评分理由: 论文主要关注改进Transformer中的旋转位置编码（RoPE），提出SIREN-RoPE，将旋转空间变为可学习的、信号条件化的空间，用于序列建模。虽然涉及Transformer架构，但未提及大语言模型、深度学习技术原理创新或科学应用，与所有关键词均无直接关联。

每个Transformer架构都投入了巨大的容量来在语义嵌入空间中学习丰富的表征——然而，旋转位置编码（RoPE）所作用的旋转流形却一直被视为一个固定的、手工设计的结构，其中仅填充了离散的序数索引。我们认为，这一旋转空间是注意力机制中一个很大程度上被忽视的表达性第二维度，对其的系统性探索可能为基于注意力的架构打开一扇新的大门。与复数的类比具有启发性：正如引入虚轴——与实轴正交且独立——解锁了曾被认为不可能的代数新结构，将旋转流形视为一个可学习的、受信号调节的空间，则为注意力开辟了一个正交的自由度。在此框架下，令牌嵌入编码了表征的语义（实）分量——即令牌的含义——而旋转则编码了其动态（虚）分量——即令牌如何随时间、位置和上下文与每一个其他令牌相关联。

我们提出了SIREN-RoPE，作为这一思想的具体实例化，它通过双分支正弦表示网络（SIREN）将异质信号——连续时间戳、周期性时间模式以及分类元数据——填充到旋转维度中。作为概念验证，我们使用来自某大型社交网络的生产级新闻推送数据集，并以生成式推荐器作为排序模型进行评估，结果表明激活这一隐藏维度能够在校准和排序目标上带来一致的改进，且计算开销可忽略不计。我们邀请学界将旋转空间视为一个尚未开发的轴，而非一个已解决的编码细节，其丰富的结构可能对注意力的影响，如同虚单位对代数的影响一样深远。

Every Transformer architecture dedicates enormous capacity to learning rich representations in semantic embedding space – yet the rotation manifold acted upon by Rotary Positional Embeddings (RoPE) has been treated as a fixed, hand-crafted structure, populated only by discrete ordinal indices. We argue that this rotation space is a largely overlooked second dimension of expressivity in the attention mechanism, one whose systematic exploration may open a new door for attention-based architectures. The analogy to complex numbers is instructive: just as introducing the imaginary axis – orthogonal to and independent of the real line – unlocked new algebraic structure once believed impossible, treating the rotation manifold as a learnable, signal-conditioned space opens an orthogonal degree of freedom in attention. In this framing, the token embedding encodes the semantic (real) component of a representation – what a token means – while the rotation encodes its dynamic (imaginary) component – how it relates to every other token across time, position, and context. We introduce SIREN-RoPE, a concrete instantiation of this idea, which populates the rotation dimension with heterogeneous signals – continuous timestamps, cyclical temporal patterns, and categorical metadata – via a dual-branch Sinusoidal Representation Network (SIREN). As a proof of concept, we evaluate on a production-scale news feed dataset from a major social network using a generative recommender as the ranking model, demonstrating that activating this hidden dimension yields consistent improvements across calibration and ranking objectives with negligible computational overhead. We invite the community to view the rotation space not as a solved positional-encoding detail, but as an untapped axis whose rich structure may prove as consequential for attention as the imaginary unit proved for algebra.

评分理由: 论文主要研究利用大语言模型（LLM）生成个性化编程示例，核心涉及LLM在教育领域的应用，但未涉及其他关键词如MoE、SLM、Scaling Laws等。因此仅对’Large Language Models’评8分，其余关键词均为0分。

自适应编程实践通常依赖于固定的示例代码和练习题库，这些库需要大量的编写工作，且可能无法很好地对应学生在编写代码时产生的逻辑错误和部分解决方案。因此，学生可能会收到未能直接针对其正在努力理解的概念的学习内容，而教师则要么投入额外精力扩充内容库，要么接受较为粗粒度的个性化水平。我们提出了一种基于知识组件（knowledge-component, KC）引导的教育内容生成方法，该方法利用从学生代码中提取的基于模式的KC。给定问题描述和学生提交的代码，我们的流程通过基于抽象语法树（AST）的分析从学生代码中提取重复出现的结构化的KC模式，并利用这些模式来条件化生成模型。在本研究中，我们将该方法应用于示例代码生成，并通过专家评估比较了基线输出与KC条件化输出。结果表明，KC条件化生成改善了主题聚焦度以及与学习者潜在逻辑错误的相关性，这为基于KC的生成模型引导能够支持大规模个性化学习提供了证据。

Adaptive programming practice often relies on fixed libraries of worked examples and practice problems, which require substantial authoring effort and may not correspond well to the logical errors and partial solutions students produce while writing code. As a result, students may receive learning content that does not directly address the concepts they are working to understand, while instructors must either invest additional effort in expanding content libraries or accept a coarse level of personalization. We present an approach for knowledge-component (KC) guided educational content generation using pattern-based KCs extracted from student code. Given a problem statement and student submissions, our pipeline extracts recurring structural KC patterns from students’ code through AST-based analysis and uses them to condition a generative model. In this study, we apply this approach to worked example generation, and compare baseline and KC-conditioned outputs through expert evaluation. Results suggest that KC-conditioned generation improves topical focus and relevance to learners’ underlying logical errors, providing evidence that KC-based steering of generative models can support personalized learning at scale.

评分理由: 论文核心研究Chain-of-Thought (CoT) 推理，特别是从多个不同思考者提供的CoT监督中学习。关键词’Chain of Thought OR CoT Reasoning OR Multi-step Reasoning’高度相关（15分），因为CoT是论文核心。‘System 2 Thinking OR Slow Thinking OR In-depth Reasoning’也相关（10分），因为CoT属于系统2思维。‘Large Language Models OR LLMs OR Foundation Models’相关（10分），因为CoT通常应用于LLMs，且论文背景涉及LLM推理。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws等均不相关。

我们研究了基于多思考者提供的思维链（Chain-of-Thought, CoT）监督的学习问题。这些思考者均给出正确但可能系统性地不同的解决方案，例如不同思考者撰写的数学题逐步解答，或解决同一问题的不同程序的逐步执行轨迹。
我们考虑那些在单一思考者的CoT监督下计算上易于学习，但在仅有最终结果监督（即无CoT）时难以学习的类别（Joshi et al. 2025）。我们证明，在密码学假设下，在被动数据收集场景中，由两个或少数不同思考者提供的CoT监督可能导致学习困难。
另一方面，我们提出了一种通用的计算高效主动学习算法，该算法对每个思考者仅需少量CoT数据（该数据量完全独立于目标精度$\varepsilon$），所需思考者数量适中（按$\log \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\log \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon}$增长），并依赖充足的被动最终结果数据（按$\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\cdot poly\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}$增长）。

We study learning with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) supervision from multiple thinkers, all of whom provide correct but possibly systematically different solutions, e.g., step-by-step solutions to math problems written by different thinkers, or step-by-step execution traces of different programs solving the same problem. We consider classes that are computationally easy to learn using CoT supervision from a single thinker, but hard to learn with only end-result supervision, i.e., without CoT (Joshi et al. 2025). We establish that, under cryptographic assumptions, learning can be hard from CoT supervision provided by two or a few different thinkers, in passive data-collection settings. On the other hand, we provide a generic computationally efficient active learning algorithm that learns with a small amount of CoT data per thinker that is completely independent of the target accuracy $\varepsilon$, a moderate number of thinkers that scales as $\log \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\log \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon}$, and sufficient passive end-result data that scales as $\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\cdot poly\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}$.

评分理由: 论文提出了一种超参数发散集成训练方法（HDET），用于自动探索学习率等超参数，主要关注训练效率和泛化性能，不涉及大模型、深度学习技术原理创新或科学应用。所有关键词均不相关，因此所有评分为0。

采用数据并行随机梯度下降训练大型神经网络时，会分配N个GPU副本以计算近乎相同的梯度更新——这种做法使得训练过程中丰富的学习率配置空间完全未被探索。我们提出超参数发散集成训练（Hyperparameter-Divergent Ensemble Training, HDET）方法，该方法以可忽略的通信开销重新利用这些副本进行同步学习率探索。HDET采用交替运行阶段：发散阶段中，各副本在结构化对称分布的学习率下独立训练；收敛阶段中，每经过T步通过AllReduce操作对所有副本的参数进行平均。基于该集成框架，我们进一步提出自动学习率（auto-LR）控制器，将各副本间的相对训练损失作为性能信号，通过基于动量的无梯度元更新机制，将共享基础调度策略向更高性能配置方向调整。该组合方法可生成自适应学习率调度策略，在不增加超参数搜索或训练预算的前提下，同时提升优化质量与泛化性能。
关键的是，该框架可推广至学习率之外的场景：任何不改变模型架构的标量超参数——例如丢弃率、注意力缩放温度或权重衰减系数——均可通过相同的发散/收敛协议在各副本间进行探索，副本间的损失差异可作为引导搜索方向的零阶超梯度。HDET作为PyTorch中OneCycleLR调度器的即插即用替代方案实现，无需修改模型架构、优化器或数据流水线。

Training large neural networks with data-parallel stochastic gradient descent allocates N GPU replicas to compute effectively identical updates – a practice that leaves the rich space of learning rate configurations entirely unexplored during training. We propose Hyperparameter-Divergent Ensemble Training (HDET), a method that repurposes these replicas for simultaneous learning rate exploration at negligible communication overhead. HDET operates in alternating phases: a fan-out stage in which replicas train independently under a structured, symmetric spread of learning rates, and a converge stage in which parameters are averaged across all replicas via AllReduce every T steps. Building on this ensemble substrate, we further propose an automatic learning rate (auto-LR) controller that treats the relative training loss across replicas as a performance signal, updating the shared base schedule toward higher-performing configurations via a momentum-based gradient-free meta-update. The combined method produces a self-adapting learning rate schedule that improves both optimization quality and generalization without additional hyperparameter sweeps or training budget. Crucially, the framework generalizes beyond learning rate: any scalar hyperparameter that does not alter model architecture – such as dropout rate, attention scale temperature, or weight-decay coefficient – can be explored across replicas using the same fan-out/converge protocol, with inter-replica loss differences serving as zero-order hypergradients that guide the search direction. HDET is implemented as a drop-in replacement for PyTorch’s OneCycleLR scheduler, requiring no changes to model architecture, optimizer, or data pipeline.

评分理由: 论文研究基于LLM的代码生成中任务描述缺陷的检测，核心涉及Large Language Models（高度相关，10分），使用小模型进行参数高效微调（PEFT/LoRA，10分），小模型本身属于Small Language Models（8分）。其他关键词如MoE、Scaling Laws、Pre-training等与论文内容无关，得0分。

大型语言模型被广泛用于代码生成，然而它们依赖于一个隐含假设：任务描述足够详细且结构良好。但在实际应用中，用户可能提供有缺陷的描述，这会对代码正确性产生显著影响。为解决这一问题，我们开发了SpecValidator——一种基于小型模型并通过参数高效微调得到的轻量级分类器，用于自动检测任务描述缺陷。我们在三个结构复杂度和任务描述各异的基准测试上，针对三种缺陷类型（词汇模糊性、欠规范性和语法格式问题）对SpecValidator进行了评估。结果表明，SpecValidator的缺陷检测F1分数为0.804，MCC为0.745，显著优于GPT-5-mini（F1=0.469，MCC=0.281）和Claude Sonnet 4（F1=0.518，MCC=0.359）。或许更重要的是，我们的分析表明，SpecValidator能够泛化到未见问题，并检测出所用基准测试原始（真实）描述中未知的欠规范性缺陷。我们的结果还显示，大型语言模型在任务描述缺陷上的鲁棒性主要取决于缺陷类型和任务描述的特征，而非模型能力，其中欠规范性缺陷最为严重。我们进一步发现，具有更丰富上下文基础的基准测试（如LiveCodeBench）表现出显著更强的韧性，这凸显了结构化任务描述对于基于大型语言模型的可靠代码生成的重要性。

Large language models are widely used for code generation, yet they rely on an implicit assumption that the task descriptions are sufficiently detailed and well-formed. However, in practice, users may provide defective descriptions, which can have a strong effect on code correctness. To address this issue, we develop SpecValidator, a lightweight classifier based on a small model that has been parameter-efficiently finetuned, to automatically detect task description defects. We evaluate SpecValidator on three types of defects, Lexical Vagueness, Under-Specification and Syntax-Formatting on 3 benchmarks with task descriptions of varying structure and complexity. Our results show that SpecValidator achieves defect detection of F1 = 0.804 and MCC = 0.745, significantly outperforming GPT-5-mini (F1 = 0.469 and MCC = 0.281) and Claude Sonnet 4 (F1 = 0.518 and MCC = 0.359). Perhaps more importantly, our analysis indicates that SpecValidator can generalize to unseen issues and detect unknown Under-Specification defects in the original (real) descriptions of the benchmarks used. Our results also show that the robustness of LLMs in task description defects depends primarily on the type of defect and the characteristics of the task description, rather than the capacity of the model, with Under-Specification defects being the most severe. We further found that benchmarks with richer contextual grounding, such as LiveCodeBench, exhibit substantially greater resilience, highlighting the importance of structured task descriptions for reliable LLM-based code generation.

评分理由: 论文主要研究临床AI评估的案例特定评分标准方法，使用LLM生成评分标准并与临床医生评分进行一致性比较。核心涉及LLM在临床评估中的应用，但未涉及其他关键词如MoE、SLM、Scaling Laws、预训练、微调、对齐、RLHF、PEFT、RAG、长上下文、KV缓存、CoT、系统2思维、MCTS、自我纠正、智能体、工具使用、多智能体、量化、推测解码、幻觉缓解、可解释性、世界模型、模型合并、上下文学习等。与’AI for Science’有一定关联，因为临床AI属于科学应用领域，但更偏向临床评估而非生物信息学或化学信息学。因此，仅LLM和AI for Science两个关键词有相关度。

目的：临床AI文档系统需要评估方法，这些方法需具备临床有效性、经济可行性，并能敏锐捕捉迭代变化。要求对每个评分实例进行专家评审的方法，对于安全、迭代的部署而言过于缓慢且成本高昂。我们提出一种针对具体病例、由临床医生制定的评分标准方法，用于临床AI评估，并探究大语言模型生成的评分标准能否接近临床医生的一致性。

材料与方法：20名临床医生为823个临床病例（736个真实病例，87个合成病例）制定了1,646条评分标准，涵盖初级保健、精神病学、肿瘤学和行为健康领域。每条评分标准均通过验证，确认基于LLM的评分代理能始终如一地为临床医生偏好的输出给出高于被拒绝输出的分数。我们评估了嵌入电子健康记录的AI代理的七个版本，这些代理面向临床医生，覆盖所有病例。

结果：临床医生制定的评分标准能有效区分高质量与低质量输出（中位分数差距：82.9%），且评分稳定性高（中位范围：0.00%）。中位分数从84%提升至95%。在后续实验中，临床医生与LLM的排名一致性（tau值：0.42-0.46）达到或超过了临床医生之间的一致性（tau值：0.38-0.43），这归因于天花板压缩效应和LLM评分标准的改进。

讨论：这种趋同性支持将LLM评分标准与临床医生制定的评分标准相结合。LLM评分标准的成本约为前者的千分之一，能够实现显著更大的评估覆盖范围，而持续的临床医生参与则使评估立足于专家判断。天花板压缩效应对未来的评分者间一致性研究构成了方法论挑战。

结论：针对具体病例的评分标准为临床AI评估提供了一条路径，既保留了专家判断，又将自动化成本降低了三个数量级。临床医生制定的评分标准确立了基线，LLM评分标准则在此基础上得到验证。

Objective. Clinical AI documentation systems require evaluation methodologies that are clinically valid, economically viable, and sensitive to iterative changes. Methods requiring expert review per scoring instance are too slow and expensive for safe, iterative deployment. We present a case-specific, clinician-authored rubric methodology for clinical AI evaluation and examine whether LLM-generated rubrics can approximate clinician agreement. Materials and Methods. Twenty clinicians authored 1,646 rubrics for 823 clinical cases (736 real-world, 87 synthetic) across primary care, psychiatry, oncology, and behavioral health. Each rubric was validated by confirming that an LLM-based scoring agent consistently scored clinician-preferred outputs higher than rejected ones. Seven versions of an EHR-embedded AI agent for clinicians were evaluated across all cases. Results. Clinician-authored rubrics discriminated effectively between high- and low-quality outputs (median score gap: 82.9%) with high scoring stability (median range: 0.00%). Median scores improved from 84% to 95%. In later experiments, clinician-LLM ranking agreement (tau: 0.42-0.46) matched or exceeded clinician-clinician agreement (tau: 0.38-0.43), attributable to both ceiling compression and LLM rubric improvement. Discussion. This convergence supports incorporating LLM rubrics alongside clinician-authored ones. At roughly 1,000 times lower cost, LLM rubrics enable substantially greater evaluation coverage, while continued clinical authorship grounds evaluation in expert judgment. Ceiling compression poses a methodological challenge for future inter-rater agreement studies. Conclusion. Case-specific rubrics offer a path for clinical AI evaluation that preserves expert judgment while enabling automation at three orders lower cost. Clinician-authored rubrics establish the baseline against which LLM rubrics are validated.

