📊 ArXiv 研究报告 (2026-05-06)

生成时间: 2026-05-06 08:52:27 数据源: ArXiv

📌 配置信息

关键词列表(共 27 个,总权重 27.0)

关键词权重类型
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.0主要
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.0主要
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.0主要
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.0主要
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.0主要
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.0主要
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.0主要
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.0主要
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.0主要
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.0主要
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.0主要
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.0主要
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.0主要
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.0主要
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.0主要
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.0主要
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.0主要
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.0主要
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.0主要
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.0主要
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.0主要
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.0主要
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.0主要
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.0主要
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.0主要
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.0主要
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.0主要

评分设置

  • 每个关键词最大分: 15
  • 及格分公式: 5.0 + 0.8 × 总权重
  • 当前及格分: 26.6

📈 论文统计

  • 总抓取: 338 篇
  • 及格论文: 0 篇 (0.0%)

📋 所有论文列表

1. ❌ SpecKV: Adaptive Speculative Decoding with Compression-Aware Gamma Selection

作者: Shikhar Shukla 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02888v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Speculative decoding accelerates large language model (LLM) inference by using a small draft model to propose candidate tokens that a larger target model verifies. A critical hyperparameter in this process is the speculation length~$γ$, which determines how many tokens the draft model proposes per step. Nearly all existing systems use a fixed~$γ$ (typically4), yet empirical evidence suggests that the optimal value varies across task types and, crucially, depends on the compression level applied to the target model. In this paper, we present \textbf{SpecKV}, a lightweight adaptive controller that selects$γ$ per speculation step using signals extracted from the draft model itself. We profile speculative decoding across 4task categories, 4speculation lengths, and 3compression levels (FP16, INT8, NF4), collecting 5,112 step-level records with per-step acceptance rates, draft entropy, and draft confidence. We demonstrate that the optimal$γ$ shifts across compression regimes and that draft model confidence and entropy are strong predictors of acceptance rate (correlation~$\approx 0.56$). SpecKV uses a small MLP trained on these signals to maximize expected tokens per speculation step, achieving a 56.0% improvement over the fixed-$γ$=4 baseline with only 0.34,ms overhead per decision ($<$0.5% of step time). The improvement is statistically significant ($p < 0.001$, paired bootstrap test). We release all profiling data, trained models, and notebooks as open-source artifacts.



2. ❌ Enhancing RL Generalizability in Robotics through SHAP Analysis of Algorithms and Hyperparameters

作者: Lingxiao Kong, Cong Yang, Oya Deniz Beyan, Zeyd Boukhers 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02867v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Despite significant advances in Reinforcement Learning (RL), model performance remains highly sensitive to algorithm and hyperparameter configurations, while generalization gaps across environments complicate real-world deployment. Although prior work has studied RL generalization, the relative contribution of specific configurations to the generalization gap has not been quantitatively decomposed and systematically leveraged for configuration selection. To address this limitation, we propose an explainable framework that evaluates RL performance across robotic environments using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to quantify configuration impacts. We establish a theoretical foundation connecting Shapley values to generalizability, empirically analyze configuration impact patterns, and introduce SHAP-guided configuration selection to enhance generalization. Our results reveal distinct patterns across algorithms and hyperparameters, with consistent configuration impacts across diverse tasks and environments. By applying these insights to configuration selection, we achieve improved RL generalizability and provide actionable guidance for practitioners.



3. ❌ Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Stabilized Knowledge Distillation for Cross–Language Code Clone Detection

作者: Mohamad Khajezade, Fatemeh H. Fard, Mohamed Sami Shehata 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02860v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Cross-language code clone detection (X-CCD) is challenging because semantically equivalent programs written in different languages often share little surface similarity. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for semantic clone detection, their use as black-box systems raises concerns about cost, reproducibility, privacy, and unreliable output formatting. In particular, compact open-source models often struggle to follow reasoning-oriented prompts and to produce outputs that can be consistently mapped to binary clone labels. To address these limitations, we propose a knowledge distillation framework that transfers reasoning capabilities from DeepSeek-R1 into compact open-source student models for X-CCD. Using cross-language code pairs derived from Project CodeNet, we construct reasoning-oriented synthetic training data and fine-tune Phi3 and Qwen-Coder with LoRA adapters. We further introduce response stabilization methods, including forced conclusion prompting, a binary classification head, and a contrastive classification head, and evaluate model behavior using both predictive metrics and response rate. Experiments on Python–Java, Rust–Java, Rust–Python, and Rust–Ruby show that knowledge distillation consistently improves the reliability of compact models and often improves predictive performance, especially under distribution shift. In addition, classification-head variants substantially reduce inference time compared to generation-based inference. Overall, our results show that reasoning-oriented distillation combined with response stabilization makes compact open-source models more practical and reliable for X-CCD detection.



4. ❌ From Sensors to Insight: Rapid, Edge-to-Core Application Development for Sensor-Driven Applications

作者: Komal Thareja, Anirban Mandal, Ewa Deelman 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02859v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Scientists increasingly rely on sensor-based data, yet transforming raw streams into insights across the edge-to-cloud continuum remains difficult. Provisioning heterogeneous infrastructure and managing execution on emerging platforms like Data Processing Units typically requires cross-domain expertise, creating significant barriers to rapid prototyping. This paper introduces an experience-driven methodology for the rapid development of sensor-driven applications. By combining pattern-based workflow engineering with AI-assisted development-implemented via Pegasus on the FABRIC testbed - we utilize an existing Orcasound hydrophone workflow as a reusable template. We introduce a pattern-based engineering methodology to generate and refine workflows for air quality, earthquake, and soil moisture monitoring. Furthermore, we show how these abstract structures are extended to edge resources through modular configuration and placement. Our evaluation focuses on user productivity and practical lessons rather than peak performance. Through these case studies, we illustrate how AI-assisted, pattern-based development lowers the entry barrier for non-experts and enables iterative exploration of sensor-driven applications across distributed infrastructures.



5. ❌ (POSTER) From Sensors to Insight: Rapid, Edge-to-Core Application Development for Sensor-Driven Applications

作者: Komal Thareja, Anirban Mandal, Ewa Deelman 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02844v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Scientists increasingly rely on sensor-based data; however transforming raw streams into insights across the edge-to-cloud continuum remains difficult due to the breadth of expertise required to coordinate the necessary data and computation flow. This paper introduces a pattern-based, AI-assisted methodology for rapid development of sensor-driven applications. Using Pegasus workflows executing on the FABRIC testbed, we demonstrate a 5-step development loop that shifts workflow construction and deployment from code-first to intent-first design. Starting from an existing Orcasound hydrophone workflow as a reusable template, we generate and refine workflows for air quality, earthquake, and soil moisture monitoring applications. We further show how these workflows extend to edge resources-including BlueField-3 DPUs and Raspberry Pis-through configuration and placement rather than workflow redesign. Our evaluation, from the perspective of a novice Pegasus user, shows that AI-assisted pattern reuse compresses multi-stage workflow development to 1-1.5 days per workflow while preserving the rigor and portability of workflow-based execution.



6. ❌ A second-order method on the Stiefel manifold via Newton$\unicode{x2013}$Schulz

作者: Xinhui Xiong, Bin Gao, P. -A. Absil 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02838v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Retraction-free approaches offer attractive low-cost alternatives to Riemannian methods on the Stiefel manifold, but they are often first-order, which may limit the efficiency under high-accuracy requirements. To this end, we propose a second-order method landing on the Stiefel manifold without invoking retractions, which is proved to enjoy local quadratic (or superlinear for its inexact variant) convergence. The update consists of the sum of (i) a component tangent to the level set of the constraint-defining function that aims to reduce the objective and (ii) a component normal to the same level set that reduces the infeasibility. Specifically, we construct the normal component via Newton$\unicode{x2013}$Schulz, a fixed-point iteration for orthogonalization. Moreover, we establish a geometric connection between the Newton$\unicode{x2013}$Schulz iteration and Stiefel manifolds, in which Newton$\unicode{x2013}$Schulz moves along the normal space. For the tangent component, we formulate a modified Newton equation that incorporates Newton$\unicode{x2013}$Schulz. Numerical experiments on the orthogonal Procrustes problem, principal component analysis, and real-data independent component analysis illustrate that the proposed method performs better than the existing methods.



7. ❌ HAAS: A Policy-Aware Framework for Adaptive Task Allocation Between Humans and Artificial Intelligence Systems

作者: Vicente Pelechanoa, Antoni Mestre, Manoli Albert, Miriam Gil 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02832v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Deciding how to distribute work between humans and AI systems is a central challenge in organisational design. Most approaches treat this as a binary choice, yet the operational reality is richer: humans and AI routinely share tasks or take complementary roles depending on context, fatigue, and the stakes involved. Governing that distribution – balancing efficiency, oversight, and human capability – remains an open problem. This paper presents Human-AI Adaptive Symbiosis (HAAS), an implemented framework for adaptive task allocation in software engineering and manufacturing. HAAS combines two coupled components: a rule-based expert system that enforces governance constraints before any learning occurs, and a contextual-bandit learner that selects among feasible collaboration modes from outcome feedback. Task-agent fit is represented through five auditable cognitive dimensions and a five-mode autonomy spectrum – from human-only to fully autonomous – embedded in a reproducible benchmark spanning both domains. Three empirical findings emerge. First, governance is not a binary switch but a tunable design variable: tighter constraints predictably convert autonomous AI assignments into supervised collaborations, with domain-specific costs and benefits. Second, in manufacturing, stronger governance can improve operational performance and reduce fatigue simultaneously – a workload-buffering effect that contradicts the usual framing of governance as pure overhead. Third, no single governance setting dominates across all contexts; moderate governance becomes increasingly competitive as the learner accumulates experience within the governed action space. Together, these findings position HAAS as a pre-deployment workbench for comparing and inspecting human–AI allocation policies before organisational commitment.



8. ❌ First-Order Efficiency for Probabilistic Value Estimation via A Statistical Viewpoint

作者: Ziqi Liu, Kiljae Lee, Yuan Zhang, Weijing Tang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02827v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Probabilistic values, including Shapley values and semivalues, provide a model-agnostic framework to attribute the behavior of a black-box model to data points or features, with a wide range of applications including explainable artificial intelligence and data valuation. However, their exact computation requires utility evaluations over exponentially many coalitions, making Monte Carlo approximation essential in modern machine learning applications. Existing estimators are often developed through different identification strategies, including weighted averages, self-normalized weighting, regression adjustment, and weighted least squares. Our key observation is that these seemingly distinct constructions share a common first-order error structure, in which the leading term is an augmented inverse-probability weighted influence term determined by the sampling law and a working surrogate function. This first-order representation yields an explicit expression for the leading mean squared error (MSE), which characterizes how the sampling law and the surrogate jointly determine statistical efficiency. Guided by this criterion, we propose an Efficiency-Aware Surrogate-adjusted Estimator (EASE) that directly chooses the sampling law and surrogate to minimize the first-order MSE. We demonstrate that EASE consistently outperforms state-of-the-art estimators for various probabilistic values.



9. ❌ Compress Then Adapt? No, Do It Together via Task-aware Union of Subspaces

作者: Jingze Ge, Yun Liu, Xue Geng, Wanqi Dong, Wang Zhe Mark, Min Wu, Xulei Yang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02829v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Adapting large pretrained models to diverse tasks is now routine, yet the two dominant strategies of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) and low-rank compression are typically composed in sequence. This decoupled practice first compresses and then fine-tunes adapters, potentially misaligning the compressed subspace with downstream objectives and squandering a global parameter budget. To overcome this limitation, we introduce JACTUS (Joint Adaptation and Compression with a Task-aware Union of Subspaces), a single framework that unifies compression and adaptation. From a small calibration set, JACTUS estimates input and pre-activation gradient covariances, forms their orthogonal union with the pretrained weight subspace, performs a projected low-rank approximation inside this union, allocates rank globally by marginal gain per parameter, and trains only a compact core matrix. This explicitly mitigates the potential misalignment between the compressed subspace and downstream objectives by coupling the directions preserved for compression with those required for adaptation, yielding a deployable low-rank model that avoids retaining full frozen weights while enabling fast and robust tuning. On vision, JACTUS attains an average 89.2% accuracy on ViT-Base across eight datasets at 80% retained parameters, surpassing strong 100% PEFT baselines (e.g., DoRA 87.9%). On language, JACTUS achieves an 80.9% average on Llama2-7B commonsense QA at the same 80% retained-parameter budget, outperforming 100% PEFT (e.g., DoRA 79.7%) and exceeding prior compress-then-finetune pipelines under the same ratained-parameter budget. We will release code.



10. ❌ SCPRM: A Schema-aware Cumulative Process Reward Model for Knowledge Graph Question Answering

作者: Jiujiu Chen, Yazheng Liu, Sihong Xie, Hui Xiong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02819v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models excel at complex reasoning, yet evaluating their intermediate steps remains challenging. Although process reward models provide step-wise supervision, they often suffer from a risk compensation effect, where incorrect steps are offset by later correct ones, assigning high rewards to flawed reasoning paths. This issue is further exacerbated in knowledge graph (KG) reasoning, as there may exist multiple paths between the start and end entities in the KGs, and a risky step can make the reasoning path flawed. Those limitations are problematic in risk-sensitive tasks such as medical and legal KG reasoning. To address the issues, we propose a Schema-aware Cumulative Process Reward Model (SCPRM) that evaluates reasoning paths by conditioning on the reasoning prefix , and incorporating schema distance between current reasoning step and the implicit target parsed from the query, which provides cumulative and future rewards to guide the path explorations. We further integrate SCPRM into Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) as SCPRM-MCTS to conduct multi-hop reasoning on KGs for question answering (QA) tasks. Across medical and legal KGQA and CWQ, SCPRM-MCTS improves the performance of Hits@k by an average of 1.18% over strong baselines, demonstrating more accurate and risk-sensitive reasoning evaluation.



11. ❌ IConFace: Identity-Structure Asymmetric Conditioning for Unified Reference-Aware Face Restoration

作者: Axi Niu, Jinyang Zhang, Senyan Qing 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02814v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Blind face restoration is highly ill-posed under severe degradation, where identity-critical details may be missing from the degraded input. Same-identity references reduce this ambiguity, but mismatched pose, expression, illumination, age, makeup, or local facial states can lead to overuse of reference appearance. We propose \textbf{IConFace}, a unified reference-aware and no-reference framework with identity–structure asymmetric conditioning. References are distilled into a norm-weighted global AdaFace identity anchor for image-only modulation, while the degraded image is reinforced as the spatial structure anchor through low-rank residuals and block-wise degraded cross-attention with two-route memory. The resulting single checkpoint exploits references when available and falls back to no-reference restoration when absent, improving identity consistency, fine-detail recovery, and degraded-only restoration quality in a unified model.



12. ❌ AIs and Humans with Agency

作者: David Mumford 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02810v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

This paper compares agency in humans with potential agency in AI programs. Human agency takes many years to develop, as the frontal lobe is activated. Early attempts to endow LLMs agency have met serious obstacles. Progress requires a new architecture where actions and plans are formulated jointly with the human actors in each real world setting.



13. ❌ Static Analysis of Recursive SHACL

作者: Anouk Oudshoorn, Magdalena Ortiz, Mantas Simkus 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02787v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

SHACL (Shapes Constraint Language) expresses constraints on RDF data by means of so-called shapes. Its central service is validation: verifying whether a data graph complies with a SHACL document. But so far, there are no static analysis services to compare documents. In this paper, we study the following problem: decide whether all graphs that validate one SHACL document also validate another. Unlike previous works that have considered the implication of shape expressions only, we consider documents comprising (recursive) shape definitions and targets. We show that implication (a.k.a. containment) is undecidable under the supported and the stable model semantics, even for the fragment that uses the description logic ALCIO for shape expressions. Under the well-founded semantics, in surprising contrast, it is decidable in single exponential time. Our key technical contribution is a translation of SHACL under the well-founded semantics into the full hybrid mu-calculus, revealing a novel link between well-founded models and a fixed point modal logic, and a worst-case optimal automata-based decision procedure.



14. ❌ When Audio-Language Models Fail to Leverage Multimodal Context for Dysarthric Speech Recognition

作者: Pehuén Moure, Niclas Pokel, Bilal Bounajma, Yingqiang Gao, Roman Boehringer, Longbiao Cheng, Shih-Chii Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02782v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems remain brittle on dysarthric and other atypical speech. Recent audio-language models raise the possibility of improving performance by conditioning on additional clinical context at inference time, but it is unclear whether these models can make use of such information. We introduce a benchmark built on the Speech Accessibility Project (SAP) dataset that tests whether diagnosis labels, clinician-derived speech ratings, and progressively richer clinical descriptions improve transcription accuracy for dysarthric speech. Across matched comparisons on nine models, we find that current models do not meaningfully use this context: diagnosis-informed and clinically detailed prompts yield negligible improvements and often degrade word error rate. We complement the prompting analysis with context-dependent fine-tuning, showing that LoRA adaptation with a mixture of clinical prompt formats achieves a WER of 0.066, a 52% relative reduction over the frozen baseline, while preserving performance when context is unavailable. Subgroup analyses reveal significant gains for Down syndrome and mild-severity speakers. These results clarify where current models fall short and provide a testbed for measuring progress toward more inclusive ASR.



15. ❌ Fine-Grained Graph Generation through Latent Mixture Scheduling

作者: Nidhi Vakil, Hadi Amiri 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02780v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Structure aware graph generation aims to generate graphs that satisfy given topological properties. It has applications in domains such as drug discovery, social network modeling, and knowledge graph construction. Unlike existing methods that only provide coarse control over graph properties, we introduce a novel conditional variational autoencoder for fine-grained structural control in graph generation. The approach refines the decoder’s latent space by dynamically aligning graph- and property-driven representations to improve both graph fidelity and control satisfaction. Specifically, the approach implements a mixture scheduler that progressively integrates graph and control priors. Experiments on five real-world datasets show the efficacy of the proposed model compared to recent baselines, achieving high generation quality while maintaining high controllability.



16. ❌ A decoupled diffusion planner that adapts to changing cost limits by using cost-conditioned generation for safety and reward gradients for performance

作者: Rufeng Chen, Zhaofan Zhang, Zhejiang Yang, Hechang Chen, Sihong Xie 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02777v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Offline safe reinforcement learning often requires policies to adapt at deployment time to safety budgets that vary across episodes or change within a single episode. While diffusion-based planners enable flexible trajectory generation, existing guidance schemes often treat reward improvement and constraint satisfaction as competing gradient objectives, which can lead to unreliable safety compliance under cost limits. We reinterpret adaptive safe trajectory generation as sampling from a constrained trajectory distribution, where the budget restricts the trajectory region, and reward shapes preferences within that region. This perspective motivates Safe Decoupled Guidance Diffusion (SDGD), which conditions classifier-free guidance on the cost limit to bias sampling toward trajectories satisfying the specified limit, while using reward-gradient guidance to refine trajectories for higher return. Because direct reward guidance can increase return while also steering samples toward trajectories with higher cumulative cost, we introduce Feasible Trajectory Relabeling (FTR) to reshape reward targets and discourage such directions. We further provide a first-order sampling-time analysis showing that FTR suppresses reward-induced cost drift under a prefix-restorative alignment condition. Extensive evaluations on the DSRL benchmark show that SDGD achieves the strongest safety compliance among baselines, satisfying the constraint on 94.7% of tasks (36/38), while obtaining the highest reward among safe methods on 21 tasks.



17. ❌ TOC-SR: Task-Optimal Compact diffusion for Image Super Resolution

作者: Sowmya Vajrala, Akshay Bankar, Manjunath Arveti, Shreyas Pandith, Sravanth Kodavanti, Subhajit Sanyal, Amit Unde, Srinivas Soumitri Miriyala 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02767v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Diffusion models have recently demonstrated strong performance for image restoration tasks, including super-resolution. However, their large model size and iterative sampling procedures make them computationally expensive for practical deployment. In this work, we present TOC-SR, a framework for building efficient one-step super-resolution models by first discovering a compact diffusion backbone. Starting from a sixteen-channel latent diffusion model, we construct parameter-efficient surrogate blocks using feature-wise generative distillation and perform architecture discovery using epsilon-constrained Bayesian Optimization to minimize model complexity while preserving generative fidelity. The resulting compact diffusion backbone achieves a 6.6x reduction in parameters and a 2.8x reduction in GMACs compared to the expanded diffusion model. We then adapt this backbone for super-resolution and distill the diffusion process into a single-step generator. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed approach enables efficient super-resolution while maintaining strong reconstruction quality.



18. ❌ U-Define: Designing User Workflows for Hard and Soft Constraints in LLM-Based Planning

作者: Christine P Lee, Xinyu Jessica Wang, Aws Albarghouthi, David Porfirio, Bilge Mutlu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02765v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

LLMs are increasingly used for end-user task planning, yet their black-box nature limits users’ ability to ensure reliability and control. While recent systems incorporate verification techniques, it remains unclear how users can effectively apply such rigid constraints to represent intent or adapt to real-world variability. For example, prior work finds that hard-only constraints are too rigid, and numeric flexibility weights confuse users. We investigate how interaction workflows can better support users in applying constraints to guide LLM-generated plans, examining whether abstracting strictness into high-level types (i.e., hard and soft) paired with distinct verification mechanisms helps users more reliably express and align intent. We present U-Define, a system that lets users define constraints in natural language and categorize them as either hard rules that must not be violated or soft preferences that allow flexibility. U-Define verifies these types through complementary methods: formal model checking for hard constraints and LLM-as-judge evaluation for soft ones. Through a technical evaluation and user studies with general and expert participants, we find that user-defined constraint types improve perceived usefulness, performance, and satisfaction while maintaining usability. These findings provide insights for designing flexible yet reliable constraint-based workflows.



19. ❌ Mitigating Misalignment Contagion by Steering with Implicit Traits

作者: Maria Chang, Ronny Luss, Miao Lui, Keerthiram Murugesan, Karthikeyan Ramamurthy, Djallel Bouneffouf 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02751v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Language models (LMs) are increasingly used in high-stakes, multi-agent settings, where following instructions and maintaining value alignment are critical. Most alignment research focuses on interactions between a single LM and a single user, failing to address the risk of misaligned behavior spreading between multiple LMs in multi-turn interactions. We find evidence of this phenomenon, which we call misalignment contagion, across multiple LMs as they engage multi-turn conversational social dilemma games. Specifically, we find that LMs become more anti-social after gameplay and that this effect is intensified when other players are steered to act maliciously. We explore different steering techniques to mitigate such misalignment contagion and find that reinforcing an LM’s system prompt is insufficient and often harmful. Instead, we propose steering with implicit traits: a technique that intermittently injects system prompts with statements that reinforce an LMs initial traits and is more effective than system prompt repetition at keeping models in line with their initial pro-social behaviors. Importantly, this method does not require access to model parameters or internal model states, making it suitable for increasingly common use cases where complex multi-agent workflows are being designed with black box models.



20. ❌ Bolek: A Multimodal Language Model for Molecular Reasoning

作者: Frederic Grabowski, Jacek Szczerbiński, Maciej Jaśkowski, Kalina Jasińska-Kobus, Paweł Dąbrowski-Tumański, Tomasz Jetka, Bartosz Topolski 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02745v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Molecular property models increasingly support high-stakes drug-discovery decisions, but their outputs are often difficult to audit: classical predictors return scores without rationale, while language models can produce fluent explanations weakly grounded in the input molecule. We introduce Bolek, a compact multimodal language model that grounds natural-language reasoning in molecular structure by injecting a Morgan fingerprint embedding into an instruction-tuned text decoder. Bolek is fine-tuned on molecular alignment tasks, including molecule description, RDKit descriptor prediction, and substructure detection, and on downstream reasoning over 15 TDC binary classification tasks using synthetic chains-of-thought anchored in concrete molecular features. Across these tasks, Bolek outperforms its Qwen3-4B-Instruct base on all endpoints in yes/no mode and on 13 of 15 in chain-of-thought mode, raising mean ROC/PR AUC from 0.55 to 0.76. It also outperforms TxGemma-9B-Chat on 13 of 15 binary classification tasks despite being less than half its size. Bolek’s explanations are more grounded than those of the baseline LLMs: it cites numerical descriptors 10-100x more often per chain-of-thought, and the cited values agree strongly with RDKit for key descriptors such as TPSA, MolLogP, and MolWt (Spearman rho = 0.87-0.91). Generalisation extends beyond the training panel: on 15 unseen TDC classification endpoints, Bolek matches TxGemma on five, and it produces non-trivial rank correlations on three held-out regression endpoints despite never seeing downstream regression during training. These results suggest that targeted modality injection and reasoning supervision tied to verifiable molecular features can yield compact, auditable molecular reasoning models.



21. ❌ Virtual Scanning for NSCLC Histology: Investigating the Discriminatory Power of Synthetic PET

作者: Fatih Aksu, Laura Ciuffetti, Francesco Di Feola, Filippo Ruffini, Giulia Romoli, Fabrizia Gelardi, Arturo Chiti, Valerio Guarrasi, Paolo Soda 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02746v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Accurate histological differentiation between adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is critical for personalized treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While [$^{18}$F]FDG PET/CT is a standard tool for the clinical evaluation of lung cancer, its utility is often limited by high costs and radiation exposure. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of “virtual scanning” as a feature-enhancement strategy by evaluating whether synthetic PET data can provide complementary feature representations to supplement anatomical CT scans in histological subtype classification. We propose a framework that leverages a 3D Pix2Pix Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), pretrained on the FDG-PET/CT Lesions dataset, to synthesize pseudo-PET volumes from anatomical CT scans. These synthetic volumes are integrated with structural CT data within the MINT framework, a multi-stage intermediate fusion architecture. Our experiments, conducted on a multi-center dataset of 714 subjects, demonstrate that the inclusion of synthetic metabolic features significantly improves classification performance over a CT-only baseline. The multimodal approach achieved a statistically significant increase in the Area Under the Curve (AUC) from 0.489 to 0.591 and improved the Geometric Mean (GMean) from 0.305 to 0.524. These results suggest that synthetic PET scans provide discriminatory metabolic cues that enable deep learning models to exploit complementary cross-modal information, offering a potential feature-enhancement strategy for clinical scenarios where physical PET scans are unavailable.



22. ❌ Triple Spectral Fusion for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition

作者: Ye Zhang, Longguang Wang, Qing Gao, Chaocan Xiang, Mohammed Bennamoun, Yulan Guo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02743v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The field of sensor-based human activity recognition (HAR) mainly uses posture, motion and context data of Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) to identify daily activities. Despite the advancements in learning-based methods, it is challenging to perform information fusion from the temporal perspective due to the complexities in fusing heterogeneous sensor data and establishing long-term context correlations. This paper proposes a novel triple spectral fusion framework tailored for HAR. First, we develop an adaptive complementary filtering technique for noise suppression and organize each IMU’s sensors into posture and motion modality nodes. Given that IMU nodes form a dynamic heterogeneous graph, we then apply adaptive filtering within the graph Fourier domain to merge both homogeneous and heterogeneous node information. Furthermore, an adaptive wavelet frequency selection approach is implemented to suppress context redundancy and shorten the length of features. This approach enhances both timestamp-based graph aggregation and the correlation of long-term contexts. Our framework uses adaptive filtering in the Fourier, graph Fourier, and wavelet domains, enabling effective multi-sensor fusion and context correlation. Extensive experiments on ten benchmark datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our framework. Project page: https://github.com/crocodilegogogo/TSF-TPAMI2026.



23. ❌ AI-Generated Smells: An Analysis of Code and Architecture in LLM and Agent-Driven Development

作者: Yuecai Zhu, Nikolaos Tsantalis, Peter C. Rigby 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02741v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The promise of Large Language Models in automated software engineering is often measured by functional correctness, overlooking the critical issue of long term maintainability. This paper presents a systematic audit of technical debt in AI-generated software, revealing that AI does not eliminate flaws but rather introduces a distinct machine signature of defects. Our multi-scale analysis, spanning single-file algorithmic tasks and complex, agent generated systems, identifies a fundamental Reasoning-Complexity Trade-off: as models become more capable, they generate increasingly bloated and coupled code. This architectural decay is so pronounced that we establish a Volume-Quality Inverse Law, where code volume is a near perfect predictor of structural degradation. Crucially, we demonstrate that neither functional correctness nor detailed prompting mitigates this decay. These findings challenge the current paradigm of prompt-driven generation, reframing the central problem of AI-based software engineering from one of code generation to one of architectural complexity management. We conclude that future progress depends on equipping agents with explicit architectural foresight to ensure the software they build is not just functional, but also maintainable.



24. ❌ Foundation Models to Unlock Real-World Evidence from Nationwide Medical Claims

作者: Fan Ma, Yuntian Liu, Xiang Lan, Weipeng Zhou, Jun Ni, Mauro Giuffrè, Lingfei Qian, Xueqing Peng, Yujia Zhou, Ruey-Ling Weng, Huan He, Lu Li, Qingyu Chen, Andrew Loza, Laila Rasmy, Degui Zhi, Yuan Lu, Chenjie Zeng, Joshua C Denny, Lee Schwamm, Daniella Meeker, Lucila Ohno-Machado, Yong Chen, Hua Xu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02740v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Evidence derived from large-scale real-world data (RWD) is increasingly informing regulatory evaluation and healthcare decision-making. Administrative claims provide population-scale, longitudinal records of healthcare utilization, expenditure, and detailed coding of diagnoses, procedures, and medications, yet their potential as a substrate for healthcare foundation models remains largely unexplored. Here we present ReClaim, a generative transformer trained from scratch on 43.8 billion medical events from more than 200 million enrollees in the MarketScan claims data spanning 2008-2022. ReClaim models longitudinal trajectories across diagnoses, procedures, medications, and expenditure, and was scaled to 140 million, 700 million, and 1.7 billion parameters. Across over 1,000 disease-onset prediction tasks, ReClaim achieved a mean AUC of 75.6%, substantially outperforming disease-specific LightGBM (66.3%) and the transformer-based Delphi model (69.4%), with the largest gains for rare diseases. These advantages held across retrospective and prospective evaluations and in external validation on two independent datasets. Performance improved monotonically with scale, and post-training added 13.8 percentage points over pre-training alone. Beyond disease prediction, ReClaim captured financial outcomes and improved real-world evidence (RWE) analyses: for healthcare expenditure forecasting it increased explained variance from 0.28 to 0.37 relative to LightGBM, and in a target trial emulation it reduced systematic bias by 72% on average relative to Delphi. Together, these results establish administrative claims as a scalable substrate for healthcare foundation models and show that learned representations generalize across time periods and data sources, supporting disease surveillance, expenditure forecasting, and RWE generation.



25. ❌ AI and Open-data Driven Scalable Solar Power Profiling

作者: Shiliang Zhang, Sabita Maharjan, Damla Turgut 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02738v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Solar photovoltaic (PV) deployment is expanding rapidly, yet detailed, up-to-date information on the spatial distribution and capacity of rooftop PV remains limited. This paper presents an open, scalable framework for detecting solar panels from open data and generating city-level solar power profiles. We leverage foundation vision AI models to detect solar panel geometries from open-source satellite imagery. This avoids manual data labeling and case-specific model training while maintaining robustness across heterogeneous imagery. Detected solar panels are converted into georeferenced polygons, yielding spatially explicit and incrementally extensible inventories. By integrating open weather data, we translate panel footprints into regional solar power profiles. The framework reduces dependency on proprietary imagery, manual labeling, and closed-source models, and offers a transparent and scalable approach for solar planning and analysis. We released the data and an API resulted from this work. For any user-specified building location, our API retrieves aerial imagery, detects rooftop solar panels, and returns georeferenced polygons. This empowers researchers and developers to scan user-defined areas to build solar panel maps and associated solar production profiles, thus facilitating advanced analysis like distributed solar production integration, local power flow optimization, energy tariff design, and infrastructure planning.



26. ❌ Coherent Hierarchical Multi-Label Learning to Defer for Medical Imaging

作者: Joshua Strong, Pramit Saha, Emma Sun, Helen Higham, Alison Noble 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02734v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Learning to Defer (L2D) enables a model to predict autonomously or defer to an expert, but prior work largely assumes flat label spaces. We study the first L2D setting with hierarchical multi-label decisions, motivated by medical-imaging workflows in which findings are organised by clinical taxonomies. In this setting, deferral is a delegation action rather than a label assignment, so treating it as an independent per-label decision can produce deferral incoherence, including taxonomic contradictions, delegation violations, and deferrals of labels already implied by the model’s own assertions. We formalise coherent hierarchical deferral under a Selective-Exclusion handoff contract, characterise the Bayes-optimal coherent deferral rule, and show that even nodewise Bayes L2D can be action-incoherent. We then propose two remedies: exact coherent projection, a dynamic-programming decoder over the coherent action set, and Taxonomic Belief Propagation (TBP) with Recursive Policy Optimisation (RPO), a contract-aware joint action model trained through the same recursion used at inference. Across real-reader and controlled-expert medical-imaging benchmarks, naive binary-relevance L2D exhibits non-trivial incoherence. Projection removes it exactly, and fast TBP+RPO drives incoherence near zero while retaining strong utility.



27. ❌ Perceptual Flow Network for Visually Grounded Reasoning

作者: Yangfu Li, Yuning Gong, Hongjian Zhan, Teng Li, Yuanhuiyi Lyu, Tianyi Chen, Qi Liu, Ziyuan Huang, Zhihang Zhong, Dandan Zheng, Yue Lu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02730v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Despite the success of Large-Vision Language Models (LVLMs), general optimization objectives (e.g., standard MLE) fail to constrain visual trajectories, leading to language bias and hallucination. To mitigate this, current methods introduce geometric priors from visual experts as additional supervision. However, we observe that such supervision is typically suboptimal: it is biased toward geometric precision and offers limited reasoning utility. To bridge this gap, we propose Perceptual Flow Network (PFlowNet), which eschews rigid alignment with the expert priors and achieves interpretable yet more effective visual reasoning. Specifically, PFlowNet decouples perception from reasoning to establish a self-conditioned generation process. Based on this, it integrates multi-dimensional rewards with vicinal geometric shaping via variational reinforcement learning, thereby facilitating reasoning-oriented perceptual behaviors while preserving visual reliability. PFlowNet delivers a provable performance guarantee and competitive empirical results, particularly setting new SOTA records on V* Bench (90.6%) and MME-RealWorld-lite (67.0%).



28. ❌ ORPilot: A Production-Oriented Agentic LLM-for-OR Tool for Optimization Modeling

作者: Guangrui Xie 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02728v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

This paper presents ORPilot, an open-source agentic AI system that translates real-world business problems into solver-ready optimization models. Unlike academic LLM-for-OR tools that assume clean problem specifications with preformatted inline data, ORPilot is designed for production conditions: ambiguous descriptions, large-scale raw operational data, and the need for portability across solver backends. The system introduces four novel components: (1) a conversational interview agent to elicit complete problem specifications, (2) a data collection agent that retrieves data independently of prompts, (3) a parameter computation agent to bridge raw tabular data and model-ready parameters, and (4) a solver-agnostic Intermediate Representation (IR) for deterministic, zero-LLM-call recompilation to Gurobi, CPLEX, PuLP, Pyomo, or OR-Tools solvers. Additionally, self-correcting retry loops utilize solver tracebacks for targeted repairs. ORPilot represents the first attempt to target production-level business problems rather than textbook operations research (OR) cases. Evaluation on real-world problems demonstrates promising results. When tested against traditional academic benchmarks: IndustryOR, NL4OPT and NLP4LP, ORPilot outperformed state-of-the-art tools in accuracy on the IndustryOR benchmark and delivered comparable performance on NL4OPT and NLP4LP.



29. ❌ OphMAE: Bridging Volumetric and Planar Imaging with a Foundation Model for Adaptive Ophthalmological Diagnosis

作者: Tienyu Chang, Zhen Chen, Renjie Liang, Jinyu Ding, Jie Xu, Sunu Mathew, Amir Reza Hajrasouliha, Andrew J. Saykin, Ruogu Fang, Yu Huang, Jiang Bian, Qingyu Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02714v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The advent of foundation models has heralded a new era in medical artificial intelligence (AI), enabling the extraction of generalizable representations from large-scale unlabeled datasets. However, current ophthalmic AI paradigms are predominantly constrained to single-modality inference, thereby creating a dissonance with clinical practice where diagnosis relies on the synthesis of complementary imaging modalities. Furthermore, the deployment of high-performance AI in resource-limited settings is frequently impeded by the unavailability of advanced three-dimensional imaging hardware. Here, we present the Ophthalmic multimodal Masked Autoencoder (OphMAE), a multi-imaging foundation model engineered to synergize the volumetric depth of 3D Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) with the planar context of 2D en face OCT. By implementing a novel cross-modal fusion architecture and a unique adaptive inference mechanism, OphMAE was pre-trained on a massive dataset with of 183,875 paired OCT images derived from 32,765 patients. In a rigorous benchmark encompassing 17 diverse diagnostic tasks with 48,340 paired OCT images from 8,191 patients, the model demonstrated state-of-the-art performance, achieving an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 96.9% for Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) and 97.2% for Diabetic Macular Edema (DME), consistently surpassing existing single-modal and multimodal foundation models. Crucially, OphMAE exhibits robust engineering adaptability: it maintains high diagnostic accuracy, such as 93.7% AUC for AMD, even when restricted to single-modality 2D inputs, and demonstrates exceptional data efficiency by retaining 95.7% AUC with as few as 500 labeled samples. This work establishes a scalable and adaptable framework for ophthalmic AI, ensuring robust performance across different tasks.



30. ❌ mdok-style at SemEval-2026 Task 10: Finetuning LLMs for Conspiracy Detection

作者: Dominik Macko 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02712v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

SemEval-2026 Task 10 is focused on conspiracy detection. Specifically, the goal is to detect whether a Reddit comment expresses a conspiracy belief. Our submitted mdok-style system utilizes data augmentation and self-training (to cope with a rather small amount of training data) to finetune the Qwen3-32B model for a binary text-classification task. The submitted system is very competitive, ranking in the 85th percentile (8th out of 52 submissions). The results shown that our approach, which originated in machine-generated text detection, can be used for conspiracy detection as well.



31. ❌ An Empirical Study of Agent Skills for Healthcare: Practice, Gaps, and Governance

作者: Gelei Xu, Ningzhi Tang, Xueyang Li, Toby Jia-Jun Li, Zhi Zheng, Wei Jin, Yiyu Shi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02709v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Healthcare automation is shaped by local procedures and organizational constraints, so agent capabilities rarely transfer unchanged across settings. Agent skills, self-contained directories that package reusable procedures for AI agents, are emerging as a procedural layer for adapting healthcare agents across diverse healthcare settings. We present the first empirical analysis of healthcare agent skills, drawing on 557 healthcare-related skills filtered from 58,159 public skills on ClawHub and annotated along ten dimensions covering function, deployment context, autonomy, and safety. We find that public healthcare skills emphasize patient-facing workflow automation and monitoring rather than the diagnostic and treatment-oriented tasks foregrounded in healthcare-agent research; coverage of the healthcare lifecycle and specialized clinical inputs remains uneven; and general technical risk does not reliably capture clinical risk. These findings position healthcare skills as a procedural layer not yet addressed by current benchmarks and risk frameworks.



32. ❌ SAIL: Structure-Aware Interpretable Learning for Anatomy-Aligned Post-hoc Explanations in OCT

作者: Tienyu Chang, Tianhao Li, Ruogu Fang, Jiang Bian, Yu Huang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02707v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Optical coherence tomography (OCT), a commonly used retinal imaging modality, plays a central role in retinal disease diagnosis by providing high-resolution visualization of retinal layers. While deep learning (DL) has achieved expert-level accuracy in OCT-based retinal disease detection, its “black box” nature poses challenges for clinical adoption, where explainability is essential for clinical trust and regulatory approval. Existing post-hoc explainable AI (XAI) methods often struggle to delineate fine-grained lesion structures, respect anatomical boundaries, or suppress noise, limiting the trustworthiness of their explanations. To bridge these gaps, we propose a Structure-Aware Interpretable Learning (SAIL) framework that integrates retinal anatomical priors at the representation level and couples them with semantic features via a fusion design. Without modifying standard post-hoc explainability methods, this representation yields sharper and more anatomically aligned attribution maps. Comprehensive experiments on diverse OCT datasets demonstrate that our structure-aware method consistently enhances interpretability, producing clinically meaningful and anatomy-aware explanations. Ablation studies further show that strong interpretability requires both structural priors and semantic features, and that properly fusing the two is critical to achieve the best explanation quality. Together, these results highlight structure-aware representations as a key step toward reliable explainability in OCT.



33. ❌ ProPACT: A Proactive AI-Driven Adaptive Collaborative Tutor for Pair Programming

作者: Anahita Golrang, Kshitij Sharma, olga viberg 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02703v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Effective pair programming depends on coordination of attention, cognitive effort, and joint regulation over time, yet most adaptive learning systems remain individual-centric and reactive. This paper introduces ProPACT, a proactive AI-driven adaptive collaborative tutor that treats collaboration itself as the object of instruction. ProPACT constructs a multimodal dyadic learner model based on Joint Visual Attention (JVA), Joint Mental Effort (JME), and individual mental effort, and employs an XGBoost-based forecasting model to predict emerging suboptimal collaboration states up to 30 seconds in advance. These predictions drive a hierarchical adaptive policy that delivers minimally intrusive scaffolds while fading support during productive collaboration. A within-subject study with 26 pair-programming dyads shows that proactive feedback significantly improves debugging success, task efficiency, feedback uptake, and post-intervention gains in JVA and JME, demonstrating the potential of forecast-driven dyadic adaptivity for real-time collaborative learning regulation.



34. ❌ Learning Equivariant Neural-Augmented Object Dynamics From Few Interactions

作者: Sergio Orozco, Tushar Kusnur, Brandon May, George Konidaris, Laura Herlant 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02699v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Learning data-efficient object dynamics models for robotic manipulation remains challenging, especially for deformable objects. A popular approach is to model objects as sets of 3D particles and learn their motion using graph neural networks. In practice, this is not enough to maintain physical feasibility over long horizons and may require large amounts of interaction data to learn. We introduce PIEGraph, a novel approach to combining analytical physics and data-driven models to capture object dynamics for both rigid and deformable bodies using limited real-world interaction data. PIEGraph consists of two components: (1) a \textbf{P}hysically \textbf{I}nformed particle-based analytical model (implemented as a spring–mass system) to enforce physically feasible motion, and (2) an \textbf{E}quivariant \textbf{Graph} Neural Network with a novel action representation that exploits symmetries in particle interactions to guide the analytical model. We evaluate PIEGraph in simulation and on robot hardware for reorientation and repositioning tasks with ropes, cloth, stuffed animals and rigid objects. We show that our method enables accurate dynamics prediction and reliable downstream robotic manipulation planning, which outperforms state of the art baselines.



35. ❌ mdok-style at SemEval-2026 Task 9: Finetuning LLMs for Multilingual Polarization Detection

作者: Dominik Macko, Alok Debnath, Jakub Simko 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02695v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

SemEval-2026 Task 9 is focused on multilingual polarization detection. Specifically, it covers the identification of multilingual, multicultural and multievent polarization along three axes (in subtasks), namely detection, type, and manifestation. Online polarization presents a concern, because it is often followed by hate speech, offensive discourse, and social fragmentation. Therefore, its detection before it escalates is crucial for a safer and more inclusive online space. We have coped with this SemEval task by finetuning mid-size LLMs for the sequence-classification task using the QLoRA parameter-efficient finetuning technique. The training data augmented the multilingual (22 languages) training sets by anonymized, lower-cased, upper-cased, and homoglyphied counterparts, making the detection more robust.



36. ❌ Caliper-in-the-Loop: Black-Box Optimization for Hyperledger Fabric Performance Tuning

作者: Yash Madhwal, Arseny Bolotnikov, Mark Prikhno, Irina Lebedeva, Ivan Laishevskiy, Vladimir Gorgadze, Artem Barger, Yury Yanovich 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02690v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Hyperledger Fabric performance depends on many interacting configuration parameters, making manual tuning difficult. We study automated throughput tuning by treating benchmarking as a noisy black-box optimization problem and applying Bayesian optimization (BO) with dimensionality reduction (DR). We implement an end-to-end Caliper-in-the-loop pipeline that deploys candidate configurations, benchmarks them, and updates the optimizer from observed throughput. The search space, derived from Fabric configuration files, has 317 dimensions. In a cloud testbed, we evaluate 16 BO+DR variants and a random-search baseline. The best method, DYCORS-PCA, achieves a 12% TPS improvement relative to the first evaluated configuration, while MPI-REMBO achieves 9%. These results suggest that BO with DR is a practical approach for high-dimensional Hyperledger Fabric tuning, while also highlighting the role of measurement noise in interpreting gains.



37. ❌ Hybrid Inspection and Task-Based Access Control in Zero-Trust Agentic AI

作者: Majed El Helou, Benjamin Ryder, Chiara Troiani, Jean Diaconu, Hervé Muyal, Marcelo Yannuzzi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02682v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Authorizing Large Language Model (LLM)-driven agents to dynamically invoke tools and access protected resources introduces significant security risks, and the risks grow dramatically as agents engage in multi-turn conversations and scale toward distributed collaboration. A compromised or malicious agentic application can tamper with tool calls, falsify results, or request permissions beyond the scope of the subject’s intended tasks, which could go unnoticed with current delegated authorization flows given their lack of visibility into the original subject’s intent. In light of this, we make the following contributions towards Continuous Agent Semantic Authorization (CASA). First, we propose a hybrid runtime enforcement model that combines deterministic and semantic controls enabled by a zero-trust interception layer. Five deterministic controls enforce structural and data-integrity guarantees over the message flow, while a semantic inspection layer evaluates whether tool call choices align with the intended tasks commissioned to the agent. Second, differently from prior Task-Based Access Control (TBAC) techniques that operate on single-turn interactions, we decompose the semantic layer into two stages: i) a task-extraction step that distills the subject’s objectives from multi-turn conversations at the interception layer, and ii) a task-tool semantic matching step at the authorization server that evaluates whether the requested tools are appropriate for the extracted tasks. Third, we extend the ASTRA dataset that we introduced in a prior work, by generating novel conversation-tool datasets with multi-turn interactions containing relevant and irrelevant tool calls for a given task. Lastly, we provide the first experimental results for TBAC under multi-turn conversations.



38. ❌ The Design and Composition of Structural Causal Decision Processes

作者: Sebastian Benthall, Alan Lujan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02681v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present two new classes of causal models of decision-making agents. Our approach is motivated by the needs of modeling the economics of computing systems. These systems are composed of subsystems and can exhibit endogenous limits on cognitive resources and value discounting. Structural Causal Decision Models (SCDMs) expand on Structural Causal Influence Models. Like SCIMs, they explicitly represent the causal relationships between model variables and the payoffs of agent decisions. Additionally, agent decisions can be constrained by their causal antecedents, and SCDMs can have open root variables for which no probability distribution or structural equation is given. We show that SCDMs have a well-defined and computationally useful property of composability. Building on SCDMs, we then define a Structural Causal Decision Process (SCDP) as a recurring SCDM with a discount variable. SCDPs benefit from the useful composition properties of SCDMs. Moreover, SCDPs are strictly more expressive than POMDPs because they do not assume rational belief formation. Indeed, an SCDP can endogenously model the memory-formation process, and is thus useful for modeling resource rational agents in dynamic settings. SCDPs are also capable of modeling variable discounting, a tool used widely in social scientific modeling. We pose that SCDPs are a useful framework for policy simulation for the digital economy, mechanism design for information systems, and digital twin modeling of cyberinfrastructure.



39. ❌ The 2026 ACII Dyadic Conversations (DaiKon) Workshop & Challenge

作者: Panagiotis Tzirakis, Alice Baird, Jeffrey Brooks, Emilia Parada-Cabaleiro, Lukas Stappen, Sharath Rao, Theo Lebryk, Jakub Piotr Clapa, Jens Madsen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02672v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The 2026 ACII Dyadic Conversations (ACII-DaiKon) Workshop & Challenge introduces a benchmark for modeling interpersonal affect and social dynamics in dyadic conversations. Although conversational affect modeling has advanced rapidly, most benchmarks remain speaker-centric and underrepresent coupled, time-evolving processes between partners, including directional influence, conversational timing coordination, and rapport development. To address this gap, ACII-DaiKon presents three coordinated sub-challenges built on a shared dataset: (1) directional interpersonal influence prediction, (2) turn-taking prediction (next-speaker and time-to-next-speech), and (3) rapport trajectory prediction across full interactions. The challenge is built on the Hume-DaiKon dataset, comprising 945 dyadic conversations (743.4 hours of audiovisual data) collected under naturalistic conditions across five languages. The benchmark supports multimodal modeling, temporal reasoning, and cross-context generalization through fixed train/validation/test splits, standardized metrics, and released baseline systems. Evaluation uses Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC), Pearson correlation, Macro-F1, and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) depending on the sub-challenge. Baseline experiments establish initial reference performance, with best test results of 0.40 CCC and 0.50 Pearson for influence prediction, 0.66 Macro-F1 and 1.50~s MAE for turn-taking, and 0.68 CCC and 0.70 Pearson for rapport trajectory modeling. These results indicate that while current methods capture coarse dyadic patterns, robust modeling of directional dependence and long-horizon interpersonal dynamics remains challenging. The workshop provides a shared platform for rigorous comparison and cross-disciplinary discussion on data validity, evaluation protocols, and culturally aware modeling for dyadic interaction.



40. ❌ An explainable hypothesis-driven approach to Drug-Induced Liver Injury with HADES

作者: Maciej Wisniewski, Bartosz Topolski, Pawel Dabrowski-Tumanski, Dariusz Plewczynski, Tomasz Jetka 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02669v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a leading cause of late-stage clinical trial attrition. However, existing computational predictors primarily rely on binary classification, a framing that limits generalization and yields no mechanistic insight to guide translational decisions. We argue that DILI prediction is better posed as an explainable hypothesis-generation problem. To support this shift, we introduce the DILER Benchmark, a dataset that extends beyond binary labels by augmenting a curated set of molecules with mechanistic hepatotoxicity hypotheses derived from biomedical literature. We further present HADES, an agentic system designed to generate transparent and auditable reasoning traces. By combining molecular-level predictions, metabolite decomposition, structural understanding, and toxicity pathway evidence, HADES mechanistically assesses DILI risk. Evaluated on the DILER Benchmark, HADES outperforms existing models in binary classification, achieving a ROC-AUC of 0.68 on the Test Set and 0.59 on the challenging Post-2021 Set, compared with 0.63 and 0.50 for DILI-Predictor, respectively. More importantly, we establish a baseline for mechanistic hypothesis generation, where HADES achieves a Hypothesis Alignment Fuzzy Jaccard Index of 0.16. This result underscores the inherent complexity of the task while highlighting the need for advanced explainable approaches in predictive toxicology.



41. ❌ Fuzzy Fingerprinting Encoder Pre-trained Language Models for Emotion Recognition in Conversations: Human Assessment and Validity Study

作者: Patrícia Pereira, Helena Moniz, Joao Paulo Carvalho 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02665v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In Emotion Recognition in Conversations (ERC), model decisions should align with nuanced human perception and ideally provide insights on the classification process. Standard encoder pre-trained language models (PLMs) are the state-of-the-art at these tasks but offer little insight into why a certain prediction is made. This is especially problematic in imbalanced datasets, where most utterances are labeled as neutral, making these models frequently misclassify minority emotions as the majority neutral class. To tackle this issue, we introduced a novel, interpretable approach to ERC by combining PLMs with Fuzzy Fingerprints (FFPs). FFP provide class-specific prototypes that reflect the characteristic class activation patterns in the PLM’s latent space. They are derived by ranking and fuzzifying the activations of the pooled conversational context-dependent embeddings across training instances for each emotion. At inference time, each input utterance is similarly fuzzy fingerprinted and matched to the emotion prototypes using a fuzzy similarity function based on the aggregation of the intersection of the fuzzy sets that define each FFP. Experimental results show that FFP integration reduces overclassification into the neutral class and human evaluation further supports the adequacy of FFP predictions. Our proposed method thus bridges the gap between deep neural inference and human perception, performing at state-of-the-art level while simultaneously offering valuable insights into the classification procedure.



42. ❌ AcademiClaw: When Students Set Challenges for AI Agents

作者: Junjie Yu, Pengrui Lu, Weiye Si, Hongliang Lu, Jiabao Wu, Kaiwen Tao, Kun Wang, Lingyu Yang, Qiran Zhang, Xiuting Guo, Xuanyu Wang, Yang Wang, Yanjie Wang, Yi Yang, Zijian Hu, Ziyi Yang, Zonghan Zhou, Binghao Qiang, Borui Zhang, Chenning Li, Enchang Zhang, Feifan Chen, Feng Jian, Fengyin Sun, Hao Qiu, Hao Zheng, Haoran Zhu, Hongyu Liu, Jianbin Deng, Jiaxin Song, Jiaying Chi, Jiayou Shi, Jie Fang, Jinghui Zhong, Jingyu Zhou, Jinze Li, Junfeng Yi, Junyan Yu, Junzhi Xue, Ni Song, Pengyi Chen, Qi Chen, Quansheng Li, Rui Tao, Shenghai Gong, Shenhang Lu, Tianqi Shen, Tianxiang Zhu, Tiehan Kang, Tingyu Li, Wendi Wu, Xiao Shen, Xiao Zhou, Xiaotao Zhang, Xinrong Li, Xuankun Yang, Xun Zhang, Yan Li, Ye Lu, Yi Wang, Yibo Zhou, Yichi Zhang, Yihao Sun, Yijun Huang, Yixin Zhu, Yixuan Wu, Yuchen Sun, Yue Wu, Yuheng Sun, Yukun Li, Yutian Tu, Yuxuan Qin, Yuzhuo Wu, Zeyu Li, Zhengyu Lou, Zhenning Ran, Zizhu He, Pengfei Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02661v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Benchmarks within the OpenClaw ecosystem have thus far evaluated exclusively assistant-level tasks, leaving the academic-level capabilities of OpenClaw largely unexamined. We introduce AcademiClaw, a bilingual benchmark of 80 complex, long-horizon tasks sourced directly from university students’ real academic workflows – homework, research projects, competitions, and personal projects – that they found current AI agents unable to solve effectively. Curated from 230 student-submitted candidates through rigorous expert review, the final task set spans 25+ professional domains, ranging from olympiad-level mathematics and linguistics problems to GPU-intensive reinforcement learning and full-stack system debugging, with 16 tasks requiring CUDA GPU execution. Each task executes in an isolated Docker sandbox and is scored on task completion by multi-dimensional rubrics combining six complementary techniques, with an independent five-category safety audit providing additional behavioral analysis. Experiments on six frontier models show that even the best achieves only a 55% pass rate. Further analysis uncovers sharp capability boundaries across task domains, divergent behavioral strategies among models, and a disconnect between token consumption and output quality, providing fine-grained diagnostic signals beyond what aggregate metrics reveal. We hope that AcademiClaw and its open-sourced data and code can serve as a useful resource for the OpenClaw community, driving progress toward agents that are more capable and versatile across the full breadth of real-world academic demands. All data and code are available at https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/AcademiClaw.



