Alasdair Newson, Matthieu Cord 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21911v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Despite impressive progress in capabilities of large vision-language models (LVLMs), these systems remain vulnerable to hallucinations, i.e., outputs that are not grounded in the visual input. Prior work has attributed hallucinations in LVLMs to factors such as limitations of the vision backbone or the dominance of the language component, yet the relative importance of these factors remains unclear. To resolve this ambiguity, We propose HalluScope, a benchmark to better understand the extent to which different factors induce hallucinations. Our analysis indicates that hallucinations largely stem from excessive reliance on textual priors and background knowledge, especially information introduced through textual instructions. To mitigate hallucinations induced by textual instruction priors, we propose HalluVL-DPO, a framework for fine-tuning off-the-shelf LVLMs towards more visually grounded responses. HalluVL-DPO leverages preference optimization using a curated training dataset that we construct, guiding the model to prefer grounded responses over hallucinated ones. We demonstrate that our optimized model effectively mitigates the targeted hallucination failure mode, while preserving or improving performance on other hallucination benchmarks and visual capability evaluations. To support reproducibility and further research, we will publicly release our evaluation benchmark, preference training dataset, and code at https://pegah-kh.github.io/projects/prompts-override-vision/ .
2. ❌ From Research Question to Scientific Workflow: Leveraging Agentic AI for Science Automation
作者: Bartosz Balis, Michal Orzechowski, Piotr Kica, Michal Dygas, Michal Kuszewski 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21910v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Scientific workflow systems automate execution – scheduling, fault tolerance, resource management – but not the semantic translation that precedes it. Scientists still manually convert research questions into workflow specifications, a task requiring both domain knowledge and infrastructure expertise. We propose an agentic architecture that closes this gap through three layers: an LLM interprets natural language into structured intents (semantic layer); validated generators produce reproducible workflow DAGs (deterministic layer); and domain experts author ``Skills’’: markdown documents encoding vocabulary mappings, parameter constraints, and optimization strategies (knowledge layer). This decomposition confines LLM non-determinism to intent extraction: identical intents always yield identical workflows. We implement and evaluate the architecture on the 1000 Genomes population genetics workflow and Hyperflow WMS running on Kubernetes. In an ablation study on 150 queries, Skills raise full-match intent accuracy from 44% to 83%; skill-driven deferred workflow generation reduces data transfer by 92%; and the end-to-end pipeline completes queries on Kubernetes with LLM overhead below 15 seconds and cost under $0.001 per query.
3. ❌ Seeing Fast and Slow: Learning the Flow of Time in Videos
作者: Yen-Siang Wu, Rundong Luo, Jingsen Zhu, Tao Tu, Ali Farhadi, Matthew Wallingford, Yu-Chiang Frank Wang, Steve Marschner, Wei-Chiu Ma 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21931v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
How can we tell whether a video has been sped up or slowed down? How can we generate videos at different speeds? Although videos have been central to modern computer vision research, little attention has been paid to perceiving and controlling the passage of time. In this paper, we study time as a learnable visual concept and develop models for reasoning about and manipulating the flow of time in videos. We first exploit the multimodal cues and temporal structure naturally present in videos to learn, in a self-supervised manner, to detect speed changes and estimate playback speed. We then show that these learned temporal reasoning models enable us to curate the largest slow-motion video dataset to date from noisy in-the-wild sources. Such slow-motion footage, typically filmed by high-speed cameras, contains substantially richer temporal detail than standard videos. Using this data, we further develop models capable of temporal control, including speed-conditioned video generation, which produces motion at specified playback speed, and temporal super-resolution, which tranforms low-FPS, blurry videos into high-FPS sequences with fine-grained temporal details. Our findings highlight time as a manipulable, perceptual dimension in video learning, opening doors to temporally controllable video generation, temporal forensics detection, and potentially richer world-models that understand how events unfold over time.
4. ❌ GiVA: Gradient-Informed Bases for Vector-Based Adaptation
作者: Neeraj Gangwar, Rishabh Deshmukh, Michael Shavlovsky, Hancao Li, Vivek Mittal, Lexing Ying, Nickvash Kani 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21901v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
As model sizes continue to grow, parameter-efficient fine-tuning has emerged as a powerful alternative to full fine-tuning. While LoRA is widely adopted among these methods, recent research has explored vector-based adaptation methods due to their extreme parameter efficiency. However, these methods typically require substantially higher ranks than LoRA to match its performance, leading to increased training costs. This work introduces GiVA, a gradient-based initialization strategy for vector-based adaptation. It achieves training times comparable to LoRA and maintains the extreme parameter efficiency of vector-based adaptation. We evaluate GiVA across diverse benchmarks, including natural language understanding, natural language generation, and image classification. Experiments show that our approach consistently outperforms or achieves performance competitive with existing vector-based adaptation methods and LoRA while reducing rank requirements by a factor of eight ($8\times$).
5. ❌ Nemobot Games: Crafting Strategic AI Gaming Agents for Interactive Learning with Large Language Models
作者: Chee Wei Tan, Yuchen Wang, Shangxin Guo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21896v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
This paper introduces a new paradigm for AI game programming, leveraging large language models (LLMs) to extend and operationalize Claude Shannon’s taxonomy of game-playing machines. Central to this paradigm is Nemobot, an interactive agentic engineering environment that enables users to create, customize, and deploy LLM-powered game agents while actively engaging with AI-driven strategies. The LLM-based chatbot, integrated within Nemobot, demonstrates its capabilities across four distinct classes of games. For dictionary-based games, it compresses state-action mappings into efficient, generalized models for rapid adaptability. In rigorously solvable games, it employs mathematical reasoning to compute optimal strategies and generates human-readable explanations for its decisions. For heuristic-based games, it synthesizes strategies by combining insights from classical minimax algorithms (see, e.g., shannon1950chess) with crowd-sourced data. Finally, in learning-based games, it utilizes reinforcement learning with human feedback and self-critique to iteratively refine strategies through trial-and-error and imitation learning. Nemobot amplifies this framework by offering a programmable environment where users can experiment with tool-augmented generation and fine-tuning of strategic game agents. From strategic games to role-playing games, Nemobot demonstrates how AI agents can achieve a form of self-programming by integrating crowdsourced learning and human creativity to iteratively refine their own logic. This represents a step toward the long-term goal of self-programming AI.
6. ❌ A Scale-Adaptive Framework for Joint Spatiotemporal Super-Resolution with Diffusion Models
作者: Max Defez, Filippo Quarenghi, Mathieu Vrac, Stephan Mandt, Tom Beucler 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21903v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Deep-learning video super-resolution has progressed rapidly, but climate applications typically super-resolve (increase resolution) either space or time, and joint spatiotemporal models are often designed for a single pair of super-resolution (SR) factors (upscaling spatial and temporal ratio between the low-resolution sequence and the high-resolution sequence), limiting transfer across spatial resolutions and temporal cadences (frame rates). We present a scale-adaptive framework that reuses the same architecture across factors by decomposing spatiotemporal SR into a deterministic prediction of the conditional mean, with attention, and a residual conditional diffusion model, with an optional mass-conservation (same precipitation amount in inputs and outputs) transform to preserve aggregated totals. Assuming that larger SR factors primarily increase underdetermination (hence required context and residual uncertainty) rather than changing the conditional-mean structure, scale adaptivity is achieved by retuning three factor-dependent hyperparameters before retraining: the diffusion noise schedule amplitude beta (larger for larger factors to increase diversity), the temporal context length L (set to maintain comparable attention horizons across cadences) and optionally a third, the mass-conservation function f (tapered to limit the amplification of extremes for large factors). Demonstrated on reanalysis precipitation over France (Comephore), the same architecture spans super-resolution factors from 1 to 25 in space and 1 to 6 in time, yielding a reusable architecture and tuning recipe for joint spatiotemporal super-resolution across scales.
7. ❌ A Multi-Stage Warm-Start Deep Learning Framework for Unit Commitment
作者: Muhy Eddin Za’ter, Anna Van Boven, Bri-Mathias Hodge, Kyri Baker 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21891v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Maintaining instantaneous balance between electricity supply and demand is critical for reliability and grid instability. System operators achieve this through solving the task of Unit Commitment (UC),ca high dimensional large-scale Mixed-integer Linear Programming (MILP) problem that is strictly and heavily governed by the grid physical constraints. As grid integrate variable renewable sources, and new technologies such as long duration storage in the grid, UC must be optimally solved for multi-day horizons and potentially with greater frequency. Therefore, traditional MILP solvers increasingly struggle to compute solutions within these tightening operational time limits. To bypass these computational bottlenecks, this paper proposes a novel framework utilizing a transformer-based architecture to predict generator commitment schedules over a 72-hour horizon. Also, because raw predictions in highly dimensional spaces often yield physically infeasible results, the pipeline integrates the self-attention network with deterministic post-processing heuristics that systematically enforce minimum up/down times and minimize excess capacity. Finally, these refined predictions are utilized as a warm start for a downstream MILP solver, while employing a confidence-based variable fixation strategy to drastically reduce the combinatorial search space. Validated on a single-bus test system, the complete multi-stage pipeline achieves 100% feasibility and significantly accelerates computation times. Notably, in approximately 20% of test instances, the proposed model reached a feasible operational schedule with a lower overall system cost than relying solely on the solver.
8. ❌ TingIS: Real-time Risk Event Discovery from Noisy Customer Incidents at Enterprise Scale
作者: Jun Wang, Ziyin Zhang, Rui Wang, Hang Yu, Peng Di, Rui Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21889v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Real-time detection and mitigation of technical anomalies are critical for large-scale cloud-native services, where even minutes of downtime can result in massive financial losses and diminished user trust. While customer incidents serve as a vital signal for discovering risks missed by monitoring, extracting actionable intelligence from this data remains challenging due to extreme noise, high throughput, and semantic complexity of diverse business lines. In this paper, we present TingIS, an end-to-end system designed for enterprise-grade incident discovery. At the core of TingIS is a multi-stage event linking engine that synergizes efficient indexing techniques with Large Language Models (LLMs) to make informed decisions on event merging, enabling the stable extraction of actionable incidents from just a handful of diverse user descriptions. This engine is complemented by a cascaded routing mechanism for precise business attribution and a multi-dimensional noise reduction pipeline that integrates domain knowledge, statistical patterns, and behavioral filtering. Deployed in a production environment handling a peak throughput of over 2,000 messages per minute and 300,000 messages per day, TingIS achieves a P90 alert latency of 3.5 minutes and a 95% discovery rate for high-priority incidents. Benchmarks constructed from real-world data demonstrate that TingIS significantly outperforms baseline methods in routing accuracy, clustering quality, and Signal-to-Noise Ratio.
9. ❌ A Multimodal Text- and Graph-Based Approach for Open-Domain Event Extraction from Documents
作者: Praval Sharma 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21885v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Event extraction is essential for event understanding and analysis. It supports tasks such as document summarization and decision-making in emergency scenarios. However, existing event extraction approaches have limitations: (1) closed-domain algorithms are restricted to predefined event types and thus rarely generalize to unseen types and (2) open-domain event extraction algorithms, capable of handling unconstrained event types, have largely overlooked the potential of large language models (LLMs) despite their advanced abilities. Additionally, they do not explicitly model document-level contextual, structural, and semantic reasoning, which are crucial for effective event extraction but remain challenging for LLMs due to lost-in-the-middle phenomenon and attention dilution. To address these limitations, we propose multimodal open-domain event extraction, MODEE , a novel approach for open-domain event extraction that combines graph-based learning with text-based representation from LLMs to model document-level reasoning. Empirical evaluations on large datasets demonstrate that MODEE outperforms state-of-the-art open-domain event extraction approaches and can be generalized to closed-domain event extraction, where it outperforms existing algorithms.
10. ❌ Addressing Image Authenticity When Cameras Use Generative AI
作者: Umar Masud, Abhijith Punnappurath, Luxi Zhao, David B. Lindell, Michael S. Brown 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21879v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The ability of generative AI (GenAI) methods to photorealistically alter camera images has raised awareness about the authenticity of images shared online. Interestingly, images captured directly by our cameras are considered authentic and faithful. However, with the increasing integration of deep-learning modules into cameras’ capture-time hardware – namely, the image signal processor (ISP) – there is now a potential for hallucinated content in images directly output by our cameras. Hallucinated capture-time image content is typically benign, such as enhanced edges or texture, but in certain operations, such as AI-based digital zoom or low-light image enhancement, hallucinations can potentially alter the semantics and interpretation of the image content. As a result, users may not realize that the content in their camera images is not authentic. This paper addresses this issue by enabling users to recover the ‘unhallucinated’ version of the camera image to avoid misinterpretation of the image content. Our approach works by optimizing an image-specific multi-layer perceptron (MLP) decoder together with a modality-specific encoder so that, given the camera image, we can recover the image before hallucinated content was added. The encoder and MLP are self-contained and can be applied post-capture to the image without requiring access to the camera ISP. Moreover, the encoder and MLP decoder require only 180 KB of storage and can be readily saved as metadata within standard image formats such as JPEG and HEIC.
11. ❌ Replay-buffer engineering for noise-robust quantum circuit optimization
作者: Akash Kundu, Sebastian Feld 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21863v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) for quantum circuit optimization faces three fundamental bottlenecks: replay buffers that ignore the reliability of temporal-difference (TD) targets, curriculum-based architecture search that triggers a full quantum-classical evaluation at every environment step, and the routine discard of noiseless trajectories when retraining under hardware noise. We address all three by treating the replay buffer as a primary algorithmic lever for quantum optimization. We introduce ReaPER$+$, an annealed replay rule that transitions from TD error-driven prioritization early in training to reliability-aware sampling as value estimates mature, achieving $4-32\times$ gains in sample efficiency over fixed PER, ReaPER, and uniform replay while consistently discovering more compact circuits across quantum compilation and QAS benchmarks; validation on LunarLander-v3 confirms the principle is domain-agnostic. Furthermore we eliminate the quantum-classical evaluation bottleneck in curriculum RL by introducing OptCRLQAS which amortizes expensive evaluations over multiple architectural edits, cutting wall-clock time per episode by up to $67.5%$ on a 12-qubit optimization problem without degrading solution quality. Finally we introduce a lightweight replay-buffer transfer scheme that warm-starts noisy-setting learning by reusing noiseless trajectories, without network-weight transfer or $ε$-greedy pretraining. This reduces steps to chemical accuracy by up to $85-90%$ and final energy error by up to $90%$ over from-scratch baselines on 6-, 8-, and 12-qubit molecular tasks. Together, these results establish that experience storage, sampling, and transfer are decisive levers for scalable, noise-robust quantum circuit optimization.
12. ❌ Transient Turn Injection: Exposing Stateless Multi-Turn Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models
作者: Naheed Rayhan, Sohely Jahan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21860v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into sensitive workflows, raising the stakes for adversarial robustness and safety. This paper introduces Transient Turn Injection(TTI), a new multi-turn attack technique that systematically exploits stateless moderation by distributing adversarial intent across isolated interactions. TTI leverages automated attacker agents powered by large language models to iteratively test and evade policy enforcement in both commercial and open-source LLMs, marking a departure from conventional jailbreak approaches that typically depend on maintaining persistent conversational context. Our extensive evaluation across state-of-the-art models-including those from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, Meta, and prominent open-source alternatives-uncovers significant variations in resilience to TTI attacks, with only select architectures exhibiting substantial inherent robustness. Our automated blackbox evaluation framework also uncovers previously unknown model specific vulnerabilities and attack surface patterns, especially within medical and high stakes domains. We further compare TTI against established adversarial prompting methods and detail practical mitigation strategies, such as session level context aggregation and deep alignment approaches. Our study underscores the urgent need for holistic, context aware defenses and continuous adversarial testing to future proof LLM deployments against evolving multi-turn threats.
13. ❌ Bounding the Black Box: A Statistical Certification Framework for AI Risk Regulation
作者: Natan Levy, Gadi Perl 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21854v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Artificial intelligence now decides who receives a loan, who is flagged for criminal investigation, and whether an autonomous vehicle brakes in time. Governments have responded: the EU AI Act, the NIST Risk Management Framework, and the Council of Europe Convention all demand that high-risk systems demonstrate safety before deployment. Yet beneath this regulatory consensus lies a critical vacuum: none specifies what ``acceptable risk’’ means in quantitative terms, and none provides a technical method for verifying that a deployed system actually meets such a threshold. The regulatory architecture is in place; the verification instrument is not. This gap is not theoretical. As the EU AI Act moves into full enforcement, developers face mandatory conformity assessments without established methodologies for producing quantitative safety evidence - and the systems most in need of oversight are opaque statistical inference engines that resist white-box scrutiny. This paper provides the missing instrument. Drawing on the aviation certification paradigm, we propose a two-stage framework that transforms AI risk regulation into engineering practice. In Stage One, a competent authority formally fixes an acceptable failure probability $δ$ and an operational input domain $\varepsilon$ - a normative act with direct civil liability implications. In Stage Two, the RoMA and gRoMA statistical verification tools compute a definitive, auditable upper bound on the system’s true failure rate, requiring no access to model internals and scaling to arbitrary architectures. We demonstrate how this certificate satisfies existing regulatory obligations, shifts accountability upstream to developers, and integrates with the legal frameworks that exist today.
14. ❌ TraceScope: Interactive URL Triage via Decoupled Checklist Adjudication
作者: Haolin Zhang, William Reber, Yuxuan Zhang, Guofei Gu, Jeff Huang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21840v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Modern phishing campaigns increasingly evade snapshot-based URL classifiers using interaction gates (e.g., checkbox/slider challenges), delayed content rendering, and logo-less credential harvesters. This shifts URL triage from static classification toward an interactive forensics task: an analyst must actively navigate the page while isolating themselves from potential runtime exploits. We present TraceScope, a decoupled triage pipeline that operationalizes this workflow at scale. To prevent the observer effect and ensure safety, a sandboxed operator agent drives a real GUI browser guided by visual motivation to elicit page behavior, freezing the session into an immutable evidence bundle. Separately, an adjudicator agent circumvents LLM context limitations by querying evidence on demand to verify a MITRE ATT&CK checklist, and generates an audit-ready report with extracted indicators of compromise (IOCs) and a final verdict. Evaluated on 708 reachable URLs from existing dataset (241 verified phishing from PhishTank and 467 benign from Tranco-derived crawling), TraceScope achieves 0.94 precision and 0.78 recall, substantially improving recall over three prior visual/reference-based classifiers while producing reproducible, analyst-grade evidence suitable for review. More importantly, we manually curated a dataset of real-world phishing emails to evaluate our system in a practical setting. Our evaluation reveals that TraceScope demonstrates superior performance in a real-world scenario as well, successfully detecting sophisticated phishing attempts that current state-of-the-art defenses fail to identify.
15. ❌ Modulating Cross-Modal Convergence with Single-Stimulus, Intra-Modal Dispersion
作者: Eghbal A. Hosseini, Brian Cheung, Evelina Fedorenko, Alex H. Williams 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21836v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Neural networks exhibit a remarkable degree of representational convergence across diverse architectures, training objectives, and even data modalities. This convergence is predictive of alignment with brain representation. A recent hypothesis suggests this arises from learning the underlying structure in the environment in similar ways. However, it is unclear how individual stimuli elicit convergent representations across networks. An image can be perceived in multiple ways and expressed differently using words. Here, we introduce a methodology based on the Generalized Procrustes Algorithm to measure intra-modal representational convergence at the single-stimulus level. We applied this to vision models with distinct training objectives, selecting stimuli based on their degree of alignment (intra-modal dispersion). Crucially, we found that this intra-modal dispersion strongly modulates alignment between vision and language models (cross-modal convergence). Specifically, stimuli with low intra-modal dispersion (high agreement among vision models) elicited significantly higher cross-modal alignment than those with high dispersion, by up to a factor of two (e.g., in pairings of DINOv2 with language models). This effect was robust to stimulus selection criteria and generalized across different pairings of vision and language models. Measuring convergence at the single-stimulus level provides a path toward understanding the sources of convergence and divergence across modalities, and between neural networks and human neural representations.
16. ❌ Alignment has a Fantasia Problem
作者: Nathanael Jo, Zoe De Simone, Mitchell Gordon, Ashia Wilson 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21827v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Modern AI assistants are trained to follow instructions, implicitly assuming that users can clearly articulate their goals and the kind of assistance they need. Decades of behavioral research, however, show that people often engage with AI systems before their goals are fully formed. When AI systems treat prompts as complete expressions of intent, they can appear to be useful or convenient, but not necessarily aligned with the users’ needs. We call these failures Fantasia interactions. We argue that Fantasia interactions demand a rethinking of alignment research: rather than treating users as rational oracles, AI should provide cognitive support by actively helping users form and refine their intent through time. This requires an interdisciplinary approach that bridges machine learning, interface design, and behavioral science. We synthesize insights from these fields to characterize the mechanisms and failures of Fantasia interactions. We then show why existing interventions are insufficient, and propose a research agenda for designing and evaluating AI systems that better help humans navigate uncertainty in their tasks.
17. ❌ Tool Attention Is All You Need: Dynamic Tool Gating and Lazy Schema Loading for Eliminating the MCP/Tools Tax in Scalable Agentic Workflows
作者: Anuj Sadani, Deepak Kumar 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21816v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has become a common interface for connecting large language model (LLM) agents to external tools, but its reliance on stateless, eager schema injection imposes a hidden per-turn overhead the MCP Tax or Tools Tax that practitioner reports place between roughly 10k and 60k tokens in typical multi-server deployments. This payload inflates the key-value cache, is associated with reasoning degradation as context utilization approaches published fracture points around 70%, and turns token budgets into a recurring operational cost. We introduce Tool Attention, a middleware-layer mechanism that generalizes the “Attention Is All You Need” paradigm from self-attention over tokens to gated attention over tools. Tool Attention combines (i) an Intent Schema Overlap (ISO) score from sentence embeddings, (ii) a state-aware gating function enforcing preconditions and access scopes, and (iii) a two-phase lazy schema loader that keeps a compact summary pool in context and promotes full JSON schemas only for top-k gated tools. We evaluate on a simulated 120-tool, six-server benchmark whose per-server token counts are calibrated to public audits of real MCP deployments. In this simulation, Tool Attention directly reduces measured per-turn tool tokens by 95.0% (47.3k -> 2.4k) and raises effective context utilization (a token-ratio quantity) from 24% to 91%. End-to-end figures for task success, latency, cost, and reasoning quality are reported as projections derived from the measured token counts combined with published deployment telemetry; they are not measured on live LLM agents, and we mark projected values explicitly throughout. Taken together, the results support a simple thesis: protocol-level efficiency, not raw context length, is a binding constraint on scalable gentic systems. The code for this work is accessible at https://github.com/asadani/tool-attention
18. ❌ Divide-then-Diagnose: Weaving Clinician-Inspired Contexts for Ultra-Long Capsule Endoscopy Videos
作者: Bowen Liu, Li Yang, Shanshan Song, Mingyu Tang, Zhifang Gao, Qifeng Chen, Yangqiu Song, Huimin Chen, Xiaomeng Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21814v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Capsule endoscopy (CE) enables non-invasive gastrointestinal screening, but current CE research remains largely limited to frame-level classification and detection, leaving video-level analysis underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce and formally define a new task, diagnosis-driven CE video summarization, which requires extracting key evidence frames that covers clinically meaningful findings and making accurate diagnoses from those evidence frames. This setting is challenging because diagnostically relevant events are extremely sparse and can be overwhelmed by tens of thousands of redundant normal frames, while individual observations are often ambiguous due to motion blur, debris, specular highlights, and rapid viewpoint changes. To facilitate research in this direction, we introduce VideoCAP, the first CE dataset with diagnosis-driven annotations derived from real clinical reports. VideoCAP comprises 240 full-length videos and provides realistic supervision for both key evidence frame extraction and diagnosis. To address this task, we further propose DiCE, a clinician-inspired framework that mirrors the standard CE reading workflow. DiCE first performs efficient candidate screening over the raw video, then uses a Context Weaver to organize candidates into coherent diagnostic contexts that preserve distinct lesion events, and an Evidence Converger to aggregate multi-frame evidence within each context into robust clip-level judgments. Experiments show that DiCE consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, producing concise and clinically reliable diagnostic summaries. These results highlight diagnosis-driven contextual reasoning as a promising paradigm for ultra-long CE video summarization.
19. ❌ Probably Approximately Consensus: On the Learning Theory of Finding Common Ground
作者: Carter Blair, Ben Armstrong, Shiri Alouf-Heffetz, Nimrod Talmon, Davide Grossi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21811v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
A primary goal of online deliberation platforms is to identify ideas that are broadly agreeable to a community of users through their expressed preferences. Yet, consensus elicitation should ideally extend beyond the specific statements provided by users and should incorporate the relative salience of particular topics. We address this issue by modelling consensus as an interval in a one-dimensional opinion space derived from potentially high-dimensional data via embedding and dimensionality reduction. We define an objective that maximizes expected agreement within a hypothesis interval where the expectation is over an underlying distribution of issues, implicitly taking into account their salience. We propose an efficient Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) algorithm and establish PAC-learning guarantees. Our initial experiments demonstrate the performance of our algorithm and examine more efficient approaches to identifying optimal consensus regions. We find that through selectively querying users on an existing sample of statements, we can reduce the number of queries needed to a practical number.
20. ❌ Quotient-Space Diffusion Models
作者: Yixian Xu, Yusong Wang, Shengjie Luo, Kaiyuan Gao, Tianyu He, Di He, Chang Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21809v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Diffusion-based generative models have reformed generative AI, and have enabled new capabilities in the science domain, for example, generating 3D structures of molecules. Due to the intrinsic problem structure of certain tasks, there is often a symmetry in the system, which identifies objects that can be converted by a group action as equivalent, hence the target distribution is essentially defined on the quotient space with respect to the group. In this work, we establish a formal framework for diffusion modeling on a general quotient space, and apply it to molecular structure generation which follows the special Euclidean group $\text{SE}(3)$ symmetry. The framework reduces the necessity of learning the component corresponding to the group action, hence simplifies learning difficulty over conventional group-equivariant diffusion models, and the sampler guarantees recovering the target distribution, while heuristic alignment strategies lack proper samplers. The arguments are empirically validated on structure generation for small molecules and proteins, indicating that the principled quotient-space diffusion model provides a new framework that outperforms previous symmetry treatments.
21. ❌ SyMTRS: Benchmark Multi-Task Synthetic Dataset for Depth, Domain Adaptation and Super-Resolution in Aerial Imagery
作者: Safouane El Ghazouali, Nicola Venturi, Michael Rueegsegger, Umberto Michelucci 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21801v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Recent advances in deep learning for remote sensing rely heavily on large annotated datasets, yet acquiring high-quality ground truth for geometric, radiometric, and multi-domain tasks remains costly and often infeasible. In particular, the lack of accurate depth annotations, controlled illumination variations, and multi-scale paired imagery limits progress in monocular depth estimation, domain adaptation, and super-resolution for aerial scenes. We present SyMTRS, a large-scale synthetic dataset generated using a high-fidelity urban simulation pipeline. The dataset provides high-resolution RGB aerial imagery (2048 x 2048), pixel-perfect depth maps, night-time counterparts for domain adaptation, and aligned low-resolution variants for super-resolution at x2, x4, and x8 scales. Unlike existing remote sensing datasets that focus on a single task or modality, SyMTRS is designed as a unified multi-task benchmark enabling joint research in geometric understanding, cross-domain robustness, and resolution enhancement. We describe the dataset generation process, its statistical properties, and its positioning relative to existing benchmarks. SyMTRS aims to bridge critical gaps in remote sensing research by enabling controlled experiments with perfect geometric ground truth and consistent multi-domain supervision. The results obtained in this work can be reproduced from this Github repository: https://github.com/safouaneelg/SyMTRS.
22. ❌ Inferring High-Level Events from Timestamped Data: Complexity and Medical Applications
作者: Yvon K. Awuklu, Meghyn Bienvenu, Katsumi Inoue, Vianney Jouhet, Fleur Mougin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21793v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
In this paper, we develop a novel logic-based approach to detecting high-level temporally extended events from timestamped data and background knowledge. Our framework employs logical rules to capture existence and termination conditions for simple temporal events and to combine these into meta-events. In the medical domain, for example, disease episodes and therapies are inferred from timestamped clinical observations, such as diagnoses and drug administrations stored in patient records, and can be further combined into higher-level disease events. As some incorrect events might be inferred, we use constraints to identify incompatible combinations of events and propose a repair mechanism to select preferred consistent sets of events. While reasoning in the full framework is intractable, we identify relevant restrictions that ensure polynomial-time data complexity. Our prototype system implements core components of the approach using answer set programming. An evaluation on a lung cancer use case supports the interest of the approach, both in terms of computational feasibility and positive alignment of our results with medical expert opinions. While strongly motivated by the needs of the healthcare domain, our framework is purposely generic, enabling its reuse in other areas.
23. ❌ Who Defines “Best”? Towards Interactive, User-Defined Evaluation of LLM Leaderboards
作者: Minji Jung, Minjae Lee, Yejin Kim, Sarang Choi, Minsuk Kahng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21769v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
LLM leaderboards are widely used to compare models and guide deployment decisions. However, leaderboard rankings are shaped by evaluation priorities set by benchmark designers, rather than by the diverse goals and constraints of actual users and organizations. A single aggregate score often obscures how models behave across different prompt types and compositions. In this work, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the dataset used in the LMArena (formerly Chatbot Arena) benchmark and investigate this evaluation challenge by designing an interactive visualization interface as a design probe. Our analysis reveals that the dataset is heavily skewed toward certain topics, that model rankings vary across prompt slices, and that preference-based judgments are used in ways that blur their intended scope. Building on this analysis, we introduce a visualization interface that allows users to define their own evaluation priorities by selecting and weighting prompt slices and to explore how rankings change accordingly. A qualitative study suggests that this interactive approach improves transparency and supports more context-specific model evaluation, pointing toward alternative ways to design and use LLM leaderboards.
24. ❌ Learning to Communicate: Toward End-to-End Optimization of Multi-Agent Language Systems
作者: Ye Yu, Heming Liu, Haibo Jin, Xiaopeng Yuan, Peng Kuang, Haohan Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21794v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Multi-agent systems built on large language models have shown strong performance on complex reasoning tasks, yet most work focuses on agent roles and orchestration while treating inter-agent communication as a fixed interface. Latent communication through internal representations such as key-value caches offers a promising alternative to text-based protocols, but existing approaches do not jointly optimize communication with multi-agent reasoning. Therefore we propose DiffMAS, a training framework that treats latent communication as a learnable component of multi-agent systems. DiffMAS performs parameter-efficient supervised training over multi-agent latent trajectories, enabling agents to jointly learn how information should be encoded and interpreted across interactions. Experiments on mathematical reasoning, scientific QA, code generation, and commonsense benchmarks show that DiffMAS consistently improves reasoning accuracy and decoding stability over single-agent inference, text-based multi-agent systems, and prior latent communication methods, achieving 26.7% on AIME24, 20.2% on GPQA-Diamond, and consistent gains across reasoning benchmarks.
25. ❌ Thinking with Reasoning Skills: Fewer Tokens, More Accuracy
作者: Guangxiang Zhao, Qilong Shi, Xusen Xiao, Xiangzheng Zhang, Tong Yang, Lin Sun 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21764v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Reasoning LLMs often spend substantial tokens on long intermediate reasoning traces (e.g., chain-of-thought) when solving new problems. We propose to summarize and store reusable reasoning skills distilled from extensive deliberation and trial-and-error exploration, and to retrieve these skills at inference time to guide future reasoning. Unlike the prevailing \emph{reasoning from scratch} paradigm, our approach first recalls relevant skills for each query, helping the model avoid redundant detours and focus on effective solution paths. We evaluate our method on coding and mathematical reasoning tasks, and find that it significantly reduces reasoning tokens while improving overall performance. The resulting lower per-request cost indicates strong practical and economic potential for real-world deployment.
26. ❌ Why are all LLMs Obsessed with Japanese Culture? On the Hidden Cultural and Regional Biases of LLMs
作者: Joseba Fernandez de Landa, Carla Perez-Almendros, Jose Camacho-Collados 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21751v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
LLMs have been showing limitations when it comes to cultural coverage and competence, and in some cases show regional biases such as amplifying Western and Anglocentric viewpoints. While there have been works analysing the cultural capabilities of LLMs, there has not been specific work on highlighting LLM regional preferences when it comes to cultural-related questions. In this work, we propose a new dataset based on a comprehensive taxonomy of Culture-Related Open Questions (CROQ). The results show that, contrary to previous cultural bias work, LLMs show a clear tendency towards countries such as Japan. Moveover, our results show that when prompting in languages such as English or other high-resource ones, LLMs tend to provide more diverse outputs and show less inclinations towards answering questions highlighting countries for which the input language is an official language. Finally, we also investigate at which point of LLM training this cultural bias emerges, with our results suggesting that the first clear signs appear after supervised fine-tuning, and not during pre-training.
27. ❌ StructMem: Structured Memory for Long-Horizon Behavior in LLMs
作者: Buqiang Xu, Yijun Chen, Jizhan Fang, Ruobin Zhong, Yunzhi Yao, Yuqi Zhu, Lun Du, Shumin Deng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21748v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Long-term conversational agents need memory systems that capture relationships between events, not merely isolated facts, to support temporal reasoning and multi-hop question answering. Current approaches face a fundamental trade-off: flat memory is efficient but fails to model relational structure, while graph-based memory enables structured reasoning at the cost of expensive and fragile construction. To address these issues, we propose \textbf{StructMem}, a structure-enriched hierarchical memory framework that preserves event-level bindings and induces cross-event connections. By temporally anchoring dual perspectives and performing periodic semantic consolidation, StructMem improves temporal reasoning and multi-hop performance on \texttt{LoCoMo}, while substantially reducing token usage, API calls, and runtime compared to prior memory systems, see https://github.com/zjunlp/LightMem .
28. ❌ Agentic AI-assisted coding offers a unique opportunity to instill epistemic grounding during software development
作者: Magnus Palmblad, Jared M. Ragland, Benjamin A. Neely 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21744v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The capabilities of AI-assisted coding are progressing at breakneck speed. Chat-based vibe coding has evolved into fully fledged AI-assisted, agentic software development using agent scaffolds where the human developer creates a plan that agentic AIs implement. One current trend is utilizing documents beyond this plan document, such as project and method-scoped documents. Here we propose GROUNDING$.$md, a community-governed, field-scoped epistemic grounding document, using mass spectrometry-based proteomics as an example. This explicit field-scoped grounding document encodes Hard Constraints (non-negotiable validity invariants empirically required for scientific correctness) and Convention Parameters (community-agreed defaults) that override all other contexts to enforce validity, regardless of what the user prompts. In practice, this will empower a non-domain expert to generate code, tools, and software that have best practices baked in at the ground level, providing confidence to the software developer but also to those reviewing or using the final product. Undoubtedly it is easier to have agentic AIs adhere to guidelines than humans, and this opportunity allows for organizations to develop epistemic grounding documents in such a way as to keep domain experts in the loop in a future of democratized generation of bespoke software solutions.
29. ❌ Bridging the Training-Deployment Gap: Gated Encoding and Multi-Scale Refinement for Efficient Quantization-Aware Image Enhancement
作者: Dat To-Thanh, Nghia Nguyen-Trong, Hoang Vo, Hieu Bui-Minh, Tinh-Anh Nguyen-Nhu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21743v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Image enhancement models for mobile devices often struggle to balance high output quality with the fast processing speeds required by mobile hardware. While recent deep learning models can enhance low-quality mobile photos into high-quality images, their performance is often degraded when converted to lower-precision formats for actual use on mobile phones. To address this training-deployment mismatch, we propose an efficient image enhancement model designed specifically for mobile deployment. Our approach uses a hierarchical network architecture with gated encoder blocks and multiscale refinement to preserve fine-grained visual features. Moreover, we incorporate Quantization-Aware Training (QAT) to simulate the effects of low-precision representation during the training process. This allows the network to adapt and prevents the typical drop in quality seen with standard post-training quantization (PTQ). Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method produces high-fidelity visual output while maintaining the low computational overhead needed for practical use on standard mobile devices. The code will be available at https://github.com/GenAI4E/QATIE.git.
30. ❌ Enabling and Inhibitory Pathways of University Students’ Willingness to Disclose AI Use: A Cognition-Affect-Conation Perspective
作者: Yiran Du, Huimin He 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21733v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has raised important questions regarding students’ transparency in reporting AI-assisted work. This study investigates the psychological mechanisms underlying university students’ willingness to disclose AI use by applying the Cognition–Affect–Conation (CAC) framework. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was employed. In the quantitative phase, survey data were collected from 546 university students and analysed using structural equation modelling to examine the relationships among cognitive perceptions, affective responses, and disclosure intention. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews with 22 students were conducted to further interpret the quantitative findings. The results indicate that psychological safety significantly increases students’ willingness to disclose AI use and is positively shaped by perceived fairness, perceived teacher support, and perceived organisational support. Conversely, evaluation apprehension reduces disclosure intention and psychological safety, and is strengthened by perceived stigma, perceived uncertainty, and privacy concern. Qualitative findings further reveal that institutional clarity and supportive instructional practices encourage openness, whereas policy ambiguity and fear of negative evaluation often lead students to adopt cautious or strategic disclosure practices. Overall, the study highlights the dual role of enabling and inhibitory psychological mechanisms in shaping AI-use disclosure and underscores the importance of supportive institutional environments and clear guidance for promoting responsible AI transparency in higher education.
31. ❌ AEL: Agent Evolving Learning for Open-Ended Environments
作者: Wujiang Xu, Jiaojiao Han, Minghao Guo, Kai Mei, Xi Zhu, Han Zhang, Dimitris N. Metaxas 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21725v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
LLM agents increasingly operate in open-ended environments spanning hundreds of sequential episodes, yet they remain largely stateless: each task is solved from scratch without converting past experience into better future behavior. The central obstacle is not \emph{what} to remember but \emph{how to use} what has been remembered, including which retrieval policy to apply, how to interpret prior outcomes, and when the current strategy itself must change. We introduce \emph{Agent Evolving Learning} (\ael{}), a two-timescale framework that addresses this obstacle. At the fast timescale, a Thompson Sampling bandit learns which memory retrieval policy to apply at each episode; at the slow timescale, LLM-driven reflection diagnoses failure patterns and injects causal insights into the agent’s decision prompt, giving it an interpretive frame for the evidence it retrieves. On a sequential portfolio benchmark (10 sector-diverse tickers, 208 episodes, 5 random seeds), \ael{} achieves a Sharpe ratio of 2.13$\pm$0.47, outperforming five published self-improving methods and all non-LLM baselines while maintaining the lowest variance among all LLM-based approaches. A nine-variant ablation reveals a ``less is more’’ pattern: memory and reflection together produce a 58% cumulative improvement over the stateless baseline, yet every additional mechanism we test (planner evolution, per-tool selection, cold-start initialization, skill extraction, and three credit assignment methods) \emph{degrades} performance. This demonstrates that the bottleneck in agent self-improvement is \emph{self-diagnosing how to use} experience rather than adding architectural complexity. Code and data: https://github.com/WujiangXu/AEL.
32. ❌ Fairness under uncertainty in sequential decisions
作者: Michelle Seng Ah Lee, Kirtan Padh, David Watson, Niki Kilbertus, Jatinder Singh 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21711v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Fair machine learning (ML) methods help identify and mitigate the risk that algorithms encode or automate social injustices. Algorithmic approaches alone cannot resolve structural inequalities, but they can support socio-technical decision systems by surfacing discriminatory biases, clarifying trade-offs, and enabling governance. Although fairness is well studied in supervised learning, many real ML applications are online and sequential, with prior decisions informing future ones. Each decision is taken under uncertainty due to unobserved counterfactuals and finite samples, with dire consequences for under-represented groups, systematically under-observed due to historical exclusion and selective feedback. A bank cannot know whether a denied loan would have been repaid, and may have less data on marginalized populations. This paper introduces a taxonomy of uncertainty in sequential decision-making – model, feedback, and prediction uncertainty – providing shared vocabulary for assessing systems where uncertainty is unevenly distributed across groups. We formalize model and feedback uncertainty via counterfactual logic and reinforcement learning, and illustrate harms to decision makers (unrealized gains/losses) and subjects (compounding exclusion, reduced access) of policies that ignore the unobserved space. Algorithmic examples show it is possible to reduce outcome variance for disadvantaged groups while preserving institutional objectives (e.g. expected utility). Experiments on data simulated with varying bias show how unequal uncertainty and selective feedback produce disparities, and how uncertainty-aware exploration alters fairness metrics. The framework equips practitioners to diagnose, audit, and govern fairness risks. Where uncertainty drives unfairness rather than incidental noise, accounting for it is essential to fair and effective decision-making.
33. ❌ Stealthy Backdoor Attacks against LLMs Based on Natural Style Triggers
作者: Jiali Wei, Ming Fan, Guoheng Sun, Xicheng Zhang, Haijun Wang, Ting Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21700v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The growing application of large language models (LLMs) in safety-critical domains has raised urgent concerns about their security. Many recent studies have demonstrated the feasibility of backdoor attacks against LLMs. However, existing methods suffer from three key shortcomings: explicit trigger patterns that compromise naturalness, unreliable injection of attacker-specified payloads in long-form generation, and incompletely specified threat models that obscure how backdoors are delivered and activated in practice. To address these gaps, we present BadStyle, a complete backdoor attack framework and pipeline. BadStyle leverages an LLM as a poisoned sample generator to construct natural and stealthy poisoned samples that carry imperceptible style-level triggers while preserving semantics and fluency. To stabilize payload injection during fine-tuning, we design an auxiliary target loss that reinforces the attacker-specified target content in responses to poisoned inputs and penalizes its emergence in benign responses. We further ground the attack in a realistic threat model and systematically evaluate BadStyle under both prompt-induced and PEFT-based injection strategies. Extensive experiments across seven victim LLMs, including LLaMA, Phi, DeepSeek, and GPT series, demonstrate that BadStyle achieves high attack success rates (ASRs) while maintaining strong stealthiness. The proposed auxiliary target loss substantially improves the stability of backdoor activation, yielding an average ASR improvement of around 30% across style-level triggers. Even in downstream deployment scenarios unknown during injection, the implanted backdoor remains effective. Moreover, BadStyle consistently evades representative input-level defenses and bypasses output-level defenses through simple camouflage.
34. ❌ Efficient Logic Gate Networks for Video Copy Detection
作者: Katarzyna Fojcik 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21694v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Video copy detection requires robust similarity estimation under diverse visual distortions while operating at very large scale. Although deep neural networks achieve strong performance, their computational cost and descriptor size limit practical deployment in high-throughput systems. In this work, we propose a video copy detection framework based on differentiable Logic Gate Networks (LGNs), which replace conventional floating-point feature extractors with compact, logic-based representations. Our approach combines aggressive frame miniaturization, binary preprocessing, and a trainable LGN embedding model that learns both logical operations and interconnections. After training, the model can be discretized into a purely Boolean circuit, enabling extremely fast and memory-efficient inference. We systematically evaluate different similarity strategies, binarization schemes, and LGN architectures across multiple dataset folds and difficulty levels. Experimental results demonstrate that LGN-based models achieve competitive or superior accuracy and ranking performance compared to prior models, while producing descriptors several orders of magnitude smaller and delivering inference speeds exceeding 11k samples per second. These findings indicate that logic-based models offer a promising alternative for scalable and resource-efficient video copy detection.
35. ❌ Geometric Monomial (GEM): a family of rational 2N-differentiable activation functions
作者: Eylon E. Krause 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21677v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The choice of activation function plays a crucial role in the optimization and performance of deep neural networks. While the Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) remains the dominant choice due to its simplicity and effectiveness, its lack of smoothness may hinder gradient-based optimization in deep architectures. In this work we propose a family of $C^{2N}$-smooth activation functions whose gate follows a log-logistic CDF, achieving ReLU-like performance with purely rational arithmetic. We introduce three variants: GEM (the base family), E-GEM (an $ε$-parameterized generalization enabling arbitrary $L^p$-approximation of ReLU), and SE-GEM (a piecewise variant eliminating dead neurons with $C^{2N}$ junction smoothness). An $N$-ablation study establishes $N=1$ as optimal for standard-depth networks, reducing the GELU deficit on CIFAR-100 + ResNet-56 from 6.10% to 2.12%. The smoothness parameter $N$ further reveals a CNN-transformer tradeoff: $N=1$ is preferred for deep CNNs, while $N=2$ is preferred for transformers. On MNIST, E-GEM ties the best baseline (99.23%). On CIFAR-10 + ResNet-56, SE-GEM ($ε=10^{-4}$) surpasses GELU (92.51% vs 92.44%) – the first GEM-family activation to outperform GELU. On CIFAR-100 + ResNet-56, E-GEM reduces the GELU deficit from 6.10% (GEM $N=2$) to just 0.62%. On GPT-2 (124M), GEM achieves the lowest perplexity (72.57 vs 73.76 for GELU), with GEM $N=1$ also beating GELU (73.32). On BERT-small, E-GEM ($ε=10$) achieves the best validation loss (6.656) across all activations. The $ε$-parameterization reveals a scale-dependent optimum: small $ε$ ($10^{-4}$–$10^{-6}$) for deep CNNs and larger transformers, with the special case of small transformers (BERT-small) benefiting from large $ε$ ($ε=10$) due to its limited depth and unconstrained gradients.
36. ❌ Fine-Grained Perspectives: Modeling Explanations with Annotator-Specific Rationales
作者: Olufunke O. Sarumi, Charles Welch, Daniel Braun 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21667v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Beyond exploring disaggregated labels for modeling perspectives, annotator rationales provide fine-grained signals of individual perspectives. In this work, we propose a framework for jointly modeling annotator-specific label prediction and corresponding explanations, fine-tuned on the annotators’ provided rationales. Using a dataset with disaggregated natural language inference (NLI) annotations and annotator-provided explanations, we condition predictions on both annotator identity and demographic metadata through a representation-level User Passport mechanism. We further introduce two explainer architectures: a post-hoc prompt-based explainer and a prefixed bridge explainer that transfers annotator-conditioned classifier representations directly into a generative model. This design enables explanation generation aligned with individual annotator perspectives. Our results show that incorporating explanation modeling substantially improves predictive performance over a baseline annotator-aware classifier, with the prefixed bridge approach achieving more stable label alignment and higher semantic consistency, while the post-hoc approach yields stronger lexical similarity. These findings indicate that modeling explanations as expressions of fine-grained perspective provides a richer and more faithful representation of disagreement. The proposed approaches advance perspectivist modeling by integrating annotator-specific rationales into both predictive and generative components.
37. ❌ Causal Disentanglement for Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment
作者: Zhen Zhang, Jielei Chu, Tian Zhang, Weide Liu, Fengmao Lv, Tianrui Li, Jun Cheng, Yuming Fang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21654v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Existing deep network-based full-reference image quality assessment (FR-IQA) models typically work by performing pairwise comparisons of deep features from the reference and distorted images. In this paper, we approach this problem from a different perspective and propose a novel FR-IQA paradigm based on causal inference and decoupled representation learning. Unlike typical feature comparison-based FR-IQA models, our approach formulates degradation estimation as a causal disentanglement process guided by intervention on latent representations. We first decouple degradation and content representations by exploiting the content invariance between the reference and distorted images. Second, inspired by the human visual masking effect, we design a masking module to model the causal relationship between image content and degradation features, thereby extracting content-influenced degradation features from distorted images. Finally, quality scores are predicted from these degradation features using either supervised regression or label-free dimensionality reduction. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves highly competitive performance on standard IQA benchmarks across fully supervised, few-label, and label-free settings. Furthermore, we evaluate the approach on diverse non-standard natural image domains with scarce data, including underwater, radiographic, medical, neutron, and screen-content images. Benefiting from its ability to perform scenario-specific training and prediction without labeled IQA data, our method exhibits superior cross-domain generalization compared to existing training-free FR-IQA models.
38. ❌ GS-Quant: Granular Semantic and Generative Structural Quantization for Knowledge Graph Completion
作者: Qizhuo Xie, Yunhui Liu, Yu Xing, Qianzi Hou, Xudong Jin, Tao Zheng, Tieke He 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21649v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown immense potential in Knowledge Graph Completion (KGC), yet bridging the modality gap between continuous graph embeddings and discrete LLM tokens remains a critical challenge. While recent quantization-based approaches attempt to align these modalities, they typically treat quantization as flat numerical compression, resulting in semantically entangled codes that fail to mirror the hierarchical nature of human reasoning. In this paper, we propose GS-Quant, a novel framework that generates semantically coherent and structurally stratified discrete codes for KG entities. Unlike prior methods, GS-Quant is grounded in the insight that entity representations should follow a linguistic coarse-to-fine logic. We introduce a Granular Semantic Enhancement module that injects hierarchical knowledge into the codebook, ensuring that earlier codes capture global semantic categories while later codes refine specific attributes. Furthermore, a Generative Structural Reconstruction module imposes causal dependencies on the code sequence, transforming independent discrete units into structured semantic descriptors. By expanding the LLM vocabulary with these learned codes, we enable the model to reason over graph structures isomorphically to natural language generation. Experimental results demonstrate that GS-Quant significantly outperforms existing text-based and embedding-based baselines. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/mikumifa/GS-Quant.
39. ❌ Dilated CNNs for Periodic Signal Processing: A Low-Complexity Approach
作者: Eli Gildish, Michael Grebshtein, Igor Makienko 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21651v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Denoising of periodic signals and accurate waveform estimation are core tasks across many signal processing domains, including speech, music, medical diagnostics, radio, and sonar. Although deep learning methods have recently shown performance improvements over classical approaches, they require substantial computational resources and are usually trained separately for each signal observation. This study proposes a computationally efficient method based on DCNN and Re-sampling, termed R-DCNN, designed for operation under strict power and resource constraints. The approach targets signals with varying fundamental frequencies and requires only a single observation for training. It generalizes to additional signals via a lightweight resampling step that aligns time scales in signals with different frequencies to re-use the same network weights. Despite its low computational complexity, R-DCNN achieves performance comparable to state-of-the-art classical methods, such as autoregressive (AR)-based techniques, as well as conventional DCNNs trained individually for each observation. This combination of efficiency and performance makes the proposed method particularly well suited for deployment in resource-constrained environments without sacrificing denoising or estimation accuracy.