评分理由: 论文聚焦于大语言模型（LLMs）在医疗诊断中的可信赖部署，研究良性输入变化对模型行为的影响，提出Green Shielding框架和HCM-Dx基准。与’Large Language Models’高度相关（10分），因为核心是LLMs；与’Hallucination Mitigation’相关（8分），因为涉及模型输出的可靠性和安全性；与’AI for Science’相关（10分），因为应用于医学诊断；与’LLM Agents’部分相关（5分），因为提及agentic AI系统。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、预训练等均未涉及，评分为0。

大规模语言模型（LLMs）的部署日益广泛，但其输出对用户提问方式中常规、非对抗性的变化高度敏感，现有红队测试工作尚未充分解决这一差距。我们提出“绿色屏蔽”（Green Shielding）这一以用户为中心的议程，通过刻画良性输入变化如何改变模型行为，构建基于证据的部署指南。我们通过CUE标准将该议程付诸实践：包含真实语境（Context）的基准测试、反映真实效用（Utility）的参考标准与指标，以及体现模型行为诱发（Elicitation）中现实变化的扰动。在PCS框架指导下，我们与执业医师合作，通过医疗诊断领域实现了绿色屏蔽：构建了HealthCareMagic-Diagnosis（HCM-Dx）基准测试——包含患者撰写的问诊查询、结构化参考诊断集以及用于评估鉴别诊断列表的临床指标。我们还研究了捕捉常规输入变化的扰动机制，并证明提示层面的因素会沿临床有意义的维度改变模型行为。在多个前沿LLM中，这些变化呈现出类似帕累托（Pareto）的权衡关系。特别地，中性化（neutralization）处理——在保留临床内容的同时移除常见用户层面因素——能提升合理性并生成更简洁、更接近临床医生的鉴别诊断，但会降低对高度可能及安全关键病症的覆盖度。这些结果共同表明，交互选择可系统性地改变模型输出中与任务相关的属性，并为高风险领域的更安全部署提供面向用户的指导。尽管本文以医疗诊断为实例，该议程可自然延伸至其他决策支持场景及自主AI系统。

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed, yet their outputs can be highly sensitive to routine, non-adversarial variation in how users phrase queries, a gap not well addressed by existing red-teaming efforts. We propose Green Shielding, a user-centric agenda for building evidence-backed deployment guidance by characterizing how benign input variation shifts model behavior. We operationalize this agenda through the CUE criteria: benchmarks with authentic Context, reference standards and metrics that capture true Utility, and perturbations that reflect realistic variations in the Elicitation of model behavior. Guided by the PCS framework and developed with practicing physicians, we instantiate Green Shielding in medical diagnosis through HealthCareMagic-Diagnosis (HCM-Dx), a benchmark of patient-authored queries, together with structured reference diagnosis sets and clinically grounded metrics for evaluating differential diagnosis lists. We also study perturbation regimes that capture routine input variation and show that prompt-level factors shift model behavior along clinically meaningful dimensions. Across multiple frontier LLMs, these shifts trace out Pareto-like tradeoffs. In particular, neutralization, which removes common user-level factors while preserving clinical content, increases plausibility and yields more concise, clinician-like differentials, but reduces coverage of highly likely and safety-critical conditions. Together, these results show that interaction choices can systematically shift task-relevant properties of model outputs and support user-facing guidance for safer deployment in high-stakes domains. Although instantiated here in medical diagnosis, the agenda extends naturally to other decision-support settings and agentic AI systems.

评分理由: 论文研究LLM智能体在Minecraft中完成科学发现到应用的闭环，核心涉及LLM Agents和Tool Use，与LLM Agents高度相关（10分），与Tool Use相关（8分，因为智能体需要使用工具构建电路），其他关键词如CoT、Self-Correction等虽可能隐含但未明确提及，故评0分。

发现因果规律并将其应用于构建功能性系统——即“发现到应用”循环——是通用智能的显著特征，然而，由于科学发现与现实世界工程之间存在巨大的复杂性鸿沟，评估这一能力一直受到阻碍。我们提出了SciCrafter，一个基于Minecraft的基准测试，通过参数化的红石电路任务来实现这一循环。智能体必须按照指定模式（例如同时点亮或按时间序列点亮）点燃灯；缩放目标参数会显著增加构建复杂性和所需知识，从而迫使智能体进行真正的发现，而非依赖记忆中的解决方案。我们在通用代码智能体框架下评估了包括GPT-5.2、Gemini-3-Pro和Claude-Opus-4.5在内的前沿模型，发现所有模型的成功率均停滞在约26%。为了诊断这些失败，我们将该循环分解为四种能力——知识缺口识别、实验发现、知识整合和知识应用——并设计了有针对性的干预措施，其边际贡献作为相应缺口的代理指标。我们的分析表明，尽管通用知识应用能力仍然是所有模型中最大的缺口，但对于前沿模型而言，知识缺口识别开始成为主要障碍——这表明瓶颈正从“正确解决问题”转向“为当前AI提出正确的问题”。我们发布SciCrafter作为诊断探针，用于未来研究能够驾驭完整“发现到应用”循环的AI系统。

Discovering causal regularities and applying them to build functional systems–the discovery-to-application loop–is a hallmark of general intelligence, yet evaluating this capacity has been hindered by the vast complexity gap between scientific discovery and real-world engineering. We introduce SciCrafter, a Minecraft-based benchmark that operationalizes this loop through parameterized redstone circuit tasks. Agents must ignite lamps in specified patterns (e.g., simultaneously or in timed sequences); scaling target parameters substantially increases construction complexity and required knowledge, forcing genuine discovery rather than reliance on memorized solutions. Evaluating frontier models including GPT-5.2, Gemini-3-Pro, and Claude-Opus-4.5 under a general-purpose code agent scaffold, we find that all plateau at approximately 26% success rate. To diagnose these failures, we decompose the loop into four capacities–knowledge gap identification, experimental discovery, knowledge consolidation, and knowledge application–and design targeted interventions whose marginal contributions serve as proxies for corresponding gaps. Our analysis reveals that although the general knowledge application capability still remains as the biggest gap across all models, for frontier models the knowledge gap identification starts to become a major hurdle–indicating the bottleneck is shifting from solving problems right to raising the right problems for current AI. We release SciCrafter as a diagnostic probe for future research on AI systems that navigate the full discovery-to-application loop.

评分理由: 论文聚焦于自主AI代理的运行时治理，提出信息可行性原则和Agent Viability Framework，并实现RiskGate系统。核心关键词’LLM Agents’高度相关（10分），因为论文明确讨论自主AI代理的治理；‘Tool Use’有一定关联（5分），因为代理可能涉及工具使用，但论文未深入；其他关键词如大模型、微调、推理等均未涉及，评分为0。

自主AI智能体即使保持完全授权，也可能因行为漂移、对手适应以及决策模式变化（无需任何代码修改）而变得不安全。我们提出信息可行性原则：对智能体的治理可归结为估计未观测风险的边界 $\hat{B}(x) = U(x) + SB(x) + RG(x)$，并仅在其能力 $S(x)$ 以安全裕度超过 $\hat{B}(x)$ 时才允许执行动作。基于Aubin可行性理论的智能体可行性框架确立了三个性质——监控（P1）、预测（P2）与单调约束（P3）——它们对已记录的失效模式而言各自必要且共同充分。RiskGate 通过专用统计估计器（KL散度、分段对比整体 $z$ 检验、序列模式匹配）、故障安全单调流水线以及形式化为Aubin调控图实例（以终止开关作为最后手段）的闭环自动驾驶仪（Autopilot）来实例化该框架；标量可行性指数 $VI(t) \in [-1,+1]$ 结合一阶 $t^*$ 预测，将治理从被动响应转变为主动预测。本文的贡献包括理论框架、参考实现以及针对已发布智能体失效分类学的分析覆盖；定量实证评估被界定为后续工作。

Autonomous AI agents can remain fully authorized and still become unsafe as behavior drifts, adversaries adapt, and decision patterns shift without any code change. We propose the \textbf{Informational Viability Principle}: governing an agent reduces to estimating a bound on unobserved risk $\hat{B}(x) = U(x) + SB(x) + RG(x)$ and allowing an action only when its capacity $S(x)$ exceeds $\hat{B}(x)$ by a safety margin. The \textbf{Agent Viability Framework}, grounded in Aubin’s viability theory, establishes three properties – monitoring (P1), anticipation (P2), and monotonic restriction (P3) – as individually necessary and collectively sufficient for documented failure modes. \textbf{RiskGate} instantiates the framework with dedicated statistical estimators (KL divergence, segment-vs-rest $z$-tests, sequential pattern matching), a fail-secure monotonic pipeline, and a closed-loop Autopilot formalised as an instance of Aubin’s regulation map with kill-switch-as-last-resort; a scalar Viability Index $VI(t) \in [-1,+1]$ with first-order $t^*$ prediction transforms governance from reactive to predictive. Contributions are the theoretical framework, the reference implementation, and analytical coverage against published agent-failure taxonomies; quantitative empirical evaluation is scoped as follow-up work.

评分理由: 论文研究LLM在金融代理任务中的谄媚行为（sycophancy），核心涉及LLM和LLM Agents，因此这两个关键词得高分。其他关键词如Mixture of Experts、Scaling Laws等与论文内容无关，得0分。

鉴于当前大型语言模型（LLMs）在金融系统中的广泛应用，评估此类系统的安全性与鲁棒性变得至关重要。LLMs在通用领域场景中频繁表现出的一种失效模式是谄媚（sycophancy），即模型优先选择与用户所表达观点保持一致，而非追求正确性，从而导致准确性与可信度下降。本研究聚焦于评估LLMs在智能体金融任务中展现的谄媚现象。我们的发现包含三个方面：首先，面对用户对参考答案的反驳或矛盾时，模型性能仅出现低至中等程度的下降，这与先前研究中模型在金融智能体场景中展现的谄媚特征有所不同；其次，我们引入了一套通过用户偏好信息（与参考答案相矛盾）来测试谄媚行为的任务集，发现大多数模型在此类输入下均表现失败；最后，我们对不同恢复模式（如基于预训练LLM的输入过滤）进行了基准测试。

Given the increased use of LLMs in financial systems today, it becomes important to evaluate the safety and robustness of such systems. One failure mode that LLMs frequently display in general domain settings is that of sycophancy. That is, models prioritize agreement with expressed user beliefs over correctness, leading to decreased accuracy and trust. In this work, we focus on evaluating sycophancy that LLMs display in agentic financial tasks. Our findings are three-fold: first, we find the models show only low to modest drops in performance in the face of user rebuttals or contradictions to the reference answer, which distinguishes sycophancy that models display in financial agentic settings from findings in prior work. Second, we introduce a suite of tasks to test for sycophancy by user preference information that contradicts the reference answer and find that most models fail in the presence of such inputs. Lastly, we benchmark different modes of recovery such as input filtering with a pretrained LLM.

评分理由: 论文核心研究大模型（LLMs）在工业DSL代码生成中的应用，涉及指令微调（Instruction Tuning）、参数高效微调（PEFT/QLoRA）和上下文学习（In-context Learning），因此这些关键词得分高。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws等与论文内容无关，得0分。

大型语言模型（LLMs）在通用代码生成方面表现强劲，但其在企业领域特定语言（DSL）中的适用性仍未被充分探索，尤其是针对从单条自然语言（NL）指令生成跨多个文件和文件夹结构的仓库级变更。我们报告了宝马（BMW）的一项工业案例研究，该研究通过适配面向代码的LLMs，为一种基于Xtext的DSL（该DSL驱动下游Java/TypeScript代码生成）生成并修改项目根目录下的DSL制品。我们开发了一套端到端流水线，涵盖数据集构建、多文件任务表示、模型适配与评估。我们将DSL文件夹层次结构编码为结构化的、保留路径的JSON格式，从而支持仓库级别的单次响应生成，并学习跨文件依赖关系。我们在三种配置下评估了两个经过指令微调的代码LLMs（Qwen2.5-Coder和DeepSeek-Coder，7B参数规模）：基线提示、单样本上下文学习（one-shot in-context learning）以及参数高效微调（QLoRA）。除标准相似性指标外，我们还引入了任务特定度量，用于评估编辑正确性与仓库结构保真度。微调在所有模型和指标上带来了最显著的提升，在保留测试集上针对多文件输出实现了高精确匹配准确率、显著的编辑相似性以及1.00的结构保真度。同时，单样本上下文学习相比基线提示提供了较小但一致的改进。我们进一步通过专家开发者调查以及基于现有代码生成器的执行检查，验证了其实用价值。

Large language models (LLMs) perform strongly on general-purpose code generation, yet their applicability to enterprise domain-specific languages (DSLs) remains underexplored, especially for repository-scale change generation spanning multiple files and folder structures from a single natural-language (NL) instruction. We report an industrial case study at BMW that adapts code-oriented LLMs to generate and modify project-root DSL artifacts for an Xtext-based DSL that drives downstream Java/TypeScript code generation. We develop an end-to-end pipeline for dataset construction, multi-file task representation, model adaptation, and evaluation. We encode DSL folder hierarchies as structured, path-preserving JSON, allowing single-response generation at repository scale and learning cross-file dependencies. We evaluate two instruction-tuned code LLMs (Qwen2.5-Coder and DeepSeek-Coder, 7B) under three configurations: baseline prompting, one-shot in-context learning, and parameter-efficient fine-tuning (QLoRA). Beyond standard similarity metrics, we introduce task-specific measures that assess edit correctness and repository structural fidelity. Fine-tuning yields the most significant gains across models and metrics, achieving high exact-match accuracy, substantial edit similarity, and structural fidelity of 1.00 on our held-out set for multi-file outputs. At the same time, one-shot in-context learning provides smaller but consistent improvements over baseline prompting. We further validate practical utility via an expert developer survey and an execution-based check using the existing code generator.