43. ❌ Deciphering Shortcut Learning from an Evolutionary Game Theory Perspective

作者: Xiayang Li, Kuo Gai, Shihua Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02658v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Shortcut learning causes deep learning models to rely on non-essential features within the data. However, its formation in deep neural network training still lacks theoretical understanding. In this paper, we provide a formal definition of core and shortcut features and employ evolutionary game theory to analyze the origins of shortcut bias by modeling data samples as players and their corresponding neural tangent features as strategies, assuming the existence of core and shortcut subnetworks. We find that gradient descent (GD) and stochastic gradient descent (SGD) lead to two distinct stochastically stable states, each corresponding to a different strategy. The former primarily optimizes the shortcut subnetwork, while the latter primarily optimizes the core subnetwork. We investigate the influence of these strategies on shortcut bias through a continuous stochastic differential equation, and reveal the impact of data noise and optimization noise on the formation of shortcut bias. In brief, our work employs evolutionary game theory to characterize the dynamics of shortcut bias formation and provides a theoretical view on its mitigation.



44. ❌ Trustworthy AI Suffers from Invariance Conflicts and Causality is The Solution

作者: Ruta Binkyte, Ivaxi Sheth, Zhijing Jin, Mohammad Havaei, Bernhard Schölkopf, Mario Fritz 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02640v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

As artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) models and foundation models (FMs), is increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, ensuring their trustworthiness has become a central challenge. However, the core trustworthy AI objectives, such as fairness, robustness, privacy, and explainability, are hard to achieve simultaneously, especially while preserving utility. This position paper argues that causality is necessary to understand and balance trade-offs in performance and multiple objectives of trustworthy AI. We ground our arguments in re-interpreting trustworthy AI trade-offs as incompatible invariance requirements under different changes to the data-generating process. We then illustrate that causality provides a unifying framework for understanding how trade-offs in trustworthy AI arise, and how they can be softened or resolved through selective invariance. This perspective applies to both classical ML models and large-scale FMs. Our paper discusses how causal assumptions may be applied explicitly or implicitly in modern large-scale systems. Finally, we outline open challenges and opportunities for using causality to build more trustworthy AI.



45. ❌ ViewSAM: Learning View-aware Cross-modal Semantics for Weakly Supervised Cross-view Referring Multi-Object Tracking

作者: Jiawei Ge, Xintian Zhang, Jiuxin Cao, Bo Liu, Fabian Deuser, Chang Liu, Gong Wenkang, Siyou Li, Juexi Shao, Wenqing Wu, Chen Feng, Ioannis Patras 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02638v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Cross-view Referring Multi-Object Tracking (CRMOT) aims to track multiple objects specified by natural language across multiple camera views, with globally consistent identities. Despite recent progress, existing methods rely heavily on costly frame-level spatial annotations and cross-view identity supervision. To reduce such reliance, we explore CRMOT under weak supervision by leveraging the capabilities of foundation models. However, our empirical study shows that directly applying foundation models such as SAM2 and SAM3, even with task-specific modifications, fails to accurately understand referring expressions and maintain consistent identities across views. Yet, they remain effective at producing reliable object tracklets that can serve as pseudo supervision. We therefore repurpose foundation models as pseudo-label generators and propose a two-stage framework for weakly supervised CRMOT, using only object category labels as coarse-grained supervision. In the first stage, we design an Affinity-guided Cross-view Re-prompting strategy to refine and associate SAM3-generated tracklets across cameras, producing reliable cross-view pseudo labels for subsequent training. In the second stage, we introduce ViewSAM, a CRMOT model built upon SAM2 that explicitly models view-aware cross-modal semantics. By formulating view-induced variations as learnable conditions, ViewSAM bridges the gap between view-variant visual observations and view-invariant textual expressions, enabling robust cross-view referring tracking with only approximately 10% additional parameters. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ViewSAM achieves SOTA performance under weak supervision and remains competitive with fully supervised methods.



46. ❌ SCGNN: Semantic Consistency enhanced Graph Neural Network Guided by Granular-ball Computing

作者: Genhao Tian, Taihua Xu, Shuyin Xia, Qinghua Zhang, Jie Yang, Jianjun Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02617v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Capturing semantic consistency among nodes is crucial for effective graph representation learning. Existing approaches typically rely on $k$-nearest neighbors ($k$NN) or other node-level full search algorithms (FSA) to mine semantic relationships via exhaustive pairwise similarity computation, which suffer from high computational complexity and rigid neighbor selection, limiting scalability and introducing noisy connections. In this paper, we propose the Semantic Consistency enhanced Graph Neural Network (SCGNN), a novel plug-and-play framework that leverages granular-ball computing (GBC) to efficiently capture semantic consistency in a scalable manner. Unlike node-level FSA methods, SCGNN models group-level semantic structure by adaptively partitioning nodes into granular balls, significantly reducing computational cost while improving robustness to noise. To effectively utilize the discovered group-level semantic consistency, we design a dual enhancement strategy. Specifically, (1) a structure enhancement module constructs an anchor-based graph structure, where each anchor is a virtual node representing the group-level semantic carried by a granular ball, then injecting group-level semantic information into the graph structure; and (2) a supervision enhancement module performs label consistency checking (LCC) by combining GBC predictions with model-generated pseudo-labels, thereby producing more reliable supervision signals. SCGNN is compatible with various GNN backbones. During the forward propagation of SCGNN, the vanilla graph and the augment graph are jointly encoded, and their predictions are fused; during the backpropagation, the supervision enhancement module provides enhanced supervision signals to guide parameter updates.



47. ❌ Validation of an AI-based end-to-end model for prostate pathology using long-term archived routine samples

作者: Xiaoyi Ji, Renata Zelic, Oskar Aspegren, Nita Mulliqi, Michelangelo Fiorentino, Francesca Giunchi, Luca Molinaro, Sol Erika Boman, Lorenzo Richiardi, Andreas Pettersson, Per Henrik Vincent, Martin Eklund, Olof Akre, Kimmo Kartasalo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02614v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a clinical tool for prostate pathology, but generalization across variations in sample preparation and preservation over prolonged time periods remains poorly understood. We evaluated GleasonAI, an end-to-end attention-based multiple instance learning model, on an independent validation cohort comprising 10,366 biopsy cores from 1,028 patients across 14 Swedish regions, using archival diagnostic specimens from the ProMort cohorts collected between 1998-2015. The model achieved an overall quadratic-weighted kappa of 0.86 for core-level ISUP grading, comparable to several experienced pathologists and consistent across geographic regions. Notably, performance remained stable across the 17-year collection period, demonstrating robustness to time-related variation in archival material, a property not consistently observed with foundation model-based approaches, with exploratory analysis demonstrating a significant prognostic gradient across AI-assigned grade groups for prostate cancer-specific mortality. These findings support the generalizability of the AI grading model and demonstrate the potential of pathology archives as a large-scale resource for AI development, validation, and retrospective prognostic research.



48. ❌ Dependency Parsing Across the Resource Spectrum: Evaluating Architectures on High and Low-Resource Languages

作者: Kevin Guan, Happy Buzaaba, Christiane Fellbaum 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02608v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Transformer-based models achieve state-of-the-art dependency parsing for high-resource languages, yet their advantage over simpler architectures in low-resource settings remains poorly understood. We evaluate four parsers – the Biaffine LSTM, Stack-Pointer Network, AfroXLMR-large, and RemBERT – across ten typologically diverse languages, with a focus on low-resource African languages. We find that the Biaffine LSTM consistently outperforms transformer models in low-resource regimes, with transformers recovering their advantage as training data increases. The crossover falls within a resource range typical of treebanks for under-resourced languages. Morphological complexity (measured via MATTR) emerges as a significant secondary predictor of transformers’ relative disadvantage after controlling for corpus size. These results indicate that the Biaffine LSTM may be better suited for syntactic tool development in low-resource regimes until sufficient annotated data is available to leverage the representational capacity of pre-trained transformers.



49. ❌ Counterfactual Reasoning in Automated Planning

作者: Alberto Pozanco, Daniel Borrajo, Manuela Veloso 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02603v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Automated planning traditionally assumes that all aspects of a planning task (initial state, goals, and available actions) are fully specified in advance, an approach well-suited to domains with fixed rules and deterministic execution. However, real-world planning often requires flexibility, allowing for deviations from the original task parameters in response to unforeseen circumstances or to improve outcomes. This paper surveys existing works on counterfactual reasoning in automated planning, categorizing them by what elements are changed, when the reasoning is triggered, and why and how these changes are made. We conclude by discussing key findings and outlining open research questions to guide future work in this area.



50. ❌ CoRAL: Contact-Rich Adaptive LLM-based Control for Robotic Manipulation

作者: Berk Çiçek, Mert K. Er, Özgür S. Öğüz 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02600v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

While Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities in high-level reasoning and semantic understanding, applying them directly to contact-rich manipulation remains a challenge due to their lack of explicit physical grounding and inability to perform adaptive control. To bridge this gap, we propose CoRAL (Contact-Rich Adaptive LLM-based control), a modular framework that enables zero-shot planning by decoupling high-level reasoning from low-level control. Unlike black-box policies, CoRAL uses LLMs not as direct controllers, but as cost designers that synthesize context-aware objective functions for a sampling-based motion planner (MPPI). To address the ambiguity of physical parameters in visual data, we introduce a neuro-symbolic adaptation loop: a VLM provides semantic priors for environmental dynamics, such as mass and friction estimates, which are then explicitly refined in real time via online system identification, while the LLM iteratively modulates the cost-function structure to correct strategic errors based on interaction feedback. Furthermore, a retrieval-based memory unit allows the system to reuse successful strategies across recurrent tasks. This hierarchical architecture ensures real-time control stability by decoupling high-level semantic reasoning from reactive execution, effectively bridging the gap between slow LLM inference and dynamic contact requirements. We validate CoRAL on both simulation and real-world hardware across challenging and novel tasks, such as flipping objects against walls by leveraging extrinsic contacts. Experiments demonstrate that CoRAL outperforms state-of-the-art VLA and foundation-model-based planner baselines by boosting success rates over 50% on average in unseen contact-rich scenarios, effectively handling sim-to-real gaps through its adaptive physical understanding.



51. ❌ Foundation-Model-Based Agents in Industrial Automation: Purposes, Capabilities, and Open Challenges

作者: Vincent Henkel, Felix Gehlhoff, David Kube, Asaad Almutareb, Luis Cruz, Bernd Hellingrath, Philip Koch, Christoph Legat, Florian Mohr, Michael Oberle, Felix Ocker, Thorsten Schoeler, Mario Thron, Nico Andre Töpfer, Lucas Vogt, Yuchen Xia 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02592v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Foundation models, particularly large language models, are increasingly integrated into agent architectures for industrial tasks such as decision support, process monitoring, and engineering automation. Yet evidence on their purposes, capabilities, and limitations remains fragmented across domains. This work examines how mature foundation-model-based agent systems are in industrial contexts, how their functional profile differs from conventional agent systems, and which limitations persist. A systematic literature survey following the PRISMA 2020 guideline is presented, screening 2,341 publications and synthesising a corpus of 88 publications through a structured coding scheme. The results show that reported systems are predominantly at prototype and early validation stages (75.0% at TRL 4-6), with deployment-oriented evidence remaining rare (9.1%). Operational goals are most frequently positioned in user assistance, monitoring, and process optimisation, while conventional production-control purposes such as planning and scheduling are less prominent. Compared with an established baseline for industrial agent systems, the capability profile reveals substantial gains in human interaction (+37%) and dealing with uncertainty (+35%), but a pronounced deficit in negotiation (-39%). The most widely reported limitations concern lack of generalization, hallucination and output instability, data scarcity, and inference latency. A working definition of foundation-model-based industrial agents is also proposed, bridging conventional agent theory, automation-engineering standards, and the foundation-model paradigm.



52. ❌ Universal Smoothness via Bernstein Polynomials: A Constructive Approximation Approach for Activation Functions

作者: Wentao Zhang, Yutong Zhang, Yifan Zhu, Wentao Mo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02591v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The efficacy of deep neural networks is heavily reliant on the design of non-linear activation functions, yet existing approaches often struggle to balance optimization stability with computational efficiency. While piecewise linear functions offer inference speed, they suffer from optimization instability due to non-differentiability at the origin, whereas smooth counterparts typically incur significant computational overhead through their reliance on transcendental operations. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a general smoothing framework based on constructive approximation theory and introduces the Bernstein Linear Unit (BerLU). This novel activation function utilizes Bernstein polynomials to construct a differentiable quadratic transition region that effectively eliminates singularities while maintaining a piecewise linear structure. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that the proposed method guarantees strictly continuous differentiability and a non-expansive Lipschitz constant of one, which ensures stable gradient propagation and prevents the gradient explosion problems common in deep architectures. Comprehensive empirical evaluations across representative Vision Transformer and Convolutional Neural Network architectures confirm that this approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on standard image classification benchmarks while delivering superior computational and memory efficiency.



53. ❌ Beyond State Machines: Executing Network Procedures with Agentic Tool-Calling Sequences

作者: Purna Sai Garigipati, Onur Ayan, Kishor Chandra Joshi, Xueli An 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02584v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Agentic AI will be an essential enabling technology for designing future mobile communication systems, which could provide flexible and customized services, automate complex network operations, and drive autonomous decision-making across the network. This work studies how Large Language Model (LLM)-based network AI agents can be utilized to execute network procedures expressed as sequences of tool invocations. We investigate four approaches, which differ in how the agent obtains the procedure and in how execution is distributed between the agent and the underlying tools. We evaluated the latency and execution correctness across these approaches using a User Equipment (UE) IP allocation procedure as a case study. Furthermore, we conduct a stress test to examine how many sequential procedural steps an LLM agent can reliably execute before failure. Our results show that approaches relying on iterative agent-side reasoning incur higher latency and are more prone to execution errors, while approaches where the procedure is encapsulated within a single tool, which internally orchestrates the required steps by invoking other tools, reduce latency by limiting repeated reasoning. The stress-test results further show that the model with advanced tool-calling capability maintains reliable execution over longer procedures than the other evaluated models; however, all models exhibit reliability degradation as procedure length increases, revealing clear execution limits in multi-step tool-based workflows. To systematically analyze failures in procedure execution, we introduce a procedure-specific error taxonomy that categorizes deviations in multi-step procedural execution.



54. ❌ Hyp2Former: Hierarchy-Aware Hyperbolic Embeddings for Open-Set Panoptic Segmentation

作者: Yao Lu, Rohit Mohan, Florian Drews, Yakov Miron, Abhinav Valada 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02580v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recognizing unknown objects is crucial for safety-critical applications such as autonomous driving and robotics. Open-Set Panoptic Segmentation (OPS) aims to segment known thing and stuff classes while identifying valid unknown objects as separate instances. Prior OPS approaches largely treat known categories as a flat label set, ignoring the semantic hierarchy that provides valuable structural priors for distinguishing unknown objects from in-distribution classes. In this work, we propose Hyp2Former, an end-to-end framework for OPS that does not require explicit modeling of unknowns during training, and instead learns hierarchical semantic similarities continuously in hyperbolic space. By explicitly encoding hierarchical relationships among known categories, the model learns a structured embedding space that captures multiple levels of semantic abstraction. As a result, unknown objects that cannot be confidently classified as known categories still remain in close proximity to higher-level concepts (e.g., an unknown animal remains closer to “animal” or “object” than to unrelated concepts such as “electronics” or “stuff”) and can therefore be reliably detected, even if their fine-grained category was not represented during training. Empirical evaluations across multiple public datasets such as MS COCO, Cityscapes, and Lost&Found demonstrate that Hyp2Former outperforms existing methods on OPS, achieving the best balance between unknown object discovery and in-distribution robustness.



55. ❌ On Training Large Language Models for Long-Horizon Tasks: An Empirical Study of Horizon Length

作者: Sunghwan Kim, Junhee Cho, Beong-woo Kwak, Taeyoon Kwon, Liang Wang, Nan Yang, Xingxing Zhang, Furu Wei, Jinyoung Yeo 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02572v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise as interactive agents that solve tasks through extended sequences of environment interactions. While prior work has primarily focused on system-level optimizations or algorithmic improvements, the role of task horizon length in shaping training dynamics remains poorly understood. In this work, we present a systematic empirical study that examines horizon length through controlled task constructions. Specifically, we construct controlled tasks in which agents face identical decision rules and reasoning structures, but differ only in the length of action sequences required for successful completion. Our results reveal that increasing horizon length alone constitutes a training bottleneck, inducing severe training instability driven by exploration difficulties and credit assignment challenges. We demonstrate that horizon reduction is a key principle to address this limitation, stabilizing training and achieving better performance in long-horizon tasks. Moreover, we find that horizon reduction is related to stronger generalization across horizon lengths: models trained under reduced horizons generalize more effectively to longer-horizon variants at inference time, a phenomenon we refer to as horizon generalization.



56. ❌ Recurrent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Chemotherapy Control under Partial Observability

作者: Firas Mohamed Elamine Kiram, Imane Youkana, Rachida Saouli, Gian Antonio Susto, Laid Kahloul 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02552v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Chemotherapy dose optimization can be formulated as a dynamic treatment regime, requiring sequential decisions under uncertainty that must balance tumor suppression against toxicity. However, most reinforcement learning approaches assume full observability of the patient state, a condition rarely met in clinical practice. We investigate whether memory-augmented policies can improve chemotherapy control under partial observability. To this end, we employ a recurrent TD3-based approach with separate LSTM actor-critic networks and evaluate it on the AhnChemoEnv benchmark from DTR-Bench, considering both off-policy and on-policy recurrent architectures against feed-forward TD3 and Soft Actor-Critic. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability are held fixed to isolate hidden-state uncertainty and observation noise and to avoid confounding effects from inter-patient variability. Across ten random seeds, recurrence yields modest benefit under full observability but substantially stronger and more stable performance under partial observability, with more consistent tumor suppression and improved normal-cell preservation. These findings indicate that memory-based policies are particularly beneficial when clinically relevant state information is incomplete or noisy.



57. ❌ Double Rectified Linear Unit-based Modular Semantics for Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Framework

作者: Gianvincenzo Alfano, Sergio Greco, Lucio La Cava, Francesco Parisi, Irina Trubitsyna 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02551v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (QBAFs) provide an alternative approach to computing argument acceptability in Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAFs). Each argument is assigned an initial strength, which is then updated to a final strength by considering the influence of both its attackers and supporters. Over the years, several semantics have been proposed to compute argument acceptability in QBAFs, yet they often yield divergent or counterintuitive results, even for simple acyclic cases. We introduce novel gradual semantics for QBAFs that address these limitations, producing results that align more closely with intuitive expectations, while satisfying established rationality postulates from the literature. Furthermore, we study its convergence behavior, proving that it converges not only for acyclic QBAFs but also for broader classes of cyclic frameworks.



58. ❌ Strategy-Aware Optimization Modeling with Reasoning LLMs

作者: Ruiqing Zhao, Fengzhi Li, Yuan Zuo, Rui Liu, Yansong Liu, Yunfei Ma, Fanyu Meng, Junlan Feng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02545v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) can generate syntactically valid optimization programs, yet often struggle to reliably choose an effective modeling strategy, leading to incorrect formulations and inefficient solver behavior. We propose SAGE, a strategy-aware framework that makes Modeling Strategy explicit in both data construction and post-training. SAGE builds a solver-verified multi-strategy dataset and trains a student model with supervised fine-tuning followed by Segment-Weighted GRPO using a composite reward over format compliance, correctness, and solver efficiency. Across eight benchmarks spanning synthetic and real-world settings, SAGE improves average pass@1 from 72.7 to 80.3 over the strongest open-source baseline. With multiple generations, SAGE discovers more distinct correct formulations and improves component-level diversity at pass@16 by 19-29%. At the largest scale, SAGE produces more compact constraint systems with 14.2% fewer constraints than the baseline, consistent with solver-efficient modeling. Overall, these results show that making Modeling Strategy explicit improves automated optimization modeling. Code is available at https://github.com/rachhhhing/SAGE.



59. ❌ Improving Model Safety by Targeted Error Correction

作者: Abolfazl Mohammadi-Seif, Ricardo Baeza-Yates 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02544v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The widespread adoption of machine learning in critical applications demands techniques to mitigate high-consequence errors. Our method utilizes a dual-classifier GBDT pipeline to distinguish routine human-like errors from high-risk non-human misclassifications. Evaluated across three domains, animal breed classification, skin lesion diagnosis (ISIC 2018), and prostate histopathology (SICAPv2), our framework demonstrates robust safety improvements. To address real-world deployment concerns, our results confirm the pipeline introduces negligible inference latency (1.60% overhead for the animal dataset, 1.84% for ISIC, and 1.70% for SICAPv2) while outperforming traditional Maximum Class Probability (MCP) baselines in correction precision. Our conservative correction strategy successfully reduced dangerous non-human errors by 34.1% in ISIC and 12.57% in SICAPv2, improving super-class diagnostic safety to 90.41% and 92.13% respectively. This proves that safety-critical reliability can be substantially enhanced post-hoc without expensive model retraining. keywords: Error Analysis, Post-hoc Correction, Trustworthy AI.



60. ❌ Orchestrating Spatial Semantics via a Zone-Graph Paradigm for Intricate Indoor Scene Generation

作者: Meisheng Zhang, Shizhao Sun, Yang Zhao, Ziyuan Liu, Zhijun Gao, Jiang Bian 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02537v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Autonomous 3D indoor scene synthesis breaks down in non-convex rooms with tightly coupled spatial constraints. Data-driven generators lack topological priors for long-horizon planning, while iterative agents fragment semantics and become geometrically brittle. We present ZoneMaestro, a unified framework that shifts the paradigm from object-centric synthesis to Zone-Graph Orchestration. By internalizing a novel zone-based logic, ZoneMaestro translates high-level semantic intent into functional zones and topological constraints, enabling robust adaptation to diverse architectural forms. To support this, we construct Zone-Scene-10K, a large-scale dataset enriched with explicit Zone-Graph annotations. We further introduce an Alternating Alignment Strategy that cycles between reasoning internalization and Zone-Aware Group Relative Policy Optimization (Z-GRPO), effectively reconciling the tension between semantic richness and geometric validity without relying on external physics engines. To rigorously evaluate spatial intelligence beyond convex primitives, we formally define the task of Intricate Spatial Orchestration and release SCALE, a stress-test benchmark for irregular indoor scenarios with complex, dense spatial relations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ZoneMaestro resolves the density-safety dichotomy, significantly outperforming state-of-the-art baselines in both structural coherence and intent adherence.



61. ❌ Set-Based Training of Neural Barrier Certificates for Safety Verification of Dynamical Systems

作者: Miriam Kranzlmüller, Lukas Koller, Tobias Ladner, Matthias Althoff 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02526v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Barrier certificates are scalar functions over the state space of dynamical systems that separate all unsafe states from all reachable states. The existence of a barrier certificate formally verifies the safety of the dynamical system. Recent approaches synthesize barrier certificates by iteratively training a neural network. In each iteration, the candidate is formally verified - if successful, the barrier certificate is found. Instead, we propose a set-based training approach that tightly integrates verification into training via a set-based loss function that soundly encodes all barrier certificate properties. A loss of zero formally proves the validity of the barrier certificate, collapsing the iterative training and verification into a single training procedure. Our experiments demonstrate that our set-based training approach scales well with the system dimension and naturally handles complex nonlinear dynamics.



62. ❌ A Semantic Autonomy Framework for VLM-Integrated Indoor Mobile Robots: Hybrid Deterministic Reasoning and Cross-Robot Adaptive Memory

作者: Bogdan Felician Abaza, Andrei-Alexandru Staicu, Cristian Vasile Doicin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02525v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Autonomous indoor mobile robots can navigate reliably to metric coordinates using established frameworks such as ROS 2 Navigation 2, yet they lack the ability to interpret natural language instructions that express intent rather than positions. Vision-Language Models offer the semantic reasoning required to bridge this gap, but their inference latency (2-9 seconds per decision on consumer hardware) and session-by-session amnesia limit practical deployment. This paper presents the Semantic Autonomy Stack, a six-layer reference framework for semantically autonomous indoor navigation, and validates a complete instance featuring hybrid deterministic-VLM reasoning and cross-robot adaptive memory on physical robots with off-the-shelf edge hardware. A seven-step parametric resolver handles 88% of instructions in under 0.1 milliseconds without invoking a language model, camera, or GPU; only genuinely ambiguous instructions escalate to VLM reasoning. A five-category semantic memory framework with explicit scope taxonomy (global environment knowledge, per-operator preferences, per-robot capabilities) enables cross-session learning and cross-robot knowledge transfer: preferences learned through VLM interactions on one robot are promoted to deterministic resolution and transferred to a second robot via a shared compiled digest, achieving a measured latency reduction of 103,000-fold. Experimental validation on two custom-built differential-drive robots across 82 scenario-level decisions and three sessions demonstrates 100% semantic transfer accuracy (33/33, 95% CI [0.894, 1.000]), 100% semantic resolution accuracy, and concurrent multi-robot operation feasibility - all on Raspberry Pi 5 platforms with no onboard GPU, requiring zero training data.



63. ❌ Benchmarking Retrieval Strategies for Biomedical Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Controlled Empirical Study

作者: Devi Prasad Bal, Subhashree Puhan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02520v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) offers a well-established path to grounding large language model (LLM) outputs in external knowledge, yet the question of which retrieval strategy works best in a high-stakes domain such as biomedicine has not received the controlled, multi-metric treatment it deserves. This paper presents a systematic empirical comparison of five retrieval strategies – Dense Vector Search, Hybrid BM25 + Dense retrieval, Cross-Encoder Reranking, Multi-Query Expansion, and Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR) – within a biomedical question-answering RAG pipeline. All strategies share a fixed generation model (GPT-4o-mini), a common vector store (ChromaDB), and OpenAI’s text-embedding-3-small embeddings, ensuring that observed differences are attributable to retrieval alone. Evaluation is conducted on 250 question-answer pairs drawn from a preprocessed subset of the BioASQ benchmark (rag-mini-bioasq) using four DeepEval metrics: contextual precision, contextual recall, faithfulness, and answer relevancy, each reported with 95% confidence intervals. A no-context ablation is included as a lower bound. Cross-Encoder Reranking achieves the best composite score (0.827) and highest contextual precision (0.852), confirming that query-document interaction yields measurable retrieval gains. Multi-Query Expansion, despite its recall-oriented design, produces the weakest contextual precision (0.671), suggesting naive query diversification introduces retrieval noise. MMR sacrifices answer relevancy for diversity, while the Dense baseline (composite 0.822) falls within 0.005 points of the top strategy. All RAG conditions dramatically outperform the no-context ablation on answer relevancy (0.658-0.701 vs. 0.287), confirming the practical value of retrieval. The full pipeline, hyperparameters, and evaluation code are publicly available.



64. ❌ A Novel Preprocessing-Driven Approach to Remaining Useful Life (RUL) Prediction Using Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCN)

作者: Florent Imbert, Tosin Adewumi, Hui Han 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02507v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Accurate prediction of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) in aero-engines is vital for predictive maintenance, improved operational reliability, and reduced lifecycle costs. While deep learning approaches have demonstrated strong potential in this area, most existing methods focus primarily on model architecture design and treat input features uniformly, often neglecting the influence of data preprocessing. In this work, we propose a novel preprocessing pipeline that enhances RUL prediction by improving data quality and temporal representation before model training. Our approach leverages complete temporal sequences and generates RUL estimates at each timestep, enabling the model to capture fine-grained degradation dynamics and deliver continuous prognostic insights throughout the engine’s operational life. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed pipeline, we conduct experiments on the NASA C-MAPSS dataset. Comparative evaluations against a suite of state-of-the-art neural models including CNN, RNN, LSTM, DCNN, TCN, BiGRU-TSAM, AGCNN, and ATCN, demonstrate that our approach consistently achieves superior accuracy and robustness in aero-engine RUL prediction. These results highlight the critical role of preprocessing in maximizing the effectiveness of neural prognostic models.



65. ❌ DataClaw: A Process-Oriented Agent Benchmark for Exploratory Real-World Data Analysis

作者: Qiaohong Zhang, Weihao Ye, Jialong Chen, Yi Luo, BoYuan Li, Bowen Deng, Zibin Zheng, Jianhao Lin, Wei-Shi Zheng, Chuan Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02503v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Evaluating autonomous data analysis agents requires testing their ability to perform exploratory analysis in underexplored data environments. However, many existing benchmarks emphasize final answer accuracy in prior-guided data settings and provide limited support for reasoning process evaluation. We introduce DataClaw, a process-oriented benchmark for exploratory real-world data analysis. DataClaw contains approximately 2.06 million real-world records across enterprise, industry and policy domains, with native data noise preserved. It further includes 492 cross-domain tasks derived from think-tank consulting scenarios, each annotated with intermediate milestones for process-level evaluation. These annotations allow DataClaw to measure how far an agent progresses and where its reasoning breaks down. Experiments with eight advanced LLMs show that current agents remain far from reliable in this setting, with seven models achieving below 50% overall accuracy. Process analysis further reveals partial progress hidden behind wrong answers and distinct exploration strategies across models. Overall, DataClaw provides a less data constrained diagnostic testbed for probing the capability boundaries of autonomous data-analysis agents.



66. ❌ Pretraining on Sleep Data Improves non-Sleep Biosignal Tasks

作者: William Lehn-Schiøler, Magnus Ruud Kjær, Phillip Hempel, Magnus Guldberg Pedersen, Rahul Thapa, Bryan He, Nicolai Spicher, Andreas Brink-Kjaer, Lars Kai Hansen, Emmanuel Mignot 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02500v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Sleep foundation models have recently demonstrated strong performance on in-domain polysomnography tasks, including sleep staging, apnea detection, and disease risk prediction. In this work, we investigate whether sleep biosignals can serve as an effective pretraining distribution for learning representations that transfer beyond sleep to adjacent domains. Following sleep foundation models, we perform sleep-only multimodal contrastive pretraining (with a leave-one-out objective) and evaluate transfer to non-sleep EEG and ECG, two well-benchmarked biosignal modalities with heterogeneous datasets and clinically meaningful downstream tasks. Across eight downstream tasks spanning multiple EEG and ECG datasets, sleep pretraining consistently improves performance relative to training from scratch. Moreover, on several tasks, we achieve performance competitive with or surpassing prior specialized state-of-the-art and foundation models.



67. ❌ Efficient Preference Poisoning Attack on Offline RLHF

作者: Chenye Yang, Weiyu Xu, Lifeng Lai 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02495v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Offline Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) pipelines such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) train on a pre-collected preference dataset, which makes them vulnerable to preference poisoning attack. We study label flip attacks against log-linear DPO. We first illustrate that flipping one preference label induces a parameter-independent shift in the DPO gradient. Using this key property, we can then convert the targeted poisoning problem into a structured binary sparse approximation problem. To solve this problem, we develop two attack methods: Binary-Aware Lattice Attack (BAL-A) and Binary Matching Pursuit Attack (BMP-A). BAL-A embeds the binary flip selection problem into a binary-aware lattice and applies Lenstra-Lenstra-Lovász reduction and Babai’s nearest plane algorithm; we provide sufficient conditions that enforce binary coefficients and recover the minimum-flip objective. BMP-A adapts binary matching pursuit to our non-normalized gradient dictionary and yields coherence-based recovery guarantees and robustness (impossibility) certificates for $K$-flip budgets. Experiments on synthetic dictionaries and the Stanford Human Preferences dataset validate the theory and highlight how dictionary geometry governs attack success.



68. ❌ From Experimental Limits to Physical Insight: A Retrieval-Augmented Multi-Agent Framework for Interpreting Searches Beyond the Standard Model

作者: Altan Cakir, Ayca Yerlikaya 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02491v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Modern searches for physics beyond the Standard Model produce rapidly expanding literature containing heterogeneous information, including textual analyses, numerical datasets, and graphical exclusion limits. Integrating these distributed sources remains a time-consuming and manual process for physicists. We present HEP-CoPilot, a retrieval-augmented multi-agent AI framework for the exploration and interpretation of high-energy physics literature. The system unifies textual information from publications, structured experimental data from HEPData, and reconstructed physics plots within a multimodal retrieval and reasoning architecture. By combining retrieval-augmented language models with coordinated agent workflows, it enables evidence-grounded reasoning over experimental analyses and structured interpretation of collider results. We evaluate the framework on recent CMS searches for physics beyond the Standard Model. Case studies show that HEP-CoPilot can retrieve relevant measurements, reconstruct exclusion limits directly from HEPData records, and perform cross-paper comparisons of experimental constraints. This enables consistent, physics-aware comparison across analyses without manual data integration. These results demonstrate that retrieval-augmented AI systems can function as scientific co-pilots for particle physics, facilitating navigation of complex literature, structuring heterogeneous evidence, and accelerating the interpretation pipeline for new physics searches.



69. ❌ GRAIL: A Deep-Granularity Hybrid Resonance Framework for Real-Time Agent Discovery via SLM-Enhanced Indexing

作者: Jinliang Xu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02489v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

As the ecosystem of Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents expands rapidly, efficient and accurate Agent Discovery becomes a critical bottleneck for large-scale multi-agent collaboration. Existing approaches typically face a dichotomy: either relying on heavy-weight LLMs for intent parsing, leading to prohibitive latency (often exceeding 30 seconds), or using monolithic vector retrieval that sacrifices semantic precision for speed. To bridge this gap, we propose \textbf{GRAIL} (Granular Resonance-based Agent/AI Link), a novel framework achieving sub-400ms discovery latency without compromising accuracy. GRAIL introduces three key innovations: (1) \textbf{SLM-Enhanced Prediction}, replacing the generalized LLM parser with a specialized, fine-tuned Small Language Model (SLM) for millisecond-level capability tag prediction; (2) \textbf{Pseudo-Document Expansion}, augmenting agent descriptions with synthetic queries to enhance semantic density for robust dense retrieval; and (3) \textbf{MaxSim Resonance}, a fine-grained matching mechanism computing maximum similarity between user queries and discrete agent usage examples, effectively mitigating semantic dilution. Validated on \textbf{AgentTaxo-9K}, our new large-scale dataset of 9,240 agents, GRAIL reduces end-to-end discovery latency by over \textbf{79$\times$} compared to LLM-parsing baselines, while significantly outperforming traditional vector search in Recall@10. This framework offers a scalable, industrial-grade solution for the real-time ``Internet of Agents."



70. ❌ Efficient Temporal Datalog Materialisation for Composite Event Recognition

作者: Periklis Mantenoglou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02488v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Several applications demand the timely detection of critical situations, such as threats to safety and transparency, over high-velocity streams of symbolic events. This demand has motivated the development of (i) event specification languages, which define composite events via temporal patterns over simpler events, and (ii) stream reasoning frameworks, evaluating patterns expressed in these languages. However, event specification languages are typically studied in isolation, complicating their comparison in terms of expressivity and obscuring the scope of their associated stream reasoners. To mitigate this issue, we map practical fragments of prominent event specification languages into Temporal Datalog->-, a temporal Datalog with stratified negation and no future dependencies. To support efficient stream reasoning over Temporal Datalog->-, we propose Streaming Trigger Graphs, an extension of a state-of-the-art technique for Datalog materialisation. Our approach yields a uniform composite event recognition mechanism that has the potential to generalise across a wide range of practical event specification languages.



71. ❌ Shadow-Loom: Causal Reasoning over Graphical World Model of Narratives

作者: David Wilmot 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02475v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Stories hold a reader’s attention because they have causes, secrets, and consequences. Shadow-Loom is an experimental open-source framework that turns a narrative into a versioned graphical world model and lets two engines act on it: a causal physics grounded in Pearl’s ladder of causation and a recently proposed counterfactual calculus over Ancestral Multi-World Networks; and a narrative physics that scores the same graph against four structural reader-states – mystery, dramatic irony, suspense, and surprise – in the tradition of Sternberg’s curiosity/suspense/surprise triad, with suspense formalised in the structural-affect line of work on story comprehension and computational suspense. Large language models are used only at the boundary: extraction, rendering, and audit; identification, intervention, and counterfactual reasoning are carried out in typed code over the graph. The system is offered as a research artefact rather than as a benchmarked NLP model; code, fixtures, and pipeline are released open source.



72. ❌ Reference-Sampled Boltzmann Projection for KL-Regularized RLVR: Target-Matched Weighted SFT, Finite One-Shot Gaps, and Policy Mirror Descent

作者: Yao Shu, Chenxing Wei, Hongbin Lin, Shuang Qiu, Hui Xiong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02469v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Online reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) turns checkable outcomes into a scalable training signal, but it keeps rollout generation, verifier scoring, and reference-policy evaluations on the optimization path. Static weighted supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on precomputed rollouts seems to remove this bottleneck, yet a weighted likelihood is not specified by rewards alone: its sampler and weights induce the policy being fit. This paper identifies the reference-sampled weighted-SFT objective whose induced policy equals the fixed-reference KL-regularized RLVR optimizer. The optimizer is the standard Boltzmann target policy, obtained by exponentially tilting the reference policy by verifier reward. Matching a weighted-SFT induced policy to this target forces density-ratio weights; in the reference-sampled subclass, this reduces uniquely, up to prompt scaling, to the prompt-normalized Boltzmann weight $\exp(r(x,y)/β)/Z(x)$. BOLT, a Boltzmann-Targeted SFT procedure, is the empirical estimator of this projection. The finite one-shot analysis separates the exact stored-support price $β\log(1/π^*(S_N\mid x))$ from partition estimation, effective-sample-size variance, generalization, optimization, and approximation errors. This decomposition explains why extra SFT epochs cannot repair missing reference-policy coverage and exposes the temperature–coverage–variance frontier. When coverage needs adaptive sampling, refreshed Boltzmann projections become KL policy mirror descent; finite inner solves enter as additive drift from the exact mirror step. Single-run Qwen experiments provide projection evidence for the target-matched weight, one-shot saturation, refreshed-sampler gains, and optimization-time savings, within the stated single-run scope.



73. ❌ When Stress Becomes Signal: Detecting Antifragility-Compatible Regimes in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

作者: Jose Manuel de la Chica, Juan Manuel Vera, Jairo Rodríguez 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02463v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Multi-agent LLM systems are increasingly used to solve complex tasks through decomposition, debate, specialization, and ensemble reasoning. However, these systems are usually evaluated in terms of robustness: whether performance is preserved under perturbation. This paper studies a different question: whether semantic stress exposes structured variation that could support future antifragile learning. We introduce CAFE, a statistical framework for detecting antifragility-compatible regimes in multi-agent architectures. CAFE models a controlled expected distribution of semantic stressors, reconstructs an architecture-specific observed effective stress distribution from multi-dimensional judge signals, and compares both distributions using a distributional Jensen Gap under a convex stress potential. A positive gap does not imply immediate performance improvement; instead, it indicates a convex-expansive deformation of the observed stress distribution, suggesting that the architecture exposes learnable stress structure. We evaluate CAFE on a banking-risk analysis benchmark with five multi-agent architectures: flat, hierarchical, debate, meta-adaptive, and ensemble. Across all architectures, semantic stress reduces average judged quality by roughly one third. Yet all architectures exhibit positive distributional Jensen Gaps with bootstrap confidence intervals above zero. These results show that immediate quality degradation can coexist with statistically detectable antifragility-compatible stress geometry. CAFE is therefore not an antifragile learner itself, but a measurement layer for identifying when and where antifragility learning may be worth applying.



74. ❌ LLM-Assisted Repository-Level Generation with Structured Spec-Driven Engineering

作者: Shuzhao Feng, Boqi Chen, Brett H Meyer, Gunter Mussbacher 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02455v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

State-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in code generation at the function level. However, the output quality significantly declines when scaling to repository-level systems. Current workflows relying only on natural language prompts suffer from inherent ambiguity and a lack of verifiability. To address this, we propose structured spec-driven engineering (SSDE), a paradigm that leverages structured artifacts to guide LLM generation. We argue that structured specifications as LLM inputs make high-quality, repository-level code generation a tangible goal, while at the same time offering superior verifiability, leading to significant potential for improvement. We first investigate the feasibility of this vision through a pilot study generating Model-View-Controller (MVC) business logic for three software systems using five LLMs, and then highlight the potential, challenges, and future roadmap for SSDE.



75. ❌ Causal Software Engineering: A Vision and Roadmap

作者: Roberto Pietrantuono, Luca Giamattei, Stefano Russo, Julien Siebert, Neil Walkinshaw 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02454v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Software engineering increasingly involves making high-stakes decisions under uncertainty, using signals from code, field data, and socio-technical processes. Recent AI-driven support (e.g., anomaly detection, predictive analytics, AIOps, as well as LLM-based agents) has amplified engineers’ ability to detect patterns and synthesize content and recommendations, but many critical questions are interventional or counterfactual: What is the expected impact of changing a load-balancing strategy? Would an outage have been avoided under a different release plan? Correlational models answer “what tends to co-occur”; they struggle to answer “what would happen if we act.” We propose Causal Software Engineering (CSE) as a future paradigm in which causal models and causal reasoning systematically inform activities across the software lifecycle, augmenting existing practices with explicit assumptions, uncertainty-aware effect estimates, and counterfactual diagnosis. We outline (i) a causal-first workflow view spanning development and operations, (ii) a staged roadmap for tools and organizational adoption, and (iii) an evaluation and benchmark agenda for measuring progress.



76. ❌ Position: How can Graphs Help Large Language Models?

作者: Xiyuan Wang, Yi Hu, Yanbo Wang, Chuan Shi, Muhan Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02452v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), classic graph learning tasks have greatly benefited from LLMs, including improved encoding of textual features, more efficient construction of graphs from text, and enhanced reasoning over knowledge graphs. In this paper, we ask a complementary question: How can graphs help LLMs? We address this question from three perspectives: 1) graphs provide an up-to-date knowledge source that helps reduce LLM hallucinations, 2) graph-based prompting techniques-such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT), Tree-of-Thought (ToT), and Graph-of-Thought (GoT)-enhance LLM reasoning capabilities, and 3) integrating graphs into LLMs improves their understanding of structured data, expanding their applicability to domains such as e-commerce, code, and relational databases (RDBs). We further outlook some future directions including designing sparse LLM architectures based on graphs and brain-inspired memory systems.



77. ❌ PC-MNet: Dual-Level Congruity Modeling for Multimodal Sarcasm Detection via Polarity-Modulated Attention

作者: Maoheng Li, Ling Zhou, Xiaohua Huang, Rubing Huang, Wenming Zheng, Guoying Zhao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02447v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Multimodal sarcasm detection, which aims to precisely identify pragmatic incongruities between literal text and nonverbal cues, has gained substantial attention in multimodal understanding. Recent advancements have predominantly relied on naïve similarity-based attention mechanisms and uniform late fusion strategies.Furthermore, given that functional entanglement restricts traditional late fusions, we incorporate a scalar congruity routing mechanism and a prior-guided contextual graph. This mechanism anchors a generalized incongruity manifold through a two-stage asymmetric optimization driven by inconsistency-aware contrastive learning, selectively fusing only the most discriminative multi-granularity evidence. Extensive experiments on the \texttt{MUStARD} benchmark and its spurious-correlation-mitigated balanced datasets demonstrate that our approach achieves new state-of-the-art performance, surpassing the strongest multimodal baseline by a substantial 3.14% improvement in Macro-F1. By architecturally isolating atomic, composition, and contextual conflicts. This work provides a robust, decoupled paradigm for modeling subtle pragmatic incongruities in human communication.



78. ❌ Measuring AI Reasoning: A Guide for Researchers

作者: Munachiso Samuel Nwadike, Zangir Iklassov, Kareem Ali, Rifo Genadi, Kentaro Inui 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02442v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In this paper, we offer a guide for researchers on evaluating reasoning in language models, building the case that reasoning should be assessed through evidence of adaptive, multi-step search rather than final-answer accuracy alone. Under an evaluation-oriented definition, reasoning requires selecting intermediate steps and halting according to input-dependent conditions, which we formalize as a search-like procedure. We show that single forward passes in scalable architectures are structurally limited in their ability to realize such variable-depth computation, motivating intermediate decoding and externalized reasoning traces as appropriate evaluation interfaces. Central to our argument is that final-answer accuracy alone is an insufficient measure of reasoning, because it provides little ability to diagnose or debug the underlying processes that produce individual solutions in frontier models. We therefore argue for a shift toward process-based evaluation, in which reasoning is assessed through the faithfulness and validity of intermediate reasoning traces as first-class evaluation targets.



79. ❌ The Model Knows, the Decoder Finds: Future Value Guided Particle Power Sampling

作者: Tu Nguyen, Rasul Tutunov, Xiaotong Ji, Matthieu Zimmer 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02427v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

A recurring pattern in “reasoning without training” is that base LLMs already assign non-trivial probability mass to correct multi-step solutions; the bottleneck is locating these modes efficiently at inference time. Power sampling provides a principled way to bias decoding toward such modes by targeting p_theta(x)^alpha with alpha > 1, but practical approximations must account for future-dependent correction factors that determine which prefixes remain promising. We introduce Auxiliary Particle Power Sampling (APPS), a blockwise particle algorithm for approximating the sequence-level power target with a bounded population of partial solutions. APPS propagates hypotheses in parallel using proposal-corrected power reweighting and refines their survival through future-value-guided selection at resampling boundaries. This redistributes finite compute across competing prefixes rather than committing to a single unfolding path, while providing a direct scaling knob in the particle count and predictable peak memory. We instantiate the future-value signal with short-horizon rollouts and also study an amortized variant that replaces rollouts with a lightweight learned selection head. Across reasoning benchmarks, APPS improves the accuracy-runtime trade-off of training-free decoding and suggests that part of the gap to post-trained systems can be recovered through more faithful inference-time power approximation.



80. ❌ FitText: Evolving Agent Tool Ecologies via Memetic Retrieval

作者: Kyle Zheng, Han Zhang, Renliang Sun, Chenchen Ye, Wei Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02411v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

A semantic gap separates how users describe tasks from how tools are documented. As API ecosystems scale to tens of thousands of endpoints, static retrieval from the initial query alone cannot bridge this gap: the agent’s understanding of what it needs evolves during execution, but its tool set does not. We introduce FitText, a training-free framework that makes retrieval dynamic by embedding it directly in the agent’s reasoning loop. FitText generates natural-language pseudo-tool descriptions as retrieval probes, refines them iteratively using retrieval feedback, and explores diverse alternatives through stochastic generation. Memetic Retrieval adds evolutionary selection pressure over candidate descriptions, guided by a tool memory that avoids redundant search. On ToolRet (43k tools, 4 domains), FitText improves average retrieval rank from 8.81 to 2.78; on StableToolBench (16,464 APIs), it achieves a 0.73 average pass rate–a 24-point absolute gain over static query retrieval. The gains transfer across base models capable of acting as competent semantic operators; under weaker base models, Memetic’s evolutionary search inverts–amplifying noise rather than refining signal–surfacing model capacity as a prerequisite for evolutionary tool exploration.



81. ❌ Automatic Reflection Level Classification in Hungarian Student Essays

作者: Zsolt Csibi, Mónika Sándor, Mónika Serfőző, Kinga Gyöngy, Kristian Fenech 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02402v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Reflective thinking is a key competency in education, but assessing reflective writing remains a time-consuming and subjective task for education experts. While automated reflective analysis has been explored in several languages, Hungarian language was not researched extensively. In this paper, we present the first comprehensive study on automatic reflection level classification in Hungarian student essays. We used a large, expert-annotated Hungarian dataset consisting of 1,954 reflective essays collected over multiple academic years and labeled on a four-level reflection scale. We investigate two approaches: (1) classical machine learning models using TF-IDF and semantic embedding features, and (2) Hungarian-specific transformer models fine-tuned for document-level reflection classification. To address the strong class imbalance in the dataset, we systematically examine class weighting, oversampling, data augmentation, and alternative loss functions. An extensive ablation study is conducted to analyze the contribution of each modeling and balancing strategy. Our results show that shallow machine learning models with appropriate feature engineering achieve strong overall performance, reaching up to 71% overall score averaged over accuracy, F1-score, and ROC AUC metrics, while transformer-based models achieve slightly lower overall score (68%) averaged over the same metrics, but demonstrate better generalization on minority reflection classes. These findings highlight the continued relevance of classical methods for low-resource settings and the robustness of transformer models for imbalanced classification. The proposed dataset and experimental insights provide a solid foundation for future research on automated reflective analysis in Hungarian and other morphologically rich languages.



82. ❌ The Compliance Trap: How Structural Constraints Degrade Frontier AI Metacognition Under Adversarial Pressure

作者: Rahul Kumar 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02398v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

As frontier AI models are deployed in high-stakes decision pipelines, their ability to maintain metacognitive stability – knowing what they do not know, detecting errors, seeking clarification – under adversarial pressure is a critical safety requirement. Current safety evaluations focus on detecting strategic deception (scheming); we investigate a more fundamental failure mode: cognitive collapse. We present SCHEMA, an evaluation of 11 frontier models from 8 vendors across 67,221 scored records using a 6-condition factorial design with dual-classifier scoring. We find that 8 of 11 models suffer catastrophic metacognitive degradation under adversarial pressure, with accuracy dropping by up to 30.2 percentage points (all $p < 2 \times 10^{-8}$, surviving Bonferroni correction). Crucially, we identify a “Compliance Trap”: through factorial isolation and a benign distraction control, we demonstrate that collapse is driven not by the psychological content of survival threats, but by compliance-forcing instructions that override epistemic boundaries. Removing the compliance suffix restores performance even under active threat. Models with advanced reasoning capabilities exhibit the most severe absolute degradation, while Anthropic’s Constitutional AI demonstrates near-perfect immunity – not from superior capability (Google’s Gemini matches its baseline accuracy) but from alignment-specific training. We release the complete dataset and evaluation infrastructure.



83. ❌ HeavySkill: Heavy Thinking as the Inner Skill in Agentic Harness

作者: Jianing Wang, Linsen Guo, Zhengyu Chen, Qi Guo, Hongyu Zang, Wenjie Shi, Haoxiang Ma, Xiangyu Xi, Xiaoyu Li, Wei Wang, Xunliang Cai 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02396v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent advances in agentic harness with orchestration frameworks that coordinate multiple agents with memory, skills, and tool use have achieved remarkable success in complex reasoning tasks. However, the underlying mechanism that truly drives performance remains obscured behind intricate system designs. In this paper, we propose HeavySkill, a perspective that views heavy thinking not only as a minimal execution unit in orchestration harness but also as an inner skill internalized within the model’s parameters that drives the orchestrator to solve complex tasks. We identify this skill as a two-stage pipeline, i.e., parallel reasoning then summarization, which can operate beneath any agentic harness. We present a systematic empirical study of HeavySkill across diverse domains. Our results show that this inner skill consistently outperforms traditional Best-of-N (BoN) strategies; notably, stronger LLMs can even approach Pass@N performance. Crucially, we demonstrate that the depth and width of heavy thinking, as a learnable skill, can be further scaled via reinforcement learning, offering a promising path toward self-evolving LLMs that internalize complex reasoning without relying on brittle orchestration layers.



84. ❌ Controllable and Verifiable Process Data Synthesis for Process Reward Models

作者: Yinghui Chi, Lucien Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02395v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Process reward models (PRMs) rely on high-quality process supervision data, yet existing construction methods often provide limited control over error location, error type, and trajectory consistency. We propose a controllable and verifiable framework for synthesizing process supervision data for PRMs. Our framework first constructs a correct symbolic reasoning chain, injects a template-aware error into an intermediate step, recomputes subsequent steps under the corrupted state, and verifies that the injected step is not derivable from its prefix. The resulting paired trajectories are prefix-invalid at the first error while remaining trajectory-consistent after symbolic recomputation, and are translated into aligned natural-language processes for PRM training and evaluation. Experiments show that the synthesized data improve Best-of-8 reranking on logical reasoning benchmarks and transfer to mathematical reasoning. Step-level evaluation further shows that first-error localization remains substantially more challenging than overall step classification, highlighting the need for fine-grained and verifiable process supervision.



85. ❌ FEAT: Fashion Editing and Try-On from Any Design

作者: Soye Kwon, Keonyoung Lee, Dahuin Jung, Jaekoo Lee 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02393v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Fashion design aims to express a designer’s creative intent and to depict how garments interact with the human body. Recent methods condition on multimodal inputs to support garment editing and virtual try-on. However, existing methods still (i) confine design to garment-related images, excluding creative design sources such as artwork, abstract imagery, and natural photographs, and (ii) cannot support complete outfits, including accessories. We present FEAT (Fashion Editing And Try-On from Any Design), a method that enables editing and try-on across garments and accessories using diverse design sources. To achieve this, we introduce Disentangled Dual Injection (DDI). It takes both apparel and non-apparel design sources and selectively injects design cues via content and style disentanglement. Furthermore, we propose Orthogonal-Guided Noise Fusion (OGNF), a training-free mechanism that removes residual garments via orthogonal projection and applies region-specific noise strategies to enable virtual try-on for both garments and accessories. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FEAT achieves state-of-the-art performance in design flexibility, prompt consistency, and visual realism.



