评分理由: 论文核心研究LLMs在事实问答中的可靠性问题，提出一个将规划与检索/合成分离的模块化框架。高度相关（10分）的关键词包括：LLMs（核心研究对象）、RAG（直接解决检索增强问题）、Tool Use（框架涉及工具使用进行检索）、Hallucination Mitigation（核心目标是减少幻觉提高事实性）。较强相关（8分）的关键词：Chain of Thought/System 2 Thinking（涉及显式规划分解步骤）、LLM Agents（框架具有代理特性）。中等相关（5分）：SFT（使用教师-学生框架进行监督训练）。其余关键词论文未涉及或仅边缘提及，评0分。

当答案依赖于最新或相互冲突的信息时，基于大语言模型（LLMs）的事实探寻问答仍不可靠。尽管检索增强型和工具调用型LLMs减少了幻觉问题，但它们通常依赖于隐式规划，导致工具使用效率低下。我们提出一种模块化框架，将规划与事实检索及答案合成明确分离。通过师生框架训练一个轻量级学生规划器，以生成由抽象推理步骤和可搜索事实请求组成的结构化分解。监督信号仅包含规划轨迹和事实请求，不提供事实答案或检索证据。在推理阶段，规划器生成计划，而经过提示工程设计的模块则执行检索和响应合成。我们在SEAL-0（一个针对搜索增强型LLMs的极具挑战性的基准测试）上评估所提出的框架。结果表明，与单一推理模型和基于提示的工具增强框架相比，监督式规划在准确性和延迟方面均有提升，这证明显式学习的规划结构对于构建可靠的事实探寻型LLMs至关重要。

Fact-seeking question answering with large language models (LLMs) remains unreliable when answers depend on up-to-date or conflicting information. Although retrieval-augmented and tool-using LLMs reduce hallucinations, they often rely on implicit planning, leading to inefficient tool usage. We propose a modular framework that explicitly separates planning from factual retrieval and answer synthesis. A lightweight student planner is trained via a teacher-student framework to generate structured decompositions consisting of abstract reasoning steps and searchable fact requests. The supervision signals contain only planning traces and fact requests, without providing factual answers or retrieved evidence. At inference, the planner produces plans, while prompt-engineered modules perform retrieval and response synthesis. We evaluate the proposed framework on SEAL-0, an extremely challenging benchmark for search-augmented LLMs. Results show that supervised planning improves both accuracy and latency compared to monolithic reasoning models and prompt-based tool-augmented frameworks, demonstrating that explicitly learned planning structures are essential for reliable fact-seeking LLMs.

评分理由: 论文核心研究大语言模型（LLMs）在保险领域的专业化应用，因此与"Large Language Models"高度相关（10分）。方法上，论文提出了一个包含SFT和RLAIF的端到端对齐范式，因此与"Post-training/SFT"、“Instruction Tuning/Alignment”、“RLHF/RLAIF/DPO"高度相关（均为10分）。论文明确以解决幻觉问题为核心目标之一，因此与"Hallucination Mitigation"高度相关（10分）。论文提到现有方法依赖RAG，但其方法旨在超越RAG，因此与"RAG"有一定关联（5分）。论文涉及将LLM适配到垂直领域，与"Domain Adaptation"有一定关联（5分）。论文未涉及其他关键词的具体技术或概念，因此其余关键词评分为0分。

将大型语言模型（LLM）适配于保险等高风险垂直领域面临着一项重大挑战：应用场景要求严格遵循复杂的监管规定与业务逻辑，且对幻觉零容忍。现有方法通常存在“能力权衡”问题——为获取领域专业知识而牺牲通用智能，或过度依赖检索增强生成（RAG）而缺乏内在推理能力。为弥补这一差距，我们提出了INS-S1，这是一个通过新颖的端到端对齐范式训练而成的保险专用大语言模型系列。我们的方法包含两项方法论创新：（1）一个可验证的数据合成系统，用于构建支持精算推理与合规性的分层数据集；（2）一个渐进式监督微调-强化学习（SFT-RL）课程框架，该框架将动态数据退火与经过验证的推理（RLVR）和人工智能反馈（RLAIF）的协同组合相结合。通过优化数据比例与奖励信号，该框架在强化领域约束的同时防止了灾难性遗忘。此外，我们发布了迄今为止最全面的保险领域基准测试INSEva（包含超过3.9万个样本）。大量实验表明，INS-S1在领域任务上实现了最先进的性能，显著优于DeepSeek-R1和Gemini-2.5-Pro。至关重要的是，它保持了顶级的通用能力，并实现了创纪录的低幻觉率（0.6%，基于HHEM评估）。我们的结果表明，严格的领域专业化可以在不损害通用智能的前提下实现。

Adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) to high-stakes vertical domains like insurance presents a significant challenge: scenarios demand strict adherence to complex regulations and business logic with zero tolerance for hallucinations. Existing approaches often suffer from a Competency Trade-off - sacrificing general intelligence for domain expertise - or rely heavily on RAG without intrinsic reasoning. To bridge this gap, we present INS-S1, an insurance-specific LLM family trained via a novel end-to-end alignment paradigm. Our approach features two methodological innovations: (1) A Verifiable Data Synthesis System that constructs hierarchical datasets for actuarial reasoning and compliance; and (2) A Progressive SFT-RL Curriculum Framework that integrates dynamic data annealing with a synergistic mix of Verified Reasoning (RLVR) and AI Feedback (RLAIF). By optimizing data ratios and reward signals, this framework enforces domain constraints while preventing catastrophic forgetting. Additionally, we release INSEva, the most comprehensive insurance benchmark to date (39k+ samples). Extensive experiments show that INS-S1 achieves SOTA performance on domain tasks, significantly outperforming DeepSeek-R1 and Gemini-2.5-Pro. Crucially, it maintains top-tier general capabilities and achieves a record-low 0.6% hallucination rate (HHEM). Our results demonstrate that rigorous domain specialization can be achieved without compromising general intelligence.

评分理由: 论文CausalEvolve提出了一种基于LLM的AI科学家代理，用于解决开放式的科学问题，因此与"Large Language Models"和"LLM Agents"高度相关（10分）。研究属于"AI for Science"领域，直接应用LLM于科学发现（10分）。方法涉及因果推理、反思和进化改进，与"Chain of Thought”、“System 2 Thinking"和"Self-Correction"有一定关联（8分）。其他关键词如MoE、SFT、RAG等未在摘要中提及，与论文核心内容无关（0分）。

以AlphaEvolve为代表的进化型智能体是利用大型语言模型构建AI科学家的显著成功案例之一。这类智能体通过迭代改进与演化程序，并借助大型语言模型的先验知识与推理能力，以解决开放式的科学问题。尽管取得了成功，现有的进化型智能体仍缺乏针对演化过程的定向引导机制，以及有效组织与利用历史进化经验中获取知识的系统方法。因此，它们在接近已知性能边界时会出现进化效率递减与振荡现象。为弥补这一不足，我们开发了CausalEvolve，其配备了一个因果推理工作台，能够利用大型语言模型识别并推演进化过程中的关键引导因素。在初始阶段，CausalEvolve首先识别结果层面的影响因素，这些因素能为优化目标提供互补性启发。在进化过程中，该系统还通过监测演化中的异常模式并结合溯因推理来假设新的影响因素，从而开辟新的进化方向。通过全面的实验验证，我们证明CausalEvolve在四项具有挑战性的开放式科学任务中，能有效提升进化效率并发现更优解决方案。

Evolve-based agent such as AlphaEvolve is one of the notable successes in using Large Language Models (LLMs) to build AI Scientists. These agents tackle open-ended scientific problems by iteratively improving and evolving programs, leveraging the prior knowledge and reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Despite the success, existing evolve-based agents lack targeted guidance for evolution and effective mechanisms for organizing and utilizing knowledge acquired from past evolutionary experience. Consequently, they suffer from decreasing evolution efficiency and exhibit oscillatory behavior when approaching known performance boundaries. To mitigate the gap, we develop CausalEvolve, equipped with a causal scratchpad that leverages LLMs to identify and reason about guiding factors for evolution. At the beginning, CausalEvolve first identifies outcome-level factors that offer complementary inspirations in improving the target objective. During the evolution, CausalEvolve also inspects surprise patterns during the evolution and abductive reasoning to hypothesize new factors, which in turn offer novel directions. Through comprehensive experiments, we show that CausalEvolve effectively improves the evolutionary efficiency and discovers better solutions in 4 challenging open-ended scientific tasks.

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLM在复杂推理任务中的局限性，并提出BIGMAS多智能体系统架构来提升推理性能。与关键词高度相关（10分）的有：LLMs（论文直接使用LLMs作为基础模型）、Chain of Thought（论文明确提到chain-of-thought机制和推理任务）、System 2 Thinking（论文研究复杂多步推理，属于深度推理范畴）、LLM Agents（论文构建专门的LLM智能体）、Multi-agent Systems（论文核心是多智能体系统架构）。其他关键词在论文摘要中未提及或与论文内容无关，故评0分。

大语言模型（LLM）已在广泛的语言任务中展现出卓越能力，但复杂的多步推理仍是根本性挑战。尽管配备扩展思维链机制的大型推理模型（LRM）相比标准LLM表现出性能提升，但这两类模型在足够复杂的任务上仍存在准确性崩溃现象，这表明仅靠模型级推理的扩展并不足够。受人类认知的全局工作空间理论启发，我们提出脑启发的图多智能体系统（BIGMAS）。该系统将专用LLM智能体组织为动态构建的有向图节点，并仅通过中心化共享工作空间进行协同。问题自适应的图设计器（GraphDesigner）构建任务特定的智能体拓扑结构，而全局编排器（Orchestrator）则利用完整的共享状态进行路由决策，从而克服反应式方法的局部视野瓶颈。在Game24、Six Fives和伦敦塔任务上对六种前沿LLM的实验表明，BIGMAS能持续提升标准LLM与LRM的推理性能，其表现优于包括ReAct和思维树（Tree of Thoughts）在内的现有多智能体基线方法，这证明多智能体架构设计能够提供与模型级推理增强正交的互补性增益。

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide range of language tasks, yet complex multi-step reasoning remains a fundamental challenge. While Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) equipped with extended chain-of-thought mechanisms demonstrate improved performance over standard LLMs, both model types still suffer from accuracy collapse on sufficiently complex tasks, suggesting that scaling model-level reasoning alone is insufficient. Inspired by the global workspace theory of human cognition, we propose Brain-Inspired Graph Multi-Agent Systems (BIGMAS), in which specialized LLM agents are organized as nodes in a dynamically constructed directed graph and coordinate exclusively through a centralized shared workspace. A problem-adaptive GraphDesigner constructs task-specific agent topologies, while a global Orchestrator leverages the complete shared state for routing decisions, overcoming the local-view bottleneck of reactive approaches. Experiments on Game24, Six Fives, and Tower of London across six frontier LLMs demonstrate that BIGMAS consistently improves reasoning performance for both standard LLMs and LRMs, outperforming existing multi-agent baselines including ReAct and Tree of Thoughts, showing that multi-agent architectural design provides complementary gains orthogonal to model-level reasoning enhancements.

!!! info

论文提出BIGMAS框架，结合神经科学中的全局工作空间理论。技术路线包括：1) 使用GraphDesigner动态生成任务特定的代理图结构；2) 建立集中式共享工作空间，确保所有中间结果全局可见；3) 引入全局Orchestrator基于完整历史状态进行路由；4) 在Game24、Six Fives和Tower of London等可验证的推理基准上，对DeepSeek、Claude、GPT和Gemini等六种前沿LLM进行广泛评估。

• 架构创新性强，将神经科学原理（GWT）成功应用于LLM多智能体系统设计。
• 解决了现有多智能体系统拓扑固定和状态碎片化的核心局限。
• 实现了真正的动态适应性，能够根据不同问题调整代理组成和拓扑结构。
• 实验验证全面，涵盖了多种前沿模型和不同类型的推理任务，结论具有说服力。

• 系统架构相对复杂，引入GraphDesigner和全局编排器可能会增加推理延迟和计算成本。
• 依赖于GraphDesigner生成正确的图结构，如果初始图设计不合理，可能影响后续推理效率。
• 论文主要关注数学和规划类任务，在开放域问答或常识推理等任务上的泛化能力有待进一步验证。

评分理由: 论文SFCoT专注于提升大语言模型（LLMs）在链式思维（Chain-of-Thought）推理过程中的安全性，核心是防止越狱攻击。因此，与"Large Language Models"和"Chain of Thought"高度相关（10分）。它涉及安全对齐（“Alignment”）和幻觉缓解（“Hallucination Mitigation”）以提升事实性，以及通过实时校准实现自我纠正（“Self-Correction”），这些是论文的关键组成部分，给予8分。其他关键词如MoE、SFT、RAG、量化等未在摘要中提及，与论文主题无关，给予0分。

大语言模型（LLMs）在复杂推理任务中展现出卓越能力，但其安全对齐机制仍极易受到越狱攻击的破坏。现有防御方法通常仅对最终输出进行事后过滤，导致中间推理步骤缺乏监控，易受对抗性操纵。为弥补这一缺陷，本文提出一种更安全的思维链框架（SaFer Chain-of-Thought, SFCoT），该框架能实时评估并校准潜在的不安全推理步骤。SFCoT融合了三级安全评分系统与多视角一致性验证机制，旨在全程检测推理过程中的潜在风险。动态干预模块随后执行针对性校准，将推理路径引导至安全结果。实验表明，SFCoT将攻击成功率从$58.97%$降至$12.31%$，在未显著影响通用性能的前提下，证明其作为一种高效的大语言模型安全增强方法的有效性。

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning tasks. However, they remain highly susceptible to jailbreak attacks that undermine their safety alignment. Existing defense mechanisms typically rely on post hoc filtering applied only to the final output, leaving intermediate reasoning steps unmonitored and vulnerable to adversarial manipulation. To address this gap, this paper proposes a SaFer Chain-of-Thought (SFCoT) framework, which proactively evaluates and calibrates potentially unsafe reasoning steps in real time. SFCoT incorporates a three-tier safety scoring system alongside a multi-perspective consistency verification mechanism, designed to detect potential risks throughout the reasoning process. A dynamic intervention module subsequently performs targeted calibration to redirect reasoning trajectories toward safe outcomes. Experimental results demonstrate that SFCoT reduces the attack success rate from $58.97%$ to $12.31%$, demonstrating it as an effective and efficient LLM safety enhancement method without a significant decline in general performance.