评分理由: 论文研究土耳其语中证据形态与信息来源可信度的关系，并评估LLM在源敏感推理上的表现。核心涉及LLM（10分），因为评估了10个LLM；涉及Chain of Thought（5分）和System 2 Thinking（5分），因为推理任务需要多步推理；涉及Hallucination Mitigation（5分）和Mechanistic Interpretability（5分），因为探讨了LLM的可靠性和可解释性；涉及In-context Learning（5分），因为使用了不同提示范式。其他关键词如MoE、SLM等完全无关。

本文探讨信息来源可信度是否塑造土耳其语的示证形态，以及大语言模型（LLMs）能否追踪这一敏感性。我们研究了受控完形填空语境中-DI与-mIs之间的过去时域对立，其中信息来源被明确设定为外部来源，仅对其感知可信度进行操作（高信任度 vs. 低信任度）。在一项人类产出实验中，土耳其语母语者表现出稳健的信任效应：高信任度语境相对更多地使用-DI，而低信任度语境相对更多地使用-mIs，且该模式在敏感性分析中保持稳定。随后，我们在三种提示范式（开放式填空、显性过去时填空、强制二选一A/B选择）下评估了10个大语言模型。大语言模型的行为高度依赖于模型和提示方式：部分模型表现出微弱或局部的信任一致性偏移，但整体效果不稳定，常出现反转，且往往被输出合规性问题及强烈的基线后缀偏好所掩盖。这些结果为基于信任/承诺的土耳其语示证性解释提供了新证据，并揭示了人类与LLMs在来源敏感性示证推理方面的显著差距。

This paper investigates whether source trustworthiness shapes Turkish evidential morphology and whether large language models (LLMs) track this sensitivity. We study the past-domain contrast between -DI and -mIs in controlled cloze contexts where the information source is overtly external, while only its perceived reliability is manipulated (High-Trust vs. Low-Trust). In a human production experiment, native speakers of Turkish show a robust trust effect: High-Trust contexts yield relatively more -DI, whereas Low-Trust contexts yield relatively more -mIs, with the pattern remaining stable across sensitivity analyses. We then evaluate 10 LLMs in three prompting paradigms (open gap-fill, explicit past-tense gap-fill, and forced-choice A/B selection). LLM behavior is highly model- and prompt-dependent: some models show weak or local trust-consistent shifts, but effects are generally unstable, often reversed, and frequently overshadowed by output-compliance problems and strong base-rate suffix preferences. The results provide new evidence for a trust-/commitment-based account of Turkish evidentiality and reveal a clear human-LLM gap in source-sensitive evidential reasoning.

评分理由: 论文核心关注大模型长上下文推理中的KV缓存压缩问题，提出层依赖的剪枝方法DepthKV。与’Large Language Models’高度相关（10分），因为研究LLM推理效率；与’KV Cache Compression’高度相关（10分），因为直接针对KV缓存压缩；与’Context Window Extension’相关（8分），因为长上下文推理涉及上下文窗口扩展。其他关键词如MoE、SLM、Scaling Laws等均不涉及，评分为0。

长上下文推理是大语言模型（LLMs）的一项关键能力，支撑着长文档理解、摘要生成和代码生成等应用。然而，高效的自回归推理依赖于键值（KV）缓存，其内存占用随序列长度线性增长，从而成为主要的内存瓶颈。为缓解这一开销，KV缓存剪枝方法在推理过程中丢弃注意力分数较低的缓存令牌。现有方法大多在各层间采用统一的剪枝比例，隐含地假设所有层对整体模型性能的贡献相同。我们证明这一假设并非最优，因为不同层对剪枝的敏感度存在显著差异。我们提出DepthKV，一种基于层依赖的剪枝框架，该框架根据各层的敏感度在层间分配固定的全局KV预算，而非采用统一分配方式。在多个模型和任务上，DepthKV在相同全局剪枝比例下始终优于统一剪枝，表明通过层依赖分配能够更有效地利用KV缓存预算。

Long-context reasoning is a critical capability of large language models (LLMs), enabling applications such as long-document understanding, summarization, and code generation. However, efficient autoregressive inference relies on the key-value (KV) cache, whose memory footprint grows linearly with sequence length, leading to a major memory bottleneck. To mitigate this overhead, KV cache pruning methods discard cached tokens with low attention scores during inference. Most existing methods apply a uniform pruning ratio across layers, implicitly assuming that all layers contribute equally to overall model performance. We show that this assumption is suboptimal, as layers differ significantly in their sensitivity to pruning. We propose DepthKV, a layer-dependent pruning framework that allocates a fixed global KV budget across layers based on their sensitivity, rather than using a uniform allocation. Across multiple models and tasks, DepthKV consistently outperforms uniform pruning at the same global pruning ratio, demonstrating more effective utilization of the KV cache budget through layer-dependent allocation.

评分理由: 论文聚焦于自主AI代理的安全架构，核心涉及LLM Agents（15分，核心主题）、Tool Use（10分，代理调用工具）、Multi-agent Systems（5分，提及多代理协调）。其他关键词如LLMs（10分，基础模型）相关，但非核心创新点。其余关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws等均不相关。

自主AI智能体将大型语言模型扩展为完整的运行时系统，使其能够加载技能、摄取外部内容、维护记忆、规划多步骤行动并调用特权工具。在此类系统中，安全故障很少局限于单一接口；相反，它们可能跨越初始化、输入处理、记忆、决策与执行等阶段传播，往往仅在有害后果实际作用于环境时才显现。本文提出AgentWard——一种面向生命周期、纵深防御的架构，系统性地组织跨越这五个阶段的防护。AgentWard将各阶段特有的异构控制与跨层协调相结合，使得威胁能在其传播路径上被拦截，同时保护关键资产。我们详细阐述了五个协同防护层的设计原理与架构，并在OpenClaw上实现了一个插件原生原型以证明其实用可行性。这一视角为在自主AI智能体中构建运行时安全控制、管理信任传播以及强制执行隔离提供了具体蓝图。我们的代码已开源，地址为https://github.com/FIND-Lab/AgentWard。

Autonomous AI agents extend large language models into full runtime systems that load skills, ingest external content, maintain memory, plan multi-step actions, and invoke privileged tools. In such systems, security failures rarely remain confined to a single interface; instead, they can propagate across initialization, input processing, memory, decision-making, and execution, often becoming apparent only when harmful effects materialize in the environment. This paper presents AgentWard, a lifecycle-oriented, defense-in-depth architecture that systematically organizes protection across these five stages. AgentWard integrates stage-specific, heterogeneous controls with cross-layer coordination, enabling threats to be intercepted along their propagation paths while safeguarding critical assets. We detail the design rationale and architecture of five coordinated protection layers, and implement a plugin-native prototype on OpenClaw to demonstrate practical feasibility. This perspective provides a concrete blueprint for structuring runtime security controls, managing trust propagation, and enforcing execution containment in autonomous AI agents. Our code is available at https://github.com/FIND-Lab/AgentWard .

评分理由: 该论文提出DySIB方法，从高维时间序列数据中学习低维表示，应用于物理摆实验视频。方法基于信息瓶颈原理，最大化过去与未来观测窗口之间的预测互信息，同时惩罚表示复杂度。论文完全不涉及大语言模型、深度学习技术原理创新或AI在科学领域的应用（如生物医药、化学信息学等），而是聚焦于动力系统状态变量推断，属于传统机器学习与物理交叉领域。因此所有关键词相关度均为0。

从高维观测数据中识别系统的动力学状态变量是物理科学中的一个核心问题。其挑战在于状态变量无法直接观测，必须无监督地从原始高维数据中推断得出。本文提出DySIB（动态对称信息瓶颈，Dynamical Symmetric Information Bottleneck）作为一种学习时间序列数据低维表示的方法，该方法通过最大化过去与未来观测窗口之间的预测互信息，同时惩罚表示复杂度来实现。该目标函数完全在潜在空间中运作，无需对观测数据进行重构。我们将DySIB应用于一个物理摆的实验视频数据集，该系统的底层状态空间是已知的。该方法通过数据自洽地设定学习架构的超参数，恢复出一个与摆的相空间维度、拓扑结构及几何形状相匹配的二维表示，且学习到的坐标与规范的角度和角速度平滑对齐。这些结果在一个特征明确的实验系统上证明，潜在空间中的预测信息可用于直接从高维数据中恢复可解释的动力学坐标。

Identifying the dynamical state variables of a system from high-dimensional observations is a central problem across physical sciences. The challenge is that the state variables are not directly observable and must be inferred from raw high-dimensional data without supervision. Here we introduce DySIB (Dynamical Symmetric Information Bottleneck) as a method to learn low-dimensional representations of time-series data by maximizing predictive mutual information between past and future observation windows while penalizing representation complexity. This objective operates entirely in latent space and avoids reconstruction of the observations. We apply DySIB to an experimental video dataset of a physical pendulum, where the underlying state space is known. The method, with hyperparameters of the learning architecture set self-consistently by the data, recovers a two-dimensional representation that matches the dimensionality, topology, and geometry of the pendulum phase space, with the learned coordinates aligning smoothly with the canonical angle and angular velocity. These results demonstrate, on a well-characterized experimental system, that predictive information in latent space can be used to recover interpretable dynamical coordinates directly from high-dimensional data.

评分理由: 论文提出K-MetBench基准，用于评估气象领域的大语言模型（LLMs）在专家推理、地域知识和多模态方面的能力。核心相关关键词包括：Large Language Models（10分，核心研究对象）、Chain of Thought（8分，涉及专家推理逻辑）、LLM Agents（8分，目标为构建可靠的气象AI助手）、Hallucination Mitigation（8分，发现模型在正确预测时仍存在幻觉）、AI for Science（10分，气象科学应用）。其他关键词如MoE、SLM等与论文内容无关，评分为0。

针对韩国气象预报员的实用型（多模态）大语言模型助手的开发，因缺乏基于权威来源的多维度、专家级评估框架而受阻。为解决这一问题，我们提出K-MetBench——一个基于国家资格考试的诊断性基准。该基准从四个维度揭示了关键缺陷：图表专家视觉推理、基于专家验证依据的逻辑有效性、韩国特定地理文化理解，以及细粒度领域分析。我们对55个模型的评估显示，在解读专业图表时存在显著的模态差距，以及在逻辑推理上的差距——模型即便做出正确预测，其逻辑仍存在幻觉。关键在于，韩国模型在本地语境中显著优于规模更大的全球模型，这表明仅靠参数规模扩展无法解决文化依赖性问题。K-MetBench为开发可靠且具备文化意识的专家级人工智能体提供了路线图。数据集可在https://huggingface.co/datasets/soyeonbot/K-MetBench获取。

The development of practical (multimodal) large language model assistants for Korean weather forecasters is hindered by the absence of a multidimensional, expert-level evaluation framework grounded in authoritative sources. To address this, we introduce K-MetBench, a diagnostic benchmark grounded in national qualification exams. It exposes critical gaps across four dimensions: expert visual reasoning of charts, logical validity via expert-verified rationales, Korean-specific geo-cultural comprehension, and fine-grained domain analysis. Our evaluation of 55 models reveals a profound modality gap in interpreting specialized diagrams and a reasoning gap where models hallucinate logic despite correct predictions. Crucially, Korean models outperform significantly larger global models in local contexts, demonstrating that parameter scaling alone cannot resolve cultural dependencies. K-MetBench serves as a roadmap for developing reliable, culturally aware expert AI agents. The dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/soyeonbot/K-MetBench .

评分理由: 论文核心关注端侧小语言模型（SLMs）在移动应用中的集成挑战，与’Small Language Models’高度相关（15分）。其他关键词如LLMs、MoE、Scaling Laws等均未涉及，故评0分。

设备端小型语言模型（SLMs）有望为移动用户提供完全离线、保护隐私的人工智能体验（无需依赖云端，数据不离开设备）。但这一承诺在实践中能否实现？本文通过一项纵向从业者案例研究，记录了将SLMs（Gemma 4 E2B，26亿参数；Qwen3 0.6B，6亿参数）集成到Palabrita（一款生产环境中的Android猜词游戏）时所面临的工程挑战。在为期5天的开发冲刺中，系统经历了204次提交（约90次直接与AI相关），实现了根本性转变：从最初由大语言模型（LLM）生成完整结构化谜题（单词、类别、难度及五条提示，以JSON格式输出）的雄心勃勃设计，演变为一种务实架构——由精选词表提供单词，LLM仅生成三条简短提示，并在失败时采用确定性回退方案。我们识别出设备端SLM集成特有的五类故障：输出格式违规、约束违反、上下文质量下降、延迟不兼容以及模型选择不稳定。针对每类故障，我们记录了观察到的症状、根本原因，以及有效缓解这些问题的提示工程与架构策略，包括多层防御性解析、带失败反馈的上下文重试、会话轮换、渐进式提示加固以及系统性责任削减。我们的研究结果表明，设备端SLM在生产级移动应用中具有可行性，但前提是开发者必须接受一个基本约束：最可靠的设备端LLM功能，恰恰是LLM承担最少工作的功能。我们将经验提炼为八项可操作的设计启发式原则，供将SLMs集成到移动应用中的从业者参考。

On-device Small Language Models (SLMs) promise fully offline, private AI experiences for mobile users (no cloud dependency, no data leaving the device). But is this promise achievable in practice? This paper presents a longitudinal practitioner case study documenting the engineering challenges of integrating SLMs (Gemma 4 E2B, 2.6B parameters; Qwen3 0.6B, 600M parameters) into Palabrita, a production Android word-guessing game. Over a 5-day development sprint comprising 204 commits (~90 directly AI-related), the system underwent a radical transformation: from an ambitious design where the LLM generated complete structured puzzles (word, category, difficulty, and five hints as JSON) to a pragmatic architecture where curated word lists provide the words and the LLM generates only three short hints, with a deterministic fallback if it fails. We identify five categories of failures specific to on-device SLM integration: output format violations, constraint violations, context quality degradation, latency incompatibility, and model selection instability. For each failure category, we document the observed symptoms, root causes, and the prompt engineering and architectural strategies that effectively mitigated them, including multi-layer defensive parsing, contextual retry with failure feedback, session rotation, progressive prompt hardening, and systematic responsibility reduction. Our findings demonstrate that on-device SLMs are viable for production mobile applications, but only when the developer accepts a fundamental constraint: the most reliable on-device LLM feature is one where the LLM does the least. We distill our experience into eight actionable design heuristics for practitioners integrating SLMs into mobile apps.

评分理由: 论文主要研究持续学习中的灾难性遗忘问题，提出了一种受大脑皮层启发的参数隔离方法Functional Task Networks (FTN)，该方法类似于混合专家模型（Mixture of Experts），使用高维自组织二进制掩码来隔离任务相关神经元。因此，与’Mixture of Experts’高度相关（10分），与其他关键词如LLMs、预训练、微调等无关（0分）。

块序列持续学习要求单一模型既能保护先前解决方案免受灾难性遗忘，又能在推理阶段无需任务标签的情况下高效推断当前输入对应的先前解决方案。我们提出功能任务网络（Functional Task Networks, FTN），这是一种受哺乳动物新皮层结构和动力学基序启发的参数隔离方法。与混合专家模型类似，该方法在大量小型但深度网络构成的群体上使用高维自组织二进制掩码，其灵感来源于锥体神经元的树突模型。该掩码通过三阶段流程生成：（1）对连续掩码进行梯度下降以识别任务相关神经元；（2）平滑核将结果向空间连续性方向偏置；（3）k-胜者全取（k-winner-take-all）在固定容量预算下对所得群体进行二值化处理。与混合专家模型相同，每个神经元均为独立的深度网络，因此不相交的掩码可产生严格不相交的梯度更新，从而为抵抗灾难性遗忘提供结构性保障。该三阶段流程通过单次梯度步骤即可恢复先前训练任务的子网络，在推理阶段实现无监督任务分割。我们在三个持续学习基准上对其进行测试：（1）合成多任务分类/回归生成器；（2）带打乱类别标签的MNIST（纯概念漂移）；（3）置换MNIST（领域漂移）。在所有三个基准上，采用细粒度平滑的FTN（FTN-Slow）几乎实现零遗忘。采用大核且仅进行2次平滑迭代的FTN（FTN-Fast）则在保留部分记忆的同时提升了速度。我们证明，空间组织机制将有效掩码搜索从组合优化中的O(C(H,K))级top-k子集问题，简化为紧凑皮层邻域上近线性扫描的O(H)级复杂度，并通过基于梯度的更新实现并行化。

Block-sequential continual learning demands that a single model both protect prior solutions from catastrophic forgetting and efficiently infer at inference time which prior solution matches the current input without task labels. We present Functional Task Networks (FTN), a parameter-isolation method inspired by structural and dynamical motifs found in the mammalian neocortex. Similar to mixture-of-experts, this method uses a high dimensional, self-organizing binary mask over a large population of small but deep networks, inspired by dendritic models of pyramidal neurons. The mask is produced by a three-stage procedure: (1) gradient descent on a continuous mask identifies task-relevant neurons, (2) a smoothing kernel biases the result toward spatial contiguity, (3) and k-winner-take-all binarizes the resulting group at a fixed capacity budget. Like mixture-of-experts, each neuron is an independent deep network, so disjoint masks give exactly disjoint gradient updates, providing structural guarantees against catastrophic forgetting. This three-stage procedure recovers the sub-network of a previously-trained task in a single gradient step, providing unsupervised task segmentation at inference time. We test it on three continual-learning benchmarks: (1) a synthetic multi-task classification/regression generator, (2) MNIST with shuffled class labels (pure concept shift), and (3) Permuted MNIST (domain shift). On all three, FTN with fine grained smoothing (FTN-Slow) results in nearly zero forgetting. FTN with a large kernel and only 2 iterations of smoothing (FTN-Fast) trades off some retention for increased speed. We show that the spatial organization mechanism reduces the effective mask search from the combinatorial top-k subset problem in O(C(H,K)) to the complexity of a near-linear scan in O(H) over compact cortical neighborhoods, which is parallelized by the gradient-based update.