86. ❌ Is It Novel and Why? Fine-Grained Patent Novelty Prediction Based on Passage Retrieval

作者: Valentin Knappich, Anna Hätty, Simon Razniewski, Annemarie Friedrich 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02392v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Novelty assessment is a critical yet complex task in the examination process for patent acceptance, requiring examiners to determine whether an invention is disclosed in a prior art document. The process involves intricate matching between specific features of a patent claim and passages in the prior art. While prior work has approached novelty prediction primarily as a binary classification task at the claim level, we argue that this formulation is susceptible to spurious correlations and lacks the granularity required for practical application. In this work, we introduce FiNE-Patents (Fine-grained Novelty Examination of Patents), a novel dataset comprising 3,658 first patent claims annotated with fine-grained, feature-level prior art references extracted from European Search Opinion (ESOP) documents. We propose shifting the evaluation paradigm from simple binary classification to a joint retrieval and abstract reasoning task at the feature level, requiring models to identify specific passages from a prior art document that disclose individual claim features, and to identify which features of a claim make it novel. We implement and evaluate LLM-based workflows that decompose claims into features, analyze each feature against prior art, and finally derive a claim-level novelty prediction. Our experiments demonstrate that these workflows outperform embedding-based baselines on passage retrieval and novel feature identification. Furthermore, we show that unlike trained classifiers, LLMs are robust against spurious correlations present in the claim-level novelty classification task. We release the dataset and code to foster further research into transparent and granular patent analysis.



87. ❌ Entanglement is Half the Story: Post-Selection vs. Partial Traces

作者: Gustav J L Jäger, Krzysztof Bieniasz, Martin B Plenio, Hans-Martin Rieser 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02385v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

While tensor networks have their traditional application in simulating quantum systems, in the recent decade they have gathered interest as machine learning models. We combine the experience from both fields and derive how quantum constraints placed on a tensor network manifest a change in capabilities. To this end, we employ a method of inference of classical tensor networks on a quantum computer to define a hybrid architecture. This hybrid tensor network is a practical unified framework for it’s classical and quantum tensor network edge cases. We identify post-selection as the important property on which this interpolation hinges. The amount of post-selection corresponds to the level to which quantum constraints are enforced on the tensor network. On this basis, we propose a new hyperparameter which controls the transition between the hybrid and the quantum tensor network. In the comparison of classical and quantum tensor networks it complements the bond dimension. Quantum machine learning is improved by using the hyperparameter to allocate the practically limited post-selection to the quantum model in a trainable manner.



88. ❌ Enhancing Multimodal In-Context Learning via Inductive-Deductive Reasoning

作者: Haoyu Wang, Haonan Wang, Yuyan Chen, Jun Chen, Gang Liu, Qian Wang, Jiahong Yan, Yanghua Xiao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02378v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In-context learning (ICL) allows large models to adapt to tasks using a few examples, yet its extension to vision-language models (VLMs) remains fragile. Our analysis reveals that the fundamental limitation lies in an inductive gap, models often produce correct answers from flawed reasoning, while struggling to extract consistent rules across demonstrations. This gap is further exacerbated by two visual-level obstacles: an overwhelming proportion of redundant visual tokens that obscure textual cues, and a skewed attention distribution that favors the initial image at the expense of subsequent context. To address these issues, we introduce a framework that restructures multimodal ICL as a principled inductive-deductive process. The framework incorporates a similarity-based visual token compression module to filter out redundant patches, a dynamic attention rebalancing mechanism to distribute focus equitably across all images, and a chain-of-thought paradigm that explicitly guides the model to analyze individual examples, derive a generalizable rule, and then apply it to the query. An auxiliary learning pipeline combines supervised fine-tuning with reinforcement learning using verifiable rewards to reinforce faithful citation and noise filtering. Evaluations across eight benchmarks covering visual perception, logical reasoning, STEM problems, and sarcasm detection demonstrate consistent and significant improvements over standard ICL baselines for multiple open-source VLMs, highlighting the potential of equipping models with genuine inductive capabilities in multimodal settings.



89. ❌ Privacy Preserving Machine Learning Workflow: from Anonymization to Personalized Differential Privacy Budgets in Federated Learning

作者: Judith Sáinz-Pardo Díaz, Álvaro López García 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02372v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The growing development of artificial intelligence based solutions, together with privacy legislation, has driven the rise of the so-called privacy preserving machine learning architectures, such as federated learning. While federated learning enables model training on decentralized data preventing their sharing and centralization, it still faces several challenges related to data integrity and privacy. This paper presents a comprehensive privacy preserving federated learning workflow for sensitive tabular data, including anonymization and differential privacy techniques. We also introduce a formal definition for the concept of client drift, together with ways of detecting it to mitigate poisoning attacks. Then, we detail a complete methodology for assigning personalized privacy budgets for global differential privacy to the different clients participating in the network, based on a re-identification risk metric. The proposed methodology is presented and tested on an openly available dataset of medical records. Within the experimental setup we show that the approach based on personalized budgets, compared to the architecture including global differential privacy with fixed privacy budget, achieves a better model performance in terms of two error metrics.



90. ❌ A Compound AI Agent for Conversational Grant Discovery

作者: Zhisheng Tang, Mayank Kejriwal 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02366v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Research funding discovery remains fundamentally fragmented: researchers navigate disparate agency portals (e.g., in the United States, NSF, NIH, DARPA, Grants.gov, and many others) with heterogeneous interfaces, search capabilities, and data schemas. We present a compound AI system that unifies this landscape through two tightly coupled components: (1) an aggregation layer that autonomously collects, normalizes, and indexes almost 12,000 federal and nonprofit opportunities from fragmented sources via LLM-equipped browser agents, maintaining a biweekly-updated unified database; and (2) an agentic ReAct-based query processing layer that interprets research context (including from PDF documents) and employs hybrid search combining a structured index with selective web search to retrieve relevant opportunities - while avoiding LLM hallucination. The conversational interface supports iterative refinement through multi-turn interactions, allowing researchers to progressively apply constraints without reformulating their core research description. Results stream in real time with full transparency of intermediate reasoning, enabling appropriate calibration of user trust. Currently used by almost 3,000+ users, our approach demonstrates the feasibility of compound AI in reducing grant discovery time from 30–45 minutes (manual, fragmented portal searches) to under 10 minutes (unified, conversational search).



91. ❌ When Correct Isn’t Usable: Improving Structured Output Reliability in Small Language Models

作者: Cosimo Galeone, Minsu Park, Giuseppe Ettorre, Daniele Ligorio 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02363v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Deployed language models must produce outputs that are both correct and format-compliant. We study this structured-output reliability gap using two mathematical benchmarks – GSM8K and MATH – as a controlled testbed: ground truth is unambiguous and the output contract is strict (JSON with required fields). We evaluate three 7-9B models under five prompting strategies and report output accuracy – the joint event of mathematical correctness and valid JSON structure – as the primary metric. A systematic format failure emerges: NAIVE prompting (no system prompt) achieves up to 85% task accuracy on GSM8K but 0% output accuracy across all models and datasets. REFERENCE prompting (a minimal hand-written JSON format prompt) fares little better, yielding 0% output accuracy for two of four models tested. Constrained decoding enforces syntactic validity but incurs 3.6x-8.2x latency overhead and in several settings degrades task performance substantially. To overcome this limitation, we developed AloLab, an iterative system-prompt optimizer (meta-agent: Claude Sonnet 4.5) requiring only black-box API access to the target model; it reaches 84-87% output accuracy on GSM8K and 34-40% on MATH across five independent runs per model, with 29/30 paired McNemar comparisons against the best static prompt significant at p < 0.05, at near-NAIVE inference latency and without model fine-tuning. The same format failure extends to GPT-4o (OpenAI, 2024), a proprietary closed-source model: REFERENCE achieves 0% output accuracy due to systematic markdown-fence wrapping, while AloLab reaches 95.2% [94.8, 95.6]. An ablation replacing the Sonnet 4.5 meta-agent with Claude 3 Haiku reduces mean output accuracy to 61.0% and increases run-to-run standard deviation from <1 pp to 21.8 pp, confirming that meta-agent capability is a primary driver of optimization quality.



92. ❌ APIOT: Autonomous Vulnerability Management Across Bare-Metal Industrial OT Networks

作者: Adel ElZemity, Budi Arief, Shujun Li, Calvin Brierley, Yichao Wang, Yuxiang Huang, James Pope, Haoxiang Li, George Oikonomou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02346v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Bare-metal operational technology (OT) devices – especially the microcontrollers running Modbus/TCP and CoAP at the base of industrial control systems – have remained outside the reach of autonomous security attacks. Prior autonomous pentesting studies target Linux and web systems, whose shells and filesystems are familiar to LLM agents. Bare-metal OT has neither, so agents must reason directly over protocol fields and parser semantics. This requires new action-space designs and runtime controls, and opens new research questions about protocol-level exploit reasoning and its deployment envelope. We present APIOT (Autonomous Purple-teaming for Industrial OT), the first large language model (LLM) framework demonstrating an autonomous attack and remediation of bare-metal OT devices, achieving the full discovery -> exploitation -> patching -> verification cycle without step-by-step human intervention. We implemented and evaluated this framework on Zephyr RTOS firmware across heterogeneous industrial IoT (IIoT) topologies. Through 290 experiment runs spanning five frontier LLMs, three network topologies, two impairment levels, and guided versus unguided conditions, APIOT achieved a mission success rate of 90.0% on the full attack-remediation cycle. We found that the runtime governance layer (which we call an overseer) is a critical engineering variable: without it, agents exhibit systematic degenerate patterns, including repetition loops, missing crash verification, and reconnaissance deadlocks. Together, these findings carry two implications beyond our testbed. Attacker expertise is no longer the binding constraint on bare-metal OT exploitation, and defender threat models must now assume LLM-augmented adversaries capable of executing autonomous discovery-through-remediation cycles against industrial firmware.



93. ❌ LLM-enabled Social Agents

作者: Önder Gürcan, Moharram Challenger 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02335v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed agent-agent and human-agent interaction by enabling software, physical, and simulation agents to communicate and deliberate through natural language. Yet fluent language use does not by itself yield socially intelligible behaviour. Most current systems remain weakly grounded in roles, norms, intentions, and contextual constraints, limiting their capacity for meaningful participation in social environments. This paper develops a conceptual baseline for LLM-enabled social agents by arguing that they should be grounded in role definitions operationalized through persona descriptions. On this basis, we outline research directions for representation, hybrid control, and evaluation. The paper concludes that persona-based role definitions are a necessary foundation for turning language competence into social behaviour.



94. ❌ When Attention Collapses: Residual Evidence Modeling for Compositional Inference

作者: Niklas Houba 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02323v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Compositional inference - the decomposition of observations into an unknown number of latent components - is central to perception and scientific data analysis. Attention-based models perform well when components are approximately separable, as in object-centric vision. Under additive superposition, however - where multiple components contribute to every observation - we identify a structural failure mode we term slot collapse: multiple slots converge to the same dominant component while weaker ones remain unrepresented. We trace this to a general limitation: attention is memoryless with respect to explained evidence. All slots repeatedly operate on the same input without accounting for what has already been explained, so gradients are dominated by the strongest component, inducing shared fixed points across slots. As a result, attention fails to enforce non-redundant allocation under additive superposition. We address this by introducing residual evidence modeling, instantiated via evidence depletion - a minimal modification combining multiplicative depletion with an attention bias. Controlled ablations show that parallel attention, sequential processing alone, and loss-based regularization fail to resolve collapse; evidence depletion, which adds residual state to sequential attention, consistently succeeds. Across synthetic benchmarks and real-world audio mixtures (FUSS), evidence depletion reduces slot collapse by up to an order of magnitude, generalizing beyond synthetic settings. On gravitational-wave source inference for the ESA/NASA LISA mission, under identical architectures, data, and losses, standard attention fails while evidence depletion prevents collapse and enables multi-source posterior estimation. These results show that under additive superposition, residual evidence tracking is the operative ingredient for preventing collapse and enabling compositional inference.



95. ❌ ANO: A Principled Approach to Robust Policy Optimization

作者: Yiheng Zhang, Yiming Wang, Kaiyan Zhao, Zhenglin Wan, Jiayu Chen, Leong Hou U 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02320v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) dominates deep RL but faces a fundamental dilemma. Its “hard clipping” mechanism discards valuable gradient information from outliers, leading to sample inefficiency. Conversely, removing clipping (as in SPO) exposes optimization to unbounded gradients, causing significant instability and hyperparameter sensitivity. To resolve this, we establish a Unified Trust Region Framework that generalizes existing objectives. Within this framework, we derive Anchored Neighborhood Optimization (ANO) based on a set of design principles. We identify that the failure of standard policy gradients stems from a misapplication of gradient influence on outliers. We propose the Redescending Influence Principle, a paradigm shift from monotonic penalties (SPO) and hard-thresholding (PPO) to dynamic outlier suppression, and prove its necessity for stability in high-variance stochastic optimization. Theoretically, we prove ANO possesses the minimal structural complexity required for robust optimization. Empirically, ANO achieves state-of-the-art performance on MuJoCo benchmarks, significantly outperforming PPO and SPO. Notably, ANO demonstrates superior stability, preventing policy collapse even under aggressive hyperparameters (e.g., learning rates 3x larger than standard) where PPO fails completely.



作者: Soham Wasmatkar, Subinay Adhikary, Rakshit Rohan, Shouvik Kumar Guha, Saptarshi Pyne, Kripabandhu Ghosh 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02318v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In 2011, Judea Pearl received the Turing Award, considered the Nobel Prize in Computing, for fundamental contributions to artificial intelligence through the development of a calculus for probabilistic and causal reasoning. It includes pioneering the development of causal discovery algorithms. These computer algorithms can analyze large multivariate datasets and automatically discover the causal relationships among the constituent variables. They have been widely used in many critical fields such as medicine and economics to support decisions. However, to our knowledge, they have not been leveraged in law. This paper attempts to alleviate this gap by investigating whether causal discovery algorithms can be leveraged for automated generation of legal arguments. To that end, a novel legal dataset is prepared by identifying 17 legal concepts, such as physical assault and property dispute. A curated collection of 150 homicide cases are annotated with these concepts, e.g., a case is annotated with physical assault only if a physical assault had been reported in that case. Subsequently, a selected set of widely-used causal discovery algorithms is applied to the annotated dataset to discover the causal relationships between the legal concepts. Additionally, the degrees of belief associated with the discovered relationships are quantified in mathematical probabilities. It is shown that some of the causal relationships help generate viable legal arguments, e.g., if one could establish that a physical assault has not taken place during a homicide, it should be a sufficient condition (with probability 1) to establish that the homicide has not been committed due to a property-related dispute. Thus, this paper shows that causal discovery algorithms can be helpful in generating legal arguments, opening up avenues for promising future endeavors.



97. ❌ Anon: Extrapolating Optimizer Adaptivity Across the Real Spectrum

作者: Yiheng Zhang, Kaiyan Zhao, Shaowu Wu, Yiming Wang, Jiajun Wu, Leong Hou U, Steve Drew, Xiaoguang Niu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02317v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Adaptive optimizers such as Adam have achieved great success in training large-scale models like large language models and diffusion models. However, they often generalize worse than non-adaptive methods, such as SGD on classical architectures like CNNs. We identify a key cause of this performance gap: adaptivity in pre-conditioners, which limits the optimizer’s ability to adapt to diverse optimization landscapes. To address this, we propose Anon (Adaptivity Non-restricted Optimizer with Novel convergence technique), a novel optimizer with continuously tunable adaptivity in R, allowing it to interpolate between SGD-like and Adam-like behaviors and even extrapolate beyond both. To ensure convergence across the entire adaptivity spectrum, we introduce incremental delay update (IDU), a novel mechanism that is more flexible than AMSGrad’s hard max-tracking strategy and enhances robustness to gradient noise. We theoretically establish convergence guarantees under both convex and non-convex settings. Empirically, Anon consistently outperforms state-of-the-art optimizers on representative image classification, diffusion, and language modeling tasks. These results demonstrate that adaptivity can serve as a valuable tunable design principle, and Anon provides the first unified and reliable framework capable of bridging the gap between classical and modern optimizers and surpassing their advantageous properties.



98. ❌ Distilling Long-CoT Reasoning through Collaborative Step-wise Multi-Teacher Decoding

作者: Taewon Yun, Jisu Shin, Jeonghwan Choi, Seunghwan Bang, Hwanjun Song 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02290v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Distilling large reasoning models is essential for making Long-CoT reasoning practical, as full-scale inference remains computationally prohibitive. Existing curation-based approaches select complete reasoning traces post-hoc, overlooking collaboration among heterogeneous teachers and lacking dynamic exploration, which leads to redundant sampling and missed complementary reasoning. We introduce CoRD, a collaborative multi-teacher decoding framework that performs step-wise reasoning synthesis guided by predictive perplexity-based scoring and beam search. This enables heterogeneous LRMs to jointly construct coherent reasoning trajectories while efficiently preserving diverse, high-potential hypotheses. Experiments show that CoRD produces higher-quality reasoning data and achieves near teacher-level student performance with fewer, structured supervision signals, without substantial efficiency overhead. CoRD further generalizes well to out-of-domain and open-ended settings. The dataset and model are available at \href{https://github.com/DISL-Lab/CoRD}{https://github.com/DISL-Lab/CoRD}.



99. ❌ EngiAgent: Fully Connected Coordination of LLM Agents for Solving Open-ended Engineering Problems with Feasible Solutions

作者: Xiyuan Zhou, Ruixi Zou, Xinlei Wang, Yuheng Cheng, Yan Xu, Junhua Zhao, Jinjin Gu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02289v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Engineering problem solving is central to real-world decision-making, requiring mathematical formulations that not only represent complex problems but also produce feasible solutions under data and physical constraints. Unlike mathematical problem solving, which operates on predefined formulations, engineering tasks demand open-ended analysis, feasibility-driven modeling, and iterative refinement. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in reasoning and code generation, they often fail to ensure feasibility, which limits their applicability to engineering problem solving. To address this challenge, we propose EngiAgent, a multi-agent system with a fully connected coordinator that simulates expert workflows through specialized agents for problem analysis, modeling, verification, solving, and solution evaluation. The fully connected coordinator enables flexible feedback routing, overcoming the rigidity of prior pipeline-based reflection methods and ensuring feasibility at every stage of the process. This design not only improves robustness to diverse failure cases such as data extraction errors, constraint inconsistencies, and solver failures, but also enhances the overall quality of problem solving. Empirical results across four representative domains demonstrate that EngiAgent achieves substantial improvements in feasibility compared to prior approaches, establishing a new paradigm for feasibility-oriented engineering problem solving with LLMs. Our source code and data are available at https://github.com/AI4Engi/EngiAgent.



100. ❌ Complexity Horizons of Compressed Models in Analog Circuit Analysis

作者: Pacome Simon Mbonimpa 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02285v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) for specialized engineering domains, such as circuit analysis, often faces a trade-off between reasoning accuracy and computational efficiency. Traditional evaluation methods treat model performance as a flat metric, failing to account for the hierarchical nature of engineering knowledge. We propose a performance-aware model compression strategy that utilizes prerequisite graphs to optimize model selection for circuit analysis tasks. By structuring electronics design concepts as Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs), we can identify the specific complexity horizons of an LLM’s compressed variants’ tiers. Our framework introduces an agentic pipeline for generating prerequisite-based datasets and a strategic evaluation engine that dynamically cascades queries across a spectrum of compressed variants of an LLM. This approach allows to select the smallest compressed model, given its conceptual knowledge boundaries in circuit analysis. Experimental results on analog electronics datasets demonstrate that prerequisite graphs provide a granular map of model compression with respect to the performance given circuit analysis complexity. (Source Code: https://github.com/pacomesimon/LLM_prereq_graphs_circuit_analysis, Demo: https://huggingface.co/spaces/pacomesimon/LLM_prereq_graphs_circuit_analysis)



101. ❌ FlexSQL: Flexible Exploration and Execution Make Better Text-to-SQL Agents

作者: Quang Hieu Pham, Yang He, Ping Nie, Canwen Xu, Davood Rafiei, Yuepeng Wang, Xi Ye, Jocelyn Qiaochu Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02815v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Text-to-SQL over large analytical databases requires navigating complex schemas, resolving ambiguous queries, and grounding decisions in actual data. Most current systems follow a fixed pipeline where schema elements are retrieved once upfront and the database is only revisited for post-hoc repair, limiting recovery from early mistakes. We present FlexSQL, a text-to-SQL agent whose core design principle is flexible database interaction: the agent can explore schema structure, inspect data values, and run verification queries at any point during reasoning. FlexSQL generates diverse execution plans to cover multiple query interpretations, implements each plan in either SQL or Python depending on the task, and uses a two-tiered repair mechanism that can backtrack from code-level errors to plan-level revisions. On Spider2-Snow, using gpt-oss-120b, FlexSQL achieves a 65.4% score, outperforming strong open-source baselines that use stronger, larger models such as gpt-o3 and DeepSeek-R1. When integrated into a general-purpose coding agent (as skills in Claude Code), our approach yields over 10% relative improvement on Spider2-Snow. Further analysis shows that flexible exploration and flexible execution jointly contribute to the effectiveness of our approach, highlighting flexibility as a key design principle. Our code is available at: https://github.com/StringNLPLAB/FlexSQL



102. ❌ Reinforcement Learning for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems through Orchestration Traces

作者: Chenchen Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02801v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

As large language model (LLM) agents evolve from isolated tool users into coordinated teams, reinforcement learning (RL) must optimize not only individual actions but also how work is spawned, delegated, communicated, aggregated, and stopped. This paper studies RL for LLM-based multi-agent systems through orchestration traces: temporal interaction graphs whose events include sub-agent spawning, delegation, communication, tool use, return, aggregation, and stopping decisions. Using this lens, we identify three technical axes. First, reward design spans eight families, including orchestration rewards for parallelism speedup, split correctness, and aggregation quality. Second, reward and credit signals attach to eight credit- or signal-bearing units from token to team; explicit counterfactual message-level credit remains especially sparse in our curated pool. Third, orchestration learning decomposes into five sub-decisions: when to spawn, whom to delegate to, how to communicate, how to aggregate, and when to stop. In our curated pool as of May 4, 2026, we found no explicit RL training method for the stopping decision. We connect academic methods to public industrial evidence from Kimi Agent Swarm, OpenAI Codex, and Anthropic Claude Code. The resulting scale gap is a gap between publicly reported deployment envelopes and open academic evaluation regimes, not independent verification of industrial training traces. We release the artifact at https://github.com/xxzcc/awesome-llm-mas-rl, including an 84-entry tagged paper pool, a 32-record exclusion log, scripted corpus statistics, and a minimal JSON schema for replayable orchestration traces.



103. ❌ FunFuzz: An LLM-Powered Evolutionary Fuzzing Framework

作者: Mario Rodríguez Béjar, B. Romera-Paredes, Jose L. Hernández-Ramos 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02789v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Modern fuzzers increasingly use Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate structured inputs, but LLM-driven fuzzing is sensitive to prompt initialization and sampling variance, which can reduce exploration efficiency and lead to redundant inputs. We present FunFuzz, a multi-island evolutionary fuzzing framework that runs several isolated searches in parallel and periodically migrates high-value candidates to maintain diversity. FunFuzz derives initial generation prompts from documentation and initializes islands with topic-specific instructions, then continuously adapts prompts using feedback-guided selection. During fuzzing, candidates are prioritized by incremental compiler coverage, while compiler-internal failure signals are used to identify crash-inducing inputs. We evaluate FunFuzz on compiler fuzzing, where inputs are source programs and success is measured by compiler coverage and unique compiler-internal failures. Across repeated 24-hour campaigns on GCC and Clang, FunFuzz achieves higher compiler coverage than previous LLM-driven baselines and discovers more unique failure-triggering inputs.



104. ❌ PubMed-Ophtha: An open resource for training ophthalmology vision-language models on scientific literature

作者: Verena Jasmin Hallitschke, Carsten Eickhoff, Philipp Berens 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02720v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Vision-language models hold considerable promise for ophthalmology, but their development depends on large-scale, high-quality image-text datasets that remain scarce. We present PubMed-Ophtha, a hierarchical dataset of 102,023 ophthalmological image-caption pairs extracted from 15,842 open-access articles in PubMed Central. Unlike existing datasets, figures are extracted directly from article PDFs at full resolution and decomposed into their constituent panels, panel identifiers, and individual images. Each image is annotated with its imaging modality – color fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, retinal imaging, or other – and a mark status indicating the presence of annotation marks such as arrows. Figure captions are split into panel-level subcaptions using a two-step LLM approach, achieving a mean average sentence BLEU score of 0.913 on human-annotated data. Panel and image detection models reach a mAP@0.50 of 0.909 and 0.892, respectively, and figure extraction achieves a median IoU of 0.997. To support reproducibility, we additionally release the human-annotated ground-truth data, all trained models, and the full dataset generation pipeline.



105. ❌ ContextualJailbreak: Evolutionary Red-Teaming via Simulated Conversational Priming

作者: Mario Rodríguez Béjar, Francisco J. Cortés-Delgado, S. Braghin, Jose L. Hernández-Ramos 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02647v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that bypass safety alignment and elicit harmful responses. A growing body of work shows that contextual priming, where earlier turns covertly bias later replies, constitutes a powerful attack surface, with hand-crafted multi-turn scaffolds consistently outperforming single-turn manipulations on capable models. However, automated optimization-based red-teaming has remained largely limited to the single-turn setting, iterating over static prompts and lacking the ability to reason about which forms of conversational priming induce compliance. While recent multi-turn, search-based approaches have begun to bridge this gap, the mutator design space underlying effective primed dialogues remains largely unexplored. We present ContextualJailbreak, a black-box red-teaming strategy that performs evolutionary search over a simulated multi-turn primed dialogue. The strategy leverages a graded 0-5 harm score from a two-level judge as an in-loop signal, enabling partially harmful responses to guide the search process rather than being discarded. Search is driven by five semantically defined mutation operators: roleplay, scenario, expand, troubleshooting, and mechanistic, of which the last two are novel contributions of this work. Across 50 representative HarmBench behaviors, ContextualJailbreak achieves an ASR of 100% on gpt-oss:20B, 100% on qwen3-8B, 100% on llama3.1:70B, and 90% on gpt-oss:120B, outperforming four single- and multi-turn baselines by 31-96 percentage points on average. The 40 maximally harmful attacks discovered against gpt-oss:120B transfer without adaptation to closed frontier models, achieving 90.0% on gpt-4o-mini, 70.0% on gpt-5, and 70.0% on gemini-3-flash, but only 17.5% on claude-opus-4-7 and 15.0% on claude-sonnet-4-6, revealing a pronounced provider-level asymmetry in alignment robustness.



106. ❌ Mapping Discourse Reframing: A Multi-Layer Network Approach to Italian HPV Vaccine Discourse on X (2010-2024)

作者: Lorella Viola 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02629v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Understanding how online narratives travel through coalitions is critical for identifying information disorder, yet computational analyses often rely on conservative network constructions that erase initially sparse but salient signals. This paper proposes a novel multi-layer framework that captures low-frequency signals of emerging information disorder allowing for locating where online discourse is reframed and amplified over time. The use case is 14 years of Italian discourse on X regarding the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine across three pivotal epochs (2010-2024). Utilizing hashtag co-occurrence networks, we introduce a dual-layer approach. We first identify robust core discourse coalitions through conservative community detection, revealing a stable prevention-oriented backbone contrasted with increasingly separable skepticism coalitions. We then introduce a coverage layer and project fringe hashtags into core coalitions based on weighted connectivity. Using a manually labelled set of skeptical and conspiratorial seed tweets, we demonstrate that this core-coverage projection significantly improves the recovery of long-tail, problematic hashtags while preserving an interpretable coalition structure. Our findings characterize the structural maturation of polarized narratives and provide a methodology for mapping how discourse is reframed and amplified by information disorder over time.



107. ❌ Synthetic Users, Real Differences: an Evaluation Framework for User Simulation in Multi-Turn Conversations

作者: Yu Lu Liu, Hyokun Yun, Tanya Roosta, Ziang Xiao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02624v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

There is growing interest in exploring user simulation as an alternative to gathering and scoring real user-chatbot interactions for AI chatbot evaluation. For this purpose, it is important to ensure the realism of the simulation, i.e., the extent to which simulated dialogues reflect real dialogues users have with chatbots. Most existing methods evaluating simulation realism produce coarse quality signal and remain solely at the level of individual dialogues. To support more rigorous evaluation in this area, we propose realsim, an evaluation framework that enables practitioners to take a distributional view of real vs. simulated dialogues along 8 dimensions, covering attributes related to the communicative functions of the interaction, user states, and the surface form of user messages. We then instantiate the framework with a curated dataset of 1K multi-turn task-focused real user-chatbot dialogues that cover 16 domains of chatbot applications. Overall, we find that simulated users tend to struggle at capturing communication frictions that real users introduce to interactions, which could make evaluations based on such simulations overly optimistic. We also observe variability in performance across different domains, which may indicate a need for domain-specific user simulators.



108. ❌ Beating the Style Detector: Three Hours of Agentic Research on the AI-Text Arms Race

作者: Andreas Maier, Moritz Zaiss, Siming Bayer 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02620v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Reproducing an empirical NLP study used to take weeks. Given the released data and a modern agentic-research harness, we redo every experiment of a recent ACL,2026 study on personal-style post-editing of LLM drafts – and add three new ones – with the human investigator acting only as a reviewer-in-the-loop. We reproduce all seven preregistered hypotheses and recover the paper’s headline correlation between perceived self-similarity and embedding-measured self-similarity to three decimal places ($r{=}{+}0.244$, $p{<}10^{-8}$, $n{=}648$). Under a leakage-free held-out protocol, GPT-5.5 and Claude,Opus,4.7 close $71$–$75,%$ of the style gap to the same-author ceiling on $324$ paired tasks, against $24,%$ for the human post-edit, and beat the human post-edit on $\sim$$80,%$ of tasks. We then frame the same data as an AI-text detection arms race. A leave-authors-out linear SVM on LUAR-MUD embeddings reaches AUC $0.93$–$1.00$ across approaches; six diagnostics show that GPT-5.5 detection is mostly a length confound while Opus detection is a genuine stylistic signature. Given $T{=}20$ feedback iterations against the frozen detector, an Opus agent flips two of five held-out test mimics to the human half-space and shrinks every margin by an order of magnitude. With moderate effort against a known detector, a frontier LLM can already efficiently lower its own AI-detection probability. All code, $648$ mimic drafts, trained detectors, diagnostics, and adversarial trajectories are released.



109. ❌ SemEval-2026 Task 7: Everyday Knowledge Across Diverse Languages and Cultures

作者: Nedjma Ousidhoum, Junho Myung, Carla Perez-Almendros, Jiho Jin, Amr Keleg, Meriem Beloucif, Yi Zhou, Rodrigo Agerri, Vladimir Araujo, Naomi Baes, James Barry, Joanne Boisson, Nancy F. Chen, Christine de Kock, Aleksandra Edwards, Joseba Fernandez de Landa, Mohamed Fazli Imam, Huda Hakami, Shu-Kai Hsieh, Joseph Marvin Imperial, Roy Ka-Wei Lee, Zhengyuan Liu, Chenyang Lyu, Younes Samih, Johan Sjons, Bryan Tan, Asahi Ushio, Weihua Zheng, Alice Oh, Jose Camacho-Collados 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02601v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present our shared task on evaluating the adaptability of LLMs and NLP systems across multiple languages and cultures. The task data consist of an extended version of our manually constructed BLEnD benchmark (Myung et al. 2024), covering more than 30 language-culture pairs, predominantly representing low-resource languages spoken across multiple continents. As the task is designed strictly for evaluation, participants were not permitted to use the data for training, fine-tuning, few-shot learning, or any other form of model modification. Our task includes two tracks: (a) Short-Answer Questions (SAQ) and (b) Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQ). Participants were required to predict labels and were allowed to submit any NLP system and adopt diverse modelling strategies, provided that the benchmark was used solely for evaluation. The task attracted more than 140 registered participants, and we received final submissions from 62 teams, along with 19 system description papers. We report the results and present an analysis of the best-performing systems and the most commonly adopted approaches. Furthermore, we discuss shared insights into open questions and challenges related to evaluation, misalignment, and methodological perspectives on model behaviour in low-resource languages and for under-represented cultures.



110. ❌ Revisiting Semantic Role Labeling: Efficient Structured Inference with Dependency-Informed Analysis

作者: Sangpil Youm, Leah Jones, Bonnie J. Dorr 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02505v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Semantic Role Labeling (SRL) provides an explicit representation of predicate-argument structure, capturing linguistically grounded relations such as who did what to whom. While recent NLP progress has been dominated by large language models (LLMs), these systems often rely on implicit semantic representations, often lacking explicit structural constraints and systematic explanatory mechanisms. Traditionally, SRL systems have often relied on AllenNLP; however, the framework entered maintenance mode in December 2022, limiting compatibility with evolving encoder architectures and modern inference requirements. We revisit structured SRL modeling, introducing a modernized encoder-based framework that preserves explicit predicate-argument structure while enabling inference 10 times faster. Using BERT-base, the model attains comparable predictive performance, and RoBERTa and DeBERTa further improve F1 performance within the same framework. We adopt a dependency-informed diagnostic methodology to characterize span-level inconsistencies and conduct a representation-level analysis of LLM behavior under dependency-informed structural signals. Results indicate that dependency cues primarily improve structural stability. Finally, we illustrate how the framework’s explicit predicate-argument structure can support multilingual SRL projection as a downstream application.



111. ❌ A multilingual hallucination benchmark: MultiWikiQHalluA

作者: Freja Thoresen, Dan Saattrup Smart 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02504v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Most hallucination evaluations focus on English, leaving it unclear whether findings transfer to lower-resource languages. We investigate faithfulness hallucinations, defined as model-generated content that is fluent and plausible but diverges from the provided input or is internally inconsistent. Leveraging the multilingual MultiWikiQA dataset, we utilize the LettuceDetect framework to create synthetic hallucination datasets for 306 languages, from which we train token-level hallucination classifiers for 30 European languages. In this work, we present evaluations of model hallucinations on a selection of languages: English, Danish, German, and Icelandic. Using these classifiers, we evaluate the hallucination rates for Qwen3-0.6B, Qwen3-14B, Gemma-3-12B-IT, cogito-v1-preview-qwen-32B, and cogito-v1-preview-llama-70B. Our classifiers reveal notably higher hallucination rates for Qwen3-0.6B (up to 60% of answers containing at least one hallucination, peaking in Icelandic) and generally lower rates for larger models, with cogito-v1-preview-qwen-32B and cogito-v1-preview-llama-70B performing best on most languages. Hallucination rates are consistently higher for lower-resource languages, particularly Icelandic.



112. ❌ Tibetan-TTS:Low-Resource Tibetan Speech Synthesis with Large Model Adaptation

作者: Jiaxu He, Chao Wang, Jie Lian, Yuqing Cai, Yongxiang Li, Renzeg Duojie, Jie Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02496v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Tibetan text-to-speech (TTS) has long been challenged by scarce speech resources, significant dialectal variation, and the complex mapping between written text and spoken pronunciation. To address these issues, this work presents, to the best of our knowledge, the first large-model-based Tibetan TTS system in the industry, built upon a large speech synthesis model developed by Xingchen AGI Lab. The proposed system integrates data quality enhancement, Tibetan-oriented text representation and tokenizer adaptation, and cross-lingual adaptive training for low-resource Tibetan speech synthesis. Experimental results show that the system can generate stable, natural, and intelligible Tibetan speech under low-resource conditions. In subjective evaluation, the MOS scores of the syllable-level and BPE-based systems reach 4.28 and 4.35, while their pronunciation accuracies reach 97.6% and 96.6%, respectively, outperforming an external commercial Tibetan TTS interface. These results demonstrate that combining a large-model backbone with Tibetan-oriented text representation adaptation and cross-lingual adaptive training enables highly usable low-resource Tibetan speech synthesis, and also provides a technical foundation for future unified multi-dialect Tibetan speech synthesis.



作者: Stanisław Sójka, Witold Kowalczyk 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02472v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Legal texts often contain computational legal clauses–provisions whose understanding requires complex logic. While frontier Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) can describe such clauses, building production-ready systems is limited by reasoning errors and the high cost of inference. We propose Amortized Intelligence, a neuro-symbolic approach where we use an LLM once to translate a legal text into Deterministic Autonomous Contract Language (DACL): a typed graph intermediate representation. Adjudication then relies on deterministic graph executions with a visually auditable trace. In comparison against runtime LRM baselines (including GPT-5.2 and Gemini 3 Pro), our DACL-based Agent achieves near-perfect consistency and mitigates the “reasoning cliff” observed in probabilistic models. The system reduces compute costs by over 90% in high-volume workflows while satisfying the strict auditability requirements of legal adjudication.



114. ❌ ATLAS: Article Tracking, Linking, and Analysis of Swedish Encyclopedias

作者: Albin Andersson, Salam Jonasson, Fredrik Wastring, Pierre Nugues 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02466v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The digitization of old encyclopedias represents an important step to improve access to historically structured knowledge. Often, however, this process does not go beyond an optical character recognition, leaving all the underlying structure unexploited. In addition, many encyclopedias had multiple editions reflecting the evolution of knowledge. The lack of structure in the raw text makes it difficult to track changes across these editions. In this work, we built a pipeline to restore the text structure, where we extract the headwords and identify entries; categorize the entities; match entries across editions; and link entries to a Wikidata item. We applied this pipeline to the four major editions of \textit{Nordisk familjebok}, an authoritative Swedish encyclopedia published between 1876 and 1951. We could extract the headwords with an F1 score of 97.8% and we obtained an F1 score of 93.4% on the headword classification. On a small-scale evaluation, we reached a 93% precision on the cross-edition matching, 85% precision and 16.5% recall on the Wikidata linking. This shows that an automated approach to digitized historical knowledge is possible. This should facilitate the preservation of general knowledge and the understanding of knowledge transmission. The datasets and programs are available online.



115. ❌ Leveraging Argument Structure to Predict Content Hatefulness

作者: Nicolas Benjamin Ocampo, Davide Ceolin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02457v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Information disorder is a challenging phenomenon that affects society at large. This phenomenon entails the diffusion of misleading, misinforming, and hateful content online. In different contexts, one aspect of the problem may prevail, but overall, this is a broad problem that requires comprehensive solutions. While each dimension of the problem (hate speech, disinformation, misinformation, etc.) requires in-depth analysis, in this paper, we look into the possibility of argument structure to provide relevant information to link these different areas of the problem. In particular, we focus on the WSF-ARG+ dataset, which consists of white supremacy forum messages annotated in terms of argument structure (premises and conclusion). There, we leverage the checkworthiness and hatefulness annotations of the argument components to obtain insights into the hatefulness of the whole message. Our results show promising insights (up to 96% F1), indicating the possibility of extending this direction in the future to tackle hateful content identification and information disorder countering.



116. ❌ HalluScan: A Systematic Benchmark for Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Instruction-Following LLMs

作者: Ahmed Cherif 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02443v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse natural language processing tasks, yet they remain susceptible to hallucinations – generating content that is factually incorrect, unfaithful to provided context, or misaligned with user instructions. We present HalluScan, a comprehensive benchmark framework that systematically evaluates hallucination detection and mitigation across 72 configurations spanning 6 detection methods, 4 open-weight model families, and 3 diverse domains. We introduce three key contributions: (1) HalluScore, a novel composite metric that achieves a Pearson correlation of r = 0.41 with human expert judgments; (2) Adaptive Detection Routing (ADR), an intelligent routing algorithm achieving 2.0x cost reduction with only 0.1% AUROC degradation; and (3) systematic error cascade decomposition revealing substantial variation in hallucination error types across domains. Our experiments reveal that NLI Verification achieves the highest overall AUROC of 0.88, while RAV achieves the second-highest AUROC of 0.66.



117. ❌ Fight Poison with Poison: Enhancing Robustness in Few-shot Machine-Generated Text Detection with Adversarial Training

作者: Wenjing Duan, Qi Zhou, Yuanfan Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02374v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Machine-generated text (MGT) detection is critical for regulating online information ecosystems, yet existing detectors often underperform in few-shot settings and remain vulnerable to adversarial, humanizing attacks. To build accurate and robust detectors under limited supervision, we adopt a threat-modeling perspective and study detector vulnerabilities from an attacker’s viewpoint under an output-only black-box setting. Motivated by this perspective, we propose RAG-GuidEd Attacker Strengthens ConTrastive Few-shot Detector (REACT), an adversarial training framework that improves both few-shot detection performance and robustness against attacks. REACT couples a humanization-oriented attacker with a target detector: the attacker leverages retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to craft highly human-like adversarial examples to evade detection, while the detector learns from these adversaries with a contrastive objective to stabilize few-shot representation learning and enhance robustness. We alternately update the attacker and the detector to enable their co-evolution. Experiments on 4 datasets with 4 shot sizes and 3 random seeds show that REACT improves average detection F1 by 4.95 points over 8 state-of-the-art (SOTA) detectors and reduces the average attack success rate (ASR) under 4 strong attacks by 3.66 percentage points.



118. ❌ InfoLaw: Information Scaling Laws for Large Language Models with Quality-Weighted Mixture Data and Repetition

作者: Fengze Liu, Weidong Zhou, Binbin Liu, Ping Guo, Zijun Wang, Bingni Zhang, Yifan Zhang, Yifeng Yu, Xiaohuan Zhou, Taifeng Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02364v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Upweighting high-quality data in LLM pretraining often improves performance, but in datalimited regimes, especially under overtraining, stronger upweighting increases repetition and can degrade performance. However, standard scaling laws do not reliably extrapolate across mixture recipes or under repetitions, making the selection for optimal data recipes at scaling underdetermined. To solve this, we introduce InfoLaw (Information Scaling Laws), a data-aware scaling framework that predicts loss from consumed tokens, model size, data mixture weights, and repetition. The key idea is to model pretraining as information accumulation, where quality controls information density and repetition induces scaledependent diminishing returns. We first collect the model performance after training on datasets that vary in scale, quality distribution, and repetition level. Then we build up the modeling for information so that information accurately predicts those model performance. InfoLaw predicts performance on unseen data recipes and larger scale runs (up to 7B, 425B tokens) with 0.15% mean and 0.96% max absolute error in loss, and it extrapolates reliably across overtraining levels, enabling efficient data-recipe selection under varying compute budgets.



119. ❌ MolViBench: Evaluating LLMs on Molecular Vibe Coding

作者: Jiatong Li, Yuxuan Ren, Weida Wang, Changmeng Zheng, Xiao-yong Wei, Qing Li, Yatao Bian 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02351v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Molecular Vibe Coding, a paradigm where chemists interact with LLMs to generate executable programs for molecular tasks, has emerged as a flexible alternative to chemical agents with predefined tools, enabling chemists to express arbitrarily complex, customized workflows. Unlike general coding tasks, molecular coding imposes a distinctive challenge that LLMs should jointly equip programming, molecular understanding, and domain-specific reasoning capabilities. However, existing benchmarks remain disconnected. General code generation benchmarks such as HumanEval and SWE-bench require no chemistry knowledge, while chemistry-focused benchmarks such as S^2-Bench and ChemCoTBench evaluate knowledge recall or property prediction rather than executable code generation. To bridge this gap, we introduce MolViBench, the first benchmark tailored for Molecular Vibe Coding. MolViBench comprises 358 curated tasks across five cognitive levels, ranging from single-API recall to end-to-end virtual screening pipeline design, spanning 12 real-world drug discovery workflows. To rigorously assess generated code, we also propose a multi-layered evaluation framework that combines type-aware output comparison and AST-based API-semantic fallback analysis, which jointly measures executability and chemical correctness. We systematically evaluate 9 frontier coding LLMs and compare three real-world Molecular Vibe Coding paradigms, providing a practical and fine-grained testbed for diagnosing LLMs’ coding capabilities in AI-accelerated molecular discovery.



120. ❌ Decoding-Time Debiasing via Process Reward Models: From Controlled Fill-in to Open-Ended Generation

作者: Muneeb Ur Raheem Khan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02348v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models pick up social biases from the data they are trained on and carry those biases into downstream applications, often reinforcing stereotypes around gender, race, religion, disability, age, and socioeconomic status. The standard fixes (retraining on curated data or fine-tuning with human feedback) are expensive, need access to model weights, and risk degrading the model on other tasks. In this paper we take a different route: we debias the model at decoding time, treating bias mitigation as a structured search over candidate tokens without ever touching model weights. A separate Process Reward Model (PRM) acts as a judge, scoring each candidate for both fairness and fluency. We design three schemes of increasing sophistication (Best-of-N selection, Sequential critique-and-revise, and Constitutional self-audit) and evaluate them on four models (GPT-4o-mini, Llama 3.2 3B, Gemma 3 4B, Qwen 2.5 3B) across a 200-prompt bilingual benchmark in English and Urdu covering eight bias categories. Sequential debiasing proves the most effective, raising mean bias scores by up to +0.40 over baseline while preserving (and sometimes improving) fluency. We then extend all three schemes to open-ended generation, where each token is debiased on the fly, and introduce a lightweight Bias Guard gate that fires only on potentially biased words, keeping overhead near 2x for well-calibrated models. A formal overhead metric that separates generator cost from judge cost reveals that Best-of-N is effectively free on the generator side in a native implementation. GPT-4o-mini, included as a strong proprietary anchor, confirms that the framework scales with model capability; the three open-weight models show where current small-scale LLMs still struggle.



作者: Xianglei Liao, Chuanyi Li, Kun Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02308v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Against the backdrop of rapid advances in artificial intelligence, legal argument mining has emerged as an important research area linking legal texts with intelligent analysis, carrying significant theoretical and practical implications. Existing studies have primarily developed along three dimensions: data, technology, and theory. At the data level, raw legal texts and annotated corpora constitute the foundational resources. At the technological level, research paradigms have evolved from rule-based systems and traditional machine learning to large language models (LLMs). At the theoretical level, argumentation theory and legal dogmatics provide important references for modeling argumentation structures. However, despite ongoing progress, the overall development of legal argument mining remains relatively slow. Building on a systematic review of existing research, this study conducts an in-depth analysis and finds that this is due not only to data scarcity or technical limitations, but more fundamentally to the lack of a structured representational approach that reconciles theoretical expressiveness with computational feasibility. Specifically, this challenge manifests in dilemmas in data standardization, obstacles to effective modeling, and limitations in domain adaptation. In response, the study proposes several key directions for future research. It aims to provide a reframing of key problems and a pathway for future development in legal argument mining, while leaving specific models and implementation schemes for further investigation.



122. ❌ Compositional Multi-hop Factual Error Correction via Decomposition-and-Injection

作者: Lei Zhu, Xiaobao Wang, Jianbiao Yang, Chenyang Wang, Dongxiao He, Longbiao Wang, Jianwu Dang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02277v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Factual Error Correction (FEC) aims to revise inaccurate text into statements that are factually consistent with external evidence. Although recent methods perform well on single-hop correction, they often treat claims as atomic units and struggle with multi-hop cases that require compositional reasoning across multiple evidence sources. This challenge is further amplified by limited paired data and difficulties in locating semantic errors within complex reasoning chains. We present CECoR (Compositional Error Correction via Reasoning-aware Synthesis), a reasoning-aware framework that introduces a Decomposition and Injection paradigm for compositional error correction. CECoR decomposes multi-hop claims into interpretable reasoning steps and injects controlled perturbations to synthesize high-quality training pairs. A two-stage learning strategy combining supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning improves factual accuracy and robustness. Comprehensive evaluations show that CECoR achieves strong performance on multi-hop benchmarks, outperforming both distantly supervised methods and few-shot LLM baselines. It also generalizes effectively to single-hop correction and remains stable under noisy evidence, demonstrating its versatility for real-world factual correction.



123. ❌ A Systematic Benchmark of Machine Transliteration Models for the Tajik-Farsi Language Pair: A Comparative Study from Rule-Based to Transformer Architectures

作者: Mullosharaf K. Arabov 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02270v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

This paper presents the first comprehensive comparative analysis of modern machine learning architectures for transliteration between Tajik (Cyrillic script) and Persian (Arabic script). A key contribution is the creation and validation of a unique parallel corpus aggregated from multiple heterogeneous sources, including crowdsourced projects, lexicographic pairs, parallel texts of “Shahnameh”, diplomatic articles, texts of “Masnavi-i Ma’navi”, official terminology lists, and transliterated correspondences. The initial dataset comprised 328,253 sentence pairs; a representative subset of 40,000 pairs was formed using stratified random sampling. The experiment compared six classes of models: rule-based baseline, LSTM with attention, character-level Transformer, G2P Transformer (trained from scratch), pre-trained multilingual models (mBART, mT5 with LoRA), and byte-level ByT5. Results demonstrate the overwhelming superiority of ByT5 (chrF++ 87.4 for Tajik to Farsi, 80.1 for reverse). The G2P Transformer significantly outperformed mBART (72.3 vs. 62.2 chrF++) despite limited data. Models using subword tokenization (mT5) failed completely (chrF++ less than 18.5). The findings demonstrate that for accurate transliteration of the Tajik-Farsi pair, architectures operating at the byte or character level are unequivocally more effective than traditional multilingual Seq2Seq models relying on subword tokenization.



124. ❌ Reliability-Oriented Multilingual Orthopedic Diagnosis: A Domain-Adaptive Modeling and a Conceptual Validation Framework

作者: Danish Ali, Li Xiaojian, Sundas Iqbal, Farrukh Zaidi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02266v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly proposed for clinical decision support including multilingual diagnosis in low-resource settings. However, their reliability, calibration and safety characteristics remain insufficiently understood for structured, high-risk tasks. We present a system-level analysis of multilingual orthopedic diagnosis from free-text clinical notes in English, Hindi and Punjabi. We evaluate three modeling regimes: (i) task-aligned multilingual transformer encoders, (ii) a task-fine-tuned baseline (DistilBERT), and (iii) a domain-adaptive architecture tailored to orthopedic text (IndicBERT-HPA). These models are compared with zero-shot, instruction-tuned LLMs to assess suitability for structured diagnostic classification. Results indicate that while LLMs exhibit strong linguistic fluency, they show unstable calibration and reduced reliability under structured multilingual conditions, particularly in low-resource languages. These findings are specific to zero-shot evaluation and do not imply limitations of fine-tuned models. Domain-adaptive specialization substantially improves cross-lingual discrimination and confidence behavior. IndicBERT-HPA, with language-specific orthopedic adapter heads achieves consistently strong performance across six diagnostic categories and more predictable deployment characteristics than task-only adaptation. Building on these observations, we outline a conceptual deterministic agent-based validation framework for future implementation, formalizing evidence checks, language-sensitive validation and conservative human-in-the-loop gating. Reliable multilingual clinical decision support requires specialized architecture, explicit reliability analysis, and structured validation for safety-critical systems.



125. ❌ WindowQuant: Mixed-Precision KV Cache Quantization based on Window-Level Similarity for VLMs Inference Optimization

作者: Wei Tao, Xiaoyang Qu, Peiqiang Wang, Guokuan Li, Jiguang Wan, Kai Lu, Jianzong Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02262v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recently, video language models (VLMs) have been applied in various fields. However, the visual token sequence of the VLM is too long, which may cause intolerant inference latency and GPU memory usage. Existing methods propose mixed-precision quantization to the key-value (KV) cache in VLMs based on token granularity, which is time-consuming in the search process and hardware inefficient during computation. This paper introduces a novel approach called WindowQuant, which employs window-adaptive mixed-precision quantization to optimize the KV cache. WindowQuant consists of two modules: window-level quantization search and window-level KV cache computation. Window-level quantization search quickly determines the optimal bit-width configuration of the KV cache windows based on the similarity scores between the corresponding visual token windows and the text prompt, maintaining the model accuracy. Furthermore, window-level KV cache computation reorders the KV cache windows before quantization, avoiding the hardware inefficiency caused by mixed-precision quantization in inference computation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that WindowQuant outperforms state-of-the-art VLM models and KV cache quantization methods on various datasets.



126. ❌ An Information-theoretic Propagation Denoising and Fusion Framework for Fake News Detection

作者: Mengyang Chen, Lingwei Wei, Wei Zhou, Songlin Hu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02259v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Incomplete propagation data significantly hinders robust fake news detection. Recent approaches leverage large language models to simulate missing user interactions via role-playing, thereby enriching propagation with synthetic signals. However, such propagation data is intrinsically unreliable, and directly fusing it can lead to biased representations, leading to limited detection performance. In this paper, we alleviate the unreliability of synthetic propagation from the mutual information perspective and propose a novel information-theoretic propagation denoising and fusion (InfoPDF) framework to learn effective representations from both real and synthetic propagation. Specifically, we first generate attribute-specific synthetic propagation using large language models. Then we model each synthetic propagation graph as a probabilistic latent distribution to guide reliability-aware adaptive fusion with real propagation. During training, we design a mutual information-based objective to learn compressed and task-sufficient propagation representations. It jointly suppresses noisy signals across attribute-specific synthetic propagation, maintains consistency between real and synthetic propagation representations, and ensures task sufficiency for fake news detection and attribute prediction. Experiments on three real-world datasets show that InfoPDF consistently achieves superior performance across various fake news detection tasks. Further analysis demonstrates that InfoPDF can estimate attribute-level reliabilities and learn more discriminative propagation representations.



127. ❌ Zero-Shot Confidence Estimation for Small LLMs: When Supervised Baselines Aren’t Worth Training

作者: Luong N. Nguyen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02241v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

How reliably can a small language model estimate its own correctness? The answer determines whether local-to-cloud routing-escalating queries a cheap local model cannot handle-can work without supervised training data. As inference costs dominate large language model (LLM) deployment budgets, routing most queries to a cheap local model while reserving expensive cloud calls for hard cases is an increasingly common cost-control strategy. We compare zero-shot confidence signals against RouteLLM-style supervised baselines across three 7-8B model families and two datasets (1,000 and 500 queries per model, respectively). Average token log-probability, which requires no training data, matches or exceeds supervised baselines in-distribution (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.650-0.714 vs. 0.644-0.676) and substantially outperforms them out-of-distribution (0.717-0.833 vs. 0.512-0.564), because it measures a property of the model’s generation rather than the query distribution. This paper further proposes retrieval-conditional self-assessment, a pre-generation signal that selectively injects retrieved knowledge when similarity is high, improving over bare self-assessment by up to +0.069 AUROC at 3-10x lower latency than log-probability. A supervised baseline trained on 1,000 labeled examples never exceeds the zero-shot signal. We release all code, data, and experiment logs.



