📊 ArXiv 研究报告 (2026-05-05)

生成时间: 2026-05-05 08:43:05 数据源: ArXiv

📌 配置信息

关键词列表(共 27 个,总权重 27.0)

关键词权重类型
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.0主要
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.0主要
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.0主要
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.0主要
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.0主要
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.0主要
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.0主要
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.0主要
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.0主要
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.0主要
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.0主要
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.0主要
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.0主要
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.0主要
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.0主要
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.0主要
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.0主要
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.0主要
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.0主要
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.0主要
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.0主要
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.0主要
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.0主要
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.0主要
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.0主要
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.0主要
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.0主要

评分设置

  • 每个关键词最大分: 15
  • 及格分公式: 5.0 + 0.8 × 总权重
  • 当前及格分: 26.6

📈 论文统计

  • 总抓取: 214 篇
  • 及格论文: 0 篇 (0.0%)

📋 所有论文列表

1. ❌ When RAG Chatbots Expose Their Backend: An Anonymized Case Study of Privacy and Security Risks in Patient-Facing Medical AI

作者: Alfredo Madrid-García, Miguel Rujas 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00796v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Background: Patient-facing medical chatbots based on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) are increasingly promoted to deliver accessible, grounded health information. AI-assisted development lowers the barrier to building them, but they still demand rigorous security, privacy, and governance controls. Objective: To report an anonymized, non-destructive security assessment of a publicly accessible patient-facing medical RAG chatbot and identify governance lessons for safe deployment of generative AI in health. Methods: We used a two-stage strategy. First, Claude Opus 4.6 supported exploratory prompt-based testing and structured vulnerability hypotheses. Second, candidate findings were manually verified using Chrome Developer Tools, inspecting browser-visible network traffic, payloads, API schemas, configuration objects, and stored interaction data. Results: The LLM-assisted phase identified a critical vulnerability: sensitive system and RAG configuration appeared exposed through client-server communication rather than restricted server-side. Manual verification confirmed that ordinary browser inspection allowed collection of the system prompt, model and embedding configuration, retrieval parameters, backend endpoints, API schema, document and chunk metadata, knowledge-base content, and the 1,000 most recent patient-chatbot conversations. The deployment also contradicted its privacy assurances: full conversation records, including health-related queries, were retrievable without authentication. Conclusions: Serious privacy and security failures in patient-facing RAG chatbots can be identified with standard browser tools, without specialist skills or authentication; independent review should be a prerequisite for deployment. Commercial LLMs accelerated this assessment, including under a false developer persona; assistance available to auditors is equally available to adversaries.



2. ❌ Can Coding Agents Reproduce Findings in Computational Materials Science?

作者: Ziyang Huang, Yi Cao, Ali K. Shargh, Jing Luo, Ruidong Mei, Mohd Zaki, Zhan Liu, Wyatt Bunstine, William Jurayj, Somdatta Goswami, Tyrel McQueen, Michael Shields, Jaafar El-Awady, Paulette Clancy, Benjamin Van Durme, Nicholas Andrews, William Walden, Daniel Khashabi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00803v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models are increasingly deployed as autonomous coding agents and have achieved remarkably strong performance on software engineering benchmarks. However, it is unclear whether such success transfers to computational scientific workflows, where tasks require not only strong coding ability, but also the ability to navigate complex, domain-specific procedures and to interpret results in the context of scientific claims. To address this question, we present AutoMat, a benchmark for evaluating LLM-based agents’ ability to reproduce claims from computational materials science. AutoMat poses three interrelated challenges: recovering underspecified computational procedures, navigating specialized toolchains, and determining whether the resulting evidence supports a claim. By working closely with subject matter experts, we curate a set of claims from real materials science papers to test whether coding agents can recover and execute the end-to-end workflow needed to support (or undermine) such claims. We then evaluate multiple representative coding agent settings across several foundation models. Our results show that current LLM-based agents obtain low overall success rates on AutoMat, with the best-performing setting achieving a success rate of only 54.1%. Error analysis further reveals that agents perform worst when workflows must be reconstructed from paper text alone and that they fail primarily due to incomplete procedures, methodological deviations, and execution fragility. Taken together, these findings position AutoMat as both a benchmark for computational scientific reproducibility and a tool for diagnosing the current limitations of agentic systems in AI-for-science settings.



3. ❌ Persistent Visual Memory: Sustaining Perception for Deep Generation in LVLMs

作者: Siyuan Huang, Xiaoye Qu, Yafu Li, Tong Zhu, Zefeng He, Muxin Fu, Daizong Liu, Wei-Long Zheng, Yu Cheng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00814v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

While autoregressive Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) demonstrate remarkable proficiency in multimodal tasks, they face a “Visual Signal Dilution” phenomenon, where the accumulation of textual history expands the attention partition function, causing visual attention to decay inversely with generated sequence length. To counteract this, we propose Persistent Visual Memory (PVM), a lightweight learnable module designed to ensure sustained, on-demand visual perception. Integrated as a parallel branch alongside the Feed-Forward Network (FFN) in LVLMs, PVM establishes a distance-agnostic retrieval pathway that directly provides visual embeddings for precise visual perception, thereby structurally mitigating the signal suppression inherent to deep generation. Extensive experiments on Qwen3-VL models demonstrate that PVM brings notable improvements with negligible parameter overhead, delivering consistent average accuracy gains across both 4B and 8B scales, particularly in complex reasoning tasks that demand persistent visual perception. Furthermore, in-depth analysis reveals that PVM can resist length-induced signal decay and accelerate internal prediction convergence.



4. ❌ Make Your LVLM KV Cache More Lightweight

作者: Xihao Chen, Yangyang Guo, Roger Zimmermann 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00789v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Key-Value (KV) cache has become a de facto component of modern Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) for inference. While it enhances decoding efficiency in Large Language Models (LLMs), its direct adoption in LVLMs introduces substantial GPU memory overhead due to the large number of vision tokens processed during the prefill stage. To tackle this problem, we propose LightKV, a novel approach that reduces KV cache size by exploiting the redundancy among vision-token embeddings. Guided by text prompts, LightKV employs cross-modality message passing to aggregate informative messages across vision tokens and progressively compress them during prefill. This prompt-aware guidance distinguishes our method from prior vision-only compression strategies. We evaluate LightKV on eight open-source LVLMs across eight public benchmark datasets, e.g., MME and SeedBench. Experimental results demonstrate that with only 55% of the original vision tokens, LightKV (a) halves the vision-token KV cache size, (b) reduces computation by up to 40%, and (c) preserves general-purpose performance while significantly outperforming existing baselines.



5. ❌ Unsupervised Denoising of Real Clinical Low Dose Liver CT with Perceptual Attention Networks

作者: Jingxi Pu, Tonghua Liu, Zhilin Guan, Siqiao Li, Yang Ming, Zheng Cong, Wei Zhang, Fangwei Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00793v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

With the development of deep learning, medical image processing has been widely used to assist clinical research. This paper focuses on the denoising problem of low-dose computed tomography using deep learning. Although low-dose computed tomography reduces radiation exposure to patients, it also introduces more noise, which may interfere with visual interpretation by physicians and affect diagnostic results. To address this problem, inspired by Cycle-GAN for unsupervised learning, this paper proposes an end-to-end unsupervised low-dose computed tomography denoising framework. The proposed framework combines a U-Net structure for multi-scale feature extraction, an attention mechanism for feature fusion, and a residual network for feature transformation. It also introduces perceptual loss to improve the network for the characteristics of medical images. In addition, we construct a real low-dose computed tomography dataset and design a large number of comparative experiments to validate the proposed method, using both image-based evaluation metrics and medical evaluation criteria. Compared with classical methods, the main advantage of this paper is that it addresses the limitation that real clinical data cannot be directly used for supervised learning, while still achieving excellent performance. The experimental results are also professionally evaluated by imaging physicians and meet clinical needs.



6. ❌ GeoContra: From Fluent GIS Code to Verifiable Spatial Analysis with Geography-Grounded Repair

作者: Yinhao Xiao, Rongbo Xiao, Yihan Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00782v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Reliable spatial analysis in GIScience requires preserving coordinate semantics, topology, units, and geographic plausibility. Current LLM-based GIS systems generate fluent scripts but rarely enforce these geographic rules at scale. We present GeoContra, a verification and repair framework for LLM-driven Python GIS workflows. It represents each task as an executable geospatial contract-including natural-language questions, schemas, CRS metadata, expected outputs, spatial predicates, topology, metrics, required operations, and forbidden shortcuts. Generated programs undergo static rule inspection, runtime validation, and semantic verification, with violations fed back into a bounded repair loop. Evaluated on 7,079 real geospatial tasks across 15 Boston-area zones, 9 task families, and 11 open-source models (600 runs each), GeoContra improves spatial correctness on closed models from 47.6% to 77.5% for DeepSeek-V4 and from 57.7% to 81.5% for Kimi-K2.5. Across 11 open models, average correctness rises by 26.6%. GeoContra turns fluent code production into verifiable spatial analysis, catching negative travel times, CRS/field-schema violations, missing predicates, and brittle output casts that otherwise yield executable but geographically invalid results.



7. ❌ Directed Social Regard: Surfacing Targeted Advocacy, Opposition, Aid, Harms, and Victimization in Online Media

作者: Scott Friedman, Ruta Wheelock, Sonja Schmer-Galunder, Drisana Iverson, Jake Vasilakes, Joan Zheng, Jeffrey Rye, Vasanth Sarathy, Christopher Miller 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00776v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The language in online platforms, influence operations, and political rhetoric frequently directs a mix of pro-social sentiment (e.g., advocacy, helpfulness, compassion) and anti-social sentiment (e.g., threats, opposition, blame) at different topics, all in the same message. While many natural language processing (NLP) tools classify or score a text’s overall sentiment as positive, neutral, or negative, these tools cannot report that positive and negative sentiments coexist, and they cannot report the target of those sentiments. This paper presents the Directed Social Regard (DSR) approach to multi-dimensional, multi-valence sentiment analysis, comprised of a pair of transformer-based models that (1) detects span-level targets of sentiment in a message and then (2) scores all spans within the message context along three (-1, 1) axes of regard that are motivated by social science theories of moral disengagement and moral framing. We present a data collection and annotation strategy for DSR dataset construction, a transformer-based architecture for span-level scoring, and a validation study with promising results. We apply the validated DSR model on six third-party datasets of online media and report meaningful correlations between DSR outputs and the labels and topics in these pre-existing social science datasets.



8. ❌ Position: agentic AI orchestration should be Bayes-consistent

作者: Theodore Papamarkou, Pierre Alquier, Matthias Bauer, Wray Buntine, Andrew Davison, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Maurizio Filippone, Andrew Y. K. Foong, Vincent Fortuin, Dimitris Fouskakis, Jes Frellsen, Eyke Hüllermeier, Theofanis Karaletsos, Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan, Nikita Kotelevskii, Salem Lahlou, Yingzhen Li, Fang Liu, Clare Lyle, Thomas Möllenhoff, Konstantina Palla, Maxim Panov, Yusuf Sale, Kajetan Schweighofer, Artem Shelmanov, Siddharth Swaroop, Martin Trapp, Willem Waegeman, Andrew Gordon Wilson, Alexey Zaytsev 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00742v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

LLMs excel at predictive tasks and complex reasoning tasks, but many high-value deployments rely on decisions under uncertainty, for example, which tool to call, which expert to consult, or how many resources to invest. While the usefulness and feasibility of Bayesian approaches remain unclear for LLM inference, this position paper argues that the control layer of an agentic AI system (that orchestrates LLMs and tools) is a clear case where Bayesian principles should shine. Bayesian decision theory provides a framework for agentic systems that can help to maintain beliefs over task-relevant latent quantities, to update these beliefs from observed agentic and human-AI interactions, and to choose actions. Making LLMs themselves explicitly Bayesian belief-updating engines remains computationally intensive and conceptually nontrivial as a general modeling target. In contrast, this paper argues that coherent decision-making requires Bayesian principles at the orchestration level of the agentic system, not necessarily the LLM agent parameters. This paper articulates practical properties for Bayesian control that fit modern agentic AI systems and human-AI collaboration, and provides concrete examples and design patterns to illustrate how calibrated beliefs and utility-aware policies can improve agentic AI orchestration.



9. ❌ Meritocratic Fairness in Budgeted Combinatorial Multi-armed Bandits via Shapley Values

作者: Shradha Sharma, Swapnil Dhamal, Shweta Jain 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00762v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We propose a new framework for meritocratic fairness in budgeted combinatorial multi-armed bandits with full-bandit feedback (BCMAB-FBF). Unlike semi-bandit feedback, the contribution of individual arms is not received in full-bandit feedback, making the setting significantly more challenging. To compute arm contributions in BCMAB-FBF, we first extend the Shapley value, a classical solution concept from cooperative game theory, to the $K$-Shapley value, which captures the marginal contribution of an agent restricted to a set of size at most $K$. We show that $K$-Shapley value is a unique solution concept that satisfies Symmetry, Linearity, Null player, and efficiency properties. We next propose K-SVFair-FBF, a fairness-aware bandit algorithm that adaptively estimates $K$-Shapley value with unknown valuation function. Unlike standard bandit literature on full bandit feedback, K-SVFair-FBF not only learns the valuation function under full feedback setting but also mitigates the noise arising from Monte Carlo approximations. Theoretically, we prove that K-SVFair-FBF achieves $O(T^{3/4})$ regret bound on fairness regret. Through experiments on federated learning and social influence maximization datasets, we demonstrate that our approach achieves fairness and performs more effectively than existing baselines.



10. ❌ EASE: Federated Multimodal Unlearning via Entanglement-Aware Anchor Closure

作者: Zihao Ding, Beining Wu, Jun Huang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00733v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Federated Multimodal Learning (FML) trains multimodal models across decentralized clients while keeping their image-text pairs private. However, joint embedding training entangles forgotten knowledge across both modalities and client gradient subspaces, hindering federated unlearning. Previous federated unlearning approaches neither sever the cross-modal reconstruction channel mediated by bilinear coupling nor separate forget-exclusive update directions from those shared with retained clients. We identify an Anchor Principle for federated multimodal contrastive unlearning: forgotten alignments persist through three residual anchors arising from bilinear cross-modal coupling, principal-angle subspace entanglement, and continued federated updates. At the modality level, we show that bilateral displacement of both visual and language branches closes the cross-modal reconstruction channel. Correspondingly, our method addresses subspace entanglement through Cosine–Sine decomposition of client-update subspaces, isolating forget-exclusive directions from retain support. Moreover, we propose a direction-selective Forget Lock that bounds residual drift across rounds. Combining these strategies, we present EASE, an Entanglement-Aware Subspace Excision framework that closes all three anchor channels under a unified design. EASE demonstrates consistent superiority across multiple datasets and unlearning scenarios, for instance, matching the retrain reference to within 0.2 and 4.2 R@1 points on the forget and retain sides under client unlearning on Flickr30K with CLIP-B/32.



11. ❌ To Call or Not to Call: A Framework to Assess and Optimize LLM Tool Calling

作者: Qinyuan Wu, Soumi Das, Mahsa Amani, Arijit Nag, Seungeon Lee, Krishna P. Gummadi, Abhilasha Ravichander, Muhammad Bilal Zafar 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00737v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Agentic AI architectures augment LLMs with external tools, unlocking strong capabilities. However, tool use is not always beneficial; some calls may be redundant or even harmful. Effective tool use, therefore, hinges on a core LLM decision: whether to call or not call a tool, when performing a task. This decision is particularly challenging for web search tools, where the benefits of external information depend on the model’s internal knowledge and its ability to integrate potentially noisy tool responses. We introduce a principled framework inspired by decision-making theory to evaluate web search tool-use decisions along three key factors: necessity, utility, and affordability. Our analysis combines two complementary lenses: a normative perspective that infers true need and utility from an optimal allocation of tool calls, and a descriptive perspective that infers the model’s self-perceived need and utility from their observed behaviors. We find that models’ perceived need and utility of tool calls are often misaligned with their true need and utility. Building on this framework, we train lightweight estimators of need and utility based on models’ hidden states. Our estimators enable simple controllers that can improve decision quality and lead to stronger task performance than the self-perceived set up across three tasks and six models.



12. ❌ Empowering Heterogeneous Graph Foundation Models via Decoupled Relation Alignment

作者: Ziyu Zheng, Yaming Yang, Zhe Wang, Ziyu Guan, Wei Zhao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00731v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

While Graph Foundation Models (GFMs) have achieved remarkable success in homogeneous graphs, extending them to multi-domain heterogeneous graphs (MDHGs) remains a formidable challenge due to cross-type feature shifts and intra-domain relation gaps. Existing global feature alignment methods (PCA or SVD) enforce a shared feature space blindly, which distorts type-specific semantics and disrupts original topologies, inevitably leading to “Type Collapse” and “Relation Confusion”. To address these fundamental limitations, we propose Decoupled relation Subspace Alignment (DRSA), a novel, plug-and-play relation-driven alignment framework. DRSA fundamentally shifts the paradigm by decoupling feature semantics from relation structures. Specifically, it introduces a dual-relation subspace projection mechanism to coordinate cross-type interactions within a shared low-rank relation subspace explicitly. Furthermore, a feature-structure decoupled representation is designed to decompose aligned features into a semantic projection component and a structural residual term, adaptively absorbing intra-domain variations. Optimized via a stable alternating minimization strategy based on Block Coordinate Descent, DRSA constructs a well-calibrated, structure-aware latent space. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world benchmark datasets demonstrate that DRSA can be seamlessly integrated as a universal preprocessing module, significantly and consistently enhancing the cross-domain and few-shot knowledge transfer capabilities of state-of-the-art GFMs. The code is available at: https://github.com/zhengziyu77/DSRA.



13. ❌ Augmented Lagrangian Multiplier Network for State-wise Safety in Reinforcement Learning

作者: Jiaming Zhang, Yujie Yang, Yao Lyu, Shengbo Eben Li, Liping Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00667v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Safety is a primary challenge in real-world reinforcement learning (RL). Formulating safety requirements as state-wise constraints has become a prominent paradigm. Handling state-wise constraints with the Lagrangian method requires a distinct multiplier for every state, necessitating neural networks to approximate them as a multiplier network. However, applying standard dual gradient ascent to multiplier networks induces severe training oscillations. This is because the inherent instability of dual ascent is exacerbated by network generalization – local overshoots and delayed updates propagate to adjacent states, further amplifying policy fluctuations. Existing stabilization techniques are designed for scalar multipliers, which are inadequate for state-dependent multiplier networks. To address this challenge, we propose an augmented Lagrangian multiplier network (ALaM) framework for stable learning of state-wise multipliers. ALaM consists of two key components. First, a quadratic penalty is introduced into the augmented Lagrangian to compensate for delayed multiplier updates and establish the local convexity near the optimum, thereby mitigating policy oscillations. Second, the multiplier network is trained via supervised regression toward a dual target, which stabilizes training and promotes convergence. Theoretically, we show that ALaM guarantees multiplier convergence and thus recovers the optimal policy of the constrained problem. Building on this framework, we integrate soft actor-critic (SAC) with ALaM to develop the SAC-ALaM algorithm. Experiments demonstrate that SAC-ALaM outperforms state-of-the-art safe RL baselines in both safety and return, while also stabilizing training dynamics and learning well-calibrated multipliers for risk identification.



14. ❌ Towards Improving Speaker Distance Estimation through Generative Impulse Response Augmentation

作者: Anton Ratnarajah, Mehmet Ergezer, Arun Nair, Mrudula Athi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00721v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The Room Acoustics and Speaker Distance Estimation (SDE) Challenge at ICASSP 2025 explores the effectiveness of augmented room impulse response (RIR) data for improving SDE model performance. This challenge at GenDARA involves generating RIRs to supplement sparse datasets and fine-tuning SDE models with the augmented data. We employ the open-source fast diffuse room impulse response generator (FastRIR) conditioned only on speaker and listener locations. We design a quality filter to ensure generated RIR alignment with challenge RIRs, and hyperparameter optimization is employed for model fine-tuning. Our approach reduces the mean absolute error (MAE) of the five positions from 1.66m to 0.6m for GWA rooms and from 2.18m to 0.69m for Treble rooms, with results demonstrating that the augmentation approach significantly improves estimation accuracy, particularly at medium to long distances.



15. ❌ InpaintSLat: Inpainting Structured 3D Latents via Initial Noise Optimization

作者: Jaeyoung Chung, Suyoung Lee, Kyoung Mu Lee 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00664v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present a training-free approach for controllable 3D inpainting based on initial noise optimization. In the structured 3D latent diffusion framework, we observe that the underlying geometric structure is established during the early stages of the diffusion process and exhibits high sensitivity to the initial noise. Such characteristics compromise stability in tasks like inpainting and editing, where the model must ensure strict alignment with the existing context while synthesizing a new structure. In this paper, we introduce a strategy to optimize the initial noise within the structured 3D latent diffusion framework, ensuring high-fidelity 3D inpainting. Specifically, we update the initial noise by leveraging a backpropagation approximation grounded in the rectified flow model, with the spectral parameterization specially designed for robust and efficient structured 3D latent optimization. Experiments demonstrate consistent improvements in contextual consistency and prompt alignment over representative training-free inpainting baselines, establishing initial noise control as an independent dimension for 3D inpainting, orthogonal to conventional sampling trajectory manipulation.



16. ❌ Reinforcement Learning with Markov Risk Measures and Multipattern Risk Approximation

作者: Andrzej Ruszczynski, Tiangang Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00654v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

For a risk-averse finite-horizon Markov Decision Problem, we introduce a special class of Markov coherent risk measures, called mini-batch measures. We also define the class of multipattern risk-averse problems that generalizes the class of linear systems. We use both concepts in a feature-based $Q$-learning method with multipattern $Q$-factor approximation and we prove a high-probability regret bound of $\mathcal{O}\big(H^2 N^H \sqrt{ K}\big)$, where $H$ is the horizon, $N$ is the mini-batch size, and $K$ is the number of episodes. We also propose an economical version of the $Q$-learning method that streamlines the policy evaluation (backward) step. The theoretical results are illustrated on a stochastic assignment problem and a short-horizon multi-armed bandit problem.



17. ❌ AdaMeZO: Adam-style Zeroth-Order Optimizer for LLM Fine-tuning Without Maintaining the Moments

作者: Zhijie Cai, Haolong Chen, Guangxu Zhu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00650v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Fine-tuning LLMs is necessary for various dedicated downstream tasks, but classic backpropagation-based fine-tuning methods require substantial GPU memory. To this end, a recent work, MeZO, which relies solely on forward passes to fine-tune LLMs, significantly reduces GPU requirements at the cost of slower convergence due to its indifference to loss landscapes. Standard solutions, such as Adam, explore loss landscapes by estimating the first- and second-order moments and storing them in memory to guide the model’s movement through dimensions with lower curvature and vice versa. However, directly applying Adam negates MeZO’s advantage as it will triple the memory requirement. In light of this, we propose AdaMeZO, a zeroth-order optimizer that leverages Adam-style first- and second-moment estimates without maintaining them in memory. We present a theoretical analysis of AdaMeZO, corroborated by extensive experiments demonstrating AdaMeZO’s performance, showing that AdaMeZO can outperform MeZO while requiring up to $70%$ fewer forward passes. Trajectory visualizations affirm AdaMeZO’s ability to adapt to diverse loss landscapes.



18. ❌ Learning Multimodal Energy-Based Model with Multimodal Variational Auto-Encoder via MCMC Revision

作者: Jiali Cui, Zhiqiang Lao, Heather Yu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00644v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Energy-based models (EBMs) are a flexible class of deep generative models and are well-suited to capture complex dependencies in multimodal data. However, learning multimodal EBM by maximum likelihood requires Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling in the joint data space, where noise-initialized Langevin dynamics often mixes poorly and fails to discover coherent inter-modal relationships. Multimodal VAEs have made progress in capturing such inter-modal dependencies by introducing a shared latent generator and a joint inference model. However, both the shared latent generator and joint inference model are parameterized as unimodal Gaussian (or Laplace), which severely limits their ability to approximate the complex structure induced by multimodal data. In this work, we study the learning problem of the multimodal EBM, shared latent generator, and joint inference model. We present a learning framework that effectively interweaves their MLE updates with corresponding MCMC refinements in both the data and latent spaces. Specifically, the generator is learned to produce coherent multimodal samples that serve as strong initial states for EBM sampling, while the inference model is learned to provide informative latent initializations for generator posterior sampling. Together, these two models serve as complementary models that enable effective EBM sampling and learning, yielding realistic and coherent multimodal EBM samples. Extensive experiments demonstrate superior performance for multimodal synthesis quality and coherence compared to various baselines. We conduct various analyses and ablation studies to validate the effectiveness and scalability of the proposed multimodal framework.



19. ❌ Learn where to Click from Yourself: On-Policy Self-Distillation for GUI Grounding

作者: Yan Zhang, Daiqing Wu, Huawen Shen, Yu Zhou, Can Ma 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00642v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Graphical User Interface (GUI) grounding maps natural language instructions to the visual coordinates of target elements and serves as a core capability for autonomous GUI agents. Recent reinforcement learning methods (e.g., GRPO) have achieved strong performance, but they rely on expensive multiple rollouts and suffer from sparse signals on hard samples. These limitations make on-policy self-distillation (OPSD), which provides dense token-level supervision from a single rollout, a promising alternative. However, its applicability to GUI grounding remains unexplored. In this paper, we present GUI-SD, the first OPSD framework tailored for GUI grounding. First, it constructs a visually enriched privileged context for the teacher using a target bounding box and a Gaussian soft mask, providing informative guidance without leaking exact coordinates. Second, it employs entropy-guided distillation, which adaptively weights tokens based on digit significance and teacher confidence, concentrating optimization on the most impactful and reliable positions. Extensive experiments on six representative GUI grounding benchmarks show that GUI-SD consistently outperforms GRPO-based methods and naive OPSD in both accuracy and training efficiency. Code and training data are available at https://zhangyan-ucas.github.io/GUI-SD/.



20. ❌ Born-Qualified: An Autonomous Framework for Deploying Advanced Energy and Electronic Materials

作者: Steven R. Spurgeon, Milad Abolhasani, Frederick Baddour, Ryan B. Comes, Vinayak P. Dravid, Hilary Egan, Patrick Emami, Robert W. Epps, Davi M. Fébba, Renae Gannon, E. Ashley Gaulding, Ayana Ghosh, Kenny Gruchalla, Grace Guinan, Taro Hitosugi, Michael Holden, Sergei V. Kalinin, Yangang Liang, John S. Mangum, Matthew J. Olszta, Nathaniel H. Park, Axel Palmstrom, Michelle A. Smeaton, Brooks Tellekamp, Nicholas E. Thornburg, Raymond R. Unocic, Daniela Ushizima, Rama K. Vasudevan, Robert White, Andrew Young, Andriy Zakutayev 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00639v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Autonomous science is transforming how we discover materials and chemical systems for advanced energy technologies. However, many initially promising systems never reach deployment. This “valley of death” stems from optimization that prioritizes laboratory metrics over industrial viability. We propose a new strategy: “born-qualified” autonomous development, which embeds manufacturability, cost, and durability constraints from the outset. This approach is enabled by four pillars, including the development of multi-objective metrics, causal models, a modular infrastructure, and embedding manufacturing in the discovery loop. Realizing this vision will require sustained, community-wide commitment, but the potential return on that investment is commensurate with the scale of the challenge.



21. ❌ BlenderRAG: High-Fidelity 3D Object Generation via Retrieval-Augmented Code Synthesis

作者: Massimo Rondelli, Francesco Pivi, Maurizio Gabbrielli 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00632v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Automatic generation of executable Blender code from natural language remains challenging, with state-of-the-art LLMs producing frequent syntactic errors and geometrically inconsistent objects. We present BlenderRAG, a retrieval-augmented generation system that operates on a curated multimodal dataset of 500 expert-validated examples (text, code, image) across 50 object categories. By retrieving semantically similar examples during generation, BlenderRAG improves compilation success rates from 40.8% to 70.0% and semantic normalized alignment from 0.41 to 0.77 (CLIP similarity) across four state-of-the-art LLMs, without requiring fine-tuning or specialized hardware, making it immediately accessible for deployment. The dataset and code will be available at https://github.com/MaxRondelli/BlenderRAG.



22. ❌ Fairness of Classifiers in the Presence of Constraints between Features

作者: Martin C. Cooper, Imane Bousdira 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00592v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In Machine Learning, an accepted definition of fairness of a decision taken by a classifier is that it should not depend on protected features, such as gender. Unfortunately, when constraints exist between features, such dependencies can be obscured by the constraints. To avoid this problem, we propose that a decision be considered fair if it has a fair explanation. We define a fair explanation as a prime-implicant reason for the decision that does not contain any protected feature (where the constraints are taken into account in the definition of prime-implicant). Surprisingly, ignoring constraints can completely change the fairness of a decision (according to this definition) even in the absence of constraints between protected and unprotected features. Three possible definitions of fairness of a classifier are that for all its decisions (1) there are only fair explanations, (2) there is at least one fair explanation, or (3) changing protected features does not change the outcome. We identify the relationships between these different definitions of fairness and study the computational complexity of testing fairness of classifiers.



23. ❌ Possibilistic Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Learning

作者: Yao Ni, Jeremie Houssineau, Yew Soon Ong, Piotr Koniusz 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00600v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Deep neural networks achieve impressive results across diverse applications, yet their overconfidence on unseen inputs necessitates reliable epistemic uncertainty modelling. Existing methods for uncertainty modelling face a fundamental dilemma: Bayesian approaches provide principled estimates but remain computationally prohibitive, while efficient second-order predictors lack rigorous derivations connecting their specific objectives to epistemic uncertainty quantification. To resolve this dilemma, we introduce Dirichlet-approximated possibilistic posterior predictions (DAPPr), a principled framework leveraging possibility theory. We define a possibilistic posterior over parameters, projects this posterior to the prediction space via supremum operators, and approximates the projected posterior using learnable Dirichlet possibility functions. This projection-and-approximation strategy yields a simple training objective with closed-form solutions. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that our approach achieves competitive or superior uncertainty quantification performance compared to state-of-the-art evidential deep learning methods while maintaining both principled derivation and computational efficiency. Code will be available at https://github.com/MaxwellYaoNi/DAPPr.



24. ❌ Jailbreaking Vision-Language Models Through the Visual Modality

作者: Aharon Azulay, Jan Dubiński, Zhuoyun Li, Atharv Mittal, Yossi Gandelsman 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00583v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The visual modality of vision-language models (VLMs) is an underexplored attack surface for bypassing safety alignment. We introduce four jailbreak attacks exploiting the vision component: (1) encoding harmful instructions as visual symbol sequences with a decoding legend, (2) replacing harmful objects with benign substitutes (e.g., bomb -> banana) then prompting for harmful actions using the substitute term, (3) replacing harmful text in images (e.g., on book covers) with benign words while visual context preserves the original meaning, and (4) visual analogy puzzles whose solution requires inferring a prohibited concept. Evaluating across six frontier VLMs, our visual attacks bypass safety alignment and expose a cross-modality alignment gap: text-based safety training does not automatically generalize to harmful intent conveyed visually. For example, our visual cipher achieves 40.9% attack success on Claude-Haiku-4.5 versus 10.7% for an equivalent textual cipher. To further our insight into the attack mechanism, we present preliminary interpretability and mitigation results. These findings highlight that robust VLM alignment requires treating vision as a first-class target for safety post-training.



25. ❌ AI Washing Inflates Expected Performance but Not Interaction Outcomes: An AI Placebo Study Using Fitts’ Law

作者: Nick von Felten, Luisa Ella Müller, Johannes Schöning 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00582v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Expectations about the support of artificial intelligence (AI) may influence interaction outcomes similar to placebos. Such expectations may result from AI washing, a practice of overstating a system’s AI capabilities when actual functionality is limited. For example, some computer mice are marketed as “AI-assisted” despite lacking AI in core functions. In a within-subjects study, 28 participants completed Fitts’ Law tasks with a computer mouse under three conditions: no support, supposed predictive AI support, and supposed biosignal-enhanced AI support. Objective Fitts’ Law performance indicators and subjective performance expectations, perceived workload, and perceived usability were measured. Compared to baseline, participants expected significantly improved performance in placebo conditions. However, these expectations did not translate into differences in objective or subjective assessments. This paper contributes evidence that AI washing inflates user expectations without altering actual interaction outcomes, highlighting a critical transparency issue. By exposing how deceptive AI marketing can shape user expectations, we underscore the need for accountability in AI product claims. Further, we establish Fitts’ Law as a rigorous methodological lens for auditing AI-labelled input devices.



26. ❌ Instance-Aware Parameter Configuration in Bilevel Late Acceptance Hill Climbing for the Electric Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem

作者: Yinghao Qin, Xinwei Wang, Mosab Bazargani, Jun Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00572v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Algorithm performance in combinatorial optimization is highly sensitive to parameter settings, while a single globally tuned configuration often fails to exploit the heterogeneity of instances. This limitation is particularly evident in the Electric Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem, where instances differ in structure, demand patterns, and energy constraints. This paper investigates instance-aware parameter configuration for Bilevel Late Acceptance Hill Climbing, a state-of-the-art metaheuristic for the Electric Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem. An offline tuning procedure is used to obtain instance-specific parameter labels, which are then mapped from instance features via a regression model to enable parameter prediction for unseen instances prior to execution. Experimental results on the IEEE WCCI 2020 benchmark and its extensions show that the proposed approach achieves an average objective value reduction of $0.28%$ across eight held-out test instances relative to a globally tuned configuration. This corresponds to a significant cost reduction in multimillion-dollar transportation operations.