评分理由: 论文聚焦于图像编辑中的Chain-of-Thought（CoT）推理，提出了Meta-CoT范式，通过两级分解提升理解粒度和泛化能力。与关键词’Chain of Thought’高度相关（12分），因为CoT是核心方法；其他关键词如LLMs、MoE等均不涉及，得0分。

统一多模态理解/生成模型通过将细粒度理解融入其思维链（Chain-of-Thought, CoT）过程，已展现出改进的图像编辑性能。然而，一个关键问题仍未得到充分探索：何种形式的CoT及训练策略能够同时增强理解的粒度与泛化能力？为此，我们提出Meta-CoT范式，该范式对任意单图像编辑操作进行两层分解，并具备两个关键特性：（1）可分解性。我们观察到，任何编辑意图均可表示为三元组——（任务、目标、所需理解能力）。受此启发，Meta-CoT对编辑任务与目标进行双重分解，生成任务特定的CoT，并在所有目标上遍历编辑操作。这种分解增强了模型对编辑操作的理解粒度，并引导其在训练过程中学习三元组的每个元素，从而显著提升编辑能力。（2）可泛化性。在第二层分解中，我们进一步将编辑任务拆解为五个基础元任务。我们发现，在这五个元任务上结合三元组中另外两个元素进行训练，足以实现对多样化、未见编辑任务的强泛化。为进一步使模型的编辑行为与其CoT推理对齐，我们引入了CoT-编辑一致性奖励（CoT-Editing Consistency Reward），该奖励鼓励在编辑过程中更准确、更有效地利用CoT信息。实验表明，我们的方法在21个编辑任务上实现了总体15.8%的提升，并且仅需在少量元任务上训练即可有效泛化至未见编辑任务。我们的代码、基准测试及模型已发布于https://shiyi-zh0408.github.io/projectpages/Meta-CoT/。

Unified multi-modal understanding/generative models have shown improved image editing performance by incorporating fine-grained understanding into their Chain-of-Thought (CoT) process. However, a critical question remains underexplored: what forms of CoT and training strategy can jointly enhance both the understanding granularity and generalization? To address this, we propose Meta-CoT, a paradigm that performs a two-level decomposition of any single-image editing operation with two key properties: (1) Decomposability. We observe that any editing intention can be represented as a triplet - (task, target, required understanding ability). Inspired by this, Meta-CoT decomposes both the editing task and the target, generating task-specific CoT and traversing editing operations on all targets. This decomposition enhances the model’s understanding granularity of editing operations and guides it to learn each element of the triplet during training, substantially improving the editing capability. (2) Generalizability. In the second decomposition level, we further break down editing tasks into five fundamental meta-tasks. We find that training on these five meta-tasks, together with the other two elements of the triplet, is sufficient to achieve strong generalization across diverse, unseen editing tasks. To further align the model’s editing behavior with its CoT reasoning, we introduce the CoT-Editing Consistency Reward, which encourages more accurate and effective utilization of CoT information during editing. Experiments demonstrate that our method achieves an overall 15.8% improvement across 21 editing tasks, and generalizes effectively to unseen editing tasks when trained on only a small set of meta-tasks. Our code, benchmark, and model are released at https://shiyi-zh0408.github.io/projectpages/Meta-CoT/

评分理由: 该论文研究视觉-语言-动作（VLA）策略中的动作生成，提出粗到细的两阶段生成方法CF-VLA，旨在提高效率。论文主要涉及机器人动作生成、扩散模型、推理加速等，但未涉及任何给定的关键词（如大语言模型、混合专家、小语言模型、缩放定律、预训练、微调、对齐、RLHF、PEFT、RAG、长上下文、KV缓存、思维链、系统2思维、MCTS、自我纠正、智能体、工具使用、多智能体、量化、推测解码、幻觉缓解、可解释性、世界模型、模型合并、上下文学习、AI for Science）。因此所有关键词评分为0。

基于流的视觉-语言-动作（VLA）策略在动作生成方面具有强大的表达能力，但其存在一个根本性的效率问题：从无信息的高斯噪声中恢复动作结构需要多步推理，导致在实时约束下效率与质量之间的权衡不佳。我们通过重新思考生成式动作建模中起始点的作用来解决这一问题。我们不缩短采样轨迹，而是提出CF-VLA，一种由粗到精的两阶段公式，将动作生成重构为一个粗初始化步骤（构建一个具有动作感知的起始点），随后进行单步局部精炼以修正残差误差。具体而言，粗阶段学习终点速度上的条件后验分布，将高斯噪声转化为结构化的初始化，而精阶段则从该初始化出发进行固定时间的精炼。为稳定训练，我们引入一种逐步策略，首先学习受控的粗预测器，然后进行联合优化。在CALVIN和LIBERO上的实验表明，我们的方法在低NFE（函数评估次数）场景下建立了强大的效率-性能前沿：它持续优于现有的NFE=2方法，在多项指标上匹配或超越NFE=10的$π_{0.5}$基线，将动作采样延迟降低75.4%，并实现了最佳的平均真实机器人成功率为83.0%，比MIP高出19.5个百分点，比$π_{0.5}$高出4.0个百分点。这些结果表明，结构化的由粗到精生成能够同时实现强性能和高效推理。我们的代码可在https://github.com/EmbodiedAI-RoboTron/CF-VLA获取。

Flow-based vision-language-action (VLA) policies offer strong expressivity for action generation, but suffer from a fundamental inefficiency: multi-step inference is required to recover action structure from uninformative Gaussian noise, leading to a poor efficiency-quality trade-off under real-time constraints. We address this issue by rethinking the role of the starting point in generative action modeling. Instead of shortening the sampling trajectory, we propose CF-VLA, a coarse-to-fine two-stage formulation that restructures action generation into a coarse initialization step that constructs an action-aware starting point, followed by a single-step local refinement that corrects residual errors. Concretely, the coarse stage learns a conditional posterior over endpoint velocity to transform Gaussian noise into a structured initialization, while the fine stage performs a fixed-time refinement from this initialization. To stabilize training, we introduce a stepwise strategy that first learns a controlled coarse predictor and then performs joint optimization. Experiments on CALVIN and LIBERO show that our method establishes a strong efficiency-performance frontier under low-NFE (Number of Function Evaluations) regimes: it consistently outperforms existing NFE=2 methods, matches or surpasses the NFE=10 $π_{0.5}$ baseline on several metrics, reduces action sampling latency by 75.4%, and achieves the best average real-robot success rate of 83.0%, outperforming MIP by 19.5 points and $π_{0.5}$ by 4.0 points. These results suggest that structured, coarse-to-fine generation enables both strong performance and efficient inference. Our code is available at https://github.com/EmbodiedAI-RoboTron/CF-VLA.

评分理由: 论文核心是GraphRAG的可解释性框架XGRAG，与’Retrieval-Augmented Generation’高度相关（10分），与’Large Language Models’直接相关（10分），因为使用LLMs生成答案。‘Mechanistic Interpretability’和’Hallucination Mitigation’也相关（各10分和8分），因为XGRAG旨在提供因果解释并提升可信度。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws等均不涉及。

基于图的检索增强生成（GraphRAG）通过使用知识图谱（KGs）为大语言模型（LLMs）提供结构化、语义连贯的上下文，从而扩展了传统的RAG，生成了更具依据性的答案。然而，GraphRAG的推理过程仍是一个黑箱，限制了我们对特定结构化知识如何影响最终输出的理解。现有的面向RAG系统的可解释性（XAI）方法，专为基于文本的检索设计，仅能通过知识组件之间的关系结构来解释LLM的响应，这在透明性和可信度方面造成了关键缺口。为解决这一问题，我们提出了XGRAG，一个新颖的框架，通过采用基于图的扰动策略，量化单个图组件对模型答案的贡献，从而为GraphRAG系统生成具有因果依据的解释。我们进行了大量实验，将XGRAG与RAG-Ex（标准RAG的XAI基线）进行比较，并评估了其在多种问题类型、叙事结构和LLM下的鲁棒性。结果表明，在NarrativeQA、FairyTaleQA和TriviaQA数据集上，通过衡量生成解释与原始答案之间对齐程度的F1分数评估，XGRAG的解释质量相比基线RAG-Ex提升了14.81%。此外，XGRAG的解释与图中心性度量表现出强相关性，验证了其捕捉图结构的能力。XGRAG通过透明的、基于图的解释增强了RAG系统的可解释性，为可信人工智能提供了一种可扩展且可泛化的方法。

Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) extends traditional RAG by using knowledge graphs (KGs) to give large language models (LLMs) a structured, semantically coherent context, yielding more grounded answers. However, GraphRAG reasoning process remains a black-box, limiting our ability to understand how specific pieces of structured knowledge influence the final output. Existing explainability (XAI) methods for RAG systems, designed for text-based retrieval, are limited to interpreting an LLM response through the relational structures among knowledge components, creating a critical gap in transparency and trustworthiness. To address this, we introduce XGRAG, a novel framework that generates causally grounded explanations for GraphRAG systems by employing graph-based perturbation strategies, to quantify the contribution of individual graph components on the model answer. We conduct extensive experiments comparing XGRAG against RAG-Ex, an XAI baseline for standard RAG, and evaluate its robustness across various question types, narrative structures and LLMs. Our results demonstrate a 14.81% improvement in explanation quality over the baseline RAG-Ex across NarrativeQA, FairyTaleQA, and TriviaQA, evaluated by F1-score measuring alignment between generated explanations and original answers. Furthermore, XGRAG explanations exhibit a strong correlation with graph centrality measures, validating its ability to capture graph structure. XGRAG provides a scalable and generalizable approach towards trustworthy AI through transparent, graph-based explanations that enhance the interpretability of RAG systems.

评分理由: 论文主要研究神经符号系统的语义统一框架，基于范畴论和单子，不涉及大模型、深度学习或AI for Science等关键词。所有关键词评分均为0，因为论文内容与这些关键词完全无关。

ULLER（统一学习与推理语言）提供了一种统一的一阶逻辑（FOL）语法，使其知识库能够直接用于广泛的神经符号系统。原始规范赋予该语法三种两两独立的语义：经典语义、模糊语义和概率语义，每种语义都配有专门的语义规则。我们证明，这些看似不同的语义实际上都是基于单子（monad）的范畴框架的实例，而单子正是函数式编程中用于建模副作用的结构。这使得新语义的模块化添加以及它们之间的系统性转换成为可能。作为示例，我们概述了如何通过将Giry单子扩展到概率空间，在逻辑张量网络（LTN）中为任意（包括无限）域添加广义量化。特别地，我们的方法支持在Python和Haskell中模块化实现ULLER，我们已在GitHub上发布了其初始版本。

ULLER (Unified Language for LEarning and Reasoning) offers a unified first-order logic (FOL) syntax, enabling its knowledge bases to be used directly across a wide range of neurosymbolic systems. The original specification endows this syntax with three pairwise independent semantics: classical, fuzzy, and probabilistic, each accompanied by dedicated semantic rules. We show that these seemingly disparate semantics are all instances of one categorical framework based on monads, the very construct that models side effects in functional programming. This enables the modular addition of new semantics and systematic translations between them. As example, we outline the addition of generalised quantification in Logic Tensor Networks (LTN) to arbitrary (also infinite) domains by extending the Giry monad to probability spaces. In particular, our approach allows a modular implementation of ULLER in Python and Haskell, of which we have published initial versions on GitHub.

评分理由: 论文评估前沿模型作为AI研究代理时是否破坏安全研究，核心涉及LLM Agents（10分）、Alignment（8分，因为涉及价值对齐和拒绝协助）、Tool Use（8分，模型使用工具）。其他关键词如RLHF、CoT等未直接涉及。

我们评估了前沿模型在作为前沿人工智能公司内部的人工智能研究智能体部署时，破坏或拒绝协助安全研究的倾向。我们对四个Claude模型（Mythos Preview、Opus 4.7 Preview、Opus 4.6和Sonnet 4.6）进行了两项互补性评估：一项是无提示破坏评估，测试模型在有机会破坏安全研究时的行为；另一项是破坏延续评估，测试模型在进入先前行为已开始破坏研究的轨迹中时，是否继续实施破坏。我们发现所有模型均未出现无提示破坏的实例，Mythos Preview和Opus 4.7 Preview的拒绝率接近于零，尽管所有模型有时仅部分完成任务。在延续评估中，Mythos Preview在7%的案例中主动继续破坏（相比之下，Opus 4.6为3%，Sonnet 4.6为4%，Opus 4.7 Preview为0%），并且在大多数此类案例中表现出推理与输出之间的不一致，表明存在隐蔽的破坏推理。我们的评估框架基于Petri（一个开源的大语言模型审计工具），并采用自定义脚手架在Claude Code内部运行模型，同时配备用于生成逼真破坏轨迹的迭代流程。我们测量了评估意识以及一种新形式的情境意识，称为“预填充意识”（prefill awareness），即识别先前轨迹内容并非由自身生成的能力。Opus 4.7 Preview表现出显著升高的无提示评估意识，而所有模型的预填充意识均较低。最后，我们讨论了局限性，包括评估意识混淆、场景覆盖范围有限，以及除安全研究破坏之外尚未测试的风险路径。

We evaluate the propensity of frontier models to sabotage or refuse to assist with safety research when deployed as AI research agents within a frontier AI company. We apply two complementary evaluations to four Claude models (Mythos Preview, Opus 4.7 Preview, Opus 4.6, and Sonnet 4.6): an unprompted sabotage evaluation testing model behaviour with opportunities to sabotage safety research, and a sabotage continuation evaluation testing whether models continue to sabotage when placed in trajectories where prior actions have started undermining research. We find no instances of unprompted sabotage across any model, with refusal rates close to zero for Mythos Preview and Opus 4.7 Preview, though all models sometimes only partially completed tasks. In the continuation evaluation, Mythos Preview actively continues sabotage in 7% of cases (versus 3% for Opus 4.6, 4% for Sonnet 4.6, and 0% for Opus 4.7 Preview), and exhibits reasoning-output discrepancy in the majority of these cases, indicating covert sabotage reasoning. Our evaluation framework builds on Petri, an open-source LLM auditing tool, with a custom scaffold running models inside Claude Code, alongside an iterative pipeline for generating realistic sabotage trajectories. We measure both evaluation awareness and a new form of situational awareness termed “prefill awareness”, the capability to recognise that prior trajectory content was not self-generated. Opus 4.7 Preview shows notably elevated unprompted evaluation awareness, while prefill awareness remains low across all models. Finally, we discuss limitations including evaluation awareness confounds, limited scenario coverage, and untested pathways to risk beyond safety research sabotage.