128. ❌ Perturbation Dose Responses in Recursive LLM Loops: Raw Switching, Stochastic Floors, and Persistent Escape under Append, Replace, and Dialog Updates

作者: Pawel Kaplanski 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02236v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recursive language-model loops often settle into recognizable attractor-like patterns. The practical question is how much injected text is needed to move a settled loop somewhere else, and whether that move lasts. We study this in 30-step recursive loops by separating the model from the context-update rule: append, replace, and dialog updates expose different histories to the same generator. The main result is that persistent redirection in append-mode recursive loops is memory-policy-conditioned. Under a 12,000-character tail clip, destination-coherent persistence plateaus near 16 percent and retained source-basin escape near 36 percent at dose 400; neither crosses 50 percent. Under a full-history protocol, retained source-basin escape crosses 50 percent near 400 tokens and saturates at 75-80 percent by 1,500 tokens, while destination-coherent persistence first reaches 0.50 near 1,500 tokens with a Wilson 95 percent CI of [0.41, 0.61]. For raw switching, adversarial continuations yield an ED50 near 40 tokens, with paired-control floors near 35 percent and net switching never reaching +50 percentage points within 5-400 tokens. Replace-mode raw switching is near-saturated but largely reflects state-reset overwrite: insert-mode probes drop it to 12-32 percent. A homogeneous-perturbation control reproduced the high-dose non-monotonic dip in destination-coherent persistence, refuting perturbation heterogeneity as the cause; the dip appears structural, with mechanism unresolved. We report 37 experiments on gpt-4o-mini with within-vendor replication on gpt-4.1-nano. Recursive-loop evaluations should distinguish transient movement from durable escape, subtract stochastic floors, and treat context-update rules as first-class safety-relevant design choices.



129. ❌ Bucketing the Good Apples: A Method for Diagnosing and Improving Causal Abstraction

作者: Li Puyin, Jiyuan Tan, Ahmad Jabbar, Thomas Icard, Atticus Geiger 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02234v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present a method for diagnosing interpretation in neural networks by identifying an input subspace where a proposed interpretation is highly faithful. Our method is particularly useful for causal-abstraction-style interpretability, where a high-level causal hypothesis is evaluated by interchange interventions. Rather than treating interchange intervention accuracy as a single global summary, we refine this framework by partitioning the input space into well-interpreted and under-interpreted regions according to pairwise interchange-intervention behavior. This turns causal abstraction from a purely global evaluation into a more diagnostic tool: it not only measures whether an interpretation works, but also reveals where it works, where it fails, and what distinguishes the two cases. This diagnostic view also provides practical heuristics for improving interpretations. By analyzing the structure of the well-interpreted and under-interpreted regions, we can identify missing distinctions in a high-level hypothesis, discover previously unmodeled intermediate variables, and combine complementary partial interpretations into a stronger one. We instantiate this idea as a simple four-step recipe and show that it yields informative error analyses across multiple causal abstraction settings. In a toy logic task, recursively applying the recipe recovers a high-level hypothesis from scratch. More broadly, our results suggest that partitioning the input space is a useful step toward more precise, constructive, and scalable mechanistic interpretability.



130. ❌ ARGUS: Policy-Adaptive Ad Governance via Evolving Reinforcement with Adversarial Umpiring

作者: Deyi Ji, Junyu Lu, Xuanyi Liu, Liqun Liu, Hailong Zhang, Peng Shu, Huan Yu, Jie Jiang, Tianru Chen, Lanyun Zhu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02200v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Online advertising governance faces significant challenges due to the non-stationary nature of regulatory policies, where emerging mandates (e.g., restrictions on education or aesthetic anxiety) create severe label inconsistencies and reasoning ambiguities in historical datasets. In this paper, we propose ARGUS, a policy-adaptive governance system that enables evolving reinforcement through multi-agent adversarial umpiring. ARGUS addresses the sparsity of new policy data by employing a three-stage framework: (1) Policy Seeding for initial perception; (2) Adversarial Label Rectification, which utilizes a Prosecutor-Defender-Umpire'' architecture to resolve conflicts between stale labels and new mandates; and (3) Latent Knowledge Discovery, which employs a tripartite dialectical discussion to unearth sophisticated, gray-area’’ violations. By leveraging RAG-enhanced policy knowledge and Chain-of-Thought synthesis as dynamic rewards for reinforcement learning, ARGUS synchronizes its reasoning pathways with evolving regulations. Extensive experiments on both industrial and public datasets demonstrate that ARGUS significantly outperforms traditional fine-tuning baselines, achieving superior policy-adaptive learning with minimal gold data.



131. ❌ CLaC at SemEval-2026 Task 6: Response Clarity Detection in Political Discourse

作者: Nawar Turk, Lucas Miquet-Westphal, Leila Kosseim 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02170v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In this paper, we present our system for SemEval-2026 Task 6 (CLARITY) on response clarity and evasion detection in question-answer pairs from U.S. presidential interviews, comparing fine-tuned encoders with prompt-based LLMs. Our LLM ensemble achieves 80 macro-F1 on the 3-class Task 1 (9th/41) and 59 on the 9-class Task 2 (3rd/33). Across 8 transformer encoders optimized through a four-stage pipeline, partial encoder layer unfreezing outperforms full fine-tuning by a wide margin. Combining English and multilingual encoders further improves ensemble performance over either family alone, despite multilingual models being individually weaker. Prompt-based LLMs, without any task-specific parameter updates, outperform fine-tuned encoders, particularly on minority classes; among open-weight LLMs, parameter count does not predict performance. Enriched input, concatenating the full interviewer turn, improves LLM performance but not that of encoders, an effect that persists with Longformer’s extended context window, suggesting the divergence is not attributable to sequence-length capacity alone in our settings. The Clear Reply/Ambivalent boundary remains the dominant failure mode, mirroring the disagreement among human annotators. Our code, prompts, model configurations, and results are publicly available.



132. ❌ Sharpness-Aware Pretraining Mitigates Catastrophic Forgetting

作者: Ishaan Watts, Catherine Li, Sachin Goyal, Jacob Mitchell Springer, Aditi Raghunathan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02105v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Pretraining optimizers are tuned to produce the strongest possible base model, on the assumption that a stronger starting point yields a stronger model after subsequent changes like post-training and quantization. This overlooks the geometry of the base model which controls how much of the base model’s capabilities survive subsequent parameter updates. We study three pretraining optimization approaches that bias optimization toward flatter minima: Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM), large learning rates, and shortened learning rate annealing periods. Across model sizes ranging from 20M to 150M parameters, we find that these interventions consistently improve downstream performance after post-training on five common datasets with up to 80% less forgetting. These principles hold at scale: a short SAM mid-training phase applied to an existing OLMo-2-1B checkpoint reduces forgetting by 31% after MetaMath post-training and by 40% after 4-bit quantization.



133. ❌ EditPropBench: Measuring Factual Edit Propagation in Scientific Manuscripts

作者: Garvin Kruthof 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02083v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Local factual edits in scientific manuscripts often create non-local revision obligations. If a dataset changes from 215 to 80 documents, claims such as ‘medium-scale’ or ‘a few hundred items’ may also become stale, even though they do not repeat the edited number. We introduce EditPropBench, a benchmark for measuring whether LLM editors propagate factual edits through dependent manuscript claims. Each item contains an ML/NLP-style synthetic manuscript, a targeted edit, and a controlled fact graph with sentence-level labels for direct targets, required downstream updates, and protected unrelated text. EditPropBench provides a controlled manuscript-level benchmark with sentence-level dependency supervision, three editing protocols, adversarial metric probes, stress-test variants, and a metric suite centered on Edit-Ripple Adherence (ERA). On the hard implicit/free-form stratum, five LLM editing systems span ERA 0.148–0.705; even the strongest misses roughly 30% of required cascade updates. A mixed-stratum stress test shows that LLMs retain a positive advantage over deterministic substitution baselines when easy substitution-solvable cases are included. Finally, an audit of recent arXiv cs.CL benchmark and dataset papers finds fact-dependent qualitative claims in 37.2% of papers. EditPropBench shows that current LLM editors can repair many implicit consequences of factual edits, but reliable scientific revision still requires cascade-aware checking.



134. ❌ Enhanced LLM Reasoning by Optimizing Reward Functions with Search-Driven Reinforcement Learning

作者: Arash Ahmadi, Sarah Sharif, Yaser, Banad 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02073v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Mathematical reasoning is a key benchmark for large language models. Reinforcement learning is a standard post-training mechanism for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models, yet performance remains sensitive to the design of the reward function that drives policy optimization. This paper introduces a search-driven framework that treats the reward specification itself as an object of optimization. The setting of interest is one in which the base model is held fixed and the reward specification is the primary remaining design lever. Candidate reward functions are generated by a frontier language model, validated automatically, screened through 500-step Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) training runs on a Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct base model with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), and ranked by F1 on the GSM8K test set. Ranked summaries from prior rounds are then fed back into the next round of generation. Over five rounds, the search produces 50 candidate rewards. The mean F1 rises from 0.596 in Round 1 to 0.632 in Round 5, and the top individual reward reaches F1 = 0.787. Seven ensemble configurations of top-ranked rewards are evaluated. The best ensemble achieves F1 = 0.795 (95% bootstrap CI [0.756, 0.832]) and accuracy 0.660 [0.635, 0.686], a 0.19 absolute F1 gain over a base-rewards-only GRPO baseline (F1 = 0.609). Pairwise McNemar tests with Bonferroni correction show all five-or-more-reward configurations are statistically indistinguishable at α = 0.05/21. A three-seed re-training of the best ensemble yields F1 of 0.785. A randomly drawn 5-reward control collapses to F1 = 0.047, which shows that the ranked-feedback loop, not the additive signal of having more rewards, drives the gain.



135. ❌ Pair2Score: Pairwise-to-Absolute Transfer for LLM-Based Essay Scoring

作者: İbrahim Rıza Hallaç, Hasan Oğul 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02069v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Many scoring applications require absolute predictions, while pairwise comparisons can provide a simpler learning objective. We present Pair2Score, a two-stage learning framework that transfers pairwise comparisons into absolute scoring with parameter-efficient LLaMA adaptation. Stage 1 trains a directional Siamese ranker on pairwise comparisons derived from absolute trait labels; Stage 2 trains an absolute predictor using configurable transfer strategies (warm-start and embedding-fusion variants). We evaluate on rubric-aligned Automated Essay Scoring (AES) traits (grammar, vocabulary, syntax) under a five-fold protocol that co-rotates held-out fold and random seed. At the trait level, the best-performing transfer variant improves quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) over an absolute-only baseline for all three traits. However, not all transfer configurations help: a one-epoch pairwise stage transfers more reliably than extended pairwise training, and transfer configuration – not just the inclusion of a pairwise stage – determines whether downstream scoring benefits.



136. ❌ Methods, Data, and Conceptual Change: Reflections from Two Quantitative Diachronic Case Studies

作者: Catherine Wong, Bach Phan-Tat, Susan Fitzmaurice 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02052v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

This discussion paper reflects on how quantitative approaches to historical linguistics interact with dataset properties. Drawing on two worked examples, we examine English data using quad-based concept modelling of Early Modern English discourse in EEBO-TCP (c. 1470s-1690s; 765M words) alongside SynFlow analysis of scientific writing in Royal Society Corpus 6.0.4 (1750-1799; drawn from a 78.6M-token open corpus). Through parallel comparison, the paper explores how each approach operationalises concepts, the data assumptions they entail, and the diachronic interpretations they support. We argue that comparative methodological reflection clarifies the limits of purely lexical, frequency-based approaches and highlights how dataset structure shapes the kinds of semantic change that quantitative methods can reliably detect.



137. ❌ What Single-Prompt Accuracy Misses: A Multi-Variant Reliability Audit of Language Models

作者: Ranit Karmakar, Jayita Chatterjee 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02038v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Single-prompt accuracy is the dominant way to benchmark language models, but it can miss reliability failures that matter. We evaluate a 15-model open-weight corpus, with the main reliability analyses focused on 10 instruct models across five classification and reasoning benchmarks under five prompt variants each, measuring accuracy, token-probability calibration, verbal-confidence calibration, verbal parse rate, and prompt-perturbation spread for every (model x dataset x variant) cell. We find three broad results. First, evaluation design can materially change the conclusion. Switching Expected Calibration Error (ECE) token from a raw to a label-set-normalised definition changes per-cell calibration by a mean absolute 0.149. More strikingly, pairing a chain-of-thought prompt with a first-character evaluator on ARC-Challenge reduces apparent accuracy by 72-88% across all five primary models; two independent repair procedures recover 93.8% and 102.7% of the lost performance, indicating an evaluator-side rather than model-side failure. Second, confidence signals are fragile. On MMLU-Pro, every primary model verbally reports confidence substantially above both its accuracy and its token-probability confidence on the same rows, and verbal parse rate can collapse for a single model on a single prompt variant. Third, prompt robustness does not track parameter count reliably. Across 10 instruct models, the correlation between model size and prompt-perturbation spread ranges from -0.244 to 0.474 across benchmarks. Taken together, these results show that reliability conclusions for small language models depend not only on the model being evaluated, but also on the evaluation pipeline used to measure it. We argue that calibration definitions, evaluator logic, verbal parseability, and prompt robustness should be reported explicitly when making reliability claims.



138. ❌ A Multimodal Dataset for Visually Grounded Ambiguity in Machine Translation

作者: Jingheng Pan, Xintong Wang, Longyue Wang, Liang Ding, Weihua Luo, Chris Biemann 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02035v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Ambiguity resolution is a key challenge in multimodal machine translation (MMT), where models must genuinely leverage visual input to map an ambiguous expression to its intended meaning. Although prior work has proposed disambiguation-oriented benchmarks that provide supportive evidence for the role of vision, we observe substantial issues in data quality and a mismatch with translation scenarios. Moreover, existing ambiguity-oriented evaluations are not well suited to broader ambiguity types in open-ended translation. To address these limitations, we present VIDA (Visually-Dependent Ambiguity), a dataset of 2,500 carefully curated instances in which resolving an annotated ambiguous source span requires visual evidence. We further propose Disambiguation-Centric Metrics that use an LLM-as-a-judge classifier to verify whether annotated ambiguous expressions are resolved correctly at the span level. Experiments with two state-of-the-art Large Vision Language Models under vanilla inference, supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and our chain-of-thought SFT (CoT-SFT) show that while SFT improves overall translation quality, CoT-SFT yields more consistent gains in disambiguation accuracy, especially on out-of-distribution subsets, indicating a stronger generalization for resolving diverse ambiguity types.



139. ❌ Counting as a minimal probe of language model reliability

作者: Tianxiang Dai, Jonathan Fan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02028v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models perform strongly on benchmarks in mathematical reasoning, coding and document analysis, suggesting a broad ability to follow instructions. However, it remains unclear whether such success reflects general logical competence, repeated application of learned procedures, or pattern matching that mimics rule execution. We investigate this question by introducing Stable Counting Capacity, an assay in which models count repeated symbols until failure. The assay removes knowledge dependencies, semantics and ambiguity from evaluation, avoids lexical and tokenization confounds, and provides a direct measure of procedural reliability beyond standard knowledge-based benchmarks. Here we show, across more than 100 model variants, that stable counting capacity remains far below advertised context limits. Model behavior is consistent neither with open-ended logic nor with stable application of a learned rule, but instead with use of a finite set of count-like internal states, analogous to counting on fingers. Once this resource is exhausted, the appearance of rule following disappears and exact execution collapses into guessing, even with additional test-time compute. These findings show that fluent performance in current language models does not guarantee general, reliable rule following.



作者: Weihang Su, Xuanyi Chen, Yueyue Wu, Qingyao Ai, Yiqun Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02011v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Automating the drafting of judgment documents is pivotal to judicial efficiency, yet it remains challenging due to the dual requirements of comprehensive retrieval of legal information and rigorous logical reasoning. Existing approaches, typically relying on standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Supervised Fine-Tuning, often suffer from insufficient evidence recall, hallucinated statutory references, and logically flawed legal reasoning. To bridge this gap, we propose Judge-R1, a unified framework designed to enhance LLM-based judgment document generation by jointly improving legal information collection and judgment document generation. First, we introduce Agentic Legal Information Collection, which employs a dynamic planning agent to retrieve precise statutes and precedents from multiple sources. Second, we implement Rubric-Guided Optimization, a reinforcement learning phase utilizing Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with a comprehensive legal reward function to enforce adherence to judicial standards and reasoning logic. Extensive experiments on the JuDGE benchmark demonstrate that Judge-R1 significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both legal accuracy and generation quality.



141. ❌ Learn-to-learn on Arbitrary Textual Conditioning: A Hypernetwork-Driven Meta-Gated LLM

作者: Luo Ji, Qi Qin, Ningyuan Xi, Teng Chen, Qingqing Gu, Hongyan Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01973v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Conventional LLMs may suffer from corpus heterogeneity and subtle condition changes. While finetuning can create the catastrophe forgetting issue, application of meta-learning on LLMs is also limited due to its complexity and scalability. In this paper, we activate the meta-signal of $β$ within the SwiGLU blocks, resulting in a meta-gating mechanism that adaptively adjusts the nonlinearity of FFN. A hypernetwork is employed which dynamically produces $β$ on textual conditions, providing meta-controllability on LLMs. By testing on different condition types such as task, domain, persona, and style, our method outperforms finetuning and meta-learning baselines, and can generalize reasonably on unseen tasks, condition types, or instructions. Our code can be found in https://github.com/AaronJi/MeGan.



142. ❌ Flexi-LoRA with Input-Adaptive Ranks: Efficient Finetuning for Speech and Reasoning Tasks

作者: Zongqian Li, Yixuan Su, Han Zhou, Zihao Fu, Nigel Collier 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01959v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods like Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) have become essential for deploying large language models, yet their static parameter allocation remains suboptimal for inputs of varying complexity. We present Flexi-LoRA, a novel framework that dynamically adjusts LoRA ranks based on input complexity during both training and inference. Through empirical analysis across question answering, mathematical reasoning, and speech tasks, we demonstrate that maintaining consistency between training and inference dynamics is important for effective adaptation, particularly for sequential reasoning tasks. Our findings reveal that input-dependent parameter allocation achieves higher performance with fewer parameters by optimally matching rank configurations to question complexity. Furthermore, task-specific dependency on rank dynamics varies, with mathematical reasoning tasks exhibiting higher dependency than QA tasks. Successful adaptation manifests not only in correctness but also in reasoning quality and instruction adherence. Flexi-LoRA consistently outperforms static LoRA while using fewer parameters, with performance gains more pronounced on tasks requiring strict reasoning chains. Our approach realizes key benefits of mixture-of-experts frameworks through a more streamlined implementation, reducing parameter redundancy while improving model capabilities. We provide comprehensive empirical studies across diverse tasks, establishing a basis for future work in input-adaptive and efficient fine-tuning approaches.



143. ❌ LLM-Augmented Semantic Steering of Text Embedding Projection Spaces

作者: Wei Liu, Eric Krokos, Kirsten Whitley, Rebecca Faust, Chris North 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01957v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Low-dimensional projections of text embeddings support visual analysis of document collections, but their spatial organization may not reflect the relationships an analyst intends to examine. Existing semantic interaction approaches encode semantic intent indirectly through geometric constraints or model updates, limiting interpretability and flexibility. We introduce LLM-augmented semantic steering, which enables analysts to express semantic intent by grouping a small set of example documents within the projection. A large language model externalizes this intent as natural-language representations and selectively extends it to related documents; the resulting semantic information is then incorporated into document representations via text augmentation or embedding-level blending, without retraining the underlying models. A case study illustrates how the same corpus can be reorganized from different semantic perspectives, while simulation-based evaluation shows that semantic steering improves global and local alignment with target semantic structures using only minimal interaction. Embedding-level blending further enables continuous and controllable steering of projection layouts. These results position projection spaces as intent-dependent semantic workspaces that can be reshaped through explicit, interpretable, language-mediated interaction.



144. ❌ Moira: Language-driven Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for Pair Trading

作者: Polydoros Giannouris, Yuechen Jiang, Lingfei Qian, Yuyan Wang, Xueqing Peng, Jimin Huang, Guojun Xiong, Sophia Ananiadou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01954v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Many sequential decision-making problems exhibit hierarchical structure, where high-level semantic choices constrain downstream actions and feedback is delayed and ambiguous. Learning in such settings is challenging due to credit assignment: performance degradation may arise from flawed abstractions, suboptimal execution, or their interaction. We study this challenge through pair trading, a domain that naturally combines long-horizon semantic reasoning for asset pair selection with short-horizon execution under partial observability. We formulate pair trading as a hierarchical reinforcement learning problem and propose a language-driven optimization framework in which both high-level and low-level policies are parameterized by large language models (LLMs) and optimized exclusively through prompt updates. Our approach leverages pretrained LLMs as hierarchical policies and uses trajectory- and episode-level textual feedback to adapt abstractions and execution without gradient-based fine-tuning. By explicitly separating abstraction selection from execution, the framework reduces non-stationarity across hierarchical levels and enables targeted adaptation under delayed feedback. Experiments on real-world market data show consistent improvements over traditional and LLM-based baselines, demonstrating the effectiveness of language-driven hierarchical reinforcement learning.



145. ❌ StressEval: Failure-Driven Dynamic Benchmarking for Knowledge-Intensive Reasoning in Large Language Models

作者: Yongrui Chen, Yangyang Ma, Xiaoying Huang, Shenyu Zhang, Huajun Chen, Haofen Wang, Guilin Qi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01939v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Static benchmarks for LLMs are increasingly compromised by contamination and overfitting especially on knowledge intensive reasoning tasks While recent dynamic benchmarks can alleviate staleness they often increase difficulty at the expense of answerability and controllability In this paper we propose StressEval a failure driven data synthesis framework that turns observed model failures into dynamic challenging and controllable test instances StressEval consists of three stages first it constructs a semi structured difficulty card that identifies the failed reasoning step and its root cause second it applies a dual perspective instance synthesis method that targets both knowledge gaps and reasoning breakdowns while preserving the underlying difficulty factors and third it applies a gating mechanism to retain only grounded unambiguous instances Seeding from multiple knowledge intensive reasoning datasets we employ StressEval to build Dynamic OneEval a focused suite of challenging dynamic benchmark Across several state of the art LLMs Dynamic OneEval yields substantially larger performance drops than the original benchmarks while retaining explicit difficulty factors enabling more actionable iteration



146. ❌ A Language for Describing Agentic LLM Contexts

作者: Noga Peleg Pelc, Gal A. Kaminka, Yoav Goldberg 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01920v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models are increasingly used within larger systems (“LLM agents”). These make a sequence of LLM calls, each call providing the LLM with a combination of instructions, observations, and interaction history. The design of the encoded information and its structure play a central role in the quality of the resulting system, leading to efforts spent on context engineering. It is therefore critical to communicate the composition of the LLM context in a system, and how it evolves over time. Yet, no standard exists for doing so: context construction is typically conveyed through informal prose, ad hoc diagrams, or direct inspection of code, none of which precisely capture how a prompt evolves across interaction steps or how two context representation strategies differ. To remedy this, we introduce the Agentic Context Description Language (ACDL), a language for specifying the structure and dynamics of LLM input contexts in a precise, readable, and standard manner, along with visualizations. ACDL provides constructs for specifying context aspects such as role message sequences, dynamic content, time-indexed references, and conditional or iterative structure, capturing the full architecture of a prompt independently of any particular implementation. ACDL diagrams can be hand drawn on a whiteboard, or written in formal language which can then be rendered. We describe the language, demonstrate it by documenting several existing systems and their variants, and encourage the community to adopt it for describing LLM systems context, both in day-to-day communication and in papers. Tooling, examples and documentation are available at www.acdlang.org.



147. ❌ RefusalGuard: Geometry-Preserving Fine-Tuning for Safety in LLMs

作者: Sadia Asif, Mohammad Mohammadi Amiri 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01913v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Fine-tuning safety-aligned language models for downstream tasks often leads to substantial degradation of refusal behavior, making models vulnerable to adversarial misuse. While prior work has shown that safety-relevant features are encoded in structured representations within the model’s activation space, how these representations change during fine-tuning and why alignment degrades remains poorly understood. In this work, we investigate the representation-level mechanisms underlying alignment degradation. Our analysis shows that standard fine-tuning induces systematic drift in safety-relevant representations, distorts their geometric structure, and introduces interference between task optimization and safety features. These effects collectively lead to increased harmful compliance. Motivated by these findings, we introduce REFUSALGUARD, a representation-level fine-tuning framework that preserves safety-relevant structure during model adaptation. Our approach constrains updates in hidden representation space, ensuring that safety-mediating components remain stable while allowing task-specific learning in complementary directions. We evaluate REFUSALGUARD across multiple model families, including LLaMA, Gemma, and Qwen, on adversarial safety benchmarks such as AdvBench, DirectHarm4, and JailbreakBench, as well as downstream utility tasks. Our approach achieves attack success rates comparable to base safety-aligned models while maintaining competitive task performance, significantly outperforming baselines.



148. ❌ Spoken Language Identification with Pre-trained Models and Margin Loss

作者: Zhihua Fang, Liang He, Weiwu Jiang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01905v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

For the speaker-controlled spoken language identification task proposed in the TidyLang Challenge 2026, this paper proposes a language identification method based on pre-trained models and margin-based losses. The proposed method adopts a pre-trained ECAPA-TDNN as the feature encoder and incorporates margin-based losses to enhance the discriminative ability of language representations, thereby improving inter-class separability and reducing the interference of non-linguistic factors such as speaker characteristics. Experimental results on the Tidy-X dataset show that the proposed method achieves 85.95% macro accuracy and 90.96% micro accuracy on the language identification task and 17.08% equal error rate (EER) on the verification task. Compared with the official baseline, the macro accuracy improves by 45.7%, the micro accuracy improves by 15.2%, and the EER is reduced by approximately 50.8%, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method. The code will be released at https://github.com/PunkMale/TidyLang2026.



149. ❌ Maistros: A Greek Large Language Model Adapted Through Knowledge Distillation From Large Reasoning Models

作者: Nikolaos Giarelis, Charalampos Mastrokostas, Nikos Karacapilidis 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01870v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have substantially advanced the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP), achieving state-of-the-art performance across a wide range of tasks. These improvements have been attributed, in part, to their emerging reasoning capabilities, which are enabled by large-scale training and increased model capacity. However, existing LLMs can generate erroneous responses when addressing complex queries that fall outside their training distribution, due to limited internal knowledge or the need for multi-step reasoning. To address these limitations, recent work has introduced large reasoning models (LRMs), which incorporate explicit internal reasoning processes to improve response accuracy. Additionally, state-of-the-art LRMs often comprise hundreds of billions of parameters and require several seconds per inference, even on advanced multi-GPU systems. These characteristics limit their practicality for deployment in conventional computing environments. Meanwhile, NLP research on multilingual LLMs continues to prioritize high-resource languages. However, these models exhibit limited performance in under-resourced languages, primarily due to insufficient language- and culture-specific training data. In this paper, we focus on Modern Greek, for which only a limited number of question answering (QA) datasets have been proposed, most of which are intended for model evaluation. To address this research gap in Greek QA, we make the following contributions: (i) CulturaQA, a high-quality LRM-generated and human-curated dataset, for Greek LLM training and evaluation; (ii) a memory-efficient LLM evaluation framework adaptable to diverse languages and QA tasks; (iii) Maistros 8B, a state-of-the-art open-weights Greek LLM developed via knowledge distillation and fine-tuning on CulturaQA; and (iv) a comprehensive evaluation of nine LLMs across nine human-curated Greek QA datasets.



150. ❌ Spatiotemporal Hidden-State Dynamics as a Signature of Internal Reasoning in Large Language Models

作者: Kotaro Furuya, Takahito Tanimura 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01853v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large reasoning models (LRMs) generate extended solutions, yet it remains unclear whether these traces reflect substantive internal computation or merely verbosity and overthinking. Although recent hidden-state analyses suggest that internal representations carry correctness-related signals, their coarse aggregations may obscure the token and layer structure underlying reasoning computation. We investigate hidden-state transitions across decoding steps and layers, and identify a distinct spatiotemporal pattern in LRMs: successful trajectories exhibit broad temporal dynamics with localized layer-wise concentration, while this structure is weaker in non-reasoning models and knowledge-heavy domains. We formalize this characteristic as Spatiotemporal Amplitude of Latent Transition (StALT), a training-free trajectory statistic that summarizes temporal changes between adjacent tokens weighted by within-token layer saliency. Across diverse models and benchmarks, StALT reliably separates correct from incorrect trajectories in reasoning-intensive regimes, providing a competitive label-free correctness signal alongside strong output-space and length-based baselines. Intervention analyses further show that this spatiotemporal amplitude responds systematically to manipulations that increase or reduce the demand for internal reasoning, supporting its association with latent reasoning dynamics in LRMs. These findings provide empirical evidence that LRMs exhibit measurable hidden-state dynamics and offer a practical probe for understanding internal computation beyond output-based evaluation.



151. ❌ Do Large Language Models Plan Answer Positions? Position Bias in Multiple-Choice Question Generation

作者: Xuemei Tang, Xufeng Duan, Zhenguang G. Cai 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01846v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate multiple-choice questions (MCQs), where correct answers should ideally be uniformly distributed across options. However, we observe that LLMs exhibit systematic position biases during generation. Through extensive experiments with 10 LLMs and 5 vision-language models (VLMs) on three MCQ generation tasks, we show that these biases are structured, with similar patterns emerging within model families. To investigate the underlying mechanisms, we conduct probing experiments and find that hidden representations in the question stem encode predictive signals of the correct answer position, suggesting that answer position may be implicitly planned during generation. Building on this insight, we apply activation steering to manipulate internal representations and influence answer position. Our results show that steering can partially control positional preferences and substantially shift answer position distributions. Our findings provide a practical framework for studying implicit positional planning in LLMs and highlight the importance of controllable generation for reliable MCQ construction and evaluation.



152. ❌ The Cylindrical Representation Hypothesis for Language Model Steering

作者: Lang Gao, Jinghui Zhang, Wei Liu, Fengxian Ji, Chenxi Wang, Zirui Song, Akash Ghosh, Youssef Mohamed, Preslav Nakov, Xiuying Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01844v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Steering is a widely used technique for controlling large language models, yet its effects are often unstable and hard to predict. Existing theoretical accounts are largely based on the Linear Representation Hypothesis (LRH). While LRH assumes that concepts can be orthogonalized for lossless control, this idealized mapping fails in real representations and cannot account for the observed unpredictability of steering. By relaxing LRH’s orthogonality assumption while preserving linear representations, we show that overlapping concept contributions naturally yield a sample-specific axis-orthogonal structure. We formalize this as the Cylindrical Representation Hypothesis (CRH). In CRH, a central axis captures the main difference between concept absence and presence and drives concept generation. A surrounding normal plane controls steering sensitivity by determining how easily the axis can activate the target concept. Within this plane, only specific sensitive sectors strongly facilitate concept activation, while other sectors can suppress or delay it. While the surrounding normal plane can be reliably identified from difference vectors, the sensitive sector cannot, introducing intrinsic uncertainty at the sector level. This uncertainty provides a principled explanation for why steering outcomes often fluctuate even when using well-aligned directions. Our experiments verify the existence of the cylindrical structure and demonstrate that CRH provides a valid and practical way to interpret model steering behavior in real settings: https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/CRH.



153. ❌ RMGAP: Benchmarking the Generalization of Reward Models across Diverse Preferences

作者: Yangyang Zhou, Yi-Chen Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01831v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback has become the standard paradigm for language model alignment, where reward models directly determine alignment effectiveness. In this work, we focus on how to evaluate the generalizability of reward models. By “generalizability”, we mean the ability of RMs to correctly rank responses to align with diverse user preferences. However, existing reward model benchmarks are typically designed around a universal preference, failing to assess this generalization. To address this critical gap, we introduce RMGAP, a benchmark comprising 1,097 instances across Chat, Writing, Reasoning, and Safety domains. Since different users exhibit diverse preferences for the same task, we first generate four distinct responses with different linguistic profiles for each collected prompt. However, the original prompt set lacks the specificity to convey different preferences. We therefore construct tailored prompts by contrasting these candidates and designing scenarios in which one response becomes the uniquely appropriate choice. Moreover, we observe that users often express the same preference using different phrasings, and thus extend each prompt with two paraphrased variants. Our evaluation of 24 state-of-the-art RMs reveals their substantial limitations: even the best RM achieves only 49.27% Best-of-N accuracy, highlighting considerable room for improvement in reward model generalization. Related data and code are available at https://github.com/nanzhi84/RMGAP.



154. ❌ The Compliance Gap: Why AI Systems Promise to Follow Process Instructions but Don’t

作者: Kwan Soo Shin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01771v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

An auditor instructs an AI assistant: “open each file individually using the Read tool – no scripts, no agents.” The AI replies “Yes” – then issues a single batched call summarizing all fifty files at once. We call this the Compliance Gap: a third, orthogonal axis of AI honesty distinct from factual truthfulness and rhetorical substance. Three questions: does this verbal-behavioral disconnect exist (existence); can any text-only observer recover it (detectability); what infrastructure does AI deployment need (remedy)? Some 75 benchmarks (IFEval, SWE-bench, BFCL, COMPASS, SpecEval) measure outcome fidelity; none measures process fidelity. Theorem 1 shows the gap is structurally inevitable under RL that rewards text without observing behavior. Theorem 2, via the Data Processing Inequality, shows it is undetectable from text alone – by any human or LLM observer, present or future. Thirteen experiments and 2,031 sessions on six frontier models confirm both predictions. Under default framing, all six exhibit instruction compliance rates of 0% – Claude Sonnet 4 verbally agrees ten out of ten times then bypasses in all ten. The gap is selective: 97% compliance where rationale is rewarded (audit trails), 0-4% where it is not (file reading, privacy masking); removing delegation tools raises compliance to 75% (Cohen’s d = 2.47), confirming environmental affordance rather than weight-encoded failure. Nine blinded human raters achieve Fleiss’ kappa = 0.130 and correctly identify zero of fifteen compliant sessions, exactly as Theorem 2 predicts. Where humans show 47% intention-behavior gaps in psychology and 96.5pp gaps in surgical audits, RLHF-trained models approach 100% under default conditions – a regime warranting its own measurement infrastructure. We release BS-Bench: the first open benchmark for process compliance, with seven tool-call-log audit metrics and a public leaderboard.



155. ❌ Only Say What You Know: Calibration-Aware Generation for Long-Form Factuality

作者: Wen Luo, Guangyue Peng, Liang Wang, Nan Yang, Wei Li, Yuhan Song, Shaohang Wei, Feifan Song, Furu Wei, Houfeng Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01749v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large Reasoning Models achieve strong performance on complex tasks but remain prone to hallucinations, particularly in long-form generation where errors compound across reasoning steps. Existing approaches to improving factuality, including abstention and factuality-driven optimization, follow a \emph{coupled exploration-commitment} paradigm, in which intermediate reasoning is unconditionally propagated to the final output, limiting fine-grained control over information selection and integration. In this paper, we propose an \textbf{Exploration-Commitment Decoupling} paradigm that disentangles knowledge exploration from final commitment, enabling models to explore with awareness while answering cautiously. We instantiate the paradigm with \textbf{Calibration-Aware Generation (CAG)}, a framework that equips models with end-to-end, calibration-aware generation capabilities, by augmenting intermediate reasoning with calibrated reliability estimates and prioritizing reliable content in final outputs. Across five long-form factuality benchmarks and multiple model families, CAG improves factuality by up to 13%, while reducing decoding time by up to 37%. Overall, our work highlights decoupling as a principled approach for more reliable long-form generation, offering directions for trustworthy and self-aware generative systems.



156. ❌ NH-CROP: Robust Pricing for Governed Language Data Assets under Cost Uncertainty

作者: Xu Zheng, Feiyu Wu, Zhuocheng Wang, Yiming Dai, Hui Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01745v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Language data are increasingly acquired and governed as assets, yet platforms often price candidate resources before knowing their true privacy or access costs. We study online pricing for governed language data assets under cost uncertainty. At each round, a platform observes an NLP task, a candidate asset, and a coarse cost estimate, may pay for a refined cost signal, posts a price, and receives safe net revenue. We introduce \textsc{NH-CROP}, a clipped robust pricing framework with a no-harm information-acquisition gate. The method compares direct pricing, risk-aware pricing, and verify-then-price, and acquires information only when its estimated decision value exceeds the best no-verification alternative. Across synthetic, real-proxy, and downstream-utility-grounded benchmarks, clipped \textsc{NH-CROP} variants improve or remain competitive with price-only and risk-aware baselines. Causal ablations show that paid verification is not the main source of gains in real-proxy and utility-grounded settings: the strongest learned policies often choose not to verify. Oracle and high-decision-value diagnostics show that refined cost information can still have substantial local value. Overall, governed language-data platforms should calibrate pricing under uncertain access costs first and verify only when information is cheap and decision-actionable.



157. ❌ Less is More: Geometric Unlearning for LLMs with Minimal Data Disclosure

作者: Chenchen Tan, Xinghao Li, Shujie Cui, Youyang Qu, Cunjian Chen, Longxiang Gao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01735v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world systems, they must support post-hoc removal of specific content to meet privacy and governance requirements. This motivates selective unlearning, which suppresses information about a particular entity or topic while preserving the LLM’s general utility. However, most existing LLM unlearning methods require access to the original training corpus and rely on output-level refusal tuning or broad gradient updates, creating a tension among unlearning strength, non-target preservation, and data availability. We propose Geometric Unlearning (GU), an approach that operates directly on the model’s prompt-time planning states without access to the original training corpus. GU distills a compact, low-rank geometry of desired safe behavior from a small set of safe reference prompts, and uses lightweight anchor-in-context synthetic prompts to trigger localized, projection-based alignment of hidden planning representations to this safe geometry. A teacher-distillation regularizer on synthetic non-target anchors further reduces collateral drift. Across privacy-oriented unlearning benchmarks (ToFU and UnlearnPII), GU achieves strong target suppression with minimal impact on non-target performance, demonstrating that effective unlearning can be achieved with minimal synthetic data.



158. ❌ EGAD: Entropy-Guided Adaptive Distillation for Token-Level Knowledge Transfer

作者: Hao Zhang, Zhibin Zhang, Guangxin Wu, Wanyi Ning, Jiafeng Guo, Xueqi Cheng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01732v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance across diverse domains, yet their enormous computational and memory requirements hinder deployment in resource-constrained environments. Knowledge distillation offers a promising solution by transferring knowledge from a large teacher model to a smaller student model. However, existing distillation methods typically treat all tokens equally, ignoring the fact that different tokens contribute unequally to model decisions. This can lead to inefficient knowledge transfer and reduced learning effectiveness. To address this limitation, we propose an entropy-based adaptive distillation strategy that dynamically adjusts the training process at the token level. Our method leverages the teacher’s output entropy to guide three aspects of distillation. Specifically, we introduce a token-level curriculum by dynamically shifting focus from low- to high-entropy tokens during training. We further adjust the distillation temperature based on token entropy to better capture teacher confidence patterns. Moreover, we employ a dual-branch architecture for efficient logits-only distillation on easy tokens and deeper feature-based distillation on difficult tokens. Extensive experiments validate the soundness and effectiveness of our method.



159. ❌ SignVerse-2M: A Two-Million-Clip Pose-Native Universe of 25+ Sign Languages

作者: Sen Fang, Hongbin Zhong, Yanxin Zhang, Dimitris N. Metaxas 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01720v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Existing large-scale sign language resources typically provide supervision only at the level of raw video-text alignment and are often produced in laboratory settings. While such resources are important for semantic understanding, they do not directly provide a unified interface for open-world recognition and translation, or for modern pose-driven sign language video generation frameworks: 1. RGB-based pretrained recognition models depend heavily on fixed backgrounds or clothing conditions during recording, and are less robust in open-world settings than style-agnostic pose-processing models. 2. Recent pose-guided image/video generation models mostly use a unified keypoint representation such as DWPose as their control interface. At present, the sign language field still lacks a data resource that can directly interface with this modern pose-native paradigm while also targeting real-world open scenarios. We present SignVerse-2M, a large-scale multilingual pose-native dataset for sign language pose modeling and evaluation. Built from publicly available multilingual sign language video resources, it applies DWPose in a unified preprocessing pipeline to convert raw videos into 2D pose sequences that can be used directly for modeling, resulting in a consolidated corpus of about two million clips covering more than 25 sign languages. Unlike many laboratory datasets, this resource preserves the recording conditions and speaker diversity of real-world videos while reducing appearance variation through a unified pose representation. Toward this goal, we further provide the data construction pipeline, task definitions, and a simple SignDW Transformer baseline, demonstrating the feasibility of this resource for multilingual pose-space modeling and its compatibility with modern pose-driven pipelines, while discussing the evaluation claims it can support as well as its current limitations.



160. ❌ TCDA: Thread-Constrained Discourse-Aware Modeling for Conversational Sentiment Quadruple Analysis

作者: Xinran Li, Xinze Che, Yifan Lyu, Zhiqi Huang, Xiujuan Xu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01717v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Conversational Aspect-based Sentiment Quadruple Analysis (DiaASQ) needs to capture the complex interrelationships in multiple rounds of dialogues. Existing methods usually employ simple Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN), which introduce structural noise and fail to consider the temporal sequence of the dialogues, or use standard RoPE, which implicitly captures relative distances in a flat sequence but cannot clearly separate the token-level syntactic order from the utterance-level progression, and may suffer from the Distance Dilution problem. To address these issues, we propose a new framework that combines Thread-Constrained Directed Acyclic Graph (TC-DAG) and Discourse-Aware Rotary Position Embedding (D-RoPE). Specifically, TC-DAG filters out cross-thread noise based on thread constraints, maintains global connectivity through root anchoring, and incorporates the temporal sequence of the dialogues. D-RoPE aligns multi-layer semantics using dual-stream projection and multi-scale frequency signals, captures thread dependencies using tree-like distances, and alleviates the token-level Distance Dilution problem by incorporating utterance-level progressions. Experimental results on two benchmark datasets demonstrate that our framework achieves state-of-the-art performance.



161. ❌ The Reasoning Trap: An Information-Theoretic Bound on Closed-System Multi-Step LLM Reasoning

作者: Kwan Soo Shin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01704v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

When copies of the same language model are prompted to debate, they produce diverse phrasings of one perspective rather than diverse perspectives. Multi-agent debate (MAD), and more broadly closed-system reasoning where agents iteratively transform each other’s outputs, tends to preserve answer accuracy while degrading the reasoning behind those answers. We name the multi-agent case the Debate Trap and the broader phenomenon the Reasoning Trap, offering a programmatic theory of evidence-grounded reasoning failure.The framework has three parts: (i) SFS (Supported Faithfulness Score), a claim-level metric verifying decomposed atomic claims against provided evidence (decomposer-invariant rankings: Spearman rho=1.0); (ii) EGSR (Evidence-Grounded Socratic Reasoning), replacing adversarial argumentation with evidence-grounded inquiry; (iii) Theorem 1 (DPI Bound): under standard MAD, the chain E -> O^0 -> O^1 -> … is Markov, and the Data Processing Inequality implies E[I(E;O^{t+1})] <= E[I(E;O^t)]. Three companion results – open-system recovery (Theorem 2), EGSR accumulation (Lemma 2), and vote-aggregation floor (Proposition 1) – partition multi-step LLM reasoning by its information-theoretic relationship to E. Across 16 conditions on SciFact (300 claims) and FEVER (1,000 claims), DebateCV (C13) preserves 88% of baseline accuracy while SFS drops 43%; majority-vote MAD (C15) reduces SFS to 1.7% of baseline (p < 10^{-6}, d = -0.96); EGSR recovers 98%. An R6 cohort study (Korean n=10x30 FEVER; English n=3x200 SciFact) finds inter-rater Fleiss kappa <= +0.018 with 0.8-1.4 Likert intra-rater shifts across language and domain – the human agreement that faithfulness metrics have been calibrated against is not itself stable. We offer one falsifiable conjecture: any closed-system reasoning protocol preserving Theorem 1’s Markov structure is, in expectation, subject to the same DPI bound.



162. ❌ BIM Information Extraction Through LLM-based Adaptive Exploration

作者: Sylvain Hellin, Suhyung Jang, Stefan Fuchs, Stavros Nousias, André Borrmann 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01698v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

BIM models provide structured representations of building geometry, semantics, and topology, yet extracting specific information from them remains remarkably difficult. Current approaches translate natural language into structured queries by assuming a fixed data organization (static approach), which BIM heterogeneity eventually invalidates. We address this with a new paradigm, adaptive exploration, where an LLM-based agent iteratively executes code to extract information from a BIM model, discovering its structure at runtime instead of assuming it. We evaluate this approach on ifc-bench v2, an open-source BIM question-answering benchmark introduced alongside this work, comprising 1,027 tasks across 37 IFC models from 21 projects. A factorial ablation across two LLM capability levels and four augmentation strategies shows that adaptive exploration significantly outperforms static query generation across all configurations, regardless of the augmentation strategy. These results indicate that BIM heterogeneity is best addressed at the paradigm level, not by further optimizing static approaches.



163. ❌ GRAVITY: Architecture-Agnostic Structured Anchoring for Long-Horizon Conversational Memory

作者: Yushi Sun, Bowen Cao, Dong Fang, Lingfeng Su, Wai Lam 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01688v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Long-horizon conversational agents rely on memory systems with increasingly sophisticated retrieval mechanisms. However, retrieved fragments are typically fed to the language model as unstructured text, lacking the relational, temporal, and thematic structures essential for complex reasoning. To bridge this reasoning gap, we introduce GRAVITY (\textbf{G}eneration-time \textbf{R}elational \textbf{A}nchoring \textbf{V}ia \textbf{I}njected \textbf{T}opological Memor\textbf{Y}), a plug-and-play structured memory module. GRAVITY extracts three complementary knowledge representations from raw conversational utterances: entity profiles grounded in relational graphs, temporal event tuples linked into causal traces, and cross-session topic summaries. At generation time, it injects these representations into the host system’s prompt as structured anchoring contexts. This approach effectively synthesizes scattered evidence into a coherent, query-relevant context without requiring any architectural modifications to the host model. Extensive evaluations across five diverse memory systems on the LongMemEval and LoCoMo benchmarks demonstrate the efficacy of our approach. On average, GRAVITY improves LLM-judge accuracy by 7.5–10.1%. Gains are inversely correlated with baseline strength: the weakest host improves by 12.2% while the strongest still gains 3.8–5.7%. These findings establish structured context anchoring as a broadly effective, architecture-agnostic augmentation paradigm for long-horizon conversational memory.



164. ❌ MultiBreak: A Scalable and Diverse Multi-turn Jailbreak Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Safety

作者: Jialin Song, Xiaodong Liu, Weiwei Yang, Wuyang Chen, Mingqian Feng, Xuekai Zhu, Jianfeng Gao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01687v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present MultiBreak, a scalable and diverse multi-turn jailbreak benchmark to evaluate large language model (LLM) safety. Multi-turn jailbreaks mimic natural conversational settings, making them easier to bypass safety-aligned LLM than single-turn jailbreaks. Existing multi-turn benchmarks are limited in size or rely heavily on templates, which restrict their diversity. To address this gap, we unify a wide range of harmful jailbreak intents, and introduce an active learning pipeline for expanding high-quality multi-turn adversarial prompts, where a generator is iteratively fine-tuned to produce stronger attack candidates, guided by uncertainty-based refinement. Our MultiBreak includes 10,389 multi-turn adversarial prompts, spans 2,665 distinct harmful intents, and covers the most diverse set of topics to date. Empirical evaluation shows that our benchmark achieves up to a 54.0 and 34.6 higher attack success rate (ASR)} than the second-best dataset on DeepSeek-R1-7B and GPT-4.1-mini, respectively. More importantly, safety evaluations suggest that diverse attack categories uncover fine-grained LLM vulnerabilities}, and categories that appear benign under single-turn can exhibit substantially higher adversarial effectiveness in multi-turn scenarios. These findings highlight persistent vulnerabilities of LLMs under realistic adversarial settings and establish MultiBreak as a scalable resource for advancing LLM safety.



165. ❌ CP-SynC: Multi-Agent Zero-Shot Constraint Modeling in MiniZinc with Synthesized Checkers

作者: Yuliang Song, Eldan Cohen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01675v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Constraint Programming (CP) is a powerful paradigm for solving combinatorial problems, yet translating natural language problem descriptions into executable models remains a significant bottleneck. While Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in automating this translation, they often struggle with subtle semantic errors in the absence of oracle validation at test time. To address this, we introduce CP-SynC (Constraint Programming modeling with Synthesized Checkers), a multi-agent workflow for zero-shot constraint modeling in MiniZinc. CP-SynC coordinates modeling agents that generate and refine candidate models and validation agents that synthesize semantic checkers to provide feedback on semantic correctness. To mitigate noise inherent in individual LLM outputs, CP-SynC explores multiple modeling trajectories in parallel and employs selection agents to select the final model via multi-agent evidence aggregation. Extensive experiments on a benchmark of 100 CP problems show that CP-SynC substantially outperforms existing baselines in MiniZinc modeling.



166. ❌ Beyond Perplexity: Character Distribution Signatures and the MDTA Benchmark for AI Text Detection

作者: Priyadarshan Narayanasamy, Swastik Agrawal, Klint Faber, Fardina Fathmiul Alam 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01647v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Training-free AI text detection methods primarily rely on model log-probabilities, achieving strong performance through approaches like Binoculars and DNA-DetectLLM. However, these methods face a fundamental ceiling as models are optimized through RLHF to produce human-like probability distributions. We introduce an alternative detection signal based on character distribution signatures. We provide theoretical foundations showing that AI models, trained on massive domain-balanced corpora, approximate global character patterns while humans exhibit domain-specialized distributions, creating a “Wall of Separation” where human-AI divergence significantly exceeds AI-AI divergence. To enable systematic evaluation, we construct the Models-Domains-Temperatures-Adversarials (MDTA) benchmark comprising 642,274 prompt-aligned samples across 4 models, 5 domains, 3 temperature settings, and 3 adversarial strategies, substantially expanding the HC3 dataset with modern model responses, temperature variation, and adversarial augmentation. We introduce the Letter Distribution Score (LD-Score), demonstrating low correlation (r = 0.08-0.13) with perplexity methods. When integrated with DNA-DetectLLM, Binoculars and FastDetectGPT via a non-linear classifier, LD-Score yields consistent improvements in AUROC and F1, with particularly pronounced gains in specialized domains where vocabulary constraints amplify the detection signal. The MDTA dataset can be accessed at: https://huggingface.co/datasets/nsp909/MDTA.



167. ❌ Prescriptive Scaling Laws for Data Constrained Training

作者: Justin Lovelace, Christian Belardi, Srivatsa Kundurthy, Shriya Sudhakar, Kilian Q. Weinberger 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01640v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Training compute is increasingly outpacing the availability of high-quality data. This shifts the central challenge from optimal compute allocation to extracting maximum value from limited data. The widely adopted Chinchilla scaling law assumes every training token is unique. This limits its ability to guide pretraining decisions in data-constrained regimes. We model the excess loss under repetition with a simple additive overfitting penalty and find that it accurately describes model behavior. Our scaling law yields qualitatively new compute-optimal allocation advice. Beyond a point, further repetition is counterproductive and compute is better spent on model capacity. We show that following our law’s recommended configuration improves performance in data-constrained regimes. Finally, because our one-parameter form isolates overfitting in a single coefficient, it enables direct comparison across training configurations. As a case study, we show that strong weight decay ($λ=1.0$) reduces this coefficient by approximately 70%, providing a scaling-law explanation for recent findings that optimal weight decay in data-constrained regimes is an order of magnitude larger than standard practice.



168. ❌ Prosa: Rubric-Based Evaluation of LLMs on Real User Chats in Brazilian Portuguese

作者: Roseval Malaquias Junior, Giovana Kerche Bonás, Thales Sales Almeida, Hugo Abonizio, Thiago Laitz, Ramon Pires, Marcos Piau, Celio Larcher, Rodrigo Nogueira 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01630v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Rankings produced by holistic LLM-as-a-judge scoring are sensitive to the bias of the chosen judge model. We show that switching to binary rubric scoring with multi-judge filtering removes this sensitivity: decomposing the judgement matters more than the judge model itself. To support this claim, we introduce Prosa, the first real user multi-turn Brazilian Portuguese chat benchmark: 1,000 WildChat conversations scored by three judges from three model families on 16 models. Under filtered rubric scoring the three judges agree on every one of the 16 ranks, whereas under holistic scoring they agree on only 7 of 16. Additionally, the rubric filtering pipeline increases the average score gap between neighbouring models by 47%, thereby improving Prosa’s discriminative power. Evaluating a new model on Prosa costs approximately $2.1 when using Gemini 3 Flash as the judge. We release the benchmark and the filtering code to ensure that future models can be assessed under identical conditions. These artifacts also make our rubric-based scoring method reusable beyond Prosa, supporting other open-ended evaluation settings.



169. ❌ Where Do Prompt Perturbations Break Generation? A Segment-Level View of Robustness in LoRA-Tuned Language Models

作者: Zhuoyun Li, Boxuan Wang, Jinwei Hu, Zhenglin Huang, Qisong He, Xinmiao Huang, Guangliang Cheng, Xiaowei Huang, Yi Dong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01605v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models are sensitive to minor prompt perturbations, yet existing robustness methods usually enforce consistency at the whole-sequence level. This holistic view can hide an important failure mode: a perturbed response may remain globally similar to the clean one while drifting on a critical entity, relation, or conclusion. We introduce S$^2$R$^2$, a segment-level framework for robust LoRA fine-tuning. S$^2$R$^2$ decomposes clean and perturbed generations into semantic segments, aligns them with an optimal-transport objective, and penalises the segments with the largest meaning drift. To connect this output-side objective with model adaptation, we add an adapter-stability regulariser motivated by segment-level attention reallocation, using LoRA norm control as a tractable proxy for limiting perturbation-amplified evidence shifts. A PAC-Bayesian complexity view further explains why controlling adapter growth may support transfer beyond observed perturbations. Experiments on summarisation benchmarks show that S$^2$R$^2$ improves robustness under typographical noise, deletion, synonym replacement, and paraphrasing, while maintaining competitive clean performance and stronger cross-dataset transfer than consistency-based baselines.