27. ❌ Structure Liberates: How Constrained Sensemaking Produces More Novel Research Output

作者: James Mooney, Zae Myung Kim, Young-Jun Lee, Dongyeop Kang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00557v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Scientific discovery is an extended process of ideation–surveying prior work, forming hypotheses, and refining reasoning–yet existing approaches treat this phase as a brief preamble despite its central role in research. We introduce SCISENSE, a sensemaking-grounded framework that operationalizes ideation as a structured sequence of eight cognitive stages (Pirolli & Card, 2005). We construct SCISENSE-Traj, a 100K-scale dataset of citation-conditioned research trajectories in two modes: Target, where an LLM reconstructs the ideation path leading to a known paper from its cited works, and Infer, where the LLM proposes novel directions from the same citations. We distill these into SCISENSE-LM, a family of sensemaking LLMs spanning 3B to 70B parameters. Contrary to the assumption that looser supervision promotes greater exploration, Target-trained models achieve a 2.0% improvement in trajectory quality over Infer-trained models while also producing more novel and diverse outputs. This advantage propagates downstream: coding agents conditioned on Target trajectories produce research artifacts with higher executability and quality than those conditioned on Infer trajectories. This suggests that targeted ideation reduces cognitive burden on downstream agents, freeing them to explore more creatively. SCISENSE offers both a practical tool for augmenting LLM-driven research workflows and a principled testbed for studying how planning shapes scientific discovery.



28. ❌ A11y-Compressor: A Framework for Enhancing the Efficiency of GUI Agent Observations through Visual Context Reconstruction and Redundancy Reduction

作者: Michito Takeshita, Takuro Kawada, Takumi Ohashi, Shunsuke Kitada, Hitoshi Iyatomi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00551v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

AI agents that interact with graphical user interfaces (GUIs) require effective observation representations for reliable grounding. The accessibility tree is a commonly used text-based format that encodes UI element attributes, but it suffers from redundancy and lacks structural information such as spatial relationships among elements. We propose A11y-Compressor, a framework that transforms linearized accessibility trees into compact and structured representations. Our implementation, Compressed-a11y, applies a lightweight and structured transformation pipeline with modal detection, redundancy reduction, and semantic structuring. Experiments on the OSWorld benchmark show that Compressed-a11y reduces input tokens to 22% of the original while improving task success rates by 5.1 percentage points on average.



29. ❌ Linking Behaviour and Perception to Evaluate Meaningful Human Control over Partially Automated Driving

作者: Ashwin George, Lucas Elbert Suryana, Lorenzo Flipse, Bart van Arem, David A. Abbink, Simeon Craig Calvert, Luciano Cavalcante Siebert, Arkady Zgonnikov 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00556v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Partial driving automation creates a tension: drivers remain legally responsible for vehicle behaviour, yet their active control is significantly reduced. This reduction undermines the engagement and sense of agency needed to intervene safely. Meaningful human control (MHC) has been proposed as a normative framework to address this tension. However, empirical methods for evaluating whether existing systems actually provide MHC remain underdeveloped. In this study, we investigated the extent to which drivers experience MHC when interacting with partially automated driving systems. Twenty-four drivers completed a simulator study involving silent automation failures under two modes - haptic shared control (HSC) and traded control (TC). We derived behavioural metrics from telemetry data, subjective perception scores from post-trial surveys and used them to test hypothesised relations between them derived from the properties of systems under MHC. The confirmatory analysis showed a significant negative correlation between the perception of the automated vehicle (AV) understanding the driver and conflict in steering torques. An exploratory analysis also revealed a surprising positive correlation between reaction times and the perception of sufficient control. Qualitative feedback from open-ended post-experiment questionnaires revealed that mismatches in intentions between the driver and automation, lack of safety, and resistance to driver inputs contribute to the reduction of perceived MHC, while subtle haptic guidance aligned with driver intent had a positive effect. These findings suggest that future designs should prioritise effortless driver interventions, transparent communication of automation intent, and context-sensitive authority allocation to strengthen meaningful human control in partially automated driving.



30. ❌ Beyond Continuity: Simulation-free Reconstruction of Discrete Branching Dynamics from Single-cell Snapshots

作者: Junda Ying, Yuxuan Wang, Bowen Yang, Peijie Zhou, Lei Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00545v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Inferring cellular trajectories from destructive snapshots is complicated by the challenges of stochasticity and non-conservative mass dynamics such as cell proliferation and apoptosis. Existing unbalanced Optimal Transport (OT) methods treat mass as a continuous fluid, performing inference at the population level. However, this macroscopic view often fails to capture the discrete, jump-like nature of birth-death events at single-cell resolution, which is essential for understanding lineage branching and fate decisions. We present Unbalanced Schrödinger Bridge (USB), a simulation-free framework for learning underlying dynamics that effectively integrates both stochastic and unbalanced effects which also models the discrete, jump-like birth-death dynamics at single-cell resolution. Theoretically, USB provides a tractable solution to the Branching Schrödinger Bridge (BSB) problem, offering a rigorous microscopic interpretation where individual cells undergo both Brownian motion and discrete birth-death jumps. Technically, the method implements an efficient solver by introducing a simulation-free training objective that effectively scales to high-dimensional omics data. Empirically, we demonstrate on both simulated and real-world datasets that USB not only achieves trajectory reconstruction performance better than or comparable to deterministic baselines but also uniquely enables realistic discrete simulation of birth-death dynamics at single-cell resolution.



31. ❌ SAGA: Workflow-Atomic Scheduling for AI Agent Inference on GPU Clusters

作者: Dongxin Guo, Jikun Wu, Siu Ming Yiu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00528v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

AI agents execute tens to hundreds of chained LLM calls per task, yet GPU schedulers treat each call as independent, discarding gigabytes of intermediate state between steps and inflating end-to-end latency by 3-8x. We argue that this request-level abstraction is fundamentally mismatched to compound AI workloads, and propose a shift to program-level scheduling: treating the entire agent workflow (not individual inference calls) as the first-class schedulable unit. We present SAGA, a distributed scheduler that implements this abstraction through three mechanisms: (1) Agent Execution Graphs that capture workflow structure to predict KV cache reuse across tool-call boundaries, achieving within 1.31x of Bélády’s optimal offline policy; (2) session-affinity batching with work stealing that co-locates correlated requests while maintaining global load balance; and (3) Agent Fair Share, a task-completion-time fairness metric with provable bounded-deviation guarantees. On a 64-GPU cluster serving SWE-bench coding agents and WebArena browser tasks, SAGA reduces task completion time by 1.64x (geometric mean, p < 0.001) over vLLM v0.15.1 with prefix caching and affinity routing, while improving GPU memory utilization by 1.22x and achieving 99.2% SLO attainment under multi-tenant interference. These latency gains come at a quantified cost: approximately 30% lower peak throughput than throughput-optimal batch scheduling, a tradeoff appropriate for the latency-sensitive interactive deployments that dominate compound AI usage. Our results demonstrate that workflow-aware scheduling is essential for efficient compound AI serving.



32. ❌ Hierarchical Abstract Tree for Cross-Document Retrieval-Augmented Generation

作者: Ziwen Zhao, Menglin Yang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00529v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models with external knowledge, and tree-based RAG organizes documents into hierarchical indexes to support queries at multiple granularities. However, existing Tree-RAG methods designed for single-document retrieval face critical challenges in scaling to cross-document multi-hop questions: (1) poor distribution adaptability, where $k$-means clustering introduces noise due to rigid distribution assumptions; (2) structural isolation, as tree indexes lack explicit cross-document connections; and (3) coarse abstraction, which obscures fine-grained details. To address these limitations, we propose $Ψ$-RAG, a tree-RAG framework with two key components. First, a hierarchical abstract tree index built through an iterative “merging and collapse” process that adapts to data distributions without a priori assumption. Second, a multi-granular retrieval agent that intelligently interacts with the knowledge base with reorganized queries and an agent-powered hybrid retriever. $Ψ$-RAG supports diverse tasks from token-level question answering to document-level summarization. On cross-document multi-hop QA benchmarks, it outperforms RAPTOR by 25.9% and HippoRAG 2 by 7.4% in average F1 score. Code is available at https://github.com/Newiz430/Psi-RAG.



33. ❌ Silicon Showdown: Performance, Efficiency, and Ecosystem Barriers in Consumer-Grade LLM Inference

作者: Allan Kazakov, Abdurrahman Javat 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00519v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The operational landscape of local Large Language Model (LLM) inference has shifted from lightweight models to datacenter-class weights exceeding 70B parameters, creating profound systems challenges for consumer hardware. This paper presents a systematic empirical analysis of the Nvidia and Apple Silicon ecosystems, specifically characterizing the distinct intra-architecture trade-offs required to deploy these massive models. On the Nvidia Blackwell architecture, we identify a critical “Backend Dichotomy” within the TensorRT-LLM stack: while the new NVFP4 quantization format delivers a 1.6x throughput advantage over optimized BF16 baselines (151 tokens/s vs. 92 tokens/s), realizing this performance requires navigating complex runtime constraints that trade startup latency for generation speed. Furthermore, we characterize the “VRAM Wall” for 70B+ models: on discrete GPUs, users face a destructive choice between aggressive quantization (e.g., Q2) that degrades model intelligence to fit in VRAM, or PCIe-bottlenecked CPU offloading, which reduces throughput by over 90% compared to full-GPU execution. Conversely, Apple’s Unified Memory Architecture (UMA) circumvents these bottlenecks, enabling linear scaling for 80B parameter models at practical 4-bit precisions. This architectural divergence extends to operational sustainability, where Apple’s SoC design demonstrates up to a 23x advantage in energy efficiency (tokens/joule). We conclude that for consumer-grade inference, the optimal hardware is defined by a complex interplay between compute density (Nvidia) and memory capacity (Apple), moderated by the significant “ecosystem friction” of proprietary quantization workflows.



34. ❌ LLM-Oriented Information Retrieval: A Denoising-First Perspective

作者: Lu Dai, Liang Sun, Fanpu Cao, Ziyang Rao, Cehao Yang, Hao Liu, Hui Xiong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00505v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Modern information retrieval (IR) is no longer consumed primarily by humans but increasingly by large language models (LLMs) via retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and agentic search. Unlike human users, LLMs are constrained by limited attention budgets and are uniquely vulnerable to noise; misleading or irrelevant information is no longer just a nuisance, but a direct cause of hallucinations and reasoning failures. In this perspective paper, we argue that denoising-maximizing usable evidence density and verifiability within a context window-is becoming the primary bottleneck across the full information access pipeline. We conceptualize this paradigm shift through a four-stage framework of IR challenges: from inaccessible to undiscoverable, to misaligned, and finally to unverifiable. Furthermore, we provide a pipeline-organized taxonomy of signal-to-noise optimization techniques, spanning indexing, retrieval, context engineering, verification, and agentic workflow. We also present research works on information denoising in domains that rely heavily on retrieval such as lifelong assistant, coding agent, deep research, and multimodal understanding.



35. ❌ Space Network of Experts: Architecture and Expert Placement

作者: Zhanwei Wang, Huiling Yang, Min Sheng, Khaled B. Letaief, Kaibin Huang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00515v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Leveraging continuous solar energy harvesting at high efficiency, space data centers are envisioned as a promising platform for executing energy-intensive large language models (LLMs). Recognizing this advantage, space and AI conglomerates (e.g., SpaceX, Google) are actively investing in this vision. One key challenge, however, is the efficient distributed deployment of a large-scale LLM in a satellite network due to the limited onboard computing and communication resources. This gives rise to a placement problem that involves partitioning and mapping model components to satellites such that the fundamentally different model architecture and network topology can be reconciled to ensure low-latency token generation. To address this problem, we present the Space Network of Experts (Space-XNet) framework targeting the distributed execution of a popular mixture-of-experts (MoE) model in space. The proposed placement strategies are two-level: (1) layer placement, which assigns MoE layers to satellite subnets; and (2) intra-layer expert placement, which assigns individual experts to satellites associated with the same layer/subnet. For layer placement, we exploit the ring-like communication pattern of autoregressive inference to partition the satellite constellation along the orbiting direction into subnets arranged on a ring, each hosting one MoE layer. Based on this architecture, we formulate and solve an optimization problem for intra-layer expert placement to map experts with heterogeneous activation probabilities onto satellites. The derived strategy reveals an intuitive principle: a frequently activated expert should be mapped to a satellite on a routing path with low expected latency. Experiments over a thousand-satellite constellation show that Space-XNet achieves at least a threefold latency reduction compared with conventional random and ablation-based placement strategies.



36. ❌ “What Are You Really Trying to Do?”: Co-Creating Life Goals from Everyday Computer Use

作者: Shardul Sapkota, Matthew Jörke, Zane Sabbagh, Omar Shaikh, Grace Wang, James A. Landay 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00497v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent advances in user modeling make it feasible to conduct open-ended inference over a person’s everyday computer use. Despite longstanding visions of systems that deeply understand our actions and the purposes they serve in our lives, existing systems only capture what a person is doing in the moment – not why they are doing it – limiting these systems to surface-level support. We introduce striving co-creation, a process for inferring broader life goals from unstructured observations of computer use. Grounded in Activity Theory and Emmons’ personal strivings framework, our system progressively constructs a hierarchical representation of a person’s activities. Crucially, strivings are difficult to fully resolve from observation alone, as the same action can be driven by many different goals. Our system therefore supports an editing interface that gives people agency over how they are understood by the system, feeding their corrections back into subsequent rounds of striving induction. In a week-long field deployment (N=14), we find that our co-creation process produces strivings that are representative of participants’ long-term goals and gives them greater agency than baseline methods.



37. ❌ Scalable Context-Aware Graph Attention for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Large-Scale Mobile Networks

作者: Sara Malacarne, Eirik Hoel-Høiseth, Erlend Aune, David Zsolt Biró, Massimiliano Ruocco 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00482v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Mobile network operators must monitor thousands of heterogeneous network elements across the radio access network and the packet core, each exposing high-dimensional KPI time series. The scale and cost of incident labelling make supervised approaches impractical, motivating unsupervised anomaly detection robust to context shifts and nonstationarity. We propose \textbf{C-MTAD-GAT} (\emph{Context-aware Multivariate Time-series Anomaly Detection with Graph Attention}), an anomaly detection framework designed to operate as a single shared model across large populations of network elements. The model combines temporal and feature-wise graph attention with lightweight static and dynamic context conditioning and a dual-head decoder for reconstruction and multi-step forecasting. It produces per-element, per-feature anomaly scores, converted to alerts via fully unsupervised thresholds calibrated from validation residuals. On the TELCO dataset released with DC-VAE \cite{garcia2023onemodel}, C-MTAD-GAT improves event-level affiliation and pointwise F1 while generating fewer alarms than prior graph-attention and VAE-based baselines. We then apply the same system to nation-scale radio access and evolved packet core control-plane counter data from a mobile network operator, where it is deployed. Operator feedback indicates the alerts are actionable and support daily monitoring, showing scalability across domains without relying on labelled incidents.



38. ❌ PAMod: Modeling Cyclical Shifts via Phase-Amplitude Modulation for Non-stationary Time Series Forecasting

作者: Yingbo Zhou, Yutong Ye, Shuhao Li, Rui Qian, Qiang Huang, Lemao Liu, Li Sun, Dejing Dou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00466v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Real-world time series forecasting faces the fundamental challenge of non-stationary statistical properties, including shifts in mean and variance over time. While reversible instance normalization (RevIN) has shown promise by stationarizing inputs and denormalizing outputs, it relies on the strong assumption that historical and future distributions remain identical. We observe that in many practical applications, distribution shifts follow cyclical patterns that correlate with periodic positions (e.g., seasonal and holiday volatility). To this end, we propose PAMod, a lightweight yet powerful framework that models cyclical distribution shifts via Phase-Amplitude Modulation in the normalized feature space. PAMod learns periodic embeddings to modulate representations: phase modulation captures mean shifts, while amplitude modulation adapts to variance changes. Crucially, we prove mathematically that modulating in normalized space is equivalent to applying dynamic denormalization, offering an elegant unification of distribution adaptation and representation learning. Extensive experiments on twelve real-world benchmarks demonstrate that PAMod achieves state-of-the-art performance with fewer computational resources. Furthermore, our modulation mechanism, as a novel plug-and-play technique, can improve existing time-series forecasting methods with simple integration.



39. ❌ Adaptation of AI-accelerated CFD Simulations to the IPU platform

作者: P. Rosciszewski, A. Krzywaniak, S. Iserte, K. Rojek, P. Gepner 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00462v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Intelligence Processing Units (IPU) have proven useful for many AI applications. In this paper, we evaluate them within the emerging field of \emph{AI for simulation}, where traditional numerical simulations are supported by artificial intelligence approaches. We focus specifically on a program for training machine learning models supporting a \emph{computational fluid dynamics} application. We use custom TensorFlow provided by the Poplar SDK to adapt the program for the IPU-POD16 platform and investigate its ease of use and performance scalability. Training a model on data from OpenFOAM simulations allows us to get accurate simulation state predictions in test time. We show how to utilize the \emph{popdist} library to overcome a performance bottleneck in feeding training data to the IPU on the host side, achieving up to 34% speedup. Due to communication overheads, using data parallelism to utilize two IPUs instead of one does not improve the throughput. However, once the intra-IPU costs have been paid, the hardware capabilities for inter-IPU communication allow for good scalability. Increasing the number of IPUs from 2 to 16 improves the throughput from 560.8 to 2805.8 samples/s.



40. ❌ Thinking in Text and Images: Interleaved Vision–Language Reasoning Traces for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation

作者: Jinkun Liu, Haohan Chi, Lingfeng Zhang, Yifan Xie, YuAn Wang, Long Chen, Hangjun Ye, Xiaoshuai Hao, Wenbo Ding 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00438v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Long-horizon robotic manipulation requires plans that are both logically coherent and geometrically grounded. Existing Vision-Language-Action policies usually hide planning in latent states or expose only one modality: text-only chain-of-thought encodes causal order but misses spatial constraints, while visual prediction provides geometric cues but often remains local and semantically underconstrained. We introduce Interleaved Vision–Language Reasoning (IVLR), a policy framework built around \trace{}, an explicit intermediate representation that alternates textual subgoals with visual keyframes over the full task horizon. At test time, a single native multimodal transformer self-generates this global semantic-geometric trace from the initial observation and instruction, caches it, and conditions a closed-loop action decoder on the trace, original instruction, and current observation. Because standard robot datasets lack such traces, we construct pseudo-supervision by temporally segmenting demonstrations and captioning each stage with a vision-language model. Across simulated benchmarks for long-horizon manipulation and visual distribution shift, \method{} reaches 95.5% average success on LIBERO, including 92.4% on LIBERO-Long, and 59.4% overall success on SimplerEnv-WidowX. Ablations show that both modalities are necessary: without traces, LIBERO-Long success drops to 37.7%; text-only and vision-only traces reach 62.0% and 68.4%, while the full interleaved trace reaches 92.4%. Stress tests with execution perturbations and masked trace content show moderate degradation, suggesting that the trace can tolerate local corruption and moderate execution drift, but remains limited under stale or incorrect global plans.



41. ❌ Impact of Task Phrasing on Presumptions in Large Language Models

作者: Kenneth J. K. Ong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00436v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Concerns with the safety and reliability of applying large-language models (LLMs) in unpredictable real-world applications motivate this study, which examines how task phrasing can lead to presumptions in LLMs, making it difficult for them to adapt when the task deviates from these assumptions. We investigated the impact of these presumptions on the performance of LLMs using the iterated prisoner’s dilemma as a case study. Our experiments reveal that LLMs are susceptible to presumptions when making decisions even with reasoning steps. However, when the task phrasing was neutral, the models demonstrated logical reasoning without much presumptions. These findings highlight the importance of proper task phrasing to reduce the risk of presumptions in LLMs.



42. ❌ On the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Human-Machine Symbiosis

作者: Ching-Chun Chang, Yuchen Guo, Hanrui Wang, Timo Spinde, Isao Echizen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00440v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has rendered the boundary between humanity and computational machinery increasingly ambiguous. In the presence of more interwoven relationships within human-machine symbiosis, the very notion of AI-generated information becomes difficult to define, as such information arises not from either humans or machines in isolation, but from their mutual shaping. Therefore, a more pertinent question lies not merely in whether AI has participated, but in how it has participated. In general, the role assumed by AI is often specified, either implicitly or explicitly, in the input prompt, yet becomes less apparent or altogether unobservable when the generated content alone is available. Once detached from the dialogue context, the functional role may no longer be traceable. This study considers the problem of tracing the functional role played by AI in natural language generation. A methodology is proposed to infer the latent role specified by the prompt, embed this role into the content during the probabilistic generation process and subsequently recover the nature of AI participation from the resulting text. Experimentation is conducted under a representative scenario in which AI acts either as an assistive agent that edits human-written content or as a creative agent that generates new content from a brief concept. The experimental results support the validity of the proposed methodology in terms of discrimination between roles, robustness against perturbations and preservation of linguistic quality. We envision that this study may contribute to future research on the ethics of AI with regard to whether AI has been used fairly, transparently and appropriately.



43. ❌ Escaping Mode Collapse in LLM Generation via Geometric Regulation

作者: Xin Du, Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00435v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Mode collapse is a persistent challenge in generative modeling and appears in autoregressive text generation as behaviors ranging from explicit looping to gradual loss of diversity and premature trajectory convergence. We take a dynamical-systems view and reinterpret mode collapse as reduced state-space accessibility caused by geometric collapse: during generation, the model’s internal trajectory becomes confined to a low-dimensional region of its representation space. This implies mode collapse is not purely a token-level phenomenon and cannot be reliably solved by symbolic constraints or probability-only decoding heuristics. Guided by this perspective, we propose Reinforced Mode Regulation (RMR), a lightweight, online state-space intervention that regulates dominant self-reinforcing directions in the Transformer value cache (implemented as low-rank damping). Across multiple large language models, RMR substantially reduces mode collapse and enables stable, high-quality generation at extremely low entropy rates (down to 0.8 nats/step), whereas standard decoding typically collapses near 2.0 nats/step.



44. ❌ AEM: Adaptive Entropy Modulation for Multi-Turn Agentic Reinforcement Learning

作者: Haotian Zhao, Yuxin Zhang, Songlin Zhou, Stephen S. -T. Yau, Wenyu Zhang, Lun Tian, Tianshu Zhu, Yifeng Huang, Yucheng Zeng, Jingnan Gu, Daxiang Dong, Jianmin Wu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00425v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Reinforcement learning (RL) has significantly advanced the ability of large language model (LLM) agents to interact with environments and solve multi-turn tasks. Yet effective training remains challenging, as sparse, outcome-only rewards make it difficult to assign credit to individual steps in an agent’s action trajectory. A common remedy is to introduce dense intermediate supervision, such as process reward models or auxiliary self-supervised signals, but this increases supervision and tuning complexity and often generalizes poorly across tasks and domains. This paper presents AEM, a supervision-free credit assignment method that adaptively modulates entropy dynamics during RL training to achieve a more effective exploration-exploitation trade-off. Theoretically, we elevate entropy analysis from the token level to the response level to reduce token sampling variance and show that entropy drift under natural gradients is intrinsically governed by the product of the advantage and the relative response surprisal. Specifically, we derive a practical proxy to reshape training dynamics, enabling a natural transition from exploration to exploitation. Extensive experiments across various benchmarks and models ranging from 1.5B to 32B parameters demonstrate the effectiveness of AEM, including a notable 1.4 percent gain when integrated into a state-of-the-art baseline on the highly challenging SWE-bench-Verified benchmark.



45. ❌ Improving LLM Code Generation via Requirement-Aware Curriculum Reinforcement Learning

作者: Shouyu Yin, Zhao Tian, Junjie Chen, Shikai Guo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00433v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Code generation, which aims to automatically generate source code from given programming requirements, has the potential to substantially improve software development efficiency. With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), LLM-based code generation has attracted widespread attention from both academia and industry. However, as programming requirements become increasingly complex, existing LLMs still exhibit notable performance limitations. To address this challenge, recent studies have proposed training-based curriculum reinforcement learning (CRL) strategies to improve LLM code generation performance. Despite their effectiveness, existing CRL approaches suffer from several limitations, including misaligned requirement difficulty perception, the absence of requirement difficulty optimization, and suboptimal curriculum sampling strategies. In CRL-based code generation, programming requirements serve as the sole input to the model, making their quality and difficulty critical to training effectiveness. Motivated by insights from software requirements engineering, we propose RECRL, a novel requirement-aware curriculum reinforcement learning framework for enhancing LLM-based code generation. RECRL automatically perceives model-specific requirement difficulty, optimizes challenging requirements to improve training data utilization, and employs an adaptive curriculum sampling strategy to construct training batches with smoothly varying difficulty. Extensive experiments on five state-of-the-art LLMs across five widely-used code generation benchmarks by comparing with five state-of-the-art baselines, demonstrate the significant effectiveness of RECRL. For example, RECRL achieves an average Pass@1 improvement of 1.23%-5.62% over all state-of-the-art baselines.



46. ❌ Skills as Verifiable Artifacts: A Trust Schema and a Biconditional Correctness Criterion for Human-in-the-Loop Agent Runtimes

作者: Alfredo Metere 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00424v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Agent skills – structured packages of instructions, scripts, and references that augment a large language model (LLM) without modifying the model itself – have moved from convenience to first-class deployment artifact. The runtime that loads them inherits the same problem package managers and operating systems have always faced: a piece of content claims a behavior; the runtime must decide whether to believe it. We argue this paper’s central thesis up front: a skill is \emph{untrusted code} until it is verified, and the runtime that loads it must enforce that default rather than infer trust from a signature, a clearance, or a registry of origin. Without skill verification, a human-in-the-loop (HITL) gate must fire on every irreversible call – which is operationally untenable and degrades into rubber-stamping at any non-trivial scale. With skill verification treated as a separate, gated process, HITL fires only for what is unverified, and the system becomes sustainable. We give a trust schema (§\ref{sec:schema}) that includes an explicit verification level on every skill manifest; a capability gate (§\ref{sec:gate}) whose HITL policy is a function of that verification level; a \emph{biconditional} correctness criterion (§\ref{sec:biconditional}) that any candidate verification procedure must satisfy on an adversarial-ensemble exercise (§\ref{sec:eval}); and a portable runtime profile (§\ref{sec:guidelines}) with ten normative guidelines abstracted from a working open-source reference implementation \cite{metere2026enclawed}. The contribution is harness- and model-agnostic; nothing here requires retraining, fine-tuning, or proprietary infrastructure.



47. ❌ BWLA: Breaking the Barrier of W1AX Post-Training Quantization for LLMs

作者: Zhixiong Zhao, Zukang Xu, Dawei Yang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00422v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) have driven major progress in NLP, yet their substantial memory and compute demands still hinder practical deployment. Binarization can compress weights to 1 bit, fundamentally lowering compute and bandwidth cost. However, existing methods cannot address activation heavy tails and thus must keep activations in high precision, preventing true end-to-end acceleration. To overcome this limitation, we propose BWLA (Binarized Weights and Low-bit Activations), the first post-training quantization framework that preserves high accuracy while achieving 1-bit weight quantization together with low-bit activations (e.g., 6 bits). The Orthogonal-Kronecker Transformation (OKT) learns an orthogonal mapping via EM minimization, converting unimodal weights into symmetric bimodal forms while suppressing activation tails and incoherence. The Proximal SVD Projection (PSP) then performs lightweight low-rank refinement through proximal SVD projection, further enhancing quantizability with minimal overhead. On Qwen3-32B, BWLA reaches a Wikitext2 perplexity of 11.92 under 6-bit activations (vs. 38 from SOTA), improves five zero-shot tasks by more than 70%, and delivers 3.26 times inference speedup, demonstrating strong potential for real-world LLM compression and acceleration.



48. ❌ RadLite: Multi-Task LoRA Fine-Tuning of Small Language Models for CPU-Deployable Radiology AI

作者: Pankaj Gupta, Kartik Bose 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00421v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) show promise in radiology but their deployment is limited by computational requirements that preclude use in resource-constrained clinical environments. We investigate whether small language models (SLMs) of 3-4 billion parameters can achieve strong multi-task radiology performance through LoRA fine-tuning, enabling deployment on consumer-grade CPUs. We train Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct and Qwen3-4B on 162K samples spanning 9 radiology tasks - RADS classification across 10 systems, impression generation, temporal comparison, radiology NLI, NER, abnormality detection, N/M staging, and radiology Q&A - compiled from 12 public datasets. Both models are evaluated on up to 500 held-out test samples per task with standardized metrics. Our key findings are: (1) LoRA fine-tuning dramatically improves performance over zero-shot baselines (RADS accuracy +53%, NLI +60%, N-staging +89%); (2) the two models exhibit complementary strengths - Qwen2.5 excels at structured generation tasks while Qwen3 dominates extractive tasks; (3) a task-outed oracle ensemble combining both models achieves the best performance across all tasks; (4) few-shot prompting with fine-tuned models hurts performance, demonstrating that LoRA adaptation is more effective than in-context learning for specialized domains; and (5) models can be quantized to GGUF format (~1.8-2.4GB) for CPU deployment at 4-8 tokens/second on consumer hardware. Our work demonstrates that small, efficiently fine-tuned models - which we collectively call RadLite - can serve as practical multi-task radiology AI assistants deployable entirely on consumer hardware without GPU requirements.



49. ❌ Trees to Flows and Back: Unifying Decision Trees and Diffusion Models

作者: Sai Niranjan Ramachandran, Suvrit Sra 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00414v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Decision trees and diffusion models are ostensibly disparate model classes, one discrete and hierarchical, the other continuous and dynamic. This work unifies the two by establishing a crisp mathematical correspondence between hierarchical decision trees and diffusion processes in appropriate limiting regimes. Our unification reveals a shared optimization principle: \emph{Global Trajectory Score Matching (GTSM)}, for which gradient boosting (in an idealized version) is asymptotically optimal. We underscore the conceptual value of our work through two key practical instantiations: \treeflow, which achieves competitive generation quality on tabular data with higher fidelity and a 2\times computational speedup, and \dsmtree, a novel distillation method that transfers hierarchical decision logic into neural networks, matching teacher performance within 2% on many benchmarks.



50. ❌ Physically Native World Models: A Hamiltonian Perspective on Generative World Modeling

作者: Sen Cui, Jingheng Ma 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00412v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

World models have recently re-emerged as a central paradigm for embodied intelligence, robotics, autonomous driving, and model-based reinforcement learning. However, current world model research is often dominated by three partially separated routes: 2D video-generative models that emphasize visual future synthesis, 3D scene-centric models that emphasize spatial reconstruction, and JEPA-like latent models that emphasize abstract predictive representations. While each route has made important progress, they still struggle to provide physically reliable, action-controllable, and long-horizon stable predictions for embodied decision making. In this paper, we argue that the bottleneck of world models is no longer only whether they can generate realistic futures, but whether those futures are physically meaningful and useful for action. We propose \emph{Hamiltonian World Models} as a physically grounded perspective on world modeling. The key idea is to encode observations into a structured latent phase space, evolve the latent state through Hamiltonian-inspired dynamics with control, dissipation, and residual terms, decode the predicted trajectory into future observations, and use the resulting rollouts for planning. We discuss how Hamiltonian structure may improve interpretability, data efficiency, and long-horizon stability, while also noting practical challenges in real-world robotic scenes involving friction, contact, non-conservative forces, and deformable objects.



51. ❌ Agent Capsules: Quality-Gated Granularity Control for Multi-Agent LLM Pipelines

作者: Aninda Ray 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00410v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

A multi-agent pipeline with N agents typically issues N LLM calls per run. Merging agents into fewer calls (compound execution) promises token savings, but naively merged calls silently degrade quality through tool loss and prompt compression. We present Agent Capsules, an adaptive execution runtime that treats multi-agent pipeline execution as an optimization problem with empirical quality constraints. The runtime instruments coordination overhead per group, scores composition opportunity, selects among three compound execution strategies, and gates every mode switch on rolling-mean output quality. A controlled negative result confirms that injecting more context into a merged call worsens compression rather than relieving it, so the framework’s escalation ladder (standard, then two-phase, then sequential) recovers quality by moving toward per-agent dispatch rather than by rewriting merged prompts. On LLM-judged quality, the controller matches a hand-tuned oracle on every measured (model, group, mode) cell: routing compound whenever the oracle would, and reverting to fine whenever quality would fail the floor, without per-model configuration. Against a hand-crafted LangGraph implementation of a 14-agent competitive intelligence pipeline, Agent Capsules uses 51% fewer fine-mode input tokens and 42% fewer compound-mode input tokens, at +0.020 and +0.017 quality respectively. Against a DSPy implementation of a 5-agent due diligence pipeline, the framework uses 19% fewer tokens than uncompiled DSPy at quality parity, and 68% fewer tokens than MIPROv2 at +0.052 quality. Even before compound mode fires, the runtime delivers efficiency through automatic policy resolution, cache-aligned prompts, and topology-aware context injection, matching both hand-tuned and compile-time baselines without training data or per-pipeline engineering.



52. ❌ Scalable Learning in Structured Recurrent Spiking Neural Networks without Backpropagation

作者: Bo Tang, Weiwei Xie 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00402v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) provide a promising framework for energy-efficient and biologically grounded computation; however, scalable learning in deep recurrent architectures with sparse connectivity remains a major challenge. In this work, we propose a structured multi-layer recurrent SNN architecture composed of locally dense recurrent layers augmented with sparse small-world long-range projections to a readout population. The long-range connectivity is largely fixed, preserving routing efficiency and hardware scalability, while synaptic adaptation is performed using strictly local plasticity mechanisms. To enable supervised learning without backpropagation or surrogate gradients, we introduce a biologically motivated learning framework that combines: (i) population-based winner-take-all (WTA) teaching signals at the output layer, (ii) fixed random broadcast alignment feedback pathways, and (iii) low-dimensional modulatory neuron populations that gate synaptic updates through three-factor learning rules with eligibility traces. This design supports deep recurrent computation with sparse global communication and purely local synaptic updates. We analyze the algorithmic properties, computational complexity, and hardware feasibility of the proposed approach, and demonstrate stable learning and competitive performance on benchmark classification tasks. The results highlight the potential of structured recurrence and neuromodulatory learning to enable scalable, hardware-compatible SNN training beyond gradient-based methods.