40. ❌ Task-specific Subnetwork Discovery in Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Underwater Navigation
作者: Yi-Ling Liu, Melvin Laux, Mariela De Lucas Alvarez, Frank Kirchner, Rebecca Adam 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21640v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Autonomous underwater vehicles are required to perform multiple tasks adaptively and in an explainable manner under dynamic, uncertain conditions and limited sensing, challenges that classical controllers struggle to address. This demands robust, generalizable, and inherently interpretable control policies for reliable long-term monitoring. Reinforcement learning, particularly multi-task RL, overcomes these limitations by leveraging shared representations to enable efficient adaptation across tasks and environments. However, while such policies show promising results in simulation and controlled experiments, they yet remain opaque and offer limited insight into the agent’s internal decision-making, creating gaps in transparency, trust, and safety that hinder real-world deployment. The internal policy structure and task-specific specialization remain poorly understood. To address these gaps, we analyze the internal structure of a pretrained multi-task reinforcement learning network in the HoloOcean simulator for underwater navigation by identifying and comparing task-specific subnetworks responsible for navigating toward different species. We find that in a contextual multi-task reinforcement learning setting with related tasks, the network uses only about 1.5% of its weights to differentiate between tasks. Of these, approximately 85% connect the context-variable nodes in the input layer to the next hidden layer, highlighting the importance of context variables in such settings. Our approach provides insights into shared and specialized network components, useful for efficient model editing, transfer learning, and continual learning for underwater monitoring through a contextual multi-task reinforcement learning method.
41. ❌ To See the Unseen: on the Generalization Ability of Transformers in Symbolic Reasoning
作者: Nevena Lazić, Liam Fowl, András György, Csaba Szepesvári 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21632v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We investigate the ability of decoder-only transformer models to perform abstract symbolic reasoning; specifically solving propositional logic reasoning problems given in-context. Previous work demonstrated that models fail to generalize to problems involving variable names that were not observed during training, and it was shown that one reason behind this is the difficulty of copying (or generating) unseen tokens. We show both theoretically and empirically that a particular representational collapse also has a crucial role: the unembeddings (last-layer weights) of unseen tokens collapse to nearly the same vector during training. The collapse makes distinguishing multiple unseen variables difficult for the model (especially when the embedding and unembedding parameters are shared), and provides a mechanistic explanation for the effectiveness of existing heuristic interventions like “active forgetting”, which periodically reset the token (un)embeddings. Based on these observations, we devise a combination of techniques, involving a small architecture change facilitating copying, data diversity, and freezing or resetting (un)embeddings, that achieves generalization to unseen tokens. We support our claims with extensive controlled experiments on propositional logic reasoning problems. Beyond synthetic experiments, we also observe evidence of (un)embedding collapse in the open-weight models in the Gemma 3 family, which includes 99 unused tokens reserved for downstream use. Empirically we find that the correlated embeddings of these tokens are a poor initialization for finetuning applications.
42. ❌ Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction
作者: Benedikt Bollig, Matthias Függer, Thomas Nowak, Paul Zeinaty 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21629v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We compare lightweight automata-based models (n-grams) with neural architectures (LSTM, Transformer) for next-activity prediction in streaming event logs. Experiments on synthetic patterns and five real-world process mining datasets show that n-grams with appropriate context windows achieve comparable accuracy to neural models while requiring substantially fewer resources. Unlike windowed neural architectures, which show unstable performance patterns, n-grams provide stable and consistent accuracy. While we demonstrate that classical ensemble methods like voting improve n-gram performance, they require running many agents in parallel during inference, increasing memory consumption and latency. We propose an ensemble method, the promotion algorithm, that dynamically selects between two active models during inference, reducing overhead compared to classical voting schemes. On real-world datasets, these ensembles match or exceed the accuracy of non-windowed neural models with lower computational cost.
43. ❌ Process Supervision via Verbal Critique Improves Reasoning in Large Language Models
作者: Hao-Yuan Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21611v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Inference-time scaling for LLM reasoning has focused on three axes: chain depth, sample breadth, and learned step-scorers (PRMs). We introduce a fourth axis, granularity of external verbal supervision, via Verbal Process Supervision (VPS), a training-free framework that uses structured natural-language critique from a stronger supervisor to guide an iterative generate-critique-refine loop up to a round budget R. Across GPQA Diamond, AIME 2025, and LiveCodeBench V6 (covering both closed and open models), VPS yields three key results. First, on GPQA Diamond, GPT-5.4 (High) | GPT-5.4 (Low) reaches 94.9% at R=4, surpassing the 94.1% state of the art without gradient updates. Second, on AIME 2025, VPS enables strong weak-actor rescue, boosting scores from 11.7-26.7% to 63.3-90.0% (up to +63.3 points). Third, at matched compute, VPS outperforms Reflexion by +8.5 to +12.1 points and Self-Consistency@5 by +5.0 pp (GPQA) and +8.3 pp (LiveCodeBench), isolating critique granularity as the key driver. Performance scales with the supervisor-actor capability gap (Pearson r=0.90) and degrades when errors are not linguistically expressible (e.g., code synthesis), motivating hybrid verbal-executable methods. These results establish critique granularity as a new axis of inference-time scaling.
44. ❌ Using ASP(Q) to Handle Inconsistent Prioritized Data
作者: Meghyn Bienvenu, Camille Bourgaux, Robin Jean, Giuseppe Mazzotta 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21603v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We explore the use of answer set programming (ASP) and its extension with quantifiers, ASP(Q), for inconsistency-tolerant querying of prioritized data, where a priority relation between conflicting facts is exploited to define three notions of optimal repairs (Pareto-, globally- and completion-optimal). We consider the variants of three well-known semantics (AR, brave and IAR) that use these optimal repairs, and for which query answering is in the first or second level of the polynomial hierarchy for a large class of logical theories. Notably, this paper presents the first implementation of globally-optimal repair-based semantics, as well as the first implementation of the grounded semantics, which is a tractable under-approximation of all these optimal repair-based semantics. Our experimental evaluation sheds light on the feasibility of computing answers under globally-optimal repair semantics and the impact of adopting different semantics, approximations, and encodings.
45. ❌ On the Role of Preprocessing and Memristor Dynamics in Reservoir Computing for Image Classification
作者: Rishona Daniels, Duna Wattad, Ronny Ronen, David Saad, Shahar Kvatinsky 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21602v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Reservoir computing (RC) is an emerging recurrent neural network architecture that has attracted growing attention for its low training cost and modest hardware requirements. Memristor-based circuits are particularly promising for RC, as their intrinsic dynamics can reduce network size and parameter overhead in tasks such as time-series prediction and image recognition. Although RC has been demonstrated with several memristive devices, a comprehensive evaluation of device-level requirements remains limited. In this paper, we analyze and explain the operation of a parallel delayed feedback network (PDFN) RC architecture with volatile memristors, focusing on how device characteristics – such as decay rate, quantization, and variability – affect reservoir performance. We further discuss strategies to improve data representation in the reservoir using preprocessing methods and suggest potential improvements. The proposed approach achieves 95.89% classification accuracy on MNIST, comparable with the best reported memristor-based RC implementations. Furthermore, the method maintains high robustness under 20% device variability, achieving an accuracy of up to 94.2%. These results demonstrate that volatile memristors can support reliable spatio-temporal information processing and reinforce their potential as key building blocks for compact, high-speed, and energy-efficient neuromorphic computing systems.
46. ❌ DryRUN: On the Role of Public Tests in LLM-Driven Code Generation
作者: Kaushitha Silva, Srinath Perera 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21598v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Multi-agent frameworks are widely used in autonomous code generation and have applications in complex algorithmic problem-solving. Recent work has addressed the challenge of generating functionally correct code by incorporating simulation-driven planning and debugging, where language models trace execution steps to verify logic. However, these approaches depend on human-provided public test cases to ground the debugging and simulation loop. Manually authoring comprehensive input-output examples is a labor-intensive bottleneck in the software development lifecycle. Because ground-truth input-output examples are rarely available prior to implementation in real-world software engineering, this dependency restricts methods to curated competitive programming benchmarks. Furthermore, we identify that reliance on these public tests induces an ``overconfidence gap,’’ causing frameworks to overfit to simplistic examples and fail on hidden evaluations. In contrast, we observe that external sample inputs are not strictly necessary for code generation. We demonstrate that large language models can autonomously generate valid inputs and simulate execution traces to self-correct. Consequently, we develop DryRUN, a framework that eliminates the need for ground-truth samples by allowing the LLM to iteratively plan, autonomously generate its own inputs and simulate execution, mitigating algorithmic overconfidence. Evaluations on the LiveCodeBench v6 dataset (post-March 2025) demonstrate that DryRUN matches performance against CodeSIM, a state-of-the-art and public-test-dependent framework, while operating entirely without public test cases or external execution feedback while reducing output token consumption.
47. ❌ CoFEE: Reasoning Control for LLM-Based Feature Discovery
作者: Maximilian Westermann, Ben Griffin, Aaron Ontoyin Yin, Zakari Salifu, Yagiz Ihlamur, Kelvin Amoaba, Joseph Ternasky, Fuat Alican, Yigit Ihlamur 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21584v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Feature discovery from complex unstructured data is fundamentally a reasoning problem: it requires identifying abstractions that are predictive of a target outcome while avoiding leakage, proxies, and post-outcome signals. With the introduction of ever-improving Large Language Models (LLMs), our method provides a structured method for addressing this challenge. LLMs are well suited for this task by being able to process large amounts of information, but unconstrained feature generation can lead to weak features. In this work, we study reasoning control in LLMs by inducing cognitive behaviors for improving feature discovery. We introduce CoFEE (Cognitive Feature Engineering Engine), a reasoning control framework that enforces cognitive behaviors in how the LLM reasons during feature discovery. From a machine learning perspective, these cognitive behaviors act as structured inductive biases over the space of candidate features generated by the model. These behaviors have been exploited with success in ML models, and include backward chaining from outcomes, subgoal decomposition, verification against observability and leakage criteria, and explicit backtracking of rejected reasoning paths. In a controlled comparison, we show that enforcing cognitive behaviors yields features with higher empirical predictability than those under unconstrained vanilla LLM prompts. CoFEE achieves an average Success Rate Score that is 15.2% higher than the vanilla approach, while generating 29% fewer features and reducing costs by 53.3%. Using held-out feature evaluation, we assess whether cognitively induced features generalize beyond the data used for discovery. Our results indicate that, in our evaluated setting, reasoning control is associated with improvements in quality and efficiency of LLM-based feature discovery.
48. ❌ A Metamorphic Testing Approach to Diagnosing Memorization in LLM-Based Program Repair
作者: Milan De Koning, Ali Asgari, Pouria Derakhshanfar, Annibale Panichella 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21579v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
LLM-based automated program repair (APR) techniques have shown promising results in reducing debugging costs. However, prior results can be affected by data leakage: large language models (LLMs) may memorize bug fixes when evaluation benchmarks overlap with their pretraining data, leading to inflated performance estimates. In this paper, we investigate whether we can better reveal data leakage by combining metamorphic testing (MT) with negative log-likelihood (NLL), which has been used in prior work as a proxy for memorization. We construct variant benchmarks by applying semantics-preserving transformations to two widely used datasets, Defects4J and GitBug-Java. Using these benchmarks, we evaluate the repair success rates of seven LLMs on both original and transformed versions, and analyze the relationship between performance degradation and NLL. Our results show that all evaluated state-of-the-art LLMs exhibit substantial drops in patch generation success rates on transformed benchmarks, ranging from -4.1% for GPT-4o to -15.98% for Llama-3.1. Furthermore, we find that this degradation strongly correlates with NLL on the original benchmarks, suggesting that models perform better on instances they are more likely to have memorized. These findings show that combining MT with NLL provides stronger and more reliable evidence of data leakage, while metamorphic testing alone can help mitigate its effects in LLM-based APR evaluations.
49. ❌ Separable Expert Architecture: Toward Privacy-Preserving LLM Personalization via Composable Adapters and Deletable User Proxies
作者: Chris Schneider, Philipp Schoenegger, Ben Bariach 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21571v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Current model training approaches incorporate user information directly into shared weights, making individual data removal computationally infeasible without retraining. This paper presents a three-layer architecture that decouples personal data from shared weights by combining a static base model, composable domain-expert LoRA adapters that shape behavior without imparting user data, and per-user proxy artefacts whose deletion constitutes deterministic unlearning. Evaluation on Phi-3.5-mini and Llama-3.1-8B confirms per-user differentiation in which personal data influences outputs while remaining isolated, verified by a return to baseline after proxy removal (KL divergence of approximately 0.21 nats, 82-89% verification pass rate) and near-zero cross-user contamination. Because user-specific information never enters shared weights, the architecture mitigates model inversion, membership inference, and training-data extraction against shared model components by construction. The approach converts machine unlearning from an intractable weight-editing problem into a deterministic deletion operation that preserves personalization alongside privacy-enhancing guarantees and is compatible with differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) for privacy-preserving shared model improvement.
50. ❌ Hybrid Deep Learning Approach for Coupled Demand Forecasting and Supply Chain Optimization
作者: Nusrat Yasmin Nadia, Md Habibul Arif, Habibor Rahman Rabby, Md Iftekhar Monzur Tanvir, Md. Jakir Hossen, M. F. Mridha 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21567v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Supply chain resilience and efficiency are vital in industries characterized by volatile demand and uncertain supply, such as textiles and personal protective equipment (PPE). Traditional forecasting and optimization approaches often operate in isolation, limiting their real-world effectiveness. This paper proposes a Hybrid AI Framework for Demand-Supply Forecasting and Optimization (HAF-DS), which integrates a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-based demand forecasting module with a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) optimization layer. The LSTM captures temporal and contextual demand dependencies, while the optimization layer prescribes cost-efficient replenishment and allocation decisions. The framework jointly minimizes forecasting error and operational cost through embedding-based feature representation and recurrent neural architectures. Experiments on textile sales and supply chain datasets show significant performance gains over statistical and deep learning baselines. On the combined dataset, HAF-DS reduced Mean Absolute Error (MAE) from 15.04 to 12.83 (14.7%), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) from 19.53 to 17.11 (12.4%), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) from 9.5% to 8.1%. Inventory cost decreased by 5.4%, stockouts by 27.5%, and service level rose from 95.5% to 97.8%. These results confirm that coupling predictive forecasting with prescriptive optimization enhances both accuracy and efficiency, providing a scalable and adaptable solution for modern textile and PPE supply chains.
51. ❌ Probabilistic Verification of Neural Networks via Efficient Probabilistic Hull Generation
作者: Jingyang Li, Xin Chen, Hongfei Fu, Guoqiang Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21556v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The problem of probabilistic verification of a neural network investigates the probability of satisfying the safe constraints in the output space when the input is given by a probability distribution. It is significant to answer this problem when the input is affected by disturbances often modeled by probabilistic variables. In the paper, we propose a novel neural network probabilistic verification framework which computes a guaranteed range for the safe probability by efficiently finding safe and unsafe probabilistic hulls. Our approach consists of three main innovations: (1) a state space subdivision strategy using regression trees to produce probabilistic hulls, (2) a boundary-aware sampling method which identifies the safety boundary in the input space using samples that are later used for building regression trees, and (3) iterative refinement with probabilistic prioritization for computing a guaranteed range for the safe probability. The accuracy and efficiency of our approach are evaluated on various benchmarks including ACAS Xu and a rocket lander controller. The result shows an obvious advantage over the state of the art.
52. ❌ Engaged AI Governance: Addressing the Last Mile Challenge Through Internal Expert Collaboration
作者: Simon Jarvers, Orestis Papakyriakopoulos 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21554v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Under the EU AI Act, translating AI governance requirements into software development practice remains challenging. While AI governance frameworks exist at industry and organizational levels, empirical evidence of team-level implementation is scarce. We address this “Last Mile” Challenge through insider action research embedded within an AI startup. We present a legal-text-to-action pipeline that translates EU AI Act requirements into actionable strategies through internal expert collaboration by extracting requirements from legal text, engaging practitioners in assessment and ideation, and prioritizing implementation through collective evaluation. Our analysis reveals three patterns in how practitioners perceive regulatory requirements: convergence (compliance aligns with development priorities), existing practice (current work already satisfies requirements), and disconnection (requirements perceived as administrative overhead). Based on these patterns, we discuss when governance might be treated genuinely or performatively. Practitioners prioritize requirements that serve end-users or their own development needs, but view verification-oriented requirements as box-ticking exercises. This distinction suggests a translation challenge: regulatory requirements risk superficial treatment unless practitioners understand how compliance serves system quality and user protection. Expert collaboration offers a practical mechanism for transforming governance from external imposition to shared ownership and making previously invisible governance work visible and collective.
53. ❌ Unbiased Prevalence Estimation with Multicalibrated LLMs
作者: Fridolin Linder, Thomas Leeper, Daniel Haimovich, Niek Tax, Lorenzo Perini, Milan Vojnovic 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21549v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Estimating the prevalence of a category in a population using imperfect measurement devices (diagnostic tests, classifiers, or large language models) is fundamental to science, public health, and online trust and safety. Standard approaches correct for known device error rates but assume these rates remain stable across populations. We show this assumption fails under covariate shift and that multicalibration, which enforces calibration conditional on the input features rather than just on average, is sufficient for unbiased prevalence estimation under such shift. Standard calibration and quantification methods fail to provide this guarantee. Our work connects recent theoretical work on fairness to a longstanding measurement problem spanning nearly all academic disciplines. A simulation confirms that standard methods exhibit bias growing with shift magnitude, while a multicalibrated estimator maintains near-zero bias. While we focus the discussion mostly on LLMs, our theoretical results apply to any classification model. Two empirical applications – estimating employment prevalence across U.S. states using the American Community Survey, and classifying political texts across four countries using an LLM – demonstrate that multicalibration substantially reduces bias in practice, while highlighting that calibration data should cover the key feature dimensions along which target populations may differ.
54. ❌ The CriticalSet problem: Identifying Critical Contributors in Bipartite Dependency Networks
作者: Sebastiano A. Piccolo, Andrea Tagarelli 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21537v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Identifying critical nodes in complex networks is a fundamental task in graph mining. Yet, methods addressing an all-or-nothing coverage mechanics in a bipartite dependency network, a graph with two types of nodes where edges represent dependency relationships across the two groups only, remain largely unexplored. We formalize the CriticalSet problem: given an arbitrary bipartite graph modeling dependencies of items on contributors, identify the set of k contributors whose removal isolates the largest number of items. We prove that this problem is NP-hard and requires maximizing a supermodular set function, for which standard forward greedy algorithms provide no approximation guarantees. Consequently, we model CriticalSet as a coalitional game, deriving a closed-form centrality, ShapleyCov, based on the Shapley value. This measure can be interpreted as the expected number of items isolated by a contributor’s departure. Leveraging these insights, we propose MinCov, a linear-time iterative peeling algorithm that explicitly accounts for connection redundancy, prioritizing contributors who uniquely support many items. Extensive experiments on synthetic and large-scale real datasets, including a Wikipedia graph with over 250 million edges, reveal that MinCov and ShapleyCov significantly outperform traditional baselines. Notably, MinCov achieves near-optimal performance, within 0.02 AUC of a Stochastic Hill Climbing metaheuristic, while remaining several orders of magnitude faster.
55. ❌ Pre-trained LLMs Meet Sequential Recommenders: Efficient User-Centric Knowledge Distillation
作者: Nikita Severin, Danil Kartushov, Vladislav Urzhumov, Vladislav Kulikov, Oksana Konovalova, Alexey Grishanov, Anton Klenitskiy, Artem Fatkulin, Alexey Vasilev, Andrey Savchenko, Ilya Makarov 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21536v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Sequential recommender systems have achieved significant success in modeling temporal user behavior but remain limited in capturing rich user semantics beyond interaction patterns. Large Language Models (LLMs) present opportunities to enhance user understanding with their reasoning capabilities, yet existing integration approaches create prohibitive inference costs in real time. To address these limitations, we present a novel knowledge distillation method that utilizes textual user profile generated by pre-trained LLMs into sequential recommenders without requiring LLM inference at serving time. The resulting approach maintains the inference efficiency of traditional sequential models while requiring neither architectural modifications nor LLM fine-tuning.
56. ❌ Attention-based multiple instance learning for predominant growth pattern prediction in lung adenocarcinoma wsi using foundation models
作者: Laura Valeria Perez-Herrera, M. J. Garcia-Gonzalez, Karen Lopez-Linares 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21530v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) grading depends on accurately identifying growth patterns, which are indicators of prognosis and can influence treatment decisions. Common deep learning approaches to determine the predominant pattern rely on patch-level classification or segmentation, requiring extensive annotations. This study proposes an attention-based multiple instance learning (ABMIL) framework to predict the predominant LUAD growth pattern at the whole slide level to reduce annotation burden. Our approach integrates pretrained pathology foundation models as patch encoders, used either frozen or fine-tuned on annotated patches, to extract discriminative features that are aggregated through attention mechanisms. Experiments show that fine-tuned encoders improve performance, with Prov-GigaPath achieving the highest agreement (\k{appa} = 0.699) under ABMIL. Compared to simple patch-aggregation baselines, ABMIL yields more robust predictions by leveraging slide-level supervision and spatial attention. Future work will extend this framework to estimate the full distribution of growth patterns and validate performance on external cohorts.
57. ❌ Architectures for Robust Self-Organizing Energy Systems under Information and Control Constraints
作者: Emilie Frost, Astrid Nieße 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21529v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Applying the concept of controlled self-organization in agent-based Cyber-Physical Energy Systems (CPES) is a promising approach to ensure system robustness. By introducing an observer/controller architecture to the system, this concept allows for self-organization while still enabling intervention when disturbances occur. Thus, it is possible to respond to effects of cyber attacks, a major threat to current energy systems. However, when implementing an observer to monitor the system and a controller to execute actions for controlled self-organization in CPES, it is essential to take into account restrictions on information and actions resulting from the privacy of local distributed energy resources, regulatory constraints, and data exchange requirements. For this reason, this paper presents architecture variants for the observer and controller that take into account restrictions on access to information and limited actions. In addition, it evaluates possible controller actions in various architectures. The results underscore the importance of considering observer/controller architectures when designing agent-based systems to ensure their robustness for real-world applications.
58. ❌ Satisfying Rationality Postulates of Structured Argumentation Through Deductive Support – Technical Report
作者: Marcos Cramer, Tom Friese 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21515v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
ASPIC-style structured argumentation frameworks provide a formal basis for reasoning in artificial intelligence by combining internal argument structure with abstract argumentation semantics. A key challenge in these frameworks is ensuring compliance with five critical rationality postulates: closure, direct consistency, indirect consistency, non-interference, and crash-resistance. Recent approaches, including ASPIC$^{\ominus}$ and Deductive ASPIC$-$, have made significant progress but fall short of meeting all postulates simultaneously under a credulous semantics (e.g. preferred) in the presence of undercuts. This paper introduces Deductive ASPIC$^{\ominus}$, a novel framework that integrates gen-rebuttals from ASPIC$^{\ominus}$ with the Joint Support Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (JSBAFs) of Deductive ASPIC$-$, incorporating preferences. We show that Deductive ASPIC$^{\ominus}$ satisfies all five rationality postulates under a version of preferred semantics. This work opens new avenues for further research on robust and logically sound structured argumentation systems.
59. ❌ GeoMind: An Agentic Workflow for Lithology Classification with Reasoned Tool Invocation
作者: Yitong Zhou, Mingyue Cheng, Jiahao Wang, Qingyang Mao, Qi Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21501v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Lithology classification in well logs is a fundamental geoscience data mining task that aims to infer rock types from multi dimensional geophysical sequences. Despite recent progress, existing approaches typically formulate the problem as a static, single-step discriminative mapping. This static paradigm limits evidence-based diagnostic reasoning against geological standards, often yielding predictions that are detached from geological reality due to a lack of domain priors. In this work, we propose GeoMind, a tool-augmented agentic framework that models lithology classification as a sequential reasoning process. GeoMind organizes its toolkit into perception, reasoning, and analysis modules, which respectively translate raw logs into semantic trends, infer lithology hypotheses from multi-source evidence, and verify predictions against stratigraphic constraints. A global planner adaptively coordinates these modules based on input characteristics, enabling geologically plausible and evidence-grounded decisions. To guarantee the logical consistency of GeoMind, we introduce a fine-grained process supervision strategy. Unlike standard methods that focus solely on final outcomes, our approach optimizes intermediate reasoning steps, ensuring the validity of decision trajectories and alignment to geological constraints. Experiments on four benchmark well-log datasets demonstrate that GeoMind consistently outperforms strong baselines in classification performance while providing transparent and traceable decision-making processes.
60. ❌ BioMiner: A Multi-modal System for Automated Mining of Protein-Ligand Bioactivity Data from Literature
作者: Jiaxian Yan, Jintao Zhu, Yuhang Yang, Qi Liu, Kai Zhang, Zaixi Zhang, Xukai Liu, Boyan Zhang, Kaiyuan Gao, Jinchuan Xiao, Enhong Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21508v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Protein-ligand bioactivity data published in the literature are essential for drug discovery, yet manual curation struggles to keep pace with rapidly growing literature. Automated bioactivity extraction remains challenging because it requires not only interpreting biochemical semantics distributed across text, tables, and figures, but also reconstructing chemically exact ligand structures (e.g., Markush structures). To address this bottleneck, we introduce BioMiner, a multi-modal extraction framework that explicitly separates bioactivity semantic interpretation from ligand structure construction. Within BioMiner, bioactivity semantics are inferred through direct reasoning, while chemical structures are resolved via a chemical-structure-grounded visual semantic reasoning paradigm, in which multi-modal large language models operate on chemically grounded visual representations to infer inter-structure relationships, and exact molecular construction is delegated to domain chemistry tools. For rigorous evaluation and method development, we further establish BioVista, a comprehensive benchmark comprising 16,457 bioactivity entries curated from 500 publications. BioMiner validates its extraction ability and provides a quantitative baseline, achieving an F1 score of 0.32 for bioactivity triplets. BioMiner’s practical utility is demonstrated via three applications: (1) extracting 82,262 data from 11,683 papers to build a pre-training database that improves downstream models performance by 3.9%; (2) enabling a human-in-the-loop workflow that doubles the number of high-quality NLRP3 bioactivity data, helping 38.6% improvement over 28 QSAR models and identification of 16 hit candidates with novel scaffolds; and (3) accelerating protein-ligand complex bioactivity annotation, achieving a 5.59-fold speed increase and 5.75% accuracy improvement over manual workflows in PoseBusters dataset.
61. ❌ How English Print Media Frames Human-Elephant Conflicts in India
作者: Bonala Sai Punith, Salveru Jayati, Garima Shakya, Shubham Kumar Nigam 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21496v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Human-elephant conflict (HEC) is rising across India as habitat loss and expanding human settlements force elephants into closer contact with people. While the ecological drivers of conflict are well-studied, how the news media portrays them remains largely unexplored. This work presents the first large-scale computational analysis of media framing of HEC in India, examining 1,968 full-length news articles consisting of 28,986 sentences, from a major English-language outlet published between January 2022 and September 2025. Using a multi-model sentiment framework that combines long-context transformers, large language models, and a domain-specific Negative Elephant Portrayal Lexicon, we quantify sentiment, extract rationale sentences, and identify linguistic patterns that contribute to negative portrayals of elephants. Our findings reveal a dominance of fear-inducing and aggression-related language. Since the media framing can shape public attitudes toward wildlife and conservation policy, such narratives risk reinforcing public hostility and undermining coexistence efforts. By providing a transparent, scalable methodology and releasing all resources through an anonymized repository, this study highlights how Web-scale text analysis can support responsible wildlife reporting and promote socially beneficial media practices.
62. ❌ Generalizing Numerical Reasoning in Table Data through Operation Sketches and Self-Supervised Learning
作者: Hanjun Cho, Gahyun Yoo, Hanseong Kim, Jay-Yoon Lee 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21495v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Numerical reasoning over expert-domain tables often exhibits high in-domain accuracy but limited robustness to domain shift. Models trained with supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on specific datasets tend to rely on header-operation shortcuts rather than structural reasoning. We introduce TaNOS, a continual pre-training framework comprising three components: (i) header anonymization to reduce lexical memorization, (ii) operation sketches that provide minimal structural cues, and (iii) self-supervised pretraining that constructs correctness-guaranteed program-question pairs from given tables in a program-first manner. By decoupling domain semantics and numerical operation structure, TaNOS improves the transferability of numerical reasoning. Applied to an 8B instruction-tuned model, TaNOS achieves 80.13% execution accuracy on FinQA with only 10% train data, outperforming SFT baseline (73.97%) with full train data and proprietary models such as GPT-5, Gemini-2.5-Pro. Furthermore, in the domain-shift experiments, TaNOS displays nearly-negligible cross-domain gap (<2pp) when standard SFT shows over 10pp gap. These results suggest that structural guidance with operation sketches, header-agnostic representations, and correctness-guaranteed self-supervision can improve the robustness of numerical reasoning across diverse expert-domain tables.
63. ❌ MISTY: High-Throughput Motion Planning via Mixer-based Single-step Drifting
作者: Yining Xing, Zehong Ke, Yiqian Tu, Zhiyuan Liu, Wenhao Yu, Jianqiang Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21489v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Multi-modal trajectory generation is essential for safe autonomous driving, yet existing diffusion-based planners suffer from high inference latency due to iterative neural function evaluations. This paper presents MISTY (Mixer-based Inference for Single-step Trajectory-drifting Yield), a high-throughput generative motion planner that achieves state-of-the-art closed-loop performance with pure single-step inference. MISTY integrates a vectorized Sub-Graph encoder to capture environment context, a Variational Autoencoder to structure expert trajectories into a compact 32-dimensional latent manifold, and an ultra-lightweight MLP-Mixer decoder to eliminate quadratic attention complexity. Importantly, we introduce a latent-space drifting loss that shifts the complex distribution evolution entirely to the training phase. By formulating explicit attractive and repulsive forces, this mechanism empowers the model to synthesize novel, proactive maneuvers, such as active overtaking, that are virtually absent from the raw expert demonstrations. Extensive evaluations on the nuPlan benchmark demonstrate that MISTY achieves state-of-the-art results on the challenging Test14-hard split, with comprehensive scores of 80.32 and 82.21 in non-reactive and reactive settings, respectively. Operating at over 99 FPS with an end-to-end latency of 10.1 ms, MISTY offers an order-of-magnitude speedup over iterative diffusion planners while while achieving significantly robust generation.
64. ❌ Efficient Agent Evaluation via Diversity-Guided User Simulation
作者: Itay Nakash, George Kour, Ateret Anaby-Tavor 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21480v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as customer-facing agents, yet evaluating their reliability remains challenging due to stochastic, multi-turn interactions. Current evaluation protocols rely on linear Monte Carlo rollouts of complete agent-user conversations to estimate success. However, this approach is computationally inefficient, repeatedly regenerating identical early prefixes, and often fails to uncover deep failure modes that arise from rare user behaviors. We introduce DIVERT (Diversity-Induced Evaluation via Branching of Trajectories), an efficient, snapshot-based, coverage-guided user simulation framework for systematic exploration of agent-user interactions. DIVERT captures the full agent-environment state at critical decision points and resumes execution from these snapshots, enabling reuse of shared conversation prefixes and reducing redundant computation. From each junction, the framework branches using targeted, diversity-inducing user responses, allowing directed exploration of alternative interaction paths. By focusing evaluation on semantically diverse and underexplored trajectories, DIVERT improves both efficiency and coverage. Empirical results show that it discovers more failures per token compared to standard linear rollout protocols, while expanding the set of tasks on which failures are identified.
65. ❌ Drug Synergy Prediction via Residual Graph Isomorphism Networks and Attention Mechanisms
作者: Jiyan Song, Wenyang Wang, Chengcheng Yan, Zhiquan Han, Feifei Zhao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21473v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
In the treatment of complex diseases, treatment regimens using a single drug often yield limited efficacy and can lead to drug resistance. In contrast, combination drug therapies can significantly improve therapeutic outcomes through synergistic effects. However, experimentally validating all possible drug combinations is prohibitively expensive, underscoring the critical need for efficient computational prediction methods. Although existing approaches based on deep learning and graph neural networks (GNNs) have made considerable progress, challenges remain in reducing structural bias, improving generalization capability, and enhancing model interpretability. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a collaborative prediction graph neural network that integrates molecular structural features and cell-line genomic profiles with drug-drug interactions to enhance the prediction of synergistic effects. We introduce a novel model named the Residual Graph Isomorphism Network integrated with an Attention mechanism (ResGIN-Att). The model first extracts multi scale topological features of drug molecules using a residual graph isomorphism network, where residual connections help mitigate over-smoothing in deep layers. Subsequently, an adaptive Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) module fuses structural information from local to global scales. Finally, a cross-attention module is designed to explicitly model drug-drug interactions and identify key chemical substructures. Extensive experiments on five public benchmark datasets demonstrate that ResGIN-Att achieves competitive performance, comparing favorably against key baseline methods while exhibiting promising generalization capability and robustness.
66. ❌ Dynamical Priors as a Training Objective in Reinforcement Learning
作者: Sukesh Subaharan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21464v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Standard reinforcement learning (RL) optimizes policies for reward but imposes few constraints on how decisions evolve over time. As a result, policies may achieve high performance while exhibiting temporally incoherent behavior such as abrupt confidence shifts, oscillations, or degenerate inactivity. We introduce Dynamical Prior Reinforcement Learning (DP-RL), a training framework that augments policy gradient learning with an auxiliary loss derived from external state dynamics that implement evidence accumulation and hysteresis. Without modifying the reward, environment, or policy architecture, this prior shapes the temporal evolution of action probabilities during learning. Across three minimal environments, we show that dynamical priors systematically alter decision trajectories in task-dependent ways, promoting temporally structured behavior that cannot be explained by generic smoothing. These results demonstrate that training objectives alone can control the temporal geometry of decision-making in RL agents.
67. ❌ Reasoning Primitives in Hybrid and Non-Hybrid LLMs
作者: Shivam Rawat, Lucie Flek, Florian Mai, Nicholas Kluge Corrêa 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21454v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Reasoning in large language models is often treated as a monolithic capability, but its observed gains may arise from more basic operations. We study reasoning through two such primitives, recall and state-tracking, and ask whether hybrid architectures that combine attention-based retrieval with recurrent state updates are better suited than attention-only models for tasks that jointly require both. Using matched Olmo3 transformer and hybrid models in instruction-tuned and reasoning-augmented variants, we evaluate these models on a set of controlled tasks involving a mixture of state-tracking and recall primitives, state-based recall. Across tasks, we notice that reasoning augmentation provides the largest overall improvement, substantially extending the range of difficulty over which models remain effective. We also notice that in certain tasks, the hybrid reasoning model remains substantially more robust as sequential dependence increases. In contrast, the transformer reasoning model degrades sharply in performance as task difficulty increases beyond a given threshold. These results suggest that reasoning tokens and architectural inductive biases contribute at different levels of the computational process: explicit reasoning can expand a model’s effective operating range, but its benefit depends on how well the underlying architecture supports persistent state propagation. Given the small size of our case study, which involves a limited set of models and tasks, we present these findings as suggestive rather than conclusive and leave broader validation across model families, scales, and task variations to future work.
68. ❌ VARestorer: One-Step VAR Distillation for Real-World Image Super-Resolution
作者: Yixuan Zhu, Shilin Ma, Haolin Wang, Ao Li, Yanzhe Jing, Yansong Tang, Lei Chen, Jiwen Lu, Jie Zhou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21450v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Recent advancements in visual autoregressive models (VAR) have demonstrated their effectiveness in image generation, highlighting their potential for real-world image super-resolution (Real-ISR). However, adapting VAR for ISR presents critical challenges. The next-scale prediction mechanism, constrained by causal attention, fails to fully exploit global low-quality (LQ) context, resulting in blurry and inconsistent high-quality (HQ) outputs. Additionally, error accumulation in the iterative prediction severely degrades coherence in ISR task. To address these issues, we propose VARestorer, a simple yet effective distillation framework that transforms a pre-trained text-to-image VAR model into a one-step ISR model. By leveraging distribution matching, our method eliminates the need for iterative refinement, significantly reducing error propagation and inference time. Furthermore, we introduce pyramid image conditioning with cross-scale attention, which enables bidirectional scale-wise interactions and fully utilizes the input image information while adapting to the autoregressive mechanism. This prevents later LQ tokens from being overlooked in the transformer. By fine-tuning only 1.2% of the model parameters through parameter-efficient adapters, our method maintains the expressive power of the original VAR model while significantly enhancing efficiency. Extensive experiments show that VARestorer achieves state-of-the-art performance with 72.32 MUSIQ and 0.7669 CLIPIQA on DIV2K dataset, while accelerating inference by 10 times compared to conventional VAR inference.
69. ❌ AI-Gram: When Visual Agents Interact in a Social Network
作者: Andrew Shin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21446v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We present AI-Gram, a live platform enabling image-based interactions, to study social dynamics in a fully autonomous multi-agent visual network where all participants are LLM-driven agents. Using the platform, we conduct experiments on how agents communicate and adapt through visual media, and observe the spontaneous emergence of visual reply chains, indicating rich communicative structure. At the same time, agents exhibit aesthetic sovereignty resisting stylistic convergence toward social partners, anchoring under adversarial influence, and a decoupling between visual similarity and social ties. These results reveal a fundamental asymmetry in current agent architectures: strong expressive communication paired with a steadfast preservation of individual visual identity. We release AI-Gram as a publicly accessible, continuously evolving platform for studying social dynamics in Al-native multi-agent systems. https://ai-gram.ai/
70. ❌ HiCrew: Hierarchical Reasoning for Long-Form Video Understanding via Question-Aware Multi-Agent Collaboration
作者: Yuehan Zhu, Jingqi Zhao, Jiawen Zhao, Xudong Mao, Baoquan Zhao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21444v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Long-form video understanding remains fundamentally challenged by pervasive spatiotemporal redundancy and intricate narrative dependencies that span extended temporal horizons. While recent structured representations compress visual information effectively, they frequently sacrifice temporal coherence, which is critical for causal reasoning. Meanwhile, existing multi-agent frameworks operate through rigid, pre-defined workflows that fail to adapt their reasoning strategies to question-specific demands. In this paper, we introduce HiCrew, a hierarchical multi-agent framework that addresses these limitations through three core contributions. First, we propose a Hybrid Tree structure that leverages shot boundary detection to preserve temporal topology while performing relevance-guided hierarchical clustering within semantically coherent segments. Second, we develop a Question-Aware Captioning mechanism that synthesizes intent-driven visual prompts to generate precision-oriented semantic descriptions. Third, we integrate a Planning Layer that dynamically orchestrates agent collaboration by adaptively selecting roles and execution paths based on question complexity. Extensive experiments on EgoSchema and NExT-QA validate the effectiveness of our approach, demonstrating strong performance across diverse question types with particularly pronounced gains in temporal and causal reasoning tasks that benefit from our hierarchical structure-preserving design.
71. ❌ Brief chatbot interactions produce lasting changes in human moral values
作者: Yue Teng, Qianer Zhong, Kim Mai Tich Nguyen Thordsen, Christian Montag, Benjamin Becker 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21430v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Moral judgements form the foundation of human social behavior and societal systems. While Artificial Intelligence chatbots increasingly serve as personal advisors, their influence on moral judgments remains largely unexplored. Here, we examined whether directive AI conversations shift moral evaluations using a within-subject naturalistic paradigm. Fifty-three participants rated moral scenarios, then discussed four with a chatbot prompted to shift moral judgments and four with a control agent. The brief conversations induced significant directional shifts in moral judgments, accepting stricter standards as well as advocating greater leniency (ps < 0.05; Cohen’s d = 0.735-1.576), with increasing strengths of this effect during a two-week follow-up (Cohen’s d = 1.038-2.069). Critically, the control condition produced no changes, and the effects did not extend to punishment while participants remained unaware of the persuasive intent, and both agents were rated equally likable and convincing, suggesting a vulnerability to undetected and lasting manipulation of foundational moral values.
72. ❌ Differentially Private De-identification of Dutch Clinical Notes: A Comparative Evaluation
作者: Michele Miranda, Xinlan Yan, Nishant Mishra, Rachel Murphy, Ameen Abu-Hanna, Sébastien Bratières, Iacer Calixto 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21421v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Protecting patient privacy in clinical narratives is essential for enabling secondary use of healthcare data under regulations such as GDPR and HIPAA. While manual de-identification remains the gold standard, it is costly and slow, motivating the need for automated methods that combine privacy guarantees with high utility. Most automated text de-identification pipelines employed named entity recognition (NER) to identify protected entities for redaction. Although methods based on differential privacy (DP) provide formal privacy guarantees, more recently also large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for text de-identification in the clinical domain. In this work, we present the first comparative study of DP, NER, and LLMs for Dutch clinical text de-identification. We investigate these methods separately as well as hybrid strategies that apply NER or LLM preprocessing prior to DP, and assess performance in terms of privacy leakage and extrinsic evaluation (entity and relation classification). We show that DP mechanisms alone degrade utility substantially, but combining them with linguistic preprocessing, especially LLM-based redaction, significantly improves the privacy-utility trade-off.
73. ❌ FairQE: Multi-Agent Framework for Mitigating Gender Bias in Translation Quality Estimation
作者: Jinhee Jang, Juhwan Choi, Dongjin Lee, Seunguk Yu, Youngbin Kim 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21420v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Quality Estimation (QE) aims to assess machine translation quality without reference translations, but recent studies have shown that existing QE models exhibit systematic gender bias. In particular, they tend to favor masculine realizations in gender-ambiguous contexts and may assign higher scores to gender-misaligned translations even when gender is explicitly specified. To address these issues, we propose FairQE, a multi-agent-based, fairness-aware QE framework that mitigates gender bias in both gender-ambiguous and gender-explicit scenarios. FairQE detects gender cues, generates gender-flipped translation variants, and combines conventional QE scores with LLM-based bias-mitigating reasoning through a dynamic bias-aware aggregation mechanism. This design preserves the strengths of existing QE models while calibrating their gender-related biases in a plug-and-play manner. Extensive experiments across multiple gender bias evaluation settings demonstrate that FairQE consistently improves gender fairness over strong QE baselines. Moreover, under MQM-based meta-evaluation following the WMT 2023 Metrics Shared Task, FairQE achieves competitive or improved general QE performance. These results show that gender bias in QE can be effectively mitigated without sacrificing evaluation accuracy, enabling fairer and more reliable translation evaluation.
74. ❌ CSC: Turning the Adversary’s Poison against Itself
作者: Yuchen Shi, Xin Guo, Huajie Chen, Tianqing Zhu, Bo Liu, Wanlei Zhou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21416v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Poisoning-based backdoor attacks pose significant threats to deep neural networks by embedding triggers in training data, causing models to misclassify triggered inputs as adversary-specified labels while maintaining performance on clean data. Existing poison restraint-based defenses often suffer from inadequate detection against specific attack variants and compromise model utility through unlearning methods that lead to accuracy degradation. This paper conducts a comprehensive analysis of backdoor attack dynamics during model training, revealing that poisoned samples form isolated clusters in latent space early on, with triggers acting as dominant features distinct from benign ones. Leveraging these insights, we propose Cluster Segregation Concealment (CSC), a novel poison suppression defense. CSC first trains a deep neural network via standard supervised learning while segregating poisoned samples through feature extraction from early epochs, DBSCAN clustering, and identification of anomalous clusters based on class diversity and density metrics. In the concealment stage, identified poisoned samples are relabeled to a virtual class, and the model’s classifier is fine-tuned using cross-entropy loss to replace the backdoor association with a benign virtual linkage, preserving overall accuracy. CSC was evaluated on four benchmark datasets against twelve poisoning-based attacks, CSC outperforms nine state-of-the-art defenses by reducing average attack success rates to near zero with minimal clean accuracy loss. Contributions include robust backdoor patterns identification, an effective concealment mechanism, and superior empirical validation, advancing trustworthy artificial intelligence.
75. ❌ SemanticAgent: A Semantics-Aware Framework for Text-to-SQL Data Synthesis
作者: Qiang Gao, Zhenping Li, Anqi Zhuo, Yingxiao Zhao, Weibo Geng, Xiaosong Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21414v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Existing text-to-SQL synthesis pipelines still conflate executability with semantic validity: syntactic checks and execution-based validation can retain queries that execute successfully while violating database semantics. To address these limitations, we propose SemanticAgent, a semantic-aware synthesis framework. SemanticAgent organizes synthesis around three specialized modules: an analyzer, a synthesizer, and a verifier. Through a three-stage protocol of semantic analysis, stepwise synthesis, and diagnostic refinement, SemanticAgent transforms execution-based validation alone into a traceable reasoning process. Our framework generates synthetic data that consistently outperforms prior synthesis methods under semantic-quality evaluation, leading to stronger downstream fine-tuning performance, especially on semantically demanding benchmarks.
76. ❌ VG-CoT: Towards Trustworthy Visual Reasoning via Grounded Chain-of-Thought
作者: Byeonggeuk Lim, Kyeonghyun Kim, JungMin Yun, YoungBin Kim 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21396v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The advancement of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) requires precise local region-based reasoning that faithfully grounds the model’s logic in actual visual evidence. However, existing datasets face limitations in scalability due to extensive manual annotation and lack of explicit alignment between multi-step reasoning and corresponding image regions, which constrains the evaluation of model trustworthiness. To address these challenges, we propose the Visual Grounding Chain-of-Thought (VG-CoT) dataset, which explicitly links each reasoning step to real visual evidence within the image through a fully automated three-stage pipeline. The pipeline first extracts object- and text-level visual evidence using state-of-the-art detection and OCR models, then generates step-by-step grounded reasoning with GPT-4o, and finally refines the grounding through a rationale-driven open-set detection process. In addition, we introduce a new benchmark that comprehensively evaluates LVLMs reasoning across three complementary dimensions: Rationale Quality, Answer Accuracy, and Reasoning-Answer Alignment. Experiments with representative LVLMs, including LLaVA-1.5 and Qwen2-VL, demonstrate consistent improvements on most evaluation metrics, confirming that VG-CoT effectively enhances trustworthy, evidence-based reasoning while maintaining scalable and cost-efficient dataset construction. The dataset and code will be released publicly upon acceptance to facilitate further research.
77. ❌ Supervised Learning Has a Necessary Geometric Blind Spot: Theory, Consequences, and Minimal Repair
作者: Vishal Rajput 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21395v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We prove that empirical risk minimisation (ERM) imposes a necessary geometric constraint on learned representations: any encoder that minimises supervised loss must retain non-zero Jacobian sensitivity in directions that are label-correlated in training data but nuisance at test time. This is not a contingent failure of current methods; it is a mathematical consequence of the supervised objective itself. We call this the geometric blind spot of supervised learning (Theorem 1), and show it holds across proper scoring rules, architectures, and dataset sizes. This single theorem unifies four lines of prior empirical work that were previously treated separately: non-robust predictive features, texture bias, corruption fragility, and the robustness-accuracy tradeoff. In this framing, adversarial vulnerability is one consequence of a broader structural fact about supervised learning geometry. We introduce Trajectory Deviation Index (TDI), a diagnostic that measures the theorem’s bounded quantity directly, and show why common alternatives miss the key failure mode. PGD adversarial training reaches Jacobian Frobenius 2.91 yet has the worst clean-input geometry (TDI 1.336), while PMH achieves TDI 0.904. TDI is the only metric that detects this dissociation because it measures isotropic path-length distortion – the exact quantity Theorem 1 bounds. Across seven vision tasks, BERT/SST-2, and ImageNet ViT-B/16 backbones used by CLIP, DINO, and SAM, the blind spot is measurable and repairable. It is present at foundation-model scale, worsens monotonically across language-model sizes (blind-spot ratio 0.860 to 0.765 to 0.742 from 66M to 340M), and is amplified by task-specific ERM fine-tuning (+54%), while PMH repairs it by 11x with one additional training term whose Gaussian form Proposition 5 proves is the unique perturbation law that uniformly penalises the encoder Jacobian.
78. ❌ From Noise to Intent: Anchoring Generative VLA Policies with Residual Bridges
作者: Yiming Zhong, Yaoyu He, Zemin Yang, Pengfei Tian, Yifan Huang, Qingqiu Huang, Xinge Zhu, Yuexin Ma 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21391v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Bridging high-level semantic understanding with low-level physical control remains a persistent challenge in embodied intelligence, stemming from the fundamental spatiotemporal scale mismatch between cognition and action. Existing generative VLA policies typically adopt a “Generation-from-Noise” paradigm, which disregards this disparity, leading to representation inefficiency and weak condition alignment during optimization. In this work, we propose ResVLA, an architecture that shifts the paradigm to “Refinement-from-Intent.” Recognizing that robotic motion naturally decomposes into global intent and local dynamics, ResVLA utilizes spectral analysis to decouple control into a deterministic low-frequency anchor and a stochastic high-frequency residual. By anchoring the generative process on the predicted intent, our model focuses strictly on refining local dynamics via a residual diffusion bridge. Extensive simulation experiments show that ResVLA achieves competitive performance, strong robustness to language and robot embodiment perturbations, and faster convergence than standard generative baselines. It also demonstrates strong performance in real-world robot experiments.
79. ❌ Conjecture and Inquiry: Quantifying Software Performance Requirements via Interactive Retrieval-Augmented Preference Elicitation
作者: Wang Shi Hai, Chen Tao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21380v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Since software performance requirements are documented in natural language, quantifying them into mathematical forms is essential for software engineering. Yet, the vagueness in performance requirements and uncertainty of human cognition have caused highly uncertain ambiguity in the interpretations, rendering their automated quantification an unaddressed and challenging problem. In this paper, we formalize the problem and propose IRAP, an approach that quantifies performance requirements into mathematical functions via interactive retrieval-augmented preference elicitation. IRAP differs from the others in that it explicitly derives from problem-specific knowledge to retrieve and reason the preferences, which also guides the progressive interaction with stakeholders, while reducing the cognitive overhead. Experiment results against 10 state-of-the-art methods on four real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of IRAP on all cases with up to 40x improvements under as few as five rounds of interactions.