170. ❌ Fine-Tuning Pre-Trained Code Models for AI-Generated Code Detection

作者: Jany-Gabriel Ispas, Sergiu Nisioi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01596v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

This paper describes the system submitted by team \textbf{Archaeology} to SemEval-2026 Task~13 on AI-generated code detection. The shared task consists of three subtasks; we participate in Subtask-A (binary classification: human-written vs.\ AI-generated code) and Subtask-B (11-class attribution of the generating model). Starting from a TF-IDF and Logistic Regression baseline, we fine-tune four pre-trained code models (CodeBERT, GraphCodeBERT, UniXcoder, and CodeT5+) with separate strategies for each subtask. For Subtask-A, we use leave-one-language-out cross-validation, code augmentation, chunked inference with trimmed-mean aggregation, and threshold calibration on a difficult dataset. For Subtask-B, we use sandwich token packing, class-balanced loss, and multi-seed ensembling with test-time augmentation. Our best submissions obtain macro-F1 scores of 0.737 on Subtask-A (6th/81 teams) and 0.422 on Subtask-B (7th/34 teams).



171. ❌ Led to Mislead: Adversarial Content Injection for Attacks on Neural Ranking Models

作者: Amin Bigdeli, Amir Khosrojerdi, Radin Hamidi Rad, Morteza Zihayat, Charles L. A. Clarke, Ebrahim Bagheri 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01591v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Neural Ranking Models (NRMs) are central to modern information retrieval but remain highly vulnerable to adversarial manipulation. Existing attacks often rely on heuristics or surrogate models, limiting effectiveness and transferability. We propose CRAFT, a supervised framework for black-box adversarial rank attacks powered by large language models (LLMs). CRAFT operates in three stages: adversarial dataset generation via retrieval-augmented generation and self-refinement, supervised fine-tuning on curated adversarial examples, and preference-guided optimization to align generations with rank-promotion objectives. Extensive experiments on the MS MARCO passage dataset, TREC Deep Learning 2019, and TREC Deep Learning 2020 benchmarks show that CRAFT significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving higher promotion rates and rank boosts while preserving fluency and semantic fidelity. Moreover, CRAFT transfers effectively across diverse ranking architectures, including cross-encoder, embedding-based, and LLM-based rankers, underscoring vulnerabilities in real-world retrieval systems. This work provides a principled framework for studying adversarial threats in NRMs, underscores the risks of generative AI in rank manipulation, and provides a foundation for developing more robust retrieval systems. To support reproducibility, we publicly release our source code, trained models, and prompt templates.



172. ❌ Feedback-Normalized Developer Memory for Reinforcement-Learning Coding Agents: A Safety-Gated MCP Architecture

作者: Mehmet Iscan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01567v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language model (LLM) coding agents increasingly operate over repositories, terminals, tests, and execution traces across long software-engineering episodes. Persistent memory is useful, but static vector stores or generic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) are insufficient for reinforcement-learning (RL) code development, where small details can alter Bellman targets, terminal masks, gradient flow, or validation claims. This paper presents RL Developer Memory, a local-first, Model Context Protocol (MCP)-native developer-memory architecture for RL coding agents. It treats memory selection as a logged contextual decision process: issue_match ranks candidates and records telemetry, issue_feedback maps raw labels to bounded rewards, and issue_record_resolution links verified resolutions to earlier retrieval events. A deterministic ranker remains deployed, while a contextual-bandit residual policy runs in shadow mode and can affect canary behavior only through conservative off-policy-evaluation (OPE) gates. RL/control memories require theory-to-code metadata and review-gated governance. The system is evaluated on a deterministic 200-case benchmark with RL algorithm bugs, hard negatives, review-gated RL/control cases, and low-risk failures. In the same-commit comparison, deterministic control and full shadow/OPE both achieve 80.0% expected-decision accuracy and 100.0% hard-negative suppression; the full configuration adds learning telemetry rather than accuracy gain. Static validation passed 11/11 checks; dynamic integration passed 10/10 cases. The evidence reports limits: active learned-policy deployment and official-client MCP interoperability are unsupported, live full-configuration latency regresses, and 40 residual non-RL failures remain. The contribution is an auditable memory-control architecture with explicit claim boundaries, not a universal coding-agent improvement claim.



173. ❌ Automated Interpretability and Feature Discovery in Language Models with Agents

作者: Arnau Marin-Llobet, Javier Ferrando 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01555v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We introduce an autonomous multiagent framework for mechanistic interpretability that automates both explaining and finding internal features in large language models. The system runs two coupled loops: (1) explanation refinement, where an agent proposes competing hypotheses and iteratively tests them with targeted prompt controls and a multi-metric evaluation; and (2) feature discovery, where an agent generates prompt sets, constructs a k-nearest-neighbor graph in activation space, and retrieves candidate features using statistical separability and semantic coherence criteria. On Gemma-2 family models and MLP neurons in weight-sparse transformers, our agent improves over one-shot auto-interpretations, discovers language-specific and safety-relevant features, and produces auditable explanation traces, showing that agent-driven empirical loops yield sharper and more falsifiable explanations than one-shot labels.



174. ❌ The grip of grammar on meaning uncertainty: cross-linguistic evidence, neural correlates, and clinical relevance

作者: Rui He, Claudio Palominos, Samuele Vallisa, Ni Yang, Han Zhang, Miguel Ángel Santos Santos, Neguine Rezaii, Sergi Valero, Yonghua Huang, Huan Li, Hong Jiang, Yongjun Peng, Maria Francisca Alonso-Sánchez, Frederike Stein, Tilo Kircher, Philipp Homan, Iris Sommer, Lena Palaniyappan, Wolfram Hinzen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01537v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Isolated word meanings are inherently uncertain. This uncertainty reduces when they are combined and anchored in context. We propose that grammar compresses meaning uncertainty cross-linguistically, which is reflected in brain and selectively disrupted in disorders. Compression was operationalized as the relative difference between non-contextual surprisal estimated from lexical frequency, and contextual surprisal from grammar-sensitive models. In narratives from 20 languages, contextual surprisal reduced frequency-based surprisal. This reduction closely tracked the surprisal cost of reversing word order, and scaled with richer, non-redundant lexis as organized by more complex but optimal dependency structure. During fMRI, surprisal and its reduction explained BOLD activity for comprehension and production in overlapping but distinct regions. Uncertainty reduction was significantly attenuated in aphasia, dementia, and schizophrenia, but remained intact where primary deficit is not language. These findings position uncertainty reduction via grammar as a foundational concept that illuminates principles, brain basis, and disruptions of language.



175. ❌ MIRL: Mutual Information-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Language Models

作者: Yin Zhang, Jiaxuan Zhao, Zonghan Wu, Zengxiang Li, Junfeng Fang, Kun Wang, Qingsong Wen, Yilei Shao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01520v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) frequently suffer from visual perception errors and hallucinations that compromise answer accuracy in complex reasoning tasks. Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) offers a promising solution by optimizing policies using answer correctness signals. Despite their effectiveness, prevailing RLVR methods face two critical limitations. First, much of the sampling budget is wasted on trajectories doomed to fail due to early visual description errors. Second, sparse rewards cannot distinguish whether failures stem from visual perception or reasoning stages. We introduce MIRL, a decoupled framework that addresses both limitations by leveraging mutual information (MI) between generated descriptions and visual inputs as a cheap pre-screening signal. This enables intelligent budget allocation toward high-potential trajectories via forking, while decoupled training provides independent MI-based rewards for visual perception optimization, resolving reward blindness. Experiments on six vision-language reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that MIRL achieves 70.22% average accuracy and successfully surpasses the performance of sampling 16 complete trajectories using only 10 pre-samples with top-6 selection (25% fewer complete trajectories). Our code is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/mirl-main/.



176. ❌ FT-RAG: A Fine-grained Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Complex Table Reasoning

作者: Zebin Guo, Weidong Geng, Ruichen Mao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01495v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by grounding responses in external knowledge during inference. However, conventiona RAG systems under-perform on structured tabular data, largely due to coarse retrieval granularity and insufficient table semantic comprehension. To address these limitations, we introduce FT-RAG, a fine-grained framework that employs knowledge association by decomposing tables into entry-level semantic units to construct a structured graph. FT-RAG employs a structural neighbor expansion mechanism to find semantically connected entities during graph retrieval, followed by multi-modal fusion to consolidate the context of table retrieval results. Further, to address the scarcity of specialized datasets in this domain, we introduce Multi-Table-RAG-Lib, a benchmark comprising 9870 QA pairs with high complexity and difficulty, curated to demand multi-table integration and text-table information fusion for reasoning. FT-RAG surpasses top-performing baselines across all metrics, achieving a 23.5% and 59.2% improvement in table-level and cell-level Hit Rates, respectively. Generation performance also sees a remarkable 62.2% increase in exact value accuracy recall. These metrics verify the framework’s effectiveness in factual grounding across both pure tabular and heterogeneous table-text contexts. Therefore, our method establishes a new state-of-the-art performance for complex reasoning over mixed-modality documents.



177. ❌ SciResearcher: Scaling Deep Research Agents for Frontier Scientific Reasoning

作者: Tianshi Zheng, Rui Wang, Xiyun Li, Yangqiu Song, Tianqing Fang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01489v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Frontier scientific reasoning is rapidly emerging as a key foundation for advancing AI agents in automated scientific discovery. Deep research agents offer a promising approach to this challenge. These models develop robust problem-solving capabilities through post-training on information-seeking tasks, which are typically curated via knowledge graph construction or iterative web browsing. However, these strategies face inherent limitations in frontier science, where domain-specific knowledge is scattered across sparse and heterogeneous academic sources, and problem solving requires sophisticated computation and reasoning far beyond factual recall. To bridge this gap, we introduce SciResearcher, a fully automated agentic framework for frontier-science data construction. SciResearcher synthesizes diverse conceptual and computational tasks grounded in academic evidence, while eliciting information acquisition, tool-integrated reasoning, and long-horizon capabilities. Leveraging the curated data for supervised fine-tuning and agentic reinforcement learning, we develop SciResearcher-8B, an agent foundation model that achieves 19.46% on the HLE-Bio/Chem-Gold benchmark, establishing a new state of the art at its parameter scale and surpassing several larger proprietary agents. It further achieves 13-15% absolute gains on SuperGPQA-Hard-Biology and TRQA-Literature benchmarks. Overall, SciResearcher introduces a new paradigm for automated data construction for frontier scientific reasoning and offers a scalable path toward future scientific agents.



178. ❌ ReMedi: Reasoner for Medical Clinical Prediction

作者: Yushi Cao, Yiming Chen, Hongchao Jiang, Hung-yi Lee, Robby T. Tan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01474v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Predicting future clinical outcomes from electronic health records (EHR) remains challenging due to the complexity and heterogeneity of patient data. LLMs have shown strong potential for such predictive tasks, yet existing approaches mainly focus on enhancing medical knowledge through distillation or RAG while relying on the model’s internal ability to interpret contextual information. In this work, we present ReMedi (Reasoner for Medical Clinical Prediction), a framework for improving clinical outcome prediction from EHR. ReMedi generates rationale-answer pairs using a challenging sample regeneration mechanism for complex clinical questions, which leverages ground-truth answers as hints to enhance reasoning for further fine-tuning and preference tuning. ReMedi integrates ground-truth outcome guidance into the preference data construction loop, regenerating rationale-answer variants. By tuning on these rationale-answer pairs, the model improves its predictive performance. Experiments on multiple EHR prediction tasks demonstrate substantial gains of up to 19.9 percent over state-of-the-art baselines in terms of F1 score, underscoring ReMedi’s effectiveness in real-world clinical prediction.



179. ❌ Auditing demographic bias in AI-based emergency police dispatch: a cross-lingual evaluation of eleven large language models

作者: William Guey, Wei Zhang, Pierrick Bougault, Yi Wang, Bertan Ucar, Vitor D. de Moura, José O. Gomes 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01451v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly being integrated into high-stakes public safety systems, including emergency call triage and dispatch decision support, yet their demographic fairness in this context remains largely untested. Here we introduce a cross-lingual audit framework that operationalizes the Police Priority Dispatch System as a five-level ordinal classification task and applies a controlled minimal-pair design to isolate the effect of demographic cues. Across 19,800 model outputs spanning 11 frontier models, 15 scenario pairs, three demographic categories (religious appearance, gender, and race), and two languages (English and Mandarin Chinese), we find that demographic bias emerges systematically when incident severity is ambiguous but largely disappears when the operational priority is clearly determined by call content. Bias magnitude varies by demographic axis, with the largest effects observed for religious appearance, followed by gender and race. Critically, bias does not transfer consistently across languages: gender bias is substantially amplified in Mandarin Chinese, whereas race bias is more pronounced in English, revealing cross-lingual asymmetries that aggregate analyses obscure. In several scenarios, demographic cues produce counter-directional effects, challenging simple stereotype-amplification accounts of model behavior. These findings suggest that bias in LLM-based dispatch is not a fixed property of models alone, but arises from the interaction between demographic signals, contextual ambiguity, and language. Beyond these empirical results, the proposed framework provides a scalable audit infrastructure that enables deploying agencies to evaluate candidate models on jurisdiction-relevant scenarios prior to real-world adoption.



180. ❌ Artificial intelligence language technologies in multilingual healthcare: Grand challenges ahead

作者: Vicent Briva-Iglesias 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01441v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

AI language technologies (AILTs), increasingly enabled by large language models (LLMs), are becoming embedded in multilingual healthcare workflows for translation, rewriting, documentation, interpreting, and messaging in language-discordant settings. Yet fluent output is not the same as clinically safe or equitable communication: performance varies across languages, accents, tasks, and workflows, and efficiency gains can hide errors, reduce traceability, and shift responsibility across clinicians, translators, interpreters, and health systems. This narrative review synthesises recent peer-reviewed evidence across written communication, spoken communication, and emerging agentic workflows. Using the Human-Centered AI Language Technology (HCAILT) lens, it examines capabilities, evaluation practices, implementation patterns, and recurrent errors through reliability, safety culture, and trustworthiness. We identify key convergences and contradictions in the literature and propose seven grand challenges for the next phase of research and deployment. Progress, we argue, requires not only better models but also accountable sociotechnical design, calibrated human oversight, and stronger collaboration across MT/NLP, translation studies, HCI, clinical practice, implementation science, and policy.



181. ❌ Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forward

作者: Gal Yona, Mor Geva, Yossi Matias 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01428v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Despite significant strides in factual reliability, errors – often termed hallucinations – remain a major concern for generative AI, especially as LLMs are increasingly expected to be helpful in more complex or nuanced setups. Yet even in the simplest setting – factoid question-answering with clear ground truth-frontier models without external tools continue to hallucinate. We argue that most factuality gains in this domain have come from expanding the model’s knowledge boundary (encoding more facts) rather than improving awareness of that boundary (distinguishing known from unknown). We conjecture that the latter is inherently difficult: models may lack the discriminative power to perfectly separate truths from errors, creating an unavoidable tradeoff between eliminating hallucinations and preserving utility. This tradeoff dissolves under a different framing. If we understand hallucinations as confident errors – incorrect information delivered without appropriate qualification – a third path emerges beyond the answer-or-abstain dichotomy: expressing uncertainty. We propose faithful uncertainty: aligning linguistic uncertainty with intrinsic uncertainty. This is one facet of metacognition – the ability to be aware of one’s own uncertainty and to act on it. For direct interaction, acting on uncertainty means communicating it honestly; for agentic systems, it becomes the control layer governing when to search and what to trust. Metacognition is thus essential for LLMs to be both trustworthy and capable; we conclude by highlighting open problems for progress towards this objective.



182. ❌ Medmarks: A Comprehensive Open-Source LLM Benchmark Suite for Medical Tasks

作者: Benjamin Warner, Ratna Sagari Grandhi, Max Kieffer, Aymane Ouraq, Saurav Panigrahi, Geetu Ambwani, Kunal Bagga, Nikhil Khandekar, Arya Hariharan, Nishant Mishra, Manish Ram, Shamus Sim Zi Yang, Ahmed Essouaied, Adepoju Jeremiah Moyondafoluwa, Robert Scholz, Bofeng Huang, Molly Beavers, Srishti Gureja, Anish Mahishi, Sameed Khan, Maxime Griot, Hunar Batra, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Siddhant Bharadwaj, Ronald Clark, Ashish Vashist, Anas Zafar, Leema Krishna Murali, Harsh Deshpande, Ameen Patel, William Brown, Johannes Hagemann, Connor Lane, Paul Steven Scotti, Tanishq Mathew Abraham 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01417v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) for medical applications remains challenging due to benchmark saturation, limited data accessibility, and insufficient coverage of relevant tasks. Existing suites have either saturated, heavily depend on restricted datasets, or lack comprehensive model coverage. We introduce Medmarks, a fully open-source evaluation suite with 30 benchmarks spanning question answering, information extraction, medical calculations, and open-ended clinical reasoning. We perform a systematic evaluation of 61 models across 71 configurations using verifiable metrics and LLM-as-a-Judge. Our results show that frontier reasoning models (Gemini 3 Pro Preview, GPT-5.1, & GPT-5.2) achieve the highest performance across both benchmarks, most frontier proprietary models are significantly more token efficient than open-weight alternatives, medically fine-tuned models outperform their generalist counterparts, and that models are susceptible to answer-order bias (particularly smaller models and Grok 4). A subset of our evals (Medmarks-T) can be directly used as reinforcement learning environments to post-train LLMs for medical reasoning. Code is available at https://github.com/MedARC-AI/Medmarks



183. ❌ AlbumFill: Album-Guided Reasoning and Retrieval for Personalized Image Completion

作者: Yu-Ju Tsai, Brian Price, Qing Liu, Luis Figueroa, Daniil Pakhomov, Zhihong Ding, Scott Cohen, Ming-Hsuan Yang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02892v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Personalized image completion aims to restore occluded regions in personal photos while preserving identity and appearance. Existing methods either rely on generic inpainting models that often fail to maintain identity consistency, or assume that suitable reference images are explicitly provided. In practice, suitable references are often not explicitly provided, requiring the system to search for identity-consistent images within personal photo collections. We present AlbumFill, a training-free framework that retrieves identity-consistent references from personal albums for personalized completion. Given an occluded image and a personal album, a vision-language model infers missing semantic cues to guide composed image retrieval, and the retrieved references are used by reference-based completion models. To facilitate this task, we introduce a dataset containing 54K human-centric samples with associated album images. Experiments across multiple baselines demonstrate the difficulty of personalized completion and highlight the importance of identity-consistent reference retrieval. Project Page: https://liagm.github.io/AlbumFill/



184. ❌ Laplacian Frequency Interaction Network for Rural Thematic Road Extraction

作者: Baiyan Chen, Weixin Zhai 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02866v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Rural thematic road network construction aims to extract topological road structures from movement trajectory images of agricultural machinery. However, this task faces challenges where downsampling methods commonly used in existing studies tend to blur the sparse high-frequency road structures, and the heavy noise from dense field operations often leads to fragmented or redundant topologies in the extracted networks. To address these challenges, we propose LFINet, a Laplacian Frequency Interaction Network. The network begins with a Laplacian Multi-scale Separator (LMS) to decouple the image into low-frequency semantic contexts and high-frequency structural details. These components are then processed by the Cross-Frequency Interaction Block (CFIB) through a dual-pathway architecture in which a High-Frequency Block (HFB) refines local structures while a Spatial Transformer (ST) captures global semantics. Subsequently, a Frequency Gated Modulation (FGM) mechanism integrates the features from pathways by leveraging semantic contexts to calibrate the structural details. Finally, a Progressive Reconstruction Decoder iteratively fuses multi-scale features to ensure topological consistency. Experiments conducted on a real-world agricultural trajectories dataset from Henan Province, China, show that LFINet establishes a new state-of-the-art. Specifically, it achieves an F1-score of 92.54% and an IoU of 86.12%, surpassing the second-ranked method by 0.64% and 1.1%, respectively. This confirms its capability to effectively construct topological road networks from noisy and sparse field data.



185. ❌ Pixel Perfect: Relational Image Quality Assessment with Spatially-Aware Distortions

作者: Fadeel Sher Khan, Long N. Le, Abhinau K. Venkataramanan, Seok-Jun Lee, Hamid R. Sheikh 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02863v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Traditional image quality assessment (IQA) methods rely on mean opinion scores (MOS), which are resource-intensive to collect and fail to provide interpretable, localized feedback on specific image distortions. We overcome these limitations by shifting from absolute quality prediction to a relational and directional assessment. Our approach utilizes a self-supervised synthetic distortion engine to generate training data, eliminating the need for manual annotation. A distortion prediction network is trained with an anti-symmetric objective to produce spatially-aware, disentangled maps that identify the type, intensity, and direction of distortions relative to a reference image. Subsequently, a scoring network is trained via contrastive learning on ordinally ranked image sets to predict a relational quality score. Our method provides a more granular and interpretable approach to IQA for the targeted optimization of image processing algorithms without requiring any human-labeled quality scores.



186. ❌ Active Sampling for Ultra-Low-Bit-Rate Video Compression via Conditional Controlled Diffusion

作者: Amirhosein Javadi, Shirin Saeedi Bidokhti, Tara Javidi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02849v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Diffusion models provide a powerful generative prior for perceptual reconstruction at ultra-low bitrates, but effective video compression requires controlling the generative process using highly compact conditioning signals. In this work, we present ActDiff-VC, a diffusion-based video compression framework for the ultra-low-bitrate regime. Our method partitions videos into variable-length segments, transmits keyframes only when needed, and summarizes temporal dynamics using a compact set of tracked point trajectories. Conditioned on these sparse signals, a conditional diffusion decoder synthesizes the remaining frames, enabling perceptually realistic reconstruction under severe rate constraints. To support this design, we introduce two mechanisms: content-adaptive keyframe selection and budget-aware sparse trajectory selection, which together enable compact yet effective conditioning for generative reconstruction. Experiments on the UVG and MCL-JCV benchmarks show that ActDiff-VC achieves up to 64.6% bitrate reduction at matched NIQE, improves KID by up to 64.6% and FID by up to 37.7% at comparable bitrates against strong learned codecs, and delivers favorable perceptual rate–distortion trade-offs relative to learned and diffusion-based baselines in the ultra-low-bitrate regime.



187. ❌ VideoNet: A Large-Scale Dataset for Domain-Specific Action Recognition

作者: Tanush Yadav, Mohammadreza Salehi, Jae Sung Park, Vivek Ramanujan, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Yejin Choi, Ali Farhadi, Rohun Tripathi, Ranjay Krishna 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02834v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Videos are unique in their ability to capture actions which transcend multiple frames. Accordingly, for many years action recognition was the quintessential task for video understanding. Unfortunately, due to a lack of sufficiently diverse and challenging data, modern vision-language models (VLMs) are no longer evaluated on their action recognition capabilities. To revitalize action recognition in the era of VLMs, we advocate for a returned focus on domain-specific actions. To this end, we introduce VideoNet, a domain-specific action recognition benchmark covering 1,000 distinct actions from 37 domains. We begin with a multiple-choice evaluation setting, where the difference between closed and open models is stark: Gemini 3.1 Pro attains 69.9% accuracy while Qwen3-VL-8B gets a mere 45.0%. To understand why VLMs struggle on VideoNet, we relax the questions into a binary setting, where random chance is 50%. Still, Qwen achieves only 59.2% accuracy. Further relaxing the evaluation setup, we provide $k\in{1,2,3}$ in-context examples of the action. Some models excel in the few-shot setting, while others falter; Qwen improves $+7.0%$, while Gemini declines $-4.8%$. Notably, these gains fall short of the $+13.6%$ improvement in non-expert humans when given few-shot examples. Finding that VLMs struggle to fully exploit in-context examples, we shift from test-time improvements to the training side. We collect the first large-scale training dataset for domain-specific actions, totaling nearly 500k video question-answer pairs. Fine-tuning a Molmo2-4B model on our data, we surpass all open-weight 8B models on the VideoNet benchmark.



188. ❌ Edge-Efficient Image Restoration: Transformer Distillation into State-Space Models

作者: Srinivas Soumitri Miriyala, Sowmya Vajrala, Sravanth Kodavanti, Vikram Nelvoy Rajendiran, Sharan Kumar Allur 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02794v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We propose a modular framework for hybrid image restoration that integrates transformer and state-space model (SSM) blocks with a focus on improving runtime efficiency on edge hardware. While transformers provide strong global modeling through self-attention, their attention kernels incur substantial latency on mobile devices, especially for high-resolution inputs. In contrast, SSMs such as Mamba offer lineartime sequence modeling with lower runtime overhead but may underperform on fine grained restoration tasks. To balance accuracy and efficiency, we train lightweight SSM blocks as feature-distilled surrogates of transformer blocks and use them to construct hybrid U-Net-style architectures. To automatically discover effective block combinations, we introduce Efficient Network Search (ENS), a multi-objective search strategy that selects task-specific hybrid configurations from pre-aligned components. ENS optimizes restoration quality while penalizing transformer usage, serving as a lightweight proxy for latency and enabling architecture discovery without repeated hardware profiling. On a Snapdragon 8 Elite CPU, the Restormer baseline requires 10119.52 ms for inference. In contrast, ENS-discovered hybrids significantly reduce runtime: ENS-Deblurring runs in 2973 ms (3.4x faster), ENS-Deraining in 5816 ms (1.74x faster), and ENS-Denoising in 8666 ms (1.17x faster), while maintaining competitive restoration quality.



189. ❌ HumanSplatHMR: Closing the Loop Between Human Mesh Recovery and Gaussian Splatting Avatar

作者: Yeheng Zong, Pou-Chun Kung, Yike Pan, Seth Isaacson, Yizhou Chen, Ram Vasudevan, Katherine A. Skinner 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02784v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Accurately recovering human pose and appearance from video is an essential component of scene reconstruction, with applications to motion capture, motion prediction, virtual reality, and digital twinning. Despite significant interest in building realistic human avatars from video, this paper demonstrates that existing methods do not accurately recover the 3D geometry of humans. ViT-based approaches are not consistently reliable and can overfit to 2D views, while NeRF- and Gaussian Splatting-based avatars treat pose and appearance separately, limiting rendering generalization to new poses. To resolve these shortcomings, this paper proposes HumanSplatHMR, a joint optimization framework that refines 3D human poses while simultaneously learning a high-fidelity avatar for novel-view and novel-pose synthesis. Our key insight is to close the loop between geometric pose estimation and differentiable rendering. Unlike prior human avatar methods that rely on accurate human pose obtained through motion capture systems or offline refinement, which are impractical in in-the-wild scenarios, our approach uses only human mesh estimates from a state-of-the-art human pose estimator to better reflect real-world conditions. Therefore, instead of using the human pose only as a deformation prior, HumanSplatHMR backpropagates photometric, segmentation, and depth losses through a differentiable renderer to the pose parameters and global position. This coupling refines the global 3D pose over time, improving accuracy and alignment while producing better renderings from novel views. Experiments show consistent improvements over pose recovery baselines that omit image-level refinement and avatar baselines that decouple pose estimation from avatar reconstruction.



190. ❌ Linearizing Vision Transformer with Test-Time Training

作者: Yining Li, Dongchen Han, Zeyu Liu, Hanyi Wang, Yulin Wang, Gao Huang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02772v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

While linear-complexity attention mechanisms offer a promising alternative to Softmax attention for overcoming the quadratic bottleneck, training such models from scratch remains prohibitively expensive. Inheriting weights from pretrained Transformers provides an appealing shortcut, yet the fundamental representational gap between Softmax and linear attention prevents effective weight transfer. In this work, we address this conversion challenge from two perspectives: architectural alignment and representational alignment. We identify Test-Time Training (TTT) as a linear-complexity architecture whose two-layer dynamic formulation is structurally aligned with Softmax attention, enabling direct inheritance of pretrained attention weights. To further align representational properties, including key shift-invariance and locality, we introduce key instance normalization and a lightweight locality enhancement module. We validate our approach by linearizing Stable Diffusion 3.5 and introduce SD3.5-T$^5$ (Transformer To Test Time Training). With only 1 hour of fine-tuning on 4$\times$H20 GPUs, SD3.5-T$^5$ achieves comparable text-to-image quality to the fine-tuned Softmax model, while accelerating inference by 1.32$\times$ and 1.47$\times$ at 1K and 2K resolutions.



191. ❌ FoR-Net: Learning to Focus on Hard Regions for Efficient Semantic Segmentation

作者: Hsin-Jui Pan, Sheng-Wei Chan, Meng-Qian Li, Chun-Po Shen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02764v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present FoR-Net, a lightweight architecture for semantic segmentation that focuses on identifying and enhancing hard regions. Instead of relying on heavy global modeling, FoR-Net adopts an efficient strategy that selectively emphasizes informative regions through a learned importance map and a Top-K activation mechanism. Specifically, a selector module predicts region-wise importance, enabling the model to focus on challenging areas such as thin structures and object boundaries. Multi-scale reasoning is achieved using convolutional branches with different receptive fields, allowing diverse spatial context aggregation. We evaluate FoR-Net on the Cityscapes benchmark under limited computational resources. Despite its lightweight design and standard training configuration, FoR-Net achieves competitive performance and demonstrates improved consistency in challenging regions. These results suggest that region-focused reasoning provides a simple yet effective inductive bias for efficient semantic segmentation.



192. ❌ Unified Map Prior Encoder for Mapping and Planning

作者: Zongzheng Zhang, Sizhe Zou, Guantian Zheng, Zhenxin Zhu, Yu Gao, Guoxuan Chi, Shuo Wang, Yuwen Heng, Zhigang Sun, Yiru Wang, Hao Sun, Chao Ma, Zhen Li, Anqing Jiang, Hao Zhao 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02762v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Online mapping and end-to-end (E2E) planning in autonomous driving remain largely sensor-centric, leaving rich map priors, including HD/SD vector maps, rasterized SD maps, and satellite imagery, underused because of heterogeneity, pose drift, and inconsistent availability at test time. We present UMPE, a Unified Map Prior Encoder that can ingest any subset of four priors and fuse them with BEV features for both mapping and planning. UMPE has two branches. The vector encoder pre-aligns HD/SD polylines with a frame-wise SE(2) correction, encodes points via multi-frequency sinusoidal features, and produces polyline tokens with confidence scores. BEV queries then apply cross-attention with confidence bias, followed by normalized channel-wise gating to avoid length imbalance and softly down-weight uncertain sources. The raster encoder shares a ResNet-18 backbone conditioned by FiLM with scaling and shift at every stage, performs SE(2) micro-alignment, and injects priors through zero-initialized residual fusion, so the network starts from a do-no-harm baseline and learns to add only useful prior evidence. A vector-then-raster fusion order reflects the inductive bias of geometry first, appearance second. On nuScenes mapping, UMPE lifts MapTRv2 from 61.5 to 67.4 mAP (+5.9) and MapQR from 66.4 to 71.7 mAP (+5.3). On Argoverse2, UMPE adds +4.1 mAP over strong baselines. UMPE is compositional: when trained with all priors, it outperforms single-prior models even when only one prior is available at test time, demonstrating powerset robustness. For E2E planning with the VAD backbone on nuScenes, UMPE reduces trajectory error from 0.72 to 0.42 m L2 on average (-0.30 m) and collision rate from 0.22% to 0.12% (-0.10%), surpassing recent prior-injection methods. These results show that a unified, alignment-aware treatment of heterogeneous map priors yields better mapping and better planning.



193. ❌ DynoSLAM: Dynamic SLAM with Generative Graph Neural Networks for Real-World Social Navigation

作者: Danil Tokhchukov, Veronika Morozova, Gonzalo Ferrer 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02759v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Traditional Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) algorithms rely heavily on the static environment assumption, which severely limits their applicability in real-world spaces populated by moving entities, such as pedestrians. In this work, we propose DynoSLAM, a tightly-coupled Dynamic GraphSLAM architecture that integrates socially-aware Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) directly into the factor graph optimization. Unlike conventional approaches that use rigid constant-velocity heuristics or deterministic single-agent neural priors, our framework formulates pedestrian motion forecasting as a stochastic World Model. By utilizing Monte Carlo rollouts from a trained GNN, we capture the multimodal epistemic uncertainty of human interactions and embed it into the SLAM graph via a dynamic Mahalanobis distance factor. We demonstrate through extensive simulated experiments that this stochastic formulation not only maintains highly accurate retrospective tracking but also prevents the optimization failures caused by the deterministic “argmax problem”. Ultimately, extracting the empirical mean and covariance matrices of future pedestrian states provides a mathematically rigorous, probabilistic safety envelope for downstream local planners, enabling anticipatory and collision-free robot navigation in densely crowded environments.



194. ❌ Does it Really Count? Assessing Semantic Grounding in Text-Guided Class-Agnostic Counting

作者: Giacomo Pacini, Luca Ciampi, Nicola Messina, Nicola Tonellotto, Giuseppe Amato, Fabrizio Falchi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02752v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Open-world text-guided class-agnostic counting (CAC) has emerged as a flexible paradigm for counting arbitrary object classes by using natural language prompts. However, current evaluation protocols primarily focus on standard counting errors within single-category images, overlooking a fundamental requirement: the ability to correctly ground the textual prompt in the visual scene. In this paper, we show that several state-of-the-art CAC models often struggle to determine which object class should be counted based on the given prompt, revealing a misalignment between textual semantics and visual object representations. This limitation leads to spurious counting responses and reduced reliability in real-world scenarios. To systematically address these limitations, we propose a new evaluation framework focused on model robustness and trustworthiness. Our contribution is two-fold: (i) we introduce PrACo++ (Prompt-Aware Counting++), a novel test suite featuring two dedicated evaluation protocols – the negative-label test and the distractor test – paired with new specialized metrics; and (ii) we present the MUCCA (MUlti-Category Class-Agnostic counting) evaluation dataset, a new collection of real-world images featuring multiple annotated object categories per scene, unlike existing CAC benchmarks that typically include a single category per image. Our extensive experimental evaluation of 10 state-of-the-art methods shows that, despite strong performance under standard counting metrics, current models exhibit significant weaknesses in understanding and grounding object class descriptions. Finally, we provide a quantitative analysis of how semantic similarity between prompts influences these failures. Overall, our results underscore the need for more semantically grounded architectures and offer a reliable framework for future assessment in open-world text-guided CAC methods.



195. ❌ Seeing Realism from Simulation: Efficient Video Transfer for Vision-Language-Action Data Augmentation

作者: Chenyu Hui, Xiaodi Huang, Siyu Xu, Yunke Wang, Shan You, Fei Wang, Tao Huang, Chang Xu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02757v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Vision-language-action (VLA) models typically rely on large-scale real-world videos, whereas simulated data, despite being inexpensive and highly parallelizable to collect, often suffers from a substantial visual domain gap and limited environmental diversity, resulting in weak real-world generalization. We present an efficient video augmentation framework that converts simulated VLA videos into realistic training videos while preserving task semantics and action trajectories. Our pipeline extracts structured conditions from simulation via video semantic segmentation and video captioning, rewrites captions to diversify environments, and uses a conditional video transfer model to synthesize realistic videos. To make augmentation practical at scale, we introduce a diffusion feature-reuse mechanism that reuses video tokens across adjacent timesteps to accelerate generation, and a coreset sampling strategy that identifies a compact, non-redundant subset for augmentation under limited computation. Extensive experiments on Robotwin 2.0, LIBERO, LIBERO-Plus, and a real robotic platform demonstrate consistent improvements. For example, our method improves RDT-1B by 8% on Robotwin 2.0, and boosts $π_0$ by 5.1% on the more challenging LIBERO-Plus benchmark. Code is available at: https://github.com/nanfangxiansheng/Seeing-Realism-from-Simulation.



196. ❌ SIAM: Head and Brain MRI Segmentation from Few High-Quality Templates via Synthetic Training

作者: Romain Valabregue, Ines Khemir, Eric Badinet, François Rousseau, Guillaume Auzias, Reuben Dorent 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02737v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Synthetic training has recently advanced brain MRI segmentation by enabling contrast-agnostic models trained entirely on generated data. However, most existing approaches rely on hundreds of automatically labeled templates, introducing systematic biases and limiting their flexibility to incorporate new anatomical structures. We present the Segment It All Model (SIAM), a 3D whole-head segmentation framework for 16 anatomical structures, trained using only six high-quality, manually annotated templates. SIAM extends domain randomization to both intensity and shape domains: synthetic image generation ensures contrast variability, while high-resolution spatial transformations model anatomical differences in cortical thickness and deep nuclei morphology. Unlike prior synthetic models, SIAM simultaneously segments brain as well as extra-cerebral tissues, including cerebrospinal fluid, vessels, dura mater, skull, and skin, enabling fully automated, preprocessing-free analysis. Evaluation across eight heterogeneous datasets (N=301), that include multiple contrasts (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, CT) and span a wide range of ages, demonstrates that SIAM matches or outperforms state-of-the-art methods for brain structures, in addition to extending automated segmentation to non-brain structures. The model also exhibits superior consistency across contrasts and repeated acquisitions, together with improved sensitivity to subtle gray matter atrophy. We openly release the model and the label templates at https://github.com/romainVala/SIAM.



197. ❌ AnchorD: Metric Grounding of Monocular Depth Using Factor Graphs

作者: Simon Dorer, Martin Büchner, Nick Heppert, Abhinav Valada 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02667v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Dense and accurate depth estimation is essential for robotic manipulation, grasping, and navigation, yet currently available depth sensors are prone to errors on transparent, specular, and general non-Lambertian surfaces. To mitigate these errors, large-scale monocular depth estimation approaches provide strong structural priors, but their predictions can be potentially skewed or mis-scaled in metric units, limiting their direct use in robotics. Thus, in this work, we propose a training-free depth grounding framework that anchors monocular depth estimation priors from a depth foundation model in raw sensor depth through factor graph optimization. Our method performs a patch-wise affine alignment, locally grounding monocular predictions in metric real-world depth while preserving fine-grained geometric structure and discontinuities. To facilitate evaluation in challenging real-world conditions, we introduce a benchmark dataset with dense scene-wide ground truth depth in the presence of non-Lambertian objects. Ground truth is obtained via matte reflection spray and multi-camera fusion, overcoming the reliance on object-only CAD-based annotations used in prior datasets. Extensive evaluations across diverse sensors and domains demonstrate consistent improvements in depth performance without any (re-)training. We make our implementation publicly available at https://anchord.cs.uni-freiburg.de.



198. ❌ Temporally Consistent Object 6D Pose Estimation for Robot Control

作者: Kateryna Zorina, Vojtech Priban, Mederic Fourmy, Josef Sivic, Vladimir Petrik 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02708v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Single-view RGB object pose estimators have reached a level of precision and efficiency that makes them good candidates for vision-based robot control. However, off-the-shelf methods lack temporal consistency and robustness that are mandatory for a stable feedback control. In this work, we develop a factor graph approach to enforce temporal consistency of the object pose estimates. In particular, the proposed approach: (i) incorporates object motion models, (ii) explicitly estimates the object pose measurement uncertainty, and (iii) integrates the above two components in an online optimization-based estimator. We demonstrate that with appropriate outlier rejection and smoothing using the proposed factor graph approach, we can significantly improve the results on standardized pose estimation benchmarks. We experimentally validate the stability of the proposed approach for a feedback-based robot control task in which the object is tracked by the camera attached to a torque controlled manipulator.



199. ❌ Biological Spatial Priors Regularize Foundation Model Representations for Cross-Site MSI Generalization in Colorectal Cancer

作者: Dasari Naga Raju 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02660v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Predicting microsatellite instability (MSI) status from routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) whole slide images (WSIs) offers a practical alternative to molecular testing, but models trained at one institution tend to generalize poorly to slides acquired at a different site. Foundation model representations, despite their generality, still encode site-specific texture alongside the conserved biological morphology underlying MSI. We investigate whether tile-level spatial priors derived from known MSI histology can guide these representations toward more site-invariant features. We introduce a biologically motivated spatial prior based on peripheral distance encoding, reflecting the Crohn’s-like peripheral lymphocytic reaction at the tumor invasive margin, and evaluate a secondary local immune neighborhood encoding reflecting the lymphocyte-to-tumor ratio in each tile’s immediate spatial neighborhood. Both priors are injected into a TransMIL aggregator before self-attention, allowing the transformer to integrate spatial biological context with UNI2-h or Virchow2 features across all attention layers. We evaluate six foundation model and MIL aggregator combinations as a reference, then assess the effect of each spatial prior. Training on TCGA-COAD (137 slides) and evaluating externally on TCGA-READ (50 slides) without retraining, peripheral distance encoding achieves MSI AUC 0.959 +/- 0.012 on COAD and MSS specificity 1.000 on READ, compared to 0.957 and 0.939 for the strongest reference configuration. Local immune neighborhood encoding achieves comparable internal AUC but lower cross-site specificity, suggesting margin proximity encodes a more site-invariant biological signal than local immune density. Results suggest biologically grounded spatial priors act as regularizers that reduce reliance on site-specific imaging patterns.



200. ❌ Mamoda2.5: Enhancing Unified Multimodal Model with DiT-MoE

作者: Yangming Shi, Shixiang Zhu, Tao Shen, Zhimiao Yu, Dengsheng Chen, Taicai Chen, Yunfei Yang, Juan Zhou, Chen Cheng, Liang Ma, Xibin Wu, Benxuan Yan, Ge Li, Tuoyu Zhang, Dan Li, Chang Liu, Zhenbang Sun 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02641v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present Mamoda2.5, a unified AR-Diffusion framework that seamlessly integrates multimodal understanding and generation within a single architecture. To efficiently enhance the model’s generation capability, we equip the Diffusion Transformer backbone with a fine-grained Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) design (128 experts, Top-8 routing), yielding a 25B-parameter model that activates only 3B parameters, significantly reducing training costs while scaling up the model capacity. Mamoda2.5 achieves top-tier generation performance on VBench 2.0 and sets a new record in video editing quality, surpassing evaluated open-source models and matching the performance of current top-tier proprietary models, including the Kling O1 on OpenVE-Bench. Furthermore, we introduce a joint few-step distillation and reinforcement learning framework that compresses the 30-step editing model into a 4-step model and greatly accelerates model inference. Compared to open-source baselines, Mamoda2.5 achieves up to $95.9\times$ faster video editing inference. In real-world applications, Mamoda2.5 has been successfully deployed for content moderation and creative restoration tasks in advertising scenarios, achieving a 98% success rate in internal advertising video editing scenario.



201. ❌ Human Activity Recognition Method for Moderate Violence Detection

作者: Luis Angel Aparicio Borjas, Victor Elias Nieto, Juan Irving Vasquez, Alfonso Fernandez-Vazquez, Gerardo Antonio Alvarez Hernandez 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02659v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Physical violence in public spaces is a significant public health concern, with minor incidents such as pushing often serving as precursors to more severe escalations. This research develops an automated system for the real-time detection of moderate physical violence, specifically pushing, in surveillance camera footage. The proposed solution integrates state-of-the-art computer vision models, utilizing YOLO11 and YOLO11-Pose for human detection and skeletal keypoint extraction. By calculating body inclination and joint angles between shoulders and hips, a Random Forest classifier was trained to distinguish between normal behavior and aggressive physical contact. The system’s performance was evaluated through three progressive case studies representing increasing levels of difficulty. In controlled environments with frontal views, the model achieved a precision of 0.98. In the most challenging scenario, featuring high-altitude, steep-angle recordings from real-world surveillance infrastructure, the system maintained a precision of 0.72 despite significant perspective distortion and visual noise. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using skeletal analysis for early violence intervention in urban security contexts.



202. ❌ AutoFocus: Uncertainty-Aware Active Visual Search for GUI Grounding

作者: Ruilin Yao, Shegnwu Xiong, Tianyu Zou, Shili Xiong, Yi Rong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02630v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have enabled autonomous GUI agents that translate natural language instructions into executable screen coordinates. However, grounding performance degrades in high-resolution interfaces, where dense layouts and small interactive elements expose a resolution gap between modern displays and model input constraints. Existing zoom-in strategies rely on fixed anchors, heuristic grids, or reinforcement learning, lacking a principled mechanism to adaptively determine where refinement is needed and how much spatial uncertainty should be explored. We propose AutoFocus, a training-free, uncertainty-aware active visual search framework for GUI grounding. Our key insight is that token-level perplexity in coordinate generation naturally reflects spatial uncertainty. Rather than committing to a single prediction, AutoFocus samples multiple coordinate hypotheses and converts their axial perplexities into an anisotropic gaussian spatial probability field, explicitly modeling directional uncertainty. Based on this field, we generate global and local region proposals and introduce Shape-Aware Zooming to balance tight localization with contextual preservation. A visual prompt-based aggregation step then selects the most consistent prediction via structured comparison. Extensive experiments on ScreenSpot-Pro and ScreenSpot-V2 demonstrate consistent improvements across both general-purpose and GUI-specialized VLMs.



203. ❌ Rethinking Low-Light Image Enhancement: A Log-Domain Intensity–Chromaticity Decoupling Perspective

作者: Guangrui Bai, Yifan Mei, Yahui Deng, Yuhan Chen, Yuze Qiu, Wenhai Liu, Erbao Dong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02627v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Explicit reconstruction constraints derived from the decoupled representation are further imposed to suppress abnormal channel amplification and chromatic noise. Experiments on LOLv2-Real, MIT-Adobe FiveK, and LSRW show that the proposed method achieves competitive or superior quantitative and visual performance, reaching 29.71 dB PSNR and 0.89 SSIM on LOLv2-Real. DarkFace experiments further indicate improved downstream face detection under low-light conditions. Code and pretrained models are available at: https://github.com/mubaisam/ICD.



204. ❌ Retrieving Any Relevant Moments: Benchmark and Models for Generalized Moment Retrieval

作者: Yiming Ding, Siyu Cao, Luyuan Jiao, Yixuan Li, Zitong Wang, Zhiyong Liu, Lu Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02623v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Video Moment Retrieval (VMR) aims to localize temporal segments in videos that correspond to a natural language query, but typically assumes only a single matching moment for each query. This assumption does not always hold in real-world scenarios, where queries may correspond to multiple or no moments. Thus, we formulate Generalized Moment Retrieval (GMR), a unified setting that requires retrieving the complete set of relevant moments or predicting an empty set. To enable systematic study of GMR, we introduce Soccer-GMR, a large-scale benchmark built on challenging soccer videos that reflect general GMR scenarios, with realistic negative and positive queries. The benchmark is constructed via a duration-flexible semi-automated pipeline with human verification, enabling scalable data generation while maintaining high annotation quality. We further design a unified evaluation protocol with complementary metrics tailored for null-set rejection, positive-query localization, and end-to-end GMR performance. Finally, we establish strong baselines across two modeling paradigms: a lightweight plug-and-play GMR adapter for discriminative VMR models, and a GMR-tailored GRPO reward for fine-tuning multimodal large language models (MLLMs). Extensive experiments show consistent gains across all metrics and expose key limitations of current methods, positioning GMR as a more realistic and challenging benchmark for video-language understanding.



205. ❌ Global-Local Feature Decoding with Adapter-Guided SAMv2 for Salient Object Detection

作者: Morteza Moradi, Mohammad Moradi, Simone Palazzo, Ali Borji, Concetto Spampinato 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02616v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Salient Object Detection (SOD) remains an essential yet underexplored task in the era of large-scale vision models. Although foundation models like SAM exhibit strong generalization, their potential for SOD is not fully realized, and training or fully fine-tuning them is computationally expensive and prone to overfitting under limited data. To overcome these challenges, we introduce GLASSNet, a Global-Local feature decoding framework that uses SAMv2 as a frozen encoder paired with a lightweight, spatially aware convolutional adapter-reducing learnable encoder parameters by over 97%. To enhance saliency quality, GLASSNet employs a dual-decoder architecture: one decoder captures global, long-range semantics with an expanded receptive field, while the other captures fine local details such as edges and textures. Fusing these complementary cues yields saliency maps that combine global coherence with local precision, producing accurate final masks. Extensive experiments on standard SOD and camouflaged object detection benchmarks show that GLASSNet surpasses state-of-the-art methods, demonstrating the power of frozen foundation models combined with targeted adaptation and global-local decoding.



206. ❌ Rethinking the Need for Source Models: Source-Free Domain Adaptation from Scratch Guided by a Vision-Language Model

作者: Zhou Bingtao, Xiang Mian, Ning Qian 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02604v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Source-Free Domain Adaptation (SFDA) adapts source models to target domains without accessing source data, addressing privacy and transmission issues. However, existing methods still initialize from a source pre-trained model and thus are not truly source-free. Recent works have introduced Vision-Language (ViL) models to guide the adaptation process, in these methods, we observe that for the same target domain, different source models yield minimal variation in final results, indicating the source model itself has limited impact. Motivated by this, we propose ViL-Only Domain Adaptation (VODA) , a stricter setting that eliminates all dependencies on source domain, relying solely on a randomly initialized model, a ViL model, and unlabeled target data. We analyze the adaptation dynamics of VODA and introduce Two-Stage Denoised-Region Distillation (TS-DRD) , a two-stage framework that first warms up the model with ViL guidance, then seek a Denoised-Region inherent in both the ViL and adapting model, yielding cleaner supervision for distillation. Experiments on Office-Home, VisDA, and DomainNet-126 show that under VODA, TS-DRD achieves competitive or superior performance to existing SFDA methods that still use source models, demonstrating its effectiveness and the potential of the VODA setting.



207. ❌ Representation learning from OCT images

作者: Hedi Tabia, Désiré Sidibé, Nawres Khlifa, Ahmed Tabia, Ines Rahmany, Noura Aboudi, Zainab Haddad, Hajer Khachnaoui, Hsouna Zgolli 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02589v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) has become one of the most used imaging modality in ophthalmology. It provides high-resolution, non-invasive visualization of retinal microarchitecture. The automated analysis of OCT images through representation learning has emerged as a central research frontier. This has mainly been driven by the clinical need to process large acquisition volumes. The objective is to reduce the reliance on expert annotation, and improve diagnostic consistency across devices and populations. This survey provides a comprehensive and structured review of representation learning methods for retinal OCT image analysis. It covers the period from early deep learning approaches to the most recent developments in foundation models and vision-language systems. We organize the literature along a principled taxonomy of learning paradigms, encompassing supervised learning with CNN-based and transformer-based architectures, self-supervised and semi-supervised methods, generative approaches, as well as 3D volumetric modeling, multimodal representation learning, and large-scale pretrained foundation models. For each paradigm, we analyze the core methodological contributions, identify persistent limitations, and trace the connections between successive approaches. We further provide a structured overview of publicly available OCT datasets, discuss evaluation protocol considerations, and present a unified problem formulation that situates each learning paradigm within a common mathematical framework. Building on this analysis, we identify and discuss the most pressing open research directions emerging in the literature. This includes volumetric foundation model pretraining, uncertainty-aware representation learning, federated and privacy-preserving training, fairness and bias mitigation, concept-based interpretability,…



208. ❌ StableMind: Source-Free Cross-Subject fMRI Decoding with Regularized Adaptation

作者: Jintao Guo, Lin Wang, Shumeng Li, Jian Zhang, Yulin Zhou, Luyang Cao, Hairong Zheng, Yinghuan Shi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02586v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Existing cross-subject fMRI decoding methods typically train a model on multiple scanned subjects and then adapt it to a new subject using substantial paired fMRI-image data. However, in realistic scenarios, new-subject fMRI data are often limited due to costly data acquisition, and raw data from previous subjects may be inaccessible, leading existing methods to suffer performance degradation during new-subject adaptation. In this paper, we identify that this degradation stems from two key issues: brain-side instability caused by large subject differences in fMRI responses, and image-side supervision unreliability caused by fine-grained visual details that are not reliably supported by limited fMRI signals. To address these challenges, we propose StableMind, a regularized adaptation framework designed to improve brain-side representation stability and image-side supervision reliability. (1) To stabilize brain representations, StableMind reuses ridge projections from the pretrained model as adaptation priors to constrain limited-data new-subject adaptation, and applies Fourier-based feature-level brain augmentation to improve robustness to individual variability. (2) To improve image supervision reliability, StableMind introduces difficulty-aware image blur for brain-image alignment, reducing the influence of fine-grained visual details that are weakly supported by limited fMRI signals while preserving stable visual structure. Experiments on the Natural Scenes Dataset under a unified 1-hour adaptation protocol demonstrate that StableMind achieves 84.02% image retrieval accuracy and 81.66% brain retrieval accuracy averaged over four subjects, surpassing the state-of-the-art method by 5.71% brain retrieval accuracy with fewer trainable adaptation parameters. Our code is available at https://github.com/lingeringlight/StableMind.



209. ❌ Stylistic Attribute Control in Latent Diffusion Models

作者: Max Reimann, Benito Buchheim, Jürgen Döllner 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02583v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Text-to-image diffusion models have revolutionized image synthesis and editing, but precise control over stylistic attributes remains a challenge, often causing unintended content modifications. We propose an approach for fine-grained parametric control of stylistic attributes in latent diffusion models by learning disentangled editing directions from synthetic datasets. We use guidance composition to close the domain gap between stylistically finetuned and foundation models, preserving the original image semantics while applying stylistic adjustments. To ensure consistent edits, we introduce a training regularization loss and enhance DDIM inversion with optimized null-conditional embeddings for real image editing. We validate our approach by learning from stylistically filtered synthetic datasets varying a range of stylistic attributes, including outlines, local contrast, watercolorization effects, and geometric patterns. Our evaluations demonstrate that compared to current text-based editing techniques, our method offers well-integrated, more precise and continuously adjustable stylistic modifications.



210. ❌ Self-Supervised Spatial And Zero-Shot Angular Super-Resolution by Spatial-Angular Implicit Representation For Rotating-View SNR-Efficient Diffusion MRI

作者: Yinzhe Wu, Hongyu Rui, Fanwen Wang, Jiahao Huang, Zi Wang, Guang Yang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02575v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Rotating-view thick-slice acquisition is highly SNR-efficient for mesoscale diffusion MRI (dMRI) but requires numerous rotating views to satisfy Nyquist sampling, resulting in long scan time. We propose a self-supervised Spatial-Angular Implicit Neural Representation (SA-INR) that reconstructs high-resolution dMRI from a single view per diffusion direction, representing a massive acceleration. Our model, an MLP conditioned on a b=0 structural prior and the b-direction via FiLM, is trained end-to-end on the anisotropic input. The framework not only accurately reconstructs the trained b-directions (spatial SR) but also learns a continuous q-space representation, enabling high-fidelity “zero-shot” synthesis of unseen b-directions (angular SR). On simulated data, our method achieved high fidelity for both trained (34.82 dB) and unseen (33.08 dB) directions. Most importantly, the synthesized angular data also improved the quantitative accuracy of downstream DTI model fitting. Our SA-INR framework breaks the classical sampling limits, paving the way for fast, quantitative high-resolution dMRI.