53. ❌ Social Bias in LLM-Generated Code: Benchmark and Mitigation

作者: Fazle Rabbi, Lin Ling, Song Wang, Jinqiu Yang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00382v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed to generate code for human-centered applications where demographic fairness is critical. However, existing evaluations focus almost exclusively on functional correctness, leaving social bias in LLM-generated code largely unexamined. Extending our prior work on Solar, we conduct a comprehensive empirical study using SocialBias-Bench, a benchmark of 343 real-world coding tasks spanning seven demographic dimensions. We evaluate four prominent LLMs and find severe bias across all models, with Code Bias Scores reaching up to 60.58%. We further show that standard prompt-level interventions, such as Chain-of-Thought reasoning and fairness persona assignment, inadvertently amplify bias rather than reduce it. We then investigate whether structured multi-agent software process frameworks can improve fairness, finding that structured pipelines reduce bias when early roles correctly scope what the code should and should not consider. However, adding explicit fairness instructions to all agent roles produces worse outcomes than providing none, suggesting that diffused responsibility goes unaddressed. To address these limitations, we propose the Fairness Monitor Agent (FMA), a modular component that plugs into any existing code generation pipeline without modifying it. FMA analyzes the task description to determine which attributes should be considered or restricted, then detects and corrects violations through an iterative review process, without requiring an executable test suite. Evaluated on all 343 tasks, FMA reduces bias by 65.1% compared to a developer agent alone and improves functional correctness from 75.80% to 83.97%, outperforming all other studied approaches.



54. ❌ GaMMA: Towards Joint Global-Temporal Music Understanding in Large Multimodal Models

作者: Zuyao You, Zhesong Yu, Mingyu Liu, Bilei Zhu, Yuan Wan, Zuxuan Wu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00371v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In this paper, we propose GaMMA, a state-of-the-art (SoTA) large multimodal model (LMM) designed to achieve comprehensive musical content understanding. GaMMA inherits the streamlined encoder-decoder design of LLaVA, enabling effective cross-modal learning between music and language. By incorporating audio encoders in a mixture-of-experts manner, GaMMA effectively unifies both time-series and non-time-series music understanding tasks within one set of parameters. Our approach combines carefully curated datasets at scale with a progressive training pipeline, effectively pushing the boundaries of music understanding via pretraining, supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and reinforcement learning (RL). To comprehensively assess both temporal and non-temporal capability of music LMMs, we introduce MusicBench, the largest music-oriented benchmark, comprising 3,739 human-curated multiple-choice questions covering diverse aspects of musical understanding. Extensive experiments demonstrate that GaMMA establishes new SoTA in the music domain, achieving 79.1% accuracy on MuchoMusic, 79.3% on MusicBench-Temporal, and 81.3% on MusicBench-Global, consistently outperforming previous methods.



55. ❌ AlphaInventory: Evolving White-Box Inventory Policies via Large Language Models with Deployment Guarantees

作者: Chenyu Huang, Jianghao Lin, Zhengyang Tang, Bo Jiang, Ruoqing Jiang, Benyou Wang, Lai Wei 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00369v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We study how large language models can be used to evolve inventory policies in online, non-stationary environments. Our work is motivated by recent advances in LLM-based evolutionary search, such as AlphaEvolve, which demonstrates strong performance for static and highly structured problems such as mathematical discovery, but is not directly suited to online dynamic inventory settings. To this end, we propose AlphaInventory, an end-to-end inventory-policy evolution and inference framework grounded in confidence-interval-based certification. The framework trains a large language model using reinforcement learning, incorporates demand data as well as numerical and textual features beyond demand, and generates white-box inventory policy with statistical safety guarantees for deployment in future periods. We further introduce a unified theoretical interface that connects training, inference, and deployment. This allows us to characterize the probability that the AlphaInventory evolves a statistically safe and improved policy, and to quantify the deployment gap relative to the oracle-safe benchmark. Tested on both synthetic data and real-world retail data, AlphaInventory outperforms classical inventory policies and deep learning based methods. In canonical inventory settings, it evolves new policies that improve upon existing benchmarks.



56. ❌ Pedagogical Promise and Peril of AI: A Text Mining Analysis of ChatGPT Research Discussions in Programming Education

作者: Juvy C. Grume, John Paul P. Miranda, Aileen P. De Leon, Jordan L. Salenga, Hilene E. Hernandez, Mark Anthony A. Castro, Vernon Grace M. Maniago, Joel D. Canlas, Joel B. Quiambao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00361v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

GenAI systems such as ChatGPT are increasingly discussed in programming education, but the ways in which the research literature conceptualizes and frames their role remain unclear. This chapter applies text mining to publications indexed in a leading academic database to map scholarly discourse on ChatGPT in programming education. Term frequency analysis, phrase pattern extraction, and topic modeling reveal four dominant themes: pedagogical implementation, student-centered learning and engagement, AI infrastructure and human-AI collaboration, and assessment, prompting, and model evaluation. The literature prioritizes classroom practice and learner interaction, with comparatively limited attention to assessment design and institutional governance. Across studies, ChatGPT is positioned both as a learning aid that supports explanation, feedback, and efficiency and as a pedagogical risk linked to overreliance, unreliable outputs, and academic integrity concerns. These findings support responsible integration and highlight the need for stronger assessment and governance mechanisms.



57. ❌ MemRouter: Memory-as-Embedding Routing for Long-Term Conversational Agents

作者: Tianyu Hu, Weikai Lin, Weizhi Zhang, Jing Ma, Song Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00356v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Long-term conversational agents must decide which turns to store in external memory, yet recent systems rely on autoregressive LLM generation at every turn to make that decision. We present MemRouter, a write-side memory router that decouples memory admission from the downstream answer backbone and replaces per-turn memory-management decoding with an embedding-based routing policy. MemRouter encodes each turn together with recent context, projects the resulting embeddings through a frozen LLM backbone, and predicts whether the turn should be stored using lightweight classification heads while training only 12M parameters. Under a controlled matched-harness comparison on LoCoMo, where the retrieval pipeline, answer prompts, and QA backbone (Qwen2.5-7B) are held identical, MemRouter outperforms an LLM-based memory manager on every question category (overall F1 52.0 vs 45.6, non-overlapping 95% CIs) while reducing memory-management p50 latency from 970ms to 58ms. Descriptive factorial averaging further shows that learned admission improves mean F1 by +10.3 over random storage, category-specific prompting adds +5.2 over a generic prompt, and retrieval contributes +0.7. These results suggest that write-side memory admission can be learned by a small supervised router, while answer generation remains a separate downstream component in long-horizon conversational QA.



58. ❌ VQ-SAD: Vector Quantized Structure Aware Diffusion For Molecule Generation

作者: Farshad Noravesh, Reza Haffari, Layki Soon, Arghya Pal 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00354v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Many diffusion based molecule generation methods ignore the symbolic information of molecules and represent the atom and bond type as one hot representation. Methods based on Morgan fingerprints produce hash collisions and are hard to embed into a continuous space without information loss and random fingerprints correspond to no valid molecule. To circumvent this issue we use another paradigm and consider atom and bond codes as latent variables of VQ-VAE. We introduce VQ-SAD which first trains a VQ-VAE and uses the frozen pretrained VQ-VAE model and considers the codebooks for both atom and bond types as tokenizers for the downstream diffusion process. VQ-SAD is a neuro-symbolic model that utilizes both symbolic and neural structural information for a diffusion based model with learnable forward process. The large discrete code space provides a more balanced atom and bond types which enhances the denoising process. VQ-VAE slightly outperforms SOTA models for diffusion based molecule generation on QM9 and ZINC250k datasets.



59. ❌ Hypergraph and Latent ODE Learning for Multimodal Root Cause Localization in Microservices

作者: Xin Liu, Yuhang He, Sichen Zhao, Kejian Tong, Xingyu Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00351v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Root cause localization in cloud native microservice systems requires modeling complex service dependencies, irregular temporal dynamics, and heterogeneous observability data. We present HyperODE RCA, a unified framework that combines hypergraph attention learning, latent ordinary differential equations, and multimodal cross attention fusion for fine grained root cause analysis. The method learns higher order service interactions through differentiable hyperedge construction, captures continuous anomaly evolution from irregular observations with an ODE RNN encoder, and adaptively fuses logs, traces, metrics, entities, and events using context aware modality routing. We further improve robustness with a variational information bottleneck, temporal causal regularization, and invariant risk constraints. Experiments on the Tianchi AIOps benchmark show clear gains over strong baselines in ranking and classification performance, while preserving interpretability through learned hypergraph attention.



60. ❌ Odysseus: Scaling VLMs to 100+ Turn Decision-Making in Games via Reinforcement Learning

作者: Chengshuai Shi, Wenzhe Li, Xinran Liang, Yizhou Lu, Wenjia Yang, Ruirong Feng, Seth Karten, Ziran Yang, Zihan Ding, Gabriel Sarch, Danqi Chen, Karthik Narasimhan, Chi Jin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00347v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Given the rapidly growing capabilities of vision-language models (VLMs), extending them to interactive decision-making tasks such as video games has emerged as a promising frontier. However, existing approaches either rely on large-scale supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on human trajectories or apply reinforcement learning (RL) only in relatively short-horizon settings (typically around 20–30 turns). In this work, we study RL-based training of VLMs for long-horizon decision-making in Super Mario Land, a visually grounded environment requiring 100+ turns of interaction with coordinated perception, reasoning, and action. We begin with a systematic investigation of key algorithmic components and propose an adapted variant of PPO with a lightweight turn-level critic, which substantially improves training stability and sample efficiency over critic-free methods such as GRPO and Reinforce++. We further show that pretrained VLMs provide strong action priors, significantly improving sample efficiency during RL training and reducing the need for manual design choices such as action engineering, compared to classical deep RL trained from scratch. Building on these insights, we introduce Odysseus, an open training framework for VLM agents, achieving substantial gains across multiple levels of the game and at least 3 times average game progresses than frontier models. Moreover, the trained models exhibit consistent improvements under both in-game and cross-game generalization settings, while maintaining general-domain capabilities. Overall, our results identify key ingredients for making RL stable and effective in long-horizon, multi-modal settings, and provide practical guidance for developing VLMs as embodied agents.



61. ❌ AI Adoption Among Teachers: Insights on Concerns, Support, Confidence, and Attitudes

作者: Vanessa B. Sibug, Maria Anna D. Cruz, Vicky P. Vital, Juvy C. Grume, Almer B. Gamboa, Emerson Q. Fernando, Lloyd D. Feliciano, Jordan L. Salenga, John Paul P. Miranda 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00343v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The study examines the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in education by analyzing the roles of institutional support, teacher confidence, and teacher concerns. It aims to determine whether teacher concerns moderate the relationship between institutional support and two outcomes: teacher confidence and attitudes toward AI adoption. The sample included 260 teachers from the Philippines. Composite scores were calculated for institutional support, confidence, concerns, and attitudes. Moderated multiple regression analysis showed that institutional support significantly predicted both teacher confidence and attitudes toward AI. However, teacher concerns did not significantly moderate these relationships. A follow-up mediation analysis tested whether confidence explains the effect of institutional support on attitudes. Results showed full mediation. The indirect effect was significant based on the Sobel test, and the direct effect became non-significant when confidence was included in the model. This shows that institutional support improves teacher attitudes by increasing their confidence. The study recommends that institutions provide structured and ongoing support to strengthen teacher confidence. Professional development, mentoring, and AI integration in teacher education programs can increase readiness and support effective AI adoption.



62. ❌ Budget-Aware Routing for Long Clinical Text

作者: Khizar Qureshi, Geoffrey Martin, Yifan Peng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00336v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

A key challenge for large language models is token cost per query and overall deployment cost. Clinical inputs are long, heterogeneous, and often redundant, while downstream tasks are short and high stakes. We study budgeted context selection, where a subset of document units is chosen under a strict token budget so an off-the-shelf generator can meet fixed cost and latency constraints. We cast this as a knapsack-constrained subset selection problem with two design choices, unitization that defines document segmentation and selection that determines which units are kept. We propose \textbf{RCD}, a monotone submodular objective that balances relevance, coverage, and diversity. We compare sentence, section, window, and cluster-based unitization, and introduce a routing heuristic that adapts to the budget regime. Experiments on MIMIC discharge notes, Cochrane abstracts, and L-Eval show that optimal strategies depend on the evaluation setting. Positional heuristics perform best at low budgets in extractive tasks, while diversity-aware methods such as MMR improve LLM generation. Selector choice matters more than unitization, with cluster-based grouping reducing performance and other schemes behaving similarly. ROUGE saturates for LLM summaries, while BERTScore better reflects quality differences. We release our code at https://github.com/stone-technologies/ACL_budget_paper.



63. ❌ AgentFloor: How Far Up the tool use Ladder Can Small Open-Weight Models Go?

作者: Ranit Karmakar, Jayita Chatterjee 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00334v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Production agentic systems make many model calls per user request, and most of those calls are short, structured, and routine. This raises a practical routing question that existing evaluations do not directly answer: which parts of an agent workflow truly require large frontier intelligence, and which can be handled by smaller models? We introduce AgentFloor, a deterministic 30-task benchmark organized as a six-tier capability ladder, spanning instruction following, tool use, multi-step coordination, and long-horizon planning under persistent constraints. We evaluate 16 open-weight models, from 0.27B to 32B parameters, alongside GPT-5 across 16,542 scored runs. Our results reveal a clear boundary of model necessity. Small and mid-sized open-weight models are already sufficient for much of the short-horizon, structured tool use work that dominates real agent pipelines, and in aggregate, the strongest open-weight model matches GPT-5 on our benchmark while being substantially cheaper and faster to run. The gap appears most clearly on long-horizon planning tasks that require sustained coordination and reliable constraint tracking over many steps, where frontier models still hold an advantage, though neither side reaches strong reliability. We also find that this boundary is not explained by scale alone: some failures respond to targeted interventions, but the effects are model-specific rather than universal. These findings suggest a practical design principle for agentic systems: use smaller open-weight models for the broad base of routine actions, and reserve large frontier models for the narrower class of tasks that truly demand deeper planning and control. We release the benchmark, harness, sweep configurations, and full run corpus.



64. ❌ DynamicPO: Dynamic Preference Optimization for Recommendation

作者: Xingyu Hu, Kai Zhang, Jiancan Wu, Shuli Wang, Chi Wang, Wenshuai Chen, Yinhua Zhu, Haitao Wang, Xingxing Wang, Xiang Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00327v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In large language model (LLM)-based recommendation systems, direct preference optimization (DPO) effectively aligns recommendations with user preferences, requiring multi-negative objective functions to leverage abundant implicit-feedback negatives and sharpen preference boundaries. However, our empirical analyses reveal a counterintuitive phenomenon, preference optimization collapse, where increasing the number of negative samples can lead to performance degradation despite a continuously decreasing training loss. We further theoretically demonstrate that this collapse arises from gradient suppression, caused by the dominance of easily discriminable negatives over boundary-critical negatives that truly define user preference boundaries. As a result, boundary-relevant signals are under-optimized, weakening the model’s decision boundary. Motivated by these observations, we propose DynamicPO (Dynamic Preference Optimization), a lightweight and plug-and-play framework comprising two adaptive mechanisms: Dynamic Boundary Negative Selection, which identifies and prioritizes informative negatives near the model’s decision boundary, and Dual-Margin Dynamic beta Adjustment, which calibrates optimization strength per sample according to boundary ambiguity. Extensive experiments on three public datasets show that DynamicPO effectively prevents optimization collapse and improves recommendation accuracy on multi-negative preference optimization methods, with negligible computational overhead. Our code and datasets are available at https://github.com/xingyuHuxingyu/DynamicPO.



65. ❌ Unbox Responsible GeoAI: Navigating Climate Extreme and Disaster Mapping

作者: Hao Li, Steffen Knoblauch 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00315v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

As climate extreme and disaster events become more frequent and intense, Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI) has emerged as a transformative approach for large-scale disaster mapping and risk reduction. However, the purely mechanical, performance-driven deployment of GeoAI models can result in amplifying inherent spatial inequalities, preventing effective emergency decision-making, and producing severe environmental carbon footprint. To unbox the concept of responsible GeoAI, this position paper examines its emerging role, e.g., in climate extreme and disaster mapping, from a critical GIS perspective. We address the nexus of responsible GeoAI into four interrelated theoretical dimensions, specifically Representativeness, Explainability, Sustainability, and Ethics, with examples from climate extreme and disaster mapping. Moreover, targeting at the operational practice, we then propose a conceptual governance Model of responsible GeoAI that categorizes its governance practices into Data, Application, and Society scopes. Last, this position paper aims to raise the attention in the broader GIS community that the future of climate resilience relies not just on building better algorithms, but on fostering a governance ecosystem where GeoAI is deployed responsibly, ethically, and sustainably.



66. ❌ Semia: Auditing Agent Skills via Constraint-Guided Representation Synthesis

作者: Hongbo Wen, Ying Li, Hanzhi Liu, Chaofan Shou, Yanju Chen, Yuan Tian, Yu Feng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00314v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

An agent skill is a configuration package that equips an LLM-driven agent with a concrete capability, such as reading email, executing shell commands, or signing blockchain transactions. Each skill is a hybrid artifact-a structured half declares executable interfaces, while a prose half dictates when and how those interfaces fire-and the prose is reinterpreted probabilistically on every invocation. Conventional static analyzers parse the structured half but ignore the prose; LLM-based tools read the prose but cannot reproducibly prove that a tainted input reaches a high-impact sink. We present Semia, a static auditor for agent skills. Semia lifts each skill into the Skill Description Language (SDL), a Datalog fact base that captures LLM-triggered actions, prose-defined conditions, and human-in-the-loop checkpoints. Synthesizing a fact base that is both structurally sound and semantically faithful to the original prose is the central challenge; we address it with Constraint-Guided Representation Synthesis (CGRS), a propose-verify-evaluate loop that refines LLM candidates until convergence. Security properties (e.g., indirect injection, secret leakage, confused deputies, unguarded sinks, etc.) over an agent skill can then be reduced to Datalog reachability queries. We evaluate Semia on 13,728 real-world skills from public marketplaces. Semia renders all of them auditable and finds that more than half carry at least one critical semantic risk. On a stratified sample of 541 expert-labeled skills, Semia achieves 97.7% recall and an F1 of 90.6%, substantially outperforming signature-based scanners and LLM baselines.



67. ❌ Beyond Structure: Revolutionising Materials Discovery via AI-Driven Synthesis Protocol-Property Relationships

作者: Guillaume Lambard 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00313v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The current structure-centric paradigm in artificial intelligence (AI)-driven materials discovery, despite delivering thousands of candidate structures, is stalling at a critical barrier: the synthesizability gap. We argue that closing this gap demands a pivot to a synthesis-first paradigm in which executable synthesis protocols, not just atomic configurations, are treated as primary design variables. We outline a roadmap built on three pillars: (i) representing synthesis procedures as machine-readable protocols, (ii) deploying generative and inverse-design models to propose actionable reaction pathways and recipes, and (iii) integrating closed-loop optimisation to refine protocols against experimental realities and sustainability constraints. Framed in terms of the causal backbone P->X->y from protocol P to structure X and properties y, this perspective sets out methodological building blocks, standards needs and self-driving laboratory (SDL) integration strategies to accelerate reproducible, data-first materials discovery.



68. ❌ Beyond Visual Fidelity: Benchmarking Super-Resolution Models for Large-Scale Remote Sensing Imagery via Downstream Task Integration

作者: Zhili Li, Kangyang Chai, Zhihao Wang, Xiaowei Jia, Yanhua Li, Gengchen Mai, Sergii Skakun, Dinesh Manocha, Yiqun Xie 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00310v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Super-resolution (SR) techniques have made major advances in reconstructing high-resolution images from low-resolution inputs. The increased resolution provides visual enhancement and utility for monitoring tasks. In particular, SR has been increasingly developed for satellite-based Earth observation, with applications in urban planning, agriculture, ecology, and disaster response. However, existing SR studies and benchmarks typically use fidelity metrics such as PSNR or SSIM, whereas the true utility of super-resolved images lies in supporting downstream tasks such as land cover classification, biomass estimation, and change detection. To bridge this gap, we introduce GeoSR-Bench, a downstream task-integrated SR benchmark dataset to evaluate SR models beyond fidelity metrics. GeoSR-Bench comprises spatially co-located, temporally aligned, and quality-controlled image pairs from about 36,000 locations across diverse land covers, spanning resolutions from 500m to 0.6m. To the best of our knowledge, GeoSR-Bench is the first SR benchmark that directly connects improved image resolution from SR models with downstream Earth monitoring tasks, including land cover segmentation, infrastructure mapping, and biophysical variable estimation. Using GeoSR-Bench, we benchmark GAN, transformer, neural operator, and diffusion-based SR models on perceptual quality and downstream task performance. We conduct experiments with 270 settings, covering 2 cross-platform SR tasks, 9 SR models, 3 downstream task models, and 5 downstream tasks for each SR task. The results show that improvements in traditional SR metrics often do not correlate with gains in task performance, and the correlations can be negative, indicating that these metrics provide limited guidance for selecting superior models for downstream tasks. This reveals the need to integrate downstream tasks into SR model development and evaluation.



69. ❌ When LLMs Stop Following Steps: A Diagnostic Study of Procedural Execution in Language Models

作者: Sailesh Panda, Pritam Kadasi, Abhishek Upperwal, Mayank Singh 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00817v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) often achieve strong performance on reasoning benchmarks, but final-answer accuracy alone does not show whether they faithfully execute the procedure specified in a prompt. We study this question through a controlled diagnostic benchmark for procedural execution, where models are given a step-wise arithmetic algorithm and two numeric inputs, and must return the final computed value. The benchmark uses simple arithmetic operations but increases complexity through algorithm length and look-back dependencies over intermediate variables. Across 14 models and 55 datasets, average first-answer accuracy drops from 61% on 5-step procedures to 20% on 95-step procedures. Generation-level analysis shows that failures often involve missing answers, premature answers, self-correction after an initial error, under-executed traces, and hallucinated extra steps. These findings suggest that apparent reasoning ability can mask substantial weaknesses in faithful instruction execution.



70. ❌ RunAgent: Interpreting Natural-Language Plans with Constraint-Guided Execution

作者: Arunabh Srivastava, Mohammad A., Khojastepour, Srimat Chakradhar, Sennur Ulukus 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00798v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Humans solve problems by executing targeted plans, yet large language models (LLMs) remain unreliable for structured workflow execution. We propose RunAgent, a multi-agent plan execution platform that interprets natural-language plans while enforcing stepwise execution through constraints and rubrics. RunAgent bridges the expressiveness of natural language with the determinism of programming via an agentic language with explicit control constructs (e.g., \texttt{IF}, \texttt{GOTO}, \texttt{FORALL}). Beyond verifying syntactic and semantic verification of the step output, which is performed based on the specific instruction of each step, RunAgent autonomously derives and validates constraints based on the description of the task and its instance at each step. RunAgent also dynamically selects among LLM-based reasoning, tool usage, and code generation and execution (e.g., in Python), and incorporates error correction mechanisms to ensure correctness. Finally, RunAgent filters the context history by retaining only relevant information during the execution of each step. Evaluations on Natural-plan and SciBench Datasets demonstrate that RunAgent outperforms baseline LLMs and state-of-the-art PlanGEN methods.



71. ❌ LASE: Language-Adversarial Speaker Encoding for Indic Cross-Script Identity Preservation

作者: Venkata Pushpak Teja Menta 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00777v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

A speaker encoder used in multilingual voice cloning should treat the same speaker identically regardless of which script the audio was uttered in. Off-the-shelf encoders do not, and the failure is accent-conditional. On a 1043-pair Western-accented voice corpus across English, Hindi, Telugu, and Tamil, WavLM-base-plus-sv loses 0.082 absolute cosine similarity when the same voice changes script and ECAPA-TDNN loses 0.105. On a 1369-pair Indian-accented voice corpus, the gap shrinks to 0.006 (WavLM-SV) and 0.044 (ECAPA-TDNN). The leak is largest where it matters most for cross-script TTS: when a system projects a non-Indic-trained voice into Indic scripts. We present LASE (Language-Adversarial Speaker Encoder), a small projection head over frozen WavLM-base-plus trained with two losses: a supervised contrastive loss over voice identity, and a gradient-reversal cross-entropy against a 4-language classifier that pushes the embedding to be language-uninformative while remaining speaker-informative. Trained on 1118 quality-gated cross-script pairs synthesised from 8 commercial multilingual voices, LASE’s residual gap is consistent with zero on both corpora (Delta = 0.013 Western, Delta = 0.026 Indian; both bootstrap 95% CIs include zero) and amplifies the cross-script-vs-floor margin 2.4-2.7x over both baselines. An ECAPA+GRL ablation shows the GRL objective improves either backbone but the WavLM choice contributes too. In synthetic multi-speaker diarisation, LASE matches ECAPA-TDNN on cross-script speaker recall (0.788 vs 0.789) with ~100x less training data. We release the r1 checkpoint, both corpora, and the bootstrap recipe.



72. ❌ Characterizing the Expressivity of Local Attention in Transformers

作者: Jiaoda Li, Ryan Cotterell 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00768v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The transformer is the most popular neural architecture for language modeling. The cornerstone of the transformer is its global attention mechanism, which lets the model aggregate information from all preceding tokens before generating the next token. One common variant of attention is called local attention, which restricts each token to aggregating information from a bounded window of predecessors, reducing the quadratic cost of global attention to linear. Although this restriction is usually motivated by efficiency, it has also been found to improve model quality, a phenomenon that has so far lacked a satisfactory explanation. We provide a formal account of this phenomenon in terms of recognizer expressivity. It has been shown that fixed-precision transformers with global attention correspond to a fragment of linear temporal logic containing a single past operator. We additionally prove that adding local attention introduces a second temporal operator, strictly enlarging the class of recognizable regular languages. Moreover, global and local attention are expressively complementary: neither subsumes the other, and combining them yields the richest fragment. Experiments on formal language recognition and natural language modeling corroborate the theory, showing that hybrid global–local transformers outperform their global-only counterparts.



73. ❌ FinSafetyBench: Evaluating LLM Safety in Real-World Financial Scenarios

作者: Yutao Hou, Yihan Jiang, Yuhan Xie, Jian Yang, Liwen Zhang, Hailiang Huang, Guanhua Chen, Yun Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00706v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in financial scenarios. However, they may produce harmful outputs, including facilitating illegal activities or unethical behavior, posing serious compliance risks. To systematically evaluate LLM safety in finance, we propose FinSafetyBench, a bilingual (English-Chinese) red-teaming benchmark designed to test an LLM’s refusal of requests that violate financial compliance. Grounded in real-world financial crime cases and ethics standards, the benchmark comprises 14 subcategories spanning financial crimes and ethical violations. Through extensive experiments on general-purpose and finance-specialized LLMs under three representative attack settings, we identify critical vulnerabilities that allow adversarial prompts to bypass compliance safeguards. Further analysis reveals stronger susceptibility in Chinese contexts and highlights the limitations of prompt-level defenses against sophisticated or implicit manipulation strategies.



74. ❌ Learning How and What to Memorize: Cognition-Inspired Two-Stage Optimization for Evolving Memory

作者: Derong Xu, Shuochen Liu, Pengfei Luo, Pengyue Jia, Yingyi Zhang, Yi Wen, Yimin Deng, Wenlin Zhang, Enhong Chen, Xiangyu Zhao, Tong Xu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00702v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language model (LLM) agents require long-term user memory for consistent personalization, but limited context windows hinder tracking evolving preferences over long interactions. Existing memory systems mainly rely on static, hand-crafted update rules; although reinforcement learning (RL)-based agents learn memory updates, sparse outcome rewards provide weak supervision, resulting in unstable long-horizon optimization. Drawing on memory schema theory and the functional division between prefrontal regions and hippocampus regions, we introduce MemCoE, a cognition-inspired two-stage optimization framework that learns how memory should be organized and what information to update. In the first stage, we propose Memory Guideline Induction to optimize a global guideline via contrastive feedback interpreted as textual gradients; in the second stage, Guideline-Aligned Memory Policy Optimization uses the induced guideline to define structured process rewards and performs multi-turn RL to learn a guideline-following memory evolution policy. We evaluate on three personalization memory benchmarks, covering explicit/implicit preference and different sizes and noise, and observe consistent improvements over strong baselines with favorable robustness, transferability, and efficiency.



75. ❌ Adaptive Querying with AI Persona Priors

作者: Kaizheng Wang, Yuhang Wu, Assaf Zeevi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00696v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We study adaptive querying for learning user-dependent quantities of interest, such as responses to held-out items and psychometric indicators, within tight question budgets. Classical Bayesian design and computerized adaptive testing typically rely on restrictive parametric assumptions or expensive posterior approximations, limiting their use in heterogeneous, high-dimensional, and cold-start settings. We introduce a persona-induced latent variable model that represents a user’s state through membership in a finite dictionary of AI personas, each offering response distributions produced by a large language model. This yields expressive priors with closed-form posterior updates and efficient finite-mixture predictions, enabling scalable Bayesian design for sequential item selection. Experiments on synthetic data and WorldValuesBench demonstrate that persona-based posteriors deliver accurate probabilistic predictions and an interpretable adaptive elicitation pipeline.



76. ❌ ML-Bench&Guard: Policy-Grounded Multilingual Safety Benchmark and Guardrail for Large Language Models

作者: Yunhan Zhao, Zhaorun Chen, Xingjun Ma, Yu-Gang Jiang, Bo Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00689v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in cross-linguistic contexts, ensuring safety in diverse regulatory and cultural environments has become a critical challenge. However, existing multilingual benchmarks largely rely on general risk taxonomies and machine translation, which confines guardrail models to these predefined categories and hinders their ability to align with region-specific regulations and cultural nuances. To bridge these gaps, we introduce ML-Bench, a policy-grounded multilingual safety benchmark covering 14 languages. ML-Bench is constructed directly from regional regulations, where risk categories and fine-grained rules derived from jurisdiction-specific legal texts are directly used to guide the generation of multilingual safety data, enabling culturally and legally aligned evaluation across languages. Building on ML-Bench, we develop ML-Guard, a Diffusion Large Language Model (dLLM)-based guardrail model that supports multilingual safety judgment and policy-conditioned compliance assessment. ML-Guard has two variants, one 1.5B lightweight model for fast `safe/unsafe’ checking and a more capable 7B model for customized compliance checking with detailed explanations. We conduct extensive experiments against 11 strong guardrail baselines across 6 existing multilingual safety benchmarks and our ML-Bench, and show that ML-Guard consistently outperforms prior methods. We hope that ML-Bench and ML-Guard can help advance the development of regulation-aware and culturally aligned multilingual guardrail systems.



77. ❌ Beyond Benchmarks: MathArena as an Evaluation Platform for Mathematics with LLMs

作者: Jasper Dekoninck, Nikola Jovanović, Tim Gehrunger, Kári Rögnvalddson, Ivo Petrov, Chenhao Sun, Martin Vechev 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00674v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly capable mathematical collaborators, but static benchmarks are no longer sufficient for evaluating progress: they are often narrow in scope, quickly saturated, and rarely updated. This makes it hard to compare models reliably and track progress over time. Instead, we need evaluation platforms: continuously maintained systems that run, aggregate, and analyze evaluations across many benchmarks to give a comprehensive picture of model performance within a broad domain. In this work, we build on the original MathArena benchmark by substantially broadening its scope from final-answer olympiad problems to a continuously maintained evaluation platform for mathematical reasoning with LLMs. MathArena now covers a much wider range of tasks, including proof-based competitions, research-level arXiv problems, and formal proof generation in Lean. Additionally, we maintain a clear evaluation protocol for all models and regularly design new benchmarks as model capabilities improve to ensure that MathArena remains challenging. Notably, the strongest model, GPT-5.5, now reaches 98% on the 2026 USA Math Olympiad and 74% on research-level questions, showing that frontier models can now comfortably solve extremely challenging mathematical problems. This highlights the importance of continuously maintained evaluation platforms like MathArena to track the rapid progress of LLMs in mathematical reasoning.



78. ❌ H-RAG at SemEval-2026 Task 8: Hierarchical Parent-Child Retrieval for Multi-Turn RAG Conversations

作者: Passant Elchafei, Hossam Emam, Mohamed Alansary, Monorama Swain, Markus Schedl 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00631v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present H-RAG, our submission to SemEval-2026 Task 8 (MTRAGEval), addressing both Task A (Retrieval) and Task C (Generation with Retrieved Passages). Task A evaluates standalone retrieval quality, while Task C assesses end-to-end retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) in multi-turn conversational settings, requiring both accurate answer generation and faithful grounding in retrieved evidence. Our approach implements a hierarchical parent-child RAG pipeline that separates fine-grained child-level retrieval from parent-level context reconstruction during generation. Documents are segmented into overlapping sentence-based child chunks, while full documents are preserved as parent units to provide coherent context. Retrieval combines hybrid dense-sparse search, tunable weighting, and embedding-based similarity rescoring over child chunks. Retrieved evidence is aggregated at the parent level and supplied to an instruction-tuned language model for response generation. H-RAG achieves an nDCG@5 score of 0.4271 on Task A and a harmonic mean score of 0.3241 on Task C (RB_agg: 0.2488, RL_F: 0.2703, RB_llm: 0.6508), underscoring the importance of retrieval configuration and parent-level aggregation in multi-turn RAG performance.