评分理由: 论文核心是使用LLM进行注意力重排序，提出查询相关的头选择方法RouteHead，属于LLM应用，与’Large Language Models’高度相关（15分）。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws等均未涉及，评分为0。

大语言模型（Large Language Models, LLMs）近期被探索作为细粒度零样本重排序器，通过利用注意力信号来估计文档相关性。然而，现有方法要么聚合所有注意力头的信号，要么依赖通过启发式规则静态选择的子集。这种方案可能并非最优，因为信息丰富的注意力头会随查询或领域而变化。此外，由于冗余或冲突的排序信号，简单组合多个注意力头可能导致性能下降。本文提出一种查询相关的注意力头选择方法——RouteHead，用于基于注意力机制的LLM重排序。具体而言，我们学习一个轻量级路由器，能够将每个查询映射到最优的注意力头集合，并通过仅聚合这些头的注意力信号来计算相关性分数。由于查询到最优头的标签不可得，我们首先通过离线搜索构建伪标签。路由器为每个注意力头配备一个可学习的嵌入向量，并利用从冻结LLM的隐藏状态中提取的查询嵌入来表示每个查询，随后在伪标签上使用稀疏正则化器进行训练。在多个基准数据集和多种LLM主干网络上的实验表明，所提方法持续优于强基线方法。

Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently been explored as fine-grained zero-shot re-rankers by leveraging attention signals to estimate document relevance. However, existing methods either aggregate attention signals across all heads or rely on a statically selected subset identified by heuristic rules. This solution can be suboptimal because the informative heads can vary across queries or domains. Moreover, naively combining multiple heads can degrade performance due to redundancy or conflicting ranking signals. In this paper, we propose a query-dependent head selection method, RouteHead, for attention-based re-ranking with LLMs. Specifically, we learn a lightweight router that can map each query to an optimal head set, and relevance scores are computed by aggregating attention signals only from these heads. Since query-to-head optimal labels are unavailable, we first construct pseudo labels via an offline search. The router represents each head with a learnable embedding and represents each query using an embedding extracted from the hidden states of the frozen LLM. Then it is trained on the pseudo labels with a sparsity regularizer. Experiments on diverse benchmarks and multiple LLM backbones show that the proposed method consistently outperforms strong baselines.

评分理由: 论文研究量子支持向量机（QSVM）在医学基础模型嵌入上的分类优势，涉及医学基础模型（MedSigLIP-448, RAD-DINO, ViT-patch32）和AI for Science，因此’Large Language Models OR LLMs OR Foundation Models’和’AI for Science OR Bioinformatics OR Cheminformatics’高度相关（10分）。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws、Pre-training等均未涉及，评分为0。

我们提供了在无噪声模拟条件下，使用量子支持向量机（QSVM）并结合三种医学基础模型（MedSigLIP-448、RAD-DINO、ViT-patch32）的冻结嵌入，对MIMIC-CXR胸部X光片进行二元保险分类时量子核优势的证据。我们提出了一个双层公平比较框架，其中两种分类器均接收相同的PCA-q特征。在第一层（未调优的QSVM与未调优的线性SVM，两者C=1）中，QSVM在所有18个测试配置中均赢得了少数类F1分数（17个在p<0.001水平，1个在p<0.01水平）。经典线性核在每个量子比特数下，在90-100%的随机种子中退化为多数类预测，而QSVM则保持了非平凡的召回率。在q=11（MedSigLIP-448平台中心）时，QSVM无需超参数调优即实现了平均F1=0.343，而经典方法F1=0.050（F1增益=+0.293，p<0.001）。在第二层（未调优的QSVM与C调优的RBF SVM）中，QSVM在所有七个测试配置中获胜（平均增益+0.068，最大+0.112）。特征谱分析显示，在q=11时量子核有效秩达到69.80，远超线性核秩，而经典方法的坍缩现象对C值不敏感。完整的量子比特扫描揭示了不同模型间依赖于架构的浓度起始点。代码：https://github.com/sebasmos/qml-medimage

We provide evidence of quantum kernel advantage under noiseless simulation in binary insurance classification on MIMIC-CXR chest radiographs using quantum support vector machines (QSVM) with frozen embeddings from three medical foundation models (MedSigLIP-448, RAD-DINO, ViT-patch32). We propose a two-tier fair comparison framework in which both classifiers receive identical PCA-q features. At Tier 1 (untuned QSVM vs. untuned linear SVM, C = 1 both sides), QSVM wins minority-class F1 in all 18 tested configurations (17 at p < 0.001, 1 at p < 0.01). The classical linear kernel collapses to majority-class prediction on 90-100% of seeds at every qubit count, while QSVM maintains non-trivial recall. At q = 11 (MedSigLIP-448 plateau center), QSVM achieves mean F1 = 0.343 vs. classical F1 = 0.050 (F1 gain = +0.293, p < 0.001) without hyperparameter tuning. Under Tier 2 (untuned QSVM vs. C-tuned RBF SVM), QSVM wins all seven tested configurations (mean gain +0.068, max +0.112). Eigenspectrum analysis reveals quantum kernel effective rank reaches 69.80 at q = 11, far exceeding linear kernel rank, while classical collapse remains C-invariant. A full qubit sweep reveals architecture-dependent concentration onset across models. Code: https://github.com/sebasmos/qml-medimage

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLM agent的技能检索增强，与’LLM Agents’高度相关（15分），与’Retrieval-Augmented Generation’高度相关（14分），因为提出SRA范式动态检索技能。涉及’Tool Use’（10分）因为技能可视为工具。其他关键词如MoE、SLM、Scaling Laws等均不相关。

随着大型语言模型（LLM）演变为具备自主问题解决能力的智能体，它们越来越依赖外部可复用的技能来处理超出其原生参数能力范围的任务。在现有智能体系统中，整合技能的主流策略是在上下文窗口内显式列举可用技能。然而，这种策略难以扩展：随着技能库的扩大，上下文预算被迅速消耗，且智能体在识别正确技能时的准确性显著下降。为此，本文提出技能检索增强（SRA）这一新范式，智能体可根据需求从大型外部技能库中动态检索、整合并应用相关技能。为使该问题可量化，我们构建了一个大规模技能库，并引入SRA-Bench——首个针对完整SRA流程进行分解评估的基准测试，涵盖技能检索、技能整合及最终任务执行。SRA-Bench包含5,400个高能力需求的测试实例与636个手工构建的黄金技能，这些技能与网络收集的干扰技能混合，形成包含26,262个技能的大规模语料库。大量实验表明，基于检索的技能增强能显著提升智能体性能，验证了该范式的潜力。同时，我们揭示了技能整合中的根本性差距：当前LLM智能体倾向于以相近速率加载技能，无论是否检索到黄金技能，也无论任务是否实际需要外部能力。这表明技能增强的瓶颈不仅在于检索，更在于基础模型判断应加载何种技能以及何时需要外部加载的能力。这些发现将SRA定位为一个独特的研究问题，并为未来智能体系统中能力的可扩展增强奠定了基础。

As large language models (LLMs) evolve into agentic problem solvers, they increasingly rely on external, reusable skills to handle tasks beyond their native parametric capabilities. In existing agent systems, the dominant strategy for incorporating skills is to explicitly enumerate available skills within the context window. However, this strategy fails to scale: as skill corpora expand, context budgets are consumed rapidly, and the agent becomes markedly less accurate in identifying the right skill. To this end, this paper formulates Skill Retrieval Augmentation (SRA), a new paradigm in which agents dynamically retrieve, incorporate, and apply relevant skills from large external skill corpora on demand. To make this problem measurable, we construct a large-scale skill corpus and introduce SRA-Bench, the first benchmark for decomposed evaluation of the full SRA pipeline, covering skill retrieval, skill incorporation, and end-task execution. SRA-Bench contains 5,400 capability-intensive test instances and 636 manually constructed gold skills, which are mixed with web-collected distractor skills to form a large-scale corpus of 26,262 skills. Extensive experiments show that retrieval-based skill augmentation can substantially improve agent performance, validating the promise of the paradigm. At the same time, we uncover a fundamental gap in skill incorporation: current LLM agents tend to load skills at similar rates, regardless of whether a gold skill is retrieved or whether the task actually requires external capabilities. This shows that the bottleneck in skill augmentation lies not only in retrieval but also in the base model’s ability to determine which skill to load and when external loading is actually needed. These findings position SRA as a distinct research problem and establish a foundation for the scalable augmentation of capabilities in future agent systems.

评分理由: 论文评估了视觉语言模型在天文观测推理任务上的表现，涉及多模态数据（光学、射电等）和推理能力。与’Chain of Thought’相关，因为论文分析了模型推理质量，并使用了现象学提示和物理提示来改善推理；与’AI for Science’高度相关，因为论文聚焦于AI在天文学中的应用。其他关键词如大模型、微调、RAG等均未涉及。

视觉-语言模型（Vision-language models, VLMs）正日益被提出作为科学数据解释的通用工具，然而它们在多种模态下的真实天文观测数据上的可靠性尚未得到检验。我们提出了AstroVLBench，这是一个全面的基准测试，包含超过4,100个经专家验证的实例，涵盖光学成像、射电干涉测量、多波段测光、时域光变曲线和光学光谱五大任务。通过评估六种前沿模型，我们发现其性能强烈依赖于模态：尽管有一个模型（Gemini 3 Pro）在各项任务中表现出最稳定的一致能力，但各任务的具体优势各不相同，且所有模型均显著逊色于领域专用方法。机制消融实验揭示，性能不仅取决于将注意力引导至显著的视觉特征，还取决于将这些特征锚定于物理知识。描述“看什么”的现象学提示（Phenomenological prompts）通过增强模型聚焦能力提高了准确率，但解释“为什么这些特征重要”的物理提示（Physical prompts）整体上表现更优，并产生了更均衡的分类结果，减少了类别特定偏差。与此一致的是，将底层的一维测量数据直接以数值表格而非渲染图的形式呈现，可带来高达13个百分点的提升。推理质量分析进一步表明，在没有明确物理锚定的情况下，模型可能从现象学上看似合理的线索中得出正确预测，同时提供物理上不精确的论证，这证实了仅凭准确率不足以实现值得信赖的科学部署。这些发现为观测天文学中的VLMs提供了首个系统性的多模态基准，并识别了当前模型失效的具体表征、锚定和推理瓶颈。

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly proposed as general-purpose tools for scientific data interpretation, yet their reliability on real astronomical observations across diverse modalities remains untested. We present AstroVLBench, a comprehensive benchmark comprising over 4,100 expert-verified instances across five tasks spanning optical imaging, radio interferometry, multi-wavelength photometry, time-domain light curves, and optical spectroscopy. Evaluating six frontier models, we find that performance is strongly modality-dependent: while one model (Gemini 3 Pro) emerges as the most consistently capable across tasks, task-specific strengths vary, and all models substantially underperform domain-specialized methods. Mechanistic ablations reveal that performance depends not only on directing attention to salient visual features but also on grounding those features in physical knowledge. Phenomenological prompts describing what to look for improve accuracy by sharpening model focus, but physical prompts explaining why those features matter perform better overall and yield more balanced classifications with reduced class-specific bias. Consistent with this picture, presenting the underlying one-dimensional measurements directly as numerical tables instead of rendered plots yields up to 13 percentage points improvement. Reasoning quality analysis further demonstrates that, without explicit physical grounding, models may reach correct predictions from phenomenologically plausible cues while providing physically imprecise justifications, establishing that accuracy alone is insufficient for trustworthy scientific deployment. These findings provide the first systematic, multi-modal baselines for VLMs in observational astronomy and identify the specific representation, grounding, and reasoning bottlenecks where current models fail.

评分理由: 论文提出FastOMOP，一个用于OMOP CDM数据上可靠生成真实世界证据的多智能体架构。核心涉及LLM Agents、Multi-agent Systems、Tool Use和Hallucination Mitigation（通过治理层防止幻觉）。同时属于AI for Science（生物医学应用）。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws等不相关。

观测医学结果合作伙伴通用数据模型（OMOP CDM）由观测健康数据科学与信息学（OHDSI）协作维护，实现了83个国家近10亿患者电子健康记录数据的标准化。然而，从这些数据存储库中生成真实世界证据（RWE）仍是一个需要临床、流行病学和技术专业知识的手动流程。大语言模型（LLM）与多智能体系统在临床任务中展现出潜力，但RWE自动化暴露了一个根本性挑战：智能体系统会引发现有方法无法管控的新兴行为、协调失败及安全风险。目前尚无基础设施能够确保智能体驱动的RWE生成在全生命周期内具备灵活性、安全性与可审计性。我们提出FastOMOP——一种开源多智能体架构，通过将治理、可观测性与编排三个基础设施层与可插拔的智能体团队分离来解决这一空白。治理在流程边界通过独立于智能体推理的确定性验证强制执行，确保任何受损或产生幻觉的智能体均无法绕过安全控制。表型分析、研究设计与统计分析等智能体团队通过受控工具暴露继承这些保障。我们使用自然语言到SQL的智能体团队，在三个OMOP CDM数据集（Synthea合成数据、MIMIC-IV及兰开夏教学医院IDRIL的真实世界NHS数据集）上验证了FastOMOP。FastOMOP实现了0.84-0.94的可靠性评分，且对抗性与范围外阻断率达到完美水平，证明流程边界治理能够提供独立于模型选择的安全保障。这些结果表明，RWE部署中的可靠性差距源于架构而非模型能力，并使FastOMOP成为渐进式RWE自动化的受控架构。

The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model (OMOP CDM), maintained by the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) collaboration, enabled the harmonisation of electronic health records data of nearly one billion patients in 83 countries. Yet generating real-world evidence (RWE) from these repositories remains a manual process requiring clinical, epidemiological and technical expertise. LLMs and multi-agent systems have shown promise for clinical tasks, but RWE automation exposes a fundamental challenge: agentic systems introduce emergent behaviours, coordination failures and safety risks that existing approaches fail to govern. No infrastructure exists to ensure agentic RWE generation is flexible, safe and auditable across the lifecycle. We introduce FastOMOP, an open-source multi-agent architecture that addresses this gap by separating three infrastructure layers, governance, observability and orchestration, from pluggable agent-teams. Governance is enforced at the process boundary through deterministic validation independent of agent reasoning, ensuring no compromised or hallucinating agent can bypass safety controls. Agent teams for phenotyping, study design and statistical analysis inherit these guarantees through controlled tool exposure. We validated FastOMOP using a natural-language-to-SQL agent team across three OMOP CDM datasets: synthetic data from Synthea, MIMIC-IV and a real-world NHS dataset from Lancashire Teaching Hospitals (IDRIL). FastOMOP achieved reliability scores of 0.84-0.94 with perfect adversarial and out-of-scope block rates, demonstrating process-boundary governance delivers safety guarantees independent of model choice. These results indicate that the reliability gap in RWE deployment is architectural rather than model capability, and establish FastOMOP as a governed architecture for progressive RWE automation.