!!! info

论文首先定义了包含安全评分函数和校准过程的数学模型。技术路线上，首先利用CoT Parser解析推理步骤；接着通过三层评分系统（基于敏感词库的词汇层、轻量级深度学习模型的语义层、基于上下文的策略层）计算安全分数；对于处于“灰色地带”的步骤，生成多个语义变体进行一致性验证；最后根据评分和验证结果，通过动态干预器对推理链进行重写或截断，确保最终输出的安全性。

• 主动防御机制：在推理过程中实时介入，防止有害信息在中间步骤中累积，比事后过滤更有效。
• 细粒度评估：结合词汇、语义和策略三个层面的评分，能捕捉复杂的对抗性攻击和隐晦的风险。
• 平衡安全与效用：通过重写机制而非简单的截断，有效降低了安全防御对模型正常推理能力的负面影响。
• 鲁棒性强：多视角一致性验证能有效识别通过语言微调绕过过滤的攻击。

• 依赖CoT解析：对于不支持显式CoT输出的闭源模型，需要额外的提示工程或微调来提取推理步骤，可能引入解析误差。
• 计算开销：实时监控每个推理步骤、生成变体进行一致性验证以及重写操作，会增加推理延迟和计算成本。
• 阈值敏感性：安全评分的阈值和一致性方差阈值需要针对不同模型和应用场景进行精细调整，泛化性可能受限。

评分理由: 论文核心是开发一个基于LLM的多模态多智能体框架，用于室内空间设计。高度相关的关键词包括：1) “Large Language Models” (论文明确使用LLMs进行空间推理和设计生成，是核心组件)；2) “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” (论文明确使用RAG来减少数据依赖)；3) “LLM Agents” (论文构建了专门的智能体，如Reference、Spatial、Interactive、Grader)；4) “Multi-agent Systems” (多个智能体协同工作，是框架的核心架构)。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、训练技术、推理优化、科学AI应用等，论文未涉及或未明确提及，因此评分为0。

在建筑室内设计领域，由于客户缺乏设计知识，而设计师难以解释复杂的空间关系，沟通不畅问题频发，常导致项目延期和经济损失。近年来，生成式布局工具的进展通过自动化生成三维可视化方案，缩小了这一鸿沟。然而，现有方法存在局限：基于规则的体系采用硬编码的空间约束，限制了参与式互动；而数据驱动模型则依赖于大量训练数据集。近期兴起的大语言模型（Large Language Models, LLMs）通过自然语言实现对空间关系的直观推理，弥补了这一不足。本研究提出一个基于大语言模型的多模态、多智能体框架，能够动态地将自然语言描述和图像转化为三维设计方案。通过提示词指南运作的专项智能体（参考智能体、空间智能体、交互智能体、评分智能体）协同应对核心挑战：该智能体系统支持实时用户交互以实现迭代式空间优化，同时检索增强生成（Retrieval-Augmented Generation, RAG）技术降低了数据依赖性，无需针对特定任务进行模型训练。本框架能准确解读空间意图并生成优化的三维室内设计，从而提升生产效率，促进非专业设计者的参与。通过对多样化的平面布局和用户问卷进行评估，验证了该框架的有效性。一项独立的大语言模型评估显示，参与式生成的布局在用户意图契合度、美学一致性、功能性和动线流畅性方面均获得更高评分。问卷结果表明，用户满意度达77%，且相较于传统设计软件表现出明显偏好。这些发现表明，该框架增强了以用户为中心的沟通，并促进了更具包容性、高效性和适应性的设计流程。项目页面：https://rsigktyper.github.io/AICodesign/

In architectural interior design, miscommunication frequently arises as clients lack design knowledge, while designers struggle to explain complex spatial relationships, leading to delayed timelines and financial losses. Recent advancements in generative layout tools narrow the gap by automating 3D visualizations. However, prevailing methodologies exhibit limitations: rule-based systems implement hard-coded spatial constraints that restrict participatory engagement, while data-driven models rely on extensive training datasets. Recent large language models (LLMs) bridge this gap by enabling intuitive reasoning about spatial relationships through natural language. This research presents an LLM-based, multimodal, multi-agent framework that dynamically converts natural language descriptions and imagery into 3D designs. Specialized agents (Reference, Spatial, Interactive, Grader), operating via prompt guidelines, collaboratively address core challenges: the agent system enables real-time user interaction for iterative spatial refinement, while Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) reduces data dependency without requiring task-specific model training. This framework accurately interprets spatial intent and generates optimized 3D indoor design, improving productivity, and encouraging nondesigner participation. Evaluations across diverse floor plans and user questionnaires demonstrate effectiveness. An independent LLM evaluator consistently rated participatory layouts higher in user intent alignment, aesthetic coherence, functionality, and circulation. Questionnaire results indicated 77% satisfaction and a clear preference over traditional design software. These findings suggest the framework enhances user-centric communication and fosters more inclusive, effective, and resilient design processes. Project page: https://rsigktyper.github.io/AICodesign/

评分理由: 论文核心研究多模态大语言模型（MLLMs）作为视觉代理（agent）使用外部工具链解决复杂视觉任务的能力评估，与"Large Language Models”（MLLMs是LLMs的扩展）、“LLM Agents”（评估模型作为代理的能力）、“Tool Use”（核心研究工具使用和组合）高度相关（10分）。与"Chain of Thought"相关（8分），因为论文涉及多步规划和执行轨迹评估。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、训练技术、推理优化、科学AI应用等，论文未直接涉及，给0分。

近期研究进展将多模态大语言模型的应用范围从标准视觉问答扩展至利用外部工具处理高级视觉任务。尽管取得这一进步，如何精确执行并有效组合多样化工具以完成复杂任务，仍是持续存在的瓶颈。受限于稀疏的工具集和简单的工具使用轨迹，现有基准测试无法捕捉复杂多样的工具交互，难以评估模型在现实实际条件下的性能。为弥补这一差距，我们提出了VisualToolChain-Bench（VTC-Bench），这是一个旨在评估多模态大语言模型工具使用能力的综合性基准测试。为贴合实际计算机视觉流程，我们的框架集成了32种基于OpenCV的多样化视觉操作。这一丰富的工具集支持广泛的组合方式，使VTC-Bench能够严格评估多工具组合能力以及长视野、多步骤计划的执行能力。为实现精确评估，我们构建了680个精编问题，这些问题按九级认知层次组织，每个问题均配有真实执行轨迹。对19个领先多模态大语言模型的广泛实验揭示了当前模型在视觉代理能力方面的关键局限。具体而言，模型难以适应多样化工具集并将其泛化至未见过的操作，其中表现最佳的Gemini-3.0-Pro模型在我们的基准测试中仅达到51%的准确率。此外，多工具组合仍是持续存在的挑战。面对复杂任务时，模型难以制定高效的执行计划，严重依赖狭窄且次优的熟悉功能子集，而非选择最优工具。通过揭示这些根本性挑战，VTC-Bench建立了一个严谨的基线，以指导开发更具泛化能力的视觉代理模型。

Recent advancements extend Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) beyond standard visual question answering to utilizing external tools for advanced visual tasks. Despite this progress, precisely executing and effectively composing diverse tools for complex tasks remain persistent bottleneck. Constrained by sparse tool-sets and simple tool-use trajectories, existing benchmarks fail to capture complex and diverse tool interactions, falling short in evaluating model performance under practical, real-world conditions. To bridge this gap, we introduce VisualToolChain-Bench~(VTC-Bench), a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate tool-use proficiency in MLLMs. To align with realistic computer vision pipelines, our framework features 32 diverse OpenCV-based visual operations. This rich tool-set enables extensive combinations, allowing VTC-Bench to rigorously assess multi-tool composition and long-horizon, multi-step plan execution. For precise evaluation, we provide 680 curated problems structured across a nine-category cognitive hierarchy, each with ground-truth execution trajectories. Extensive experiments on 19 leading MLLMs reveal critical limitations in current models’ visual agentic capabilities. Specifically, models struggle to adapt to diverse tool-sets and generalize to unseen operations, with the leading model Gemini-3.0-Pro only achieving 51% on our benchmark. Furthermore, multi-tool composition remains a persistent challenge. When facing complex tasks, models struggle to formulate efficient execution plans, relying heavily on a narrow, suboptimal subset of familiar functions rather than selecting the optimal tools. By identifying these fundamental challenges, VTC-Bench establishes a rigorous baseline to guide the development of more generalized visual agentic models.

评分理由: 论文核心研究RAG框架下意识形态文本对LLM输出的影响，因此与"Retrieval-Augmented Generation"和"Large Language Models"高度相关（10分）。研究涉及意识形态对齐和事实性风险，与"Instruction Tuning/Alignment"和"Hallucination Mitigation/Factuality"有一定关联（5分）。案例研究使用COVID-19治疗数据，属于科学领域AI应用，与"AI for Science"相关（5分）。其他关键词如MoE、量化、推理加速等未涉及，得0分。

本文研究了检索到的意识形态文本对大型语言模型（LLM）输出的影响。尽管近期对理解LLM中意识形态的兴趣有所增加，但在检索增强生成（RAG）的背景下，此问题却鲜受关注。为填补这一空白，我们设计了一个基于关于COVID-19治疗的意识形态负载文本的外部知识源。我们的语料库基于1,117篇学术文章，代表了关于该疾病有争议和受认可治疗的论述。我们提出了一个基于词汇多维分析（Lexical Multidimensional Analysis, LMDA）的语料库语言学框架，以识别语料库内的意识形态。我们要求LLM回答源自三个已识别意识形态维度的问题，并采用两种类型的上下文提示：第一种包含用户问题和意识形态文本；第二种包含问题、意识形态文本及LMDA描述。通过计算词汇和语义表征的余弦相似度，评估参考意识形态文本与LLM回答之间的意识形态对齐程度。结果表明，基于意识形态检索文本的LLM回答更倾向于与外部知识中遇到的意识形态保持一致，而增强型提示进一步影响了LLM的输出。我们的发现强调了在RAG框架内识别意识形态论述的重要性，这不仅能减轻非预期的意识形态偏见，也能降低恶意操纵此类模型的风险。

This paper studies the impact of retrieved ideological texts on the outputs of large language models (LLMs). While interest in understanding ideology in LLMs has recently increased, little attention has been given to this issue in the context of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). To fill this gap, we design an external knowledge source based on ideological loaded texts about COVID-19 treatments. Our corpus is based on 1,117 academic articles representing discourses about controversial and endorsed treatments for the disease. We propose a corpus linguistics framework, based on Lexical Multidimensional Analysis (LMDA), to identify the ideologies within the corpus. LLMs are tasked to answer questions derived from three identified ideological dimensions, and two types of contextual prompts are adopted: the first comprises the user question and ideological texts; and the second contains the question, ideological texts, and LMDA descriptions. Ideological alignment between reference ideological texts and LLMs’ responses is assessed using cosine similarity for lexical and semantic representations. Results demonstrate that LLMs’ responses based on ideological retrieved texts are more aligned with the ideology encountered in the external knowledge, with the enhanced prompt further influencing LLMs’ outputs. Our findings highlight the importance of identifying ideological discourses within the RAG framework in order to mitigate not just unintended ideological bias, but also the risks of malicious manipulation of such models.

评分理由: 论文CLAG专注于为小型语言模型（SLMs）代理设计一个基于聚类的记忆组织框架，以解决全局记忆池中知识稀释和无关上下文干扰的问题。因此，与"Small Language Models"高度相关（10分），因为SLMs是核心研究对象；与"LLM Agents"高度相关（10分），因为框架专为代理设计；与"Retrieval-Augmented Generation"有一定关联（8分），因为涉及记忆检索以支持知识重用；与"Large Language Models"有一定关联（5分），因为论文在背景中提及LLM代理作为对比，但研究焦点是SLMs。其他关键词如MoE、Scaling Laws、Alignment等与论文内容无直接关系，均得0分。

大型语言模型智能体高度依赖外部记忆系统以支持知识复用与复杂推理任务。然而，现有记忆系统大多将经验存储于单一的全局检索池中，这可能导致存储的知识逐渐被稀释或污染。该问题对于小型语言模型尤为突出，因其极易受到无关上下文干扰。本文提出CLAG，一种基于聚类的智能体记忆框架，使小型语言模型智能体能够通过主动聚类来组织记忆。CLAG采用由小型语言模型驱动的路由机制，将新增记忆分配至语义连贯的聚类中，并自主生成包含主题摘要与描述性标签的聚类专属档案，使每个聚类成为独立的功能单元。通过在这些结构化邻域内进行局部演化，CLAG有效降低了跨主题干扰并提升了内部记忆密度。在检索阶段，该框架采用两阶段流程：首先通过聚类档案筛选相关聚类以排除干扰项并缩减搜索空间，随后进行精确检索。在三个小型语言模型骨干网络及多个问答数据集上的实验表明，相较于现有智能体记忆系统，CLAG在保持轻量高效的同时，持续提升了答案质量与系统鲁棒性。

Large language model agents heavily rely on external memory to support knowledge reuse and complex reasoning tasks. Yet most memory systems store experiences in a single global retrieval pool which can gradually dilute or corrupt stored knowledge. This problem is especially pronounced for small language models (SLMs), which are highly vulnerable to irrelevant context. We introduce CLAG, a CLustering-based AGentic memory framework where an SLM agent actively organizes memory by clustering. CLAG employs an SLM-driven router to assign incoming memories to semantically coherent clusters and autonomously generates cluster-specific profiles, including topic summaries and descriptive tags, to establish each cluster as a self-contained functional unit. By performing localized evolution within these structured neighborhoods, CLAG effectively reduces cross-topic interference and enhances internal memory density. During retrieval, the framework utilizes a two-stage process that first filters relevant clusters via their profiles, thereby excluding distractors and reducing the search space. Experiments on multiple QA datasets with three SLM backbones show that CLAG consistently improves answer quality and robustness over prior memory systems for agents, remaining lightweight and efficient.

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLM在SimulMT中的应用，与"Large Language Models"高度相关（10分）。方法涉及KV cache优化以实现高效解码，与"KV Cache Compression"和"Inference Acceleration"相关（各8分）。论文提到fine-tuning策略，与"Post-training"有一定关联（5分）。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws、RAG、Alignment等均未涉及，得0分。

大语言模型（LLMs）近期在同步机器翻译（SimulMT）任务中展现出有潜力的性能。然而，将仅解码器架构的LLMs应用于SimulMT时，会引入位置不匹配问题，导致解码效率与位置一致性之间形成两难困境。现有方法通常依赖于特定的位置编码或精心设计的提示方案，因而难以同时实现推理效率、位置一致性以及广泛的模型兼容性。本研究提出ExPosST，一种通过显式位置分配来解决此困境的通用框架。ExPosST为输入源语言词元预留固定的位置槽，使得在不同位置编码方法下均可利用KV缓存实现高效解码。为进一步弥合微调与推理之间的差距，我们引入了一种策略一致的微调方法，使训练过程与推理时的解码行为保持一致。跨多个语言对的实验表明，ExPosST能有效支持多种策略下的同步翻译。

Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated promising performance in simultaneous machine translation (SimulMT). However, applying decoder-only LLMs to SimulMT introduces a positional mismatch, which leads to a dilemma between decoding efficiency and positional consistency. Existing approaches often rely on specific positional encodings or carefully designed prompting schemes, and thus fail to simultaneously achieve inference efficiency, positional consistency, and broad model compatibility. In this work, we propose ExPosST, a general framework that resolves this dilemma through explicit position allocation. ExPosST reserves fixed positional slots for incoming source tokens, enabling efficient decoding with KV cache across different positional encoding methods. To further bridge the gap between fine-tuning and inference, we introduce a policy-consistent fine-tuning strategy that aligns training with inference-time decoding behavior. Experiments across multiple language pairs demonstrate that ExPosST effectively supports simultaneous translation under diverse policies.