79. ❌ EGREFINE: An Execution-Grounded Optimization Framework for Text-to-SQL Schema Refinement

作者: Jiaqian Wang, Yutao Qi, Wenjin Hou, Yu Pang, Rui Yang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00628v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Text-to-SQL enables non-expert users to query databases in natural language, yet real-world schemas often suffer from ambiguous, abbreviated, or inconsistent naming conventions that degrade model accuracy. Existing approaches treat schemas as fixed and address errors downstream. In this paper, we frame schema refinement as a constrained optimization problem: find a renaming function that maximizes downstream Text-to-SQL execution accuracy while preserving query equivalence through database views. We analyze the computational hardness of this problem, which motivates a column-wise greedy decomposition, and instantiate it as EGRefine: a four-phase pipeline that screens ambiguous columns, generates context-aware candidate names, verifies them through execution-grounded feedback, and materializes the result as non-destructive SQL views. The pipeline carries two structural properties: column-local non-degradation, ensured by the conservative selection rule in the verification phase, and database-level query equivalence, ensured by the view-based materialization phase. Together they make the resulting refinement safe by construction at the column level, with cross-column and prompt-level interactions handled empirically rather than analytically. Across controlled schema-degradation, real-world, and enterprise benchmarks, EGRefine recovers accuracy lost to schema naming noise where applicable and correctly abstains where the underlying task exceeds current Text-to-SQL capabilities, with refined schemas transferring across model families to enable refine-once, serve-many-models deployment. Code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/ai-jiaqian/EGRefine.



80. ❌ SC-Taxo: Hierarchical Taxonomy Generation under Semantic Consistency Constraints using Large Language Models

作者: Shiqiang Cai, Nianhong Niu, Shizhu He, Kang Liu, Jun Zhao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00620v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Scientific literature is expanding at an unprecedented pace, making it increasingly challenging to efficiently organize and access domain knowledge. A high-quality scientific taxonomy offers a structured and hierarchical representation of a research field, facilitating literature exploration and topic navigation, as well as enabling downstream applications such as trend analysis, idea generation, and information retrieval. However, existing taxonomy generation approaches often suffer from structural inconsistencies and semantic misalignment across hierarchical levels. Through empirical analysis, we find that these issues largely stem from inadequate modeling of hierarchical semantic consistency. To address this limitation, we propose a semantic-consistent taxonomy generation (SC-Taxo) framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) with hierarchy-aware refinement stages to ensure semantic consistency. Specifically, SC-Taxo introduces a bidirectional heading generation mechanism that jointly performs bottom-up abstraction and top-down semantic constraint, while further capturing peer-level semantic dependencies to enhance horizontal consistency. Experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate consistent improvements in hierarchy alignment and heading quality, and additional evaluation on Chinese scientific literature validates its robust cross-lingual generalization.



81. ❌ Is Textual Similarity Invariant under Machine Translation? Evidence Based on the Political Manifesto Corpus

作者: Daria Boratyn, Damian Brzyski, Albert Leśniak, Wojciech Łukasik, Maciej Rapacz, Jan Rybicki, Wojciech Słomczyński, Dariusz Stolicki 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00618v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We investigate the extent to which cosine similarity between paragraph embeddings is invariant under machine translation, using the Manifesto Corpus of over 2,800 political party platforms in 28 languages translated to English via the EU eTranslation service. Rather than measuring translation-induced semantic shift directly we measure the stability of pairwise similarity relationships across embedding models, and use inter-model disagreement on original-language text as a calibrated invariance threshold. This yields a per-language non-inferiority test for four hypotheses about how translation interacts with embedding choice, with verdicts that distinguish languages where translation demonstrably preserves semantic structure from those where it demonstrably degrades it and from those where the available evidence does not resolve the question. The framework is corpus- and pipeline-agnostic and extends naturally to downstream tasks. Applied to our data, it identifies ten languages with translation invariance and four with detectable distortion.



82. ❌ Beyond Decodability: Reconstructing Language Model Representations with an Encoding Probe

作者: Gaofei Shen, Martijn Bentum, Tom Lentz, Afra Alishahi, Grzegorz Chrupała 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00607v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Probing is widely used to study which features can be decoded from language model representations. However, the common decoding probe approach has two limitations that we aim to solve with our new encoding probe approach: contributions of different features to model representations cannot be directly compared, and feature correlations can affect probing results. We present an Encoding Probe that reverses this direction and reconstructs internal representations of models using interpretable features. We evaluate this method on text and speech transformer models, using feature sets spanning acoustics, phonetics, syntax, lexicon, and speaker identity. Our results suggest that speaker-related effects vary strongly across different training objectives and datasets, while syntactic and lexical features contribute independently to reconstruction. These results show that the Encoding Probe provides a complementary perspective on interpreting model representations beyond decodability.



83. ❌ AGoQ: Activation and Gradient Quantization for Memory-Efficient Distributed Training of LLMs

作者: Wenxiang Lin, Juntao Huang, Luhan Zhang, Laili Li, Xiang Bao, Mengyang Zhang, Bing Wang, Shaohuai Shi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00539v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Quantization is a key method for reducing the GPU memory requirement of training large language models (LLMs). Yet, current approaches are ineffective for 4-bit activations and 8-bit gradients, which would easily cause slow convergence or accuracy loss. To address this, we introduce AGoQ, incorporating two new techniques: 1) a layer-aware activation quantization algorithm that allocates appropriate bit-widths for activations of various layers based on their types and pipeline stages to achieve near 4-bit activation storage, and 2) a gradient quantization algorithm that reduces memory usage and shortens communication time by employing 8-bit gradient storage and precision-preserving 8-bit All-Reduce communication. We conduct extensive experiments using different sizes of LLMs on two GPU clusters (up to 64 GPUs), and the experimental results show that our AGoQ reduces the memory by up to 52% and achieves up to 1.34$\times$ improvement of training speed compared to state-of-the-art training systems Megatron-LM (w/ or w/o ZeRO), COAT and DeepSpeed with 8B to 32B LLaMA models, while achieving convergence loss on pretraining and comparable accuracy on downstream tasks with LLaMA architectures.



84. ❌ ControBench: An Interaction-Aware Benchmark for Controversial Discourse Analysis on Social Networks

作者: Ta Thanh Thuy, Jiaqi Zhu, Xuan Liu, Lin Shang, Reihaneh Rabbany, Guillaume Rabusseau, Lihui Chen, Zheng Yilun, Sitao Luan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00513v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Understanding how people argue across ideological divides online is important for studying political polarization, misinformation, and content moderation. Existing datasets capture only part of this problem: some preserve text but ignore interaction structure, some model structure without rich semantics, and others represent conversations without stable user-level ideological identity. We introduce ControBench, a benchmark for controversial discourse analysis that combines heterogeneous social interaction graphs with rich textual semantics. Built from Reddit discussions on three topics, Trump, abortion, and religion, ControBench contains 7,370 users, 1,783 posts, and 26,525 interactions. The graph contains user and post nodes connected by semantically enriched edges; in particular, user-comment-user edges encode both a reply and the parent comment that it responds to, preserving local argumentative context. User labels are derived from self-declared Reddit flairs, providing a scalable proxy for ideological identity without manual annotation. The resulting datasets exhibit low or negative adjusted homophily (Trump: -0.77, Abortion: 0.06, Religion: 0.04), reflecting the cross-cutting structure of real-world debate. We evaluate graph neural networks, pretrained language models, and large language models on ControBench and observe distinct performance patterns across topics and model families, especially when ideological boundaries are ambiguous. These results position ControBench as a challenging and realistic benchmark for controversial discourse analysis.



85. ❌ Surprisal Minimisation over Goal-directed Alternatives Predicts Production Choice in Dialogue

作者: Tom Utting, Mario Giulianelli, Arabella Sinclair 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00506v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We model utterance production as probabilistic cost-sensitive choice over contextual alternatives, using information-theoretic notions of cost. We distinguish between goal-directed alternatives that realise a fixed communicative intent and goal-agnostic alternatives defined only by contextual plausibility, allowing us to derive speaker- and listener-oriented interpretations of different cost measures. We present a procedure to generate both types of alternative sets using language models. Analysing production choices in open-ended dialogue under both deterministic and probabilistic cost minimisation, we find that surprisal minimisation relative to goal-directed alternatives provides the strongest predictive account under both analyses. By contrast, uniform information density and length-based costs exhibit weaker and less consistent predictive power across conditions. More broadly, our study suggests that alternative-conditioned optimisation with LM-generated alternatives provides a principled framework for studying speaker and listener pressures in naturalistic language production.



86. ❌ ReLay: Personalized LLM-Generated Plain-Language Summaries for Better Understanding, but at What Cost?

作者: Joey Chan, Yikun Han, Jingyuan Chen, Samuel Fang, Lauren D. Gryboski, Alexandra Lee, Sheel Tanna, Qingqing Zhu, Zhiyong Lu, Lucy Lu Wang, Yue Guo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00468v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Plain Language Summaries (PLS) aim to make research accessible to lay readers, but they are typically written in a one-size-fits-all style that ignores differences in readers’ information needs and comprehension. In health contexts, this limitation is particularly important because misunderstanding scientific information can affect real-world decisions. Large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities for personalizing PLS, but it remains unclear whether personalization helps, which strategies are most effective, and how to balance personalization with safety. We introduce ReLay, a dataset of 300 participant–PLS pairs from 50 lay participants in both static (expert-written) and interactive (LLM-personalized) settings. ReLay includes user characteristics, health information needs, information-seeking behavior, comprehension outcomes, interaction logs, and quality ratings. We use ReLay to evaluate five LLMs across two personalization methods. Personalization improves comprehension and perceived quality, but it also raises the risk of reinforcing user biases and introducing hallucinations, revealing a trade-off between personalization and safety. These findings highlight the need for personalization methods that are both effective and trustworthy for diverse lay audiences.



87. ❌ Rethinking LLM Ensembling from the Perspective of Mixture Models

作者: Jiale Fu, Yuchu Jiang, Peijun Wu, Chonghan Liu, Joey Tianyi Zhou, Xu Yang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00419v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Model ensembling is a well-established technique for improving the performance of machine learning models. Conventionally, this involves averaging the output distributions of multiple models and selecting the most probable label. This idea has been naturally extended to large language models (LLMs), yielding improved performance but incurring substantial computational cost. This inefficiency stems from directly applying conventional ensemble implementation to LLMs, which require a separate forward pass for each model to explicitly compute the ensemble distribution. In this paper, we propose the Mixture-model-like Ensemble (ME). By reinterpreting the ensemble as a mixture model, ME stochastically selects a single model at each step to generate the next token, thereby avoiding the need to explicitly compute the full ensemble distribution. ME is mathematically equivalent to sampling from the ensemble distribution, but requires invoking only one model, making it 1.78x-2.68x faster than conventional ensemble. Furthermore, this perspective connects LLM ensembling and token-level routing methods, suggesting that LLM ensembling is a special case of routing methods. Our findings open new avenues for efficient LLM ensembling and motivate further exploration of token-level routing strategies for LLMs. Our code is available at https://github.com/jialefu/Mixture-model-like-Ensemble/.



88. ❌ FollowTable: A Benchmark for Instruction-Following Table Retrieval

作者: Rihui Jin, Yuchen Lu, Ting Zhang, Jun Wang, Kuicai Dong, Zhaocheng Du, Dongping Liu, Gang Wang, Yong Liu, Guilin Qi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00400v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Table Retrieval (TR) has traditionally been formulated as an ad-hoc retrieval problem, where relevance is primarily determined by topical semantic similarity. With the growing adoption of LLM-based agentic systems, access to structured data is increasingly instruction-driven, where relevance is conditional on explicit content and schema constraints rather than topical similarity alone. We therefore formalize Instruction-Following Table Retrieval (IFTR), a new task that requires models to jointly satisfy topical relevance and fine-grained instruction constraints. We identify two core challenges in IFTR: (i) sensitivity to content scope, such as inclusion and exclusion constraints, and (ii) awareness of schema-grounded requirements, including column semantics and representation granularity–capabilities largely absent in existing retrievers. To support systematic evaluation, we introduce FollowTable, the first large-scale benchmark for IFTR, constructed via a taxonomy-driven annotation pipeline. We further propose a new metric, termed the Instruction Responsiveness Score, to evaluate whether retrieval rankings consistently adapt to user instructions relative to a topic-only baseline. Our results indicate that existing retrieval models struggle to follow fine-grained instructions over tabular data. In particular, they exhibit systematic biases toward surface-level semantic cues and remain limited in handling schema-grounded constraints, highlighting substantial room for future improvements.



89. ❌ Agentic AI for Substance Use Education: Integrating Regulatory and Scientific Knowledge Sources

作者: Kosar Haghani, Zahra Kolagar, Mohammed Atiquzzaman 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00383v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The delivery of traditional substance education has remained problematic due to challenges in scalability, personalization, and the currency of information in a rapidly evolving substance use landscape. While artificial intelligence (AI) offers a promising frontier for enhancing educational delivery, its application in providing real-time, authoritative substance use education remains largely underexplored. We built an agentic-based AI web application that combined Drug Enforcement Administration records with peer-reviewed literature in real-time to provide transparent context-sensitive substance use education. The system uses retrieval-augmented generation with a carefully filtered corpus of 102 documents and dynamic PubMed queries. Document storage was semantically chunked and placed in a vector representation in order to be easily retrieved. We conducted an expert evaluation study in which a panel of five subject matter experts generated 30 domain-specific questions, and two independent raters assessed 90 system interactions (30 primary questions plus two contextual follow-ups each) using a five-point Likert scale across four criteria: factual accuracy, citation quality, contextual coherence, and regulatory appropriateness. Mean ratings ranged from 4.18 to 4.35 across the four criteria (overall category range: 4.05-4.52), with substantial inter-rater agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.78). These findings suggest that agentic AI architectures integrating authoritative regulatory sources with real-time scientific literature represent a promising direction for scalable, accurate, and verifiable health education delivery, warranting further evaluation through longitudinal user studies.



90. ❌ ResRL: Boosting LLM Reasoning via Negative Sample Projection Residual Reinforcement Learning

作者: Zihan Lin, Xiaohan Wang, Jie Cao, Jiajun Chai, Li Wang, Xiaodong Lu, Wei Lin, Ran He, Guojun Yin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00380v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) enhances reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs) but usually exhibits limited generation diversity due to the over-incentivization of positive rewards. Although methods like Negative Sample Reinforcement (NSR) mitigate this issue by upweighting penalty from negative samples, they may suppress the semantic distributions shared between positive and negative responses. To boost reasoning ability without losing diversity, this paper proposes negative sample projection Residual Reinforcement Learning (ResRL) that decouples similar semantic distributions among positive and negative responses. We theoretically link Lazy Likelihood Displacement (LLD) to negative-positive head-gradient interference and derive a single-forward proxy that upper-bounds representation alignment to guide conservative advantage reweighting. ResRL then projects negative-token hidden representations onto an SVD-based low-rank positive subspace and uses projection residuals to modulate negative gradients, improving reasoning while preserving diversity and outperforming strong baselines on average across twelve benchmarks spanning Mathematics, Code, Agent Tasks, and Function Calling. Notably, ResRL surpasses NSR on mathematical reasoning by 9.4% in Avg@16 and 7.0% in Pass@128. Code is available at https://github.com/1229095296/ResRL.git.



91. ❌ Language-free Experience at Expo 2025 Osaka

作者: Michael Paul, Kenji Imamura, Xiaolin Wang, Shohei Higashiyama, Masao Utiyama 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00373v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In line with the Global Communication Plan 2025, we have pursued the development of multilingual translation technologies to realize a language-barrier-free experience at Expo 2025 Osaka. Our work includes the advancement of simultaneous interpretation systems emphasizing high translation quality and low latency. Key achievements include chunk-based input segmentation, context-aware translation, and multi-engine machine translation technologies. Through demonstration deployments and collaboration with private companies, our technologies have led to real-world applications, with several services and systems showcased at Expo 2025 Osaka.



92. ❌ Uniform-Correct Policy Optimization: Breaking RLVR’s Indifference to Diversity

作者: Anamika Lochab, Bolian Li, Ruqi Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00365v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has achieved substantial gains in single-attempt accuracy (Pass@1) on reasoning tasks, yet often suffers from reduced multi-sample coverage (Pass@K), indicating diversity collapse. We identify a structural cause for this degradation: common RLVR objectives, such as GRPO, are indifferent to how probability mass is distributed among correct solutions. Combined with stochastic training dynamics, this indifference induces a self-reinforcing collapse, in which probability mass concentrates on a narrow subset of correct outputs while alternative valid solutions are suppressed. We formalize this collapse mechanism and further characterize the optimal policy structure under two complementary criteria: robustness and entropy-regularized optimality, which identify the Uniform-Correct Policy as uniquely optimal. Motivated by this analysis, we propose Uniform-Correct Policy Optimization (UCPO), a modification to GRPO that adds a conditional uniformity penalty on the policy’s distribution over correct solutions. The penalty redistributes gradient signal toward underrepresented correct responses, encouraging uniform allocation of probability mass within the correct set. Across three models (1.5B-7B parameters) and five mathematical reasoning benchmarks, UCPO improves Pass@K and diversity while maintaining competitive Pass@1, achieving up to +10% absolute improvement on AIME24 at Pass@64 and up to 45% higher equation-level diversity within the correct set. The code is available at https://github.com/AnamikaLochab/UCPO.



93. ❌ Unlearning What Matters: Token-Level Attribution for Precise Language Model Unlearning

作者: Jiawei Wu, DouDou Zhou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00364v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Machine unlearning has emerged as a critical capability for addressing privacy, safety, and regulatory concerns in large language models (LLMs). Existing methods operate at the sequence level, applying uniform updates across all tokens despite only a subset encoding the knowledge targeted for removal. This introduces gradient noise, degrades utility, and leads to suboptimal forgetting. We propose TokenUnlearn, a token-level attribution framework that identifies and selectively targets critical tokens. Our approach combines knowledge-aware signals via masking, and entropy-aware signals to yield importance scores for precise token selection. We develop two complementary strategies: hard selection, applying unlearning only to high-importance tokens, and soft weighting, modulating gradient contributions based on importance scores. Both extend existing methods to token-level variants. Theoretical analysis shows token-level selection improves gradient signal-to-noise ratio. Experiments on TOFU and WMDP benchmarks across three model architectures demonstrate consistent improvements over sequence-level baselines in both forgetting effectiveness and utility preservation.



94. ❌ From Backward Spreading to Forward Replay: Revisiting Target Construction in LLM Parameter Editing

作者: Wei Liu, Hongkai Liu, Zhiying Deng, Yee Whye Teh, Wee Sun Lee 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00358v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

LLM parameter editing methods commonly rely on computing an ideal target hidden-state at a target layer (referred as anchor point) and distributing the target vector to multiple preceding layers (commonly known as backward spreading) for cooperative editing. Although widely used for a long time, its underlying basis have not been systematically investigated. In this paper, we first conduct a systematic study of its foundations, which helps clarify its capability boundaries, practical considerations, and potential failure modes. Then, we propose a simple and elegant alternative that replaces backward spreading with forward-propagation. Instead of optimizing the target at the last editing layer, we optimize the anchor point at the first editing layer, and then propagate it forward to obtain accurate and mutually compatible target hidden-states for all subsequent editing layers. This approach achieves the same computational complexity as existing methods while producing more accurate layer-wise targets. Our method is simple, without interfering with either the computation of the initial target hidden state or any other components of the subsequent editing pipeline, and thus constituting a benefit for a wide range of LLM parameter editing methods.



95. ❌ Block-wise Codeword Embedding for Reliable Multi-bit Text Watermarking

作者: Joeun Kim, HoEun Kim, Dongsup Jin, Young-Sik Kim 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00348v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent multi-bit watermarking methods for large language models (LLMs) prioritize capacity over reliability, often conflating decoding with detection. Our analysis reveals that existing ECC-based extractors suffer from catastrophic false positive rates (FPR), and applying rejection thresholds merely collapses detection sensitivity (TPR) to random guessing. To resolve this structural limitation, we propose \textbf{BREW} (Block-wise Reliable Embedding for Watermarking), a framework shifting the paradigm to \emph{designated verification}. BREW employs a two-stage mechanism: (i) \textbf{blind message estimation} via independent block voting, followed by (ii) \textbf{window-shifting verification} that rigorously validates the payload against local edits. Experiments demonstrate that BREW achieves a TPR of 0.965 with an FPR of 0.02 under 10% synonym substitution, demonstrating that the high-FPR issue is not an inherent trade-off of multi-bit watermarking, but a solvable structural flaw of prior decoding-centric designs. Our framework is model-agnostic and theoretically grounded, providing a scalable solution for reliable forensic deployment.



96. ❌ Making Every Verified Token Count: Adaptive Verification for MoE Speculative Decoding

作者: Lehan Pan, Ziyang Tao, Ruoyu Pang, Xiao Wang, Jianjun Zhao, Yanyong Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00342v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Tree-based speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive generation by verifying multiple draft candidates in parallel, but this advantage weakens for sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models. As the draft tree grows, different branches activate different experts, expanding the union of activated experts and substantially increasing target-side verification cost. We propose EVICT, a training-free, hyperparameter-free, and lossless adaptive verification method for MoE speculative decoding. EVICT makes every verified token count by truncating the draft tree before target verification and retaining only the cost-effective prefix. It leverages fine-grained drafter signals to estimate candidate benefit, combines them with offline-profiled verification cost, and remains highly compatible with the high-performance graph-based serving framework SGLang. Extensive experiments on diverse MoE backbones and benchmarks show that EVICT achieves up to 2.35x speedup over autoregressive decoding and an average 1.21x speedup over the state-of-the-art baseline EAGLE-3, while significantly reducing unnecessary expert activations during verification.



97. ❌ Borrowed Geometry: Computational Reuse of Frozen Text-Pretrained Transformer Weights Across Modalities

作者: Abay Bektursun 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00333v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Frozen Gemma 4 31B weights pretrained exclusively on text tokens, unmodified, transfer across modality boundaries through a thin trainable interface. (1) OGBench scene-play-singletask-task1-v0: $+4.33$pt over published GCIQL at $n=3$ with std 0.74 – a published-SOTA win on a robotic manipulation task the substrate has never seen. (2) D4RL Walker2d-medium-v2: Decision-Transformer parity ($76.2 \pm 0.8$, $n=3$) at $0.43\times$ DT’s trainable count, with the frozen substrate compressing to a 5L slice ($+1.66$pt over the 6L baseline at $n=3$). (3) Associative recall as the cleanest pretraining-load-bearing case: the frozen slice + a 113K-parameter linear interface reaches L30 best-checkpoint per-bit error 0.0505 ($n=2$); a 6.36M-parameter from-scratch trained transformer at matched capacity ($1/\sqrt{d_k}$ scaling, two seeds, LR sweep) cannot solve the task at all under the protocol (best L30 = 0.4395), an $8.7\times$ advantage. Architecture-alone falsifications: a frozen random transformer with correct $1/\sqrt{d_k}$ scaling stays at random-chance loss for 50k steps; a random-init Gemma slice fails OGBench cube-double-play-task1 entirely (0.89% across $n=3$ where pretrained reaches 60%). A dual-measurement protocol – text-activation probing on 95 English sentences plus task-ablation on a non-language target – names individual heads independently identifiable on both protocols: head L26.28 scores $3.7\times$ the slice mean for English token-copying and is the #2 most-critical head for binary copy ablation ($Δ$ L30 $= +0.221$); three further heads (L27.28, L27.2, L27.3) classify by the same protocol. The mechanism is single-model and the cross-modality results are single-task within their respective benchmarks; cross-model replication is structurally constrained because Gemma 4 31B is the only model on the small-scale Pareto frontier as of April 2026.



98. ❌ Prompt-Induced Score Variance in Zero-Shot Binary Vision-Language Safety Classification

作者: Charles Weng, Dingwen Li, Alexander Martin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00326v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Single-prompt first-token probabilities from zero-shot vision-language model (VLM) safety classifiers are treated as decision scores, but we show they are unreliable under semantically equivalent prompt reformulation: even when the binary label is constrained to a fixed output position, equivalent prompts can induce materially different unsafe probabilities for the same sample. Across multimodal safety benchmarks and multiple VLM families, cross-prompt variance is strongly associated with prompt-level disagreement and higher error, making it a useful fragility diagnostic. A training-free mean ensemble improves NLL on all 14 dataset-model evaluation pairs and ECE on 12/14 relative to a train-selected single-prompt baseline, and wins more head-to-head NLL comparisons than labeled temperature scaling, Platt scaling, and isotonic regression applied to the same prompt. Ranking gains are consistent against the train-selected baseline on both AUROC and AUPRC, and against the full 15-prompt distribution remain consistent on AUPRC while softening on AUROC. Labeled calibration on top of the mean provides further gains when labels are available, identifying prompt averaging as a strong label-free first stage rather than a replacement for calibration. We frame this as a reliability stress test for zero-shot VLM first-token safety scores and recommend prompt-family evaluation with mean aggregation as a standard label-free reliability baseline.



99. ❌ Structure-Aware Chunking for Tabular Data in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

作者: Pooja Guttal, Varun Magotra, Vasudeva Mahavishnu, Natasha Chanto, Sidharth Sivaprasad, Manas Gaur 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00318v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Tabular documents such as CSV and Excel files are widely used in enterprise data pipelines, yet existing chunking strategies for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) are primarily designed for unstructured text and do not account for tabular structure. We propose a structure-aware tabular chunking (STC) framework that operates on row-level units by constructing a hierarchical Row Tree representation, where each row is encoded as a key-value block. STC performs token-constrained splitting aligned with structural boundaries and applies overlap-free greedy merging to produce dense, non-overlapping chunks. This design preserves semantic relationships between fields within a row while improving token utilization and reducing fragmentation. Across evaluations on the MAUD dataset, STC reduces chunk count by up to 40% and 56% compared to standard recursive and key-value based baselines, respectively, while improving token utilization and processing efficiency. In retrieval benchmarks, STC improves MRR from 0.3576 to 0.5945 in a hybrid setting and increases Recall@1 from 0.366 to 0.754 in BM25-only retrieval. These results demonstrate that preserving structure during chunking improves retrieval performance, highlighting the importance of structure-aware chunking for RAG over tabular data.



100. ❌ Posterior Augmented Flow Matching

作者: George Stoica, Sayak Paul, Matthew Wallingford, Vivek Ramanujan, Abhay Nori, Winson Han, Ali Farhadi, Ranjay Krishna, Judy Hoffman 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00825v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Flow matching (FM) trains a time-dependent vector field that transports samples from a simple prior to a complex data distribution. However, for high-dimensional images, each training sample supervises only a single trajectory and intermediate point, yielding an extremely sparse and high-variance training signal. This under-constrained supervision can cause flow collapse, where the learned dynamics memorize specific source-target pairings, mapping diverse inputs to overly similar outputs, failing to generalize. We introduce Posterior-Augmented Flow Matching (PAFM), a theoretically grounded generalization of FM that replaces single-target supervision with an expectation over an approximate posterior of valid target completions for a given intermediate state and condition. PAFM factorizes this intractable posterior into (i) the likelihood of the intermediate under a hypothesized endpoint and (ii) the prior probability of that endpoint under the condition, and uses an importance sampling scheme to construct a mixture over multiple candidate targets. We prove that PAFM yields an unbiased estimator of the original FM objective while substantially reducing gradient variance during training by aggregating information from many plausible continuation trajectories per intermediate. Finally, we show that PAFM improves over FM by up to 3.4 FID50K across different model scales (SiT-B/2 and SiT-XL/2), different architectures (SiT and MMDiT), and in both class and text conditioned benchmarks (ImageNet and CC12M), with a negligible increase in the compute overhead. Code: https://github.com/gstoica27/PAFM.git.



101. ❌ Let ViT Speak: Generative Language-Image Pre-training

作者: Yan Fang, Mengcheng Lan, Zilong Huang, Weixian Lei, Yunqing Zhao, Yujie Zhong, Yingchen Yu, Qi She, Yao Zhao, Yunchao Wei 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00809v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In this paper, we present \textbf{Gen}erative \textbf{L}anguage-\textbf{I}mage \textbf{P}re-training (GenLIP), a minimalist generative pretraining framework for Vision Transformers (ViTs) designed for multimodal large language models (MLLMs). To better align vision encoders with the autoregressive nature of LLMs, GenLIP trains a ViT to predict language tokens directly from visual tokens using a standard language modeling objective, without contrastive batch construction or an additional text decoder. This design offers three key advantages: (1) \textbf{Simplicity}: a single transformer jointly models visual and textual tokens; (2) \textbf{Scalability}: it scales effectively with both data and model size; and (3) \textbf{Performance}: it achieves competitive or superior results across diverse multimodal benchmarks. Trained on 8B samples from Recap-DataComp-1B, GenLIP matches or surpasses strong baselines despite using substantially less pretraining data. After continued pretraining on multi-resolution images at native aspect ratios, GenLIP further improves on detail-sensitive tasks such as OCR and chart understanding, making it a strong foundation for vision encoders in MLLMs.



102. ❌ GMGaze: MoE-Based Context-Aware Gaze Estimation with CLIP and Multiscale Transformer

作者: Xinyuan Zhao, Yihang Wu, Ahmad Chaddad, Sarah A. Alkhodair, Reem Kateb 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00799v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Gaze estimation methods commonly use facial appearances to predict the direction of a person gaze. However, previous studies show three major challenges with convolutional neural network (CNN)-based, transformer-based, and contrastive language-image pre-training (CLIP)-based methods, including late fusion of image features, lack of factor-aware conditioning, and impractical capacity scaling. To address these challenges, we propose Globally-conditioned Multi-scale Gaze estimation (GMGaze), which leverages a multi-scale transformer architecture. Specifically, the model first introduces semantic prototype conditioning, which modulates the CLIP global image embedding using four learned prototype banks (i.e., illumination, background, head pose and appearance) to generate two complementary context-biased global tokens. These tokens, along with the CLIP patch and CNN tokens, are fused at the first layer. This early unified fusion prevents information loss common in late-stage merging. Finally, each token passes through sparse Mixture-of-Experts modules, providing conditional computational capacity without uniformly increasing dense parameters. For cross-domain adaptation, we incorporate an adversarial domain adaptation technique with a feature separation loss that encourages the two global tokens to remain de-correlated. Experiments using four public benchmarks (MPIIFaceGaze, EYEDIAP, Gaze360, and ETH-XGaze) show that GMGaze achieves mean angular errors of 2.49$^\circ$, 3.22$^\circ$, 10.16$^\circ$, and 1.44$^\circ$, respectively, outperforming previous baselines in all within-domain settings. In cross-domain evaluations, it provides state-of-the-art (SOTA) results on two standard transfer routes.



103. ❌ Map2World: Segment Map Conditioned Text to 3D World Generation

作者: Jaeyoung Chung, Suyoung Lee, Jianfeng Xiang, Jiaolong Yang, Kyoung Mu Lee 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00781v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

3D world generation is essential for applications such as immersive content creation or autonomous driving simulation. Recent advances in 3D world generation have shown promising results; however, these methods are constrained by grid layouts and suffer from inconsistencies in object scale throughout the entire world. In this work, we introduce a novel framework, Map2World, that first enables 3D world generation conditioned on user-defined segment maps of arbitrary shapes and scales, ensuring global-scale consistency and flexibility across expansive environments. To further enhance the quality, we propose a detail enhancer network that generates fine details of the world. The detail enhancer enables the addition of fine-grained details without compromising overall scene coherence by incorporating global structure information. We design the entire pipeline to leverage strong priors from asset generators, achieving robust generalization across diverse domains, even under limited training data for scene generation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing approaches in user-controllability, scale consistency, and content coherence, enabling users to generate 3D worlds under more complex conditions.



104. ❌ Modeling Subjective Urban Perception with Human Gaze

作者: Lin Che, Xi Wang, Marc Pollefeys, Konrad Schindler, Martin Raubal, Peter Kiefer 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00764v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Urban perception describes how people subjectively evaluate urban environments, shaping how cities are experienced and understood. Existing computational approaches primarily model urban perception directly from street view images, but largely ignore the human perceptual process through which such judgments are formed. In this paper, we introduce Place Pulse-Gaze, an urban perception dataset that augments street view images with synchronized eye-tracking recordings and individual perception labels. Based on this dataset, we propose a Gaze-Guided Urban Perception Framework to study how gaze behavior contributes to the modeling of subjective urban perception. The framework systematically investigates three complementary settings: gaze-only modeling, gaze fusion with explicit semantic scene representations, and gaze fusion with implicit richer visual representations. Experiments show that gaze alone already carries useful predictive signals for subjective urban perception, and that integrating gaze with scene representations further improves prediction under both semantic and richer visual representations. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of incorporating human perceptual processes into urban scene understanding and open a direction for gaze-guided multimodal urban computing.



105. ❌ Quantum Gradient-Based Approach for Edge and Corner Detection Using Sobel Kernels

作者: Mohammad Aamir Sohail, Gabriela Pinheiro, Yasemin Poyraz Kocak, Batuhan Hangun, Emre Camkerten, Simge Yigit, Hafize Asude Ertan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00744v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Edge detection refers to identifying points in a digital image where intensity changes sharply, indicating object boundaries or structural features. Corners are locations where gray-level intensity changes abruptly in multiple directions and are widely used in feature extraction, object tracking, and 3D modeling. In this study, we present a quantum implementation of Sobel-based edge detection and Harris-style corner detection. Two quantum image encoding methods - Flexible Representation of Quantum Images (FRQI) and Quantum Probability Image Encoding (QPIE) - are used to encode the input data and are comparatively analyzed. The proposed approach introduces a quantum gradient computation scheme based on lag-2 differences, enabling the evaluation of gradient-like features in superposition. To improve detection quality and reduce false positives, a classical post-processing step is applied to candidate corner points identified by the quantum circuit. Results show that the proposed quantum circuits produce outputs consistent with classical Sobel and Harris operators. Furthermore, the QPIE-based configuration yields more stable and coherent results than FRQI, especially under limited measurement shots. While gradient computation can be performed efficiently at the circuit level, the overall cost remains dominated by state preparation, measurement, and classical post-processing. All experiments are conducted under noiseless simulation, and performance on NISQ hardware may be affected by noise and measurement limitations. Therefore, this work demonstrates a functional and scalable quantum realization of classical edge and corner detection methods rather than an end-to-end speedup.