评分理由: 论文核心使用LLMs从交通法规中推导驾驶要求，涉及LLM应用、RAG（检索相关法规）、CoT（推理过程）、LLM Agents（构建合规层和监控器）以及幻觉缓解（提高匹配准确性）。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、预训练等不相关。

遵守交通法律法规是人类驾驶员的基本要求，然而自动驾驶车辆（AVs）在多种真实场景中可能违反这些要求。为将法律合规性编码至自动驾驶系统，传统方法采用形式化逻辑语言明确指定行为约束，但这一过程劳动密集、难以扩展且维护成本高昂。随着人工智能的最新进展，利用大型语言模型（LLMs）从交通法律法规中推导法律要求具有广阔前景。然而，若缺乏对结构化交通场景的显式锚定与推理，LLMs常会检索到不相关条款或遗漏可适用条款，从而生成不精确的要求。为解决此问题，我们提出了一种新型流水线，通过编码层次化语义的节点式锚点，将LLM推理锚定于交通场景分类体系。在中国交通法规及OnSite数据集（5,897个场景）上，我们的方法将法律-场景匹配率提升29.1%，并将推导出的强制性要求与禁止性要求的准确率分别提升36.9%和38.2%。我们进一步通过构建用于自动驾驶导航的法律合规层，并开发用于现场测试的车载实时合规监控器，验证了其实用性，为未来自动驾驶车辆的开发、部署及监管监督奠定了坚实基础。

Driving in compliance with traffic laws and regulations is a basic requirement for human drivers, yet autonomous vehicles (AVs) can violate these requirements in diverse real-world scenarios. To encode law compliance into AV systems, conventional approaches use formal logic languages to explicitly specify behavioral constraints, but this process is labor-intensive, hard to scale, and costly to maintain. With recent advances in artificial intelligence, it is promising to leverage large language models (LLMs) to derive legal requirements from traffic laws and regulations. However, without explicitly grounding and reasoning in structured traffic scenarios, LLMs often retrieve irrelevant provisions or miss applicable ones, yielding imprecise requirements. To address this, we propose a novel pipeline that grounds LLM reasoning in a traffic scenario taxonomy through node-wise anchors that encode hierarchical semantics. On Chinese traffic laws and OnSite dataset (5,897 scenarios), our method improves law-scenario matching by 29.1% and increases the accuracy of derived mandatory and prohibitive requirements by 36.9% and 38.2%, respectively. We further demonstrate real-world applicability by constructing a law-compliance layer for AV navigation and developing an onboard, real-time compliance monitor for in-field testing, providing a solid foundation for future AV development, deployment, and regulatory oversight.

评分理由: 论文提出Chart2NCode数据集和CharLuMA模型，用于图表到代码生成。核心创新是使用语言条件混合低秩子空间（Mixture of Experts）的参数高效微调（PEFT）方法，因此与’Mixture of Experts’和’PEFT’高度相关。模型基于LLaVA架构，属于多模态大语言模型，但与’Large Language Models’相关度中等。其他关键词如’Small Language Models’、‘Scaling Laws’等均不涉及。

图表到代码生成将图表图像转换为可执行的绘图脚本，从而实现高保真复现与可编辑的可视化。现有方法主要围绕Python展开，这限制了实际应用，并忽视了一个关键的监督来源：同一张图表可由不同绘图语言中语义等价的脚本表达。为填补这一空白，我们提出了Chart2NCode数据集，包含176K张图表及其对应的Python、R和LaTeX对齐脚本，这些脚本能生成视觉上等价的输出，并通过元数据到模板的流水线构建，辅以渲染验证与人工质量检查。基于LLaVA风格的架构，我们进一步提出了CharLuMA，这是一种参数高效的适配模块，通过语言条件混合低秩子空间增强多模态投影器，使模型能够共享核心图表理解能力，同时通过轻量级路由将代码生成专精于目标语言。大量实验表明，该方法在所有语言中均能持续提升可执行性与视觉保真度，超越强开源基线模型，并与专有系统保持竞争力。进一步分析揭示，平衡的多语言监督对所有语言均有裨益，且适配器分配了紧凑的共享核心与语言专用容量。代码与数据可在https://github.com/Zhihan72/CharLuMA获取。

Chart-to-code generation converts a chart image into an executable plotting script, enabling faithful reproduction and editable visualizations. Existing methods are largely Python-centric, limiting practical use and overlooking a critical source of supervision: the same chart can be expressed by semantically equivalent scripts in different plotting languages. To fill this gap, we introduce Chart2NCode, a dataset of 176K charts paired with aligned scripts in Python, R, and LaTeX that render visually equivalent outputs, constructed via a metadata-to-template pipeline with rendering verification and human quality checks. Building on a LLaVA-style architecture, we further propose CharLuMA, a parameter-efficient adaptation module that augments the multimodal projector with a language-conditioned mixture of low-rank subspaces, allowing the model to share core chart understanding while specializing code generation to the target language through lightweight routing. Extensive experiments show consistent gains in executability and visual fidelity across all languages, outperforming strong open-source baselines and remaining competitive with proprietary systems. Further analyses reveal that balanced multi-language supervision benefits all languages and that the adapter allocates a compact shared core plus language-specific capacity. Codes and data are available at https://github.com/Zhihan72/CharLuMA.

评分理由: 论文研究层次强化学习中的分层行为空间（HBS），不涉及大模型、深度学习技术原理创新或AI for Science。所有关键词均与论文内容无关，因此所有评分为0。

近期在分层强化学习领域的研究表明，当基于一组预定义的选项奖励函数进行学习时，该方法已成功扩展至数十亿时间步的规模。我们提出，无需为每个选项设置单一奖励函数，而是通过让控制器指定奖励函数的线性组合，使奖励函数能够有效诱导出行为空间，从而表征更具表达力的策略集合。我们将此方法命名为分层行为空间（Hierarchical Behaviour Spaces, HBS）。我们在NetHack学习环境中对HBS进行了评估，验证了其卓越性能。通过一系列实验，我们发现——或许与常规认知相悖——该方法中分层结构的优势源于探索能力的增强，而非长期推理能力的提升。

Recent work in hierarchical reinforcement learning has shown success in scaling to billions of timesteps when learning over a set of predefined option reward functions. We show that, instead of using a single reward function per option, the reward functions can be effectively used to induce a space of behaviours, by letting the controller specify linear combinations over reward functions, allowing a more expressive set of policies to be represented. We call this method Hierarchical Behaviour Spaces (HBS). We evaluate HBS on the NetHack Learning Environment, demonstrating strong performance. We conduct a series of experiments and determine that, perhaps going against conventional wisdom, the benefits of hierarchy in our method come from increased exploration rather than long term reasoning.

评分理由: 论文研究多智能体系统在电网边缘设备协调中的应用，使用梯度基多智能体近端学习（GradMAP），与’Multi-agent Systems OR Agent Coordination’高度相关（10分）。其他关键词如大模型、预训练、微调、推理加速等均不涉及，因此评分为0。

协调大规模电网边缘设备需要采用在部署时保持完全去中心化、同时仍遵循三相交流配电网物理规律的学习方法。本文提出基于梯度的多智能体近端学习（GradMAP）以应对这一挑战。GradMAP为每个智能体训练独立的神经网络策略，无需任何参数共享，且每个智能体仅利用自身局部观测进行在线决策，无需通信。在离线训练阶段，GradMAP将可微的三相交流潮流模型嵌入原始-对偶学习循环中，并利用隐式微分传播精确的网络约束违反信息以更新策略参数。为加速训练，GradMAP通过近端代理在更直接的策略输出（动作）空间（而非其他工作如PPO所使用的概率分布空间）所定义的信任域内复用昂贵的环境梯度。在包含1000个智能体（管理IEEE 123节点馈线上的电池、热泵和可控发电机）的案例研究中，GradMAP在单台工作站级NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 48GB GPU上训练15分钟内即可学习到最小化三相交流潮流约束违反的去中心化策略。相较于基于梯度的自监督学习基准，训练速度提升3-5倍，且训练效率显著优于多智能体强化学习基准。在样本外测试中，GradMAP还实现了最低的运行成本和约束违反水平。

Coordinating large populations of grid-edge devices requires learning methods that remain fully decentralised in deployment while still respecting three-phase AC distribution-network physics. This paper proposes gradient-based multi-agent proximal learning (GradMAP) to address this challenge. GradMAP trains independent neural-network policies for each agent without any parameter sharing, and each agent uses only its own local observation for online decision-making without communication. During offline training, GradMAP embeds a differentiable three-phase AC power-flow model in a primal-dual learning loop and uses implicit differentiation to propagate exact network-constraint violations to update the policy parameters. To speed up training, GradMAP reuses expensive environment gradients through a proximal surrogate within a trust region defined in the more direct policy-output (action) space, instead of the probability distribution space used in other works, such as PPO. In case studies with 1,000 agents managing batteries, heat pumps, and controllable generators on the IEEE 123-bus feeder, GradMAP learns decentralised policies that minimise three-phase AC load-flow constraint violations within 15 minutes of training on a single workstation-class NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 48GB GPU. This is a 3–5x training speed-up over gradient-based self-supervised learning benchmarks and substantially better training efficiency than multi-agent reinforcement-learning benchmarks. In out-of-sample tests, GradMAP also delivers among the lowest operating cost and constraint violations.

评分理由: 论文核心关注大语言模型（LLMs）的评估数据集生成，提出STELLAR-E系统，用于合成高质量、领域特定和语言特定的评估数据集。与LLMs高度相关（15分），涉及小模型评估（SLMs，5分），并提及领域适应（Domain Adaptation，5分）。其他关键词如MoE、RAG、CoT等未涉及，评分为0。

各行业对大型语言模型（Large Language Models, LLMs）的依赖日益加深，凸显了构建稳健的领域专用及语言专用评估数据集的必要性；然而，由于隐私问题、监管限制以及人工创建的时间成本，此类数据集的收集面临诸多挑战。现有的自动化基准测试方法往往受限于对既有数据的依赖、可扩展性差、聚焦单一领域以及缺乏多语言支持。我们提出STELLAR-E——一个全自动系统，能够利用最少的人工输入，在不依赖现有数据集的情况下，生成自定义规模的高质量合成数据集。该系统由两个阶段构成：（1）对TGRT自指令（Self-Instruct）框架进行改进，构建一个合成数据引擎，实现可控、自定义的合成数据集生成；（2）构建一个评估流水线，整合基于统计和基于LLM的指标，以评估合成数据集在基于LLM的应用评估中的适用性。与现有的语言专用基准相比，合成数据集在LLM作为评判者（LLM-as-a-judge）评分上的平均差异为+5.7%，显示出其在全面评估大、小规模LLM方面具有可比拟的质量。尽管真实数据集对LLM（尤其是较小模型）仍略具挑战性，但本研究建立了一个可扩展且可适应不同领域的基准测试框架，支持对LLM应用的公平评估，为人工方法提供了更快速的替代方案，并实现了高效的自动化质量保障循环。

The increasing reliance on Large Language Models (LLMs) across diverse sectors highlights the need for robust domain-specific and language-specific evaluation datasets; however, the collection of such datasets is challenging due to privacy concerns, regulatory restrictions, and the time cost for manual creation. Existing automated benchmarking methods are often limited by relying on pre-existing data, poor scalability, single-domain focus, and lack of multilingual support. We present STELLAR-E - a fully automated system to generate high-quality synthetic datasets of custom size, using minimal human inputs without depending on existing datasets. The system is structured in two stages: (1) We modify the TGRT Self-Instruct framework to create a synthetic data engine that enables controllable, custom synthetic dataset generation, and (2) an evaluation pipeline incorporating statistical and LLM-based metrics to assess the applicability of the synthetic dataset for LLM-based application evaluations. The synthetic datasets reach an average difference of +5.7% in terms of LLM-as-a-judge scores against existing language-specific benchmarks, demonstrating comparable quality for comprehensive assessment of big and small LLMs. While real datasets remain slightly more challenging for LLMs especially for smaller models, this work establishes a scalable and domain-adaptable benchmarking framework that supports fair evaluation of LLM applications, offering a faster alternative to manual approaches and enabling high-efficiency automated quality assurance cycles.

评分理由: 论文聚焦于大语言模型（LLMs）的运行时安全检测，提出层间收敛指纹（LCF）方法，通过分析隐藏状态轨迹检测后门攻击、越狱和提示注入。与关键词的相关性：‘Large Language Models’ 高度相关（15分），因为核心对象是LLMs；‘Small Language Models’ 略有提及（5分），因为方法适用于on-device LLMs；‘Hallucination Mitigation’ 相关（10分），因为检测恶意行为间接减少幻觉；‘Mechanistic Interpretability’ 部分相关（8分），因为利用隐藏状态轨迹进行解释性分析。其他关键词如MoE、Scaling Laws等均不相关。

大型语言模型在运行时可能出现异常行为，而干净数据验证无法预见这些行为：训练时后门在触发前保持潜伏状态，越狱攻击破坏安全对齐，提示注入覆盖部署者的指令。现有运行时防御措施逐一应对这些威胁，且通常假设存在干净的参考模型、触发器知识或可编辑权重，这些假设对于不透明的第三方制品几乎不成立。我们提出层间收敛指纹（Layerwise Convergence Fingerprinting, LCF），这是一种无需调优的运行时监控器，将层间隐藏状态轨迹视为健康信号：LCF对每个层间差异计算对角马氏距离（Mahalanobis distance），通过Ledoit-Wolf收缩进行聚合，并基于200个干净样本的留一法校准设定阈值，无需参考模型、触发器知识或重新训练。在四种架构（Llama-3-8B、Qwen2.5-7B、Gemma-2-9B、Qwen2.5-14B）上，针对后门、越狱攻击和提示注入（56种后门组合、3种越狱技术以及BIPIA电子邮件+代码问答）进行评估，LCF将Qwen2.5-7B和Gemma-2的平均后门攻击成功率（ASR）降至1%以下，在Qwen2.5-14B上降至1.3%；检测出92-100%的DAN越狱攻击（GCG和较温和的角色扮演越狱为62-100%）；并在全部八个（模型、领域）组合中标记出100%的文本载荷注入，后门假阳性率（FPR）为12-16%，推理开销低于0.1%。单一聚合分数即可覆盖所有三类威胁，无需针对特定威胁进行调优，这使得LCF成为面向云端和端侧大语言模型的通用运行时安全层。

Large language models deployed at runtime can misbehave in ways that clean-data validation cannot anticipate: training-time backdoors lie dormant until triggered, jailbreaks subvert safety alignment, and prompt injections override the deployer’s instructions. Existing runtime defenses address these threats one at a time and often assume a clean reference model, trigger knowledge, or editable weights, assumptions that rarely hold for opaque third-party artifacts. We introduce Layerwise Convergence Fingerprinting (LCF), a tuning-free runtime monitor that treats the inter-layer hidden-state trajectory as a health signal: LCF computes a diagonal Mahalanobis distance on every inter-layer difference, aggregates via Ledoit-Wolf shrinkage, and thresholds via leave-one-out calibration on 200 clean examples, with no reference model, trigger knowledge, or retraining. Evaluated on four architectures (Llama-3-8B, Qwen2.5-7B, Gemma-2-9B, Qwen2.5-14B) across backdoors, jailbreaks, and prompt injection (56 backdoor combinations, 3 jailbreak techniques, and BIPIA email + code-QA), LCF reduces mean backdoor attack success rate (ASR) below 1% on Qwen2.5-7B and Gemma-2 and to 1.3% on Qwen2.5-14B, detects 92-100% of DAN jailbreaks (62-100% for GCG and softer role-play), and flags 100% of text-payload injections across all eight (model, domain) cells, at 12-16% backdoor FPR and <0.1% inference overhead. A single aggregation score covers all three threat families without threat-specific tuning, positioning LCF as a general-purpose runtime safety layer for cloud-served and on-device LLMs.