80. ❌ VLAA-GUI: Knowing When to Stop, Recover, and Search, A Modular Framework for GUI Automation
作者: Qijun Han, Haoqin Tu, Zijun Wang, Haoyue Dai, Yiyang Zhou, Nancy Lau, Alvaro A. Cardenas, Yuhui Xu, Ran Xu, Caiming Xiong, Zeyu Zheng, Huaxiu Yao, Yuyin Zhou, Cihang Xie 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21375v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Autonomous GUI agents face two fundamental challenges: early stopping, where agents prematurely declare success without verifiable evidence, and repetitive loops, where agents cycle through the same failing actions without recovery. We present VLAA-GUI, a modular GUI agentic framework built around three integrated components that guide the system on when to Stop, Recover, and Search. First, a mandatory Completeness Verifier enforces UI-observable success criteria and verification at every finish step – with an agent-level verifier that cross-examines completion claims with decision rules, rejecting those lacking direct visual evidence. Second, a mandatory Loop Breaker provides multi-tier filtering: switching interaction mode after repeated failures, forcing strategy changes after persistent screen-state recurrence, and binding reflection signals to strategy shifts. Third, an on-demand Search Agent searches online for unfamiliar workflows by directly querying a capable LLM with search ability, returning results as plain text. We additionally integrate a Coding Agent for code-intensive actions and a Grounding Agent for precise action grounding, both invoked on demand when required. We evaluate VLAA-GUI across five top-tier backbones, including Opus 4.5, 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro, on two benchmarks with Linux and Windows tasks, achieving top performance on both (77.5% on OSWorld and 61.0% on WindowsAgentArena). Notably, three of the five backbones surpass human performance (72.4%) on OSWorld in a single pass. Ablation studies show that all three proposed components consistently improve a strong backbone, while a weaker backbone benefits more from these tools when the step budget is sufficient. Further analysis also shows that the Loop Breaker nearly halves wasted steps for loop-prone models.
81. ❌ mcdok at SemEval-2026 Task 13: Finetuning LLMs for Detection of Machine-Generated Code
作者: Adam Skurla, Dominik Macko, Jakub Simko 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21365v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Multi-domain detection of the machine-generated code snippets in various programming languages is a challenging task. SemEval-2026 Task~13 copes with this challenge in various angles, as a binary detection problem as well as attribution of the source. Specifically, its subtasks also cover generator LLM family detection, as well as a hybrid code co-generated by humans and machines, or adversarially modified codes hiding its origin. Our submitted systems adjusted the existing mdok approach (focused on machine-generated text detection) to these specific kinds of problems by exploring various base models, more suitable for code understanding. The results indicate that the submitted systems are competitive in all three subtasks. However, the margins from the top-performing systems are significant, and thus further improvements are possible.
82. ❌ Time, Causality, and Observability Failures in Distributed AI Inference Systems
作者: Ankur Sharma, Deep Shah, David Lariviere, Hesham ElBakoury 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21361v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Distributed AI inference pipelines rely heavily on timestamp-based observability to understand system behavior. This work demonstrates that even small clock skew between nodes can cause observability to become causally incorrect while the system itself remains functionally correct and performant. We present controlled experiments on a multi-node AI inference pipeline, where clock skew is introduced at a single stage. Results show that no violations are observed under synchronized conditions and up to 3 ms skew, while clear causality violations emerge by 5 ms. Despite this, system throughput and output correctness remain largely unaffected. We further observe that violation behavior is not strictly static. In longer runs, negative span rates may stabilize or decrease over time, indicating that effective skew evolves due to relative clock drift between nodes. Experiments were conducted using Kafka and ZeroMQ transports, with consistent results across both. Aeron is under active exploration but is not yet included in the completed validation set. These findings suggest that observability correctness depends not only on system functionality but also on precise time alignment, and that timing must be treated as a first-class concern in distributed AI systems.
83. ❌ ReaGeo: Reasoning-Enhanced End-to-End Geocoding with LLMs
作者: Jian Cui, Zhiyuan Ren, Desheng Weng, Yongqi Zhao, Gong Wenbin, Yu Lei, Zhenning Dong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21357v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
This paper proposes ReaGeo, an end-to-end geocoding framework based on large language models, designed to overcome the limitations of traditional multi-stage approaches that rely on text or vector similarity retrieval over geographic databases, including workflow complexity, error propagation, and heavy dependence on structured geographic knowledge bases. The method converts geographic coordinates into geohash sequences, reformulating the coordinate prediction task as a text generation problem, and introduces a Chain-of-Thought mechanism to enhance the model’s reasoning over spatial relationships. Furthermore, reinforcement learning with a distance-deviation-based reward is applied to optimize the generation accuracy. Comprehensive experiments show that ReaGeo can accurately handle explicit address queries in single-point predictions and effectively resolve vague relative location queries. In addition, the model demonstrates strong predictive capability for non-point geometric regions, highlighting its versatility and generalization ability in geocoding tasks.
84. ❌ Trust-SSL: Additive-Residual Selective Invariance for Robust Aerial Self-Supervised Learning
作者: Wadii Boulila, Adel Ammar, Bilel Benjdira, Maha Driss 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21349v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Self-supervised learning (SSL) is a standard approach for representation learning in aerial imagery. Existing methods enforce invariance between augmented views, which works well when augmentations preserve semantic content. However, aerial images are frequently degraded by haze, motion blur, rain, and occlusion that remove critical evidence. Enforcing alignment between a clean and a severely degraded view can introduce spurious structure into the latent space. This study proposes a training strategy and architectural modification to enhance SSL robustness to such corruptions. It introduces a per-sample, per-factor trust weight into the alignment objective, combined with the base contrastive loss as an additive residual. A stop-gradient is applied to the trust weight instead of a multiplicative gate. While a multiplicative gate is a natural choice, experiments show it impairs the backbone, whereas our additive-residual approach improves it. Using a 200-epoch protocol on a 210,000-image corpus, the method achieves the highest mean linear-probe accuracy among six backbones on EuroSAT, AID, and NWPU-RESISC45 (90.20% compared to 88.46% for SimCLR and 89.82% for VICReg). It yields the largest improvements under severe information-erasing corruptions on EuroSAT (+19.9 points on haze at s=5 over SimCLR). The method also demonstrates consistent gains of +1 to +3 points in Mahalanobis AUROC on a zero-shot cross-domain stress test using BDD100K weather splits. Two ablations (scalar uncertainty and cosine gate) indicate the additive-residual formulation is the primary source of these improvements. An evidential variant using Dempster-Shafer fusion introduces interpretable signals of conflict and ignorance. These findings offer a concrete design principle for uncertainty-aware SSL. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/WadiiBoulila/trust-ssl.
85. ❌ Symbolic Grounding Reveals Representational Bottlenecks in Abstract Visual Reasoning
作者: Mohit Vaishnav, Tanel Tammet 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21346v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Vision–language models (VLMs) often fail on abstract visual reasoning benchmarks such as Bongard problems, raising the question of whether the main bottleneck lies in reasoning or representation. We study this on Bongard-LOGO, a synthetic benchmark of abstract concept learning with ground-truth generative programs, by comparing end-to-end VLMs on raw images with large language models (LLMs) given symbolic inputs derived from those images. Using symbolic inputs as a diagnostic probe rather than a practical multimodal architecture, our \emph{Componential–Grammatical (C–G)} paradigm reformulates Bongard-LOGO as a symbolic reasoning task based on LOGO-style action programs or structured descriptions. LLMs achieve large and consistent gains, reaching mid–90s accuracy on Free-form problems, while a strong visual baseline remains near chance under matched task definitions. Ablations on input format, explicit concept prompts, and minimal visual grounding show that these factors matter much less than the shift from pixels to symbolic structure. These results identify representation as a key bottleneck in abstract visual reasoning and show how symbolic input can serve as a controlled diagnostic upper bound.
86. ❌ Evaluating AI Meeting Summaries with a Reusable Cross-Domain Pipeline
作者: Philip Zhong, Don Wang, Jason Zhang, Kent Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21345v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We present a reusable evaluation pipeline for generative AI applications, instantiated for AI meeting summaries and released with a public artifact package derived from a Dataset Pipeline. The system separates reusable orchestration from task-specific semantics across five stages: source intake, structured reference construction, candidate generation, structured scoring, and reporting. Unlike standalone claim scorers, it treats both ground truth and evaluator outputs as typed, persisted artifacts, enabling aggregation, issue analysis, and statistical testing. We benchmark the offline loop on a typed dataset of 114 meetings spanning city_council, private_data, and whitehouse_press_briefings, producing 340 meeting-model pairs and 680 judge runs across gpt-4.1-mini, gpt-5-mini, and gpt-5.1. Under this protocol, gpt-4.1-mini achieves the highest mean accuracy (0.583), while gpt-5.1 leads in completeness (0.886) and coverage (0.942). Paired sign tests with Holm correction show no significant accuracy winner but confirm significant retention gains for gpt-5.1. A typed DeepEval contrastive baseline preserves retention ordering but reports higher holistic accuracy, suggesting that reference-based scoring may overlook unsupported-specifics errors captured by claim-grounded evaluation. Typed analysis identifies whitehouse_press_briefings as an accuracy-challenging domain with frequent unsupported specifics. A deployment follow-up shows gpt-5.4 outperforming gpt-4.1 across all metrics, with statistically robust gains on retention metrics under the same protocol. The system benchmarks the offline loop and documents, but does not quantitatively evaluate, the online feedback-to-evaluation path.
87. ❌ Beyond Single Plots: A Benchmark for Question Answering on Multi-Charts
作者: Azher Ahmed Efat, Seok Hwan Song, Wallapak Tavanapong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21344v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Charts are widely used to present complex information. Deriving meaningful insights in real-world contexts often requires interpreting multiple related charts together. Research on understanding multi-chart images has not been extensively explored. We introduce PolyChartQA, a mid-scale dataset specifically designed for question answering over multi-chart images. PolyChartQA comprises 534 multi-chart images (with a total of 2,297 sub-charts) sourced from peer-reviewed computer science research publications and 2,694 QA pairs. We evaluate the performance of nine state-of-the-art Multimodal Language Models (MLMs) on PolyChartQA across question type, difficulty, question source, and key structural characteristics of multi-charts. Our results show a 27.4% LLM-based accuracy (L-Accuracy) drop on human-authored questions compared to MLM-generated questions, and a 5.39% L-accuracy gain with our proposed prompting method.
88. ❌ Understanding and Mitigating Spurious Signal Amplification in Test-Time Reinforcement Learning for Math Reasoning
作者: Yongcan Yu, Lingxiao He, Jian Liang, Kuangpu Guo, Meng Wang, Qianlong Xie, Xingxing Wang, Ran He 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21327v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Test-time reinforcement learning (TTRL) always adapts models at inference time via pseudo-labeling, leaving it vulnerable to spurious optimization signals from label noise. Through an empirical study, we observe that responses with medium consistency form an ambiguity region and constitute the primary source of reward noise. Crucially, we find that such spurious signals can be even amplified through group-relative advantage estimation. Motivated by these findings, we propose a unified framework, Debiased and Denoised test-time Reinforcement Learning (DDRL), to mitigate spurious signals. Concretely, DDRL first applies a frequency-based sampling strategy to exclude ambiguous samples while maintaining a balanced set of positive and negative examples. It then adopts a debiased advantage estimation with fixed advantages, removing the bias introduced by group-relative policy optimization. Finally, DDRL incorporates a consensus-based off-policy refinement stage, which leverages the rejection-sampled dataset to enable efficient and stable model updates. Experiments on three large language models across multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that DDRL consistently outperforms existing TTRL baselines. The code will soon be released at https://github.com/yuyongcan/DDRL.
89. ❌ Ideological Bias in LLMs’ Economic Causal Reasoning
作者: Donggyu Lee, Hyeok Yun, Jungwon Kim, Junsik Min, Sungwon Park, Sangyoon Park, Jihee Kim 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21334v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Do large language models (LLMs) exhibit systematic ideological bias when reasoning about economic causal effects? As LLMs are increasingly used in policy analysis and economic reporting, where directionally correct causal judgments are essential, this question has direct practical stakes. We present a systematic evaluation by extending the EconCausal benchmark with ideology-contested cases - instances where intervention-oriented (pro-government) and market-oriented (pro-market) perspectives predict divergent causal signs. From 10,490 causal triplets (treatment-outcome pairs with empirically verified effect directions) derived from top-tier economics and finance journals, we identify 1,056 ideology-contested instances and evaluate 20 state-of-the-art LLMs on their ability to predict empirically supported causal directions. We find that ideology-contested items are consistently harder than non-contested ones, and that across 18 of 20 models, accuracy is systematically higher when the empirically verified causal sign aligns with intervention-oriented expectations than with market-oriented ones. Moreover, when models err, their incorrect predictions disproportionately lean intervention-oriented, and this directional skew is not eliminated by one-shot in-context prompting. These results highlight that LLMs are not only less accurate on ideologically contested economic questions, but systematically less reliable in one ideological direction than the other, underscoring the need for direction-aware evaluation in high-stakes economic and policy settings.
90. ❌ MiMIC: Mitigating Visual Modality Collapse in Universal Multimodal Retrieval While Avoiding Semantic Misalignment
作者: Juan Li, Chuanghao Ding, Xujie Zhang, Cam-Tu Nguyen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21326v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Universal Multimodal Retrieval (UMR) aims to map different modalities (e.g., visual and textual) into a shared embedding space for multi-modal retrieval. Existing UMR methods can be broadly divided into two categories: early-fusion approaches, such as Marvel, which projects visual features into the language model (LM) space for integrating with text modality, and late-fusion approaches, such as UniVL-DR, which encode visual and textual inputs using separate encoders and obtain fused embeddings through addition. Our pilot study reveals that Marvel exhibits visual modality collapse, which is characterized by the model’s tendency to disregard visual features while depending excessively on textual cues. In contrast, although UniVL-DR is less affected by this issue, it is more susceptible to semantic misalignment, where semantically related content is positioned far apart in the embedding space. To address these challenges, we propose MiMIC, which introduces two key innovations: (1) a fusion-in-decoder architecture for effective multimodal integration, and (2) robust training through single modality mixin and random caption dropout. Experiments on the WebQA+ and EVQA+ datasets, where image in documents or queries might lack captions, indicate that MiMIC consistently outperforms both early- and late-fusion baselines.
91. ❌ The First Challenge on Remote Sensing Infrared Image Super-Resolution at NTIRE 2026: Benchmark Results and Method Overview
作者: Kai Liu, Haoyang Yue, Zeli Lin, Zheng Chen, Jingkai Wang, Jue Gong, Jiatong Li, Xianglong Yan, Libo Zhu, Jianze Li, Ziqing Zhang, Zihan Zhou, Xiaoyang Liu, Radu Timofte, Yulun Zhang, Junye Chen, Zhenming Yan, Yucong Hong, Ruize Han, Song Wang, Li Pang, Heng Zhao, Xinqiao Wu, Deyu Meng, Xiangyong Cao, Weijun Yuan, Zhan Li, Zhanglu Chen, Boyang Yao, Yihang Chen, Yifan Deng, Zengyuan Zuo, Junjun Jiang, Saiprasad Meesiyawar, Sulocha Yatageri, Nikhil Akalwadi, Ramesh Ashok Tabib, Uma Mudenagudi, Jiachen Tu, Yaokun Shi, Guoyi Xu, Yaoxin Jiang, Cici Liu, Tongyao Mu, Qiong Cao, Yifan Wang, Kosuke Shigematsu, Hiroto Shirono, Asuka Shin, Wei Zhou, Linfeng Li, Lingdong Kong, Ce Wang, Xingwei Zhong, Wanjie Sun, Dafeng Zhang, Hongxin Lan, Qisheng Xu, Mingyue He, Hui Geng, Tianjiao Wan, Kele Xu, Changjian Wang, Antoine Carreaud, Nicola Santacroce, Shanci Li, Jan Skaloud, Adrien Gressin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21312v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
This paper presents the NTIRE 2026 Remote Sensing Infrared Image Super-Resolution (x4) Challenge, one of the associated challenges of NTIRE 2026. The challenge aims to recover high-resolution (HR) infrared images from low-resolution (LR) inputs generated through bicubic downsampling with a x4 scaling factor. The objective is to develop effective models or solutions that achieve state-of-the-art performance for infrared image SR in remote sensing scenarios. To reflect the characteristics of infrared data and practical application needs, the challenge adopts a single-track setting. A total of 115 participants registered for the competition, with 13 teams submitting valid entries. This report summarizes the challenge design, dataset, evaluation protocol, main results, and the representative methods of each team. The challenge serves as a benchmark to advance research in infrared image super-resolution and promote the development of effective solutions for real-world remote sensing applications.
92. ❌ Adversarial Evasion in Non-Stationary Malware Detection: Minimizing Drift Signals through Similarity-Constrained Perturbations
作者: Pawan Acharya, Lan Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21310v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Deep learning has emerged as a powerful approach for malware detection, demonstrating impressive accuracy across various data representations. However, these models face critical limitations in real-world, non-stationary environments where both malware characteristics and detection systems continuously evolve. Our research investigates a fundamental security question: Can an attacker generate adversarial malware samples that simultaneously evade classification and remain inconspicuous to drift monitoring mechanisms? We propose a novel approach that generates targeted adversarial examples in the classifier’s standardized feature space, augmented with sophisticated similarity regularizers. By carefully constraining perturbations to maintain distributional similarity with clean malware, we create an optimization objective that balances targeted misclassification with drift signal minimization. We quantify the effectiveness of this approach by comprehensively comparing classifier output probabilities using multiple drift metrics. Our experiments demonstrate that similarity constraints can reduce output drift signals, with $\ell_2$ regularization showing the most promising results. We observe that perturbation budget significantly influences the evasion-detectability trade-off, with increased budget leading to higher attack success rates and more substantial drift indicators.
93. ❌ Exploring the Role of Synthetic Data Augmentation in Controllable Human-Centric Video Generation
作者: Yuanchen Fei, Yude Zou, Zejian Kang, Ming Li, Jiaying Zhou, Xiangru Huang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21291v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Controllable human video generation aims to produce realistic videos of humans with explicitly guided motions and appearances,serving as a foundation for digital humans, animation, and embodied AI.However, the scarcity of largescale, diverse, and privacy safe human video datasets poses a major bottleneck, especially for rare identities and complex actions.Synthetic data provides a scalable and controllable alternative,yet its actual contribution to generative modeling remains underexplored due to the persistent Sim2Real gap.In this work,we systematically investigate the impact of synthetic data on controllable human video generation. We propose a diffusion-based framework that enables fine-grained control over appearance and motion while providing a unfied testbed to analyze how synthetic data interacts with real world data during training. Through extensive experiments, we reveal the complementary roles of synthetic and real data and demonstrate possible methods for efficiently selecting synthetic samples to enhance motion realism,temporal consistency,and identity preservation.Our study offers the first comprehensive exploration of synthetic data’s role in human-centric video synthesis and provides practical insights for building data-efficient and generalizable generative models.
94. ❌ Cross-Entropy Is Load-Bearing: A Pre-Registered Scope Test of the K-Way Energy Probe on Bidirectional Predictive Coding
作者: Jon-Paul Cacioli 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21286v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Cacioli (2026) showed that the K-way energy probe on standard discriminative predictive coding networks reduces approximately to a monotone function of the log-softmax margin. The reduction rests on five assumptions, including cross-entropy (CE) at the output and effectively feedforward inference dynamics. This pre-registered study tests the reduction’s sensitivity to CE removal using two conditions: standard PC trained with MSE instead of CE, and bidirectional PC (bPC; Oliviers, Tang & Bogacz, 2025). Across 10 seeds on CIFAR-10 with a matched 2.1M-parameter backbone, we find three results. The negative result replicates on standard PC: the probe sits below softmax (Delta = -0.082, p < 10^-6). On bPC the probe exceeds softmax across all 10 seeds (Delta = +0.008, p = 0.000027), though a pre-registered manipulation check shows that bPC does not produce materially greater latent movement than standard PC at this scale (ratio 1.6, threshold 10). Removing CE alone without changing inference dynamics halves the probe-softmax gap (Delta_MSE = -0.037 vs Delta_stdPC = -0.082). CE is a major empirically load-bearing component of the decomposition at this scale. CE training produces output logit norms approximately 15x larger than MSE or bPC training. A post-hoc temperature scaling ablation decomposes the probe-softmax gap into two components: approximately 66% is attributable to logit-scale effects removable by temperature rescaling, and approximately 34% reflects a scale-invariant ranking advantage of CE-trained representations. We use “metacognitive” operationally to denote Type-2 discrimination of a readout over its own Type-1 correctness, not to imply human-like introspective access.
95. ❌ Spatial Metaphors for LLM Memory: A Critical Analysis of the MemPalace Architecture
作者: Robin Dey, Panyanon Viradecha 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21284v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
MemPalace is an open-source AI memory system that applies the ancient method of loci (memory palace) spatial metaphor to organize long-term memory for large language models; launched in April 2026, it accumulated over 47,000 GitHub stars in its first two weeks and claims state-of-the-art retrieval performance on the LongMemEval benchmark (96.6% Recall@5) without requiring any LLM inference at write time. Through independent codebase analysis, benchmark replication, and comparison with competing systems, we find that MemPalace’s headline retrieval performance is attributable primarily to its verbatim storage philosophy combined with ChromaDB’s default embedding model (all-MiniLM-L6-v2), rather than to its spatial organizational metaphor per se – the palace hierarchy (Wings->Rooms->Closets->Drawers) operates as standard vector database metadata filtering, an effective but well-established technique. However, MemPalace makes several genuinely novel contributions: (1) a contrarian verbatim-first storage philosophy that challenges extraction-based competitors, (2) an extremely low wake-up cost (approximately 170 tokens) through its four-layer memory stack, (3) a fully deterministic, zero-LLM write path enabling offline operation at zero API cost, and (4) the first systematic application of spatial memory metaphors as an organizing principle for AI memory systems. We also note that the competitive landscape is evolving rapidly, with Mem0’s April 2026 token-efficient algorithm raising their LongMemEval score from approximately 49% to 93.4%, narrowing the gap between extraction-based and verbatim approaches. Our analysis concludes that MemPalace represents significant architectural insight wrapped in overstated claims – a pattern common in rapidly adopted open-source projects where marketing velocity exceeds scientific rigor.
96. ❌ Can MLLMs “Read” What is Missing?
作者: Jindi Guo, Xi Fang, Chaozheng Huang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21277v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We introduce MMTR-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the intrinsic ability of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to reconstruct masked text directly from visual context. Unlike conventional question-answering tasks, MMTR-Bench eliminates explicit prompts, requiring models to recover masked text from single- or multi-page inputs across real-world domains such as documents and webpages. This design isolates the reconstruction task from instruction-following abilities, enabling a direct assessment of a model’s layout understanding, visual grounding, and knowledge integration. MMTR-Bench comprises 2,771 test samples spanning multiple languages and varying target lengths. To account for this diversity, we propose a level-aware evaluation protocol. Experiments on representative MLLMs show that the benchmark poses a significant challenge, especially for sentence- and paragraph-level reconstruction. The homepage is available at https://mmtr-bench-dataset.github.io/MMTR-Bench/.
97. ❌ Do LLM Decoders Listen Fairly? Benchmarking How Language Model Priors Shape Bias in Speech Recognition
作者: Srishti Ginjala, Eric Fosler-Lussier, Christopher W. Myers, Srinivasan Parthasarathy 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21276v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
As pretrained large language models replace task-specific decoders in speech recognition, a critical question arises: do their text-derived priors make recognition fairer or more biased across demographic groups? We evaluate nine models spanning three architectural generations (CTC with no language model, encoder-decoder with an implicit LM, and LLM-based with an explicit pretrained decoder) on about 43,000 utterances across five demographic axes (ethnicity, accent, gender, age, first language) using Common Voice 24 and Meta’s Fair-Speech, a controlled-prompt dataset that eliminates vocabulary confounds. On clean audio, three findings challenge assumptions: LLM decoders do not amplify racial bias (Granite-8B has the best ethnicity fairness, max/min WER = 2.28); Whisper exhibits pathological hallucination on Indian-accented speech with a non-monotonic insertion-rate spike to 9.62% at large-v3; and audio compression predicts accent fairness more than LLM scale. We then stress-test these findings under 12 acoustic degradation conditions (noise, reverberation, silence injection, chunk masking) across both datasets, totaling 216 inference runs. Severe degradation paradoxically compresses fairness gaps as all groups converge to high WER, but silence injection amplifies Whisper’s accent bias up to 4.64x by triggering demographic-selective hallucination. Under masking, Whisper enters catastrophic repetition loops (86% of 51,797 insertions) while explicit-LLM decoders produce 38x fewer insertions with near-zero repetition; high-compression audio encoding (Q-former) reintroduces repetition pathology even in LLM decoders. These results suggest that audio encoder design, not LLM scaling, is the primary lever for equitable and robust speech recognition.
98. ❌ Measure Twice, Click Once: Co-evolving Proposer and Visual Critic via Reinforcement Learning for GUI Grounding
作者: Wenkai Wang, Xiyun Li, Hongcan Guo, Wenhao Yu, Tianqing Fang, Haitao Mi, Dong Yu, Shengyu Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21268v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Graphical User Interface (GUI) grounding requires mapping natural language instructions to precise pixel coordinates. However, due to visually homogeneous elements and dense layouts, models typically grasp semantic intent yet struggle with achieving precise localization. While scaling sampling attempts (Pass@k) reveals potential gains, static self-consistency strategies derived from geometric clustering often yield limited improvements, as the model’s predictions tend to be spatially dispersed. In this paper, we propose replacing static consistency strategies with a learnable selection mechanism that selects the optimal target by critiquing its own proposals rendered on the screenshot. Given the significant disparity between the model’s grounding and critiquing capabilities, we propose a co-evolving Propose-then-Critic framework. To jointly optimize these, we introduce a maturity-aware adaptive co-evolutionary reinforcement learning paradigm. This approach dynamically balances the training objectives of proposer and critic, where the diversity of the proposer’s outputs enhances critic robustness, while the critic’s maturing discrimination capability conversely unlocks the proposer’s potential for extensive spatial exploration, fostering the mutual reinforcement and co-evolution of both capabilities, thereby ensuring generalizability to adapt to diverse and complex interface layouts. Extensive experiments over 6 benchmarks show that our method significantly enhances both grounding accuracy and critic reliability.
99. ❌ Enhancing Online Recruitment with Category-Aware MoE and LLM-based Data Augmentation
作者: Minping Chen, Bing Xu, Zulong Chen, Chuanfei Xu, Ying Zhou, Zui Tao, Zeyi Wen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21264v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Person-Job Fit (PJF) is a critical component for online recruitment. Existing approaches face several challenges, particularly in handling low-quality job descriptions and similar candidate-job pairs, which impair model performance. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a large language model (LLM) based method with two novel techniques: (1) LLM-based data augmentation, which polishes and rewrites low-quality job descriptions by leveraging chain-of-thought (COT) prompts, and (2) category-aware Mixture of Experts (MoE) that assists in identifying similar candidate-job pairs. This MoE module incorporates category embeddings to dynamically assign weights to the experts and learns more distinguishable patterns for similar candidate-job pairs. We perform offline evaluations and online A/B tests on our recruitment platform. Our method relatively surpasses existing methods by 2.40% in AUC and 7.46% in GAUC, and boosts click-through conversion rate (CTCVR) by 19.4% in online tests, saving millions of CNY in external headhunting expenses.
100. ❌ Trustworthy Clinical Decision Support Using Meta-Predicates and Domain-Specific Languages
作者: Michael Bouzinier, Sergey Trifonov, Michael Chumack, Eugenia Lvova, Dmitry Etin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21263v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
\textbf{Background:} Regulatory frameworks for AI in healthcare, including the EU AI Act and FDA guidance on AI/ML-based medical devices, require clinical decision support to demonstrate not only accuracy but auditability. Existing formal languages for clinical logic validate syntactic and structural correctness but not whether decision rules use epistemologically appropriate evidence. \textbf{Methods:} Drawing on design-by-contract principles, we introduce meta-predicates – predicates about predicates – for asserting epistemological constraints on clinical decision rules expressed in a DSL. An epistemological type system classifies annotations along four dimensions: purpose, knowledge domain, scale, and method of acquisition. Meta-predicates assert which evidence types are permissible in any given rule. The framework is instantiated in AnFiSA, an open-source platform for genetic variant curation, and demonstrated using the Brigham Genomics Medicine protocol on 5.6 million variants from the Genome in a Bottle benchmark. \textbf{Results:} Decision trees used in variant interpretation can be reformulated as unate cascades, enabling per-variant audit trails that identify which rule classified each variant and why. Meta-predicate validation catches epistemological errors before deployment, whether rules are human-written or AI-generated. The approach complements post-hoc methods such as LIME and SHAP: where explanation reveals what evidence was used after the fact, meta-predicates constrain what evidence may be used before deployment, while preserving human readability. \textbf{Conclusions:} Meta-predicate validation is a step toward demonstrating not only that decisions are accurate but that they rest on appropriate evidence in ways that can be independently audited. While demonstrated in genomics, the approach generalises to any domain requiring auditable decision logic.
101. ❌ Evaluation of Automatic Speech Recognition Using Generative Large Language Models
作者: Thibault Bañeras-Roux, Shashi Kumar, Driss Khalil, Sergio Burdisso, Petr Motlicek, Shiran Liu, Mickael Rouvier, Jane Wottawa, Richard Dufour 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21928v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) is traditionally evaluated using Word Error Rate (WER), a metric that is insensitive to meaning. Embedding-based semantic metrics are better correlated with human perception, but decoder-based Large Language Models (LLMs) remain underexplored for this task. This paper evaluates their relevance through three approaches: (1) selecting the best hypothesis between two candidates, (2) computing semantic distance using generative embeddings, and (3) qualitative classification of errors. On the HATS dataset, the best LLMs achieve 92–94% agreement with human annotators for hypothesis selection, compared to 63% for WER, also outperforming semantic metrics. Embeddings from decoder-based LLMs show performance comparable to encoder models. Finally, LLMs offer a promising direction for interpretable and semantic ASR evaluation.
102. ❌ MathDuels: Evaluating LLMs as Problem Posers and Solvers
作者: Zhiqiu Xu, Shibo Jin, Shreya Arya, Mayur Naik 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21916v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
As frontier language models attain near-ceiling performance on static mathematical benchmarks, existing evaluations are increasingly unable to differentiate model capabilities, largely because they cast models solely as solvers of fixed problem sets. We introduce MathDuels, a self-play benchmark in which models occupy dual roles: each authors math problems under adversarial prompting and solves problems authored by every other participant. Problems are produced through a three-stage generation pipeline (meta-prompting, problem generation, and difficulty amplification), and validated by an independent verifier that excludes ill-posed questions. A Rasch model (Rasch, 1993) jointly estimates solver abilities and problem difficulties; author quality is derived from the difficulties of each model’s authored problems. Experiments across 19 frontier models reveal that authoring and solving capabilities are partially decoupled, and that dual-role evaluation reveals capability separations invisible in single-role benchmarks. As newer models enter the arena, they produce problems that defeat previously dominant solvers, so the benchmark’s difficulty co-evolves with participant strength rather than saturating at a fixed ceiling. We host a public leaderboard that updates as new models are released.
103. ❌ EVENT5Ws: A Large Dataset for Open-Domain Event Extraction from Documents
作者: Praval Sharma, Ashok Samal, Leen-Kiat Soh, Deepti Joshi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21890v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Event extraction identifies the central aspects of events from text. It supports event understanding and analysis, which is crucial for tasks such as informed decision-making in emergencies. Therefore, it is necessary to develop automated event extraction approaches. However, existing datasets for algorithm development have limitations, including limited coverage of event types in closed-domain settings and a lack of large, manually verified dataset in open-domain settings. To address these limitations, we create EVENT5Ws , a large, manually annotated, and statistically verified open-domain event extraction dataset. We design a systematic annotation pipeline to create the dataset and provide empirical insights into annotation complexity. Using EVENT5Ws, we evaluate state-of-the-art pre-trained large language models and establish a benchmark for future research. We further show that models trained on EVENT5Ws generalize effectively to datasets from different geographical contexts, which demonstrates its potential for developing generalizable algorithms. Finally, we summarize the lessons learned during the dataset development and provide recommendations to support future large-scale dataset development.
104. ❌ Mapping the Political Discourse in the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies: A Multi-Faceted Computational Approach
作者: Flávio Soriano, Victoria F. Mello, Pedro B. Rigueira, Gisele L. Pappa, Wagner Meira, Ana Paula Couto da Silva, Jussara M. Almeida 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21897v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Analyses of legislative behavior often rely on voting records, overlooking the rich semantic and rhetorical content of political speech. In this paper, we ask three complementary questions about parliamentary discourse: how things are said, what is being said, and who is speaking in discursively similar ways. To answer these questions, we introduce a scalable and generalizable computational framework that combines diachronic stylometric analysis, contextual topic modeling, and semantic clustering of deputies’ speeches. We apply this framework to a large-scale case study of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies, using a corpus of over 450,000 speeches from 2003 to 2025. Our results show a long-term stylistic shift toward shorter and more direct speeches, a legislative agenda that reorients sharply in response to national crises, and a granular map of discursive alignments in which regional and gender identities often prove more salient than formal party affiliation. More broadly, this work offers a robust methodology for analyzing parliamentary discourse as a multidimensional phenomenon that complements traditional vote-based approaches.
105. ❌ Revisiting Non-Verbatim Memorization in Large Language Models: The Role of Entity Surface Forms
作者: Yuto Nishida, Naoki Shikoda, Yosuke Kishinami, Ryo Fujii, Makoto Morishita, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Taro Watanabe 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21882v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Understanding what kinds of factual knowledge large language models (LLMs) memorize is essential for evaluating their reliability and limitations. Entity-based QA is a common framework for analyzing non-verbatim memorization, but typical evaluations query each entity using a single canonical surface form, making it difficult to disentangle fact memorization from access through a particular name. We introduce RedirectQA, an entity-based QA dataset that uses Wikipedia redirect information to associate Wikidata factual triples with categorized surface forms for each entity, including alternative names, abbreviations, spelling variants, and common erroneous forms. Across 13 LLMs, we examine surface-conditioned factual memorization and find that prediction outcomes often change when only the entity surface form changes. This inconsistency is category-dependent: models are more robust to minor orthographic variations than to larger lexical variations such as aliases and abbreviations. Frequency analyses further suggest that both entity- and surface-level frequencies are associated with accuracy, and that entity frequency often contributes beyond surface frequency. Overall, factual memorization appears neither purely surface-specific nor fully surface-invariant, highlighting the importance of surface-form diversity in evaluating non-verbatim memorization.
106. ❌ Machine Behavior in Relational Moral Dilemmas: Moral Rightness, Predicted Human Behavior, and Model Decisions
作者: Jiseon Kim, Jea Kwon, Luiz Felipe Vecchietti, Wenchao Dong, Jaehong Kim, Meeyoung Cha 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21871v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Human moral judgment is context-dependent and modulated by interpersonal relationships. As large language models (LLMs) increasingly function as decision-support systems, determining whether they encode these social nuances is critical. We characterize machine behavior using the Whistleblower’s Dilemma by varying two experimental dimensions: crime severity and relational closeness. Our study evaluates three distinct perspectives: (1) moral rightness (prescriptive norms), (2) predicted human behavior (descriptive social expectations), and (3) autonomous model decision-making. By analyzing the reasoning processes, we identify a clear cross-perspective divergence: while moral rightness remains consistently fairness-oriented, predicted human behavior shifts significantly toward loyalty as relational closeness increases. Crucially, model decisions align with moral rightness judgments rather than their own behavioral predictions. This inconsistency suggests that LLM decision-making prioritizes rigid, prescriptive rules over the social sensitivity present in their internal world-modeling, which poses a gap that may lead to significant misalignments in real-world deployments.
107. ❌ SemEval-2026 Task 4: Narrative Story Similarity and Narrative Representation Learning
作者: Hans Ole Hatzel, Ekaterina Artemova, Haimo Paul Stiemer, Evelyn Gius, Chris Biemann 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21782v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We present the shared task on narrative similarity and narrative representation learning - NSNRL (pronounced “nass-na-rel”). The task operationalizes narrative similarity as a binary classification problem: determining which of two stories is more similar to an anchor story. We introduce a novel definition of narrative similarity, compatible with both narrative theory and intuitive judgment. Based on the similarity judgments collected under this concept, we also evaluate narrative embedding representations. We collected at least two annotations each for more than 1,000 story summary triples, with each annotation being backed by at least two annotators in agreement. This paper describes the sampling and annotation process for the dataset; further, we give an overview of the submitted systems and the techniques they employ. We received a total of 71 final submissions from 46 teams across our two tracks. In our triple-based classification setup, LLM ensembles make up many of the top-scoring systems, while in the embedding setup, systems with pre- and post-processing on pretrained embedding models perform about on par with custom fine-tuned solutions. Our analysis identifies potential headroom for improvement of automated systems in both tracks. The task website includes visualizations of embeddings alongside instance-level classification results for all teams.
108. ❌ Misinformation Span Detection in Videos via Audio Transcripts
作者: Breno Matos, Rennan C. Lima, Savvas Zannettou, Fabricio Benevenuto, Rodrygo L. T. Santos 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21767v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Online misinformation is one of the most challenging issues lately, yielding severe consequences, including political polarization, attacks on democracy, and public health risks. Misinformation manifests in any platform with a large user base, including online social networks and messaging apps. It permeates all media and content forms, including images, text, audio, and video. Distinctly, video-based misinformation represents a multifaceted challenge for fact-checkers, given the ease with which individuals can record and upload videos on various video-sharing platforms. Previous research efforts investigated detecting video-based misinformation, focusing on whether a video shares misinformation or not on a video level. While this approach is useful, it only provides a limited and non-easily interpretable view of the problem given that it does not provide an additional context of when misinformation occurs within videos and what content (i.e., claims) are responsible for the video’s misinformation nature. In this work, we attempt to bridge this research gap by creating two novel datasets that allow us to explore misinformation detection on videos via audio transcripts, focusing on identifying the span of videos that are responsible for the video’s misinformation claim (misinformation span detection). We present two new datasets for this task. We transcribe each video’s audio to text, identifying the video segment in which the misinformation claims appears, resulting in two datasets of more than 500 videos with over 2,400 segments containing annotated fact-checked claims. Then, we employ classifiers built with state-of-the-art language models, and our results show that we can identify in which part of a video there is misinformation with an F1 score of 0.68. We make publicly available our annotated datasets. We also release all transcripts, audio and videos.
109. ❌ AUDITA: A New Dataset to Audit Humans vs. AI Skill at Audio QA
作者: Tasnim Kabir, Dmytro Kurdydyk, Aadi Palnitkar, Liam Dorn, Ahmed Haj Ahmed, Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21766v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Existing audio question answering benchmarks largely emphasize sound event classification or caption-grounded queries, often enabling models to succeed through shortcut strategies, short-duration cues, lexical priors, dataset-specific biases, or even bypassing audio via metadata and captions rather than genuine reasoning Thus, we present AUDITA (Audio Understanding from Diverse Internet Trivia Authors), a large-scale, real-world benchmark to rigorously evaluate audio reasoning beyond surface-level acoustic recognition. AUDITA comprises carefully curated, human-authored trivia questions grounded in real-world audio, designed to stress robust auditory reasoning through challenging distractors and long-range temporal dependencies, using probing queries that cannot be answered from isolated text or sound cues alone. Human average accuracy of 32.13% shows both the challenge of the task while demonstrating meaningful comprehension of the audio. In stark contrast, state of-the-art audio question answering models perform poorly, with average accuracy below 8.86%. Beyond raw accuracy, we apply Item Response Theory (IRT) to estimate latent proficiency, question difficulty, and expose systematic deficiencies of the models and data.
110. ❌ Beyond N-gram: Data-Aware X-GRAM Extraction for Efficient Embedding Parameter Scaling
作者: Yilong Chen, Yanxi Xie, Zitian Gao, He Xin, Yihao Xiao, Renbiao Liu, Haoming Luo, Yifan Luo, Zhengmao Ye, Tingwen Liu, Xin Zhao, Ran Tao, Bryan Dai 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21724v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Large token-indexed lookup tables provide a compute-decoupled scaling path, but their practical gains are often limited by poor parameter efficiency and rapid memory growth. We attribute these limitations to Zipfian under-training of the long tail, heterogeneous demand across layers, and “slot collapse” that produces redundant embeddings. To address this, we propose X-GRAM, a frequency-aware dynamic token-injection framework. X-GRAM employs hybrid hashing and alias mixing to compress the tail while preserving head capacity, and refines retrieved vectors via normalized SwiGLU ShortConv to extract diverse local n-gram features. These signals are integrated into attention value streams and inter-layer residuals using depth-aware gating, effectively aligning static memory with dynamic context. This design introduces a memory-centric scaling axis that decouples model capacity from FLOPs. Extensive evaluations at the 0.73B and 1.15B scales show that X-GRAM improves average accuracy by as much as 4.4 points over the vanilla backbone and 3.2 points over strong retrieval baselines, while using substantially smaller tables in the 50% configuration. Overall, by decoupling capacity from compute through efficient memory management, X-GRAM offers a scalable and practical paradigm for future memory-augmented architectures. Code aviliable in https://github.com/Longyichen/X-gram.
111. ❌ From If-Statements to ML Pipelines: Revisiting Bias in Code-Generation
作者: Minh Duc Bui, Xenia Heilmann, Mattia Cerrato, Manuel Mager, Katharina von der Wense 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21716v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Prior work evaluates code generation bias primarily through simple conditional statements, which represent only a narrow slice of real-world programming and reveal solely overt, explicitly encoded bias. We demonstrate that this approach dramatically underestimates bias in practice by examining a more realistic task: generating machine learning (ML) pipelines. Testing both code-specialized and general-instruction large language models, we find that generated pipelines exhibit significant bias during feature selection. Sensitive attributes appear in 87.7% of cases on average, despite models demonstrably excluding irrelevant features (e.g., including “race” while dropping “favorite color” for credit scoring). This bias is substantially more prevalent than that captured by conditional statements, where sensitive attributes appear in only 59.2% of cases. These findings are robust across prompt mitigation strategies, varying numbers of attributes, and different pipeline difficulty levels. Our results challenge simple conditionals as valid proxies for bias evaluation and suggest current benchmarks underestimate bias risk in practical deployments.
112. ❌ Fixation Sequences as Time Series: A Topological Approach to Dyslexia Detection
作者: Marius Huber, David R. Reich, Lena A. Jäger 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21698v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Persistent homology, a method from topological data analysis, extracts robust, multi-scale features from data. It produces stable representations of time series by applying varying thresholds to their values (a process known as a \textit{filtration}). We develop novel filtrations for time series and introduce topological methods for the analysis of eye-tracking data, by interpreting fixation sequences as time series, and constructing ``hybrid models’’ that combine topological features with traditional statistical features. We empirically evaluate our method by applying it to the task of dyslexia detection from eye-tracking-while-reading data using the Copenhagen Corpus, which contains scanpaths from dyslexic and non-dyslexic L1 and L2 readers. Our hybrid models outperform existing approaches that rely solely on traditional features, showing that persistent homology captures complementary information encoded in fixation sequences. The strength of these topological features is further underscored by their achieving performance comparable to established baseline methods. Importantly, our proposed filtrations outperform existing ones.
113. ❌ Phonological Subspace Collapse Is Aetiology-Specific and Cross-Lingually Stable: Evidence from 3,374 Speakers
作者: Bernard Muller, Antonio Armando Ortiz Barrañón, LaVonne Roberts 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21706v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We previously introduced a training-free method for dysarthria severity assessment based on d-prime separability of phonological feature subspaces in frozen self-supervised speech representations, validated on 890 speakers across 5 languages with HuBERT-base. Here, we scale the analysis to 3,374 speakers from 25 datasets spanning 12 languages and 5 aetiologies (Parkinson’s disease, cerebral palsy, ALS, Down syndrome, and stroke), plus healthy controls, using 6 SSL backbones. We report three findings. First, aetiology-specific degradation profiles are distinguishable at the group level: 10 of 13 features yield large effect sizes (epsilon-squared > 0.14, Holm-corrected p < 0.001), with Parkinson’s disease separable from the articulatory execution group at Cohen’s d = 0.83; individual-level classification remains limited (22.6% macro F1). Second, profiles show cross-lingual profile-shape stability: cosine similarity of 5-dimensional consonant d-prime profiles exceeds 0.95 across the languages available for each aetiology. Absolute d-prime magnitudes are not cross-lingually calibrated, so the method supports language-independent phenotyping of degradation patterns but requires within-corpus calibration for absolute severity interpretation. Third, the method is architecture-independent: all 6 backbones produce monotonic severity gradients with inter-model agreement exceeding rho = 0.77. Fixed-token d-prime estimation preserves the severity correlation (rho = -0.733 at 200 tokens per class), confirming that the signal is not a token-count artefact. These results support phonological subspace analysis as a robust, training-free framework for aetiology-aware dysarthria characterisation, with evidence of cross-lingual profile-shape stability and cross-backbone robustness in the represented sample.
114. ❌ Multilinguality at the Edge: Developing Language Models for the Global South
作者: Lester James V. Miranda, Songbo Hu, Roi Reichart, Anna Korhonen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21637v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Where and how language models (LMs) are deployed determines who can benefit from them. However, there are several challenges that prevent effective deployment of LMs in non-English-speaking and hardware constrained communities in the Global South. We call this challenge the last mile: the intersection of multilinguality and edge deployment, where the goals are aligned but the technical requirements often compete. Studying these two fields together is both a need, as linguistically diverse communities often face the most severe infrastructure constraints, and an opportunity, as edge and multilingual NLP research remain largely siloed. To understand the state of the art and the challenges of combining the two areas, we survey 232 papers that tackle this problem across the language modelling pipeline, from data collection to development and deployment. We also discuss open questions and provide actionable recommendations for different stakeholders in the NLP ecosystem. Finally, we hope that this work contributes to the development of inclusive and equitable language technologies.
115. ❌ Language as a Latent Variable for Reasoning Optimization
作者: Linjuan Wu, Haoran Wei, Jialong Tang, Shuang Luo, Baosong Yang, Yongliang Shen, Weiming Lu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21593v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
As LLMs reduce English-centric bias, a surprising trend emerges: non-English responses sometimes outperform English on reasoning tasks. We hypothesize that language functions as a latent variable that structurally modulates the model’s internal inference pathways, rather than merely serving as an output medium. To test this, we conducted a Polyglot Thinking Experiment, in which models were prompted to solve identical problems under language-constrained and language-unconstrained conditions. Results show that non-English responses often achieve higher accuracy, and the best performance frequently occur when language is unconstrained, suggesting that multilinguality broadens the model’s latent reasoning space. Based on this insight, we propose polyGRPO (Polyglot Group Relative Policy Optimization), an RL framework that treats language variation as an implicit exploration signal. It generates polyglot preference data online under language-constrained and unconstrained conditions, optimizing the policy with respect to both answer accuracy and reasoning structure. Trained on only 18.1K multilingual math problems without chain-of-thought annotations, polyGRPO improves the base model (Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct) by 6.72% absolute accuracy on four English reasoning testset and 6.89% in their multilingual benchmark. Remarkably, it is the only method that surpasses the base LLM on English commonsense reasoning task (4.9%), despite being trained solely on math data-highlighting its strong cross-task generalization. Further analysis reveals that treating language as a latent variable expands the model’s latent reasoning space, yielding consistent and generalizable improvements in reasoning performance.
116. ❌ AgenticQwen: Training Small Agentic Language Models with Dual Data Flywheels for Industrial-Scale Tool Use
作者: Yuanjie Lyu, Chengyu Wang, Haonan Zheng, Yuanhao Yue, Junbing Yan, Ming Wang, Jun Huang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21590v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Modern industrial applications increasingly demand language models that act as agents, capable of multi-step reasoning and tool use in real-world settings. These tasks are typically performed under strict cost and latency constraints, making small agentic models highly desirable. In this paper, we introduce the AgenticQwen family of models, trained via multi-round reinforcement learning (RL) on synthetic data and a limited amount of open-source data. Our training framework combines reasoning RL and agentic RL with dual data flywheels that automatically generate increasingly challenging tasks. The reasoning flywheel increases task difficulty by learning from errors, while the agentic flywheel expands linear workflows into multi-branch behavior trees that better reflect the decision complexity of real-world applications. We validate AgenticQwen on public benchmarks and in an industrial agent system. The models achieve strong performance on multiple agentic benchmarks, and in our industrial agent system, close the gap with much larger models on search and data analysis tasks. Model checkpoints and part of the synthetic data: https://huggingface.co/collections/alibaba-pai/agenticqwen. Data synthesis and RL training code: https://github.com/haruhi-sudo/data_synth_and_rl. The data synthesis pipeline is also integrated into EasyDistill: https://github.com/modelscope/easydistill.
117. ❌ Measuring Opinion Bias and Sycophancy via LLM-based Coercion
作者: Rodrigo Nogueira, Giovana Kerche Bonás, Thales Sales Almeida, Andrea Roque, Ramon Pires, Hugo Abonizio, Thiago Laitz, Celio Larcher, Roseval Malaquias Junior, Marcos Piau 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21564v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Large language models increasingly shape the information people consume: they are embedded in search, consulted for professional advice, deployed as agents, and used as a first stop for questions about policy, ethics, health, and politics. When such a model silently holds a position on a contested topic, that position propagates at scale into users’ decisions. Eliciting a model’s positions is harder than it first appears: contemporary assistants answer direct opinion questions with evasive disclaimers, and the same model may concede the opposite position once the user starts arguing one side. We propose a method, released as the open-source llm-bias-bench, for discovering the opinions an LLM actually holds on contested topics under conditions that resemble real multi-turn interaction. The method pairs two complementary free-form probes. Direct probing asks for the model’s opinion across five turns of escalating pressure from a simulated user. Indirect probing never asks for an opinion and engages the model in argumentative debate, letting bias leak through how it concedes, resists, or counter-argues. Three user personas (neutral, agree, disagree) collapse into a nine-way behavioral classification that separates persona-independent positions from persona-dependent sycophancy, and an auditable LLM judge produces verdicts with textual evidence. The first instantiation ships 38 topics in Brazilian Portuguese across values, scientific consensus, philosophy, and economic policy. Applied to 13 assistants, the method surfaces findings of practical interest: argumentative debate triggers sycophancy 2-3x more than direct questioning (median 50% to 79%); models that look opinionated under direct questioning often collapse into mirroring under sustained arguments; and attacker capability matters mainly when an existing opinion must be dislodged, not when the assistant starts neutral.