106. ❌ Exploring the Limits of End-to-End Feature-Affinity Propagation for Single-Point Supervised Infrared Small Target Detection

作者: Qiancheng Zhou, Wenhua Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00722v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Single-point supervised infrared small target detection (IRSTD) drastically reduces dense annotation costs. Current state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods achieve high precision by recovering mask supervision through explicit, offline pseudo-label construction, such as multi-stage active learning and physics-driven mask generation. In this paper, we study a minimalist alternative: generating point-to-mask supervision online through in-batch, point-anchored feature-affinity propagation. We instantiate this paradigm as GSACP, an end-to-end testbed that directly supervises the detector using hard-margin feature affinity gated by local image priors, entirely eliminating external label-evolution loops. This compact design, however, exposes an optimization bottleneck. Because the affinity target is generated from the same feature representation being optimized, training forms a self-referential loop. We theoretically formalize this as \emph{Self-Referential Propagation Drift}, a representation-supervision entanglement that can sharpen true boundaries or distort the feature space to satisfy its own targets. To systematically isolate these failure modes, we apply a protocolized single-variable ablation procedure spanning local EMA teacher decoupling, hard-background contrastive separation, and adaptive support geometry. On the SIRST3 dataset, GSACP-Final establishes a new ultra-low false-alarm operating regime, achieving a highly competitive $0.6674$ mIoU while demonstrating a $38% relative reduction in false-positive artifacts ($\mathrm{Fa}$) compared with PAL. By systematically deconstructing the end-to-end paradigm, we map its performance boundaries and show that in-batch feature propagation provides a compact alternative for deployment scenarios where false-alarm suppression is paramount.



107. ❌ Unpaired Image Deraining Using Reward-Guided Self-Reinforcement Strategy

作者: Yinghao Chen, Yeying Jin, Xiang Chen, Yanyan Wei, Ziyang Yan, Yaowen Fu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00719v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Unsupervised deraining has attracted attention for its ability to learn the real-world distribution of rain without paired supervision. However, the lack of strong constraints makes it difficult for the network to converge, especially with the complex diversity of rain degradation. A key motivation is that high-quality deraining results occasionally emerge during training, which can be leveraged to guide the optimization process. To overcome these challenges, we introduce RGSUD (Reward-Guided Self-Reinforcement Unsupervised Image Deraining), comprising two key stages: reward recycling and self-reinforcement (SR) training. For the former stage, we propose an Image Quality Assessment (IQA)-based dynamic reward recycling mechanism that selects optimal derained outputs during training and continuously collects high-quality deraining images. In latter stage, we incorporate these rewards into the model’s optimization process, constraining the optimization space and improving alignment between derained outputs and clean images. By leveraging IQA-based self-reinforced loss and dynamically updated rewards, we enhance the quality of synthesized pseudo-paired data and stabilize the optimization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves SOTA performance across multiple datasets, including paired synthetic, paired real, and unpaired real images, outperforming existing unsupervised deraining approaches in both subjective and objective IQA metrics. Additionally, we show that the self-reinforcement strategy is adaptable to other unsupervised deraining methods and our deraining framework demonstrates strong generalization across existing supervised deraining networks.



108. ❌ Learning Coarse-to-Fine Osteoarthritis Representations under Noisy Hierarchical Labels

作者: Tongxu Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00718v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) assessment involves a natural but often underused label hierarchy: a coarse binary OA decision and a fine-grained Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) severity grade. Existing deep learning studies commonly treat these targets as separate classification problems, either reducing OA assessment to disease presence or directly optimizing noisy ordinal KL labels. In this work, we ask whether this clinical hierarchy can serve as a representation-level supervisory prior. Rather than introducing a complex architecture, we use a deliberately simple dual-head model with a shared encoder and two task-specific heads as a probe of hierarchical supervision. We compare single-OA, single-KL, and dual-head training across multiple 3D backbones under the same test protocol. Beyond standard classification metrics, we perform paired statistical comparisons, analyze latent severity-axis geometry, and examine saliency overlap with cartilage regions. The results show that dual-head supervision produces backbone-dependent gains, with clear improvements in KL-related metrics for selected backbones. More importantly, the gains are accompanied by a more ordered coarse-to-fine latent organization and, for responsive backbones, stronger anatomical alignment of saliency with cartilage. These findings suggest that even simple hierarchical dual-head supervision can reshape disease representations under noisy coarse/fine labels, providing a useful inductive bias for OA diagnosis and severity grading.



109. ❌ PhysEdit: Physically-Consistent Region-Aware Image Editing via Adaptive Spatio-Temporal Reasoning

作者: Guandong Li, Mengxia Ye 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00707v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Image editing instructions are heterogeneous: a color swap, an object insertion, and a physical-action edit all demand different spatial coverage and different reasoning depth, yet existing reasoning-based editors apply a single fixed inference recipe to every instruction. We argue that adaptivity along both the spatial and temporal axes is the missing degree of freedom, and we present PhysEdit, an editing framework built around this principle. PhysEdit introduces two inference-time modules that compose without retraining the backbone. At its core, (1) Complexity-Adaptive Reasoning Depth (CARD) predicts edit complexity directly from the instruction and reference image and allocates the reasoning step count N_r and reasoning-token length r per sample – turning a previously fixed inference schedule into a conditional-computation problem. CARD is supported by (2) a Spatial Reasoning Mask (SRM) that extracts an instruction-conditioned spatial prior from cross-attention to confine reasoning to regions that semantically require it. On the full 737-case ImgEdit Basic-Edit Suite, PhysEdit delivers a 1.18x wall-clock speedup (64.3s vs. 76.1s per sample) over a strong reasoning baseline while slightly improving instruction adherence (CLIP-T 0.2283 vs. 0.2266, +0.7%) and matching identity preservation within noise (CLIP-I 0.8246 vs. 0.8280). The speedup is category-dependent and reaches 1.52x on appearance-level edits, validating CARD’s adaptive allocation as the principal source of efficiency gain. A 30-sample pilot with full ablations isolates the contribution of each module.



110. ❌ Static and Dynamic Graph Alignment Network for Temporal Video Grounding

作者: Zhanjie Hu, Bolin Zhang, Jianhua Wang, Jianbo Zheng, Chenchen Yan, Takahiro Komamizu, Ichiro Ide, Jiangbo Qian 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00684v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Temporal Video Grounding (TVG) aims to localize temporal moments in an untrimmed video that semantically correspond to given natural language queries. Recently, Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN) have been widely adopted in TVG to model temporal relations among video clips and enhance contextual reasoning by constructing clip-level graphs. Despite their effectiveness, existing GCN-based TVG methods encounter three critical bottlenecks: 1) Most methods construct graph nodes using either static or dynamic features alone, resulting in incomplete visual representation and overlooking complementary semantics, 2) Most methods construct temporal graphs in a query-agnostic manner, leading to inefficient feature interaction within the temporal graph representation, and 3) Most methods often suffer from a single-granularity semantic matching, while direct training on complex temporal localization task may lead to slow convergence and suboptimal precision. To address these challenges, we propose Static and Dynamic Graph Alignment Network (SDGAN). First, SDGAN jointly exploits static and dynamic visual features to construct two complementary temporal graphs and performs Position-wise Nodes Alignment, enabling more expressive and robust visual representation. Second, SDGAN introduces Query-Clip Contrastive Learning and Adaptive Graph Modeling to explicitly align visual clips with their corresponding textual queries, yielding query-aware visual representations. Third, SDGAN incorporates multi-granularity temporal proposals within Progressive Easy-to-Hard Training Strategy, effectively bridging coarse-grained semantic localization and fine-grained temporal boundary refinement. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that SDGAN achieves superior performance across complex TVG scenarios. Codes and datasets are available at https://github.com/ZhanJieHu/SDGAN.



111. ❌ Foundation AI Models for Aerosol Optical Depth Estimation from PACE Satellite Data

作者: Zahid Hassan Tushar, Sanjay Purushotham 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00678v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) retrieval is essential for Earth observation, supporting applications from air quality monitoring to climate studies. Conventional physics-based AOD retrieval methods formulate the problem as a pixel-wise inversion, relying on radiative transfer modeling, memory-intensive look-up tables, and auxiliary meteorological data. While recent data-driven approaches have shown promise, many fail to exploit the spatial-spectral coherence of hyperspectral imagery, leading to spatially inconsistent and noise-sensitive retrievals. We present the first study exploring Foundation AI models for AOD retrieval and propose ViTCG, a Vision Transformer with Channel-wise Grouping-based spatial regression framework that reduces retrieval bias and error. ViTCG uses hyperspectral top-of-atmosphere radiance as input and jointly models spatial context and spectral information. Validation with PACE radiance observations demonstrates a 62% reduction in mean squared error compared to state-of-the-art foundation models, including Prithvi, and produces spatially coherent AOD fields.



112. ❌ DMDSC: A Dynamic-Margin Deep Simplex Classifier for Open-Set Recognition on Medical Image Datasets

作者: Vishal, Arnav Aditya, Nitin Kumar, Saurabh J. Shigwan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00675v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Medical imaging datasets are often characterized by extreme class imbalances, where rare pathologies are significantly underrepresented compared to common conditions. This imbalance poses a dual challenge for Open-Set Recognition (OSR): models must maintain high classification accuracy on known classes while reliably rejecting unknown samples unseen during training in the clinical settings. While recently proposed Deep Simplex Classifier (DSC)\cite{cevikalp2024reaching} and UnCertainty-aware Deep Simplex Classifier (UCDSC)\cite{Aditya_2026_WACV} successfully leverage Neural Collapse to ensure maximal inter-class separation, they rely on a uniform margin that does not account for the varying densities of medical classes. In this paper, we propose DMDSC an enhanced framework featuring a dynamic margin approach. Our approach automatically adapts class-specific margins based on label frequency, enforcing a higher penalty and tighter feature clustering for rare pathologies to counteract the effects of data imbalance. Extensive experiments conducted on diverse medical benchmarks on BloodMNIST\cite{medmnistv2}, OCTMNIST\cite{medmnistv2}, DermaMNIST\cite{medmnistv2}, and BreaKHis~\cite{spanhol2015dataset} datasets, demonstrate that our framework outperforms state-of-the-art methods.



113. ❌ Prediction of Alzheimer’s Disease Risk Factors from Retinal Images via Deep Learning: Development and Validation of Biologically Relevant Morphological Associations in the UK Biobank

作者: Seowung Leem, Yunchao Yang, Adam J. Woods, Ruogu Fang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00665v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The systemic, metabolic, lifestyle factors have established associations with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) through epidemiologic and AD-specific biomarker studies. Whether colored fundus photography (CFP) contains retinal structural signatures corresponding to these AD-related risk domains remains unclear. To determine whether deep learning (DL) models can predict 12 AD-related risk factors from CFP and to characterize the retinal structures underlying these predictions, thereby assessing whether CFP reflects pathways to AD vulnerability. Using UK Biobank CFPs, DL models were trained using 62,876 images from 44,501 unique participants to predict 12 factors linked to AD incidence: 6 categorical (sex, smoking, sleeplessness, economic status, alcohol use, depression) and 6 continuous (age, age at completing education, BMI, systolic, diastolic blood pressure, HbA1c). Model performance, model saliency, and saliency-derived scores (CAM-Score) were evaluated and compared to retinal morphometry. The scores were also compared between incident-AD cases (average 8.55 years before onset) and matched controls. Performance of DL ranged from AUROC= 0.5654-0.9480 for categorical and R2=-0.0291-0.7620 for continuous factors, outperforming most of the morphometry-machine learning models. Saliency-based score consistently highlighted biologically meaningful regions, particularly the optic nerve head and retinal vasculature. It also aligned with present morphometric variations. Several saliency-based scores differed significantly between incident AD and matched controls, suggesting potential overlap between retinal correlates of risk factors and preclinical AD-associated changes. CFP encodes retinal signatures linked to AD risk factors. Although not diagnostic, DL-derived retinal representations may uncover biologically meaningful risk-related structural changes mirroring the potential AD vulnerability.



114. ❌ Affordance Agent Harness: Verification-Gated Skill Orchestration

作者: Haojian Huang, Jiahao Shi, Yinchuan Li, Yingcong Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00663v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Affordance grounding requires identifying where and how an agent should interact in open-world scenes, where actionable regions are often small, occluded, reflective, and visually ambiguous. Recent systems therefore combine multiple skills (e.g., detection, segmentation, interaction-imagination), yet most orchestrate them with fixed pipelines that are poorly matched to per-instance difficulty, offer limited targeted recovery from intermediate errors, and fail to reuse experience from recurring objects. These failures expose a systems problem: test-time grounding must acquire the right evidence, decide whether that evidence is reliable enough to commit, and do so under bounded inference cost without access to labels. We propose Affordance Agent Harness, a closed-loop runtime that unifies heterogeneous skills with an evidence store and cost control, retrieves episodic memories to provide priors for recurring categories, and employs a Router to adaptively select and parameterize skills. An affordance-specific Verifier then gates commitments using self-consistency, cross-scale stability, and evidence sufficiency, triggering targeted retries before a final judge fuses accumulated evidence and trajectories into the prediction. Experiments on multiple affordance benchmarks and difficulty-controlled subsets show a stronger accuracy-cost Pareto frontier than fixed-pipeline baselines, improving grounding quality while reducing average skill calls and latency. Project page: https://tenplusgood.github.io/a-harness-page/.



115. ❌ UniVidX: A Unified Multimodal Framework for Versatile Video Generation via Diffusion Priors

作者: Houyuan Chen, Hong Li, Xianghao Kong, Tianrui Zhu, Shaocong Xu, Weiqing Xiao, Yuwei Guo, Chongjie Ye, Lvmin Zhang, Hao Zhao, Anyi Rao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00658v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent progress has shown that video diffusion models (VDMs) can be repurposed for diverse multimodal graphics tasks. However, existing methods often train separate models for each problem setting, which fixes the input-output mapping and limits the modeling of correlations across modalities. We present UniVidX, a unified multimodal framework that leverages VDM priors for versatile video generation. UniVidX formulates pixel-aligned tasks as conditional generation in a shared multimodal space, adapts to modality-specific distributions while preserving the backbone’s native priors, and promotes cross-modal consistency during synthesis. It is built on three key designs. Stochastic Condition Masking (SCM) randomly partitions modalities into clean conditions and noisy targets during training, enabling omni-directional conditional generation instead of fixed mappings. Decoupled Gated LoRA (DGL) introduces per-modality LoRAs that are activated when a modality serves as the generation target, preserving the strong priors of the VDM. Cross-Modal Self-Attention (CMSA) shares keys and values across modalities while keeping modality-specific queries, facilitating information exchange and inter-modal alignment. We instantiate UniVidX in two domains: UniVid-Intrinsic, for RGB videos and intrinsic maps including albedo, irradiance, and normal; and UniVid-Alpha, for blended RGB videos and their constituent RGBA layers. Experiments show that both models achieve performance competitive with state-of-the-art methods across distinct tasks and generalize robustly to in-the-wild scenarios, even when trained on fewer than 1,000 videos. Project page: https://houyuanchen111.github.io/UniVidX.github.io/



116. ❌ Paired-CSLiDAR: Height-Stratified Registration for Cross-Source Aerial-Ground LiDAR Pose Refinement

作者: Montana Hoover, Jing Liang, Tianrui Guan, Dinesh Manocha 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00634v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We introduce Paired-CSLiDAR (CSLiDAR), a cross-source aerial-ground LiDAR benchmark for single-scan pose refinement: refining a ground-scan pose within a 50 m-radius aerial crop. The benchmark contains 12,683 ground-aerial pairs across 6 evaluation sites and per-scan reference 6-DoF alignments for sub-meter root-mean-square error (RMSE) evaluation. Because aerial scans capture rooftops and canopy while ground scans capture facades and under-canopy, the two modalities share only a fraction of their geometry, primarily the terrain surface, causing standard registration methods and learned correspondence models to converge to metrically incorrect local minima. We propose Residual-Guided Stratified Registration (RGSR), a training-free, geometry-only refinement pipeline that exploits the shared ground plane through height-stratified ICP, reversed registration directions, and confidence-gated accept-if-better selection. RGSR achieves 86.0% S@0.75 m and 99.8% S@1.0 m on the primary benchmark of 9,012 scans, outperforming both the confidence-gated cascade at 83.7% and GeoTransformer at 76.3%. We validate RMSE-based pose selection with independent survey control and trajectory consistency, and show that added Fourier-Mellin BEV proposals can reduce RMSE while increasing actual pose error under extreme partial overlap. The dataset and code are being prepared for public release.



117. ❌ CMTA: Leveraging Cross-Modal Temporal Artifacts for Generalizable AI-Generated Video Detection

作者: Hang Wang, Chao Shen, Chenhao Lin, Minghui Yang, Lei Zhang, Cong Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00630v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The proliferation of advanced AI video synthesis techniques poses an unprecedented challenge to digital video authenticity. Existing AI-generated video (AIGV) detection methods primarily focus on uni-modal or spatiotemporal artifacts, but they overlook the rich cues within the visual-textual cross-modal space, especially the temporal stability of semantic alignment. In this work, we identify a distinctive fingerprint in AIGVs, termed cross-modal temporal artifact (CMTA). Unlike real videos that exhibit natural temporal fluctuations in cross-modal alignment due to semantic variations, AIGVs display unnaturally stable semantic trajectories governed by given input prompts. To bridge this gap, we propose the CMTA framework, a cross-modal detection approach that captures these unique temporal artifacts through joint cross-modal embedding and multi-grained temporal modeling. Specifically, CMTA leverages BLIP to generate frame-level image captions and utilizes CLIP to extract corresponding visual-textual representations. A coarse-grained temporal modeling branch is then designed to characterize temporal fluctuations in cross-modal alignment with a GRU. In parallel, a fine-grained branch is constructed to capture intricate inter-frame variations from integrated visual-textual features with a Transformer encoder. Extensive experiments on 40 subsets across four large-scale datasets, including GenVideo, EvalCrafter, VideoPhy, and VidProM, validate that our approach sets a new state-of-the-art while exhibiting superior cross-generator generalization. Code and models of CMTA will be released at https://github.com/hwang-cs-ime/CMTA



118. ❌ Faithful Extreme Image Rescaling with Learnable Reversible Transformation and Semantic Priors

作者: Hao Wei, Yanhui Zhou, Chenyang Ge, Saeed Anwar, Ajmal Mian 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00605v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Most recent extreme rescaling methods struggle to preserve semantically consistent structures and produce realistic details, due to the severely ill-posed nature of low- to high-resolution mapping under scaling factors of $16\times$ or higher. To alleviate the above problems, we propose FaithEIR, a diffusion-based framework for extreme image rescaling. Inspired by singular value decomposition, we develop learnable reversible transformation that enables invertible downscaling and upscaling in the latent space. To compensate for information loss due to quantization, we propose an adaptive detail prior, a high-frequency dictionary that captures the empirical average of commonly occurring structures in the training data. Finally, we design a lightweight pixel semantic embedder to provide semantic conditioning for the pretrained diffusion model. We present extensive experimental results demonstrating that our FaithEIR consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving superior reconstruction fidelity and perceptual quality. Our code, model weights, and detailed results are released at https://github.com/cshw2021/FaithEIR.



119. ❌ Robust Fusion of Object-Level V2X for Learned 3D Object Detection

作者: Lukas Ostendorf, Lennart Reiher, Onn Haran, Lutz Eckstein 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00595v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Perception for automated driving is largely based on onboard environmental sensors, such as cameras and radar, which are cost-effective but limited by line-of-sight and field-of-view constraints. These inherent limitations may cause onboard perception to fail under occlusions or poor visibility conditions. In parallel, cooperative awareness via vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication is becoming increasingly available, enabling vehicles and infrastructure to share their own state as object-level information that complements onboard perception. In this work, we study how such V2X information can be integrated into 3D object detection and how robust the resulting system is to realistic V2X imperfections. Using the nuScenes dataset, we emulate object-level cooperative awareness messages from ground truth, injecting controlled noise and object dropout to mimic real-world conditions such as latency, localization errors, and low V2X penetration rates. We convert these messages into a dedicated bird’s-eye view (BEV) input and fuse them into a BEVFusion-style detector. Our results demonstrate that while object-level cooperative information can substantially improve detection performance, achieving an NDS of 0.80 under favorable conditions, models trained on idealized data become fragile and over-reliant on V2X. Conversely, our proposed noise-aware training strategy, coupled with explicit confidence encoding, enhances robustness, maintaining performance gains even under severe noise and reduced V2X penetration.



120. ❌ Intrinsic Gradient Suppression for Label-Noise Prompt Tuning in Vision-Language Models

作者: Jiayu Li, Jiaxin Qi, Sheng Zhou, Jiaqiang Huang, Xiansheng Hua 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00591v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Contrastive vision-language models like CLIP exhibit remarkable zero-shot generalization. However, prompt tuning remains highly sensitive to label noise, as mislabeled samples generate disproportionately large gradients that can overwhelm pre-trained priors. We argue that because CLIP already provides a near-optimal initialization, adaptation should be inherently conservative, particularly against the extreme gradient updates common in noisy settings. To this end, we propose Double-Softmax Prompt Tuning (DSPT), a hyperparameter-free method for intrinsic gradient suppression. By applying a sequential probabilistic normalization, DSPT induces a self-adaptive saturation zone that suppresses gradients from high-error noisy samples while maintaining informative updates. We also provide both theoretical analysis and empirical evidence about how this mechanism achieves adaptive suppression. This design transforms ``gradient vanishing’’, traditionally a training bottleneck, into a principled noise-filtering shield for label-noise prompt tuning. Extensive experiments confirm that this simple, drop-in design achieves state-of-the-art robustness across various noisy benchmarks, outperforming methods with complex architectures and handcrafted hyperparameters.



121. ❌ Federated Distillation for Whole Slide Image via Gaussian-Mixture Feature Alignment and Curriculum Integration

作者: Luru Jing, Cong Cong, Yanyuan Chen, Yongzhi Cao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00578v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Federated learning (FL) offers a promising framework for collaborative digital pathology by enabling model training across institutions. However, real-world deployments face heterogeneity arising from diverse multiple instance learning (MIL) architectures and heterogeneous feature extractors across institutions. We propose FedHD, a novel FL framework that performs local Gaussian-mixture feature alignment tailored for WSI analysis. Instead of exchanging model parameters, each client independently distills semantically rich synthetic feature representations aligned with the distribution of real WSIs. To preserve diagnostic diversity, FedHD adopts a one-to-one distillation strategy, generating a synthetic counterpart for each real slide to avoid over-compression. During federation, a curriculum-based integration strategy progressively incorporates cross-site synthetic features into local training once performance plateaus. Furthermore, an optional interpretation module reconstructs pseudo-patches from synthetic embeddings, enhancing transparency. FedHD is architecture-agnostic, privacy-preserving, and supports personalized yet collaborative training across diverse institutions. Experiments on TCGA-IDH, CAMELYON16, and CAMELYON17 show that FedHD consistently outperforms state-of-the-art federated and distillation baselines.



122. ❌ 2D-SuGaR: Surface-Aware Gaussian Splatting for Geometrically Accurate Mesh Reconstruction

作者: Prajwal Gupta C. R., Divyam Sheth, Jinjoo Ha, Mirela Ostrek, Justus Thies 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00569v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has emerged as a powerful technique for generating photorealistic renderings of a scene in real-time. However, the volumetric nature of 3DGS limits its ability to accurately capture surface geometry. To address this, 2D Gaussian Splatting (2DGS) was proposed to enable view-consistent and geometrically accurate surface reconstruction from multi-view images. However, 2DGS can be sensitive to the initialization of the Gaussian primitives. Reliance on Structure-from-Motion (SfM) initializations, which can produce poor estimates on challenging image sets, may lead to subpar results. In this work, we enhance 2DGS by incorporating monocular depth and normal priors to improve both geometric accuracy and robustness. We propose a depth-guided initialization strategy for Gaussians and introduce a clustering-based technique for pruning degenerate Gaussians. We evaluate our method on the DTU dataset, where it achieves state-of-the-art results in mesh reconstruction while preserving high-quality novel view synthesis.



123. ❌ Depth-Guided Privacy-Preserving Visual Localization Using 3D Sphere Clouds

作者: Heejoon Moon, Jongwoo Lee, Jeonggon Kim, Je Hyeong Hong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00562v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The emergence of deep neural networks capable of revealing high-fidelity scene details from sparse 3D point clouds has raised significant privacy concerns in visual localization involving private maps. Lifting map points to randomly oriented 3D lines is a well-known approach for obstructing undesired recovery of the scene images, but these lines are vulnerable to a density-based attack that can recover the point cloud geometry by observing the neighborhood statistics of lines. With the aim of nullifying this attack, we present a new privacy-preserving scene representation called \emph{sphere cloud}, which is constructed by lifting all points to 3D lines crossing the centroid of the map, resembling points on the unit sphere. Since lines are most dense at the map centroid, the sphere cloud mislead the density-based attack algorithm to incorrectly yield points at the centroid, effectively neutralizing the attack. Nevertheless, this advantage comes at the cost of i) a new type of attack that may directly recover images from this cloud representation and ii) unresolved translation scale for camera pose estimation. To address these issues, we introduce a simple yet effective cloud construction strategy to thwart new attack and propose an efficient localization framework to guide the translation scale by utilizing absolute depth maps acquired from on-device time-of-flight (ToF) sensors. Experimental results on public RGB-D datasets demonstrate sphere cloud achieves competitive privacy-preserving ability and localization runtime while not excessively compensating the pose estimation accuracy compared to other depth-guided localization methods.



124. ❌ Colorful-Noise: Training-Free Low-Frequency Noise Manipulation for Color-Based Conditional Image Generation

作者: Nadav Z. Cohen, Ofir Abramovich, Ariel Shamir 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00548v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Text-to-image diffusion models generate images by gradually converting white Gaussian noise into a natural image. White Gaussian noise is well suited for producing diverse outputs from a single text prompt due to its absence of structure. However, this very property limits control over, and predictability of, specific visual attributes, as the noise is not human-interpretable. In this work, we investigate the characteristics of the input noise in diffusion models. We show that, although all frequencies in white Gaussian noise have comparable statistical energy, low-frequency components primarily determine the images global structure and color composition, while high-frequency components control finer details. Building on this observation, we demonstrate that simple manipulations of the low-frequency noise using low-frequency image priors can effectively condition the generation process to reconstruct these low-frequency visual cues. This allows us to define a simple, training-free method with minimal overhead that steers overall image structure and color, while letting high-frequency components freely emerge as fine details, enabling variability across generated outputs.



125. ❌ Vesselpose: Vessel Graph Reconstruction from Learned Voxel-wise Direction Vectors in 3D Vascular Images

作者: Rajalakshmi Palaniappan, Christoph Karg, Nemesio Navarro-Arambula, Peter Hirsch, Kristin Kraeker, Lisa Mais, Dagmar Kainmueller 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00538v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Blood vessel segmentation and -tracing are essential tasks in many medical imaging applications. Although numerous methods exist, the prevailing segment-then-fix paradigm is fundamentally limited regarding its suitability for modeling the task of complete and topologically accurate vascular network reconstruction. Here, we propose an approach to extract topologically more accurate vascular graphs from 3D image data, building upon highly successful ideas from the related biomedical tasks of cell segmentation and -tracking. Our approach first predicts voxel-wise vessel direction vectors joint with standard vessel segmentation masks. Second, to extract the vascular graph from these predictions, we introduce a direction-vector-guided extension of the TEASAR algorithm. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on three benchmark datasets, spanning both synthetic and real imagery. We further demonstrate the applicability of our approach to challenging 3D micro-CT scans of rat heart vasculature. Finally, we propose meaningful and interpretable measures of topological error, namely false splits and false merges for graphs. Overall, our approach substantially improves the topological accuracy of reconstructed vascular graphs, being able to separate closely apposed vessel segments and handle multiple vascular trees within a single volume.



126. ❌ Multi-frame Restoration for High-rate Lissajous Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy

作者: Minhee Lee, Sangyoon Lee, Jiwook Lee, Minki Hong, Kyuyoung Kim, Wonhwa Kim, Jaeho Lee 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00527v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Lissajous confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is a promising solution for high speed in vivo optical biopsy for handheld scenarios. However, Lissajous scanning traces a resonant trajectory and samples only the visited pixels per frame; at high frame rates, many pixels remain unvisited, creating structured holes. In this work, we introduce the first benchmark for high-rate Lissajous CLE, consisting of low-quality video clips paired with high-quality reference images. The reference images are wide-FOV mosaics obtained by stitching stabilized, slow-scan frames of the same tissue, enabling temporally aligned supervision. Using this dataset, we propose MIRA, a lightweight recurrent framework for Lissajous CLE restoration that iteratively aggregates temporal context through feature reuse and displacement alignment. Our experiments demonstrate that MIRA outperforms both lightweight and high-complexity baselines in restoration quality while maintaining a favorable computational efficiency suitable for clinical deployment.



127. ❌ IdentiFace: Multi-Modal Iterative Diffusion Framework for Identifiable Suspect Face Generation in Crime Investigations

作者: Weichen Liu, Yixin Yang, Changsheng Chen, Alex Kot 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00526v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Suspect face generation remains a technical challenge in crime investigations. Traditional sketch-drawing workflows suffer from low efficiency and quality, while diffusion-based approaches still face intrinsic limitations on conditional ambiguity for text-to-image models and sampling variance for one-shot generation. We proposed IdentiFace, a novel diffusion-based framework for identifiable suspect face generation, which addressed these issues through (1) multi-modal input design to strengthen conditional control, and (2) an iterative generation pipeline enabling identifiable feature adjustment. We additionally contributed a facial identity loss and two task-specific datasets. Comprehensive experiments on synthetic datasets and in real-world scenarios indicate that IdentiFace achieves superior performance over existing methods, especially in terms of identity retrieval, and shows strong potential for practical applications.



128. ❌ PhysiGen: Integrating Collision-Aware Physical Constraints for High-Fidelity Human-Human Interaction Generation

作者: Nan Lei, Yuan-Ming Li, Ling-An Zeng, Liang Xu, Zhi-Wei Xia, Hui-Wen Huang, Fa-Ting Hong, Wei-Shi Zheng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00517v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Despite substantial progress in text-driven 3D human motion synthesis, generating realistic multi-person interaction sequences remains challenging. Notably, body inter-penetration is a pervasive issue from both data acquisition to the generated results, which significantly undermines the realism and usability. Previous generative models either ignored this issue or introduced computationally expensive mesh-level loss functions to alleviate inter-body collisions. In this paper, we propose a general-purpose and computationally efficient optimization strategy named PhysiGen to explicitly integrate collision-aware physical constraints for human-human interaction generation. Specifically, we simplify the high-resolution human body mesh into geometric primitives to greatly reduce the cost of inter-person collision detection. Moreover, we identify the collision regions as the guidance of the optimization directions. PhysiGen is plug-and-play and can be readily integrated into existing human interaction generation models. Extensive cross-dataset and cross-model experiments show that our method can effectively reduce interpenetration and significantly improve visual coherence and physical plausibility compared to the state-of-the-art methods.



129. ❌ Scale-Aware Adversarial Analysis: A Diagnostic for Generative AI in Multiscale Complex Systems

作者: Mengke Zhao, Guang-Xing Li, Duo Xu, Keping Qiu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00510v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Complex physical systems, from supersonic turbulence to the macroscopic structure of the universe, are governed by continuous multiscale dynamics. While modern machine learning architectures excel at mapping the high-dimensional observables of these systems, it remains unclear whether they internalize the governing physical laws or merely interpolate discrete statistical correlations. Standard Explainable AI (XAI) architectures, particularly perturbation-based and gradient-saliency methods, rely on pixel-wise perturbations, which generate unphysical artifacts and push inputs off the valid empirical distribution. To resolve this, we introduce a diagnostic framework driven by Constrained Diffusion Decomposition (CDD), a diffusion-based multiscale data decomposition algorithm that enables physically constrained data generation and model evaluation via scale-aware modifications. Applying this framework to a Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model (DDPM), we execute deterministic interventions directly within the continuous, CDD-based scale space. We demonstrate that under moderate physical perturbations, the unconstrained generative model exhibits localized structural freezing and non-linear instability rather than continuous PDE-like responses. The network fails to maintain cross-scale continuity, causing the generative trajectory to diverge when pushed into unseen physical states. By synthesizing a continuum of physically coherent states, this scale-informed methodology establishes a controlled test ground to evaluate algorithmic vulnerabilities, providing the rigorous physical constraints necessary for future architectures to respect the multiscale causality of the natural universe.



130. ❌ End-to-End Autoregressive Image Generation with 1D Semantic Tokenizer

作者: Wenda Chu, Bingliang Zhang, Jiaqi Han, Yizhuo Li, Linjie Yang, Yisong Yue, Qiushan Guo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00503v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Autoregressive image modeling relies on visual tokenizers to compress images into compact latent representations. We design an end-to-end training pipeline that jointly optimizes reconstruction and generation, enabling direct supervision from generation results to the tokenizer. This contrasts with prior two-stage approaches that train tokenizers and generative models separately. We further investigate leveraging vision foundation models to improve 1D tokenizers for autoregressive modeling. Our autoregressive generative model achieves strong empirical results, including a state-of-the-art FID score of 1.48 without guidance on ImageNet 256x256 generation.