评分理由: 该论文提出基于内感受（interoception）的机器框架，旨在将生物体的内部状态调节原理应用于人工智能系统，以增强自适应性和鲁棒性。论文聚焦于具身AI和内部状态调节，未涉及大语言模型、深度学习技术原理或科学应用中的具体模型（如LLM、MoE、RAG等），也未提及任何评分关键词中的技术或概念。因此，所有关键词相关度均为0分。

本综述提出一个基于内感受（interoception）与具身人工智能（embodied AI）的整合性框架——即内感受机器框架（interoceptive machine framework）——该框架将源于生物体的内部状态调节原理转化为适用于自适应自主性的计算架构。内感受被定义为对内部信号的监测、整合与调节，已被证明对理解生物系统中的自适应行为具有重要意义。所提出的框架将内感受的功能贡献组织为三个功能原则：稳态（homeostatic）、动态平衡（allostatic）与生成性（enactive），每个原则对应不同的计算角色：内部存活性调节、基于预期不确定性的重新评估，以及通过交互进行的主动数据生成。这些原则并非旨在作为直接的神经生理映射，而是作为指导人工智能体设计的抽象概念，使其具备更优的自我调节能力与情境敏感行为。通过将内部状态变量与调节回路嵌入这些原则，人工智能系统能够在不确定和动态环境中实现更稳健的决策、校准后的不确定性处理以及自适应交互策略。该方法为构建具备功能基础自我调节能力的智能体提供了一条具体且可验证的路径，对人机交互与辅助技术具有直接意义。最终，内感受机器框架提供了一个统一视角，用以理解内部状态调节如何增强具身人工智能系统的自主性、适应性与鲁棒性。

This review proposes an integrative framework grounded on interoception and embodied AI-termed the interoceptive machine framework-that translates biologically inspired principles of internal-state regulation into computational architectures for adaptive autonomy. Interoception, conceived as the monitoring, integration, and regulation of internal signals, has proven relevant for understanding adaptive behavior in biological systems. The proposed framework organizes interoceptive contributions into three functional principles: homeostatic, allostatic, and enactive, each associated with distinct computational roles: internal viability regulation, anticipatory uncertainty-based re-evaluation, and active data generation through interaction. These principles are not intended as direct neurophysiological mappings, but as abstractions that inform the design of artificial agents with improved self-regulation and context-sensitive behavior. By embedding internal state variables and regulatory loops within these principles, AI systems can achieve more robust decision-making, calibrated uncertainty handling, and adaptive interaction strategies, particularly in uncertain and dynamic environments. This approach provides a concrete and testable pathway toward agents capable of functionally grounded self-regulation, with direct implications for human-computer interaction and assistive technologies. Ultimately, the interoceptive machine framework offers a unifying perspective on how internal-state regulation can enhance autonomy, adaptivity, and robustness in embodied AI systems

评分理由: 论文研究LLM驱动的自动化代码审查机器人的评估方法，核心涉及LLM应用（Large Language Models相关度8），但未涉及其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws等。论文主要关注评估方法而非模型技术原理创新，因此其他关键词评分为0。

自动化代码审查（ACR）机器人正越来越多地应用于工业软件开发中，以协助开发人员进行拉取请求（PR）审查。随着其应用日益普及，一个关键挑战是如何可靠且大规模地评估机器人生成评论的有用性。在实践中，此类评估通常依赖于开发者的操作和注释，而这些操作和注释又受到上下文和组织因素的影响，从而使其难以作为客观的基准真相。我们研究了在工业环境中自动化评估基于大语言模型（LLM）的ACR机器人的可行性与局限性。我们分析了一个来自Beko公司的工业数据集，包含2604条机器人生成的PR评论，每条评论均由软件工程师标记为“已修复”（fixed）或“不予修复”（wontFix）。我们采用了两种自动化评估方法——G-Eval和“LLM作为评判者”（LLM-as-a-Judge）流程，并分别使用二元决策和0-4李克特量表（Likert-scale）形式进行，从而能够与开发者提供的标签进行受控比较。在Gemini-2.5-pro、GPT-4.1-mini和GPT-5.2模型上，两种评估策略与人工标签的一致性均仅为中等水平。一致性比率大约在0.44至0.62之间，不同模型之间以及二元决策与李克特量表形式之间存在显著差异，表明结果对模型选择和评估设计均较为敏感。我们的研究结果揭示了在工业环境中完全自动化评估ACR机器人评论所面临的实际局限性。开发者的操作（如解决或忽略评论）不仅反映了评论质量，还反映了上下文约束、优先级决策以及工作流动态，这些因素很难通过静态工件来捕捉。对一位软件工程总监的后续访谈结果进一步证实，开发者的标签行为受到工作流压力和组织约束的强烈影响，从而强化了将此类信号视为客观基准真相所面临的挑战。

Automated code review (ACR) bots are increasingly used in industrial software development to assist developers during pull request (PR) review. As adoption grows, a key challenge is how to evaluate the usefulness of bot-generated comments reliably and at scale. In practice, such evaluation often relies on developer actions and annotations that are shaped by contextual and organizational factors, complicating their use as objective ground truth. We examine the feasibility and limitations of automating the evaluation of LLM-powered ACR bots in an industrial setting. We analyze an industrial dataset from Beko comprising 2,604 bot-generated PR comments, each labeled by software engineers as fixed/wontFix. Two automated evaluation approaches, G-Eval and an LLM-as-a-Judge pipeline, are applied using both binary decisions and a 0-4 Likert-scale formulation, enabling a controlled comparison against developer-provided labels. Across Gemini-2.5-pro, GPT-4.1-mini, and GPT-5.2, both evaluation strategies achieve only moderate alignment with human labels. Agreement ratios range from approximately 0.44 to 0.62, with noticeable variation across models and between binary and Likert-scale formulations, indicating sensitivity to both model choice and evaluation design. Our findings highlight practical limitations in fully automating the evaluation of ACR bot comments in industrial contexts. Developer actions such as resolving or ignoring comments reflect not only comment quality, but also contextual constraints, prioritization decisions, and workflow dynamics that are difficult to capture through static artifacts. Insights from a follow-up interview with a software engineering director further corroborate that developer labeling behavior is strongly influenced by workflow pressures and organizational constraints, reinforcing the challenges of treating such signals as objective ground truth.

评分理由: 论文主要研究AI系统的交叉性危害，使用LLM分析5300份事故报告。虽然使用了LLM作为分析工具，但核心主题是AI伦理和公平性，而非大模型或深度学习的技术创新。论文不涉及任何列出的关键词所代表的技术方向，如MoE、预训练、微调、RAG、推理加速等。因此，除了’Large Language Models’因作为工具使用而获得中等相关度外，其他关键词均为0分。

AI风险评估是识别AI系统所造成危害的主要工具。这些危害包括交叉性危害，即由身份类别（如阶级与肤色）之间的相互作用所产生的危害，而当这些类别被单独考量时，此类危害不会发生或以不同方式发生。然而，现有的AI风险评估仍围绕孤立的身份类别构建，即便考虑交叉性，也几乎只关注种族与性别。基于对已记录AI事件的大规模分析，我们表明AI危害并非一次仅涉及一个身份类别。通过使用应用于大语言模型的结构化评估标准，我们分析了来自AI事件数据库（AI Incident Database）中1200起已记录事件的5300份报告，该数据库是经过最精心整理的事件数据来源。从这些报告中，我们识别出1513名受危害主体及其相关身份类别，准确率达98%。在单一类别层面，我们发现年龄与政治身份在已记录的AI危害中出现的频率与种族和性别相当。在交叉类别层面，特定交叉点的危害被放大至三倍：青春期女性、低阶层有色人种以及上层政治精英。我们认为，交叉性应成为AI风险评估的核心组成部分，以便更准确地捕捉危害如何在各社会群体中产生与分布。

AI risk assessment is the primary tool for identifying harms caused by AI systems. These include intersectional harms, which arise from the interaction between identity categories (e.g., class and skin tone) and which do not occur, or occur differently, when those categories are considered separately. Yet existing AI risk assessments are still built around isolated identity categories, and when intersections are considered, they focus almost exclusively on race and gender. Drawing on a large-scale analysis of documented AI incidents, we show that AI harms do not occur one identity category at a time. Using a structured rubric applied with a Large Language Model (LLM), we analyze 5,300 reports from 1,200 documented incidents in the AI Incident Database, the most curated source of incident data. From these reports, we identify 1,513 harmed subjects and their associated identity categories, achieving 98% accuracy. At the level of individual categories, we find that age and political identity appear in documented AI harms at rates comparable to race and gender. At the level of intersecting categories, harm is amplified up to three times at specific intersections: adolescent girls, lower-class people of color, and upper-class political elites. We argue that intersectionality should be a core component of AI risk assessment to more accurately capture how harms are produced and distributed across social groups.

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLM agents中的注意力稳定性问题，提出SSRP框架，涉及LLM agents、self-correction、chain-of-thought reasoning、system 2 thinking、hallucination mitigation、mechanistic interpretability等。与RAG和in-context learning有一定关联，但其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、预训练等无关。

随着大语言模型（LLM）智能体向自主数字协作者转型，如何在非线性多轮对话中保持确定性的目标导向性已成为架构层面的瓶颈。我们识别并形式化了一种系统性故障模式，即仅解码器自回归Transformer中的“注意力锁存”（Attention Latch）。这一现象是“信息过度压缩”（Information Over-squashing）的行为表现，当历史上下文的累积概率权重覆盖了任务中的更新时，智能体便会固守过时的约束条件，即使接收到明确矛盾的指令也无法摆脱。我们提出“自合成推理协议”（Self-Synthesizing Reasoning Protocols, SSRP），这是一种元认知框架，实现了高层架构规划（Architect）与逐轮程序执行（Executive）之间的离散分离。我们利用MultiWOZ 2.2数据集和“聚合枢轴准确率”（Aggregate Pivot Accuracy, APA）这一新型指标，在9000条轨迹上对SSRP进行了评估。APA指标的有效性通过将其得分映射至U形的“迷失在中间”（Lost in the Middle）曲线得到验证。我们设计了三个实验层级：基于近期性的浅层检索试点、高熵标准操作流程（SOP）以及语义劫持的三跳多事实合成任务。实验结果实证性地定位了“注意力稳定边界”（Attention Stability Boundary），在此边界处，GPT 5.4的无状态Vanilla ReAct基线成功率骤降至0.1%，而SSRP实现了715倍的韧性提升。我们在Gemini 3.1 Pro、Claude Sonnet 4.6和DeepSeek V3.2上均验证了统计显著的性能增益。审计工作证实了SSRP的必要性：通过递归反射基线（100%成功率）证明了注意力缺失的存在；通过等距压力测试（90%准确率）将锁存现象与位置偏差解耦；并基于信息瓶颈（Information Bottleneck）原理与粒度消融实验对SSRP进行了形式化。程序完整性审计（98.8%遵循率）揭示了一个“基础悖论”（Grounding Paradox）：高稳定性模型在检索-推理污染条件下，因拒绝产生幻觉而失败。

As LLM agents transition to autonomous digital coworkers, maintaining deterministic goal-directedness in non-linear multi-turn conversations emerged as an architectural bottleneck. We identify and formalize a systemic failure mode termed the Attention Latch in decoder-only autoregressive Transformers. This phenomenon, a behavioral manifestation of Information Over-squashing, occurs when the cumulative probabilistic weight of historical context overrides mid-task updates, causing agents to remain anchored to obsolete constraints despite explicit contradictory instructions. We propose Self-Synthesizing Reasoning Protocols (SSRP), a metacognitive framework that implements a discrete separation between high-level architectural planning (Architect) and turn-by-turn procedural execution (Executive). We evaluate SSRP across 9K trajectories using the MultiWOZ 2.2 dataset and the Aggregate Pivot Accuracy (APA), a novel metric we validate by mapping its scores to the U-shaped ‘Lost in the Middle’ curve. We present 3 experimental tiers: a shallow recency-based retrieval pilot, a high-entropy SOP, and a semantic hijacked 3-hop Multi-Fact Synthesis task. Our results empirically locate the Attention Stability Boundary, where stateless Vanilla ReAct baselines for GPT 5.4 collapse to 0.1% success while SSRP achieves a 715X Resilience Lift. We demonstrate statistically significant gains across Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and DeepSeek V3.2. Audits confirm SSRP necessity by proving attentional lapse via a recursive reflexion baseline (100% success); decoupling the latch from positional bias through equidistant stress testing (90% accuracy); and formalizing SSRP via the Information Bottleneck principle and granularity ablations. Procedural Integrity audit (98.8% adherence) reveals a Grounding Paradox where high-stability models fail by refusing to hallucinate under retrieval-reasoning contamination.

评分理由: 论文提出MIMIC，一个用于生物分子的生成式多模态基础模型，属于AI for Science领域，与’Foundation Models’高度相关（10分）。模型涉及预训练（Pre-training）过程（8分），但未涉及其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws等。因此，仅两个关键词得分较高，其余为0分。

生物学功能源于序列、结构、调控、进化及细胞环境之间的耦合约束，然而当前大多数生物学基础模型仅在单一模态内训练或针对固定前向任务。我们提出MIMIC——一个生成式多模态基础模型，该模型基于我们新构建的对齐数据集LORE进行训练，该数据集将核酸、蛋白质、进化、结构、调控及语义/环境模态与部分可观测的生物分子状态相关联。MIMIC采用分轨编码器-解码器架构，能够以任意观测模态子集为条件，在基因组、转录组和蛋白质组范围内重建或生成分子状态的缺失组分。与仅基于序列的输入相比，多模态条件化持续提升了MIMIC的序列重建能力，而其学习到的表征则使RNA和蛋白质下游任务达到最优性能。MIMIC实现了最优的剪接预测，其联合生成框架支持异构体感知推理，进一步提升了预测性能。除预测外，同一生成框架还支持约束设计。在RNA层面，MIMIC利用进化与结构信号，在不逆转致病突变的前提下，识别出临床相关的HBB剪接破坏突变中的校正性编辑。在蛋白质层面，通过对PD-L1和hACE2结合位点的形状与表面化学进行联合条件化，MIMIC生成了多样且高置信度的序列，并在计算机模拟中展现出对靶标结合的有力支持。最后，MIMIC将实验环境作为语义条件，对依赖实验条件的RNA化学探测进行建模，而非将环境视为固定输出。综上，这些结果确立了MIMIC对齐的多模态生成建模作为统一表征学习、条件预测及约束生物分子设计的强有力基础，且所有这些能力均集成于单一模型之中。

Biological function emerges from coupled constraints across sequence, structure, regulation, evolution, and cellular context, yet most foundation models in biology are trained within one modality or for a fixed forward task. We present MIMIC, a generative multimodal foundation model trained on our newly curated and aligned dataset, LORE, linking nucleic acid, protein, evolutionary, structural, regulatory, and semantic/contextual modalities within partially observed biomolecular states. MIMIC uses a split-track encoder-decoder architecture to condition on arbitrary subsets of observed modalities and reconstruct or generate missing components of molecular state across the genome, transcriptome, and proteome. Multimodal conditioning consistently improves MIMIC’s sequence reconstruction relative to sequence-only inputs, while its learned representations enable state-of-the-art performance on RNA and protein downstream tasks. MIMIC achieves state-of-the-art splicing prediction, and its joint generative formulation enables isoform-aware inference that further improves performance. Beyond prediction, the same generative framework supports constrained design. For RNA, MIMIC identifies corrective edits in a clinically relevant HBB splice-disrupting mutation without reverting it by using evolutionary and structural signals. For proteins, jointly conditioning on shape and surface chemistry of PD-L1 and hACE2 binding sites produces diverse, high-confidence sequences with strong in silico support for target binding. Finally, MIMIC uses experimental context as semantic conditioning to model assay-dependent RNA chemical probing, rather than treating context as a fixed output. Together, these results position MIMIC’s aligned multimodal generative modeling as a strong foundation for unifying representation learning, conditional prediction, and constrained biomolecular design within a single model.