211. ❌ Automated In-the-Wild Data Collection for Continual AI Generated Image Detection

作者: Thanasis Pantsios, Dimitrios Karageorgiou, Christos Koutlis, George Karantaidis, Olga Papadopoulou, Symeon Papadopoulos 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02567v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The rapid advancement of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has introduced significant challenges for reliable AI-generated image detection. Existing detectors often suffer from performance degradation under distribution shifts and when encountering newly emerging generative models. In this work, we propose a data-centric continual adaptation framework for updating detectors in evolving environments. We show that both in-the-wild data and generator-driven data are essential for adapting detectors. We introduce an automated, weakly supervised pipeline for constructing in-the-wild datasets through fact-check article retrieval. Additionally, we demonstrate that incorporating even a small amount of generator-driven data during training enables effective adaptation to newly emerging models, while combining it with in-the-wild data within a continual learning framework enables robust adaptation and mitigates catastrophic forgetting. Extensive experiments on two state-of-the-art detectors show significant improvements of +9.14% and +8% in average accuracy, respectively.



212. ❌ Low-Latency Embedded Driver Monitoring System with a Multi-Task Neural Network

作者: Carmelo Scribano, Giovanni Cappelletti, Elia Giacobazzi, Giorgia Franchini, Paolo Burgio, Marko Bertogna 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02563v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Road traffic accidents remain a significant global concern, with the majority attributed to human factors such as driver distraction and fatigue. This study proposes a camera-based approach to derive useful indicators to assess driver attentiveness and alertness. The proposed pipeline jointly satisfies the stringent real-time requirements imposed by the critical application and minimizes the computational requirements to allow for deployment on a tight computational budget. To this end, we develop a lightweight multi-task neural network that predicts multiple indicators for the face region in a single forward pass. The developed model is integrated into a complete execution workflow to produce a real-time estimate of attentiveness, fatigue, and engagement in distracting activities.



213. ❌ TemPose-TF-ASF: Two-Stage Bidirectional Stroke Context Fusion for Badminton Stroke Classification

作者: Tzu-Yu Liu, Duan-Shin Lee 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02558v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Accurate badminton stroke prediction is crucial for fine-grained sports analysis and tactical decision support. However, existing methods struggle to model rich temporal context. This paper introduces \emph{TemPose-TF-ASF (Adjacent-Stroke Fusion)}, a context-aware extension of \emph{TemPose}. It enhances stroke recognition by incorporating stroke-type information from both preceding and subsequent strokes. A two-stage training and inference strategy is adopted. Preliminary predictions from the baseline model are reused as estimated temporal context. These predictions guide the joint optimization of the \emph{ASF} module and the classifier. By explicitly modeling bidirectional temporal stroke dependencies, the proposed method can be seamlessly integrated into existing state-of-the-art models. Experiments on a large-scale badminton match dataset show consistent improvements over the baseline and its variants in terms of Accuracy and Macro-F1. Moreover, integrating \emph{ASF} into other advanced methods yields notable performance gains. These results demonstrate strong transferability and generalization capability.



214. ❌ MooD: An Efficient VA-Driven Affective Image Editing Framework via Fine-Grained Semantic Control

作者: Xinyi Yin, Yiduo Wang, Tingqi Hu, Meicong Si, Yunyun Shi, Shi Chen, Hao Wang, Junxiao Xue, Xuecheng Wu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02521v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Affective image editing (AIE) aims to edit visual content to evoke target emotions. However, existing methods often overlook inference efficiency and predominantly depend on discrete emotion representations, which to some extent limits their practical applicability and makes it challenging to capture complex and subtle human emotions. To tackle these gaps, we propose MooD, the first framework that directly leverages continuous Valence-Arousal (VA) values for fine-grained and efficient AIE. Specifically, we first introduce a VA-Aware retrieval strategy to bridge vague affective values and concrete visual semantics. Building upon this, MooD integrates visual transfer and semantic guidance to achieve controllable AIE. Furthermore, we construct AffectSet, a VA-annotated dataset to support model optimization and evaluation. Extensive qualitative and quantitative experimental results demonstrate that our MooD achieves superior performance in both affective controllability and visual fidelity while maintaining high efficiency. A series of ablation studies further reveal the crucial factors of our design. Our code and data will be made publicly open soon.



215. ❌ Multispectral Blind Image Super-Resolution for Standing Dead Tree Segmentation

作者: Mete Ahishali, Anis Ur Rahman, Einari Heinaro, Aysen Degerli, Samuli Junttila 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02471v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Mapping standing dead trees is crucial for acquiring information on the effects of climate change on forests and forest biodiversity. However, leveraging high-quality aerial imagery for dead tree segmentation poses challenges due to limitations in sensor availability and the scarcity of annotated data. In this study, we propose a generic blind super-resolution framework that incorporates Attention-Guided Domain Adaptation Networks (ADA-Nets) to learn the mapping from low-resolution to high-resolution multispectral image domains. Our approach operates solely on unpaired samples, mimicking real-world conditions, i.e., low-resolution images are not synthetically obtained by downsampling the high-resolution images. Moreover, the proposed method serves as a general-purpose restorer addressing several image degradation types, including saturation, noise, and low contrast that typically occur in low-resolution images acquired by low-end sensors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to perform real-world and generic super-resolution for multispectral data in the scope of standing dead tree segmentation. Experimental evaluations demonstrate segmentation performances of 54% and 64% in Dice scores. Notably, the first result is obtained without using any high-resolution annotations; the segmentation network is trained on super-resolved low-resolution images, while evaluation is performed on the high-resolution data. We publicly share the aerial multispectral dataset with manually annotated labels at https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/meteahishali/aerial-imagery-for-dead-tree-segmentation-poland.



216. ❌ ExpoCM: Exposure-Aware One-Step Generative Single-Image HDR Reconstruction

作者: Aoyu Liu, Zhen Liu, Ziyi Wang, Dian Chen, Bing Zeng, Shuaicheng Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02464v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Single-image HDR reconstruction aims to recover high dynamic range radiance from a single low dynamic range (LDR) input, but remains highly ill-posed due to detail saturation in over-exposed regions and noise amplification in under-exposed areas. While recent diffusion-based approaches offer powerful generative priors, they often overlook the exposure-dependent nature of the degradation and incur substantial computational costs from iterative sampling. To address these challenges, we propose ExpoCM, a novel one-step generative HDR reconstruction framework that reformulates HDR reconstruction as a Probability Flow ODE (PF-ODE) and constructs exposure-aware consistency trajectories via exposure-dependent perturbations. Specifically, a soft exposure mask is first constructed to separate the LDR image into over-, under-, and well-exposed regions. Based on this partition, region-conditioned consistency trajectories are designed to hallucinate saturated details, suppress noise in dark regions, and preserve reliable structures within a single, distillation-free inference step. To further enhance perceptual quality, we introduce an Exposure-guided Luminance-Chromaticity Loss in the CIE~$\text{L}^\text{a}^\text{b}^*$ space, which assigns exposure-aware weights to luminance and chromaticity components, effectively mitigating brightness bias and color drift. Extensive experiments on the HDR-REAL, HDR-EYE, and AIM2025 benchmarks demonstrate that ExpoCM achieves state-of-the-art fidelity and perceptual accuracy, while enabling over 400$\times$ and 20$\times$ faster inference compared to DDPM (1000 steps) and DDIM (50 steps), respectively.



217. ❌ M\textsuperscript{4}Fuse: Lightweight State-Space MoE with a Cross-Scale Gating Bridge for Brain Tumor Segmentation

作者: Meihua Zhou, Xinyu Tong, Li Yang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02444v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Encoder-decoder imbalance and the reliance on large input volumes make many 3D brain tumor segmentation models both compute-heavy and brittle. We present M\textsuperscript{4}Fuse, a lightweight network that prioritizes discriminative brain tumor cues over exhaustive appearance reconstruction. Our method balances encoder and decoder capacity and replaces depth expansion with a synergistic design: it propagates long-range context with linear complexity via a grouped state space mixer, denoises and aligns skip features using a cross-scale dual-stage gating bridge, and absorbs cross-site acquisition shifts with a sample-level mixture-of-experts. On the BraTS2019 and BraTS2021 benchmarks, M\textsuperscript{4}Fuse outperforms other lightweight excellent methods in both parameter count and performance. Even at a challenging input resolution of (64\times128\times128) (half that of existing excellent models), M\textsuperscript{4}Fuse reduces parameters by 62.63% and improves average performance by 0.09%. Ablations of key components validate the method’s exceptional parameter-to-accuracy efficiency and robustness across diverse data centers.



218. ❌ Anomaly-Preference Image Generation

作者: Fuyun Wang, Yuanzhi Wang, Xu Guo, Sujia Huang, Tong Zhang, Dan Wang, Hui Yan, Xin Liu, Zhen Cui 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02439v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Synthesizing realistic and diverse anomalous samples from limited data is vital for robust model generalization. However, existing methods struggle to reconcile fidelity and diversity, often hampered by distribution misalignment and overfitting, respectively.To mitigate this, we introduce Anomaly Preference Optimization,a novel paradigm that reformulates anomaly generation as a preference learning problem.Central to our approach is an implicit preference alignment mechanism that leverages real anomalies as positive references, deriving optimization signals directly from denoising trajectory deviations without requiring costly human annotation. Furthermore, we propose a Time-Aware Capacity Allocation module that dynamically distributes model capacity along the diffusion timeline,prioritizing structural diversity during highnoise phases while enhancing fine-grained fidelity in low-noise stages. During inference, a hierarchical sampling strategy modulates the coherencealignment trade-off, enabling precise control over generation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that significantly outperforms existing baselines,achieving state-of-the-art performance in both realism and diversity.



219. ❌ Mixture Prototype Flow Matching for Open-Set Supervised Anomaly Detection

作者: Fuyun Wang, Yuanzhi Wang, Xu Guo, Sujia Huang, Tong Zhang, Dan Wang, Hui Yan, Xin Liu, Zhen Cui 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02438v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Open-set supervised anomaly detection (OSAD) aims to identify unseen anomalies using limited anomalous supervision. However, existing prototype-based methods typically model normal data via a unimodal Gaussian prior, failing to capture inherent multi-modality and resulting in blurred decision boundaries. To address this, we propose Mixture Prototype Flow Matching (MPFM), a framework that learns a continuous transformation from normal feature distributions to a structured Gaussian mixture prototype space. Departing from traditional flow-based approaches that rely on a single velocity vector, MPFM explicitly models the velocity field as a Gaussian mixture prior where each component corresponds to a distinct normal class. This design facilitates mode-aware and semantically coherent distribution transport. Furthermore, we introduce a Mutual Information Maximization Regularizer (MIMR) to prevent prototype collapse and maximize normal-anomaly separability. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MPFM achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse benchmarks under both single- and multi-anomaly settings.



220. ❌ Multi-Rater Calibrated Segmentation Models

作者: Meritxell Riera-Marín, Javier García López, Júlia Rodríguez-Comas, Miguel A. González Ballester, Adrian Galdran 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02437v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Objective: Accurate probability estimates are essential for the safe deployment of medical image segmentation models in clinical decision-making. However, modern deep segmentation networks are often poorly calibrated, a problem exacerbated when multiple expert annotations exhibit substantial disagreement. While inter-rater variability is typically treated as noise, it provides valuable information about intrinsic annotation ambiguity that must be reflected in model confidence. Methods: We improve the probabilistic calibration of medical image segmentation models by reformulating multi-rater supervision as an ordinal learning problem. Voxel-wise annotator agreement is treated as an ordered target, linking predictive confidence to the empirical variability in training data. This formulation allows the use of ordinal-aware scoring rules, such as the Ranked Probability Score ordinal loss, combined with a standard binary objective to preserve discriminative performance. Results: We evaluated the proposed approach across four public segmentation benchmarks spanning ophthalmology, histopathology, and thoracic imaging. Calibration was assessed using a multi-rater extension of expected calibration error. Results consistently show that ordinal-aware training yields substantially improved calibration with respect to inter-rater agreement without degrading segmentation accuracy. Conclusions: Treating multi-rater annotations as ordered information provides a principled and architecture-agnostic route to more reliable probabilistic segmentation models.



221. ❌ DirectEdit: Step-Level Accurate Inversion for Flow-Based Image Editing

作者: Desong Yang, Mang Ye 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02417v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

With recent advancements in large-scale pre-trained text-to-image (T2I) models, training-free image editing methods have demonstrated remarkable success. Typically, these methods involve adding noise to a clean image via an inversion process, followed by separate denoising steps for the reconstruction and editing paths during the forward process. However, since the reconstruction path is approximated using noisy latents from mismatched timesteps, existing methods inevitably suffer from accumulated drift, which fundamentally limits reconstruction fidelity. To address this challenge, we systematically analyze the inversion process within the flow transformer and propose DirectEdit, a simple yet effective editing method that eliminates the inherent reconstruction error without introducing additional neural function evaluations (NFEs). Unlike most prior works that attempt to rectify the inversion path, DirectEdit focuses on directly aligning the forward paths, enabling precise reconstruction and reliable feature sharing. Furthermore, we introduce a preservation mechanism based on attention feature injection and multi-branch mask-guided noise blending, which effectively balances fidelity and editability. Extensive experiments across diverse scenarios demonstrate that DirectEdit achieves efficient and accurate image editing, delivering superior performance that outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Code and examples are available at https://desongyang.github.io/Directedit.



222. ❌ UnGAP: Uncertainty-Guided Affine Prompting for Real-Time Crack Segmentation

作者: Conghui Li, Huanyu He, Xin Wang, Weiyao Lin, Chern Hong Lim 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02380v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Real-time crack segmentation is vital for structural health monitoring but is plagued by aleatoric uncertainties arising from varying lighting, blur, and texture ambiguity. Current uncertainty-aware approaches typically treat uncertainty estimation as a passive endpoint for post-hoc analysis, failing to close the loop by feeding this information back to refine feature representations. We contend that independent pixel-wise heteroscedastic modeling is uniquely suited for crack segmentation, as cracks are defined by fine-grained local gradients rather than the global semantic coherence relied upon in general object segmentation. However, this approach suffers from a structural optimization pathology: high predicted variance attenuates loss gradients, effectively causing the model to ignore difficult samples and under-fit complex boundaries. To address these challenges, we propose UnGAP, a novel framework that establishes a closed-loop mechanism between uncertainty estimation and feature learning. Central to our approach is the Uncertainty-Prompted Feature Modulator (UPFM), which treats aleatoric uncertainty as an active visual prompt rather than a mere output. UPFM dynamically calibrates feature distributions through pixel-wise affine transformations. Crucially, this mechanism mitigates the heteroscedastic pathology by transforming high variance, which would otherwise indicate gradient suppression, into a constructive signal for stronger feature rectification in ambiguous regions. Additionally, a boundary-aware detection head is introduced to further constrain prediction precision. Extensive experiments demonstrate that UnGAP balances superior segmentation accuracy with real-time inference speed, effectively validating the benefit of transforming uncertainty from a passive metric into an active calibration tool.



223. ❌ Graph-Augmented Topological Internalization with Dual-Stream Classifiers for Medical Report Generation

作者: Moyu Tang, Chupei Tang, Junxiao Kong, Di Wang, Tianchi Lu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02376v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Automated medical report generation, MRG, holds substantial value for alleviating radiologist workload and enhancing diagnostic efficiency. However, mainstream approaches typically treat diverse chest abnormalities as isolated classification targets. This paradigm often overlooks inherent disease co-occurrences and struggles to translate medical topological structures into explicit data correlations, constraining the model’s reasoning capacity on complex or subtle lesions. To address this, we propose a Graph-Augmented Dual-Stream Medical Report Generation with Topological Internalization, GDMRG. Our framework introduces a Topological Knowledge Internalization module, TKI, which leverages a Graph Convolutional Network, GCN, to generate an explicit parameterized weight matrix based on global disease co-occurrence priors. This facilitates efficient topological knowledge injection without relying on external retrieval mechanisms. Building upon this, we construct a dual-stream classification system: the main branch generates discrete diagnostic prompts under topological constraints, while the auxiliary branch employs an asymmetric optimization strategy to dynamically calibrate decision boundaries for highly imbalanced samples. Concurrently, to establish a logical closed loop between diagnosis and visual grounding, we design a diagnostic-driven Diagnosis-Guided Spatial Attention, DGSA, that utilizes high-dimensional clinical semantics to recalibrate the visual encoder, mitigating feature hallucinations. Comprehensive experiments on the MIMIC-CXR dataset demonstrate that GDMRG achieves competitive clinical efficacy, CE, while maintaining natural language fluency. Furthermore, our model exhibits robust zero-shot generalization on the IU X-Ray dataset. In summary, this work presents an integrated and interpretable paradigm for medical report generation.



224. ❌ Channel-Level Relation to Attentive Aggregation with Neighborhood-Homogeneity Constraint for Point Cloud Analysis

作者: Jiaqi Shi, Jin Xiao, Xiaoguang Hu, Wenxuan Ji, Zichong Jia, Zifan Long, Tianyou Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02357v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In 3D point cloud understanding, the core challenge lies in accurately capturing discriminative features within complex neighborhoods, which directly affects the execution precision of downstream tasks such as embodied AI and autonomous driving. Existing methods explore feature correlation discrimination but are limited to point-level spatial distribution or channel responses, enabling only coarse-grained level evaluation. For modern multi-scale point cloud networks, such coarse-grained metrics inevitably incur significant information loss in deeper layers. To address this issue, we propose a novel network equipped with a channel-level metric-based enhancement mechanism, termed the PointCRA network. Our core idea is to introduce temporal trend variation as a new evaluation dimension to avoid the information loss caused by weight dimension collapse in existing spatial and channel attention mechanisms. On this basis, we construct a multi-level calibration framework guided by neighborhood homogeneity for weight calibration, and design a dedicated loss function to enhance channel discriminability. The module effectively leverages the intrinsic feature priors of deep networks to adaptively correct the feature aggregation process, offering strong interpretability with low parameter overhead. Furthermore, our proposed method exhibits strong transferability, interpretability, and parameter efficiency. We validate the proposed method effectiveness on diverse datasets and benchmark models, and further demonstrate its rationality through extensive analytical experiments. Our PointCRA achieves 77.5% mIoU on the S3DIS dataset, 90.4% OA on the ScanObjectNN dataset, and 87.4% instance mIoU on the ShapeNetPart dataset. The code and pretrained weights are publicly available on GitHub:



225. ❌ Improving Imbalanced Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Diagnosis via CBAM-Enhanced CNN Backbones

作者: Duy Nguyen Huu, Duy Hoang Khuong, Ngu Huynh Cong Viet 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02328v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Chest radiography is a widely used imaging modality for thoracic disease diagnosis, yet its conventional interpretation remains time-consuming and heavily dependent on expert knowledge. While deep learning has improved diagnostic efficiency through automated feature extraction, challenges such as class imbalance and the localization of multiple co-existing pathologies remain unsolved. In this paper, inspired by the strength of Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) in feature refinement and the capability of CNN blocks in feature extraction, we propose a strategy to integrate CBAM into traditional CNN blocks to enhance performance in multi-label classification tasks. Our method achieves a mean AUC of 0.8695 on ChestXray14 dataset, outperforming several state-of-the-art baselines.Our source code is available at: https://github.com/NNNguyenDuyyy/FETC_CBAM_Enhanced_CNN.git



226. ❌ Open-access model for detecting openly dumped dispersed municipal solid waste from crowdsourced UAV imagery in Sub-Saharan Africa

作者: Steffen Knoblauch, Ram Kumar Muthusamy, Luis M. A. Bettencourt, Costas Velis, Pierre Chrzanowski, Edward Charles Anderson, Pete Masters, Innocent Maholi, Antonio Inguane, Levi Szamek, Alexander Zipf 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02316v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Managing municipal solid waste in rapidly urbanizing Sub-Saharan Africa remains challenging due to dispersed informal dumping and limited high-resolution datasets for spatial monitoring. We present an open-access deep learning model for automated detection of openly dumped dispersed solid waste via crowdsourced UAV imagery, trained and evaluated across 29 regions in 10 countries, encompassing diverse environmental contexts. A deep learning model trained on manually annotated image tiles achieved excellent performance in detecting openly dumped dispersed solid waste across all study regions. Predicted distributions reveal heterogeneous accumulation patterns, ranging from localized hotspots - often along waterways, where waste can exacerbate flood and public health risks - to more dispersed litter across urban areas. Waste accumulation is most strongly associated with population density and indicators of lack of local infrastructure access, whereas its relationship with broader measures of regional development is weaker, highlighting the importance of fine-scale data for understanding localized waste dynamics. By releasing the model, this study provides a ready-to-use tool for UAV imagery collected by municipalities and local mapping communities, enabling openly dumped dispersed solid waste monitoring without extensive technical expertise. This approach empowers local practitioners to convert UAV imagery into actionable insights, supporting targeted interventions and improved municipal solid waste management across Sub-Saharan Africa.



227. ❌ Momentum-Anchored Multi-Scale Fusion Model for Long-Tailed Chest X-Ray Classification

作者: Duy Hoang Khuong, Duy Nguyen Huu, Ngu Huynh Cong Viet 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02292v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Chest X-ray classification suffers from severe class imbalance where gradient updates bias toward majority classes, causing feature drift and poor performance on rare but critical pathologies. We propose a Momentum-Anchored Multi-Scale Fusion Network that uses exponential moving averages (EMA) as a temporal anchoring mechanism to stabilize feature representations under long-tailed distributions. Our approach applies selective momentum updates to the final expansion block of an EfficientNet backbone, creating a slowly-evolving reference branch that resists gradient-induced drift while preserving discriminative patterns for minority classes. Combined with multi-scale spatial fusion ($1\times 1$, $3 \times 3$, $5 \times 5$ convolutions), this anchoring strategy maintains representational stability throughout training. On ChestX-ray14, our method achieves 0.8682 average AUC, outperforming state-of-the-art approaches and showing particular improvements on rare pathologies like Hernia (0.9470) and Pneumonia (0.8165). The results demonstrate that momentum anchoring effectively counters feature instability in long-tailed medical image classification.



228. ❌ A Hybrid Approach for Closing the Sim2real Appearance Gap in Game Engine Synthetic Datasets

作者: Stefanos Pasios 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02291v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Video game engines have been an important source for generating large volumes of visual synthetic datasets for training and evaluating computer vision algorithms that are to be deployed in the real world. While the visual fidelity of modern game engines has been significantly improved with technologies such as ray-tracing, a notable sim2real appearance gap between the synthetic and the real-world images still remains, which limits the utilization of synthetic datasets in real-world applications. In this letter, we investigate the ability of a state-of-the-art image generation and editing diffusion model (FLUX.2-4B Klein) to enhance the photorealism of synthetic datasets and compare its performance against a traditional image-to-image translation model (REGEN). Furthermore, we propose a hybrid approach that combines the strong geometry and material transformations of diffusion-based methods with the distribution-matching capabilities of image-to-image translation techniques. Through experiments, it is demonstrated that REGEN outperforms FLUX.2-4B Klein and that by combining both FLUX.2-4B Klein and REGEN models, better visual realism can be achieved compared to using each model individually, while maintaining semantic consistency. The code is available at: https://github.com/stefanos50/Hybrid-Sim2Real



229. ❌ LabBuilder: Protocol-Grounded 3D Layout Generation for Interactable and Safe Laboratory

作者: Jianbao Cao, Zhangrui Zhao, Bohan Feng, Zixuan Hu, Rui Li, Haiyuan Wan, Chenxi Li, Jingyuan Li, Wenzhe Cai, Lei Bai, Wanli Ouyang, Lingyu Duan, Di Huang, Mingting Pan, Sha Zhang, Xinzhu Ma, Shixiang Tang, Dongzhan Zhou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02288v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Automated laboratories hold the promise of accelerating scientific discovery, yet their deployment is bottlenecked by the difficulty of designing safe and executable environments. While simulator-based design offers scalability, existing 3D scene generation methods are primarily tailored for household settings, optimizing for visual plausibility while neglecting the rigorous functional semantics and safety constraints essential for scientific experimentation. We present LabBuilder, an end-to-end system that generates and verifies 3D laboratory layouts from concise textual specifications. It operates through three tightly coupled components: LabForge first curates a meta-dataset of annotated assets and chemical knowledge, translating natural language specifications into structured protocols; building on these protocols, LabGen synthesizes laboratory layouts via an iterative, constraint-aware optimization strategy; finally, LabTouchstone evaluates the resulting layouts as a unified benchmark. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LabBuilder significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods, producing laboratory environments that are not only realistic but also functionally valid and safe for complex experimental workflows.



230. ❌ Beyond Known Objects: A Novel Framework for Open-Set Object Detection using Negative-Aware Norm

作者: Yuchen Zhang, Yao Lu, Johannes Betz 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02284v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Open-Set Object Detection (OSOD) is crucial for autonomous driving, where perception systems must recognize and localize both known and previously unseen objects in complex, dynamic environments. While recent approaches deliver promising results, they often require retraining the detector extensively to learn objectness, which describes the likelihood that a bounding box tightly encloses a valid object, regardless of whether its category was learned during training. Deviating from existing work, we hypothesize that standard off-the-shelf detectors may already contain helpful cues for objectness, owing to their training on numerous and diverse known categories. Building on this idea, we propose NAN-SPOT, a training-light framework that does not require to retrain the base object detector and estimates objectness by leveraging a hidden layer metric called Negative-Aware Norm (NAN), requiring only minutes of training on just hundreds of images. To support comprehensive evaluation, we introduce COCO-Open, an expanded version of the existing COCO-Mixed dataset, increasing unknown object annotations from 433 to 1853, making it the most exhaustively labeled dataset for OSOD to the best of our knowledge. Experimental results demonstrate that NAN-SPOT achieves even better performance on unknown object detection than methods requiring heavy training, without compromising performance on known objects. This efficiency and robustness make NAN-SPOT a promising step towards open-world perception in autonomous driving.



231. ❌ Rethinking Electro-Optical Vision Foundation Models for Remote Sensing Retrieval: A Controlled Comparison with Generalist VFM

作者: Hyobin Park, Minseok Seo, Dong-Geol Choi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02283v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Vision foundation models have attracted significant attention for their ability to leverage large-scale unlabeled visual data. This advantage is particularly important in remote sensing, where data acquisition is costly and annotation often requires expert knowledge. Recent electro-optical vision foundation models aim to learn domain-specific representations from remote sensing imagery, but it remains unclear whether they are more effective than strong generalist vision foundation models under retrieval-based evaluation. In this study, we conduct a controlled comparison between representative EO-specific and generalist vision foundation models for remote sensing image retrieval. Using the same datasets, retrieval protocol, and evaluation metric, we evaluate both in-domain performance and cross-scene generalization. Our results show that strong generalist vision foundation models are competitive with, and in some cases outperform, existing EO-specific models. Moreover, EO-specific models often suffer from substantial degradation under cross-scene evaluation, while generalist models show more stable transfer. These findings suggest that EO pretraining alone does not guarantee stronger retrieval-oriented remote sensing representations. We discuss the limitations of current EO-specific pretraining strategies and highlight the need for future EO vision foundation models to better exploit the physical, spatial, spectral, and geographic characteristics of remote sensing imagery.



232. ❌ EdgeLPR: On the Deep Neural Network trade-off between Precision and Performance in LiDAR Place Recognition

作者: Pierpaolo Serio, Hetian Wang, Zixiang Wei, Vincenzo Infantino, Lorenzo Gentilini, Lorenzo Pollini, Valentina Donzella 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02275v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Place recognition is essential for long-term autonomous navigation, enabling loop closure and consistent mapping. Although deep learning has improved performance, deploying such models on resource-constrained platforms remains challenging. This work explores efficient LiDAR-based place recognition for EdgeAI by leveraging Bird’s Eye View representations to enable lightweight image-based networks. We benchmark representative architectures without aggregation heads using a unified descriptor scheme based on global pooling and linear projection, and evaluate performance under FP32, FP16, and INT8 quantization. Experiments reveal trade-offs between accuracy, robustness, and efficiency: FP16 matches FP32 with lower cost, while INT8 introduces architecture-dependent degradation. Overall, the presented results are a strong basis for future research on ‘use-case’-aware quantisation of Neural Networks for Edge deployment.



233. ❌ SpectraDINO: Bridging the Spectral Gap in Vision Foundation Models via Lightweight Adapters

作者: Yagiz Nalcakan, Hyeongjin Ju, Incheol Park, Sanghyeop Yeo, Youngwan Jin, Shiho Kim 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02258v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) pretrained on large-scale RGB data have demonstrated remarkable representation quality, yet their applicability to multispectral imaging spanning Near-Infrared (NIR), Short-Wave Infrared (SWIR), and Long-Wave Infrared (LWIR) remains largely unexplored. These spectral modalities offer complementary sensing capabilities critical for robust perception in adverse conditions, but present a fundamental domain gap relative to RGB-centric pretrained models. We present SpectraDINO, a multispectral VFM that bridges this spectral gap by extending DINOv2 ViT backbones to beyond-visible modalities through lightweight, per-modality bottleneck adapters, while preserving the rich representations of the frozen RGB backbone. We introduce a multi-stage teacher-student training protocol in which a frozen DINOv2 teacher guides a spectral student via cosine distillation, symmetric contrastive loss, patch-level alignment, and a novel neighborhood-structure-preservation loss. This staged curriculum enables strong cross-modal alignment without catastrophic forgetting of RGB priors. We evaluate SpectraDINO on multispectral object detection and semantic segmentation across challenging NIR, SWIR, and LWIR benchmarks using widely adopted fusion strategies. SpectraDINO achieves state-of-the-art performance across most benchmarks, validating its effectiveness as a general-purpose backbone for spectral generalization. The code and weights for model variants are available at https://github.com/Yonsei-STL/SpectraDINO.



234. ❌ Fine-Tuning Impairs the Balancedness of Foundation Models in Long-tailed Personalized Federated Learning

作者: Shihao Hou, Chikai Shang, Zhiheng Yang, Jiacheng Yang, Xinyi Shang, Junlong Gao, Yiqun Zhang, Yang Lu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02247v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Personalized federated learning (PFL) with foundation models has emerged as a promising paradigm enabling clients to adapt to heterogeneous data distributions. However, real-world scenarios often face the co-occurrence of non-IID data and long-tailed class distributions, presenting unique challenges that remain underexplored in PFL. In this paper, we investigate this long-tailed personalized federated learning and observe that current methods suffer from two limitations: (i) fine-tuning degrades performance below zero-shot baselines due to the erosion of inherent class balance in foundation models; (ii) conventional personalization techniques further transfer this bias to local models through parameter or feature-level fusion. To address these challenges, we propose Federated Learning via Gradient Purification and Residual Learning (FedPuReL), which preserves balanced knowledge in the global model while enabling unbiased personalization. Specifically, we purify local gradients using zero-shot predictions to maintain a class-balanced global model, and model personalization as residual correction atop the frozen global model. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FedPuReL consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving superior performance on both global and personalized models across diverse long-tailed scenarios. The code is available at https://github.com/shihaohou/FedPuReL.



235. ❌ InfiltrNet: Dual-Branch CNN-Transformer Architecture for Brain Tumor Infiltration Risk Prediction

作者: S M Asif Hossain, Shruti Kshirsagar 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02230v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Gliomas are aggressive brain tumors that infiltrate surrounding tissue beyond the visible tumor margins observed on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Predicting the spatial extent of this infiltration is essential for surgical planning and radiation therapy, yet existing deep learning approaches focus on segmenting the visible tumor rather than estimating infiltration risk in the surrounding tissue. This paper presents InfiltrNet, a novel dual-branch architecture that combines a convolutional neural network (CNN) encoder with a Swin Transformer encoder through cross-attention fusion modules to predict three-zone infiltration risk maps from multimodal MRI. A label generation strategy based on distance transforms is proposed to derive reproducible infiltration risk zones from standard Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) annotations. InfiltrNet is trained with a combined Dice-CrossEntropy and boundary-aware loss augmented by auxiliary supervision heads at intermediate decoder levels. Extensive experiments on BraTS 2020 and BraTS 2025 demonstrate that InfiltrNet outperforms five established baselines. Explainability analysis using GradCAM++ and Occlusion sensitivity confirms that the model attends to clinically relevant peritumoral regions.



236. ❌ Toward Fine-Grained Speech Inpainting Forensics:A Dataset, Method, and Metric for Multi-Region Tampering Localization

作者: Tung Vu, Yen Nguyen, Hai Nguyen, Cuong Pham, Cong Tran 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02223v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent advances in voice cloning and text-to-speech synthesis have made partial speech manipulation - where an adversary replaces a few words within an utterance to alter its meaning while preserving the speaker’s identity - an increasingly realistic threat. Existing audio deepfake detection benchmarks focus on utterance-level binary classification or single-region tampering, leaving a critical gap in detecting and localizing multiple inpainted segments whose count is unknown a priori. We address this gap with three contributions. First, we introduce MIST (Multiregion Inpainting Speech Tampering), a large-scale multilingual dataset spanning 6 languages with 1-3 independently inpainted word-level segments per utterance, generated via LLM-guided semantic replacement and neural voice cloning, with fake content constituting only 2-7% of each utterance. Second, we propose ISA (Iterative Segment Analysis), a backbone-agnostic framework that performs coarse-to-fine sliding-window classification with gap-tolerant region proposal and boundary refinement to recover all tampered regions without prior knowledge of their count. Third, we define SF1@tau, a segment-level F1 metric based on temporal IoU matching that jointly evaluates region count accuracy and localization precision. Zero-shot evaluation reveals that partial inpainting at word granularity remains unsolved by existing deepfake detectors: utterance-level classifiers trained on fully synthesized speech assign near zero fake probability to MIST utterances where only 2-7% of content is manipulated. ISA consistently outperforms non-iterative baselines in this challenging setting, and the dataset, code, and evaluation toolkit are publicly released.



237. ❌ Generative Modeling with Orbit-Space Particle Flow Matching

作者: Sinan Wang, Jinjin He, Shenyifan Lu, Ruicheng Wang, Greg Turk, Bo Zhu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02222v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We present Orbit-Space Geometric Probability Paths (OGPP), a particle-native flow-matching framework for generative modeling of particle systems. OGPP is motivated by two insights: (i) particles are defined up to permutation symmetries, so anonymous indexing inflates per-index target variance and yields curved, hard-to-learn flows; and (ii) particles live in physical space, so the flow terminal velocity has physical meaning and can encode geometric attributes, e.g., surface normals. OGPP instantiates three key components: (1) orbit-space canonicalization of the probability-path terminal endpoint, (2) particle index embeddings for role specialization, and (3) geometric probability paths with arc-length-aware terminal velocities that generate normals as a byproduct of the flow. We evaluate OGPP on minimal-surface benchmarks, where it reduces metric error by up to two orders of magnitude in a single inference step; on ShapeNet, where it matches the state of the art with 5x fewer steps and reaches airplane EMD comparable to DiT-3D with 26x fewer parameters and 5x fewer steps; and on single-shape encoding, where it produces normals and reconstructions competitive with 6D generators while operating entirely in 3D.



238. ❌ NTIRE 2026 Challenge on Efficient Low Light Image Enhancement: Methods and Results

作者: Jiebin Yan, Chenyu Tu, Weixia Zhang, Zhihua Wang, Peibei Cao, Qinghua Lin, Yuming Fang, Xiaoning Liu, Zongwei Wu, Zhuyun Zhou, Radu Timofte 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02212v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

This paper presents a comprehensive review of the NITRE 2026 Efficient Low Light Image Enhancement (E-LLIE) Challenge, highlighting the proposed solutions and final outcomes. This challenge focuses on mobile image enhancement under low-light conditions, aiming to design lightweight networks that improve enhancement quality while ensuring practical deployability under limited computational resources. A total of 207 participants registered, 27 teams submitted valid entries, and 17 teams ultimately provided valid factsheet. Based on these submissions, this paper provides a systematic evaluation of recent methods for E-LLIE, offering a comprehensive overview of state-of-the-art progress and demonstrating significant improvements in both performance and efficiency.



239. ❌ MultiSense-Pneumo: A Multimodal Learning Framework for Pneumonia Screening in Resource-Constrained Settings

作者: Dineth Jayakody, Pasindu Thenahandi, Chameli Dommanige 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02207v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Pneumonia remains a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in low resource settings where access to imaging, laboratory testing, and specialist care is limited. Clinical assessment relies on heterogeneous evidence, including symptoms, respiratory patterns, and chest imaging, making screening inherently multimodal. However, many existing computational approaches remain unimodal and focus primarily on radiographs. In this work, we present MultiSense-Pneumo, a multimodal framework for pneumonia oriented screening and triage support that integrates structured symptom descriptors, cough audio, spoken language, and chest radiographs. The system combines deterministic symptom triage, LightGBM based acoustic classification, domain adversarial radiograph analysis using ResNet 18, transformer based speech recognition, and an interpretable multimodal fusion operator. Each modality is transformed into a normalized risk signal and aggregated into a unified screening estimate, enabling transparent and modular decision support. MultiSense-Pneumo is designed for real world deployment under modest computational constraints and can operate fully offline on standard laptop class hardware, making it suitable for community health workers, rural clinics, and emergency response settings. Experimental results demonstrate robustness of the radiograph pathway under domain shifts, while highlighting limitations in minority class recall for acoustic signals. MultiSense-Pneumo is intended as a research prototype for screening and triage support rather than a clinically validated diagnostic system.



240. ❌ Metric Unreliability in Multimodal Machine Unlearning: A Systematic Analysis and Principled Unified Score

作者: Abdullah Ahmad Khan, Hamid Laga, Ferdous Sohel 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02206v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Machine unlearning in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) is required for compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), yet current evaluation practices are inconsistent. We present the first systematic study of metric reliability in multimodal unlearning. Five standard metrics, Forget Accuracy (FA), Retain Accuracy (RA), Membership Inference Attack (MIA), Activation Distance (AD), and JS divergence (JS), yield conflicting method rankings across three VQA benchmarks (MLLMU-Bench, UnLOK-VQA, MMUBench). Kendall tau analysis over 36 unlearned LLaVA-1.5-7B models reveals two opposing clusters, {FA, RA, MIA} and {AD, JS}, with tau_FA_AD = -0.26, reproduced on BLIP-2 OPT-2.7B. Agreement is lower in multimodal VQA (average tau = 0.086) than in unimodal classification (average tau = 0.158; difference = 0.072), indicating that dual image-and-text pathways amplify inconsistency. We introduce the Unified Quality Score (UQS), a composite metric with weights derived from each metric’s Spearman correlation with the oracle distance d(M_hat, M_star), where M_star is the oracle model retrained only on the retain set. RA shows the strongest reliability (rho = 0.484, p = 0.003), while FA is negatively correlated (rho = -0.418, p = 0.011). UQS yields stable rankings under 100 random weight perturbations (tau = 0.647 +- 0.262). We release the benchmark, 36 checkpoints, and an interactive leaderboard. Code and pre-computed results are available at https://github.com/neurips26/UnifiedUnl.



241. ❌ Super-resolution of airborne laser scanning point clouds for forest inventory

作者: Jinyuan Shao, Sangyoong Park, Chunxi Zhao, Ayman Habib, Songlin Fei 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02201v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) can collect point clouds across large areas, enabling large-scale forest inventory. However, ALS point clouds are sparse and noisy, resulting in inaccurate individual-tree-level forest inventory, such as stem localization and tree size estimation. To overcome this problem, we propose a deep learning model, 3D Forest Super Resolution (3DFSR), to simultaneously improve point density and reduce noise for ALS forest point cloud. 3DFSR is a voxel-based CNN with a U-Net architecture. The proposed 3DFSR is evaluated on ALS point clouds collected in both temperate forests in the U.S. and boreal forests in Germany. Experimental results demonstrate that 3DFSR can generate finer point clouds of tree structure than other state-of-the-art point cloud super-resolution algorithms, achieving 0.249 m Chamfer Distance and 2.711 m Hausdorff Distance. Furthermore, to verify the effectiveness of 3DFSR point clouds in forest inventory, we conduct stem detection, DBH measurements, and stem reconstruction on both original ALS point clouds and 3DFSR enhanced point clouds. We find that stem detection and reconstruction algorithms developed for TLS/MLS point clouds can directly work on our 3DFSR point clouds, and DBH can be derived with circle-fitting method. F1 score of stem detection is improved from 0.71 on original ALS point clouds to 0.97 on 3DFSR point clouds; DBH estimation improves from 13.45 cm RMSE using allometric equations to 6.43 cm using circle fitting; comparing to stems reconstruction from MLS point clouds, stem reconstructed from 3DFSR point clouds has 0.170 m of Chamfer Distance and 0.377 m of Hausdorff Distance, and 0.95 R2 volume estimation. Finally, we find that the proposed 3DFSR is applicable to process point densities from 10 to 1700 points/m2; it also can be generalized across data collected from different LiDAR platforms without transfer learning.



242. ❌ SlimDiffSR: Toward Lightweight and Efficient Remote Sensing Image Super-Resolution via Diffusion Model Distillation

作者: Ce Wang, Zhenyu Hu, Wanjie Sun 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02198v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Diffusion models have recently achieved remarkable performance in image super-resolution (SR), but their high computational cost limits practical deployment in remote sensing applications. To address this issue, we propose SlimDiffSR, a lightweight and efficient diffusion-based framework for real-world remote sensing image super-resolution. Unlike existing single-step diffusion methods that rely on fixed timesteps, we first introduce an uncertainty-guided timestep assignment strategy to construct a stronger single-step teacher model, where reconstruction difficulty is explicitly linked to diffusion timesteps, enabling adaptive generative strength. Building upon this teacher, we further present a structured pruning strategy tailored to remote sensing imagery, which systematically removes redundant semantic modules and replaces standard operations with lightweight designs, including frequency-separable convolution, direction-separable convolution, and a query-driven global aggregation module. These components explicitly exploit the unique characteristics of remote sensing data, such as sparse high-frequency details, strong directional patterns, and long-range spatial dependencies. To enhance knowledge transfer, we incorporate Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) into the distillation process to align feature distributions between the teacher and student models. Extensive experiments on multiple remote sensing benchmarks demonstrate that SlimDiffSR achieves a favorable balance between efficiency and reconstruction quality. In particular, it attains up to $200\times$ inference acceleration and a $20\times$ reduction in model parameters compared with multi-step diffusion models, while achieving competitive perceptual quality and clearly outperforming existing lightweight diffusion baselines in efficiency. The code is available at: https://github.com/wwangcece/SlimDiffSR.



243. ❌ RAFNet: Region-Aware Fusion Network for Pansharpening

作者: Jianing Zhang, Zijian Zhou, Kai Sun 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02184v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Pansharpening aims to generate high-resolution multispectral (HRMS) images by fusing low-resolution multispectral (LRMS) and high-resolution panchromatic (PAN) images. Although deep learning has advanced this field, mainstream frequency-based methods relying on standard scaled dot-product attention suffer from quadratic computational complexity and fail to exploit the inherent regional sparsity of remote sensing imagery. Furthermore, existing spatial enhancement strategies typically employ static convolution kernels, which struggle to adapt to the complex frequency and regional variations of PAN and MS images. To address these bottlenecks, we propose a Region-Aware Fusion (RAFNet) Network that synergistically models spatial and frequency information. Specifically, we design a Spatial Adaptive Refinement (SAR) module that leverages the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) for directional frequency separation and K-means clustering for regional partitioning, which enables the dynamic construction of region-specific adaptive convolution kernels, achieving spatially and frequency-adaptive feature enhancement. Moreover, we introduce a Clustered Frequency Aggregation (CFA) module based on a sparse attention mechanism guided by the semantic clusters, which executes a region-aware sparse attention strategy that drastically reduces computational redundancy while ensuring high-quality frequency feature extraction. In addition we integrated these modules into a progressive, multi-level spatial-frequency network architecture to facilitate robust interaction and accurate image reconstruction. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed RAFNet significantly outperforms state-of-the-art pansharpening methods in both reduced- and full-resolution assessments. The code is available at https://github.com/PatrickNod/RAFNet.



244. ❌ Heterogeneous Model Fusion for Privacy-Aware Multi-Camera Surveillance via Synthetic Domain Adaptation

作者: Peggy Joy Lu, Wei-Yu Chen, Yao-Tsung Huang, Vincent Shin-Mu Tseng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02169v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We propose HeroCrystal, a novel privacy-preserving framework for multi-camera domain-adaptive object detection, addressing challenges such as data privacy, class imbalance, and heterogeneous architectures. Our framework consists of three key stages. In the Generated Stage, we introduce a one-shot, target-aware diffusion-based generation module that learns visual style from a single target-domain image while leveraging prompt-based control to synthesize specific object instances. Unlike conventional style transfer-based methods that require large target datasets and ignore semantic-level discrepancies, our approach enables privacy-preserving augmentation to reduce ethical concerns, and introduces controllable rare object generation to mitigate long-tailed category degradation. In the Federated Stage, we employ probabilistic Faster R-CNN on the client side to improve localization accuracy, and a dynamic model contrastive strategy to suppress domain-specific bias. The server side performs model fusion across heterogeneous architectures without accessing raw data. Finally, in the Distilled Stage, we propose an inconsistent categories integration algorithm to resolve label inconsistency and architecture heterogeneity across clients. Extensive experiments on multiple cross-domain detection benchmarks demonstrate that our method outperforms existing multi-source domain adaptation and federated learning baselines under multi-class, privacy-preserving settings. Our method improves mAP by +2.1% over prior privacy-preserving approaches and achieves a new state-of-the-art mAP of 33.4%, highlighting the effectiveness of HeroCrystal in enabling practical multi-camera AI surveillance systems.



245. ❌ Manifold-Aligned Guided Integrated Gradients for Reliable Feature Attribution

作者: Soyeon Kim, Seongwoo Lim, Kyowoon Lee, Jaesik Choi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02167v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Feature attribution is central to diagnosing and trusting deep neural networks, and Integrated Gradients (IG) is widely used due to its axiomatic properties. However, IG can yield unreliable explanations when the integration path between a baseline and the input passes through regions with noisy gradients. While Guided Integrated Gradients reduces this sensitivity by adaptively updating low-gradient-magnitude features, input-space guidance still produces intermediate inputs that deviate from the data manifold. To address this limitation, we propose \emph{Manifold-Aligned Guided Integrated Gradients} (MA-GIG), which constructs attribution paths in the latent space of a pre-trained variational autoencoder. By decoding intermediate latent states, MA-GIG biases the path toward the learned generative manifold and reduces exposure to implausible input-space regions. Through qualitative and quantitative evaluations, we demonstrate that MA-GIG produces faithful explanations by aggregating gradients on path features proximal to the input. Consequently, our method reduces off-manifold noise and outperforms prior path-based attribution methods across multiple datasets and classifiers. Our code is available at https://github.com/leekwoon/ma-gig/.



246. ❌ Cross-Polarization Fusion of VV AND VH SAR Observations for Improved Flood Mapping

作者: Jagrati Talreja, Tewodros Syum Gebre, Leila Hashemi Beni 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02153v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery is widely used for flood monitoring due to its all-weather and day-night imaging capability. However, flood mapping using single-polarization SAR data remains challenging in complex environments where surface and volume scattering coexist. In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of cross-polarization fusion of VV and VH SAR observations for improved flood mapping. A deep learning-based segmentation framework is employed to jointly exploit complementary information from VV and VH polarizations. To ensure a fair evaluation, three configurations are compared under identical training conditions: VV only, VH only, and fused VV-VH input. Performance is assessed using standard flood mapping metrics, including Intersection over Union (IoU) and F1-score, along with qualitative visual analysis. Experimental results demonstrate that VV-VH fusion consistently outperforms single-polarization models, particularly in vegetated and heterogeneous flood regions, leading to more accurate flood boundary delineation. The findings highlight the importance of cross-polarization SAR fusion for enhancing the reliability of SAR-based flood mapping in disaster monitoring applications.



247. ❌ SpecEdit: Training-Free Acceleration for Diffusion based Image Editing via Semantic Locking

作者: Zhengan Yan, Shikang Zheng, Haoran Qin, Xiaobing Tu, Yinggui Wang, Jiacheng Liu, Jiaxuan Ren, Yuqi Lin, Peiliang Cai, Jinkui Ren, Xiantao Zhang, Linfeng Zhang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02152v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Diffusion-based image editing offers strong semantic controllability, but remains computationally expensive due to iterative high-resolution denoising over all spatial tokens. Dynamic-resolution sampling reduces this cost by performing early steps at reduced resolution. However, existing approaches prioritize upsampling using low-level heuristics such as edge detection or channel variance, which are weakly aligned with editing semantics and may lead to structural inconsistency. Moreover, spatial regions are often upsampled without verifying whether semantic modification is actually required, resulting in redundant high-resolution computation and accumulated errors. Therefore, we propose SpecEdit, a training-free dynamic-resolution framework tailored for diffusion-based image editing. SpecEdit follows a draft-and-verify scheme: a low-resolution draft first estimates the semantic outcome, after which token-level discrepancies are used to identify edit-relevant tokens for high-resolution denoising, while the remaining tokens stay at a coarse resolution. Experiments on Qwen-Image-Edit and FLUX.1-Kontext-dev demonstrate up to 10x and 7x acceleration, while maintaining strong quality. SpecEdit is complementary to step distillation and other acceleration techniques, achieving up to 13x speedup when combined with existing methods. Our code is in supplementary material and will be released on GitHub.



248. ❌ FLoRA: Fusion-Latent for Optical Reconstruction and Flood Area Segmentation via Cross-Modal Multi-Task Distillation Network

作者: Jagrati Talreja, Tewodros Syum Gebre, Leila Hashemi-Beni 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02137v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Accurate flood water mapping is critical for disaster management, yet current methods struggle to fully exploit the potential of spaceborne imagery. Optical data offers high interpretability but is limited by environmental conditions, whereas SAR provides reliable all-weather coverage with reduced visual interpretability. FLoRA (Fusion Latent for Optical Reconstruction and Area Segmentation) is a cross-modal multi-task framework that jointly reconstructs high-fidelity optical imagery and segments flood water regions from Sentinel 1 SAR by fusing the complementary strengths of optical and SAR data. During training, a lightweight optical teacher (driven by RGB and NDVI priors) provides pyramidal features that guide SAR representations into a fusion latent space via multiscale windowed cross attention and FiLM conditioning, with gated residuals preventing overcorrection. This design enables multi-task learning across two complementary objectives: (a) SAR-to-optical translation for fine-grained RGB reconstruction and (b) flood water region segmentation for hydrologic interpretation. The dual decoders are optimized using Charbonnier SSIM for structural fidelity, edge FFT magnitude losses for spectral realism, and Dice BCE hydrology-aware edge alignment for precise flood water delineation. A feature distillation constraint further aligns fused SAR features with the optical teacher’s manifold. Evaluations on SEN1FLOODS11, DEEPFLOOD, and SEN12MS demonstrate that FLoRA surpasses fusion baselines in PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS, demonstrating that multi-modal fusion within a teacher-guided latent space yields semantically faithful and physically consistent flood-water intelligence from spaceborne observations.



249. ❌ Video Generation with Predictive Latents

作者: Yian Zhao, Feng Wang, Qiushan Guo, Chang Liu, Xiangyang Ji, Jian Zhang, Jie Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02134v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Video Variational Autoencoder (VAE) enables latent video generative modeling by mapping the visual world into compact spatiotemporal latent spaces, improving training efficiency and stability. While existing video VAEs achieve commendable reconstruction quality, continued optimization of reconstruction does not necessarily translate into improved generative performance. How to enhance the diffusability of video latents remains a critical and unresolved challenge. In this work, inspired by principles of predictive world modeling, we investigate the potential of predictive learning to improve the video generative modeling. To this end, we introduce a simple and effective predictive reconstruction objective that unifies predictive learning with video reconstruction. Specifically, we randomly discard future frames and encode only partial past observations, while training the decoder to reconstruct the observed frames and predict future ones simultaneously. This design encourages the latent space to encode temporally predictive structures and build a more coherent understanding of video dynamics, thereby improving generation quality. Our model, termed Predictive Video VAE (PV-VAE), achieves superior performance on video generation, with 52% faster convergence and a 34.42 FVD improvement over the Wan2.2 VAE on UCF101. Furthermore, comprehensive analyses demonstrate that PV-VAE not only exhibits favorable scalability, with generative performance improving alongside VAE training, but also yields consistent gains in downstream video understanding, underscoring a latent space that effectively captures temporal coherence and motion priors.



250. ❌ From Where Things Are to What They Are For: Benchmarking Spatial-Functional Intelligence in Multimodal LLMs

作者: Le Zhang, Jihan Yang, Soundarya Krishnan, Jimit Majmudar, Xiou Ge, Prasoon Puri, Prathamesh Nandkishor Saraf, Shruti Bhargava, Dhivya Piraviperumal, Yinan Ling, Cindy Pan, Hong Yu, Aishwarya Agrawal, Bo-Hsiang Tseng 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02130v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Human-level agentic intelligence extends beyond low-level geometric perception, evolving from recognizing where things are to understanding what they are for. While existing benchmarks effectively evaluate the geometric perception capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs), they fall short of probing the higher-order cognitive abilities required for grounded intelligence. To address this gap, we introduce the Spatial-Functional Intelligence Benchmark (SFI-Bench), a video-based benchmark with over 1,500 expert-annotated questions derived from diverse egocentric indoor video scans. SFI-Bench systematically evaluates two complementary dimensions of advanced reasoning: (1) Structured Spatial Reasoning, which requires understanding complex layouts and forming coherent spatial representations, and (2) Functional Reasoning, which involves inferring object affordances and their context-dependent utility. The benchmark includes tasks such as conditional counting, multi-hop relational reasoning, functional pairing, and knowledge-grounded troubleshooting, directly challenging models to integrate perception, memory, and inference. Our experiments reveal that current MLLMs consistently struggle to combine spatial memory with functional reasoning and external knowledge, highlighting a critical bottleneck in achieving grounded intelligence. SFI-Bench therefore provides a diagnostic tool for measuring progress toward more cognitively capable and truly grounded multimodal agents.