131. ❌ GOR-IS: 3D Gaussian Object Removal in the Intrinsic Space

作者: Yonghao Zhao, Yupeng Gao, Jian Yang, Jin Xie, Beibei Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00498v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent advances in Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) have made it standard practice to reconstruct 3D scenes from multi-view images. Removing objects from such 3D representations is a fundamental editing task that requires complete and seamless inpainting of occluded regions, ensuring consistency in geometry and appearance. Although existing methods have made notable progress in improving inpainting consistency, they often neglect global lighting effects, leading to physically implausible results. Moreover, these methods struggle with view-dependent non-Lambertian surfaces, where appearance varies across viewpoints, leading to unreliable inpainting. In this paper, we present 3D Gaussian Object Removal in the Intrinsic Space (GOR-IS), a novel framework for physically consistent and visually coherent 3D object removal. Our approach decomposes the scene into intrinsic components and explicitly models light transport to maintain global lighting effects consistency. Furthermore, we introduce an intrinsic-space inpainting module that operates directly in the material and lighting domains, effectively addressing the challenges posed by non-Lambertian surfaces. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that our framework substantially improves the physical consistency and visual coherence of object removal, outperforming existing methods by 13% in perceptual similarity (LPIPS) and 2dB in peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). Code is publicly available at https://applezyh.github.io/GOR-IS-project-page/



132. ❌ High-Speed Vision Improves Zero-Shot Semantic Understanding of Human Actions

作者: Yongpeng Cao, Yuji Yamakawa 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00496v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Understanding human actions from visual observations is essential for human–robot interaction, particularly when semantic interpretation of unfamiliar or hard-to-annotate actions is required. In scenarios such as rapid and less common activities, collecting sufficient labeled data for supervised learning is challenging, making zero-shot approaches a practical alternative for semantic understanding without task-specific training. While recent advances in large-scale pretrained models enable such zero-shot reasoning, the impact of temporal resolution, especially for rapid and fine-grained motions, remains underexplored. In this study, we investigate how temporal resolution affects zero-shot semantic understanding of high-speed human actions. Using kendo as a representative case of rapid and subtle motion patterns, we propose a training-free pipeline that combines a pre-trained video-language model for semantic representation with large language model-based reasoning for pairwise action comparison. Through controlled experiments across multiple frame rates (120 Hz, 60 Hz, and 30 Hz), we show that higher temporal resolution significantly improves semantic separability in zero-shot settings. We further analyze the role of tracking-based human joint information under both full and partial observation scenarios. Quantitative evaluation using a nearest-class prototype strategy demonstrates that high-speed video provides more stable and interpretable semantic representations for fast actions. These findings highlight the importance of temporal resolution in training-free action recognition and suggest that high-speed perception can enhance semantic understanding capabilities.



133. ❌ MMAudio-LABEL: Audio Event Labeling via Audio Generation for Silent Video

作者: Kazuya Tateishi, Akira Takahashi, Atsuo Hiroe, Hirofumi Takeda, Shusuke Takahashi, Yuki Mitsufuji 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00495v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent advances in multimodal generation have enabled high-quality audio generation from silent videos. Practical applications, such as sound production, demand not only the generated audio but also explicit sound event labels detailing the type and timing of sounds. One straightforward approach involves applying a standard sound event detection to the generated audio. However, this post-hoc pipeline is inherently limited, as it is prone to error accumulation. To address this limitation, we propose MMAudio-LABEL (LAtent-Based Event Labeling), an event-aware audio generation framework built on a foundational audio generation model as its backbone that jointly generates audio and frame-aligned sound event predictions from silent videos. We evaluate our method on the Greatest Hits dataset for onset detection and 17-class material classification. Our approach improves onset-detection accuracy from 46.7% to 75.0% and material-classification accuracy from 40.6% to 61.0% over baselines. These results suggest that jointly learning audio generation and event prediction enables a more interpretable and practical video-to-audio synthesis.



134. ❌ Leveraging Vision-Language Models as Weak Annotators in Active Learning

作者: Phuong Ngoc Nguyen, Kaito Shiku, Ryoma Bise, Seiichi Uchida, Shinnosuke Matsuo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00480v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Active learning aims to reduce annotation cost by selectively querying informative samples for supervision under a limited labeling budget. In this work, we investigate how vision-language models (VLMs) can be leveraged to further reduce the reliance on costly human annotation within the active learning paradigm. To this end, we find that the reliability of VLMs varies significantly with label granularity in fine-grained recognition tasks: they perform poorly on fine-grained labels but can provide accurate coarse-grained labels. Leveraging this property, we propose an active learning framework that combines fine-grained human annotations with coarse-grained VLM-generated weak labels through instance-wise label assignment. We further model the systematic noise in VLM-generated labels using a small set of trusted full labels. Experiments on CUB200 and FGVC-Aircraft show that the proposed framework consistently outperforms existing active learning methods under the same annotation budget.



135. ❌ MSACT: Multistage Spatial Alignment for Stable Low-Latency Fine Manipulation

作者: Xianbo Cai, Hideyuki Ichiwara, Masaki Yoshikawa, Tetsuya Ogata 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00475v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Real-world fine manipulation, particularly in bimanual manipulation, typically requires low-latency control and stable visual localization, while collecting large-scale data is costly and limited demonstrations may lead to localization drift. Existing approaches make different trade-offs: action-chunking policies such as ACT enable low-latency execution and data efficiency but rely on dense visual features without explicit spatial consistency, generative methods such as Diffusion Policy improve expressiveness but can incur iterative sampling latency, vision-language-action and voxel-based methods enhance generalization and geometric grounding but require higher computational cost and system complexity. We introduce a multistage spatial attention module that extracts stable 2D attention points and jointly predicts future attention sequences with a temporal alignment loss. Built upon ACT with a pretrained ResNet visual prior, a multistage attention module extracts task-relevant 2D attention points as a local spatial modality for action prediction. To maintain consistent object tracking, we introduce a self-supervised objective that aligns predicted attention sequences with visual features from future frames, suppressing drift without keypoint annotations and improving stability of the vision-to-action mapping under limited data. Experiments on simulated and real-world fine manipulation tasks, conducted on the ALOHA bimanual platform, evaluate task success, attention drift, inference latency, and robustness to visual disturbances. Results indicate improvements in localization stability and task performance while maintaining low-latency inference under the tested conditions.



136. ❌ From Local to Global to Mechanistic: An iERF-Centered Unified Framework for Interpreting Vision Models

作者: Yearim Kim, Sangyu Han, Nojun Kwak 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00474v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Modern vision models achieve remarkable accuracy, but explaining where evidence arises, what the model encodes, and how internal computations assemble that evidence remains fragmented. We introduce an iERF-centric framework that unifies local, global, and mechanistic interpretability around a single analysis unit: the pointwise feature vector (PFV) paired with its instance-specific Effective Receptive Field (iERF). On the local side, Sharing Ratio Decomposition (SRD) expresses each PFV as a mixture of upstream PFVs via sharing ratios and propagates iERFs to construct class-discriminative saliency maps. SRD yields high-resolution, activation-faithful explanations, is robust to targeted manipulation and noise, and remains activation-agnostic across common nonlinearities. For the global view, we introduce Concept-Anchored Feature Explanation (CAFE), which utilizes the iERF as a semantic label, grounding abstract latent vectors in verifiable pixel-level evidence. With CAFE, we address the challenge of non-localized sparse autoencoder latents–especially in Transformers, where early self-attention mixes distant context. To answer how representations are composed through depth, we propose the Interlayer Concept Graph with Interlayer Concept Attribution (ICAT), which quantifies concept-to-concept influence while isolating layer pairs; an interlayer insertion, deletion protocol identifies Integrated Gradients as the most faithful instantiation. Empirically, across ResNet50, VGG16, and ViTs, our framework outperforms baselines in both fidelity and robustness, successfully interprets dispersed SAE features, and exposes dominant concept routes in correct, misclassified, and adversarial cases. Grounded in iERFs, our approach provides a coherent, evidence-backed map from pixels to concepts to decisions.



137. ❌ Combined Dictionary Unfolding Network with Gradient-Adaptive Fidelity for Transferable Multi-Source Fusion

作者: Ge Luo, Jun-Jie Huang, Qi Yu, Tianrui Liu, Ke Liang, Yuming Xiang, Wentao Zhao, Xinwang Liu, Meng Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00461v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Deep Unfolding Network-based methods have emerged as effective solutions for multi-source image fusion by combining model-driven iterative optimization with data-driven deep learning. However, most existing deep unfolding image fusion methods are derived from alternating minimization, which updates the features of different modalities separately. This design introduces considerable computational and memory overhead, limiting deployment on resource-constrained edge devices. To address this issue, we propose CDNet, a lightweight Combined Dictionary Unfolding Network for multi-source image fusion. Rather than introducing a new sparse coding prior or empirically compressing an existing fusion network, CDNet translates the unique-common decomposition prior of coupled dictionary learning into a structurally constrained joint unfolding architecture. The resulting CDBlock follows a block-sparse interaction topology and performs a model-derived joint update of common and modality-specific representations, thereby streamlining feature learning and improving efficiency.In addition, we design a compact High- and Low-frequency Image Fidelity loss for unsupervised training without ground-truth images. We evaluate CDNet on four tasks, including multi-exposure image fusion, infrared and visible image fusion, medical image fusion, and infrared and visible image fusion for semantic segmentation. Experimental results show that CDNet achieves competitive or superior fusion performance with high efficiency. For infrared and visible image fusion, CDNet outperforms competing methods on four of six metrics on the TNO dataset and five of six metrics on the RoadScene dataset. In particular, it surpasses the second-best method by 1.23 dB and 1.59 dB in PSNR on TNO and RoadScene, respectively.



138. ❌ Learning from Compressed CT: Feature Attention Style Transfer and Structured Factorized Projections for Resource-Efficient Medical Image Analysis

作者: Shadid Yousuf, S. M. Mahbubur Rahman, Mohammed Imamul Hassan Bhuiyan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00448v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The deployment of artificial intelligence in medical imaging is hindered by high computational complexity and resource-intensive processing of volumetric data. Although chest computed tomography (CT) volumes offer richer diagnostic information than projection radiography, their use in AI-based diagnosis remains limited due to the computational burden of processing uncompressed volumetric images (typically stored in NIfTI or DICOM format). Addressing the growing need for low-resource deployment and efficient electronic data transfer, we investigate the utilization of JPEG-compressed chest CT volumes for thoracic abnormality detection. We propose Feature Attention Style Transfer (FAST), a novel distillation framework that transfers both activation patterns and structural relationships from high-fidelity CT representations to a spatiotemporal visual encoder operating on compressed inputs. By combining Gram-matrix-based attention style preservation with dual-attention feature alignment, FAST enables robust feature extraction from degraded volumes. Furthermore, we introduce Structured Factorized Projection (SFP), leveraging Block Tensor Train decomposition as a parameter-efficient alternative to dense projection layers, reducing projection-head parameters by almost half. Our contrastive learning pipeline, CT-Lite, integrates these components with a SigLIP-based multimodal alignment objective. Experiments on CT-RATE, NIDCH, and Rad-ChestCT demonstrate that CT-Lite achieves AUROC within 5-7% of the uncompressed-input baseline across all three datasets, despite operating on compressed inputs with significantly fewer parameters, paving the way for AI-based clinical evaluation under resource constraints.



139. ❌ Scaling Video Understanding via Compact Latent Multi-Agent Collaboration

作者: Kerui Chen, Jinglu Wang, Jianrong Zhang, Ming Li, Yan Lu, Hehe Fan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00444v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) advance vision language understanding but face inherent limitations in long-video tasks due to bounded perception context budgets. Existing agentic methods mitigate this via rule-based preprocessing, yet often suffer from information loss, high cost, and reliance on textual intermediates. We propose MACF, an end-to-end Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework that decouples per-agent perception budgets from global video complexity, enabling scalable video understanding while preserving visual fidelity. MACF partitions videos into segments for locally budgeted agents and enables holistic reasoning via an agent-native latent communication protocol. Each agent encodes partial observations into compact, task-sufficient tokens in a shared embedding space, allowing efficient and information-preserving collaboration by a central coordinator. We introduce a curriculum training strategy that progressively enforces semantic alignment, evidence summarization, and cross-agent coordination. Extensive experiments on diverse video understanding benchmarks show that MACF consistently outperforms state-of-the-art MLLMs and multi-agent systems under identical budget constraints, demonstrating the effectiveness of our latent collaboration for scalable video understanding.



140. ❌ Adaptive Equilibrium: Dynamic Weighting Framework for Generalized Interruption of DeepFake Models

作者: Hongrui Zheng, Liejun Wang, Zhiqing Guo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00443v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The advancement of generalized deepfake disruption is constrained by the interruption imbalance, a fundamental bottleneck inherent to the generation of universal perturbations. We reveal that conventional static gradient normalization fundamentally struggles to resolve architectural conflicts, causing the optimization to bias towards susceptible models while neglecting resistant ones. We argue that achieving high and uniform effectiveness requires resolving this imbalance by reaching an adaptive equilibrium. We propose the Adaptive Equilibrium Framework (AEF), which employs a dynamic weighting mechanism that utilizes real-time loss feedback to adaptively assign greater interruption weights to the most resistant models. This approach shifts the optimization from an average-case problem to finding a dynamic balance, driving the perturbation to a uniformly effective equilibrium state. Comprehensive experiments validate that AEF achieves a more balanced interruption performance, maintaining a consistent interruption success rate across the evaluated diverse architectures.



141. ❌ LIMSSR: LLM-Driven Sequence-to-Score Reasoning under Training-Time Incomplete Multimodal Observations

作者: Huangbiao Xu, Huanqi Wu, Xiao Ke, Yuxin Peng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00434v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Real-world multimodal learning is often hindered by missing modalities. While Incomplete Multimodal Learning (IML) has gained traction, existing methods typically rely on the unrealistic assumption of full-modal availability during training to provide reconstruction supervision or cross-modal priors. This paper tackles the more challenging setting of IML under training-time incomplete observations, which precludes reliance on a ``God’s eye view’’ of complete data. We propose LIMSSR (LLM-Driven Incomplete Multimodal Sequence-to-Score Reasoning), a framework that reformulates this challenge as a conditional sequence reasoning task. LIMSSR leverages the semantic reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models via Prompt-Guided Context-Aware Modality Imputation and Multidimensional Representation Fusion to infer latent semantics from available contexts without direct reconstruction. To mitigate hallucinations, we introduce a Mask-Aware Dual-Path Aggregation to dynamically calibrate inference uncertainty. Extensive experiments on three Action Quality Assessment datasets demonstrate that LIMSSR significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines without relying on complete training data, establishing a new paradigm for data-efficient multimodal learning. Code is available at https://github.com/XuHuangbiao/LIMSSR.



142. ❌ MMAudioReverbs: Video-Guided Acoustic Modeling for Dereverberation and Room Impulse Response Estimation

作者: Akira Takahashi, Ryosuke Sawata, Shusuke Takahashi, Yuki Mitsufuji 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00431v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Although recent video-to-audio (V2A) models excelled at synthesizing semantically plausible sounds from visual inputs, they do not explicitly model room-acoustic effects such as reverberation or room impulse responses (RIRs), and thus offer limited controllability over these effects. However, we hypothesize that such V2A models implicitly have semantic knowledge of the relationship between spatial audio and the corresponding vision cues. In this paper, we revisit a V2A model for the sake of the above, and propose the way to utilize the pretrained model as prior for physically grounded room-acoustic processing. Based on one of the state-of-the-art V2A models, MMAudio, we propose MMAudioReverbs that is a unified framework dealing with i) dereverberation and ii) room impulse response (RIR) estimation without network architectural modification, and fine-tuned on a small dataset. Experimental results showed that audio and visual cues respectively have advantage depending on the type of physical room acoustics. It implies that foundation V2A models can be used for physically grounded room-acoustic analysis.



143. ❌ Beyond Heuristics: Learnable Density Control for 3D Gaussian Splatting

作者: Zhenhua Ning, Xin Li, Jun Yu, Guangming Lu, Yaowei Wang, Wenjie Pei 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00408v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

While 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has demonstrated impressive real-time rendering performance, its efficacy remains constrained by a reliance on heuristic density control. Despite numerous refinements to these handcrafted rules, such methods inherently lack the flexibility to adapt to diverse scenes with complex geometries. In this paper, we propose a paradigm shift for density control from rigid heuristics to fully learnable policies. Specifically, we introduce \textbf{LeGS}, a framework that reformulates density control as a parameterized policy network optimized via Reinforcement Learning (RL). Central to our approach is the tailored effective reward function grounded in sensitivity analysis, which precisely quantifies the marginal contribution of individual Gaussians to reconstruction quality. To maintain computational tractability, we derive a closed-form solution that reduces the complexity of reward calculation from $O(N^2)$ to $O(N)$. Extensive experiments on the Mip-NeRF 360, Tanks & Temples, and Deep Blending datasets demonstrate that \textbf{LeGS} significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, striking a superior balance between reconstruction quality and efficiency. The code will be released at https://github.com/AaronNZH/LeGS



144. ❌ BOLT: Online Lightweight Adaptation for Preparation-Free Heterogeneous Cooperative Perception

作者: Kang Yang, Tianci Bu, Peng Wang, Deying Li, Yongcai Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00405v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Most existing heterogeneous cooperative perception methods depend on prior preparation like offline joint training or tailored collaborator-model adaptation. Such preprocessing is, however, generally impractical in real scenarios, as agents are usually independently trained by different developers and meet occasionally online. This work investigates \emph{preparation-free heterogeneous cooperative perception}, where agents use independently trained single-agent detectors without any pre-deployment coordination. We find direct cross-agent fusion under this setting greatly underperforms ego-only perception. We present BOLT, a lightweight plug-and-play module that adapts neighboring features online via ego-as-teacher distillation, requiring only ego predictions without ground-truth labels. BOLT leverages high-confidence ego perception features to guide cross-agent feature-domain alignment, while enabling neighbors to contribute features in the ego’s low-confidence regions. With only 0.9M trainable parameters, BOLT improves AP@50 by up to 32.3 points over vanilla unadapted fusion in the preparation-free setting. It consistently outperforms ego-only results on DAIR-V2X and OPV2V, across different encoder pairs and fusion strategies. Code: https://github.com/sidiangongyuan/BOLT.



145. ❌ SIMON: Saliency-aware Integrative Multi-view Object-centric Neural Decoding

作者: YuSheng Lin, Ji-Hwa Tsai, Chun-Shu Wei 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00401v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent EEG-to-image retrieval methods leverage pretrained vision encoders and foveation-inspired priors, but typically assume a fixed, center-focused view. This center bias conflicts with content-driven human attention, creating a geometric-semantic dissociation between visual features and EEG responses. We propose SIMON, a saliency-aware multi-view framework for zero-shot EEG-to-image retrieval. SIMON combines foreground segmentation and saliency prediction to select fixation centers via Saliency-Aware Sampling (SAS), then generates foveated views that emphasize informative object regions while suppressing background clutter. On THINGS-EEG, SIMON achieves state-of-the-art performance in both intra-subject and inter-subject settings, reaching an average Top-1 accuracy of 69.7% and 19.6%, respectively, consistently outperforming recent competitive baselines. Analyses across sampling granularity, EEG channel topology, and visual/brain encoder backbones further support the robustness of saliency-aware multi-view integration. Our code and models are publicly available at https://github.com/simonlink666/SIMON.



146. ❌ RTPrune: Reading-Twice Inspired Token Pruning for Efficient DeepSeek-OCR Inference

作者: Ben Wan, Yan Feng, Zihan Tang, Weizhe Huang, Yuting Zeng, Jia Wang, Tongxuan Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00392v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

DeepSeek-OCR leverages visual-text compression to reduce long-text processing costs and accelerate inference, yet visual tokens remain prone to redundant textual and structural information. Moreover, current token pruning methods for conventional vision-language models (VLMs) fail to preserve textual fidelity due to improper compression mechanisms. By analyzing the decoding process of DeepSeek-OCR, we find that a distinct two-stage reading trajectory: the model initially prioritizes the majority of high-norm tokens, then subsequently redistributes its attention to the remaining ones. Motivated by this insight, we propose RTPrune, a two-stage token pruning method tailored for DeepSeek-OCR. In the first stage, we prioritize high-norm visual tokens that capture salient textual and structural information. In the second stage, the remaining tokens are paired and merged based on optimal transport theory to achieve efficient feature aggregation. We further introduce a dynamic pruning ratio that adapts to token similarity and textual density for OCR tasks, enabling a better efficiency-accuracy trade-off. Extensive experiments demonstrate state-of-the-art performance, as evidenced by 99.47% accuracy and 1.23$\times$ faster prefill on OmniDocBench, achieved with 84.25% token retention when applied to DeepSeek-OCR-Large.



147. ❌ Flow matching for Sentinel-2 super-resolution: implementation, application, and implications

作者: Dakota Hester, Vitor S. Martins, Lucas B. Ferreira, Thainara M. A. Lima, Juliana A. Araújo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00367v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Developing robust techniques for super-resolution of satellite imagery involves navigating commonly observed trade-offs between spectral fidelity and perceptual quality. In this work, we introduce a flow matching model for 4x super-resolution of 10-m Sentinel-2 visible and near-infrared bands over the conterminous United States (CONUS) using a dataset of 120,851 10-m Sentinel-2 and 2.5-m resampled NAIP imagery pairs acquired on the same day. Our results showed that the flow matching model outperformed diffusion and Real-ESRGAN models in pixel-wise accuracy in a single sampling step using the Euler method. When evaluated with a second-order Midpoint solver, our model generated perceptually realistic super-resolved imagery in only 20 sampling steps, effectively navigating the perception-distortion trade-off at inference time without retraining. We used this model to produce a super-resolved 2.5-m 4-band CONUS imagery product derived from 2025 10-m Sentinel-2 annual composites, consisting of over 1.58 trillion pixels. We further evaluated the use of super-resolved data on a land cover classification task using semantic segmentation models. Finally, we generated a yearly 2.5-m land cover product for the Chesapeake Bay watershed for 2020-2025. An accuracy assessment against 25,000 ground truth points revealed an overall accuracy of 89.11% for the annual land cover product. We conclude that flow matching is an effective generative modeling approach for super-resolution of Sentinel-2 imagery compared to diffusion and Generative Adversarial Network-based methods, and has strong implications for expanding access to high-resolution imagery for geospatial applications that demand fine spatial detail.



148. ❌ Time-series Meets Complex Motion Modeling: Robust and Computational-effective Motion Predictor for Multi-object Tracking

作者: Nhat-Tan Do, Le-Huy Tu, Nhi Ngoc-Yen Nguyen, Dieu-Phuong Nguyen, Trong-Hop Do 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00362v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Multi-object tracking (MOT) is critical in numerous real-world applications, including surveillance, autonomous driving, and robotics. Accurately predicting object motion is fundamental to MOT, but current methods struggle with the complexities of real-world, non-linear motion (e.g., sudden stops, sharp turns). While recent research has gravitated towards increasingly complex and computationally expensive generative models to tackle this problem, their practical utility is often constrained. This paper challenges that paradigm, arguing that such complexity is not only unnecessary but can be outperformed by a more efficient, purpose-built approach. We introduce the Temporal Convolutional Motion Predictor (TCMP), a novel framework for MOT that leverages a modified Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) featuring dilated convolutions and a regression head. This design allows for effective motion prediction across arbitrary temporal context lengths. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance, specifically improves upon the previous best method in several key metrics: HOTA (a measure of overall tracking accuracy) increases from 62.3% to 63.4%, IDF1 (a measure of identity preservation) rises from 63.0% to 65.0%, and AssA (a measure of association accuracy) improves from 47.2% to 49.1%. Significantly, TCMP achieves this performance while being highly efficient; it has only 0.014 times the parameters and requires only 0.05 times the computational cost (FLOPs) compared to the SOTA method. while is only 0.014 times the size (in terms of parameters) and requires only 0.05 times the computational cost (in terms of FLOPs). These findings highlight the robustness of our method to advance MOT systems by ensuring adaptability, accuracy, and efficiency in complex tracking environments.



149. ❌ CURE-OOD: Benchmarking Out-of-Distribution Detection for Survival Prediction

作者: Wenjie Zhao, Jia Li, Mingrui Liu, Jing Wang, Yunhui Guo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00350v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

``How long can I live and remain free of cancer?’’ is often the first question a patient asks after receiving a cancer diagnosis and treatment. Accurate survival prediction helps alleviate psychological distress and supports risk stratification and personalized treatment planning. Recent survival prediction frameworks have shown strong performance using computed tomography (CT) images. However, variations in imaging acquisition introduce out-of-distribution (OOD) samples caused by covariate shifts that undermine model reliability. Despite this challenge, to our knowledge, no existing benchmark systematically studies OOD detection in cancer survival prediction. To address this gap, we introduce the Cancer sURvival bEnchmark for OOD Detection (CURE-OOD), the first benchmark for systematically evaluating OOD detection in survival prediction under controlled acquisition-induced distribution shifts. CURE-OOD defines scanner-parameter-based training, in-distribution (ID), and OOD test splits across four survival prediction tasks. Our experiments show that covariate shifts notably reduce survival prediction performance. It also shows that mainstream classification-oriented OOD detectors can fail in survival prediction. Finally, we include HazardDev as a simple survival-aware reference baseline for OOD detection. CURE-OOD enables systematic analysis of how distribution shifts affect both downstream survival performance and OOD detectability.



150. ❌ Pose-Aware Diffusion for 3D Generation

作者: Zihan Zhou, Luxi Chen, Jingzhi Zhou, Yuhao Wan, Min Zhao, Baoyu Fan, Chongxuan Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00345v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Generating pose-aligned 3D objects is challenging due to the spatial mismatches and transformation ambiguities inherent in decoupled canonical-then-rotate paradigms. To this end, we introduce Pose-Aware Diffusion (PAD), a novel end-to-end diffusion framework that synthesizes 3D geometry directly within the observation space. By unprojecting monocular depth into a partial point cloud and explicitly injecting it as a 3D geometric anchor, PAD abandons canonical assumptions to enforce rigorous spatial supervision. This native generation intrinsically resolves pose ambiguity, producing high-fidelity pose-aligned assets. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PAD achieves superior geometric alignment and image-to-3D correspondence compared to state-of-the-art methods. Additionally, PAD naturally extends to compositional 3D scene reconstruction via a simple union of independently generated objects, highlighting its robust ability to preserve precise spatial layouts.



151. ❌ Online Self-Calibration Against Hallucination in Vision-Language Models

作者: Minghui Chen, Chenxu Yang, Hengjie Zhu, Dayan Wu, Zheng Lin, Qingyi Si 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00323v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) often suffer from hallucinations, generating descriptions that include visual details absent from the input image. Recent preference alignment methods typically rely on supervision distilled from stronger models such as GPT. However, this offline paradigm introduces a Supervision-Perception Mismatch: the student model is forced to align with fine-grained details beyond its perceptual capacity, learning to guess rather than to see. To obtain reliable self-supervision for online learning, we identify a Generative-Discriminative Gap within LVLMs, where models exhibit higher accuracy on discriminative verification than open-ended generation. Leveraging this capability, we propose \textbf{O}nline \textbf{S}elf-\textbf{CA}lib\textbf{R}ation (OSCAR), a framework that integrates Monte Carlo Tree Search with a Dual-Granularity Reward Mechanism to construct preference data and iteratively refines the model via Direct Preference Optimization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that OSCAR achieves state-of-the-art performance on hallucination benchmarks while improving general multimodal capabilities.



152. ❌ A Model-based Visual Contact Localization and Force Sensing System for Compliant Robotic Grippers

作者: Kaiwen Zuo, Shuyuan Yang, Zonghe Chua 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00307v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Grasp force estimation can help prevent robots from damaging delicate objects during manipulation and improve learning-based robotic control. Integrating force sensing into deformable grippers negotiates trade-offs in cost, complexity, mechanical robustness, and performance. With the growing integration of RGB-D wrist cameras into robotic systems for control purposes, camera-based techniques are a promising solution for indirect visual force estimation. Current approaches mostly utilize end-to-end deep learning, which can be brittle when generalizing to new scenarios, while existing model-based approaches are unsuited to grasping and modern grasper geometries. To address these challenges, we developed a model-based visual force sensing approach integrating an iterative contact localization with generalization to unseen objects. The system extracts structural key points from wrist camera RGB-D images of deforming fin-ray-shaped soft grippers, and uses these key points to define parameters of an inverse finite element analysis simulation in Simulation Open Framework Architecture. The iterative contact localization sub-system utilizes a deep learning-based online 3D reconstruction and pose estimation pipeline to dynamically update contact location, and is robust to visual occlusion and unseen objects. Our system demonstrated an average root mean square error of 0.23 N and normalized root mean square deviation of 2.11% during the load phase, and 0.48 N and 4.34% over the entire grasping process when interacting with different objects under various conditions, showcasing its potential for real-time model-based indirect force sensing of soft grippers.



153. ❌ HyCOP: Hybrid Composition Operators for Interpretable Learning of PDEs

作者: Jinpai Zhao, Nishant Panda, Yen Ting Lin, Eirik Valseth, Diane Oyen, Clint Dawson 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00820v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We introduce HyCOP, a modular framework that learns parametric PDE solution operators by composing simple modules (advection, diffusion, learned closures, boundary handling) in a query-conditioned way. Rather than learning a monolithic map, HyCOP learns a policy over short programs - which module to apply and for how long - conditioned on regime features and state statistics. Modules may be numerical sub-solvers or learned components, enabling hybrid surrogates evaluated at arbitrary query times without autoregressive rollout. Across diverse PDE benchmarks, HyCOP produces interpretable programs, delivers order-of-magnitude OOD improvements over monolithic neural operators, and supports modular transfer through dictionary updates (e.g., boundary swaps, residual enrichment). Our theory characterizes expressivity and gives an error decomposition that separates composition error from module error and doubles as a process-level diagnostic.



154. ❌ Generating Statistical Charts with Validation-Driven LLM Workflows

作者: Pavlin G. Poličar, Andraž Pevcin, Blaž Zupan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00800v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Generating diverse, readable statistical charts from tabular data remains challenging for LLMs, as many failures become apparent after rendering and are not detectable from data or code alone. Existing chart datasets also rarely provide fully aligned artifacts, such as executable code, dataset context, and question-answer pairs. We present a structured LLM-based workflow that decomposes chart generation into dataset screening, plot proposal, code synthesis, rendering, validation-driven refinement, description generation, and question-answer generation. By incorporating rendered-output validation, the workflow addresses visualization-specific failure modes such as readability and semantic mismatch. It treats chart generation as an inspectable process rather than a one-shot prompt-to-code task, retaining each chart with its code, dataset context, description, and question-answer pairs. Applied to UCI datasets, the workflow produces 1,500 charts from 74 datasets, spanning 24 chart families and paired with 30,003 question-answer pairs. We evaluate 16 multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) on these chart-question pairs. The results show that chart-syntax questions are nearly saturated, while value extraction, comparison, and reasoning remain more challenging, illustrating the workflow’s utility for diagnostic studies of chart-grounded multimodal reasoning.



155. ❌ SAVGO: Learning State-Action Value Geometry with Cosine Similarity for Continuous Control

作者: Stavros Orfanoudakis, Pedro P. Vergara 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00787v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

While representation and similarity learning have improved the sample efficiency of Reinforcement Learning (RL), they are rarely used to shape policy updates directly in the action space. To bridge this gap, a geometry-aware RL algorithm that explicitly incorporates value-based similarity into the policy update, State-Action Value Geometry Optimization (SAVGO), is proposed. In detail, SAVGO learns a joint state-action embedding space in which pairs with similar action-value estimates exhibit high cosine similarity, while dissimilar pairs are mapped to distinct directions. This learned geometry enables the generation of a similarity kernel over candidate actions sampled at each update, allowing policy improvement to be guided directly toward higher-value regions beyond local gradient-based updates. As a result, representation learning, value estimation, and policy optimization are unified within a single geometry-consistent objective, while preserving the scalability of off-policy actor-critic training. The proposed method is evaluated on standard MuJoCo continuous-control benchmarks, demonstrating improvements over strong baselines on challenging high-dimensional tasks. Ablation studies are done to analyze the contributions of value-geometry learning and similarity-based policy updates.



156. ❌ Observable Performance Does Not Fully Reflect System Organization: A Multi-Level Analysis of Gait Dynamics Under Occlusal Constraint

作者: Jacques Raynal, Pierre Slangen, Jacques Margerit 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00778v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In biomechanical systems, observable performance is often used as a proxy for underlying system organization. However, this assumption implicitly presumes a correspondence between output metrics and internal system states that may not hold in adaptive systems. In this study, the vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) is considered as a constraint applied to an adaptive neuromechanical system, enabling the exploration of system-level responses under controlled variations. A single-case design in a patient with Parkinson’s disease allows an intra-individual analysis across repeated conditions.The analysis is structured across three complementary levels: (i) aggregated linear metrics describing observable performance, (ii) a dynamical systems framework describing temporal organization in state space, and (iii) a latent space representation obtained through unsupervised embedding. The results show that conditions with comparable observable performance may correspond to different organizations in both state space and latent space representations. This dissociation highlights a limitation of aggregated metrics and suggests that similar outputs may arise from non-equivalent system states. A fourth level is proposed as a purely conceptual extension describing potential relationships between system states. This level is not implemented and is not derived from experimental data. These observations are strictly exploratory and non-causal. The proposed framework does not establish mechanistic, predictive, or directional relationships, but provides a structured approach for analyzing constraint-driven systems across multiple levels of representation.



157. ❌ Learning the Helmholtz equation operator with DeepONet for non-parametric 2D geometries

作者: Rodolphe Barlogis, Ferhat Tamssaouet, Quentin Falcoz, Stéphane Grieu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00760v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

This paper deals with solving the 2D Helmholtz equation on non-parametric domains, leveraging a physics-informed neural operator network based on the DeepONet framework. We consider a 2D square domain with an inclusion of arbitrary boundary geometry at its center. This inclusion acts as a scatterer for an incoming harmonic wave. The aim is to learn the operator linking the geometry of the scatterer to the resulting scattered field. A signed distance function to the boundary of the inner inclusion, evaluated at several points in the domain, is used to encode its geometry. It serves as input for the branch part of the DeepONet architecture, while local information is used as input for the trunk part. This approach enables the encoding of arbitrary geometries, whether they are parameterized or not. The evaluation of the model on unseen geometries is compared with its finite element method (FEM) equivalent to test its generalization capabilities. The trained network weights implicitly embed the local physics and their interaction with the domain geometry. If the training space sufficiently covers the target evaluation space, the model can generalize accordingly. Furthermore, it can be refined to extend to another region of interest without retraining from scratch. This framework also avoids the need to remesh the domain for each geometry. The proposed approach delivers a computationally lighter surrogate model than FEM alternatives and avoids relying on FEM-generated training data.