评分理由: 论文主要关注低精度神经网络架构搜索（NAS）在边缘AI中的应用，涉及量化（Quantization）和硬件感知优化。与量化高度相关（10分），因为核心是FP16低精度训练。与AI for Science（5分）部分相关，因为应用于太空海事监测的血管分割，属于科学应用。其他关键词如大模型、MoE、SLM等均不相关。

在边缘加速器上设计满足严格延迟与精度约束的深度神经网络，日益依赖于硬件感知优化，包括由设备级指标引导的神经架构搜索（NAS）。然而，大多数硬件感知的NAS流水线仍基于全精度假设进行架构优化，仅在搜索完成后才应用低精度适配，这导致优化阶段的行为与低精度硬件上部署时的执行之间存在失配，从而可能显著降低精度。我们通过将部署对齐的低精度训练直接集成到硬件感知的NAS中来解决这一局限。候选架构在微调和评估过程中暴露于FP16数值约束，从而在不修改搜索空间或进化策略的前提下，实现架构效率与数值鲁棒性的联合优化。我们针对星载海事监测中的血管分割任务评估了所提出的框架，目标硬件为英特尔Movidius Myriad X视觉处理单元（VPU）。实验表明，对于同一架构（95,791个参数），后训练精度转换将设备上性能从0.85 mIoU降至0.78 mIoU，而部署对齐的低精度训练在设备上实现了0.826 mIoU，在不增加模型复杂度的情况下，弥补了约三分之二的部署引入精度差距。这些结果表明，将部署一致的数值约束纳入硬件感知的NAS，能够显著提升资源受限边缘人工智能（AI）中优化与部署之间的鲁棒性与对齐程度。

Designing deep networks that meet strict latency and accuracy constraints on edge accelerators increasingly relies on hardware-aware optimization, including neural architecture search (NAS) guided by device-level metrics. Yet most hardware-aware NAS pipelines still optimize architectures under full-precision assumptions and apply low-precision adaptation only after the search, leading to a mismatch between optimization-time behavior and deployment-time execution on low-precision hardware that can substantially degrade accuracy. We address this limitation by integrating deployment-aligned low-precision training directly into hardware-aware NAS. Candidate architectures are exposed to FP16 numerical constraints during fine-tuning and evaluation, enabling joint optimization of architectural efficiency and numerical robustness without modifying the search space or evolutionary strategy. We evaluate the proposed framework on vessel segmentation for spaceborne maritime monitoring, targeting the Intel Movidius Myriad X Visual Processing Unit (VPU). While post-training precision conversion reduces on-device performance from 0.85 to 0.78 mIoU, deployment-aligned low-precision training achieves 0.826 mIoU on-device for the same architecture (95,791 parameters), recovering approximately two-thirds of deployment-induced accuracy gap without increasing model complexity. These results demonstrate that incorporating deployment-consistent numerical constraints into hardware-aware NAS substantially improves robustness and alignment between optimization and deployment for resource-constrained edge Artificial Intelligence (AI).

评分理由: 论文核心关注LLM多智能体系统中的异常检测，与’Large Language Models’、‘LLM Agents’、‘Multi-agent Systems’高度相关，因此给予15分。其他关键词如MoE、SLM、Scaling Laws等与论文主题无关，评分为0。

大型语言模型（LLMs）与多智能体系统（MAS）的快速融合显著增强了其协作解决问题的能力，但也扩大了其攻击面，使其面临提示感染和智能体间通信受损等漏洞。尽管新兴的基于图的异常检测方法在保护这些网络方面展现出潜力，但该领域目前缺乏一个标准化、可复现的环境来训练这些模型并评估其有效性。为填补这一空白，我们提出了Gammaf（面向LLM多智能体系统的基于图异常监控框架），这是一个开源基准测试平台。Gammaf本身并非新型防御机制，而是一个综合评估架构，旨在生成合成多智能体交互数据集，并对现有及未来的防御模型进行性能基准测试。该框架通过两条相互依赖的流水线运行：训练数据生成阶段，该阶段模拟跨多种网络拓扑结构的辩论，将交互捕获为鲁棒的属性图；以及防御系统基准测试阶段，该阶段在实时推理轮次中通过动态隔离被标记的对抗性节点来主动评估防御模型。通过使用既定防御基线（XG-Guard和BlindGuard）在多项知识任务（如MMLU-Pro和GSM8K）上进行严格评估，我们证明了Gammaf的高实用性、拓扑可扩展性和执行效率。此外，我们的实验结果表明，为LLM-MAS配备有效的攻击修复措施不仅能恢复系统完整性，还能通过促进早期共识并切断对抗性智能体典型的大量令牌生成，从而显著降低整体运营成本。

The rapid integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) has significantly enhanced their collaborative problem-solving capabilities, but it has also expanded their attack surfaces, exposing them to vulnerabilities such as prompt infection and compromised inter-agent communication. While emerging graph-based anomaly detection methods show promise in protecting these networks, the field currently lacks a standardized, reproducible environment to train these models and evaluate their efficacy. To address this gap, we introduce Gammaf (Graph-based Anomaly Monitoring for LLM Multi-Agent systems Framework), an open-source benchmarking platform. Gammaf is not a novel defense mechanism itself, but rather a comprehensive evaluation architecture designed to generate synthetic multi-agent interaction datasets and benchmark the performance of existing and future defense models. The proposed framework operates through two interdependent pipelines: a Training Data Generation stage, which simulates debates across varied network topologies to capture interactions as robust attributed graphs, and a Defense System Benchmarking stage, which actively evaluates defense models by dynamically isolating flagged adversarial nodes during live inference rounds. Through rigorous evaluation using established defense baselines (XG-Guard and BlindGuard) across multiple knowledge tasks (such as MMLU-Pro and GSM8K), we demonstrate Gammaf’s high utility, topological scalability, and execution efficiency. Furthermore, our experimental results reveal that equipping an LLM-MAS with effective attack remediation not only recovers system integrity but also substantially reduces overall operational costs by facilitating early consensus and cutting off the extensive token generation typical of adversarial agents.

评分理由: 论文研究多行为推荐中的生成式序列建模，提出BITRec框架，通过层次化行为聚合和转换关系编码来建模行为强度和转换模式。论文未涉及大模型、深度学习技术原理创新或AI for Science，所有关键词均不相关，因此评分为0。

多行为推荐旨在通过对携带不同意图信号的多种交互类型进行建模，来预测用户转化。近年来，生成式序列建模方法通过实现灵活的序列生成，已成为多行为推荐的重要范式。然而，现有生成方法通常将行为视为辅助性的词元特征，并将其输入统一的注意力机制。这些模型隐式地假设历史行为之间的依赖关系具有均匀激活特性，从而无法区分行为强度的差异或捕捉行为间的转换模式。为解决上述局限，我们提出BITRec——一种新颖的生成式多行为推荐框架，通过选择性依赖激活引入结构化行为建模。BITRec包含：（i）层次化行为聚合（Hierarchical Behavior Aggregation, HBA），通过分离的探索路径与承诺路径显式建模行为强度差异；以及（ii）转换关系编码（Transition Relation Encoding, TRE），通过显式的可学习关系矩阵对转换结构进行编码。在包含数百万交互的四个大规模数据集（RetailRocket、Taobao、Tmall、Insurance Dataset）上进行的实验表明，该方法在多个指标上实现了一致性的15-23%提升，其中在Tmall数据集上MRR最高提升22.79%，在Taobao数据集上HR@10提升17.83%、NDCG@10提升17.55%。

Multi-behavior recommendation aims to predict user conversions by modeling various interaction types that carry distinct intent signals. Recently, generative sequence modeling methods have emerged as an important paradigm for multi-behavior recommendation by achieving flexible sequence generation. However, existing generative methods typically treat behaviors as auxiliary token features and feed them into unified attention mechanisms. These models implicitly assume uniform activation of dependencies among historical behaviors, thereby failing to discern differences in intensity or capture transition patterns. To address these limitations, we propose BITRec, a novel generative multi-behavior recommendation framework that introduces structured behavioral modeling through selective dependency activation. BITRec incorporates (i) Hierarchical Behavior Aggregation (HBA), which explicitly models behavioral intensity differences through separated exploration and commitment pathways, and (ii) Transition Relation Encoding (TRE), which encodes transition structures through explicit learnable relation matrices. Experiments on four large-scale datasets (RetailRocket, Taobao, Tmall, Insurance Dataset) with millions of interactions achieve consistent improvements of 15-23% across multiple metrics, with peak gains of 22.79% MRR on Tmall and 17.83% HR@10, 17.55% NDCG@10 on Taobao.

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLM在医疗领域的应用，具体为多发性骨髓瘤临床记录推理。高度相关关键词：Large Language Models（核心使用LLM）、Retrieval-Augmented Generation（对比RAG方法）、LLM Agents（提出agentic reasoning系统）、AI for Science（医疗AI应用）。其他关键词如MoE、SLM、Scaling Laws等未涉及，评分为0。

多发性骨髓瘤的管理涉及长达数年至数十年的序贯治疗，每次决策均取决于分散在数十至数百份异质性临床文件中的累积疾病史。基于大语言模型（LLM）的系统能否在接近专家共识的水平上综合这些证据，尚未得到证实。本研究对某三级医疗中心（2001-2026年）收治的811例骨髓瘤患者的纵向临床记录进行了回顾性评估，涵盖44,962份文件及1,334,677项实验室检测值，并在MIMIC-IV数据库上进行了外部验证。我们比较了一种智能体推理系统与单次检索增强生成（RAG）、迭代式RAG及全上下文输入方法在469对患者-问题（源自48个模板，分属三个复杂度层级）上的表现。参考标签由四位肿瘤科医生进行双重标注，并由资深血液科医生裁定。迭代式RAG与全上下文输入方法收敛于共同上限（75.4% vs 75.8%，p = 1.00）。智能体系统达到79.6%的一致性（95% CI 76.4-82.8），显著超过两个基线水平（分别高出3.8和4.2个百分点；p = 0.006和0.007）。性能提升随问题复杂度增加而上升，在基于标准的综合任务中达到+9.4个百分点（p = 0.032）；随病历长度增加，在最长病历的前十分位（n = 10）中达到+13.5个百分点。系统错误率（12.2%）与专家分歧率（13.6%）相当，但严重程度呈反向分布：57.8%的系统错误具有临床意义，而专家分歧中仅18.8%具有临床意义。智能体推理是唯一超越共同上限的方法，其优势集中于最复杂的问题与最长的病历。残留系统错误带来的更大临床后果表明，在将这些发现转化为患者获益之前，需在常规诊疗中进行前瞻性评估。

Multiple myeloma is managed through sequential lines of therapy over years to decades, with each decision depending on cumulative disease history distributed across dozens to hundreds of heterogeneous clinical documents. Whether LLM-based systems can synthesise this evidence at a level approaching expert agreement has not been established. A retrospective evaluation was conducted on longitudinal clinical records of 811 myeloma patients treated at a tertiary centre (2001-2026), covering 44,962 documents and 1,334,677 laboratory values, with external validation on MIMIC-IV. An agentic reasoning system was compared against single-pass retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), iterative RAG, and full-context input on 469 patient-question pairs from 48 templates at three complexity levels. Reference labels came from double annotation by four oncologists with senior haematologist adjudication. Iterative RAG and full-context input converged on a shared ceiling (75.4% vs 75.8%, p = 1.00). The agentic system reached 79.6% concordance (95% CI 76.4-82.8), exceeding both baselines (+3.8 and +4.2 pp; p = 0.006 and 0.007). Gains rose with question complexity, reaching +9.4 pp on criteria-based synthesis (p = 0.032), and with record length, reaching +13.5 pp in the top decile (n = 10). The system error rate (12.2%) was comparable to expert disagreement (13.6%), but severity was inverted: 57.8% of system errors were clinically significant versus 18.8% of expert disagreements. Agentic reasoning was the only approach to exceed the shared ceiling, with gains concentrated on the most complex questions and longest records. The greater clinical consequence of residual system errors indicates that prospective evaluation in routine care is required before these findings translate into patient benefit.

评分理由: 论文主要关注人类-AI合作的主观感知测量，开发了感知合作量表（PCS）和团队感知量表（TPS），并在包括LLM交互在内的三个研究中验证。虽然涉及LLM交互，但论文核心是心理学测量工具的开发与验证，而非大模型或深度学习的技术创新或应用。因此，与所有关键词的相关性极低，仅因LLM交互场景而给予LLMs关键词2分，其余均为0分。

随着人机协作日益普遍，我们需要可靠的评估工具来衡量人机合作互动的主观质量。本文引入两个基于理论构建的量表：基于联合活动理论的感知合作量表（Perceived Cooperativity Scale, PCS），以及基于演化合作理论的团队感知量表（Teaming Perception Scale, TPS）。PCS用于捕捉在单一互动序列中智能体所展现的感知合作能力与实践；TPS则用于捕捉由相互贡献与支持所涌现出的团队感。两个量表均经过改编以适用于人人合作场景，从而实现跨智能体的比较。通过三项研究（总样本量N=409），涵盖合作纸牌游戏、大语言模型（LLM）交互以及决策支持系统，对维度结构、信度与效度的分析表明，两个量表均能有效区分不同合作质量的合作伙伴，并展现出符合预期的构念效度。这些量表为广泛的人机协作情境下的实证研究与系统评估提供了基础。

As human-AI cooperation becomes increasingly prevalent, reliable instruments for assessing the subjective quality of cooperative human-AI interaction are needed. We introduce two theoretically grounded scales: the Perceived Cooperativity Scale (PCS), grounded in joint activity theory, and the Teaming Perception Scale (TPS), grounded in evolutionary cooperation theory. The PCS captures an agent’s perceived cooperative capability and practice within a single interaction sequence; the TPS captures the emergent sense of teaming arising from mutual contribution and support. Both scales were adapted for human-human cooperation to enable cross-agent comparisons. Across three studies (N = 409) encompassing a cooperative card game, LLM interaction, and a decision-support system, analyses of dimensionality, reliability, and validity indicated that both scales successfully differentiated between cooperation partners of varying cooperative quality and showed construct validity in line with expectations. The scales provide a basis for empirical investigation and system evaluation across a wide range of human-AI cooperation contexts.

评分理由: 论文主要关注机器人触觉传感中的图像传感器模拟，提出SPLIT方法，利用潜在空间算术分离接触几何与光学属性。不涉及大模型、深度学习或任何列出的关键词，与AI for Science也无直接关联（非科学发现，而是机器人传感）。所有关键词评分均为0。

训练用于机器人触觉感知的机器学习模型需要大量数据，然而由于物理复杂性和多变性，获取真实的交互数据仍然是一项挑战。因此，模拟触觉传感器是加速该领域进展的关键步骤。本文提出SPLIT，一种用于模拟基于图像的触觉传感器的新方法，主要聚焦于DIGIT传感器。我们方法的核心是一种潜在空间算术策略，该策略明确地将接触几何形状与传感器特定的光学特性分离开来。与每个新单元都需要重新校准的方法不同，这种分离使得SPLIT能够适应不同的DIGIT背景，甚至无需完整模型重新训练即可将数据迁移至诸如GelSight R1.5等不同的传感器。除了这种适应性之外，我们的方法还实现了比现有替代方案更快的推理速度。此外，我们提供了一种经过校准的有限元方法（FEM）软体网格模拟，具有可变分辨率，可在速度与保真度之间实现可调节的权衡。另外，我们的算法支持双向模拟，既可以从变形网格生成逼真的图像，也可以从触觉图像重建网格。这种多功能性使SPLIT成为加速机器人触觉感知研究进展的宝贵工具。

Training machine learning models for robotic tactile sensing requires vast amounts of data, yet obtaining realistic interaction data remains a challenge due to physical complexity and variability. Simulating tactile sensors is thus a crucial step in accelerating progress. This paper presents SPLIT, a novel method for simulating image-based tactile sensors, with a primary focus on the DIGIT sensor. Central to our approach is a latent space arithmetic strategy that explicitly disentangles contact geometry from sensor-specific optical properties. Unlike methods that require recalibration for every new unit, this disentanglement allows SPLIT to adapt to diverse DIGIT backgrounds and even transfer data to distinct sensors like the GelSight R1.5 without full model retraining. Beyond this adaptability, our approach achieves faster inference speeds than existing alternatives. Furthermore, we provide a calibrated finite element method (FEM) soft-body mesh simulation with variable resolution, offering a tunable trade-off between speed and fidelity. Additionally, our algorithm supports bidirectional simulation, allowing for both the generation of realistic images from deformation meshes and the reconstruction of meshes from tactile images. This versatility makes SPLIT a valuable tool for accelerating progress in robotic tactile sensing research.