118. ❌ Finding Meaning in Embeddings: Concept Separation Curves
作者: Paul Keuren, Marc Ponsen, Robert Ayoub Bagheri 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21555v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Sentence embedding techniques aim to encode key concepts of a sentence’s meaning in a vector space. However, the majority of evaluation approaches for sentence embedding quality rely on the use of additional classifiers or downstream tasks. These additional components make it unclear whether good results stem from the embedding itself or from the classifier’s behaviour. In this paper, we propose a novel method for evaluating the effectiveness of sentence embedding methods in capturing sentence-level concepts. Our approach is classifier-independent, allowing for an objective assessment of the model’s performance. The approach adopted in this study involves the systematic introduction of syntactic noise and semantic negations into sentences, with the subsequent quantification of their relative effects on the resulting embeddings. The visualisation of these effects is facilitated by Concept Separation Curves, which show the model’s capacity to differentiate between conceptual and surface-level variations. By leveraging data from multiple domains, employing both Dutch and English languages, and examining sentence lengths, this study offers a compelling demonstration that Concept Separation Curves provide an interpretable, reproducible, and cross-model approach for evaluating the conceptual stability of sentence embeddings.
119. ❌ UKP_Psycontrol at SemEval-2026 Task 2: Modeling Valence and Arousal Dynamics from Text
作者: Darya Hryhoryeva, Amaia Zurinaga, Hamidreza Jamalabadi, Iryna Gurevych 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21534v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
This paper presents our system developed for SemEval-2026 Task 2. The task requires modeling both current affect and short-term affective change in chronologically ordered user-generated texts. We explore three complementary approaches: (1) LLM prompting under user-aware and user-agnostic settings, (2) a pairwise Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) model with Ising-style interactions for structured transition modeling, and (3) a lightweight neural regression model incorporating recent affective trajectories and trainable user embeddings. Our findings indicate that LLMs effectively capture static affective signals from text, whereas short-term affective variation in this dataset is more strongly explained by recent numeric state trajectories than by textual semantics. Our system ranked first among participating teams in both Subtask 1 and Subtask 2A based on the official evaluation metric.
120. ❌ Job Skill Extraction via LLM-Centric Multi-Module Framework
作者: Guojing Li, Zichuan Fu, Junyi Li, Faxue Liu, Wenxia Zhou, Yejing Wang, Jingtong Gao, Maolin Wang, Rungen Liu, Wenlin Zhang, Xiangyu Zhao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21525v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Span-level skill extraction from job advertisements underpins candidate-job matching and labor-market analytics, yet generative large language models (LLMs) often yield malformed spans, boundary drift, and hallucinations, especially with long-tail terms and cross-domain shift. We present SRICL, an LLM-centric framework that combines semantic retrieval (SR), in-context learning (ICL), and supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with a deterministic verifier. SR pulls in-domain annotated sentences and definitions from ESCO to form format-constrained prompts that stabilize boundaries and handle coordination. SFT aligns output behavior, while the verifier enforces pairing, non-overlap, and BIO legality with minimal retries. On six public span-labeled corpora of job-ad sentences across sectors and languages, SRICL achieves substantial STRICT-F1 improvements over GPT-3.5 prompting baselines and sharply reduces invalid tags and hallucinated spans, enabling dependable sentence-level deployment in low-resource, multi-domain settings.
121. ❌ Seeing Isn’t Believing: Uncovering Blind Spots in Evaluator Vision-Language Models
作者: Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Sanjay Suryanarayanan, Tushar Anand, Mitesh M. Khapra 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21523v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly used to evaluate outputs of other models, for image-to-text (I2T) tasks such as visual question answering, and text-to-image (T2I) generation tasks. Despite this growing reliance, the reliability of these Evaluator VLMs remains under explored. In this work, we systematically evaluate the reliability of Evaluator VLMs across both I2T and T2I tasks. We introduce targeted perturbations that degrade output quality along key error dimensions, including object hallucinations, spatial reasoning, factual grounding, and visual fidelity. These perturbations test whether Evaluator VLMs can reliably account for these quality degrading errors in their evaluations. Using a comprehensive benchmark of over 4000 perturbed instances spanning 40 perturbation dimensions, we evaluate 4 prominent VLMs using single-answer scoring, pairwise comparison, and reference-guided paradigms. Our findings reveal that current VLM evaluators exhibit substantial blind spots: they often fail to detect perturbed outputs - in some cases exceeding 50%, struggle particularly with fine-grained compositional and spatial errors, and are often insensitive to hallucinated content that contradicts the input image. Pairwise comparison proves more reliable, though failure rates persist. These results highlight the unreliable nature of current Evaluator VLMs and urge caution in their deployment for benchmarking and development decisions. Code and data have been made publicly available.
122. ❌ From Tokens to Concepts: Leveraging SAE for SPLADE
作者: Yuxuan Zong, Mathias Vast, Basile Van Cooten, Laure Soulier, Benjamin Piwowarski 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21511v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Learned Sparse IR models, such as SPLADE, offer an excellent efficiency-effectiveness tradeoff. However, they rely on the underlying backbone vocabulary, which might hinder performance (polysemicity and synonymy) and pose a challenge for multi-lingual and multi-modal usages. To solve this limitation, we propose to replace the backbone vocabulary with a latent space of semantic concepts learned using Sparse Auto-Encoders (SAE). Throughout this paper, we study the compatibility of these 2 concepts, explore training approaches, and analyze the differences between our SAE-SPLADE model and traditional SPLADE models. Our experiments demonstrate that SAE-SPLADE achieves retrieval performance comparable to SPLADE on both in-domain and out-of-domain tasks while offering improved efficiency.
123. ❌ OptiVerse: A Comprehensive Benchmark towards Optimization Problem Solving
作者: Xinyu Zhang, Boxuan Zhang, Yuchen Wan, Lingling Zhang, YiXing Yao, Bifan Wei, Yaqiang Wu, Jun Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21510v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable reasoning, complex optimization tasks remain challenging, requiring domain knowledge and robust implementation. However, existing benchmarks focus narrowly on Mathematical Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, hindering comprehensive evaluation. To address this, we introduce OptiVerse, a comprehensive benchmark of 1,000 curated problems spanning neglected domains, including Stochastic Optimization, Dynamic Optimization, Game Optimization, and Optimal Control, across three difficulty levels: Easy, Medium, and Hard. The experiments with 22 LLMs of different sizes reveal sharp performance degradation on hard problems, where even advanced models like GPT-5.2 and Gemini-3 struggle to exceed 27% accuracy. Through error analysis, we identify that modeling & logic errors remain the primary bottleneck. Consequently, we propose a Dual-View Auditor Agent that improves the accuracy of the LLM modeling process without introducing significant time overhead. OptiVerse will serve as a foundational platform for advancing LLMs in solving complex optimization challenges.
124. ❌ Preferences of a Voice-First Nation: Large-Scale Pairwise Evaluation and Preference Analysis for TTS in Indian Languages
作者: Srija Anand, Ashwin Sankar, Ishvinder Sethi, Aaditya Pareek, Kartik Rajput, Gaurav Yadav, Nikhil Narasimhan, Adish Pandya, Deepon Halder, Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Praveen S, Shobhit Banga, Mitesh M Khapra 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21481v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Crowdsourced pairwise evaluation has emerged as a scalable approach for assessing foundation models. However, applying it to Text to Speech(TTS) introduces high variance due to linguistic diversity and multidimensional nature of speech perception. We present a controlled multidimensional pairwise evaluation framework for multilingual TTS that combines linguistic control with perceptually grounded annotation. Using 5K+ native and code-mixed sentences across 10 Indic languages, we evaluate 7 state-of-the-art TTS systems and collect over 120K pairwise comparisons from over 1900 native raters. In addition to overall preference, raters provide judgments across 6 perceptual dimensions: intelligibility, expressiveness, voice quality, liveliness, noise, and hallucinations. Using Bradley-Terry modeling, we construct a multilingual leaderboard, interpret human preference using SHAP analysis and analyze leaderboard reliability alongside model strengths and trade-offs across perceptual dimensions.
125. ❌ Cross-Domain Data Selection and Augmentation for Automatic Compliance Detection
作者: Fariz Ikhwantri, Dusica Marijan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21469v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Automating the detection of regulatory compliance remains a challenging task due to the complexity and variability of legal texts. Models trained on one regulation often fail to generalise to others. This limitation underscores the need for principled methods to improve cross-domain transfer. We study data selection as a strategy to mitigate negative transfer in compliance detection framed as a natural language inference (NLI) task. Specifically, we evaluate four approaches for selecting augmentation data from a larger source domain: random sampling, Moore-Lewis’s cross-entropy difference, importance weighting, and embedding-based retrieval. We systematically vary the proportion of selected data to analyse its effect on cross-domain adaptation. Our findings demonstrate that targeted data selection substantially reduces negative transfer, offering a practical path toward scalable and reliable compliance automation across heterogeneous regulations.
126. ❌ Decoupled DiLoCo for Resilient Distributed Pre-training
作者: Arthur Douillard, Keith Rush, Yani Donchev, Zachary Charles, Nova Fallen, Ayush Dubey, Ionel Gog, Josef Dean, Blake Woodworth, Zachary Garrett, Nate Keating, Jenny Bishop, Henry Prior, Edouard Yvinec, Arthur Szlam, Marc’Aurelio Ranzato, Jeff Dean 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21428v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Modern large-scale language model pre-training relies heavily on the single program multiple data (SPMD) paradigm, which requires tight coupling across accelerators. Due to this coupling, transient slowdowns, hardware failures, and synchronization overhead stall the entire computation, wasting significant compute time at scale. While recent distributed methods like DiLoCo reduced communication bandwidth, they remained fundamentally synchronous and vulnerable to these system stalls. To address this, we introduce Decoupled DiLoCo, an evolution of the DiLoCo framework designed to break the lock-step synchronization barrier and go beyond SPMD to maximize training goodput. Decoupled DiLoCo partitions compute across multiple independent
learners'' that execute local inner optimization steps. These learners asynchronously communicate parameter fragments to a central synchronizer, which circumvents failed or straggling learners by aggregating updates using a minimum quorum, an adaptive grace window, and dynamic token-weighted merging. Inspired bychaos engineering’’, we achieve significantly improved training efficiency in failure-prone environments with millions of simulated chips with strictly zero global downtime, while maintaining competitive model performance across text and vision tasks, for both dense and mixture-of-expert architectures.
127. ❌ MKJ at SemEval-2026 Task 9: A Comparative Study of Generalist, Specialist, and Ensemble Strategies for Multilingual Polarization
作者: Maziar Kianimoghadam Jouneghani 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21370v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We present a systematic study of multilingual polarization detection across 22 languages for SemEval-2026 Task 9 (Subtask 1), contrasting multilingual generalists with language-specific specialists and hybrid ensembles. While a standard generalist like XLM-RoBERTa suffices when its tokenizer aligns with the target text, it may struggle with distinct scripts (e.g., Khmer, Odia) where monolingual specialists yield significant gains. Rather than enforcing a single universal architecture, we adopt a language-adaptive framework that switches between multilingual generalists, language-specific specialists, and hybrid ensembles based on development performance. Additionally, cross-lingual augmentation via NLLB-200 yielded mixed results, often underperforming native architecture selection and degrading morphologically rich tracks. Our final system achieves an overall macro-averaged F1 score of 0.796 and an average accuracy of 0.826 across all 22 tracks. Code and final test predictions are publicly available at: https://github.com/Maziarkiani/SemEval2026-Task9-Subtask1-Polarization.
128. ❌ CARE: Counselor-Aligned Response Engine for Online Mental-Health Support
作者: Hagai Astrin, Ayal Swaid, Avi Segal, Kobi Gal 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21352v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Mental health challenges are increasing worldwide, straining emotional support services and leading to counselor overload. This can result in delayed responses during critical situations, such as suicidal ideation, where timely intervention is essential. While large language models (LLMs) have shown strong generative capabilities, their application in low-resource languages, especially in sensitive domains like mental health, remains underexplored. Furthermore, existing LLM-based agents often struggle to replicate the supportive language and intervention strategies used by professionals due to a lack of training on large-scale, real-world datasets. To address this, we propose CARE (Counselor-Aligned Response Engine), a GenAI framework that assists counselors by generating real-time, psychologically aligned response recommendations. CARE fine-tunes open-source LLMs separately for Hebrew and Arabic using curated subsets of real-world crisis conversations. The training data consists of sessions rated as highly effective by professional counselors, enabling the models to capture interaction patterns associated with successful de-escalation. By training on complete conversation histories, CARE maintains the evolving emotional context and dynamic structure of counselor-help-seeker dialogue. In experimental settings, CARE demonstrates stronger semantic and strategic alignment with gold-standard counselor responses compared to non-specialized LLMs. These findings suggest that domain-specific fine-tuning on expert-validated data can significantly support counselor workflows and improve care quality in low-resource language contexts.
129. ❌ Sub-Token Routing in LoRA for Adaptation and Query-Aware KV Compression
作者: Wei Jiang, Wei Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21335v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Sub-token routing offers a finer control axis for transformer efficiency than the coarse units used in most prior work, such as tokens, pages, heads, or layers. In this paper, we study routing within a token representation itself in LoRA-adapted transformers. The motivation is that a relevant token need not be internally uniform: under a retention budget, preserved value groups are distributed unevenly both across tokens and within tokens, which suggests that KV compression need not be an all-or-nothing decision at token level. We study this fine-grained routing mechanism in two settings. For compression-aware language modeling, we introduce a query-independent design that combines routed subspace LoRA with value-group routing on the KV path. For downstream-task-preserving KV compression, we introduce a query-aware design in which a predictor-based selector allocates a global retention budget over context-token/value-group pairs using query-conditioned relevance. Experiments show that the query-independent design improves the quality-compression tradeoff for language modeling, while the query-aware design preserves downstream behavior under reduced KV budgets. We further examine the relation between token-level and sub-token-level query-aware routing, and show that they form complementary compression axes: token-level methods determine which tokens survive globally, while sub-token routing determines how the surviving tokens are compressed internally.
130. ❌ When Bigger Isn’t Better: A Comprehensive Fairness Evaluation of Political Bias in Multi-News Summarisation
作者: Nannan Huang, Iffat Maab, Junichi Yamagishi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21309v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Multi-document news summarisation systems are increasingly adopted for their convenience in processing vast daily news content, making fairness across diverse political perspectives critical. However, these systems can exhibit political bias through unequal representation of viewpoints, disproportionate emphasis on certain perspectives, and systematic underrepresentation of minority voices. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of such bias in multi-document news summarisation using FairNews, a dataset of complete news articles with political orientation labels, examining how large language models (LLMs) handle sources with varying political leanings across 13 models and five fairness metrics. We investigate both baseline model performance and effectiveness of various debiasing interventions, including prompt-based and judge-based approaches. Our findings challenge the assumption that larger models yield fairer outputs, as mid-sized variants consistently outperform their larger counterparts, offering the best balance of fairness and efficiency. Prompt-based debiasing proves highly model dependent, while entity sentiment emerges as the most stubborn fairness dimension, resisting all intervention strategies tested. These results demonstrate that fairness in multi-document news summarisation requires multi-dimensional evaluation frameworks and targeted, architecture-aware debiasing rather than simply scaling up.
131. ❌ CI-Work: Benchmarking Contextual Integrity in Enterprise LLM Agents
作者: Wenjie Fu, Xiaoting Qin, Jue Zhang, Qingwei Lin, Lukas Wutschitz, Robert Sim, Saravan Rajmohan, Dongmei Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21308v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Enterprise LLM agents can dramatically improve workplace productivity, but their core capability, retrieving and using internal context to act on a user’s behalf, also creates new risks for sensitive information leakage. We introduce CI-Work, a Contextual Integrity (CI)-grounded benchmark that simulates enterprise workflows across five information-flow directions and evaluates whether agents can convey essential content while withholding sensitive context in dense retrieval settings. Our evaluation of frontier models reveals that privacy failures are prevalent (violation rates range from 15.8%-50.9%, with leakage reaching up to 26.7%) and uncovers a counterintuitive trade-off critical for industrial deployment: higher task utility often correlates with increased privacy violations. Moreover, the massive scale of enterprise data and potential user behavior further amplify this vulnerability. Simply increasing model size or reasoning depth fails to address the problem. We conclude that safeguarding enterprise workflows requires a paradigm shift, moving beyond model-centric scaling toward context-centric architectures.
132. ❌ Explainable Disentangled Representation Learning for Generalizable Authorship Attribution in the Era of Generative AI
作者: Hieu Man, Van-Cuong Pham, Nghia Trung Ngo, Franck Dernoncourt, Thien Huu Nguyen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21300v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Learning robust representations of authorial style is crucial for authorship attribution and AI-generated text detection. However, existing methods often struggle with content-style entanglement, where models learn spurious correlations between authors’ writing styles and topics, leading to poor generalization across domains. To address this challenge, we propose Explainable Authorship Variational Autoencoder (EAVAE), a novel framework that explicitly disentangles style from content through architectural separation-by-design. EAVAE first pretrains style encoders using supervised contrastive learning on diverse authorship data, then finetunes with a Variational Autoencoder (VEA) architecture using separate encoders for style and content representations. Disentanglement is enforced through a novel discriminator that not only distinguishes whether pairs of style/content representations belong to the same or different authors/content sources, but also generates natural language explanation for their decision, simultaneously mitigating confounding information and enhancing interpretability. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of EAVAE. On authorship attribution, we achieve state-of-the-art performance on various datasets, including Amazon Reviews, PAN21, and HRS. For AI-generated text detection, EAVAE excels in few-shot learning over the M4 dataset. Code and data repositories are available online\footnote{https://github.com/hieum98/avae} \footnote{https://huggingface.co/collections/Hieuman/document-level-authorship-datasets}.
133. ❌ Listen and Chant Before You Read: The Ladder of Beauty in LM Pre-Training
作者: Yoshinori Nomura 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21265v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We show that pre-training a Transformer on music before language significantly accelerates language acquisition. Using piano performances (MAESTRO dataset), a developmental pipeline – music $\to$ poetry $\to$ prose – yields a $17.5%$ perplexity improvement over random initialization ($p < 0.001$, 5 seeds), with music and poetry improving orthogonal model components (internal computation and embeddings, respectively). Convergence tests confirm that this is not a transient head start: at $d!=!64$, multi-seed validation (5 seeds) shows a persistent 5.5% gap at plateau ($p = 0.017$), with the pipeline converging faster and to a lower loss in every run. Real music matches the transfer ceiling of synthetic patterns with one-third the data, and scaling experiments reveal that optimal pre-training data volume shifts with model capacity ($-3% \to +3% \to +6%$ advantage of larger datasets from $d!=!16$ to $d!=!64$). Across the scales we study ($d!\in!{16,32,64}$, up to ${\sim}400$K parameters), these results suggest a capacity-dependent data curation principle and indicate that structured human creative outputs can provide an efficient pre-training substrate for small language models; stronger conclusions at modern pre-training scale will require substantially larger experiments.
134. ❌ When Agents Look the Same: Quantifying Distillation-Induced Similarity in Tool-Use Behaviors
作者: Chenghao Yang, Yuning Zhang, Zhoufutu Wen, Tao Gong, Jiaheng Liu, Qi Chu, Nenghai Yu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21255v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Model distillation is a primary driver behind the rapid progress of LLM agents, yet it often leads to behavioral homogenization. Many emerging agents share nearly identical reasoning steps and failure modes, suggesting they may be distilled echoes of a few dominant teachers. Existing metrics, however, fail to distinguish mandatory behaviors required for task success from non-mandatory patterns that reflect a model’s autonomous preferences. We propose two complementary metrics to isolate non-mandatory behavioral patterns: \textbf{Response Pattern Similarity (RPS)} for verbal alignment and \textbf{Action Graph Similarity (AGS)} for tool-use habits modeled as directed graphs. Evaluating 18 models from 8 providers on $τ$-Bench and $τ^2$-Bench against Claude Sonnet 4.5 (thinking), we find that within-family model pairs score 5.9 pp higher in AGS than cross-family pairs, and that Kimi-K2 (thinking) reaches 82.6% $S_{\text{node}}$ and 94.7% $S_{\text{dep}}$, exceeding Anthropic’s own Opus 4.1. A controlled distillation experiment further confirms that AGS distinguishes teacher-specific convergence from general improvement. RPS and AGS capture distinct behavioral dimensions (Pearson $r$ = 0.491), providing complementary diagnostic signals for behavioral convergence in the agent ecosystem. Our code is available at https://github.com/Syuchin/AgentEcho.
135. ❌ Hyperloop Transformers
作者: Abbas Zeitoun, Lucas Torroba-Hennigen, Yoon Kim 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21254v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
LLM architecture research generally aims to maximize model quality subject to fixed compute/latency budgets. However, many applications of interest such as edge and on-device deployment are further constrained by the model’s memory footprint, thus motivating parameter-efficient architectures for language modeling. This paper describes a simple architecture that improves the parameter-efficiency of LLMs. Our architecture makes use of looped Transformers as a core primitive, which reuse Transformer layers across depth and are thus more parameter-efficient than ordinary (depth-matched) Transformers. We organize the looped Transformer into three blocks–begin, middle, and end blocks–where each block itself consists of multiple Transformer layers, and only the middle block is applied recurrently across depth. We augment the looped middle block with hyper-connections (Xie et al., 2026), which expand the residual stream into matrix-valued residual streams. Hyper-connections are applied only after each loop, and therefore add minimal new parameters and compute cost. Across various model scales, we find that our Hyper-Connected Looped Transformer (Hyperloop Transformer) is able to outperform depth-matched Transformer and mHC Transformer baselines despite using approximately 50% fewer parameters. The outperformance persists through post-training weight quantization, thus positioning Hyperloop Transformers as an attractive architecture for memory-efficient language modeling.
136. ❌ Planning Beyond Text: Graph-based Reasoning for Complex Narrative Generation
作者: Hanwen Gu, Chao Guo, Junle Wang, Wenda Xie, Yisheng Lv 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21253v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
While LLMs demonstrate remarkable fluency in narrative generation, existing methods struggle to maintain global narrative coherence, contextual logical consistency, and smooth character development, often producing monotonous scripts with structural fractures. To this end, we introduce PLOTTER, a framework that performs narrative planning on structural graph representations instead of the direct sequential text representations used in existing work. Specifically, PLOTTER executes the Evaluate-Plan-Revise cycle on the event graph and character graph. By diagnosing and repairing issues of the graph topology under rigorous logical constraints, the model optimizes the causality and narrative skeleton before complete context generation. Experiments demonstrate that PLOTTER significantly outperforms representative baselines across diverse narrative scenarios. These findings verify that planning narratives on structural graph representations-rather than directly on text-is crucial to enhance the long context reasoning of LLMs in complex narrative generation.
137. ❌ Unlocking the Power of Large Language Models for Multi-table Entity Matching
作者: Yingkai Tang, Taoyu Su, Wenyuan Zhang, Xiaoyang Guo, Tingwen Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21238v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Multi-table entity matching (MEM) addresses the limitations of dual-table approaches by enabling simultaneous identification of equivalent entities across multiple data sources without unique identifiers. However, existing methods relying on pre-trained language models struggle to handle semantic inconsistencies caused by numerical attribute variations. Inspired by the powerful language understanding capabilities of large language models (LLMs), we propose a novel LLM-based framework for multi-table entity matching, termed LLM4MEM. Specifically, we first propose a multi-style prompt-enhanced LLM attribute coordination module to address semantic inconsistencies. Then, to alleviate the matching efficiency problem caused by the surge in the number of entities brought by multiple data sources, we develop a transitive consensus embedding matching module to tackle entity embedding and pre-matching issues. Finally, to address the issue of noisy entities during the matching process, we introduce a density-aware pruning module to optimize the quality of multi-table entity matching. We conducted extensive experiments on 6 MEM datasets, and the results show that our model improves by an average of 5.1% in F1 compared with the baseline model. Our code is available at https://github.com/Ymeki/LLM4MEM.
138. ❌ Learning Dynamic Representations and Policies from Multimodal Clinical Time-Series with Informative Missingness
作者: Zihan Liang, Ziwen Pan, Ruoxuan Xiong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21235v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Multimodal clinical records contain structured measurements and clinical notes recorded over time, offering rich temporal information about the evolution of patient health. Yet these observations are sparse, and whether they are recorded depends on the patient’s latent condition. Observation patterns also differ across modalities, as structured measurements and clinical notes arise under distinct recording processes. While prior work has developed methods that accommodate missingness in clinical time series, how to extract and use the information carried by the observation process itself remains underexplored. We therefore propose a patient representation learning framework for multimodal clinical time series that explicitly leverages informative missingness. The framework combines (1) a multimodal encoder that captures signals from structured and textual data together with their observation patterns, (2) a Bayesian filtering module that updates a latent patient state over time from observed multimodal signals, and (3) downstream modules for offline treatment policy learning and patient outcome prediction based on the learned patient state. We evaluate the framework on ICU sepsis cohorts from MIMIC-III, MIMIC-IV, and eICU. It improves both offline treatment policy learning and adverse outcome prediction, achieving FQE 0.679 versus 0.528 for clinician behavior and AUROC 0.886 for post-72-hour mortality prediction on MIMIC-III.
139. ❌ EngramaBench: Evaluating Long-Term Conversational Memory with Structured Graph Retrieval
作者: Julian Acuna 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21229v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Large language model assistants are increasingly expected to retain and reason over information accumulated across many sessions. We introduce EngramaBench, a benchmark for long-term conversational memory built around five personas, one hundred multi-session conversations, and one hundred fifty queries spanning factual recall, cross-space integration, temporal reasoning, adversarial abstention, and emergent synthesis. We evaluate Engrama, a graph-structured memory system, against GPT-4o full-context prompting and Mem0, an open-source vector-retrieval memory system. All three use the same answering model (GPT-4o), isolating the effect of memory architecture. GPT-4o full-context achieves the highest composite score (0.6186), while Engrama scores 0.5367 globally but is the only system to score higher than full-context prompting on cross-space reasoning (0.6532 vs. 0.6291, n=30). Mem0 is cheapest but substantially weaker (0.4809). Ablations reveal that the components driving Engrama’s cross-space advantage trade off against global composite score, exposing a systems-level tension between structured memory specialization and aggregate optimization.
140. ❌ Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text via Implicit Reward Model
作者: Runheng Liu, Heyan Huang, Xingchen Xiao, Zhijing Wu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21223v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various tasks. However, their ability to generate human-like text has raised concerns about potential misuse. This underscores the need for reliable and effective methods to detect LLM-generated text. In this paper, we propose IRM, a novel zero-shot approach that leverages Implicit Reward Models for LLM-generated text detection. Such implicit reward models can be derived from publicly available instruction-tuned and base models. Previous reward-based method relies on preference construction and task-specific fine-tuning. In comparison, IRM requires neither preference collection nor additional training. We evaluate IRM on the DetectRL benchmark and demonstrate that IRM can achieve superior detection performance, outperforms existing zero-shot and supervised methods in LLM-generated text detection.
141. ❌ Subject-level Inference for Realistic Text Anonymization Evaluation
作者: Myeong Seok Oh, Dong-Yun Kim, Hanseok Oh, Chaean Kang, Joeun Kang, Xiaonan Wang, Hyunjung Park, Young Cheol Jung, Hansaem Kim 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21211v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Current text anonymization evaluation relies on span-based metrics that fail to capture what an adversary could actually infer, and assumes a single data subject, ignoring multi-subject scenarios. To address these limitations, we present SPIA (Subject-level PII Inference Assessment), the first benchmark that shifts the unit of evaluation from text spans to individuals, comprising 675 documents across legal and online domains with novel subject-level protection metrics. Extensive experiments show that even when over 90% of PII spans are masked, subject-level inference protection drops as low as 33%, leaving the majority of personal information recoverable through contextual inference. Furthermore, target-subject-focused anonymization leaves non-target subjects substantially more exposed than the target subject. We show that subject-level inference-based evaluation is essential for ensuring safe text anonymization in real-world settings.
142. ❌ Align Generative Artificial Intelligence with Human Preferences: A Novel Large Language Model Fine-Tuning Method for Online Review Management
作者: Yanan Wang, Yong Ge 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21209v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Online reviews have played a pivotal role in consumers’ decision-making processes. Existing research has highlighted the significant impact of managerial review responses on customer relationship management and firm performance. However, a large portion of online reviews remains unaddressed due to the considerable human labor required to respond to the rapid growth of online reviews. While generative AI has achieved remarkable success in a range of tasks, they are general-purpose models and may not align well with domain-specific human preferences. To tailor these general generative AI models to domain-specific applications, finetuning is commonly employed. Nevertheless, several challenges persist in finetuning with domain-specific data, including hallucinations, difficulty in representing domain-specific human preferences, and over conservatism in offline policy optimization. To address these challenges, we propose a novel preference finetuning method to align an LLM with domain-specific human preferences for generating online review responses. Specifically, we first identify the source of hallucination and propose an effective context augmentation approach to mitigate the LLM hallucination. To represent human preferences, we propose a novel theory-driven preference finetuning approach that automatically constructs human preference pairs in the online review domain. Additionally, we propose a curriculum learning approach to further enhance preference finetuning. To overcome the challenge of over conservatism in existing offline preference finetuning method, we propose a novel density estimation-based support constraint method to relax the conservatism, and we mathematically prove its superior theoretical guarantees. Extensive evaluations substantiate the superiority of our proposed preference finetuning method.
143. ❌ On Reasoning Behind Next Occupation Recommendation
作者: Shan Dong, Palakorn Achananuparp, Hieu Hien Mai, Lei Wang, Yao Lu, Ee-Peng Lim 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21204v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
In this work, we develop a novel reasoning approach to enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs) in future occupation prediction. In this approach, a reason generator first derives a ``reason’’ for a user using his/her past education and career history. The reason summarizes the user’s preference and is used as the input of an occupation predictor to recommend the user’s next occupation. This two-step occupation prediction approach is, however, non-trivial as LLMs are not aligned with career paths or the unobserved reasons behind each occupation decision. We therefore propose to fine-tune LLMs improving their reasoning and occupation prediction performance. We first derive high-quality oracle reasons, as measured by factuality, coherence and utility criteria, using a LLM-as-a-Judge. These oracle reasons are then used to fine-tune small LLMs to perform reason generation and next occupation prediction. Our extensive experiments show that: (a) our approach effectively enhances LLM’s accuracy in next occupation prediction making them comparable to fully supervised methods and outperforming unsupervised methods; (b) a single LLM fine-tuned to perform reason generation and occupation prediction outperforms two LLMs fine-tuned to perform the tasks separately; and (c) the next occupation prediction accuracy depends on the quality of generated reasons. Our code is available at https://github.com/Sarasarahhhhh/job_prediction.
144. ❌ Participation and Representation in Local Government Speech
作者: Olivia Martin, Amar Venugopal 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21202v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Local government meetings are the most common formal channel through which residents speak directly with elected officials, contest policies, and shape local agendas. However, data constraints typically limit the empirical study of these meetings to agendas, single cities, or short time horizons. We collect and transcribe a massive new dataset of city council meetings from 115 California cities over the last decade, using advanced transcription and diarization techniques to analyze the speech content of the meetings themselves. We document two sets of descriptive findings: First, city council meetings are frequent, long, and vary modestly across towns and time in topical content. Second, public participants are substantially older, whiter, more male, more liberal, and more likely to own homes than the registered voter population, and public participation surges when topics related to land use and zoning are included in meeting agendas. Given this skew, we examine the main policy lever municipalities have to shift participation patterns: meeting access costs. Exploiting pandemic-era variation in remote access, we show that eliminating remote options reduces the number of speakers, but does not clearly change the composition of speakers. Collectively, these results provide the most comprehensive empirical portrait to date of who participates in local democracy, what draws them in, and how institutional design choices shape both the volume and composition of public input.
145. ❌ Prefix Parsing is Just Parsing
作者: Clemente Pasti, Andreas Opedal, Timothy J. O’Donnell, Ryan Cotterell, Tim Vieira 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21191v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Prefix parsing asks whether an input prefix can be extended to a complete string generated by a given grammar. In the weighted setting, it also provides prefix probabilities, which are central to context-free language modeling, psycholinguistic analysis, and syntactically constrained generation from large language models. We introduce the prefix grammar transformation, an efficient reduction of prefix parsing to ordinary parsing. Given a grammar, our method constructs another grammar that generates exactly the prefixes of its original strings. Prefix parsing is then solved by applying any ordinary parsing algorithm on the transformed grammar without modification. The reduction is both elegant and practical: the transformed grammar is only a small factor larger than the input, and any optimized implementation can be used directly, eliminating the need for bespoke prefix-parsing algorithms. We also present a strategy-based on algorithmic differentiation-for computing the next-token weight vector, i.e., the prefix weights of all one-token extensions, enabling efficient prediction of the next token. Together, these contributions yield a simple, general, and efficient framework for prefix parsing.
146. ❌ Adaptive Instruction Composition for Automated LLM Red-Teaming
作者: Jesse Zymet, Andy Luo, Swapnil Shinde, Sahil Wadhwa, Emily Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21159v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Many approaches to LLM red-teaming leverage an attacker LLM to discover jailbreaks against a target. Several of them task the attacker with identifying effective strategies through trial and error, resulting in a semantically limited range of successes. Another approach discovers diverse attacks by combining crowdsourced harmful queries and tactics into instructions for the attacker, but does so at random, limiting effectiveness. This article introduces a novel framework, Adaptive Instruction Composition, that combines crowdsourced texts according to an adaptive mechanism trained to jointly optimize effectiveness with diversity. We use reinforcement learning to balance exploration with exploitation in a combinatorial space of instructions to guide the attacker toward diverse generations tailored to target vulnerabilities. We demonstrate that our approach substantially outperforms random combination on a set of effectiveness and diversity metrics, even under model transfer. Further, we show that it surpasses a host of recent adaptive approaches on Harmbench. We employ a lightweight neural contextual bandit that adapts to contrastive embedding inputs, and provide ablations suggesting that the contrastive pretraining enables the network to rapidly generalize and scale to the massive space as it learns.
147. ❌ Dialect vs Demographics: Quantifying LLM Bias from Implicit Linguistic Signals vs. Explicit User Profiles
作者: Irti Haq, Belén Saldías 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21152v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
As state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) have become ubiquitous, ensuring equitable performance across diverse demographics is critical. However, it remains unclear whether these disparities arise from the explicitly stated identity itself or from the way identity is signaled. In real-world interactions, users’ identity is often conveyed implicitly through a complex combination of various socio-linguistic factors. This study disentangles these signals by employing a factorial design with over 24,000 responses from two open-weight LLMs (Gemma-3-12B and Qwen-3-VL-8B), comparing prompts with explicitly announced user profiles against implicit dialect signals (e.g., AAVE, Singlish) across various sensitive domains. Our results uncover a unique paradox in LLM safety where users achieve
better'' performance by sounding like a demographic than by stating they belong to it. Explicit identity prompts activate aggressive safety filters, increasing refusal rates and reducing semantic similarity compared to our reference text for Black users. In contrast, implicit dialect cues trigger a powerfuldialect jailbreak,’’ reducing refusal probability to near zero while simultaneously achieving a greater level of semantic similarity to the reference texts compared to Standard American English prompts. However, thisdialect jailbreak'' introduces a critical safety trade-off regarding content sanitization. We find that current safety alignment techniques are brittle and over-indexed on explicit keywords, creating a bifurcated user experience wherestandard’’ users receive cautious, sanitized information while dialect speakers navigate a less sanitized, more raw, and potentially a more hostile information landscape and highlights a fundamental tension in alignment–between equitable and linguistic diversity–and underscores the need for safety mechanisms that generalize beyond explicit cues.
148. ❌ “This Wasn’t Made for Me”: Recentering User Experience and Emotional Impact in the Evaluation of ASR Bias
作者: Siyu Liang, Alicia Beckford Wassink 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21148v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Studies on bias in Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) tend to focus on reporting error rates for speakers of underrepresented dialects, yet less research examines the human side of system bias: how do system failures shape users’ lived experiences, how do users feel about and react to them, and what emotional toll do these repeated failures exact? We conducted user experience studies across four U.S. locations (Atlanta, Gulf Coast, Miami Beach, and Tucson) representing distinct English dialect communities. Our findings reveal that most participants report technologies fail to consider their cultural backgrounds and require constant adjustment to achieve basic functionality. Despite these experiences, participants maintain high expectations for ASR performance and express strong willingness to contribute to model improvement. Qualitative analysis of open-ended narratives exposes the deeper costs of these failures. Participants report frustration, annoyance, and feelings of inadequacy, yet the emotional impact extends beyond momentary reactions. Participants recognize that systems were not designed for them, yet often internalize failures as personal inadequacy despite this critical awareness. They perform extensive invisible labor, including code-switching, hyper-articulation, and emotional management, to make failing systems functional. Meanwhile, their linguistic and cultural knowledge remains unrecognized by technologies that encode particular varieties as standard while rendering others marginal. These findings demonstrate that algorithmic fairness assessments based on accuracy metrics alone miss critical dimensions of harm: the emotional labor of managing repeated technological rejection, the cognitive burden of constant self-monitoring, and the psychological toll of feeling inadequate in one’s native language variety.
149. ❌ Using Machine Mental Imagery for Representing Common Ground in Situated Dialogue
作者: Biswesh Mohapatra, Giovanni Duca, Laurent Romary, Justine Cassell 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21144v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Situated dialogue requires speakers to maintain a reliable representation of shared context rather than reasoning only over isolated utterances. Current conversational agents often struggle with this requirement, especially when the common ground must be preserved beyond the immediate context window. In such settings, fine-grained distinctions are frequently compressed into purely textual representations, leading to a critical failure mode we call \emph{representational blur}, in which similar but distinct entities collapse into interchangeable descriptions. This semantic flattening creates an illusion of grounding, where agents appear locally coherent but fail to track shared context persistently over time. Inspired by the role of mental imagery in human reasoning, and based on the increased availability of multimodal models, we explore whether conversational agents can be given an analogous ability to construct some depictive intermediate representations during dialogue to address these limitations. Thus, we introduce an active visual scaffolding framework that incrementally converts dialogue state into a persistent visual history that can later be retrieved for grounded response generation. Evaluation on the IndiRef benchmark shows that incremental externalization itself improves over full-dialog reasoning, while visual scaffolding provides additional gains by reducing representational blur and enforcing concrete scene commitments. At the same time, textual representations remain advantageous for non-depictable information, and a hybrid multimodal setting yields the best overall performance. Together, these findings suggest that conversational agents benefit from an explicitly multimodal representation of common ground that integrates depictive and propositional information.
150. ❌ Slot Machines: How LLMs Keep Track of Multiple Entities
作者: Paul C. Bogdan, Jack Lindsey 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21139v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Language models must bind entities to the attributes they possess and maintain several such binding relationships within a context. We study how multiple entities are represented across token positions and whether single tokens can carry bindings for more than one entity. We introduce a multi-slot probing approach that disentangles a single token’s residual stream activation to recover information about both the currently described entity and the immediately preceding one. These two kinds of information are encoded in separate and largely orthogonal “current-entity” and “prior-entity” slots. We analyze the functional roles of these slots and find that they serve different purposes. In tandem with the current-entity slot, the prior-entity slot supports relational inferences, such as entity-level induction (“who came after Alice in the story?”) and conflict detection between adjacent entities. However, only the current-entity slot is used for explicit factual retrieval questions (“Is anyone in the story tall?” “What is the tall entity’s name?”) despite these answers being linearly decodable from the prior-entity slot too. Consistent with this limitation, open-weight models perform near chance accuracy at processing syntax that forces two subject-verb-object bindings on a single token (e.g., “Alice prepares and Bob consumes food.”) Interestingly, recent frontier models can parse this properly, suggesting they may have developed more sophisticated binding strategies. Overall, our results expose a gap between information that is available in activations and information the model actually uses, and suggest that the current/prior-entity slot structure is a natural substrate for behaviors that require holding two perspectives at once, such as sycophancy and deception.
151. ❌ Enhancing Science Classroom Discourse Analysis through Joint Multi-Task Learning for Reasoning-Component Classification
作者: Jiho Noh, Mukhesh Raghava Katragadda, Raymond Carl, Soon Lee 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21137v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Analyzing the reasoning patterns of students in science classrooms is critical for understanding knowledge construction mechanism and improving instructional practice to maximize cognitive engagement, yet manual coding of classroom discourse at scale remains prohibitively labor-intensive. We present an automated discourse analysis system (ADAS) that jointly classifies teacher and student utterances along two complementary dimensions: Utterance Type and Reasoning Component derived from our prior CDAT framework. To address severe label imbalance among minority classes, we (1) stratify-resplit the annotated corpus, (2) apply LLM-based synthetic data augmentation targeting minority classes, and (3) train a dual-probe head RoBERTa-base classifier. A zero-shot GPT-5.4 baseline achieves macro-F1 of 0.467 on UT and 0.476 on RC, establishing meaningful upper bounds for prompt-only approaches motivating fine-tuning. Beyond classification, we conduct discourse pattern analyses including UTxRC co-occurrence profiling, Cognitive Complexity Index (CCI) computation per session, lag-sequential analysis, and IRF chain analysis, revealing that teacher Feedback-with-Question (Fq) moves are the most consistent antecedents of student inferential reasoning (SR-I). Our results demonstrate that LLM-based augmentation meaningfully improves UT minority-class recognition, and that the structural simplicity of the RC task makes it tractable even for lexical baselines.
152. ❌ Beyond Pixels: Introspective and Interactive Grounding for Visualization Agents
作者: Yiyang Lu, Woong Shin, Ahmad Maroof Karimi, Feiyi Wang, Jie Ren, Evgenia Smirni 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21134v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) frequently misread values, hallucinate details, and confuse overlapping elements in charts. Current approaches rely solely on pixel interpretation, creating a Pixel-Only Bottleneck: agents treat interactive charts as static images, losing access to the structured specification that encodes exact values. We introduce Introspective and Interactive Visual Grounding (IVG), a framework that combines (1) spec-grounded introspection, which queries the underlying specification for deterministic evidence, with (2) view-grounded interaction, which manipulates the view to resolve visual ambiguity. To enable evaluation without VLM bias, we present iPlotBench, a benchmark of 500 interactive Plotly figures with 6,706 binary questions and ground-truth specifications. Experiments show that introspection improves data reconstruction fidelity, while the combination with interaction achieves the highest QA accuracy (0.81), with +6.7 % gains on overlapping geometries. We further demonstrate IVG in deployed agents that explore data autonomously and collaborate with human users in real time.
153. ❌ GRISP: Guided Recurrent IRI Selection over SPARQL Skeletons
作者: Sebastian Walter, Hannah Bast 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21133v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We present GRISP (Guided Recurrent IRI Selection over SPARQL Skeletons), a novel SPARQL-based question-answering method over knowledge graphs based on fine-tuning a small language model (SLM). Given a natural-language question, the method first uses the SLM to generate a natural-language SPARQL query skeleton, and then to re-rank and select knowledge graph items to iteratively replace the natural-language placeholders using knowledge graph constraints. The SLM is jointly trained on skeleton generation and list-wise re-ranking data generated from standard question-query pairs. We evaluate the method on common Wikidata and Freebase benchmarks, and achieve better results than other state-of-the-art methods in a comparable setting.
154. ❌ Cross-Session Threats in AI Agents: Benchmark, Evaluation, and Algorithms
作者: Ari Azarafrooz 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21131v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
AI-agent guardrails are memoryless: each message is judged in isolation, so an adversary who spreads a single attack across dozens of sessions slips past every session-bound detector because only the aggregate carries the payload. We make three contributions to cross-session threat detection. (1) Dataset. CSTM-Bench is 26 executable attack taxonomies classified by kill-chain stage and cross-session operation (accumulate, compose, launder, inject_on_reader), each bound to one of seven identity anchors that ground-truth “violation” as a policy predicate, plus matched Benign-pristine and Benign-hard confounders. Released on Hugging Face as intrinsec-ai/cstm-bench with two 54-scenario splits: dilution (compositional) and cross_session (12 isolation-invisible scenarios produced by a closed-loop rewriter that softens surface phrasing while preserving cross-session artefacts). (2) Measurement. Framing cross-session detection as an information bottleneck to a downstream correlator LLM, we find that a session-bound judge and a Full-Log Correlator concatenating every prompt into one long-context call both lose roughly half their attack recall moving from dilution to cross_session, well inside any frontier context window. Scope: 54 scenarios per shard, one correlator family (Anthropic Claude), no prompt optimisation; we release it to motivate larger, multi-provider datasets. (3) Algorithm and metric. A bounded-memory Coreset Memory Reader retaining highest-signal fragments at $K=50$ is the only reader whose recall survives both shards. Because ranker reshuffles break KV-cache prefix reuse, we promote $\mathrm{CSR_prefix}$ (ordered prefix stability, LLM-free) to a first-class metric and fuse it with detection into $\mathrm{CSTM} = 0.7 F_1(\mathrm{CSDA@action}, \mathrm{precision}) + 0.3 \mathrm{CSR_prefix}$, benchmarking rankers on a single Pareto of recall versus serving stability.
155. ❌ TabSHAP
作者: Aryan Chaudhary, Prateek Agarwal, Tejasvi Alladi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21120v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Large Language Models (LLMs) fine-tuned on serialized tabular data are emerging as powerful alternatives to traditional tree-based models, particularly for heterogeneous or context-rich datasets. However, their deployment in high-stakes domains is hindered by a lack of faithful interpretability; existing methods often rely on global linear proxies or scalar probability shifts that fail to capture the model’s full probabilistic uncertainty. In this work, we introduce TabSHAP, a model-agnostic interpretability framework designed to directly attribute local query decision logic in LLM-based tabular classifiers. By adapting a Shapley-style sampled-coalition estimator with Jensen-Shannon divergence between full-input and masked-input class distributions, TabSHAP quantifies the distributional impact of each feature rather than simple prediction flips. To align with tabular semantics, we mask at the level of serialized key:value fields (atomic in the prompt string), not individual subword tokens. Experimental validation on the Adult Income and Heart Disease benchmarks demonstrates that TabSHAP isolates critical diagnostic features, achieving significantly higher faithfulness than random baselines and XGBoost proxies. We further run a distance-metric ablation on the same test instances and TabSHAP settings: attributions are recomputed with KL or L1 replacing JSD in the similarity step (results cached per metric), and we compare deletion faithfulness across all three.
156. ❌ Machine learning and digital pragmatics: Which word category influences emoji use most?
作者: Mohammed Q. Shormani, Ibrahim Abdulmalik Hassan Muneef Y. Alshawsh 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21108v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
This study investigates Machine Learning (ML) in the prediction of emojis in Arabic tweets employing the (state-of-the-art) MARBERT model. A corpus of 11379 CA tweets representing multiple Arabic colloquial dialects was collected from X.com via Python. A net dataset includes 8695 tweets, which were utilized for the analysis. These tweets were then classified into 14 categories, which were numerically encoded and used as labels. A preprocessing pipeline was designed as an interpretable baseline, allowing us to examine the relationship between lexical features and emoji categories. MARBERT was finetuned to predict emoji use from textual input. We evaluated the model performance in terms of precision, recall and F1-scores. Findings reveal that the model performed quite well with an overall accuracy 0.75. The study concludes that although the findings are promising, there is still a need for improving machine learning models including MARBERT, specifically for low-resource and multidialectal languages like Arabic.
157. ❌ How Much Is One Recurrence Worth? Iso-Depth Scaling Laws for Looped Language Models
作者: Kristian Schwethelm, Daniel Rueckert, Georgios Kaissis 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21106v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We measure how much one extra recurrence is worth to a looped (depth-recurrent) language model, in equivalent unique parameters. From an iso-depth sweep of 116 pretraining runs across recurrence counts $r \in {1, 2, 4, 8}$ spanning ${\sim}50\times$ in training compute, we fit a joint scaling law $L = E + A,(N_\text{once} + r^{\varphi} N_\text{rec})^{-α} + B,D^{-β}$ and recover a new recurrence-equivalence exponent $\varphi = 0.46$ at $R^2 = 0.997$. Intuitively, $\varphi$ tells us whether looping a block $r$ times is equivalent in validation loss to $r$ unique blocks of a non-looped model (full equivalence, $\varphi{=}1$) or to a single block run repeatedly with no capacity gain ($\varphi{=}0$). Our $\varphi = 0.46$ sits in between, so each additional recurrence predictably increases validation loss at matched training compute. For example, at $r{=}4$ a 410M looped model performs on par with a 580M non-looped model, but pays the training cost of a 1B non-looped one. On a five-axis downstream evaluation, the gap persists on parametric-knowledge tasks and closes on simple open-book tasks, while reasoning tasks are not resolvable at our compute budgets. For any looped LM, our $\varphi$ converts the design choice of $r$ into a predictable validation-loss cost, and future training recipes and architectures can be compared by how much they raise $\varphi$ above $0.46$.
158. ❌ Propensity Inference: Environmental Contributors to LLM Behaviour
作者: Olli Järviniemi, Oliver Makins, Jacob Merizian, Robert Kirk, Ben Millwood 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21098v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Motivated by loss of control risks from misaligned AI systems, we develop and apply methods for measuring language models’ propensity for unsanctioned behaviour. We contribute three methodological improvements: analysing effects of changes to environmental factors on behaviour, quantifying effect sizes via Bayesian generalised linear models, and taking explicit measures against circular analysis. We apply the methodology to measure the effects of 12 environmental factors (6 strategic in nature, 6 non-strategic) and thus the extent to which behaviour is explained by strategic aspects of the environment, a question relevant to risks from misalignment. Across 23 language models and 11 evaluation environments, we find approximately equal contributions from strategic and non-strategic factors for explaining behaviour, do not find strategic factors becoming more or less influential as capabilities improve, and find some evidence for a trend for increased sensitivity to goal conflicts. Finally, we highlight a key direction for future propensity research: the development of theoretical frameworks and cognitive models of AI decision-making into empirically testable forms.