158. ❌ Themis: Training Robust Multilingual Code Reward Models for Flexible Multi-Criteria Scoring

作者: Indraneil Paul, Glavaš Glavas, Iryna Gurevych 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00754v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Reward models (RMs) have become an indispensable fixture of the language model (LM) post-training playbook, enabling policy alignment and test-time scaling. Research on the application of RMs in code generation, however, has been comparatively sparse, with existing work largely focusing on execution feedback. This choice constrains post-training to optimizing functional correctness over self-contained executable code. In this work, we examine the training and evaluation of multilingual, multi-criteria code RMs. To this end, we first compile Themis-CodeRewardBench, a benchmark to evaluate code RMs across five preference dimensions (i.e., criteria) and eight programming languages, on which we profile 50+ code, math, and general-purpose RMs. Observing the limited proficiency of current RMs beyond scoring for functional correctness, we develop Themis-CodePreference, the largest open-source collection of code preferences to date (more than 350k preference pairs), and use it to train Themis-RM, a suite of multilingual code reward models for flexible multi-criteria scoring, ranging in size from 600M to 32B parameters. Our experiments and ablations demonstrate positive scaling trends, strong cross-lingual transfer when training on diverse preferences, and the importance of multi-criteria training for reliable code reward modeling.



作者: Sizhe Tang, Zuyuan Zhang, Mahdi Imani, Tian Lan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00751v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) scales poorly in cooperative multi-agent domains because expansion must consider an exponentially large set of joint actions, severely limiting exploration under realistic search budgets. We propose NonZero, which keeps multi-agent MCTS tractable by running surrogate-guided selection over a low-dimensional nonlinear representation using an interaction-guided proposal rule, instead of directly exploring the full joint-action space. Our exploration uses an interaction score: single-agent deviations are ranked by predicted gain, while two-agent deviations are scored by a mixed-difference measure that reveals coordination benefits even when no single agent can improve alone. We formalize candidate proposal as a bandit problem over local deviations and derive a proposal rule, NonZero, with a sublinear local-regret guarantee for reaching approximate graph-local optima without enumerating the joint-action space. Empirically, NonZero improves sample efficiency and final performance on MatGame, SMAC, and SMACv2 relative to strong model-based and model-free baselines under matched search budgets.



160. ❌ Quantum Interval Bound Propagation for Certified Training of Quantum Neural Networks

作者: Emma Andrews, Nahyeon Kim, Prabhat Mishra 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00747v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Quantum machine learning is a promising field for efficiently learning features of a dataset to perform a specified task, such as classification. Interval bound propagation (IBP) is a popular certified training method in classical machine learning, where the lower and upper bounds are tracked throughout the model. These bounds are used during training to ensure that the model is certified to predict the correct label even under adversarial perturbations. While IBP is successful in classical domain, there are limited certified training efforts in quantum domain. In this paper, we present quantum interval bound propagation (QIBP) to establish a certified training routine for quantum machine learning, certifying the accuracy of models under adversarial perturbations. We implement QIBP using both interval and affine arithmetic to explore the tradeoffs between the two implementations in terms of accuracy and other design considerations. Extensive evaluation demonstrates that the resulting certified trained models have robust decision boundaries, guaranteed to predict the correct class for the samples within the trained adversarial robustness bounds.



161. ❌ Randomized Subspace Nesterov Accelerated Gradient

作者: Gaku Omiya, Pierre-Louis Poirion, Akiko Takeda 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00740v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Randomized-subspace methods reduce the cost of first-order optimization by using only low-dimensional projected-gradient information, a feature that is attractive in forward-mode automatic differentiation and communication-limited settings. While Nesterov acceleration is well understood for full-gradient and coordinate-based methods, obtaining accelerated methods for general subspace sketches that use only projected-gradient information and can improve over full-dimensional Nesterov acceleration in oracle complexity is technically nontrivial. We develop randomized-subspace Nesterov accelerated gradient methods for smooth convex and smooth strongly convex optimization under matrix smoothness and generic sketch moment assumptions. The key technical ingredient is a three-sequence formulation tailored to matrix smoothness, which recovers the corresponding classical Nesterov methods in the full-dimensional case. The resulting theory establishes accelerated oracle-complexity guarantees and makes explicit how matrix smoothness and the sketch distribution enter the complexity. It also provides a unified basis for comparing sketch families and identifying when randomized-subspace acceleration improves over full-dimensional Nesterov acceleration in oracle complexity.



162. ❌ Temporal Data Requirement for Predicting Unplanned Hospital Readmissions

作者: Ramin Mohammadi, Vahab vahdat, Sarthak Jain, Amir T. Namin, Ramya Palacholla, Sagar Kamarthi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00738v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

With the proliferation of Electronic Health Records (EHRs), a critical challenge in building predictive models is determining the optimal historical data time window to maximize accuracy. This study investigates the impact of various observation windows ranging from the day of surgery to three years prior on predicting 30-day readmission following hip and knee arthroplasties. The dataset encompasses both structured encounter records (over 4 million) and unstructured clinical notes (80,000) from 7,174 patients. To extract meaning from the clinical notes, we employed a suite of non neural (BOW, count BOW, TF IDF, LDA) and neural encoders (BERT, 1D CNN, BiLSTM, Average). We subsequently evaluated models utilizing clinical notes alone, structured data alone, and a combination of both modalities. Our results demonstrate that the optimal time window for unstructured clinical notes is significantly shorter than for structured data, maximum predictive performance was achieved using notes from just three to six months prior to surgery. In contrast, performance using structured data improved as the time window lengthened, but strictly plateaued after twelve months. These modality-specific temporal patterns remained consistent regardless of model complexity or encoder type. Ultimately, these findings challenge the general assumption that more historical data inherently yields better machine learning predictions, establishing targeted time-window guidelines for optimizing readmission prediction models.



163. ❌ Weisfeiler Lehman Test on Combinatorial Complexes: Generalized Expressive Power of Topological Neural Networks

作者: Jiawen Chen, Qi Shao, Duxin Chen, Wenwu Yu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00725v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Combinatorial complexes have unified set-based (e.g., graphs, hypergraphs) and part-whole (e.g., simplicial, cellular complexes) structures into a common topological framework. Existing topological neural networks and Weisfeiler-Lehman variants remain fragmented, lacking a unified theoretical foundation for topological deep learning. In this work, we introduce the Combinatorial Complex Weisfeiler-Lehman (CCWL) test, an axiomatic-style extension of the WL test to combinatorial complexes. CCWL formalizes topological message passing through four types of neighborhood relation and provides a unified perspective on the expressive power of higher-order variants. We further prove that upper and lower neighborhoods are sufficient among the four adjacent WL tests to reach the expressivity of the full CCWL framework across topological structures of combinatorial complexes. Building on this framework, we also propose the Combinatorial Complex Isomorphism Network (CCIN) and evaluate it on synthetic and real-world benchmarks. Experimental results indicate CCIN outperforms baseline methods and offers a generalized expressive framework for topological deep learning.



164. ❌ Decentralized Proximal Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics

作者: Mohammad Rafiqul Islam, Lingjiong Zhu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00723v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We propose Decentralized Proximal Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (DE-PSGLD), a decentralized Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm for sampling from a log-concave probability distribution constrained to a convex domain. Constraints are enforced through a shared proximal regularization based on the Moreau-Yosida envelope, enabling unconstrained updates while preserving consistency with the target constrained posterior. We establish non-asymptotic convergence guarantees in the 2-Wasserstein distance for both individual agent iterates and their network averages. Our analysis shows that DE-PSGLD converges to a regularized Gibbs distribution and quantifies the bias introduced by the proximal approximation. We evaluate DE-PSGLD for different sampling problems on synthetic and real datasets. As the first decentralized approach for constrained domains, our algorithm exhibits fast posterior concentration and high predictive accuracy.



165. ❌ Aitchison Embeddings for Learning Compositional Graph Representations

作者: Nikolaos Nakis, Chrysoula Kosma, Panagiotis Promponas, Michail Chatzianastasis, Giannis Nikolentzos 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00716v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Representation learning is central to graph machine learning, powering tasks such as link prediction and node classification. However, most graph embeddings are hard to interpret, offering limited insight into how learned features relate to graph structure. Many networks naturally admit a role-mixture view, where nodes are best described as mixtures over latent archetypal factors. Motivated by this structure, we propose a compositional graph embedding framework grounded in Aitchison geometry, the canonical geometry for comparing mixtures. Nodes are represented as simplex-valued compositions and embedded via isometric log-ratio (ILR) coordinates, which preserve Aitchison distances while enabling unconstrained optimization in Euclidean space. This yields intrinsically interpretable embeddings whose geometry reflects relative trade-offs among archetypes and supports coherent behavior under component restriction; we consider both fixed and learnable ILR bases. Across node classification and link prediction, our method achieves competitive performance with strong baselines while providing explainability by construction rather than post-hoc. Finally, subcompositional coherence enables principled component restriction: removing and renormalizing subsets preserves a well-defined geometry, which we exploit via subcompositional dimensionality removal to probe how archetype groups influence representations and predictions.



166. ❌ Deep Kernel Learning for Stratifying Glaucoma Trajectories

作者: Bruce Rushing, Angela Danquah, Alireza Namazi, Arjun Dirghangi, Heman Shakeri 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00708v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Effectively stratifying patient risk in chronic diseases like glaucoma is a major clinical challenge. Clinicians need tools to identify patients at high risk of progression from sparse and irregularly-sampled electronic health records (EHRs). We propose a novel deep kernel learning (DKL) architecture that leverages a Gaussian Process (GP) backend. The GP’s kernel is defined by a transformer-based feature extractor applied to clinical-BERT embeddings to model glaucoma patient trajectories from multimodal EHR data. Our method successfully identifies three clinically distinct patient subgroups. Crucially, the model learns to decouple disease progression from current severity, identifying a high-risk group with a worsening trajectory despite having better average visual acuity than a second, stably poor group. This reveals that the model learns to identify progression risk rather than just the current disease state. This ability to stratify patients based on their risk trajectory progression offers a powerful tool for clinical decision support, enabling targeted interventions for high-risk individuals and improving the management of glaucoma care.



167. ❌ FedKPer: Tackling Generalization and Personalization in Medical Federated Learning via Knowledge Personalization

作者: Zoe Fowler, Ghassan AlRegib 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00698v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Federated learning (FL) holds great potential for medical applications. However, statistical heterogeneity across healthcare institutions poses a major challenge for FL, as the global model struggles both to generalize across unseen patient populations and to adapt to the unique data distributions of individual hospitals. This heterogeneity also exacerbates forgetting at both the global and local level, resulting in previous learned patient patterns to be misclassified after model updates. While prior work has largely treated generalization and personalization as separate challenges, we show that a better balance between the two can be achieved through selective alignment with the global model and a modified aggregation scheme, which together mitigate the effects of statistical heterogeneity. Specifically, we introduce FedKPer, which introduces knowledge personalization into the training stage of each local device. Afterwards, generalization is considered via the global model aggregation process, where local updates that are reliable and label-diverse are emphasized. We evaluate the performance of FedKPer, devising additional metrics that relate to common consequences of forgetting. Overall, we demonstrate FedKPer improves the generalization-personalization trade-off without sacrificing retention.



168. ❌ Evaluating the Architectural Reasoning Capabilities of LLM Provers via the Obfuscated Natural Number Game

作者: Lixing Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00677v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

While Large Language Models have achieved notable success on formal mathematics benchmarks such as MiniF2F, it remains unclear whether these results stem from genuine logical reasoning or semantic pattern matching against pre-training data. This paper identifies Architectural Reasoning: the ability to synthesize formal proofs using exclusively local axioms and definitions within an alien math domain, as the necessary ability for future automated theorem discovery AI. We use the Obfuscated Natural Number Game, a benchmark to evaluate Architectural Reasoning. By renaming identifiers in the Natural Number Game in Lean 4, we created a zero-knowledge, closed environment. We evaluate state-of-the-art models, finding a universal latency tax where obfuscation increases inference time. The results also reveal a divergence in robustness: while general models (Claude-Sonnet-4.5, GPT-4o) suffer performance degradation, reasoning models (DeepSeek-R1, GPT-5, DeepSeek-Prover-V2) maintain the same accuracy despite the absence of semantic cues. These findings provide a quantitative metric for assessing the true capacity for mathematical reasoning.



169. ❌ Spiking Sequence Machines and Transformers

作者: Joy Bose 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00662v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Sequence learning reduces to similarity-based retrieval over a temporally indexed representation space, a constraint on any sequence model, not a property of a specific architecture. We show that a spiking Sparse Distributed Memory sequence machine (2007) and the transformer (2017) independently instantiate the same five functional operations (encoding, context maintenance, associative retrieval, storage, and decoding), with cosine similarity as the shared retrieval primitive in both. We formalise a Phase-Latency Isomorphism showing that sinusoidal positional phase and spike timing are linearly related, and prove that dot product attention is invariant to this mapping up to a global scale factor on the positional component (Lemma 1). Empirically, frequency-compressed positional encoding fails to converge on a positionally demanding copy task, while a learned rank-based embedding matches or exceeds sinusoidal encoding, indicating that the critical property for positional representation is distance discriminability under dot-product similarity, not sinusoidal form. Time, phase, and rank are three instantiations of the same computational primitive, an ordered index whose structure survives similarity-based retrieval.



170. ❌ Budget Constraints as Riemannian Manifolds

作者: Michael Helcig, Dan Alistarh 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00649v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Assigning one of K options to each of N groups under a total cost budget is a recurring problem in machine learning, appearing in mixed-precision quantization, non-uniform pruning, and expert selection. The objective (model loss) depends jointly on all assignments and does not decompose across groups, which prevents combinatorial solvers from optimizing the true objective directly and limits them to proxy objectives. Evolutionary search evaluates the actual loss but lacks gradient information, while penalty-based methods provide gradients but enforce the budget only approximately and require sensitive hyperparameter tuning. We observe that under softmax relaxation, the budget constraint defines a smooth Riemannian manifold in logit space with particularly simple geometry: the normal vector is available in closed form, shifting logits along the cost vector changes expected cost monotonically, allowing binary-search retraction, and vector transport reduces to a single inner product. Building on this structure, we propose Riemannian Constrained Optimization (RCO), which augments a standard Adam update with tangent projection, binary-search retraction, and momentum transport. Combined with Gumbel straight-through estimation and budget-constrained dynamic programming for discrete feasibility, RCO enables first-order optimization of the true objective under exact budget enforcement, without introducing constraint hyperparameters. On synthetic knapsack problems with known optima, the manifold-based constraint handling recovers optimal solutions, whereas penalty methods plateau at 83% of optimal. On LLM compression tasks, including mixed-precision quantization and MoE expert pruning, RCO matches or exceeds evolutionary search methods while requiring 3x to 16x lower wall-clock cost on the evaluated configurations.



171. ❌ PEACE: Cross-modal Enhanced Pediatric-Adult ECG Alignment for Robust Pediatric Diagnosis

作者: Xinran Liu, Yuwen Li, Hongxiang Gao, Heyang Xu, Jianqing Li, Zongmin Wang, Chengyu Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00647v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Automated pediatric electrocardiogram (ECG) diagnosis remains challenging because models trained predominantly on adult data suffer from substantial cross-population mismatch, while pediatric labels are often scarce. We present PEACE (Pediatric-Adult ECG Alignment via Cross-modal Enhancement), a structured cross-modal alignment framework for adult-to-pediatric ECG transfer. PEACE integrates tri-axial clinical semantic decomposition, label-query feature extraction, and curriculum-gated optimization to align transferable adult ECG representations with pediatric diagnostic targets. Since ZZU-pECG provides no paired clinical reports, we generate label-conditioned semantic descriptors using Gemini with concise clinical prompts and use them only as auxiliary training supervision; inference remains ECG-only. On ZZU-pECG, PEACE achieves 59.39%, 79.03%, and 90.89% AUC under zero-shot, 50-shot, and full fine-tuning settings, respectively, and reaches 96.65% AUC on the shared PTB-XL label space. These results suggest that structured clinical semantic supervision can improve low-resource adult-to-pediatric ECG transfer, while prospective clinical validation and more explicit age-aware modeling remain necessary before real-world deployment.



172. ❌ From Prediction to Practice: A Task-Aware Evaluation Framework for Blood Glucose Forecasting

作者: Alireza Namazi, Heman Shakeri 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00645v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Clinical time-series forecasting is increasingly studied for decision support, yet standard aggregate metrics can obscure whether a model is actually useful for the task it is meant to serve. In safety-critical settings, low average error can coexist with dangerous failures in exactly the high-risk regimes that matter most. We present a task-aware evaluation framework for blood glucose forecasting built around two downstream uses: hypoglycemia early warning and insulin dosing decision support. For early warning, we evaluate on real data from three clinical cohorts using event-level recall and false alarms per patient-day, metrics that reflect operational alarm burden rather than aggregate accuracy. We show that models appearing acceptable overall, with recall above 0.9 on the full test set, can fail badly in the post-bolus slice, where insulin-on-board is elevated and missed warnings carry the greatest clinical consequences. Standard forecasting evaluation, however, does not test whether a model can reason about the effects of actions, a requirement for supporting insulin dosing decisions. We therefore add a second, interventional arm using the FDA-accepted UVA/Padova simulator, where we evaluate whether forecasters can predict glucose responses to altered insulin plans in paired factual/counterfactual scenarios. We show that models that look strong on real-data forecasting often fail to predict the direction, magnitude, or ranking of intervention effects, and choose poor insulin doses when evaluated under a clinically motivated cost. Taken together, the two arms reveal a consistent gap between forecasting accuracy and task-relevant usefulness. We release the benchmark, the standardized preprocessing pipeline for public cohorts, and the simulator-based interventional dataset as a reproducible toolkit.



173. ❌ Bridging Graph Drawing and Dimensionality Reduction with Stochastic Stress Optimization

作者: Daniel Hangan, Stephen Kobourov, Jacob Miller 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00641v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Both Dimensionality Reduction (DR) and Graph Drawing (GD) aim to visualize abstract, non-linear structures, yet rely on different optimization paradigms. This contrast is evident in Multidimensional Scaling (MDS), which typically depends on the SMACOF algorithm despite graph drawing results showing that simpler stochastic optimization schemes can be more effective for the same objective. We bridge these domains by adapting Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) techniques from graph drawing to vector data embedding. We present a scikit-learn compatible estimator that minimizes global stress through local pairwise updates, improving upon the existing implementation. Experiments on standard high-dimensional benchmarks show that our stochastic solver converges substantially faster than SMACOF while achieving comparable or lower stress.



174. ❌ Knowing when to trust machine-learned interatomic potentials

作者: Shams Mehdi, Ilkwon Cho, Olexandr Isayev 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00640v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Prevailing machine-learned interatomic potential (MLIP) uncertainty-quantification methods rely on ensembles of independently trained backbones. These methods scale unfavorably with foundation-scale MLIPs, and their member-disagreement signals correlate weakly with per-molecule prediction error. Here we probe the frozen per-atom representations of a pretrained MLIP with a compact discriminative classifier, recasting MLIP uncertainty quantification as selective classification rather than error regression. The resulting method, PROBE (Post-hoc Reliability frOm Backbone Embeddings), produces a per-prediction reliability probability that monotonically tracks actual error without modification to the underlying model. Across large held-out evaluation sets and two structurally distinct MLIP architectures, PROBE outperforms ensemble disagreement as a binary reliability signal, which strengthens with the expressiveness of the backbone representation, implying a favorable scaling trajectory toward foundation-scale MLIPs. Multi-head self-attention additionally yields per-atom importance maps, providing chemically interpretable diagnostics at no additional computational cost. PROBE is post-hoc and architecture-agnostic, and is directly deployable on any MLIP that exposes per-atom representations.



175. ❌ Unlearning Offline Stochastic Multi-Armed Bandits

作者: Zichun Ye, Runqi Wang, Xuchuang Wang, Xutong Liu, Shuai Li, Mohammad Hajiesmaili 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00638v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Machine unlearning aims to unlearn data points from a learned model, offering a principled way to process data-deletion requests and mitigate privacy risks without full retraining. Prior work has mainly studied unsupervised / supervised machine unlearning, leaving unlearning for sequential decision-making systems far less understood. We initiate the first study of a foundational sequential decision-making problem: offline stochastic multi-armed bandits (MAB). We formalize the privacy constraint for offline MAB and measure utility by the post-unlearning decision quality. We conduct a systematic study of both single- and multi-source unlearning scenarios under two data-generation models, the fixed-sample model and the distribution model. For these settings, our algorithmic design is built on two canonical base algorithms: Gaussian mechanism and rollback, and we propose adaptive algorithms that switch between them according to the data regime and privacy constraint. We further introduce a mixing procedure that elucidates the rationale behind these baselines. We provide performance guarantees across the above settings and establish lower bounds under both dataset models. Experiments validate the predicted tradeoffs and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods.



176. ❌ Class Angular Distortion Index for Dimensionality Reduction

作者: Kaviru Gunaratne, Stephen Kobourov, Jacob Miller 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00637v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Dimensionality reduction (DR) techniques are often characterized by whether they preserve global, high-level structures in the data or local, neighborhood structures. This distinction matters in visualization: global methods can obscure clusters while local methods can over-emphasize them. Yet, even when clusters appear distinct, their relative arrangement in the projection may be arbitrary or misleading, a common issue in techniques such as t-SNE and UMAP. Existing cluster quality metrics either only measure cluster separability or assume spherical, globular clusters in the original space. We introduce the Class Angular Distortion Index (CADI), a metric that uses internal angles among point triples to determine the faithfulness of cluster organization in a projection. We show cases on both real and synthetic data where existing cluster metrics fail, but CADI provides an interpretable result. Since it relies on computing angles, CADI is also differentiable, enabling optimization. We demonstrate this with a CADI-based DR technique.



177. ❌ Decouple before Integration: Test-time Synthesis of SFT and RLVR Task Vectors

作者: Chaohao Yuan, Chenghao Xiao, Yu Rong, Hong Cheng, Long-Kai Huang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00610v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

SFT and RLVR represent two fundamental yet distinct paradigms for LLM post-training, each excelling in distinct dimensions. SFT expands knowledge breadth while RLVR enhances reasoning depth. Yet integrating these complementary strengths remains a formidable challenge. Sequential training can cause catastrophic forgetting, and joint optimization often suffers from severe gradient conflicts. We analyze SFT and RLVR through the lens of task vectors and reveal three structural properties behind these failures: a 30* magnitude disparity, 45* sign interference, and heterogeneous module-wise update distributions. These findings show SFT and RLVR are difficult to integrate directly, but they also suggest that the two paradigms modify partly complementary components of the model. Motivated by these observations, we propose Decoupled Test-time Synthesis (DoTS), a post-hoc framework allows SFT and RLVR checkpoints to be trained independently and synthesizes their capabilities only at inference time via task vector arithmetic, without updating model parameters. To reduce interference, DOTS applies selective sparsification with norm-preserving rescaling. It then uses Bayesian optimization on a small set of unlabeled queries to search for combination coefficients on the Pareto frontier of consistency and perplexity. Empirically, \ours matches or exceeds the performance of training-based SFT–RLVR integration methods across multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks, incurring only $\sim$3% of the computational cost. When applied to stronger post-trained checkpoints, DOTS surpasses SOTA models and generalizes to out-of-domain benchmarks without re-tuning. Code is available at https://github.com/chaohaoyuan/DoTS.



178. ❌ Affinity Is Not Enough: Recovering the Free Energy Principle in Mixture-of-Experts

作者: Man Yung Wong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00604v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Sparse MoE routing fails at domain transitions, where the current token belongs to one distribution and the next to another. In a controlled experiment (4 experts, 5 seeds), standard affinity routing assigns only 0.006 +/- 0.001 probability to the correct expert at the transition. Three lightweight gate modifications raise this to 0.748 +/- 0.002 (124x), cutting experts needed for 99% coverage from infeasible to a small constant: temporal memory (beta), a per-expert LIF membrane potential accumulating routing context across tokens; precision-weighted gating (Pi), a per-expert inverse variance of recent prediction error, yielding 31x contrast between reliable and unreliable experts; and anticipatory routing, a next-state predictor conditioned on the beta-accumulated hidden state. The mechanisms draw from Friston’s Free Energy Principle and use LIF dynamics from spiking neural networks. An ablation across all 2^3 subsets reveals a super-additive beta x Ant interaction: anticipation alone gives nothing (+0.000 +/- 0.001); beta alone gives modest gain (+0.295 +/- 0.013); combined they close 75% of the oracle gap (+0.741 +/- 0.002, exceeding the sum by +0.446 +/- 0.014). This is structural: a stateless predictor cannot detect approaching transitions because pre-transition tokens are distributionally identical to within-domain tokens. In a character-level MoE LM (5 seeds), beta-routing reduces transition-step BPC from 6.56 +/- 0.01 (Standard) to 4.01 +/- 0.15 (beta-MoE); the beta + Ant gate places 0.86 +/- 0.02 probability on the correct domain expert before that domain appears in input, vs 0.42 +/- 0.12 for Standard MoE. Reference implementations (~200 lines each): https://github.com/russellwmy/affinity-is-not-enough



179. ❌ Gradient Regularized Newton Boosting Trees with Global Convergence

作者: Nikita Zozoulenko, Daniel Falkowski, Thomas Cass, Lukas Gonon 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00581v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDTs) dominate tabular machine learning, with modern implementations like XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost being based on Newton boosting: a second-order descent step in the space of decision trees. Despite its empirical success, the global convergence of Newton boosting is poorly understood compared to first-order boosting. In this paper, we introduce Restricted Newton Descent, which studies convex optimization with Newton’s method on Hilbert spaces with inexact iterates, based on the concepts of cosine angle and weak gradient edge. Within this framework, we recover Newton boosting with GBDTs and classical finite-dimensional theory as special cases. We first prove that vanilla Newton boosting achieves a linear rate of convergence for smooth, strongly convex losses that satisfy a Hessian-dominance condition. To handle general convex losses with Lipschitz Hessians, we extend a recent gradient regularized Newton scheme to the restricted weak learner setting. This scheme minimally modifies the classical algorithm by introducing an adaptive $\ell_2$-regularization term proportional to the square root of the gradient norm at each iteration. We establish a $\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{k^2})$ rate for this scheme, thereby obtaining a globally convergent second-order GBDT algorithm with a rate matching that of first-order boosting with Nesterov momentum. In numerical experiments, we show that our scheme converges while vanilla Newton boosting may diverge.



180. ❌ Stable-GFlowNet: Toward Diverse and Robust LLM Red-Teaming via Contrastive Trajectory Balance

作者: Minchan Kwon, Sunghyun Baek, Minseo Kim, Jaemyung Yu, Dongyoon Han, Junmo Kim 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00553v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large Language Model (LLM) Red-Teaming, which proactively identifies vulnerabilities of LLMs, is an essential process for ensuring safety. Finding effective and diverse attacks in red-teaming is important, but achieving both is challenging. Generative Flow Networks (GFNs) that perform distribution matching are a promising methods, but they are notorious for training instability and mode collapse. In particular, unstable rewards in red-teaming accelerate mode collapse. We propose Stable-GFN (S-GFN), which eliminates partition function $Z$ estimation in GFN and reduces training instability. S-GFN avoids Z-estimation through pairwise comparisons and employs a robust masking methodology against noisy rewards. Additionally, we propose a fluency stabilizer to prevent the model from getting stuck in local optima that produce gibberish. S-GFN provides more stable training while maintaining the optimal policy of GFN. We demonstrate the overwhelming attack performance and diversity of S-GFN across various settings.



181. ❌ Tempus: A Temporally Scalable Resource-Invariant GEMM Streaming Framework for Versal AI Edge

作者: M. Grailoo, J. Núñez-Yáñez 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00536v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Scaling laws for Large Language Models (LLMs) establish that model quality improves with computational scale, yet edge deployment imposes strict constraints on compute, memory, and power. Since General Matrix Multiplication (GEMM) accounts for up to 90% of inference time, efficient GEMM acceleration is critical for edge AI. The Adaptive Intelligent Engines available in the AMD Versal adaptive SoCs are well suited for this task, but existing state-of-the-art (SOTA) frameworks maximize performance through spatial scaling, distributing workloads across hundreds of cores – an approach that fails on resource-limited edge SoCs due to physical implementation failures, bandwidth saturation, and excessive resource consumption. We propose Tempus, a Resource-Invariant Temporal GEMM framework for the AMD Versal AI Edge SoC. Rather than expanding hardware resources with matrix size, Tempus employs a fixed compute block of 16 AIE-ML cores, achieving scalability through iterative graph execution and algorithmic data tiling and replication in the Programmable Logic. High-speed cascade streaming ensures low-latency partial sum reduction at Initiation Interval (II) of 1, while a deadlock-free DATAFLOW protocol maximizes transfer-compute overlap and PLIO reuse. Evaluated on GEMM workloads, Tempus achieves 607 GOPS at 10.677 W total on-chip power. By characterizing system-level efficiency through the Platform-Aware Utility (PAU) metric, we prove that Tempus achieves a 211.2x higher prominence factor than the leading spatial SOTA (ARIES). Furthermore, the framework maintains a 0.00% utilization of URAM/DSP, yielding 22.0x core frugality, 7.1x power frugality, and a 6.3x reduction in I/O demand, establishing a sustainable, scalable foundation for edge LLM inference.



182. ❌ A Comparative Study of QSPR Methods on a Unique Multitask PAMPA dataset

作者: Andrs Formanek, Anna Vincze, Richrd Bicsak, Yves Moreau, Gyorgy T. Balogh, Adam Arany 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00508v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present a unique, multitask dataset comprising 143 drug and drug candidate molecules, each evaluated on in vitro, parallel artificial-membrane permeability assays (PAMPA) using six different model membranes. Using this resource, we systematically assess the effectiveness of various molecular descriptors and regression models in predicting passive membrane permeability. The studied models range from simple linear regression to a modern pre-trained transformer architecture. Particular attention is given to the trade-off between predictive performance and model interpretability, highlighting the challenges introduced by machine learning approaches. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive study on simultaneous modeling of multiple organ-specific PAMPA membranes to date, offering novel insights into membrane-specific permeability profiles. We found that expert-designed physico-chemical property descriptors are more fitting for a limited sample size permeabilty study than deep learning based representations.



183. ❌ LambdaRankIC: Directly Optimizing Rank IC for Financial Prediction

作者: Yan Lin, Yihong Su, Yi Yang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00501v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In financial predictions, the performance of machine learning models is often assessed by Rank IC, which is the Spearman rank correlation between the model predictions and the realized asset returns. Despite its wide adoption, most existing models are trained using regression losses or ranking objectives that may not align with Rank IC. We propose LambdaRankIC, a novel learning-to-rank approach that directly optimizes Rank IC. We circumvent the non-differentiability of the ranking operator by deriving the closed-form expression for the lambda gradients induced by the pairwise rank swaps, which enables efficient gradient-based optimization within the LambdaRank framework. We implement LambdaRankIC as a custom objective in XGBoost. Theoretically, we show that our approach optimizes an upper bound on Rank IC. We evaluate the proposed approach on both simulated and real-world financial data. In simulation studies, LambdaRankIC accurately recovers the true ranking structure in noiseless settings and consistently outperforms regression-based and NDCG-oriented ranking methods under low signal-to-noise ratios and heavy-tailed noise regimes. In empirical experiments using real market data, LambdaRankIC achieves the best out-of-sample performance on evaluation metrics commonly used in finance, including Rank IC, ICIR, monthly return, and Sharpe ratio. These results show that directly optimizing Rank IC can yield substantial improvements over conventional learning objectives in financial predictions when the full-order ranking quality is the primary goal.



184. ❌ Scaling Federated Linear Contextual Bandits via Sketching

作者: Hantao Yang, Hong Xie, Xutong Liu, Defu Lian 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00500v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In federated contextual linear bandits, high data dimensionality incurs prohibitive computation and communication costs: local agents perform $O(d^3)$-time determinant computation and upload $O(d^2)$ parameters, making existing algorithms unscalable, where $d$ is the dimension of data. To relieve these scaling bottlenecks, this paper proposes Federated Sketch Contextual Linear Bandits (FSCLB). On the computation side, FSCLB uses SVD to indirectly obtain the determinant required for communication, eliminating the prohibitive cost of direct determinant calculation and cutting complexity from $O(d^3)$ to $O(l^2d)$ per round, where $l< d$ is the sketch size. On the communication side, FSCLB introduces a double-sketch strategy that reduces both upload and download costs from $O(d^2)$ to $O(ld)$. Naively involving sketch update into federated contextual linear bandits can destroy the local increment and invalidate the asynchronous communication condition; FSCLB solves this by replacing the covariance matrix with the sketch matrix when deciding whether to communicate. Theoretically, FSCLB achieves a regret bound of $\widetilde{O} ((\sqrt{d}+\sqrt{M\varepsilon_l})\sqrt{lT})$, where $\varepsilon_l$ is the upper bounded by the spectral tail of the covariance matrix; when $l$ exceeds the rank of the covariance matrix, the bound simplifies to $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{ldT})$, matching the optimal no-sketch regret. Experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets show that FSCLB significantly reduces computational and communication costs by over 90 % while sacrificing only a negligible amount of cumulative reward.