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLM智能体在电子商务中的应用，直接涉及LLM和智能体技术，因此"Large Language Models"和"LLM Agents"得10分。论文提到使用工具奖励进行强化学习训练，与"Tool Use"高度相关，得10分。其他关键词如MoE、量化、推理加速、幻觉缓解等均未在摘要中提及，与论文内容无关，得0分。

在电子商务领域，大语言模型智能体在推荐、预算规划与捆绑交易等购物任务中展现出潜力，其中从长期对话中准确捕捉用户偏好至关重要。然而，实现这一潜力面临两大挑战：(1) 缺乏用于评估长期偏好感知购物任务的基准测试体系；(2) 由于现有设计将偏好识别与购物辅助视为独立模块，导致缺乏端到端优化。本文提出一个包含长期记忆机制的新型基准测试，涵盖超过120万真实商品的两类购物任务，并推出“购物伴侣”——一个支持用户干预、能协同处理记忆检索与购物辅助的统一框架。为训练此类能力，我们开发了双奖励强化学习策略，通过工具级奖励机制应对多轮交互中固有的稀疏与不连续奖励问题。实验结果表明，即使最先进的模型（如GPT-5）在我们的基准测试中成功率也低于70%，凸显了该领域的重大挑战。值得注意的是，基于“购物伴侣”框架训练的轻量化大语言模型持续超越现有强基线模型，实现了更优的偏好捕捉与任务执行效果，这验证了我们统一设计的有效性。

In e-commerce, LLM agents show promise for shopping tasks such as recommendations, budgeting, and bundle deals, where accurately capturing user preferences from long-term conversations is critical. However, two challenges hinder realizing this potential: (1) the absence of benchmarks for evaluating long-term preference-aware shopping tasks, and (2) the lack of end-to-end optimization due to existing designs that treat preference identification and shopping assistance as separate components. In this paper, we introduce a novel benchmark with a long-term memory setup, spanning two shopping tasks over 1.2 million real-world products, and propose Shopping Companion, a unified framework that jointly tackles memory retrieval and shopping assistance while supporting user intervention. To train such capabilities, we develop a dual-reward reinforcement learning strategy with tool-wise rewards to handle the sparse and discontinuous rewards inherent in multi-turn interactions. Experimental results demonstrate that even state-of-the-art models (such as GPT-5) achieve success rates under 70% on our benchmark, highlighting the significant challenges in this domain. Notably, our lightweight LLM, trained with Shopping Companion, consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving better preference capture and task performance, which validates the effectiveness of our unified design.

!!! info

论文构建了一个包含120万真实产品的模拟环境，并开发了基于记忆和产品的两个搜索引擎及五个专用工具。采用部分可观测马尔可夫决策过程（POMDP）对任务进行建模，提出了两阶段智能体框架：阶段一进行偏好识别与记忆检索，阶段二执行购物任务。训练方面，使用双奖励强化学习策略，针对不同阶段和任务类型设计奖励函数，通过LLM-as-Judge范式进行评估。

• 填补了现有基准在长期记忆与端到端购物任务结合方面的空白。
• 端到端优化策略解决了传统方法中记忆模块与任务执行分离的问题。
• 双奖励RL策略有效应对了多轮交互中的奖励稀疏挑战。
• 基于大规模真实产品数据（120万），具有很高的现实意义。

• 基准中的用户指令和偏好是通过LLM合成的，可能与完全真实的人类行为存在细微差异。
• 评估依赖于LLM-as-Judge（GPT-5），尽管与人类有高一致性，但仍可能存在评估偏差。
• 论文主要关注特定类型的购物任务（如单品购买、附加交易），可能未覆盖所有电商场景。

评分理由: 论文核心批判了当前基于问卷式提示评估LLM安全性的方法，认为其不适用于评估实际部署的AI智能体（LLM Agents），并讨论了AI对齐（Alignment）方法的类似问题。因此，与"Large Language Models"、“LLM Agents"和"Alignment"高度相关（10分），其他关键词未涉及（0分）。

随着人工智能系统能力不断提升，衡量其安全性与人类价值观的对齐程度变得至关重要。人工智能研究领域正迅速发展出专门致力于此类评估的方法。然而，当前大多数进展可能并不适用于评估现实世界部署中的人工智能系统。标准方法采用问卷式提示，让大型语言模型在假设场景中描述其价值观或行为。这些方法仅关注未经增强的大型语言模型，未能评估实际可能执行相关行为、从而带来更大风险的人工智能体。大型语言模型对问卷式提示所描述场景的参与方式，与基于同款大型语言模型构建的智能体存在显著差异，这体现在输入内容、可行行动、环境交互及内部处理机制等多个层面的分歧上。因此，大型语言模型对场景描述的反应很可能无法代表相应智能体的实际行为。我们进一步指出，此类评估对大型语言模型准确报告其反事实行为的能力和倾向性做出了强假设，导致其缺乏结构效度，不足以评估现实环境中人工智能系统的风险。我们认为，当前的人工智能对齐方法也存在结构上相同的问题。最后，我们探讨了如何通过正视这些缺陷来改进安全评估与对齐训练。

As AI systems advance in capabilities, measuring their safety and alignment to human values is becoming paramount. A fast-growing field of AI research is devoted to developing such assessments. However, most current advances therein may be ill-suited for assessing AI systems across real-world deployments. Standard methods prompt large language models (LLMs) in a questionnaire-style to describe their values or behavior in hypothetical scenarios. By focusing on unaugmented LLMs, they fall short of evaluating AI agents, which could actually perform relevant behaviors, hence posing much greater risks. LLMs’ engagement with scenarios described by questionnaire-style prompts differs starkly from that of agents based on the same LLMs, as reflected in divergences in the inputs, possible actions, environmental interactions, and internal processing. As such, LLMs’ responses to scenario descriptions are unlikely to be representative of the corresponding LLM agents’ behavior. We further contend that such assessments make strong assumptions concerning the ability and tendency of LLMs to report accurately about their counterfactual behavior. This makes them inadequate to assess risks from AI systems in real-world contexts as they lack construct validity. We then argue that a structurally identical issue holds for current AI alignment approaches. Lastly, we discuss improving safety assessments and alignment training by taking these shortcomings to heart.

!!! info

本文主要采用理论分析和概念论证的方法。作者通过对比分析问卷式评估与AI智能体在真实世界部署中的特征，解构了QAs的隐含假设。文章结合心理学中的构念效度概念，论证了当前评估方法在逻辑上的不足，并引用了现有的基准测试（如MACHIAVELLI, TRUSTLLM）作为案例进行具体分析。

• 观点犀利，指出了当前AI安全评估领域的一个盲点：过度关注模型文本回答而忽视了智能体的实际行为风险。
• 逻辑清晰，通过定义核心假设（泛化能力）并逐一击破，论证过程严谨。
• 具有广泛的适用性，批评不仅适用于安全评估，还延伸到了AI对齐训练领域。
• 结合了心理学中的评估理论（构念效度），为AI安全评估提供了跨学科的理论视角。

• 本文主要停留在理论批评层面，未提出具体的、可落地的替代性评估方案或新的基准测试。
• 虽然指出了问题，但对于如何构建能够评估真实智能体行为的系统，仅给出了方向性建议，缺乏技术细节。
• 论证主要基于逻辑推演，缺乏大规模的实证数据来直接对比问卷结果与智能体实际行为的偏差程度。

评分理由: 论文核心研究大语言模型（LLMs）在医疗领域的应用，特别是通过检索增强生成（RAG）技术连接外部临床数据库时面临的隐私-效用权衡问题。因此，与"Large Language Models"和"Retrieval-Augmented Generation"高度相关（10分），属于"AI for Science"在生物医学信息学（Bioinformatics）范畴的应用（10分）。论文未涉及其他关键词的具体技术原理或创新，如MoE、量化、推理加速、对齐训练等，故相关度为0分。

检索增强生成（RAG）技术的最新进展使得大语言模型（LLM）能够基于临床证据生成输出。然而，将LLM与外部数据库连接会引入上下文泄露风险：这是一种微妙的隐私威胁，即使没有明确的标识符，独特的医疗细节组合也可能导致患者被重新识别。尽管存在《健康保险携带和责任法案》（HIPAA）和《通用数据保护条例》（GDPR）等严格法规，当前医疗领域的基准测试仍过度侧重于准确性，而忽视了此类隐私问题。为填补这一空白，我们提出了MedPriv-Bench，这是首个专门设计用于联合评估医疗开放式问答中隐私保护与临床效用的基准测试。我们的框架采用多智能体、人在回路（human-in-the-loop）的流程，合成敏感的医疗上下文和临床相关查询，以创建真实的隐私压力。我们建立了一个标准化评估协议，利用预训练的RoBERTa-自然语言推理（NLI）模型作为自动化评判器来量化数据泄露，其与人类专家的平均一致性达到85.9%。通过对9个代表性LLM的广泛评估，我们揭示了普遍存在的隐私-效用权衡问题。我们的研究结果强调了在隐私敏感环境中，需要特定领域的基准测试来验证医疗人工智能系统的安全性与有效性。

Recent advances in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) have enabled large language models (LLMs) to ground outputs in clinical evidence. However, connecting LLMs with external databases introduces the risk of contextual leakage: a subtle privacy threat where unique combinations of medical details enable patient re-identification even without explicit identifiers. Current benchmarks in healthcare heavily focus on accuracy, ignoring such privacy issues, despite strict regulations like Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). To fill this gap, we present MedPriv-Bench, the first benchmark specifically designed to jointly evaluate privacy preservation and clinical utility in medical open-ended question answering. Our framework utilizes a multi-agent, human-in-the-loop pipeline to synthesize sensitive medical contexts and clinically relevant queries that create realistic privacy pressure. We establish a standardized evaluation protocol leveraging a pre-trained RoBERTa-Natural Language Inference (NLI) model as an automated judge to quantify data leakage, achieving an average of 85.9% alignment with human experts. Through an extensive evaluation of 9 representative LLMs, we demonstrate a pervasive privacy-utility trade-off. Our findings underscore the necessity of domain-specific benchmarks to validate the safety and efficacy of medical AI systems in privacy-sensitive environments.

评分理由: 论文核心研究大语言模型（LLMs）的知识蒸馏，将基于二次注意力的LLMs蒸馏到基于xLSTM的线性化架构中，因此与"Large Language Models"高度相关（10分）。论文提到蒸馏了指令调优模型，与"Instruction Tuning"有一定关联（5分）。论文提出合并线性化专家的额外阶段，与"Model Merging"高度相关（10分）。论文提到专家合并，与"Mixture of Experts"有一定关联（5分）。其他关键词如小模型、预训练、对齐、推理加速等未在摘要中提及，评为0分。

已有大量研究尝试将基于二次注意力机制的大语言模型（LLM）蒸馏至次二次线性化架构中。然而，尽管研究广泛，此类蒸馏模型在多种下游任务上仍常常无法达到其教师大语言模型的性能水平。我们设定了无损蒸馏的目标，并将其定义为学生模型与教师模型在任务集上经容差校正的“胜平率”。为此，我们为基于xLSTM的学生模型引入了一套高效的蒸馏流程。我们提出了一个额外的合并阶段，将独立线性化的专家模型整合为单一模型。通过从Llama、Qwen和Olmo系列中蒸馏基础模型及指令微调模型，我们验证了该流程的有效性。在许多设定下，我们基于xLSTM的学生模型恢复了教师模型的大部分性能，甚至在某些下游任务上实现了超越。我们的贡献是朝着为基于Transformer的大语言模型提供更节能、更具成本效益的替代方案迈出的重要一步。

There have been numerous attempts to distill quadratic attention-based large language models (LLMs) into sub-quadratic linearized architectures. However, despite extensive research, such distilled models often fail to match the performance of their teacher LLMs on various downstream tasks. We set out the goal of lossless distillation, which we define in terms of tolerance-corrected Win-and-Tie rates between student and teacher on sets of tasks. To this end, we introduce an effective distillation pipeline for xLSTM-based students. We propose an additional merging stage, where individually linearized experts are combined into a single model. We show the effectiveness of this pipeline by distilling base and instruction-tuned models from the Llama, Qwen, and Olmo families. In many settings, our xLSTM-based students recover most of the teacher’s performance, and even exceed it on some downstream tasks. Our contributions are an important step towards more energy-efficient and cost-effective replacements for transformer-based LLMs.

!!! info

论文提出的方法主要包括四个步骤：(1) 将预训练的Transformer教师模型的权重转移到学生模型，并引入适配器和门控；(2) 进行隐藏状态匹配以对齐中间层表示；(3) 合并查询和键投影以优化架构；(4) 进行知识蒸馏。核心架构上，用混合的mLSTM-SWA模块替换了标准的自注意力层。此外，研究采用了模块化线性化策略，即先独立蒸馏不同领域的专家模型，然后通过权重空间合并技术将其整合，以提升整体性能。

• 有效解决了现有线性化模型在数学推理和代码合成等困难生成任务上性能不足的问题。
• 引入的“合并阶段”使得蒸馏过程模块化，提高了灵活性和最终模型的泛化能力。
• 提出了更严格的评估指标（Win-and-Tie率），更准确地衡量了模型作为“即插即用”替代品的可靠性。
• 结合了mLSTM的长程记忆能力和SWA的局部建模优势，架构设计合理。

• 虽然性能接近，但在某些极端情况下可能仍无法完全达到教师模型的能力。
• 引入的合并阶段和混合架构可能会增加训练和部署的工程复杂度。
• 论文内容在提供的文本中未完全结束，关于注意力机制的详细讨论和部分实验细节可能缺失。
• xLSTM及其混合架构对特定硬件加速器的依赖和优化程度可能不如成熟的Transformer。

评分理由: 论文提出了一种轻量级视觉-语言-动作模型（AnoleVLA），用于资源受限环境下的机器人操作。核心创新是使用深度状态空间模型替代标准Transformer骨干网络，以实现高效的多模态序列处理。与关键词的相关性分析如下：1）与"Large Language Models"有一定关联（5分），因为VLA模型通常基于大语言模型架构，但论文未明确讨论LLMs；2）与"Small Language Models"高度相关（8分），因为论文明确目标是开发轻量级模型用于移动设备；3）与"Quantization"和"Inference Acceleration"高度相关（各8分），因为论文的核心贡献是通过模型架构创新（深度状态空间模型）实现模型轻量化和推理加速（3倍速度提升）；4）其他关键词（如MoE、Scaling Laws、Alignment等）在论文中未涉及，得0分。

本研究针对语言引导的机器人操作问题展开探讨，该任务要求机器人基于视觉观察与自然语言指令对多种物体进行操作。对于在人类环境中运行的服务机器人而言，此项任务至关重要，需同时满足安全性、高效性及任务层级的泛化能力。尽管视觉-语言-动作模型（Vision-Language-Action models, VLAs）在此类任务中已展现出强大性能，但由于标准Transformer主干网络的计算成本较高，其在资源受限环境中的部署仍面临挑战。为突破此限制，我们提出AnoleVLA——一种轻量级VLA模型，其采用深度状态空间模型以实现多模态序列的高效处理。该模型凭借其轻量化架构与快速序列状态建模能力，能够高效处理视觉与文本输入，从而使机器人能够生成流畅的运动轨迹。我们在仿真环境与物理实验中均对所提方法进行了评估。值得注意的是，在真实世界评估中，AnoleVLA的任务成功率较代表性大规模VLA模型高出21个百分点，同时推理速度提升约三倍。

In this study, we address the problem of language-guided robotic manipulation, where a robot is required to manipulate a wide range of objects based on visual observations and natural language instructions. This task is essential for service robots that operate in human environments, and requires safety, efficiency, and task-level generality. Although Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) have demonstrated strong performance for this task, their deployment in resource-constrained environments remains challenging because of the computational cost of standard transformer backbones. To overcome this limitation, we propose AnoleVLA, a lightweight VLA that uses a deep state space model to process multimodal sequences efficiently. The model leverages its lightweight and fast sequential state modeling to process visual and textual inputs, which allows the robot to generate trajectories efficiently. We evaluated the proposed method in both simulation and physical experiments. Notably, in real-world evaluations, AnoleVLA outperformed a representative large-scale VLA by 21 points for the task success rate while achieving an inference speed approximately three times faster.