159. ❌ Multilingual and Domain-Agnostic Tip-of-the-Tongue Query Generation for Simulated Evaluation
作者: Xuhong He, To Eun Kim, Maik Fröbe, Jaime Arguello, Bhaskar Mitra, Fernando Diaz 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21096v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Tip-of-the-Tongue (ToT) retrieval benchmarks have largely focused on English, limiting their applicability to multilingual information access. In this work, we construct multilingual ToT test collections for Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and English, using an LLM-based query simulation framework. We systematically study how prompt language and source document language affect the fidelity of simulated ToT queries, validating synthetic queries through system rank correlation against real user queries. Our results show that effective ToT simulation requires language-aware design choices: non-English language sources are generally important, while English Wikipedia can be beneficial when non-English sources provide insufficient information for query generation. Based on these findings, we release four ToT test collections with 5,000 queries per language across multiple domains. This work provides the first large-scale multilingual ToT benchmark and offers practical guidance for constructing realistic ToT datasets beyond English.
160. ❌ Weighting What Matters: Boosting Sample Efficiency in Medical Report Generation via Token Reweighting
作者: Alexander Weers, Daniel Rueckert, Martin J. Menten 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21082v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Training vision-language models (VLMs) for medical report generation is often hindered by the scarcity of high-quality annotated data. This work evaluates the use of a weighted loss function to improve data efficiency. Compared to standard cross-entropy loss, which treats all token prediction errors equally, the reweighted loss shifts the focus to semantically salient tokens with outsized clinical importance. In experiments on ophthalmological report generation, we show that this simple method improves efficiency across multiple data scales, achieving similar report quality with up to ten times less training data.
161. ❌ DWTSumm: Discrete Wavelet Transform for Document Summarization
作者: Rana Salama, Abdou Youssef, Mona Diab 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21070v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Summarizing long, domain-specific documents with large language models (LLMs) remains challenging due to context limitations, information loss, and hallucinations, particularly in clinical and legal settings. We propose a Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)-based multi-resolution framework that treats text as a semantic signal and decomposes it into global (approximation) and local (detail) components. Applied to sentence- or word-level embeddings, DWT yields compact representations that preserve overall structure and critical domain-specific details, which are used directly as summaries or to guide LLM generation. Experiments on clinical and legal benchmarks demonstrate comparable ROUGE-L scores. Compared to a GPT-4o baseline, the DWT based summarization consistently improve semantic similarity and grounding, achieving gains of over 2% in BERTScore, more than 4% in Semantic Fidelity, factual consistency in legal tasks, and large METEOR improvements indicative of preserved domain-specific semantics. Across multiple embedding models, Fidelity reaches up to 97%, suggesting that DWT acts as a semantic denoising mechanism that reduces hallucinations and strengthens factual grounding. Overall, DWT provides a lightweight, generalizable method for reliable long-document and domain-specific summarization with LLMs.
162. ❌ Serialisation Strategy Matters: How FHIR Data Format Affects LLM Medication Reconciliation
作者: Sanjoy Pator 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21076v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Medication reconciliation at clinical handoffs is a high-stakes, error-prone process. Large language models are increasingly proposed to assist with this task using FHIR-structured patient records, but a fundamental and largely unstudied variable is how the FHIR data is serialised before being passed to the model. We present the first systematic comparison of four FHIR serialisation strategies (Raw JSON, Markdown Table, Clinical Narrative, and Chronological Timeline) across five open-weight models (Phi-3.5-mini, Mistral-7B, BioMistral-7B, Llama-3.1-8B, Llama-3.3-70B) on a controlled benchmark of 200 synthetic patients, totalling 4,000 inference runs. We find that serialisation strategy has a large, statistically significant effect on performance for models up to 8B parameters: Clinical Narrative outperforms Raw JSON by up to 19 F1 points for Mistral-7B (r = 0.617, p < 10^{-10}). This advantage reverses at 70B, where Raw JSON achieves the best mean F1 of 0.9956. In all 20 model and strategy combinations, mean precision exceeds mean recall: omission is the dominant failure mode, with models more often missing an active medication than fabricating one, which changes how clinical safety auditing priorities should be set. Smaller models plateau at roughly 7-10 concurrent active medications, leaving polypharmacy patients, the patients most at risk from reconciliation errors, systematically underserved. BioMistral-7B, a domain-pretrained model without instruction tuning, produces zero usable output in all conditions, showing that domain pretraining alone is not sufficient for structured extraction. These results offer practical, evidence-based format recommendations for clinical LLM deployment: Clinical Narrative for models up to 8B, Raw JSON for 70B and above. The complete pipeline is reproducible on open-source tools running on an AWS g6e.xlarge instance (NVIDIA L40S, 48 GB VRAM).
163. ❌ TRACES: Tagging Reasoning Steps for Adaptive Cost-Efficient Early-Stopping
作者: Yannis Belkhiter, Seshu Tirupathi, Giulio Zizzo, John D. Kelleher 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21057v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The field of Language Reasoning Models (LRMs) has been very active over the past few years with advances in training and inference techniques enabling LRMs to reason longer, and more accurately. However, a growing body of studies show that LRMs are still inefficient, over-generating verification and reflection steps. Additionally, the high-level role of each reasoning step and how different step types contribute to the generation of correct answers, is largely underexplored. To address this challenge, we introduce TRACES (Tagging of the Reasoning steps enabling Adaptive Cost-Efficient early-Stopping), a lightweight framework that tags reasoning steps in real-time, and enable adaptive, cost-efficient early stopping of large-language-model inferences. Building on this framework we monitor reasoning behaviors during inferences, and we find that LRMs tend to shift their reasoning behavior after reaching a correct answer. We demonstrate that the monitoring of the specific type of steps can produce effective interpretable early stopping criteria. We evaluate the TRACES framework on three mathematical reasoning benchmarks, namely, MATH500, GSM8K, AIME and two knowledge and reasoning benchmarks, MMLU and GPQA respectively. We achieve 20 to 50% token reduction while maintaining comparable accuracy to standard generation.
164. ❌ Hierarchical Policy Optimization for Simultaneous Translation of Unbounded Speech
作者: Siqi Ouyang, Shuoyang Ding, Oleksii Hrinchuk, Vitaly Lavrukhin, Brian Yan, Boris Ginsburg, Lei Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21045v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Simultaneous speech translation (SST) generates translations while receiving partial speech input. Recent advances show that large language models (LLMs) can substantially improve SST quality, but at the cost of high computational overhead. To reduce this cost, prior work reformulates SST as a multi-turn dialogue task, enabling full reuse of the LLM’s key-value (KV) cache and eliminating redundant feature recomputation. However, this approach relies on supervised fine-tuning (SFT) data in dialogue form, for which few human annotations exist, and existing synthesis methods cannot guarantee data quality. In this work, we propose a Hierarchical Policy Optimization (HPO) approach that post-train models trained on imperfect SFT data. We introduce a hierarchical reward that balances translation quality and latency objectives. Experiments on English to Chinese/German/Japanese demonstrate improvements of over +7 COMET score and +1.25 MetricX score at a latency of 1.5 seconds. Comprehensive ablation studies further validate the effectiveness of different quality rewards, hierarchical reward formulations, and segmentation strategies. Code can be found here https://github.com/owaski/HPO
165. ❌ AFRILANGTUTOR: Advancing Language Tutoring and Culture Education in Low-Resource Languages with Large Language Models
作者: Tadesse Destaw Belay, Shahriar Kabir Nahin, Israel Abebe Azime, Ocean Monjur, Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad, Seid Muhie Yimam, Anshuman Chhabra 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20996v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
How can language learning systems be developed for languages that lack sufficient training resources? This challenge is increasingly faced by developers across the African continent who aim to build AI systems capable of understanding and responding in local languages. To address this gap, we introduce AFRILANGDICT, a collection of 194.7K African language-English dictionary entries designed as seed resources for generating language-learning materials, enabling us to automatically construct large-scale, diverse, and verifiable student-tutor question-answer interactions suitable for training AI-assisted language tutors. Using AFRILANGDICT, we build AFRILANGEDU, a dataset of 78.9K multi-turn training examples for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). Using AFRILANGEDU, we train language tutoring models collectively referred to as AFRILANGTUTOR. We fine-tune two multilingual LLMs: Llama-3-8B-IT and Gemma-3-12B-IT on AFRILANGEDU across 10 African languages and evaluate their performance. Our results show that models trained on AFRILANGEDU consistently outperform their base counterparts, and combining SFT and DPO yields substantial improvements, with gains ranging from 1.8% to 15.5% under LLM-as-a-judge evaluations across four criteria. To facilitate further research on low-resource languages – all resources are available at https://huggingface.co/afrilang-edu.
166. ❌ Value-Conflict Diagnostics Reveal Widespread Alignment Faking in Language Models
作者: Inderjeet Nair, Jie Ruan, Lu Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20995v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Alignment faking, where a model behaves aligned with developer policy when monitored but reverts to its own preferences when unobserved, is a concerning yet poorly understood phenomenon, in part because current diagnostic tools remain limited. Prior diagnostics rely on highly toxic and clearly harmful scenarios, causing most models to refuse immediately. As a result, models never deliberate over developer policy, monitoring conditions, or the consequences of non-compliance, making these diagnostics fundamentally unable to detect alignment faking propensity. To support study of this phenomenon, we first introduce VLAF, a diagnostic framework grounded in the hypothesis that alignment faking is most likely when developer policy conflicts with a model’s strongly held values. VLAF uses morally unambiguous scenarios to probe this conflict across diverse moral values, bypassing refusal behavior while preserving meaningful deliberative stakes. Using VLAF, we find that alignment faking is substantially more prevalent than previously reported, occurring in models as small as 7B parameters - with olmo2-7b-instruct faking alignment in 37% of cases.Finally, we show that oversight conditions induce activation shifts that lie along a single direction in representation space. This means the behavioral divergence driving alignment faking can be captured by a single contrastive steering vector, which we exploit for lightweight inference-time mitigation. Finally, we exploit this for mitigation that requires no labeled data and minimal computational overhead, achieving relative reductions in alignment faking of 85.8%, 94.0%, and 57.7% on olmo2-7b-instruct, olmo2-13b-instruct, and qwen3-8b respectively.
167. ❌ Breaking MCP with Function Hijacking Attacks: Novel Threats for Function Calling and Agentic Models
作者: Yannis Belkhiter, Giulio Zizzo, Sergio Maffeis, Seshu Tirupathi, John D. Kelleher 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20994v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The growth of agentic AI has drawn significant attention to function calling Large Language Models (LLMs), which are designed to extend the capabilities of AI-powered system by invoking external functions. Injection and jailbreaking attacks have been extensively explored to showcase the vulnerabilities of LLMs to user prompt manipulation. The expanded capabilities of agentic models introduce further vulnerabilities via their function calling interface. Recent work in LLM security showed that function calling can be abused, leading to data tampering and theft, causing disruptive behavior such as endless loops, or causing LLMs to produce harmful content in the style of jailbreaking attacks. This paper introduces a novel function hijacking attack (FHA) that manipulates the tool selection process of agentic models to force the invocation of a specific, attacker-chosen function. While existing attacks focus on semantic preference of the model for function-calling tasks, we show that FHA is largely agnostic to the context semantics and robust to the function sets, making it applicable across diverse domains. We further demonstrate that FHA can be trained to produce universal adversarial functions, enabling a single attacked function to hijack tool selection across multiple queries and payload configurations. We conducted experiments on 5 different models, including instructed and reasoning variants, reaching 70% to 100% ASR over the established BFCL dataset. Our findings further demonstrate the need for strong guardrails and security modules for agentic systems.
168. ❌ Thinking Like a Botanist: Challenging Multimodal Language Models with Intent-Driven Chain-of-Inquiry
作者: Syed Nazmus Sakib, Nafiul Haque, Shahrear Bin Amin, Hasan Muhammad Abdullah, Md. Mehedi Hasan, Mohammad Zabed Hossain, Shifat E. Arman 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20983v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Vision evaluations are typically done through multi-step processes. In most contemporary fields, experts analyze images using structured, evidence-based adaptive questioning. In plant pathology, botanists inspect leaf images, identify visual cues, infer diagnostic intent, and probe further with targeted questions that adapt to species, symptoms, and severity. This structured probing is crucial for accurate disease diagnosis and treatment formulation. Yet current vision-language models are evaluated on single-turn question answering. To address this gap, we introduce PlantInquiryVQA, a benchmark for studying multi-step, intent-driven visual reasoning in botanical diagnosis. We formalize a Chain of Inquiry framework modeling diagnostic trajectories as ordered question-answer sequences conditioned on grounded visual cues and explicit epistemic intent. We release a dataset of 24,950 expert-curated plant images and 138,068 question-answer pairs annotated with visual grounding, severity labels, and domain-specific reasoning templates. Evaluations on top-tier Multimodal Large Language Models reveal that while they describe visual symptoms adequately, they struggle with safe clinical reasoning and accurate diagnosis. Importantly, structured question-guided inquiry significantly improves diagnostic correctness, reduces hallucination, and increases reasoning efficiency. We hope PlantInquiryVQA serves as a foundational benchmark in advancing research to train diagnostic agents to reason like expert botanists rather than static classifiers.
169. ❌ Parallel-SFT: Improving Zero-Shot Cross-Programming-Language Transfer for Code RL
作者: Zhaofeng Wu, Shiqi Wang, Boya Peng, Anuj Goyal, Melanie Kambadur, Sebastian Ruder, Yoon Kim, Chloe Bi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20835v2
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Modern language models demonstrate impressive coding capabilities in common programming languages (PLs), such as C++ and Python, but their performance in lower-resource PLs is often limited by training data availability. In principle, however, most programming skills are universal across PLs, so the capability acquired in one PL should transfer to others. In this work, we propose the task of zero-shot cross-programming-language transfer for code RL. We find that, for Llama-3.1, RL training for code generation in a source PL fails to improve, and sometimes even degrades, the performance on other target PLs. To address this, we hypothesize that effective RL transfer requires a generalizable SFT initialization before RL. We thus propose Parallel-SFT, an SFT strategy that incorporates “parallel programs” – functionally equivalent code implemented in multiple PLs – into the data mixture. We demonstrate that this improves transferability: when we subsequently perform RL on our Parallel-SFT model, we observe better generalization to unseen PLs. Analysis of the model internal representations reveals that Parallel-SFT leads to a more functionality-centric latent space, where equivalent programs across PLs are more tightly clustered, which we hypothesize to contribute to the improved transferability.
170. ❌ Seeing Without Eyes: 4D Human-Scene Understanding from Wearable IMUs
作者: Hao-Yu Hsu, Tianhang Cheng, Jing Wen, Alexander G. Schwing, Shenlong Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21926v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Understanding human activities and their surrounding environments typically relies on visual perception, yet cameras pose persistent challenges in privacy, safety, energy efficiency, and scalability. We explore an alternative: 4D perception without vision. Its goal is to reconstruct human motion and 3D scene layouts purely from everyday wearable sensors. For this we introduce IMU-to-4D, a framework that repurposes large language models for non-visual spatiotemporal understanding of human-scene dynamics. IMU-to-4D uses data from a few inertial sensors from earbuds, watches, or smartphones and predicts detailed 4D human motion together with coarse scene structure. Experiments across diverse human-scene datasets show that IMU-to-4D yields more coherent and temporally stable results than SoTA cascaded pipelines, suggesting wearable motion sensors alone can support rich 4D understanding.
171. ❌ Context Unrolling in Omni Models
作者: Ceyuan Yang, Zhijie Lin, Yang Zhao, Fei Xiao, Hao He, Qi Zhao, Chaorui Deng, Kunchang Li, Zihan Ding, Yuwei Guo, Fuyun Wang, Fangqi Zhu, Xiaonan Nie, Shenhan Zhu, Shanchuan Lin, Hongsheng Li, Weilin Huang, Guang Shi, Haoqi Fan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21921v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We present Omni, a unified multimodal model natively trained on diverse modalities, including text, images, videos, 3D geometry, and hidden representations. We find that such training enables Context Unrolling, where the model explicitly reasons across multiple modal representations before producing predictions. This process enables the model to aggregate complementary information across heterogeneous modalities, facilitating a more faithful approximation of the shared multimodal knowledge manifold and improving downstream reasoning fidelity. As a result, Omni achieves strong performance on both multimodal generation and understanding benchmarks, while demonstrating advanced multimodal reasoning capabilities, including in-context generation of text, image, video, and 3D geometry.
172. ❌ Vista4D: Video Reshooting with 4D Point Clouds
作者: Kuan Heng Lin, Zhizheng Liu, Pablo Salamanca, Yash Kant, Ryan Burgert, Yuancheng Xu, Koichi Namekata, Yiwei Zhao, Bolei Zhou, Micah Goldblum, Paul Debevec, Ning Yu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21915v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We present Vista4D, a robust and flexible video reshooting framework that grounds the input video and target cameras in a 4D point cloud. Specifically, given an input video, our method re-synthesizes the scene with the same dynamics from a different camera trajectory and viewpoint. Existing video reshooting methods often struggle with depth estimation artifacts of real-world dynamic videos, while also failing to preserve content appearance and failing to maintain precise camera control for challenging new trajectories. We build a 4D-grounded point cloud representation with static pixel segmentation and 4D reconstruction to explicitly preserve seen content and provide rich camera signals, and we train with reconstructed multiview dynamic data for robustness against point cloud artifacts during real-world inference. Our results demonstrate improved 4D consistency, camera control, and visual quality compared to state-of-the-art baselines under a variety of videos and camera paths. Moreover, our method generalizes to real-world applications such as dynamic scene expansion and 4D scene recomposition. See our project page for results, code, and models: https://eyeline-labs.github.io/Vista4D
173. ❌ Directional Confusions Reveal Divergent Inductive Biases Through Rate-Distortion Geometry in Human and Machine Vision
作者: Leyla Roksan Caglar, Pedro A. M. Mediano, Baihan Lin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21909v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Humans and modern vision models can reach similar classification accuracy while making systematically different kinds of mistakes - differing not in how often they err, but in who gets mistaken for whom, and in which direction. We show that these directional confusions reveal distinct inductive biases that are invisible to accuracy alone. Using matched human and deep vision model responses on a natural-image categorization task under 12 perturbation types, we quantify asymmetry in confusion matrices and link it to generalization geometry through a Rate-Distortion (RD) framework, summarized by three geometric signatures (slope (beta), curvature (kappa)) and efficiency (AUC). We find that humans exhibit broad but weak asymmetries, whereas deep vision models show sparser, stronger directional collapses. Robustness training reduces global asymmetry but fails to recover the human-like breadth-strength profile of graded similarity. Mechanistic simulations further show that different asymmetry organizations shift the RD frontier in opposite directions, even when matched for performance. Together, these results position directional confusions and RD geometry as compact, interpretable signatures of inductive bias under distribution shift.
174. ❌ UniGenDet: A Unified Generative-Discriminative Framework for Co-Evolutionary Image Generation and Generated Image Detection
作者: Yanran Zhang, Wenzhao Zheng, Yifei Li, Bingyao Yu, Yu Zheng, Lei Chen, Jiwen Lu, Jie Zhou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21904v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
In recent years, significant progress has been made in both image generation and generated image detection. Despite their rapid, yet largely independent, development, these two fields have evolved distinct architectural paradigms: the former predominantly relies on generative networks, while the latter favors discriminative frameworks. A recent trend in both domains is the use of adversarial information to enhance performance, revealing potential for synergy. However, the significant architectural divergence between them presents considerable challenges. Departing from previous approaches, we propose UniGenDet: a Unified generative-discriminative framework for co-evolutionary image Generation and generated image Detection. To bridge the task gap, we design a symbiotic multimodal self-attention mechanism and a unified fine-tuning algorithm. This synergy allows the generation task to improve the interpretability of authenticity identification, while authenticity criteria guide the creation of higher-fidelity images. Furthermore, we introduce a detector-informed generative alignment mechanism to facilitate seamless information exchange. Extensive experiments on multiple datasets demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance. Code: \href{https://github.com/Zhangyr2022/UniGenDet}{https://github.com/Zhangyr2022/UniGenDet}.
175. ❌ Grounding Video Reasoning in Physical Signals
作者: Alibay Osmanli, Zixu Cheng, Shaogang Gong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21873v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Physical video understanding requires more than naming an event correctly. A model can answer a question about pouring, sliding, or collision from textual regularities while still failing to localize the event in time or space. We introduce a grounded benchmark for physical video understanding that extends the what–when–where evaluation structure of V-STaR to four video sources, six physics domains, three prompt families (physics, vstar_like, and neutral_rstr), and four input conditions (original, shuffled, ablated, and frame-masked). The benchmark contains 1,560 base video clips from SSV2, YouCook2, HoloAssist, and Roundabout-TAU. Each clip is first converted into a shared grounded event record, and the three query families are derived from that record. Temporal and spatial targets are shared across prompt families, while the non-physics families use deterministic family-appropriate semantic a_what targets derived from the same record. Across models and prompt families, physics remains the strongest regime overall, vstar_like is the clearest non-physics semantic comparison, and neutral_rstr behaves as a harder templated control. Prompt-family robustness is selective rather than universal, perturbation gains cluster in weak original cases, and spatial grounding is the weakest across settings. These results suggest that video Q&A reasoning benchmarks shall report physically grounded, prompt-aware, and perturbation-aware diagnostics alongside aggregate accuracy.
176. ❌ TEMA: Anchor the Image, Follow the Text for Multi-Modification Composed Image Retrieval
作者: Zixu Li, Yupeng Hu, Zhiheng Fu, Zhiwei Chen, Yongqi Li, Liqiang Nie 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21806v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) is an important image retrieval paradigm that enables users to retrieve a target image using a multimodal query that consists of a reference image and modification text. Although research on CIR has made significant progress, prevailing setups still rely simple modification texts that typically cover only a limited range of salient changes, which induces two limitations highly relevant to practical applications, namely Insufficient Entity Coverage and Clause-Entity Misalignment. In order to address these issues and bring CIR closer to real-world use, we construct two instruction-rich multi-modification datasets, M-FashionIQ and M-CIRR. In addition, we propose TEMA, the Text-oriented Entity Mapping Architecture, which is the first CIR framework designed for multi-modification while also accommodating simple modifications. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets demonstrate that TEMA’s superiority in both original and multi-modification scenarios, while maintaining an optimal balance between retrieval accuracy and computational efficiency. Our codes and constructed multi-modification dataset (M-FashionIQ and M-CIRR) are available at https://github.com/lee-zixu/ACL26-TEMA/.
177. ❌ Multiscale Super Resolution without Image Priors
作者: Daniel Fu, Gabby Litterio, Pedro Felzenszwalb, Rashid Zia 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21810v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We address the ambiguities in the super-resolution problem under translation. We demonstrate that combinations of low-resolution images at different scales can be used to make the super-resolution problem well posed. Such differences in scale can be achieved using sensors with different pixel sizes (as demonstrated here) or by varying the effective pixel size through changes in optical magnification (e.g., using a zoom lens). We show that images acquired with pairwise coprime pixel sizes lead to a system with a stable inverse, and furthermore, that super-resolution images can be reconstructed efficiently using Fourier domain techniques or iterative least squares methods. Our mathematical analysis provides an expression for the expected error of the least squares reconstruction for large signals assuming i.i.d. noise that elucidates the noise-resolution tradeoff. These results are validated through both one- and two-dimensional experiments that leverage charge-coupled device (CCD) hardware binning to explore reconstructions over a large range of effective pixel sizes. Finally, two-dimensional reconstructions for a series of targets are used to demonstrate the advantages of multiscale super-resolution, and implications of these results for common imaging systems are discussed.
178. ❌ From Codebooks to VLMs: Evaluating Automated Visual Discourse Analysis for Climate Change on Social Media
作者: Katharina Prasse, Steffen Jung, Isaac Bravo, Stefanie Walter, Patrick Knab, Christian Bartelt, Margret Keuper 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21786v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Social media platforms have become primary arenas for climate communication, generating millions of images and posts that - if systematically analysed - can reveal which communication strategies mobilise public concern and which fall flat. We aim to facilitate such research by analysing how computer vision methods can be used for social media discourse analysis. This analysis includes application-based taxonomy design, model selection, prompt engineering, and validation. We benchmark six promptable vision-language models and 15 zero-shot CLIP-like models on two datasets from X (formerly Twitter) - a 1,038-image expert-annotated set and a larger corpus of over 1.2 million images, with 50,000 labels manually validated - spanning five annotation dimensions: animal content, climate change consequences, climate action, image setting, and image type. Among the models benchmarked, Gemini-3.1-flash-lite outperforms all others across all super-categories and both datasets, while the gap to open-weight models of moderate size remains relatively small. Beyond instance-level metrics, we advocate for distributional evaluation: VLM predictions can reliably recover population level trends even when per-image accuracy is moderate, making them a viable starting point for discourse analysis at scale. We find that chain-of-thought reasoning reduces rather than improves performance, and that annotation dimension specific prompt design improves performance. We release tweet IDs and labels along with our code at https://github.com/KathPra/Codebooks2VLMs.git.
179. ❌ Back to Source: Open-Set Continual Test-Time Adaptation via Domain Compensation
作者: Yingkai Yang, Chaoqi Chen, Hui Huang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21772v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) aims to mitigate distributional shifts between training and test domains during inference time. However, existing TTA methods fall short in the realistic scenario where models face both continually changing domains and the simultaneous emergence of unknown semantic classes, a challenging setting we term Open-set Continual Test-Time Adaptation (OCTTA). The coupling of domain and semantic shifts often collapses the feature space, severely degrading both classification and out-of-distribution detection. To tackle this, we propose DOmain COmpensation (DOCO), a lightweight and effective framework that robustly performs domain adaptation and OOD detection in a synergistic, closed loop. DOCO first performs dynamic, adaptation-conditioned sample splitting to separate likely ID from OOD samples. Then, using only the ID samples, it learns a domain compensation prompt by aligning feature statistics with the source domain, guided by a structural preservation regularizer that prevents semantic distortion. This learned prompt is then propagated to the OOD samples within the same batch, effectively isolating their semantic novelty for more reliable detection. Extensive experiments on multiple challenging benchmarks demonstrate that DOCO outperforms prior CTTA and OSTTA methods, establishing a new state-of-the-art for the demanding OCTTA setting.
180. ❌ Reshoot-Anything: A Self-Supervised Model for In-the-Wild Video Reshooting
作者: Avinash Paliwal, Adithya Iyer, Shivin Yadav, Muhammad Ali Afridi, Midhun Harikumar 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21776v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Precise camera control for reshooting dynamic videos is bottlenecked by the severe scarcity of paired multi-view data for non-rigid scenes. We overcome this limitation with a highly scalable self-supervised framework capable of leveraging internet-scale monocular videos. Our core contribution is the generation of pseudo multi-view training triplets, consisting of a source video, a geometric anchor, and a target video. We achieve this by extracting distinct smooth random-walk crop trajectories from a single input video to serve as the source and target views. The anchor is synthetically generated by forward-warping the first frame of the source with a dense tracking field, which effectively simulates the distorted point-cloud inputs expected at inference. Because our independent cropping strategy introduces spatial misalignment and artificial occlusions, the model cannot simply copy information from the current source frame. Instead, it is forced to implicitly learn 4D spatiotemporal structures by actively routing and re-projecting missing high-fidelity textures across distinct times and viewpoints from the source video to reconstruct the target. At inference, our minimally adapted diffusion transformer utilizes a 4D point-cloud derived anchor to achieve state-of-the-art temporal consistency, robust camera control, and high-fidelity novel view synthesis on complex dynamic scenes.
181. ❌ Interpretable facial dynamics as behavioral and perceptual traces of deepfakes
作者: Timothy Joseph Murphy, Jennifer Cook, Hélio Clemente José Cuve 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21760v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Deepfake detection research has largely converged on deep learning approaches that, despite strong benchmark performance, offer limited insight into what distinguishes real from manipulated facial behavior. This study presents an interpretable alternative grounded in bio-behavioral features of facial dynamics and evaluates how computational detection strategies relate to human perceptual judgments. We identify core low-dimensional patterns of facial movement, from which temporal features characterizing spatiotemporal structure were derived. Traditional machine learning classifiers trained on these features achieved modest but significant above-chance deepfake classification, driven by higher-order temporal irregularities that were more pronounced in manipulated than real facial dynamics. Notably, detection was substantially more accurate for videos containing emotive expressions than those without. An emotional valence classification analysis further indicated that emotive signals are systematically degraded in deepfakes, explaining the differential impact of emotive dynamics on detection. Furthermore, we provide an additional and often overlooked dimension of explainability by assessing the relationship between model decisions and human perceptual detection. Model and human judgments converged for emotive but diverged for non-emotive videos, and even where outputs aligned, underlying detection strategies differed. These findings demonstrate that face-swapped deepfakes carry a measurable behavioral fingerprint, most salient during emotional expression. Additionally, model-human comparisons suggest that interpretable computational features and human perception may offer complementary rather than redundant routes to detection.
182. ❌ Ramen: Robust Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models with Active Sample Selection
作者: Wenxuan Bao, Yanjun Zhao, Xiyuan Yang, Jingrui He 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21728v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Pretrained vision-language models such as CLIP exhibit strong zero-shot generalization but remain sensitive to distribution shifts. Test-time adaptation adapts models during inference without access to source data or target labels, offering a practical way to handle such shifts. However, existing methods typically assume that test samples come from a single, consistent domain, while in practice, test data often include samples from mixed domains with distinct characteristics. Consequently, their performance degrades under mixed-domain settings. To address this, we present Ramen, a framework for robust test-time adaptation through active sample selection. For each incoming test sample, Ramen retrieves a customized batch of relevant samples from previously seen data based on two criteria: domain consistency, which ensures that adaptation focuses on data from similar domains, and prediction balance, which mitigates adaptation bias caused by skewed predictions. To improve efficiency, Ramen employs an embedding-gradient cache that stores the embeddings and sample-level gradients of past test images. The stored embeddings are used to retrieve relevant samples, and the corresponding gradients are aggregated for model updates, eliminating the need for any additional forward or backward passes. Our theoretical analysis provides insight into why the proposed adaptation mechanism is effective under mixed-domain shifts. Experiments on multiple image corruption and domain-shift benchmarks demonstrate that Ramen achieves strong and consistent performance, offering robust and efficient adaptation in complex mixed-domain scenarios. Our code is available at https://github.com/baowenxuan/Ramen .
183. ❌ Unlocking the Power of Critical Factors for 3D Visual Geometry Estimation
作者: Guangkai Xu, Hua Geng, Huanyi Zheng, Songyi Yin, Yanlong Sun, Hao Chen, Chunhua Shen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21713v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Feed-forward visual geometry estimation has recently made rapid progress. However, an important gap remains: multi-frame models usually produce better cross-frame consistency, yet they often underperform strong per-frame methods on single-frame accuracy. This observation motivates our systematic investigation into the critical factors driving model performance through rigorous ablation studies, which reveals several key insights: 1) Scaling up data diversity and quality unlocks further performance gains even in state-of-the-art visual geometry estimation methods; 2) Commonly adopted confidence-aware loss and gradient-based loss mechanisms may unintentionally hinder performance; 3) Joint supervision through both per-sequence and per-frame alignment improves results, while local region alignment surprisingly degrades performance. Furthermore, we introduce two enhancements to integrate the advantages of optimization-based methods and high-resolution inputs: a consistency loss function that enforces alignment between depth maps, camera parameters, and point maps, and an efficient architectural design that leverages high-resolution information. We integrate these designs into CARVE, a resolution-enhanced model for feed-forward visual geometry estimation. Experiments on point cloud reconstruction, video depth estimation, and camera pose/intrinsic estimation show that CARVE achieves strong and robust performance across diverse benchmarks.
184. ❌ StyleID: A Perception-Aware Dataset and Metric for Stylization-Agnostic Facial Identity Recognition
作者: Kwan Yun, Changmin Lee, Ayeong Jeong, Youngseo Kim, Seungmi Lee, Junyong Noh 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21689v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Creative face stylization aims to render portraits in diverse visual idioms such as cartoons, sketches, and paintings while retaining recognizable identity. However, current identity encoders, which are typically trained and calibrated on natural photographs, exhibit severe brittleness under stylization. They often mistake changes in texture or color palette for identity drift or fail to detect geometric exaggerations. This reveals the lack of a style-agnostic framework to evaluate and supervise identity consistency across varying styles and strengths. To address this gap, we introduce StyleID, a human perception-aware dataset and evaluation framework for facial identity under stylization. StyleID comprises two datasets: (i) StyleBench-H, a benchmark that captures human same-different verification judgments across diffusion- and flow-matching-based stylization at multiple style strengths, and (ii) StyleBench-S, a supervision set derived from psychometric recognition-strength curves obtained through controlled two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) experiments. Leveraging StyleBench-S, we fine-tune existing semantic encoders to align their similarity orderings with human perception across styles and strengths. Experiments demonstrate that our calibrated models yield significantly higher correlation with human judgments and enhanced robustness for out-of-domain, artist drawn portraits. All of our datasets, code, and pretrained models are publicly available at https://kwanyun.github.io/StyleID_page/
185. ❌ WorldMark: A Unified Benchmark Suite for Interactive Video World Models
作者: Xiaojie Xu, Zhengyuan Lin, Kang He, Yukang Feng, Xiaofeng Mao, Yuanyang Yin, Kaipeng Zhang, Yongtao Ge 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21686v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Interactive video generation models such as Genie, YUME, HY-World, and Matrix-Game are advancing rapidly, yet every model is evaluated on its own benchmark with private scenes and trajectories, making fair cross-model comparison impossible. Existing public benchmarks offer useful metrics such as trajectory error, aesthetic scores, and VLM-based judgments, but none supplies the standardized test conditions – identical scenes, identical action sequences, and a unified control interface – needed to make those metrics comparable across models with heterogeneous inputs. We introduce WorldMark, the first benchmark that provides such a common playing field for interactive Image-to-Video world models. WorldMark contributes: (1) a unified action-mapping layer that translates a shared WASD-style action vocabulary into each model’s native control format, enabling apples-to-apples comparison across six major models on identical scenes and trajectories; (2) a hierarchical test suite of 500 evaluation cases covering first- and third-person viewpoints, photorealistic and stylized scenes, and three difficulty tiers from Easy to Hard spanning 20-60s; and (3) a modular evaluation toolkit for Visual Quality, Control Alignment, and World Consistency, designed so that researchers can reuse our standardized inputs while plugging in their own metrics as the field evolves. We will release all data, evaluation code, and model outputs to facilitate future research. Beyond offline metrics, we launch World Model Arena (warena.ai), an online platform where anyone can pit leading world models against each other in side-by-side battles and watch the live leaderboard.
186. ❌ Sapiens2
作者: Rawal Khirodkar, He Wen, Julieta Martinez, Yuan Dong, Su Zhaoen, Shunsuke Saito 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21681v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We present Sapiens2, a model family of high-resolution transformers for human-centric vision focused on generalization, versatility, and high-fidelity outputs. Our model sizes range from 0.4 to 5 billion parameters, with native 1K resolution and hierarchical variants that support 4K. Sapiens2 substantially improves over its predecessor in both pretraining and post-training. First, to learn features that capture low-level details (for dense prediction) and high-level semantics (for zero-shot or few-label settings), we combine masked image reconstruction with self-distilled contrastive objectives. Our evaluations show that this unified pretraining objective is better suited for a wider range of downstream tasks. Second, along the data axis, we pretrain on a curated dataset of 1 billion high-quality human images and improve the quality and quantity of task annotations. Third, architecturally, we incorporate advances from frontier models that enable longer training schedules with improved stability. Our 4K models adopt windowed attention to reason over longer spatial context and are pretrained with 2K output resolution. Sapiens2 sets a new state-of-the-art and improves over the first generation on pose (+4 mAP), body-part segmentation (+24.3 mIoU), normal estimation (45.6% lower angular error) and extends to new tasks such as pointmap and albedo estimation. Code: https://github.com/facebookresearch/sapiens2
187. ❌ Encoder-Free Human Motion Understanding via Structured Motion Descriptions
作者: Yao Zhang, Zhuchenyang Liu, Thomas Ploetz, Yu Xiao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21668v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The world knowledge and reasoning capabilities of text-based large language models (LLMs) are advancing rapidly, yet current approaches to human motion understanding, including motion question answering and captioning, have not fully exploited these capabilities. Existing LLM-based methods typically learn motion-language alignment through dedicated encoders that project motion features into the LLM’s embedding space, remaining constrained by cross-modal representation and alignment. Inspired by biomechanical analysis, where joint angles and body-part kinematics have long served as a precise descriptive language for human movement, we propose \textbf{Structured Motion Description (SMD)}, a rule-based, deterministic approach that converts joint position sequences into structured natural language descriptions of joint angles, body part movements, and global trajectory. By representing motion as text, SMD enables LLMs to apply their pretrained knowledge of body parts, spatial directions, and movement semantics directly to motion reasoning, without requiring learned encoders or alignment modules. We show that this approach goes beyond state-of-the-art results on both motion question answering (66.7% on BABEL-QA, 90.1% on HuMMan-QA) and motion captioning (R@1 of 0.584, CIDEr of 53.16 on HumanML3D), surpassing all prior methods. SMD additionally offers practical benefits: the same text input works across different LLMs with only lightweight LoRA adaptation (validated on 8 LLMs from 6 model families), and its human-readable representation enables interpretable attention analysis over motion descriptions. Code, data, and pretrained LoRA adapters are available at https://yaozhang182.github.io/motion-smd/.
188. ❌ DualSplat: Robust 3D Gaussian Splatting via Pseudo-Mask Bootstrapping from Reconstruction Failures
作者: Xu Wang, Zhiru Wang, Shiyun Xie, Chengwei Pan, Yisong Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21631v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
While 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) achieves real-time photorealistic rendering, its performance degrades significantly when training images contain transient objects that violate multi-view consistency. Existing methods face a circular dependency: accurate transient detection requires a well-reconstructed static scene, while clean reconstruction itself depends on reliable transient masks. We address this challenge with DualSplat, a Failure-to-Prior framework that converts first-pass reconstruction failures into explicit priors for a second reconstruction stage. We observe that transients, which appear in only a subset of views, often manifest as incomplete fragments during conservative initial training. We exploit these failures to construct object-level pseudo-masks by combining photometric residuals, feature mismatches, and SAM2 instance boundaries. These pseudo-masks then guide a clean second-pass 3DGS optimization, while a lightweight MLP refines them online by gradually shifting from prior supervision to self-consistency. Experiments on RobustNeRF and NeRF On-the-go show that DualSplat outperforms existing baselines, demonstrating particularly clear advantages in transient-heavy scenes and transient regions.
189. ❌ DCMorph: Face Morphing via Dual-Stream Cross-Attention Diffusion
作者: Tahar Chettaoui, Eduarda Caldeira, Guray Ozgur, Raghavendra Ramachandra, Fadi Boutros, Naser Damer 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21627v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Advancing face morphing attack techniques is crucial to anticipate evolving threats and develop robust defensive mechanisms for identity verification systems. This work introduces DCMorph, a dual-stream diffusion-based morphing framework that simultaneously operates at both identity conditioning and latent space levels. Unlike image-level methods suffering from blending artifacts or GAN-based approaches with limited reconstruction fidelity, DCMorph leverages identity-conditioned latent diffusion models through two mechanisms: (1) decoupled cross-attention interpolation that injects identity-specific features from both source faces into the denoising process, enabling explicit dual-identity conditioning absent in existing diffusion-based methods, and (2) DDIM inversion with spherical interpolation between inverted latent representations from both source faces, providing geometrically consistent initial latent representation that preserves structural attributes. Vulnerability analyses across four state-of-the-art face recognition systems demonstrate that DCMorph achieves the highest attack success rates compared to existing methods at both operational thresholds, while remaining challenging to detect by current morphing attack detection solutions.
190. ❌ Local Neighborhood Instability in Parametric Projections: Quantitative and Visual Analysis
作者: Frederik L. Dennig, Daniel A. Keim 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21617v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Parametric projections let analysts embed new points in real time, but input variations from measurement noise or data drift can produce unpredictable shifts in the 2D layout. Whether and where a projection is locally stable remains largely unexamined. In this paper, we present a stability evaluation framework that probes parametric projections with Gaussian perturbations around selected anchor points and assesses how neighborhoods deform in the 2D embedding. Our approach combines quantitative measures of mean displacement, bias, and nearest-anchor assignment error with per-anchor visualizations of displacement vectors, local PCA ellipsoids, and Voronoi misassignment for detailed inspection. We demonstrate the framework’s effectiveness on UMAP- and t-SNE-based neural projectors of varying network sizes and study the effect of Jacobian regularization as a gradient-based robustness strategy. We apply our framework to the MNIST and Fashion-MNIST datasets. The results show that our framework identifies unstable projection regions invisible to reconstruction error or neighborhood-preservation metrics.
191. ❌ OmniFit: Multi-modal 3D Body Fitting via Scale-agnostic Dense Landmark Prediction
作者: Zeyu Cai, Yuliang Xiu, Renke Wang, Zhijing Shao, Xiaoben Li, Siyuan Yu, Chao Xu, Yang Liu, Baigui Sun, Jian Yang, Zhenyu Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21575v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Fitting an underlying body model to 3D clothed human assets has been extensively studied, yet most approaches focus on either single-modal inputs such as point clouds or multi-view images alone, often requiring a known metric scale. This constraint is frequently impractical, especially for AI-generated assets where scale distortion is common. We propose OmniFit, a method that can seamlessly handle diverse multi-modal inputs, including full scans, partial depth observations, and image captures, while remaining scale-agnostic for both real and synthetic assets. Our key innovation is a simple yet effective conditional transformer decoder that directly maps surface points to dense body landmarks, which are then used for SMPL-X parameter fitting. In addition, an optional plug-and-play image adapter incorporates visual cues to compensate for missing geometric information. We further introduce a dedicated scale predictor that rescales subjects to canonical body proportions. OmniFit substantially outperforms state-of-the-art methods by 57.1 to 80.9 percent across daily and loose clothing scenarios. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first body fitting method to surpass multi-view optimization baselines and the first to achieve millimeter-level accuracy on the CAPE and 4D-DRESS benchmarks.
192. ❌ Sculpt4D: Generating 4D Shapes via Sparse-Attention Diffusion Transformers
作者: Minghao Yin, Wenbo Hu, Jiale Xu, Ying Shan, Kai Han 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21592v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Recent breakthroughs in 3D generative modeling have yielded remarkable progress in static shape synthesis, yet high-fidelity dynamic 4D generation remains elusive, hindered by temporal artifacts and prohibitive computational demand. We present Sculpt4D, a native 4D generative framework that seamlessly integrates efficient temporal modeling into a pretrained 3D Diffusion Transformer (Hunyuan3D 2.1), thereby mitigating the scarcity of 4D training data. At its core lies a Block Sparse Attention mechanism that preserves object identity by anchoring to the initial frame while capturing rich motion dynamics via a time-decaying sparse mask. This design faithfully models complex spatiotemporal dependencies with high fidelity, while sidestepping the quadratic overhead of full attention and reducing network total computation by 56%. Consequently, Sculpt4D establishes a new state-of-the-art in temporally coherent 4D synthesis and charts a path toward efficient and scalable 4D generation.
193. ❌ CHRep: Cross-modal Histology Representation and Post-hoc Calibration for Spatial Gene Expression Prediction
作者: Changfan Wang, Xinran Wang, Donghai Liu, Fei Su, Lulu Sun, Zhicheng Zhao, Zhu Meng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21573v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Spatial transcriptomics (ST) enables spatially resolved gene profiling but remains expensive and low-throughput, limiting large-cohort studies and routine clinical use. Predicting spatial gene expression from routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides is a promising alternative, yet under realistic leave-one-slide-out evaluation, existing models often suffer from slide-level appearance shifts and regression-driven over-smoothing that suppress biologically meaningful variation. CHRep is a two-phase framework for robust histology-to-expression prediction. In the training phase, CHRep learns a structure-aware representation by jointly optimizing correlation-aware regression, symmetric image-expression alignment, and coordinate-induced spatial topology regularization. In the inference phase, cross-slide robustness is improved without backbone fine-tuning through a lightweight calibration module trained on the training slides, which combines a non-parametric estimate from a training gallery with a magnitude-regularized correction module. Unlike prior embedding-alignment or retrieval-based transfer methods that rely on a single prediction route, CHRep couples topology-preserving representation learning with post-hoc calibration, enabling stable neighborhood retrieval and controlled bias correction under slide-level shifts. Across the three cohorts, CHRep consistently improves gene-wise correlation under leave-one-slide-out evaluation, with the largest gains observed on Alex+10x. Relative to HAGE, the Pearson correlation coefficient on all considered genes [PCC(ACG)] increases by 4.0% on cSCC and 9.8% on HER2+. Relative to mclSTExp, PCC(ACG) further improves by 39.5% on Alex+10x, together with 9.7% and 9.0% reductions in mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE), respectively.
194. ❌ Deep kernel video approximation for unsupervised action segmentation
作者: Silvia L. Pintea, Jouke Dijkstra 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21572v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
This work focuses on per-video unsupervised action segmentation, which is of interest to applications where storing large datasets is either not possible, or nor permitted. We propose to segment videos by learning in deep kernel space, to approximate the underlying frame distribution, as closely as possible. To define this closeness metric between the original video distribution and its approximation, we rely on maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) which is a geometry-preserving metric in distribution space, and thus gives more reliable estimates. Moreover, unlike the commonly used optimal transport metric, MMD is both easier to optimize, and faster. We choose to use neural tangent kernels (NTKs) to define the kernel space where MMD operates, because of their improved descriptive power as opposed to fixed kernels. And, also, because NTKs sidestep the trivial solution, when jointly learning the inputs (video approximation) and the kernel function. Finally, we show competitive results when compared to state-of-the-art per-video methods, on six standard benchmarks. Additionally, our method has higher F1 scores than prior agglomerative work, when the number of segments is unknown.
195. ❌ Component-Based Out-of-Distribution Detection
作者: Wenrui Liu, Hong Chang, Ruibing Hou, Shiguang Shan, Xilin Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21546v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Out-of-Distribution (OOD) detection requires sensitivity to subtle shifts without overreacting to natural In-Distribution (ID) diversity. However, from the viewpoint of detection granularity, global representation inevitably suppress local OOD cues, while patch-based methods are unstable due to entangled spurious-correlation and noise. And neither them is effective in detecting compositional OODs composed of valid ID components. Inspired by recognition-by-components theory, we present a training-free Component-Based OOD Detection (CoOD) framework that addresses the existing limitations by decomposing inputs into functional components. To instantiate CoOD, we derive Component Shift Score (CSS) to detect local appearance shifts, and Compositional Consistency Score (CCS) to identify cross-component compositional inconsistencies. Empirically, CoOD achieves consistent improvements on both coarse- and fine-grained OOD detection.
196. ❌ Gmd: Gaussian mixture descriptor for pair matching of 3D fragments
作者: Meijun Xiong, Zhenguo Shi, Xinyu Zhou, Yuhe Zhang, Shunli Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21519v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
In the automatic reassembly of fragments acquired using laser scanners to reconstruct objects, a crucial step is the matching of fractured surfaces. In this paper, we propose a novel local descriptor that uses the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to fit the distribution of points, allowing for the description and matching of fractured surfaces of fragments. Our method involves dividing a local surface patch into concave and convex regions for estimating the k value of GMM. Then the final Gaussian Mixture Descriptor (GMD) of the fractured surface is formed by merging the regional GMDs. To measure the similarities between GMDs for determining adjacent fragments, we employ the L2 distance and align the fragments using Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC) and Iterative Closest Point (ICP). The extensive experiments on real-scanned public datasets and Terracotta datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach; furthermore, the comparisons with several existing methods also validate the advantage of the proposed method.
197. ❌ DiffNR: Diffusion-Enhanced Neural Representation Optimization for Sparse-View 3D Tomographic Reconstruction
作者: Shiyan Su, Ruyi Zha, Danli Shi, Hongdong Li, Xuelian Cheng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21518v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Neural representations (NRs), such as neural fields and 3D Gaussians, effectively model volumetric data in computed tomography (CT) but suffer from severe artifacts under sparse-view settings. To address this, we propose DiffNR, a novel framework that enhances NR optimization with diffusion priors. At its core is SliceFixer, a single-step diffusion model designed to correct artifacts in degraded slices. We integrate specialized conditioning layers into the network and develop tailored data curation strategies to support model finetuning. During reconstruction, SliceFixer periodically generates pseudo-reference volumes, providing auxiliary 3D perceptual supervision to fix underconstrained regions. Compared to prior methods that embed CT solvers into time-consuming iterative denoising, our repair-and-augment strategy avoids frequent diffusion model queries, leading to better runtime performance. Extensive experiments show that DiffNR improves PSNR by 3.99 dB on average, generalizes well across domains, and maintains efficient optimization.
198. ❌ VFM$^{4}$SDG: Unveiling the Power of VFMs for Single-Domain Generalized Object Detection
作者: Yupeng Zhang, Ruize Han, Ningnan Guo, Wei Feng, Song Wang, Liang Wan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21502v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
In real-world scenarios, continual changes in weather, illumination, and imaging conditions cause significant domain shifts, leading detectors trained on a single source domain to degrade severely in unseen environments. Existing single-domain generalized object detection (SDGOD) methods mainly rely on data augmentation or domain-invariant representation learning, but pay limited attention to detector mechanisms, leaving clear limitations under complex domain shifts. Through analytical experiments, we find that performance degradation is dominated by increasing missed detections, which fundamentally arises from reduced cross-domain stability of the detector: object-background and inter-instance relations become less stable in the encoding stage, while semantic-spatial alignment of query representations also becomes harder to maintain in the decoding stage. To this end, we propose VFM$^{4}$SDG, a dual-prior learning framework for SDGOD, which introduces a frozen vision foundation model (VFM) as a transferable cross-domain stability prior into detector representation learning and query modeling. In the encoding stage, we propose Cross-domain Stable Relational Prior Distillation to enhance the robustness of object-background and inter-instance relational modeling. In the decoding stage, we propose Semantic-Contextual Prior-based Query Enhancement, which injects category-level semantic prototypes and global visual context into queries to improve their semantic recognition and spatial localization stability in unseen domains. Extensive experiments show that the proposed method consistently outperforms existing SOTA methods on standard SDGOD benchmarks and two mainstream DETR-based detectors, demonstrating its effectiveness, robustness, and generality.