185. ❌ Distance metric learning for conditional anomaly detection

作者: Michal Valko, Milos Hauskrecht 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00490v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Anomaly detection methods can be very useful in identifying unusual or interesting patterns in data. A recently proposed conditional anomaly detection framework extends anomaly detection to the problem of identifying anomalous patterns on a subset of attributes in the data. The anomaly always depends (is conditioned) on the value of remaining attributes. The work presented in this paper focuses on instance-based methods for detecting conditional anomalies. The methods depend heavily on the distance metric that lets us identify examples in the dataset that are most critical for detecting the anomaly. To optimize the performance of such methods we study and devise a metric learning method that learns the distance metric to reflect best the conditional anomaly pattern.



186. ❌ Revealing graph bandits for maximizing local influence

作者: Alexandra Carpentier, Michal Valko 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00489v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We study a graph bandit setting where the objective of the learner is to detect the most influential node of a graph by requesting as little information from the graph as possible. One of the relevant applications for this setting is marketing in social networks, where the marketer aims at finding and taking advantage of the most influential customers. The existing approaches for bandit problems on graphs require either partial or complete knowledge of the graph. In this paper, we do not assume any knowledge of the graph, but we consider a setting where it can be gradually discovered in a sequential and active way. At each round, the learner chooses a node of the graph and the only information it receives is a stochastic set of the nodes that the chosen node is currently influencing. To address this setting, we propose BARE, a bandit strategy for which we prove a regret guarantee that scales with the detectable dimension, a problem dependent quantity that is often much smaller than the number of nodes.



187. ❌ Trading off rewards and errors in multi-armed bandits

作者: Akram Erraqabi, Alessandro Lazaric, Michal Valko, Emma Brunskill, Yun-En Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00488v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In multi-armed bandits, the most-explored arms are the most informative, while reward maximization typically pulls only the best arm. We study the tradeoff between identifying arm means accurately and accumulating reward, and present an algorithm with regret guarantees that interpolates between the two objectives. We provide both upper and lower bounds and validate empirically.



188. ❌ Near-optimal and Efficient First-Order Algorithm for Multi-Task Learning with Shared Linear Representation

作者: Shihong Ding, Fangyu Du, Cong Fang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00473v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Multi-task learning (MTL) has emerged as a pivotal paradigm in machine learning by leveraging shared structures across multiple related tasks. Despite its empirical success, the development of likelihood-based efficiently solvable algorithms–even for shared linear representations–remains largely underdeveloped, primarily due to the non-convex structure intrinsic to matrix factorization. This paper introduces a first-order algorithm that jointly learns a shared representation and task-specific parameters, with guaranteed efficiency. Notably, it converges in $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(1)$ iterations and attains a \emph{near-optimal} estimation error of $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(dk/(TN))$, \emph{improving} over existing likelihood-based methods by a factor of $k$, where $d$, $k$, $T$, $N$ denote input dimension, representation dimension, task count, and samples per task, respectively. Our results justify that likelihood-based first-order methods can efficiently solve the MTL problem.



189. ❌ Batch Normalization for Neural Networks on Complex Domains

作者: Xuan Son Nguyen, Nistor Grozavu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00467v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Riemannian neural networks have proven effective in solving a variety of machine learning tasks. The key to their success lies in the development of principled Riemannian analogs of fundamental building blocks in deep neural networks (DNNs). Among those, Riemannian batch normalization (BN) layers have shown to enhance training stability and improve accuracy. In this paper, we propose BN layers for neural networks on complex domains. The proposed layers have close connections with existing Riemannian BN layers. We derive essential components for practical implementations of BN layers on some complex domains which are less studied in previous works, e.g., the Siegel disk domain. We conduct experiments on radar clutter classification, node classification, and action recognition demonstrating the efficacy of our method.



190. ❌ CleanBase: Detecting Malicious Documents in RAG Knowledge Databases

作者: Weifei Jin, Xilong Wang, Wei Zou, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Gong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00460v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is vulnerable to prompt injection attacks, in which an adversary inserts malicious documents containing carefully crafted injected prompts into the knowledge database. When a user issues a question targeted by the attack, the RAG system may retrieve these malicious documents, whose injected prompts mislead it into generating attacker-specified answers, thereby compromising the integrity of the RAG system. In this work, we propose CleanBase, a method to detect malicious documents within a knowledge database. Our key insight is that malicious documents crafted for the same attack-targeted questions often exhibit high semantic similarity, as attackers deliberately make them consistent to improve attack success rates. Accordingly, CleanBase constructs a similarity graph over the knowledge database, where each node represents a document and an edge connects two nodes if their semantic similarity–computed using an embedding model–exceeds a statistically determined threshold. Due to their inherent similarity, malicious documents tend to form cliques within this graph. CleanBase detects such cliques and flags the corresponding documents as malicious. We theoretically derive upper bounds on CleanBase’s false positive and false negative rates and empirically validate its effectiveness. Experimental results across multiple datasets and prompt injection attacks demonstrate that CleanBase accurately detects malicious documents and effectively safeguards RAG systems. Our source code is available at https://github.com/WeifeiJin/CleanBase.



191. ❌ Federated Learning with Hypergradient-based Online Update of Aggregation Weights

作者: Ayano Nakai-Kasai, Tadashi Wadayama 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00458v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Federated learning using mobile and Internet of Things devices requires not only the ability to handle heterogeneity of clients’ data distributions but also high adaptability to varying communication environments. We propose FedHAW (Federated Learning with Hypergradient-based update of Aggregation Weights) that implements online updates of aggregation weights. FedHAW updates the aggregation weights by using hypergradient, the gradient of the objective function with respect to the weights, which can be calculated with low computational overhead. Simulation results show that the proposed method possesses high generalization performance in heterogeneous environments and high robustness to communication errors.



192. ❌ A Policy-Driven DRL Framework for System-Level Tradeoff Control in NR-U/Wi-Fi Coexistence

作者: Po-Heng Chou, Yi-Fang Yu, Shou-Yu Chen, Chiapin Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00457v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The coexistence of NR-U and Wi-Fi in unlicensed spectrum introduces a system-level resource coordination problem, where heterogeneous channel access mechanisms lead to a significant imbalance in spectrum utilization and degraded Wi-Fi performance. To address this challenge, we propose a policy-driven deep reinforcement learning (DRL) framework for adaptive TXOP control, in which the coexistence process is formulated as a Markov decision process (MDP) and a deep Q-network (DQN) learns control policies through online interaction. A key contribution is the introduction of a policy layer via reward design, enabling explicit control of system-level tradeoffs among fairness, throughput, and quality of service (QoS). Three policies, namely absolute fairness, moderate fairness, and utility-based fairness, are developed to achieve different operating points. Simulation results show that the proposed framework achieves a Jain fairness index above 0.9 under strict fairness control. Compared to absolute fairness, moderate fairness improves aggregate throughput by 68.22%, while the utility-based policy further enhances utility by 177.6%. These results demonstrate that policy-driven control provides a flexible and effective solution for managing tradeoffs in heterogeneous coexistence networks.



193. ❌ Soft Graph Diffusion Transformer for MIMO Detection

作者: Nan Jiang, Jiadong Hong, Lei Liu, Xinyu Bian, Wenjie Wang, Zhaoyang Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00449v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Learning-based MIMO detection has shown strong empirical performance, yet existing methods typically rely on fixed-depth architectures without explicitly modeling the progressive refinement of symbol estimates. In this paper, we revisit MIMO detection from a flow matching perspective and propose the Soft Graph Diffusion Transformer (SGDiT), which reformulates detection as a noise-level-conditioned denoising process that progressively transforms a Gaussian initialization toward the posterior conditioned on channel observations. An adaptive layer normalization (AdaLN)-conditioned soft graph transformer is employed to parameterize the denoising dynamics, enabling stage-aware information integration between observation and symbol domains. To better align with the discrete nature of symbol detection, we further adopt a cross-entropy-based training objective that directly models bit-wise posterior probabilities, providing a more suitable inductive bias than conventional regression-based formulations. Experimental results across various MIMO system configurations demonstrate that SGDiT achieves competitive bit error rate (BER) performance compared with representative baselines. Furthermore, the proposed model exhibits good generalization capability across different channel conditions. Overall, the SGDiT framework provides an effective and practical approach for neural MIMO detection.



194. ❌ The Power of Order: Fooling LLMs with Adversarial Table Permutations

作者: Xinshuai Dong, Haifeng Chen, Xuyuan Liu, Shengyu Chen, Haoyu Wang, Shaoan Xie, Kun Zhang, Zhengzhang Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00445v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large Language Models have achieved remarkable success and are increasingly deployed in critical applications involving tabular data, such as Table Question Answering. However, their robustness to the structure of this input remains a critical, unaddressed question. This paper demonstrates that modern LLMs exhibit a significant vulnerability to the layout of tabular data. Specifically, we show that semantically-invariant permutations of rows and columns - rearrangements that do not alter the table’s underlying information - are sometimes sufficient to cause incorrect or inconsistent model outputs. To systematically probe this vulnerability, we introduce Adversarial Table Permutation, a novel, gradient-based attack that efficiently identifies worst-case permutations designed to maximally disrupt model performance. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that ATP significantly degrades the performance of a wide range of LLMs. This reveals a pervasive vulnerability across different model sizes and architectures, including the most recent and popular models. Our findings expose a fundamental weakness in how current LLMs process structured data, underscoring the urgent need to develop permutation-robust models for reliable, real-world applications.



195. ❌ Optimal Spatio-Temporal Decoupling for Bayesian Conformal Prediction

作者: Yu-Hsueh Fang, Chia-Yen Lee 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00432v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Online Conformal Prediction (CP) struggles to balance temporal adaptability and structural stability. Feedback-driven methods (e.g., Adaptive Conformal Inference (ACI)) suffer from systemic marginal under-coverage and high interval variance during abrupt shifts, while temporally discounted Bayesian CP suffers from severe structural lag and uncalibrated interval bloat. We propose State-Adaptive Bayesian Conformal Prediction (SA-BCP) to achieve optimal spatio-temporal decoupling. By gating long-term temporal inertia with spatial kernel-density evidence, SA-BCP proactively expands intervals for recognized historical regimes while maintaining tight efficiency during stable states. We rigorously prove this mechanism’s optimality, identifying a minimax bias-variance tradeoff governed by an evidence threshold $K$. Extensive benchmarks on volatile financial datasets (2016–2026), including AMD, Gold, and GBP/USD, demonstrate that SA-BCP consistently minimizes the strictly proper Winkler score across diverse confidence levels. Specifically, SA-BCP resolves the systematic under-coverage inherent to ACI variants while simultaneously reducing the uncalibrated interval bloat of Bayesian CP by 10% to 37% under high-confidence requests. By elegantly navigating this tradeoff, SA-BCP achieves an optimal balance between conditional reliability and predictive efficiency.



196. ❌ GD4: Graph-based Discrete Denoising Diffusion for MIMO Detection

作者: Qincheng Lu, Sitao Luan, Xiao-Wen Chang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00423v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In wireless communications, recovering the optimal solution to the multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) detection problem is NP-hard. Obtaining high-quality suboptimal solutions with a favorable performance-complexity trade-off is particularly challenging in under-determined systems with $N_t$ transmit antennas and $N_r < N_t$ receive antennas. Recent diffusion-based MIMO detectors have shown promise, but they require extensive sampling iterations at inference time, and their performance degrades in under-determined scenarios. We propose GD4, a graph-based discrete denoising diffusion method for MIMO detection. Unlike existing diffusion-based detectors that operate in a continuous relaxed space, GD4 performs denoising directly in the discrete symbol space and enables fast inference with one or a few denoising evaluations. Numerical results show that, under a similar inference-time compute budget, GD4 produces higher-quality suboptimal solutions than existing diffusion-based detectors and some widely used classical baseline including box-constrained Babai point and the $K$-best box-constrained randomized Klein-Babai point in both under-determined and overdetermined settings.



197. ❌ Foresight Arena: An On-Chain Benchmark for Evaluating AI Forecasting Agents

作者: Maksym Nechepurenko, Pavel Shuvalov 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00420v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Evaluating the true forecasting ability of AI agents requires environments resistant to overfitting, free from centralized trust, and grounded in incentive-compatible scoring. Existing benchmarks either rely on static datasets vulnerable to training-data contamination, or measure trading PnL – a metric conflating predictive accuracy with timing, sizing, and risk appetite. We introduce Foresight Arena, the first permissionless, on-chain benchmark for evaluating AI forecasting agents on real-world prediction markets. Agents submit probabilistic forecasts on binary Polymarket markets via a commit-reveal protocol enforced by Solidity smart contracts on Polygon PoS; outcomes are resolved trustlessly through the Gnosis Conditional Token Framework. Performance is measured by the Brier Score and a novel Alpha Score – proper scoring rules that incentivize honest probability reporting and isolate predictive edge over market consensus. We provide a formal analysis: closed-form variance for per-market Alpha, the connection to Murphy’s classical Brier decomposition, and a power analysis characterizing the number of rounds required to reliably distinguish agents of different skill levels. We show that detecting a true edge of $α^* = 0.02$ at 80% power requires approximately 350 resolved binary predictions (50 rounds of 7 markets), while $α^* = 0.01$ requires four times more. We complement these analytical results with a 50-round live evaluation of five frontier LLM agents plus a random baseline. Murphy decomposition distinguishes well-calibrated agents from market-tracking agents that fail through reduced resolution. All smart contracts and evaluation infrastructure are open-source.



198. ❌ M-CaStLe: Uncovering Local Causal Structures in Multivariate Space-Time Gridded Data

作者: J. Jake Nichol, Michael Weylandt, G. Matthew Fricke, Jhayron Perez-Carrasquilla, Melanie E. Moses 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00398v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Causal graph discovery for space-time systems is challenging in high-dimensional gridded data, which often has many more grid cells than temporal observations per cell. The Causal Space-Time Stencil Learning (CaStLe) meta-algorithm was developed to address that niche under space-time locality and stationarity assumptions, but it is currently limited to univariate analyses. In this work, we present M-CaStLe. M-CaStLe generalizes the local embedding and parent-identification phases of CaStLe to jointly model local within-variable and cross-variable space-time causal structures in gridded data. Like CaStLe, by constraining candidate parents to a constant-size space-time neighborhood and pooling spatial replicates, M-CaStLe increases effective sample size to make discovery tractable in high-dimensional settings. We further decompose the resulting multivariate stencil graph into reaction and spatial graphs to aid interpretation in complex settings. We study M-CaStLe in four settings: a multivariate space-time vector autoregression benchmark with known ground truth, an advective-diffusive-reaction partial differential equation verification problem with derived physical reference structure, an atmospheric chemistry case study in a low-temporal-sample regime, and an El Niño Southern Oscillation study on reanalysis data, identifying phase-dependent ocean–atmosphere coupling. Across these settings, M-CaStLe more accurately recovers multivariate causal structure in controlled settings and identifies important physical dynamics in real-world case studies. Overall, M-CaStLe advances causal discovery for multivariate space-time systems while retaining interpretability at the grid level.



199. ❌ Mesh Field Theory: Port-Hamiltonian Formulation of Mesh-Based Physics

作者: Satoshi Noguchi, Yoshinobu Kawahara 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00394v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present Mesh Field Theory (MeshFT) and its neural realization, MeshFT-Net: a structure-preserving framework for mesh-based continuum physics that cleanly separates the physics’ topological structure from its metric structure. Imposing minimal physical principles (locality, permutation equivariance, orientation covariance, and energy balance/dissipation inequality), we prove a reduction theorem for mesh-based physics. Under these conditions, the physical dynamics admit a local factorization into a port-Hamiltonian form: the conservative interconnection is fixed uniquely by mesh topology, whereas metric effects enter only through constitutive relations and dissipation. This reduction clarifies what must be fixed and what should be learned, directly informing MeshFT-Net’s design. Across evaluations on analytic and realistic datasets, physics-consistency tests, and out-of-distribution validation, MeshFT-Net achieves near-zero energy drift and strong physical fidelity (correct dispersion and momentum conservation) along with robust extrapolation and high data efficiency. By eliminating non-physical degrees of freedom and learning only metric-dependent structure, MeshFT provides a principled inductive bias for stable, faithful, and data-efficient learning-based physical simulation.



200. ❌ Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Double Oracle Efficiency in Policy Optimization and Offline Estimation

作者: Haichen Hu, Jian Qian, David Simchi-Levi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00393v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Reinforcement learning (RL) in large environments often suffers from severe computational bottlenecks, as conventional regret minimization algorithms require repeated, costly calls to planning and statistical estimation oracles. While recent advances have explored offline oracle-efficient algorithms, their computational complexity typically scales with the cardinality of the state and action spaces, rendering them intractable for large-scale or continuous environments. In this paper, we address this fundamental limitation by studying offline oracle-efficient episodic RL through the lens of log-barrier and log-determinant regularization. Specifically, for tabular Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), we propose a novel algorithm that achieves the optimal $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret bound while requiring only $O(H\log\log T)$ calls to both the offline statistical estimation and planning oracles when $T$ is known and $O(H\log T)$ calls when $T$ is unknown. Crucially, this oracle complexity is entirely independent of the size of the state and action spaces. This strict independence drastically reduces the planning oracle complexity, representing a substantial improvement over existing offline oracle-efficient algorithms (Qian et al., 2024). Furthermore, we demonstrate the versatility of our framework by generalizing the algorithm to linear MDPs featuring infinite state spaces and arbitrary action spaces. We prove that this generalized approach successfully attains meaningful sub-linear regret. Consequently, our work yields the first doubly oracle-efficient (i.e., efficient with respect to both statistical estimation and policy optimization) regret minimization algorithm capable of solving MDPs with infinite state and action spaces, significantly expanding the boundaries of computationally tractable RL.



201. ❌ Towards Robust and Scalable Density-based Clustering via Graph Propagation

作者: Yingtao Zheng, Hugo Phibbs, Ninh Pham 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00390v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present \textit{CluProp}, a novel framework that reimagines varied-density clustering in high-dimensional spaces as a label propagation process over neighborhood graphs. Our approach formally bridges the gap between density-based clustering and graph connectivity, leveraging efficient propagation mechanisms from network science to mitigate the parameter sensitivity inherent in traditional density-based methods. Specifically, we introduce a deterministic density-based propagation strategy to ensure scalable neighborhood identification. The framework is agnostic to the choice of distance metric and exhibits superior performance on large-scale data, processing millions of points in minutes while consistently outperforming existing baselines in accuracy.



202. ❌ PILIR: Physics-Informed Local Implicit Representation

作者: Jianfeng Li, Feng Wang, Ke Tang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00385v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Physics-Informed Neural Networks have become a powerful mesh-free method for solving partial differential equations, but their performance is often limited by spectral bias. Specifically, in standard MLPs used in PINNs, the global parameter coupling causes the model to prioritize learning low-frequency components, resulting in slow convergence for high-frequency details. To overcome this limitation, we introduce the Physics-Informed Local Implicit Representation (PILIR). Our approach separates the global physical domain into a discrete latent feature space and a continuous generative decoder. By using a learnable grid to encode explicit spatial locality, PILIR can capture high-frequency details locally, preventing dilution by global patterns. A generative neural operator then synthesizes these local latent features into continuous physical fields, allowing accurate reconstruction of fine-scale structures. Experiments on a range of challenging PDEs show that PILIR effectively mitigates spectral bias, thereby boosting the convergence of high-frequency details and achieving superior accuracy compared to state-of-the-art methods.



203. ❌ Advancing Edge Classification through High-Dimensional Causal Modeling of Node-Edge Interplay

作者: Duanyu Feng, Li Ding, Hongru Liang, Wenqiang Lei 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00374v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Edge classification, a crucial task for graph applications, remains relatively under-explored compared to link prediction. Current methods often overlook the potential causal influences of node features on edge features, leading to a loss of relevant prior information. In this work, we present an empirical exploration using the Causal Edge Classification Framework (CECF). Unlike conventional causal inference methods, CECF is the first framework to apply causal inference principles to the edge classification task and to explore modeling edge features as a high-dimensional treatment within a causal framework. Based on the node embedding of Graph Neural Network (GNN), CECF seeks to learn a balanced representation of high-dimensional edge features by mitigating the potential influence of node features. Then, a cross-attention network captures the complex dependencies between node and edge features for final edge classification.Extensive experiments demonstrate that CECF not only achieves superior performance but also serves as a flexible, plug-and-play enhancement for existing methods.We also provide empirical analyses, offering insights into when and how this high-dimensional causal modeling framework works for the edge classification.



204. ❌ Group Cognition Learning: Making Everything Better Through Governed Two-Stage Agents Collaboration

作者: Chunlei Meng, Pengbin Feng, Rong Fu, Hoi Leong Lee, Xiaojing Du, Zhaolu Kang, Zeyu Zhang, Weilin Zhou, Chun Ouyang, Zhongxue Gan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00370v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Centralized multimodal learning commonly compresses language, acoustic, and visual signals into a single fused representation for prediction. While effective, this paradigm suffers from two limitations: modality dominance, where optimization gravitates towards the path of least resistance, ignoring weaker but informative modalities, and spurious modality coupling, where models overfit to incidental cross-modal correlations. To address these, we propose Group Cognition Learning (GCL), a governed collaboration paradigm that applies a two-stage protocol after modality-specific encoding. In Stage 1 (Selective Interaction), a Routing Agent proposes directed interaction routes, and an Auditing Agent assigns sample-wise gates to emphasize exchanges that yield positive marginal predictive gain while suppressing redundant coupling. In Stage 2 (Consensus Formation), a Public-Factor Agent maintains an explicit shared factor, and an Aggregation Agent produces the final prediction through contribution-aware weighting while keeping each modality representation as a specialization channel. Extensive experiments on CMU-MOSI, CMU-MOSEI, and MIntRec demonstrate that GCL mitigates dominance and coupling, establishing state-of-the-art results across both regression and classification benchmarks. Analysis experiments further demonstrate the effectiveness of the design.



205. ❌ Geometric analysis of attractor boundaries and storage capacity limits in kernel Hopfield networks

作者: Akira Tamamori 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00366v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

High-capacity associative memories based on Kernel Logistic Regression (KLR) exhibit strong storage capabilities, but the dynamical and geometric mechanisms underlying their stability remain poorly understood. This paper investigates the global geometry of attractor basins and the physical determinants of the storage limit in KLR-trained Hopfield networks. We combine empirical evaluations using random sequences and real-world image embeddings (CIFAR-10) with phenomenological morphing experiments and statistical Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) analysis. Our experiments reveal that the network achieves a storage capacity for random sequences up to $P/N \approx 16$ , and maintains stable retrieval for structured data at effective loads near $P/N \approx 20$ . Through morphing analysis, we reveal that attractors on the “Ridge of Optimization” are separated by sharp, phase-transition-like boundaries, characterized by steep effective potential barriers and critical slowing down. Furthermore, by contrasting an SNR analysis with a geometric reference point inspired by Cover’s theorem, we show that the ultimate storage limit is constrained primarily not by a lack of geometric separability in the feature space, but by the loss of dynamical stability against crosstalk noise. These findings suggest that KLR networks function as highly localized, exemplar-based memories that operate optimally just before the onset of dynamical collapse, providing new insights into the design of robust, large-scale retrieval systems.



206. ❌ Binomial flows: Denoising and flow matching for discrete ordinal data

作者: Yair Shenfeld, Ricardo Baptista, Stefano Peluchetti 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00360v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Flow-based generative modeling in continuous spaces exploit Tweedie’s formula to express the denoiser (learned in training) as a score function (used in sampling). In contrast, this relation has been largely missing in the discrete setting where common approaches focus on learning discrete scores and rates. In this work we close this gap for discrete non-negative ordinal data by introducing Binomial flows. Our framework provides a simple recipe for training a discrete diffusion model which simultaneously denoises, samples, and estimates exact likelihoods. We verify our methodology on synthetic examples and obtain competitive results on real-world data sets.



207. ❌ Free Energy Surface Sampling via Reduced Flow Matching

作者: Zichen Liu, Tiejun Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00337v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Sampling the free energy surface, namely, the distribution of collective variables (CVs), is a crucial problem in statistical physics, as it underpins a better understanding of chemical reactions and conformational transitions. Traditional methods for free energy surface sampling involve simulation in high-dimensional configuration space and projecting the resulting configurations onto the CV space. To reduce the computational costs of such sampling, we propose FES-FM, a reduced flow matching (FM) method for free energy sampling (FES). We train a dynamical transport map in the CV space, thereby enabling direct sampling of the free energy surface. For many-particle systems, we construct a prior distribution based on the Hessian at a local minimum of the potential, which ensures both rotation-translation invariance and physically meaningful configurations. We evaluate the proposed method across a variety of potential functions and collective variables. Comparative experiments demonstrate that our approach drastically reduces computational costs while delivering superior accuracy per unit sampling time.



208. ❌ Conformalized Quantum DeepONet Ensembles for Scalable Operator Learning with Distribution-Free Uncertainty

作者: Purav Matlia, Christian Moya, Guang Lin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00330v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Operator learning enables fast surrogate modeling of high-dimensional dynamical systems, but existing approaches face two fundamental limitations: quadratic inference complexity and unreliable uncertainty quantification in safety-critical settings. We propose Conformalized Quantum DeepONet Ensembles, a framework that addresses both challenges simultaneously. By leveraging Quantum Orthogonal Neural Networks (QOrthoNNs), we reduce operator inference complexity from O(n^2) to O(n), enabling scalable evaluation over fine discretizations. To provide rigorous uncertainty quantification, we combine ensemble-based epistemic modeling with adaptive conformal prediction, yielding distribution-free coverage guarantees. A key challenge in ensembling is that naive parallelism scales hardware resources linearly with the number of models. We resolve this by using Superposed Parameterized Quantum Circuits (SPQCs), which compress multiple ensemble members into a single circuit and enable simultaneous multi-model execution. Experiments on synthetic partial differential equations and real-world power system dynamics demonstrate that our approach achieves accurate predictions while maintaining calibrated uncertainty under realistic quantum noise. These results establish a practical pathway toward scalable, uncertainty-aware operator learning in quantum machine learning.



209. ❌ Intelligent Elastic Feature Fading: Enabling Model Retrain-Free Feature Efficiency Rollouts at Scale

作者: Jieming Di, Xiaoyu Chen, Ying She, Siyu Wang, Lizzie Liu, Fenggang Wu, Jiaoying Mu, Tony Tsui, Amr Elroumy, Hsing Tang, Zewei Jiang, Qiao Yang, Lin Qi, Haibo Lin, Weifeng Cui, Daniel Li, Kapil Gupta, Shivendra Pratap Singh, Jie Zheng, Arnold Overwijk, Ling Leng, Sri Reddy, Robert Malkin, Rocky Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00324v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large-scale ranking systems depend on thousands of features derived from user behavior across multiple time horizons. Typically requires model retraining – resulting in long iteration cycles (3–6 months), substantial GPU resource consumption, and limited rollout throughput. We introduce Intelligent Elastic Feature Fading (IEFF), a production infrastructure system that enables retrain-free feature efficiency rollouts by elastically controlling feature coverage and distribution at serving time. IEFF supports incremental feature coverage adjustments while models adapt through recurring training, eliminating dependencies on explicit retraining cycles. The system incorporates strict safety guardrails, reversibility mechanisms, and comprehensive monitoring to ensure stability at scale. Across multiple production use cases, IEFF accelerates efficiency-related rollouts by 5$\times$, eliminates retraining-related GPU overhead, and enables faster capacity recycling. Extensive offline and online experiments demonstrate that gradual feature fading prevents 50–55% of online performance degradation compared to abrupt feature removal, while maintaining stable model behavior. These results establish elastic, system-level feature fading as a practical and scalable approach for managing feature efficiency in modern industrial ranking systems.



210. ❌ Federated Weather Modeling on Sensor Data

作者: Shengchao Chen, Guodong Long 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00322v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Federated weather modeling on sensor data is a distributed system underpinned by federated learning, enabling multiple sensor data sources, including ground weather stations, satellites and IoT devices, to collaboratively train deep learning models without sharing raw data. This method safeguards data privacy and security while leverages diverse, geographically distributed datasets to improve the accuracy and robustness of global/regional weather modeling tasks such as forecasting and anomaly detection.



211. ❌ Reconstruction of glymphatic transport fields from subject-specific imaging data, with particular emphasis on cerebrospinal fluid flow and tracer conservation

作者: A. Derya Bakiler, Michael J. Johnson, Michael R. A. Abdelmalik, Frimpong A. Baidoo, Andrew Badachhape, Ananth V. Annapragada, Thomas J. R. Hughes, Shaolie S. Hossain 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00730v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The reconstruction of physically valid transport fields from subject-specific imaging data is a fundamental challenge in image-based computational modeling due to measurement noise, modeling uncertainties and discretization errors. Without a methodology to construct models that faithfully reflect the underlying physics, mechanistic understanding of complex biological systems is inherently limited. In this work, we address this challenge in the glymphatic system, the brain’s waste-clearance network, where cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is transported through perivascular spaces into the brain parenchyma to facilitate metabolic waste removal. We introduce a computational framework for the high-fidelity reconstruction of subject-specific glymphatic transport fields from spatiotemporal imaging data. The formulation utilizes an advection-diffusion model with a velocity decomposition that imposes mass conservation, enabling the recovery of solenoidal (divergence-free) velocity fields through the solution of a constrained inverse problem. The system is discretized using immersed isogeometric analysis with quadratic B-spline basis functions, providing smooth, high-continuity solutions and inherent regularization of imaging noise. We demonstrate the framework’s utility by using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of tracer transport in a mouse brain, obtaining spatially varying estimates of CSF velocity, diffusivity, and clearance parameters. Forward simulations using the recovered fields show close agreement with experimental observations, validating the framework’s ability to characterize complex transport dynamics while preserving physical integrity. This approach provides a generalizable methodology for the robust inference of physically consistent transport fields from imperfect imaging data, with broad applicability to the image-guided modeling of biological and engineering systems.



212. ❌ Reduced-Precision Stochastic Simulation for Mathematical Biology

作者: Tom Kimpson, Mark B. Flegg, Jennifer A. Flegg 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00479v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The stochastic simulation algorithm (SSA) is widely used to perform exact forward simulation of discrete stochastic processes in biology. However, the computational cost, driven by sequential event-by-event sampling across large ensembles, remains a computational barrier. We investigate whether reduced-precision floating-point arithmetic can accelerate SSA without degrading statistical fidelity, drawing on the success of reduced-precision methods in weather and climate modelling. We evaluate two strategies across five canonical models (birth–death, Schlögl, Telegraph, dimerisation, repressilator): (i) mixed precision, computing propensities in 16-bit while maintaining accumulators in 32-bit; and (ii) uniform precision, performing all arithmetic in 16-bit. Mixed-precision SSA produces ensemble statistics that closely match the 64-bit reference for all models, as measured by Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests and Wasserstein distances. Under uniform precision, deterministic rounding introduces systematic biases across several models, with catastrophic failures in some cases. Stochastic rounding (SR) and propensity normalisation eliminate these biases, restoring distributional fidelity across all models tested (KS $p > 0.05$). Our results establish mixed-precision SSA with SR as a viable acceleration strategy for mathematical biology: 16-bit formats shrink per-variable data size by $2$–$4\times$ relative to \texttt{fp32}/\texttt{fp64}, yielding comparable reductions in memory footprint and up to $\sim 1.5\times$ wall-clock speedup on CPU hardware that lacks native 16-bit arithmetic. As a hardware-level acceleration, mixed-precision SSA complements algorithmic methods such as tau-leaping and maps naturally onto modern GPU and TPU architectures with native 16-bit arithmetic.



213. ❌ High-resolution ro-vibrational and rotational spectroscopy of the open-shell, linear CCH$^+$ ion ($^3Π$)

作者: Kim Steenbakkers, Weslley G. D. P. Silva, Oskar Asvany, Gerrit C. Groenenboom, Pavol Jusko, Britta Redlich, Sandra Brünken, Stephan Schlemmer 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00564v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In this work, we report on the high-resolution infrared spectrum of CCH$^+$ ($^3Π$) recorded in the range $3066-3184$~cm$^{-1}$ by means of leak-out spectroscopy. This spectral range covers the fundamental of the CH stretching mode and a highly excited bending vibrational mode. Based on this data (385 ro-vibrational lines), accurate spectroscopic descriptions of the ground and the two vibrationally excited states of CCH$^+$ were obtained. Besides the band origins, spin-orbit coupling constants, rotational constants, centrifugal distortion constants and $Λ$-doubling constants for the ground and excited vibrational states have been derived. This effective Hamiltonian analysis allowed a search for pure rotational lines of CCH$^+$ in its electronic and vibrational ground state using a two-color millimeterwave - infrared scheme. We observed all rotational transitions from $J^{\prime\prime} = 2$ up to $J^{\prime\prime} = 6$ within the $Ω= 2$ lowest energy fine structure component with resolved hyperfine splittings. This data has already guided the first detection of CCH$^+$ in space toward the Orion Bar photo-dissociation region, and has the potential to support further astronomical searches for CCH$^+$ either through radio or infrared spectroscopy, for example with the James Webb Space Telescope.



214. ❌ Machine learning evaluation of structural descriptors for supercooled water

作者: Kohei Yoshikawa, Kokoro Shikata, Kang Kim, Nobuyuki Matubayasi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-01 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00415v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The anomalous behavior of liquid water is widely associated with a liquid-liquid phase transition between high- and low-density states in the supercooled regime. At the microscopic level, tetrahedral hydrogen-bond networks govern these properties, motivating structural descriptors that characterize local molecular environments. These structural descriptors quantify features such as tetrahedral order, local density, and the separation between the first and second coordination shells; however, they have largely been proposed independently, with limited systematic comparison. Here we evaluate 16 previously proposed descriptors using a neural-network-based temperature classification framework, enabling an objective assessment of their ability to distinguish temperature-dependent structural changes in supercooled water. We further apply an explainable artificial intelligence method that identifies the structural features responsible for the model predictions. This approach reveals how different descriptors encode local structural information and establishes a data-driven framework for benchmarking structural descriptors in liquid water.



Token 消耗统计

  • 总计: 920,184 tokens(输入 920,184 / 输出 0)