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLMs在事实问答中的可靠性问题，提出一个将规划与检索/合成分离的模块化框架。高度相关（10分）的关键词包括：LLMs（核心研究对象）、RAG（直接解决检索增强问题）、Tool Use（框架涉及工具使用进行检索）、Hallucination Mitigation（核心目标是减少幻觉提高事实性）。较强相关（8分）的关键词：Chain of Thought/System 2 Thinking（涉及显式规划分解步骤）、LLM Agents（框架具有代理特性）。中等相关（5分）：SFT（使用教师-学生框架进行监督训练）。其余关键词论文未涉及或仅边缘提及，评0分。

当答案依赖于最新或相互冲突的信息时，基于大语言模型（LLMs）的事实探寻问答仍不可靠。尽管检索增强型和工具调用型LLMs减少了幻觉问题，但它们通常依赖于隐式规划，导致工具使用效率低下。我们提出一种模块化框架，将规划与事实检索及答案合成明确分离。通过师生框架训练一个轻量级学生规划器，以生成由抽象推理步骤和可搜索事实请求组成的结构化分解。监督信号仅包含规划轨迹和事实请求，不提供事实答案或检索证据。在推理阶段，规划器生成计划，而经过提示工程设计的模块则执行检索和响应合成。我们在SEAL-0（一个针对搜索增强型LLMs的极具挑战性的基准测试）上评估所提出的框架。结果表明，与单一推理模型和基于提示的工具增强框架相比，监督式规划在准确性和延迟方面均有提升，这证明显式学习的规划结构对于构建可靠的事实探寻型LLMs至关重要。

Fact-seeking question answering with large language models (LLMs) remains unreliable when answers depend on up-to-date or conflicting information. Although retrieval-augmented and tool-using LLMs reduce hallucinations, they often rely on implicit planning, leading to inefficient tool usage. We propose a modular framework that explicitly separates planning from factual retrieval and answer synthesis. A lightweight student planner is trained via a teacher-student framework to generate structured decompositions consisting of abstract reasoning steps and searchable fact requests. The supervision signals contain only planning traces and fact requests, without providing factual answers or retrieved evidence. At inference, the planner produces plans, while prompt-engineered modules perform retrieval and response synthesis. We evaluate the proposed framework on SEAL-0, an extremely challenging benchmark for search-augmented LLMs. Results show that supervised planning improves both accuracy and latency compared to monolithic reasoning models and prompt-based tool-augmented frameworks, demonstrating that explicitly learned planning structures are essential for reliable fact-seeking LLMs.

评分理由: 论文核心研究大语言模型（LLMs）在保险领域的专业化应用，因此与"Large Language Models"高度相关（10分）。方法上，论文提出了一个包含SFT和RLAIF的端到端对齐范式，因此与"Post-training/SFT”、“Instruction Tuning/Alignment”、“RLHF/RLAIF/DPO"高度相关（均为10分）。论文明确以解决幻觉问题为核心目标之一，因此与"Hallucination Mitigation"高度相关（10分）。论文提到现有方法依赖RAG，但其方法旨在超越RAG，因此与"RAG"有一定关联（5分）。论文涉及将LLM适配到垂直领域，与"Domain Adaptation"有一定关联（5分）。论文未涉及其他关键词的具体技术或概念，因此其余关键词评分为0分。

将大型语言模型（LLM）适配于保险等高风险垂直领域面临着一项重大挑战：应用场景要求严格遵循复杂的监管规定与业务逻辑，且对幻觉零容忍。现有方法通常存在“能力权衡”问题——为获取领域专业知识而牺牲通用智能，或过度依赖检索增强生成（RAG）而缺乏内在推理能力。为弥补这一差距，我们提出了INS-S1，这是一个通过新颖的端到端对齐范式训练而成的保险专用大语言模型系列。我们的方法包含两项方法论创新：（1）一个可验证的数据合成系统，用于构建支持精算推理与合规性的分层数据集；（2）一个渐进式监督微调-强化学习（SFT-RL）课程框架，该框架将动态数据退火与经过验证的推理（RLVR）和人工智能反馈（RLAIF）的协同组合相结合。通过优化数据比例与奖励信号，该框架在强化领域约束的同时防止了灾难性遗忘。此外，我们发布了迄今为止最全面的保险领域基准测试INSEva（包含超过3.9万个样本）。大量实验表明，INS-S1在领域任务上实现了最先进的性能，显著优于DeepSeek-R1和Gemini-2.5-Pro。至关重要的是，它保持了顶级的通用能力，并实现了创纪录的低幻觉率（0.6%，基于HHEM评估）。我们的结果表明，严格的领域专业化可以在不损害通用智能的前提下实现。

Adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) to high-stakes vertical domains like insurance presents a significant challenge: scenarios demand strict adherence to complex regulations and business logic with zero tolerance for hallucinations. Existing approaches often suffer from a Competency Trade-off - sacrificing general intelligence for domain expertise - or rely heavily on RAG without intrinsic reasoning. To bridge this gap, we present INS-S1, an insurance-specific LLM family trained via a novel end-to-end alignment paradigm. Our approach features two methodological innovations: (1) A Verifiable Data Synthesis System that constructs hierarchical datasets for actuarial reasoning and compliance; and (2) A Progressive SFT-RL Curriculum Framework that integrates dynamic data annealing with a synergistic mix of Verified Reasoning (RLVR) and AI Feedback (RLAIF). By optimizing data ratios and reward signals, this framework enforces domain constraints while preventing catastrophic forgetting. Additionally, we release INSEva, the most comprehensive insurance benchmark to date (39k+ samples). Extensive experiments show that INS-S1 achieves SOTA performance on domain tasks, significantly outperforming DeepSeek-R1 and Gemini-2.5-Pro. Crucially, it maintains top-tier general capabilities and achieves a record-low 0.6% hallucination rate (HHEM). Our results demonstrate that rigorous domain specialization can be achieved without compromising general intelligence.

评分理由: 论文CausalEvolve提出了一种基于LLM的AI科学家代理，用于解决开放式的科学问题，因此与"Large Language Models"和"LLM Agents"高度相关（10分）。研究属于"AI for Science"领域，直接应用LLM于科学发现（10分）。方法涉及因果推理、反思和进化改进，与"Chain of Thought”、“System 2 Thinking"和"Self-Correction"有一定关联（8分）。其他关键词如MoE、SFT、RAG等未在摘要中提及，与论文核心内容无关（0分）。

以AlphaEvolve为代表的进化型智能体是利用大型语言模型构建AI科学家的显著成功案例之一。这类智能体通过迭代改进与演化程序，并借助大型语言模型的先验知识与推理能力，以解决开放式的科学问题。尽管取得了成功，现有的进化型智能体仍缺乏针对演化过程的定向引导机制，以及有效组织与利用历史进化经验中获取知识的系统方法。因此，它们在接近已知性能边界时会出现进化效率递减与振荡现象。为弥补这一不足，我们开发了CausalEvolve，其配备了一个因果推理工作台，能够利用大型语言模型识别并推演进化过程中的关键引导因素。在初始阶段，CausalEvolve首先识别结果层面的影响因素，这些因素能为优化目标提供互补性启发。在进化过程中，该系统还通过监测演化中的异常模式并结合溯因推理来假设新的影响因素，从而开辟新的进化方向。通过全面的实验验证，我们证明CausalEvolve在四项具有挑战性的开放式科学任务中，能有效提升进化效率并发现更优解决方案。

Evolve-based agent such as AlphaEvolve is one of the notable successes in using Large Language Models (LLMs) to build AI Scientists. These agents tackle open-ended scientific problems by iteratively improving and evolving programs, leveraging the prior knowledge and reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Despite the success, existing evolve-based agents lack targeted guidance for evolution and effective mechanisms for organizing and utilizing knowledge acquired from past evolutionary experience. Consequently, they suffer from decreasing evolution efficiency and exhibit oscillatory behavior when approaching known performance boundaries. To mitigate the gap, we develop CausalEvolve, equipped with a causal scratchpad that leverages LLMs to identify and reason about guiding factors for evolution. At the beginning, CausalEvolve first identifies outcome-level factors that offer complementary inspirations in improving the target objective. During the evolution, CausalEvolve also inspects surprise patterns during the evolution and abductive reasoning to hypothesize new factors, which in turn offer novel directions. Through comprehensive experiments, we show that CausalEvolve effectively improves the evolutionary efficiency and discovers better solutions in 4 challenging open-ended scientific tasks.

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLM在复杂推理任务中的局限性，并提出BIGMAS多智能体系统架构来提升推理性能。与关键词高度相关（10分）的有：LLMs（论文直接使用LLMs作为基础模型）、Chain of Thought（论文明确提到chain-of-thought机制和推理任务）、System 2 Thinking（论文研究复杂多步推理，属于深度推理范畴）、LLM Agents（论文构建专门的LLM智能体）、Multi-agent Systems（论文核心是多智能体系统架构）。其他关键词在论文摘要中未提及或与论文内容无关，故评0分。

大语言模型（LLM）已在广泛的语言任务中展现出卓越能力，但复杂的多步推理仍是根本性挑战。尽管配备扩展思维链机制的大型推理模型（LRM）相比标准LLM表现出性能提升，但这两类模型在足够复杂的任务上仍存在准确性崩溃现象，这表明仅靠模型级推理的扩展并不足够。受人类认知的全局工作空间理论启发，我们提出脑启发的图多智能体系统（BIGMAS）。该系统将专用LLM智能体组织为动态构建的有向图节点，并仅通过中心化共享工作空间进行协同。问题自适应的图设计器（GraphDesigner）构建任务特定的智能体拓扑结构，而全局编排器（Orchestrator）则利用完整的共享状态进行路由决策，从而克服反应式方法的局部视野瓶颈。在Game24、Six Fives和伦敦塔任务上对六种前沿LLM的实验表明，BIGMAS能持续提升标准LLM与LRM的推理性能，其表现优于包括ReAct和思维树（Tree of Thoughts）在内的现有多智能体基线方法，这证明多智能体架构设计能够提供与模型级推理增强正交的互补性增益。

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide range of language tasks, yet complex multi-step reasoning remains a fundamental challenge. While Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) equipped with extended chain-of-thought mechanisms demonstrate improved performance over standard LLMs, both model types still suffer from accuracy collapse on sufficiently complex tasks, suggesting that scaling model-level reasoning alone is insufficient. Inspired by the global workspace theory of human cognition, we propose Brain-Inspired Graph Multi-Agent Systems (BIGMAS), in which specialized LLM agents are organized as nodes in a dynamically constructed directed graph and coordinate exclusively through a centralized shared workspace. A problem-adaptive GraphDesigner constructs task-specific agent topologies, while a global Orchestrator leverages the complete shared state for routing decisions, overcoming the local-view bottleneck of reactive approaches. Experiments on Game24, Six Fives, and Tower of London across six frontier LLMs demonstrate that BIGMAS consistently improves reasoning performance for both standard LLMs and LRMs, outperforming existing multi-agent baselines including ReAct and Tree of Thoughts, showing that multi-agent architectural design provides complementary gains orthogonal to model-level reasoning enhancements.

评分理由: 论文SFCoT专注于提升大语言模型（LLMs）在链式思维（Chain-of-Thought）推理过程中的安全性，核心是防止越狱攻击。因此，与"Large Language Models"和"Chain of Thought"高度相关（10分）。它涉及安全对齐（“Alignment”）和幻觉缓解（“Hallucination Mitigation”）以提升事实性，以及通过实时校准实现自我纠正（“Self-Correction”），这些是论文的关键组成部分，给予8分。其他关键词如MoE、SFT、RAG、量化等未在摘要中提及，与论文主题无关，给予0分。

大语言模型（LLMs）在复杂推理任务中展现出卓越能力，但其安全对齐机制仍极易受到越狱攻击的破坏。现有防御方法通常仅对最终输出进行事后过滤，导致中间推理步骤缺乏监控，易受对抗性操纵。为弥补这一缺陷，本文提出一种更安全的思维链框架（SaFer Chain-of-Thought, SFCoT），该框架能实时评估并校准潜在的不安全推理步骤。SFCoT融合了三级安全评分系统与多视角一致性验证机制，旨在全程检测推理过程中的潜在风险。动态干预模块随后执行针对性校准，将推理路径引导至安全结果。实验表明，SFCoT将攻击成功率从$58.97%$降至$12.31%$，在未显著影响通用性能的前提下，证明其作为一种高效的大语言模型安全增强方法的有效性。

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning tasks. However, they remain highly susceptible to jailbreak attacks that undermine their safety alignment. Existing defense mechanisms typically rely on post hoc filtering applied only to the final output, leaving intermediate reasoning steps unmonitored and vulnerable to adversarial manipulation. To address this gap, this paper proposes a SaFer Chain-of-Thought (SFCoT) framework, which proactively evaluates and calibrates potentially unsafe reasoning steps in real time. SFCoT incorporates a three-tier safety scoring system alongside a multi-perspective consistency verification mechanism, designed to detect potential risks throughout the reasoning process. A dynamic intervention module subsequently performs targeted calibration to redirect reasoning trajectories toward safe outcomes. Experimental results demonstrate that SFCoT reduces the attack success rate from $58.97%$ to $12.31%$, demonstrating it as an effective and efficient LLM safety enhancement method without a significant decline in general performance.