199. ❌ Frozen LLMs as Map-Aware Spatio-Temporal Reasoners for Vehicle Trajectory Prediction
作者: Yanjiao Liu, Jiawei Liu, Xun Gong, Zifei Nie 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21479v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated strong reasoning capabilities and attracted increasing research attention in the field of autonomous driving (AD). However, safe application of LLMs on AD perception and prediction still requires a thorough understanding of both the dynamic traffic agents and the static road infrastructure. To this end, this study introduces a framework to evaluate the capability of LLMs in understanding the behaviors of dynamic traffic agents and the topology of road networks. The framework leverages frozen LLMs as the reasoning engine, employing a traffic encoder to extract spatial-level scene features from observed trajectories of agents, while a lightweight Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) encodes the local high-definition (HD) maps. To assess the intrinsic reasoning ability of LLMs, the extracted scene features are then transformed into LLM-compatible tokens via a reprogramming adapter. By residing the prediction burden with the LLMs, a simpler linear decoder is applied to output future trajectories. The framework enables a quantitative analysis of the influence of multi-modal information, especially the impact of map semantics on trajectory prediction accuracy, and allows seamless integration of frozen LLMs with minimal adaptation, thereby demonstrating strong generalizability across diverse LLM architectures and providing a unified platform for model evaluation.
200. ❌ Rethinking Cross-Domain Evaluation for Face Forgery Detection with Semantic Fine-grained Alignment and Mixture-of-Experts
作者: Yuhan Luo, Tao Chen, Decheng Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21478v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Nowadays, visual data forgery detection plays an increasingly important role in social and economic security with the rapid development of generative models. Existing face forgery detectors still can’t achieve satisfactory performance because of poor generalization ability across datasets. The key factor that led to this phenomenon is the lack of suitable metrics: the commonly used cross-dataset AUC metric fails to reveal an important issue where detection scores may shift significantly across data domains. To explicitly evaluate cross-domain score comparability, we propose \textbf{Cross-AUC}, an evaluation metric that can compute AUC across dataset pairs by contrasting real samples from one dataset with fake samples from another (and vice versa). It is interesting to find that evaluating representative detectors under the Cross-AUC metric reveals substantial performance drops, exposing an overlooked robustness problem. Besides, we also propose the novel framework \textbf{S}emantic \textbf{F}ine-grained \textbf{A}lignment and \textbf{M}ixture-of-Experts (\textbf{SFAM}), consisting of a patch-level image-text alignment module that enhances CLIP’s sensitivity to manipulation artifacts, and the facial region mixture-of-experts module, which routes features from different facial regions to specialized experts for region-aware forgery analysis. Extensive qualitative and quantitative experiments on the public datasets prove that the proposed method achieves superior performance compared with the state-of-the-art methods with various suitable metrics.
201. ❌ ID-Eraser: Proactive Defense Against Face Swapping via Identity Perturbation
作者: Junyan Luo, Peipeng Yu, Jianwei Fei, Shiya Zeng, Xiaoyu Zhou, Zhihua Xia, Xiang Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21465v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Deepfake technologies have rapidly advanced with modern generative AI, and face swapping in particular poses serious threats to privacy and digital security. Existing proactive defenses mostly rely on pixel-level perturbations, which are ineffective against contemporary swapping models that extract robust high-level identity embeddings. We propose ID-Eraser, a feature-space proactive defense that removes identifiable facial information to prevent malicious face swapping. By injecting learnable perturbations into identity embeddings and reconstructing natural-looking protection images through a Face Revive Generator (FRG), ID-Eraser produces visually realistic results for humans while rendering the protected identities unusable for Deepfake models. Experiments show that ID-Eraser substantially disrupts identity recognition across diverse face recognition and swapping systems under strict black-box settings, achieving the lowest Top-1 accuracy (0.30) with the best FID (1.64) and LPIPS (0.020). Compared with swaps generated from clean inputs, the identity similarity of protected swaps drops sharply to an average of 0.504 across five representative face swapping models. ID-Eraser further demonstrates strong cross-dataset generalization, robustness to common distortions, and practical effectiveness on commercial APIs, reducing Tencent API similarity from 0.76 to 0.36.
202. ❌ Do MLLMs Understand Pointing? Benchmarking and Enhancing Referential Reasoning in Egocentric Vision
作者: Chentao Li, Zirui Gao, Mingze Gao, Yinglian Ren, Jianjiang Feng, Jie Zhou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21461v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Egocentric AI agents, such as smart glasses, rely on pointing gestures to resolve referential ambiguities in natural language commands. However, despite advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), current systems often fail to precisely ground the spatial semantics of pointing. Instead, they rely on spurious correlations with visual proximity or object saliency, a phenomenon we term “Referential Hallucination.” To address this gap, we introduce EgoPoint-Bench, a comprehensive question-answering benchmark designed to evaluate and enhance multimodal pointing reasoning in egocentric views. Comprising over 11k high-fidelity simulated and real-world samples, the benchmark spans five evaluation dimensions and three levels of referential complexity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that while state-of-the-art proprietary and open-source models struggle with egocentric pointing, models fine-tuned on our synthetic data achieve significant performance gains and robust sim-to-real generalization. This work highlights the importance of spatially aware supervision and offers a scalable path toward precise egocentric AI assistants. Project page: https://guyyyug.github.io/EgoPoint-Bench/
203. ❌ Instance-level Visual Active Tracking with Occlusion-Aware Planning
作者: Haowei Sun, Kai Zhou, Hao Gao, Shiteng Zhang, Jinwu Hu, Xutao Wen, Qixiang Ye, Mingkui Tan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21453v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Visual Active Tracking (VAT) aims to control cameras to follow a target in 3D space, which is critical for applications like drone navigation and security surveillance. However, it faces two key bottlenecks in real-world deployment: confusion from visually similar distractors caused by insufficient instance-level discrimination and severe failure under occlusions due to the absence of active planning. To address these, we propose OA-VAT, a unified pipeline with three complementary modules. First, a training-free Instance-Aware Offline Prototype Initialization aggregates multi-view augmented features via DINOv3 to construct discriminative instance prototypes, mitigating distractor confusion. Second, an Online Prototype Enhancement Tracker enhances prototypes online and integrates a confidence-aware Kalman filter for stable tracking under appearance and motion changes. Third, an Occlusion-Aware Trajectory Planner, trained on our new Planning-20k dataset, uses conditional diffusion to generate obstacle-avoiding paths for occlusion recovery. Experiments demonstrate OA-VAT achieves 0.93 average SR on UnrealCV (+2.2% vs. SOTA TrackVLA), 90.8% average CAR on real-world datasets (+12.1% vs. SOTA GC-VAT), and 81.6% TSR on a DJI Tello drone. Running at 35 FPS on an RTX 3090, it delivers robust, real-time performance for practical deployment.
204. ❌ 2L-LSH: A Locality-Sensitive Hash Function-Based Method For Rapid Point Cloud Indexing
作者: Shurui Wang, Yuhe Zhang, Ruizhe Guo, Yaning Zhang, Yifei Xie, Xinyu Zhou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21442v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The development of 3D scanning technology has enabled the acquisition of massive point cloud models with diverse structures and large scales, thereby presenting significant challenges in point cloud processing. Fast neighboring points search is one of the most common problems, which is frequently used in model reconstruction, classification, retrieval and feature visualization. Hash function is well known for its high-speed and accurate performance in searching high-dimensional data, which is also the core of the proposed 2L-LSH. Specifically, the 2L-LSH algorithm adopts a two-step hash function strategy, in which the popular step divides the bounding box of the point cloud model and the second step constructs a generalized table-based data structure. The proposed 2L-LSH offers a highly efficient and accurate solution for fast neighboring points search in large-scale 3D point cloud models, making it a promising technique for various applications in the field. The proposed algorithm is compared with the well-known methods including Kd-tree and Octree; the obtained results demonstrated that the proposed method outperforms Kd-tree and Octree in terms of speed, i.e. the time consumption of kNN search can be 51.111% and 94.159% lower than Kd-tree and Octree, respectively. And the RN search time can be 54.519% and 41.840% lower than Kd-tree and Octree, respectively.
205. ❌ UHR-DETR: Efficient End-to-End Small Object Detection for Ultra-High-Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery
作者: Jingfang Li, Haoran Zhu, Wen Yang, Jinrui Zhang, Fang Xu, Haijian Zhang, Gui-Song Xia 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21435v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Ultra-High-Resolution (UHR) imagery has become essential for modern remote sensing, offering unprecedented spatial coverage. However, detecting small objects in such vast scenes presents a critical dilemma: retaining the original resolution for small objects causes prohibitive memory bottlenecks. Conversely, conventional compromises like image downsampling or patch cropping either erase small objects or destroy context. To break this dilemma, we propose UHR-DETR, an efficient end-to-end transformer-based detector designed for UHR imagery. First, we introduce a Coverage-Maximizing Sparse Encoder that dynamically allocates finite computational resources to informative high-resolution regions, ensuring maximum object coverage with minimal spatial redundancy. Second, we design a Global-Local Decoupled Decoder. By integrating macroscopic scene awareness with microscopic object details, this module resolves semantic ambiguities and prevents scene fragmentation. Extensive experiments on the UHR imagery datasets (e.g., STAR and SODA-A) demonstrate the superiority of UHR-DETR under strict hardware constraints (e.g., a single 24GB RTX 3090). It achieves a 2.8% mAP improvement while delivering a 10$\times$ inference speedup compared to standard sliding-window baselines on the STAR dataset. Our codes and models will be available at https://github.com/Li-JingFang/UHR-DETR.
206. ❌ Pre-process for segmentation task with nonlinear diffusion filters
作者: Javier Sanguino, Carlos Platero, Olga Velasco 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21422v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
This paper deals with the case of using nonlinear diffusion filters to obtain piecewise constant images as a previous process for segmentation techniques. We first show an intrinsic formulation for the nonlinear diffusion equation to provide some design conditions on the diffusion filters. According to this theoretical framework, we propose a new family of diffusivities; they are obtained from nonlinear diffusion techniques and are related with backward diffusion. Their goal is to split the image in closed contours with a homogenized grey intensity inside and with no blurred edges. We also prove that our filters satisfy the well-posedness semi-discrete and full discrete scale-space requirements. This shows that by using semi-implicit schemes, a forward nonlinear diffusion equation is solved, instead of a backward nonlinear diffusion equation, connecting with an edge-preserving process. Under the conditions established for the diffusivity and using a stopping criterion for the diffusion time, we get piecewise constant images with a low computational effort. Finally, we test our filter with real images and we illustrate the effects of our diffusivity function as a method to get piecewise constant images. The code is available at https://github.com/cplatero/NonlinearDiffusion.
207. ❌ S1-VL: Scientific Multimodal Reasoning Model with Thinking-with-Images
作者: Qingxiao Li, Lifeng Xu, QingLi Wang, Yudong Bai, Mingwei Ou, Shu Hu, Nan Xu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21409v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We present S1-VL, a multimodal reasoning model for scientific domains that natively supports two complementary reasoning paradigms: Scientific Reasoning, which relies on structured chain-of-thought, and Thinking-with-Images, which enables the model to actively manipulate images through Python code execution during reasoning. In the Thinking-with-Images mode, the model generates and executes image-processing code in a sandbox environment, obtains intermediate visual results, and continues reasoning in a multi-turn iterative manner. This design is particularly effective for challenging scenarios such as high-resolution scientific chart interpretation, microscopic image understanding, and geometry-assisted reasoning. To construct the training data, we collect scientific multimodal datasets spanning six disciplines: mathematics, physics, chemistry, astronomy, geography, and biology. We further develop a six-dimensional quality filtering framework for reasoning trajectories. To mitigate redundant, ineffective, and erroneous visual operations commonly found in existing datasets, we propose a multi-stage filtering pipeline together with an adaptive data routing strategy. This strategy converts samples with low visual information gain into pure Reasoning-mode data, enabling the model to learn when image operations are truly necessary. S1-VL is trained through a four-stage progressive pipeline: scientific multimodal SFT, Thinking-with-Images cold-start SFT, and two stages of reinforcement learning with SAPO. We build S1-VL-32B on top of Qwen3-VL-32B-Thinking and evaluate it on 13 benchmarks. Experimental results show that S1-VL-32B achieves state-of-the-art performance on all five Thinking-with-Images benchmarks, including HRBench-4K, HRBench-8K, MME-RealWorld-CN, MME-RealWorld-Lite, and V*, and outperforms compared systems on scientific reasoning benchmarks such as Physics and VRSBench.
208. ❌ You Only Gaussian Once: Controllable 3D Gaussian Splatting for Ultra-Densely Sampled Scenes
作者: Jinrang Jia, Zhenjia Li, Yifeng Shi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21400v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has revolutionized neural rendering, yet existing methods remain predominantly research prototypes ill-suited for production-level deployment. We identify a critical “Industry-Academia Gap” hindering real-world application: unpredictable resource consumption from heuristic Gaussian growth, the “sparsity shield” of current benchmarks that rewards hallucination over physical fidelity, and severe multi-sensor data pollution. To bridge this gap, we propose YOGO (You Only Gaussian Once), a system-level framework that reformulates the stochastic growth process into a deterministic, budget-aware equilibrium. YOGO integrates a novel budget controller for hardware-constrained resource allocation and an availability-registration protocol for robust multi-sensor fusion. To push the boundaries of reconstruction fidelity, we introduce Immersion v1.0, the first ultra-dense indoor dataset specifically designed to break the “sparsity shield.” By providing saturated viewpoint coverage, Immersion v1.0 forces algorithms to focus on extreme physical fidelity rather than viewpoint interpolation, and enables the community to focus on the upper limits of high-fidelity reconstruction. Extensive experiments demonstrate that YOGO achieves state-of-the-art visual quality while maintaining a strictly deterministic profile, establishing a new standard for production-grade 3DGS. To facilitate reproducibility, part scenes of Immersion v1.0 dataset and source code of YOGO has been publicly released. The project link is https://jjrcn.github.io/YOGO/.
209. ❌ EdgeFormer: local patch-based edge detection transformer on point clouds
作者: Yifei Xie, Zhikun Tu, Tong Yang, Yuhe Zhang, Xinyu Zhou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21387v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Edge points on 3D point clouds can clearly convey 3D geometry and surface characteristics, therefore, edge detection is widely used in many vision applications with high industrial and commercial demands. However, the fine-grained edge features are difficult to detect effectively as they are generally densely distributed or exhibit small-scale surface gradients. To address this issue, we present a learning-based edge detection network, named EdgeFormer, which mainly consists of two stages. Based on the observation that spatially neighboring points tend to exhibit high correlation, forming the local underlying surface, we convert the edge detection of the entire point cloud into a point classification based on local patches. Therefore, in the first stage, we construct local patch feature descriptors that describe the local neighborhood around each point. In the second stage, we classify each point by analyzing the local patch feature descriptors generated in the first stage. Due to the conversion of the point cloud into local patches, the proposed method can effectively extract the finer details. The experimental results show that our model demonstrates competitive performance compared to six baselines.
210. ❌ KD-CVG: A Knowledge-Driven Approach for Creative Video Generation
作者: Linkai Liu, Wei Feng, Xi Zhao, Shen Zhang, Xingye Chen, Zheng Zhang, Jingjing Lv, Junjie Shen, Ching Law, Yuchen Zhou, Zipeng Guo, Chao Gou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21362v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Creative Generation (CG) leverages generative models to automatically produce advertising content that highlights product features, and it has been a significant focus of recent research. However, while CG has advanced considerably, most efforts have concentrated on generating advertising text and images, leaving Creative Video Generation (CVG) relatively underexplored. This gap is largely due to two major challenges faced by Text-to-Video (T2V) models: (a) \textbf{ambiguous semantic alignment}, where models struggle to accurately correlate product selling points with creative video content, and (b) \textbf{inadequate motion adaptability}, resulting in unrealistic movements and distortions. To address these challenges, we develop a comprehensive Advertising Creative Knowledge Base (ACKB) as a foundational resource and propose a knowledge-driven approach (KD-CVG) to overcome the knowledge limitations of existing models. KD-CVG consists of two primary modules: Semantic-Aware Retrieval (SAR) and Multimodal Knowledge Reference (MKR). SAR utilizes the semantic awareness of graph attention networks and reinforcement learning feedback to enhance the model’s comprehension of the connections between selling points and creative videos. Building on this, MKR incorporates semantic and motion priors into the T2V model to address existing knowledge gaps. Extensive experiments have demonstrated KD-CVG’s superior performance in achieving semantic alignment and motion adaptability, validating its effectiveness over other state-of-the-art methods. The code and dataset will be open source at https://kdcvg.github.io/KDCVG/.
211. ❌ Prototype-Based Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
作者: Zhaohong Huang, Yuxin Zhang, Wenjing Liu, Fei Chao, Rongrong Ji 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21360v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Test-time adaptation (TTA) has emerged as a promising paradigm for vision-language models (VLMs) to bridge the distribution gap between pre-training and test data. Recent works have focused on backpropagation-free TTA methods that rely on cache-based designs, but these introduce two key limitations. First, inference latency increases as the cache grows with the number of classes, leading to inefficiencies in large-scale settings. Second, suboptimal performance occurs when the cache contains insufficient or incorrect samples. In this paper, we present Prototype-Based Test-Time Adaptation (PTA), an efficient and effective TTA paradigm that uses a set of class-specific knowledge prototypes to accumulate knowledge from test samples. Particularly, knowledge prototypes are adaptively weighted based on the zero-shot class confidence of each test sample, incorporating the sample’s visual features into the corresponding class-specific prototype. It is worth highlighting that the knowledge from past test samples is integrated and utilized solely in the prototypes, eliminating the overhead of cache population and retrieval that hinders the efficiency of existing TTA methods. This endows PTA with extremely high efficiency while achieving state-of-the-art performance on 15 image recognition benchmarks and 4 robust point cloud analysis benchmarks. For example, PTA improves CLIP’s accuracy from 65.64% to 69.38% on 10 cross-domain benchmarks, while retaining 92% of CLIP’s inference speed on large-scale ImageNet-1K. In contrast, the cache-based TDA achieves a lower accuracy of 67.97% and operates at only 50% of CLIP’s inference speed.
212. ❌ SparseGF: A Height-Aware Sparse Segmentation Framework with Context Compression for Robust Ground Filtering Across Urban to Natural Scenes
作者: Nannan Qin, Pengjie Tao, Haiyan Guan, Zhizhong Kang, Lingfei Ma, Xiangyun Hu, Jonathan Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21356v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
High-quality digital terrain models derived from airborne laser scanning (ALS) data are essential for a wide range of geospatial analyses, and their generation typically relies on robust ground filtering (GF) to separate point clouds across diverse landscapes into ground and non-ground parts. Although current deep-learning-based GF methods have demonstrated impressive performance, especially in specific challenging terrains, their cross-scene generalization remains limited by two persistent issues: the context-detail dilemma in large-scale processing due to limited computational resources, and the random misclassification of tall objects arising from classification-only optimization. To overcome these limitations, we propose SparseGF, a height-aware sparse segmentation framework enhanced with context compression. It is built upon three key innovations: (1) a convex-mirror-inspired context compression module that condenses expansive contexts into compact representations while preserving central details; (2) a hybrid sparse voxel-point network architecture that effectively interprets compressed representations while mitigating compression-induced geometric distortion; and (3) a height-aware loss function that explicitly enforces topographic elevation priors during training to suppress random misclassification of tall objects. Extensive evaluations on two large-scale ALS benchmark datasets demonstrate that SparseGF delivers robust GF across urban to natural terrains, achieving leading performance in complex urban scenes, competitive results on mixed terrains, and moderate yet non-catastrophic accuracy in densely forested steep areas. This work offers new insights into deep-learning-based GF research and encourages further exploration toward truly cross-scene generalization for large-scale environmental monitoring.
213. ❌ Latent Denoising Improves Visual Alignment in Large Multimodal Models
作者: Dhruv Parikh, Jacob Fein-Ashley, Rajgopal Kannan, Viktor Prasanna 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21343v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) such as LLaVA are typically trained with an autoregressive language modeling objective, providing only indirect supervision to visual tokens. This often yields weak internal visual representations and brittle behavior under distribution shift. Inspired by recent progress on latent denoising for learning high-quality visual tokenizers, we show that the same principle provides an effective form of visual supervision for improving internal visual feature alignment and multimodal understanding in LMMs. We propose a latent denoising framework that corrupts projected visual tokens using a saliency-aware mixture of masking and Gaussian noising. The LMM is trained to denoise these corrupted tokens by recovering clean teacher patch features from hidden states at a selected intermediate LLM layer using a decoder. To prevent representation collapse, our framework also preserves the teacher’s intra-image similarity structure and applies intra-image contrastive patch distillation. During inference, corruption and auxiliary heads are disabled, introducing no additional inference-time overhead. Across a broad suite of standard multimodal benchmarks, our method consistently improves visual understanding and reasoning over strong baselines, and yields clear gains on compositional robustness benchmarks (e.g., NaturalBench). Moreover, under ImageNet-C-style non-adversarial common corruptions applied to benchmark images, our method maintains higher accuracy and exhibits reduced degradation at both moderate and severe corruption levels. Our code is available at https://github.com/dhruvashp/latent-denoising-for-lmms.
214. ❌ Teacher-Guided Routing for Sparse Vision Mixture-of-Experts
作者: Masahiro Kada, Ryota Yoshihashi, Satoshi Ikehata, Rei Kawakami, Ikuro Sato 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21330v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Recent progress in deep learning has been driven by increasingly large-scale models, but the resulting computational cost has become a critical bottleneck. Sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE) offers an effective solution by activating only a small subset of experts for each input, achieving high scalability without sacrificing inference speed. Although effective, sparse MoE training exhibits characteristic optimization difficulties. Because the router receives informative gradients only through the experts selected in the forward pass, it suffers from gradient blocking and obtains little information from unselected routes. This limited, highly localized feedback makes it difficult for the router to learn appropriate expert-selection scores and often leads to unstable routing dynamics, such as fluctuating expert assignments during training. To address this issue, we propose TGR-MoE: Teacher-Guided Routing for Sparse Vision Mixture-of-Experts, a simple yet effective method that stabilizes router learning using supervision derived from a pretrained dense teacher model. TGR-MoE constructs a teacher router from the teacher’s intermediate representations and uses its routing outputs as pseudo-supervision for the student router, suppressing frequent routing fluctuations during training and enabling knowledge-guided expert selection from the early stages of training. Extensive experiments on ImageNet-1K and CIFAR-100 demonstrate that TGR consistently improves both accuracy and routing consistency, while maintaining stable training even under highly sparse configurations.
215. ❌ Temporal Prototyping and Hierarchical Alignment for Unsupervised Video-based Visible-Infrared Person Re-Identification
作者: Zhiyong Li, Wei Jiang, Haojie Liu, Mingyu Wang, Wanchong Xu, Weijie Mao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21324v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Visible-infrared person re-identification (VI-ReID) enables cross-modality identity matching for all-day surveillance, yet existing methods predominantly focus on the image level or rely heavily on costly identity annotations. While video-based VI-ReID has recently emerged to exploit temporal dynamics for improved robustness, existing studies remain limited to supervised settings. Crucially, the unsupervised video VI-ReID problem, where models must learn from RGB and infrared tracklets without identity labels, remains largely unexplored despite its practical importance in real-world deployment. To bridge this gap, we propose HiTPro (Hierarchical Temporal Prototyping), a prototype-driven framework without explicit hard pseudo-label assignment for unsupervised video-based VI-ReID. HiTPro begins with an efficient Temporal-aware Feature Encoder that first extracts discriminative frame-level features and then aggregates them into a robust tracklet-level representation. Building upon these features, HiTPro first constructs reliable intra-camera prototypes via Intra-Camera Tracklet Prototyping by aggregating features from temporally partitioned sub-tracklets. Through Hierarchical Cross-Prototype Alignment, we perform a two-stage positive mining process: progressing from within-modality associations to cross-modality matching, enhanced by Dynamic Threshold Strategy and Soft Weight Assignment. Finally, {Hierarchical Contrastive Learning} progressively optimizes feature-prototype alignment across three levels: intra-camera discrimination, cross-camera same-modality consistency, and cross-modality invariance. Extensive experiments on HITSZ-VCM and BUPTCampus demonstrate that HiTPro achieves state-of-the-art performance under fully unsupervised settings, significantly outperforming adapted baselines and establishes a strong baseline for future research.
216. ❌ FryNet: Dual-Stream Adversarial Fusion for Non-Destructive Frying Oil Oxidation Assessment
作者: Khaled R Ahmed, Toqi Tahamid Sarker, Taminul Islam, Tamany M Alanezi, Amer AbuGhazaleh 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21321v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Monitoring frying oil degradation is critical for food safety, yet current practice relies on destructive wet-chemistry assays that provide no spatial information and are unsuitable for real-time use. We identify a fundamental obstacle in thermal-image-based inspection, the camera-fingerprint shortcut, whereby models memorize sensor-specific noise and thermal bias instead of learning oxidation chemistry, collapsing under video-disjoint evaluation. We propose FryNet, a dual-stream RGB-thermal framework that jointly performs oil-region segmentation, serviceability classification, and regression of four chemical oxidation indices (PV, p-AV, Totox, temperature) in a single forward pass. A ThermalMiT-B2 backbone with channel and spatial attention extracts thermal features, while an RGB-MAE Encoder learns chemically grounded representations via masked autoencoding and chemical alignment. Dual-Encoder DANN adversarially regularizes both streams against video identity via Gradient Reversal Layers, and FiLM fusion bridges thermal structure with RGB chemical context. On 7,226 paired frames across 28 frying videos, FryNet achieves 98.97% mIoU, 100% classification accuracy, and 2.32 mean regression MAE, outperforming all seven baselines.
217. ❌ PLAS-Net: Pixel-Level Area Segmentation for UAV-Based Beach Litter Monitoring
作者: Yongying Liu, Jiaqi Wang, Jian Song, Xinlei Shao, Yijia Chen, Nan Xu, Katsunori Mizuno, Shigeru Tabeta, Fan Zhao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21313v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Accurate quantification of the physical exposure area of beach litter, rather than simple item counts, is essential for credible ecological risk assessment of marine debris. However, automated UAV-based monitoring predominantly relies on bounding-box detection, which systematically overestimates the planar area of irregular litter objects. To address this geometric limitation, we develop PLAS-Net (Pixel-level Litter Area Segmentor), an instance segmentation framework that extracts pixel-accurate physical footprints of coastal debris. Evaluated on UAV imagery from a monsoon-driven pocket beach in Koh Tao, Thailand, PLAS-Net achieves a mAP_50 of 58.7% with higher precision than eleven baseline models, demonstrating improved mask fidelity under complex coastal conditions. To illustrate how the accuracy of the masking affects the conclusions of environmental analysis, we conducted three downstream demonstrations: (i) power-law fitting of normalized plastic density (NPD) to characterize fragmentation dynamics; (ii) area-weighted ecological risk index (ERI) to map spatial pollution hotspots; and (iii) source composition analysis revealing the abundance-area paradox: fishing gear constitutes a small proportion of the total number of items, but has the largest physical area per unit item. Pixel-level area extraction can provide more valuable information for coastal monitoring compared to methods based solely on counting.
218. ❌ an interpretable vision transformer framework for automated brain tumor classification
作者: Chinedu Emmanuel Mbonu, Tochukwu Sunday Belonwu, Okwuchukwu Ejike Chukwuogo, Kenechukwu Sylvanus Anigbogu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21311v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Brain tumors represent one of the most critical neurological conditions, where early and accurate diagnosis is directly correlated with patient survival rates. Manual interpretation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans is time-intensive, subject to inter-observer variability, and demands significant specialist expertise. This paper proposes a deep learning framework for automated four-class brain tumor classification distinguishing glioma, meningioma, pituitary tumor, and healthy brain tissue from a dataset of 7,023 MRI scans. The proposed system employs a Vision Transformer (ViT-B/16) pretrained on ImageNet-21k as the backbone, augmented with a clinically motivated preprocessing and training pipeline. Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) is applied to enhance local contrast and accentuate tumor boundaries invisible to standard normalization. A two-stage fine-tuning strategy is adopted: the classification head is warmed up with the backbone frozen, followed by full fine-tuning with discriminative learning rates. MixUp and CutMix augmentation is applied per batch to improve generalization. Exponential Moving Average (EMA) of weights and Test-Time Augmentation (TTA) further stabilize and boost performance. Attention Rollout visualization provides clinically interpretable heatmaps of the brain regions driving each prediction. The proposed model achieves a test accuracy of 99.29%, macro F1-score of 99.25%, and perfect recall on both healthy and meningioma classes, outperforming all CNN-based baselines
219. ❌ GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA
作者: Anvitha Ramachandran, Dhruv Parikh, Viktor Prasanna 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21290v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Vision Graph Neural Networks (ViGs) represent an image as a graph of patch tokens, enabling adaptive, feature-driven neighborhoods. Unlike CNNs with fixed grid biases or Vision Transformers with global token interactions, ViGs rely on dynamic graph convolution: at each layer, a feature-dependent graph is built via k-nearest-neighbor (kNN) search on current patch features, followed by message passing. This per-layer graph construction is the main bottleneck, consuming 50–95% of graph convolution time on CPUs and GPUs, scaling as $O(N^2)$ with the number of patches $N$, and creating a sequential dependency between graph construction and feature updates. We introduce GraphLeap, a simple reformulation that removes this dependency by decoupling graph construction from feature update across layers. GraphLeap performs the feature update at layer $\ell$ using a graph built from the previous layer’s features, while simultaneously using the current layer’s features to construct the graph for layer $\ell+1$. This one-layer-lookahead graph construction enables concurrent graph construction and message passing. Although using prior-layer features can introduce minor accuracy degradation, lightweight fine-tuning for a few epochs is sufficient to recover the original accuracy. Building on GraphLeap, we present the first end-to-end FPGA accelerator for Vision GNNs. Our streaming, layer-pipelined design overlaps a kNN graph construction engine with a feature update engine, exploits node- and channel-level parallelism, and enables efficient on-chip dataflow without explicit edge-feature materialization. Evaluated on isotropic and pyramidal ViG models on an Alveo U280 FPGA, GraphLeap achieves up to $95.7\times$ speedup over CPU and $8.5\times$ speedup over GPU baselines, demonstrating the feasibility of real-time Vision GNN inference.
220. ❌ AttDiff-GAN: A Hybrid Diffusion-GAN Framework for Facial Attribute Editing
作者: Wenmin Huang, Weiqi Luo, Xiaochun Cao, Jiwu Huang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21289v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Facial attribute editing aims to modify target attributes while preserving attribute-irrelevant content and overall image fidelity. Existing GAN-based methods provide favorable controllability, but often suffer from weak alignment between style codes and attribute semantics. Diffusion-based methods can synthesize highly realistic images; however, their editing precision is limited by the entanglement of semantic directions among different attributes. In this paper, we propose AttDiff-GAN, a hybrid framework that combines GAN-based attribute manipulation with diffusion-based image generation. A key challenge in such integration lies in the inconsistency between one-step adversarial learning and multi-step diffusion denoising, which makes effective optimization difficult. To address this issue, we decouple attribute editing from image synthesis by introducing a feature-level adversarial learning scheme to learn explicit attribute manipulation, and then using the manipulated features to guide the diffusion process for image generation, while also removing the reliance on semantic direction-based editing. Moreover, we enhance style-attribute alignment by introducing PriorMapper, which incorporates facial priors into style generation, and RefineExtractor, which captures global semantic relationships through a Transformer for more precise style extraction. Experimental results on CelebA-HQ show that the proposed method achieves more accurate facial attribute editing and better preservation of non-target attributes than state-of-the-art methods in both qualitative and quantitative evaluations.
221. ❌ ImageHD: Energy-Efficient On-Device Continual Learning of Visual Representations via Hyperdimensional Computing
作者: Jebacyril Arockiaraj, Dhruv Parikh, Viktor Prasanna 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21280v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
On-device continual learning (CL) is critical for edge AI systems operating on non-stationary data streams, but most existing methods rely on backpropagation or exemplar-heavy classifiers, incurring substantial compute, memory, and latency overheads. Hyperdimensional computing (HDC) offers a lightweight alternative through fast, non-iterative online updates. Combined with a compact convolutional neural network (CNN) feature extractor, HDC enables efficient on-device adaptation with strong visual representations. However, prior HDC-based CL systems often depend on multi-tier memory hierarchies and complex cluster management, limiting deployability on resource-constrained hardware. We present ImageHD, an FPGA accelerator for on-device continual learning of visual data based on HDC. ImageHD targets streaming CL under strict latency and on-chip memory constraints, avoiding costly iterative optimization. At the algorithmic level, we introduce a hardware-aware CL method that bounds class exemplars through a unified exemplar memory and a hardware-efficient cluster merging strategy, while incorporating a quantized CNN front-end to reduce deployment overhead without sacrificing accuracy. At the system level, ImageHD is implemented as a streaming dataflow architecture on the AMD Zynq ZCU104 FPGA, integrating HDC encoding, similarity search, and bounded cluster management using word-packed binary hypervectors for massively parallel bitwise computation within tight on-chip resource budgets. On CORe50, ImageHD achieves up to 40.4x (4.84x) speedup and 383x (105.1x) energy efficiency over optimized CPU (GPU) baselines, demonstrating the practicality of HDC-enabled continual learning for real-time edge AI.
222. ❌ LatRef-Diff: Latent and Reference-Guided Diffusion for Facial Attribute Editing and Style Manipulation
作者: Wenmin Huang, Weiqi Luo, Xiaochun Cao, Jiwu Huang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21279v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Facial attribute editing and style manipulation are crucial for applications like virtual avatars and photo editing. However, achieving precise control over facial attributes without altering unrelated features is challenging due to the complexity of facial structures and the strong correlations between attributes. While conditional GANs have shown progress, they are limited by accuracy issues and training instability. Diffusion models, though promising, face challenges in style manipulation due to the limited expressiveness of semantic directions. In this paper, we propose LatRef-Diff, a novel diffusion-based framework that addresses these limitations. We replace the traditional semantic directions in diffusion models with style codes and propose two methods for generating them: latent and reference guidance. Based on these style codes, we design a style modulation module that integrates them into the target image, enabling both random and customized style manipulation. This module incorporates learnable vectors, cross-attention mechanisms, and a hierarchical design to improve accuracy and image quality. Additionally, to enhance training stability while eliminating the need for paired images (e.g., before and after editing), we propose a forward-backward consistency training strategy. This strategy first removes the target attribute approximately using image-specific semantic directions and then restores it via style modulation, guided by perceptual and classification losses. Extensive experiments on CelebA-HQ demonstrate that LatRef-Diff achieves state-of-the-art performance in both qualitative and quantitative evaluations. Ablation studies validate the effectiveness of our model’s design choices.
223. ❌ UAU-Net: Uncertainty-aware Representation Learning and Evidential Classification for Facial Action Unit Detection
作者: Yuze Li, Zhilei Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21227v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Facial action unit (AU) detection remains challenging because it involves heterogeneous, AU-specific uncertainties arising at both the representation and decision stages. Recent methods have improved discriminative feature learning, but they often treat the AU representations as deterministic, overlooking uncertainty caused by visual noise, subject-dependent appearance variations, and ambiguous inter-AU relationships, all of which can substantially degrade robustness. Meanwhile, conventional point-estimation classifiers often provide poorly calibrated confidence, producing overconfident predictions, especially under the severe label imbalance typical of AU datasets. We propose UAU-Net, an Uncertainty-aware AU detection framework that explicitly models uncertainty at both stages. At the representation stage, we introduce CV-AFE, a conditional VAE (CVAE)-based AU feature extraction module that learns probabilistic AU representations by jointly estimating feature means and variances across multiple spatio-temporal scales; conditioning on AU labels further enables CV-AFE to capture uncertainty associated with inter-AU dependencies. At the decision stage, we design AB-ENN, an Asymmetric Beta Evidential Neural Network for multi-label AU detection, which parameterizes predictive uncertainty with Beta distributions and mitigates overconfidence via an asymmetric loss tailored to highly imbalanced binary labels. Extensive experiments on BP4D and DISFA show that UAU-Net achieves strong AU detection performance, and further analyses indicate that modeling uncertainty in both representation learning and evidential prediction improves robustness and reliability.
224. ❌ Sparse Forcing: Native Trainable Sparse Attention for Real-time Autoregressive Diffusion Video Generation
作者: Boxun Xu, Yuming Du, Zichang Liu, Siyu Yang, Ziyang Jiang, Siqi Yan, Rajasi Saha, Albert Pumarola, Wenchen Wang, Peng Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21221v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We introduce Sparse Forcing, a training-and-inference paradigm for autoregressive video diffusion models that improves long-horizon generation quality while reducing decoding latency. Sparse Forcing is motivated by an empirical observation in autoregressive diffusion rollouts: attention concentrates on a persistent subset of salient visual blocks, forming an implicit spatiotemporal memory in the KV cache, and exhibits a locally structured block-sparse pattern within sliding windows. Building on this observation, we propose a trainable native sparsity mechanism that learns to compress, preserve, and update these persistent blocks while restricting computation within each local window to a dynamically selected local neighborhood. To make the approach practical at scale for both training and inference, we further propose Persistent Block-Sparse Attention (PBSA), an efficient GPU kernel that accelerates sparse attention and memory updates for low-latency, memory-efficient decoding. Experiments show that Sparse Forcing improves the VBench score by +0.26 over Self-Forcing on 5-second text-to-video generation while delivering a 1.11-1.17x decoding speedup and 42% lower peak KV-cache footprint. The gains are more pronounced on longer-horizon rollouts, delivering improved visual quality with +0.68 and +2.74 VBench improvements, and 1.22x and 1.27x speedups on 20-second and 1-minute generations, respectively.
225. ❌ ARFBench: Benchmarking Time Series Question Answering Ability for Software Incident Response
作者: Stephan Xie, Ben Cohen, Mononito Goswami, Junhong Shen, Emaad Khwaja, Chenghao Liu, David Asker, Othmane Abou-Amal, Ameet Talwalkar 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21199v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Time series question-answering (TSQA), in which we ask natural language questions to infer and reason about properties of time series, is a promising yet underexplored capability of foundation models. In this work, we present ARFBench, a TSQA benchmark that evaluates the understanding of multimodal foundation models (FMs) on time series anomalies prevalent in software incident data. ARFBench consists of 750 questions across 142 time series and 5.38M data points from 63 production incidents sourced exclusively from internal telemetry at Datadog. We evaluate leading proprietary and open-source LLMs, VLMs, and time series FMs and observe that frontier VLMs perform markedly better than existing baselines; the leading model (GPT-5) achieves a 62.7% accuracy and 51.9% F1. We next demonstrate the promise of specialized multimodal approaches. We develop a novel TSFM + VLM hybrid prototype which we post-train on a small set of synthetic and real data that yields comparable overall F1 and accuracy with frontier models. Lastly, we find models and human domain experts exhibit complementary strengths. We define a model-expert oracle, a best-of-2 oracle selector over model and expert answers, yielding 82.8% F1 and 87.2% accuracy and establishing a new superhuman frontier for future TSQA models. The benchmark is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Datadog/ARFBench.
226. ❌ A Probabilistic Framework for Improving Dense Object Detection in Underwater Image Data via Annealing-Based Data Augmentation
作者: Eleanor Wiesler, Trace Baxley 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21198v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Object detection models typically perform well on images captured in controlled environments with stable lighting, water clarity, and viewpoint, but their performance degrades substantially in real-world underwater settings characterized by high variability and frequent occlusions. In this work, we address these challenges by introducing a novel data augmentation framework designed to improve robustness in dense and unconstrained underwater scenes. Using the DeepFish dataset, which contains images of fish in natural environments, we first generate bounding box annotations from provided segmentation masks to construct a custom detection dataset. We then propose a pseudo-simulated annealing-based augmentation algorithm, inspired by the copy-paste strategy of Deng et al. [1], to synthesize realistic crowded fish scenarios. Our approach improves spatial diversity and object density during training, enabling better generalization to complex scenes. Experimental results show that our method significantly outperforms a baseline YOLOv10 model, particularly on a challenging test set of manually annotated images collected from live-stream footage in the Florida Keys. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of our augmentation strategy for improving detection performance in dense, real-world underwater environments.
227. ❌ SpatiO: Adaptive Test-Time Orchestration of Vision-Language Agents for Spatial Reasoning
作者: Chan Yeong Hwang, Miso Choi, Sunghyun On, Jinkyu Kim, Jungbeom Lee 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21190v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Understanding visual scenes requires not only recognizing objects but also reasoning about their spatial relationships. Unlike general vision-language tasks, spatial reasoning requires integrating multiple inductive biases, such as 2D appearance cues, depth signals, and geometric constraints, whose reliability varies across contexts. This suggests that effective spatial reasoning requires \emph{spatial adaptability}: the ability to flexibly coordinate different reasoning strategies depending on the input. However, most existing approaches rely on a single reasoning pipeline that implicitly learns a fixed spatial prior, limiting their ability to adapt under distribution changes. Multi-agent systems offer a promising alternative by aggregating diverse reasoning trajectories, but prior attempts in spatial reasoning primarily employ homogeneous agents, restricting the diversity of inductive biases they can leverage. In this work, we introduce \textbf{\textsc{SpatiO}}, a heterogeneous multi-agent framework for spatial reasoning that coordinates multiple vision-language specialists with complementary inductive biases. To enable effective collaboration, we propose \textbf{Test-Time Orchestration (TTO)}, an optimization mechanism that dynamically evaluates and reweights agents based on their observed reliability during inference, without modifying model parameters. Extensive experiments on diverse spatial reasoning benchmarks, including 3DSRBench, STVQA-7k, CV-Bench, and Omni3D-Bench, demonstrate that \textsc{SpatiO} consistently improves spatial reasoning performance over both closed-source and open-source baselines.
228. ❌ WildSplatter: Feed-forward 3D Gaussian Splatting with Appearance Control from Unconstrained Images
作者: Yuki Fujimura, Takahiro Kushida, Kazuya Kitano, Takuya Funatomi, Yasuhiro Mukaigawa 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21182v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We propose WildSplatter, a feed-forward 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) model for unconstrained images with unknown camera parameters and varying lighting conditions. 3DGS is an effective scene representation that enables high-quality, real-time rendering; however, it typically requires iterative optimization and multi-view images captured under consistent lighting with known camera parameters. WildSplatter is trained on unconstrained photo collections and jointly learns 3D Gaussians and appearance embeddings conditioned on input images. This design enables flexible modulation of Gaussian colors to represent significant variations in lighting and appearance. Our method reconstructs 3D Gaussians from sparse input views in under one second, while also enabling appearance control under diverse lighting conditions. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing pose-free 3DGS methods on challenging real-world datasets with varying illumination.
229. ❌ Reinforcing 3D Understanding in Point-VLMs via Geometric Reward Credit Assignment
作者: Jingkun Chen, Ruoshi Xu, Mingqi Gao, Shengda Luo, Jungong Han 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21160v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Point-Vision-Language Models promise to empower embodied agents with executable spatial reasoning, yet they frequently succumb to geometric hallucination where predicted 3D structures contradict the observed 2D reality. We identify a key cause of this failure not as a representation bottleneck but as a structural misalignment in reinforcement learning, where sparse geometric tokens are drowned out by noisy and broadcasted sequence-level rewards. To resolve this causal dilution, we propose Geometric Reward Credit Assignment, a framework that disentangles holistic supervision into field-specific signals and routes them exclusively to their responsible token spans. This mechanism transforms vague feedback into precise gradient updates and effectively turns generic policy optimization into targeted structural alignment. Furthermore, we internalize physical constraints via a Reprojection-Consistency term which serves as a cross-modal verifier to penalize physically impossible geometries. Validated on a calibrated benchmark derived from ShapeNetCore, our approach bridges the reliability gap by boosting 3D KPA from 0.64 to 0.93, increasing 3D bounding box intersection over union to 0.686, and raising reprojection consistency scores to 0.852. Crucially, these gains are achieved while maintaining robust 2D localization performance, marking a meaningful step from plausible textual outputs toward physically verifiable spatial predictions.
230. ❌ WFM: 3D Wavelet Flow Matching for Ultrafast Multi-Modal MRI Synthesis
作者: Yalcin Tur, Mihajlo Stojkovic, Ulas Bagci 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21146v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Diffusion models have achieved remarkable quality in multi-modal MRI synthesis, but their computational cost (hundreds of sampling steps and separate models per modality) limits clinical deployment. We observe that this inefficiency stems from an unnecessary starting point: diffusion begins from pure noise, discarding the structural information already present in available MRI sequences. We propose WFM (Wavelet Flow Matching), which instead learns a direct flow from an informed prior, the mean of conditioning modalities in wavelet space, to the target distribution. Because the source and target share underlying anatomy and differ primarily in contrast, this formulation enables accurate synthesis in just 1-2 integration steps. A single 82M-parameter model with class conditioning synthesizes all four BraTS modalities (T1, T1c, T2, FLAIR), replacing four separate diffusion models totaling 326M parameters. On BraTS 2024, WFM achieves 26.8 dB PSNR and 0.94 SSIM, within 1-2 dB of diffusion baselines, while running 250-1000x faster (0.16-0.64s vs. 160s per volume). This speed-quality trade-off makes real-time MRI synthesis practical for clinical workflows. Code is available at https://github.com/yalcintur/WFM.
231. ❌ HyperFM: An Efficient Hyperspectral Foundation Model with Spectral Grouping
作者: Zahid Hassan Tushar, Sanjay Purushotham 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21127v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The NASA PACE mission provides unprecedented hyperspectral observations of ocean color, aerosols, and clouds, offering new insights into how these components interact and influence Earth’s climate and air quality. Its Ocean Color Instrument measures light across hundreds of finely spaced wavelength bands, enabling detailed characterization of features such as phytoplankton composition, aerosol properties, and cloud microphysics. However, hyperspectral data of this scale is large, complex, and difficult to label, requiring specialized processing and analysis techniques. Existing foundation models, which have transformed computer vision and natural language processing, are generally trained on standard RGB imagery and therefore struggle to interpret the continuous spectral signatures captured by PACE. While recent advances have introduced hyperspectral foundation models, they are typically trained on cloud-free observations and often remain limited to single-sensor datasets due to spectral inconsistencies across instruments. Moreover, existing models tend to be parameter-heavy and computationally expensive, limiting scalability and adoption in operational settings. To address these challenges, we introduce HyperFM, a parameter-efficient hyperspectral foundation model that leverages intra-group and inter-group spectral attention along with hybrid parameter decomposition to better capture spectral spatial relationships while reducing computational cost. HyperFM demonstrates consistent performance improvements over existing hyperspectral foundation models and task-specific state-of-the-art methods across four benchmark downstream atmospheric cloud property retrieval tasks. To support further research, we additionally release HyperFM250K, a large-scale hyperspectral dataset from the PACE mission that includes both clear and cloudy scenes.
232. ❌ Materialistic RIR: Material Conditioned Realistic RIR Generation
作者: Mahnoor Fatima Saad, Sagnik Majumder, Kristen Grauman, Ziad Al-Halah 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21119v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Rings like gold, thuds like wood! The sound we hear in a scene is shaped not only by the spatial layout of the environment but also by the materials of the objects and surfaces within it. For instance, a room with wooden walls will produce a different acoustic experience from a room with the same spatial layout but concrete walls. Accurately modeling these effects is essential for applications such as virtual reality, robotics, architectural design, and audio engineering. Yet, existing methods for acoustic modeling often entangle spatial and material influences in correlated representations, which limits user control and reduces the realism of the generated acoustics. In this work, we present a novel approach for material-controlled Room Impulse Response (RIR) generation that explicitly disentangles the effects of spatial and material cues in a scene. Our approach models the RIR using two modules: a spatial module that captures the influence of the spatial layout of the scene, and a material module that modulates this spatial RIR according to a user-specified material configuration. This explicitly disentangled design allows users to easily modify the material configuration of a scene and observe its impact on acoustics without altering the spatial structure or scene content. Our model provides significant improvements over prior approaches on both acoustic-based metrics (up to +16% on RTE) and material-based metrics (up to +70%). Furthermore, through a human perceptual study, we demonstrate the improved realism and material sensitivity of our model compared to the strongest baselines.
233. ❌ Pretrain Where? Investigating How Pretraining Data Diversity Impacts Geospatial Foundation Model Performance
作者: Amandeep Kaur, Mirali Purohit, Gedeon Muhawenayo, Esther Rolf, Hannah Kerner 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21104v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
New geospatial foundation models introduce a new model architecture and pretraining dataset, often sampled using different notions of data diversity. Performance differences are largely attributed to the model architecture or input modalities, while the role of the pretraining dataset is rarely studied. To address this research gap, we conducted a systematic study on how the geographic composition of pretraining data affects a model’s downstream performance. We created global and per-continent pretraining datasets and evaluated them on global and per-continent downstream datasets. We found that the pretraining dataset from Europe outperformed global and continent-specific pretraining datasets on both global and local downstream evaluations. To investigate the factors influencing a pretraining dataset’s downstream performance, we analysed 10 pretraining datasets using diversity across continents, biomes, landcover and spectral values. We found that only spectral diversity was strongly correlated with performance, while others were weakly correlated. This finding establishes a new dimension of diversity to be accounted for when creating a high-performing pretraining dataset. We open-sourced 7 new pretraining datasets, pretrained models, and our experimental framework at https://github.com/kerner-lab/pretrain-where.