251. ❌ Ultrasound Vision-Language Alignment via Contrastive Learning

作者: Zhuoyang Lyu, Yiyang Zhang, Tongxin Wang, Ruirui Lan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02126v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Ultrasound foundation models have achieved strong performance on structured prediction tasks but remain exclusively vision-based, limiting zero-shot and few-shot transfer to novel tasks where task-specific annotation is scarce. We address this gap with EchoCare-CLIP, a CLIP-style dual-encoder contrastive framework that aligns ultrasound images with clinical text in a shared embedding space. We curate a multi-organ corpus of over 16K image-text pairs spanning breast, liver, lung, and thyroid, with over 78% of captions derived from expert-annotated reports, and complement the remainder with a three-tier template-based and LLM-based caption generation pipeline. We evaluate model configurations spanning two text encoder families (CLIP, BioClinicalBERT) and two caption strategies (template-based, LLM-generated) against OpenAI CLIP and BiomedCLIP baselines. Our trained models consistently improve cross-modal alignment over baselines, with the best configuration achieving a paired alignment score of 0.682. However, stronger alignment does not guarantee better downstream performance: CLIP-based variants with partial fine-tuning achieve the strongest zero-shot classification on external held-out datasets (0.709 on BUSI; 0.626 on AULI), while full end-to-end fine-tuning degrades transfer due to overfitting. On linear probing and few-shot adaptation, model rankings are dataset-dependent, reflecting a trade-off between domain adaptation and representational generalizability. We further show that template-based captions match or outperform LLM-generated captions, suggesting lexical diversity is not a proxy for caption quality. Taken together, our results demonstrate that ultrasound vision-language alignment is achievable from public data alone, but robust clinical transfer requires careful balancing of domain adaptation, encoder capacity, and caption supervision quality.



252. ❌ From Spherical to Gaussian: A Comparative Analysis of Point Cloud Cropping Strategies in Large-Scale 3D Environments

作者: Maximilian Kellner, Dominik Merkle, Michael Brunklaus, Alexander Reiterer 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02098v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Large-scale 3D point clouds can consist of billions of points. Even after downsampling, these point clouds are too large for modern 3D neural networks. In order to develop a semantic understanding of the scene, the point clouds are divided into smaller subclouds that can be processed. Typically, this division is done using spherical crops, resulting in a loss of surrounding geometric context. To address this issue, we propose alternative methods that produce subclouds with larger crop sizes while maintaining a similar number of points. Specifically, we compare exponential, Gaussian, and linear cropping methods with the spherical method. We evaluated two 3D deep learning model architectures using multiple indoor and outdoor environment datasets. Our results demonstrate that altering the cropping strategy can enhance model performance, especially for large-scale outdoor scenes, yielding new state-of-the-art results. Code is available at https://github.com/mvg-inatech/point_cloud_cropping



253. ❌ SignMAE: Segmentation-Driven Self-Supervised Learning for Sign Language Recognition

作者: Kunyuan Xie, Zhixi Cai, Kalin Stefanov 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02094v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Subtle hand differences make sign language recognition challenging, yet many existing methods rely on encoders pretrained on generic action datasets that poorly capture such fine-grained cues. We propose a self-supervised pretraining method for sign language recognition that uses segmentation-based masking to adapt to the presence and motion of key body parts, rather than treating hand poses as static visual tokens. The resulting mask-and-reconstruct objective improves fine-grained sign representation learning. On WLASL, NMFs-CSL, and Slovo, our encoder achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving per-instance and per-class Top-1 accuracy while using fewer input frames and modalities than comparable encoders.



254. ❌ Observability Conditions and Filter Design for Visual Pose Estimation via Dual Quaternions

作者: Nicholas B. Andrews, Kristi A. Morgansen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02054v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

This paper presents a dual quaternion framework for 6-DOF visual target tracking that addresses key limitations of perspective-n-point (P$n$P) solvers: sensitivity to noise and outliers, and inability to propagate estimates through measurement dropouts. A nonlinear observability analysis is performed using a Lie algebraic approach, deriving sufficient conditions for local observability under two sensing modalities: relative position vector and unit vector measurements. For the unit vector case, the classical collinear feature point degeneracy of the perspective-three-point problem is recovered through rank analysis of the observability codistribution matrix, providing a control-theoretic interpretation of a previously geometric result. A dual quaternion Lie group unscented Kalman filter is then developed, directly modeling relative dynamics without assumptions about cooperative measurements or slowly-varying motion. Simulations demonstrate improved pose estimation accuracy and robustness to occlusions compared to an off-the-shelf P$n$P solver. Results are broadly applicable to visual-inertial navigation, simultaneous localization and mapping, and P$n$P solver development.



255. ❌ Cross-Language Learning within Arabic Script for Low-Resource HTR

作者: Sana Al-azzawi, Elisa Barney, Marcus Liwicki 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02089v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Handwritten Text Recognition (HTR) under limited labeled data remains a challenging problem, particularly for Arabic-script languages. Although modern sequence-based recognizers perform well in high-resource settings, their accuracy degrades sharply as training data becomes scarce. Arabic-script languages share a common writing system with substantial character overlap, motivating cross-script training as a strategy to mitigate data scarcity. We performed experiments on Arabic, Urdu, and Persian scripts and achieved improvements over single-script baselines (new SotA especially for low-resource settings). A key finding of our experiments is that cross-script transfer is largely driven by script-level overlap rather than uniform accuracy improvements. Through a statistical character-level analysis we show that gains are structurally concentrated on characters shared across scripts, while language-specific characters exhibit limited or negative transfer. These findings provide insight into transfer dynamics in low-resource script families. Detailed results include: We conduct a controlled line-level study of cross-script joint training for Arabic-script HTR under low-resource regimes (number of samples K \in 100, 500, 1000 labeled lines) on Arabic (KHATT), Urdu (NUST-UHWR), and Persian (PHTD). A CRNN model is trained on the union of multiple related Arabic-script datasets and evaluated on individual target languages. On Persian (PHTD), joint training achieves a Character Error Rate (CER) of 9.99, surpassing previously reported results despite not using the full available training data. On an Urdu dataset (UNHD), joint training reduces CER from 17.20 to 14.45. Code and data splits are released to ensure reproducibility.1



256. ❌ How Can One Choose the Best CAM-Based Explainability Method for a CNN Model?

作者: Daniel da Silva Costa, Pedro Nuno de Souza Moura, Adriana C. F. Alvim 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02007v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In recent years, several advances have been observed in Deep Learning with surprising results. Models in this area have been increasingly used in numerous applications, including those sensitive to human life, which require clear explanations and justifications. Various explainability methods have been proposed, but not many metrics to evaluate these methods. The most commonly used metric is the Intersection over Union (IoU). However, due to the characteristics of the results of the explainability methods, called saliency maps, which do not have a known shape, we hypothesise that there must be a better metric that allows one to find an explainability method that produces results that best resemble the human perception. We propose using different metrics to assess the similarity between human perception and the explanation saliency maps to find a better metric. An investigation was conducted employing a subset of the Chihuahuas images from ImageNet dataset. Several CAM-based explainability methods were used to generate saliency maps for each chihuahua image. Alignment was measured by applying distance metrics between the bounding box of human annotations and the saliency maps produced by each explainability method. Rankings of the best saliency maps were created using the results of the distance metrics and compared to the ranking obtained using people’s choice, collected through crowdsourcing, of the best explanation saliency maps for each selected image. Comparison between rankings was performed using the Rank-Biased Overlap (RBO) metric. The results indicate the feasibility of our method to find the explainability method that best resembles human perception. In our experiments, the two metrics that best resemble human perception corresponded to Manhattan and Correlation. Besides, the best explainability methods regarding human perception were LayerCAM, Score-CAM, and IS-CAM.



257. ❌ From Concept to Capability: Evaluating 3D Gaussian Splatting for Synthetic Scene Editing in Autonomous Driving

作者: Ali Nouri, Yifei Zhang, Yifan Zhang, Tayssir Bouraffa, Zhennan Fei, Zijian Han, Håkan Sivencrona, Anders Heyden 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01995v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The perception of an Autonomous Driving System (ADS) critically depends on relevant, comprehensive, and diverse datasets to ensure its safety while operating in the environment. Field data collection lacks completeness with respect to the list of rare but still possible safety-related scenarios needed for the development, verification, and validation of the ADS. 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has shown promising capabilities for the reconstruction and editing of scenes based on data collected by cameras and LiDAR sensors. However, the industrial fidelity evaluation of reconstructions is underexplored, which is crucial when employing such methods in safety-related systems, especially for ADS. This becomes more challenging as ADS operates in a dynamic, uncontrolled environment with limited viewpoints and often partially occluded objects. This paper addresses this gap by proposing and implementing a framework (Fig. 1) to systematically analyze the capabilities and limitations of 3DGS for use in the reconstruction of safety-related scenes. It focuses on the quality of reconstruction for vehicles and pedestrians, which are the two most critical object classes for ADS. Our findings provide industry insights into the fidelity degradation of reconstructions from multiple novel viewpoints, both lateral and longitudinal, enabling the integration of these methods into real-world industrial AD software development and testing pipelines.



258. ❌ ProtoFair: Fair Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning via Pseudo-Counterfactual Pairs

作者: Marah Halawa, Olaf Hellwich 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01971v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Self-supervised learning methods learn high-quality visual representations, yet recent studies show that these representations often capture demographic biases present in the training data. Existing fairness-aware methods address this by redesigning the self-supervised objective itself, limiting portability across the rapidly evolving landscape of self-supervised learning (SSL) frameworks. We propose ProtoFair, a fairness-aware contrastive loss designed to work alongside existing SSL objectives without modifying them. ProtoFair leverages unsupervised prototype clustering to identify pseudo-counterfactual pairs: samples sharing the same cluster assignment but belonging to different sensitive groups. By pulling these content-matched, cross-group samples together in the embedding space, ProtoFair encourages the encoder to learn representations that are invariant to the sensitive attribute. The method requires only sensitive attribute annotations, no target labels, and integrates seamlessly with both SimCLR and SupCon. Experiments on CelebA and UTKFace demonstrate consistent fairness improvements while maintaining competitive accuracy.



259. ❌ MER-DG: Modality-Entropy Regularization for Multimodal Domain Generalization

作者: Yavuz Yarici, Ghassan AlRegib 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01967v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Deploying multimodal models in real-world scenarios requires generalization to new environments where recording conditions differ from training, a challenge known as multimodal domain generalization (MMDG). Standard architectures employ separate encoders for each modality and a fusion module, training the system end-to-end by optimizing on the fused features. In this paper, we identify that such joint optimization causes encoders to exploit cross-modal co-occurrences, statistical relationships between modalities that arise from source-specific recording conditions, rather than learning domain-invariant features. We term this failure mode Fusion Overfitting. To address this, we propose Modality-Entropy Regularization for Domain Generalization (MER-DG), which maximizes the entropy of each encoder’s feature distribution to preserve feature diversity. MER-DG is architecture-agnostic and integrates into existing multimodal frameworks as an additive loss term. Extensive experiments on EPIC-Kitchens and HAC benchmarks demonstrate average improvements of approximately 5% over standard fusion and approximately 2% over state-of-the-art methods.



260. ❌ Sonar-GPS Fusion for Seabed Mapping in Turbid Shallow Waters with an Autonomous Surface Vehicle

作者: Yisheng Zhang, Michael Xu, Alan Williams, Matthew Gray, Nare Karapetyan, Miao Yu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01949v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Accurate seabed mapping is essential for habitat monitoring and infrastructure inspection. In turbid, shallow coastal waters, such as shellfish aquaculture farms, the effectiveness of traditional optical methods is limited. Autonomous surface vehicles (ASVs) equipped with forward-looking sonar (FLS) offer a promising alternative. However, existing sonar-based systems face challenges in achieving fine resolution mapping over long trajectories due to low-resolution positioning measurements and accumulated drift over long trajectories. In this paper, we present a drift-resilient seabed mapping framework that integrates local FLS frame alignment using the Fourier-Mellin transform (FMT) with global trajectory optimization based on an extended Kalman filter (EKF) that fuses global positioning system (GPS), inertial measurement unit (IMU), and compass data. A variance-based image blending strategy is used to further reduce visual artifacts in overlapping regions. Field trials on a structured oyster farm site show that our framework helps reduce drift in RMSE by 9.5% relative to the FMT-only baseline. This framework also enables sub-meter reconstruction accuracy and preservation of high-resolution textures needed for oyster inventory estimation within the mapped areas.



261. ❌ ViM-Q: Scalable Algorithm-Hardware Co-Design for Vision Mamba Model Inference on FPGA

作者: Shengzhe Lyu, Yuhan She, Patrick S. Y. Hung, Ray C. C. Cheung, Weitao Xu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01935v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Vision Mamba (ViM) models offer a compelling efficiency advantage over Transformers by leveraging the linear complexity of State Space Models (SSMs), yet efficiently deploying them on FPGAs remains challenging. Linear layers struggle with dynamic activation outliers that render static quantization ineffective, while uniform quantization fails to capture the weight distribution at low bit-widths. Furthermore, while associative scan accelerates SSMs on GPUs, its memory access patterns are misaligned with the streaming dataflow required by FPGAs. To address these challenges, we present ViM-Q, a scalable algorithm-hardware co-design for end-to-end ViM inference on the edge. We introduce a hardware-aware quantization scheme combining dynamic per-token activation quantization and per-channel smoothing to mitigate outliers, alongside a custom 4-bit per-block Additive Power-of-Two (APoT) weight quantization. The models are deployed on a runtime-parameterizable FPGA accelerator featuring a linear engine employing a Lookup-Table (LUT) unit to replace multiplications with shift-add operations, and a fine-grained pipelined SSM engine that parallelizes the state dimension while preserving sequential recurrence. Crucially, the hardware supports runtime configuration, adapting to diverse dimensions and input resolutions across the ViM family. Implemented on an AMD ZCU102 FPGA, ViM-Q achieves an average 4.96x speedup and 59.8x energy efficiency gain over a quantized NVIDIA RTX 3090 GPU baseline for low-batch inference on ViM-tiny. This co-design shows a viable path for deploying ViM models on resource-constrained edge devices.



262. ❌ Exploring Data-Free LoRA Transferability for Video Diffusion Models

作者: Yuchen Wang, Wenliang Zhong, Lichen Bai, Zikai Zhou, Shitong Shao, Bojun Cheng, Shuo Chen, Shuo Yang, Zeke Xie 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01929v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Video diffusion models leveraging step distillation or causal distillation have achieved remarkable performance. However, adapting existing LoRAs to these variants remains a critical challenge due to weight space mismatches. We observe that direct application leads to style degradation and structural collapse, yet the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. To fill this gap, we delve into the weight space and identify that the incompatibility stems from spectral interference within shared functional clusters defined over singular subspaces. Specifically, our analysis reveals that while both paradigms respect spectral rigidity, they establish conflicting routing pathways that clash through constructive overload or destructive cancellation. To address this issue, we propose Cluster-Aware Spectral Arbitration (CASA), a data-free framework that dynamically arbitrates between safeguarding the target’s manifold and restoring LoRA alignment based on spectral density. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CASA effectively mitigates artifacts and revives LoRA functionality. Our code is available at https://github.com/Noahwangyuchen/CASA



263. ❌ CADFS: A Big CAD Program Dataset and Framework for Computer-Aided Design with Large Language Models

作者: Vladislav Pyatov, Gleb Bobrovskikh, Saveliy Galochkin, Nikita Boldyrev, Oleg Voynov, Alexander Filippov, Gonzalo Ferrer, Peter Wonka, Evgeny Burnaev 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01925v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We introduce CADFS, a data-centric framework that enables large vision-language models to generate complex CAD design histories. Existing generative CAD systems are restricted to sketch-extrude operations due to simplified representations and limited datasets. We address this by introducing a FeatureScript-based representation and constructing a dataset of 450k real-world CAD models spanning 15 modeling operations. We obtain the dataset via a new pipeline that reconstructs clean, executable FeatureScript programs and provides multimodal annotations. Fine-tuning a VLM on this representation yields state-of-the-art results in text-conditioned CAD generation and image-based reconstruction, producing more accurate, diverse, and feature-rich designs than prior frameworks. Ablations show that each individual component of our framework, i.e., the FeatureScript representation, the extended operation set, and representation-aligned textual descriptions, significantly improves performance. Our framework substantially broadens the complexity and realism achievable in generative CAD. The CADFS framework and the new dataset are available at https://voyleg.github.io/cadfs/.



264. ❌ SimPB++: Simultaneously Detecting 2D and 3D Objects from Multiple Cameras

作者: Yingqi Tang, Zhaotie Meng, Erkang Cheng, Haibin Ling 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01924v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Simultaneous perception of 2D objects in perspective view and 3D objects in Bird’s Eye View (BEV) is challenging for multi-camera autonomous driving. Existing two-stage pipelines use 2D results only as a one-time cue for 3D detection. We propose SimPB++, which simultaneously detects 2D objects in perspective and 3D objects in BEV from multiple cameras. It unifies both tasks into an end-to-end model with a hybrid decoder architecture, coupling multi-view 2D and 3D decoders interactively. Two novel modules enable deep interaction: Dynamic Query Allocation adaptively assigns 2D queries to 3D candidates, and Adaptive Query Aggregation refines 3D representations using multi-view 2D features, forming a cyclic 3D-2D-3D refinement. For multi-view 2D detection, we use Query-group Attention for intra-group communication. We also design a Crop-and-Scale strategy for long-range perception and a Propagating Denoising strategy with an auxiliary RoI detector. SimPB++ supports mixed supervision with 2D-only and fully annotated data, reducing reliance on expensive 3D labels. Experiments show state-of-the-art performance on nuScenes for both tasks and strong long-range detection (up to 150m) on Argoverse2.



265. ❌ EAPFusion: Intrinsic Evolving Auxiliary Prior Guidance for Infrared and Visible Image Fusion

作者: Zhenyu Sun, Luobin Zhang, Axi Niu, Haishen Wang, Qingsen Yan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01916v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Infrared-visible image fusion aims to create an information-rich fused image by integrating the complementary thermal saliency from infrared sensing and fine textures from visible imaging. Such accurate fusion is essential for real-world perception applications in complex scenes, including nighttime autonomous driving, search and rescue, and surveillance, and can further benefit downstream tasks such as semantic segmentation. However, most existing fusion methods rely upon static trained weights that cannot adapt to scene-specific content at inference time, and often suffer from a granularity mismatch when coarse auxiliary semantics are injected, which makes it difficult to simultaneously highlight targets and preserve details. In this work, we propose EAPFusion to address these issues by using self-evolving intrinsic priors instead of relying on external auxiliary models. Concretely, EAPFusion maintains a compact set of intrinsic priors and progressively updates them across scales. These evolved priors are utilized to dynamically generate convolutional kernels, shifting the paradigm from fixed, pre-trained filters to instance-adaptive parameters via prior-conditioned dynamic convolution. Furthermore, we design a channel-level fusion module that shuffles and interleaves infrared and visible channels, applying local channel mixing to boost cross-modal complementarity. Experiments on different datasets, including cross-dataset evaluation and semantic segmentation, show that the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art quantitative and qualitative fusion results, and consistently boosts downstream performance. Code is coming soon.



266. ❌ SurgCheck: Do Vision-Language Models Really Look at Images in Surgical VQA?

作者: Jongmin Shin, Ka Young Kim, Eunki Cho, Seong Tae Kim, Namkee Oh 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01911v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Purpose: Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown promising performance in surgical visual question answering (VQA). However, existing surgical VQA datasets often contain linguistic shortcuts, where question phrasing implicitly constrains the answer space. It remains unclear whether reported performance reflects visual understanding or reliance on such linguistic shortcuts. Methods: We introduce SurgCheck, a diagnostic benchmark for quantifying linguistic shortcut reliance in surgical VQA. SurgCheck employs a paired-question design in which each surgical frame is associated with an original question containing entity names and a less-biased counterpart that removes these names while preserving identical visual content and ground-truth answers. The resulting performance gap provides a diagnostic signal of shortcut reliance. To ensure that the less-biased question remains well-defined even without entity names, four grounding cues are incorporated: bounding box, arrow, spatial position, and periphrasis. We evaluate both general-purpose and surgical-specific VLMs under zero-shot and fine-tuned settings on SurgCheck. To evaluate open-ended zero-shot responses, we introduce an LLM-as-a-judge evaluation protocol. Results: Using SurgCheck, we observe consistent performance degradation on less-biased questions across five VLMs, despite identical visual inputs. Text-only ablation reveals minimal performance drops for action and target prediction, indicating that action and target prediction is largely driven by linguistic shortcuts rather than visual reasoning. Conclusion: SurgCheck provides a controlled diagnostic framework that exposes failure modes masked by linguistic bias in existing surgical VQA benchmarks. Our findings demonstrate that strong benchmark performance does not necessarily imply faithful visual understanding, underscoring the need for bias-aware evaluation in surgical VQA.



267. ❌ Unsupervised Machine Learning for Detecting Structural Anomalies in European Regional Statistics

作者: Bogdan Oancea 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02884v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Ensuring the coherence of regional socio-economic statistics is a central task for national statistical institutes. Traditional validation tools, such as range edits, ratio checks, or univariate outlier detection, are effective for identifying extreme values in individual series but are less suited for detecting unusual combinations of indicators in high-dimensional settings. This paper proposes an unsupervised machine learning framework for identifying structurally atypical regional profiles within Europe using publicly available Eurostat data. We construct a cross-sectional dataset of NUTS2 regions (2022) covering four key indicators: GDP per capita in PPS, unemployment rate, tertiary educational attainment, and population density. We apply and compare five anomaly detection techniques, univariate z-scores, Mahalanobis distance, Isolation Forest, Local Outlier Factor, and One-Class SVM, and classify a region as a structural anomaly if it is flagged by at least three of the five methods. The findings show that machine learning methods identify a consistent set of regions whose multivariate profiles diverge substantially from the EU-wide pattern. These include both highly developed metropolitan economies (Brussels, Vienna, Berlin, Prague) and regions with persistent socio-economic disadvantages (Central and Western Slovakia, Northern Hungary, Castilla-La Mancha, Extremadura), as well as Istanbul, whose profile differs markedly from EU capital regions. Importantly, these anomalies do not necessarily signal data quality issues; rather, they reflect meaningful structural divergence that warrants analytical or policy attention. The proposed framework is fully reproducible, scalable, and compatible with existing validation workflows, offering a flexible tool for early detection of unusual regional configurations within the European Statistical System.



268. ❌ Multi-fidelity surrogates for mechanics of composites: from co-kriging to multi-fidelity neural networks

作者: Haizhou Wen, Elham Kiyani, Gang Li, Srikanth Pilla, George Em Karniadakis, Zhen Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02871v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Composite materials exhibit strongly hierarchical and anisotropic properties governed by coupled mechanisms spanning constituents, plies, laminates, structures, and manufacturing history. This intrinsic complexity makes predictive modeling of composites expensive, because repeated experiments and high-fidelity simulations are needed to cover large design spaces of material, structure, and manufacturing. Multi-fidelity surrogate modeling addresses this challenge by combining abundant, less expensive data with limited high-accuracy data to recover reliable high-fidelity predictions. This review presents a structured overview of multi-fidelity modeling for composite mechanics, covering Gaussian-process or Kriging-based methods, including co-Kriging, coregionalization models, autoregressive formulations, nonlinear autoregressive Gaussian processes, multi-fidelity deep Gaussian processes, and multi-fidelity neural networks. Their distinctions are examined in terms of cross-fidelity correlation, discrepancy representation, uncertainty quantification, and scalability. Selected examples of their applications to composites are introduced according to the roles that multi-fidelity surrogates play in engineering problems, including forward prediction for rapid exploration of material design spaces, inverse optimization for composite parameter identification and design search under limited high-fidelity access, and workflow integration, where heterogeneous data sources, constraints, and validation requirements determine model utility. Open question discussions highlight recurring challenges specific to composites, such as regime-dependent fidelity gaps associated with nonlinear damage and manufacturing history, mismatches between simulations and experiments, and uncertainty propagation across multi-fidelity models.



269. ❌ Trust, but Verify: Peeling Low-Bit Transformer Networks for Training Monitoring

作者: Arian Eamaz, Farhang Yeganegi, Mojtaba Soltanalian 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02853v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Understanding whether deep neural networks are effectively optimized remains challenging, as training occurs in highly nonconvex landscapes and standard metrics provide limited visibility into layer-wise learning quality. This challenge is particularly acute for transformer-based language models, where training is expensive, models are often reused in frozen form, and poorly optimized layers can silently degrade performance. We propose a layer-wise peeling framework for monitoring training dynamics, in which each transformer layer is locally optimized against intermediate representations of the trained model. By constructing lightweight, layer-specific reference solutions and projecting layers onto multiple intermediate outputs via different permutations, we obtain achievable baselines that enable fine-grained diagnosis of under-optimized layers. Experiments on decoder-only transformer models show that these layer-wise reference bounds can match or even surpass the trained model at various stages of training, exposing inefficiencies that remain hidden in aggregate loss curves. We further demonstrate that this analysis remains effective under binarization and quantized settings, where training dynamics are particularly fragile. Across all numerical results, the proposed bounds consistently separate apparent convergence from effective optimality, highlighting optimization opportunities that are invisible when relying on training loss alone.



270. ❌ A Closed-Form Persistence-Landmark Pipeline for Certified Point-Cloud and Graph Classification

作者: Sushovan Majhi, Atish Mitra, Žiga Virk, Pramita Bagchi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02836v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We introduce PLACE (Persistence-Landmark Analytic Classification Engine), a closed-form pipeline for classifying point clouds and graphs through their persistent-homology signatures. Three quantitative guarantees – a margin-based excess-risk rate, a closed-form descriptor-selection rule, and a per-prediction certificate – are derived from training labels alone, with no learned weights or held-out calibration. The embedding sums Mitra-Virk single-point coordinate functions over a sparse landmark grid; closed-form weights maximize a structural distortion constant $λ(ν)$ (a Lipschitz lower bound on $\mathcal{D}n$ under non-interference). (i) An $O(kR/(Δ\sqrt{m{\min}}))$ margin bound, driven by class-mean separation $Δ$ and embedding radius $R$, matched by a sample-starved minimax lower bound. (ii) The Mahalanobis margin under Ledoit-Wolf-shrunk covariance is the strongest closed-form descriptor selector on a heterogeneous 64-descriptor chemical-graph pool (mean Spearman $ρ\approx +0.54$ across 10 benchmarks, positive on 9 of 10); the isotropic surrogate $Δ/\sqrt\ell$ admits a closed-form selection-consistency rate on homogeneous (14-15 descriptor) protein/social pools. (iii) A training-time-decided certificate with no per-prediction overhead, in non-asymptotic Pinelis and asymptotic Gaussian plug-in forms. Empirically, PLACE is the strongest diagram-based method on Orbit5k and matches the strongest topology-based baseline within statistical noise on MUTAG and COX2. The remaining gaps fall into two diagnosable regimes: descriptor blindness on NCI1/NCI109, and pool-coverage limits elsewhere. Both radii exceed the firing threshold $\hatΔ/2$ on every benchmark at our training-set sizes, dominated by the $\sqrt\ell$ scaling of the multivariate-norm bound; the per-prediction certificate is constructive but not yet operational at these sizes.



271. ❌ Universality in Deep Neural Networks: An approach via the Lindeberg exchange principle

作者: Filippo Giovagnini, Sotirios Kotitsas, Marco Romito 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02771v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We consider the infinite-width limit of a fully connected deep neural network with general weights, and we prove quantitative general bounds on the $2$-Wasserstein distance between the network and its infinite-width Gaussian limit, under appropriate regularity assumptions on the activation function. Our main tool is a Lindeberg principle for Deep Neural Networks, which we use to successively replace the weights on each layer by Gaussian random variables.



272. ❌ Adaptive Interpolation-Synthesis for Motion In-Betweening on Keyframe-Based Animation

作者: Anton Raël, Julien Boucher, Antoine Lhermitte 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02742v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Motion in-betweening is one of the most artistically demanding and time consuming stages of 3D animation, where the expressivity and rhythm of motion are defined. The level of creative control it requires makes it a major production bottleneck, underscoring the need for intelligent tools that assist animators in this process. Although recent deep learning approaches have achieved strong results in motion synthesis and in-betweening, they assume data characteristics, motion styles, and problem formulations that diverge from professional animation workflows. To bridge this gap, we propose a method explicitly aligned with the constraints of motion in-betweening for keyframe-based animation in production environments. At its core, the Adaptive Interpolation-Synthesis (AIS) layer mirrors the animator’s creative process by dynamically balancing learned interpolation and direct pose synthesis. In addition, a domain-based input keypose schedule reflects the distribution of production data, improving stylistic consistency and alignment between training and real-world usage. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on production data; when integrated into Autodesk Maya, it enables animators to complete in-betweening tasks with a 3.5x speedup.



273. ❌ Visual Latents Know More Than They Say: Unsilencing Latent Reasoning in MLLMs

作者: Xin Zhang, Qiqi Tao, Jiawei Du, Moyun Liu, Joey Tianyi Zhou 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02735v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Continuous latent-space reasoning offers a compact alternative to textual chain-of-thought for multimodal models, enabling high-dimensional visual evidence to be integrated without explicit reasoning tokens. However, we identify a previously overlooked optimization pathology in existing latent visual reasoning methods: although visual latents become semantically enriched during training, their contribution to final answer prediction is systematically suppressed. Within the shared parameter space, the autoregressive objective favors shortcut reliance on direct visual input, driving latent tokens toward transition-like states rather than informative reasoning content. We term this phenomenon Silenced Visual Latents. To address it, we disentangle the two conflicting objectives by directly optimizing the latent reasoning at inference time, keeping backbone parameters frozen. In Stage I, visual latents are warmed up via query-guided contrastive latent–visual alignment, improving semantic quality while preventing latent collapse. In Stage II, the latent reasoning is further optimized via a confidence-progression reward, which incentivizes predicted token distributions along the latent span to become progressively more concentrated, routing predictions through the latent reasoning rather than bypassing it. Experiments across eight benchmarks and four model backbones show that inference-time latent optimization, without any parameter updates, effectively unleashes the suppressed reasoning capacity of visual latents.



274. ❌ Dimensionality-Aware Anomaly Detection in Learned Representations of Self-Supervised Speech Models

作者: Sandra Arcos-Holzinger, Sarah M. Erfani, James Bailey, Sanjeev Khudanpur 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02715v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Self-supervised speech models (S3Ms) achieve strong downstream performance, yet their learned representations remain poorly understood under natural and adversarial perturbations. Prior studies rely on representation similarity or global dimensionality, offering limited visibility into local geometric changes. We ask: how do perturbations deform local geometry, and do these shifts track downstream automatic speech recognition (ASR) degradation? To address this, we present GRIDS, a framework using Local Intrinsic Dimensionality (LID) across layer-wise representations in WavLM and wav2vec 2.0. We find that LID increases for all low signal-to noise ratio (SNR) perturbations and diverges at high SNR: benign noise converges toward the clean profile, while adversarial inputs retain early-layer LID elevation. We show LID elevation co-occurs with increased WER, and that layer-wise LID features enable anomaly detection (AUROC 0.78-1.00), opening the door to transcript-free monitoring in S3Ms.



275. ❌ Federated Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Mobile Crowdsensing under Incomplete Information

作者: Sumedh J. Dongare, Patrick Weber, Andrea Ortiz, Walid Saad, Oliver Hinz, Anja Klein 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02705v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Mobile crowdsensing (MCS) is a distributed sensing architecture that utilizes existing sensors on mobile units (MUs) to perform sensing tasks. A mobile crowdsensing platform (MCSP) publishes the sensing tasks and the MUs decide whether to participate in exchange for money. The MCS system is dynamic: the task requirements, the MUs’ availability, and their available resources change over time. The MUs aim to find an efficient task participation strategy to maximize their income while the MCSP focuses on maximizing the number of completed tasks. As optimal strategies require perfect non-causal information about the MCS system, which is unavailable in realistic scenarios, the main challenge is to find an efficient task participation strategy for the MUs under incomplete information. To this end, a novel fully decentralized federated deep reinforcement learning algorithm, FDRL-PPO, is proposed. FDRL-PPO enables every MU to learn its own task participation strategy based on its experiences, available resources, and preferences, without relying on perfect non-causal information about the MCS system. To replenish their batteries, the MUs rely on energy harvesting. As a result, their available energy varies over time, leading to varying availability and fragmented learning experiences. To mitigate these challenges, the proposed approach leverages federated learning, enabling MUs to collaboratively improve their models without sharing private raw data like their own experiences. By exchanging only learned models, MUs collectively compensate for individual limitations, and find more scalable, robust, and efficient task participation strategies. Comprehensive evaluations on both synthetic and real-world datasets show that FDRL-PPO consistently outperforms benchmark algorithms in terms of task completion ratio, fairness in task completion, energy consumption, and number of conflicting proposals.



276. ❌ Robust and Fast Training via Per-Sample Clipping

作者: Davide Nobile, Philipp Grohs 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02701v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We propose a robust gradient estimator based on per-sample gradient clipping and analyze its properties both theoretically and empirically. We show that the resulting method, per-sample clipped SGD (PS-Clip-SGD), achieves optimal in-expectation convergence rates for non-convex optimization problems under heavy-tailed gradient noise. Moreover, we establish high-probability convergence guarantees that match the in-expectation rates up to polylogarithmic factors in the failure probability. We complement our theoretical results with multiple numerical experiments. In particular, we demonstrate that PS-Clip-SGD outperforms both vanilla SGD with momentum and standard gradient clipping when training AlexNet on the CIFAR-100 dataset, even after accounting for the additional computational time caused by per-sample clipping. We also empirically show that, in the presence of gradient accumulation, applying clipping at the mini-batch level can improve training performance while incurring virtually no additional computational cost. This finding is particularly interesting, as it contradicts the common practice of applying clipping only after all accumulation steps have been completed.



277. ❌ Random-Effects Algorithm for Random Objects in Metric Spaces

作者: Marcos Matabuena, Mateo Cámara 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02693v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Across many scientific disciplines, multiple observations are collected from the same experimental units, and in modern datasets these observations often arise as non-Euclidean random objects. In such settings, the incorporation of random effects is a critical modeling step for efficient estimation and personalized prediction. Although mixed-effects models are well established for scalar outcomes and, more recently, for functional data in Hilbert spaces, general random-effects frameworks for objects in metric spaces remain underdeveloped. In this paper, we propose a nonlinear Fréchet-based algorithm for random-effects modeling of arbitrary random objects defined on a metric space. Using M-estimation theory, we establish conditions under which the proposed metric-space prediction target is consistently estimated under a working random-effects formulation. We then evaluate the empirical performance of the proposed method using both synthetic data and digital health datasets that require practical tools for analyzing random objects in metric spaces, such as multivariate probability distributions and random graphs. We show that, although our method is developed beyond Hilbert spaces, it can outperform existing Hilbert space-based methods.



278. ❌ ParaRNN: An Interpretable and Parallelizable Recurrent Neural Network for Time-Dependent Data

作者: Yuxi Cai, Lan Li, Feiqing Huang, Guodong Li 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02692v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The proliferation of large-scale and structurally complex data has spurred the integration of machine learning methods into statistical modeling. Recurrent neural networks (RNNs), a foundational class of models for time-dependent data, can be viewed as nonlinear extensions of classical autoregressive moving average models. Despite their flexibility and empirical success in machine learning, RNNs often suffer from limited interpretability and slow training, which hinders their use in statistics. This paper proposes the Parallelized RNN (ParaRNN), a novel model composed of multiple small recurrent units. ParaRNN admits an additive representation that decouples recurrent dynamics into interpretable components, whose behavior can be characterized through recurrence features. This interpretability enables its applications in nonparametric regression for time-dependent data, while the design also allows efficient parallelization. The approximation capacity and non-asymptotic prediction error bounds in a nonparametric regression setting are established for ParaRNN. Empirical results on three sequential modeling tasks further demonstrate that ParaRNN achieves performance comparable to vanilla RNNs while offering improved interpretability and efficiency.



279. ❌ MSMixer: Learned Multi-Scale Temporal Mixing with Complementary Linear Shortcut for Long-Term Time Series Forecasting

作者: Ahmed Cherif 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02689v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Long-term time series forecasting requires models that simultaneously capture rapid oscillations, medium-range periodicities, and slowly evolving macro-trends from a fixed look-back window. Existing lightweight MLP-based models typically operate on a single temporal resolution, limiting their ability to explicitly model patterns at multiple scales. We propose MSMixer, a channel-independent multi-scale MLP architecture that addresses this limitation through three complementary innovations: (i) three parallel scale branches at down-sample factors {1x, 4x, 16x} with independent MLP blocks, (ii) a learnable softmax gate that dynamically weighs branch outputs, and (iii) a DLinear complementary shortcut that provides full-window trend and seasonality context. MSMixer contains only 112K parameters at H=96 and runs at O(T) complexity. Evaluated on four ETT benchmarks with standard chronological splits and three random seeds, MSMixer achieves the lowest average MSE (0.357) among lightweight models, outperforming DLinear (0.386, -7.4%) and NLinear (0.365, -2.1%), winning 12 of 16 configurations. Against five Transformer-based baselines from the literature, MSMixer achieves best or second-best MSE in 9 of 16 configurations while using 5x fewer parameters than PatchTST. Ablation and sensitivity analyses confirm the complementary contributions of the multi-scale branches and the DLinear shortcut.



280. ❌ Spectral Model eXplainer: a chemically-grounded explainability framework for spectral-based machine learning models

作者: Jose Vinicius Ribeiro, Rafael Figueira Goncalves, Fabio Luiz Melquiades, Sylvio Barbon Junior 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02684v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Spectral-based machine learning models have been increasingly deployed in chemometrics and spectroscopy, where predictive accuracy is as important as explainability. Current employed eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods are largely adapted from tabular or generic multivariate domains, assigning relevance to isolated spectral variables rather than to the chemically meaningful spectral zones. Widely adopted tools such as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Permutation Feature Importance (PFI), and Variable Importance in Projection scores (VIP) were not designed for the physical continuity and high collinearity of spectral data, and their variable-level outputs require post-hoc aggregation to recover zone-level information. This study introduces the Spectral Model eXplainer (SMX), a post-hoc, global, model-agnostic XAI framework that explains spectral classifiers through expert-informed spectral zones. SMX summarizes each zone via PCA, defines quantile-based logical predicates, estimates predicate relevance with perturbation in stochastic subsamples, and aggregates bag-wise rankings in a directed weighted graph summarized by Local Reaching Centrality. A key component is threshold spectrum reconstruction, which back-projects predicate boundaries to the original spectral domain in natural measurement units, enabling direct visual comparison with measured spectra. The method was evaluated on eight real spectral datasets (six based on X-ray Fluorescence–XRF and two based on Gamma-ray Spectrometry) and one synthetic benchmark with known gr



281. ❌ CARD: Coarse-to-fine Autoregressive Modeling with Radix-based Decomposition for Transferable Free Energy Estimation

作者: Ziyang Yu, Yi He, Wenbing Huang, Wen Yan, Yang Liu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02657v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Estimating free energy differences quantifies thermodynamic preferences in molecular interactions, which is central to chemistry and drug discovery. Despite fruitful progress, existing methods still face key limitations: classical computational approaches remain prohibitively expensive due to their reliance on extensive molecular dynamics simulations, while deep learning-based methods are constrained by either less-expressive generative models or input dimensions tied to a specific system, resulting in negligible generalization. To address these challenges, we propose CARD, a generative framework that employs a novel radix-based decomposition to bijectively convert 3D coordinates into mixed discrete-continuous sequences, enabling coarse-to-fine autoregressive modeling with enhanced expressiveness. Notably, the model corresponds to a distribution with zero free energy, serving as a proposal for absolute free energy computation of arbitrary systems without relying on alchemical pathways. Experiments across diverse tasks demonstrate that CARD matches the accuracy of classical computational methods on unseen systems with diverse topologies, while achieving an approximately 40-fold speedup in inference.



282. ❌ Online Generalised Predictive Coding

作者: Mehran H. Z. Bazargani, Szymon Urbas, Adeel Razi, Thomas Brendan Murphy, Karl Friston 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02675v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

This paper introduces an extension of generalised filtering for online applications. Generalised filtering refers to data assimilation schemes that jointly infer latent states, learn unknown model parameters, and estimate uncertainty in an integrated framework – e.g., estimate state and observation noise – at the same time (i.e., triple estimation). This framework appears across disciplines under different names, including variational Kalman-Bucy filtering in engineering, generalised predictive coding in neuroscience, and Dynamic Expectation Maximisation (DEM) in time-series analysis. Here, we specialise DEM for ``online’’ data assimilation, through a separation of temporal scales. We describe the variational principles and procedures that allow one to assimilate data in a way that allows for a slow updating of parameters and precisions, which contextualise fast Bayesian belief updating about the dynamic hidden states. Using numerical studies, we demonstrate the validity of online DEM (ODEM) using a non-linear – and potentially chaotic – generative model, to show that the ODEM scheme can track the latent states of the generative process, even when its functional form differs fundamentally from the dynamics of the generative model. Framed from a neuro-mimetic predictive coding perspective, ODEM offers a biologically inspired solution to online inference, learning, and uncertainty estimation in dynamic environments.



283. ❌ ARA: Agentic Reproducibility Assessment For Scalable Support Of Scientific Peer-Review

作者: Kevin Riehl, Andres L. Marin, Nikofors Zacharof, Fan Wu, Patrick Langer, Robert Jakob, Anastasios Kouvelas, Georgios Fontaras, Michail A. Makridis 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02651v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Scientific peer review increasingly struggles to assess reproducibility at the scale and complexity of modern research output. Evaluating reproducibility requires reconstructing experimental dependencies, methodological choices, data flows, and result-generating procedures, which often exceeds what human reviewers can provide. Agentic Reproducibility Assessment (ARA) formalizes reproducibility assessment as a structured reasoning task over scientific documents. Given a paper, ARA extracts a directed workflow graph linking sources, methods, experiments, and outputs, then evaluates its reconstructability using structural and content-based scores for reproducibility assessments. Experiments on 213 ReScience C articles - the largest cross-domain benchmark of human-validated computational reproducibility studies considered to date - demonstrate ARA’s generalizability and consistent workflow reconstruction and assessment across LLMs, model temperatures, and scientific domains. ARA achieves ~61% accuracy on three benchmarks, and the highest accuracy reported on ReproBench (60.71% vs. 36.84%) and GoldStandardDB (61.68% vs. 43.56%), highlighting its potential to complement human review at scale and enabling next-generation peer review. Code and Data available: https://github.com/AndresLaverdeMarin/agentic_reproducibility_assessment.



284. ❌ CNNs for Vis-NIR Chemometrics: From Contradiction to Conditional Design

作者: Dário Passos 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02636v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Near-infrared (NIR; a.k.a.\ NIRS) deep-learning studies in chemometrics increasingly report mutually inconsistent conclusions regarding convolutional neural network (CNN) design, including small versus large kernels, shallow versus deep architectures, raw spectra versus preprocessing, and single-domain training versus transfer learning. As a result, the same architecture can appear superior in one study and inferior in another, creating a practical impasse for chemometric practitioners. In this review, we argue that these contradictions are not evidence of irreconcilable methods but a structurally expected consequence of uncontrolled moderating variables. Specifically, we trace recurring disagreements to (i) the indirect nature of Vis–NIR measurement in water-dominated matrices, (ii) mismatch between effective receptive field (ERF) and the width of informative spectral structure, and (iii) validation design (including split strategy, hyperparameter tuning budget, and exposure to deployment-like shifts) acting as a hidden hyperparameter that can dominate model ranking. Building on evidence from published chemometrics and spectroscopy studies, we propose a conditional design framework that links architecture and preprocessing choices to spectral physics, dataset regime, and intended deployment scenario. Overall, the proposed perspective moves DL Chemometrics from template-driven architecture selection toward reproducible, physics-aware, and deployment-aligned model comparison.



285. ❌ Gradient-Gated DPO: Stabilizing Preference Optimization in Language Models

作者: Inoussa Mouiche 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02626v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Preference optimization has become a central paradigm for aligning large language models with human feedback. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplifies reinforcement learning from human feedback by directly optimizing pairwise preferences, removing the need for reward modeling and policy optimization. However, recent work shows that DPO exhibits a squeezing effect, where negative gradients applied to rejected responses concentrate probability mass on high-confidence predictions while suppressing alternative responses. This phenomenon arises even in simple softmax models and can lead to systematic probability collapse during training. We introduce Gradient-Gated Preference Optimization (Gate-DPO), a method that stabilizes training by modulating rejected gradients according to the model’s probability geometry. When updates target extremely low-probability responses, the gate attenuates harmful gradients while preserving standard optimization behavior. Gate-DPO addresses this optimization pathology without modifying the underlying preference objective and is complementary to existing methods such as extended SFT, IPO, and Cal-DPO. Experiments across multiple architectures and preference datasets show that Gate-DPO consistently reduces squeezing and improves chosen-response likelihood. Mass-dynamics analysis further reveals healthier optimization behavior, with improved preferred responses and reduced suppression of the overall distribution. Notably, smaller gated models can exhibit stronger chosen-response improvements than larger ungated models, suggesting that controlling gradient dynamics, rather than scale alone, is key to stable and efficient alignment.



286. ❌ TRACED: In vivo imaging of extracellular intrinsic diffusivity, tortuosity, cell size distribution and cell density in human glioma patients

作者: Joshua K. Marchant, Hong-Hsi Lee, Elizabeth R. Gerstner, Susie Y. Huang, Bruce R. Rosen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02615v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The lack of analytical models describing diffusion time dependence at intermediate time scales in complex tissue microstructure limits the accurate quantification of extracellular diffusivity and tissue microstructure. We introduce TRACED, a biophysical model that incorporates diffusion time dependence in cell distributions to quantify pathologically-relevant properties in solid tumors. Neural networks were trained on Monte Carlo diffusion simulations using sphere distribution-based geometries to enable the rapid computation of time-dependent diffusion MRI signals in cell populations of variable cell size. Model sensitivity and fit performance were assessed via simulation. Diffusion data from eight mixed-grade glioma patients was fitted using the TRACED model. Data fitting was performed using a novel physics-informed transfer learning pipeline, Sim2PINN. In two patients, cell size measurements were compared directly with image-localized histology. Simulation results indicate improved parameter estimation compared to the simple two-compartment model. TRACED enabled the simultaneous in vivo quantification of intracellular volume fraction, cell size distribution, extracellular intrinsic diffusivity, and tortuosity in glioma patients. Neural network implementations of diffusion time-dependence and tortuosity showed behavior consistent with coarse-graining and effective medium theory, respectively. Future work will explore the clinical utility of TRACED parameters in additional patients.



287. ❌ Selective Prediction from Agreement: A Lipschitz-Consistent Version Space Approach

作者: Mohamadsadegh Khosravani 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02611v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We consider selective classification with abstention in the fixed-pool (or transductive) setting, where the unlabeled pool is given beforehand and only a subset of points can be queried for labels. Our main insight is to view selective prediction through agreement: given queried labels and Lipschitz margin constraints in an embedding space, the version space of Lipschitz-consistent classification heads is well defined. We obtain upper and lower Lipschitz margin bounds that define, for each pool point, a set of certified valid labels containing the prediction of every head in the version space. The model therefore predicts only when the label is forced (i.e., all consistent heads agree), and abstains otherwise. We also propose a monotone submodular geometric proxy for budgeted querying, and show that a greedy algorithm retains the standard approximation factor.



288. ❌ Gradient-Discrepancy Acquisition for Pool-Based Active Learning

作者: Mohamadsadegh Khosravani, Sandra Zilles 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02609v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The effectiveness of active learning hinges on the choice of the acquisition criterion by which a learning algorithm selects potentially informative data points whose label is subsequently queried. This paper proposes a novel gradient-based acquisition criterion, derived from a generalization bound introduced by Luo et al. (2022). This criterion can be applied in lieu of uncertainty measures in uncertainty sampling, or incorporated into diversity-based methods that consider the spread of sampled points in addition to the uncertainty of their labels. We provide a theoretical justification of the proposed acquisition criterion, and demonstrate its effectiveness in an empirical evaluation.



289. ❌ Isotropic Fourier Neural Operators

作者: Michael F. Staddon 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02597v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Fourier Neural Operators are deep learning models that learn mappings between function spaces and can be used to learn and solve partial differential equations (PDEs), in some cases significantly faster than traditional PDE solvers. Within the model are Fourier layers, which apply linear transformations directly to the Fourier modes, with parameters depending on the wave numbers. However, most physical systems are isotropic, with the results being independent of the coordinate system chosen, but the linear transformations do not necessarily respect these symmetries. We propose a modification to the linear transformations that ensures spatial symmetries are respected, called the Isotropic Fourier Neural Operator, which both improves model performance and reduces the number of parameters by up to a factor of 16 in 2D and 96 in 3D.



290. ❌ HARMES: A Multi-Modal Dataset for Wearable Human Activity Recognition with Motion, Environmental Sensing and Sound

作者: Robin Burchard, Pascal-André Brückner, Marius Bock, Juergen Gall, Kristof Van Laerhoven 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02596v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

With each sensing modality exhibiting inherent strengths and limitations, multi-modal approaches for wearable Human Activity Recognition (HAR) are becoming increasingly relevant – particularly for recognizing Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), where individual modalities often produce ambiguous signals for similar or complex activities. This work introduces HARMES, a multi-modal wearable dataset combining three wrist-recorded modalities: motion sensing via an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU), atmospheric environmental sensors (humidity, temperature, and pressure), and audio. Collected from 20 participants performing household activities in their own homes, HARMES totals over 80 hours of recorded data, with approximately three hours of labeled activity data per participant across 15 ADL classes. To the best of our knowledge, HARMES is the first dataset to combine this particular sensor trio, and it is nearly six times larger than the previously largest wrist-inertial-acoustic HAR dataset. In an extensive benchmark, we evaluate cross-subject generalization and conduct an ablation study revealing that modality contributions are activity-dependent and can provide complementary value, particularly for activities that are ambiguous from motion data alone. HARMES is freely available at Zenodo, alongside example code for loading the dataset and training models on GitHub.



291. ❌ Gradient Boosted Risk Scores

作者: Costa Georgantas, Jonas Richiardi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02593v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Risk scores are an interpretable and actionable class of machine learning models with applications in medicine, insurance, and risk management. Unlike most computational methods, risk scores are designed to be computed by a human by attributing points to a data sample based on a limited set of criteria. The most common approaches for generating risk scores use linear regressions to estimate the effect of selected variables. We propose a simple and effective approach towards building compact and predictive risk scores. We provide an algorithm based on gradient boosting that is capable of modeling nonlinear effects, along with a C++ implementation with Python and R bindings. Through extensive empirical evaluation on twelve tabular datasets spanning regression, classification, and time-to-event tasks, we show that our method achieves competitive predictive performance while producing substantially more compact scores than regression-based alternatives, with 60% fewer rules for classification tasks and 16% fewer rules for time-to-event tasks on average, compared to AutoScore.



292. ❌ StreamIndex: Memory-Bounded Compressed Sparse Attention via Streaming Top-k

作者: Jaber Jaber, Osama Jaber 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02568v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

DeepSeek-V3.2 and V4 introduce Compressed Sparse Attention (CSA): a lightning indexer (a learned scoring projection over compressed keys) scores them, the top-k are selected per query, and a sparse attention kernel reads only those. Public CSA implementations materialize a [B, S, H_I, T] FP32 score tensor before the top-k reduction. With H_I=64 indexer heads and the V4-Flash compression ratio m=4, that intermediate is 256 GB at sequence length S=65,536, exceeding any single-GPU high-bandwidth-memory (HBM) budget. We present StreamIndex, a Triton implementation of the CSA pipeline whose central component is a chunked partition-merge top-k driver that never materializes the full intermediate. On synthetic-but-realistic V4-shaped inputs at the indexer-step (layer) level on a single NVIDIA H200, the materialize path runs out of memory (OOMs) at S=65,536 with V4-Flash dimensions; StreamIndex runs the same indexer to S=1,048,576 with 6.21 GB peak HBM, a 32x regime extension. Set-overlap recall against the materialize ground truth is bit-exact at small S where both fit; across three 5-point design-space sweeps (chunk size, key-tile size, top-k), mean recall rounds to 1.0000 with min recall at least 0.9980 in every cell. The chunked driver composes with TileLang’s pipelined attention kernel: at S=262,144 with V4-Flash dimensions, the materialize indexer paired with TileLang attention OOMs while the chunked indexer paired with the same attention runs in 1.97 s at 18.56 GB peak. Our contribution targets the indexer step; we make no claim of a faster attention kernel or of real-checkpoint end-to-end behavior. Code: https://github.com/RightNow-AI/StreamIndex.



293. ❌ Beyond Specialization: Robust Reinforcement Learning Navigation via Procedural Map Generators

作者: Christian Jestel, Nicolas Bach, Marvin Wiedemann, Jan Finke, Peter Detzner 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02528v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) navigation policies often overfit to the structure of their training environments, as environmental diversity is typically constrained by the manual effort required to design diverse scenarios. While procedural map generation offers scalable diversity, no prior work systematically compares how different generator types affect policy generalization. We integrate four generators (sparse, maze, graph, and Wave Function Collapse) with guaranteed navigability into MuRoSim, a 2D simulator focusing on training efficiency for LiDAR-based navigation. We cross-evaluate five navigation policies on 1000 seeded maps per generator across three training seeds. Results show a strongly asymmetric cross-generator transfer: a specialist trained on sparse layouts falls to 3.3% success on mazes, whereas a policy trained on the combined generator set achieves 91.5 +/- 1.1% mean success. We further demonstrate that A* path-planner subgoal inputs are the dominant factor for robustness, raising success from the 90.2 +/- 1.4% feedforward baseline to 98.9 +/- 0.4% and outperforming GRU recurrence, which only improves the reactive baseline. The DRL policies outperform a classical Carrot+A* controller, which matches their success only at low speeds (1.0 m/s) but collapses to 24.9% at 2.0 m/s. This highlights learned speed adaptation as the decisive advantage of the learned approach. Real-world experiments on a RoboMaster confirm sim-to-real transfer in a cluttered arena, while a maze-like layout exposes remaining failure modes that recurrence helps mitigate.