评分理由: 论文核心是开发一个基于LLM的多模态多智能体框架，用于室内空间设计。高度相关的关键词包括：1) “Large Language Models” (论文明确使用LLMs进行空间推理和设计生成，是核心组件)；2) “Retrieval-Augmented Generation” (论文明确使用RAG来减少数据依赖)；3) “LLM Agents” (论文构建了专门的智能体，如Reference、Spatial、Interactive、Grader)；4) “Multi-agent Systems” (多个智能体协同工作，是框架的核心架构)。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、训练技术、推理优化、科学AI应用等，论文未涉及或未明确提及，因此评分为0。

在建筑室内设计领域，由于客户缺乏设计知识，而设计师难以解释复杂的空间关系，沟通不畅问题频发，常导致项目延期和经济损失。近年来，生成式布局工具的进展通过自动化生成三维可视化方案，缩小了这一鸿沟。然而，现有方法存在局限：基于规则的体系采用硬编码的空间约束，限制了参与式互动；而数据驱动模型则依赖于大量训练数据集。近期兴起的大语言模型（Large Language Models, LLMs）通过自然语言实现对空间关系的直观推理，弥补了这一不足。本研究提出一个基于大语言模型的多模态、多智能体框架，能够动态地将自然语言描述和图像转化为三维设计方案。通过提示词指南运作的专项智能体（参考智能体、空间智能体、交互智能体、评分智能体）协同应对核心挑战：该智能体系统支持实时用户交互以实现迭代式空间优化，同时检索增强生成（Retrieval-Augmented Generation, RAG）技术降低了数据依赖性，无需针对特定任务进行模型训练。本框架能准确解读空间意图并生成优化的三维室内设计，从而提升生产效率，促进非专业设计者的参与。通过对多样化的平面布局和用户问卷进行评估，验证了该框架的有效性。一项独立的大语言模型评估显示，参与式生成的布局在用户意图契合度、美学一致性、功能性和动线流畅性方面均获得更高评分。问卷结果表明，用户满意度达77%，且相较于传统设计软件表现出明显偏好。这些发现表明，该框架增强了以用户为中心的沟通，并促进了更具包容性、高效性和适应性的设计流程。项目页面：https://rsigktyper.github.io/AICodesign/

In architectural interior design, miscommunication frequently arises as clients lack design knowledge, while designers struggle to explain complex spatial relationships, leading to delayed timelines and financial losses. Recent advancements in generative layout tools narrow the gap by automating 3D visualizations. However, prevailing methodologies exhibit limitations: rule-based systems implement hard-coded spatial constraints that restrict participatory engagement, while data-driven models rely on extensive training datasets. Recent large language models (LLMs) bridge this gap by enabling intuitive reasoning about spatial relationships through natural language. This research presents an LLM-based, multimodal, multi-agent framework that dynamically converts natural language descriptions and imagery into 3D designs. Specialized agents (Reference, Spatial, Interactive, Grader), operating via prompt guidelines, collaboratively address core challenges: the agent system enables real-time user interaction for iterative spatial refinement, while Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) reduces data dependency without requiring task-specific model training. This framework accurately interprets spatial intent and generates optimized 3D indoor design, improving productivity, and encouraging nondesigner participation. Evaluations across diverse floor plans and user questionnaires demonstrate effectiveness. An independent LLM evaluator consistently rated participatory layouts higher in user intent alignment, aesthetic coherence, functionality, and circulation. Questionnaire results indicated 77% satisfaction and a clear preference over traditional design software. These findings suggest the framework enhances user-centric communication and fosters more inclusive, effective, and resilient design processes. Project page: https://rsigktyper.github.io/AICodesign/

评分理由: 论文核心研究多模态大语言模型（MLLMs）作为视觉代理（agent）使用外部工具链解决复杂视觉任务的能力评估，与"Large Language Models”（MLLMs是LLMs的扩展）、“LLM Agents”（评估模型作为代理的能力）、“Tool Use”（核心研究工具使用和组合）高度相关（10分）。与"Chain of Thought"相关（8分），因为论文涉及多步规划和执行轨迹评估。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、训练技术、推理优化、科学AI应用等，论文未直接涉及，给0分。

近期研究进展将多模态大语言模型的应用范围从标准视觉问答扩展至利用外部工具处理高级视觉任务。尽管取得这一进步，如何精确执行并有效组合多样化工具以完成复杂任务，仍是持续存在的瓶颈。受限于稀疏的工具集和简单的工具使用轨迹，现有基准测试无法捕捉复杂多样的工具交互，难以评估模型在现实实际条件下的性能。为弥补这一差距，我们提出了VisualToolChain-Bench（VTC-Bench），这是一个旨在评估多模态大语言模型工具使用能力的综合性基准测试。为贴合实际计算机视觉流程，我们的框架集成了32种基于OpenCV的多样化视觉操作。这一丰富的工具集支持广泛的组合方式，使VTC-Bench能够严格评估多工具组合能力以及长视野、多步骤计划的执行能力。为实现精确评估，我们构建了680个精编问题，这些问题按九级认知层次组织，每个问题均配有真实执行轨迹。对19个领先多模态大语言模型的广泛实验揭示了当前模型在视觉代理能力方面的关键局限。具体而言，模型难以适应多样化工具集并将其泛化至未见过的操作，其中表现最佳的Gemini-3.0-Pro模型在我们的基准测试中仅达到51%的准确率。此外，多工具组合仍是持续存在的挑战。面对复杂任务时，模型难以制定高效的执行计划，严重依赖狭窄且次优的熟悉功能子集，而非选择最优工具。通过揭示这些根本性挑战，VTC-Bench建立了一个严谨的基线，以指导开发更具泛化能力的视觉代理模型。

Recent advancements extend Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) beyond standard visual question answering to utilizing external tools for advanced visual tasks. Despite this progress, precisely executing and effectively composing diverse tools for complex tasks remain persistent bottleneck. Constrained by sparse tool-sets and simple tool-use trajectories, existing benchmarks fail to capture complex and diverse tool interactions, falling short in evaluating model performance under practical, real-world conditions. To bridge this gap, we introduce VisualToolChain-Bench~(VTC-Bench), a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate tool-use proficiency in MLLMs. To align with realistic computer vision pipelines, our framework features 32 diverse OpenCV-based visual operations. This rich tool-set enables extensive combinations, allowing VTC-Bench to rigorously assess multi-tool composition and long-horizon, multi-step plan execution. For precise evaluation, we provide 680 curated problems structured across a nine-category cognitive hierarchy, each with ground-truth execution trajectories. Extensive experiments on 19 leading MLLMs reveal critical limitations in current models’ visual agentic capabilities. Specifically, models struggle to adapt to diverse tool-sets and generalize to unseen operations, with the leading model Gemini-3.0-Pro only achieving 51% on our benchmark. Furthermore, multi-tool composition remains a persistent challenge. When facing complex tasks, models struggle to formulate efficient execution plans, relying heavily on a narrow, suboptimal subset of familiar functions rather than selecting the optimal tools. By identifying these fundamental challenges, VTC-Bench establishes a rigorous baseline to guide the development of more generalized visual agentic models.

评分理由: 论文核心研究RAG框架下意识形态文本对LLM输出的影响，因此与"Retrieval-Augmented Generation"和"Large Language Models"高度相关（10分）。研究涉及意识形态对齐和事实性风险，与"Instruction Tuning/Alignment"和"Hallucination Mitigation/Factuality"有一定关联（5分）。案例研究使用COVID-19治疗数据，属于科学领域AI应用，与"AI for Science"相关（5分）。其他关键词如MoE、量化、推理加速等未涉及，得0分。

本文研究了检索到的意识形态文本对大型语言模型（LLM）输出的影响。尽管近期对理解LLM中意识形态的兴趣有所增加，但在检索增强生成（RAG）的背景下，此问题却鲜受关注。为填补这一空白，我们设计了一个基于关于COVID-19治疗的意识形态负载文本的外部知识源。我们的语料库基于1,117篇学术文章，代表了关于该疾病有争议和受认可治疗的论述。我们提出了一个基于词汇多维分析（Lexical Multidimensional Analysis, LMDA）的语料库语言学框架，以识别语料库内的意识形态。我们要求LLM回答源自三个已识别意识形态维度的问题，并采用两种类型的上下文提示：第一种包含用户问题和意识形态文本；第二种包含问题、意识形态文本及LMDA描述。通过计算词汇和语义表征的余弦相似度，评估参考意识形态文本与LLM回答之间的意识形态对齐程度。结果表明，基于意识形态检索文本的LLM回答更倾向于与外部知识中遇到的意识形态保持一致，而增强型提示进一步影响了LLM的输出。我们的发现强调了在RAG框架内识别意识形态论述的重要性，这不仅能减轻非预期的意识形态偏见，也能降低恶意操纵此类模型的风险。

This paper studies the impact of retrieved ideological texts on the outputs of large language models (LLMs). While interest in understanding ideology in LLMs has recently increased, little attention has been given to this issue in the context of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). To fill this gap, we design an external knowledge source based on ideological loaded texts about COVID-19 treatments. Our corpus is based on 1,117 academic articles representing discourses about controversial and endorsed treatments for the disease. We propose a corpus linguistics framework, based on Lexical Multidimensional Analysis (LMDA), to identify the ideologies within the corpus. LLMs are tasked to answer questions derived from three identified ideological dimensions, and two types of contextual prompts are adopted: the first comprises the user question and ideological texts; and the second contains the question, ideological texts, and LMDA descriptions. Ideological alignment between reference ideological texts and LLMs’ responses is assessed using cosine similarity for lexical and semantic representations. Results demonstrate that LLMs’ responses based on ideological retrieved texts are more aligned with the ideology encountered in the external knowledge, with the enhanced prompt further influencing LLMs’ outputs. Our findings highlight the importance of identifying ideological discourses within the RAG framework in order to mitigate not just unintended ideological bias, but also the risks of malicious manipulation of such models.

评分理由: 论文CLAG专注于为小型语言模型（SLMs）代理设计一个基于聚类的记忆组织框架，以解决全局记忆池中知识稀释和无关上下文干扰的问题。因此，与"Small Language Models"高度相关（10分），因为SLMs是核心研究对象；与"LLM Agents"高度相关（10分），因为框架专为代理设计；与"Retrieval-Augmented Generation"有一定关联（8分），因为涉及记忆检索以支持知识重用；与"Large Language Models"有一定关联（5分），因为论文在背景中提及LLM代理作为对比，但研究焦点是SLMs。其他关键词如MoE、Scaling Laws、Alignment等与论文内容无直接关系，均得0分。

大型语言模型智能体高度依赖外部记忆系统以支持知识复用与复杂推理任务。然而，现有记忆系统大多将经验存储于单一的全局检索池中，这可能导致存储的知识逐渐被稀释或污染。该问题对于小型语言模型尤为突出，因其极易受到无关上下文干扰。本文提出CLAG，一种基于聚类的智能体记忆框架，使小型语言模型智能体能够通过主动聚类来组织记忆。CLAG采用由小型语言模型驱动的路由机制，将新增记忆分配至语义连贯的聚类中，并自主生成包含主题摘要与描述性标签的聚类专属档案，使每个聚类成为独立的功能单元。通过在这些结构化邻域内进行局部演化，CLAG有效降低了跨主题干扰并提升了内部记忆密度。在检索阶段，该框架采用两阶段流程：首先通过聚类档案筛选相关聚类以排除干扰项并缩减搜索空间，随后进行精确检索。在三个小型语言模型骨干网络及多个问答数据集上的实验表明，相较于现有智能体记忆系统，CLAG在保持轻量高效的同时，持续提升了答案质量与系统鲁棒性。

Large language model agents heavily rely on external memory to support knowledge reuse and complex reasoning tasks. Yet most memory systems store experiences in a single global retrieval pool which can gradually dilute or corrupt stored knowledge. This problem is especially pronounced for small language models (SLMs), which are highly vulnerable to irrelevant context. We introduce CLAG, a CLustering-based AGentic memory framework where an SLM agent actively organizes memory by clustering. CLAG employs an SLM-driven router to assign incoming memories to semantically coherent clusters and autonomously generates cluster-specific profiles, including topic summaries and descriptive tags, to establish each cluster as a self-contained functional unit. By performing localized evolution within these structured neighborhoods, CLAG effectively reduces cross-topic interference and enhances internal memory density. During retrieval, the framework utilizes a two-stage process that first filters relevant clusters via their profiles, thereby excluding distractors and reducing the search space. Experiments on multiple QA datasets with three SLM backbones show that CLAG consistently improves answer quality and robustness over prior memory systems for agents, remaining lightweight and efficient.

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLM在SimulMT中的应用，与"Large Language Models"高度相关（10分）。方法涉及KV cache优化以实现高效解码，与"KV Cache Compression"和"Inference Acceleration"相关（各8分）。论文提到fine-tuning策略，与"Post-training"有一定关联（5分）。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws、RAG、Alignment等均未涉及，得0分。

大语言模型（LLMs）近期在同步机器翻译（SimulMT）任务中展现出有潜力的性能。然而，将仅解码器架构的LLMs应用于SimulMT时，会引入位置不匹配问题，导致解码效率与位置一致性之间形成两难困境。现有方法通常依赖于特定的位置编码或精心设计的提示方案，因而难以同时实现推理效率、位置一致性以及广泛的模型兼容性。本研究提出ExPosST，一种通过显式位置分配来解决此困境的通用框架。ExPosST为输入源语言词元预留固定的位置槽，使得在不同位置编码方法下均可利用KV缓存实现高效解码。为进一步弥合微调与推理之间的差距，我们引入了一种策略一致的微调方法，使训练过程与推理时的解码行为保持一致。跨多个语言对的实验表明，ExPosST能有效支持多种策略下的同步翻译。

Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated promising performance in simultaneous machine translation (SimulMT). However, applying decoder-only LLMs to SimulMT introduces a positional mismatch, which leads to a dilemma between decoding efficiency and positional consistency. Existing approaches often rely on specific positional encodings or carefully designed prompting schemes, and thus fail to simultaneously achieve inference efficiency, positional consistency, and broad model compatibility. In this work, we propose ExPosST, a general framework that resolves this dilemma through explicit position allocation. ExPosST reserves fixed positional slots for incoming source tokens, enabling efficient decoding with KV cache across different positional encoding methods. To further bridge the gap between fine-tuning and inference, we introduce a policy-consistent fine-tuning strategy that aligns training with inference-time decoding behavior. Experiments across multiple language pairs demonstrate that ExPosST effectively supports simultaneous translation under diverse policies.