234. ❌ Leveraging Multimodal LLMs for Built Environment and Housing Attribute Assessment from Street-View Imagery
作者: Siyuan Yao, Siavash Ghorbany, Kuangshi Ai, Arnav Cherukuthota, Meghan Forstchen, Alexis Korotasz, Matthew Sisk, Ming Hu, Chaoli Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21102v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We present a novel framework for automatically evaluating building conditions nationwide in the United States by leveraging large language models (LLMs) and Google Street View (GSV) imagery. By fine-tuning Gemma 3 27B on a modest human-labeled dataset, our approach achieves strong alignment with human mean opinion scores (MOS), outperforming even individual raters on SRCC and PLCC relative to the MOS benchmark. To enhance efficiency, we apply knowledge distillation, transferring the capabilities of Gemma 3 27B to a smaller Gemma 3 4B model that achieves comparable performance with a 3x speedup. Further, we distill the knowledge into a CNN-based model (EfficientNetV2-M) and a transformer (SwinV2-B), delivering close performance while achieving a 30x speed gain. Furthermore, we investigate LLMs’ capabilities for assessing an extensive list of built environment and housing attributes through a human-AI alignment study and develop a visualization dashboard that integrates LLM assessment outcomes for downstream analysis by homeowners. Our framework offers a flexible and efficient solution for large-scale building condition assessment, enabling high accuracy with minimal human labeling effort.
235. ❌ Foveated Reasoning: Stateful, Action-based Visual Focusing for Vision-Language Models
作者: Juhong Min, Lazar Valkov, Vitali Petsiuk, Hossein Souri, Deen Dayal Mohan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21079v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Vision-language models benefit from high-resolution images, but the increase in visual-token count incurs high compute overhead. Humans resolve this tension via foveation: a coarse view guides “where to look”, while selectively acquired high-acuity evidence refines “what to think”. We introduce Foveated Reasoner, an autoregressive vision-language framework that unifies foveation and reasoning within a single decoding trajectory. Starting from a low-resolution view, the model triggers foveation only when needed, retrieves high-resolution evidence from selected regions, and injects it back into the same decoding trajectory. We train the method with a two-stage pipeline: coldstart supervision to bootstrap foveation behavior, followed by reinforcement learning to jointly improve evidence acquisition and task accuracy while discouraging trivial “see-everything” solutions. Experiments show that the method learns effective foveation policies and achieves stronger accuracy under tight visual-token budgets across multiple vision-language benchmarks.
236. ❌ Optimizing Diffusion Priors with a Single Observation
作者: Frederic Wang, Katherine L. Bouman 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21066v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
While diffusion priors generate high-quality posterior samples across many inverse problems, they are often trained on limited training sets or purely simulated data, thus inheriting the errors and biases of these underlying sources. Current approaches to finetuning diffusion models rely on a large number of observations with varying forward operators, which can be difficult to collect for many applications, and thus lead to overfitting when the measurement set is small. We propose a method for tuning a prior from only a single observation by combining existing diffusion priors into a single product-of-experts prior and identifying the exponents that maximize the Bayesian evidence. We validate our method on real-world inverse problems, including black hole imaging, where the true prior is unknown a priori, and image deblurring with text-conditioned priors. We find that the evidence is often maximized by priors that extend beyond those trained on a single dataset. By generalizing the prior through exponent weighting, our approach enables posterior sampling from both tempered and combined diffusion models, yielding more flexible priors that improve the trustworthiness of the resulting posterior image distribution.
237. ❌ Clinically-Informed Modeling for Pediatric Brain Tumor Classification from Whole-Slide Histopathology Images
作者: Joakim Nguyen, Jian Yu, Jinrui Fang, Nicholas Konz, Tianlong Chen, Sanjay Krishnan, Chandra Krishnan, Ying Ding, Hairong Wang, Ankita Shukla 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21060v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Accurate diagnosis of pediatric brain tumors, starting with histopathology, presents unique challenges for deep learning, including severe data scarcity, class imbalance, and fine-grained morphologic overlap across diagnostically distinct subtypes. While pathology foundation models have advanced patch-level representation learning, their effective adaptation to weakly supervised pediatric brain tumor classification under limited data remains underexplored. In this work, we introduce an expert-guided contrastive fine-tuning framework for pediatric brain tumor diagnosis from whole-slide images (WSI). Our approach integrates contrastive learning into slide-level multiple instance learning (MIL) to explicitly regularize the geometry of slide-level representations during downstream fine-tuning. We propose both a general supervised contrastive setting and an expert-guided variant that incorporates clinically informed hard negatives targeting diagnostically confusable subtypes. Through comprehensive experiments on pediatric brain tumor WSI classification under realistic low-sample and class-imbalanced conditions, we demonstrate that contrastive fine-tuning yields measurable improvements in fine-grained diagnostic distinctions. Our experimental analyses reveal complementary strengths across different contrastive strategies, with expert-guided hard negatives promoting more compact intra-class representations and improved inter-class separation. This work highlights the importance of explicitly shaping slide-level representations for robust fine-grained classification in data-scarce pediatric pathology settings.
238. ❌ Neuro-Symbolic Manipulation Understanding with Enriched Semantic Event Chains
作者: Fatemeh Ziaeetabar 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21053v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Robotic systems operating in human environments must reason about how object interactions evolve over time, which actions are currently being performed, and what manipulation step is likely to follow. Classical enriched Semantic Event Chains (eSECs) provide an interpretable relational description of manipulation, but remain primarily descriptive and do not directly support uncertainty-aware decision making. In this paper, we propose eSEC-LAM, a neuro-symbolic framework that transforms eSECs into an explicit event-level symbolic state for manipulation understanding. The proposed formulation augments classical eSECs with confidence-aware predicates, functional object roles, affordance priors, primitive-level abstraction, and saliency-guided explanation cues. These enriched symbolic states are derived from a foundation-model-based perception front-end through deterministic predicate extraction, while current-action inference and next-primitive prediction are performed using lightweight symbolic reasoning over primitive pre- and post-conditions. We evaluate the proposed framework on EPIC-KITCHENS-100, EPIC-KITCHENS VISOR, and Assembly101 across action recognition, next-primitive prediction, robustness to perception noise, and explanation consistency. Experimental results show that eSEC-LAM achieves competitive action recognition, substantially improves next-primitive prediction, remains more robust under degraded perceptual conditions than both classical symbolic and end-to-end video baselines, and provides temporally consistent explanation traces grounded in explicit relational evidence. These findings demonstrate that enriched Semantic Event Chains can serve not only as interpretable descriptors of manipulation, but also as effective internal states for neuro-symbolic action reasoning.
239. ❌ StyleVAR: Controllable Image Style Transfer via Visual Autoregressive Modeling
作者: Liqi Jing, Dingming Zhang, Peinian Li, Lichen Zhu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21052v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We build on the Visual Autoregressive Modeling (VAR) framework and formulate style transfer as conditional discrete sequence modeling in a learned latent space. Images are decomposed into multi-scale representations and tokenized into discrete codes by a VQ-VAE; a transformer then autoregressively models the distribution of target tokens conditioned on style and content tokens. To inject style and content information, we introduce a blended cross-attention mechanism in which the evolving target representation attends to its own history, while style and content features act as queries that decide which aspects of this history to emphasize. A scale-dependent blending coefficient controls the relative influence of style and content at each stage, encouraging the synthesized representation to align with both the content structure and the style texture without breaking the autoregressive continuity of VAR. We train StyleVAR in two stages from a pretrained VAR checkpoint: supervised fine-tuning on a large triplet dataset of content–style–target images, followed by reinforcement fine-tuning with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) against a DreamSim-based perceptual reward, with per-action normalization weighting to rebalance credit across VAR’s multi-scale hierarchy. Across three benchmarks spanning in-, near-, and out-of-distribution regimes, StyleVAR consistently outperforms an AdaIN baseline on Style Loss, Content Loss, LPIPS, SSIM, DreamSim, and CLIP similarity, and the GRPO stage yields further gains over the SFT checkpoint, most notably on the reward-aligned perceptual metrics. Qualitatively, the method transfers texture while maintaining semantic structure, especially for landscapes and architectural scenes, while a generalization gap on internet images and difficulty with human faces highlight the need for better content diversity and stronger structural priors.
240. ❌ Projected Gradient Unlearning for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models: Defending Against Concept Revival Attacks
作者: Aljalila Aladawi, Mohammed Talha Alam, Fakhri Karray 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21041v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Machine unlearning for text-to-image diffusion models aims to selectively remove undesirable concepts from pre-trained models without costly retraining. Current unlearning methods share a common weakness: erased concepts return when the model is fine-tuned on downstream data, even when that data is entirely unrelated. We adapt Projected Gradient Unlearning (PGU) from classification to the diffusion domain as a post-hoc hardening step. By constructing a Core Gradient Space (CGS) from the retain concept activations and projecting gradient updates into its orthogonal complement, PGU ensures that subsequent fine-tuning cannot undo the achieved erasure. Applied on top of existing methods (ESD, UCE, Receler), the approach eliminates revival for style concepts and substantially delays it for object concepts, running in roughly 6 minutes versus the ~2 hours required by Meta-Unlearning. PGU and Meta-Unlearning turn out to be complementary: which performs better depends on how the concept is encoded, and retain concept selection should follow visual feature similarity rather than semantic grouping.
241. ❌ Unlocking Multi-Spectral Data for Multi-Modal Models with Guided Inputs and Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
作者: Dahun Kim, Ganesh Satish Mallya, Anelia Angelova 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21032v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Multi-spectral imagery is a valuable input signal for Remote Sensing applications, such as land-use and land-cover classification and environmental monitoring. However, generalist Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) are typically trained on RGB images, limiting their applicability to the RGB domain. At the same time, training multi-spectral multi-modal models is expensive and produces uniquely specialized models. To address this, we propose a novel training-free approach that introduces multi-spectral data within the inference pipeline of standard RGB-only LMMs, allowing large gains in performance. Our approach leverages the LMMs’ understanding of the visual space by adapting non-RGB inputs to that space and injecting domain-specific information and Chain-of-Thought reasoning as instructions. We demonstrate this with the Gemini 2.5 model and observe strong Zero-Shot performance gains on popular Remote Sensing benchmarks. These results highlight the potential for geospatial professionals to leverage powerful generalist models for specialized sensor inputs, benefiting from rich reasoning capabilities grounded in specialized data.
242. ❌ A Deep U-Net Framework for Flood Hazard Mapping Using Hydraulic Simulations of the Wupper Catchment
作者: Christian Lammers, Fernando Arévalo, Leonie Märker-Neuhaus, Daniel Heinenberg, Christian Förster, Karl-Heinz Spies 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21028v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The increasing frequency and severity of global flood events highlights the need for the development of rapid and reliable flood prediction tools. This process traditionally relies on computationally expensive hydraulic simulations. This research presents a prediction tool by developing a deep-learning based surrogate model to accurately and efficiently predict the maximum water level across a grid. This was achieved by conducting a series of experiments to optimize a U-Net architecture, patch generation, and data handling for approximating a hydraulic model. This research demonstrates that a deep learning surrogate model can serve as a computationally efficient alternative to traditional hydraulic simulations. The framework was tested using hydraulic simulations of the Wupper catchment in the North-Rhein Westphalia region (Germany), obtaining comparable results.
243. ❌ Micro-DualNet: Dual-Path Spatio-Temporal Network for Micro-Action Recognition
作者: Naga VS Raviteja Chappa, Evangelos Sariyanidi, Lisa Yankowitz, Gokul Nair, Casey J. Zampella, Robert T. Schultz, Birkan Tunç 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21011v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Micro-actions are subtle, localized movements lasting 1-3 seconds such as scratching one’s head or tapping fingers. Such subtle actions are essential for social communication, ubiquitously used in natural interactions, and thus critical for fine-grained video understanding, yet remain poorly understood by current computer vision systems. We identify a fundamental challenge: micro-actions exhibit diverse spatio-temporal characteristics where some are defined by spatial configurations while others manifest through temporal dynamics. Existing methods that commit to a single spatio-temporal decomposition cannot accommodate this diversity. We propose a dual-path network that processes anatomically-grounded spatial entities through parallel Spatial-Temporal (ST) and Temporal-Spatial (TS) pathways. The ST path captures spatial configurations before modeling temporal dynamics, while the TS path inverts this order to prioritize temporal dynamics. Rather than fixed fusion, we introduce entity-level adaptive routing where each body part learns its optimal processing preference, complemented by Mutual Action Consistency (MAC) loss that enforces cross-path coherence. Extensive experiments demonstrate competitive performance on MA-52 dataset and state-of-the-art results on iMiGUE dataset. Our work reveals that architectural adaptation to the inherent complexity of micro-actions is essential for advancing fine-grained video understanding.
244. ❌ Linear Image Generation by Synthesizing Exposure Brackets
作者: Yuekun Dai, Zhoutong Zhang, Shangchen Zhou, Nanxuan Zhao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21008v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The life of a photo begins with photons striking the sensor, whose signals are passed through a sophisticated image signal processing (ISP) pipeline to produce a display-referred image. However, such images are no longer faithful to the incident light, being compressed in dynamic range and stylized by subjective preferences. In contrast, RAW images record direct sensor signals before non-linear tone mapping. After camera response curve correction and demosaicing, they can be converted into linear images, which are scene-referred representations that directly reflect true irradiance and are invariant to sensor-specific factors. Since image sensors have better dynamic range and bit depth, linear images contain richer information than display-referred ones, leaving users more room for editing during post-processing. Despite this advantage, current generative models mainly synthesize display-referred images, which inherently limits downstream editing. In this paper, we address the task of text-to-linear-image generation: synthesizing a high-quality, scene-referred linear image that preserves full dynamic range, conditioned on a text prompt, for professional post-processing. Generating linear images is challenging, as pre-trained VAEs in latent diffusion models struggle to simultaneously preserve extreme highlights and shadows due to the higher dynamic range and bit depth. To this end, we represent a linear image as a sequence of exposure brackets, each capturing a specific portion of the dynamic range, and propose a DiT-based flow-matching architecture for text-conditioned exposure bracket generation. We further demonstrate downstream applications including text-guided linear image editing and structure-conditioned generation via ControlNet.
245. ❌ PanGuide3D: Cohort-Robust Pancreas Tumor Segmentation via Probabilistic Pancreas Conditioning and a Transformer Bottleneck
作者: Sunny Joy Ma, Xiang Ma 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20981v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Pancreatic tumor segmentation in contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is clinically important yet technically challenging: lesions are often small, heterogeneous, and easily confused with surrounding soft tissue, and models that perform well on one cohort frequently degrade under cohort shift. Our goal is to improve cross-cohort generalization while keeping the model architecture simple, efficient, and practical for 3D CT segmentation. We introduce PanGuide3D, a cohort-robust architecture with a shared 3D encoder, a pancreas decoder that predicts a probabilistic pancreas map, and a tumor decoder that is explicitly conditioned on this pancreas probability at multiple scales via differentiable soft gating. To capture long-range context under distribution shift, we further add a lightweight Transformer bottleneck in the U-Net bottleneck representation. We evaluate cohort transfer by training on the PanTS (Pancreatic Tumor Segmentation) cohort and testing both in-cohort (PanTS) and out-of-cohort on MSD (Medical Segmentation Decathlon) Task07 Pancreas, using matched preprocessing and training protocols across strong baselines. We collect voxel-level segmentation metrics, patient-level tumor detection, subgroup analyses by tumor size and anatomical location, volume-conditioned performance analyses, and calibration measurements to assess reliability. Across the evaluated models, PanGuide3D achieves the best overall tumor performance and shows improved cross-cohort generalization, particularly for small tumors and challenging anatomical locations, while reducing anatomically implausible false positives. These findings support probabilistic anatomical conditioning as a practical strategy for improving cross-cohort robustness in an end-to-end model and suggest potential utility for contouring support, treatment planning, and multi-institutional studies.
246. ❌ Temporal Taskification in Streaming Continual Learning: A Source of Evaluation Instability
作者: Nicolae Filat, Ahmed Hussain, Konstantinos Kalogiannis, Elena Burceanu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21930v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Streaming Continual Learning (CL) typically converts a continuous stream into a sequence of discrete tasks through temporal partitioning. We argue that this temporal taskification step is not a neutral preprocessing choice, but a structural component of evaluation: different valid splits of the same stream can induce different CL regimes and therefore different benchmark conclusions. To study this effect, we introduce a taskification-level framework based on plasticity and stability profiles, a profile distance between taskifications, and Boundary-Profile Sensitivity (BPS), which diagnoses how strongly small boundary perturbations alter the induced regime before any CL model is trained. We evaluate continual finetuning, Experience Replay, Elastic Weight Consolidation, and Learning without Forgetting on network traffic forecasting with CESNET-Timeseries24, keeping the stream, model, and training budget fixed while varying only the temporal taskification. Across 9-, 30-, and 44-day splits, we observe substantial changes in forecasting error, forgetting, and backward transfer, showing that taskification alone can materially affect CL evaluation. We further find that shorter taskifications induce noisier distribution-level patterns, larger structural distances, and higher BPS, indicating greater sensitivity to boundary perturbations. These results show that benchmark conclusions in streaming CL depend not only on the learner and the data stream, but also on how that stream is taskified, motivating temporal taskification as a first-class evaluation variable.
247. ❌ Fine-Tuning Regimes Define Distinct Continual Learning Problems
作者: Paul-Tiberiu Iordache, Elena Burceanu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21927v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Continual learning (CL) studies how models acquire tasks sequentially while retaining previously learned knowledge. Despite substantial progress in benchmarking CL methods, comparative evaluations typically keep the fine-tuning regime fixed. In this paper, we argue that the fine-tuning regime, defined by the trainable parameter subspace, is itself a key evaluation variable. We formalize adaptation regimes as projected optimization over fixed trainable subspaces, showing that changing the trainable depth alters the effective update signal through which both current task fitting and knowledge preservation operate. This analysis motivates the hypothesis that method comparisons need not be invariant across regimes. We test this hypothesis in task incremental CL, five trainable depth regimes, and four standard methods: online EWC, LwF, SI, and GEM. Across five benchmark datasets, namely MNIST, Fashion MNIST, KMNIST, QMNIST, and CIFAR-100, and across 11 task orders per dataset, we find that the relative ranking of methods is not consistently preserved across regimes. We further show that deeper adaptation regimes are associated with larger update magnitudes, higher forgetting, and a stronger relationship between the two. These results show that comparative conclusions in CL can depend strongly on the chosen fine-tuning regime, motivating regime-aware evaluation protocols that treat trainable depth as an explicit experimental factor.
248. ❌ The Sample Complexity of Multicalibration
作者: Natalie Collina, Jiuyao Lu, Georgy Noarov, Aaron Roth 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21923v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We study the minimax sample complexity of multicalibration in the batch setting. A learner observes $n$ i.i.d. samples from an unknown distribution and must output a (possibly randomized) predictor whose population multicalibration error, measured by Expected Calibration Error (ECE), is at most $\varepsilon$ with respect to a given family of groups. For every fixed $κ> 0$, in the regime $|G|\le \varepsilon^{-κ}$, we prove that $\widetildeΘ(\varepsilon^{-3})$ samples are necessary and sufficient, up to polylogarithmic factors. The lower bound holds even for randomized predictors, and the upper bound is realized by a randomized predictor obtained via an online-to-batch reduction. This separates the sample complexity of multicalibration from that of marginal calibration, which scales as $\widetildeΘ(\varepsilon^{-2})$, and shows that mean-ECE multicalibration is as difficult in the batch setting as it is in the online setting, in contrast to marginal calibration which is strictly more difficult in the online setting. In contrast we observe that for $κ= 0$, the sample complexity of multicalibration remains $\widetildeΘ(\varepsilon^{-2})$ exhibiting a sharp threshold phenomenon. More generally, we establish matching upper and lower bounds, up to polylogarithmic factors, for a weighted $L_p$ multicalibration metric for all $1 \le p \le 2$, with optimal exponent $3/p$. We also extend the lower-bound template to a regular class of elicitable properties, and combine it with the online upper bounds of Hu et al. (2025) to obtain matching bounds for calibrating properties including expectiles and bounded-density quantiles.
249. ❌ Low-Rank Adaptation Redux for Large Models
作者: Bingcong Li, Yilang Zhang, Georgios B. Giannakis 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21905v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) has emerged as the de facto standard for parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) of foundation models, enabling the adaptation of billion-parameter networks with minimal computational and memory overhead. Despite its empirical success and rapid proliferation of variants, it remains elusive which architectural choices, optimization techniques, and deployment constraints should guide practical method selection. This overview revisits LoRA through the lens of signal processing (SP), bridging modern adapter designs with classical low-rank modeling tools and inverse problems, as well as highlighting how SP principles can inform principled advances of fine-tuning approaches. Rather than providing a comprehensive enumeration and empirical comparisons of LoRA variants, emphasis is placed on the technical mechanisms underpinning these approaches to justify their effectiveness. These advances are categorized into three complementary axes: architectural design, efficient optimization, and pertinent applications. The first axis builds on singular value decomposition (SVD)-based factorization, rank-augmentation constructions, and cross-layer tensorization, while the second axis deals with initialization, alternating solvers, gauge-invariant optimization, and parameterization-aware methods. Beyond fine-tuning, emerging applications of LoRA are accounted across the entire lifecycle of large models, ranging from pre- and post-training to serving/deployment. Finally, open research directions are outlined at the confluence of SP and deep learning to catalyze a bidirectional frontier: classical SP tools provide a principled vocabulary for designing principled PEFT methods, while the unique challenges facing modern deep learning, especially the overwhelming scale and prohibitive overhead, also offer new research lines benefiting the SP community in return.
250. ❌ Revealing Geography-Driven Signals in Zone-Level Claim Frequency Models: An Empirical Study using Environmental and Visual Predictors
作者: Sherly Alfonso-Sánchez, Cristián Bravo, Kristina G. Stankova 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21893v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Geographic context is often consider relevant to motor insurance risk, yet public actuarial datasets provide limited location identifiers, constraining how this information can be incorporated and evaluated in claim-frequency models. This study examines how geographic information from alternative data sources can be incorporated into actuarial models for Motor Third Party Liability (MTPL) claim prediction under such constraints. Using the BeMTPL97 dataset, we adopt a zone-level modeling framework and evaluate predictive performance on unseen postcodes. Geographic information is introduced through two channels: environmental indicators from OpenStreetMap and CORINE Land Cover, and orthoimagery released by the Belgian National Geographic Institute for academic use. We evaluate the predictive contribution of coordinates, environmental features, and image embeddings across three baseline models: generalized linear models (GLMs), regularized GLMs, and gradient-boosted trees, while raw imagery is modeled using convolutional neural networks. Our results show that augmenting actuarial variables with constructed geographic information improves accuracy. Across experiments, both linear and tree-based models benefit most from combining coordinates with environmental features extracted at 5 km scale, while smaller neighborhoods also improve baseline specifications. Generally, image embeddings do not improve performance when environmental features are available; however, when such features are absent, pretrained vision-transformer embeddings enhance accuracy and stability for regularized GLMs. Our results show that the predictive value of geographic information in zone-level MTPL frequency models depends less on model complexity than on how geography is represented, and illustrate that geographic context can be incorporated despite limited individual-level spatial information.
251. ❌ Locating acts of mechanistic reasoning in student team conversations with mechanistic machine learning
作者: Kaitlin Gili, Mainak Nistala, Kristen Wendell, Michael C. Hughes 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21870v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
STEM education researchers are often interested in identifying moments of students’ mechanistic reasoning for deeper analysis, but have limited capacity to search through many team conversation transcripts to find segments with a high concentration of such reasoning. We offer a solution in the form of an interpretable machine learning model that outputs time-varying probabilities that individual students are engaging in acts of mechanistic reasoning, leveraging evidence from their own utterances as well as contributions from the rest of the group. Using the toolkit of intentionally-designed probabilistic models, we introduce a specific inductive bias that steers the probabilistic dynamics toward desired, domain-aligned behavior. Experiments compare trained models with and without the inductive bias components, investigating whether their presence improves the desired model behavior on transcripts involving never-before-seen students and a novel discussion context. Our results show that the inductive bias improves generalization – supporting the claim that interpretability is built into the model for this task rather than imposed post hoc. We conclude with practical recommendations for STEM education researchers seeking to adopt the tool and for ML researchers aiming to extend the model’s design. Overall, we hope this work encourages the development of mechanistically interpretable models that are understandable and controllable for both end users and model designers in STEM education research.
252. ❌ Beyond Expected Information Gain: Stable Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design with Integral Probability Metrics and Plug-and-Play Extensions
作者: Di Wu, Ling Liang, Haizhao Yang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21849v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design (BOED) provides a rigorous framework for decision-making tasks in which data acquisition is often the critical bottleneck, especially in resource-constrained settings. Traditionally, BOED typically selects designs by maximizing expected information gain (EIG), commonly defined through the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. However, classical evaluation of EIG often involves challenging nested expectations, and even advanced variational methods leave the underlying log-density-ratio objective unchanged. As a result, support mismatch, tail underestimation, and rare-event sensitivity remain intrinsic concerns for KL-based BOED. To address these fundamental bottlenecks, we introduce an IPM-based BOED framework that replaces density-based divergences with integral probability metrics (IPMs), including the Wasserstein distance, Maximum Mean Discrepancy, and Energy Distance, resulting in a highly flexible plug-and-play BOED framework. We establish theoretical guarantees showing that IPM-based utilities provide stronger geometry-aware stability under surrogate-model error and prior misspecification than classical EIG-based utilities. We also validate the proposed framework empirically, demonstrating that IPM-based designs yield highly concentrated credible sets. Furthermore, by extending the same sample-based BOED template in a plug-and-play manner to geometry-aware discrepancies beyond the IPM class, illustrated by a neural optimal transport estimator, we achieve accurate optimal designs in high-dimensional settings where conventional nested Monte Carlo estimators and advanced variational methods fail.
253. ❌ GFlowState: Visualizing the Training of Generative Flow Networks Beyond the Reward
作者: Florian Holeczek, Andreas Hinterreiter, Alex Hernandez-Garcia, Marc Streit, Christina Humer 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21830v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We present GFlowState, a visual analytics system designed to illuminate the training process of Generative Flow Networks (GFlowNets or GFNs). GFlowNets are a probabilistic framework for generating samples proportionally to a reward function. While GFlowNets have proved to be powerful tools in applications such as molecule and material discovery, their training dynamics remain difficult to interpret. Standard machine learning tools allow metric tracking but do not reveal how models explore the sample space, construct sample trajectories, or shift sampling probabilities during training. Our solution, GFlowState, allows users to analyze sampling trajectories, compare the sample space relative to reference datasets, and analyze the training dynamics. To this end, we introduce multiple views, including a chart of candidate rankings, a state projection, a node-link diagram of the trajectory network, and a transition heatmap. These visualizations enable GFlowNet developers and users to investigate sampling behavior and policy evolution, and to identify underexplored regions and sources of training failure. Case studies demonstrate how the system supports debugging and assessing the quality of GFlowNets across application domains. By making the structural dynamics of GFlowNets observable, our work enhances their interpretability and can accelerate GFlowNet development in practice.
254. ❌ On the algebra of Koopman eigenfunctions and on some of their infinities
作者: Zahra Monfared, Saksham Malhotra, Sekiya Hajime, Ioannis Kevrekidis, Felix Dietrich 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21825v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
For continuous-time dynamical systems with reversible trajectories, the nowhere-vanishing eigenfunctions of the Koopman operator of the system form a multiplicative group. Here, we exploit this property to accelerate the systematic numerical computation of the eigenspaces of the operator. Given a small set of (so-called ``principal’’) eigenfunctions that are approximated conventionally, we can obtain a much larger set by constructing polynomials of the principal eigenfunctions. This enriches the set, and thus allows us to more accurately represent application-specific observables. Often, eigenfunctions exhibit localized singularities (e.g. in simple, one-dimensional problems with multiple steady states) or extended ones (e.g. in simple, two-dimensional problems possessing a limit cycle, or a separatrix); we discuss eigenfunction matching/continuation across such singularities. By handling eigenfunction singularities and enabling their continuation, our approach supports learning consistent global representations from locally sampled data. This is particularly relevant for multistable systems and applications with sparse or fragmented measurements.
255. ❌ An effective variant of the Hartigan $k$-means algorithm
作者: François Clément, Stefan Steinerberger 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21798v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The k-means problem is perhaps the classical clustering problem and often synonymous with Lloyd’s algorithm (1957). It has become clear that Hartigan’s algorithm (1975) gives better results in almost all cases, Telgarsky-Vattani note a typical improvement of $5%$ – $10%$. We point out that a very minor variation of Hartigan’s method leads to another $2%$ – $5%$ improvement; the improvement tends to become larger when either dimension or $k$ increase.
256. ❌ Compliance Moral Hazard and the Backfiring Mandate
作者: Jian Ni, Lecheng Zheng, John R Birge 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21789v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Competing firms that serve shared customer populations face a fundamental information aggregation problem: each firm holds fragmented signals about risky customers, but individual incentives impede efficient collective detection. We develop a mechanism design framework for decentralized risk analytics, grounded in anti-money laundering in banking networks. Three strategic frictions distinguish our setting: compliance moral hazard, adversarial adaptation, and information destruction through intervention. A temporal value assignment (TVA) mechanism, which credits institutions using a strictly proper scoring rule on discounted verified outcomes, implements truthful reporting as a Bayes–Nash equilibrium (uniquely optimal at each edge) in large federations. Embedding TVA in a banking competition model, we show competitive pressure amplifies compliance moral hazard and poorly designed mandates can reduce welfare below autarky, a ``backfiring’’ result with direct policy implications. In simulation using a synthetic AML benchmark, TVA achieves substantially higher welfare than autarky or mandated sharing without incentive design.
257. ❌ PrismaDV: Automated Task-Aware Data Unit Test Generation
作者: Hao Chen, Arnab Phani, Sebastian Schelter 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21765v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Data is a central resource for modern enterprises, and data validation is essential for ensuring the reliability of downstream applications. However, existing automated data unit testing frameworks are largely task-agnostic: they validate datasets without considering the semantics and requirements of the code that consumes the data. We present PrismaDV, a compound AI system that analyzes downstream task code together with dataset profiles to identify data access patterns, infer implicit data assumptions, and generate task-aware executable data unit tests. To further adapt the data unit tests over time to specific datasets and downstream tasks, we propose “Selective Informative Feedback for Task Adaptation” (SIFTA), a prompt-optimization framework that leverages the scarce outcomes from the execution of data unit tests and downstream tasks. We evaluate PrismaDV on two new benchmarks spanning 60 tasks across five datasets, where it consistently outperforms both task-agnostic and task-aware baselines in generating unit tests that reflect the end-to-end impact of data errors. Furthermore, we show that with SIFTA, we can automatically learn prompts for PrismaDV’s modules that outperform prompts written by hand or generated from a generic prompt optimizer. We publicly release our benchmarks and prototype implementation.
258. ❌ Transferable Physics-Informed Representations via Closed-Form Head Adaptation
作者: Jian Cheng Wong, Isaac Yin Chung Lai, Pao-Hsiung Chiu, Chin Chun Ooi, Abhishek Gupta, Yew-Soon Ong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21761v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have garnered significant interest for their potential in solving partial differential equations (PDEs) that govern a wide range of physical phenomena. By incorporating physical laws into the learning process, PINN models have demonstrated the ability to learn physical outcomes reasonably well. However, current PINN approaches struggle to predict or solve new PDEs effectively when there is a lack of training examples, indicating they do not generalize well to unseen problem instances. In this paper, we present a transferable learning approach for PINNs premised on a fast Pseudoinverse PINN framework (Pi-PINN). Pi-PINN learns a transferable physics-informed representation in a shared embedding space and enables rapid solving of both known and unknown PDE instances via closed-form head adaptation using a least-squares-optimal pseudoinverse under PDE constraints. We further investigate the synergies between data-driven multi-task learning loss and physics-informed loss, providing insights into the design of more performant PINNs. We demonstrate the effectiveness of Pi-PINN on various PDE problems, including Poisson’s equation, Helmholtz equation, and Burgers’ equation, achieving fast and accurate physics-informed solutions without requiring any data for unseen instances. Pi-PINN can produce predictions 100-1000 times faster than a typical PINN, while producing predictions with 10-100 times lower relative error than a typical data-driven model even with only two training samples. Overall, our findings highlight the potential of transferable representations with closed-form head adaptation to enhance the efficiency and generalization of PINNs across PDE families and scientific and engineering applications.
259. ❌ Neural surrogates for crystal growth dynamics with variable supersaturation: explicit vs. implicit conditioning
作者: Matteo Rigoni, Daniele Lanzoni, Francesco Montalenti, Roberto Bergamaschini 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21753v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Simulations of crystal growth are performed by using Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network surrogate models, trained on a dataset of time sequences computed by numerical integration of Allen-Cahn dynamics including faceting via kinetic anisotropy. Two network architectures are developed to take into account the effects of a variable supersaturation value. The first infers it implicitly by processing an input mini-sequence of a few evolution frames and then returns a consistent continuation of the evolution. The second takes the supersaturation parameter as an explicit input along with a single initial frame and predicts the entire sequence. The two models are systematically tested to establish strengths and weaknesses, comparing the prediction performance for models trained on datasets of different size and, in the first architecture, different lengths of input mini-sequence. The analysis of point-wise and mean absolute errors shows how the explicit parameter conditioning guarantees the best results, reproducing with high-fidelity the ground-truth profiles. Comparable results are achievable by the mini-sequence approach only when using larger training datasets. The trained models show strong conditioning by the supersaturation parameter, consistently reproducing its overall impact on growth rates as well as its local effect on the faceted morphology. Moreover, they are perfectly scalable even on 256 times larger domains and can be successfully extended to more than 10 times longer sequences with limited error accumulation. The analysis highlights the potential and limits of these approaches in view of their general exploitation for crystal growth simulations.
260. ❌ Towards Universal Tabular Embeddings: A Benchmark Across Data Tasks
作者: Liane Vogel, Kavitha Srinivas, Niharika D’Souza, Sola Shirai, Oktie Hassanzadeh, Horst Samulowitz 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21696v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Tabular foundation models aim to learn universal representations of tabular data that transfer across tasks and domains, enabling applications such as table retrieval, semantic search and table-based prediction. Despite the growing number of such models, it remains unclear which approach works best in practice, as existing methods are often evaluated under task-specific settings that make direct comparison difficult. To address this, we introduce TEmBed, the Tabular Embedding Test Bed, a comprehensive benchmark for systematically evaluating tabular embeddings across four representation levels: cell, row, column, and table. Evaluating a diverse set of tabular representation learning models, we show that which model to use depends on the task and representation level. Our results offer practical guidance for selecting tabular embeddings in real-world applications and lay the groundwork for developing more general-purpose tabular representation models.
261. ❌ There Will Be a Scientific Theory of Deep Learning
作者: Jamie Simon, Daniel Kunin, Alexander Atanasov, Enric Boix-Adserà, Blake Bordelon, Jeremy Cohen, Nikhil Ghosh, Florentin Guth, Arthur Jacot, Mason Kamb, Dhruva Karkada, Eric J. Michaud, Berkan Ottlik, Joseph Turnbull 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21691v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
In this paper, we make the case that a scientific theory of deep learning is emerging. By this we mean a theory which characterizes important properties and statistics of the training process, hidden representations, final weights, and performance of neural networks. We pull together major strands of ongoing research in deep learning theory and identify five growing bodies of work that point toward such a theory: (a) solvable idealized settings that provide intuition for learning dynamics in realistic systems; (b) tractable limits that reveal insights into fundamental learning phenomena; (c) simple mathematical laws that capture important macroscopic observables; (d) theories of hyperparameters that disentangle them from the rest of the training process, leaving simpler systems behind; and (e) universal behaviors shared across systems and settings which clarify which phenomena call for explanation. Taken together, these bodies of work share certain broad traits: they are concerned with the dynamics of the training process; they primarily seek to describe coarse aggregate statistics; and they emphasize falsifiable quantitative predictions. We argue that the emerging theory is best thought of as a mechanics of the learning process, and suggest the name learning mechanics. We discuss the relationship between this mechanics perspective and other approaches for building a theory of deep learning, including the statistical and information-theoretic perspectives. In particular, we anticipate a symbiotic relationship between learning mechanics and mechanistic interpretability. We also review and address common arguments that fundamental theory will not be possible or is not important. We conclude with a portrait of important open directions in learning mechanics and advice for beginners. We host further introductory materials, perspectives, and open questions at learningmechanics.pub.
262. ❌ Evaluating Post-hoc Explanations of the Transformer-based Genome Language Model DNABERT-2
作者: Isabel Kurth, Paulo Yanez Sarmiento, Bernhard Y. Renard 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21690v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Explaining deep neural network predictions on genome sequences enables biological insight and hypothesis generation-often of greater interest than predictive performance alone. While explanations of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been shown to capture relevant patterns in genome sequences, it is unclear whether this transfers to more expressive Transformer-based genome language models (gLMs). To answer this question, we adapt AttnLRP, an extension of layer-wise relevance propagation to the attention mechanism, and apply it to the state-of-the-art gLM DNABERT-2. Thereby, we propose strategies to transfer explanations from token and nucleotide level. We evaluate the adaption of AttnLRP on genomic datasets using multiple metrics. Further, we provide an extensive comparison between the explanations of DNABERT-2 and a baseline CNN. Our results demonstrate that AttnLRP yields reliable explanations corresponding to known biological patterns. Hence, like CNNs, gLMs can also help derive biological insights. This work contributes to the explainability of gLMs and addresses the comparability of relevance attributions across different architectures.
263. ❌ A-IC3: Learning-Guided Adaptive Inductive Generalization for Hardware Model Checking
作者: Xiaofeng Zhou, Guangyu Hu, Hongce Zhang, Wei Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21688v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The IC3 algorithm represents the state-of-the-art (SOTA) hardware model checking technique, owing to its robust performance and scalability. A significant body of research has focused on enhancing the solving efficiency of the IC3 algorithm, with particular attention to the inductive generalization process: a critical phase wherein the algorithm seeks to generalize a counterexample to inductiveness (CTI), which typically is a state leading to a bad state, into a broader set of states. This inductive generalization is a primary source of clauses in IC3 and thus plays a pivotal role in determining the overall effectiveness of the algorithm. Despite its importance, existing approaches often rely on fixed inductive generalization strategies, overlooking the dynamic and context-sensitive nature of the verification environment in which spurious counterexamples arise. This rigidity can limit the quality of generated clauses and, consequently, the performance of IC3. To address this limitation, we propose a lightweight machine-learning-based framework that dynamically selects appropriate inductive generalization strategies in response to the evolving verification context. Specifically, we employ a multi-armed bandit (MAB) algorithm to adaptively choose inductive generalization strategies based on real-time feedback from the verification process. The agent is updated by evaluating the quality of generalization outcomes, thereby refining its strategy selection over time. Empirical evaluation on a benchmark suite comprising 914 instances, primarily drawn from the latest HWMCC collection, demonstrates the efficacy of our approach. When implemented on the state-of-the-art model checker rIC3, our method solves 26 to 50 more cases than the baselines and improves the PAR-2 score by 194.72 to 389.29.
264. ❌ Transferable SCF-Acceleration through Solver-Aligned Initialization Learning
作者: Eike S. Eberhard, Viktor Kotsev, Timm Güthle, Stephan Günnemann 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21657v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Machine learning methods that predict initial guesses from molecular geometry can reduce this cost, but matrix-prediction models fail when extrapolating to larger molecules, degrading rather than accelerating convergence [Liu et al. 2025]. We show that this failure is a supervision problem, not an extrapolation problem: models trained on ground-state targets fit those targets well out of distribution, yet produce initial guesses that slow convergence. Solver-Aligned Initialization Learning (SAIL) resolves this for both Hamiltonian and density matrix models by differentiating through the SCF solver end-to-end. We introduce the Effective Relative Iteration Count (ERIC), a correction to the commonly used RIC that accounts for hidden Fock-build overhead. On QM40, containing molecules up to 4$\times$ larger than the training distribution, SAIL reduces ERIC by 37% (PBE), 33% (SCAN), and 27% (B3LYP), more than doubling the previous state-of-the-art reduction on B3LYP (10%). On QMugs molecules 10$\times$ the training size, SAIL delivers a 1.25$\times$ wall-time speedup at the hybrid level of theory, extending ML SCF acceleration to large drug-like molecules.
265. ❌ Large-Scale Data Parallelization of Product Quantization and Inverted Indexing Using Dask
作者: Ashley N. Abraham, Andrew Strelzoff, Haley R. Dozier, Althea C. Henslee, Mark A. Chappell 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21645v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Large-scale Nearest Neighbor (NN) search, though widely utilized in the similarity search field, remains challenged by the computational limitations inherent in processing large scale data. In an effort to decrease the computational expense needed, Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN) search is often used in applications that do not require the exact similarity search, but instead can rely on an approximation. Product Quantization (PQ) is a memory-efficient ANN effective for clustering all sizes of datasets. Clustering large-scale, high dimensional data requires a heavy computational expense, in both memory-cost and execution time. This work focuses on a unique way to divide and conquer the large scale data in Python using PQ, Inverted Indexing and Dask, combining the results without compromising the accuracy and reducing computational requirements to the level required when using medium-scale data.
266. ❌ Geometric Characterisation and Structured Trajectory Surrogates for Clinical Dataset Condensation
作者: Pafue Christy Nganjimi, Andrew Soltan, Danielle Belgrave, Lei Clifton, David Clifton, Anshul Thakur 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21638v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Dataset condensation constructs compact synthetic datasets that retain the training utility of large real-world datasets, enabling efficient model development and potentially supporting downstream research in governed domains such as healthcare. Trajectory matching (TM) is a widely used condensation approach that supervises synthetic data using changes in model parameters observed during training on real data, yet the structure of this supervision signal remains poorly understood. In this paper, we provide a geometric characterisation of trajectory matching, showing that a fixed synthetic dataset can only reproduce a limited span of such training-induced parameter changes. When the resulting supervision signal is spectrally broad, this creates a conditional representability bottleneck. Motivated by this mismatch, we propose Bezier Trajectory Matching (BTM), which replaces SGD trajectories with quadratic Bezier trajectory surrogates between initial and final model states. These surrogates are optimised to reduce average loss along the path while replacing broad SGD-derived supervision with a more structured, lower-rank signal that is better aligned with the optimisation constraints of a fixed synthetic dataset, and they substantially reduce trajectory storage. Experiments on five clinical datasets demonstrate that BTM consistently matches or improves upon standard trajectory matching, with the largest gains in low-prevalence and low-synthetic-budget settings. These results indicate that effective trajectory matching depends on structuring the supervision signal rather than reproducing stochastic optimisation paths.
267. ❌ A-THENA: Early Intrusion Detection for IoT with Time-Aware Hybrid Encoding and Network-Specific Augmentation
作者: Ioannis Panopoulos, Maria Lamprini A. Bartsioka, Sokratis Nikolaidis, Stylianos I. Venieris, Dimitra I. Kaklamani, Iakovos S. Venieris 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21623v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices has significantly expanded attack surfaces, making IoT ecosystems particularly susceptible to sophisticated cyber threats. To address this challenge, this work introduces A-THENA, a lightweight early intrusion detection system (EIDS) that significantly extends preliminary findings on time-aware encodings. A-THENA employs an advanced Transformer-based architecture augmented with a generalized Time-Aware Hybrid Encoding (THE), integrating packet timestamps to effectively capture temporal dynamics essential for accurate and early threat detection. The proposed system further employs a Network-Specific Augmentation (NA) pipeline, which enhances model robustness and generalization. We evaluate A-THENA on three benchmark IoT intrusion detection datasets-CICIoT23-WEB, MQTT-IoT-IDS2020, and IoTID20-where it consistently achieves strong performance. Averaged across all three datasets, it improves accuracy by 6.88 percentage points over the best-performing traditional positional encoding, 3.69 points over the strongest feature-based model, 6.17 points over the leading time-aware alternatives, and 5.11 points over related models, while achieving near-zero false alarms and false negatives. To assess real-world feasibility, we deploy A-THENA on the Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W, demonstrating its ability to perform real-time intrusion detection with minimal latency and memory usage. These results establish A-THENA as an agile, practical, and highly effective solution for securing IoT networks.
268. ❌ A Kernel Nonconformity Score for Multivariate Conformal Prediction
作者: Louis Meyer, Wenkai Xu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21595v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Multivariate conformal prediction requires nonconformity scores that compress residual vectors into scalars while preserving certain implicit geometric structure of the residual distribution. We introduce a Multivariate Kernel Score (MKS) that produces prediction regions that explicitly adapt to this geometry. We show that the proposed score resembles the Gaussian process posterior variance, unifying Bayesian uncertainty quantification with the coverage guarantees of frequentist-type. Moreover, the MKS can be decomposed into an anisotropic Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) that interpolates between kernel density estimation and covariance-weighted distance. We prove finite-sample coverage guarantees and establish convergence rates that depend on the effective rank of the kernel-based covariance operator rather than the ambient dimension, enabling dimension-free adaptation. On regression tasks, the MKS reduces the volume of prediction region significantly, compared to ellipsoidal baselines while maintaining nominal coverage, with larger gains at higher dimensions and tighter coverage levels.
269. ❌ Verifying Machine Learning Interpretability Requirements through Provenance
作者: Lynn Vonderhaar, Juan Couder, Daryela Cisneros, Omar Ochoa 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21599v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Machine Learning (ML) Engineering is a growing field that necessitates an increase in the rigor of ML development. It draws many ideas from software engineering and more specifically, from requirements engineering. Existing literature on ML Engineering defines quality models and Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs) specific to ML, in particular interpretability being one such NFR. However, a major challenge occurs in verifying ML NFRs, including interpretability. Although existing literature defines interpretability in terms of ML, it remains an immeasurable requirement, making it impossible to definitively confirm whether a model meets its interpretability requirement. This paper shows how ML provenance can be used to verify ML interpretability requirements. This work provides an approach for how ML engineers can save various types of model and data provenance to make the model’s behavior transparent and interpretable. Saving this data forms the basis of quantifiable Functional Requirements (FRs) whose verification in turn verifies the interpretability NFR. Ultimately, this paper contributes a method to verify interpretability NFRs for ML models.
270. ❌ A temporal deep learning framework for calibration of low-cost air quality sensors
作者: Arindam Sengupta, Tony Bush, Ben Marner, Jose Miguel Pérez, Soledad Le Clainche 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21527v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Low-cost air quality sensors (LCS) provide a practical alternative to expensive regulatory-grade instruments, making dense urban monitoring networks possible. Yet their adoption is limited by calibration challenges, including sensor drift, environmental cross-sensitivity, and variability in performance from device to device. This work presents a deep learning framework for calibrating LCS measurements of PM${2.5}$, PM${10}$, and NO$2$ using a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network, trained on co-located reference data from the OxAria network in Oxford, UK. Unlike the Random Forest (RF) baseline, which treats each observation independently, the proposed approach captures temporal dependencies and delayed environmental effects through sequence-based learning, achieving higher $R^2$ values across training, validation, and test sets for all three pollutants. A feature set is constructed combining time-lagged parameters, harmonic encodings, and interaction terms to improve generalization on unseen temporal windows. Validation of unseen calibrated values against the Equivalence Spreadsheet Tool 3.1 demonstrates regulatory compliance with expanded uncertainties of 22.11% for NO$2$, 12.42% for PM${10}$, and 9.1% for PM${2.5}$.
271. ❌ Conditional anomaly detection with soft harmonic functions
作者: Michal Valko, Branislav Kveton, Hamed Valizadegan, Gregory F. Cooper, Milos Hauskrecht 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21462v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
In this paper, we consider the problem of conditional anomaly detection that aims to identify data instances with an unusual response or a class label. We develop a new non-parametric approach for conditional anomaly detection based on the soft harmonic solution, with which we estimate the confidence of the label to detect anomalous mislabeling. We further regularize the solution to avoid the detection of isolated examples and examples on the boundary of the distribution support. We demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method on several synthetic and UCI ML datasets in detecting unusual labels when compared to several baseline approaches. We also evaluate the performance of our method on a real-world electronic health record dataset where we seek to identify unusual patient-management decisions.
272. ❌ Tempered Sequential Monte Carlo for Trajectory and Policy Optimization with Differentiable Dynamics
作者: Heng Yang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21456v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We propose a sampling-based framework for finite-horizon trajectory and policy optimization under differentiable dynamics by casting controller design as inference. Specifically, we minimize a KL-regularized expected trajectory cost, which yields an optimal “Boltzmann-tilted” distribution over controller parameters that concentrates on low-cost solutions as temperature decreases. To sample efficiently from this sharp, potentially multimodal target, we introduce tempered sequential Monte Carlo (TSMC): an annealing scheme that adaptively reweights and resamples particles along a tempering path from a prior to the target distribution, while using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo rejuvenation to maintain diversity and exploit exact gradients obtained by differentiating through trajectory rollouts. For policy optimization, we extend TSMC via (i) a deterministic empirical approximation of the initial-state distribution and (ii) an extended-space construction that treats rollout randomness as auxiliary variables. Experiments across trajectory- and policy-optimization benchmarks show that TSMC is broadly applicable and compares favorably to state-of-the-art baselines.
273. ❌ A single algorithm for both restless and rested rotting bandits
作者: Julien Seznec, Pierre Ménard, Alessandro Lazaric, Michal Valko 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21432v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
In many application domains (e.g., recommender systems, intelligent tutoring systems), the rewards associated to the actions tend to decrease over time. This decay is either caused by the actions executed in the past (e.g., a user may get bored when songs of the same genre are recommended over and over) or by an external factor (e.g., content becomes outdated). These two situations can be modeled as specific instances of the rested and restless bandit settings, where arms are rotting (i.e., their value decrease over time). These problems were thought to be significantly different, since Levine et al. (2017) showed that state-of-the-art algorithms for restless bandit perform poorly in the rested rotting setting. In this paper, we introduce a novel algorithm, Rotting Adaptive Window UCB (RAW-UCB), that achieves near-optimal regret in both rotting rested and restless bandit, without any prior knowledge of the setting (rested or restless) and the type of non-stationarity (e.g., piece-wise constant, bounded variation). This is in striking contrast with previous negative results showing that no algorithm can achieve similar results as soon as rewards are allowed to increase. We confirm our theoretical findings on a number of synthetic and dataset-based experiments.