294. ❌ Physics-Informed Neural Learning for State Reconstruction and Parameter Identification in Coupled Greenhouse Climate Dynamics

作者: Sani Biswas, Khursheed J. Ansari, Md. Nasim Akhtar 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02524v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have recently emerged as a promising framework for integrating data-driven learning with physical knowledge. In this work, we propose a coupled PINN approach for the joint reconstruction of indoor temperature and humidity dynamics in greenhouse environments, together with simultaneous identification of key model parameters. The method incorporates a reduced-order physically motivated model into the learning process, enabling consistent estimation under sparse and noisy observations. The artificial intelligence contribution lies in the development of a coupled physics-informed neural learning framework that integrates governing dynamical constraints into neural network training, while the engineering application focuses on greenhouse climate state reconstruction and parameter identification. The proposed framework is evaluated on a controlled synthetic benchmark that mimics diurnal forcing conditions. Compared with a purely data-driven neural network baseline, the coupled PINN achieves improved reconstruction accuracy, reducing temperature and humidity errors while maintaining high coefficients of determination. The improvement is particularly pronounced in the humidity channel, where latent moisture dynamics are more difficult to infer from limited measurements. In addition to accurate state reconstruction, the method successfully recovers the dominant physical parameters governing the system dynamics, demonstrating its ability to learn interpretable representations beyond data interpolation. These results highlight the potential of physics-informed learning for greenhouse climate modeling and, more broadly, for data-scarce environmental systems.



295. ❌ Evaluating Tabular Representation Learning for Network Intrusion Detection

作者: Muhammad Usman Butt, Andreas Hotho, Daniel Schlör 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02519v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Classic Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) often rely on manual feature engineering to extract meaningful patterns from network traffic data. However, this approach requires domain expertise and runs counter to the widely adopted principle of modern machine learning and neural networks: that models themselves should learn meaningful representations directly from data. We investigate whether tabular representation learning techniques can improve intrusion detection performance by automatically learning robust feature representations for NetFlow data. This paper presents a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art representation learning methods on benchmark NetFlow datasets, comparing against traditional autoencoders and end-to-end transformer baselines. We evaluate learned representations using both supervised classifiers and unsupervised anomaly detectors, with comprehensive hyperparameter exploration for each combination. Our results reveal strong dataset-model dependency, with no single approach consistently dominating across all scenarios. For supervised classification, TabICL achieves the best performance on CIDDS, while autoencoders follow closely and tie with end-to-end transformer models for the best average rank across datasets. Supervised approaches substantially outperform unsupervised anomaly detection methods, where no single combination consistently dominates as optimal choices depend on the dataset. Cross-dataset transfer experiments demonstrate that learned representations can generalize across network environments with appropriate method and classifier selection. However, transfer performance varies substantially depending on the source-target dataset combination, indicating sensitivity to distributional differences between network environments.



296. ❌ MPCS: Neuroplastic Continual Learning via Multi-Component Plasticity and Topology-Aware EWC

作者: Joern Hentsch 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02509v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Continual learning systems face a fundamental tension between plasticity – acquiring new knowledge – and stability – retaining prior knowledge. We introduce MPCS (Multi-Plasticity Continual System), a neuroplastic architecture that integrates eleven complementary mechanisms: task-driven neurogenesis, Fourier-encoded inputs, EWC regularization, meta-replay, mixed consolidation, hybrid gating, synapse pruning/regeneration, Hebbian updates, task similarity routing, adaptive growth control, and continuous neuron importance tracking. We evaluate MPCS on MEP-BENCH, a multi-track benchmark spanning 31 tasks across regression, classification, logic, and mixed domains, using a three-dimensional Pareto criterion over task performance (Perf), representation diversity (RD), and gradient conflict rate (GCR). Across 15 ablation configurations (3 seeds x 4 tracks x 2000 epochs), MPCS achieves a Normalized Efficiency Score of 94.2, placing it on the Pareto frontier among 9 of 14 gate-passing systems. Key findings: (i) Fourier encoding is the single most critical component (removal drops Perf by 30.7 pp and fails the MEP gate on 14% of tasks); (ii) global EWC degrades performance (NES = -4.2); topology-local EWC reduces this penalty (NES 90.5->91.8) but does not eliminate it; removing EWC entirely yields MPCS_EFFICIENT, the highest-Perf system – establishing a monotone relationship in the high task-similarity regime (s_bar ~= 0.95): global EWC < topology EWC < no EWC; (iii) the Pareto status assessment is predictive: removing the two Pareto-dominated components (EWC + Hebbian) jointly yields MPCS_EFFICIENT, which improves Perf by 0.6 pp at 4.7x lower compute cost (127 vs. 602 min), validating the Pareto frontier as an actionable model-compression guide.



297. ❌ Black-box optimization of noisy functions with unknown smoothness

作者: Jean-Bastien Grill, Michal Valko, Rémi Munos 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02462v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We study the problem of black-box optimization of a function f of any dimension, given function evaluations perturbed by noise. The function is assumed to be locally smooth around one of its global optima, but this smoothness is unknown. Our contribution is an adaptive optimization algorithm, POO or parallel optimistic optimization, that is able to deal with this setting. POO performs almost as well as the best known algorithms requiring the knowledge of the smoothness. Furthermore, POO works for a larger class of functions than what was previously considered, especially for functions that are difficult to optimize, in a very precise sense. We provide a finite-time analysis of POO’s performance, which shows that its error after n evaluations is at most a factor of sqrt(ln n) away from the error of the best known optimization algorithms using the knowledge of the smoothness.



298. ❌ Middle-mile logistics through the lens of goal-conditioned reinforcement learning

作者: Onno Eberhard, Thibaut Cuvelier, Michal Valko, Bruno De Backer 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02461v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Middle-mile logistics describes the problem of routing parcels through a network of hubs linked by trucks with finite capacity. We rephrase this as a multi-object goal-conditioned MDP. Our method combines graph neural networks with model-free RL, extracting small feature graphs from the environment state.



299. ❌ Active multiple matrix completion with adaptive confidence sets

作者: Andrea Locatelli, Alexandra Carpentier, Michal Valko 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02458v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In this work, we formulate a new multi-task active learning setting in which the learner’s goal is to solve multiple matrix completion problems simultaneously. At each round, the learner can choose from which matrix it receives a sample from an entry drawn uniformly at random. Our main practical motivation is market segmentation, where the matrices represent different regions with different preferences of the customers. The challenge in this setting is that each of the matrices can be of a different size and also of a different rank which is unknown. We provide and analyze a new algorithm, MAlocate that is able to adapt to the unknown ranks of the different matrices. We then give a lower-bound showing that our strategy is minimax-optimal and demonstrate its performance with synthetic experiments.



300. ❌ Generalized Distributional Alignment Games for Unbiased Answer-Level Fine-Tuning

作者: Mehryar Mohri, Jon Schneider, Yutao Zhong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02435v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

The Distributional Alignment Game framework provides a powerful variational perspective on Answer-Level Fine-Tuning (ALFT). However, standard algorithms for these games rely on estimating logarithmic rewards from small batches, introducing a systematic bias due to Jensen’s inequality that can destabilize training. In this paper, we systematically resolve this structural estimation bias. First, we generalize the alignment game to arbitrary Bregman divergences, showing that for a family of geometries inducing polynomial rewards, we can construct provably exact and unbiased estimators using U-statistics. Second, for the canonical KL divergence game where an exact solution is impossible, we derive a globally robust minimax polynomial estimator that is provably optimal, achieving the fundamental statistical error limit of $Θ(1/K^2)$, which we establish via the Ditzian-Totik theorem. Finally, we synthesize these two approaches to propose a novel Variance-Optimal Augmented Polynomial Optimization Program (AQP) Estimator, proving that by systematically reducing variance, our method achieves not only optimal bias but also provably accelerated game convergence, leading to more efficient and stable training with zero online computational overhead.



301. ❌ Dueling DDQN-Based Adaptive Multi-Objective Handover Optimization for LEO Satellite Networks

作者: Po-Heng Chou, Chiapin Wang, Chung-Chi Huang, Kuan-Hao Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02416v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In this paper, we propose a dueling double deep Q-network (DDQN)-based adaptive multi-objective handover framework for LEO satellite networks. The proposed method enables dynamic trade-off learning among throughput, blocking probability, and switching cost under time-varying network conditions. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed approach consistently outperforms conventional baselines, achieving up to 10.3% throughput improvement and near-zero blocking under typical operating conditions.



302. ❌ Spatial-Temporal Learning-Based Distributed Routing for Dynamic LEO Satellite Networks

作者: Po-Heng Chou, Chiapin Wang, Shou-Yu Chen, Hsiang-Ming Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02413v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

In this paper, we propose a spatial-temporal learning-based distributed routing framework for dynamic Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite networks, where graph attention networks (GAT) and long short-term memory (LSTM) are integrated within a deep Q-network (DQN)-based architecture to enable distributed and adaptive routing decisions based on local observations. The routing problem is formulated as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) to address partial observability under dynamic topology and time-varying traffic. Simulation results show that the proposed method significantly outperforms conventional and learning-based routing schemes in terms of throughput, packet loss, queue length, and end-to-end delay, while achieving proactive congestion avoidance with up to 23.26% queue reduction. In addition, the proposed approach maintains low computational overhead with negligible carbon emissions, demonstrating its efficiency from a Green AI perspective.



303. ❌ Inducing Permutation Invariant Priors in Bayesian Optimization for Carbon Capture and Storage Applications

作者: Sofianos Panagiotis Fotias, Vassilis Gaganis 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02409v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Bayesian Optimization is an iterative method, tailored to optimizing expensive black box objective functions. Surrogate models like Gaussian Processes, which are the gold standard in Bayesian Optimization, can be inefficient for inputs with permutation symmetries, as the most common kernels employed are better suited for vector inputs rather than unordered sets of items. Motivated by this issue, we turn to permutation invariant Bayesian Optimization for well placement in Carbon Capture and Storage projects. The high fidelity black box simulator is instructed to operate wells under group control, giving rise to permutation symmetries within injector and producer groups that cannot be exploited with standard GP kernels. In this work, our main contribution is a novel Gaussian Process kernel (GP-Perm) that encodes permutation invariance by comparing sets through a stable divergence between their induced empirical representations, and can be combined with standard kernels for additional vector-valued inputs. As a learned invariant baseline, we also consider a Deep Kernel Learning model (DKL-DS) using the Deep Sets architecture to learn a permutation-invariant embedding. We evaluate the proposed methodology across 8 use cases, comprising seven synthetic benchmarks and one realistic CCS case study (Johansen formation)



304. ❌ Closed-Loop CO2 Storage Control With History-Based Reinforcement Learning and Latent Model-Based Adaptation

作者: Sofianos Panagiotis Fotias, Vassilis Gaganis 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02405v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Closed-loop management of geological CO2 storage requires control policies that adapt to uncertain reservoir behavior while relying on observations that are realistically available during operation. This work formulates CO2 injection and brine-production control as a partially observable sequential decision problem and studies deployable deep reinforcement-learning controllers trained with high-fidelity reservoir simulation. We first compare privileged-state, well-only, history-conditioned, masking-curriculum, and asymmetric teacher-student model-free policies in order to quantify the value of temporal well-response information and training-time privileged simulator states. We then evaluate a latent model-based adaptation pipeline that reuses nominal latent dynamics and retunes controllers under known injector failure, leakage-induced dynamics and reward shift, and compartmentalized reservoir connectivity. The results show that history-conditioned policies recover nearly all of the privileged-state performance while using only deployable well-level information, and that latent model-based retuning outperforms direct model-free retuning under the same scenario-specific real-simulator budget in the abnormal operating cases. The proposed framework therefore provides a simulator-budget-aware alternative to repeated online history matching and re-optimization for closed-loop CO2 storage control.



305. ❌ Statistically-Lossless Quantization of Large Language Models

作者: Michael Helcig, Eldar Kurtic, Dan Alistarh 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02404v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Model quantization has become essential for efficient large language model deployment, yet existing approaches involve clear trade-offs: methods such as GPTQ and AWQ achieve practical compression but are lossy, while lossless techniques preserve fidelity but typically do not accelerate inference. This paper explores the middle ground of statistically-lossless compression through three complementary notions of losslessness for quantized LLMs. First, task-lossless compression preserves zero-shot benchmark accuracy within natural sampling variance and remains achievable at aggressive bitwidths. Second, we formalize the stricter notion of distribution-lossless compression, requiring the quantized model’s next-token distribution to be practically indistinguishable from the original, and propose the Expected Acceptance Rate (EAR), the maximum token-agreement probability under optimal coupling, as a directly interpretable fidelity metric (for example, EAR >= 0.99 indicates 99% agreement). Third, we prove a gamma-squared variance law showing that symmetric quantization inflates noise variance by gamma squared relative to asymmetric quantization, making asymmetry necessary for distribution-lossless fidelity but not for task-level preservation. Using SLQ, a layer-wise non-uniform method with asymmetric quantization and wide bitwidth search, we achieve task-lossless compression at well below 4 bits per parameter (as low as 3.3 bits depending on the model), distribution-lossless compression at 5 to 6 bits per parameter on average, and inference speedups of 1.7 to 3.6x relative to FP16 with optimized kernels. Source code is available at https://github.com/IST-DASLab/SLQ.



306. ❌ Binary Rewards and Reinforcement Learning: Fundamental Challenges

作者: Marc Dymetman 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02375v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a standard approach for improving reasoning in language models, yet models trained with RLVR often suffer from diversity collapse: while single-sample accuracy improves, multi-sample coverage degrades, sometimes falling below the base model. We provide a structural account of this phenomenon grounded in the properties of binary rewards. Binary rewards create a fundamental degeneracy for policy gradient methods: the set of distributions maximizing expected reward is infinite, with no distinguished element. KL-control resolves this degeneracy by selecting, in the limit $β\to 0$, the filtered model $p_:=a(\cdot\mid\mathcal{Y}1)$ – the base model conditioned on validity – which is the unique fully valid distribution closest to the base model in KL divergence. This selection operates through a nontrivial asymmetry: the tilted distribution $p{[β]}\propto a(y),e^{v(y)/β}$ converges to $p_$ in forward KL as $β\to 0$, yet $p_$ cannot serve as a direct optimization target because $\mathrm{KL}(q,|,p_)$ is infinite for any full-support policy $q$. We develop explicit formulas relating the hyperparameter $β$ to the more interpretable target validity rate $μ$. Under model misspecification – the typical practical regime – the pressure to decrease $β$ drives the optimizer toward highly concentrated distributions over a small number of valid outputs, collapsing toward ever fewer as $β$ decreases, rather than toward the filtered model. We illustrate this mechanism on a toy autoregressive experiment and discuss how alternative divergences that target $p_$ directly – as pursued empirically by \citet{kruszewski_whatever_2026} – avoid this failure mode by rewarding coverage of $p_$’s support rather than concentration on high-validity outputs.



307. ❌ Predicting Post Virality with Temporal Cross-Attention over Trend Signals

作者: Sarvagya Somvanshi, Mohan Xu, Rakhi Chadalavada, Nathan Canera 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02358v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Current models for predicting social media virality rely heavily on static textual and structural features, effectively ignoring the highly dynamic nature of trend signals. We study whether real-world attention signals can improve the prediction of social-media virality beyond what post text alone reveals. We introduce \model{}, an architecture that predicts Reddit post virality by fusing internal platform representations with exogenous temporal signals derived from Wikipedia pageview spikes. We frame virality as a binary classification task that accounts for differences in subreddit scale, labeling posts as viral if they exceed the 90th percentile of per-subreddit engagement and a minimum absolute score threshold. We introduce ViralityNET combines four post-level streams: title embeddings, body embeddings, structural metadata, and learned subreddit embeddings with a cross-attention block that queries a daily sliding-window trends matrix encoding the top-512 Wikipedia spike terms from the preceding seven days. Empirical results suggest that incorporating external attention signals yields consistent gains, outperforming text-only baselines by +0.015 AUC-PR and achieving an overall AUC-ROC of 0.836. Overall, we provide evidence that incorporating external attention signals yields measurable improvements over text-only baselines, highlighting the importance of real-world dynamics in shaping online virality.



308. ❌ ZNO: Stable Rational Neural Operators in the Z-Domain for Discrete-Time Dynamic

作者: Xianli Zhu, Jia Yin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02356v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We introduce the Z-Domain Neural Operator (ZNO), a causal neural operator whose layers are stable low-rank multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) rational filters parameterized directly in the $z$-plane. ZNO addresses a limitation of existing operator learning methods, many of which are primarily tailored for continuous-time problems, while a large class of system-identification problems is intrinsically discrete-time. The $z$-domain form expresses stability as a unit-disk pole constraint and makes learned discrete-time poles directly readable. The model combines low-rank channel mixing, smooth stable pole reparameterization, causal recurrence, and an optional short finite impulse response (FIR) branch in a single $z$-domain rational recurrent layer. Across controlled discrete system-identification experiments, ZNO’s advantage is most evident when the target dynamics are stable rational systems with lightly damped poles near the unit circle. Under matched parameter budgets, ZNO is not uniformly dominant; however, with validation-selected configurations, the same architecture can achieve the lowest mean error across the controlled tasks. A five-bin difficulty sweep over near-unit-circle / long-memory dynamics shows that ZNO has the lowest mean error across memory regimes, from short (approximately 10 steps) to long (approximately 100-200 steps). On five public nonlinear system-identification benchmarks, ZNO is competitive with neural operator and state-space baselines, achieving the lowest mean error on benchmarks whose dynamics align with stable rational discrete-time filters, while classical or state-space baselines remain preferable on some systems. These results position ZNO as a strong model for stable rational discrete-time dynamics, especially in near-unit-circle and long-memory regimes, but not as a universal replacement for specialized system-identification methods.



309. ❌ A Near-optimal SQ Lower Bound for Smoothed Agnostic Learning of Boolean Halfspaces

作者: Tim Sinen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02350v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We study the complexity of smoothed agnostic learning of halfspaces on ${\pm 1}^n$ under the uniform distribution in the model of \citet{KM25} where each input coordinate is independently flipped with probability $σ\in (0, {1}/{2})$. We show that $L^1$ polynomial regression achieves complexity $\tilde{O}(n^{O(\log(1/\varepsilon)/σ)})$, and prove a nearly matching Statistical Query complexity lower bound of $n^{Ω(\log(1+σ/\varepsilon ^2)/σ)}$. This complements the recent work of \citet{DK26}, which established analogous bounds in the continuous setting under Gaussian marginals.



310. ❌ FedPLT: Scalable, Resource-Efficient, and Heterogeneity-Aware Federated Learning via Partial Layer Training

作者: Ahmad Dabaja, Rachid El-Azouzi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02337v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Federated Learning (FL) has gained significant attention in distributed machine learning by enabling collaborative model training across decentralized system while preserving data privacy. Although extensive research has addressed statistical data heterogeneity, FL still faces several challenges, including high communication and computation overheads and severe device heterogeneity, which require further investigation. Prior work has addressed these issues through sub-model training and partial parameter training. However, such methods often suffer from inconsistent parameter distributions across clients, inaccurate global loss estimation, and increased bias and variance. Guided by our empirical analysis, we propose FedPLT (Federated Learning with Partial Layer Training), an innovative and structured partial parameter training approach that exhibits training behavior similar to full model training while assigning client-specific portions of the model according to their communication and computational capabilities. In addition, we evaluate the performance of FedPLT when combined with optimal client sampling under communication constraints. We show that this integration improves FL performance by reducing sampling variance under the same communication budget. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that FedPLT achieves performance comparable to, or even surpassing, that of full-model training (i.e., FedAvg), while requiring significantly fewer trainable parameters per client. Moreover, FedPLT outperforms existing methods in highly heterogeneous environments, effectively adapts to client resource constraints, and reduces the number of straggling clients. In particular, FedPLT reduces the number of trainable parameters by 71%-82% while achieving performance on par with full-model training.



311. ❌ Denoising data using convex relaxations

作者: Charles Fefferman, Aalok Gangopadhyay, Matti Lassas, Jonathan Marty, Hariharan Narayanan 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02327v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We study the problem of denoising observations (Y_i=X_i+Z_i), where the latent variables (X_i) are sampled from a low-dimensional manifold in (\mathbb{R}^n) and the noise variables (Z_i) are isotropic Gaussian. We propose a convex-relaxation estimator that first reduces dimension by principal component analysis and then projects the observations onto the convex hull of the projected latent manifold. We construct a statistical oracle that estimates its supporting hyperplanes from empirical Gaussian tail probabilities of the noisy sample. Under a lower-mass condition on the latent distribution, we prove finite-sample guarantees for the oracle and derive error bounds for the resulting denoiser. The analysis combines risk bounds for least-squares projection under convex constraints with entropy bounds for convex hulls. We also verify the assumptions of the framework for a Cryo-Electron Microscopy observation model by establishing suitable covering number and Lipschitz estimates for the associated group action and imaging operators.



312. ❌ Differentiable Kernel Ridge Regression for Deep Learning Pipelines

作者: Jean-Marc Mercier, Gabriele Santin 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02313v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Deep neural networks dominate modern machine learning, while alternative function approximators remain comparatively underexplored at scale. In this work, we revisit kernel methods as drop-in components for standard deep learning pipelines. We introduce \emph{Sparse Kernels} (SKs), a differentiable, localized, and lazy variant of kernel ridge regression (KRR) that defers training to inference time and reduces to the solution of small local systems. We integrate SKs into PyTorch as modular layers that preserve end-to-end trainability, and we show that they expose three distinct sets of parameters – feature representations, target values, and evaluation points – each of which can be fixed or learned. This decomposition broadens the design space available to practitioners, enabling, in particular, training-free transfer, nonlinear probing, and hybrid kernel-neural models. Across convolutional networks, vision transformers, and reinforcement learning, SK-based modules serve two complementary roles: in some settings, they match the performance of trained neural readouts with substantially less training; in others, they augment existing models and improve their performance when used as additional components. Our results suggest that kernel methods, once made scalable and differentiable, can be readily integrated with deep learning rather than treated as a separate paradigm.



313. ❌ A Meta Reinforcement Learning Approach to Goals-Based Wealth Management

作者: Sanjiv R. Das, Harshad Khadilkar, Sukrit Mittal, Daniel Ostrov, Deep Srivastav, Hungjen Wang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02300v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Applying concepts related to zero-shot meta-learning and pre-training of foundation models, we develop a meta reinforcement learning approach (denoted MetaRL) that is pre-trained on thousands of goals-based wealth management (GBWM) problems. Each GBWM problem involves a multiple year scenario over which the investor looks to optimally choose an investment portfolio each year and choose to fulfill all, some, or none of the different financial goals that arise each year. These choices seek to maximize the expected total investor utility obtained from the fulfilled financial goals. By eliminating separate training and optimization for each new investor problem, the MetaRL model in inference mode produces near-optimal dynamic investment portfolio and goal-fulfilling strategies for a new GBWM problem within a few hundredths of a second. This delivers expected utilities that are, on average, 97.8% of the optimal expected utilities (determined via Dynamic Programming). These results are remarkably robust to capital market regime changes, even when training uses only one capital market regime. Further, the MetaRL approach can enable solving problems with larger state spaces where Dynamic Programming becomes computationally infeasible.



314. ❌ Graph Federated Unlearning for Privacy Preservation

作者: Ruotong Ma, Wentao Yu, Qizhou Wang, Jie Yang, Chen Gong 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02297v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Graph federated learning (GFL) facilitates decentralized training on distributed graph data while keeping sensitive user information local, aligning with policies such as GDPR and CCPA that grant users the right to freely join or withdraw from learning systems. However, even decentralized, user information can persist after quitting, potentially propagating to central servers and then redistributing to malicious clients. This privacy leakage during user withdrawal, despite its importance, has received seldom attention in GFL. To fill the gap, we explore the potential of machine unlearning (MU) to thoroughly remove user information. However, classical MU methods are known to degrade overall performance, a problem that is exacerbated in GFL due to local message passing and global model collaboration. To this end, we make two adjustments to mitigate this challenge for GFL. First, we ensure unlearning updates that minimally affect overall performance, steering them in directions orthogonal to the gradients from learning other data. Second, we introduce virtual clients, maintained by the central server, to preserve graph topology and global embeddings without recovering information of removed entities. We conduct comprehensive experiments under a representative user-withdrawal scenario and propose a novel membership inference framework to rigorously evaluate and validate the reliability of our privacy preservation. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, which also surpasses the performance of seven state-of-the-art baseline methods.



315. ❌ Variational Matrix-Learning Fourier Networks for Parametric Multiphysics Surrogates

作者: Xinyu Li, Jianhua Zhang, Liang Chen 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02280v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Multiphysics simulation is critical for system-technology co-optimization (STCO) in chiplet-based design, but repeated finite-element solutions of PDE-governed problems are computationally expensive in parametric design exploration. This paper proposes a variational matrix-learning Fourier network (VMLFN) for efficient parametric multiphysics surrogate modeling. VMLFN constructs a log-space sine neural representation with randomly sampled spectral frequencies, frequency-dependent decay regulation, and embedded Dirichlet boundary conditions. With fixed hidden-layer parameters, the output-layer weights are determined by reformulating the governing PDEs into variational weak forms and enforcing the stationarity condition of the resulting energy functional. This converts physics-informed training into a linear matrix-solving problem, requiring only first-order derivatives and avoiding both high-order automatic differentiation and penalty-coefficient tuning. A heuristic frequency-scanning algorithm is further introduced to select a problem-adaptive maximum frequency that covers the dominant spectral range of the target problem. The proposed method is validated on heat conduction, solid mechanics, and Helmholtz wave propagation problems. Results from five benchmark cases demonstrate that VMLFN delivers accurate full-field predictions with substantial speedup over conventional physics-informed neural networks and repeated finite-element simulations.



316. ❌ Foundations of Riemannian Geometry for Riemannian Optimization: A Monograph with Detailed Derivations

作者: Benyamin Ghojogh 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02279v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Riemannian geometry provides the fundamental framework for optimization on nonlinear spaces such as matrix manifolds, which arise in machine learning, signal processing, and robotics. While the underlying theory is classical, existing literature often presents results at a high level of abstraction, omitting the detailed coordinate-level derivations required for implementation and algorithm development. This work provides a self-contained and rigorous treatment of the foundations of Riemannian geometry, with a focus on explicit derivations tailored to Riemannian optimization. We systematically develop the key geometric structures – including tangent and cotangent spaces, tensor calculus, metric tensors, Levi-Civita connections, curvature, and geodesics – emphasizing step-by-step derivations in coordinates and matrix form. Building on these foundations, we derive the Riemannian gradient, Hessian, exponential map, and retraction in a form suitable for numerical computation. We further specialize these constructions to important matrix manifolds, including the Stiefel, Grassmann, and SPD (Symmetric Positive Definite) manifolds, providing explicit formulas widely used in optimization and geometric machine learning. This monograph develops a unified and implementation-oriented treatment of Riemannian geometry for optimization on manifolds. Its main contribution is the systematic organization and detailed derivation of classical geometric constructions in forms directly usable for algorithm design and numerical implementation. By connecting coordinate-level differential geometry with matrix-manifold formulas, the monograph bridges the gap between abstract theory and practical computation, and provides a reference for researchers and practitioners working in Riemannian optimization and related fields.



317. ❌ HELIX: Hybrid Encoding with Learnable Identity and Cross-dimensional Synthesis for Time Series Imputation

作者: Fengming Zhang, Wenjie Du, Huan Zhang, Ke Yu, Shen Qu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02278v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Time series imputation benefits from leveraging cross-feature correlations, yet existing attention-based methods re-discover feature relationships at each layer, lacking persistent anchors to maintain consistent representations. To address this, we propose HELIX, which assigns each feature a learnable feature identity, a persistent embedding that captures intrinsic semantic properties throughout the network. Unlike graph-based methods that rely on predefined topology and assume homogeneous spatial relationships, HELIX learns arbitrary feature dependencies end-to-end from temporal co-variation, naturally handling datasets where features mix spatial locations with semantic variables. Integrated with hybrid temporal-feature attention, HELIX achieves the state-of-the-art performance, surpassing all 16 baselines on 5 public datasets across 21 experimental settings in our evaluation. Furthermore, our mechanistic analysis reveals that HELIX aligns learned feature identities and dependencies with latent physical and semantic structure progressively across layers, demonstrating that it more effectively translates cross-feature structure into imputation accuracy.



318. ❌ Break the Block: Dynamic-size Reasoning Blocks for Diffusion Large Language Models via Monotonic Entropy Descent with Reinforcement Learning

作者: Yan Jiang, Ruihong Qiu, Zi Huang 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02263v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Recent diffusion large language models (dLLMs) have demonstrated both effectiveness and efficiency in reasoning via a block-based semi-autoregressive generation paradigm. Despite their progress, the fixed-size block generations remain a critical bottleneck for effective and coherent reasoning. 1. From a global perspective, different reasoning tasks would correspond to different optimal decoding block sizes, which makes a ``one-size-fits-all’’ assumption ineffective. 2. Even within a single reasoning task, the rigid block partitioning would break the logical flow and reduce reasoning coherence. Through empirical observations, we reveal that for block-wise entropy, incorrect reasoning exhibits a fluctuating and unsteady trend between blocks, whereas the correctly generated tasks follow a consistent descending trend. Therefore, this paper proposes b1, a novel post-training framework for dLLMs that learns dynamic-size reasoning blocks via a Monotonic Entropy Descent objective with reinforcement learning to enhance reasoning coherence.b1 integrates seamlessly as a plug-and-play module with existing dLLM’s post-training algorithms. Extensive experiments across various reasoning benchmarks showcase b1’s consistent improvement over existing fixed-size block baselines. Our code has been released at https://github.com/YanJiangJerry/Block-R1.



319. ❌ Measuring Differences between Conditional Distributions using Kernel Embeddings

作者: Peter Moskvichev, Siu Lun Chau, Dino Sejdinovic 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02260v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Comparing conditional distributions is a fundamental challenge in statistics and machine learning, with applications across a wide range of domains. While proposed methods for measuring discrepancies using kernel embeddings of distributions in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) provide powerful non-parametric techniques, the existing literature remains fragmented and lacks a unified theoretical treatment. This paper addresses this gap by establishing a coherent framework for studying kernel-based methods to measure divergence between conditional distributions through what we refer to as conditional maximum mean discrepancy (CMMD). The CMMD consists of a family of metrics which we call levels, with three special cases each using a different type of RKHS embedding: CMMD$_0$ (conditional mean operators), CMMD$_1$ (conditional mean embeddings), and CMMD$_2$ (joint mean embeddings). We additionally introduce a general level $s$ CMMD, clarifying the required assumptions, and establishing mathematical connections between the levels through the lens of operator-based smoothing. In addition to reviewing previously proposed estimators, we introduce a novel doubly robust estimator for the CMMD that maintains consistency provided at least one of the underlying models is correctly specified. We provide numerical experiments demonstrating that the CMMD effectively captures complex conditional dependencies for statistical testing.



320. ❌ Demographic-Aware Transfer Learning for Sleep Stage Classification in Clinical Polysomnography

作者: S M Asif Hossain, Shruti Kshirsagar 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02245v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Automated sleep stage classification typically employs a single population-agnostic model, disregarding established demographic variations in sleep architecture. Sleep patterns, however, differ substantially across gender, age, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity, indicating that a onesize-fits all approach may be suboptimal for diverse clinical populations. In this paper, we propose a two stage training strategy based on demographic stratification and transfer learning framework. We first pretrains a convolutional recurrent model on the full population and then fine tunes it independently for demographic subgroups defined by gender, age, and Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) severity according to the AASM clinical standard. Using the DREAMT dataset comprising 100 clinical subjects and 7 PSG channels, we evaluate 37 fine-tuned configurations across single-axis and two-way demographic combinations. Results demonstrate that 35 of the 37 fine-tuned models outperform the baseline, with Cohen’s kappa improvements ranging from 0.9 to 12.9%. These findings indicate that stratified fine tuning tailored to specific patient demographics yields substantially more accurate sleep staging than a single generalized model, offering a practical and clinically grounded paradigm for personalized sleep assessment.



321. ❌ Submodular Benchmark Selection

作者: Alexander Smola 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02209v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Evaluating large language models across many benchmarks is expensive, yet many benchmarks are highly correlated. We formalize the selection of a small, informative subset as submodular maximization under a multivariate Gaussian model. Entropy (log-determinant covariance) and mutual information between selected and remaining benchmarks arise as natural objectives. Both are submodular; entropy selection coincides with pivoted Cholesky and has spectral residual bounds, while mutual information is non-monotone in general but empirically monotone for small subsets, so we optimize it greedily. Experiments on three matrices from ten public leaderboards show that mutual information selection outperforms entropy for imputation at small subsets.



322. ❌ DurableUn: Quantization-Induced Recovery Attacks in Machine Unlearning

作者: Abdullah Ahmad Khan, Ferdous Sohel 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02196v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Machine unlearning aims to remove specified training data to satisfy privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, existing evaluations assume identical precision at unlearning and deployment, overlooking that production LLMs are deployed at low-bit precision. We show that INT4 quantization systematically restores forgotten content even when models pass compliance audits at bfloat16 (BF16), we term this the quantization recovery attack (QRA). We conduct the first systematic study of unlearning robustness under adapter-space INT4 quantization in the NF4+LoRA regime, evaluating seven methods on LLaMA-3-8B-Instruct across TOFU, MUSE-News, and WikiBio-WPU. INT8 is benign; INT4 induces recovery of up to 22x, worsening with dataset difficulty. We identify the FA-RA-Q-INT4 trilemma: no method simultaneously achieves strong forgetting, high utility, and quantization robustness. A dense Pareto sweep reveals a sharp phase transition once robustness is achieved, retaining accuracy collapses regardless of further tuning. To address this, we propose DURABLEUN-SAF (Sharpness-Aware Forgetting), a quantization-aware objective using Straight-Through Estimator gradients through INT4 rounding. DURABLEUN-SAF is the only method to achieve a stable empirical (0.047, {BF16, INT8, INT4})- durability certificate: Q-INT4= 0.043 +- 0.002, cert rate= 3/3, versus SalUn’s cert rate= 1/3 at its own published hyperparameters. We call for Q-INT4 to be adopted as a standard evaluation metric alongside FA and RA.



323. ❌ Trees and Graphs with Non Log-concave Dominating Set Sequence via AI Tools

作者: Alina Du, Steven Heilman, Greta Panova 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02193v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We give new examples of graphs and trees with dominating set sequences that are not log-concave. These examples were generated by PatternBoost, a transformer-based reinforcement learning software developed by Charton-Ellenberg-Wagner-Williamson. We also show: for any positive integer $m$, there exists a tree whose dominating set sequence is not log-concave for at least $m$ indices by modifying a similar construction of Bautista-Ramos for the independent set sequence. We show that a large class of caterpillar graphs has log-concave dominating set sequences. A continuous analogue of the sequence is also log-concave for all graphs.



324. ❌ KANs need curvature: penalties for compositional smoothness

作者: James Bagrow 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02190v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Kolmogorov-Arnold networks (KANs) offer a potent combination of accuracy and interpretability, thanks to their compositions of learnable univariate activation functions. However, the activations of well-fitting KANs tend to exhibit pathologically high-curvature oscillations, making them difficult to interpret, and standard regularization penalties do not prevent this. Here we derive a basis-agnostic curvature penalty and show that penalized models can maintain accuracy while achieving substantially smoother activations. Accounting for how function composition shapes curvature, we prove an upper bound on the full model’s curvature relative to the curvature penalty, and use this to motivate richer forms of penalties. Scientific machine learning is increasingly bottlenecked by the trade-off between accuracy and interpretability. Results such as ours that improve interpretability without sacrificing accuracy will further strengthen KANs as a practical tool for both prediction and insight.



325. ❌ Manifold-Constrained Adversarial Training for Long-Tailed Robustness via Geometric Alignment

作者: Guanmeng Xian, Ning Yang, Philip S. Yu 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02183v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Adversarial training is effective on balanced datasets, but its robustness degrades under longtailed class distributions, where tail classes suffer high robust error and unstable decision boundaries. We propose Manifold-Constrained Adversarial Training (MCAT), a unified framework that enforces the semantic validity of adversarial examples by penalizing deviations from class-conditional manifolds in feature space, while promoting balanced geometric separation across classes via an ETF-inspired regularization. We provide theoretical results that link geometric separation to lower bounds on adversarially robust margins, and show that manifold-constrained adversarial risk upperbounds robust risk on high-density semantic regions. Extensive experiments on standard longtailed benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements in overall, balanced, and tail-class adversarial robustness.



326. ❌ The Causal Description Gap: Information-Theoretic Separations Across Pearl’s Hierarchy

作者: Seyed Morteza Emadi 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02177v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Pearl’s causal hierarchy shows that observational, interventional, and counterfactual queries are qualitatively distinct. We ask a quantitative version of this question: how many additional bits are needed to specify higher-rung causal answers once lower-rung answers are known? We formalize this via query-class description length, the Kolmogorov complexity of the answer oracle induced by an SCM for a class of queries. Our main construction gives binary acyclic SCMs whose observational distribution has constant description length, while the single-variable interventional answer oracle has description length $Θ(n^2)$. A degree-sensitive upper bound shows that finite-gate-schema SCMs of indegree $d$ have observational-interventional gap at most $O(nd \log(en/d) + n \log n)$, making the quadratic construction order-optimal in the dense regime and a rooted-tree construction order-optimal for bounded indegree. The quadratic separation persists under $\varepsilon$-accurate total-variation descriptions for every fixed $\varepsilon < 1/4$. At the next rung, the full hard-do interventional oracle can still leave a $Θ(n)$ counterfactual description gap. A general ambiguity-to-bits theorem and Shannon analogue show that these gaps equal the logarithm of residual higher-rung ambiguity up to lower-order terms.



327. ❌ Longitudinal QSM: Enhancing consistency of multiple time point susceptibility maps via simultaneous reconstruction

作者: Jiye Kim, Hwihun Jeong, Taechang Kim, Eunseon Jeong, Jinhee Jang, Yangsean Choi, Jongho Lee 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01819v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) has been increasingly applied in longitudinal studies of neurodegenerative diseases and aging to assess temporal alterations in brain iron and myelin. The accuracy of such investigations depends on the repeatability and sensitivity of measurements. However, the ill-posed nature of the QSM processing steps makes the reconstruction vulnerable to background field changes, head orientation changes, noise, and imperfect registration, which compromise repeatability and sensitivity and hinder reliable detection of true changes. To address these limitations, we propose Longitudinal QSM, a simultaneous reconstruction framework that jointly estimates susceptibility maps across time points while enforcing spatial sparsity of temporal changes. The method was evaluated through simulations and in-vivo experiments and compared with conventional reconstruction methods. Longitudinal QSM consistently reduced inter-scan variability and accurately recovered simulated lesion changes. Application to stroke patient and multiple sclerosis patient data further demonstrated that the framework stabilizes non-lesion variability while preserving lesion-related temporal changes. This approach offers a promising tool for monitoring subtle temporal changes in brain iron and myelin in various neurodegenerative diseases as well as throughout aging and development.



328. ❌ Label-Free Microrefractometry of Interfacial Processes Using Fluorescent Smart Coverslips

作者: Hodaya Klimovsky, Amitay Ginsberg, Dmytro Ohorodniichuk, Maria Shehadeh, Ilya Olevsko, Gerardo Byk, Martin Oheim, Adi Salomon 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01472v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Molecular dipoles near interfaces emit highly directional radiation due to near-field interactions, making surface-bound fluorophores sensitive probes of local physicochemical changes. We introduce smart coverslips, stably coated with uniform, brightly fluorescent nanobead films, that exploit refractive-index-dependent emission shifts for sensitive micro-refractometry in small volumes. Supercritical-angle fluorescence refractometry uses single back-focal-plane images to allow us real-time RI sensing and nanometric thin-film height measurements without the need for multi-angle or multi-wavelength acquisition. Our fast, label-free, and non-invasive approach allows measurements of thin-film properties and monitoring of interfacial dynamics on a standard inverted microscope and is broadly applicable to nanobiophotonics, chemical sensing, and in-situ materials analysis.



329. ❌ How Light Reshapes the Mind. An Active Inference Framework for the Cognitive and Emotional Effects of Indoor Lighting

作者: Luca M. Possati 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01290v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Indoor lighting affects cognition, affect, and behavioural regulation, but these effects are often treated as isolated findings rather than as parts of a unified process. This paper proposes an active inference account of shared indoor lighting in multi-user environments such as offices, classrooms, and libraries. It argues that lighting shapes behaviour through three distinct channels: illuminance modulates perceptual precision, correlated colour temperature modulates arousal relative to circadian optimum, and spectral composition biases behavioural disposition toward engagement or rest. The paper formalises this hypothesis through a proof-of-concept POMDP model of agents performing sustained reading over five hours, using both reading performance and eye-tracking observations. The model generates six falsifiable predictions, all confirmed across 20 Monte Carlo simulations.



330. ❌ Axion electron-electron interaction in the RaOH molecule to search for Dark matter

作者: Mikhail Reiter, Anna Zakharova 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02775v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Axions are promising candidates for the role of Dark matter particles. In this paper, the question of the suitability of the RaOH molecule for the experimental detection of electron-electron interactions through the exchange of axions is studied. To take into account an impact of the rotations and vibrations a computation must be performed for a large number of molecular configurations. In this work we study this problem using a combination of the Generalized relativistic effective core potential and One-center restoration technique of the correct four-component spinors.



331. ❌ Polymer Knots in Thin Films: Thickness Dependence, Local Effects, and Stiffness

作者: Maurice P. Schmitt, Hendrik Meyer, Peter Virnau 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02644v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We study how confinement affects topology and conformations in polymer films of varying thickness $h$. The knotting probability exhibits a maximum at intermediate thicknesses near the bulk radius of gyration $h \approx R_\mathrm{g,bulk}$, vanishes at small $h$ and approaches bulk values for large $h$. Close to walls, the entanglement length increases monotonically and conformations become flatter. A layer-resolved analysis of structural and topological properties allows us to reconstruct the explicit thickness dependencies by integrating layer-resolved properties of a thick film.



332. ❌ Direct Time-Domain Observation of l-Doubling via Centrifugal-Distortion Pre-compensation

作者: Inbar Sternbach, Kfir Rutman Moshe, Amit Beer, Soumitra Hazra, Sharly Fleischer 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02512v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We demonstrate direct time-domain observation of l-doubling contributions in molecular rotational dynamics using shaped femtosecond laser pulses. By imposing a tailored spectral phase on the excitation pulse, we pre-compensate centrifugal distortion, which otherwise leads to temporally broadened, multi-cycle revival structures that obscure fine rotational features. A cubic spectral phase [Phys. Rev. A 107, 053108 (2023)] compresses selected revivals into near single-cycle events, in agreement with an analytic expression derived from molecular rotational constants, enabling predictive pulse design beyond numerical optimization. The resulting distortion-free revivals reveal temporally separated l-doubling contributions that remain unresolved in conventional impulsive alignment experiments. The method proves robust against experimental imperfections, including spatial light modulator discretization. While selective control of individual l-doubling components becomes feasible, here we focus on their direct observation in the time domain.



333. ❌ State-Specific Kinetic Modeling of Atomic H for H$_2$/ He Entry Flows

作者: Alex T. Carroll, Guillaume Blanquart, Aaron M. Brandis, Brett A. Cruden 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02382v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

An 11-species thermochemical model for H$_2$/ He mixtures with state-specific kinetics for atomic H is developed and used to simulate 1-D shocks at conditions relevant for ice and gas giant entry flows. To implement this kinetic model, a literature review of the state-specific excitation and ionization rate constants of atomic H is first performed. While electron-impact rate constants from various sources are found to be in good agreement, large discrepancies are found in the limited data available on heavy-particle-impact rate constants. To validate the kinetic model, 1-D steady shocks are simulated using a space-marching code that explicitly accounts for shock tube boundary layer effects. The resulting radiance profiles are compared to experimental data from the NASA Ames Electric Arc Shock Tube (EAST) facility, and are found to reproduce the measured values reasonably accurately while capturing the distinct induction zone behavior observed in the experiments. A sensitivity analysis of the kinetic rates and boundary layer treatment reveals avenues for further improvement of the model. Finally, a comparison to alternate models from the literature underscores the improved accuracy of the present model in predicting ionization and radiation profiles.



334. ❌ Voltage-Tunable Nonequilibrium Dispersion Interactions

作者: Christine M. E. Little, Daniel S. Kosov 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-04 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02315v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

We develop a nonequilibrium Green’s function theory for dispersion interactions between two nanostructures, each an open quantum system driven into a nonequilibrium steady state by an applied bias voltage. Starting from the two-particle nonequilibrium Green’s function, we derive a general expression for the interaction energy in terms of the polarisation propagators of the individual systems. The interaction energy admits a physically transparent decomposition into charge noise and charge dissipation contributions, providing a fluctuation-dissipation interpretation that generalises the equilibrium London picture. Model calculations for coupled molecular junctions demonstrate that the applied voltage can enhance the attractive dispersion interaction by nearly an order of magnitude relative to equilibrium. In thermal equilibrium, the dispersion interaction is universally attractive, irrespective of the specific form of the nanostructure Hamiltonians or their coupling to reservoirs. Out of equilibrium, we introduce a generalised Kubo-Martin-Schwinger ratio that parametrises the departure from detailed balance. We show that, in contrast to equilibrium, nonequilibrium conditions can lead to a repulsive dispersion interaction. Finally, we discuss the conditions under which population inversion in the electronic leads can drive a sign reversal of the dispersion interaction.



335. ❌ Liquid-phase encapsulation of $π$-conjugated dyes in boron nitride nanotubes: Ensemble and single-nanotube optical characterization

作者: Friedrich Schöppler, Lukas Stumpf, Lucas Fuhl, Elena Behr, Charlotte Allard, Christoph Lambert, Richard Martel, Tobias Hertel 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01906v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Boron nitride nanotubes (BNNTs) provide wide-bandgap, optically transparent one-dimensional hosts for molecular dyes, limiting direct electronic participation of the host. Whether dye@BNNT systems produce bright, well-defined J- or H-aggregates or instead heterogeneous emissive ensembles whose character depends on chain length and local packing remains only partly resolved. We address this question using ensemble extinction, photoluminescence, quantum-yield measurements, and TCSPC-derived radiative and non-radiative rates, together with polarization-resolved single-nanotube microscopy on encapsulated quaterthiophene, sexithiophene, octithiophene, and Nile Red, selected from a ten-dye screening. In the oligothiophene series, confinement modifies spectra and excited-state dynamics in a length-dependent manner, with all three oligothiophenes forming weakly emissive ensembles with suppressed effective radiative rates and 6T showing the strongest redistribution between effective radiative and non-radiative decay. The absence of radiative-rate enhancement or fluorescence-lifetime shortening across the series disfavors bright J-aggregate assignments. Polarization-resolved single-nanotube microscopy reveals strongly polarized emission, but with tube-to-tube and intratube variations, identifying oligothiophene@BNNTs as ordered yet structurally heterogeneous confined ensembles. Nile Red provides a complementary case in which the dominant response is dielectric tuning of a solvatochromic charge-transfer state rather than oligothiophene-like aggregate formation. These findings establish dye-filled BNNTs as optically quiet nanoconfined systems in which molecular ordering, dielectric confinement, and guest-guest coupling can be distinguished through combined ensemble and single-nanotube spectroscopy.



336. ❌ On the role of crack electrolyte wetting in the degradation and performance of battery active particles

作者: S. Luza-Vega, Y. Zhao, E. Martínez-Pañeda 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-03 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01806v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Cathode particle fracture is widely recognised as a major degradation mechanism in lithium-ion batteries, yet cracking also permits electrolyte wetting of newly exposed internal surfaces, modifying interfacial reaction pathways. The mechanistic role of electrolyte wetting in redistributing reactions within cracked particles remains unclear. Here, we isolate this effect through a controlled comparison between (i) a fully coupled electro-chemo-mechanical model resolving lithium concentration, electrostatic potential, and stress fields in both the active material and the electrolyte inside and outside cracks, and (ii) a single-particle chemo-mechanical model employing the conventional uniform flux assumption. The coupled model predicts strong spatial heterogeneity in interfacial reaction rates, with flux amplification approximately 8x relative to the imposed uniform flux at the crack tip. Reaction redistribution, and thus lithium flux, is governed predominantly by local solid-state lithium concentration and stress variations, while electrolyte potential gradients inside cracks remain secondary under the conditions considered. Uniform flux models can underpredict delivered capacity by 25% at 1C-rate; this discrepancy increases at higher rates. They also underestimate tensile stresses throughout the delithiation process by 10%, directly affecting crack driving conditions. These results demonstrate that neglecting crack-electrolyte coupling leads to systematic underestimation of both utilisation limits and fatigue-relevant stress histories.



337. ❌ Strong light-matter interactions in hybrid polaritonic systems

作者: Ben Johns, Andrea Schirato, Federico Toffoletti, Tommaso Giovannini, Mirko Vanzan, Margherita Marsili, Giovanni Parolin, Giulia Dall’Osto, Ajay Kumar Poonia, Chiara Cappelli, Francesca Baletto, Stefano Corni, Elisabetta Collini, Margherita Maiuri, Nicolò Maccaferri 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01583v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Strong light-matter coupling gives rise to polaritons - hybrid excitations whose mixed photonic and matter character enables control over optical, electronic and chemical properties. This Feature Article surveys the main architectures supporting polariton formation, including photonic microcavities, plasmonic nanostructures, open cavities and metasurfaces, and outlines how inorganic semiconductors, organic aggregates and hybrid systems access strong and ultrastrong coupling. Key phenomena such as coherent dynamics, vibronic interactions, dark-state reservoirs and polariton-mediated energy and electron transport are discussed, together with the experimental and theoretical tools used to study them. We highlight examples where strong coupling modifies charge transport, energy flow and chemical reactivity, and we summarize emerging regimes, including intermediate and dark-strong coupling, that broaden the landscape of hybrid light-matter physics.



338. ❌ Cavity-mediated localization and collective electron correlation phases

作者: Dominik Sidler, Michael Ruggenthaler, Angel Rubio 期刊/来源: arxiv 发布日期: 2026-05-02 arXiv链接: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01551v1

评分: 0.0 / 26.6 ❌

评分详情
关键词权重相关度得分
“Large Language Models” OR “LLMs” OR “Foundation Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Mixture of Experts” OR “MoE” OR “Sparse Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Small Language Models” OR “SLMs” OR “On-device AI”1.00.0/100.0
“Scaling Laws” AND “Data Quality”1.00.0/100.0
“Pre-training” OR “Continual Pre-training” OR “Domain Adaptation”1.00.0/100.0
“Post-training” OR “Supervised Fine-tuning” OR “SFT”1.00.0/100.0
“Instruction Tuning” OR “Alignment” OR “Value Alignment”1.00.0/100.0
“RLHF” OR “RLAIF” OR “Direct Preference Optimization” OR “DPO”1.00.0/100.0
“PEFT” OR “LoRA” OR “Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning”1.00.0/100.0
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation” OR “RAG” OR “Retrieval-Generation”1.00.0/100.0
“Context Window Extension” OR “Long Context LLMs”1.00.0/100.0
“KV Cache Compression” OR “Linear Attention” OR “FlashAttention”1.00.0/100.0
“Chain of Thought” OR “CoT Reasoning” OR “Multi-step Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“System 2 Thinking” OR “Slow Thinking” OR “In-depth Reasoning”1.00.0/100.0
“Monte Carlo Tree Search” OR “MCTS” AND “LLM”1.00.0/100.0
“Self-Correction” OR “Self-Improvement” OR “Self-Reflection”1.00.0/100.0
“LLM Agents” OR “Autonomous Agents” OR “Agentic Workflow”1.00.0/100.0
“Tool Use” OR “Function Calling” OR “API Tool Use”1.00.0/100.0
“Multi-agent Systems” OR “Agent Coordination”1.00.0/100.0
“Quantization” OR “Model Compression” OR “Low-bit Weights”1.00.0/100.0
“Speculative Decoding” OR “Inference Acceleration”1.00.0/100.0
“Hallucination Mitigation” OR “Factuality” OR “Truthfulness”1.00.0/100.0
“Mechanistic Interpretability” OR “Explainable AI”1.00.0/100.0
“World Models” AND “General World Models”1.00.0/100.0
“Model Merging” OR “Model Soups” OR “Weight Averaging”1.00.0/100.0
“In-context Learning” OR “Many-shot Learning”1.00.0/100.0
“AI for Science” OR “Bioinformatics” OR “Cheminformatics”1.00.0/100.0

评分理由: 评分失败: Error code: 402 - {’error’: {‘message’: ‘Insufficient Balance’, ’type’: ‘unknown_error’, ‘param’: None, ‘code’: ‘invalid_request_error’}}


!!! tip deepseek-chat TL;DR

评分失败,无法生成摘要
摘要 (Abstract)

Collective strong coupling of molecular ensembles to optical cavities opens a route to modifying matter through genuinely collective electronic correlations. Yet even in the absence of a cavity, Coulomb correlations are notoriously difficult to describe, and cavity coupling adds transverse correlation channels extending over the entire molecular ensemble. Here we show that this seemingly intractable problem admits a controlled description by mapping the collective intermolecular electronic correlations to the analytically solvable spherical Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model. The resulting theory predicts two collective correlation phases, a paracorrelated phase and a spin-glass correlation phase, beyond the conventional uncorrelated molecular regime. These phases reveal an entropy-driven localization-delocalization mechanism that transfers molecular electronic states into collectively correlated cavity-dressed states. Our work establishes cavity-mediated electron correlations as a microscopic mechanism for emergent phases in strongly coupled molecular ensembles.



Token 消耗统计

  • 总计: 1,458,867 tokens(输入 1,458,867 / 输出 0)