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLM智能体在电子商务中的应用，直接涉及LLM和智能体技术，因此"Large Language Models"和"LLM Agents"得10分。论文提到使用工具奖励进行强化学习训练，与"Tool Use"高度相关，得10分。其他关键词如MoE、量化、推理加速、幻觉缓解等均未在摘要中提及，与论文内容无关，得0分。

在电子商务领域，大语言模型智能体在推荐、预算规划与捆绑交易等购物任务中展现出潜力，其中从长期对话中准确捕捉用户偏好至关重要。然而，实现这一潜力面临两大挑战：(1) 缺乏用于评估长期偏好感知购物任务的基准测试体系；(2) 由于现有设计将偏好识别与购物辅助视为独立模块，导致缺乏端到端优化。本文提出一个包含长期记忆机制的新型基准测试，涵盖超过120万真实商品的两类购物任务，并推出“购物伴侣”——一个支持用户干预、能协同处理记忆检索与购物辅助的统一框架。为训练此类能力，我们开发了双奖励强化学习策略，通过工具级奖励机制应对多轮交互中固有的稀疏与不连续奖励问题。实验结果表明，即使最先进的模型（如GPT-5）在我们的基准测试中成功率也低于70%，凸显了该领域的重大挑战。值得注意的是，基于“购物伴侣”框架训练的轻量化大语言模型持续超越现有强基线模型，实现了更优的偏好捕捉与任务执行效果，这验证了我们统一设计的有效性。

In e-commerce, LLM agents show promise for shopping tasks such as recommendations, budgeting, and bundle deals, where accurately capturing user preferences from long-term conversations is critical. However, two challenges hinder realizing this potential: (1) the absence of benchmarks for evaluating long-term preference-aware shopping tasks, and (2) the lack of end-to-end optimization due to existing designs that treat preference identification and shopping assistance as separate components. In this paper, we introduce a novel benchmark with a long-term memory setup, spanning two shopping tasks over 1.2 million real-world products, and propose Shopping Companion, a unified framework that jointly tackles memory retrieval and shopping assistance while supporting user intervention. To train such capabilities, we develop a dual-reward reinforcement learning strategy with tool-wise rewards to handle the sparse and discontinuous rewards inherent in multi-turn interactions. Experimental results demonstrate that even state-of-the-art models (such as GPT-5) achieve success rates under 70% on our benchmark, highlighting the significant challenges in this domain. Notably, our lightweight LLM, trained with Shopping Companion, consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving better preference capture and task performance, which validates the effectiveness of our unified design.

评分理由: 论文核心批判了当前基于问卷式提示评估LLM安全性的方法，认为其不适用于评估实际部署的AI智能体（LLM Agents），并讨论了AI对齐（Alignment）方法的类似问题。因此，与"Large Language Models"、“LLM Agents"和"Alignment"高度相关（10分），其他关键词未涉及（0分）。

随着人工智能系统能力不断提升，衡量其安全性与人类价值观的对齐程度变得至关重要。人工智能研究领域正迅速发展出专门致力于此类评估的方法。然而，当前大多数进展可能并不适用于评估现实世界部署中的人工智能系统。标准方法采用问卷式提示，让大型语言模型在假设场景中描述其价值观或行为。这些方法仅关注未经增强的大型语言模型，未能评估实际可能执行相关行为、从而带来更大风险的人工智能体。大型语言模型对问卷式提示所描述场景的参与方式，与基于同款大型语言模型构建的智能体存在显著差异，这体现在输入内容、可行行动、环境交互及内部处理机制等多个层面的分歧上。因此，大型语言模型对场景描述的反应很可能无法代表相应智能体的实际行为。我们进一步指出，此类评估对大型语言模型准确报告其反事实行为的能力和倾向性做出了强假设，导致其缺乏结构效度，不足以评估现实环境中人工智能系统的风险。我们认为，当前的人工智能对齐方法也存在结构上相同的问题。最后，我们探讨了如何通过正视这些缺陷来改进安全评估与对齐训练。

As AI systems advance in capabilities, measuring their safety and alignment to human values is becoming paramount. A fast-growing field of AI research is devoted to developing such assessments. However, most current advances therein may be ill-suited for assessing AI systems across real-world deployments. Standard methods prompt large language models (LLMs) in a questionnaire-style to describe their values or behavior in hypothetical scenarios. By focusing on unaugmented LLMs, they fall short of evaluating AI agents, which could actually perform relevant behaviors, hence posing much greater risks. LLMs’ engagement with scenarios described by questionnaire-style prompts differs starkly from that of agents based on the same LLMs, as reflected in divergences in the inputs, possible actions, environmental interactions, and internal processing. As such, LLMs’ responses to scenario descriptions are unlikely to be representative of the corresponding LLM agents’ behavior. We further contend that such assessments make strong assumptions concerning the ability and tendency of LLMs to report accurately about their counterfactual behavior. This makes them inadequate to assess risks from AI systems in real-world contexts as they lack construct validity. We then argue that a structurally identical issue holds for current AI alignment approaches. Lastly, we discuss improving safety assessments and alignment training by taking these shortcomings to heart.

评分理由: 论文核心研究大语言模型（LLMs）在医疗领域的应用，特别是通过检索增强生成（RAG）技术连接外部临床数据库时面临的隐私-效用权衡问题。因此，与"Large Language Models"和"Retrieval-Augmented Generation"高度相关（10分），属于"AI for Science"在生物医学信息学（Bioinformatics）范畴的应用（10分）。论文未涉及其他关键词的具体技术原理或创新，如MoE、量化、推理加速、对齐训练等，故相关度为0分。

检索增强生成（RAG）技术的最新进展使得大语言模型（LLM）能够基于临床证据生成输出。然而，将LLM与外部数据库连接会引入上下文泄露风险：这是一种微妙的隐私威胁，即使没有明确的标识符，独特的医疗细节组合也可能导致患者被重新识别。尽管存在《健康保险携带和责任法案》（HIPAA）和《通用数据保护条例》（GDPR）等严格法规，当前医疗领域的基准测试仍过度侧重于准确性，而忽视了此类隐私问题。为填补这一空白，我们提出了MedPriv-Bench，这是首个专门设计用于联合评估医疗开放式问答中隐私保护与临床效用的基准测试。我们的框架采用多智能体、人在回路（human-in-the-loop）的流程，合成敏感的医疗上下文和临床相关查询，以创建真实的隐私压力。我们建立了一个标准化评估协议，利用预训练的RoBERTa-自然语言推理（NLI）模型作为自动化评判器来量化数据泄露，其与人类专家的平均一致性达到85.9%。通过对9个代表性LLM的广泛评估，我们揭示了普遍存在的隐私-效用权衡问题。我们的研究结果强调了在隐私敏感环境中，需要特定领域的基准测试来验证医疗人工智能系统的安全性与有效性。

Recent advances in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) have enabled large language models (LLMs) to ground outputs in clinical evidence. However, connecting LLMs with external databases introduces the risk of contextual leakage: a subtle privacy threat where unique combinations of medical details enable patient re-identification even without explicit identifiers. Current benchmarks in healthcare heavily focus on accuracy, ignoring such privacy issues, despite strict regulations like Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). To fill this gap, we present MedPriv-Bench, the first benchmark specifically designed to jointly evaluate privacy preservation and clinical utility in medical open-ended question answering. Our framework utilizes a multi-agent, human-in-the-loop pipeline to synthesize sensitive medical contexts and clinically relevant queries that create realistic privacy pressure. We establish a standardized evaluation protocol leveraging a pre-trained RoBERTa-Natural Language Inference (NLI) model as an automated judge to quantify data leakage, achieving an average of 85.9% alignment with human experts. Through an extensive evaluation of 9 representative LLMs, we demonstrate a pervasive privacy-utility trade-off. Our findings underscore the necessity of domain-specific benchmarks to validate the safety and efficacy of medical AI systems in privacy-sensitive environments.

评分理由: 论文核心研究大语言模型（LLMs）的知识蒸馏，将基于二次注意力的LLMs蒸馏到基于xLSTM的线性化架构中，因此与"Large Language Models"高度相关（10分）。论文提到蒸馏了指令调优模型，与"Instruction Tuning"有一定关联（5分）。论文提出合并线性化专家的额外阶段，与"Model Merging"高度相关（10分）。论文提到专家合并，与"Mixture of Experts"有一定关联（5分）。其他关键词如小模型、预训练、对齐、推理加速等未在摘要中提及，评为0分。

已有大量研究尝试将基于二次注意力机制的大语言模型（LLM）蒸馏至次二次线性化架构中。然而，尽管研究广泛，此类蒸馏模型在多种下游任务上仍常常无法达到其教师大语言模型的性能水平。我们设定了无损蒸馏的目标，并将其定义为学生模型与教师模型在任务集上经容差校正的“胜平率”。为此，我们为基于xLSTM的学生模型引入了一套高效的蒸馏流程。我们提出了一个额外的合并阶段，将独立线性化的专家模型整合为单一模型。通过从Llama、Qwen和Olmo系列中蒸馏基础模型及指令微调模型，我们验证了该流程的有效性。在许多设定下，我们基于xLSTM的学生模型恢复了教师模型的大部分性能，甚至在某些下游任务上实现了超越。我们的贡献是朝着为基于Transformer的大语言模型提供更节能、更具成本效益的替代方案迈出的重要一步。

There have been numerous attempts to distill quadratic attention-based large language models (LLMs) into sub-quadratic linearized architectures. However, despite extensive research, such distilled models often fail to match the performance of their teacher LLMs on various downstream tasks. We set out the goal of lossless distillation, which we define in terms of tolerance-corrected Win-and-Tie rates between student and teacher on sets of tasks. To this end, we introduce an effective distillation pipeline for xLSTM-based students. We propose an additional merging stage, where individually linearized experts are combined into a single model. We show the effectiveness of this pipeline by distilling base and instruction-tuned models from the Llama, Qwen, and Olmo families. In many settings, our xLSTM-based students recover most of the teacher’s performance, and even exceed it on some downstream tasks. Our contributions are an important step towards more energy-efficient and cost-effective replacements for transformer-based LLMs.

评分理由: 论文提出了一种轻量级视觉-语言-动作模型（AnoleVLA），用于资源受限环境下的机器人操作。核心创新是使用深度状态空间模型替代标准Transformer骨干网络，以实现高效的多模态序列处理。与关键词的相关性分析如下：1）与"Large Language Models"有一定关联（5分），因为VLA模型通常基于大语言模型架构，但论文未明确讨论LLMs；2）与"Small Language Models"高度相关（8分），因为论文明确目标是开发轻量级模型用于移动设备；3）与"Quantization"和"Inference Acceleration"高度相关（各8分），因为论文的核心贡献是通过模型架构创新（深度状态空间模型）实现模型轻量化和推理加速（3倍速度提升）；4）其他关键词（如MoE、Scaling Laws、Alignment等）在论文中未涉及，得0分。

本研究针对语言引导的机器人操作问题展开探讨，该任务要求机器人基于视觉观察与自然语言指令对多种物体进行操作。对于在人类环境中运行的服务机器人而言，此项任务至关重要，需同时满足安全性、高效性及任务层级的泛化能力。尽管视觉-语言-动作模型（Vision-Language-Action models, VLAs）在此类任务中已展现出强大性能，但由于标准Transformer主干网络的计算成本较高，其在资源受限环境中的部署仍面临挑战。为突破此限制，我们提出AnoleVLA——一种轻量级VLA模型，其采用深度状态空间模型以实现多模态序列的高效处理。该模型凭借其轻量化架构与快速序列状态建模能力，能够高效处理视觉与文本输入，从而使机器人能够生成流畅的运动轨迹。我们在仿真环境与物理实验中均对所提方法进行了评估。值得注意的是，在真实世界评估中，AnoleVLA的任务成功率较代表性大规模VLA模型高出21个百分点，同时推理速度提升约三倍。

In this study, we address the problem of language-guided robotic manipulation, where a robot is required to manipulate a wide range of objects based on visual observations and natural language instructions. This task is essential for service robots that operate in human environments, and requires safety, efficiency, and task-level generality. Although Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) have demonstrated strong performance for this task, their deployment in resource-constrained environments remains challenging because of the computational cost of standard transformer backbones. To overcome this limitation, we propose AnoleVLA, a lightweight VLA that uses a deep state space model to process multimodal sequences efficiently. The model leverages its lightweight and fast sequential state modeling to process visual and textual inputs, which allows the robot to generate trajectories efficiently. We evaluated the proposed method in both simulation and physical experiments. Notably, in real-world evaluations, AnoleVLA outperformed a representative large-scale VLA by 21 points for the task success rate while achieving an inference speed approximately three times faster.

评分理由: 论文核心是讨论LLM能力评估中的构念效度问题，特别是推理能力的评估。因此，与"Large Language Models"高度相关（10分），与推理相关的关键词（“Chain of Thought"和"System 2 Thinking”）有一定关联（8分），因为论文以推理能力评估为案例。其他关键词涉及具体技术、应用或评估方法，论文未直接讨论，故得0分。

近期机器学习研究日益基于基准测试表现，将推理或心理理论等类人能力归因于大语言模型。本文通过建构效度的视角审视这一实践，将其理解为将理论能力与实证测量相联结的问题。文章对比了三个有影响力的理论框架：克龙巴赫和米赫尔提出的法则学框架、梅西克提出并经凯恩完善的推论性框架，以及博斯布姆的因果性框架。笔者认为，法则学框架为当前大语言模型能力研究提供了最适宜的理论基础。它既避免了因果性框架强烈的本体论承诺，又比推论性框架提供了更具实质性的理论建构阐释框架。通过一个具体案例——大语言模型推理能力评估，本文探讨了采用法则学框架对大语言模型研究产生的概念性启示。

Recent work in machine learning increasingly attributes human-like capabilities such as reasoning or theory of mind to large language models (LLMs) on the basis of benchmark performance. This paper examines this practice through the lens of construct validity, understood as the problem of linking theoretical capabilities to their empirical measurements. It contrasts three influential frameworks: the nomological account developed by Cronbach and Meehl, the inferential account proposed by Messick and refined by Kane, and Borsboom’s causal account. I argue that the nomological account provides the most suitable foundation for current LLM capability research. It avoids the strong ontological commitments of the causal account while offering a more substantive framework for articulating construct meaning than the inferential account. I explore the conceptual implications of adopting the nomological account for LLM research through a concrete case: the assessment of reasoning capabilities in LLMs.