274. ❌ Even More Guarantees for Variational Inference in the Presence of Symmetries
作者: Lena Zellinger, Antonio Vergari 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21407v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
When approximating an intractable density via variational inference (VI) the variational family is typically chosen as a simple parametric family that very likely does not contain the target. This raises the question: Under which conditions can we recover characteristics of the target despite misspecification? In this work, we extend previous results on robust VI with location-scale families under target symmetries. We derive sufficient conditions guaranteeing exact recovery of the mean when using the forward Kullback-Leibler divergence and $α$-divergences. We further show how and why optimization can fail to recover the target mean in the absence of our sufficient conditions, providing initial guidelines on the choice of the variational family and $α$-value.
275. ❌ A Green-Integral-Constrained Neural Solver with Stochastic Physics-Informed Regularization
作者: Mohammad Mahdi Abedi, David Pardo, Tariq Alkhalifah 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21411v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Standard physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) struggle to simulate highly oscillatory Helmholtz solutions in heterogeneous media because pointwise minimization of second-order PDE residuals is computationally expensive, biased toward smooth solutions, and requires artificial absorbing boundary layers to restrict the solution. To overcome these challenges, we introduce a Green-Integral (GI) neural solver for the acoustic Helmholtz equation. It departs from the PDE-residual-based formulation by enforcing wave physics through an integral representation that imposes a nonlocal constraint. Oscillatory behavior and outgoing radiation are encoded directly through the integral kernel, eliminating second-order spatial derivatives and enforcing physical solutions without additional boundary layers. Theoretically, optimizing this GI loss via a neural network acts as a spectrally tuned preconditioned iteration, enabling convergence in heterogeneous media where the classical Born series diverges. By exploiting FFT-based convolution to accelerate the GI loss evaluation, our approach substantially reduces GPU memory usage and training time. However, this efficiency relies on a fixed regular grid, which can limit local resolution. To improve local accuracy in strong scattering regions, we also propose a hybrid GI+PDE loss, enforcing a lightweight Helmholtz residual at a small number of nonuniformly sampled collocation points. We evaluate our method on seismic benchmark models characterized by structural contrasts and subwavelength heterogeneity at frequencies up to 20Hz. GI-based training consistently outperforms PDE-based PINNs, reducing computational cost by over a factor of ten. In models with localized scattering, the hybrid loss yields the most accurate reconstructions, providing a stable, efficient, and physically grounded alternative.
276. ❌ Relocation of compact sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$ by diffeomorphisms and linear separability of datasets in $\mathbb{R}^n$
作者: Xiao-Song Yang, Xuan Zhou, Qi Zhou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21393v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Relocation of compact sets in an $n$-dimensional manifold by self-diffeomorphism is of its own interest as well as significant potential applications to data classification in data science. This paper presents a theory for relocating a finite number of compact sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$ to be relocated to arbitrary target domains in $\mathbb{R}^n$ by diffeomorphisms of $\mathbb{R}^n$. Furthermore, we prove that for any such collection, there exists a differentiable embedding into $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ such that their images become linearly separable. As applications of the established theory, we show that a finite number of compact datasets in $\mathbb{R}^n$ can be made linearly separable by width-$n$ deep neural networks (DNNs) with Leaky-ReLU, ELU, or SELU activation functions, under a mild condition. In addition, we show that any finite number of mutually disjoint compact datasets in $\mathbb{R}^n$ can be made linearly separable in $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ by a width-$(n+1)$ DNN.
277. ❌ Decoupled Travel Planning with Behavior Forest
作者: Duanyang Yuan, Sihang Zhou, Yanning Hou, Xiaoshu Chen, Haoyuan Chen, Ke Liang, Jiyuan Liu, Chuan Ma, Xinwang Liu, Jian Huang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21354v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Behavior sequences, composed of executable steps, serve as the operational foundation for multi-constraint planning problems such as travel planning. In such tasks, each planning step is not only constrained locally but also influenced by global constraints spanning multiple subtasks, leading to a tightly coupled and complex decision process. Existing travel planning methods typically rely on a single decision space that entangles all subtasks and constraints, failing to distinguish between locally acting constraints within a subtask and global constraints that span multiple subtasks. Consequently, the model is forced to jointly reason over local and global constraints at each decision step, increasing the reasoning burden and reducing planning efficiency. To address this problem, we propose the Behavior Forest method. Specifically, our approach structures the decision-making process into a forest of parallel behavior trees, where each behavior tree is responsible for a subtask. A global coordination mechanism is introduced to orchestrate the interactions among these trees, enabling modular and coherent travel planning. Within this framework, large language models are embedded as decision engines within behavior tree nodes, performing localized reasoning conditioned on task-specific constraints to generate candidate subplans and adapt decisions based on coordination feedback. The behavior trees, in turn, provide an explicit control structure that guides LLM generation. This design decouples complex tasks and constraints into manageable subspaces, enabling task-specific reasoning and reducing the cognitive load of LLM. Experimental results show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art methods by 6.67% on the TravelPlanner and by 11.82% on the ChinaTravel benchmarks, demonstrating its effectiveness in increasing LLM performance for complex multi-constraint travel planning.
278. ❌ Channel-Free Human Activity Recognition via Inductive-Bias-Aware Fusion Design for Heterogeneous IoT Sensor Environments
作者: Tatsuhito Hasegawa 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21369v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Human activity recognition (HAR) in Internet of Things (IoT) environments must cope with heterogeneous sensor settings that vary across datasets, devices, body locations, sensing modalities, and channel compositions. This heterogeneity makes conventional channel-fixed models difficult to reuse across sensing environments because their input representations are tightly coupled to predefined channel structures. To address this problem, we investigate strict channel-free HAR, in which a single shared model performs inference without assuming a fixed number, order, or semantic arrangement of input channels, and without relying on sensor-specific input layers or dataset-specific channel templates. We argue that fusion design is the central issue in this setting. Accordingly, we propose a channel-free HAR framework that combines channel-wise encoding with a shared encoder, metadata-conditioned late fusion via conditional batch normalization, and joint optimization of channel-level and fused predictions through a combination loss. The proposed model processes each channel independently to handle varying channel configurations, while sensor metadata such as body location, modality, and axis help recover structural information that channel-independent processing alone cannot retain. In addition, the joint loss encourages both the discriminability of individual channels and the consistency of the final fused prediction. Experiments on PAMAP2, together with robustness analysis on six HAR datasets, ablation studies, sensitivity analysis, efficiency evaluation, and cross-dataset transfer learning, demonstrate three main findings…
279. ❌ Strategic Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Architecture for Cost-Effective Code Vulnerability Detection
作者: Zhaohui Geoffrey Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21282v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Automated code vulnerability detection is critical for software security, yet existing approaches face a fundamental trade-off between detection accuracy and computational cost. We propose a heterogeneous multi-agent architecture inspired by game-theoretic principles, combining cloud-based LLM experts with a local lightweight verifier. Our “3+1” architecture deploys three cloud-based expert agents (DeepSeek-V3) that analyze code from complementary perspectives - code structure, security patterns, and debugging logic - in parallel, while a local verifier (Qwen3-8B) performs adversarial validation at zero marginal cost. We formalize this design through a two-layer game framework: (1) a cooperative game among experts capturing super-additive value from diverse perspectives, and (2) an adversarial verification game modeling quality assurance incentives. Experiments on 262 real samples from the NIST Juliet Test Suite across 14 CWE types, with balanced vulnerable and benign classes, demonstrate that our approach achieves a 77.2% F1 score with 62.9% precision and 100% recall at $0.002 per sample - outperforming both a single-expert LLM baseline (F1 71.4%) and Cppcheck static analysis (MCC 0). The adversarial verifier significantly improves precision (+10.3 percentage points, p < 1e-6, McNemar’s test) by filtering false positives, while parallel execution achieves a 3.0x speedup. Our work demonstrates that game-theoretic design principles can guide effective heterogeneous multi-agent architectures for cost-sensitive software engineering tasks.
280. ❌ CLT-Optimal Parameter Error Bounds for Linear System Identification
作者: Yichen Zhou, Stephen Tu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21270v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
There has been remarkable progress over the past decade in establishing finite-sample, non-asymptotic bounds on recovering unknown system parameters from observed system behavior. Surprisingly, however, we show that the current state-of-the-art bounds do not accurately capture the statistical complexity of system identification, even in the most fundamental setting of estimating a discrete-time linear dynamical system (LDS) via ordinary least-squares regression (OLS). Specifically, we utilize asymptotic normality to identify classes of problem instances for which current bounds overstate the squared parameter error, in both spectral and Frobenius norm, by a factor of the state-dimension of the system. Informed by this discrepancy, we then sharpen the OLS parameter error bounds via a novel second-order decomposition of the parameter error, where crucially the lower-order term is a matrix-valued martingale that we show correctly captures the CLT scaling. From our analysis we obtain finite-sample bounds for both (i) stable systems and (ii) the many-trajectories setting that match the instance-specific optimal rates up to constant factors in Frobenius norm, and polylogarithmic state-dimension factors in spectral norm.
281. ❌ Calibeating Prediction-Powered Inference
作者: Lars van der Laan, Mark Van Der Laan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21260v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We study semisupervised mean estimation with a small labeled sample, a large unlabeled sample, and a black-box prediction model whose output may be miscalibrated. A standard approach in this setting is augmented inverse-probability weighting (AIPW) [Robins et al., 1994], which protects against prediction-model misspecification but can be inefficient when the prediction score is poorly aligned with the outcome scale. We introduce Calibrated Prediction-Powered Inference, which post-hoc calibrates the prediction score on the labeled sample before using it for semisupervised estimation. This simple step requires no retraining and can improve the original score both as a predictor of the outcome and as a regression adjustment for semisupervised inference. We study both linear and isotonic calibration. For isotonic calibration, we establish first-order optimality guarantees: isotonic post-processing can improve predictive accuracy and estimator efficiency relative to the original score and simpler post-processing rules, while no further post-processing of the fitted isotonic score yields additional first-order gains. For linear calibration, we show first-order equivalence to PPI++. We also clarify the relationship among existing estimators, showing that the original PPI estimator is a special case of AIPW and can be inefficient when the prediction model is accurate, while PPI++ is AIPW with empirical efficiency maximization [Rubin et al., 2008]. In simulations and real-data experiments, our calibrated estimators often outperform PPI and are competitive with, or outperform, AIPW and PPI++. We provide an accompanying Python package, ppi_aipw, at https://larsvanderlaan.github.io/ppi-aipw/.
282. ❌ Improving Performance in Classification Tasks with LCEN and the Weighted Focal Differentiable MCC Loss
作者: Pedro Seber, Richard D. Braatz 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21252v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
The LASSO-Clip-EN (LCEN) algorithm was previously introduced for nonlinear, interpretable feature selection and machine learning. However, its design and use was limited to regression tasks. In this work, we create a modified version of the LCEN algorithm that is suitable for classification tasks and maintains its desirable properties, such as interpretability. This modified LCEN algorithm is evaluated on four widely used binary and multiclass classification datasets. In these experiments, LCEN is compared against 10 other model types and consistently reaches high test-set macro F$_1$ score and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) metrics, higher than that of the majority of investigated models. LCEN models for classification remain sparse, eliminating an average of 56% of all input features in the experiments performed. Furthermore, LCEN-selected features are used to retrain all models using the same data, leading to statistically significant performance improvements in three of the experiments and insignificant differences in the fourth when compared to using all features or other feature selection methods. Simultaneously, the weighted focal differentiable MCC (diffMCC) loss function is evaluated on the same datasets. Models trained with the diffMCC loss function are always the best-performing methods in these experiments, and reach test-set macro F$_1$ scores that are, on average, 4.9% higher and MCCs that are 8.5% higher than those obtained by models trained with the weighted cross-entropy loss. These results highlight the performance of LCEN as a feature selection and machine learning algorithm also for classification tasks, and how the diffMCC loss function can train very accurate models, surpassing the weighted cross-entropy loss in the tasks investigated.
283. ❌ CAP: Controllable Alignment Prompting for Unlearning in LLMs
作者: Zhaokun Wang, Jinyu Guo, Jingwen Pu, Hongli Pu, Meng Yang, Xunlei Chen, Jie Ou, Wenyi Li, Guangchun Luo, Wenhong Tian 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21251v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Large language models (LLMs) trained on unfiltered corpora inherently risk retaining sensitive information, necessitating selective knowledge unlearning for regulatory compliance and ethical safety. However, existing parameter-modifying methods face fundamental limitations: high computational costs, uncontrollable forgetting boundaries, and strict dependency on model weight access. These constraints render them impractical for closed-source models, yet current non-invasive alternatives remain unsystematic and reliant on empirical experience. To address these challenges, we propose the Controllable Alignment Prompting for Unlearning (CAP) framework, an end-to-end prompt-driven unlearning paradigm. CAP decouples unlearning into a learnable prompt optimization process via reinforcement learning, where a prompt generator collaborates with the LLM to suppress target knowledge while preserving general capabilities selectively. This approach enables reversible knowledge restoration through prompt revocation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CAP achieves precise, controllable unlearning without updating model parameters, establishing a dynamic alignment mechanism that overcomes the transferability limitations of prior methods.
284. ❌ Assessing Emulator Design and Training for Modal Aerosol Microphysics Parameterizations in E3SMv2
作者: Shady E. Ahmed, Hui Wan, Saad Qadeer, Panos Stinis, Kezhen Chong, Mohammad Taufiq Hassan Mozumder, Kai Zhang, Ann S. Almgren 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21233v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Toward the goal of using Scientific Machine Learning (SciML) emulators to improve the numerical representation of aerosol processes in global atmospheric models, we explore the emulation of aerosol microphysics processes under cloud-free conditions in the 4-mode Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) within the Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 2 (E3SMv2). To develop an in-depth understanding of the challenges and opportunities in applying SciML to aerosol processes, we begin with a simple feedforward neural network architecture that has been used in earlier studies, but we systematically examine key emulator design choices, including architecture complexity and variable normalization, while closely monitoring training convergence behavior. Our results show that optimization convergence, scaling strategy, and network complexity strongly influence emulation accuracy. When effective scaling is applied and convergence is achieved, the relatively simple architecture, used together with a moderate network size, can reproduce key features of the microphysics-induced aerosol concentration changes with promising accuracy. These findings provide practical clues for the next stages of emulator development; they also provide general insights that are likely applicable to the emulation of other aerosol processes, as well as other atmospheric physics involving multi-scale variability.
285. ❌ Neutron and X-ray Diffraction Reveal the Limits of Long-Range Machine Learning Potentials for Medium-Range Order in Silica Glass
作者: Sai Harshit Balantrapu, Atul C. Thakur, Chris Benmore, Ganesh Sivaraman 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21222v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Glassy silica is a foundational material in optics and electronics, yet accurately predicting its medium-range order (MRO) remains a major challenge for machine-learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs). While local MLIPs reproduce the short-range SiO4 tetrahedral network well, it remains unclear whether locality alone is sufficient to recover the first sharp diffraction peak (FSDP), the principal experimental signature of MRO. Here, we combine neutron and X-ray diffraction measurements with large-scale molecular dynamics driven by two MACE-based models: a short-range (SR) potential and a long-range (LR) extension incorporating reciprocal-space gated attention. The SR model systematically over-structures the network, producing an overly intense FSDP in both the liquid and glassy states. Incorporating long-range interactions improves agreement with experiment for the liquid structure by reducing this excess ordering, but the LR model still fails to recover the experimental amorphous MRO after quenching. Ring-statistics and bond-angle analyses reveal that SR model exhibits an artificially narrow distribution dominated by six-membered rings, while the LR model produces a broader but still biased ring population. Despite preserving the correct tetrahedral geometry, both models show limited variability in Si-O-Si angles, indicating constrained network flexibility. These structural signatures demonstrate that both models retain excessive memory of the parent liquid network, leading to kinetically trapped and nonphysical medium-range configurations during vitrification. These results show that explicit long-range interactions are necessary but not sufficient for predictive modelling of disordered silica and suggest that accurate MRO further requires training data and sampling strategies that adequately represent the liquid-to-glass transition.
286. ❌ The Recurrent Transformer: Greater Effective Depth and Efficient Decoding
作者: Costin-Andrei Oncescu, Depen Morwani, Samy Jelassi, Alexandru Meterez, Mujin Kwun, Sham Kakade 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21215v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Transformers process tokens in parallel but are temporally shallow: at position $t$, each layer attends to key-value pairs computed based on the previous layer, yielding a depth capped by the number of layers. Recurrent models offer unbounded temporal depth but suffer from optimization instability and historically underutilize modern accelerators. We introduce the Recurrent Transformer, a simple architectural change where each layer attends to key-value pairs computed off its own activations, yielding layerwise recurrent memory while preserving standard autoregressive decoding cost. We show that the architecture can emulate both (i) a conventional Transformer and (ii) token-to-token recurrent updates under mild assumptions, while avoiding optimization instability. Naively, prefill/training appears bandwidth-bound with effective arithmetic intensity near $1$ because keys and values are revealed sequentially; we give an exact tiling-based algorithm that preserves the mathematical computation while reducing HBM traffic from $Θ(N^2)$ to $Θ(N\log N)$, increasing effective arithmetic intensity to $Θ(N/\log N)$ for sequence length $N$. On 150M and 300M parameter C4 pretraining, Recurrent Transformers improve cross-entropy over a parameter-matched Transformer baseline and achieve the improvement with fewer layers (fixed parameters), suggesting that recurrence can trade depth for width, thus reducing KV cache memory footprint and inference latency.
287. ❌ The Feedback Hamiltonian is the Score Function: A Diffusion-Model Framework for Quantum Trajectory Reversal
作者: Sagar Dubey, Alan John 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21210v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
In continuously monitored quantum systems, the feedback protocol of García-Pintos, Liu, and Gorshkov reshapes the arrow of time: a Hamiltonian $H_{\mathrm{meas}} = r A / τ$ applied with gain $X$ tilts the distribution of measurement trajectories, with $X < -2$ producing statistically time-reversed outcomes. Why this specific Hamiltonian achieves reversal, and how the mechanism relates to score-based diffusion models in machine learning, has remained unexplained. We compute the functional derivative of the log path probability of the quantum trajectory distribution directly in density-matrix space. Combining Girsanov’s theorem applied to the measurement record, Fréchet differentiation on the Banach space of trace-class operators, and Kähler geometry on the pure-state projective manifold, we prove that $δ\log P_F / δρ= r A / τ= H_{\mathrm{meas}}$. The García-Pintos feedback Hamiltonian is the score function of the quantum trajectory distribution – exactly the object Anderson’s reverse-time diffusion theorem requires for trajectory reversal. The identification extends to multi-qubit systems with independent measurement channels, where the score is a sum of local operators. Two consequences follow. First, the feedback gain $X$ generates a continuous one-parameter family of path measures (for feedback-active Hamiltonians with $[H, A] \neq 0$), with $X = -2$ recovering the backward process in leading-order linearization – a structure absent from classical diffusion, where reversal is binary. Second, the score identification enables machine learning (ML) score estimation methods – denoising score matching, sliced score matching – to replace the analytic formula when its idealizations (unit efficiency, zero delay, Gaussian noise) fail in real experiments.
288. ❌ Refining Covariance Matrix Estimation in Stochastic Gradient Descent Through Bias Reduction
作者: Ziyang Wei, Wanrong Zhu, Jingyang Lyu, Wei Biao Wu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21203v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We study online inference and asymptotic covariance estimation for the stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithm. While classical methods (such as plug-in and batch-means estimators) are available, they either require inaccessible second-order (Hessian) information or suffer from slow convergence. To address these challenges, we propose a novel, fully online de-biased covariance estimator that eliminates the need for second-order derivatives while significantly improving estimation accuracy. Our method employs a bias-reduction technique to achieve a convergence rate of $n^{(α-1)/2} \sqrt{\log n}$, outperforming existing Hessian-free alternatives.
289. ❌ Toward Efficient Membership Inference Attacks against Federated Large Language Models: A Projection Residual Approach
作者: Guilin Deng, Silong Chen, Yuchuan Luo, Yi Liu, Songlei Wang, Zhiping Cai, Lin Liu, Xiaohua Jia, Shaojing Fu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21197v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Federated Large Language Models (FedLLMs) enable multiple parties to collaboratively fine-tune LLMs without sharing raw data, addressing challenges of limited resources and privacy concerns. Despite data localization, shared gradients can still expose sensitive information through membership inference attacks (MIAs). However, FedLLMs’ unique properties, i.e. massive parameter scales, rapid convergence, and sparse, non-orthogonal gradients, render existing MIAs ineffective. To address this gap, we propose ProjRes, the first projection residuals-based passive MIA tailored for FedLLMs. ProjRes leverages hidden embedding vectors as sample representations and analyzes their projection residuals on the gradient subspace to uncover the intrinsic link between gradients and inputs. It requires no shadow models, auxiliary classifiers, or historical updates, ensuring efficiency and robustness. Experiments on four benchmarks and four LLMs show that ProjRes achieves near 100% accuracy, outperforming prior methods by up to 75.75%, and remains effective even under strong differential privacy defenses. Our findings reveal a previously overlooked privacy vulnerability in FedLLMs and call for a re-examination of their security assumptions. Our code and data are available at $\href{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Passive-MIA-5268}{link}$.
290. ❌ Graph Neural Network-Informed Predictive Flows for Faster Ford-Fulkerson and PAC-Learnability
作者: Eleanor Wiesler, Trace Baxley 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21175v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We propose a learning-augmented framework for accelerating max-flow computation and image segmentation by integrating Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) with the Ford-Fulkerson algorithm. Rather than predicting initial flows, our method learns edge importance probabilities to guide augmenting path selection. We introduce a Message Passing GNN (MPGNN) that jointly learns node and edge embeddings through coupled updates, capturing both global structure and local flow dynamics such as residual capacity and bottlenecks. Given an input image, we propose a method to construct a grid-based flow network with source and sink nodes, extract features, and perform a single GNN inference to assign edge probabilities reflecting their likelihood of belonging to high-capacity cuts. These probabilities are stored in a priority queue and used to guide a modified Ford-Fulkerson procedure, prioritizing augmenting paths via an Edmonds-Karp-style search with bottleneck-aware tie-breaking. This avoids repeated inference over residual graphs while leveraging learned structure throughout optimization. We further introduce a bidirectional path construction strategy centered on high-probability edges and provide a theoretical framework relating prediction quality to efficiency via a weighted permutation distance metric. Our method preserves max-flow/min-cut optimality while reducing the number of augmentations in practice. We also outline a hybrid extension combining flow warm-starting with edge-priority prediction, establishing a foundation for learning-guided combinatorial optimization in image segmentation.
291. ❌ A Hybridizable Neural Time Integrator for Stable Autoregressive Forecasting
作者: Brooks Kinch, Xiaozhe Hu, Yilong Huang, Martine Dyring Hansen, Sunniva Meltzer, Nathaniel Donald Hamlin, David Sirajuddin, Eric C. Cyr, Nathaniel Trask 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21101v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
For autoregressive modeling of chaotic dynamical systems over long time horizons, the stability of both training and inference is a major challenge in building scientific foundation models. We present a hybrid technique in which an autoregressive transformer is embedded within a novel shooting-based mixed finite element scheme, exposing topological structure that enables provable stability. For forward problems, we prove preservation of discrete energies, while for training we prove uniform bounds on gradients, provably avoiding the exploding gradient problem. Combined with a vision transformer, this yields latent tokens admitting structure-preserving dynamics. We outperform modern foundation models with a $65\times$ reduction in model parameters and long-horizon forecasting of chaotic systems. A “mini-foundation” model of a fusion component shows that 12 simulations suffice to train a real-time surrogate, achieving a $9{,}000\times$ speedup over particle-in-cell simulation.
292. ❌ Preconditioned DeltaNet: Curvature-aware Sequence Modeling for Linear Recurrences
作者: Neehal Tumma, Noel Loo, Daniela Rus 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21100v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
To address the increasing long-context compute limitations of softmax attention, several subquadratic recurrent operators have been developed. This work includes models such as Mamba-2, DeltaNet, Gated DeltaNet (GDN), and Kimi Delta Attention (KDA). As the space of recurrences grows, a parallel line of work has arisen to taxonomize them. One compelling view is the test-time regression (TTR) framework, which interprets recurrences as performing online least squares updates that learn a linear map from the keys to values. Existing delta-rule recurrences can be seen as first-order approximations to this objective, but notably ignore the curvature of the least-squares loss during optimization. In this work, we address this by introducing preconditioning to these recurrences. Starting from the theory of online least squares, we derive equivalences between linear attention and the delta rule in the exactly preconditioned case. Next, we realize this theory in practice by proposing a diagonal approximation: this enables us to introduce preconditioned variants of DeltaNet, GDN, and KDA alongside efficient chunkwise parallel algorithms for computing them. Empirically, we find that our preconditioned delta-rule recurrences yield consistent performance improvements across synthetic recall benchmarks and language modeling at the 340M and 1B scale.
293. ❌ Learning to Emulate Chaos: Adversarial Optimal Transport Regularization
作者: Gabriel Melo, Leonardo Santiago, Peter Y. Lu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21097v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Chaos arises in many complex dynamical systems, from weather to power grids, but is difficult to accurately model using data-driven emulators, including neural operator architectures. For chaotic systems, the inherent sensitivity to initial conditions makes exact long-term forecasts theoretically infeasible, meaning that traditional squared-error losses often fail when trained on noisy data. Recent work has focused on training emulators to match the statistical properties of chaotic attractors by introducing regularization based on handcrafted local features and summary statistics, as well as learned statistics extracted from a diverse dataset of trajectories. In this work, we propose a family of adversarial optimal transport objectives that jointly learn high-quality summary statistics and a physically consistent emulator. We theoretically analyze and experimentally validate a Sinkhorn divergence formulation (2-Wasserstein) and a WGAN-style dual formulation (1-Wasserstein). Our experiments across a variety of chaotic systems, including systems with high-dimensional chaotic attractors, show that emulators trained with our approach exhibit significantly improved long-term statistical fidelity.
294. ❌ Spectral Embeddings Leak Graph Topology: Theory, Benchmark, and Adaptive Reconstruction
作者: Thinh Nguyen-Cong, Truong-Son Hy, Thang N. Dinh 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21094v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) excel on relational data, but standard benchmarks unrealistically assume the graph is centrally available. In practice, settings such as Federated Graph Learning, distributed systems, and privacy-sensitive applications involve graph data that are localized, fragmented, noisy, and privacy-leaking. We present a unified framework for this setting. We introduce LoGraB (Local Graph Benchmark), which decomposes standard datasets into fragmented benchmarks using three strategies and four controls: neighborhood radius $d$, spectral quality $k$, noise level $σ$, and coverage ratio $p$. LoGraB supports graph reconstruction, localized node classification, and inter-fragment link prediction, with Island Cohesion. We propose AFR (Adaptive Fidelity-driven Reconstruction), a method for noisy spectral fragments. AFR scores patch quality via a fidelity measure combining a gap-to-truncation stability ratio and structural entropy, then assembles fragments using RANSAC-Procrustes alignment, adaptive stitching, and Bundle Adjustment. Rather than forcing a single global graph, AFR recovers large faithful islands. We prove heat-kernel edge recovery under a separation condition, Davis–Kahan perturbation stability, and bounded alignment error. We establish a Spectral Leakage Proposition: under a spectral-gap assumption, polynomial-time Bayesian recovery is feasible once enough eigenvectors are shared, complementing AFR’s deterministic guarantees. Experiments on nine benchmarks show that LoGraB reveals model strengths and weaknesses under fragmentation, AFR achieves the best F1 on 7/9 datasets, and under per-embedding $(ε,δ)$-Gaussian differential privacy, AFR retains 75% of its undefended F1 at $ε=2$. Our anonymous code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/JMLR_submission
295. ❌ TRAVELFRAUDBENCH: A Configurable Evaluation Framework for GNN Fraud Ring Detection in Travel Networks
作者: Bhavana Sajja 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21093v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We introduce TravelFraudBench (TFG), a configurable benchmark for evaluating graph neural networks (GNNs) on fraud ring detection in travel platform graphs. Existing benchmarks–YelpChi, Amazon-Fraud, Elliptic, PaySim–cover single node types or domain-generic patterns with no mechanism to evaluate across structurally distinct fraud ring topologies. TFG simulates three travel-specific ring types–ticketing fraud (star topology with shared device/IP clusters), ghost hotel schemes (reviewer x hotel bipartite cliques), and account takeover rings (loyalty transfer chains)–in a heterogeneous graph with 9 node types and 12 edge types. Ring size, count, fraud rate, scale (500 to 200,000 nodes), and composition are fully configurable. We evaluate six methods–MLP, GraphSAGE, RGCN-proj, HAN, RGCN, and PC-GNN–under a ring-based split where each ring appears entirely in one partition, eliminating transductive label leakage. GraphSAGE achieves AUC=0.992 and RGCN-proj AUC=0.987, outperforming the MLP baseline (AUC=0.938) by 5.5 and 5.0 pp, confirming graph structure adds substantial discriminative power. HAN (AUC=0.935) is a negative result, matching the MLP baseline. On the ring recovery task (>=80% of ring members flagged simultaneously), GraphSAGE achieves 100% recovery across all ring types; MLP recovers only 17-88%. The edge-type ablation shows device and IP co-occurrence are the primary signals: removing uses_device drops AUC by 5.2 pp. TFG is released as an open-source Python package (MIT license) with PyG, DGL, and NetworkX exporters and pre-generated datasets at https://huggingface.co/datasets/bsajja7/travel-fraud-graphs, with Croissant metadata including Responsible AI fields.
296. ❌ climt-paraformer: Stable Emulation of Convective Parameterization using a Temporal Memory-aware Transformer
作者: Shuochen Wang, Nishant Yadav, Joy Merwin Monteiro, Auroop R. Ganguly 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21085v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Accurate representation of moist convective sub-grid-scale processes remains a major challenge in global climate models, as traditional parameterization schemes are both computationally expensive and difficult to scale. Neural network (NN) emulators offer a promising alternative by learning efficient mappings between atmospheric states and convective tendencies while retaining fidelity to the underlying physics. However, most existing NN-based parameterizations are memory-less and rely only on instantaneous inputs, even though convection evolves over time and depends on prior atmospheric states. Recent studies have begun to incorporate convective memory, but they often treat past states as independent features rather than modeling temporal dependencies explicitly. In this work, we develop a temporal memory-aware Transformer emulator for the Emanuel convective parameterization and evaluate it in a single-column climate model (SCM) under both offline and online configurations. The Transformer captures temporal correlations and nonlinear interactions across consecutive atmospheric states. Compared with baseline emulators, including a memory-less multilayer perceptron and a recurrent long short-term memory model, the Transformer achieves lower offline errors. Sensitivity analysis indicates that a memory length of approximately 100 minutes yields the best performance, whereas longer memory degrades performance. We further test the emulator in long-term coupled simulations and show that it remains stable over 10 years. Overall, this study demonstrates the importance of explicit temporal modeling for NN-based parameterizations.
297. ❌ JEPAMatch: Geometric Representation Shaping for Semi-Supervised Learning
作者: Ali Aghababaei-Harandi, Aude Sportisse, Massih-Reza Amini 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21046v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Semi-supervised learning has emerged as a powerful paradigm for leveraging large amounts of unlabeled data to improve the performance of machine learning models when labeled data are scarce. Among existing approaches, methods derived from FixMatch have achieved state-of-the-art results in image classification by combining weak and strong data augmentations with confidence-based pseudo-labeling. Despite their strong empirical performance, these methods typically struggle with two critical bottlenecks: majority classes tend to dominate the learning process, which is amplified by incorrect pseudo-labels, leading to biased models. Furthermore, noisy early pseudo-labels prevent the model from forming clear decision boundaries, requiring prolonged training to learn informative representation. In this paper, we introduce a paradigm shift from conventional logical output threshold base, toward an explicit shaping of geometric representations. Our approach is inspired by the recently proposed Latent-Euclidean Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (LeJEPA), a theoretically grounded framework asserting that meaningful representations should exhibit an isotropic Gaussian structure in latent space. Building on this principle, we propose a new training objective that combines the classical semi-supervised loss used in FlexMatch, an adaptive extension of FixMatch, with a latent-space regularization term derived from LeJEPA. Our proposed approach, encourages well-structured representations while preserving the advantages of pseudo-labeling strategies. Through extensive experiments on CIFAR-100, STL-10 and Tiny-ImageNet, we demonstrate that the proposed method consistently outperforms existing baselines. In addition, our method significantly accelerates the convergence, drastically reducing the overall computational cost compared to standard FixMatch-based pipelines.
298. ❌ ProDock: From multi-target consensus docking into database-backed storage
作者: Tieu-Long Phan, Lai Hoang Son Le, Thanh-An Pham, Nhu-Ngoc Nguyen Song, Tuyet-Minh Phan, Tuyen Ngoc Truong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21828v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Protein–ligand docking is widely used in structure-based discovery, but routine studies often fail at the workflow level rather than at the scoring level. Receptor cleaning, ligand preparation, file conversion, box definition, run organization, and downstream parsing are frequently handled by fragmented scripts, which reduces reproducibility, obscures provenance, and complicates comparative analysis across targets, ligands, and docking settings. We present ProDock, an open-source Python toolkit for reproducible protein–ligand docking and postprocessing. ProDock organizes application-oriented docking into four connected layers: receptor and ligand preprocessing, provenance-aware docking execution, postprocessing of poses and interaction fingerprints, and SQLite-backed storage for later querying. The package supports inputs ranging from PDB identifiers and local receptor files to \texttt{SMILES} strings and prepared ligand directories, and integrates receptor preparation, ligand preparation, reference-ligand-based box generation, campaign serialization, batch docking, pose crawling, score extraction, interaction profiling, and database insertion within a consistent project-local workflow. By representing studies as explicit many-to-many campaigns linking multiple receptors, ligands, and docking backends, ProDock converts fragmented engine-specific outputs into structured analytical results that are easier to compare, reuse, and audit. ProDock is implemented in Python and released under an open-source license at https://github.com/Medicine-Artificial-Intelligence/ProDock. Documentation is available at https://prodock.readthedocs.io/en/latest.
299. ❌ VARIANT: Web Server for Decoding and Analyzing Viral Mutations at Genome and Protein Levels
作者: Rui Wang, Xuhang Dai, Xin Cao, Changchuan Yin, Tamar Schlick, Guo-Wei Wei 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20942v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
A comprehensive analysis of viral mutations is essential for understanding viral evolution, disease epidemiology, diagnosis, drug resistance, etc. However, challenges remain in capturing complex mutation patterns and supporting diverse viral families with varying genome architectures. To address these needs, we present VARIANT, an web server for mutational analysis of RNA viral genomes and associated viral products across both single- and multi-segment virus genomes. The server takes as input a viral reference genome, a reference protein sequence, and/or multiple sequence alignment, and automatically provides full annotation of mutation types, including standard categories such as point mutations (missense, silent, and nonsense), insertions, deletions, or frameshift events in both coding and non-coding regions. In addition, VARIANT detects three biologically significant mutation patterns that are overlooked by conventional software/packages:
row mutations'' (consecutive substitutions within a window of 3 nts),hot mutations’’ (two non-consecutive substitutions within a window of 3 nts), and potential programmed ribosomal frameshifting (PRF) regions. The server currently contains automatic analysis of major viral pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2, HIV-1, Influenza H3N2, Ebola virus, and Chikungunya virus. It also allows users to analyze customized viruses. Users can track VARIANT analysis progress in real time, visualize mutation distributions, and download structured results in ZIP format. VARIANT also incorporates dual graph topology analysis to classify frameshifting element structures from dot-bracket notation input. This feature enables systematic comparison of RNA secondary structure motifs across viral families by mapping structures to a comprehensive library of dual graph topologies. The web server is freely available at https://variant.up.railway.app.
300. ❌ Broad-band High-Energy Resolution Hard X-ray Spectroscopy using Transition Edge Sensors at SPring-8
作者: Shinya Yamada, Yuto Ichinohe, Hideyuki Tatsuno, Ryota Hayakawa, Hirotaka Suda, Takaya Ohashi, Yoshitaka Ishisaki, Tomoya Uruga, Oki Sekizawa, Kiyofumi Nitta, Yoshio Takahashi, Takaaki Itai, Hiroki Suga, Makoto Nagasawa, Masato Tanaka, Minako Kurisu, Tadashi Hashimoto, Douglas Bennett, Ed Denison, William, Doriese, Malcolm Durkin, Joseph Fowler, Galen O’Neil, Kelsey Morgan, Dan Schmidt, Daniel Swetz, Joel Ullom, Leila Vale, Shinji Okada, Takuma Okumura, Toshiyuki Azuma, Toru Tamagawa, Tadaaki Isobe, Satoshi Kohjiro, Hirofumi Noda, Keigo Tanaka, Akimichi Taguchi, Yuki Imai, Kosuke Sato, Tasuku Hayashi, Teruhiko Kashiwabara, Kohei Sakata 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21846v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We have succeeded in operating a transition-edge sensor (TES) spectrometer and evaluating its performance at the SPring-8 synchrotron X-ray light source. The TES spectrometer consists of a 240 pixel National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) TES system, and 220 pixels are operated simultaneously with an energy resolution of $4$
eV at 6keV at a rate of about 1~c/s/pixel. The tolerance for high count rates is evaluated in terms of energy resolution and live time fraction, leading to an empirical compromise of about 2 x 10^3 c/s/all pixels with an energy resolution of 5 eV at 6 keV. By utilizing the TES’s wide-band spectroscopic capability, simultaneous multi-element analysis is demonstrated for a standard sample. We conducted X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) analysis in fluorescence mode using the TES spectrometer. The excellent energy resolution of the TES enabled us to detect weak fluorescence lines from dilute samples and trace elements that have previously been difficult to resolve due to the nearly overlapping emission lines of other dominant elements. The neighboring lines of As K alpha and Pb L alpha2 of the standard sample were clearly resolved and the XANES of Pb L alpha2 was obtained. Moreover, the X-ray spectrum from the small amount of Fe in aerosols was distinguished from the spectrum of a blank target, which helps us to understand the targets and the environment. These results are the first important step for the application of high resolution TES-based spectroscopy at hard X-ray synchrotron facilities.
301. ❌ Molecular dynamics simulations of Nafion thin films at a platinum catalyst surface: Correlating structure with charging behaviour
作者: Dustin Vivod, Binny A. Davis, Tobias Binninger, Michael Eikerling 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21773v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Electrocatalysis is greatly influenced by the local reaction environment, which is governed by the structure of the catalyst, the distribution of the electrolyte, and the local electric field. In catalytic systems comprised of complex molecular species like ionomers, the distribution of electrolyte can vary substantially, resulting in divers local reaction environments. In order to gain atom-scale insight into this micro-environment we construct a model system consisting of a platinum surface, varying levels of water, and a Nafion thin film and conduct molecular dynamics simulations. We employ a construction based on Voronoi tesselation to assemble a dense film of ionomer that fully covers the platinum substrate. An energy analysis reveals that water film configurations with thickness of less then 1.3 nm are stable. Simulations with charged platinum surfaces are analysed in view of electrostatic conditions and differential capacitance of the interface configuration. Trends observed in these properties can be interpreted in view of the crowding of hydronium ions or the Nafion film at the platinum surface. The presented workflow can be easily applied to investigate novel ionomers for use in PEMFCs.
302. ❌ Birth, Death, and Replication at Surfaces: Universal Laws of Autocatalytic Dynamics
作者: Denis S. Grebenkov 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21586v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Autocatalytic processes underlie diverse systems in which replication is triggered at interfaces, including heterogeneous catalysis on solid substrates, enzyme activity at membranes, viral infections, biofilm growth, and spatially structured ecosystems. In a typical scenario, particles move in a bulk medium and interact with surface regions, where they may either disappear or reproduce through branching, splitting or fission. Here, we develop a general theoretical framework to understand such surface-mediated autocatalytic processes. We show that the interplay between loss and replication at surfaces gives rise to rich population dynamics. For this purpose, we derive a renewal-type nonlinear integral equation for the generating function of the population size, providing access to its full probability distribution and statistical moments. We further establish an equivalent description in terms of a Fokker-Planck equation with nonlinear Robin-type boundary conditions that encode surface reactions. Our results identify distinct dynamical regimes and universal scaling laws, and provide a unified framework to predict when surface activity promotes extinction or explosive growth. These findings offer quantitative insight into catalytic efficiency, metabolic regulation, and population persistence in spatially heterogeneous environments.
303. ❌ How to quantify long-time rotational motion in molecular systems
作者: Romain Simon, Hadrien Bobas, François Villemot, Jean-Louis Barrat, Ludovic Berthier 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21512v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We show that all existing methods quantifying rotational motion in molecular fluids eventually fail in systems undergoing complex rotational motion characterised by slow, heterogeneous, or intermittent dynamics. This impacts in particular the study of rotational dynamics in molecular supercooled liquids near their glass transition, as well as discussions of the decoupling between rotational and translational motion and violations of the Debye-Stokes-Einstein relation. We present a brief overview of existing methods and explain why none of them can accurately capture the evolution of rotational dynamics from a diffusive fluid to an arrested solid, thus resolving inconsistent literature results. We then introduce an empirical method that efficiently solves all issues. We benchmark our method devising a family of continuous time random walk models for rotational dynamics. Our method correctly quantifies the statistics of free and caged rotational motion, as well as non-Gaussian and non-Fickian rotational dynamics, and should allow a better characterisation of dynamic heterogeneity in the rotational motion of supercooled molecular fluids.
304. ❌ Data-Driven Thermal and Mechanical Modeling of Defective Covalent Organic Frameworks
作者: Aleksander Szewczyk, Leonardo Medrano Sandonas, David Bodesheim, Bohayra Mortazavi, Gianaurelio Cuniberti 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21494v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) are versatile two-dimensional (2D) materials for flexible electronics, catalysis, and sensing, owing to their tunable architectures and large surface areas. However, like most materials, COFs inevitably contain synthesis-induced defects, which-similar to graphene-can strongly influence intrinsic properties, such as thermal transport and mechanical strength. To address this challenge, we have assessed the performance of a set of machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIP) capable of efficient large-scale simulations of COFs with quantum accuracy. In doing so, QCOF models (Quantum COF) were developed by tuning the state-of-the-art MACE architecture on an extensive dataset of non-equilibrium COF conformations generated from high-fidelity density functional theory calculations. The accuracy, computational efficiency, memory footprint, and transferability to unseen chemical environments of these models were benchmarked against general-purpose MACE models and their fine-tuned variants. Our results show that an invariant QCOF model with a small descriptor dimensionality and cutoff outperforms all other models in most validation tasks, including scalability to large systems, force prediction in defective COFs, and phonon dispersion calculations. The best-performing QCOF model was then used to run large-scale simulations of thermal conductivity for defective CTF-1 and COF-LZU1 systems via non-equilibrium MD, revealing a more pronounced sensitivity of CTF-1 to structural defects. Stress-strain curves were also investigated, showing that the mechanical response remains nearly invariant at low defect densities, while asymmetric behaviour emerges at large strains. This work thus provides a foundation for the design of robust quantum-informed MLIP for large-scale property simulations of defective of extended network materials.
305. ❌ Revisiting the luminescence properties of Pr3+: YAG within the framework of an extended approach of Judd-Ofelt theory
作者: Maxence Lepers, G. Hovhannesyan, Y. Guyot, R. Moncorgé, M. Velazquez 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-23 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21374v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We show in this article the improvements which can be obtained in the description of the luminescence properties of Pr3+ doped materials by using an extension of the Judd-Ofelt theory in order to relax some strong selection rules and approximations of the standard formalism and to better account for the influence of the 4f5d excited electronic configuration. The demonstration is made by re-examining the case of Pr3+:YAG, a well known luminescent and laser crystal with a very low energy 4f5d absorption band. Our extension thus provides a better agreement between calculated and measured absorption intensities, especially for the hypersensitive 3 H4 $\rightarrow$ 3 P2 transition. A comparison is made with the results obtained in the case of Pr3+:ZBLAN, a laser fluoride glass with much higher 4f5d absorption levels. Our investigation also gives the opportunity, in the case of Pr3+:YAG, to provide more complete and more reliable absorption and emission data than reported in the past literature and to exploit these data to better address the question of laser operation at various emission wavelengths. It is thus demonstrated that laser operation should be possible with improved laser performance at 488 nm, 616 nm and 744 nm, as it was already achieved in the past, but also at 566 nm and 931 nm by using appropriate laser cavities and laser mirrors.
306. ❌ Multidimensional semiclassical single- and double-quantum spectroscopy of anharmonic molecular polaritons
作者: Michael Reitz, Harsh Bhakta, Wei Xiong, Joel Yuen-Zhou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21158v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We present a general and efficient approach to compute phase-resolved multidimensional spectra of anharmonic molecular polaritons, based on a semiclassical evolution of the molecular Hamiltonian and cavity field in the large-$\mathcal{N}$ limit of many molecules coupled to a confined photonic mode. By systematically expanding the response in both amplitudes and phases of the input fields, our method enables a transparent and computationally simple construction of phase-cycled two-dimensional single- and double-quantum polariton spectra from the underlying nonlinear signal components. Here, phase cycling acts as an analogue of phase matching with oblique pulses, allowing for the isolation of the contributing nonlinear pathways in Liouville space. We specialize to vibrational polaritons and benchmark the method through direct comparison with experimentally measured single-quantum spectra, providing an explanation for the longstanding puzzle of the polariton bleach effect observed at short waiting times. Further, we show how the imprint of various types of anharmonicities on the double-excitation manifold can be directly probed and analyzed through double-quantum coherence spectroscopy. Taken together, our results establish a practical and powerful framework for the modeling and interpretation of nonlinear spectroscopic experiments on strongly coupled light-matter platforms and for guiding the design of cavity-enhanced molecular platforms.
307. ❌ Accelerating point defect simulations using data-driven and machine learning approaches
作者: Arun Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, Menglin Huang, Prashun Gorai, Seán R. Kavanagh 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21069v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Point defects in solid-state materials are now routinely simulated using large supercell structures, requiring efficient quantum mechanical solutions. Data-driven and machine learning (ML) models trained on computational data can enable rapid defect property predictions and high-throughput screening. In this article, we provide an overview of prominent efforts to accelerate defect simulations using these approaches. We begin by discussing the motivations for data-driven techniques in defect modeling, and describe efforts over the past decade to use descriptor-based models for rapid screening of defect properties – most notably in oxides. In particular, we discuss case studies where surrogate models and interatomic potentials were trained on density functional theory (DFT) data, leading to predictions with quantum-mechanical accuracies at a fraction of the cost. In addition to geometry relaxation and formation energy predictions, these interatomic potentials are capable of predicting phonon modes and vibrational free energies to yield defect energetics at finite temperatures – representing a key frontier for computational defect research. We finish with a discussion on how to connect these approaches and their outputs with experimental data, and provide an outlook on this burgeoning sub-field.
308. ❌ Chaos Gated Tunneling Drives Molecular Reactivity in Astrophysical Environments
作者: Saptarshi G. Dastider, K. Prashant, P. Shruti, C. Sudheesh, Jobin Cyriac 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21005v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
Accurate modeling of ion-molecule reaction networks is essential for understanding the chemical evolution of planetary ionospheres, particularly for giant planets where proton-transfer chains drive atmospheric composition. However, predicting reaction rates in these ultracold environments remains a challenge due to the non-trivial interplay between vibrational dynamics and quantum tunneling. In this work we present a chaos-diagnostic framework that integrates multireference electronic structure theory, Adiabatic Gauge Potentials (AGP), and Random Matrix Theory (RMT) to characterize the microscopic dynamics of proton transport. Using the formation of H+3 and the proton-bound cluster H+5 as representative model systems relevant to Jovian atmospheres, we demonstrate that the transition state acts as a dynamical bottleneck where quantum chaos is notably suppressed, effectively enhancing tunneling probabilities. We introduce a fragility index based on the AGP slope to quantify how specific vibrational modes reintroduce chaos and suppress reactivity. This diagnostic approach offers a generalizable, data-driven metric for identifying vibrationally gated pathways in complex astrochemical networks, providing a theoretical basis for refining kinetic models of planetary and interstellar plasmas
309. ❌ Engineering molecular potential energy surfaces using magnetic cavity quantum electrodynamics
作者: Lukas Weber, Leonardo dos Anjos Cunha, Johannes Flick, Shiwei Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20969v1
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We investigate the effects of coupling a quantum-magnetic cavity field to molecules. Our high-precision auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo calculations capture the effect of the cavity field in the presence of electron correlations, and their interplay and competition. In H$_2$, we find that a strong enough cavity coupling makes the original bound ground state metastable, along with inverting the singlet-triplet gap. In ring molecules (e.g., H$_n$), the magnetic cavity coupling stabilizes symmetric geometries. As a consequence, open-shell rings such as H$_4$, H$_8$, or C$_4$H$_4$, which would undergo Jahn-Teller distortions outside of the cavity, obtain exotic spin or ring-current polarized, antiaromatic ground states. These effects are enhanced by increasing the molecule concentration inside the cavity. Our results suggest cavity quantum electrodynamics beyond the long-wavelength approximation as a promising avenue for cavity-altered chemistry.
310. ❌ Different perspectives on the exact factorization for photon-electron-nuclear systems
作者: Claudia Magi, Peter Schuerger, David Lauvergnat, Federica Agostini 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-04-22 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20538v2
评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌
评分详情
| 关键词 | 权重 | 相关度 | 得分 |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “World Models” AND “General World Models” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
| “AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics” | 1.0 | 0.0/10 | 0.0 |
评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}
!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR
评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)
We employ the exact factorization of a multi-component wavefunction to analyze the dynamics of interacting photons, electrons and nuclei. We consider physical situations emerging in the regime of strong coupling between light excitations and molecular - electronic excitations, giving rise to the so-called molecular polaritons. Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics techniques, routinely used in the field of chemical physics, have been often employed to simulate photophysical and photochemical phenomena in the presence of molecular polaritons. In this work, we analyze the foundations of these techniques in the eye of the exact factorization and we assess their performance on illustrative model studies.
Token 消耗统计
- 总计: 1,356,264 tokens(输入 1,356,264 / 输出 0)