评分理由: 论文《Code-A1: Adversarial Evolving of Code LLM and Test LLM via Reinforcement Learning》的核心是提出一个对抗性协同进化框架，使用强化学习（RL）联合优化一个代码大语言模型（Code LLM）和一个测试大语言模型（Test LLM）。因此，它与关键词“Large Language Models”高度相关（10分），因为论文明确研究并优化了两种LLM。同时，论文的核心训练方法是强化学习，具体使用了对抗性目标和奖励机制，这与关键词“RLHF”或“RLAIF”或“Direct Preference Optimization”或“DPO”高度相关（10分），尽管论文没有明确使用这些特定术语，但其“adversarial co-evolution framework”和“reinforcement learning”的核心机制在概念上与RLHF/RLAIF/DPO等基于奖励的优化方法高度一致，属于大模型训练与对齐技术的重要创新。论文未涉及其他关键词（如MoE、量化、RAG、CoT等）的具体内容，因此这些关键词得分为0分。

基于单元测试通过率的可验证奖励是代码生成强化学习的依赖基础。然而高质量测试套件稀缺，现有数据集覆盖有限，且静态奖励无法随模型改进而自适应调整。近期自博弈方法将代码与测试生成统一于单一模型，但面临固有困境：白盒访问会导致自我共谋——模型为获取简单奖励而生成琐碎测试，而黑盒限制则产生通用测试，无法捕捉实现特定的缺陷。我们提出Code-A1对抗协同进化框架，通过目标对立的代码大语言模型与测试大语言模型进行联合优化：代码大语言模型以获得更高测试通过率为奖励，测试大语言模型则以暴露更多缺陷为目标。这种架构分离消除了自我共谋风险，并安全实现了白盒测试生成——测试大语言模型可检查候选代码以构建针对性对抗测试。我们进一步引入“错题本”机制实现经验回放，并设计融合测试有效性与对抗难度的复合奖励函数。在Qwen2.5-Coder系列模型上的实验表明，Code-A1在代码生成性能上达到甚至超越基于人工标注测试训练的模型，同时显著提升了测试生成能力。

Reinforcement learning for code generation relies on verifiable rewards from unit test pass rates. Yet high-quality test suites are scarce, existing datasets offer limited coverage, and static rewards fail to adapt as models improve. Recent self-play methods unify code and test generation in a single model, but face a inherent dilemma: white-box access leads to self-collusion where the model produces trivial tests for easy rewards, yet black-box restriction yields generic tests that miss implementation-specific bugs. We introduce Code-A1, an adversarial co-evolution framework that jointly optimizes a Code LLM and a Test LLM with opposing objectives. The Code LLM is rewarded for passing more tests, while the Test LLM is rewarded for exposing more defects. This architectural separation eliminates self-collusion risks and safely enables white-box test generation, where the Test LLM can inspect candidate code to craft targeted adversarial tests. We further introduce a Mistake Book mechanism for experience replay and a composite reward balancing test validity with adversarial difficulty. Experiments on Qwen2.5-Coder models demonstrate that Code-A1 achieves code generation performance matching or exceeding models trained on human-annotated tests, while significantly improving test generation capability.

评分理由: 论文核心是提出一种基于大语言模型（LLMs）的自动化作文评分新方法（DLOM），将评分任务从隐式的生成式任务重构为显式的序数决策任务。因此，与"Large Language Models"和"Supervised Fine-tuning"高度相关（10分），因为论文明确使用LLMs作为基础模型，并通过SFT进行微调（提到"generation-based SFT baseline”）。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws、RAG、RLHF、PEFT、Agents等均未在摘要中提及或与论文核心方法无关，故评0分。论文属于大模型在教育领域的应用，但未涉及生物信息学等特定科学领域，因此"AI for Science"评0分。

自动作文评分（AES）旨在预测每篇作文在多个评分维度上的分数，每个维度均遵循有序离散的评分量表。大多数基于大语言模型的AES方法将评分任务构建为自回归的标记生成过程，并通过解码和解析获得最终分数，这使得评分决策隐含于生成过程中。这种处理方式在多模态AES中尤为敏感，因为视觉输入的有效性在不同作文和评分维度间存在差异。为应对这些局限，我们提出了决策级有序建模（DLOM），该方法通过复用语言模型头在预定义分数标记上提取分数维度的逻辑值，将评分转化为显式的有序决策，从而支持在分数空间中进行直接优化与分析。针对多模态AES，DLOM-GF引入门控融合模块，自适应地结合文本与多模态分数逻辑值。对于纯文本AES，DLOM-DA则添加距离感知正则化项，以更好地反映有序距离。在多模态数据集EssayJudge上的实验表明，DLOM在各项评分维度上均优于基于生成的监督微调基线，且当模态相关性存在异质性时，DLOM-GF能带来进一步的性能提升。在纯文本基准数据集ASAP/ASAP++上，DLOM在无视觉输入时依然有效，而DLOM-DA进一步提升了性能，并超越了具有代表性的强基线方法。

Automated essay scoring (AES) predicts multiple rubric-defined trait scores for each essay, where each trait follows an ordered discrete rating scale. Most LLM-based AES methods cast scoring as autoregressive token generation and obtain the final score via decoding and parsing, making the decision implicit. This formulation is particularly sensitive in multimodal AES, where the usefulness of visual inputs varies across essays and traits. To address these limitations, we propose Decision-Level Ordinal Modeling (DLOM), which makes scoring an explicit ordinal decision by reusing the language model head to extract score-wise logits on predefined score tokens, enabling direct optimization and analysis in the score space. For multimodal AES, DLOM-GF introduces a gated fusion module that adaptively combines textual and multimodal score logits. For text-only AES, DLOM-DA adds a distance-aware regularization term to better reflect ordinal distances. Experiments on the multimodal EssayJudge dataset show that DLOM improves over a generation-based SFT baseline across scoring traits, and DLOM-GF yields further gains when modality relevance is heterogeneous. On the text-only ASAP/ASAP++ benchmarks, DLOM remains effective without visual inputs, and DLOM-DA further improves performance and outperforms strong representative baselines.

评分理由: 论文提出CyCLeGen，一个统一的自回归视觉-语言基础模型，专注于图像理解和生成。它与’Large Language Models’ OR ‘LLMs’ OR ‘Foundation Models’高度相关（10分），因为论文明确将其称为’vision-language foundation model’，属于基础模型范畴。与’Pre-training’ OR ‘Continual Pre-training’ OR ‘Domain Adaptation’有一定关联（5分），因为基础模型通常涉及预训练，但论文未详细说明具体预训练方法。与’Self-Correction’ OR ‘Self-Improvement’ OR ‘Self-Reflection’有一定关联（5分），因为模型通过循环一致性实现自省和自我改进。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、RLHF、RAG等与论文内容无关，得0分。

我们提出CyCLeGen，这是一个统一视觉语言基础模型，能够在单一自回归框架内同时实现图像理解与图像生成。与现有依赖独立模块进行感知和合成的视觉模型不同，CyCLeGen采用完全集成的架构，通过图像->布局->图像和布局->图像->布局的生成循环，强制实现周期一致性学习。这种统一框架带来两个关键优势：内省能力，使模型能够对其自身生成结果进行推理；以及数据效率，允许模型在周期一致性指导的强化学习目标下，通过合成监督实现自我改进。大量实验表明，CyCLeGen在多样化的图像理解与生成基准测试中均取得显著性能提升，彰显了统一视觉语言基础模型的巨大潜力。

We present CyCLeGen, a unified vision-language foundation model capable of both image understanding and image generation within a single autoregressive framework. Unlike existing vision models that depend on separate modules for perception and synthesis, CyCLeGen adopts a fully integrated architecture that enforces cycle-consistent learning through image->layout->image and layout->image->layout generation loops. This unified formulation introduces two key advantages: introspection, enabling the model to reason about its own generations, and data efficiency, allowing self-improvement via synthetic supervision under a reinforcement learning objective guided by cycle consistency. Extensive experiments show that CyCLeGen achieves significant gains across diverse image understanding and generation benchmarks, highlighting the potential of unified vision-language foundation models.

评分理由: 论文主要研究使用AI（包括遗传算法和上下文感知LLM）自动化优化托卡马克线圈设计，属于AI在科学（具体是聚变能工程）领域的应用。因此，与"AI for Science"高度相关（10分）。论文提到使用"context-aware LLM"，因此与"Large Language Models"有一定关联（5分）。论文未涉及其他关键词的具体技术细节或原理，如MoE、训练方法、推理优化、对齐、代理系统等，因此这些关键词评分为0分。

为仿星器聚变装置寻找可行的线圈是实现未来电厂应用这一概念的关键挑战。即便是单个反应堆规模的仿星器设计，也可能需要投入多年的研究工作。为加速并自动化仿星器线圈设计流程，我们设计了一种端到端的“运行器”以执行仿星器线圈优化。所有预处理和后处理步骤均已实现自动化；用户仅需指定少量基本输入参数，最终线圈解便会更新于开源排行榜上。系统提供两种策略，可通过遗传算法或上下文感知大语言模型（LLM）进行不间断的自动化线圈优化。最后，我们构建了一种新颖的在线优化方法，用于分析线圈中的冯·米塞斯应力（Von Mises stresses），这为未来实现在线有限元计算开启了重要的可能性。

Finding feasible coils for stellarator fusion devices is a critical challenge of realizing this concept for future power plants. Years of research work can be put into the design of even a single reactor-scale stellarator design. To rapidly speed up and automate the workflow of designing stellarator coils, we have designed an end-to-end ``runner’’ for performing stellarator coil optimization. The entirety of pre and post-processing steps have been automated; the user specifies only a few basic input parameters, and final coil solutions are updated on an open-source leaderboard. Two policies are available for performing non-stop automated coil optimizations through a genetic algorithm or a context-aware LLM. Lastly, we construct a novel in-the-loop optimization of Von Mises stresses in the coils, opening up important future capabilities for in-the-loop finite-element calculations.

评分理由: 该论文专注于LLM水印检测，核心与"Large Language Models"高度相关（10分），因为论文直接研究LLM的溯源机制。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、训练方法、推理技术、对齐、压缩、科学AI应用等均未在标题或摘要中提及，与论文主题无关，故评0分。

水印技术作为大语言模型溯源的关键机制，现有密钥方案将检测与注入紧密耦合，验证时需获取密钥或依赖服务商提供的专用检测器。这种依赖性为实际治理设置了根本性障碍——若不愿损害模型安全性或依赖服务商不透明的声明，独立审计便无法实现。为解决这一困境，我们提出TTP-Detect，这是一个开创性的黑盒验证框架，专为非侵入式第三方水印验证而设计。通过解耦检测与注入环节，TTP-Detect将验证重构为相对假设检验问题。该框架采用代理模型放大水印相关信号，并运用一系列互补的相对度量方法，评估查询文本与水印分布的一致性。在多种代表性水印方案、数据集和模型上的大量实验表明，TTP-Detect在检测性能与对抗各类攻击的鲁棒性方面均表现卓越。

While watermarking serves as a critical mechanism for LLM provenance, existing secret-key schemes tightly couple detection with injection, requiring access to keys or provider-side scheme-specific detectors for verification. This dependency creates a fundamental barrier for real-world governance, as independent auditing becomes impossible without compromising model security or relying on the opaque claims of service providers. To resolve this dilemma, we introduce TTP-Detect, a pioneering black-box framework designed for non-intrusive, third-party watermark verification. By decoupling detection from injection, TTP-Detect reframes verification as a relative hypothesis testing problem. It employs a proxy model to amplify watermark-relevant signals and a suite of complementary relative measurements to assess the alignment of the query text with watermarked distributions. Extensive experiments across representative watermarking schemes, datasets and models demonstrate that TTP-Detect achieves superior detection performance and robustness against diverse attacks.

评分理由: 论文专注于遥感图像压缩，提出了一种结合条件扩散模型和PPO比特率分配的方法。与大多数大模型/深度学习技术关键词无关，仅与"Quantization/Model Compression"（涉及压缩技术）和"AI for Science"（遥感属于科学应用）有弱关联（5分），其他关键词均不相关（0分）。

现有遥感图像压缩方法仍在探索如何平衡高压缩效率与细节及任务相关信息的保留。与此同时，高分辨率无人机影像为城市监测与灾害评估提供了宝贵的结构细节，但大范围数据集极易达到数百GB量级，对存储与长期管理构成了显著挑战。本文提出了一种基于PPO的码率分配条件扩散压缩框架。该框架将条件扩散解码器与基于PPO的分块码率分配策略相结合，在实现高压缩比的同时保持优异的感知性能。我们还发布了一个高分辨率无人机影像数据集，该数据集在沿海城市居民区上空以恒定低空拍摄，包含更丰富的结构细节。实验结果表明，在DIV2K数据集上实现了19.3倍的压缩比，在无人机影像数据集上实现了21.2倍的压缩比。此外，下游目标检测实验表明，重建图像能有效保留任务相关信息，且性能损失可忽略不计。

Existing remote sensing image compression methods still explore to balance high compression efficiency with the preservation of fine details and task-relevant information. Meanwhile, high-resolution drone imagery offers valuable structural details for urban monitoring and disaster assessment, but large-area datasets can easily reach hundreds of gigabytes, creating significant challenges for storage and long-term management. In this paper, we propose a PPO-based bitrate allocation Conditional Diffusion Compression (PCDC) framework. PCDC integrates a conditional diffusion decoder with a PPO-based block-wise bitrate allocation strategy to achieve high compression ratios while maintaining strong perceptual performance. We also release a high-resolution drone image dataset with richer structural details at a consistent low altitude over residential neighborhoods in coastal urban areas. Experimental results show compression ratios of 19.3x on DIV2K and 21.2x on the drone image dataset. Moreover, downstream object detection experiments demonstrate that the reconstructed images preserve task-relevant information with negligible performance loss.

评分理由: 该论文研究反事实解释的评估指标与人类感知之间的对齐问题，属于可解释人工智能（XAI）领域。论文核心关注解释质量评估，与关键词’Mechanistic Interpretability OR Explainable AI’高度相关（评10分），因为这是可解释AI的直接应用。其他关键词主要涉及大模型技术、训练方法、推理优化、代理系统等，论文未涉及这些具体技术，因此评0分。论文不涉及大模型在不同领域的应用或技术创新，因此整体相关性较低。

可解释性被广泛视为可信人工智能系统的关键要素。然而，当前用于评估反事实解释的指标多为算法评估指标，这些指标很少通过人类对解释质量的判断进行验证。这引发了一个问题：此类指标是否真正反映了用户的感知？我们通过一项实证研究探讨了该问题，该研究在三个数据集上直接比较了算法评估指标与人类判断。参与者从多个感知质量维度对反事实解释进行评分，我们将这些评分与一套全面的标准反事实评估指标相关联。我们既分析了单个指标与人类评价的关系，也探究了指标组合能在多大程度上预测人类评估。研究结果显示，算法指标与人类评分之间的相关性普遍较弱，且高度依赖于数据集。此外，在预测模型中增加使用的指标数量并不会带来可靠的改进，这表明当前指标在捕捉人类相关评价标准方面存在结构性局限。总体而言，我们的研究结果表明，广泛使用的反事实评估指标未能反映用户所感知的解释质量的关键方面，这凸显了需要采用更以人为中心的方法来评估可解释人工智能。

Explainability is widely regarded as essential for trustworthy artificial intelligence systems. However, the metrics commonly used to evaluate counterfactual explanations are algorithmic evaluation metrics that are rarely validated against human judgments of explanation quality. This raises the question of whether such metrics meaningfully reflect user perceptions. We address this question through an empirical study that directly compares algorithmic evaluation metrics with human judgments across three datasets. Participants rated counterfactual explanations along multiple dimensions of perceived quality, which we relate to a comprehensive set of standard counterfactual metrics. We analyze both individual relationships and the extent to which combinations of metrics can predict human assessments. Our results show that correlations between algorithmic metrics and human ratings are generally weak and strongly dataset-dependent. Moreover, increasing the number of metrics used in predictive models does not lead to reliable improvements, indicating structural limitations in how current metrics capture criteria relevant for humans. Overall, our findings suggest that widely used counterfactual evaluation metrics fail to reflect key aspects of explanation quality as perceived by users, underscoring the need for more human-centered approaches to evaluating explainable artificial intelligence.

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLMs的道德对齐问题，直接涉及’Large Language Models’、‘Instruction Tuning/Alignment’和’Mechanistic Interpretability’三个关键词，分别得10分。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、Scaling Laws、Pre-training、RLHF、RAG、CoT、Agents、Quantization等均未在摘要中提及或相关，得0分。论文虽涉及道德概念，但未明确涉及’AI for Science’的具体科学领域应用，得0分。

现有的大型语言模型（LLM）行为对齐技术往往忽视了表面合规性与内部未对齐表征之间的差异，使LLM易受长尾风险影响。更重要的是，我们认为由于LLM将不同的道德概念压缩为统一的概率分布，其本质上存在一种道德漠然状态。我们基于原型理论和社会化学-101数据集构建的251k个道德向量，验证并修正了LLM潜在表征中的这种漠然性。首先，我们对23个模型的分析表明，当前LLM无法表征对立道德类别之间的差异以及这些类别内部细粒度的典型性梯度；值得注意的是，无论是模型缩放、架构调整还是显式对齐训练，都未能改变这种漠然状态。随后，我们在Qwen3-8B模型上应用稀疏自编码器，分离出单语义道德特征，并针对性重构其拓扑关系以对齐真实道德向量。这种表征对齐自然提升了道德推理的精细度，在独立的对抗性基准测试Flames上取得了75%的配对胜率。最后，我们从经验主义哲学视角阐释了当前干预方法的补救性质，主张内生对齐的人工智能可能需要从事后修正转向主动培育的范式转变。

Existing behavioral alignment techniques for Large Language Models (LLMs) often neglect the discrepancy between surface compliance and internal unaligned representations, leaving LLMs vulnerable to long-tail risks. More crucially, we posit that LLMs possess an inherent state of moral indifference due to compressing distinct moral concepts into uniform probability distributions. We verify and remedy this indifference in LLMs’ latent representations, utilizing 251k moral vectors constructed upon Prototype Theory and the Social-Chemistry-101 dataset. Firstly, our analysis across 23 models reveals that current LLMs fail to represent the distinction between opposed moral categories and fine-grained typicality gradients within these categories; notably, neither model scaling, architecture, nor explicit alignment reshapes this indifference. We then employ Sparse Autoencoders on Qwen3-8B, isolate mono-semantic moral features, and targetedly reconstruct their topological relationships to align with ground-truth moral vectors. This representational alignment naturally improves moral reasoning and granularity, achieving a 75% pairwise win-rate on the independent adversarial Flames benchmark. Finally, we elaborate on the remedial nature of current intervention methods from an experientialist philosophy, arguing that endogenously aligned AI might require a transformation from post-hoc corrections to proactive cultivation.

评分理由: 论文核心研究大语言模型（LLMs）的深度扩展问题，提出混合深度注意力（MoDA）机制，直接涉及LLMs和注意力优化技术。与’Large Language Models’高度相关（10分），因为论文明确研究LLMs的深度扩展。与’Mixture of Experts’有一定关联（8分），因为MoDA借鉴了混合思想但非严格MoE。与’KV Cache Compression OR Linear Attention OR FlashAttention’相关（8分），因为论文提出硬件高效算法并与FlashAttention-2比较效率。其他关键词如SLMs、Scaling Laws、训练方法、推理技术、应用领域等均未涉及，给0分。

深度扩展是大型语言模型（LLMs）发展的关键驱动力。然而，随着模型深度的增加，它们常常面临信号退化问题：在浅层形成的具有信息量的特征，会因残差更新的重复进行而逐渐被稀释，导致这些特征在深层中更难被恢复。我们提出了混合深度注意力（mixture-of-depths attention, MoDA）机制，该机制允许每个注意力头同时关注当前层的序列键值对（KV pairs）以及来自前面各层的深度键值对。我们进一步描述了一种针对MoDA的硬件高效算法，该算法解决了非连续内存访问模式的问题，在序列长度为64K时达到了FlashAttention-2效率的97.3%。在15亿参数模型上的实验表明，MoDA始终优于强基线模型。值得注意的是，它在10个验证基准测试中平均困惑度降低了0.2，在10个下游任务上平均性能提升了2.11%，而计算开销仅增加了可忽略的3.7% FLOPs。我们还发现，将MoDA与后归一化（post-norm）结合使用，比与前归一化（pre-norm）结合能获得更好的性能。这些结果表明，MoDA是实现深度扩展的一个有前景的基础构件。代码发布于 https://github.com/hustvl/MoDA。

Scaling depth is a key driver for large language models (LLMs). Yet, as LLMs become deeper, they often suffer from signal degradation: informative features formed in shallow layers are gradually diluted by repeated residual updates, making them harder to recover in deeper layers. We introduce mixture-of-depths attention (MoDA), a mechanism that allows each attention head to attend to sequence KV pairs at the current layer and depth KV pairs from preceding layers. We further describe a hardware-efficient algorithm for MoDA that resolves non-contiguous memory-access patterns, achieving 97.3% of FlashAttention-2’s efficiency at a sequence length of 64K. Experiments on 1.5B-parameter models demonstrate that MoDA consistently outperforms strong baselines. Notably, it improves average perplexity by 0.2 across 10 validation benchmarks and increases average performance by 2.11% on 10 downstream tasks, with a negligible 3.7% FLOPs computational overhead. We also find that combining MoDA with post-norm yields better performance than using it with pre-norm. These results suggest that MoDA is a promising primitive for depth scaling. Code is released at https://github.com/hustvl/MoDA .

评分理由: 论文提出了一种基于状态空间、需求和智能决策的认知架构概念，用于构建人工通用智能（AGI）系统，但全文未提及任何具体的大模型技术（如LLM、MoE、量化等）、训练方法（如预训练、微调、对齐等）、推理技术（如CoT、RAG、注意力优化等）或特定应用领域（如生物信息学）。论文聚焦于AGI的理论框架和概念模型，而非当前大模型或深度学习的技术实现、优化或应用，因此与所有评分关键词均无直接关联。

本文概述了在构建人工心理过程中对人类心理建模的方法。基于此综述，本文提出了一种认知架构（cognitive architecture）概念，其中心理被视为生命体或人工主体的操作系统，包含一个状态空间——其中涵盖需求状态，这些需求决定了主体在与外部世界刺激关联下的存在意义；而智能则被视为关于在此世界中采取行动以满足这些需求的决策系统。基于此概念，本文提出了一种计算形式化方法，用于通过包含主体需求的状态空间中的经验学习来创建智能体的人工通用智能系统，同时考量这些需求对智能体的生物学或存在性意义，以及主体的感知与行动。因此，构建人工通用智能的问题被形式化为：在特定智能体需求空间内、不确定性条件下做出最优决策的系统，其目标在于最大化目标达成成功率、最小化存在性风险并最大化能源效率。文中还展示了该模型的一个最小化实验实现。

This article presents an overview of approaches to modeling the human psyche in the context of constructing an artificial one. Based on this overview, a concept of cognitive architecture is proposed, in which the psyche is viewed as the operating system of a living or artificial subject, comprising a space of states, including the state of needs that determine the meaning of a subject’s being in relation to stimuli from the external world, and intelligence as a decision-making system regarding actions in this world to satisfy these needs. Based on this concept, a computational formalization is proposed for creating artificial general intelligence systems for an agent through experiential learning in a state space that includes agent’s needs, taking into account their biological or existential significance for the intelligent agent, along with agent’s sensations and actions. Thus, the problem of constructing artificial general intelligence is formalized as a system for making optimal decisions in the space of specific agent needs under conditions of uncertainty, maximizing success in achieving goals, minimizing existential risks, and maximizing energy efficiency. A minimal experimental implementation of the model is presented.

评分理由: 论文核心研究LLM搜索代理（LLM Agents），使用LLM作为基础模型，通过SFT训练，涉及数据质量（Data Quality）和预训练（Pre-training）对比，包含多跳推理（Multi-step Reasoning）。其他关键词如MoE、SLMs、RLHF、RAG等未涉及。

深度搜索能力已成为前沿大语言模型智能体不可或缺的核心能力，然而由于缺乏透明、高质量的训练数据，高性能搜索智能体的开发仍由工业巨头主导。这种持续存在的数据稀缺问题从根本上阻碍了更广泛研究界在该领域进行开发和创新的进程。为弥合这一差距，我们推出了OpenSeeker——首个完全开源的搜索智能体（即模型与数据），它通过两项核心技术突破实现了前沿性能水平：（1）基于事实的可扩展可控问答合成，该方法通过拓扑扩展和实体混淆对网络图进行逆向工程，以生成覆盖范围和复杂度均可控的复杂多跳推理任务；（2）去噪轨迹合成，该方法采用回溯总结机制对交互轨迹进行去噪处理，从而引导教师大语言模型生成高质量动作。实验结果表明，仅使用11.7k个合成样本进行训练（单次训练），OpenSeeker便在BrowseComp、BrowseComp-ZH、xbench-DeepSearch和WideSearch等多个基准测试中取得了最先进的性能。值得注意的是，通过简单的监督微调训练，OpenSeeker显著优于第二佳的全开源智能体DeepDive（例如在BrowseComp上达到29.5%对15.3%），甚至在BrowseComp-ZH基准上超越了通义深度研究等工业级竞品（48.4%对46.7%），而后者采用了大规模持续预训练、监督微调和强化学习的复合训练方案。我们将完整训练数据集和模型权重全面开源，以期推动前沿搜索智能体研究的民主化，培育更加透明、协作的生态系统。

Deep search capabilities have become an indispensable competency for frontier Large Language Model (LLM) agents, yet the development of high-performance search agents remains dominated by industrial giants due to a lack of transparent, high-quality training data. This persistent data scarcity has fundamentally hindered the progress of the broader research community in developing and innovating within this domain. To bridge this gap, we introduce OpenSeeker, the first fully open-source search agent (i.e., model and data) that achieves frontier-level performance through two core technical innovations: (1) Fact-grounded scalable controllable QA synthesis, which reverse-engineers the web graph via topological expansion and entity obfuscation to generate complex, multi-hop reasoning tasks with controllable coverage and complexity. (2) Denoised trajectory synthesis, which employs a retrospective summarization mechanism to denoise the trajectory, therefore promoting the teacher LLMs to generate high-quality actions. Experimental results demonstrate that OpenSeeker, trained (a single training run) on only 11.7k synthesized samples, achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple benchmarks including BrowseComp, BrowseComp-ZH, xbench-DeepSearch, and WideSearch. Notably, trained with simple SFT, OpenSeeker significantly outperforms the second-best fully open-source agent DeepDive (e.g., 29.5% v.s. 15.3% on BrowseComp), and even surpasses industrial competitors such as Tongyi DeepResearch (trained via extensive continual pre-training, SFT, and RL) on BrowseComp-ZH (48.4% v.s. 46.7%). We fully open-source the complete training dataset and the model weights to democratize frontier search agent research and foster a more transparent, collaborative ecosystem.

评分理由: 论文聚焦于视频多模态大语言模型（MLLMs）在机器人操作任务中的过程推理监控，核心创新在于使用强化学习激励显式的思维链生成。高度相关的关键词包括：1）‘Large Language Models’（论文研究视频MLLMs，属于大模型范畴）；2）‘Small Language Models’（论文提出7B参数模型，属于小语言模型）；3）‘Post-training/SFT’（论文明确提到当前视频MLLMs在SFT范式下训练，并以此为基线改进）；4）‘Chain of Thought’（论文核心方法是通过强化学习激励显式的思维链生成进行进度估计）。其他关键词如MoE、Scaling Laws、RLHF、RAG等与论文内容无直接关联。

精确的过程监督仍是长周期机器人操作领域的关键挑战。当前的主要瓶颈在于，现有视频多模态大语言模型主要基于监督微调范式训练，其功能如同被动的“观察者”——仅能识别正在进行的事件，而无法根据最终任务目标评估当前状态。本文提出PRIMO R1（过程推理诱导监控框架），这是一个70亿参数规模的框架，旨在将视频多模态大语言模型转化为主动的“批判者”。我们利用基于结果的强化学习机制，激励模型生成显式的思维链以进行进度评估。此外，该架构通过将视频序列显式锚定在初始状态图像与当前状态图像之间，构建了结构化的时序输入。基于提出的PRIMO数据集与基准测试，我们在多样化的领域内环境及领域外真实世界仿人机器人场景中进行了广泛实验，结果表明PRIMO R1实现了最先进的性能。量化数据显示，我们的70亿参数模型将专业推理基线的平均绝对误差降低了50%，相较于720亿规模的通用多模态大语言模型实现了显著的相对精度提升。同时，PRIMO R1在困难故障检测任务中展现出强大的零样本泛化能力。我们在RoboFail基准测试中以67.0%的准确率创造了最新性能记录，较OpenAI o1等闭源模型高出6.0%。

Accurate process supervision remains a critical challenge for long-horizon robotic manipulation. A primary bottleneck is that current video MLLMs, trained primarily under a Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) paradigm, function as passive “Observers” that recognize ongoing events rather than evaluating the current state relative to the final task goal. In this paper, we introduce PRIMO R1 (Process Reasoning Induced Monitoring), a 7B framework that transforms video MLLMs into active “Critics”. We leverage outcome-based Reinforcement Learning to incentivize explicit Chain-of-Thought generation for progress estimation. Furthermore, our architecture constructs a structured temporal input by explicitly anchoring the video sequence between initial and current state images. Supported by the proposed PRIMO Dataset and Benchmark, extensive experiments across diverse in-domain environments and out-of-domain real-world humanoid scenarios demonstrate that PRIMO R1 achieves state-of-the-art performance. Quantitatively, our 7B model achieves a 50% reduction in the mean absolute error of specialized reasoning baselines, demonstrating significant relative accuracy improvements over 72B-scale general MLLMs. Furthermore, PRIMO R1 exhibits strong zero-shot generalization on difficult failure detection tasks. We establish state-of-the-art performance on RoboFail benchmark with 67.0% accuracy, surpassing closed-source models like OpenAI o1 by 6.0%.